EP1448749A1 - Verfahren zur umwandlung in serien-reaktoren - Google Patents

Verfahren zur umwandlung in serien-reaktoren

Info

Publication number
EP1448749A1
EP1448749A1 EP02790546A EP02790546A EP1448749A1 EP 1448749 A1 EP1448749 A1 EP 1448749A1 EP 02790546 A EP02790546 A EP 02790546A EP 02790546 A EP02790546 A EP 02790546A EP 1448749 A1 EP1448749 A1 EP 1448749A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
reactor
reactors
catalyst
suspension
gas
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP02790546A
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1448749B1 (de
Inventor
Ari Minkkinen
Reynald Bonneau
Alexandre Rojey
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
IFP Energies Nouvelles IFPEN
Eni SpA
Original Assignee
IFP Energies Nouvelles IFPEN
Eni SpA
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from FR0115023A external-priority patent/FR2832415B1/fr
Application filed by IFP Energies Nouvelles IFPEN, Eni SpA filed Critical IFP Energies Nouvelles IFPEN
Publication of EP1448749A1 publication Critical patent/EP1448749A1/de
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1448749B1 publication Critical patent/EP1448749B1/de
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G2/00Production of liquid hydrocarbon mixtures of undefined composition from oxides of carbon
    • C10G2/30Production of liquid hydrocarbon mixtures of undefined composition from oxides of carbon from carbon monoxide with hydrogen
    • C10G2/32Production of liquid hydrocarbon mixtures of undefined composition from oxides of carbon from carbon monoxide with hydrogen with the use of catalysts
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G2/00Production of liquid hydrocarbon mixtures of undefined composition from oxides of carbon
    • C10G2/30Production of liquid hydrocarbon mixtures of undefined composition from oxides of carbon from carbon monoxide with hydrogen
    • C10G2/32Production of liquid hydrocarbon mixtures of undefined composition from oxides of carbon from carbon monoxide with hydrogen with the use of catalysts
    • C10G2/33Production of liquid hydrocarbon mixtures of undefined composition from oxides of carbon from carbon monoxide with hydrogen with the use of catalysts characterised by the catalyst used
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G2/00Production of liquid hydrocarbon mixtures of undefined composition from oxides of carbon
    • C10G2/30Production of liquid hydrocarbon mixtures of undefined composition from oxides of carbon from carbon monoxide with hydrogen
    • C10G2/32Production of liquid hydrocarbon mixtures of undefined composition from oxides of carbon from carbon monoxide with hydrogen with the use of catalysts
    • C10G2/34Apparatus, reactors
    • C10G2/342Apparatus, reactors with moving solid catalysts

Definitions

  • One of the ways to achieve this objective is to play on a scale factor to reduce investment costs per tonne of liquid product obtained.
  • Such three-phase reactors comprising a catalyst in suspension in a solvent generally inert in the reaction. They are generally called slurry reactors.
  • slurry reactors There have been known in particular perfectly agitated autoclave type reactors, or else bubble column type reactors which operate under variable hydrodynamic conditions ranging from the perfectly agitated reactor to the reactor operated in piston mode without dispersion, this both for the gas phase and for the liquid phase.
  • patents US 5,961,933 and US 6,060,524 describe a process and an apparatus making it possible to operate a slurry reactor of the bubble column type for the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis.
  • the slurry reactor includes an internal or external liquid recirculation system, which makes it possible to achieve higher productivities for each Fischer-Tropsch reactor.
  • Patent application WO 01 / 00.595 describes a process for the synthesis of hydrocarbons from synthesis gas in a three-phase reactor, preferably of the bubble column type, and in which the hydrodynamic conditions of the liquid phase are such that the number Péclet of the liquid phase is greater than 0 and less than 10.
  • the surface speed of the gas is preferably less than 35 cm.s-1.
  • Patent EP-B-450 860 describes a method for optimally operating a three-phase bubble column type reactor. This patent seeks to optimize the operation of a single reactor of this type, it is indicated that the performance depends essentially on the dispersion of the gas phase (number of Péclet for the gas phase) and on the suspension of the catalyst in the liquid phase. In particular, the number of Péclet for the gas phase must imperatively be greater than 0.2. Thus, this patent recommends not using a substantially perfectly stirred reactor with regard to the gas phase (number of gas Péclet close to 0), since this type of reactor leads to insufficient performance levels.
  • the method according to the invention aims to overcome these problems by combining at least two three-phase reactors, preferably at least three three-phase reactors. It has in fact been observed that the use of reactors highly mixed in series makes it possible to obtain correct progress of the reaction, while promoting the evacuation of calories. This sequence makes it possible to achieve high productivities in desired products, that is to say essentially paraffins having essentially a carbon number greater than 5, preferably greater than 10, while limiting the formation of light products (C1-C4 hydrocarbons).
  • the invention relates to a process for the synthesis of hydrocarbons preferably having at least 2 carbon atoms in their molecule and more preferably at least 5 carbon atoms in their molecule by contacting a gas containing essentially monoxide of carbon and hydrogen and in a reaction zone containing a suspension of solid particles in a liquid, which comprises solid particles of reaction catalyst. Said catalytic suspension is also called slurry.
  • the process according to the invention is therefore implemented in a three-phase reactor.
  • the method according to the invention will be implemented in a three-phase reactor of the bubble column type.
  • the process according to the invention is a process for converting a synthesis gas into liquid hydrocarbons used in at least two reactors in series, preferably at least three reactors in series containing at least one catalyst in suspension in a liquid phase , in which said reactors are perfectly mixed, the last reactor is at least partly fed by at least part of at least one of the gaseous fractions collected at the outlet of at least one of said reactors, and the product mixture in phase liquid and catalyst leaving the last reactor is at least partly separated so as to obtain a liquid product substantially free of catalyst and a liquid fraction enriched in catalyst (catalytic suspension enriched in catalyst, or concentrated catalytic suspension), which is recycled
  • Each of the reactors used is a bubble column type reactor, with contacting the gas with a very divided liquid / solid mixture (“slurry” or “slurry bubble column” reactor according to English terminology)
  • the catalysts used can be of various natures and usually contain at least one metal preferably chosen from the metals of groups 5 to 11 of the new periodic classification of the elements.
  • the catalyst can contain at least one activating agent (also called promoter) preferably chosen from the elements of groups 1 to 7 of the new periodic classification. These promoters can be used alone or in combination.
  • the support is generally a porous material and often a porous inorganic refractory oxide.
  • this support can be chosen from the group formed by alumina, silica, titanium oxide, zirconia, rare earths or mixtures of at least two of these porous mineral oxides.
  • the suspension can contain from 10 to 65% by weight of catalyst.
  • the catalyst particles have an average diameter usually between about 10 and about 100 microns. Finer particles can possibly be produced by attrition, that is to say by fragmentation of the initial catalyst particles.
  • each of the reactors is highly mixed and approaches the conditions for perfect mixing.
  • the reactors according to the invention are therefore defined as being substantially perfectly agitated and the number of Péclet can be advantageously used as a criterion making it possible to measure the degree of agitation of said reactors.
  • the piston-dispersion model can be applied to each liquid phase, since it is well suited to continuous phases.
  • the mixing effect in the gas phase will be increased if said gas phase is finely dispersed, in gas bubbles with a diameter not exceeding, for example, a few millimeters. Such a condition is moreover favorable to the reaction kinetics.
  • reactors are used in series, at least two, but preferably at least three. This also makes it possible, and this is another object of the present invention, to stage the injection of synthesis gas. In this way it is possible to optimize the configuration of the reactors in series.
  • the maximum diameter of a reactor for reasons of construction and transport by road. This diameter can be for example 11m.
  • Each of the reactors is operated at a temperature preferably between 180 ° C and 370 ° C, preferably between 180 ° C and 320 ° C, more preferably between 200 ° C and 250 ° C, and at a pressure preferably comprised between 1 and 5 MPa (Megapascal), preferably between 1 and 3 MPa.
  • the process according to the invention is a process for converting a synthesis gas into liquid hydrocarbons used in at least two reactors in series containing at least one catalyst in suspension in a liquid phase, in which said reactors are substantially perfectly mixed, the last reactor is at least partly fed by at least part of at least one of the gaseous fractions collected at the outlet of at least one of said reactors, and the mixture of product in the liquid phase and the catalyst leaving the last reactor is at least partially separated so as to obtain a liquid product substantially free of catalyst and a liquid fraction enriched in catalyst, which is recycled.
  • the process according to the invention preferably comprises at least 3 reactors in series.
  • the number of liquid peclet is preferably less than 8, and independently, the number of gas peclet is preferably less than 0.2 and more preferably less than 0.1.
  • the gas phase is separated from the liquid phase containing the catalyst in suspension. More preferably, the gaseous fractions leaving the first reactors are combined, treated and sent to the inlet of the last reactor and very preferably, the gaseous fraction leaving the last reactor is recycled at the inlet of the production stage synthesis gas.
  • the introduction of synthesis gas is distributed at the inlet of the reactors in series so that all the reactors are of identical size.
  • the catalyst of the process according to the invention is preferably formed from a porous mineral support and from at least one metal deposited on this support.
  • the catalyst is preferably suspended in the liquid phase in the form of particles with a diameter preferably less than 200 microns.
  • FIG. 1 Several embodiments of the invention are possible, one of these modes is presented in FIG. 1.
  • the synthesis gas arrives via the line 100. It is sent to the first reactor R1, in which it is dispersed within the liquid phase formed by the reaction products which are recycled. At the outlet of this first reactor R1, the mixture of liquid product formed containing the catalyst in suspension (catalytic suspension) as well as the unreacted gas is discharged through line 101. in the form of a dispersed phase. Via line 102 a second supply of synthesis gas is introduced and the resulting mixture is sent via line 103 to the second reactor R2. At the outlet of this second reactor R2, the mixture of liquid product containing the suspended catalyst and the unreacted gas are discharged via line 104, in the form of a dispersed phase.
  • a third supply of synthesis gas is introduced and the resulting mixture is sent via line 107 to the third reactor R3.
  • the mixture of liquid product containing the suspended catalyst and the unreacted gas are discharged via line 108, in the form of a dispersed phase.
  • the gas phase is separated from the liquid phase in the separator SL. This gas phase is evacuated via line 111, treated and recycled.
  • the liquid phase containing the suspended catalyst (catalytic suspension) is sent to the SC separation and filtration system.
  • the liquid phase separated from the catalyst is discharged through line 110 while the liquid phase concentrated in catalyst (concentrated catalytic suspension) is recycled through line 109 to the first reactor R1.
  • intermediate separations can optionally be carried out.
  • the residual gas fractions are separated at the outlet of each of the reactors, by means of the separators, SL1, SL2 and SL3.
  • the separators SL1, SL2, SL3 operate for example by decantation, by providing a sufficient residence time in the separation flask.
  • the gaseous fractions thus collected by conduits 111, 112 and 113 are combined, treated and recycled.
  • the gaseous fractions collected by conduits 111, 112 and 113 contain water, carbon dioxide, light hydrocarbons as well as a mixture of carbon monoxide and hydrogen. It is advantageous to send the oxide mixture carbon and hydrogen collected at the outlet of a reactor at the following reactor (not shown).
  • EXAMPLE 3 In the case of the example of embodiment shown in FIG. 3, the gas fractions collected by the conduits 112 and 113 at the outlet of the reactors R1 and R2 are combined and treated.
  • the gas mixture is first cooled in the exchanger-condenser C1, so as to condense the water.
  • a mixture of three phases is thus obtained, which are separated in the separator S4: an aqueous phase which is discharged through line 114, a liquid hydrocarbon phase which is discharged through line 115, and a gaseous phase which is evacuated through line 116.
  • the gas phase is sent to a treatment section T1, so as to at least partially separate the carbon dioxide which it contains.
  • the gaseous fraction rich in carbon dioxide, which is thus separated is discharged through line 117.
  • the treatment section T1 can implement the various known methods for separating the carbon dioxide. It is possible, for example, to use a washing process with a solvent, such as for example an amine, or else a physical solvent such as refrigerated methanol, propylene carbonate or tetraethylene glycol dimethyl ether (DMETEG). One can also use any other method based for example on a separation by adsorption or a separation by selective membrane.
  • a solvent such as for example an amine
  • a physical solvent such as refrigerated methanol, propylene carbonate or tetraethylene glycol dimethyl ether (DMETEG).
  • DMETEG tetraethylene glycol dimethyl ether
  • the gaseous mixture obtained which is evacuated from the treatment unit T1 by the conduit 106, is enriched in carbon monoxide and in hydrogen. It still contains light hydrocarbons and in particular methane. It is sent to the inlet of the last R3 reactor.
  • FIG. 4 Another example of possible arrangement is shown in FIG. 4:
  • the synthesis gas is sent to the first reactor R1 via line 100.
  • the gas phase and the liquid phase are separated in the separator SL1.
  • the gas phase leaving the separator SL1 is cooled in the exchanger C1. This refrigeration leads to the condensation of an aqueous phase and to the evacuation of this condensed phase through line 210, moreover a condensed phase of light hydrocarbons is evacuated through line 211.
  • the resulting gaseous phase is evacuated through line 113 and sent to reactor R2, being mixed at the inlet of reactor R2 with an addition of synthesis gas arriving through line 102.
  • the gas phase and the liquid phase are separated in the separator SL2 .
  • the gas phase leaving the separator SL2 is cooled in the exchanger C2.
  • This refrigeration leads to the condensation of an aqueous phase and to the evacuation of this condensed phase through line 212 and moreover of a condensed phase of light hydrocarbons which is evacuated through line 213.
  • the resulting gaseous phase is evacuated via line 112 and sent to reactor R3, with an addition of synthesis gas arriving through line 106.
  • the gas phase and the liquid phase are separated in the separator SL3.
  • the gas phase leaving the separator SL3 is cooled in the exchanger C3.
  • This refrigeration leads to the condensation of an aqueous phase and to the evacuation of this condensed phase through line 213; in addition, a condensed phase of light hydrocarbons is evacuated via line 214.
  • the liquid products leaving the separators SL1, SL2 and SL3 via the conduits 200, 201 and 202, containing the catalyst in suspension (catalytic suspensions) are sent as a mixture to the separator SC, in which the liquid products evacuated via the conduit 110 are separated a liquid phase concentrated in catalyst (concentrated catalytic suspension), which is recycled to reactors R1, R2 and R3.
  • the catalyst introduced at the base of each reactor is distributed homogeneously throughout the liquid phase occupying the reactor.
  • the unconverted gas fraction disengages at the head of each reactor and the liquid phase containing the catalyst in suspension (catalytic suspension) flows by overflow and circulates towards the base of the following reactor by simple gravity.
  • the transfer lines ensuring the passage from one reactor to the next reactor must be designed so as to present the most regular slope possible.
  • the liquid phase collected at the outlet of the last reactor is at least partially separated from the catalyst that it contains and filtered. It is then discharged through line 110.
  • the catalyst which remains in suspension in a residual liquid phase (concentrated catalytic suspension) is recycled with this liquid phase to the first reactor by the line shown in dotted lines.
  • Such an embodiment can also be implemented in cases where devices for separation and in particular for disengagement of the gas phase are implemented at the outlet of each of the reactors as is illustrated in examples 2, 3 and 4 .
  • FIGS. 6 and 7 present two diagrams of arrangement of reactors with circulation usable in the process according to the invention.
  • These reactors include an internal exchanger, for example made up of preferably tubular cooling bundles. These reactors have a supply and an outlet, the water entering via line 1 and the generated steam leaving via line 2.
  • a charge dispersion system 4 is also arranged inside the reactor. It can be a distributor plate of the gaseous charge (synthesis gas) supplied by line 3.
  • the supply of liquid comprising the catalyst in suspension can optionally be carried out by the same line, the gas / liquid / solid mixture being produced upstream, like this is the case in FIGS. 6 and 7. It is also possible to use separate supplies, only the gas supplying the dispersion system 4. In FIG. 7, the internal recirculation is favored by the design of the reactor.
  • FIG. 8 represents another mode of arrangement of reactors according to the invention, with particular circulation of the catalyst:
  • the installation comprises two (first) reactors R1, R2 operating in parallel with synthesis gas supplied by lines 100 and 102, and a reactor R3 operating in series with R1, R2, using untransformed residual synthesis gas, coming from reactors R1 and R2 via lines 101 and 104.
  • This residual synthesis gas, or the first stage is (advantageously) treated in the unit S1, in order to substantially eliminate the water, and possibly carbon dioxide, before supplying the reactor R3 via line 112.
  • the section S1 can thus correspond to the equipment C1 and S4 of Figure 3, possibly with the addition of the processing section T1 shown in the same figure.
  • FIG. 8 with respect to the installation of FIG. 3 relates to the circulation of the catalyst, that is to say of the catalytic suspension of at least one solid catalyst in a liquid phase typically composed of reaction products.
  • This catalytic suspension circulates at least partly in counter-current between the different reactors, a current of catalytic suspension circulating from the last reactor R3 (last compared to the circulation of synthesis gas), to a first reactor R2 by line 221.
  • Another stream of catalytic suspension flows from reactor R2 to reactor R1 via line 222.
  • a third stream of catalytic suspension flows from reactor R1 to reactor R3, via line 223, the separation section SC, then line 109 in which circulates a (relatively more) concentrated catalytic suspension, a stream of purified liquid having been discharged via line 110.
  • the reactor R1 is not supplied by a catalytic suspension coming from R2, but by a catalytic suspension coming from R3, flowing in the start of line 221 then in the dotted line 224. the current of In this alternative, the catalytic suspension evacuated from the reactor R2 is sent to the section SC via line 222, then the dotted line 225, then line 223.
  • a suspension current flows (directly, that is to say without passing through a separation section) from (or from) the last reactor R3, to a previous or first reactor R1 or R2 (relative to the circulation of synthesis gas), and a relatively concentrated suspension stream, coming from a separation section SC, feeds the or a last reactor R3.
  • the last reactor R3 operates with a concentration of the catalytic suspension higher than that of the preceding reactors or first reactor (s) R1, R2.
  • the average concentration (of catalyst) of the catalytic suspension in the reactor R3 is lower than that of the suspension supplying R3 via line 109, due to the production of liquid products in R3.
  • a catalytic suspension leaving a reactor is less concentrated than the catalytic suspension feeding this same reactor.
  • the advantage of having a relatively more concentrated catalytic suspension in the last reactor is that this makes it possible to compensate for less favorable operating conditions.
  • the reactor R3 being downstream of R1 and R2, operates under a lower pressure than that (s) of R1, R2.
  • the synthesis gas is depleted in reagents (H2 / CO) in the reactors R1, R2, and enriched in inert produced by the reaction, in particular in methane. Consequently, due to these two phenomena, the partial pressure of reactants (H2 / CO) is notably lower in the (or one) last reactor R3 than in a previous or first reactor R1, R2.
  • the use of a relatively higher catalytic concentration in the (or one) last reactor makes it possible to compensate for the influence of this lower partial pressure and to be able to maintain a high conversion in the last step.
  • the mass percentage of catalyst may for example be between 20 and 35% by weight, in particular between 25 and 32% by weight in the first reactors R1, R2.
  • the mass percentage of catalyst can be multiplied by a factor K of between 1.03 and 1.25, in particular between 1.06 and 1.20 and for example between 1.08 and 1.18 relative to the (x) percentage (s) of one (or more) of the first reactors R1, R2.
  • At least one reactor (R1, R2, or R3) is supplied (typically directly, that is to say without intermediate fractionation of the type of a liquid separation / catalytic suspension) by a stream of catalytic suspension originating from another reactor.
  • an installation for implementing the method according to the invention (according to one of the configurations in the preceding figures or other configurations obvious to the person skilled in the art), at least one reactor is supplied with a current of catalytic suspension coming directly from another reactor, and at least one catalytic suspension stream coming from a reactor is at least partly separated so as to obtain a liquid product substantially free of catalyst and a catalytic suspension enriched in catalyst (concentrated) , which is recycled.
  • each of the reactors is in communication with at least one other reactor, via a suspension stream sent directly to this other reactor or coming directly from this reactor.
  • the catalytic suspension enriched in catalyst is recycled to the last reactor (for example R3), so as to enrich the catalytic suspension of this last reactor compared to that (s) of the other reactors, for example of one or more reactors (R1, R2).
  • the method can in particular comprise a first reaction stage carried out in several first reactors operating in parallel, in which the gaseous fractions leaving these first reactors are combined, treated and sent to the inlet of a last reactor.
  • the conversion carried out in the first reactors can be determined so that all the reactors are of identical size.
  • This example presents a material balance sheet of an embodiment according to FIG. 4.
  • the process used comprises 3 reactors R1, R2, R3 substantially perfectly mixed and having the Péclet numbers between 0.02 and 0.03.
  • the reactor R1 operates at a temperature of 236 ° C.
  • 234 t / h of water (line 210) After cooling the gas phase, 234 t / h of water (line 210), 67 t / h of condensed hydrocarbons (line 211) and 347 t / h of synthesis gas are recovered at a pressure of 2.8 MPa. , which is sent to reactor R2 via line 113 while being mixed with 327 t / h of synthesis gas arriving through line 102.
  • liquid product is collected via line 202, 58 t / h.
  • 205 t / h of water, 75 t / h of condensate and 266 t / h of synthesis gas are recovered.
  • reactors of different sizes It is possible to carry out this example with reactors of different sizes. It is also possible to use reactors of identical size, by adapting the temperatures and conversions to liquid products used for the reactors R1, R2, R3, associated with the distribution of the synthesis gas. Adaptation of the conditions for increasing the relative size of a given reactor allowing these conditions to be obtained, can be achieved by increasing the relative flow rate of synthesis gas at the inlet of this reactor, and / or by increasing the conversion in this reactor, and / or by reducing the temperature of this reactor. Preferably, only the first two parameters are used, the temperature of the three reactors remaining substantially identical. In the previous example, the conditions cited can be obtained with reactors of identical size, operating at similar pressures (differing only in pressure losses), and maintained at the same temperature of 236 ° C.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Organic Low-Molecular-Weight Compounds And Preparation Thereof (AREA)
  • Devices And Processes Conducted In The Presence Of Fluids And Solid Particles (AREA)
EP02790546A 2001-11-20 2002-10-28 Verfahren zur umwandlung in serien-reaktoren Expired - Lifetime EP1448749B1 (de)

Applications Claiming Priority (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
FR0115023A FR2832415B1 (fr) 2001-11-20 2001-11-20 Procede de conversion de gaz de synthese dans des reacteurs en serie
FR0115023 2001-11-20
FR0212043 2002-09-27
FR0212043A FR2832416B1 (fr) 2001-11-20 2002-09-27 Procede de conversion de gaz de synthese dans des reacteurs en serie
PCT/FR2002/003695 WO2003044127A1 (fr) 2001-11-20 2002-10-28 Procede de conversion de gaz de synthese dans des reacteurs en serie

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1448749A1 true EP1448749A1 (de) 2004-08-25
EP1448749B1 EP1448749B1 (de) 2008-02-27

Family

ID=26213271

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP02790546A Expired - Lifetime EP1448749B1 (de) 2001-11-20 2002-10-28 Verfahren zur umwandlung in serien-reaktoren

Country Status (9)

Country Link
US (1) US6921778B2 (de)
EP (1) EP1448749B1 (de)
CN (1) CN100354392C (de)
AU (1) AU2002365951A1 (de)
CA (1) CA2466938C (de)
FR (1) FR2832416B1 (de)
NO (1) NO20042077L (de)
RU (1) RU2294913C2 (de)
WO (1) WO2003044127A1 (de)

Families Citing this family (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6914082B2 (en) * 2001-12-14 2005-07-05 Conocophillips Company Slurry bubble reactor operated in well-mixed gas flow regime
JP2006518327A (ja) * 2002-07-04 2006-08-10 シエル・インターナシヨネイル・リサーチ・マーチヤツピイ・ベー・ウイ 数個の並列の反応器ユニットを備えた反応器システム
US7230035B2 (en) * 2002-12-30 2007-06-12 Conocophillips Company Catalysts for the conversion of methane to synthesis gas
FR2864532B1 (fr) * 2003-12-31 2007-04-13 Total France Procede de transformation d'un gaz de synthese en hydrocarbures en presence de sic beta et effluent de ce procede
US20070208090A1 (en) * 2004-06-29 2007-09-06 Van Dijk Technologies, L.Lc. Method for Converting Natural Gas Into Synthesis Gas for Further Conversion Into Organic Liquids or Methanol and/or Dimethyl Ether
JP5155147B2 (ja) * 2005-03-16 2013-02-27 フュエルコア エルエルシー 合成炭化水素化合物を生成するためのシステム、方法、および組成物
RU2286327C1 (ru) * 2005-08-04 2006-10-27 ООО "Компания по освоению новых технологий в топливно-энергетическом комплексе-"КОНТТЭК" Способ получения моторных топлив
KR101087931B1 (ko) * 2006-05-30 2011-11-28 스타쳄 테크놀로지스, 인코포레이티드 메탄올 생산 방법 및 시스템
FR2910488B1 (fr) 2006-12-20 2010-06-04 Inst Francais Du Petrole Procede de conversion de biomasse pour la production de gaz de synthese.
BRPI0816137B1 (pt) * 2007-08-24 2017-05-02 Sasol Tech (Proprietary) Ltd processo de síntese de hidrocarbonetos para produzir produtos líquidos e gasosos a partir de reagentes gasosos

Family Cites Families (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB615381A (en) * 1946-08-06 1949-01-05 Standard Oil Dev Co An improved process for the catalytic synthesis of hydrocarbons
GB631682A (en) * 1947-02-28 1949-11-08 Standard Oil Dev Co An improved process for the synthesis of hydrocarbons
FR1239055A (fr) * 1958-10-28 1960-08-19 Koppers Gmbh Heinrich Procédé et installation d'hydrogénation de l'oxyde de carbone
US4279830A (en) 1977-08-22 1981-07-21 Mobil Oil Corporation Conversion of synthesis gas to hydrocarbon mixtures utilizing dual reactors
US5348982A (en) * 1990-04-04 1994-09-20 Exxon Research & Engineering Co. Slurry bubble column (C-2391)
IT1283774B1 (it) * 1996-08-07 1998-04-30 Agip Petroli Processo di fischer-tropsch con reattore a colonna a bolle multistadio
ZA985992B (en) * 1997-07-15 2000-01-10 Sasol Tech Pty Ltd A process for producing liquid and, optionally, gaseous products from gaseous reactants.
IT1301801B1 (it) * 1998-06-25 2000-07-07 Agip Petroli Procedimento per la preparazione di idrocarburi da gas di sintesi
US6156809A (en) * 1999-04-21 2000-12-05 Reema International Corp. Multiple reactor system and method for fischer-tropsch synthesis
FR2806736B1 (fr) * 2000-03-27 2002-05-10 Inst Francais Du Petrole Procede de production d'hydrocarbures a partir de gaz de synthese dans un reacteur triphasique

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO03044127A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CA2466938A1 (fr) 2003-05-30
AU2002365951A1 (en) 2003-06-10
FR2832416A1 (fr) 2003-05-23
CN100354392C (zh) 2007-12-12
NO20042077L (no) 2004-05-19
US20030096881A1 (en) 2003-05-22
WO2003044127A1 (fr) 2003-05-30
US6921778B2 (en) 2005-07-26
FR2832416B1 (fr) 2004-09-03
CA2466938C (fr) 2011-01-04
CN1612924A (zh) 2005-05-04
RU2294913C2 (ru) 2007-03-10
RU2004118604A (ru) 2005-05-10
EP1448749B1 (de) 2008-02-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0820806B1 (de) Verfahren mit einer Gas-Flüssig-Blasenkolonne und Anwendung zu einer Fischer-Tropsch Synthese
CN1060839C (zh) 处理海上油田的井内物流的方法和装置
US6156809A (en) Multiple reactor system and method for fischer-tropsch synthesis
CA2483041C (fr) Production de carburants liquides par un enchainement de procedes de traitement d'une charge hydrocarbonee
FR2895747A1 (fr) Procede pour produire des hydrocarbures a partir de gaz naturel.
WO2008017741A1 (fr) Procédé de production de gaz de synthèse avec oxydation partielle et vaporeformage
FR2740131A1 (fr) Procede de production d'acetylene et de gaz de synthese
CA2466938C (fr) Procede de conversion de gaz de synthese dans des reacteurs en serie
WO2015165763A1 (fr) Procede de production d'essence comprenant une etape d'isomerisation suivie d'au moins deux etapes de separation
EP0753562B1 (de) Verfahren zur Umsetzung von Synthesegas in flüssiger Phase
FR2741064A1 (fr) Procede de conversion de gaz de synthese en hydrocarbures
EP1765956B1 (de) Fischer-tropsch-syntheseverfahren mit verbesserter steuerung
FR2789691A1 (fr) Procede de synthese de distillat atmospherique comprenant l'utilisation de la technologie fischer-tropsch
FR2832415A1 (fr) Procede de conversion de gaz de synthese dans des reacteurs en serie
CA2323986C (fr) Procede de synthese d'hydrocarbures a partir de gaz de synthese en presence d'un alliage metallique de raney disperse dans une phase liquide
CA2328389C (fr) Dispositif et procede de separation de produits liquides a partir d'une suspension issue d'un reacteur fischer-tropsch et en presence d'un diluant
CA2328391C (fr) Dispositif et procede de separation de produits liquides a partir d'une suspension contenant un solide et en presence d'un diluant
CA2328385C (fr) Installation et procede de production d'hydrocarbures par synthese fischer-tropsch dans un reacteur comportant sur la boucle de recirculation des moyens de limitation de l'attrition du solide
CA2876291C (fr) Procede de synthese d'hydrocarbures a partir de gaz de synthese avec controle de la temperature de la boucle externe domaine technique de l'invention
CN1497039A (zh) 一种由合成气制备烃产物的骨架铁催化剂浆态相工艺过程
BE579330A (de)
FR2546879A1 (fr) Procede de fabrication de gaz de substitution (gns) a partir de methanol ou d'un melange methanol-gaz de synthese
FR2802831A1 (fr) Installation et procede de conversion chimique dans un reacteur triphasique comportant sur la boucle de recirculation des moyens de limitation de l'attrition du solide

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20040621

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL LT LV MK RO SI

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20041230

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20041230

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: 8566

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): FR IT

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20081128

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: CD

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20101103

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20101021

Year of fee payment: 9

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20120629

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20111028

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20111102