EP1431411B1 - Free cutting alloy - Google Patents

Free cutting alloy Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1431411B1
EP1431411B1 EP04004045A EP04004045A EP1431411B1 EP 1431411 B1 EP1431411 B1 EP 1431411B1 EP 04004045 A EP04004045 A EP 04004045A EP 04004045 A EP04004045 A EP 04004045A EP 1431411 B1 EP1431411 B1 EP 1431411B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
mass
content
alloy
steel
including zero
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP04004045A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1431411A1 (en
Inventor
Kiyohito Ishida
Katsunari Oikawa
Takashi c/o Tohoku Tokushuko K.K. Ebata
Takayuki Inoguchi
Tetsuya Shimizu
Michio Okabe
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Daido Steel Co Ltd
Tohoku Tokushuko KK
Tohoku Steel Co Ltd
Tohoku Techno Arch Co Ltd
Japan Research Industries and Industrial Technology Association (JRIA)
Original Assignee
Daido Steel Co Ltd
Tohoku Tokushuko KK
Tohoku Steel Co Ltd
Tohoku Techno Arch Co Ltd
Japan Research Industries and Industrial Technology Association (JRIA)
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from JP2000070257A external-priority patent/JP3425114B2/en
Priority claimed from JP2000221433A external-priority patent/JP3425124B2/en
Priority claimed from JP2000251602A external-priority patent/JP3425128B2/en
Priority claimed from JP2000251626A external-priority patent/JP3425129B2/en
Application filed by Daido Steel Co Ltd, Tohoku Tokushuko KK, Tohoku Steel Co Ltd, Tohoku Techno Arch Co Ltd, Japan Research Industries and Industrial Technology Association (JRIA) filed Critical Daido Steel Co Ltd
Publication of EP1431411A1 publication Critical patent/EP1431411A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1431411B1 publication Critical patent/EP1431411B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C19/00Alloys based on nickel or cobalt
    • C22C19/03Alloys based on nickel or cobalt based on nickel
    • C22C19/05Alloys based on nickel or cobalt based on nickel with chromium
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C19/00Alloys based on nickel or cobalt
    • C22C19/03Alloys based on nickel or cobalt based on nickel
    • C22C19/05Alloys based on nickel or cobalt based on nickel with chromium
    • C22C19/051Alloys based on nickel or cobalt based on nickel with chromium and Mo or W
    • C22C19/055Alloys based on nickel or cobalt based on nickel with chromium and Mo or W with the maximum Cr content being at least 20% but less than 30%
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C19/00Alloys based on nickel or cobalt
    • C22C19/03Alloys based on nickel or cobalt based on nickel
    • C22C19/05Alloys based on nickel or cobalt based on nickel with chromium
    • C22C19/051Alloys based on nickel or cobalt based on nickel with chromium and Mo or W
    • C22C19/057Alloys based on nickel or cobalt based on nickel with chromium and Mo or W with the maximum Cr content being less 10%
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C19/00Alloys based on nickel or cobalt
    • C22C19/03Alloys based on nickel or cobalt based on nickel
    • C22C19/05Alloys based on nickel or cobalt based on nickel with chromium
    • C22C19/058Alloys based on nickel or cobalt based on nickel with chromium without Mo and W
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/004Very low carbon steels, i.e. having a carbon content of less than 0,01%
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/06Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing aluminium
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/10Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing cobalt
    • C22C38/105Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing cobalt containing Co and Ni
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/28Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with titanium or zirconium
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/40Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/40Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel
    • C22C38/42Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel with copper
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/40Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel
    • C22C38/44Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel with molybdenum or tungsten
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/40Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel
    • C22C38/50Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel with titanium or zirconium
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/40Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel
    • C22C38/52Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel with cobalt
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/60Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing lead, selenium, tellurium, or antimony, or more than 0.04% by weight of sulfur

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to free cutting alloy excellent in machinability.
  • a free cutting alloy excellent in machinability is, in a case, selected for improvement of productivity.
  • free cutting alloy containing an element improving machinability such as S, Pb, Se or Bi (hereinafter referred to as machinability-improving element) is widely used.
  • machinability-improving element an element improving machinability such as S, Pb, Se or Bi
  • GB 1 519 313 relates to a stainless steel alloy and to a ferritic free-machining steel having an excellent machinability and a high corrosion resistance.
  • an object of the present invention is to provide free cutting alloy excellent in machinability, showing outstanding characteristics as an alloy such as corrosion resistivity, hot workability and cold workability or specific magnetic characteristics, which are comparable to those of conventional alloys.
  • a free cutting alloy of the present invention is characterized by the free cutting alloy of claim 1.
  • (Ti,Zr)" means one or two of Ti and Zr.
  • Machinability of an alloy can be improved by forming the above described (Ti, Zr) based compound in a matrix metal phase of the alloy. Furthermore, by forming this compound in the alloy, formation of compounds such as MnS and (Mn,Cr)S, easy to reduce corrosion resistivity and hot workability of the alloy, can be prevented or suppressed, thereby enabling corrosion resistivity, hot workability and cold workability to be retained at good levels. That is, according to the present invention, a free cutting alloy excellent in machinability can be realized without any degradation in useful characteristics as an alloy such as hardness, corrosion resistivity, hot workability, cold workability and specific magnetic characteristics.
  • a (Ti,Zr) based compound formed in a free cutting alloy of the present invention is dispersed in the alloy structure. Machinability of an alloy can be further increased especially by dispersing the compound in an alloy structure.
  • a particle size of the (Ti,Zr) based compound as observed in the structure of a polished section of the alloy is preferably, for example, approximately in the range of 0.1 to 30 ⁇ m on the average and further, an area ratio of the compound in the structure is preferably in the range of 1 to 20 %, wherein the particle size is defined by the maximum distance between two parallel lines circumscribing a particle in observation when parallel lines are drawn intersecting on a region including the particle in observation while changing a direction of the parallel lines.
  • the above described (Ti,Zr) based alloy can include at least a compound expressed in a composition formula (Ti,Zr) 4 (S,Se,Te) 2 C 2 (hereinafter also referred to as carbo-sulfide/selenide), wherein one or more of Ti and Zr may be included in the compound and one or more of S, Se and Te may be included in the compound.
  • a compound in the form of the above described composition formula not only can machinability of an alloy be improved, but corrosion resistivity is also improved.
  • identification of a (Ti,Zr) based compound in an alloy can be performed by X-ray diffraction (for example, a diffractometer method), an electron probe microanalysis method (EPMA) and the like technique.
  • X-ray diffraction for example, a diffractometer method
  • EPMA electron probe microanalysis method
  • the presence or absence of the compound of (Ti,Zr) 4 (S,Se,Te) 2 C 2 can be confirmed according to whether or not a peak corresponding to the compound appear in a diffraction chart measured by an X-ray diffractometer.
  • a region in the alloy structure in which the compound is formed can also be specified by comparison between two-dimensional mapping results on characteristic X-ray intensities of Ti, Zr, S, Se or C obtained from a surface analysis by EPMA conducted on a section structure of the alloy.
  • the present invention to be concrete, is applied on an alloy constituted as stainless steel.
  • an alloy constituted as stainless steel.
  • Ti and Zr are indispensable elements for forming a (Ti,Zr) based compound playing a central role in exerting the effect of improving machinability of a free cutting alloy of the present invention.
  • a value of W Ti + 0.52 W Zr is lower than 0.03 mass %, the (Ti,Zr) based compound is insufficiently formed in amount, thereby disabling the effect of improving machinability to be satisfactorily exerted-
  • machinability is reduced on the contrary. For this reason, the value of W Ti + 0.52 W Zr is required to be suppressed to 3.5 mass % or lower.
  • S and Se are elements for useful in improving machinability.
  • a compound useful for improving machinability for example, a (Ti,Zr) based compound expressed in the form of a composition formula (Ti,Zr) 4 (S,Se) 2 C 2 ). Therefore, contents of S and Se are specified 0.01 mass % as the lower limit.
  • the S content is set to 1 mass % and the Se content is set to 0.8 mass % as the respective upper limits.
  • S and Se are both desirably added into an alloy in a necessary and sufficient amount in order to form a compound improving machinability of the alloy, such as the above described (Ti,Zr) based compound.
  • a compound improving machinability of the alloy such as the above described (Ti,Zr) based compound.
  • An excessive addition of S results in deterioration of the out-gas resistivity.
  • Free cutting alloy of the present invention constituted as stainless steel is austenite containing stainless steel (hereinafter referred to a third selection invention), wherein the free cutting alloy contains: 2 to 50 mass % Ni; 12 to 50 mass % Cr; 5 to 85.95 mass % Fe; and 0.01 to 0.4 mass % C.
  • austenite containing stainless steel means stainless steel containing not only Fe as a main component, but an austenitic phase in the structure. While there are below exemplified corresponding kinds of steel exhibited in JIS G 4304, neither of elements Ti, Zr, S and Se as essential features of the present invention is naturally expressed in compositions described in the standard. In this case, part of Fe content of each of the above described kinds of stainless steel is replaced with the above described elements in the respective above described compositional ranges and thereby martensite containing stainless steel of the present invention is obtained. Therefore, while in description of the present specification, the same JIS Nos. are used, those actually means alloys specific to the present invention, which alloys have compositions defined in JIS standards as a base only.
  • Ni is necessary to be added to stainless steel in a content of at least 2 mass % in order to stabilize an austenitic phase in the stainless steel. Moreover, while Ni has many chances to be added into the matrix since Ni is useful for improving corrosion resistivity in an environment of a reducing acid, it is preferable to add at 2 mass % or higher in content from the viewpoint of improvement on corrosion resistivity. Moreover, when non-magnetism is desired, a necessary amount of Ni is required to be added so as to stabilize an austenitic phase more and thereby obtain an alloy as austenite containing stainless steel, considering connection with contents of other elements such as Cr and Mo. In this case, a Schoeffler diagram shown in Fig. 6 can be utilized for determination of the Ni content.
  • Cr is an indispensable element for ensuring corrosion resistivity of stainless steel. Hence, Cr is added in a content equal to 12 mass % or higher. When a Cr content is lower than 12 mass %, corrosion resistivity as stainless steel cannot be ensured due to intergranular corrosion caused by increased sensitivity at grain boundaries. On the other hand, when added in excess, there arises a risk that not only is hot workability degraded, but toughness is also reduced due to formation of a compound such as CrS.
  • a Cr content is limited to 50 mass % or lower.
  • a Cr content is preferably set in the range of 12 to 50 mass % and performances specific to stainless steel are, in a case, degraded outside the range in content of Cr.
  • a Cr content is set in the range of 15 to 30 mass % and more desirably in the range of 17 to 25 mass %.
  • Fe is an indispensable component for constituting stainless steel. Therefore, a Fe content is at 5 mass % or higher. When an Fe content is lower than 5 mass %, the Fe content is not preferable since no strength specific to stainless steel can be obtained. That an Fe content exceeds 85.95 mass % is impossible in connection with required contents of other components. Consequently, an Fe content is in the range of 5 to 85.95 mass %.
  • An Fe content is desirably set in the range of 15 to 75 mass % and more desirably in the range of 40 to 65 mass %.
  • C is an indispensable component for improvement on machinability and added in a content of 0.01 mass % or higher.
  • a (Ti,Zr) based compound is formed, and formation of the compound is considered to improves machinability of stainless steel.
  • a C content is lower than 0.01 mass %, formation of the (Ti,Zr) based compound is insufficient and the effect of improving machinability is not sufficiently attainable.
  • the content exceeds 0.4 mass %, a carbide not useful for improvement on machinability is excessively formed and therefore, machinability is deteriorated on the contrary.
  • a C content is preferably set in a proper manner taking into consideration not only that C is added such that a machinability improvement effect is exerted in best conditions according to an amount of constituting elements of a compound improving machinability, such as the (Ti,Zr) based compound, but also the effect of improving hardness exerted by the residual C dissolved in a solid solution state in the matrix phase.
  • a C content is desirably in the range of 0.03 to 0.3 mass % and more desirably in the range of 0.05 to 0.25 mass %.
  • a composition may have the following components and contents thereof in order to achieve better characteristics. That is, the composition can be 4 mass % or lower, including zero Si; 4 mass % or lower, including zero Mn; 4 mass % or lower, including zero Cu; and 4 mass % or lower, including zero Co. Description will be given of the reason why the composition has the elements and contents thereof as follows:
  • Si can be added as a deoxidizing agent for steel.
  • a content of Si is excessive high, not only is a hardness after solid solution heat treatment disadvantageously high, which in turn leads to poor cold workability, but an increased amount of a ⁇ -ferrite phase is formed, thereby deteriorating hot workability of the steel.
  • the upper limit of Si in content is set to 4 mass %.
  • a Si content is desirably set to 1 mass % or lower and more desirably to 0.5 mass % or lower, including zero.
  • Mn not only acts as a deoxidizing agent of the steel, but also exerts an effect to suppress formation of a ⁇ -ferrite phase. Furthermore, Mn has an effect to stabilize an austenitic phase. Since Mn forms a compound useful for increase in machinability in co-esistence with S and Se, Mn may added to the matrix when machinability is regarded as an important characteristic. When an effect of improving machinability is expected to be conspicuous, a Mn content is preferably set to 0.6 mass % or higher. When Mn is added, MnS is formed with ease. However, since MnS not only degrades corrosion resistivity to a great extent, but also reduces cold workability, formation of MnS is unwelcome.
  • the Mn content is set to 4 mass % or lower, including zero.
  • the Mn content is desirably set to 1 mass % or lower, including zero and more desirably to 0.5 mass % or lower, including zero.
  • Cu is not only useful for increase in corrosion resistivity, particularly for improving corrosion resistivity in an environment of a reducing acid, but also reduces work hardenability and improves moldability. Moreover, since an antibacterial property can be improved by a heat treatment or the like processing, Cu may added if necessary. However, when Cu is excessively added, hot workability is degraded and therefore, a Cu content is preferably set to 4 mass % or lower, including zero. Especially, when hot workability is regarded as an important characteristic, the Cu content is more desirably set to 1 mass % or lower, including zero.
  • Co is an element not only useful for improving corrosion resistivity, particularly in an environment of a reducing acid, but to exert an effect of ensuring non-magnetism and therefore, may added to the matrix if necessary. It is preferable to add in content of 1 mass % or higher in order to obtain more of conspicuousness of the effect. However, when Co is added in excess, not only is hot workability reduced but cost-up occurs on raw material. Hence, a Co content is preferably set to 4 mass % or lower, including zero. Especially, when hot workability or cost is taken seriously, the Co content is more desirably suppressed to 0.3 mass % or lower, including zero.
  • the stainless steel can contain one or more of Mo and W in the respective ranges of 0.1 to 10 mass % for Mo and 0.1 to 10 mass % for W. Addition of Mo and W can improve corrosion resistivity due to strengthened passivation and furthermore attain improved hardness due to second hardening. It is preferable to add Mo and W in each content of 0.1 mass %, or higher in order to make the effect exerted clearly. On the other hand, when in excess, hot workability is reduced and therefore, the content of Mo and W combined is preferably set to 10 mass % as the upper limit.
  • the stainless steels can contain: 0.05 mass % or lower P; and 0.03 mass % O; and 0.05 mass % or lower N.
  • the stainless steels can further contain one or more of Te, Bi and Pb in the respective ranges of 0.005 to 0.1 mass % for Te; 0.01 to 0.2 mass % for Bi; and 0.01 to 0.3 mass % for Pb. Description will be given of the reason why the elements and contents thereof are defined as follows:
  • a P content is preferably set as low as possible and to 0.05 mass % or lower, including zero. Although the P content is more desirably set to 0.03 mass % or lower, including zero, reduction in content more than necessary has a chance to be reflected on increased production cost.
  • O combines with Ti or Zr both of which are constituting elements of a compound useful for improving machinability and forms oxides not useful for improving machinability. Therefore, an O content should be suppressed as low as possible and is set to 0.03 mass % as the upper limit.
  • the O content is desirably set to 0.01 mass % or lower if allowable in consideration of increase in production cost.
  • N combines with Ti or Zr both of which are constituting elements of a compound useful for improving machinability and forms nitrides not useful for improving machinability. Therefore, a N content should be suppressed as low as possible and is set to 0.05 mass % as the upper limit.
  • the N content is desirably set to 0.03 mass % or lower, including zero and more desirably to 0.01 mass %, if allowable in consideration of increase in production cost.
  • Te, Bi and Pb in the respective ranges of 0.005 to 0.1 mass % for Te; 0.01 to 0.2 mass % for Bi; and 0.01 to 0.3 mass % for Pb
  • Te, Bi and Pb can further improve machinability, the elements may add if necessary.
  • the lower limits thereof at which the respective effects are exerted to clearness are as follows: 0.005 mass % Te; 0.01 mass % Bi and 0.01 mass % Pb, respectively.
  • the upper limits are set as follows: 0.1 mass % Te; 0.2 mass % Bi; and 0.3 mass % Pb.
  • the free cutting alloy of the present invention constituted as stainless steel can contain one or more selected from the group consisting of Ca, Mg, B and REM (one or more of metal elements classified as Group 3A in the periodic table of elements) in the range of 0.0005 to 0.01 mass % for one element or as a total content in a case of two or more elements.
  • the elements are useful for improving hot workability of steel.
  • the effect of improving hot workability obtainable by addition of the elements is more conspicuously exerted in the range of 0.0005 mass % or higher for one element or as a total content of more than one elements combined.
  • the elements are added in excess, the effect is saturated and hot workability is then reduced on the contrary.
  • the content of a single element or total content of the elements combined is set to 0.01 mass % as the upper limit.
  • REM since low radioactivity elements are easy to be handled when being mainly used, from this viewpoint, it is useful to use one or more selected from the group consisting of Sc, Y, La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Tm, Yb and Lu. It is desirable to use light rare earth elements, especially La or Ce from the viewpoint of conspicuous exertion of the effect and price. However, there arises no trouble with mixing-in of a trace of radioactive rare earth elements such as Th and U inevitably remaining, without being excluded, in a process to separate rare earth elements. Further, from the viewpoint of reduction in raw material cost, there can be used not-separated rare earth elements such as mish metal and didymium.
  • a free cutting alloy of the present invention constituted as stainless steel can contain one or more selected from the group consisting of Nb, V, Ta and Hf in each range of 0.01 to 0.5 mass %. Since Nb, V, Ta and Hf has an effect of forming carbo-nitrides to miniaturize crystalline particles of steel and increase toughness. Hence, the elements can add in each content up to 0.5 mass % and desirably contain 0.01 mass % or higher in the range.
  • a free cutting alloy of the present invention constituted as the above described stainless steel can contain the Wso value of which is less than 0.035 mass % when the following test is performed: an alloy test piece of said free cutting alloy is prepared so as to have the shape of rectangular prism in size of 15 mm in length, 25 mm in width and 3 mm in thickness with the entire surface being polished with No.
  • a (Ti, Zr) based compound being a feature of the present invention is formed and in the course of the formation, added S is included in the stainless steel as a constituting element of the (Ti, Zr) based compound which is more stable chemically than MnS or the like. And therefore, a S amount released into the air from the stainless steel decreases. Consequently, an out-gas resistivity of the stainless steel can also be improved by formation of the(Ti, Zr) based compound.
  • a S component released from the test piece as a sulfur containing gas is forced to be absorbed in the silver foil as a getter and a sulfur content Wso in the silver foil is measured to quantitatively determine the out-gas resistivity of a material.
  • a S content absorbed in the silver foil is defined using the W SO value and set to 0.035 mass % or lower in W SO .
  • Stainless steel of the present invention controlled so as to be 0.035 mass % or lower in Wso is hard to cause sulfur contamination in the peripheral parts when exposed to the air since a S component released from the stainless steel into the air is very small and thereby the stainless steel can be preferably used as parts of industrial equipment requiring the out-gas resistivity.
  • a factor determining out-gas resistivity of a material mainly is a composition of the material, it is desirable to fix S as carbo-sulfides of Ti and Zr for improvement on out-gas resistivity of the material.
  • a S content is desirably determined such that a value of W S /(W Ti + 0.52W Zr ) is 0.45 or less, or alternatively a value of W S /W C is 0.4 or less and W S /(W Ti + 0.52W Zr ) is 0.45 or less, wherein W S and W C denote a S content and a C content, respectively.
  • test alloy relating to the present invention is referred to as inventive steel or inventive alloy, or as a selection inventive steel or a selection inventive alloy.
  • Fig. 1 shows an X-ray diffraction chart of a steel No. 5 by a diffractometer and Fig. 8 is an optical microphotograph of a steel specimen No. 5. Further, specimens Nos. 1 to 14 in Table 1 are kinds of steel corresponding to reference steel and specimens Nos. 15 to 28 are kinds of steel as comparative examples.
  • Evaluation of machinability was collectively effected based on cutting resistance in machining, finished surface roughness and chip shapes.
  • a cutting tool made of cermet was used to perform machining under a dry condition at a circumferential speed of 150 m/min, a depth of cutting per revolution of 0.1 mm and a feed rate per revolution of 0.05 mm.
  • a cutting resistance in N as a unit was determined by measuring a cutting force generating in the machining.
  • the finished surface roughness was measured by a method stipulated in JIS B 0601 and a value thereof was an arithmetic average roughness (in ⁇ m Ra) on a test piece surface after the machining.
  • test pieces in use each had the shape of a rectangular prism of 15 mm in length, 25 mm in width and 3 mm in thickness and the entire surface of each were polished with No. 400 emery paper.
  • a test piece was placed in a sealed vessel having an inner volume of 250 cm 3 together with a silver foil having a size of 10 mm in length, 5 mm in width and 0.1 mm in thickness and 0.5 cm 3 of pure water, and a temperature in the vessel was maintained at 85°C for 20 hr.
  • a S content W SO in the silver foil after the process for the test was measured by a combustion type infrared absorbing analysis method.
  • Evaluation of cold workability was performed by measuring a threshold compressive stain in a compression test on specimens Nos. 1 to 5 and 13.
  • Test pieces for compression each had the shape of a cylinder of 15 mm in diameter and 22.5 mm in height and each piece was compressed by a 600 t oil hydraulic press to obtain a threshold compressive strain, wherein the threshold compressive strain is defined as ln (H0/H) or a natural logarithm of H0/H, H0 being an initial height of the test piece and H being a threshold height which is a maximum height at which no cracking has occurred.
  • Reference alloys of the specimens Nos. 1 to 5 were confirmed to have high threshold compressive ratios almost equal to comparative steel specimen No. 15 and higher than comparative steel specimen No. 16 by about 20 %, and have a good cold workability as well.
  • Evaluation of corrosion resistivity was performed by a salt spray test. Test pieces each were prepared so to have the shape of a cylinder of 10 mm in diameter and 50 mm in height. The entire surface of each test piece was polished with No. 400 emery paper and cleaned. A test piece was exposed to a fog atmosphere of 5 mass % NaCl aqueous solution at 35°C for 96 hr. Final evaluation was visually performed with the naked eye. As a result, the inventive steel of the present invention was confirmed to maintain good corrosion resistivity. The results are shown in Table 2.
  • the following experiment was performed on martensite containing stainless steel.
  • 50 kg steel blocks of compositions in mass % shown in Table 3 were molten in a high frequency induction furnace to form respective ingots.
  • the ingots were heated at temperature in the range of from 1050 to 1100°C to be forged in a hot state and be formed into rods each with a circular section, of a diameter of 20 mm.
  • the rods were further heated at 750°C for 1 hr, followed by air cooling to be applied to the test.
  • specimens Nos. 1 to 19 are reference steels constituted as martensite containing stainless steel. Further, in comparative examples, specimens correspond to stainless steel: a specimen No. 20 corresponds to SUS 410, a specimen No. 21 to SUS 416, a specimen No. 22 to SUS 420F and a specimen No. 23 to SUS 440F. Further, specimens Nos. 24 to 26 are of stainless steel, i.e. reference specimens.
  • inclusions of the inventive steel of the present invention was of (Ti,Zr) 4 (S,Se) 2 C 2
  • other inclusions such as (Ti,Zr)S and (Ti,Zr)S 3 are locally recognized in the matrix.
  • (Mn,Cr)S was recognized, though in a small amount.
  • An identification of inclusions was performed in the following way: A test piece in a proper amount was sampled from each of the rods. A metal matrix portion of the test piece was dissolved by electrolysis using a methanol solution including tetramethylammonium chloride and acetylaceton at 10 % as a electrolytic solution.
  • EDX Electronic Dispersive X-ray spectrometer
  • a compound was identified based on peaks of a diffraction chart.
  • a composition of a compound particle in the steel structure was separately analyzed by EDX and a compound with a composition corresponding to a compound observed by EDX was confirmed based on formation from two dimensional mapping results.
  • Fig. 3 shows EDX analytical results of arbitrary inclusions in a reference steel specimen No.2 and from the results, formation of (Ti,Zr) based compound can be recognized.
  • Fig. 4 shows optical microphotograph of reference steel specimens Nos. 2 and 13.
  • Evaluation of machinability was collectively effected based on tool ware loss in machining, finished surface roughness and ship shapes.
  • a cutting tool made of cermet was used to perform machining under a wet condition by water-soluble cutting oil at a circumferential speed of 120 m/min, a depth of cutting per revolution of 0.1 mm and a feed rate per revolution of 0.05 mm.
  • the tool ware loss was measured at a flank of the cutting tool after 60 min machining with ⁇ m as a unit of the tool wear loss.
  • the finished surface roughness and chip shapes were evaluated by a method similar to that in Example 1 (Reference).
  • Test pieces each were prepared so to have the shape of a cylinder of 15 mm in diameter and 50 mm in height. The entire surface of each test piece was polished. Each test piece was polished and thereafter, a test piece was held in a thermohygrostat at a temperature of 60°C and a relative humidity of 90 % RH for 168 hr.
  • test piece was evaluated [A]
  • test piece when dot-like stains were recognized at several points on a test piece, the test piece was evaluated [B], when red rust was recognized in an area of an area ratio of 5 % or less, the test piece was evaluated [C] and when red rust was recognized in an area wider than an area ratio of 5 %, the test piece was evaluated [D].
  • Table 4 The results are shown in Table 4.
  • the specimen No. 19 corresponds to SUS 304, the specimen No. 20 to SUS 303, the specimen No. 27 to SUS 329J4L.
  • the specimens Nos. 1 to 21 are kinds of steel for use in application of a non-magnetism
  • the specimens Nos. 22 to 29 are kinds of steel for use in application other than non-magnetism.
  • the specimens Nos. 1 to 24 and 27 were heated at 1050°C for 1 hr and thereafter water-cooled, while the other kinds of steel were heated at 750°C for 1 hr and thereafter water-cooled. Thereafter, both group of kinds of steel were further heated at 650°C for 2 hr and thereafter water-cooled, followed by tests.
  • All the test pieces of inventive steels obtained each had a main phase in which at least an austenitic phase was formed.
  • Main phases of third selection inventive steels are shown in Table 5, wherein A denotes an austenitic phase, B a ferritic phase and C a martensitic phase.
  • a free cutting alloy constituted as austenite containing stainless steel of the present invention is comparable with conventional stainless steel in hot workability, cold workability and corrosion resistivity and moreover, is improved in machinability compared with conventional stainless steel. Further, it is found that when comparing with comparative steel of the specimen No. 19, third selection inventive steels of the specimens Nos. 1 to 18 are improved in machinability. Further it is found that when comparing with comparative steel specimen No. 20, the specimens Nos. 1 to 18 are smaller in Wso and excellent in out gas resistivity. Further, when comparing with comparative steel specimens Nos. 27 to 29, it is found that third selection inventive steel Nos. 22 to 26 are improved on machinability. That is, the third selection inventive steel is comparable with the comparative steel in corrosion resistivity and hot workability and in addition, improved on machinability and out-gas resistivity.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Heat Treatment Of Steel (AREA)
  • Soft Magnetic Materials (AREA)
  • Heat Treatment Of Sheet Steel (AREA)
  • Powder Metallurgy (AREA)

Description

    Background Art
  • The present invention relates to free cutting alloy excellent in machinability.
  • Alloy has widespread applications because of a variety of characteristics thereof. A free cutting alloy excellent in machinability is, in a case, selected for improvement of productivity. In order to improve machinability, for example, free cutting alloy containing an element improving machinability such as S, Pb, Se or Bi (hereinafter referred to as machinability-improving element) is widely used. Especially in a case where machinability is particularly required because of precise finishing in machining or for other reasons, not only is a content of such a machinability-improving element increased in an alloy, but the elements are also added to an alloy in combination.
  • While S, which has widely been used for improvement of machinability, is in many cases added in the form of MnS, addition thereof in an alloy in a large content causes for degrading corrosion resistivity, hot workability and cold workability of the alloy. Moreover, when the alloy is exposed to the air, a sulfur component included in the alloy is released into the air in the form of a sulfur containing gas, which causes sulfur contamination in peripheral areas of parts with ease. Therefore, there arises a necessity of suppressing release of sulfur containing gas (hereinafter referred to as improvement on out-gas resistivity). Elements such as S, Se and Te, however, deteriorate magnetic properties to a great extent in an electromagnetic stainless steel and the like.
  • Therefore, various proposals have been made: a Mn content is limited, a Cr content in sulfide is increased or in a case where S is contained, Ti is added in combination with S in order to disperse sulfide in the shape of a sphere (for example, see JP-A-98-46292 or JP-A-81-16653). To increase a Cr content in sulfide, however, tends to greatly decrease in machinability and hot workability and therefore, such a alloy has been restricted on its application in many cases.
  • R. Kiessling et al. "Non metallic inclusions in steel", 1978 relates to sulphide inclusions in steel.
  • GB 1 519 313 relates to a stainless steel alloy and to a ferritic free-machining steel having an excellent machinability and a high corrosion resistance.
  • It is accordingly an object of the present invention is to provide free cutting alloy excellent in machinability, showing outstanding characteristics as an alloy such as corrosion resistivity, hot workability and cold workability or specific magnetic characteristics, which are comparable to those of conventional alloys.
  • Summary of the Invention
  • In order to achieve the above described object, a free cutting alloy of the present invention is characterized by the free cutting alloy of claim 1. (Ti,Zr)" means one or two of Ti and Zr.
  • Machinability of an alloy can be improved by forming the above described (Ti, Zr) based compound in a matrix metal phase of the alloy. Furthermore, by forming this compound in the alloy, formation of compounds such as MnS and (Mn,Cr)S, easy to reduce corrosion resistivity and hot workability of the alloy, can be prevented or suppressed, thereby enabling corrosion resistivity, hot workability and cold workability to be retained at good levels. That is, according to the present invention, a free cutting alloy excellent in machinability can be realized without any degradation in useful characteristics as an alloy such as hardness, corrosion resistivity, hot workability, cold workability and specific magnetic characteristics.
  • Further, a (Ti,Zr) based compound formed in a free cutting alloy of the present invention is dispersed in the alloy structure. Machinability of an alloy can be further increased especially by dispersing the compound in an alloy structure. In order to increase the effect, a particle size of the (Ti,Zr) based compound as observed in the structure of a polished section of the alloy is preferably, for example, approximately in the range of 0.1 to 30 µm on the average and further, an area ratio of the compound in the structure is preferably in the range of 1 to 20 %, wherein the particle size is defined by the maximum distance between two parallel lines circumscribing a particle in observation when parallel lines are drawn intersecting on a region including the particle in observation while changing a direction of the parallel lines.
  • The above described (Ti,Zr) based alloy can include at least a compound expressed in a composition formula (Ti,Zr)4(S,Se,Te)2C2 (hereinafter also referred to as carbo-sulfide/selenide), wherein one or more of Ti and Zr may be included in the compound and one or more of S, Se and Te may be included in the compound. By forming a compound in the form of the above described composition formula, not only can machinability of an alloy be improved, but corrosion resistivity is also improved.
  • It should be appreciated that identification of a (Ti,Zr) based compound in an alloy can be performed by X-ray diffraction (for example, a diffractometer method), an electron probe microanalysis method (EPMA) and the like technique. For example, the presence or absence of the compound of (Ti,Zr)4(S,Se,Te)2C2 can be confirmed according to whether or not a peak corresponding to the compound appear in a diffraction chart measured by an X-ray diffractometer. Further, a region in the alloy structure in which the compound is formed can also be specified by comparison between two-dimensional mapping results on characteristic X-ray intensities of Ti, Zr, S, Se or C obtained from a surface analysis by EPMA conducted on a section structure of the alloy.
  • Brief Description of the Drawings
    • Fig. 1 is a graph showing an X-ray diffraction chart of an inventive steel specimen No. 5 in experiment of Example 1 (Reference);
    • Fig. 2 is an optical microphotograph of the third selection inventive steel specimen No. 2 in Example 3;
    • Fig. 3 is a graph showing EDX analytical results of a reference specimen No.2 in Example 2 (Reference);
    • Fig. 4 is optical microphotograph of reference steels specimen Nos. 2 and 13 in Example 2 (Reference);
    • Fig. 5 is a representation describing measuring points for a hardness test in Example 2 (Reference);
    • Fig. 6 is a graph showing an example of Schaeffler diagram;
    • Fig. 7 is graphs showing EDX analytical results of a third selection inventive steel specimen No.2 in experiment of Example 3;
    • Fig. 8 is an optical microphotograph of the reference steel specimen No.5 in Example 1 (Reference);
    • Fig. 9 is a graph showing dependencies of solubility products on temperature of components of TiO, TiN, Ti4C2S2, TiC, TiS and CrS in γ-Fe;
    Preferred Embodiments of the Invention
  • The present invention, to be concrete, is applied on an alloy constituted as stainless steel. In this case, in order to form a (Ti,Zr) based compound without any degradation in characteristics as stainless steel, such an alloy preferably contains one or more of Ti and Zr such that WTi + 0.52 WZr = 0.03 to 3.5 mass %, wherein WTi and WZr denote respective contents in mass % of Ti and Zr; and one or more of S and Se in the respective ranges of 0.01 to 1.0 mass % for S and 0.01 to 0.8 mass % for Se.
  • The reason why the elements and contents thereof are selected as follows:
  • (1) The Ti and Zr content being defined such that WTi + 0.52 WZr = 0.03 to 3.5 mass %, wherein WTi and Wzr denote respective contents in mass % of Ti and Zr
  • Ti and Zr are indispensable elements for forming a (Ti,Zr) based compound playing a central role in exerting the effect of improving machinability of a free cutting alloy of the present invention. When a value of WTi + 0.52 WZr is lower than 0.03 mass %, the (Ti,Zr) based compound is insufficiently formed in amount, thereby disabling the effect of improving machinability to be satisfactorily exerted- On the other hand, when in excess of the value, machinability is reduced on the contrary. For this reason, the value of WTi + 0.52 WZr is required to be suppressed to 3.5 mass % or lower. The above effect exerted when Ti and Zr are added into an alloy is determined by the sum of the numbers of atoms (or the sum of the numbers of values in mol), regardless of kinds of metals, Ti or Zr. Since a ratio between atomic weights is almost 1 : 0.52, Ti of a smaller atomic weight exerts a larger effect with a smaller mass. Thus, a value of WTi + 0.52 WZr is said to be compositional parameter reflects the sum of the numbers of atoms of Zr and Ti included in an alloy.
  • (2) One or more of S and Se in the respective ranges of 0.01 to 1 mass % for S and 0.01 to 0.8 mass % for Se
  • S and Se are elements for useful in improving machinability. By adding S and Se into an alloy, in an alloy structure, formed is a compound useful for improving machinability (for example, a (Ti,Zr) based compound expressed in the form of a composition formula (Ti,Zr)4(S,Se)2C2). Therefore, contents of S and Se are specified 0.01 mass % as the lower limit. When the contents are excessively large, there arises a chance to cause a problem of deteriorating hot workability and therefore, there have to be the upper limits: The S content is set to 1 mass % and the Se content is set to 0.8 mass % as the respective upper limits. Further, S and Se are both desirably added into an alloy in a necessary and sufficient amount in order to form a compound improving machinability of the alloy, such as the above described (Ti,Zr) based compound. An excessive addition of S results in deterioration of the out-gas resistivity.
  • Free cutting alloy of the present invention constituted as stainless steel is austenite containing stainless steel (hereinafter referred to a third selection invention), wherein the free cutting alloy contains: 2 to 50 mass % Ni; 12 to 50 mass % Cr; 5 to 85.95 mass % Fe; and 0.01 to 0.4 mass % C.
  • Herein, austenite containing stainless steel means stainless steel containing not only Fe as a main component, but an austenitic phase in the structure. While there are below exemplified corresponding kinds of steel exhibited in JIS G 4304, neither of elements Ti, Zr, S and Se as essential features of the present invention is naturally expressed in compositions described in the standard. In this case, part of Fe content of each of the above described kinds of stainless steel is replaced with the above described elements in the respective above described compositional ranges and thereby martensite containing stainless steel of the present invention is obtained. Therefore, while in description of the present specification, the same JIS Nos. are used, those actually means alloys specific to the present invention, which alloys have compositions defined in JIS standards as a base only.
    • (1) Austenitic stainless steel is stainless steel showing an austenitic structure even in room temperature and can be exemplified as follows: SUS 201, SUS 202, SUS 301,SUS 301J, SUS 302, SUS 302B, SUS 304, SUS 304N1, SUS 304N2, SUS 305, SUS 309S, SUS 310S, SUS 316, SUS 316N, SUD 316J1, SUS 317, SUS 317J1, SUS 321, SUS 347, SUS XM15J1, SUS 836L, SUS 890L and so on.
    • (2) Austenitic-ferritic stainless steel is stainless steel showing a dual phase structure of austenite and ferrite and can be exemplified SUS 329J4L and so on.
    • (3) Precipitation hardening stainless steel is a stainless steel obtained by adding elements such as aluminum and copper, and precipitating a compound with the elements as main components by a heat treatment to harden and can be exemplified SUS 630, SUS 631 and so on. It should be appreciated that a concept of "stainless steel" includes heat resisting steel exemplified below as well:
    • (4) Austenitic heat resisting steel
      Compositions are stipulated in JIS G 4311 and G 4312, for example, and can be exemplified as follows: SUS 31, SUH 35, SUH 36, SUH 37, SUH 38, SUB 309, SUH 310, SUH 330, SUH 660, SUH 661 and so on.
  • Description will be given of the reason why the constituting elements and preferable ranges in content thereof are defined in the third selection invention of the present invention constituted as austenite containing stainless:
  • (3) 2 to 50 mass % Ni
  • Ni is necessary to be added to stainless steel in a content of at least 2 mass % in order to stabilize an austenitic phase in the stainless steel. Moreover, while Ni has many chances to be added into the matrix since Ni is useful for improving corrosion resistivity in an environment of a reducing acid, it is preferable to add at 2 mass % or higher in content from the viewpoint of improvement on corrosion resistivity. Moreover, when non-magnetism is desired, a necessary amount of Ni is required to be added so as to stabilize an austenitic phase more and thereby obtain an alloy as austenite containing stainless steel, considering connection with contents of other elements such as Cr and Mo. In this case, a Schoeffler diagram shown in Fig. 6 can be utilized for determination of the Ni content. An austenite forming element and a ferrite forming element are converted to equivalents of Ni and Cr amounts and a relationship between the equivalents and the structure is shown in Fig. 6 (see Revised 5th version Kinzoku Binran (Metal Hand Book) published by Maruzen in 1990, p. 578). However, it is required to obtain a necessary amount of Ni in consideration of exclusion of an amount in Ti and/or Zr compound from constituting elements of the matrix. Since not only does excessive addition of Ni result in cost-up, but specific characteristics as stainless steel are also degraded, a Ni content is limited to 50 mass % or lower.
  • (4) 12 to 50 mass % Cr
  • Cr is an indispensable element for ensuring corrosion resistivity of stainless steel. Hence, Cr is added in a content equal to 12 mass % or higher. When a Cr content is lower than 12 mass %, corrosion resistivity as stainless steel cannot be ensured due to intergranular corrosion caused by increased sensitivity at grain boundaries. On the other hand, when added in excess, there arises a risk that not only is hot workability degraded, but toughness is also reduced due to formation of a compound such as CrS.
  • Furthermore, a problem occurs since high temperature embrittlement becomes conspicuous, therefore a Cr content is limited to 50 mass % or lower. For this reason, a Cr content is preferably set in the range of 12 to 50 mass % and performances specific to stainless steel are, in a case, degraded outside the range in content of Cr. Desirably, a Cr content is set in the range of 15 to 30 mass % and more desirably in the range of 17 to 25 mass %.
  • (5) 5 to 85.95 mass % Fe
  • Fe is an indispensable component for constituting stainless steel. Therefore, a Fe content is at 5 mass % or higher. When an Fe content is lower than 5 mass %, the Fe content is not preferable since no strength specific to stainless steel can be obtained. That an Fe content exceeds 85.95 mass % is impossible in connection with required contents of other components. Consequently, an Fe content is in the range of 5 to 85.95 mass %. An Fe content is desirably set in the range of 15 to 75 mass % and more desirably in the range of 40 to 65 mass %.
  • (6) 0.01 to 0.4 mass % C
  • C is an indispensable component for improvement on machinability and added in a content of 0.01 mass % or higher. With C being included in the matrix, a (Ti,Zr) based compound is formed, and formation of the compound is considered to improves machinability of stainless steel. When a C content is lower than 0.01 mass %, formation of the (Ti,Zr) based compound is insufficient and the effect of improving machinability is not sufficiently attainable. On the other hand, when the content exceeds 0.4 mass %, a carbide not useful for improvement on machinability is excessively formed and therefore, machinability is deteriorated on the contrary. It is considered that residual C not included, as a constituting element, in the(Ti,Zr) based compound contributing to improvement on machinability is dissolved in the matrix phase of stainless steel in a solid state and the residual C in solid solution gives birth to an effect of increasing a hardness of the stainless steel as well. Therefore, a C content is preferably set in a proper manner taking into consideration not only that C is added such that a machinability improvement effect is exerted in best conditions according to an amount of constituting elements of a compound improving machinability, such as the (Ti,Zr) based compound, but also the effect of improving hardness exerted by the residual C dissolved in a solid solution state in the matrix phase. In consideration of the above described circumferences, a C content is desirably in the range of 0.03 to 0.3 mass % and more desirably in the range of 0.05 to 0.25 mass %.
  • In a free cutting alloy of the present invention constituted as austenite containing stainless steel, a composition may have the following components and contents thereof in order to achieve better characteristics. That is, the composition can be 4 mass % or lower, including zero Si; 4 mass % or lower, including zero Mn; 4 mass % or lower, including zero Cu; and 4 mass % or lower, including zero Co. Description will be given of the reason why the composition has the elements and contents thereof as follows:
  • (7) 4 mass % or lower, including zero Si
  • Si can be added as a deoxidizing agent for steel. However, when a content of Si is excessive high, not only is a hardness after solid solution heat treatment disadvantageously high, which in turn leads to poor cold workability, but an increased amount of a δ-ferrite phase is formed, thereby deteriorating hot workability of the steel. Hence, the upper limit of Si in content is set to 4 mass %. Especially, when cold workability and hot workability are both regarded as important characteristics, a Si content is desirably set to 1 mass % or lower and more desirably to 0.5 mass % or lower, including zero.
  • (8) 4 mass % or lower, including zero Mn
  • Mn not only acts as a deoxidizing agent of the steel, but also exerts an effect to suppress formation of a δ-ferrite phase. Furthermore, Mn has an effect to stabilize an austenitic phase. Since Mn forms a compound useful for increase in machinability in co-esistence with S and Se, Mn may added to the matrix when machinability is regarded as an important characteristic. When an effect of improving machinability is expected to be conspicuous, a Mn content is preferably set to 0.6 mass % or higher. When Mn is added, MnS is formed with ease. However, since MnS not only degrades corrosion resistivity to a great extent, but also reduces cold workability, formation of MnS is unwelcome. Therefore, the Mn content is set to 4 mass % or lower, including zero. Especially, when corrosion resistivity and cold workability are both regarded as important characteristics, the Mn content is desirably set to 1 mass % or lower, including zero and more desirably to 0.5 mass % or lower, including zero.
  • (9) 4 mass % or lower, including zero Cu
  • Cu is not only useful for increase in corrosion resistivity, particularly for improving corrosion resistivity in an environment of a reducing acid, but also reduces work hardenability and improves moldability. Moreover, since an antibacterial property can be improved by a heat treatment or the like processing, Cu may added if necessary. However, when Cu is excessively added, hot workability is degraded and therefore, a Cu content is preferably set to 4 mass % or lower, including zero. Especially, when hot workability is regarded as an important characteristic, the Cu content is more desirably set to 1 mass % or lower, including zero.
  • (10) 4 mass % or lower, including zero Co
  • Co is an element not only useful for improving corrosion resistivity, particularly in an environment of a reducing acid, but to exert an effect of ensuring non-magnetism and therefore, may added to the matrix if necessary. It is preferable to add in content of 1 mass % or higher in order to obtain more of conspicuousness of the effect. However, when Co is added in excess, not only is hot workability reduced but cost-up occurs on raw material. Hence, a Co content is preferably set to 4 mass % or lower, including zero. Especially, when hot workability or cost is taken seriously, the Co content is more desirably suppressed to 0.3 mass % or lower, including zero.
  • In the third selection invention constituted as austenite containing stainless steel, the stainless steel can contain one or more of Mo and W in the respective ranges of 0.1 to 10 mass % for Mo and 0.1 to 10 mass % for W. Addition of Mo and W can improve corrosion resistivity due to strengthened passivation and furthermore attain improved hardness due to second hardening. It is preferable to add Mo and W in each content of 0.1 mass %, or higher in order to make the effect exerted clearly. On the other hand, when in excess, hot workability is reduced and therefore, the content of Mo and W combined is preferably set to 10 mass % as the upper limit.
  • In the austenite containing stainless steel described above, contents of other elements are as follows: the stainless steels can contain: 0.05 mass % or lower P; and 0.03 mass % O; and 0.05 mass % or lower N. Moreover, the stainless steels can further contain one or more of Te, Bi and Pb in the respective ranges of 0.005 to 0.1 mass % for Te; 0.01 to 0.2 mass % for Bi; and 0.01 to 0.3 mass % for Pb. Description will be given of the reason why the elements and contents thereof are defined as follows:
  • (11) 0.05 mass % or lower, including zero P
  • P is segregated at grain boundaries and not only increases intergranular corrosion sensibility but also sometimes reduces toughness. Therefore, a P content is preferably set as low as possible and to 0.05 mass % or lower, including zero. Although the P content is more desirably set to 0.03 mass % or lower, including zero, reduction in content more than necessary has a chance to be reflected on increased production cost.
  • (12) 0.03 mass % or lower, including zero O
  • O combines with Ti or Zr both of which are constituting elements of a compound useful for improving machinability and forms oxides not useful for improving machinability. Therefore, an O content should be suppressed as low as possible and is set to 0.03 mass % as the upper limit. The O content is desirably set to 0.01 mass % or lower if allowable in consideration of increase in production cost.
  • (13) 0.05 mass % or lower, including zero N
  • N combines with Ti or Zr both of which are constituting elements of a compound useful for improving machinability and forms nitrides not useful for improving machinability. Therefore, a N content should be suppressed as low as possible and is set to 0.05 mass % as the upper limit. The N content is desirably set to 0.03 mass % or lower, including zero and more desirably to 0.01 mass %, if allowable in consideration of increase in production cost.
  • (14) One or more of Te, Bi and Pb in the respective ranges of 0.005 to 0.1 mass % for Te; 0.01 to 0.2 mass % for Bi; and 0.01 to 0.3 mass % for Pb
  • Since Te, Bi and Pb can further improve machinability, the elements may add if necessary. The lower limits thereof at which the respective effects are exerted to clearness are as follows: 0.005 mass % Te; 0.01 mass % Bi and 0.01 mass % Pb, respectively. On the other hand, since excessive addition reduces hot workability, the upper limits are set as follows: 0.1 mass % Te; 0.2 mass % Bi; and 0.3 mass % Pb.
  • Furthermore, the free cutting alloy of the present invention constituted as stainless steel, can contain one or more selected from the group consisting of Ca, Mg, B and REM (one or more of metal elements classified as Group 3A in the periodic table of elements) in the range of 0.0005 to 0.01 mass % for one element or as a total content in a case of two or more elements. The elements are useful for improving hot workability of steel. The effect of improving hot workability obtainable by addition of the elements is more conspicuously exerted in the range of 0.0005 mass % or higher for one element or as a total content of more than one elements combined. On the other hand, when the elements are added in excess, the effect is saturated and hot workability is then reduced on the contrary. Therefore, the content of a single element or total content of the elements combined is set to 0.01 mass % as the upper limit. As for REM, since low radioactivity elements are easy to be handled when being mainly used, from this viewpoint, it is useful to use one or more selected from the group consisting of Sc, Y, La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Tm, Yb and Lu. It is desirable to use light rare earth elements, especially La or Ce from the viewpoint of conspicuous exertion of the effect and price. However, there arises no trouble with mixing-in of a trace of radioactive rare earth elements such as Th and U inevitably remaining, without being excluded, in a process to separate rare earth elements. Further, from the viewpoint of reduction in raw material cost, there can be used not-separated rare earth elements such as mish metal and didymium.
  • A free cutting alloy of the present invention constituted as stainless steel can contain one or more selected from the group consisting of Nb, V, Ta and Hf in each range of 0.01 to 0.5 mass %. Since Nb, V, Ta and Hf has an effect of forming carbo-nitrides to miniaturize crystalline particles of steel and increase toughness. Hence, the elements can add in each content up to 0.5 mass % and desirably contain 0.01 mass % or higher in the range.
  • A free cutting alloy of the present invention constituted as the above described stainless steel can contain the Wso value of which is less than 0.035 mass % when the following test is performed: an alloy test piece of said free cutting alloy is prepared so as to have the shape of rectangular prism in size of 15 mm in length, 25 mm in width and 3 mm in thickness with the entire surface being polished with No. 400 emery paper; a silver foil in size of 10 mm in length, 5 mm in width and 0.1 mm in thickness with a purity of 99.9 % or higher as a S getter; 0.5 cm3 of pure water are sealed in a vessel of an inner volume of 250 cm3 together with said test piece; the temperature in said vessel is raised to 85°C and said temperature is then kept there for 20 hr; and thereafter, the S content in mass % in said silver foil piece is analyzed, then S content obtained is defined as said Wso.
  • A (Ti, Zr) based compound being a feature of the present invention is formed and in the course of the formation, added S is included in the stainless steel as a constituting element of the (Ti, Zr) based compound which is more stable chemically than MnS or the like. And therefore, a S amount released into the air from the stainless steel decreases. Consequently, an out-gas resistivity of the stainless steel can also be improved by formation of the(Ti, Zr) based compound.
  • In this case, when the out-gas resistivity test is performed, a S component released from the test piece as a sulfur containing gas is forced to be absorbed in the silver foil as a getter and a sulfur content Wso in the silver foil is measured to quantitatively determine the out-gas resistivity of a material. A S content absorbed in the silver foil is defined using the WSO value and set to 0.035 mass % or lower in WSO. Stainless steel of the present invention controlled so as to be 0.035 mass % or lower in Wso is hard to cause sulfur contamination in the peripheral parts when exposed to the air since a S component released from the stainless steel into the air is very small and thereby the stainless steel can be preferably used as parts of industrial equipment requiring the out-gas resistivity.
  • While a factor determining out-gas resistivity of a material mainly is a composition of the material, it is desirable to fix S as carbo-sulfides of Ti and Zr for improvement on out-gas resistivity of the material. For the purpose, a S content is desirably determined such that a value of WS/(WTi + 0.52WZr) is 0.45 or less, or alternatively a value of WS/WC is 0.4 or less and WS/(WTi+ 0.52WZr) is 0.45 or less, wherein WS and WC denote a S content and a C content, respectively. With such a range of components adopted, a S content which is chemically in unstable condition can be limited and thereby, the out-gas resistivity of the matrix metal phase of stainless steel can be improved.
  • Examples
  • The following experiments were performed in order to confirm the effects of the present invention. It should be appreciated that in the following description, test alloy relating to the present invention is referred to as inventive steel or inventive alloy, or as a selection inventive steel or a selection inventive alloy.
  • Example 1 Ferrite containing stainless steel (Reference only)
  • The effects of a free cutting alloy constituted as ferrite containing stainless steel (a reference steel) were confirmed by the following experiment. First, 50 kg steel blocks with respective compositions in mass % shown in Table 1 were molten in a high frequency induction furnace and ingots prepared from the molten blocks were heated at a temperature in the range of from 1050 to 1100°C and the ingots were forged in a hot state into rods with a circular section of 20 mm diameter and the rods were further heated at 800°C for 1 hr, followed by air cooling (annealing) as a source for test pieces.
  • Table 1
  • While main inclusions of reference steel was (Ti,Zr)4(S,Se)2C2, other inclusions such as (Ti,Zr)S and (Ti,Zr)S3 are locally recognized in the matrix. Further, in a specimen No. 7 high in Mn content, (Mn, Cr)S is recognized, though in a trace amount. An identification method for inclusions was performed in the following way: A test piece in a proper amount was sampled from each of the rods. A metal matrix portion of the test piece was dissolved by electrolysis using a methanol solution including tetramethylammonium chloride and acetylaceton at 10 % as a electrolytic solution. The electrolytic solution after the electrolysis was subjected to filtration and compounds not dissolved in steel were extracted from the filtrate. The extract was dried and subjected to chemical analysis by an X-ray diffraction method with a diffractometer. A compound was identified based on peaks of a diffraction chart. A composition of a compound particle in the steel structure was separately analyzed by EPMA and a compound with a composition corresponding to a compound observed by X-ray diffraction was confirmed based on formation from two dimensional mapping results. Fig. 1 shows an X-ray diffraction chart of a steel No. 5 by a diffractometer and Fig. 8 is an optical microphotograph of a steel specimen No. 5. Further, specimens Nos. 1 to 14 in Table 1 are kinds of steel corresponding to reference steel and specimens Nos. 15 to 28 are kinds of steel as comparative examples.
  • The following experiments were performed on the above described test pieces:
  • 1) Hot workability test
  • Evaluation of hot workability was effected based on visual observation of whether or not defects such as cracks occur in hot forging. [○] indicates that substantially no defect occurred in hot forging, [×] indicates that large scale cracks were recognized in hot forging and Δ indicates that small cracks occurred in hot forging.
  • 2) Evaluation of machinability
  • Evaluation of machinability was collectively effected based on cutting resistance in machining, finished surface roughness and chip shapes. A cutting tool made of cermet was used to perform machining under a dry condition at a circumferential speed of 150 m/min, a depth of cutting per revolution of 0.1 mm and a feed rate per revolution of 0.05 mm. A cutting resistance in N as a unit was determined by measuring a cutting force generating in the machining. The finished surface roughness was measured by a method stipulated in JIS B 0601 and a value thereof was an arithmetic average roughness (in µm Ra) on a test piece surface after the machining. Moreover, chip shapes were visually observed and when friability was good, the result is indicated by [G] and when friability is bad and all chips are not separated but partly connected, the result is indicated by [B] and when evaluation of chip shapes is intermidiate of [G] and [B], the result is indicated by [I].
  • 3) 4)Evaluation of out-gas resistivity
  • Evaluation of out-gas resistivity was performed by determining an amount of released S. To be concrete, test pieces in use each had the shape of a rectangular prism of 15 mm in length, 25 mm in width and 3 mm in thickness and the entire surface of each were polished with No. 400 emery paper. A test piece was placed in a sealed vessel having an inner volume of 250 cm3 together with a silver foil having a size of 10 mm in length, 5 mm in width and 0.1 mm in thickness and 0.5 cm3 of pure water, and a temperature in the vessel was maintained at 85°C for 20 hr. A S content WSO in the silver foil after the process for the test was measured by a combustion type infrared absorbing analysis method.
  • 4) Cold workability test
  • Evaluation of cold workability was performed by measuring a threshold compressive stain in a compression test on specimens Nos. 1 to 5 and 13. Test pieces for compression each had the shape of a cylinder of 15 mm in diameter and 22.5 mm in height and each piece was compressed by a 600 t oil hydraulic press to obtain a threshold compressive strain, wherein the threshold compressive strain is defined as ln (H0/H) or a natural logarithm of H0/H, H0 being an initial height of the test piece and H being a threshold height which is a maximum height at which no cracking has occurred. Reference alloys of the specimens Nos. 1 to 5 were confirmed to have high threshold compressive ratios almost equal to comparative steel specimen No. 15 and higher than comparative steel specimen No. 16 by about 20 %, and have a good cold workability as well.
  • 5) Evaluation of corrosion resistivity
  • Evaluation of corrosion resistivity was performed by a salt spray test. Test pieces each were prepared so to have the shape of a cylinder of 10 mm in diameter and 50 mm in height. The entire surface of each test piece was polished with No. 400 emery paper and cleaned. A test piece was exposed to a fog atmosphere of 5 mass % NaCl aqueous solution at 35°C for 96 hr. Final evaluation was visually performed with the naked eye. As a result, the inventive steel of the present invention was confirmed to maintain good corrosion resistivity. The results are shown in Table 2.
  • Table 2
  • It is found from Table 2 that a reference steel is comparable with conventional ferrite containing stainless steel in hot workability, cold workability and corrosion resistivity and moreover, is better in machinability than the conventional ferrite containing stainless steel. Further, it is found from Table 2 when comparing with comparative steel specimens Nos. 16 and 18 that the reference steel is smaller in Wso and better in out-gas resistivity. The reason why kinds of steel of comparative alloy specimens Nos. 16 and 18 each have a high Wso is considered that since the steel of the kinds has neither Ti nor Zr, carbo-sulfide is hard to be formed, whereby a S amount in the matrix is excessively high. In comparative alloy specimen No. 18, hot workability is poor and therefore, evaluation of machinability was not performed.
  • Example 2 Martensite containing stainless steel (Reference only)
  • The following experiment was performed on martensite containing stainless steel. First, 50 kg steel blocks of compositions in mass % shown in Table 3 were molten in a high frequency induction furnace to form respective ingots. The ingots were heated at temperature in the range of from 1050 to 1100°C to be forged in a hot state and be formed into rods each with a circular section, of a diameter of 20 mm. The rods were further heated at 750°C for 1 hr, followed by air cooling to be applied to the test.
  • Table 3
  • In Table 3, specimens Nos. 1 to 19 are reference steels constituted as martensite containing stainless steel. Further, in comparative examples, specimens correspond to stainless steel: a specimen No. 20 corresponds to SUS 410, a specimen No. 21 to SUS 416, a specimen No. 22 to SUS 420F and a specimen No. 23 to SUS 440F. Further, specimens Nos. 24 to 26 are of stainless steel, i.e. reference specimens.
  • While main inclusions of the inventive steel of the present invention was of (Ti,Zr)4(S,Se)2C2, other inclusions such as (Ti,Zr)S and (Ti,Zr)S3 are locally recognized in the matrix. Further, in a specimen No. 9 high in a Mn content and the like, (Mn,Cr)S was recognized, though in a small amount. An identification of inclusions was performed in the following way: A test piece in a proper amount was sampled from each of the rods. A metal matrix portion of the test piece was dissolved by electrolysis using a methanol solution including tetramethylammonium chloride and acetylaceton at 10 % as a electrolytic solution. The electrolytic solution after the electrolysis was subjected to filtration and compounds not dissolved in steel were extracted from the filtrate. The extract was dried and subjected to chemical analysis by EDX (Energy Dispersive X-ray spectrometer). A compound was identified based on peaks of a diffraction chart. A composition of a compound particle in the steel structure was separately analyzed by EDX and a compound with a composition corresponding to a compound observed by EDX was confirmed based on formation from two dimensional mapping results. Fig. 3 shows EDX analytical results of arbitrary inclusions in a reference steel specimen No.2 and from the results, formation of (Ti,Zr) based compound can be recognized. Further, Fig. 4 shows optical microphotograph of reference steel specimens Nos. 2 and 13.
  • The following experiment was performed on the above described test pieces.
  • 1) Hot workability test
  • Evaluation of hot workability was effected based on visual observation of whether or not defects such as cracks occur in hot forging. While workability in hot forging was at levels at which processing can be performed with no problem, as not only inclusions but an amount of alloy elements increase, deterioration in the workability was a tendency observed in the test. It was found that kinds of steel of the present invention in which one or more of Ca, B, Mg and REM was included had good hot workability when comparing with a kind of steel in which none of the elements was included.
  • 2) Evaluation of machinability
  • Evaluation of machinability was collectively effected based on tool ware loss in machining, finished surface roughness and ship shapes. A cutting tool made of cermet was used to perform machining under a wet condition by water-soluble cutting oil at a circumferential speed of 120 m/min, a depth of cutting per revolution of 0.1 mm and a feed rate per revolution of 0.05 mm. The tool ware loss was measured at a flank of the cutting tool after 60 min machining with µm as a unit of the tool wear loss. The finished surface roughness and chip shapes were evaluated by a method similar to that in Example 1 (Reference).
  • The following evaluations were performed using material subjected to treatments in which the material is kept at 980 to 1050°C for 30 min, thereafter subjected to a quenching heat treatment and still further subjected to a tempering treatment of holding at 180°C for 1 hr, followed by air cooling.
  • 3) Hardness test
  • Measurement of hardness on a test piece was performed on a C scale Rockwell hardness by the Rockwell hardness test stipulated in JIS Z 2245. The Rockwell hardness was obtained as the average of measurements at arbitrary 5 measuring points S on a circle drawn on a cross section of a rod test piece having a circular section, the circle drawn on the cross section being a circle satisfying a relation of PS = 0.25 PG, wherein G denotes a point almost coinciding with a center of the circular section, P denotes an arbitrary point on the outer periphery of the test piece and a point S is on a line segment PG
  • 4) Evaluation of out-gas resistivity
  • Evaluation of out-gas resistivity was performed similar to in Example 1 (Reference).
  • 5) Evaluation of corrosion resistivity
  • Evaluation of corrosion resistivity was performed by a method similar to in Example 1 (Reference). Test pieces each were prepared so to have the shape of a cylinder of 15 mm in diameter and 50 mm in height. The entire surface of each test piece was polished. Each test piece was polished and thereafter, a test piece was held in a thermohygrostat at a temperature of 60°C and a relative humidity of 90 % RH for 168 hr. An evaluation method was such that when no rust was confirmed, the test piece was evaluated [A], when dot-like stains were recognized at several points on a test piece, the test piece was evaluated [B], when red rust was recognized in an area of an area ratio of 5 % or less, the test piece was evaluated [C] and when red rust was recognized in an area wider than an area ratio of 5 %, the test piece was evaluated [D]. The results are shown in Table 4.
  • Table 4
  • It is found from Table 4 that while in stainless steel of comparative specimens Nos. 20 to 23, hardness is sufficiently ensured, machinability is poor. It is further found that specimens Nos. 21 to 23 are inferior in corrosion resistivity and out-gas resistivity. When a reference steel is compared with a steel in accordance with Reference Example 2, it is found that the reference steel has improved machinability, while the steel in accordance with Reference Example 2 has improved hardness, improved corrosion resistivity and improved out-gas resistivity. The reason why the steel in accordance with Reference Example 2 was improved in hardness as compared with the inventive steel is considered that a C content satisfies the formulae A and B and thereby, a C content constituting a (Ti,Zr) based compound and a C content as additive establishes an adjusted balance and thereby, a C component is sufficiently dispersed in a Fe based matrix phase. Further, the reason why out-gas resistivity was improved is considered that S is added excessively relative to an amount of a (Ti,Zr) based compound that can be formed.
  • Example 3 Austenite containing stainless steel
  • An experiment was performed on a free cutting alloy of the present invention constituted as austenite containing stainless steel (a third selection inventive steel). 50 kg blocks of compositions in mass % shown in Table 5 were molten in a high frequency induction furnace to form ingots. The ingots were heated at a temperature in the range from 1050 to 1100°C and hot forging was applied on the ingot at the same temperature to be formed into rods each having a circular section, of a diameter of 20 mm. Specimens Nos. 1 to 18 and 22 to 26 are steel corresponding to third selection inventive steels and specimens Nos. 19 to 21 and 27 to 29 are of comparative steels.
  • The specimen No. 19 corresponds to SUS 304, the specimen No. 20 to SUS 303, the specimen No. 27 to SUS 329J4L. Among them, the specimens Nos. 1 to 21 are kinds of steel for use in application of a non-magnetism and the specimens Nos. 22 to 29 are kinds of steel for use in application other than non-magnetism. Among them, the specimens Nos. 1 to 24 and 27 were heated at 1050°C for 1 hr and thereafter water-cooled, while the other kinds of steel were heated at 750°C for 1 hr and thereafter water-cooled. Thereafter, both group of kinds of steel were further heated at 650°C for 2 hr and thereafter water-cooled, followed by tests. All the test pieces of inventive steels obtained each had a main phase in which at least an austenitic phase was formed. Main phases of third selection inventive steels are shown in Table 5, wherein A denotes an austenitic phase, B a ferritic phase and C a martensitic phase.
  • Table 5
  • While main inclusions of the inventive steel of the present invention was of (Ti,Zr)4(S,Se)2C2, other inclusions such as (Ti,Zr)S and (Ti,Zr)S3 are locally recognized. Further, in specimens Nos. 9, 10 and 13 high in a Mn content and the like, (Mn,Cr)S was recognized, though in a small amount. Identification of inclusions was performed similar to in Reference Example 2. Fig. 7 shows EDX analytical results of arbitrary inclusions in the third selection inventive steel specimen No.2 and from the results, formation of (Ti,Zr) based compound can be recognized. Further, Fig. 2 shows an optical microphotograph of the third selection inventive steels specimen No. 2.
  • The following experiments were performed on the above described test pieces for 1) hot workability test, 2) evaluation of machinability, 3) evaluation of out-gas resistivity, 4) cold workability test and 5) evaluation of corrosion resistivity by methods similar to those in Reference Example 1. The experiment on the evaluation of machinability adopted a circumferential speed of a cutting tool of cermet at 120 m/min. The results obtained are shown in Table 6.
  • Table 6
  • It is found from Table 6 that a free cutting alloy constituted as austenite containing stainless steel of the present invention is comparable with conventional stainless steel in hot workability, cold workability and corrosion resistivity and moreover, is improved in machinability compared with conventional stainless steel. Further, it is found that when comparing with comparative steel of the specimen No. 19, third selection inventive steels of the specimens Nos. 1 to 18 are improved in machinability. Further it is found that when comparing with comparative steel specimen No. 20, the specimens Nos. 1 to 18 are smaller in Wso and excellent in out gas resistivity. Further, when comparing with comparative steel specimens Nos. 27 to 29, it is found that third selection inventive steel Nos. 22 to 26 are improved on machinability. That is, the third selection inventive steel is comparable with the comparative steel in corrosion resistivity and hot workability and in addition, improved on machinability and out-gas resistivity.
    Figure imgb0001
    Figure imgb0002
    Figure imgb0003
    Figure imgb0004
    Figure imgb0005
    Figure imgb0006

Claims (4)

  1. Free cutting alloy constituted as austenite containing stainless steel containing:
    2 to 50 mass % Ni; 12 to 50 mass % Cr; 5 to 85.95 mass % Fe; and 0.01 to 0.4 mass % C;
    one or more of Ti and Zr such that WTi + 0.52 WZr = 0.03 to 3.5 mass %, wherein WTi and WZr denote respective contents in mass % of Ti and Zr; and one or more of S and Se in the respective ranges of 0.01 to 1 mass % for S and 0.01 to 0.8 mass % for Se;
    and wherein a (Ti, Zr) based compound containing one or more of Ti and Zr as a metal element component, C being an indispensable element as a bonding component with the metal element component, and one or more of S, Se and Te is dispersed in a matrix metal phase; optionally further containing:
    4 mass % or lower, including zero Si; 4 mass % or lower, including zero Mn; 4 mass % or lower, including zero Cu; 4 mass % or lower, including zero Co;
    one or more of Mo and W in the respective ranges of 0.1 to 10 mass % for Mo and 0.1 to 10 mass % for W;
    0.05 mass % or lower, including zero P; 0.03 mass % or lower, including zero O; 0.05 mass % or lower, including zero N;
    one or more of Te, Bi and Pb in the respective ranges of 0.005 to 0.1 mass % for Te; 0.01 to 0.2 mass % for Bi; 0.01 to 0.3 mass % for Pb;
    one or more selected from the group consisting of Ca, Mg, B and REM (one or more of metal elements classified as Group 3A in the periodic table of elements) in the range of 0.0005 to 0.01 mass % for one element or as a total content of more than one elements combined;
    one or more selected from the group consisting of Nb, V, Ta and Hf in each range of 0.01 to 0.5 mass %, the balance being Fe and inevitable impurities.
  2. Free cutting alloy according to claim 1, wherein WS/(WTi+0.52 WZr) is 0.45 or less, wherein WS, WTi and WZr denote a S content, a Ti content and a Zr content, respectively.
  3. Free cutting alloy according to any of claims 1 to 2, the Wso value representing the amount of S released is less than 0.035 mass % when the following test is performed:
    an alloy test piece of said free cutting alloy is prepared so as to have the shape of rectangular prism in size of 15 mm in length, 25 mm in width and 3 mm in thickness with the entire surface being polished with No. 400 emery paper;
    a silver foil in size of 10 mm in length, 5 mm in width and 0.1 mm in thickness with a purity of 99.9 % or higher as a S getter;
    0.5 cm3 of pure water are sealed in a vessel of an inner volume of 250 cm3 together with said test piece;
    the temperature in said vessel is raised to 85°C and said temperature is then kept there for 20 hr;
    and thereafter, the S content in mass % in said silver foil piece is analyzed, then S content obtained is defined as said Wso.
  4. Free cutting alloy according to any of claims 1 to 3, wherein a particle size of the (Ti, Zr) based compound as observed in the structure of a polished section of the alloy is in the range of 0.1 to 30 µm on the average and further, an area ratio of the compound in the structures is in the range of 1 to 20%.
EP04004045A 1999-09-03 2000-09-01 Free cutting alloy Expired - Lifetime EP1431411B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (11)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP25090299 1999-09-03
JP25090299 1999-09-03
JP2000070257 2000-03-14
JP2000070257A JP3425114B2 (en) 2000-03-14 2000-03-14 Pb-free ferritic free-cutting stainless steel
JP2000221433A JP3425124B2 (en) 2000-07-21 2000-07-21 Ferritic free-cutting stainless steel
JP2000221433 2000-07-21
JP2000251626 2000-08-22
JP2000251602A JP3425128B2 (en) 2000-08-22 2000-08-22 Free cutting alloy material
JP2000251602 2000-08-22
JP2000251626A JP3425129B2 (en) 1999-09-03 2000-08-22 Free cutting alloy material
EP20000118990 EP1085105B1 (en) 1999-09-03 2000-09-01 Free cutting alloy

Related Parent Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP20000118990 Division EP1085105B1 (en) 1999-09-03 2000-09-01 Free cutting alloy
EP00118990.1 Division 2000-09-01

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1431411A1 EP1431411A1 (en) 2004-06-23
EP1431411B1 true EP1431411B1 (en) 2006-07-05

Family

ID=27530219

Family Applications (5)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP04004046A Expired - Lifetime EP1431412B1 (en) 1999-09-03 2000-09-01 Free cutting alloy
EP20000118990 Expired - Lifetime EP1085105B1 (en) 1999-09-03 2000-09-01 Free cutting alloy
EP04004045A Expired - Lifetime EP1431411B1 (en) 1999-09-03 2000-09-01 Free cutting alloy
EP04004043A Expired - Lifetime EP1431409B1 (en) 1999-09-03 2000-09-01 Free cutting alloy
EP04004044A Expired - Lifetime EP1431410B1 (en) 1999-09-03 2000-09-01 Free cutting alloy

Family Applications Before (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP04004046A Expired - Lifetime EP1431412B1 (en) 1999-09-03 2000-09-01 Free cutting alloy
EP20000118990 Expired - Lifetime EP1085105B1 (en) 1999-09-03 2000-09-01 Free cutting alloy

Family Applications After (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP04004043A Expired - Lifetime EP1431409B1 (en) 1999-09-03 2000-09-01 Free cutting alloy
EP04004044A Expired - Lifetime EP1431410B1 (en) 1999-09-03 2000-09-01 Free cutting alloy

Country Status (2)

Country Link
EP (5) EP1431412B1 (en)
DE (5) DE60029364T2 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102013214464A1 (en) * 2013-07-24 2015-01-29 Johannes Eyl Method for producing a chromium-containing alloy and chromium-containing alloy

Families Citing this family (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2003049241A (en) * 2001-06-01 2003-02-21 Daido Steel Co Ltd Free-cutting steel
JP2003049240A (en) * 2001-06-01 2003-02-21 Daido Steel Co Ltd Free-cutting steel
JP4895434B2 (en) 2001-06-04 2012-03-14 清仁 石田 Free-cutting Ni-base heat-resistant alloy
EP1378578B1 (en) * 2002-06-05 2007-11-07 Kiyohito Ishida Free-cutting Ni-base heat-resistant alloy
RU2485200C1 (en) * 2012-01-30 2013-06-20 Открытое акционерное общество "Тольяттиазот" Heat-resistant chrome-nickel alloy with austenitic structure
CN102723158B (en) * 2012-07-06 2015-12-02 白皞 Containing the high magnetic permeability Ni-Fe magnetically soft alloy and its production and use of rare earth
RU2551328C1 (en) * 2014-03-12 2015-05-20 Павел Сергеевич Кучин Iron based cast alloy
RU2586949C1 (en) * 2015-06-08 2016-06-10 Федеральное государственное бюджетное образовательное учреждение высшего профессионального образования "Южно-Уральский государственный университет" (национальный исследовательский университет) (ФГБОУ ВПО "ЮУрГУ" (НИУ)) Martensite-ferrite corrosion-resistant chrome-nickel steel with improved machinability
RU2600467C1 (en) * 2015-06-25 2016-10-20 Федеральное государственное унитарное предприятие "Всероссийский научно-исследовательский институт авиационных материалов" (ФГУП "ВИАМ") High-strength beryllium-containing steel
CN105033501B (en) * 2015-08-03 2017-10-27 合肥通用机械研究院 Microalloying 35Cr45NiNb welding wire for ethylene cracking furnace pipe
CN110438510B (en) * 2018-05-02 2021-07-06 温州酷乐餐桌用品有限公司 Treatment method for reducing heavy metal content in stainless steel table knife
CN109321806A (en) * 2018-10-16 2019-02-12 李访 A kind of straw granulator stalk body shredder head and preparation method thereof
CN110819918A (en) * 2019-11-12 2020-02-21 段劲松 Wear-resistant steel ball with high wear resistance and corrosion resistance for ball mill

Family Cites Families (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
SE400314B (en) * 1974-10-18 1978-03-20 Sandvik Ab STAINLESS AUTOMATIC NUMBER
JPS60155653A (en) * 1984-01-25 1985-08-15 Hitachi Ltd Iron-base super alloy and its production
JPS63125639A (en) * 1985-04-16 1988-05-28 Aichi Steel Works Ltd Soft magnetic stainless steel
JPH0765144B2 (en) * 1986-10-07 1995-07-12 大同特殊鋼株式会社 Stainless steel for cold forging
JP2734035B2 (en) * 1988-12-23 1998-03-30 大同特殊鋼株式会社 Stainless steel with excellent cold forgeability
WO1996026300A1 (en) * 1995-02-23 1996-08-29 Nippon Steel Corporation Cold-rolled steel sheet and hot-dipped galvanized steel sheet excellent in uniform workability, and process for producing the sheets
JP3601749B2 (en) * 1996-10-24 2004-12-15 大同特殊鋼株式会社 High strength, free cutting ferritic stainless steel
CA2243123C (en) * 1996-11-25 2002-01-29 Sumitomo Metal Industries, Ltd. Steel products excellent in machinability and machined steel parts
JP3777756B2 (en) * 1997-11-12 2006-05-24 大同特殊鋼株式会社 Electronic equipment parts made of ferritic free-cutting stainless steel
JPH11229032A (en) * 1998-02-13 1999-08-24 Sumitomo Metal Ind Ltd Production of steel for soft-nitriding and soft-nitrided parts using the steel
JP3890724B2 (en) * 1998-02-19 2007-03-07 住友金属工業株式会社 Ferritic / pearlite non-heat treated steel with excellent machinability
JP3489434B2 (en) * 1998-04-10 2004-01-19 住友金属工業株式会社 High-strength free-cut non-heat treated steel

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102013214464A1 (en) * 2013-07-24 2015-01-29 Johannes Eyl Method for producing a chromium-containing alloy and chromium-containing alloy
DE102013214464A9 (en) * 2013-07-24 2015-05-21 Johannes Eyl Method for producing a chromium-containing alloy and chromium-containing alloy

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE60029260T2 (en) 2007-08-30
DE60029063D1 (en) 2006-08-10
DE60029364T2 (en) 2007-08-09
EP1431412A1 (en) 2004-06-23
DE60029261D1 (en) 2006-08-17
EP1085105A2 (en) 2001-03-21
DE60029063T2 (en) 2007-06-28
DE60030175D1 (en) 2006-09-28
EP1085105A3 (en) 2001-05-16
EP1431410B1 (en) 2006-07-12
EP1431410A1 (en) 2004-06-23
DE60029260D1 (en) 2006-08-17
DE60029364D1 (en) 2006-08-24
DE60029261T2 (en) 2007-02-01
EP1431409A1 (en) 2004-06-23
EP1085105B1 (en) 2006-06-28
EP1431411A1 (en) 2004-06-23
DE60030175T2 (en) 2007-08-30
EP1431412B1 (en) 2006-08-16
EP1431409B1 (en) 2006-07-05

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2236639B2 (en) Hot work tool steel with outstanding toughness and thermal conductivity
EP1431411B1 (en) Free cutting alloy
EP2267177B1 (en) High-strength steel plate and producing method therefor
EP3553195B1 (en) High mn steel sheet and method for producing same
EP2548988A1 (en) Ferrite-based stainless steel for use in components of automobile exhaust system
KR101479826B1 (en) Martensitic stainless steel with excellent weld characteristics, and mertensitic stainless steel material
EP0593158A1 (en) Austenitic stainless steel of the chromium-nickel-manganese type, and further containing copper and nitrogen
KR20070086564A (en) Precipitation hardenable martensitic stainless steel
EP2011891A1 (en) Brake disc having high temper softening resistance
US8540934B2 (en) Lead free free-cutting steel and its use
US20140178243A1 (en) Hot work tool steel with outstanding toughness and thermal conductivity
KR102560819B1 (en) High-strength hot-rolled steel with excellent scale adhesion and manufacturing method thereof
US7297214B2 (en) Free cutting alloy
EP4411001A1 (en) Martensitic stainless steel pipe
JP2003247049A (en) Austenite-containing free cutting stainless steel
US7381369B2 (en) Free cutting alloy
US20030170138A1 (en) Free cutting alloy
JP3425124B2 (en) Ferritic free-cutting stainless steel
JP3425128B2 (en) Free cutting alloy material
JP2003221654A (en) Free-cutting stainless steel
JP3425129B2 (en) Free cutting alloy material
JP3425114B2 (en) Pb-free ferritic free-cutting stainless steel
US20080124240A1 (en) Free cutting alloy
JPS59145763A (en) Alloy tool steel

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AC Divisional application: reference to earlier application

Ref document number: 1085105

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: P

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): DE FR GB SE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20041110

AKX Designation fees paid

Designated state(s): DE FR GB SE

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20050419

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AC Divisional application: reference to earlier application

Ref document number: 1085105

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: P

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): DE FR GB SE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 60029261

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20060817

Kind code of ref document: P

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: TRGR

ET Fr: translation filed
PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20070410

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20090910

Year of fee payment: 10

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20090826

Year of fee payment: 10

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20090827

Year of fee payment: 10

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20091012

Year of fee payment: 10

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: EUG

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20100901

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20110531

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 60029261

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20110401

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100930

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110401

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100901

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100902