EP1330626B1 - Bleifreie metallpulverprojektile - Google Patents

Bleifreie metallpulverprojektile Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1330626B1
EP1330626B1 EP01981408A EP01981408A EP1330626B1 EP 1330626 B1 EP1330626 B1 EP 1330626B1 EP 01981408 A EP01981408 A EP 01981408A EP 01981408 A EP01981408 A EP 01981408A EP 1330626 B1 EP1330626 B1 EP 1330626B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
projectiles
projectile
particles
particle size
lead
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP01981408A
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1330626A1 (de
EP1330626A4 (de
Inventor
Jeffrey W. Stone
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
RA Brands LLC
Original Assignee
RA Brands LLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US09/684,230 external-priority patent/US6892647B1/en
Application filed by RA Brands LLC filed Critical RA Brands LLC
Publication of EP1330626A1 publication Critical patent/EP1330626A1/de
Publication of EP1330626A4 publication Critical patent/EP1330626A4/de
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1330626B1 publication Critical patent/EP1330626B1/de
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F42—AMMUNITION; BLASTING
    • F42B—EXPLOSIVE CHARGES, e.g. FOR BLASTING, FIREWORKS, AMMUNITION
    • F42B12/00—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material
    • F42B12/72—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the material
    • F42B12/74—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the material of the core or solid body
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F42—AMMUNITION; BLASTING
    • F42B—EXPLOSIVE CHARGES, e.g. FOR BLASTING, FIREWORKS, AMMUNITION
    • F42B8/00—Practice or training ammunition
    • F42B8/12—Projectiles or missiles
    • F42B8/14—Projectiles or missiles disintegrating in flight or upon impact
    • F42B8/16—Projectiles or missiles disintegrating in flight or upon impact containing an inert filler in powder or granular form

Definitions

  • This invention relates to lead free projectiles. Specifically, this invention relates to lead free projectiles that are significantly less dense than previous lead containing projectiles. More specifically, this invention relates to lead free projectiles that are significantly less dense than previous lead free projectiles, which were designed to approximate the theoretical density of lead.
  • the frangible metal bullet is formed from a mixture of metal particles and metal or metalloid binder forming material which is compacted into the desired shape, heated to a temperature above that needed to form at least one intermetallic compound but below the temperature of joining of the metal particles by sintering and below the temperature of formation of substantial amounts of a ductile alloy of the metal of the particles and the metal or metalloid binder forming material and then cooled.
  • Such bullets can be formulated to be lead-free.
  • the present invention provides lead free projectiles that are not limited by the theoretical density of lead, and thus offers more flexibility in terms of materials used and methods of manufacture.
  • the projectiles of the present invention satisfy the need for lead free projectiles without the expense of high cost materials and processing.
  • the projectiles of the present invention produce a similar "feel" and mimic the ballistic properties of lead projectiles of similar caliber and size, as well as similar lead free projectiles.
  • the present invention provides an alternative to lead that is less dense than lead but still retains similar external ballistic properties.
  • the projectiles of the present invention exhibit external ballistic properties similar to previous lead containing and lead free projectiles, especially when fired within ranges of about 91.4 meters (100 yards) or less.
  • the present invention provides a lead free projectile having a density less than the theoretical density of lead.
  • the present invention provides a lead free projectile according to claim 1 comprising a compacted admixture of iron powder and at least one powder selected from tin, zinc and alloys and mixtures thereof.
  • projectile includes bullet, shot, and other projectiles associated with firearms.
  • Projectile as used herein include core, which is formed from the compacted metal powders, as well as the jacketed or unjacketed core that can be loaded into a cartridge to form a round of ammunition.
  • the projectiles of the present invention comprise a mixture of metal powders, and can comprise lubricants and other materials that aid in the manufacture of such projectiles.
  • the high ductility metal powder selected from tin, zinc and alloys or mixtures thereof facilitates cold forming and ease of manufacture of the powder metal mixture into a finished projectile shape by conventional projectile forming technology.
  • the low ductility iron powder reduces the overall cost of the powder metal mixture by acting as a filler that does not sacrifice the material properties of the low ductility iron.
  • the high ductility metal powder can be a single metal or a mixture of metal powders having high ductility.
  • High ductility as used herein means that the stress-strain characteristic of the material will have an almost indistinguishable transition between elastic and inelastic response regions.
  • the selection of a particular high ductility metal powder or mixture of powders will depend on a variety of factors, including the ratio of low ductility to high ductility metal powder used in fabricating the projectile.
  • the density of the high ductility metal powder is preferably less than the theoretical density of lead, however, the density of the high ductility metal powder can be greater than lead if the density of the projectile is less than lead.
  • the high ductility metal powder consists of a mixture of powders, the mixture can contain metals of varying density. Again, it is preferred that the density of such mixtures be less than the theoretical density of lead, but the density of the mixture can be greater than lead so long as the composite density of the projectile is less than the theoretical density of lead.
  • the low ductility metal powder is iron powder.
  • Low ductility as used herein means that the material will have a well defined transition between elastic and inelastic response regions in the stress-strain characteristic relationship of the material.
  • the density of the projectile formed from the powders is preferably less than the theoretical density of lead.
  • the projectile comprises about two parts by volume of high ductility metal powder to one part low ductility metal powder.
  • the preferred ratio ensures that the compacted metal powder mixture will take on properties, including properties such as ductility and formability that aid in the production of projectiles of the present invention, of the powder metal more highly represented in the mixture.
  • the preferred material properties are those of the higher ductility metal powder, and thus it is preferred that the higher ductility metal powder comprise a higher percentage of the mixture.
  • the projectiles of the present invention can be manufactured by a wide variety of methods. Typically, the projectiles are made by compacting the mixture of metal powders, and then finishing the projectile, if necessary, by sintering, swaging, or otherwise modifying the compacted mixture. Other finishing steps can include jacketing the compacted mixture. Jacketing can be accomplished by a wide variety of known methods. Compacting can be carried out at substantially ambient conditions, without applied heat, or under heated conditions. The method of manufacture will vary depending on a wide variety of parameters, including the desired projectile, the specific composition of the metal powders, the particle size of the metal powders, and other factors that will be obvious to one skilled in the art.
  • the low ductility iron powder When compacting a mixture of metal powders, it is preferred that the low ductility iron powder has a pre-compaction particle size distribution of about from 44 to 250 ⁇ m. More specifically, a preferred low ductility mixture can have a particle distribution of about 15 to 25% by weight of particles up to about 44 ⁇ m, about from 5 to 70% by weight of particles having a particle size of about from 44 to 149 ⁇ m, and about from 5 to 15% by weight of particles having a particle size of about from 149 to 250 ⁇ m.
  • a pre-compaction particle size distribution of about 22% by weight of particles up to about 44 ⁇ m, about 68% by weight of particles having a particle size of about from 44 to 149 ⁇ m, and about 10% by weight of particles having a particle size of about from 149 to 250 ⁇ m.
  • the desired particle size distribution can be determined and obtained through a variety of conventional methods, including optical measurements and sifting.
  • the particles are also available commercially in specific particle size distributions.
  • a preferred high ductility material comprises powder having a pre-compaction particle size distribution of about from 45 to 180 ⁇ m.
  • a preferred high ductility mixture can have a particle distribution of about 10-14% by weight of particles up to about 45 ⁇ m, about from 30-50% by weight of particles having a particle size of about 75 ⁇ m, about from 20-30% by weight of particles having a particle size of about 106 ⁇ m, about from 5-10% by weight of particles having a particle size of about 150 ⁇ m, and about from 2-4% by weight of particles having a particle size of about 180 ⁇ m.
  • a pre-compaction particle size distribution for the low ductility metal of about 14% by weight of particles of about 45 ⁇ m, about 48% by weight of particles having a particle size of about 75 ⁇ m, about 28% by weight of particles having a particle size of about 105 ⁇ m, about 7% by weight of particles having a particle size of about 150 ⁇ m, and about 3% by weight of particles having a particle size of about 180 ⁇ m.
  • Some embodiments of the projectile of the present invention may be frangible.
  • Frangible as used herein, consistent with its use in the firearms and ammunition industry, means that the projectile breaks apart completely upon striking a hard target.
  • Frangible lead free projectiles of the present invention can be prepared by a process of manufacture involving only the cold compacting of the high and low ductility metal powders.
  • Non frangible projectiles can be made by cold compacting the metal powders, and can also be made by heat treating the cold compacted metal powders to strengthen the bond between the powders.
  • Frangibility depends, at least in part, on the particle size distribution of the high and low ductility metals used.
  • pre-compaction particle size distribution of about from 15 to 25% by weight of particles up to about 44 ⁇ m, about from 5 to 70% by weight of particles having a particle size of about from 44 to 149 ⁇ m, and about from 5 to 15% by weight of particles having a particle size of about from 149 to 250 ⁇ m. Even more advantageous is a pre-compaction particle size distribution of about 22% by weight of particles up to about 44 ⁇ m, about 68% by weight of particles having a particle size of about from 44 to 149 ⁇ m, and about 10% by weight of particles having a particle size of about from 149 to 250 ⁇ m.
  • the desired particle size distribution can be obtained through a variety of conventional methods, including optical measurements and sifting.
  • the particles are also available commercially in specific particle size distributions.
  • the particle size of each of the powders can vary, depending on a variety of factors such as the ratio of metal powders, and the ratio of the particle sizes of the metal powders.
  • the particles be of irregular shape to promote bonding and strength. It has been found that irregularly shaped particles, when used according to the present invention and when used as components in projectiles of the present invention, improve the bonding of the metal powders and contribute to the green strength of the compacted projectiles, as compared to spherical or regularly shaped particles.
  • the particle size distributions described above have been found to provide the advantage of integrity of the projectile before and during firing and frangibility upon impact with a target media. While the relationship between particle size distribution and frangibility are not fully understood, it is believed to be a function of the mechanical interlocking of the particles after the cold compaction of the high and low ductility metal powders.
  • the preferred particle size distribution has been found to provide strength to the compacted composite projectiles of the present invention, and is thought to be one factor enabling the formation of unsintered projectiles of the present invention. By providing such increased robustness and strength, the preferred particle size distribution may provide one factor allowing simplified fabrication of the projectiles of the present invention, involving merely the cold compacting of the metal powders.
  • the projectiles of the present invention can be manufactured by a process wherein the high and low ductility metal powders of the desired particle sizes are admixed to provide a mixture with the desired ratio of metal powders and if desired, with a desired particle size distribution.
  • the high and low ductility metal powders can also preferably be mixed with one or more lubricants or a mixture of lubricants.
  • a lubricant aids in removing the projectiles from the mold after compaction is complete. If a lubricant is to be added, it can be added to either metal powder or the mixture of metal powders.
  • a preferred lubricant is zinc stearate, which can be used alone or in combination with other lubricants. Up to about 1.0% by weight of zinc stearate can be beneficially added to the mixture of high and low ductility metal powders prior to compaction. About 0.5% has been found to be particularly satisfactory.
  • the admixture is then placed in a die which is designed to provide the desired shape of the projectile.
  • a wide variety of projectiles can be made according to the present invention, including shot and bullets.
  • the invention is particularly beneficial in bullet manufacture, and especially those having a generally elongated configuration in which a leading end has a smaller circumference than a trailing end.
  • the mixture of high and low ductility metal powders is cold compacted at a pressure of about from 3447 to 8274 bar (50,000 to 120,000 psi), with a pressure of about 6895 bar (100,000 psi) being particularly preferred.
  • Compacting at a pressure of about 6895 bar (100,000 psi) provides the optimal combination of projectile integrity before and during firing and frangibility upon impact with a target.
  • the compaction step can be performed on any mechanical press capable of providing at least about 3447 bar (50,000 psi) pressure for a dwell time which can be infinitesimally small.
  • Presently available machinery operates with dwell times of about from 0.05 to 1.5 seconds.
  • a conventional rotary dial press is used.
  • a compaction ratio of about 1.8 to 2.3 is preferred. Compaction ratio is used herein in the common sense, meaning that the initial volume of power is compared to the volume of the compacted composite that can form a projectile of the present invention.
  • the process may be varied in terms of compaction time or pressure, or the process could further comprise heat treatment such as sintering.
  • a jacket can be formed around the projectile if so desired.
  • Some embodiments of the projectiles of the present invention do not require jackets.
  • the need to incorporate a jacket into the projectiles of the present invention will depend upon the specific mixture and composition of the metal powders used to fabricate the projectile.
  • a jacket may be preferred for a variety of reasons.
  • the jacket can isolate the powdered iron material of the projectile from a gun barrel, preventing erosion of the rifling of the gun barrel which might result from direct contact between the interior surface of the barrel and the powdered iron of the projectile.
  • the jacket also helps provide additional integrity of the projectile before and during firing as well as improving the ballistics of the projectile upon firing.
  • the jacket material can be selected from those customarily used in the art, for example, metal or polymeric material.
  • Metals which can be used include aluminum, copper, zinc and combinations thereof, with copper or brass being a preferred choice.
  • Polymeric materials which can be used include polyethylene and polycarbonate, with a low density polyethylene material being preferred.
  • the jacket can be applied by any number of conventional processes, including acid or cyanide electroplating, mechanical swaging, spray coating, and chemical adhesives.
  • the preferred method is electroplating.
  • a variety of electroplating techniques can be used in the instant invention, as will be evident to those in the plating art.
  • the projectiles are cleaned and sealed before the final plating.
  • the sealing can be with impregnating methacrylate and polyester solutions.
  • a vacuum impregnation is performed immediately after compaction and prior to electroplating.
  • This impregnation involves infusion of the formed projectile cores in methacrylate material in a large batch type operation.
  • the impregnation step reduces the porosity of the projectiles by filling voids at or near the surface of the projectiles. These voids can contain impurities which might cause corrosion and plate fouling.
  • the impregnation step also provides a barrier to prevent collection of plate bath chemicals in the recesses. Such collected chemicals could leach through the plating, discoloring and changing the dimensions of the bullet.
  • the projectiles After sealing the surface of the projectiles, they can be plated with jacketing material to deposit the desired thickness of plating metal on the projectiles.
  • Acid copper plating is preferably used, which is faster and more environmentally friendly than alternative techniques, such as cyanide copper plating.
  • the projectiles After jacketing, the projectiles can be sized using customary techniques and fabricated into cartridges.
  • the additional mass of the jacket aids in the functionality and reliability of the projectiles when used with semi-automatic and fully automatic firearms.
  • Such firearms require that a minimal impulse be delivered to the gun slide for operation, and the mass added by a jacket (approximately 5-10% increase) can provide enough mass for the use of the projectiles of the present invention with these firearms.
  • the projectiles of the present invention can have a variety of configurations, including shot and bullets, but are preferably formed into bullets for use with firearms.
  • the bullets can have noses of various profiles, including round nose, soft nose, or hollow point.
  • Either the bullet or the jacket, if so provided, can include a driving band which increases the accuracy of individual bullets and reduces the dispersion of multiple bullets.
  • the invention is further illustrated by the following specific examples, in which parts and percentages are by weight or volume, as indicated in the Tables.
  • the examples show various projectiles of the present invention, fabricated according to the process described herein.
  • the frangible projectiles can be made non frangible by heat treatment, for example, sintering.
  • representative projectiles for each of the group of examples were fabricated into 9mm and .223 caliber bullets, fired and evaluated.
  • frangible bullets are prepared from blends of high ductility metal powders, namely tin (Sn), and low ductility metal powders, namely iron (Fe), in the weight percentages indicated in Table I.
  • the theoretical density of each blend is determined, and is also reported in Table I. In each Example, the blend has a theoretical density of less than lead.
  • the high ductility metal powder has a particle size distribution of about 14% by weight of particles of about 45 ⁇ m, about 48% by weight of particles having a particle size of about 75 ⁇ m, about 28% by weight of particles having a particle size of about 105 ⁇ m, about 7% by weight of particles having a particle size of about 150 ⁇ m, and about 3% by weight of particles having a particle size of about 180 ⁇ m.
  • the low ductility metal powder has a particle size distribution of about 22% by weight of particles up to about 44 ⁇ m, about 68% by weight of particles having a particle size of about from 44 to 149 ⁇ m, and about 10% by weight of particles having a particle size of about from 149 to 250 ⁇ m.
  • the powders are intimately blended with 0.15 weight percent zinc stearate using apparatus conventionally used for the handling of metal powders.
  • the blends are cold compacted at a pressure of 6205 bar (90,000 psi) for 0.15 second on a rotary dial press.
  • the bullets are jacketed with copper by electroplating. The bullets are then loaded into cartridges, tested and evaluated, and provide excellent performance characteristics.
  • Examples 4-30 the general procedure of Examples 1-3 is repeated, using blends of zinc (Zn) and iron. The specific blends and their theoretical densities are reported in Tables II and III. The resulting bullets are loaded into cartridges and evaluated, and found to provide excellent performance characteristics.
  • Example 31-55 the general procedure of Example 1-3 is repeated, using blends of tin and iron. The specific blends and their theoretical densities are reported in Table IV. The resulting bullets are loaded into cartridges and evaluated, and found to provide excellent performance characteristics.
  • TABLE I Density Element A Sn 7,31 Element B Fe 7,61 Example VolA/VolB %Wt.A %Wt.B Wt A/ Wt B Th Dens (g/cm 3 ) 1 1.50 59.02% 40.98% 1.440 7,43 2 2.00 65.75% 34.25% 1.920 7,40 3 1.94 65.06% 34.94% 1.862 7,40 TABLE II Density Element A Zn 7,17 Element B Fe 7,61 Example VolA/VolB %Wt.A %Wt.B Wt A/ Wt B Th Dens (g/cm 3 ) 4 1.50 58.55% 41.45% 1.413 7,34 5 2.00 65.32% 34.68% 1.884 7,32 6 1.94 64.63% 35.37% 1.8

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Thermal Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
  • Powder Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Manufacture Of Metal Powder And Suspensions Thereof (AREA)
  • Manufacture And Refinement Of Metals (AREA)
  • Battery Electrode And Active Subsutance (AREA)
  • Organic Low-Molecular-Weight Compounds And Preparation Thereof (AREA)

Claims (8)

  1. Bleifreies Projektil mit einer verdichteten Beimischung von etwa einem Volumenteil Eisenpulver und etwa zwei Volumenteilen von mindestens einem Pulver, das aus Zinn, Zink und Legierungen und Gemischen davon ausgewählt ist, und wobei die verdichtete Beimischung eine Dichte von weniger als 70 % der theoretischen Dichte von Blei aufweist.
  2. Projektil nach Anspruch 1, wobei das Eisenpulver im Wesentlichen aus Teilchen von etwa 44 bis 250 Mikrometer besteht.
  3. Projektil nach Anspruch 1 wobei das mindestens eine Pulver, das aus Zinn, Zink und Legierungen und Gemischen davon ausgewählt ist, im Wesentlichen aus Teilchen von etwa 45 bis 180 Mikrometer besteht.
  4. Projektil nach Anspruch 1, wobei das Eisenpulver und das mindestens eine Pulver, das aus Zinn, Zink und Legierungen und Gemischen davon ausgewählt ist, im Wesentlichen aus Teilchen von etwa 44 bis 250 Mikrometer besteht.
  5. Projektil nach Anspruch 1 mit einer theoretischen Dichte von etwa 7,19 g/cm3 bis 7,75 g/cm3 (0,26 bis 0,28 lbm/Kubikinch).
  6. Bleifreies Projektil nach Anspruch 1, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass das Projektil zerbrechlich ist.
  7. Bleifreies Projektil nach Anspruch 1, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass das Projektil gesintert ist.
  8. Bleifreies Projektil nach Anspruch 1, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass das Projektil ungesintert ist.
EP01981408A 2000-10-06 2001-10-09 Bleifreie metallpulverprojektile Expired - Lifetime EP1330626B1 (de)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US684230 2000-10-06
US09/684,230 US6892647B1 (en) 1997-08-08 2000-10-06 Lead free powdered metal projectiles
PCT/US2001/031343 WO2002046689A1 (en) 2000-10-06 2001-10-09 Lead free powdered metal projectiles

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1330626A1 EP1330626A1 (de) 2003-07-30
EP1330626A4 EP1330626A4 (de) 2004-10-13
EP1330626B1 true EP1330626B1 (de) 2008-01-16

Family

ID=24747216

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP01981408A Expired - Lifetime EP1330626B1 (de) 2000-10-06 2001-10-09 Bleifreie metallpulverprojektile

Country Status (12)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1330626B1 (de)
KR (1) KR20030048426A (de)
CN (1) CN1479856A (de)
AT (1) ATE384240T1 (de)
AU (1) AU2002213051A1 (de)
BR (1) BR0114473A (de)
CA (1) CA2425118C (de)
DE (1) DE60132477T2 (de)
DK (1) DK1330626T3 (de)
IL (1) IL155190A0 (de)
MX (1) MXPA03003030A (de)
WO (1) WO2002046689A1 (de)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10260850B2 (en) * 2016-03-18 2019-04-16 Environ-Metal, Inc. Frangible firearm projectiles, methods for forming the same, and firearm cartridges containing the same

Family Cites Families (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CH6474A (de) * 1893-02-27 1893-08-15 Von Foerster Max Neues Geschoß
WO1996001407A1 (en) 1994-07-06 1996-01-18 Lockheed Martin Energy Systems, Inc. Non-lead, environmentally safe projectiles and method of making same
US6536352B1 (en) * 1996-07-11 2003-03-25 Delta Frangible Ammunition, Llc Lead-free frangible bullets and process for making same
US6074454A (en) * 1996-07-11 2000-06-13 Delta Frangible Ammunition, Llc Lead-free frangible bullets and process for making same
US5847313A (en) * 1997-01-30 1998-12-08 Cove Corporation Projectile for ammunition cartridge
US5917143A (en) * 1997-08-08 1999-06-29 Remington Arms Company, Inc. Frangible powdered iron projectiles
US6090178A (en) * 1998-04-22 2000-07-18 Sinterfire, Inc. Frangible metal bullets, ammunition and method of making such articles

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP1330626A1 (de) 2003-07-30
WO2002046689A1 (en) 2002-06-13
EP1330626A4 (de) 2004-10-13
BR0114473A (pt) 2004-01-13
AU2002213051A1 (en) 2002-06-18
CA2425118C (en) 2009-12-22
ATE384240T1 (de) 2008-02-15
DE60132477T2 (de) 2009-01-15
MXPA03003030A (es) 2003-06-24
KR20030048426A (ko) 2003-06-19
DE60132477D1 (de) 2008-03-06
DK1330626T3 (da) 2008-05-26
IL155190A0 (en) 2003-11-23
CA2425118A1 (en) 2002-06-13
CN1479856A (zh) 2004-03-03

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0946852B2 (de) Zerbrechliches geschoss aus eisenpulver
AU680460B2 (en) Lead-free bullet
US7217389B2 (en) Tungsten-containing articles and methods for forming the same
US7685942B1 (en) Frangible powdered iron projectiles
CA2194487C (en) Non-lead, environmentally safe projectiles and method of making same
US20030101891A1 (en) Jacketed bullet and methods of making the same
EP0873494A1 (de) Bleifreies auseinanderfallendes projektil
US6158351A (en) Ferromagnetic bullet
US20100043662A1 (en) Diffusion alloyed iron powder
US6892647B1 (en) Lead free powdered metal projectiles
EP1330626B1 (de) Bleifreie metallpulverprojektile
CA2202632A1 (en) Ferromagnetic bullet
CA2489770C (en) Lead-free bullet
KR20000070539A (ko) 파쇄성 분말상 철 발사체

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20030502

AK Designated contracting states

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL LT LV MK RO SI

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: STONE, JEFFREY, W.

A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

Effective date: 20040830

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20051026

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 60132477

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20080306

Kind code of ref document: P

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: TRGR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: T3

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080116

NLV1 Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080116

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080116

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080427

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080116

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080616

EN Fr: translation not filed
PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20081017

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081107

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20081031

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20081009

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080116

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20081009

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20081009

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20090921

Year of fee payment: 9

Ref country code: FI

Payment date: 20091029

Year of fee payment: 9

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: HK

Ref legal event code: WD

Ref document number: 1058229

Country of ref document: HK

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20081009

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080116

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080417

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Payment date: 20101026

Year of fee payment: 10

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20101027

Year of fee payment: 10

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20101009

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20101009

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: EBP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: EUG

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20111010

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20111031

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20151026

Year of fee payment: 15

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20151028

Year of fee payment: 15

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 60132477

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170503

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20161009