EP1329527A2 - High strength hot corrosion and oxidation resistant, directionally solidified nickel base superalloy and articles - Google Patents

High strength hot corrosion and oxidation resistant, directionally solidified nickel base superalloy and articles Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1329527A2
EP1329527A2 EP02258710A EP02258710A EP1329527A2 EP 1329527 A2 EP1329527 A2 EP 1329527A2 EP 02258710 A EP02258710 A EP 02258710A EP 02258710 A EP02258710 A EP 02258710A EP 1329527 A2 EP1329527 A2 EP 1329527A2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
article
articles
alloy
titanium
aluminum
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP02258710A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1329527A3 (en
EP1329527B1 (en
Inventor
Alan D. Cetel
Dilip M. Shah
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Raytheon Technologies Corp
Original Assignee
United Technologies Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=21815883&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP1329527(A2) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by United Technologies Corp filed Critical United Technologies Corp
Publication of EP1329527A2 publication Critical patent/EP1329527A2/en
Publication of EP1329527A3 publication Critical patent/EP1329527A3/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1329527B1 publication Critical patent/EP1329527B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Revoked legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C19/00Alloys based on nickel or cobalt
    • C22C19/03Alloys based on nickel or cobalt based on nickel
    • C22C19/05Alloys based on nickel or cobalt based on nickel with chromium
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C19/00Alloys based on nickel or cobalt
    • C22C19/03Alloys based on nickel or cobalt based on nickel
    • C22C19/05Alloys based on nickel or cobalt based on nickel with chromium
    • C22C19/051Alloys based on nickel or cobalt based on nickel with chromium and Mo or W
    • C22C19/056Alloys based on nickel or cobalt based on nickel with chromium and Mo or W with the maximum Cr content being at least 10% but less than 20%

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to the field of nickel base superalloys for use in directionally solidified articles, and more particularly to such alloys providing articles having good mechanical properties at elevated temperatures, good resistance to hot corrosion, and good oxidation resistance.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 3,619,182 describes a moderate strength superalloy, commercially known as IN 792, having purportedly superior corrosion resistance.
  • the alloy would have been cast to form an equiaxed (e.g., no indication of crystallographic orientation) article, e.g., for gas turbine engine components.
  • equiaxed e.g., no indication of crystallographic orientation
  • GTD-111 An alloy, commonly known as GTD-111 which has been cast in equiaxed and directionally solidified forms.
  • GTD-111 has a nominal composition, in weight percent, of: 14 Cr; 9.7 Co; 1.5 Mo; 3.8 W; 3 Ta; 3 Al; 0.10 C; 5 Ti; 0.02 B; 0.04 Zr, bal. Ni. See, e.g., Schiike, et el. "Advanced Materials Propel Progress in Land-Based Gas Turbines", Advanced Materials and Processes, April 1992; see also, U.K.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 3,615,376 is directed to an alloy with a claimed composition, in weight percent, of: 0.15 - 0.3 C (described as more than is required for de-oxidation and sufficient to form grain boundary carbides); 13 - 15.6 Cr; 5 - 15 Co; 2.5 - 5 Mo; 3 - 6 W; 4 - 6 Ti; 2 - 4 Al; 0.005 - 0.02 Zr; balance Ni and incidental impurities; and also requires that Ti/Al be 1:1 - 3:1; Ti + Al between 7.5 - 9; Mo + 0.5W between 5 - 7; with a substantial absence of sigma phase and a stress rupture life of at least 25 hours at 27.5 ksi (190 Pa) at 1800°F (982°C).
  • a directionally solidified version of this alloy may also include a significant, intentionally added amount of Hf, e.g. up to or over 0.5 wt. %. It has been our experience generally that when adapting an alloy for columnar grain use, significant amounts of Hf must be added to an alloy, whether the starting alloy is equiaxed or single crystal, in order to provide critical properties, such as acceptable transverse ductility and to prevent hot tearing during casting, required for uses such as gas turbine engine components.
  • alloy disclosed in commonly owned U.S. Pat. No. 4,597,809 arose from an investigation of the effects of the minor elements carbon, boron, zirconium and hafnium on the properties of certain commercial alloys in single crystal form (the major function of these minor elements appeared to involve grain boundary strengthening). It was previously determined that fabrication of alloy IN 792 (originally in equiaxed form) as altered in the '182 patent in single crystal form - but without grain boundary strengtheners - provided substantial and unexpected benefits in mechanical properties. The single crystal IN 792 articles evaluated had no intentional additions of carbon, boron, zirconium or hafnium. In the course of the investigation of the effects of the minor elements on IN 792, it was observed that adding small amounts of carbon, i.e.
  • 0.10 wt. % to IN 792 single crystals substantially improved the hot corrosion resistance but at the same time substantially reduced the mechanical properties of the material.
  • the improvement of the hot corrosion resistance was completely unexpected and was not understood.
  • additions of tantalum were made to the basic IN 792 composition in coordination with the added carbon and it was found that when the added tantalum and carbon contents were balanced (to tie up the carbon as tantalum carbide) a good combination of improved mechanical properties and improved corrosion resistance resulted.
  • Single crystal articles are in many cases more difficult and expensive to produce, relative to their columnar grain counterparts, especially as component size increases. Moreover, where relatively large articles are to be produced, e.g., for land based gas turbine applications, the difficulty and expense can increase substantially.
  • hafnium, carbon, boron and zirconium are typically added to the single crystal or equiaxed composition for the purpose of improving properties, such as transverse creep strength and/or ductility.
  • adding hafnium, even in small amounts such as 0.5 - 2 wt. % has several undesirable consequences including increased segregation banding, which can significantly reduce castability of the alloy.
  • hafnium promotes increased eutectic ⁇ / ⁇ ' formation.
  • Hafnium also lowers the incipient melting temperature of the alloy, thereby reducing the temperature range or window available for a solution heat treatment of the alloy. Since achieving good creep strength typically requires subjecting the part to a suitable solution heat treatment, the reduced window makes it more difficult - in some cases not possible - to provide a suitable solution heat treatment. This problem is exacerbated with larger articles, such as land based gas turbine components where segregation becomes worse. Adding hafnium also increases density of the alloy, increasing the weight of parts fabricated from the alloy, and also can reduce the microstructural stability of the alloy.
  • a directionally solidified article comprising a high strength, corrosion and oxidation resistant nickel base superalloy which comprises a matrix and from about 0.4 to 1.5 vol. % of a phase based on tantalum carbide, the alloy consisting substantially of, in weight percent, of: 10 - 13.5% chromium; 8 - 10% cobalt; 1.25 - 2.5% molybdenum; 3.25 - 4.25% tungsten; 4.5 - 6% tantalum; 3.25 - 4.5% aluminum; 3 - 4.75% titanium; 0.0025 - 0.025% boron; up to about 0.05% zirconium; 0.05 - 0.15% carbon; and having no intentional addition of niobium; no intentional addition of hafnium; and balance essentially nickel; wherein aluminum + titanium is between about 6.5 - 8%.
  • Alloys for columnar grain directionally solidified articles are disclosed which have at least comparable oxidation resistance relative to single crystal counterparts, and corrosion resistance at least comparable to such alloys. Moreover the inventive alloys have oxidation resistance at least equal to equiaxed counterparts, and at least equal corrosion resistance. In many instances, the alloys of the present invention provide articles in columnar grain directionally solidified form with superior oxidation resistance than comparable articles and alloys in equiaxed or single crystal form.
  • the inventive alloys comprise a matrix with a general composition, in weight percent, of 10 - 14.5% chromium; 8 - 10% cobalt; 1.25 - 2.5% molybdenum; 3.25 - 4.25% tungsten; 4.5 - 6% tantalum; 3.25 - 4.5% aluminum; 3 - 5% titanium; 0.0025 - 0.025% boron; up to about 0.02% zirconium (no intentional additions); 0.05 - 0.15% carbon; and having no intentional addition of niobium; no intentional addition of hafnium; and balance essentially nickel; wherein aluminum + titanium is between about 6.5 - 8%.
  • the alloy also includes roughly about 0.4 to 1.5 vol. % of a phase based on tantalum carbide.
  • the alloy exhibits oxidation resistance at 2000°F (1093°C) of at least roughly 2.5X, creep rupture life at 1400°F (760°C) of at least roughly 2.4X and at 1800°F (982°C) of at least roughly 1.5X compared to a similar article having a nominal composition of 14 Cr, 4.9 Ti, 1.5 Mo, 3.8 W, 2.8 Ta, 3 Al, 9.5 Co, 0.01 B, 0.02 Zr, 0.1 C, and balance Ni.
  • the invention composition may be cast in columnar grain, directionally-solidified (or single crystal) form according to the teachings of various prior patents as is known in the art.
  • the grains of the casting will have an orientation parallel to the principal stress axis of the component, e.g., ⁇ 100> although deviations may be tolerated.
  • the articles can include high angles boundaries of up to and in excess of 20°.
  • the present composition after being cast in directionally solidified form can be heat treated in order to improve the mechanical properties of the alloy by controlling the gamma prime particle size in accordance, e.g., with the teachings of U.S. Pat. No. 4,116,723 which is also expressly incorporated herein by reference.
  • such articles as cast may have adequate creep strength (depending upon their intended use) such that solution heat treatment is unnecessary.
  • the present invention is based on altering the chemistry originally adapted for use in single crystal articles, e.g., commonly owned U.S. Pat. No. 4,597,809, which is expressly incorporated by reference herein, into an alloy that is particularly useful in the production of columnar grain articles - although we believe that the alloy of the present invention may also be useful in the production of single crystal articles also.
  • cast articles in accordance with the present invention are characterized by good hot corrosion resistance, good oxidation resistance, and good longitudinal and transverse creep-rupture properties.
  • GTD-111 e.g., GB Pat. No.
  • 1,511,652 which is used in equiaxed and columnar grain forms, and has a nominal composition in weight percent of 14 Cr, 4.9 Ti, 1.5 Mo, 3.8 W, 2.8 Ta, 3 Al, 9.5 Co, 0.01 B, ⁇ 0.02 Zr, ⁇ 0.05 C, and balance Ni.
  • beneficial and different properties may be achieved, among other things, by altering the composition of the single crystal '809 alloy by significantly increasing the carbon and boron levels (and allowing a maximum amount of zirconium in the alloy) on one hand, or by altering the nominal content of the equiaxed/columnar grain -111 alloy by significantly increasing tantalum, aluminum, molybdenum and boron contents, and significantly decreasing the titanium and chromium contents on the other hand (e.g., the '562 patent teaches among other things high chromium (above 13.7 wt. %); relatively higher cobalt (over 9.5 wt. %); that more than 0.02% zirconium is acceptable; and that tantalum over 3 - 3.5 wt. % will cause unacceptable microstructural instability). This is particularly true in the case of columnar grain articles, together with close control of the overall composition.
  • the generally preferred composition of the present invention consists substantially of, in weight percent, about 10 - 14.5% (preferably 10 - 13.5%) chromium; 8 - 10% cobalt; 1.25 - 2.5% molybdenum; 3.25 - 4.25% tungsten; 4.5 - 6% tantalum; 3.25 - 4.5% aluminum; 3 - 5% (preferably 3 - 4.75%) titanium; 0.0025 - 0.025% boron; up to about 0.02% zirconium; 0.05 - 0.15% carbon; and having no intentional addition of niobium; no intentional addition of hafnium; and balance essentially nickel; wherein aluminum + titanium is between about 6.5 - 8%.
  • the alloy also includes roughly about 0.4 to 1.5 vol.
  • the alloy comprises about 11 - 13% chromium; 8.25 - 9.75% cobalt; 1.5 - 2.25% molybdenum; 3.4 - 4.3% tungsten; 4.7 - 5.5% tantalum; 3.3 - 4% aluminum; 3.75 - 4.3% titanium; 0.008 - 0.025% boron; up to about 0.02% zirconium; 0.08 - 0.13 carbon; wherein aluminum + titanium is between about 7 - 8%.
  • the alloy comprises about 12% chromium; 9% cobalt; 1.9% molybdenum; 3.8% tungsten; 5% tantalum; 3.6% aluminum; 4.1% titanium; 0.015% boron; less than 0.02% zirconium; 0.10% carbon; and having no intentional addition of zirconium (and in any event less than about 0.02 Zr) and no intentional addition of niobium; no intentional addition of hafnium; balance essentially nickel.
  • the inventive composition includes no intentional additions of zirconium, and whether or not it is practical to tolerate about up to about 0.02 wt. %, we prefer less.
  • Mod A number of modifications (“Mod") were prepared by investment casting columnar grain articles, and were evaluated as described below. Some of the compositions (all in wt. %) are outside of the preferred ranges invention, but are still encompassed by the invention. Overall, the composition of Mod 4 is the preferred composition of the six listed below, but the other Mods and other compositions within the inventive ranges are also useful. In each case, the balance of the composition comprises nickel and small amounts of incidental impurities. For example, we have optimized the alloy for castability, without debiting other properties, by increasing carbon to about 0.08 wt. % and increasing boron to about 0.015 wt. %. The optimization effport was brought about, in part, by siginificant hot tearing during casting of large parts.
  • FIG. 2 shows the relative hot corrosion resistance of the inventive alloy compared to other alloys, including the -111 alloy. Corrosion testing was performed at 1650°F (899°C) in a corrosion gaseous environment produced by combustion of Jet A fuel (30:1 air fuel ratio) with addition of 20 ppm of ASTM sea salt and sufficient sulfur dioxide to produce a sulfur content equivalent to a 1.3% S content in the fuel. The numbers presented are the hours of exposure required to produce 1 mil (25 ⁇ m) of corrosive attack. As seen in the FIG., the inventive alloy exhibits corrosion resistance comparable to GTD-111 and significantly better than single crystal alloys of similar compositions, see, commonly owned U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,209,348 and 4,719,080 both of which are expressly incorporated by reference herein.
  • FIG. 3 shows the relative uncoated, burner rig oxidation resistance of several Mods of the inventive alloy at 2000°F (1093°C) and several other alloys. While the oxidation resistance exceeds the oxidation resistance of GTD-111, Mod 4 is significantly higher (at least 2.5X) and similar to the oxidation resistance of the single crystal alloy of the '809 patent.
  • the increase in aluminum content and decrease in titanium content if the inventive alloy over GTD-111 is largely responsible for the inventive alloy's greater oxidation resistance.
  • Transverse creep rupture ductility was also tested for several Mods, as shown in FIG. 7. Minimum elongation at rupture (see FIG. 4) was at least about 5%. Such transverse ductility would be expected to provide a material that is more resistant to the formation of casting cracks.
  • the present invention is either based on a modification of a published composition for a prior art columnar grain article, or of a published composition for a prior art single crystal article.
  • the present invention includes among other things significantly increasing tantalum, aluminum and molybdenum contents, and significantly decreasing the titanium and chromium contents.
  • the present invention includes among other things discreet amounts of boron and carbon while controlling the presence of zirconium (each of which are explicitly kept out of the prior art alloy).
  • the inventive alloy and articles fabricated from the alloy exhibit a good combination of oxidation resistance, corrosion resistance and creep-rupture resistance at various temperatures.

Abstract

Corrosion and oxidation resistant, high strength, directionally solidified superalloy alloys and articles are described. The articles have a nominal composition in weight percent of about 12% Cr, 9% Co, 1.9% Mo, 3.8% W, 5% Ta, 3.6% Al, 4.1% Ti, 0.015% B, 0.1 % C, up to about 0.02 Zr, balance essentially nickel, and include no intentional additions of hafnium or zirconium, and also have a small amounts of tantalum carbide. The resultant articles have good hot corrosion resistance and superior oxidation resistance and creep properties. The articles are preferably columnar grain, but may also be single crystal.

Description

  • The present invention relates to the field of nickel base superalloys for use in directionally solidified articles, and more particularly to such alloys providing articles having good mechanical properties at elevated temperatures, good resistance to hot corrosion, and good oxidation resistance.
  • The increasing demands for efficiency in gas turbine engines have resulted in a demand for materials capable of withstanding more severe operating conditions. In particular, good strength is required for certain applications along with the resistance to hot corrosion, oxidation and creep.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 3,619,182 describes a moderate strength superalloy, commercially known as IN 792, having purportedly superior corrosion resistance. The '182 patent describes an alloy having a composition, in weight percent, of: 9.5 - 14 Cr; 7 - 11 Co; 1 - 2.5 Mo; 3 - 4 W; 1 - 4 Ta; up to 1 Cb; 3 - 4 Al; 3 - 5 Ti; Al + Ti = 6.5 - 8; 0.005 - 0.05 B; 0.01 - 0.25 Zr; 0.02 - 0.25 C; bal. Ni. At the time the '182 application was filed, the alloy would have been cast to form an equiaxed (e.g., no indication of crystallographic orientation) article, e.g., for gas turbine engine components. The '182 patent is expressly incorporated herein by reference.
  • An alloy, commonly known as GTD-111 which has been cast in equiaxed and directionally solidified forms. In equiaxed castings, GTD-111 has a nominal composition, in weight percent, of: 14 Cr; 9.7 Co; 1.5 Mo; 3.8 W; 3 Ta; 3 Al; 0.10 C; 5 Ti; 0.02 B; 0.04 Zr, bal. Ni. See, e.g., Schiike, et el. "Advanced Materials Propel Progress in Land-Based Gas Turbines", Advanced Materials and Processes, April 1992; see also, U.K. Patent GB 1,511,562 (13.7 - 14.3 Cr; 9 - 10 Co; 1 - 1.5 Mo; 4.8 - 5.5 Ti; 2.8 - 3.2 Al; 3.7 - 4.3 W; 1 - 1.5 Nb; 2.5 - 3 Ta; 2.8 - 3.2 Al; 0.08 - 0.2 C; 4.8 - 5.5 Ti; 0.01 - 0.02 B; 0.02 - 0.1 Zr; and either 1.5 - 3.5 mixture of Ta, Cb and Hf, or 2.5 - 3 Ta or 2 - 2.5 Hf or 1 - 1.5 Cb [or Ta + Cb + Hf = 1.5 - 3.5]; and consisting of a matrix and a monocarbide phase distributed through the matrix consisting of: Ti, Mo, W and/or Ta and/or Cb and/or Hf in proportions such that the total of Mo and W is less than 15 weight percent of the carbide phase). In directionally solidified castings, the nominal composition is similar except for slightly lower amounts of zirconium. See, G.K. Bouse, "Eta (η) and Platelet Phases in Investment Cast Superalloys", presented at Superalloys 1996, Seven Springs, PA.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 3,615,376 is directed to an alloy with a claimed composition, in weight percent, of: 0.15 - 0.3 C (described as more than is required for de-oxidation and sufficient to form grain boundary carbides); 13 - 15.6 Cr; 5 - 15 Co; 2.5 - 5 Mo; 3 - 6 W; 4 - 6 Ti; 2 - 4 Al; 0.005 - 0.02 Zr; balance Ni and incidental impurities; and also requires that Ti/Al be 1:1 - 3:1; Ti + Al between 7.5 - 9; Mo + 0.5W between 5 - 7; with a substantial absence of sigma phase and a stress rupture life of at least 25 hours at 27.5 ksi (190 Pa) at 1800°F (982°C). A directionally solidified version of this alloy may also include a significant, intentionally added amount of Hf, e.g. up to or over 0.5 wt. %. It has been our experience generally that when adapting an alloy for columnar grain use, significant amounts of Hf must be added to an alloy, whether the starting alloy is equiaxed or single crystal, in order to provide critical properties, such as acceptable transverse ductility and to prevent hot tearing during casting, required for uses such as gas turbine engine components.
  • The alloy disclosed in commonly owned U.S. Pat. No. 4,597,809 arose from an investigation of the effects of the minor elements carbon, boron, zirconium and hafnium on the properties of certain commercial alloys in single crystal form (the major function of these minor elements appeared to involve grain boundary strengthening). It was previously determined that fabrication of alloy IN 792 (originally in equiaxed form) as altered in the '182 patent in single crystal form - but without grain boundary strengtheners - provided substantial and unexpected benefits in mechanical properties. The single crystal IN 792 articles evaluated had no intentional additions of carbon, boron, zirconium or hafnium. In the course of the investigation of the effects of the minor elements on IN 792, it was observed that adding small amounts of carbon, i.e. 0.10 wt. % to IN 792 single crystals substantially improved the hot corrosion resistance but at the same time substantially reduced the mechanical properties of the material. The improvement of the hot corrosion resistance was completely unexpected and was not understood. As a further step in the investigation, additions of tantalum were made to the basic IN 792 composition in coordination with the added carbon and it was found that when the added tantalum and carbon contents were balanced (to tie up the carbon as tantalum carbide) a good combination of improved mechanical properties and improved corrosion resistance resulted.
  • Single crystal articles are in many cases more difficult and expensive to produce, relative to their columnar grain counterparts, especially as component size increases. Moreover, where relatively large articles are to be produced, e.g., for land based gas turbine applications, the difficulty and expense can increase substantially.
  • As noted above, when adapting an alloy originally designed for use in single crystal articles for use in columnar grain directionally solidified applications, or adapting an alloy originally designed for use in equiaxed form for use as columnar grain directionally solidified applications, certain compositional changes are typically warranted to increase grain boundary strength and ductility. For example, hafnium, carbon, boron and zirconium are typically added to the single crystal or equiaxed composition for the purpose of improving properties, such as transverse creep strength and/or ductility. However, adding hafnium, even in small amounts such as 0.5 - 2 wt. % has several undesirable consequences including increased segregation banding, which can significantly reduce castability of the alloy. In addition, hafnium promotes increased eutectic γ/γ' formation.
  • Hafnium also lowers the incipient melting temperature of the alloy, thereby reducing the temperature range or window available for a solution heat treatment of the alloy. Since achieving good creep strength typically requires subjecting the part to a suitable solution heat treatment, the reduced window makes it more difficult - in some cases not possible - to provide a suitable solution heat treatment. This problem is exacerbated with larger articles, such as land based gas turbine components where segregation becomes worse. Adding hafnium also increases density of the alloy, increasing the weight of parts fabricated from the alloy, and also can reduce the microstructural stability of the alloy.
  • It would be desirable to provide a material for the fabrication of columnar grain articles, and to provide such articles, which have adequate strength relative to comparable articles in single crystal form, and which also demonstrate at least comparable oxidation and corrosion resistance.
  • It would also be desirable to provide the benefits of an alloy composition adapted for use as in columnar grain directionally-solidified parts while maintaining the benefits of the alloy as adapted for use in single crystal articles.
  • It would likewise be desirable to provide such an alloy which provides oxidation resistance in columnar grain form at least comparable to that in single crystal form.
  • It would be further desirable to provide such an alloy that provides adequate transverse ductility without the addition of hafnium.
  • It would be yet further desirable to provide such an alloy which does not require a solution heat treatment in order to achieve adequate creep strength.
  • According to the present invention, there is provided a directionally solidified article comprising a high strength, corrosion and oxidation resistant nickel base superalloy which comprises a matrix and from about 0.4 to 1.5 vol. % of a phase based on tantalum carbide, the alloy consisting substantially of, in weight percent, of: 10 - 13.5% chromium; 8 - 10% cobalt; 1.25 - 2.5% molybdenum; 3.25 - 4.25% tungsten; 4.5 - 6% tantalum; 3.25 - 4.5% aluminum; 3 - 4.75% titanium; 0.0025 - 0.025% boron; up to about 0.05% zirconium; 0.05 - 0.15% carbon; and having no intentional addition of niobium; no intentional addition of hafnium; and balance essentially nickel; wherein aluminum + titanium is between about 6.5 - 8%.
  • Alloys for columnar grain directionally solidified articles are disclosed which have at least comparable oxidation resistance relative to single crystal counterparts, and corrosion resistance at least comparable to such alloys. Moreover the inventive alloys have oxidation resistance at least equal to equiaxed counterparts, and at least equal corrosion resistance. In many instances, the alloys of the present invention provide articles in columnar grain directionally solidified form with superior oxidation resistance than comparable articles and alloys in equiaxed or single crystal form.
  • The inventive alloys comprise a matrix with a general composition, in weight percent, of 10 - 14.5% chromium; 8 - 10% cobalt; 1.25 - 2.5% molybdenum; 3.25 - 4.25% tungsten; 4.5 - 6% tantalum; 3.25 - 4.5% aluminum; 3 - 5% titanium; 0.0025 - 0.025% boron; up to about 0.02% zirconium (no intentional additions); 0.05 - 0.15% carbon; and having no intentional addition of niobium; no intentional addition of hafnium; and balance essentially nickel; wherein aluminum + titanium is between about 6.5 - 8%. The alloy also includes roughly about 0.4 to 1.5 vol. % of a phase based on tantalum carbide.
  • In columnar grain form, the alloy exhibits oxidation resistance at 2000°F (1093°C) of at least roughly 2.5X, creep rupture life at 1400°F (760°C) of at least roughly 2.4X and at 1800°F (982°C) of at least roughly 1.5X compared to a similar article having a nominal composition of 14 Cr, 4.9 Ti, 1.5 Mo, 3.8 W, 2.8 Ta, 3 Al, 9.5 Co, 0.01 B, 0.02 Zr, 0.1 C, and balance Ni.
  • The invention composition may be cast in columnar grain, directionally-solidified (or single crystal) form according to the teachings of various prior patents as is known in the art. Typically the grains of the casting will have an orientation parallel to the principal stress axis of the component, e.g., <100> although deviations may be tolerated. In the case of single crystal article, we believe that the articles can include high angles boundaries of up to and in excess of 20°. Where needed, the present composition after being cast in directionally solidified form can be heat treated in order to improve the mechanical properties of the alloy by controlling the gamma prime particle size in accordance, e.g., with the teachings of U.S. Pat. No. 4,116,723 which is also expressly incorporated herein by reference. However, such articles as cast may have adequate creep strength (depending upon their intended use) such that solution heat treatment is unnecessary.
  • Certain preferred embodiments of the present invention will now be described in greater detail by way of example only and with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
  • FIG. 1 is a graph illustrating preferred amounts of carbon and boron in accordance with the present invention;
  • FIG. 2 is a graph illustrating the relative hot corrosion resistance of an embodiment of the inventive alloy;
  • FIG. 3 is a graph illustrating the relative oxidation resistance of an embodiment of the inventive alloy;
  • FIGS. 4, 5 and 6 are graphs illustrating the creep rupture life of several variations of the inventive alloy; and
  • FIG. 7 is a graph illustrating transverse creep ductility of an embodiment of the inventive alloy.
  • The present invention is based on altering the chemistry originally adapted for use in single crystal articles, e.g., commonly owned U.S. Pat. No. 4,597,809, which is expressly incorporated by reference herein, into an alloy that is particularly useful in the production of columnar grain articles - although we believe that the alloy of the present invention may also be useful in the production of single crystal articles also. In columnar grain form, cast articles in accordance with the present invention are characterized by good hot corrosion resistance, good oxidation resistance, and good longitudinal and transverse creep-rupture properties. We also considered the composition of an alloy generally designated "GTD-111", see, e.g., GB Pat. No. 1,511,652, which is used in equiaxed and columnar grain forms, and has a nominal composition in weight percent of 14 Cr, 4.9 Ti, 1.5 Mo, 3.8 W, 2.8 Ta, 3 Al, 9.5 Co, 0.01 B, ∼0.02 Zr, ∼0.05 C, and balance Ni. We believe that beneficial and different properties may be achieved, among other things, by altering the composition of the single crystal '809 alloy by significantly increasing the carbon and boron levels (and allowing a maximum amount of zirconium in the alloy) on one hand, or by altering the nominal content of the equiaxed/columnar grain -111 alloy by significantly increasing tantalum, aluminum, molybdenum and boron contents, and significantly decreasing the titanium and chromium contents on the other hand (e.g., the '562 patent teaches among other things high chromium (above 13.7 wt. %); relatively higher cobalt (over 9.5 wt. %); that more than 0.02% zirconium is acceptable; and that tantalum over 3 - 3.5 wt. % will cause unacceptable microstructural instability). This is particularly true in the case of columnar grain articles, together with close control of the overall composition.
  • The generally preferred composition of the present invention consists substantially of, in weight percent, about 10 - 14.5% (preferably 10 - 13.5%) chromium; 8 - 10% cobalt; 1.25 - 2.5% molybdenum; 3.25 - 4.25% tungsten; 4.5 - 6% tantalum; 3.25 - 4.5% aluminum; 3 - 5% (preferably 3 - 4.75%) titanium; 0.0025 - 0.025% boron; up to about 0.02% zirconium; 0.05 - 0.15% carbon; and having no intentional addition of niobium; no intentional addition of hafnium; and balance essentially nickel; wherein aluminum + titanium is between about 6.5 - 8%. The alloy also includes roughly about 0.4 to 1.5 vol. % of a phase based on tantalum carbide. More preferably, the alloy comprises about 11 - 13% chromium; 8.25 - 9.75% cobalt; 1.5 - 2.25% molybdenum; 3.4 - 4.3% tungsten; 4.7 - 5.5% tantalum; 3.3 - 4% aluminum; 3.75 - 4.3% titanium; 0.008 - 0.025% boron; up to about 0.02% zirconium; 0.08 - 0.13 carbon; wherein aluminum + titanium is between about 7 - 8%. Most preferably, the alloy comprises about 12% chromium; 9% cobalt; 1.9% molybdenum; 3.8% tungsten; 5% tantalum; 3.6% aluminum; 4.1% titanium; 0.015% boron; less than 0.02% zirconium; 0.10% carbon; and having no intentional addition of zirconium (and in any event less than about 0.02 Zr) and no intentional addition of niobium; no intentional addition of hafnium; balance essentially nickel.
  • We discovered that even small additions of zirconium detrimentally affected the castability of part, particularly large parts such as land based gas turbine engine blades. Articles having more than about 0.02 wt. % zirconium tended to tear after on investment casting, during cooling and solidification of the molten material. While not fully understood, the tearing problem was obviated where zirconium was present in less than about 0.02 wt. percent. Accordingly, the inventive composition includes no intentional additions of zirconium, and whether or not it is practical to tolerate about up to about 0.02 wt. %, we prefer less. In an effort to improve the tearing problem, we tried several compositions, including intentional additions of up to about 1.0 weight % hafnium which did not obviate the problem, and would be expected to increase the weight of the alloy and decrease the incipient melting temperature of the alloy. Such a result would also restrict the available temperature window for solution heat treatment of articles, particularly larger articles such as land based gas turbine components. Accordingly, we prefer that the alloy and articles also include no intentional addition of hafnium.
  • A number of modifications ("Mod") were prepared by investment casting columnar grain articles, and were evaluated as described below. Some of the compositions (all in wt. %) are outside of the preferred ranges invention, but are still encompassed by the invention. Overall, the composition of Mod 4 is the preferred composition of the six listed below, but the other Mods and other compositions within the inventive ranges are also useful. In each case, the balance of the composition comprises nickel and small amounts of incidental impurities. For example, we have optimized the alloy for castability, without debiting other properties, by increasing carbon to about 0.08 wt. % and increasing boron to about 0.015 wt. %. The optimization effport was brought about, in part, by siginificant hot tearing during casting of large parts. The tearing was reduced and eliminated as carbon levels were raised up to at least about 0.08 wt. %. We were surprised that the tearing problem was largely eliminated at the carbon levels were raised from about 0.07 to 0.08 w. %.
    Alloy Cr Ti Mo W Ta Al Co B Zr C Ht
    GTD
    111 14 4.9 1.5 3.8 2.8 3 9.5 0.01 0.02 0.1 0
    4,597,809 12.2 4.2 1.9 3.8 5 3.6 9 0 0 0.07 U
    Mod1 11.56 4.03 1.84 3.75 5.1 3.55 8.9 0.005 0.014 0.07 0.49
    Mod2 11.68 4.04 1.83 3.72 4.96 3.58 8.86 0.005 0.015 0.06 0.88
    Mod3 12.25 4.01 1.83 3.69 5.01 3.5 8.82 0.018 0.091 0.11 0.48
    Mod4 11.94 4.03 1.84 3.75 5.15 3.55 8.93 0.008 0.02 0.06 0.01
    Mod5 11.61 4.05 1.84 3.74 5.29 3.57 8.89 0.008 0.032 0.07 0.49
    Mod6 11.9 4 1.82 3.7 4.93 3.52 8.79 0.019 0.103 0.12 0.94
    The articles to be evaluated were investment cast, and then given similar heat treatments - a solution heat treat at about 2050°F (1121°C) for 2 hours, followed by precipitation heat treat at 1975°F (1080°C) for 4 hours, followed by stabilization heat treat at about 1550°F (843°) for 24 hours. In some cases, articles were solution heat treated at 2150 - 2200°F (1177 - 1205°C) for less time, but showed no significant increase in properties.
  • FIG. 2 shows the relative hot corrosion resistance of the inventive alloy compared to other alloys, including the -111 alloy. Corrosion testing was performed at 1650°F (899°C) in a corrosion gaseous environment produced by combustion of Jet A fuel (30:1 air fuel ratio) with addition of 20 ppm of ASTM sea salt and sufficient sulfur dioxide to produce a sulfur content equivalent to a 1.3% S content in the fuel. The numbers presented are the hours of exposure required to produce 1 mil (25 µm) of corrosive attack. As seen in the FIG., the inventive alloy exhibits corrosion resistance comparable to GTD-111 and significantly better than single crystal alloys of similar compositions, see, commonly owned U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,209,348 and 4,719,080 both of which are expressly incorporated by reference herein.
  • FIG. 3 shows the relative uncoated, burner rig oxidation resistance of several Mods of the inventive alloy at 2000°F (1093°C) and several other alloys. While the oxidation resistance exceeds the oxidation resistance of GTD-111, Mod 4 is significantly higher (at least 2.5X) and similar to the oxidation resistance of the single crystal alloy of the '809 patent. The increase in aluminum content and decrease in titanium content if the inventive alloy over GTD-111 is largely responsible for the inventive alloy's greater oxidation resistance.
  • The time to produce 1% creep was tested (in many cases both transverse and longitudinal) in specimens at 1400°F (760°C) with an applied stress of 85 ksi (586 Pa) and at 1800°F (982°C) with an applied stress of 27 ksi (189 Pa). The results are illustrated in FIGS. 4, 5 and 6. Again, the inventive alloy exhibited creep rupture lives exceeding the -111 alloy.
  • Transverse creep rupture ductility was also tested for several Mods, as shown in FIG. 7. Minimum elongation at rupture (see FIG. 4) was at least about 5%. Such transverse ductility would be expected to provide a material that is more resistant to the formation of casting cracks.
  • In sum, the present invention is either based on a modification of a published composition for a prior art columnar grain article, or of a published composition for a prior art single crystal article. Using the prior art columnar grain article, the present invention includes among other things significantly increasing tantalum, aluminum and molybdenum contents, and significantly decreasing the titanium and chromium contents. Using the prior art single crystal article, the present invention includes among other things discreet amounts of boron and carbon while controlling the presence of zirconium (each of which are explicitly kept out of the prior art alloy). In any event, the inventive alloy and articles fabricated from the alloy exhibit a good combination of oxidation resistance, corrosion resistance and creep-rupture resistance at various temperatures.
  • It should be understood that the invention is not limited to the particular embodiments shown and described herein, but that various changes and modifications may be made without departing from the scope of this novel concept as defined by the following claims.

Claims (14)

  1. A directionally solidified article comprising a high strength, corrosion and oxidation resistant nickel base superalloy which comprises a matrix and from about 0.4 to 1.5 vol. % of a phase based on tantalum carbide, the alloy consisting substantially of, in weight percent, of: 10 - 13.5% chromium; 8 - 10% cobalt; 1.25 - 2.5% molybdenum; 3.25 - 4.25% tungsten; 4.5 - 6% tantalum; 3.25 - 4.5% aluminum; 3 - 4.75% titanium; 0.0025 - 0.025% boron; up to about 0.05% zirconium; 0.05 - 0.15% carbon; and having no intentional addition of niobium; no intentional addition of hafnium; and balance essentially nickel; wherein aluminum + titanium is between about 6.5 - 8%; said article having at least comparable hot corrosion resistance (measured at 1600°F (871°C)) and at least twice the oxidation resistance (measured at 2000°F (1093°C)) when compared with a directionally solidified having a nominal composition of 14 Cr, 4.9 Ti, 1.5 Mo, 3.8 W, 2.8 Ta, 3 Al, 9.5 Co, 0.01 B, 0.02 Zr, 0.1 C, and balance Ni.
  2. The article of claim 1, wherein the article comprises a columnar grain, directionally solidified article.
  3. The article of claim 2, wherein the article has transverse ductility in excess of 5% at 1400°F (760°C) and at 1800°F (982°C).
  4. The article of claim 1, wherein the article comprises a single crystal article including a high angle boundary of up to at least about 20°.
  5. The article of any preceding claim having stress rupture resistance sufficient to ensure that a load of about 27 ksi (186 Pa) applied ruptures only after more than 45 hours, and also has a time to 1% creep of more than 15 hours, at 1800°F (982°C).
  6. The article of claim 5, wherein stress rupture occurs only after more than 85 hours.
  7. The article of any preceding claim, having 11 - 13% chromium; 8.25 - 9.75% cobalt; 1.5 - 2.25% molybdenum; 3.4 - 4.3% tungsten; 4.7 - 5.5% tantalum; 3.3 - 4% aluminum; 3.75 - 4.3% titanium; 0.008 - 0.025% boron; up to about 0.04% zirconium; 0.04 - 0.15 carbon; wherein aluminum + titanium is between about 7 - 8%.
  8. The article of claim 7, having about 12% chromium; 9% cobalt; 1.9% molybdenum; 3.8% tungsten; 5% tantalum; 3.6% aluminum; 4.1% titanium; 0.015% boron; 0.10% carbon; up to about 0.02 Zr and having no intentional addition of niobium; no intentional addition of hafnium; balance essentially nickel.
  9. The article of any preceding claim, wherein the article comprises a gas turbine engine component.
  10. The article of claim 9, comprising a turbine blade or vane.
  11. The article of any preceding claim, further characterized by oxidation resistance at 2000°F (1093°C) of roughly 2.5X, and creep rupture life at 1400°F (760°C) of roughly 2.4X and at 1800°F (982°C) of at least roughly 1.5X a similar article having a nominal composition of 14 Cr, 4.9 Ti, 1.5 Mo, 3.8 W, 2.8 Ta, 3 Al, 9.5 Co, 0.01 B, 0.02 Zr, 0.1 C, and balance Ni.
  12. A high strength, corrosion resistant, nickel base superalloy adapted for use in columnar grain directionally solidified articles, comprising in weight percent of about 12% chromium; 9% cobalt; 1.9% molybdenum; 3.8% tungsten; 5% tantalum; 3.6% aluminum; 4.1% titanium; 0.015% boron; 0.1% carbon; and having no intentional addition (and in any event less than about 0.02) zirconium and no intentional amount of niobium; balance essentially nickel and incidental impurities, and wherein aluminum + titanium is between about 6.5 - 8%; and including a matrix containing from about 0.4 to 1.5 vol. % of a phase based on tantalum carbide, the article is characterized by oxidation resistance at 2000°F (1093°C) of roughly 2.5X and creep rupture life at 1400°F (760°C) of roughly 2.4X compared to a similar article having a nominal composition of 14 Cr, 4.9 Ti, 1.5 Mo, 3.8 W, 2.8 Ta, 3 Al, 9.5 Co, 0.01 B, 0.02 Zr, 0.1 C, and balance Ni.
  13. The alloy of claim 12, comprising a gas turbine engine component.
  14. The article of claim 13, comprising a turbine blade or vane.
EP02258710A 2001-12-18 2002-12-18 High strength hot corrosion and oxidation resistant, directionally solidified nickel base superalloy and articles Revoked EP1329527B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/023,565 US20030111138A1 (en) 2001-12-18 2001-12-18 High strength hot corrosion and oxidation resistant, directionally solidified nickel base superalloy and articles
US23565 2001-12-18

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1329527A2 true EP1329527A2 (en) 2003-07-23
EP1329527A3 EP1329527A3 (en) 2003-10-22
EP1329527B1 EP1329527B1 (en) 2006-05-10

Family

ID=21815883

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP02258710A Revoked EP1329527B1 (en) 2001-12-18 2002-12-18 High strength hot corrosion and oxidation resistant, directionally solidified nickel base superalloy and articles

Country Status (11)

Country Link
US (1) US20030111138A1 (en)
EP (1) EP1329527B1 (en)
JP (1) JP4413492B2 (en)
KR (1) KR100954683B1 (en)
CN (1) CN1322157C (en)
AT (1) ATE325901T1 (en)
DE (1) DE60211297T2 (en)
ES (1) ES2261604T3 (en)
IL (1) IL153479A0 (en)
RU (1) RU2295585C2 (en)
UA (1) UA73989C2 (en)

Families Citing this family (21)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20050069450A1 (en) * 2003-09-30 2005-03-31 Liang Jiang Nickel-containing alloys, method of manufacture thereof and articles derived thereform
US20060182649A1 (en) * 2005-02-16 2006-08-17 Siemens Westinghouse Power Corp. High strength oxidation resistant superalloy with enhanced coating compatibility
US9322089B2 (en) * 2006-06-02 2016-04-26 Alstom Technology Ltd Nickel-base alloy for gas turbine applications
CN100460543C (en) * 2006-06-16 2009-02-11 中国科学院金属研究所 High strength antithermal corrosion low segregation directional high temp alloy
US20100254822A1 (en) * 2009-03-24 2010-10-07 Brian Thomas Hazel Super oxidation and cyclic damage resistant nickel-base superalloy and articles formed therefrom
US20110076179A1 (en) * 2009-03-24 2011-03-31 O'hara Kevin Swayne Super oxidation and cyclic damage resistant nickel-base superalloy and articles formed therefrom
EP2248923A1 (en) * 2009-04-27 2010-11-10 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Nickel base y/ý superalloy with multiple reactive elements and use of said superalloy in complex material systems
US20110076181A1 (en) * 2009-09-30 2011-03-31 General Electric Company Nickel-Based Superalloys and Articles
US20110076180A1 (en) * 2009-09-30 2011-03-31 General Electric Company Nickel-Based Superalloys and Articles
US20110076182A1 (en) * 2009-09-30 2011-03-31 General Electric Company Nickel-Based Superalloys and Articles
WO2011047714A1 (en) 2009-10-20 2011-04-28 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Alloy for directional solidification and component made of stem-shaped crystals
EP2431489A1 (en) 2010-09-20 2012-03-21 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Nickel-base superalloy
CN102011195B (en) * 2010-11-23 2012-06-06 北京科技大学 Preparation method of directional solidification high-Nb TiAl alloy single crystal
CN103314227B (en) * 2011-01-19 2016-05-18 西门子公司 For the sliding bearing and the turbine with this sliding bearing of turbine rotor
US20120282086A1 (en) * 2011-05-04 2012-11-08 General Electric Company Nickel-base alloy
CN103114225B (en) * 2011-11-16 2016-01-27 中国科学院金属研究所 A kind of High-strength hot-corrosion-resistnickel-base nickel-base monocrystal high-temperature alloy
US9404388B2 (en) 2014-02-28 2016-08-02 General Electric Company Article and method for forming an article
ITUA20161551A1 (en) * 2016-03-10 2017-09-10 Nuovo Pignone Tecnologie Srl LEAGUE HAVING HIGH RESISTANCE TO OXIDATION AND APPLICATIONS OF GAS TURBINES THAT USE IT
CN109234655B (en) * 2018-09-27 2020-09-11 北京科技大学 Method for improving relaxation stability of GH4169 high-temperature alloy
FR3094018B1 (en) * 2019-03-20 2022-02-04 Safran SUPERALLOY WITH OPTIMIZED PROPERTIES AND LIMITED DENSITY
CN117660810B (en) * 2024-01-31 2024-04-16 四川航大新材料有限公司 High-purity high-temperature master alloy for variable-cycle gas engine turbine blade and preparation method and application thereof

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3619182A (en) * 1968-05-31 1971-11-09 Int Nickel Co Cast nickel-base alloy
GB1409628A (en) * 1973-06-26 1975-10-08 Avco Corp Nickel base alloy containing hafnium
GB2033925A (en) * 1978-09-25 1980-05-29 Johnson Matthey Co Ltd Nickel based superalloys
US4597809A (en) * 1984-02-10 1986-07-01 United Technologies Corporation High strength hot corrosion resistant single crystals containing tantalum carbide
GB2268937A (en) * 1992-07-23 1994-01-26 Abb Research Ltd Precipitation-hardenable, nickel-based superalloy
EP0855449A1 (en) * 1997-01-23 1998-07-29 Mitsubishi Materials Corporation Columnar crystalline Ni-base heat-resistant alloy having high resistance to intergranular corrosion at high temperature, method of producing the alloy, large-size article, and method of producing large-size article from the alloy
WO1999067435A1 (en) * 1998-06-23 1999-12-29 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Directionally solidified casting with improved transverse stress rupture strength

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3615376A (en) * 1968-11-01 1971-10-26 Gen Electric Cast nickel base alloy
GB1511562A (en) * 1974-07-17 1978-05-24 Gen Electric Nickel-base alloys
US6355117B1 (en) * 1992-10-30 2002-03-12 United Technologies Corporation Nickel base superalloy single crystal articles with improved performance in air and hydrogen
EP0637476B1 (en) * 1993-08-06 2000-02-23 Hitachi, Ltd. Blade for gas turbine, manufacturing method of the same, and gas turbine including the blade
JP2003529677A (en) * 1999-07-29 2003-10-07 シーメンス アクチエンゲゼルシヤフト Heat resistant structural member and method of manufacturing the same

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3619182A (en) * 1968-05-31 1971-11-09 Int Nickel Co Cast nickel-base alloy
GB1409628A (en) * 1973-06-26 1975-10-08 Avco Corp Nickel base alloy containing hafnium
GB2033925A (en) * 1978-09-25 1980-05-29 Johnson Matthey Co Ltd Nickel based superalloys
US4597809A (en) * 1984-02-10 1986-07-01 United Technologies Corporation High strength hot corrosion resistant single crystals containing tantalum carbide
GB2268937A (en) * 1992-07-23 1994-01-26 Abb Research Ltd Precipitation-hardenable, nickel-based superalloy
EP0855449A1 (en) * 1997-01-23 1998-07-29 Mitsubishi Materials Corporation Columnar crystalline Ni-base heat-resistant alloy having high resistance to intergranular corrosion at high temperature, method of producing the alloy, large-size article, and method of producing large-size article from the alloy
WO1999067435A1 (en) * 1998-06-23 1999-12-29 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Directionally solidified casting with improved transverse stress rupture strength

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
ES2261604T3 (en) 2006-11-16
UA73989C2 (en) 2005-10-17
RU2295585C2 (en) 2007-03-20
EP1329527A3 (en) 2003-10-22
DE60211297T2 (en) 2007-04-26
KR100954683B1 (en) 2010-04-27
ATE325901T1 (en) 2006-06-15
EP1329527B1 (en) 2006-05-10
DE60211297D1 (en) 2006-06-14
CN1322157C (en) 2007-06-20
JP2003231933A (en) 2003-08-19
CN1432659A (en) 2003-07-30
KR20030051386A (en) 2003-06-25
JP4413492B2 (en) 2010-02-10
IL153479A0 (en) 2003-07-06
US20030111138A1 (en) 2003-06-19

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1329527A2 (en) High strength hot corrosion and oxidation resistant, directionally solidified nickel base superalloy and articles
US5759301A (en) Monocrystalline nickel-base superalloy with Ti, Ta, and Hf carbides
EP2796578B1 (en) Cast nickel-based superalloy including iron
CA1206398A (en) Superalloy single crystal articles
CN101652487B (en) Ni-base single crystal superalloy
US20070000581A1 (en) High strength, hot corrosion and oxidation resistant, equiaxed nickel base superalloy and articles and method of making
JP4885530B2 (en) High strength and high ductility Ni-base superalloy, member using the same, and manufacturing method
US20100092302A1 (en) Ni-BASED SINGLE CRYSTAL SUPERALLOY AND TURBINE BLADE INCORPORATING THE SAME
EP2006402B1 (en) Ni-BASE SUPERALLOY AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING SAME
CA1333342C (en) Nickel-base alloy
US6054096A (en) Stable heat treatable nickel superalloy single crystal articles and compositions
EP2420584B1 (en) Nickel-based single crystal superalloy and turbine blade incorporating this superalloy
JP5186215B2 (en) Nickel-based superalloy
US20100047110A1 (en) Ni-base superalloy and gas turbine component using the same
US10024174B2 (en) Ni-based casting superalloy and cast article therefrom
US4597809A (en) High strength hot corrosion resistant single crystals containing tantalum carbide
US20170058383A1 (en) Rhenium-free nickel base superalloy of low density
US5489346A (en) Hot corrosion resistant single crystal nickel-based superalloys
EP0962542A1 (en) Stable heat treatable nickel superalloy single crystal articles and compositions
US9499886B2 (en) Ni-based single crystal superalloy and turbine blade incorporating the same
CN113366132A (en) Nickel-based superalloys having high mechanical and environmental strength at high temperatures and low densities
JPH10273748A (en) Ni-base superalloy with high corrosion resistance and high oxidation resistance for directional solidification use, and directionally solidified casting with high corrosion resistance and high oxidation resistance

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL LT LV MK RO

PUAL Search report despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL LT LV MK RO

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20040121

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20040506

AKX Designation fees paid

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE SI SK TR

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE SI SK TR

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.

Effective date: 20060510

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060510

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060510

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060510

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060510

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 60211297

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20060614

Kind code of ref document: P

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: TRGR

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060810

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: E. BLUM & CO. PATENTANWAELTE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20061010

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Payment date: 20061011

Year of fee payment: 5

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20061026

Year of fee payment: 5

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20061107

Year of fee payment: 5

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20061108

Year of fee payment: 5

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2261604

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20061204

Year of fee payment: 5

ET Fr: translation filed
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20061218

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20061220

Year of fee payment: 5

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20061231

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT ABT. CT IP PG

Effective date: 20061122

NLR1 Nl: opposition has been filed with the epo

Opponent name: SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT ABT. CT IP PG

PLAX Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2

PLAF Information modified related to communication of a notice of opposition and request to file observations + time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCOBS2

PLBB Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition received

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PFA

Owner name: UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION

Free format text: UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION#UNITED TECHNOLOGIES BUILDING, 1 FINANCIAL PLAZA#HARTFORD, CT 06101 (US) -TRANSFER TO- UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION#UNITED TECHNOLOGIES BUILDING, 1 FINANCIAL PLAZA#HARTFORD, CT 06101 (US)

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060811

PLAB Opposition data, opponent's data or that of the opponent's representative modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009299OPPO

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060510

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060810

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20061218

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060510

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

EUG Se: european patent has lapsed
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20071218

NLV4 Nl: lapsed or anulled due to non-payment of the annual fee

Effective date: 20080701

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20071231

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20071218

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20071231

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20071219

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20080701

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060510

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20071219

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20071219

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20081205

Year of fee payment: 7

RDAF Communication despatched that patent is revoked

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREV1

APBM Appeal reference recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREFNO

APBP Date of receipt of notice of appeal recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA2O

APAH Appeal reference modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCREFNO

APBQ Date of receipt of statement of grounds of appeal recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA3O

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20100831

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20091231

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20101215

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20101215

Year of fee payment: 9

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R064

Ref document number: 60211297

Country of ref document: DE

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R103

Ref document number: 60211297

Country of ref document: DE

APBU Appeal procedure closed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA9O

RDAG Patent revoked

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009271

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: PATENT REVOKED

27W Patent revoked

Effective date: 20120207

GBPR Gb: patent revoked under art. 102 of the ep convention designating the uk as contracting state

Effective date: 20120207

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R107

Ref document number: 60211297

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20120705

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MA03

Ref document number: 325901

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20120207

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: ECNC

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 60211297

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: SCHMITT-NILSON SCHRAUD WAIBEL WOHLFROM PATENTA, DE