EP1288914B1 - Procédé pour la correction de mesures de la qualité vocale - Google Patents
Procédé pour la correction de mesures de la qualité vocale Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP1288914B1 EP1288914B1 EP02012790A EP02012790A EP1288914B1 EP 1288914 B1 EP1288914 B1 EP 1288914B1 EP 02012790 A EP02012790 A EP 02012790A EP 02012790 A EP02012790 A EP 02012790A EP 1288914 B1 EP1288914 B1 EP 1288914B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- speech
- speech quality
- value
- correction
- quality
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 19
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims description 27
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 3
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- XOFYZVNMUHMLCC-ZPOLXVRWSA-N prednisone Chemical compound O=C1C=C[C@]2(C)[C@H]3C(=O)C[C@](C)([C@@](CC4)(O)C(=O)CO)[C@@H]4[C@@H]3CCC2=C1 XOFYZVNMUHMLCC-ZPOLXVRWSA-N 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000001303 quality assessment method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011835 investigation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000691 measurement method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013442 quality metrics Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G10—MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
- G10L—SPEECH ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES OR SPEECH SYNTHESIS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; SPEECH OR VOICE PROCESSING TECHNIQUES; SPEECH OR AUDIO CODING OR DECODING
- G10L25/00—Speech or voice analysis techniques not restricted to a single one of groups G10L15/00 - G10L21/00
- G10L25/48—Speech or voice analysis techniques not restricted to a single one of groups G10L15/00 - G10L21/00 specially adapted for particular use
- G10L25/69—Speech or voice analysis techniques not restricted to a single one of groups G10L15/00 - G10L21/00 specially adapted for particular use for evaluating synthetic or decoded voice signals
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G10—MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
- G10L—SPEECH ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES OR SPEECH SYNTHESIS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; SPEECH OR VOICE PROCESSING TECHNIQUES; SPEECH OR AUDIO CODING OR DECODING
- G10L21/00—Speech or voice signal processing techniques to produce another audible or non-audible signal, e.g. visual or tactile, in order to modify its quality or its intelligibility
- G10L21/02—Speech enhancement, e.g. noise reduction or echo cancellation
- G10L21/0208—Noise filtering
- G10L21/0216—Noise filtering characterised by the method used for estimating noise
- G10L2021/02168—Noise filtering characterised by the method used for estimating noise the estimation exclusively taking place during speech pauses
Definitions
- the invention relates to instrumental methods for measuring the speech quality of recorded or transmitted speech signals. It is based on voice quality metrics assumed that e.g. with the ITU-T standard P.862 ("Perceptual Evaluation of Speech Quality (PESQ), an Objective Method for end-to-end Speech Quality Assessment of Narrow-band Telephone Networks and Speech Codecs ", ITU-T, Geneva, 2001) become.
- P.862 Perceptual Evaluation of Speech Quality (PESQ), an Objective Method for end-to-end Speech Quality Assessment of Narrow-band Telephone Networks and Speech Codecs
- the perceived speech quality z. B. in telephone or broadcasting is mainly caused by speech-simultaneous disturbances, ie disturbances during the Voice activity, determined. But also noises in speech pauses go into that Quality judgment, especially with high quality voice reproduction quality.
- Speech quality determinations of speech signals are usually auditory ("subjective") investigations carried out with test subjects.
- the goal of instrumental ("objective") speech quality assessment procedures are out Properties of the speech signal to be evaluated by means of suitable calculation methods To determine characteristic values that determine the speech quality of the speech signal to be evaluated describe without having to resort to judgments from test subjects.
- Known methods for instrumental determination of speech quality determine the voice quality based on a comparison between undisturbed reference speech signal (source speech signal) and the to be evaluated and possibly disturbed signal.
- Such measuring methods are used in so-called sample connection systems, in where a known reference speech signal (source speech signal) is input to the source and z. B. transmitted over a telephone connection and recorded on the sink. After Recording of the speech signal is the calculation of a speech quality value.
- source speech signal source speech signal
- Instrumental methods for speech quality determination are usually limited to the Evaluation of sections with voice activity.
- the current ITU-T standard P.862 is also restricted to sections when determining the speech quality active language. Especially with high quality speech and sounds, the occur exclusively in speech pauses, provide these methods (eg ITU-T Rec. P.862) unreliable quality values.
- the voice quality is here too evaluated optimistically, since the perceived by a listener voice quality on the whole signal including possible noises in the speech pauses relates.
- Some instrumental methods for speech quality determination such. B. the method according to ITU-T Rec. P.862, take into account the calculation of the speech quality values Noises in the speech pauses not. The resulting readings are thereby especially at high quality playback in voice activity but occurring noises in speech breaks, unreliable. With the present method, the background noise be taken into account in the speech pauses in determining the speech quality values.
- the solution of the problem as defined in claim 1 assumes that the background noise in the Speech pauses regarding their disturbing influence on the perceived speech quality be rated. For this purpose, intensity characteristic values of the background noise are determined and with these values, the speech quality measurements made by an instrumental Method, for. B. ITU-T Rec. P.862, were corrected corrected.
- the voice quality value is obtained by using the source voice signal and the evaluating disturbed speech signal, z.
- the method of ITU-T Rec. P.962 calculated.
- These speech signals are also available to the subsequent correction process Input parameters available.
- the correction method described here requires nor the calculated speech quality value, the z. B. with the method according to ITU-T Rec. P.862 was calculated.
- one or more intensity characteristics are obtained of the noise in speech pauses.
- This can be z.
- the average loudness according to ISO 532 of the background noise in speech pauses A very efficient process for this is described in the patent application DE 101 20 168.
- other intensity characteristics e.g. Sharpness, impulsiveness, fluctuation strength
- Sharpness, impulsiveness, fluctuation strength can be included in the correction value. It It is assumed that increasing intensity characteristics of one as well Increasing noise caused by the noise in speech breaks and thus too lead to a greater reduction in perceived speech quality.
- the voice quality is rated too high by the speech quality measurement methods described with good speech reproduction quality and simultaneous noises in the speech pauses.
- One or more background noise intensity values in speech pauses are used to correct the measured speech quality value. Assuming that the measured speech quality score is on a scale from 1 (low quality) to 5 (very good quality) according to ITU-T Recommendation P.800 ("Methods for objective and subjective assessment of quality", ITU-T, Geneva 1996 ), all values above a certain speech quality threshold (eg, in the method of ITU-T Rec. P.862 above 3.0) are reduced when background noise occurs in speech pauses.
- This reduction is dependent on the intensity characteristics of the background noise, the proportion of speech pauses in the total signal PA and the speech quality value Y.
- a general description of this correction is for all speech quality values Y above a speech quality threshold YS in which only one intensity score (here N) is taken into account. This can be z.
- the function a (N) represents a unique and increasing weighting function of the intensity parameter N.
- the corrected speech quality value is always less than or equal to the uncorrected value.
- the correction is small if the intensity of the noise is low ( N is small), there are few speech pauses ( PA small) or the speech quality value is close to the speech quality threshold ( Y-YS small). More correct is when strong pauses sound with otherwise high voice quality Y occur.
- the intensity characteristics are weighted with the weighting functions a (N), b (M) and c (O), respectively. Since an increasing disturbance with increasing values is assumed, here also clear and increasing weighting functions are to be set.
- the exemplary embodiment presented here shows, by way of example, a correction of the speech quality values determined using the method according to ITU-T Rec. P.862 "PESQ" (as of 2001).
- This method provides a speech quality value by comparing an undisturbed source speech signal with the disturbed speech signal to be evaluated. These two speech signals are used to determine the average loudness of the background noise according to patent application DE 101 20 168.
- the thus calculated value N in sone is used to correct the quality value calculated by the method according to ITU-T Rec. P.862 "PESQ" (state 2001) used.
- the value of the threshold excess YD is determined, ie by what proportion the measured speech quality Y exceeds the speech quality threshold YS .
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computational Linguistics (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Audiology, Speech & Language Pathology (AREA)
- Human Computer Interaction (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Acoustics & Sound (AREA)
- Multimedia (AREA)
- Measurement Of Mechanical Vibrations Or Ultrasonic Waves (AREA)
- Monitoring And Testing Of Exchanges (AREA)
- Noise Elimination (AREA)
Claims (2)
- Procédé destiné à la correction de valeurs mesurées de la qualité de la parole, les valeurs mesurées de la qualité de la parole étant déterminées à l'aide de procédés instrumentaux n'exploitant que les segments du signal avec activité vocale, dans lequel :les bruits présents dans les pauses vocales sont pris en considération dans la détermination des valeurs de la qualité de la parole,pour cela l'intensité des bruits de fond dans les pauses vocales est déterminée et ces valeurs caractéristiques sont utilisées pour la correction des valeurs mesurées de la qualité de la parole, etla correction est effectuée de telle sorte que la valeur mesurée de la qualité de la parole soit réduite d'une valeur calculée à partir d'un ou plusieurs indicateurs pondérés de l'intensité des bruits de fond, du nombre de pauses vocales dans le signal vocal à évaluer et de la valeur mesurée de la qualité de la parole.
- Procédé selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que la correction des valeurs de la qualité de la parole mesurées selon la recommandation P.862 de l'UIT-T est effectuée de telle sorte que la puissance du son moyenne dans les pauses vocales soit déterminée comme indicateur de l'intensité, que la valeur retenue pour le calcul de la correction soit celle dépassant la valeur de seuil de 1,3 sones et limitée à 4,0 sones et que cette valeur soit multipliée par un facteur constant (0,45), le nombre de pauses vocales dans le signal entier et le nombre de valeurs mesurées de la qualité de la parole, dépassant la valeur de seuil de la qualité de la parole de 3,0 et donnant une valeur de correction qui est soustraite de la valeur mesurée de la qualité de la parole afin de déterminer la valeur corrigée de la qualité de la parole.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE10142846A DE10142846A1 (de) | 2001-08-29 | 2001-08-29 | Verfahren zur Korrektur von gemessenen Sprachqualitätswerten |
DE10142846 | 2001-08-29 |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1288914A2 EP1288914A2 (fr) | 2003-03-05 |
EP1288914A3 EP1288914A3 (fr) | 2004-05-19 |
EP1288914B1 true EP1288914B1 (fr) | 2005-12-21 |
Family
ID=7697364
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP02012790A Expired - Lifetime EP1288914B1 (fr) | 2001-08-29 | 2002-06-10 | Procédé pour la correction de mesures de la qualité vocale |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP1288914B1 (fr) |
AT (1) | ATE313846T1 (fr) |
DE (2) | DE10142846A1 (fr) |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
FR2944640A1 (fr) | 2009-04-17 | 2010-10-22 | France Telecom | Procede et dispositif d'evaluation objective de la qualite vocale d'un signal de parole prenant en compte la classification du bruit de fond contenu dans le signal. |
Family Cites Families (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
FI94810C (fi) * | 1993-10-11 | 1995-10-25 | Nokia Mobile Phones Ltd | Menetelmä huonon GSM-puhekehyksen tunnistamiseksi |
US5684921A (en) * | 1995-07-13 | 1997-11-04 | U S West Technologies, Inc. | Method and system for identifying a corrupted speech message signal |
US5809414A (en) * | 1995-11-22 | 1998-09-15 | Northern Telecom Limited | User out-of-range indication for digital wireless systems |
SE506341C2 (sv) * | 1996-04-10 | 1997-12-08 | Ericsson Telefon Ab L M | Metod och anordning för rekonstruktion av en mottagen talsignal |
EP0980064A1 (fr) * | 1998-06-26 | 2000-02-16 | Ascom AG | Méthode pour effectuer une évaluation automatique de la qualité de transmission de signaux audio |
DE19840548C2 (de) * | 1998-08-27 | 2001-02-15 | Deutsche Telekom Ag | Verfahren zur instrumentellen Sprachqualitätsbestimmung |
GB9911777D0 (en) * | 1999-05-20 | 1999-07-21 | Univ Southampton | Transceiver |
-
2001
- 2001-08-29 DE DE10142846A patent/DE10142846A1/de not_active Withdrawn
-
2002
- 2002-06-10 EP EP02012790A patent/EP1288914B1/fr not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2002-06-10 AT AT02012790T patent/ATE313846T1/de not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2002-06-10 DE DE50205328T patent/DE50205328D1/de not_active Expired - Lifetime
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
DE50205328D1 (de) | 2006-01-26 |
ATE313846T1 (de) | 2006-01-15 |
DE10142846A1 (de) | 2003-03-20 |
EP1288914A2 (fr) | 2003-03-05 |
EP1288914A3 (fr) | 2004-05-19 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
DE69331181T2 (de) | Tonverstärkervorrichtung mit automatischer Unterdrückung akustischer Rückkopplung | |
DE19952538C2 (de) | Automatische Verstärkungsregelung in einem Spracherkennungssystem | |
DE60108401T2 (de) | System zur erhöhung der sprachqualität | |
DE60023517T2 (de) | Klassifizierung von schallquellen | |
DE69334139T2 (de) | Testen von Nachrichtenübertragungsgerät | |
EP1386307B1 (fr) | Procede et dispositif pour determiner un niveau de qualite d'un signal audio | |
DE60122751T2 (de) | Verfahren und vorrichtung für die objektive bewertung der sprachqualität ohne referenzsignal | |
DE19647399C1 (de) | Gehörangepaßte Qualitätsbeurteilung von Audiotestsignalen | |
DE10017646A1 (de) | Geräuschunterdrückung im Zeitbereich | |
DE60205232T2 (de) | Verfahren und vorrichtung zur bestimmung der qualität eines sprachsignals | |
DE19948308A1 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Geräuschunterdrückung bei der Sprachübertragung | |
DE69918635T2 (de) | Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Sprachverarbeitung | |
DE10214407C1 (de) | Anordnung und Verfahren zur Messung, Bewertung und Störungserkennung von Systemen | |
DE60222770T2 (de) | Verbessertes verfahren zur ermittlung der qualität eines sprachsignals | |
EP1077448A2 (fr) | Reconnaissance de la parole prenant en compte les fluctuations du volume sonore | |
EP1048025B1 (fr) | Procede de determination instrumentale de la qualite vocale | |
EP1382034B1 (fr) | Procede de determination de valeurs caracteristiques d'intensite de bruits de fond dans des pauses de voix de signaux vocaux | |
DE2021126A1 (de) | Spracherkennungsvorrichtung | |
EP1634277A1 (fr) | Extraction de sections de signaux d'essai pour la mesure de la qualite d'un signal audio | |
DE60110541T2 (de) | Verfahren zur Spracherkennung mit geräuschabhängiger Normalisierung der Varianz | |
EP1288914B1 (fr) | Procédé pour la correction de mesures de la qualité vocale | |
DE60305306T2 (de) | Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur binauralen Qualitätsbeurteilung | |
EP1005016A2 (fr) | Procédé et dispositif de circuit pour mesurer le niveau de parole dans un système de traitement du signal de parole | |
DE102013005844B3 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Messen der Qualität eines Sprachsignals | |
EP0902416B1 (fr) | Procédé et dispositif pour reconnaitre une entrée de parole pendant la diffusion d'une annonce |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL LT LV MK RO SI |
|
PUAL | Search report despatched |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A3 Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL LT LV MK RO SI |
|
RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: 7H 04M 3/22 B Ipc: 7G 10L 19/00 A |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20041119 |
|
AKX | Designation fees paid |
Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED. Effective date: 20051221 Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20051221 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20051221 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20051221 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 50205328 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20060126 Kind code of ref document: P |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20060321 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20060321 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20060321 |
|
GBT | Gb: translation of ep patent filed (gb section 77(6)(a)/1977) |
Effective date: 20060306 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20060401 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20060522 |
|
NLV1 | Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act | ||
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20060630 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20060630 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20060630 Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20060630 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FD4D |
|
ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20060922 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20060610 |
|
BERE | Be: lapsed |
Owner name: DEUTSCHE TELEKOM A.G. Effective date: 20060630 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20051221 Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20060610 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20051221 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 15 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20160628 Year of fee payment: 15 Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20160622 Year of fee payment: 15 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20160621 Year of fee payment: 15 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 50205328 Country of ref document: DE |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20170610 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20180228 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170610 Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180103 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170630 |