EP1235459A1 - Procédé de gestion de ressources de traitement dans un système de radiocommunications mobiles - Google Patents
Procédé de gestion de ressources de traitement dans un système de radiocommunications mobiles Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP1235459A1 EP1235459A1 EP02290248A EP02290248A EP1235459A1 EP 1235459 A1 EP1235459 A1 EP 1235459A1 EP 02290248 A EP02290248 A EP 02290248A EP 02290248 A EP02290248 A EP 02290248A EP 1235459 A1 EP1235459 A1 EP 1235459A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- entity
- cost
- capacity
- base station
- codes
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W28/00—Network traffic management; Network resource management
- H04W28/16—Central resource management; Negotiation of resources or communication parameters, e.g. negotiating bandwidth or QoS [Quality of Service]
- H04W28/18—Negotiating wireless communication parameters
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W28/00—Network traffic management; Network resource management
- H04W28/16—Central resource management; Negotiation of resources or communication parameters, e.g. negotiating bandwidth or QoS [Quality of Service]
- H04W28/26—Resource reservation
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W88/00—Devices specially adapted for wireless communication networks, e.g. terminals, base stations or access point devices
- H04W88/12—Access point controller devices
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04B—TRANSMISSION
- H04B2201/00—Indexing scheme relating to details of transmission systems not covered by a single group of H04B3/00 - H04B13/00
- H04B2201/69—Orthogonal indexing scheme relating to spread spectrum techniques in general
- H04B2201/707—Orthogonal indexing scheme relating to spread spectrum techniques in general relating to direct sequence modulation
- H04B2201/70703—Orthogonal indexing scheme relating to spread spectrum techniques in general relating to direct sequence modulation using multiple or variable rates
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04B—TRANSMISSION
- H04B2201/00—Indexing scheme relating to details of transmission systems not covered by a single group of H04B3/00 - H04B13/00
- H04B2201/69—Orthogonal indexing scheme relating to spread spectrum techniques in general
- H04B2201/707—Orthogonal indexing scheme relating to spread spectrum techniques in general relating to direct sequence modulation
- H04B2201/70707—Efficiency-related aspects
- H04B2201/7071—Efficiency-related aspects with dynamic control of receiver resources
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04J—MULTIPLEX COMMUNICATION
- H04J13/00—Code division multiplex systems
- H04J13/0003—Code application, i.e. aspects relating to how codes are applied to form multiplexed channels
Definitions
- the present invention relates generally to mobile radio communications, and more particularly systems using CDMA technique (for "Code Division Multiple Access” in English).
- the CDMA technique is used in particular in so-called third generation, such as in particular the UMTS system (for "Universal Mobile Telecommunication System ".
- a mobile radio network comprises, as shown in Figure 1, a set of base stations and base station controllers.
- this network is also called UTRAN, for "UMTS Terrestrial Radio Access Network”
- the base stations are also called Node B
- base station controllers are also called RNC (for "Radio Network Controller” in English).
- the UTRAN is in relation on the one hand with mobile stations (also called user equipment, or “User Equipment”, via an interface called interface "Uu”, and on the other hand with a core network, or CN (for "Core Network "in English), by an interface called” read “interface.
- mobile stations also called user equipment, or "User Equipment”
- interface User Equipment
- CN core network
- the RNC which controls it is also called CRNC (for "Controlling Radio Network Controller” in English), and is therefore connected to this Node B via the interface "lub".
- the CRNC has a role of load control and control and allocation of radio resources for the Node B units it controls.
- SRNC for "Serving Radio Network Controller” in English
- the SRNC has a control role for the communication considered, including functions for adding or removal of radio links (using the macro-diversity transmission technique), control of parameters likely to change during communication, such as flow, power, spreading factor, ... etc.
- CDMA systems capacity limitations on the radio interface are fundamentally different from what they are in systems using other multiple access techniques, such as in particular the TDMA technique (for "Time Division Multiple Access”.
- the TDMA technique is notably used in so-called second generation systems such as the GSM system (for "Global System for Mobile communications" in English).
- GSM system for "Global System for Mobile communications” in English.
- GSM Global System for Mobile communications
- CDMA systems all users share the same frequency resource at all times. The capacity of these systems is therefore limited by interference, these systems being also called for this reason "soft limited systems" (in English).
- Figures 2 and 3 show the main treatments used, respectively in transmission and in reception, in a base station such as in particular a Node B for the UMTS system.
- channel coding uses techniques such as error correcting coding and interleaving, providing protection against transmission errors.
- Coding (such as error correcting coding) is intended to introduce redundancy in the information transmitted.
- the coding rate is defined as the ratio of the number of bits of information to be transmitted over the number of transmitted bits or coded bits.
- Different levels of quality of service can be obtained using different types of error correcting codes. For example, in UMTS, for a first type of traffic (such as high speed data) we use a first type of error correction code consisting of a turbo-code, and for a second type of traffic (such as lower speed data or voice) we uses a second type of error correction code, consisting of a code convolution.
- Channel coding also generally includes rate adaptation for to adapt the bit rate to be transmitted to the bit rate offered for its transmission.
- the adaptation of flow can include techniques such as repetition and / or punching, rate flow adaptation then being defined as the rate of repetition and / or punching.
- the gross speed is defined as the speed actually transmitted on the interface radio.
- Net debit is the debit obtained after deduction of the gross debit, of all that is not useful for the user, as in particular the redundancy introduced by the coding.
- Spreading uses the known principles of spectrum spreading.
- the length of the spreading code used is also called spreading factor.
- the net speed (also called hereinafter more simply “flow”) can vary during the same communication, and that the spreading factor can also vary depending on the speed to be transmitted.
- FIG. 3 illustrates an example of processing that can be implemented in the despreading means 8.
- This treatment corresponds in this case to that implemented in a Rake type receiver, making it possible to improve the quality estimation of the data received, by exploiting multi-path phenomena, that is to say propagation of the same source signal along multiple paths, obtained in particular by multiple reflections on elements of the environment.
- multi-path phenomena that is to say propagation of the same source signal along multiple paths, obtained in particular by multiple reflections on elements of the environment.
- CDMA systems unlike in particular TDMA systems, these paths multiple can indeed be exploited to improve the quality of the estimation of data received.
- a Rake receiver comprises a set of L fingers (or “fingers” in English) denoted 10 l to 10 L , and means 11 for combining the signals from these different fingers.
- Each finger makes it possible to despread the received signal along one of the different paths taken into account, the different paths taken into account being determined by means 12 for estimating the impulse response of the transmission channel.
- the means 11 make it possible to combine the despread signals corresponding to the different paths considered, according to a processing intended to optimize the quality of the estimation of the data received.
- the technique of reception by means of a Rake receiver is also used in conjunction with the macro-diversity transmission technique, according to which the same source signal is transmitted simultaneously to the same station mobile by several base stations.
- Macro-diversity transmission technique not only improves reception performance by of a Rake receiver, but also to minimize the risks of call loss during inter-cellular transfers, or "handovers" in English. For this reason it is also called “soft handover”, as opposed to the technique of "hard handover "according to which a mobile station is only connected at all times a single base station.
- the means for estimating the data received can also use various techniques intended to reduce interference such as for example so-called multi-user detection technique.
- the means for estimating the data received then further comprise means for combination of the signals obtained for these different reception antennas, also in order to optimize the quality of the estimation of the data received.
- Channel decoding includes functions such as deinterlacing and error correcting decoding.
- Error correcting decoding is generally significantly more complex than error correcting coding and can use techniques such as, for example, maximum likelihood decoding.
- maximum likelihood decoding Through example, for convolutional codes, we can use a so-called Viterbi algorithm.
- a base station or Node B has a set of transmitters and receivers such as the transmitter and the receiver thus recalled. A large processing capacity is thus required in a base station or Node B, in particular, in reception, for the estimation of the data received.
- the Node B signals to the CRNC its overall processing capacity (called “capacity credit”), and the quantity of this overall processing capacity, or cost, for each value of the spreading factor (or “spreading factor” in English, or SF) possible in this system.
- the set of costs for the different possible values of the spreading factor is also called capacity consumption law.
- Such information is signaled by a Node B to the CRNC whenever the processing capacity of this Node B is changed, using a message called "Resource Status Indication", or in response to a request from the CRNC using a message called "Audit Response".
- NBAP procedures for "Node B Application Part ”
- the corresponding signaling messages are also called NBAP messages.
- the DCH channel (for “Dedicated CHannel” in English) is a channel dedicated, and channels such as in particular RACH (for “Random Access CHannel” in English), FACH (for “Forward Access CHannel” in English), CPCH (for "Common Packet CHannel” in English), DSCH (for "Downlink Shared CHannel” in English), ... etc, are common channels.
- a first problem is that the specificities of the DSCH channel.
- the DSCH channel is actually a common channel, it is still associated with a dedicated DCH channel, and the procedures for establishing, erasing or reconfigurations which concern the DSCH channel simultaneously concern the channel DCH. For example, for a radio link setup operation, one or two operations can be performed: one for the DCH channel and possibly a for the DSCH channel, if a DSCH channel is associated with the DCH channel.
- DSCH channel is a common channel, it would make more sense (in order to simplify the capacity credit update operations), that this channel be taken into account in the consumption law for dedicated channels.
- the allocation cost is different depending on whether the radio link considered is or is not a first radio link (the second corresponding case to the situation where the EU has more than one radio link in the same Node B, i.e. where the EU is in a situation called, in English, of “softer-handover” with this Node B).
- the 3G TS 25.433 standard specifies that for a first radio link, two costs are taken into account, namely a cost for a radio link (or "Radio Link cost", or still “RL cost”) and a cost for a set of radio links (or “Radio Link Set” cost ”or“ RLS cost ”), while for an additional radio link, only the cost "RL cost" is taken into account.
- One of the aims of the present invention is to provide a solution to these problems.
- said cost for the associated common channel is specific to this channel.
- said common channel associated with a channel dedicated is a DSCH type channel (“Downlink Shared CHannel”).
- the cost depends on the spreading factor.
- said first entity is a controller of base stations.
- said second entity is a based.
- a second problem is that the current standard does not indicate how the variable spread factor and / or variable number of spreading codes (in the case of multicode transmission) must be taken into account in this mechanism credit.
- the spreading factor and / or the number of codes spreads used may vary during of the same communication, in the upward direction.
- the amount of resources treatment required is not the same depending on the spreading factor used and / or depending on the number of spreading codes used. It would therefore be desirable to keep account in the credit mechanism under consideration.
- Another object of the present invention is to provide a solution to this problem.
- said reference spreading factor is a minimum spreading factor.
- said reference number of codes spread is a maximum number of spread codes.
- the minimum spreading factor has a predetermined value.
- said predetermined value is a function including the type of service.
- said predetermined value is adjustable by means of operation and maintenance.
- said first entity being constituted by a CRNC (“Controlling Radio Network Controller”) and said predetermined value minimum spread factor being determined in a separate entity constituted by an SRNC ("Serving Radio Network controller”), said value predetermined minimum spreading factor is reported by the SRNC to the CRNC.
- CRNC Controlling Radio Network Controller
- SRNC Serving Radio Network controller
- said minimum spreading factor has a calculated value.
- said calculated value is obtained from a parameter corresponding to a set of format combinations of transport (or TFCS, for “Transport Format Combination Set”).
- said first entity being constituted by a CRNC (“Controlling Radio Network Controller”)
- said calculated value is calculated in CRNC from said parameter reported to CRNC by an entity separate consisting of an SRNC ("Serving Radio Network controller").
- said first entity being constituted by a CRNC (“Controlling Radio Network Controller”)
- said calculated value is reported to CRNC by an SRNC ("Serving Radio Network Controller") which calculates itself from said parameter.
- said first entity is a controller of base stations.
- said second entity is a based.
- said means for effecting said setting up to date include means for receiving a predetermined factor value reference spread and / or reference number of spreading codes, reported to this base station controller (CRNC) by a base station controller separate base (SRNC).
- CRNC base station controller
- SRNC base station controller separate base
- said means for carrying out said updating day include means for calculating a spread factor value of reference, from a parameter reported to this base station controller (CRNC) by a separate base station controller (SRNC).
- CRNC base station controller
- SRNC separate base station controller
- said means for carrying out said updating day include means for receiving a spread factor value of reference, reported to this base station controller (CRNC) by a separate base stations (SRNC) which calculates it itself.
- CRNC base station controller
- SRNC separate base stations
- a third problem is that the current standard does not indicate how the Multicode transmission must be taken into account in this credit mechanism.
- the transmission multicode can be used up or down, and the amount of processing resources required are not the same depending on the number of codes used. It would therefore be desirable to take it into account in the mechanism credit considered.
- Another object of the present invention is to provide a solution to this problem.
- the cost for the N codes corresponds to the sum of costs for each of the N codes.
- the cost for N codes is determined at from the cost for a code.
- the cost for N codes corresponds to N times the cost for a code.
- the cost for N codes corresponds to the cost for the minimum spreading factor code.
- said first entity is a controller of base stations.
- said second entity is a based.
- Another object of the present invention is also to provide a charge and / or call admission control method, taking into account the processing capacity of a base station, determined according to this credit.
- said first entity is a controller of base stations.
- said second entity is a based.
- said first entity is a controller of base stations.
- said second entity is a based.
- the present invention therefore aims in particular to solve different problems with the credit mechanism as described in the 3G TS standard 25,433 in its current state.
- a first problem is that the specificities of the DSCH channel.
- the DSCH channel is always associated with a DCH channel, it can be better to take into account its cost of treatment in the law of consumption of dedicated channels.
- the preferred solution is therefore to add / change / remove a cost for DSCH channel only once, when NBAP messages are for a first radio link.
- the invention therefore essentially provides that, for a common channel associated with a dedicated channel, said update is carried out, in the case of first radio link on the basis of cost for the dedicated channel and a cost for the associated common channel, and in the case of additional radio link on the basis of the cost for the dedicated channel only.
- a PDSCH channel (“Physical Downlink Shared Channel”) is allocated in the procedure of “Radio Link Set-up ”
- the processing cost associated with this PDSCH channel equal to“ DL RL cost ”
- this cost is debited from the capacity credit when a PDSCH channel is deleted, and the difference between the new cost and the old cost is debited from the credit of capacity (or credited if this difference is negative) when a PDSCH channel is reconfigured.
- FIG. 4 is a diagram intended to illustrate an example of means to be provided in a base station (or Node B in a system such as the UMTS system), and in a base station controller (or RNC for a system such as the system UMTS), to implement such a method according to the invention.
- a base station or Node B in a system such as the UMTS system
- a base station controller or RNC for a system such as the system UMTS
- the cost may be a function of the factor spreading, as specified in the previously mentioned standard (in its state current).
- the principle thus described is not limited to this case, and applies also in case the cost depends on one or more other parameters, such as that especially the flow.
- a second problem is that the case of variable spreading factor and / or variable number of spreading factors is not currently addressed in the standard.
- the spreading factor may vary depending on the amount of data the EU has to transmit (how to choose the factor as well as the number of spreading codes is normalized).
- the CRNC did not not a priori knowledge of this spreading factor and cannot take into account account for this spreading factor to update the capacity credit.
- said spreading factor of reference is the minimum spreading factor.
- said spreading factor of reference is the minimum spreading factor. Indeed the latter can be determined relatively easily since it is mainly dependent on the maximum flow which is part of the definition of the service (note that the choice of factor minimum spread is not standardized and therefore depends on the manufacturers).
- the minimum spreading factor a a predetermined value, depending in particular on the type of service.
- this predetermined value can be adjustable, by means such as including “O&M” or “Operation & Maintenance” means in English.
- the minimum spreading factor can be set by the SRNC, and reported to the CRNC on the "lur" interface (if the SRNC is different from CRNC) via the messages “Radio Link Addition Request” and “Radio Link Set-up Request ”, the corresponding information element, or IE (for“ Information Element "in English) being noted” Minimum UL Channelization Code Length ".
- This minimum spreading factor is then also reported by CRNC to Node B with messages of the same type on the "lub" interface.
- the minimum spreading factor can be calculated, in particular from a parameter called TFCS (for "Transport Format Combination Set "in English) usually reported as per procedures provided by the corresponding standards, for dedicated channels (or radio links), or for common transport channels.
- TFCS Transport Format Combination Set
- UMTS a characteristic of a system such as UMTS is the possibility of transporting several services on the same connection, i.e. several transport channels on the same physical channel.
- Such channels of transport (or TrCH, for "Transport Channels” in English) are treated separately according to a channel coding scheme (including error detection coding, a error correcting coding, rate adaptation, and interleaving, such as recalled in connection with FIG. 2) before being time multiplexed for form a coded composite transport channel (or CCTrCH, for "Coded Composite Transport Channel "to transmit on one or more physical channels.
- CCTrCH coded Composite Transport Channel
- Transport blocks or "Transport Blocks” in English
- TTI transmission time interval
- the number and size of Transport blocks received for a given transport channel are variable depending on of the flow, and we define the notion of transport format as the knowledge of number and size of these transport blocks (and therefore instantaneous flow), for a given transport channel.
- the CRNC can also calculate the minimum spreading factor for all TFCs in the TFCS, or more generally the CRNC can calculate a spreading factor of reference based on the TFCS, regardless of the calculation method used.
- This second embodiment is a little more complex, but it can be the only solution when the minimum spread factor is not fixed, like this is the case for example for the PCPCH channel (“Physical Common Packet Channel "in English).
- the capacity credit can be updated on the basis a number of reference spreading codes (or here number of DPDCHs channels, for "Dedicated Physical Data Channel", for the upward direction), this number of advantageously being a maximum number, signaled by the SRNC to CRNC using the IE Maximum Number of UL information element DPDCHs ”.
- the number of DPDCH channels in the uplink direction can also vary and is therefore not known, a priori, from the CRNC.
- the invention therefore essentially provides that, in the case of variable spreading factor, and / or number of variable spreading codes, said update is performed on the basis a reference spreading factor and / or a reference number of codes spreading.
- the factor reference spread is the minimum spread factor reported in the "Radio Link Setup Request” message ("Minimum UL Channelization Code length” IE).
- the number of code references spread is the maximum number indicated in the message "Radio Link Setup Request ”(“ Maximum number of UL DPDCHs ”IE).
- Figure 4 can also be used to illustrate an example of means to be provided in a base station (or Node B in a system such as the system UMTS), and in a base station controller (or RNC for a system such as the UMTS system), to implement such a method according to the invention.
- a base station or Node B in a system such as the system UMTS
- a base station controller or RNC for a system such as the UMTS system
- a third problem is that the case of multicode transmission is not currently not covered in the standard.
- the cost for N codes is simply the sum of the costs of individual codes (N times the cost of a code if the spreading codes have the same spreading factor), or more generally of derive the cost for N codes based on the cost for a code. This would avoid a additional signage and would allow to take into account in a simpler way the case of multiple codes.
- N codes corresponds to the cost of the code with the lowest spreading factor (among these N codes) although this seems less logical since the processing of N codes can be very different from the processing a code.
- Another possibility is to report the different costs for different N numbers of codes (one per number of codes and per spreading factor). This however, would require more signage. However, in the sense amount, this may be possible because multiple codes are only allowed for the minimum spreading factor. Thus, limited signage would necessary.
- the invention therefore essentially provides that, in the case of multicode transmission, using N spread codes, said update is done on a cost basis for at least one of the N spreading codes.
- the costs given in the consumer law are costs per spreading code (or "Spreading code” or “channelization code” in English).
- the cost credited or debited from the capacity credit is taken as N times the cost of a code, where N is the number of codes.
- costs given in the consumption law are costs per code spreading code (or “channeling code” or “channelization code” in English).
- the cost credited or capacity credit debited is taken as N times the cost of a code, where N is the number of codes.
- Figure 4 can also be used to illustrate an example of means to be provided in a base station (or Node B in a system such as the system UMTS), and in a base station controller (or RNC for a system such as the UMTS system), to implement such a method according to the invention.
- a base station or Node B in a system such as the system UMTS
- a base station controller or RNC for a system such as the UMTS system
- the term "update" of the capacity credit used in all of the above is intended to cover both operations by which this capacity credit is debited, in the event that new radio resources are that operations by which this capacity credit is credited, in the cases where new radio resources are no longer needed and are therefore restored.
- Another object of the present invention is also to provide a charge and / or call admission control method, taking into account the processing capacity of a base station, determined according to this credit.
- the present invention also relates to a system for mobile radio, and a base station controller, for setting up work of such a method.
- the cost may be a function of the factor spreading, as specified in the previously mentioned standard (in its state current).
- the principle thus described is not limited to this case, and applies also in case the cost depends on one or more other parameters, such as that especially the flow.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- aux Node B par une interface appelée interface « lub »,
- entre eux par une interface appelée interface « lur »,
- au coeur de réseau CN par une interface appelée interface « lu ».
- des moyens de codage-canal 2,
- des moyens d'étalement 3,
- des moyens d'émission radio-fréquence 4.
- des moyens de réception radio-fréquence 6,
- des moyens 7 d'estimation des données reçues, comportant eux-mêmes notamment des moyens de désétalement 8 et des moyens de décodage-canal 9.
- pour les canaux dédiés, lors des procédures d'établissement, addition, effacement, ou reconfiguration, d'un lien radio (ou en anglais, « radio link set-up », « radio link addition », « radio link deletion », « radio link reconfiguration ») telles que définies dans le document 3G TS 25.433 publié par le 3GPP,
- pour les canaux communs, lors des procédures d'établissement, effacement, ou reconfiguration, d'un canal commun (ou en anglais, « common transport channel set-up », « common transport channel deletion », « common transport channel reconfiguration ») telles que définies dans le document 3G TS 25.433 publié par le 3GPP.
- la deuxième entité signale à la première entité sa capacité de traitement globale, ou crédit de capacité, et la loi de consommation, ou quantité de cette capacité de traitement globale, ou coût, en fonction des ressources nécessaires,
- la première entité met à jour le crédit de capacité sur la base de la loi de consommation,
- pour le cas de ressources radio correspondant à des canaux dédiés, un coût d'allocation différent est prévu pour le cas de premier lien radio, et pour le cas de lien radio additionnel,
- pour le cas de ressources radio correspondant à un canal commun associé à un canal dédié, ladite mise à jour est effectuée, dans le cas de premier lien radio sur la base du coût pour le canal dédié et d'un coût pour le canal commun associé, et dans le cas de lien radio additionnel sur la base du coût pour le canal dédié seul.
- pour le cas de canal dédié, le coût pour un premier lien radio inclut un coût pour un lien radio et un coût additionnel, et le coût pour un lien radio additionnel inclut seulement le coût pour un lien radio.
- pour le cas de canal commun associé à un canal dédié, ledit coût pour le canal commun associé correspond au coût d'un lien radio pour le canal dédié.
- la première entité comporte des moyens pour, dans le cas de ressources radio correspondant à un canal commun associé à un canal dédié, mettre à jour le crédit de capacité, dans le cas de premier lien radio sur la base du coût pour le canal dédié et d'un coût pour le canal commun associé, et dans le cas de lien radio additionnel sur la base du coût pour le canal dédié seul.
- des moyens pour, dans le cas de ressources radio correspondant à un canal commun associé à un canal dédié, mettre à jour le crédit de capacité, dans le cas de premier lien radio sur la base du coût pour le canal dédié et d'un coût pour le canal commun associé, et dans le cas de lien radio additionnel sur la base du coût pour le canal dédié seul.
- la deuxième entité signale à la première entité sa capacité de traitement globale, ou crédit de capacité, et la loi de consommation, ou quantité de cette capacité de traitement globale, ou coût, pour différentes valeurs de facteur d'étalement,
- la première entité met à jour le crédit de capacité sur la base de la loi de consommation,
- dans le cas de facteur d'étalement variable, et/ou de nombre de codes d'étalement variable, ladite mise à jour est effectuée sur la base d'un facteur d'étalement de référence et/ou d'un nombre de référence de codes d'étalement.
- la première entité comporte des moyens pour, dans le cas de facteur d'étalement variable, et/ou de nombre de codes d'étalement variable, effectuer ladite mise à jour sur la base d'un facteur d'étalement de référence et/ou d'un nombre de référence de codes d'étalement.
- des moyens pour, dans le cas de facteur d'étalement variable, et/ou de nombre de codes d'étalement variable, effectuer ladite mise à jour sur la base d'un facteur d'étalement de référence et/ou d'un nombre de référence de codes d'étalement.
- la deuxième entité signale à la première entité sa capacité de traitement globale, ou crédit de capacité, et la loi de consommation, ou quantité de cette capacité de traitement globale, ou coût, pour différentes valeurs de facteur d'étalement,
- la première entité met à jour le crédit de capacité sur la base de la loi de consommation,
- dans le cas de transmission multicode, utilisant N codes d'étalement, ladite mise à jour est effectuée sur la base du coût pour au moins un des N codes d'étalement.
- la première entité comporte des moyens pour, dans le cas de transmission multicode, utilisant N codes d'étalement, effectuer ladite mise à jour sur la base du coût pour au moins un des N codes d'étalement.
- des moyens pour, dans le cas de transmission multicode, utilisant N codes d'étalement, effectuer ladite mise à jour sur la base du coût pour au moins un des N codes d'étalement.
- la deuxième entité signale à la première entité sa capacité de traitement globale, ou crédit de capacité, et la loi de consommation, ou quantité de cette capacité de traitement globale, ou coût, en fonction des ressources nécessaires,
- la première entité met à jour le crédit de capacité sur la base de la loi de consommation,
- lorsque le crédit de capacité, dans le sens montant et/ou descendant, devient inférieur à un premier seuil donné, tout nouvel appel est rejeté jusqu'à ce que le crédit de capacité devienne supérieur à un second seuil donné, supérieur ou égal au premier seuil.
- la première entité comporte des moyens pour, lorsque le crédit de capacité, dans le sens montant et/ou descendant, devient inférieur à un premier seuil donné, rejeter tout nouvel appel jusqu'à ce que le crédit de capacité devienne supérieur à un second seuil donné, supérieur ou égal au premier seuil.
- des moyens pour, lorsque le crédit de capacité, dans le sens montant et/ou descendant, devient inférieur à un premier seuil donné, rejeter tout nouvel appel jusqu'à ce que le crédit de capacité devienne supérieur à un second seuil donné, supérieur ou égal au premier seuil.
- la deuxième entité signale à la première entité sa capacité de traitement globale, ou crédit de capacité, et la loi de consommation, ou quantité de cette capacité de traitement globale, ou coût, en fonction des ressources nécessaires,
- la première entité met à jour le crédit de capacité sur la base de la loi de consommation,
- lorsque le crédit de capacité devient inférieur à un seuil donné, une procédure de contrôle de surcharge est initiée.
- la première entité comporte des moyens pour, lorsque le crédit de capacité devient inférieur à un seuil donné, initier une procédure de contrôle de surcharge.
- des moyens pour, lorsque le crédit de capacité devient inférieur à un seuil donné, initier une procédure de contrôle de surcharge.
- la figure 1, décrite précédemment, rappelle l'architecture générale d'un système de radiocommunications mobiles, tel que notamment le système UMTS,
- les figures 2 et 3, décrites précédemment, rappellent les principaux traitements utilisés, respectivement en émission et en réception, dans une station de base, telle qu'un Node B pour le système UMTS,
- la figure 4 est un schéma destiné à illustrer un exemple de mise en oeuvre d'un procédé suivant l'invention.
- un coût spécifique est ajouté dans la loi de consommation pour le canal DSCH, pour quelques valeurs de facteurs d'étalement ou pour toutes les valeurs possibles de facteurs d'étalement (la deuxième solution étant préférable, c'est-à-dire un coût par facteur d'étalement, comme cela est le cas pour le canal DCH).
- un des coûts spécifiés pour le DL DCH (ou « Downlink DCH », ou DCH dans le sens descendant), soit « DL RL cost », est pris en compte (on notera que seul un coût pour le sens descendant est à prendre à compte puisque le DSCH est un canal descendant seulement et puisque le traitement présente habituellement des différences significatives pour l'émetteur et le récepteur du Node B).
- lors d'une procédure d'établissement d'un lien radio (ou en anglais « Radio Link Set-up »), le coût DSCH (soit un coût spécifique, soit le coût « DL RL cost » pour le DCH, suivant les deux possibilités indiquées précédemment) est débité du credit de capacité (ce coût est débité une seule fois, quel que soit le nombre de liens radio, contrairement au coût DCH),
- lors d'une procédure d'addition d'un lien radio (ou en anglais « Radio Link Addition »), le crédit de capacité n'est pas modifié à cause du DSCH (mais il peut être changé pour tenir compte du traitement DCH),
- lors d'une procédure de reconfiguration d'un lien radio (ou en anglais « Radio Link Re-configuration »), le crédit de capacité est modifié à cause du canal DSCH une fois seulement (si le nouveau coût DSCH est différent de l'ancien) quel que soit le nombre de liens radio.
- des moyens notés 13 pour signaler à un contrôleur de stations de base sa capacité de traitement globale, ou crédit de capacité, et la quantité de cette capacité de traitement globale, ou coût, en fonction des ressources nécessaires.
- des moyens notés 14 pour recevoir d'une station de base sa capacité de traitement globale, ou crédit de capacité, et la quantité de cette capacité de traitement globale, ou coût, en fonction des ressources nécessaires,
- des moyens notés 15 pour mettre à jour le crédit de capacité sur la base de la loi de consommation, ladite mise à jour étant effectuée, dans le cas de premier lien radio sur la base du coût pour le canal dédié et d'un coût pour le canal commun associé, et dans le cas de lien radio additionnel sur la base du coût pour le canal dédié seul.
- des moyens notés 13 pour signaler à un contrôleur de stations de base sa capacité de traitement globale, ou crédit de capacité, et la quantité de cette capacité de traitement globale, ou coût, pour différentes valeurs de facteur d'étalement.
- des moyens notés 14 pour recevoir d'une station de base sa capacité de traitement globale, ou crédit de capacité, et la quantité de cette capacité de traitement globale, ou coût, pour différentes valeurs de facteur d'étalement,
- des moyens également notés 15 pour mettre à jour le crédit de capacité sur la base de la loi de consommation, ladite mise à jour étant effectuée, dans le cas de facteur d'étalement variable et/ou de nombre de codes d'étalement variable, sur la base d'un facteur d'étalement de référence et/ou d'un nombre de référence de codes d'étalement.
- des moyens pour recevoir une valeur prédéterminée de facteur d'étalement de référence et/ou de nombre de référence de codes d'étalement, signalée à ce contrôleur de stations de base (CRNC) par un contrôleur de stations de base distinct (SRNC).
- des moyens pour calculer une valeur de facteur d'étalement de référence à partir d'un paramètre signalé à ce contrôleur de stations de base (CRNC) par un contrôleur de stations de base distinct (SRNC).
- des moyens pour recevoir une valeur de facteur d'étalement de référence, signalée par un contrôleur de stations de base distinct (SRNC) qui la calcule lui-même.
- des moyens notés 13 pour signaler à un contrôleur de stations de base sa capacité de traitement globale, ou crédit de capacité, et la quantité de cette capacité de traitement globale, ou coût, pour différentes valeurs de facteur d'étalement.
- des moyens notés 14 pour recevoir d'une station de base sa capacité de traitement globale, ou crédit de capacité, et la quantité de cette capacité de traitement globale, ou coût, pour différentes valeurs de facteur d'étalement,
- des moyens également notés 15 pour mettre à jour le crédit de capacité sur la base de la loi de consommation, ladite mise à jour étant effectuée, dans le cas de transmission multicode, utilisant N codes d'étalement, sur la base du coût pour au moins un des N codes d'étalement.
- pour les procédures de « radio link set-up », « radio link addition », et « common transport channel set-up », le crédit de capacité est débité,
- pour les procédures de «radio link deletion », et de « common transport channel deletion », le crédit de capacité est crédité,
- pour le cas de « radio link reconfiguration » et de « common transport channel reconfiguration » le crédit de capacité est débité ou crédité selon que la différence entre le coût d'allocation pour le nouveau débit et pour l'ancien débit est négative ou positive.
- lorsque le crédit de capacité (dans le sens montant et/ou descendant) devient inférieur à un premier seuil donné, la procédure de contrôle d'admission d'appels peut rejeter tout nouvel appel jusqu'à ce que le crédit de capacité devienne supérieur à un second seuil donné (supérieur ou égal au premier seuil).
- en outre, lorsque le crédit de capacité devient inférieur à un seuil donné (qui peut être égal à l'un des précédents) une procédure de contrôle de surcharge peut être initiée.
Claims (16)
- Procédé de gestion de ressources de traitement dans un système de radiocommunications mobiles, dans lequel une entité dite première entité gère des ressources radio et des ressources de traitement correspondantes, ces dernières étant prévues dans une entité dite deuxième entité distincte de la première, procédé dans lequel:la deuxième entité signale à la première entité sa capacité de traitement globale, ou crédit de capacité, et la loi de consommation, ou quantité de cette capacité de traitement globale, ou coût, pour différentes valeurs de facteur d'étalement,la première entité met à jour le crédit de capacité sur la base de la loi de consommation,dans le cas de transmission multicode, utilisant N codes d'étalement, ladite mise à jour est effectuée sur la base du coût pour au moins un des N codes d'étalement.
- Procédé selon la revendication 1, dans lequel le coût pour les N codes correspond à la somme des coûts pour chacun des N codes.
- Procédé selon la revendication 1, dans lequel le coût pour les N codes est déterminé à partir du coût pour un code.
- Procédé selon la revendication 3, dans lequel le coût pour les N codes correspond au coût pour le code de facteur d'étalement minimum.
- Système de radiocommunications mobiles, pour la mise en oeuvre d'un procédé selon l'une des revendications 1 à 4, système dans lequel:la première entité comporte des moyens pour, dans le cas de transmission multicode, utilisant N codes d'étalement, effectuer ladite mise à jour sur la base du coût pour au moins un des N codes d'étalement.
- Contrôleur de stations de base pour système de radiocommunications mobiles, pour la mise en oeuvre d'un procédé selon l'une des revendications 1 à 4, ledit contrôleur de stations de base comportant :des moyens pour, dans le cas de transmission multicode, utilisant N codes d'étalement, effectuer ladite mise à jour sur la base du coût pour au moins un des N codes d'étalement.
- Procédé pour le contrôle de charge et/ou d'admission d'appels, dans un système de radiocommunications mobiles dans lequel une entité dite première entité gère des ressources radio et des ressources de traitement correspondantes, ces dernières étant prévues dans une entité dite deuxième entité distincte de la première, procédé dans lequel:la deuxième entité signale à la première entité sa capacité de traitement globale, ou crédit de capacité, et la loi de consommation, ou quantité de cette capacité de traitement globale, ou coût, en fonction des ressources nécessaires,la première entité met à jour le crédit de capacité sur la base de la loi de consommation,lorsque le crédit de capacité, dans le sens montant et/ou descendant, devient inférieur à un premier seuil donné, tout nouvel appel est rejeté jusqu'à ce que le crédit de capacité devienne supérieur à un second seuil donné, supérieur ou égal au premier seuil.
- Système de radiocommunications mobiles, pour la mise en oeuvre d'un procédé selon la revendication 7, système dans lequel:la première entité comporte des moyens pour, lorsque le crédit de capacité, dans le sens montant et/ou descendant, devient inférieur à un premier seuil donné, rejeter tout nouvel appel jusqu'à ce que le crédit de capacité devienne supérieur à un second seuil donné, supérieur ou égal au premier seuil.
- Système selon la revendication 8, dans lequel ladite première entité est un contrôleur de stations de base.
- Système selon la revendication 8, dans lequel ladite deuxième entité est une station de base.
- Contrôleur de stations de base pour système de radiocommunications mobiles, pour la mise en oeuvre d'un procédé selon la revendication 7, ledit contrôleur de stations de base comportant:des moyens pour, lorsque le crédit de capacité, dans le sens montant et/ou descendant, devient inférieur à un premier seuil donné, rejeter tout nouvel appel jusqu'à ce que le crédit de capacité devienne supérieur à un second seuil donné, supérieur ou égal au premier seuil.
- Procédé pour le contrôle de charge et/ou d'admission d'appels, dans un système de radiocommunications mobiles dans lequel une entité dite première entité gère des ressources radio et des ressources de traitement correspondantes, ces dernières étant prévues dans une entité dite deuxième entité distincte de la première, procédé dans lequel:la deuxième entité signale à la première entité sa capacité de traitement globale, ou crédit de capacité, et la loi de consommation, ou quantité de cette capacité de traitement globale, ou coût, en fonction des ressources nécessaires,la première entité met à jour le crédit de capacité sur la base de la loi de consommation,lorsque le crédit de capacité devient inférieur à un seuil donné, une procédure de contrôle de surcharge est initiée.
- Système de radiocommunications mobiles, pour la mise en oeuvre d'un procédé selon la revendication 12, système dans lequel:la première entité comporte des moyens pour, lorsque le crédit de capacité devient inférieur à un seuil donné, initier une procédure de contrôle de surcharge.
- Système selon la revendication 13, dans lequel ladite première entité est un contrôleur de stations de base.
- Système selon la revendication 13 , dans lequel ladite deuxième entité est une station de base.
- Contrôleur de stations de base pour système de radiocommunications mobiles, pour la mise en oeuvre d'un procédé selon la revendication 12, ledit contrôleur de stations de base comportant:des moyens pour, lorsque le crédit de capacité devient inférieur à un seuil donné, initier une procédure de contrôle de surcharge.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
FR0102527A FR2821515B1 (fr) | 2001-02-23 | 2001-02-23 | Procede de gestion de ressources de traitement dans un systeme de radiocommunications mobiles |
FR0102527 | 2001-02-23 |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1235459A1 true EP1235459A1 (fr) | 2002-08-28 |
EP1235459B1 EP1235459B1 (fr) | 2008-04-16 |
Family
ID=8860399
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP02290245A Expired - Lifetime EP1235458B1 (fr) | 2001-02-23 | 2002-02-04 | Procédé de gestion de ressources de traitement dans un système de radiocommunications mobiles |
EP02290248A Expired - Lifetime EP1235459B1 (fr) | 2001-02-23 | 2002-02-04 | Procédé de gestion de ressources de traitement dans un système de radiocommunications mobiles |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP02290245A Expired - Lifetime EP1235458B1 (fr) | 2001-02-23 | 2002-02-04 | Procédé de gestion de ressources de traitement dans un système de radiocommunications mobiles |
Country Status (9)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (3) | US7130640B2 (fr) |
EP (2) | EP1235458B1 (fr) |
JP (4) | JP4684521B2 (fr) |
KR (2) | KR100944294B1 (fr) |
CN (4) | CN101394670B (fr) |
AT (2) | ATE392104T1 (fr) |
DE (2) | DE60226088T2 (fr) |
ES (2) | ES2305184T3 (fr) |
FR (1) | FR2821515B1 (fr) |
Families Citing this family (34)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
FR2821515B1 (fr) * | 2001-02-23 | 2003-05-23 | Cit Alcatel | Procede de gestion de ressources de traitement dans un systeme de radiocommunications mobiles |
US6631269B1 (en) * | 2002-05-23 | 2003-10-07 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Signaling connection admission control in a wireless network |
GB0215013D0 (en) * | 2002-06-28 | 2002-08-07 | Nokia Corp | Communications system and method |
US20040032859A1 (en) * | 2002-08-15 | 2004-02-19 | Miao Kai X. | Managing a remote resource |
US7042857B2 (en) | 2002-10-29 | 2006-05-09 | Qualcom, Incorporated | Uplink pilot and signaling transmission in wireless communication systems |
US6909703B2 (en) * | 2003-02-11 | 2005-06-21 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Method for distribution of wireless transmit/receive unit (WTRU) capability between point to point and point to multipoint services |
SE0301400D0 (sv) * | 2003-05-12 | 2003-05-12 | Ericsson Telefon Ab L M | A method in a telecommunication system |
US7177297B2 (en) * | 2003-05-12 | 2007-02-13 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Fast frequency hopping with a code division multiplexed pilot in an OFDMA system |
GB2404114B (en) * | 2003-07-12 | 2005-08-10 | Motorola Inc | Communication system, communication unit and method of power saving therein |
FR2861529B1 (fr) * | 2003-10-24 | 2006-02-03 | Evolium Sas | Procede de gestion de ressources de traitement dans un systeme de radiocommunications mobiles |
US8611283B2 (en) | 2004-01-28 | 2013-12-17 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and apparatus of using a single channel to provide acknowledgement and assignment messages |
US7257409B2 (en) * | 2004-03-31 | 2007-08-14 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Centralized cell homing and load balancing in a base station controller |
US8085875B2 (en) * | 2004-07-16 | 2011-12-27 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Incremental pilot insertion for channnel and interference estimation |
US8891349B2 (en) | 2004-07-23 | 2014-11-18 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method of optimizing portions of a frame |
CN100340127C (zh) * | 2004-11-08 | 2007-09-26 | 大唐移动通信设备有限公司 | 基站控制器对基站资源的管理方法 |
US7453849B2 (en) * | 2004-12-22 | 2008-11-18 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method of implicit deassignment of resources |
US8831115B2 (en) * | 2004-12-22 | 2014-09-09 | Qualcomm Incorporated | MC-CDMA multiplexing in an orthogonal uplink |
US8238923B2 (en) * | 2004-12-22 | 2012-08-07 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method of using shared resources in a communication system |
FI20041672A0 (fi) * | 2004-12-27 | 2004-12-27 | Nokia Corp | Yhteyden varaus yhteysrajapinnassa |
WO2006075630A1 (fr) * | 2005-01-11 | 2006-07-20 | Ntt Docomo, Inc. | Procede de gestion de ressources sans fil, station de base sans fil et station de commande de ligne sans fil |
JP4538366B2 (ja) * | 2005-03-29 | 2010-09-08 | 株式会社エヌ・ティ・ティ・ドコモ | 伝送速度制御方法、移動局及び無線基地局 |
JP2006311490A (ja) * | 2005-03-30 | 2006-11-09 | Hitachi Kokusai Electric Inc | 無線基地局装置 |
EP1771021A1 (fr) * | 2005-09-29 | 2007-04-04 | Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) | Procédé et appareil d'attribution des ressources radio |
CN100444691C (zh) * | 2005-12-21 | 2008-12-17 | 中国移动通信集团公司 | 对移动终端状态转换过程中的非接入层信令的处理方法 |
US20070153768A1 (en) * | 2005-12-30 | 2007-07-05 | Balakumar Jagadesan | Apparatus and method for cordless internet protocol |
DE602006014792D1 (de) * | 2006-01-26 | 2010-07-22 | Alcatel Lucent | Unterstützung von Diensten mit hoher Datenrate in einem Mobilkommunikationssystem |
US7844277B2 (en) * | 2006-03-21 | 2010-11-30 | Alcatel-Lucent Usa Inc. | Method for coordinated control of radio resources in a distributed wireless system |
US7949354B2 (en) * | 2006-11-01 | 2011-05-24 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Method and apparatus for sharing transport channel for node serving plural cells with multimedia broadcast/multicast |
US7826366B2 (en) * | 2006-11-07 | 2010-11-02 | Microsoft Corporation | Joint channel assignment and routing in wireless networks |
US7680089B2 (en) * | 2006-11-16 | 2010-03-16 | Microsoft Corporation | Dynamic channel assignment and connectivity maintenance in wireless networks |
CN101902779B (zh) * | 2009-05-26 | 2013-06-05 | 华为技术有限公司 | 控制上行增强专用信道的信用度资源分配的方法、设备及系统 |
CN101631362B (zh) | 2009-08-07 | 2011-09-14 | 华为技术有限公司 | 一种构建无线链路的方法、基站、基站控制器及系统 |
US8649269B2 (en) * | 2010-01-15 | 2014-02-11 | Alcatel Lucent | Method of controlling resource usage in communication systems |
WO2014169957A1 (fr) * | 2013-04-18 | 2014-10-23 | Nokia Solutions And Networks Oy | Contrôle d'admission de connexion dans des communications |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2000033589A1 (fr) * | 1998-11-30 | 2000-06-08 | Nokia Networks Oy | Technique de planification des capacites d'interface hertzienne |
GB2347317A (en) * | 1999-02-25 | 2000-08-30 | Motorola Ltd | Determining a cost function from the actual resource impact of supporting a subscriber in a communications system |
WO2000054536A1 (fr) * | 1999-03-08 | 2000-09-14 | Nokia Networks Oy | Procede permettant d'etablir une communication entre un appareil utilisateur et un reseau radio |
Family Cites Families (38)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5161154A (en) * | 1991-02-12 | 1992-11-03 | Motorola, Inc. | Communication system having a varied communication resource grant channel usage requirement |
ZA946674B (en) * | 1993-09-08 | 1995-05-02 | Qualcomm Inc | Method and apparatus for determining the transmission data rate in a multi-user communication system |
US5638412A (en) * | 1994-06-15 | 1997-06-10 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method for providing service and rate negotiation in a mobile communication system |
US5867562A (en) * | 1996-04-17 | 1999-02-02 | Scherer; Gordon F. | Call processing system with call screening |
US5886988A (en) * | 1996-10-23 | 1999-03-23 | Arraycomm, Inc. | Channel assignment and call admission control for spatial division multiple access communication systems |
US6070085A (en) * | 1997-08-12 | 2000-05-30 | Qualcomm Inc. | Method and apparatus for controlling transmit power thresholds based on classification of wireless communication subscribers |
FI106181B (fi) * | 1997-09-17 | 2000-11-30 | Nokia Mobile Phones Ltd | Kanavien allokointi solukkoradiojärjestelmän tukiasemissa |
KR100250716B1 (ko) * | 1997-10-31 | 2000-04-01 | 서평원 | 코드분할 다중접속 이동통신시스템 기지국의 호제어방법 |
US6895245B2 (en) * | 1998-03-06 | 2005-05-17 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericssion(Publ) | Telecommunications interexchange measurement transfer |
EP1066729B1 (fr) * | 1998-04-03 | 2005-06-29 | Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) | Acces et allocation de ressources radio flexibles dans un systeme universel de telecommunications mobiles (sutm) |
FI981546A (fi) * | 1998-07-03 | 2000-01-04 | Nokia Networks Oy | Tiedonsiirtomenetelmä ja matkapuhelinjärjestelmä |
FI981635A (fi) * | 1998-07-17 | 2000-01-18 | Nokia Networks Oy | Dynaaminen kanavanosoitusmenetelmä solukkoradioverkossa ja järjestelmä kanavanosoituksen suorittamiseksi |
US6366780B1 (en) * | 1998-10-08 | 2002-04-02 | Nortel Networks Ltd. | Real-time spectrum usage data collection in a wireless communication system |
US6233231B1 (en) * | 1998-12-03 | 2001-05-15 | Motorola, Inc. | Data transmission within a spread-spectrum communication system |
US6792273B1 (en) * | 1998-12-18 | 2004-09-14 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Method and apparatus for resource reservation in a mobile radio communication system |
US6456858B1 (en) * | 1998-12-21 | 2002-09-24 | Verizon Wireless | System and methods in a dual mode wireless system for transmitting rescan command based on detected network conditions |
KR100366799B1 (ko) * | 1998-12-26 | 2003-04-07 | 엘지전자 주식회사 | 이동통신시스템의전송전력제어방법 |
US6163700A (en) * | 1998-12-30 | 2000-12-19 | Ericsson Inc. | System and method for adaptive reservation of radio resources for cells belonging to localized service area |
FI107505B (fi) * | 1999-02-16 | 2001-08-15 | Nokia Networks Oy | Pääsynvalvontamenetelmä |
US6507567B1 (en) * | 1999-04-09 | 2003-01-14 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Efficient handling of connections in a mobile communications network |
US6690938B1 (en) * | 1999-05-06 | 2004-02-10 | Qualcomm Incorporated | System and method for reducing dropped calls in a wireless communications network |
CN1196373C (zh) * | 1999-07-05 | 2005-04-06 | 诺基亚公司 | 选择编码方法的方法 |
US6701149B1 (en) * | 1999-07-19 | 2004-03-02 | Nortel Networks Limited | Handoff framework to support real-time delay-critical services in a next generation network |
US6487415B1 (en) * | 1999-07-19 | 2002-11-26 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Method for initiating call blocking based upon pilot fraction |
JP3309836B2 (ja) * | 1999-07-22 | 2002-07-29 | 日本電気株式会社 | Cdmaセルラー無線システムおよび通信方法 |
GB2356770A (en) * | 1999-11-23 | 2001-05-30 | Ericsson Telefon Ab L M | SRNS relocation in a UMTS network |
US6434380B1 (en) * | 1999-12-13 | 2002-08-13 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Dynamic negotiation of resources for user equipment in wireless communications system |
US6393276B1 (en) * | 2000-01-12 | 2002-05-21 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson | Mobile station assisted forward link open loop power and rate control in a CDMA system |
EP1117184A1 (fr) * | 2000-01-17 | 2001-07-18 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Procédé et dispositif pour un système de radiocommunication cellulaire du type AMRC |
US6760303B1 (en) * | 2000-03-29 | 2004-07-06 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Channel-type switching based on cell load |
KR100510642B1 (ko) * | 2000-06-21 | 2005-08-31 | 엘지전자 주식회사 | 드리프트 제어국의 무선 인터페이스 방법 |
US6738624B1 (en) * | 2000-11-16 | 2004-05-18 | Nokia Corporation | Method and system for capacity reporting in a mobile telecommunications network |
US6985739B2 (en) * | 2000-12-15 | 2006-01-10 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Admission and congestion control in a CDMA-based mobile radio communications system |
FR2819658B1 (fr) * | 2001-01-12 | 2004-04-09 | Cit Alcatel | Procede de gestion des ressources de traitement dans un systeme de radiocommunications mobiles |
FR2821515B1 (fr) * | 2001-02-23 | 2003-05-23 | Cit Alcatel | Procede de gestion de ressources de traitement dans un systeme de radiocommunications mobiles |
KR100399056B1 (ko) * | 2001-11-21 | 2003-09-26 | 한국전자통신연구원 | 무선통신망에서의 가변 서비스품질 파라미터 협상에 의한무선자원 할당 방법 |
KR100420917B1 (ko) * | 2001-12-27 | 2004-03-02 | 삼성전자주식회사 | 비동기 imt-2000 무선망 제어국에서의 트래픽 부하제어 시스템 및 그 방법 |
US6791968B2 (en) * | 2002-10-24 | 2004-09-14 | Motorola, Inc. | Method and apparatus for wirelessly communicating different information streams |
-
2001
- 2001-02-23 FR FR0102527A patent/FR2821515B1/fr not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2002
- 2002-02-04 ES ES02290248T patent/ES2305184T3/es not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2002-02-04 EP EP02290245A patent/EP1235458B1/fr not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2002-02-04 AT AT02290245T patent/ATE392104T1/de not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2002-02-04 DE DE60226088T patent/DE60226088T2/de not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2002-02-04 DE DE60225961T patent/DE60225961T2/de not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2002-02-04 ES ES02290245T patent/ES2305183T3/es not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2002-02-04 AT AT02290248T patent/ATE392787T1/de not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2002-02-04 EP EP02290248A patent/EP1235459B1/fr not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2002-02-12 JP JP2002033441A patent/JP4684521B2/ja not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2002-02-12 JP JP2002033442A patent/JP2002271297A/ja active Pending
- 2002-02-14 US US10/074,000 patent/US7130640B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2002-02-14 US US10/073,950 patent/US6996401B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2002-02-20 KR KR1020020008973A patent/KR100944294B1/ko active IP Right Grant
- 2002-02-20 KR KR1020020008970A patent/KR100886283B1/ko active IP Right Grant
- 2002-02-22 CN CN200810174134XA patent/CN101394670B/zh not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2002-02-22 CN CN02105110A patent/CN1372392A/zh active Pending
- 2002-02-22 CN CNB021051119A patent/CN100469176C/zh not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2002-02-22 CN CN2010101651919A patent/CN101827405B/zh not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2005
- 2005-12-08 US US11/296,333 patent/US20060089150A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2007
- 2007-08-03 JP JP2007202772A patent/JP4818221B2/ja not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2008
- 2008-05-28 JP JP2008139949A patent/JP4806697B2/ja not_active Expired - Lifetime
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2000033589A1 (fr) * | 1998-11-30 | 2000-06-08 | Nokia Networks Oy | Technique de planification des capacites d'interface hertzienne |
GB2347317A (en) * | 1999-02-25 | 2000-08-30 | Motorola Ltd | Determining a cost function from the actual resource impact of supporting a subscriber in a communications system |
WO2000054536A1 (fr) * | 1999-03-08 | 2000-09-14 | Nokia Networks Oy | Procede permettant d'etablir une communication entre un appareil utilisateur et un reseau radio |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
EUROPEAN TELECOMMUNICATIONS STANDARDS INSTITUTE: "Technical Specification;Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); UTRAN lub Interface NBAP Signalling (3G TS 25.433 version 3.2.0 Release 1999)", ETSI TS 125 433 V3.2.0, XX, XX, June 2000 (2000-06-01), XP002166441 * |
Also Published As
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP1235458B1 (fr) | Procédé de gestion de ressources de traitement dans un système de radiocommunications mobiles | |
EP1264494B1 (fr) | Procede d'emission de signaux radio, reseau d'acces et terminal de radiocommunication appliquant le procede | |
EP1223782B1 (fr) | Procédé de gestion de ressources de traitement dans un système de radiocommunications mobiles | |
FR2813006A1 (fr) | Procede pour tenir compte de la capacite de traitement du trafic, pour le controle de la charge de trafic dans un reseau de radiocommunications mobiles | |
EP1271980A1 (fr) | Procédé de gestion de resources de traitement dans un système de radiocommunications mobiles | |
EP1526751A1 (fr) | Procédé de gestion de ressources de traitement dans un système de radiocommunications mobiles | |
EP1223783B1 (fr) | Procédé de gestion de ressources de traitement dans un système de radiocommunications mobiles | |
EP1143639A1 (fr) | Procédé d'ajustement des instants d'émission dans un système de radiocommunications mobiles | |
EP1202470B1 (fr) | Procédé et dispositif de contrôle de la puissance d'émission d'un téléphone mobile cellulaire | |
WO2004086647A2 (fr) | Procede pour ameliorer le controle dans un systeme de radiocommunications mobiles |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20030228 |
|
AKX | Designation fees paid |
Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20061113 |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: FRENCH |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 60226088 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20080529 Kind code of ref document: P |
|
RAP2 | Party data changed (patent owner data changed or rights of a patent transferred) |
Owner name: ALCATEL LUCENT |
|
NLT2 | Nl: modifications (of names), taken from the european patent patent bulletin |
Owner name: ALCATEL LUCENT Effective date: 20080625 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080916 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080416 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2305184 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080416 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FD4D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080416 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080716 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080416 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20090119 |
|
BERE | Be: lapsed |
Owner name: EVOLIUM S.A.S. Effective date: 20090228 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080416 Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20090228 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20090228 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20090228 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20090228 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080717 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20090204 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080416 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: TP Owner name: ALCATEL LUCENT, FR Effective date: 20130612 Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: CA Effective date: 20130612 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: GC Effective date: 20130920 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 14 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 15 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 17 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R082 Ref document number: 60226088 Country of ref document: DE Representative=s name: LOUIS, POEHLAU, LOHRENTZ, DE Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R081 Ref document number: 60226088 Country of ref document: DE Owner name: NOKIA TECHNOLOGIES OY, FI Free format text: FORMER OWNER: EVOLIUM S.A.S., PARIS, FR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: 732E Free format text: REGISTERED BETWEEN 20201022 AND 20201028 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Payment date: 20210113 Year of fee payment: 20 Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20210112 Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20210119 Year of fee payment: 20 Ref country code: ES Payment date: 20210309 Year of fee payment: 20 Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20210127 Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20210112 Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MK Effective date: 20220203 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: PE20 Expiry date: 20220203 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION Effective date: 20220203 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FD2A Effective date: 20220526 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION Effective date: 20220205 |