EP1205530B1 - Catalytic converting process for producing prolifically diesel oil and liquefied gas - Google Patents

Catalytic converting process for producing prolifically diesel oil and liquefied gas Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1205530B1
EP1205530B1 EP00938463.7A EP00938463A EP1205530B1 EP 1205530 B1 EP1205530 B1 EP 1205530B1 EP 00938463 A EP00938463 A EP 00938463A EP 1205530 B1 EP1205530 B1 EP 1205530B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
oil
gasoline
catalyst
cracking
zone
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP00938463.7A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1205530A1 (en
EP1205530A4 (en
Inventor
Jiushun Zhang
Anguo Mao
Xiaoxiang Zhong
Zhigang Zhang
Zubi Chen
Yamin Wang
Wei Wang
Shuxin Cui
Zeyu Wang
Hua Cui
Ruichi Zhang
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Sinopec Research Institute of Petroleum Processing
China Petrochemical Corp
Original Assignee
Sinopec Research Institute of Petroleum Processing
China Petrochemical Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Sinopec Research Institute of Petroleum Processing, China Petrochemical Corp filed Critical Sinopec Research Institute of Petroleum Processing
Publication of EP1205530A1 publication Critical patent/EP1205530A1/en
Publication of EP1205530A4 publication Critical patent/EP1205530A4/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1205530B1 publication Critical patent/EP1205530B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G11/00Catalytic cracking, in the absence of hydrogen, of hydrocarbon oils
    • C10G11/14Catalytic cracking, in the absence of hydrogen, of hydrocarbon oils with preheated moving solid catalysts
    • C10G11/18Catalytic cracking, in the absence of hydrogen, of hydrocarbon oils with preheated moving solid catalysts according to the "fluidised-bed" technique

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a process for catalytic cracking of hydrocarbon oils in the absence of hydrogen, and specifically relates to a process for catalytic cracking of petroleum hydrocarbon stocks in the absence of hydrogen to increase simultaneously the yields of diesel oil and liquefied gas.
  • Liquefied gas is one of the important petrochemical products, of which light olefins are important chemical raw materials of high commercial value.
  • Diesel oil has high heat efficiency and the exhaust tail gas from vehicles running on diesel oil contains less harmful constituents, so it meets the more and more rigorous requirements for environmental protection all over the world. Thus, following the increase in the number of vehicles running on diesel oil, the market demand for diesel oils is also growing.
  • Diesel oil comes mainly from fraction oils produced by the primary and secondary processing of crude oil.
  • the primary processing i.e. the atmospheric and vacuum distillation
  • the yield of diesel fractions from crude oil is fixed, so no potential can be tapped.
  • catalytic cracking is usually adopted for producing diesel oil. Featuring large-volume treatment and flexible operation conditions, this process of catalytic cracking is an important means for improving the yields of liquefied gas and diesel oil.
  • CN1031834A discloses a catalytic cracking process for producing more light olefins. Although this process can produce large quantities of liquefied gas, but its yield of diesel oil is relatively low, generally lees than 10wt%, and moreover it requires a special catalyst and processing unit.
  • CN1085885A discloses a method for obtaining higher yields of liquefied gas and gasoline under the following reaction conditions: a reaction temperature of 480°-550°C, a pressure of 130-350KPa, a WHSV of 1-150h -1 , a catalyst/oil ratio of 4-15, and a steam/hydrocarbon stock weight ratio of 0.05-0.12:1.
  • the yield of liquefied gas in the reaction products is 30-40wt%, but that of diesel oil is comparatively low.
  • CN1160746A discloses a catalytic cracking process for raising the octane number of low-grade gasoline fractions, wherein a low-grade gasoline is introduced into a riser reactor through its lower part and the reaction is curried out under the conditions of a reaction temperature of 600°-730°C, a WHSV of 1-180h -1 , and catalyst/oil ratio of 6-180, then a high octane gasoline is mainly obtained.
  • the feedstocks employed in this process are low-grade gasolines, such as straight-run gasoline, coker gasoline and so on, and the yields of liquefied gas and diesel oil in the reaction products are 24-39wt% and 0.5-2.3wt% respectively.
  • USP3, 784, 463 discloses a process carried out in a reaction system comprising at least two riser reactors, wherein a low-grade gasoline is introduced into one of the riser reactors and catalytic cracking reaction occurs.
  • a low-grade gasoline is introduced into one of the riser reactors and catalytic cracking reaction occurs.
  • the gasoline octane number and yield of liquefied gas are improved.
  • this process cannot give higher yield of diesel oil, and it requires that the reaction unit should be revamped by adding at least another riser.
  • USP5,846,403 discloses a process of recracking of catalytic naphtha to obtain a maximum yield of light olefins. The process is carried out in a riser reactor comprising two reaction zones, namely an upstream reaction zone in the lower part of the reactor and a downstream reaction zone in the upper part.
  • the feedstock is a light catalytic naphtha (having a boiling point below 140°C), and the reaction conditions are: an oil-catalyst contact temperature of 620°-775°C, an oil and gas residence time of less than 1.5 sec., a catalyst/oil ratio of 75-150, and the proportion of steam accounting for 2-50wt% the weight of naphtha, while in the downstream reaction zone, the feedstock is a conventional catalytic cracking stock (having a boiling point of 220°-575°C), and the reaction conditions are: a temperature of 600°-750°C and an oil and gas residence time of less than 20 sec.
  • the yields of liquefied gas and light cycle oil (i.e. diesel oil) of this process increase by 0.97-1.21 percentage points and 0.13-0.31 percentage points higher.
  • CN1034949A discloses a process for converting petroleum hydrocarbons in which the stocks, ethane, gasoline, catalytic cracking stock and cycle oil, are successively upwardly introduced into a riser reactor through its lowermost part. This process is mainly aimed at producing light olefins, but the total yield of gasoline, diesel oil and liquefied gas decreases.
  • EP0369536A1 disclosed a process for catalytic cracking hydrocarbon feedstock, in which a hydrocarbon feedstock is charged into the lower part of the riser reactor wherein said hydrocarbon feedstock is admixed with freshly regenerated cracking catalyst, and a recycle portion of a light liquid hydrocarbon stream is charged into the riser zone at a level above the hydrocarbon feedstock charging level.
  • This process operates in such a manner to produce maximum quantities of fuel oil, or alternatively to produce maximum quantities of olefins in different conditions, but can't increase the yields of diesel oil and of olefins simultaneously.
  • US P4,422,925 discloses a process for fluidized catalytic cracking hydrocarbon feedstock for producing gaseous olefins, which comprises charging gaseous C 2 to C 3 rich stock into the lowermost portion of the riser reaction zone to contact with hot freshly regenerated catalyst and charging heavy hydrocarbon stock to an upper section, of the riser, and introducing naphtha or gas oil into a section between said lower and upper sections of said riser.
  • This process can produce high yield of light olefins but the increment of yield of diesel oil is very small.
  • US P3894932 disclosed a method for converting hydrocarbons which comprises passing C 3 -C 4 gaseous hydrocarbon fraction through a lower portion of a riser, introducing gas oil at one or more spaced apart downstream intervals, and introducing C 2 -C 4 hydrocarbon or isobutylene or gas oil through the upper portion of the riser. This method is aimed at producing aromatics and isobutane but can't increase the yields of diesel oil and liquefied gas simultaneously.
  • Another method of increasing the yield of liquefied gas is by adding a catalyst promoter to the catalytic cracking catalyst.
  • a catalyst promoter for example, USP4,309,280 discloses a method of adding a HZSM-5 zeolite in an amount of 0.01-1% by weight of the catalyst directly into the catalytic cracking unit.
  • USP3, 758,403 discloses a catalyst comprising ZSM-5 zeolite and large-pore zeolite (e.g. the Y-type and X- type) (in a ratio of 1:10-3:1) as active components, thereby raising the yield of liquefied gas and the gasoline octane number by a big margin, while the yields of propene and butene are increased by about 10wt%.
  • CN1004878B , USP4,980,053 and CN1043520A have disclosed catalysts comprising mixtures of ZSM-5 zeolite and Y-type zeolite as active components, resulting in that remarkable increases in the yield of liquefied gas are achieved.
  • this kind of methods is used to mainly increase the yield of liquefied gas by means of modifying the catalysts, while the increase in the yield of diesel oil is less.
  • the above-mentioned patented processes can only increase the yield of liquefied gas, but cannot increase the yield of diesel simultaneously, or if any, the yield of diesel oil is insignificant. Moreover, some of the above-mentioned patented processes require special catalysts or reaction units, or the existing units should be largely refitted to meet their specific requirements.
  • the object of the present invention is to provide a catalytic cracking process for increasing the yields of diesel oil and liquefied gas simultaneously on the basis of the prior art.
  • US 5,506,365 discloses a process for the conversion of petroleum hydrocarbons in the presence of catalyst particles in a fluidized phase in an essentially upflow or downflow tubular reaction zone.
  • the process includes at least one stage of steam cracking of at least one light hydrocarbon fraction and a stage of catalytic cracking of at least one heavy hydrocarbon fraction.
  • the steam cracking is carried out by contacting the light hydrocarbons and a quantity of steam equal to at least 20 percent by weight in a fluidized bed of the catalyst particles, the resulting temperature ranging from 650° to 850° C.
  • the catalytic cracking of the heavy hydrocarbons is carried out by injection of the effluents from the upstream section of the reaction zone into the catalyst suspension in such a way that the temperature of the mixture ranges from 500° to 650° C. and is then reduced to a temperature ranging 475° to 550° C.
  • US 5,616,237 discloses a fluid catalytic cracking unit equipped with multiple feed injection points along the length of the riser is operated such that portions of the same fresh feed are charged to different feed injection points.
  • the hydrocarbon fresh feed can be split into two or more non-distinct fractions, with one fraction charged to the bottom injection point along the length of the riser reactor, and the remaining fractions charged to injection points progressively higher up along the length of the riser reactor with the temperature of the upper injection feed fractions being different from that of the lowest injection point fraction prior to entry into the FCC riser reactor.
  • Hydrocarbon products from the cracking process can be recycled to one or more of the various injection points along the length of the riser.
  • a process for catalytic cracking hydrocarbon stocks to increase simultaneously the yields of diesel oil and liquefied gas carrying out in a riser or fluidized-bed reactor, wherein said reactor comprises a gasoline cracking zone, a heavy oil cracking zone, a light oil cracking zone and an optional termination reaction zone, wherein said process comprises the following steps:
  • the attached drawing is a schematic diagram of a riser reactor illustrating the flow of the catalytic cracking process provided by the present invention for increasing the yields of diesel oil and liquefied gas simultaneously.
  • the parts of the riser reactor are indicated by the reference signs in the drawing as follows:
  • the present invention relates to a process for catalytic cracking hydrocarbon stocks to increase simultaneously the yields of diesel oil and liquefied gas, carrying out in a riser or fluidized-bed reactor, according with claim 1.
  • the present invention relates to a process for catalytic cracking hydrocarbon stocks to give simultaneously higher yields of diesel oil and liquefied gas, carrying out in a riser or fluidized-bed reactor, wherein said reactor comprises a gasoline crackling zone, a heavy oil cracking zone, a light oil cracking zone and a optional termination reaction zone, wherein said process comprises the following steps:
  • Gasoline stock used in the gasoline cracking zone is a distillate oil having a boiling range of 30°-210°C selected from straight-run gasoline, catalytic gasoline and coker gasoline, or mixtures thereof, preferably a catalytic gasoline fraction having C 7 "-205°C; and it can also be a narrow fraction of gasoline of a certain stage, such as that having a boiling range of 90°-140°C or 110°-210°C.
  • Said gasoline stock may be fractions obtained from the present reaction unit per se or from other sources.
  • Said pre-lifting medium is a dry gas or steam. The weight ratio of said pre-lifting medium to gasoline stock is in the range of 0-5:1.
  • the reaction temperature is about 500°-700°C, preferably about 620°-680°C; the reaction pressure is from atmospheric pressure to 300 KPa, preferably about 100-230 KPa; the residence time is about 0.1-3.0 sec, preferably about 0.2-1.5 sec; the weight ratio of catalyst to gasoline stock is about 10-150, preferably about 20-80; the weight ratio of gasoline stock to conventional catalytic cracking feed is about 0.02-0.50:1, preferably about 0.1-0.3:1; and the regenerated catalyst has a temperature of about 600°-750°C, preferably about 660°-710°C.
  • Said gasoline stock may be introduced from the bottom of the gasoline cracking zone or through spray nozzles arranged around the gasoline cracking zone, wherein the gasoline stock is cracked to form a liquefied gas and at the same time the sulfur and olefin contents in the gasoline are reduced while the gasoline octane number is raised.
  • hot catalyst comes into contact with the gasoline stock, its temperature reduces and simultaneously a trace of coke deposits on the catalyst, hence diminishing the activity of the catalyst and passivating the metals supported thereon, which is advantageous for increasing the yield of diesel oil.
  • the catalyst in this state contacts the conventional catalytic cracking feeds in the heavy oil cracking zone and light oil cracking zone, more diesel oil is produced.
  • the resultant oil-gas mixture and reacted catalyst from the gasoline-cracking zone enter the heavy oil-cracking zone directly.
  • the conventional catalytic cracking feeds used in the heavy oil cracking zone and light oil cracking zone are selected at least one from straight-run gas oils, coker gas oils, deasphalted oils, hydrofined oils, hydrocracking tail oils, vacuum residues and atmospheric residues, or mixtures thereof.
  • Said conventional catalytic cracking feed used in steps (b) and (C) may the same or different.
  • a portion of about 20-95wt% of said conventional catalytic cracking feed solely, or mixed with slurry and/or heavy cycle oil, is charged into the heavy oil cracking zone; and a portion of about 5-80wt% of said conventional catalytic cracking feed solely, or mixed with slurry and/or heavy cycle oil, is charged into the light oil cracking zone.
  • the function of heavy oil cracking zone is to control the cracking reaction of gasoline stock, to enhance the level of heavy oil cracking severity and to ensure the conversion of heavy oil fractions so as to increase the yield of diesel oil from the feedstock in the heavy oil cracking zone and improve the feedstock's selectivity to diesel oil in the light oil cracking zone.
  • the weight ratio of catalyst to feedstock is about 5-20, preferably about 7-15;
  • the oil-gas mixture residence time is about 0.1-2 sec., preferably about 0.3-1.0 sec.;
  • the reaction pressure is from atmospheric pressure to 300 KPa, preferably about 100-230 KPa.
  • the portion of feedstock to be processed in the heavy oil cracking zone is relatively heavier and more difficult to be cracked.
  • the function of light oil cracking zone is to carry out cracking of the conventional catalytic cracking feed in this zone under an environment formed through the controlling processes of the gasoline cracking zone and heavy oil cracking zone, which is beneficial for improving the feedstocks' selectivity to diesel oil in the heavy oil cracking zone and light oil cracking zone.
  • the weight ratio of catalyst to feedstock is about 3-15, preferably about 5-10;
  • the oil-gas mixture residence time is about 0.1-6 sec., preferably about 0.3-3 sec.;
  • the reaction pressure is from atmospheric pressure to 300 KPa, preferably about 100-230 KPa.
  • the portion of feedstock to be processed in the light oil cracking zone is relatively lighter and easier to be cracked.
  • the recracking of heavy cycle oil and slurry is to convert unreacted fractions of them into valuable light oil products.
  • a termination reaction zone can be arranged after the light oil cracking zone.
  • the function of the termination reaction zone is to diminish secondary cracking of light oils from the heavy oil cracking zone and light oil cracking zone, to increase the yield of diesel oil and to control the degree of conversion of the catalytic stocks as a whole.
  • Said reaction terminating medium is selected at least one from waste water, softened water, recycle oils, heavy oil fractions, coker gas oils, deasphalted oils, straight-run gas oils and hydrocracking tail oils, or mixtures thereof.
  • the weight ratio of reaction terminating medium to conventional catalytic cracking feed is about 0-30wt%. Controlled by the quantity of terminating medium injected, the temperature in the reaction termination zone is in the range of about 470°-550°C, and the material residence time is about 0.2-3.0 sec.
  • the catalyst applicable in the process according to the present invention can be one comprising at least one active component selected from Y-type or HY-type zeolites with or without rare earth, ultra-stable Y-type zeolites with or without rare earth, zeolites of ZSM-5 series, or high-silica zeolites having pentatomic ring structure and ⁇ -zeolites, or mixtures thereof, and can also be an amorphous silica-alumina catalyst.
  • all the catalytic cracking catalysts can be applied in the process according to the present invention.
  • Said riser or fluidized bed reactor comprising a gasoline cracking zone, a heavy oil cracking zone, a light oil cracking zone and a termination reaction zone has a total height of 10-50 m, wherein the heights of the zones account for 2-20%, 2-40%, 2-60% and 0-40% respectively; more accurately, the height of each of the four zones is determined in accordance with the specific operating parameters required in each reaction zone.
  • the process according to the present invention can be carried out in conventional catalytic cracking reactors.
  • the gasoline cracking zone in certain existing catalytic cracking units since it has to be refitted, for example, the feed inlet in the gasoline cracking zone has to be rearranged at a higher location.
  • the present process can also be carried out in reactors with a gasoline cracking zone of different structures.
  • the flow scheme shows the catalytic cracking process for higher yields of both diesel oil and liquefied gas, but the shape and dimensions of the riser reactor are not restricted to what is shown in the schematic diagram, whereas they are determined by the specific conditions of operation.
  • the properties of feedstocks and catalysts used in the examples are shown in Tables 1 and 2 respectively.
  • the conventional catalytic cracking feed used was vacuum gas oil mixed with 17wt%, 18wt% of vacuum residues, and the gasoline stocks were the catalytic gasolines formed in the reaction unit.
  • Catalysts A and B were products of the Qilu Catalysts Plant of the SINOPEC, and catalyst C was a product of the Lanzhou Catalysts Plant of the CNPC.
  • This example was conducted to demonstrate that the yields of liquefied gas and diesel oil can be increased simultaneously by the process of the present invention.
  • the process was carried out in a pilot plant riser reactor.
  • the total height of the reactor was 10 m, wherein the heights of the gasoline cracking zone, heavy oil cracking zone, light oil cracking zone and termination reaction zone were 1 m, 2 m, 5 m, and 2 m respectively.
  • the pre-lifting steam and catalytic gasoline (having a RON and MON of 92.4 and 79.1 respectively and an olefin content of 47.5wt%) in a weight ratio of 0.05:1 were charged into the reactor through a location at a height of 40% the height of the gasoline cracking zone, contacted catalyst A, and then the resultant oil-gas mixture and reacted catalyst rose up and entered the heavy oil cracking zone; a portion of 65wt% of stock A and 100wt% of heavy cycle oil were charged into the reactor through the bottom of heavy oil cracking zone, contacted the reactant oil-gas mixture and catalyst from the gasoline cracking zone, and then the resultant oil-gas mixture and reacted catalyst rose up and entered the light oil cracking zone; a portion of 35wt% of stock A was charged into the reactor through the bottom of light oil cracking zone, contacted the reactant oil-gas mixture and catalyst from the heavy oil cracking zone, and then the resultant oil-gas mixture and reacted catalyst rose up and entered the termination reaction zone;
  • the reaction conditions and product distribution are shown in Table 3, from which it can be seen that the yield of liquefied gas is 16.34wt%, and the yield of diesel oil is 27.81wt%.
  • the properties of gasoline products are shown in Table 4, from which it can be seen that the gasoline products have RON and MON of 93.2 and 80.5 respectively, an olefin content of 37.8wt% and a sulfur content of 760ppm.
  • This comparative example was conducted to demonstrate the yields of liquefied gas and diesel oil obtained from a conventional catalytic feedstock in a conventional non-sectional catalytic cracking riser reactor. The process was carried out in a pilot plant riser reactor having a total height of 10 m.
  • the feedstock and catalyst used in this comparative example were the same respectively as those used in Example 1.
  • the reaction conditions and product distribution are shown in Table 3, from which it can be seen that the yield of liquefied gas is only 13.23wt%, 3.11 percentage points lower than that obtained in Example 1; and the yield of diesel oil is only 25.72wt%, 1.79 percentage points lower than that obtained in Example 1.
  • the properties of the gasoline products are shown in Table 4, from which it can be seen that the gasoline products have a RON and MON of 92.4 and 79.1 respectively, an olefin content of 47.5wt% and a sulfur content of 870ppm.
  • the pre-lifting steam and catalytic gasoline (having a RON and MON of 92.6 and 79.4 respectively and an olefin content of 46.1wt%) in a weight ratio of 0.10:1 were charged into the reactor through a location at a height of 60% the height of the gasoline cracking zone, contacted catalyst B, and then the resultant oil-gas mixture and reacted catalyst rose up and entered the heavy oil cracking zone; a portion of 40wt% of stock A and all the slurry and heavy cycle oil were charged into the reactor through the bottom of heavy oil cracking zone, contacted the reactant oil-gas mixture and catalyst from the gasoline cracking zone, and then the resultant oil-gas mixture and reacted catalyst rose up and entered the light oil cracking zone; a portion of 60wt% of stock A and all the recycling heavy cycle oil were charged into the reactor through the bottom of light oil cracking zone, contacted the reactant oil-gas mixture and catalyst from the heavy oil cracking zone, and then the resultant oil-gas mixture and reacted catalyst rose
  • the reaction conditions and product distribution are shown in Table 5, from which it can be seen that the yield of liquefied gas is 16.68wt%, and the yield of diesel oil is 27,56wt%.
  • the properties of gasoline products are shown in Table 6, from which it can be seen the gasoline products have RON and MON of 92.8 and 80.2 respectively, an olefin content of 43.4wt% and a sulfur content of 601ppm.
  • This comparative example was conducted to demonstrate the yields of liquefied gas and diesel oil obtained from a conventional catalytic feedstock in a conventional non-sectional catalytic cracking riser reactor. The process was carried out in a pilot plant riser reactor having a total height of 10 m.
  • the feedstock and catalyst used in this comparative example were the same respectively as the conventional catalytic cracking feed and catalyst used in Example 2.
  • the reaction conditions and product distribution are shown in Table 5, from which it can be seen that, in the absence of a gasoline stock, the yield of liquefied gas is only 15.23wt%, 1.36 percentage points lower than that obtained in Example 2; and the yield of diesel oil is only 25.79wt%, 1.77 percentage points lower than that obtained in Example 2.
  • the properties of the gasoline products are shown in Table 6, from which it can be seen that the gasoline products have a RON and MON of 92.6 arid 79.4 respectively, an olefin content of 46. 1wt% and a sulfur content of 850ppm.
  • the pre-lifting steam and catalytic gasoline (having a RON and MON of 92.6 and 79.4 respectively and an olefin content of 46.1wt%) in a weight ratio of 0.06:1 were charged into the reactor through a location at a height of 40% the height of the gasoline cracking zone, contacted the catalyst B, and then the resultant oil-gas mixture and reacted catalyst rose up and entered the heavy oil cracking zone; a stock A of 75wt% and all the recycling slurry were charged into the reactor through the bottom of heavy oil cracking zone, contacted the oil-gas mixture and catalyst from the gasoline cracking zone, and then the resultant oil-gas mixture and reacted catalyst rose up and entered the light oil cracking zone; a stock A of 25wt% and all the recycling heavy cycle oil were charged into the reactor through the bottom of light oil cracking zone, contacted the oil-gas mixture and catalyst from the heavy oil cracking zone, and then the resultant oil-gas mixture and reacted catalyst rose up and entered the termination reaction zone; softened
  • the reaction conditions and product distribution are shown in Table 5, from which it can be seen that the yield of liquefied gas is 18.44wt%, and the yield of diesel oil is 28.00wt%.
  • the properties of gasoline products are shown in Table 6, from which it can be seen that the gasoline products have RON and MON of 93.6 and 80.7 respectively, an olefin content of 39.9wt% and a sulfur content of 780ppm.
  • the pre-lifting steam and catalytic gasoline (having a RON and MON of 90.1 and 79.8 respectively and an olefin content of 51.2wt%) in a weight ratio of 0.09:1 were charged into the reactor through a location at a height of 20% the height of the gasoline cracking zone, contacted the catalyst C, and then the resultant oil-gas mixture and reacted catalyst rose up and entered the heavy oil cracking zone; a stock B of 60wt% and a portion of 80wt% of the recycling slurry were charged into the reactor through the bottom of heavy oil cracking zone, contacted the reactant oil-gas mixture and catalyst from the gasoline cracking zone, and then the resultant oil-gas mixture and reacted catalyst rose up and entered the light oil cracking zone; a stock B of 40wt% and all the recycling heavy cycle oil were charged into the reactor through the bottom of light oil cracking zone, contacted the reactant oil-gas mixture and catalyst from the heavy oil cracking zone, and then the resultant oil-gas mixture and reacted
  • the reaction conditions and product distribution are shown in Table 7, from which it can be seen that the yield of liquefied gas is 20.49wt%, and the yield of diesel oil is 28.45wt%.
  • the properties of gasoline products are shown in Table 8, from which it can be seen that the gasoline products have RON and MON of 90.5 and 80.2 respectively, an olefin content of 45.9wt% and a sulfur content of 314ppm.
  • This comparative example was conducted to demonstrate the yields of liquefied gas and diesel oil obtained from a conventional catalytic feedstock in a conventional non-sectional catalytic cracking riser reactor. The process was carried out in a pilot plant riser reactor having a total height of 10 m.
  • the feedstock and catalyst used in this comparative example were the same respectively as the conventional catalytic cracking feed and catalyst used in Example 4.
  • the reaction conditions and product distribution are shown in Table 7, from which it can be seen that, in the absence of a gasoline stock, the yield of liquefied gas is only 18.48wt%, 2.01 percentage points lower than that obtained in Example 4; and the yield of diesel oil is only 26.61wt%, 1.84 percentage points lower than that obtained in Example 4.
  • the properties of gasoline products are shown in Table 8, from which it can be seen that the gasoline products have a RON and MON of 79.8 and 90.1 respectively, an olefin content of 51.2wt% and a sulfur content of 394ppm.
  • the catalytic gasoline (having a RON and MON of 90.1.and 79.8 respectively and an olefin content of 51.2wt%) was charged into the reactor through the bottom of the gasoline cracking zone, contacted the catalyst C, and then the resultant oil-gas mixture and reacted catalyst rose up and entered the heavy oil cracking zone; 100wt% of stock B and all the recycling slurry were charged into the reactor through the bottom of heavy oil cracking zone, contacted the reactant oil-gas mixture and catalyst from the gasoline cracking zone, and then the resultant oil-gas mixture and reacted catalyst rose up and entered the light oil cracking zone; all the recycling heavy cycle oil was charged into the reactor through the bottom of light oil cracking zone, contacted the oil-gas mixture and catalyst from the heavy oil cracking zone, and then the resultant oil-gas mixture and reacted catalyst rose up and entered the termination reaction zone; catalytic gasoline, in an amount of 10wt% the weight of stock B was charged into the reactor through the bottom of the termination reaction zone; then, the result
  • the reaction conditions and product distribution are shown in Table 7, from which it can be seen that the yield of liquefied gas is 18.98wt%, and the yield of diesel oil is 27.04wt%.
  • the properties of gasoline products are shown in Table 8, from which it can be seen that the gasoline products have RON arid MON of 90.3 and 79.8 respectively; an olefin content of 48.8wt% and a sulfur content of 365ppm.
  • Table 1 Conventional catalytic cracking feed A B Composition of Conventional catalytic cracking feed, wt% Vacuum gas oil 82 83 Vacuum residue 18 17 Density (20°C), g/cm 3 0.9053 0.8691 Viscosity, mm 2 /sec 80°C 23.88 7.999 100°C 13.60 5.266 Conradson residue, wt% 2.3 1.65 Pour point, °C 45 33 Group composition, wt% Saturates 61.3 77.9 Aromatics 27.8 14.2 Resin 10.3 7.5 Asphaltenes 0.6 0.4 Elementary composition, wt% Carbon 86.27 86.21 Hydrogen 12.60 13.36 Sulfur 1.12 0.27 Nitrogen 0.23 0.27 Metal contents, ppm Fe 10.4 Ni 3.5 - Cu ⁇ 0.1 - V 3.9 - Na ⁇ 0.1 - Distillation range, °C IBP 268 213 5% 370 301 10% 400 328 30% 375 50% 480 418 70% 521 466 Dry point -
  • Example 1 Comp. Ex. 1A Pre-lifting steam/gasoline stock weight ratio 0.05 - Pre-lifting stock/conventional catalytic cracking feed weight ratio 0.20 0 Catalyst A A Reaction conditions Temperature, °C 500 Gasoline cracking zone 640 - Heavy oil cracking zone 580 - Light oil cracking zone 507 - Residence time, sec.
  • Example 5 Density (20°C), kg/m 3 0.7559 0.7454 0.7458 Octane number RON 90.5 90.1 90.3 MON 80.2 79.8 79.8 Olefin content, wt% 45.9 51.2 48.8 Induction period, min.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Production Of Liquid Hydrocarbon Mixture For Refining Petroleum (AREA)

Description

    Background of the Invention
  • The present invention relates to a process for catalytic cracking of hydrocarbon oils in the absence of hydrogen, and specifically relates to a process for catalytic cracking of petroleum hydrocarbon stocks in the absence of hydrogen to increase simultaneously the yields of diesel oil and liquefied gas.
  • Liquefied gas is one of the important petrochemical products, of which light olefins are important chemical raw materials of high commercial value. Diesel oil has high heat efficiency and the exhaust tail gas from vehicles running on diesel oil contains less harmful constituents, so it meets the more and more rigorous requirements for environmental protection all over the world. Thus, following the increase in the number of vehicles running on diesel oil, the market demand for diesel oils is also growing.
  • Diesel oil comes mainly from fraction oils produced by the primary and secondary processing of crude oil. In the primary processing, i.e. the atmospheric and vacuum distillation, the yield of diesel fractions from crude oil is fixed, so no potential can be tapped. In the secondary processing, catalytic cracking is usually adopted for producing diesel oil. Featuring large-volume treatment and flexible operation conditions, this process of catalytic cracking is an important means for improving the yields of liquefied gas and diesel oil.
  • CN1031834A discloses a catalytic cracking process for producing more light olefins. Although this process can produce large quantities of liquefied gas, but its yield of diesel oil is relatively low, generally lees than 10wt%, and moreover it requires a special catalyst and processing unit.
  • CN1085885A discloses a method for obtaining higher yields of liquefied gas and gasoline under the following reaction conditions: a reaction temperature of 480°-550°C, a pressure of 130-350KPa, a WHSV of 1-150h-1, a catalyst/oil ratio of 4-15, and a steam/hydrocarbon stock weight ratio of 0.05-0.12:1. The yield of liquefied gas in the reaction products is 30-40wt%, but that of diesel oil is comparatively low.
  • CN1160746A discloses a catalytic cracking process for raising the octane number of low-grade gasoline fractions, wherein a low-grade gasoline is introduced into a riser reactor through its lower part and the reaction is curried out under the conditions of a reaction temperature of 600°-730°C, a WHSV of 1-180h-1, and catalyst/oil ratio of 6-180, then a high octane gasoline is mainly obtained. The feedstocks employed in this process are low-grade gasolines, such as straight-run gasoline, coker gasoline and so on, and the yields of liquefied gas and diesel oil in the reaction products are 24-39wt% and 0.5-2.3wt% respectively.
  • USP3, 784, 463 discloses a process carried out in a reaction system comprising at least two riser reactors, wherein a low-grade gasoline is introduced into one of the riser reactors and catalytic cracking reaction occurs. By this process, the gasoline octane number and yield of liquefied gas are improved. However, this process cannot give higher yield of diesel oil, and it requires that the reaction unit should be revamped by adding at least another riser.
  • USP5,846,403 discloses a process of recracking of catalytic naphtha to obtain a maximum yield of light olefins. The process is carried out in a riser reactor comprising two reaction zones, namely an upstream reaction zone in the lower part of the reactor and a downstream reaction zone in the upper part. In the upstream reaction zone, the feedstock is a light catalytic naphtha (having a boiling point below 140°C), and the reaction conditions are: an oil-catalyst contact temperature of 620°-775°C, an oil and gas residence time of less than 1.5 sec., a catalyst/oil ratio of 75-150, and the proportion of steam accounting for 2-50wt% the weight of naphtha, while in the downstream reaction zone, the feedstock is a conventional catalytic cracking stock (having a boiling point of 220°-575°C), and the reaction conditions are: a temperature of 600°-750°C and an oil and gas residence time of less than 20 sec. Compared with conventional catalytic cracking, the yields of liquefied gas and light cycle oil (i.e. diesel oil) of this process increase by 0.97-1.21 percentage points and 0.13-0.31 percentage points higher.
  • CN1034949A discloses a process for converting petroleum hydrocarbons in which the stocks, ethane, gasoline, catalytic cracking stock and cycle oil, are successively upwardly introduced into a riser reactor through its lowermost part. This process is mainly aimed at producing light olefins, but the total yield of gasoline, diesel oil and liquefied gas decreases.
  • EP0369536A1 disclosed a process for catalytic cracking hydrocarbon feedstock, in which a hydrocarbon feedstock is charged into the lower part of the riser reactor wherein said hydrocarbon feedstock is admixed with freshly regenerated cracking catalyst, and a recycle portion of a light liquid hydrocarbon stream is charged into the riser zone at a level above the hydrocarbon feedstock charging level. This process operates in such a manner to produce maximum quantities of fuel oil, or alternatively to produce maximum quantities of olefins in different conditions, but can't increase the yields of diesel oil and of olefins simultaneously.
  • US P4,422,925 discloses a process for fluidized catalytic cracking hydrocarbon feedstock for producing gaseous olefins, which comprises charging gaseous C2 to C3 rich stock into the lowermost portion of the riser reaction zone to contact with hot freshly regenerated catalyst and charging heavy hydrocarbon stock to an upper section, of the riser, and introducing naphtha or gas oil into a section between said lower and upper sections of said riser. This process can produce high yield of light olefins but the increment of yield of diesel oil is very small.
  • US P3894932 disclosed a method for converting hydrocarbons which comprises passing C3-C4 gaseous hydrocarbon fraction through a lower portion of a riser, introducing gas oil at one or more spaced apart downstream intervals, and introducing C2-C4 hydrocarbon or isobutylene or gas oil through the upper portion of the riser. This method is aimed at producing aromatics and isobutane but can't increase the yields of diesel oil and liquefied gas simultaneously.
  • Another method of increasing the yield of liquefied gas is by adding a catalyst promoter to the catalytic cracking catalyst. For example, USP4,309,280 discloses a method of adding a HZSM-5 zeolite in an amount of 0.01-1% by weight of the catalyst directly into the catalytic cracking unit.
  • USP3, 758,403 discloses a catalyst comprising ZSM-5 zeolite and large-pore zeolite (e.g. the Y-type and X- type) (in a ratio of 1:10-3:1) as active components, thereby raising the yield of liquefied gas and the gasoline octane number by a big margin, while the yields of propene and butene are increased by about 10wt%. Furthermore, CN1004878B , USP4,980,053 and CN1043520A have disclosed catalysts comprising mixtures of ZSM-5 zeolite and Y-type zeolite as active components, resulting in that remarkable increases in the yield of liquefied gas are achieved. However, this kind of methods is used to mainly increase the yield of liquefied gas by means of modifying the catalysts, while the increase in the yield of diesel oil is less.
  • The above-mentioned patented processes can only increase the yield of liquefied gas, but cannot increase the yield of diesel simultaneously, or if any, the yield of diesel oil is insignificant. Moreover, some of the above-mentioned patented processes require special catalysts or reaction units, or the existing units should be largely refitted to meet their specific requirements.
  • The object of the present invention is to provide a catalytic cracking process for increasing the yields of diesel oil and liquefied gas simultaneously on the basis of the prior art.
  • US 5,506,365 discloses a process for the conversion of petroleum hydrocarbons in the presence of catalyst particles in a fluidized phase in an essentially upflow or downflow tubular reaction zone. The process includes at least one stage of steam cracking of at least one light hydrocarbon fraction and a stage of catalytic cracking of at least one heavy hydrocarbon fraction. The steam cracking is carried out by contacting the light hydrocarbons and a quantity of steam equal to at least 20 percent by weight in a fluidized bed of the catalyst particles, the resulting temperature ranging from 650° to 850° C. The catalytic cracking of the heavy hydrocarbons is carried out by injection of the effluents from the upstream section of the reaction zone into the catalyst suspension in such a way that the temperature of the mixture ranges from 500° to 650° C. and is then reduced to a temperature ranging 475° to 550° C.
  • US 5,616,237 discloses a fluid catalytic cracking unit equipped with multiple feed injection points along the length of the riser is operated such that portions of the same fresh feed are charged to different feed injection points. Preferably, the hydrocarbon fresh feed can be split into two or more non-distinct fractions, with one fraction charged to the bottom injection point along the length of the riser reactor, and the remaining fractions charged to injection points progressively higher up along the length of the riser reactor with the temperature of the upper injection feed fractions being different from that of the lowest injection point fraction prior to entry into the FCC riser reactor. Hydrocarbon products from the cracking process can be recycled to one or more of the various injection points along the length of the riser.
  • Summary of the Invention
  • A process for catalytic cracking hydrocarbon stocks to increase simultaneously the yields of diesel oil and liquefied gas, carrying out in a riser or fluidized-bed reactor, wherein said reactor comprises a gasoline cracking zone, a heavy oil cracking zone, a light oil cracking zone and an optional termination reaction zone, wherein said process comprises the following steps:
    1. (i) Gasoline stock and an optional pre-lifting medium are charged into the gasoline cracking zone of the reactor, contact a catalytic cracking catalyst to produce an oil-gas mixture, and then the resultant oil-gas mixture and reacted catalyst rise up and enter the heavy oil cracking zone; wherein in the gasoline cracking zone, the reaction temperature is 620-680°C, the reaction pressure is 100-230 KPa, the residence time is 0.2-1.5 sec., the weight ratio of catalyst to gasoline stock is 20-80, and the temperature of the regenerated catalyst is 660-710°C;
    2. (ii) One of the stocks selected from the mixture of conventional catalytic cracking feed and slurry, the mixture of conventional catalytic cracking feed and heavy cycle oil, and the mixture of conventional catalytic cracking feed, slurry and heavy cycle oil, is charged into the reactor through the bottom of the heavy oil cracking zone, contact the oil-gas mixture and reacted catalyst rising from the gasoline cracking zone to produce an oil-gas mixture, and then the resultant oil-gas mixture and reacted catalyst rise up and enter the light oil cracking zone, wherein in the heavy oil cracking zone, the weight ratio of catalyst to feedstock is 5-20, and the residence time is 0.1-2 sec;
    3. (iii) One of the stocks selected from the mixture of conventional catalytic cracking feed and slurry, the mixture of conventional catalytic cracking feed and heavy cycle oil, and the mixture of conventional catalytic cracking feed, slurry and heavy cycle oil, is charged into the reactor through the bottom of the light oil cracking zone, contact the oil-gas mixture and reacted catalyst rising from the heavy oil cracking zone to produce an oil-gas mixture, and then the resultant oil-gas mixture and reacted catalyst rise up and enter an optional termination reaction zone, wherein in the light oil cracking zone, the weight ratio of catalyst to feedstock is 3-15, and the residence time is 0.1-6 sec;
    4. (iv) A reaction terminating medium is optionally charged into the reactor through the bottom of the termination reaction zone to terminate the reaction, from where the resultant oil-gas mixture and catalyst flow forward to a disengaging section to separate; and
    5. (v) The reaction products are separated out in the fractionation system to obtain the desired liquefied gas, gasoline and diesel oil products, and the spent catalyst passes through steam stripping and then enters a regenerator and undergoes coke-burning, and then is circulated back for reuse;
    wherein the gasoline stocks are distillate oils having a boiling range of 30°-210°C, selected from catalytic gasoline and coker gasoline, or mixtures thereof,
    and wherein the conventional catalytic cracking feed is selected from straight-run gas oil, coker gas oil, deasphalted oil, hydrofined oil, hydrocracking tail oil, vacuum residue and atmospheric residue, or mixtures thereof. Brief Description of the Drawing
  • The attached drawing is a schematic diagram of a riser reactor illustrating the flow of the catalytic cracking process provided by the present invention for increasing the yields of diesel oil and liquefied gas simultaneously. The parts of the riser reactor are indicated by the reference signs in the drawing as follows:
    • The reference signs 1, 2, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19 are for the pipelines; 3 for the riser reactor, wherein I is for gasoline cracking zone, II for heavy oil cracking zone, III for light oil cracking zone, and IV for termination reaction zone; 4 for disengaging section; 5 for steam stripper; 6 for slant pipe (spent catalyst); 7 for regenerator; 8 for slant pipe (regenerated catalyst); and 12 for fractionation system.
    Detailed Description of the Invention
  • The present invention relates to a process for catalytic cracking hydrocarbon stocks to increase simultaneously the yields of diesel oil and liquefied gas, carrying out in a riser or fluidized-bed reactor, according with claim 1.
  • The present invention relates to a process for catalytic cracking hydrocarbon stocks to give simultaneously higher yields of diesel oil and liquefied gas, carrying out in a riser or fluidized-bed reactor, wherein said reactor comprises a gasoline crackling zone, a heavy oil cracking zone, a light oil cracking zone and a optional termination reaction zone, wherein said process comprises the following steps:
    1. (a) Gasoline stock and an optional pre-lifting medium are charged into the gasoline cracking zone of the reactor, contact a catalytic cracking catalyst to produce an oil-gas mixture, and then the resultant oil-gas mixture and reacted catalyst rise up and enter the heavy oil cracking zone;
    2. (b) Conventional catalytic cracking feed mixed with slurry and/or heavy cycle oil, is charged into the reactor through the bottom of the heavy oil cracking zone, contact the oil-gas mixture and reacted catalyst rising from the gasoline cracking zone to produce an oil-gas mixture, and then the resultant oil-gas mixture and reacted catalyst rise up and enter the light oil cracking zone;
    3. (c) Conventional catalytic cracking feed mixed with slurry and/or heavy cycle oil, is charged into the reactor through the bottom of the light oil cracking zone, contact the oil-gas mixture and reacted catalyst rising from the heavy oil cracking zone to produce an oil-gas mixture, and then the resultant oil-gas mixture and reacted catalyst rise up and enter an optional termination reaction zone;
    4. (d) A reaction terminating medium is optionally charged into the reactor through the bottom of the termination reaction zone to terminate the reaction, from where the resultant oil-gas mixture and catalyst flow forward to a disengaging section to separate; and
    5. (e) The reaction products are separated out in the fractionation system toobtain the desired liquefied gas, gasoline and diesel oil products, and the spent catalyst may pass through steam stripping and then enters a regenerator and undergoes coke-burning and then is circulated back for reuse.
  • Gasoline stock used in the gasoline cracking zone is a distillate oil having a boiling range of 30°-210°C selected from straight-run gasoline, catalytic gasoline and coker gasoline, or mixtures thereof, preferably a catalytic gasoline fraction having C7"-205°C; and it can also be a narrow fraction of gasoline of a certain stage, such as that having a boiling range of 90°-140°C or 110°-210°C. Said gasoline stock may be fractions obtained from the present reaction unit per se or from other sources. Said pre-lifting medium is a dry gas or steam. The weight ratio of said pre-lifting medium to gasoline stock is in the range of 0-5:1.
  • In the gasoline cracking zone, the reaction temperature is about 500°-700°C, preferably about 620°-680°C; the reaction pressure is from atmospheric pressure to 300 KPa, preferably about 100-230 KPa; the residence time is about 0.1-3.0 sec, preferably about 0.2-1.5 sec; the weight ratio of catalyst to gasoline stock is about 10-150, preferably about 20-80; the weight ratio of gasoline stock to conventional catalytic cracking feed is about 0.02-0.50:1, preferably about 0.1-0.3:1; and the regenerated catalyst has a temperature of about 600°-750°C, preferably about 660°-710°C.
  • Said gasoline stock may be introduced from the bottom of the gasoline cracking zone or through spray nozzles arranged around the gasoline cracking zone, wherein the gasoline stock is cracked to form a liquefied gas and at the same time the sulfur and olefin contents in the gasoline are reduced while the gasoline octane number is raised. When hot catalyst comes into contact with the gasoline stock, its temperature reduces and simultaneously a trace of coke deposits on the catalyst, hence diminishing the activity of the catalyst and passivating the metals supported thereon, which is advantageous for increasing the yield of diesel oil. When the catalyst in this state contacts the conventional catalytic cracking feeds in the heavy oil cracking zone and light oil cracking zone, more diesel oil is produced. The resultant oil-gas mixture and reacted catalyst from the gasoline-cracking zone enter the heavy oil-cracking zone directly.
  • The conventional catalytic cracking feeds used in the heavy oil cracking zone and light oil cracking zone are selected at least one from straight-run gas oils, coker gas oils, deasphalted oils, hydrofined oils, hydrocracking tail oils, vacuum residues and atmospheric residues, or mixtures thereof. Said conventional catalytic cracking feed used in steps (b) and (C) may the same or different. A portion of about 20-95wt% of said conventional catalytic cracking feed solely, or mixed with slurry and/or heavy cycle oil, is charged into the heavy oil cracking zone; and a portion of about 5-80wt% of said conventional catalytic cracking feed solely, or mixed with slurry and/or heavy cycle oil, is charged into the light oil cracking zone.
  • The function of heavy oil cracking zone is to control the cracking reaction of gasoline stock, to enhance the level of heavy oil cracking severity and to ensure the conversion of heavy oil fractions so as to increase the yield of diesel oil from the feedstock in the heavy oil cracking zone and improve the feedstock's selectivity to diesel oil in the light oil cracking zone. In the heavy oil cracking zone, the weight ratio of catalyst to feedstock is about 5-20, preferably about 7-15; the oil-gas mixture residence time is about 0.1-2 sec., preferably about 0.3-1.0 sec.; and the reaction pressure is from atmospheric pressure to 300 KPa, preferably about 100-230 KPa. The portion of feedstock to be processed in the heavy oil cracking zone is relatively heavier and more difficult to be cracked.
  • The function of light oil cracking zone is to carry out cracking of the conventional catalytic cracking feed in this zone under an environment formed through the controlling processes of the gasoline cracking zone and heavy oil cracking zone, which is beneficial for improving the feedstocks' selectivity to diesel oil in the heavy oil cracking zone and light oil cracking zone. In the light oil cracking zone, the weight ratio of catalyst to feedstock is about 3-15, preferably about 5-10; the oil-gas mixture residence time is about 0.1-6 sec., preferably about 0.3-3 sec.; and the reaction pressure is from atmospheric pressure to 300 KPa, preferably about 100-230 KPa. The portion of feedstock to be processed in the light oil cracking zone is relatively lighter and easier to be cracked.
  • The recracking of heavy cycle oil and slurry is to convert unreacted fractions of them into valuable light oil products.
  • A termination reaction zone can be arranged after the light oil cracking zone. The function of the termination reaction zone is to diminish secondary cracking of light oils from the heavy oil cracking zone and light oil cracking zone, to increase the yield of diesel oil and to control the degree of conversion of the catalytic stocks as a whole. Said reaction terminating medium is selected at least one from waste water, softened water, recycle oils, heavy oil fractions, coker gas oils, deasphalted oils, straight-run gas oils and hydrocracking tail oils, or mixtures thereof. Depending on the type of reaction terminating medium used and the operation parameters in the heavy oil cracking zone and light oil cracking zone, particularly that of the light oil cracking zone, the weight ratio of reaction terminating medium to conventional catalytic cracking feed is about 0-30wt%. Controlled by the quantity of terminating medium injected, the temperature in the reaction termination zone is in the range of about 470°-550°C, and the material residence time is about 0.2-3.0 sec.
  • The catalyst applicable in the process according to the present invention can be one comprising at least one active component selected from Y-type or HY-type zeolites with or without rare earth, ultra-stable Y-type zeolites with or without rare earth, zeolites of ZSM-5 series, or high-silica zeolites having pentatomic ring structure and β -zeolites, or mixtures thereof, and can also be an amorphous silica-alumina catalyst. In short, all the catalytic cracking catalysts can be applied in the process according to the present invention.
  • Said riser or fluidized bed reactor comprising a gasoline cracking zone, a heavy oil cracking zone, a light oil cracking zone and a termination reaction zone has a total height of 10-50 m, wherein the heights of the zones account for 2-20%, 2-40%, 2-60% and 0-40% respectively; more accurately, the height of each of the four zones is determined in accordance with the specific operating parameters required in each reaction zone.
  • The process according to the present invention can be carried out in conventional catalytic cracking reactors. However, since the gasoline cracking zone in certain existing catalytic cracking units is to long, it has to be refitted, for example, the feed inlet in the gasoline cracking zone has to be rearranged at a higher location. The present process can also be carried out in reactors with a gasoline cracking zone of different structures.
  • The process of the present invention is further illustrated with reference to the attached drawing (exemplified with riser reactor).
  • The flow scheme shows the catalytic cracking process for higher yields of both diesel oil and liquefied gas, but the shape and dimensions of the riser reactor are not restricted to what is shown in the schematic diagram, whereas they are determined by the specific conditions of operation.
  • The flow scheme of the process according to the present invention is as follows:
    • A gasoline stock and a pre-lifting medium from pipelines 1 and 2 respectively are charged in a preset ratio into the riser reactor 3 through a location at a height of 0-80% of the gasoline cracking zone I contact a catalyst, which is a fresh one or a regenerated one, and then the resultant oil-gas mixture and reacted catalyst rise up and enter the heavy oil cracking zone II; a portion of conventional catalytic cracking feed solely from pipeline 13, or mixed with a recycling slurry from pipeline 16 and/or heavy cycle oil from pipeline 17, is charged into the reactor via pipeline 13 through the bottom of the heavy oil cracking zone II contacts the reactant oil-gas mixture and catalyst rising from the gasoline cracking zone, and then the resultant oil-gas mixture and reacted catalyst rise up and enter the light oil cracking zone III; another portion of conventional catalytic cracking feed solely from pipeline 14, or mixed with a recycling slurry from pipelines 16 and 18 and /or heavy cycle oil from pipelines 17 and 19, is charged into the reactor via pipeline 14 through the bottom of the light oil cracking zone contacts the reactant oil-gas mixture and catalyst rising from the heavy oil cracking zone, and then the resultant oil-gas mixture and reacted catalyst rise up and enter the termination reaction zone IV; optionally, a reaction terminating medium from pipeline 15 is charged into the reactor through the bottom of the termination reaction zone IV, from which the reactant oil-gas mixture and spent catalyst flow into the disengaging section 4 with or without a dense fluidized bed reactor, and then the oil-gas mixture and steam via pipeline 11 enter the fractionation system 12 and are separated into dry gas, liquefied gas, gasoline, diesel oil, heavy cycle oil and slurry, and then the slurry can be circulated back to the heavy oil cracking zone via pipelines 16 and 13 in sequence, or to the light oil cracking zone via pipelines 16, 18 and 14 in sequence; and the heavy cycle oil can be circulated back to the heavy oil cracking zone via pipelines 17 and 13 in sequence, or to the light oil cracking zone via pipelines 17, 19 and 14 in sequence. The spent catalyst enters the steam stripper 5 for steam stripping, and then enters the regenerator 7 via the slant pipe 6 to undergo coke-burning and regeneration in the presence of air; the air is introduced into the regenerator 7 via pipeline 9, and flue gas is discharged therefrom via pipeline 10, and the hot regenerated catalyst is circulated back to the bottom of the gasoline cracking zone of the riser reactor for reuse.
  • The advantages of the present invention are embodied in the following points:
    1. 1. The process of the present invention can be carried out in an existing conventional catalytic cracking unit, which need not to be revamped in large scale, and it does not require special catalyst either, while the yields of liquefied gas and diesel oil can be increased by a big margin;
    2. 2. In the gasoline cracking zone, when the gasoline stock and hot catalyst comes into contact, a trace of coke deposited on the catalyst will cause passivation of the metals supported on the catalyst, hence reducing the adverse effects of the metals on product distribution. Since a large portion of strong acid sites on the zeolite and the matrix are covered by the trace of coke, this is beneficial for inhibiting coke-forming tendency during cracking of conventional catalytic cracking feed as well as for improving the selectivity to diesel oil;
    3. 3. In respect of the portion of relatively light fractions in the feedstock which can be easily cracked, the measures of operating at lower temperature with less rigorous reaction severity, shorter contact cracking and preventing secondary cracking can effectively improve the selectivity to diesel oil;
    4. 4. As sulfur contained in the gasoline stock is mainly distributed in the heavy components, the reaction in the gasoline cracking zone of the riser reactor occurs to crack selectively the heavy components therein, thus the sulfur content can be reduced remarkably,
    5. 5. In the process according to the present invention, the gasoline stock injected into the reactor can substitute completely or partially for the pre-lifting steam, as a result, the energy consumption of the reaction unit and waste water discharged therefrom are reduced, so this is beneficial for environment protection as well as for diminishing hydrothermal deactivation of the catalyst; and
    6. 6. The gasoline octane number can be maintained at a higher level or raised, while olefins of gasoline can be reduced.
    Examples
  • The process of the present invention is further illustrated by the following non-limiting examples.
  • The properties of feedstocks and catalysts used in the examples are shown in Tables 1 and 2 respectively. The conventional catalytic cracking feed used was vacuum gas oil mixed with 17wt%, 18wt% of vacuum residues, and the gasoline stocks were the catalytic gasolines formed in the reaction unit. Catalysts A and B were products of the Qilu Catalysts Plant of the SINOPEC, and catalyst C was a product of the Lanzhou Catalysts Plant of the CNPC.
  • Comparative Example 1
  • This example was conducted to demonstrate that the yields of liquefied gas and diesel oil can be increased simultaneously by the process of the present invention. The process was carried out in a pilot plant riser reactor.
  • The total height of the reactor was 10 m, wherein the heights of the gasoline cracking zone, heavy oil cracking zone, light oil cracking zone and termination reaction zone were 1 m, 2 m, 5 m, and 2 m respectively.
  • The pre-lifting steam and catalytic gasoline (having a RON and MON of 92.4 and 79.1 respectively and an olefin content of 47.5wt%) in a weight ratio of 0.05:1 were charged into the reactor through a location at a height of 40% the height of the gasoline cracking zone, contacted catalyst A, and then the resultant oil-gas mixture and reacted catalyst rose up and entered the heavy oil cracking zone; a portion of 65wt% of stock A and 100wt% of heavy cycle oil were charged into the reactor through the bottom of heavy oil cracking zone, contacted the reactant oil-gas mixture and catalyst from the gasoline cracking zone, and then the resultant oil-gas mixture and reacted catalyst rose up and entered the light oil cracking zone; a portion of 35wt% of stock A was charged into the reactor through the bottom of light oil cracking zone, contacted the reactant oil-gas mixture and catalyst from the heavy oil cracking zone, and then the resultant oil-gas mixture and reacted catalyst rose up and entered the termination reaction zone; softened water in an amount of 5% by weight of stock A was charged into the reactor through the bottom of the termination reaction zone; then, the resultant oil-gas mixture and reacted catalyst flowed to the separation system; then the reaction products were separated out, and the spent catalyst, passing through steam stripping, entered the regenerator and, after coke-burning, the regenerated catalyst was circulated back for reuse. The weight ratio of catalytic gasoline to stock A was 0.20:1.
  • The reaction conditions and product distribution are shown in Table 3, from which it can be seen that the yield of liquefied gas is 16.34wt%, and the yield of diesel oil is 27.81wt%. The properties of gasoline products are shown in Table 4, from which it can be seen that the gasoline products have RON and MON of 93.2 and 80.5 respectively, an olefin content of 37.8wt% and a sulfur content of 760ppm.
  • Comparative Example 1A
  • This comparative example was conducted to demonstrate the yields of liquefied gas and diesel oil obtained from a conventional catalytic feedstock in a conventional non-sectional catalytic cracking riser reactor. The process was carried out in a pilot plant riser reactor having a total height of 10 m.
  • The feedstock and catalyst used in this comparative example were the same respectively as those used in Example 1. The reaction conditions and product distribution are shown in Table 3, from which it can be seen that the yield of liquefied gas is only 13.23wt%, 3.11 percentage points lower than that obtained in Example 1; and the yield of diesel oil is only 25.72wt%, 1.79 percentage points lower than that obtained in Example 1. The properties of the gasoline products are shown in Table 4, from which it can be seen that the gasoline products have a RON and MON of 92.4 and 79.1 respectively, an olefin content of 47.5wt% and a sulfur content of 870ppm.
  • Example 2
  • This example was conducted to demonstrate that the yields of liquefied gas and diesel oil can be increased simultaneously by the process of the present invention. The process was carried out in the same reactor as that used in Example 1.
  • The pre-lifting steam and catalytic gasoline (having a RON and MON of 92.6 and 79.4 respectively and an olefin content of 46.1wt%) in a weight ratio of 0.10:1 were charged into the reactor through a location at a height of 60% the height of the gasoline cracking zone, contacted catalyst B, and then the resultant oil-gas mixture and reacted catalyst rose up and entered the heavy oil cracking zone; a portion of 40wt% of stock A and all the slurry and heavy cycle oil were charged into the reactor through the bottom of heavy oil cracking zone, contacted the reactant oil-gas mixture and catalyst from the gasoline cracking zone, and then the resultant oil-gas mixture and reacted catalyst rose up and entered the light oil cracking zone; a portion of 60wt% of stock A and all the recycling heavy cycle oil were charged into the reactor through the bottom of light oil cracking zone, contacted the reactant oil-gas mixture and catalyst from the heavy oil cracking zone, and then the resultant oil-gas mixture and reacted catalyst rose up and entered the termination reaction zone; softened water in an amount of 10% by weight of stock A was charged into the reactor through the bottom of the termination reaction zone; then, the resultant oil-gas mixture and reacted catalyst flowed to the separation system; then the reaction products were separated out, and the spent catalyst, passing through steam stripping, entered the regenerator and, after coke-burning, the regenerated catalyst was circulated back for reuse. The weight ratio of catalytic gasoline stock to stock A was 0.08:1.
  • The reaction conditions and product distribution are shown in Table 5, from which it can be seen that the yield of liquefied gas is 16.68wt%, and the yield of diesel oil is 27,56wt%. The properties of gasoline products are shown in Table 6, from which it can be seen the gasoline products have RON and MON of 92.8 and 80.2 respectively, an olefin content of 43.4wt% and a sulfur content of 601ppm.
  • Comparative Example 2
  • This comparative example was conducted to demonstrate the yields of liquefied gas and diesel oil obtained from a conventional catalytic feedstock in a conventional non-sectional catalytic cracking riser reactor. The process was carried out in a pilot plant riser reactor having a total height of 10 m.
  • The feedstock and catalyst used in this comparative example were the same respectively as the conventional catalytic cracking feed and catalyst used in Example 2. The reaction conditions and product distribution are shown in Table 5, from which it can be seen that, in the absence of a gasoline stock, the yield of liquefied gas is only 15.23wt%, 1.36 percentage points lower than that obtained in Example 2; and the yield of diesel oil is only 25.79wt%, 1.77 percentage points lower than that obtained in Example 2. The properties of the gasoline products are shown in Table 6, from which it can be seen that the gasoline products have a RON and MON of 92.6 arid 79.4 respectively, an olefin content of 46. 1wt% and a sulfur content of 850ppm.
  • Example 3
  • This example was conducted to demonstrate that the yields of liquefied gas and diesel oil can be increased simultaneously by the process of the present invention. The process was carried out in a pilot plant riser reactor, the same as that used in Example 1.
  • The pre-lifting steam and catalytic gasoline (having a RON and MON of 92.6 and 79.4 respectively and an olefin content of 46.1wt%) in a weight ratio of 0.06:1 were charged into the reactor through a location at a height of 40% the height of the gasoline cracking zone, contacted the catalyst B, and then the resultant oil-gas mixture and reacted catalyst rose up and entered the heavy oil cracking zone; a stock A of 75wt% and all the recycling slurry were charged into the reactor through the bottom of heavy oil cracking zone, contacted the oil-gas mixture and catalyst from the gasoline cracking zone, and then the resultant oil-gas mixture and reacted catalyst rose up and entered the light oil cracking zone; a stock A of 25wt% and all the recycling heavy cycle oil were charged into the reactor through the bottom of light oil cracking zone, contacted the oil-gas mixture and catalyst from the heavy oil cracking zone, and then the resultant oil-gas mixture and reacted catalyst rose up and entered the termination reaction zone; softened water in an amount of 5% by weight of stock A was charged into the reactor through the bottom of the termination reaction zone; then, the resultant oil-gas mixture and reacted catalyst flowed to the separation system; then the reaction products were separated out, and the spent catalyst, passing through steam stripping, entered the regenerator and, after coke-burning, the regenerated catalyst was circulated back for reuse. The weight ratio of catalytic gasoline stock to stock A was 0.15:1.
  • The reaction conditions and product distribution are shown in Table 5, from which it can be seen that the yield of liquefied gas is 18.44wt%, and the yield of diesel oil is 28.00wt%. The properties of gasoline products are shown in Table 6, from which it can be seen that the gasoline products have RON and MON of 93.6 and 80.7 respectively, an olefin content of 39.9wt% and a sulfur content of 780ppm.
  • Comparative Example 4
  • This example was conducted to demonstrate that the yields of liquefied gas and diesel oil can be increased simultaneously by the process of the present invention. The process was carried out in a pilot plant riser reactor, the same as that used in Example 1.
  • The pre-lifting steam and catalytic gasoline (having a RON and MON of 90.1 and 79.8 respectively and an olefin content of 51.2wt%) in a weight ratio of 0.09:1 were charged into the reactor through a location at a height of 20% the height of the gasoline cracking zone, contacted the catalyst C, and then the resultant oil-gas mixture and reacted catalyst rose up and entered the heavy oil cracking zone; a stock B of 60wt% and a portion of 80wt% of the recycling slurry were charged into the reactor through the bottom of heavy oil cracking zone, contacted the reactant oil-gas mixture and catalyst from the gasoline cracking zone, and then the resultant oil-gas mixture and reacted catalyst rose up and entered the light oil cracking zone; a stock B of 40wt% and all the recycling heavy cycle oil were charged into the reactor through the bottom of light oil cracking zone, contacted the reactant oil-gas mixture and catalyst from the heavy oil cracking zone, and then the resultant oil-gas mixture and reacted catalyst rose up and entered the termination reaction zone; catalytic gasoline in an amount of 5% by weight of stock B was charged into the reactor through the bottom of the termination reaction zone; then, the resultant oil-gas mixture and reacted catalyst flowed to the separation system; then the reaction products were separated out, and the spent catalyst, passing through steam stripping, entered the regenerator and, after coke-burning the regenerated catalyst was circulated back for reuse. The weight ratio of catalytic gasoline stock to stock B was 0.10:1.
  • The reaction conditions and product distribution are shown in Table 7, from which it can be seen that the yield of liquefied gas is 20.49wt%, and the yield of diesel oil is 28.45wt%. The properties of gasoline products are shown in Table 8, from which it can be seen that the gasoline products have RON and MON of 90.5 and 80.2 respectively, an olefin content of 45.9wt% and a sulfur content of 314ppm.
  • Comparative Example 3
  • This comparative example was conducted to demonstrate the yields of liquefied gas and diesel oil obtained from a conventional catalytic feedstock in a conventional non-sectional catalytic cracking riser reactor. The process was carried out in a pilot plant riser reactor having a total height of 10 m.
  • The feedstock and catalyst used in this comparative example were the same respectively as the conventional catalytic cracking feed and catalyst used in Example 4. The reaction conditions and product distribution are shown in Table 7, from which it can be seen that, in the absence of a gasoline stock, the yield of liquefied gas is only 18.48wt%, 2.01 percentage points lower than that obtained in Example 4; and the yield of diesel oil is only 26.61wt%, 1.84 percentage points lower than that obtained in Example 4. The properties of gasoline products are shown in Table 8, from which it can be seen that the gasoline products have a RON and MON of 79.8 and 90.1 respectively, an olefin content of 51.2wt% and a sulfur content of 394ppm.
  • Comparative Example 5
  • This example was conducted to demonstrate that the yields of liquefied gas and diesel oil can be increased simultaneously by the process of the present invention. The process was carried out in a pilot plant riser reactor, the same as that used in Example 1.
  • The catalytic gasoline (having a RON and MON of 90.1.and 79.8 respectively and an olefin content of 51.2wt%) was charged into the reactor through the bottom of the gasoline cracking zone, contacted the catalyst C, and then the resultant oil-gas mixture and reacted catalyst rose up and entered the heavy oil cracking zone; 100wt% of stock B and all the recycling slurry were charged into the reactor through the bottom of heavy oil cracking zone, contacted the reactant oil-gas mixture and catalyst from the gasoline cracking zone, and then the resultant oil-gas mixture and reacted catalyst rose up and entered the light oil cracking zone; all the recycling heavy cycle oil was charged into the reactor through the bottom of light oil cracking zone, contacted the oil-gas mixture and catalyst from the heavy oil cracking zone, and then the resultant oil-gas mixture and reacted catalyst rose up and entered the termination reaction zone; catalytic gasoline, in an amount of 10wt% the weight of stock B was charged into the reactor through the bottom of the termination reaction zone; then, the resultant oil-gas mixture and reacted catalyst flowed to the separation system; then the reaction products were separated out, and the spent catalyst, passing through steam stripping, entered the regenerator and, after coke-burning, the regenerated catalyst was circulated back for reuse. The weight ratio of catalytic gasoline stock to stock B was 0.049:1.
  • The reaction conditions and product distribution are shown in Table 7, from which it can be seen that the yield of liquefied gas is 18.98wt%, and the yield of diesel oil is 27.04wt%. The properties of gasoline products are shown in Table 8, from which it can be seen that the gasoline products have RON arid MON of 90.3 and 79.8 respectively; an olefin content of 48.8wt% and a sulfur content of 365ppm. Table 1
    Conventional catalytic cracking feed A B
    Composition of Conventional catalytic cracking feed, wt%
     Vacuum gas oil 82 83
     Vacuum residue 18 17
    Density (20°C), g/cm3 0.9053 0.8691
    Viscosity, mm2/sec
     80°C 23.88 7.999
     100°C 13.60 5.266
    Conradson residue, wt% 2.3 1.65
    Pour point, °C 45 33
    Group composition, wt%
     Saturates 61.3 77.9
     Aromatics 27.8 14.2
     Resin 10.3 7.5
     Asphaltenes 0.6 0.4
    Elementary composition, wt%
     Carbon 86.27 86.21
     Hydrogen 12.60 13.36
     Sulfur 1.12 0.27
     Nitrogen 0.23 0.27
    Metal contents, ppm
     Fe 10.4
     Ni 3.5 -
     Cu <0.1 -
     V 3.9 -
     Na <0.1 -
    Distillation range, °C
     IBP 268 213
     5% 370 301
     10% 400 328
     30% 375
     50% 480 418
     70% 521 466
     Dry point -
    Table 2
    Catalyst A B C
    Trade name RHZ-300 MLC-500 LV-23
    Chemical composition, wt%
     Al2O3 42.0 44.7 51.7
     Fe2O3 0.42 0.38
    Physical properties
     Specific surface area, m2/g 182 203 220
     Pore volume, ml/g 1.93 2.14 2.39
     Apparent density,g/cm3 0.8382 0.7921 0.7654
    Screen composition, %
     0-40 µm 7.4 8.5 22.4
     0-80 µm 66.4 66.3 -
     0-110 µm 90.0 87.2 81.9
     0-150 µm 98.9 95.9 -
    Table 3
    Comp. Example 1 Comp. Ex. 1A
    Pre-lifting steam/gasoline stock weight ratio 0.05 -
    Pre-lifting stock/conventional catalytic cracking feed weight ratio 0.20 0
    Catalyst A A
    Reaction conditions
     Temperature, °C 500
      Gasoline cracking zone 640 -
      Heavy oil cracking zone 580 -
      Light oil cracking zone 507 -
    Residence time, sec. 1.9
      Gasoline cracking zone 1 -
      Heavy oil cracking zone 0.4 -
      Light oil cracking zone 1 -
    Catalyst/oil ratio 5
      Gasoline cracking zone 25 -
      Heavy oil cracking zone 6.7 -
      Light oil cracking zone 5 -
    Pressure (gauge), KPa 90 90
    Regenerated catalyst temp., °C 680 660
    Product distribution, wt%
      Dry gas 3.56 3.08
      Liquefied gas 16.34 13.23
      Gasoline 37.96 43.61
      Diesel oil 26.51 24.72
      Slurry 9.25 9.23
      Coke 6.38 6.13
      Total 100.00 100.00
    Table 4
    Comp. Example 1 Com. Examp. 1A
    Density (20°C), kg/m3 0.7503
    Octane number
      RON 93.2 92.4
      MON 80.5 79.1
    Olefin content, wt% 37.8
    Induction period, min. 632 545
    Existent gum, mg/100ml 2 3
    Sulfur, ppm 760 870
    Nitrogen, ppm 21 27
    Carbon, wt% 87.20 86.65
    Hydrogen, wt% 12.75 13.26
    Distillation range, °C
     IBP 45 41
     10% 76 71
     30% 106
     50% 127 123
     70% 148 148
     90% 169 171
     EBP 192 195
    Table 5
    Example 2 Comp. Ex 2 Example 3
    Steam/gasoline stock weight ratio 0.10 - 0.06
    gasoline stock/conventionalcatalytic cracking feed weight ratio 0.08 0 0.15
    Catalyst B B B
    Reaction conditions
     Temperature, °C 500
      Gasoline cracking zone 660 - 645
      Heavy oil cracking zone 610 - 590
      Light oil cracking zone 500 - 500
    Residence time, sec. 1.83
      Gasoline cracking zone 0.3 - 1.1
      Heavy oil cracking zone 0.4 - 0.3
      Light oil cracking zone 1.89 - 1.93
    Catalyst/oil ratio 6.2
      Gasoline cracking zone 77 - 41.3
      Heavy oil cracking zone 10.3 - 8.3
      Light oil cracking zone 6.2 - 6.2
    Pressure (gauge), KPa 150 150 150
    Regenerated catalyst temp., °C 675 670 678
    Product distribution, wt%
      Dry gas 3.13 2.90 3.83
      Liquefied gas 16.68 15.32 18.44
      Gasoline 42.73 46.61 40.03
      Diesel oil 27.56 25.79 28.26
      Coke 9.05 8.57 8.78
      Loss 0.85 0.81 0.66
      Total 100.00 100.00 100.00
    Table 6
    Example 2 Com. Ex. 2 Example 3
    Density (20°C), kg/m3 0.7601 0.7548 0.7694
    Octane number
      RON 92.8 92.6 93.6
      MON 80.2 79.4 80.7
    Olefin content, wt% 43.4 46.1 39.9
    Induction period, min. 601 556 657
    Existent gum, mg/100ml 2 3 2
    Sulfur, ppm 790 850 780
    Nitrogen, ppm 22 26 20
    Carbon, wt% 86.91 86.63 87.18
    Hydrogen, wt% 13.01 13.24 12.73
    Distillation range, °C
     IBP 43 40 45
     10% 75 70 77
     30% 102 99 105
     50% 124 124 127
     70% 146 148 147
     90% 170 172 169
     EBP 192 194 192
    Table 7
    Comp. Example 4 Comp. Ex 3 Comp Example 5
    Steam/gasoline stock weight ratio 0.09 - 0
    gasoline stock/conventionalcatalytic cracking feed weight ratio 0.10 0 0.049
    Catalyst C C C
    Reaction conditions
     Temperature, °C 500
      Gasoline cracking zone 668 - 690
      Heavy oil cracking zone 596 - 520
      Light oil cracking zone 502 - 500
    Residence time, sec. 2.60
      Gasoline cracking zone 1.59 - 2.16
      Heavy oil cracking zone 1.50 - 1.40
      Light oil cracking zone 2.40 - 1.60
    Catalyst/oil ratio 5
      Gasoline cracking zone 50 - 100
      Heavy oil cracking zone 8.33 5
      Light oil cracking zone 5 - 5
    Pressure (gauge), KPa 200 200 200
    Regenerated catalyst temp.,°C 699 671 700
    Product distribution, wt%
      Dry gas 2.78 2.25 3.01
      Liquefied gas 20.49 18.48 18.98
      Gasoline 40.64 45.97 44.17
      Diesel oil 28.45 26.61 27.04
      Slurry 1.20 0 0
      Coke 6.01 6.22 6.35
      Loss 0.43 0.56 0.45
      Total 100.00 100.00 100.00
    Table 8
    Comp Example 4 Comp.Ex.3 Comp. Example 5
    Density (20°C), kg/m3 0.7559 0.7454 0.7458
    Octane number
       RON 90.5 90.1 90.3
       MON 80.2 79.8 79.8
    Olefin content, wt% 45.9 51.2 48.8
    Induction period, min. 574 515 545
    Existent gum, mg/100ml 3 4 3
    Sulfur, ppm 314 394 365
    Nitrogen, ppm 13 17 15
    Carbon, wt% 86.94 86.14 86.81
    Hydrogen, wt% 13.01 13.21 13.17
    Distillation range, °C
      IBP 40 40 43
      10% 63 62 62
      30% 84 83 82
      50% 110 107 108
      70% 136 134 135
      90% 190 190 191
      EBP 197 196 195

Claims (8)

  1. A process for catalytic cracking hydrocarbon stocks to increase simultaneously the yields of diesel oil and liquefied gas, carrying out in a riser or fluidized-bed reactor, wherein said reactor comprises a gasoline cracking zone, a heavy oil cracking zone, a light oil cracking zone and an optional termination reaction zone, wherein said process comprises the following steps:
    (i) Gasoline stock and an optional pre-lifting medium are charged into the gasoline cracking zone of the reactor, contact a catalytic cracking catalyst to produce an oil-gas mixture, and then the resultant oil-gas mixture and reacted catalyst rise up and enter the heavy oil cracking zone; wherein in the gasoline cracking zone, the reaction temperature is 620-680°C, the reaction pressure is 100-230 KPa, the residence time is 0.2-1.5 sec., the weight ratio of catalyst to gasoline stock is 20-80, and the temperature of the regenerated catalyst is 660-710°C;
    (ii) One of the stocks selected from the mixture of conventional catalytic cracking feed and slurry, the mixture of conventional catalytic cracking feed and heavy cycle oil, and the mixture of conventional catalytic cracking feed, slurry and heavy cycle oil, is charged into the reactor through the bottom of the heavy oil cracking zone, contact the oil-gas mixture and reacted catalyst rising from the gasoline cracking zone to produce an oil-gas mixture, and then the resultant oil-gas mixture and reacted catalyst rise up and enter the light oil cracking zone, wherein in the heavy oil cracking zone, the weight ratio of catalyst to feedstock is 5-20, and the residence time is 0.1-2 sec;
    (iii) One of the stocks selected from the mixture of conventional catalytic cracking feed and slurry, the mixture of conventional catalytic cracking feed and heavy cycle oil, and the mixture of conventional catalytic cracking feed, slurry and heavy cycle oil, is charged into the reactor through the bottom of the light oil cracking zone, contact the oil-gas mixture and reacted catalyst rising from the heavy oil cracking zone to produce an oil-gas mixture, and then the resultant oil-gas mixture and reacted catalyst rise up and enter an optional termination reaction zone, wherein in the light oil cracking zone, the weight ratio of catalyst to feedstock is 3-15, and the residence time is 0.1-6 sec;
    (iv) A reaction terminating medium is optionally charged into the reactor through the bottom of the termination reaction zone to terminate the reaction, from where the resultant oil-gas mixture and catalyst flow forward to a disengaging section to separate; and
    (v) The reaction products are separated out in the fractionation system to obtain the desired liquefied gas, gasoline and diesel oil products, and the spent catalyst passes through steam stripping and then enters a regenerator and undergoes coke-burning and then is circulated back for reuse;
    wherein the gasoline stocks are distillate oils having a boiling range of 30°-210°C selected from catalytic gasoline and coker gasoline, or mixtures thereof,
    and wherein the conventional catalytic cracking feed is selected from straight-run gas oil, coker gas oil, deasphalted oil, hydrofined oil, hydrocracking tail oil, vacuum residue and atmospheric residue, or mixtures thereof.
  2. A process according to claim 1, wherein said pre-lifting medium is dry gas or steam, the weight ratio of the prelifting medium to the gasoline stock is 0-0.1:1.
  3. A process according to claim 1, wherein said gasoline stock in the gasoline cracking zone is a catalytic gasoline fraction of C7-205°C.
  4. A process according to claim 1, wherein
    in the heavy oil cracking zone, the weight ratio of catalyst to feedstock is 7-15, and the residence time is 0.3-1 sec, and
    in the light oil cracking zone, the weight ratio of catalyst to feedstock is 5-10, and the residence time is 0.2-3 sec.
  5. A process according to claim 1, wherein said conventional catalytic cracking feed used in steps (ii) and (iii) may be the same or different, the weight ratio of said feed used in step (ii) to said feed used in step (iii) is 20-95:80-5.
  6. A process according to claim 1, wherein the weight ratio of gasoline stock to conventional catalytic cracking feed is 0.02-0.50:1.
  7. A process according to claim 1, wherein said reaction terminating medium is selected from waste water, softened water, catalytic gasoline, coker gasoline, straight-run gasoline, cycle oil stock, heavy oil fraction, coker gas oil, deasphalted oil, straight-run gas oil and hydrocracking tail oil, or mixtures thereof, and said reaction terminating medium accounts for 0-30wt% of the conventional catalytic cracking feed.
  8. A process according to claim 1, wherein the total height of said reactor is 10-50m, of which the heights of gasoline cracking zone, heavy oil cracking zone, light oil cracking and termination reaction zone are 2-20%, 2-40%, 2-60% and 0-40% respectively.
EP00938463.7A 1999-06-23 2000-06-20 Catalytic converting process for producing prolifically diesel oil and liquefied gas Expired - Lifetime EP1205530B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN99109195 1999-06-23
CN99109195 1999-06-23
PCT/CN2000/000166 WO2001000750A1 (en) 1999-06-23 2000-06-20 Catalytic converting process for producing prolifically diesel oil and liquefied gas

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1205530A1 EP1205530A1 (en) 2002-05-15
EP1205530A4 EP1205530A4 (en) 2011-03-02
EP1205530B1 true EP1205530B1 (en) 2015-07-22

Family

ID=5273749

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP00938463.7A Expired - Lifetime EP1205530B1 (en) 1999-06-23 2000-06-20 Catalytic converting process for producing prolifically diesel oil and liquefied gas

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (1) US6416656B1 (en)
EP (1) EP1205530B1 (en)
JP (1) JP4361234B2 (en)
NO (1) NO334807B1 (en)
WO (1) WO2001000750A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (29)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7169293B2 (en) 1999-08-20 2007-01-30 Uop Llc Controllable space velocity reactor and process
US6869521B2 (en) 2002-04-18 2005-03-22 Uop Llc Process and apparatus for upgrading FCC product with additional reactor with thorough mixing
US6866771B2 (en) 2002-04-18 2005-03-15 Uop Llc Process and apparatus for upgrading FCC product with additional reactor with catalyst recycle
US7425258B2 (en) 2003-02-28 2008-09-16 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company C6 recycle for propylene generation in a fluid catalytic cracking unit
US7270739B2 (en) 2003-02-28 2007-09-18 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Fractionating and further cracking a C6 fraction from a naphtha feed for propylene generation
BR0302326A (en) * 2003-06-03 2005-03-29 Petroleo Brasileiro Sa Fluid catalytic cracking process of mixed hydrocarbon fillers from different sources
CN1333046C (en) * 2004-04-29 2007-08-22 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Catalytic conversion process for petroleum hydrocarbons
BRPI0504854A (en) * 2005-10-31 2007-09-18 Petroleo Brasileiro Sa fcc process for maximizing middle distillates
US20070205139A1 (en) * 2006-03-01 2007-09-06 Sathit Kulprathipanja Fcc dual elevation riser feed distributors for gasoline and light olefin modes of operation
BRPI0605327B1 (en) 2006-12-20 2016-12-20 Petroleo Brasileiro Sa fluidized bed catalytic cracking process of petroleum hydrocarbon streams with maximization of light olefin production
EP2184335B1 (en) * 2007-08-09 2021-03-31 China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation A process of catalytic conversion
US9309467B2 (en) 2007-12-20 2016-04-12 China Petroleum And Chemical Corp. Integrated process for hydrogenation and catalytic cracking of hydrocarbon oil
BRPI0800236B1 (en) 2008-01-24 2019-05-14 Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING PROCESS AND EQUIPMENT FOR THE PRODUCTION OF LOW AROMATIC MEDIUM DISTILLED
KR101606496B1 (en) * 2008-03-13 2016-03-25 차이나 페트로리움 앤드 케미컬 코포레이션 Method for obtaining light fuel from inferior feedstock
JP5220456B2 (en) * 2008-03-28 2013-06-26 一般財団法人石油エネルギー技術センター Decomposition method of atmospheric distillation residue oil
CN101928587B (en) * 2009-06-25 2013-11-06 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Catalytic conversion method of hydrocarbon oil
FR2953851B1 (en) * 2009-12-14 2012-12-21 Total Raffinage Marketing CATALYTIC CRACKING PROCESS WITH MAXIMIZATION OF GAS BASES
JP6068437B2 (en) * 2011-04-15 2017-01-25 ペトロレオ ブラジレイロ ソシエダ アノニマ − ペトロブラス FCC method to maximize diesel using two separate converters
CN102952575B (en) * 2011-08-26 2014-08-20 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Catalytic conversion method for increasing gasoline octane number
CN102952576B (en) * 2011-08-26 2014-08-20 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Method for increasing gasoline octane number in wax oil catalytic conversion process
CN103725321B (en) * 2012-10-10 2015-10-28 中国石油化工股份有限公司 The petroleum hydrocarbon catalytic cracking process of a kind of high output of ethylene and/or propylene and device thereof
CN104513673B (en) * 2013-09-29 2016-08-17 中石化洛阳工程有限公司 A kind of double lift pipe catalytic cracking method and device
CN104974788B (en) * 2014-04-08 2017-02-22 中石化洛阳工程有限公司 Catalytic cracking device and catalytic cracking method
CN105885938B (en) * 2014-09-12 2017-08-22 中石化洛阳工程有限公司 A kind of fluidized catalytic cracker
CN104910951A (en) * 2015-05-26 2015-09-16 成都高普石油工程技术有限公司 Catalytic cracking unit of rich gas and crude gasoline
CN105969423B (en) * 2016-05-25 2017-12-22 杭州快凯高效节能新技术有限公司 A kind of used oil diesel device and method
CN110857395B (en) * 2018-08-24 2021-11-16 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Method and system for processing coking gasoline and heavy raw oil
CN110857396B (en) * 2018-08-24 2021-11-16 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Method and system for processing coking gasoline and heavy raw oil
CN114797411A (en) * 2022-05-23 2022-07-29 山东华星石油化工集团有限公司 Desulfurizing device for reforming pre-hydrogenated liquefied gas

Family Cites Families (24)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3784463A (en) 1970-10-02 1974-01-08 Texaco Inc Catalytic cracking of naphtha and gas oil
US3758403A (en) 1970-10-06 1973-09-11 Mobil Oil Olites catalytic cracking of hydrocarbons with mixture of zsm-5 and other ze
US3948757A (en) * 1973-05-21 1976-04-06 Universal Oil Products Company Fluid catalytic cracking process for upgrading a gasoline-range feed
US3894932A (en) 1973-11-19 1975-07-15 Mobil Oil Corp Conversion of hydrocarbons with {37 y{38 {0 faujasite-type catalysts
US4218306A (en) * 1979-01-15 1980-08-19 Mobil Oil Corporation Method for catalytic cracking heavy oils
US4309280A (en) 1980-07-18 1982-01-05 Mobil Oil Corporation Promotion of cracking catalyst octane yield performance
US4422925A (en) 1981-12-28 1983-12-27 Texaco Inc. Catalytic cracking
US4666586A (en) * 1983-10-11 1987-05-19 Farnsworth Carl D Method and arrangement of apparatus for cracking high boiling hydrocarbon and regeneration of solids used
US4478708A (en) * 1983-10-11 1984-10-23 Farnsworth Carl D Method and apparatus for separating fluidized solid particles suspended in gasiform material
USRE36403E (en) * 1985-10-30 1999-11-23 Chevron Research And Technology Company Gasoline octane enhancement in fluid catalytic cracking process with split feed injection to riser reactor
US4869807A (en) * 1985-10-30 1989-09-26 Chevron Research Company Gasoline octane enhancement in fluid catalytic cracking process with split feed injection to riser reactor
US4802971A (en) * 1986-09-03 1989-02-07 Mobil Oil Corporation Single riser fluidized catalytic cracking process utilizing hydrogen and carbon-hydrogen contributing fragments
CN1004878B (en) 1987-08-08 1989-07-26 中国石油化工总公司 Hydrocarbon catalytic conversion method for preparing low-carbon olefin
US5264115A (en) 1987-12-30 1993-11-23 Compagnie De Raffinage Et De Distribution Total France Process and apparatus for fluidized bed hydrocarbon conversion
FR2625509B1 (en) * 1987-12-30 1990-06-22 Total France METHOD AND DEVICE FOR CONVERTING HYDROCARBONS INTO A FLUIDIZED BED
CA1327177C (en) * 1988-11-18 1994-02-22 Alan R. Goelzer Process for selectively maximizing product production in fluidized catalytic cracking of hydrocarbons
CN1043520A (en) 1988-12-21 1990-07-04 中国石油化工总公司石油化工科学研究院 A kind of catalyst for cracking of producing low-carbon alkene
US5098554A (en) * 1990-03-02 1992-03-24 Chevron Research Company Expedient method for altering the yield distribution from fluid catalytic cracking units
US5310477A (en) * 1990-12-17 1994-05-10 Uop FCC process with secondary dealkylation zone
CN1031646C (en) 1992-10-22 1996-04-24 中国石油化工总公司 Method for catalytic conversion of hydrocarbons
US5616237A (en) * 1994-06-13 1997-04-01 Chevron Research And Technology Company, A Division Of Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Split feed injection fluid catalytic cracking process
CN1043782C (en) * 1996-03-21 1999-06-23 中国石油化工总公司 Gasoline octane number-raising catalytic conversion method
US5846403A (en) 1996-12-17 1998-12-08 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Recracking of cat naphtha for maximizing light olefins yields
US5965012A (en) * 1997-12-05 1999-10-12 Uop Llc FCC process with short primary contacting and controlled secondary contacting

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
ROBERT PERRY: "Perry's Chemical Engineers' Handbook", 5 February 1997, MCGRAW-HILL, ISBN: 0-07-049841-5, pages: 13-90 - 13-92 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
NO20016317D0 (en) 2001-12-21
US6416656B1 (en) 2002-07-09
NO20016317L (en) 2002-02-25
NO334807B1 (en) 2014-06-02
JP2003503580A (en) 2003-01-28
EP1205530A1 (en) 2002-05-15
JP4361234B2 (en) 2009-11-11
WO2001000750A1 (en) 2001-01-04
EP1205530A4 (en) 2011-03-02

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1205530B1 (en) Catalytic converting process for producing prolifically diesel oil and liquefied gas
US7678342B1 (en) Riser reactor for fluidized catalytic conversion
US5906728A (en) Process for increased olefin yields from heavy feedstocks
CA2657628C (en) Ancillary cracking of paraffinic naphtha in conjunction with fcc unit operations
EP0372632B1 (en) Process for the conversion of a hydrocarbonaceous feedstock
US5637207A (en) Fluid catalytic cracking process
US6495028B1 (en) Catalytic conversion process for producing isobutane and isoparaffin-enriched gasoline
US20010042700A1 (en) Naphtha and cycle oil conversion process
EP1046696B1 (en) A catalytic conversion process for producing isobutane and isoparaffin-enriched gasoline
JPH06322377A (en) Method and apparatus for catalytically cracking paraffin-rich feedstock containing high and low con-carbon components
US4218306A (en) Method for catalytic cracking heavy oils
CA2103230C (en) Fluid catalytic cracking process for producing light olefins
US5318692A (en) FCC for producing low emission fuels from high hydrogen and low nitrogen and aromatic feeds
CN111807917A (en) Method and device for preparing olefin by catalytic conversion of petroleum hydrocarbon raw material
CN1069054A (en) Catalytic cracking method for adaptable multieffect hydrocarbons
CN1179019C (en) Method for eatalyzing and transfering petroleum hydrocarbon compounds by using reactor with dual reacting regions
CN112708450B (en) Method for producing propylene by catalytic cracking of hydrocarbons
CN109722307A (en) The method and system of processing of heavy oil
CN1333046C (en) Catalytic conversion process for petroleum hydrocarbons
CN1205154C (en) Method of increasing propylene product and reducing olefine content in gasoline using C4 distillation
US4169784A (en) Catalytic cracking process using a passivation agent and an oxidation promoter
US5314612A (en) Fluid catalytic cracking process for producing low emissions fuels
CN111689829B (en) Method and device for preparing ethylene by catalytic conversion of petroleum hydrocarbon
CN111647433B (en) Method and system for producing propylene and high-octane gasoline from inferior oil
CN101665713A (en) Method and device for circulating cold regenerated catalyst

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20011221

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): DE NL

A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

Effective date: 20110127

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20111128

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20141208

GRAJ Information related to disapproval of communication of intention to grant by the applicant or resumption of examination proceedings by the epo deleted

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDIGR1

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20150129

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): DE NL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 60049014

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: FP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 60049014

Country of ref document: DE

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20160425

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20190604

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20190612

Year of fee payment: 20

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R071

Ref document number: 60049014

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MK

Effective date: 20200619