EP1197571A1 - Steel product for oil well having high strength and being excellent in resistance to sulfide stress cracking - Google Patents

Steel product for oil well having high strength and being excellent in resistance to sulfide stress cracking Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1197571A1
EP1197571A1 EP00922970A EP00922970A EP1197571A1 EP 1197571 A1 EP1197571 A1 EP 1197571A1 EP 00922970 A EP00922970 A EP 00922970A EP 00922970 A EP00922970 A EP 00922970A EP 1197571 A1 EP1197571 A1 EP 1197571A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
steel material
ksi
following relation
strength
yield strength
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP00922970A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1197571A4 (en
Inventor
Shunji Nippon Steel Corp. Yawata Works SAKAMOTO
Hitoshi Nippon St. Corp. Tech. Dev. Bureau ASAHI
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nippon Steel Corp
Original Assignee
Sumitomo Metal Industries Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Sumitomo Metal Industries Ltd filed Critical Sumitomo Metal Industries Ltd
Publication of EP1197571A1 publication Critical patent/EP1197571A1/en
Publication of EP1197571A4 publication Critical patent/EP1197571A4/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/06Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing aluminium
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21DMODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
    • C21D1/00General methods or devices for heat treatment, e.g. annealing, hardening, quenching or tempering
    • C21D1/18Hardening; Quenching with or without subsequent tempering
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/001Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing N
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/12Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing tungsten, tantalum, molybdenum, vanadium, or niobium
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/14Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing titanium or zirconium

Definitions

  • This invention relates to a high-strength steel material such as a steel pipe, for example, casing, tubing, drill pipe, for an oil well, excellent in both strength and sulfide stress cracking (hereinafter referred to as "SSC") resistance, that is used in oil and gas wells while it is exposed to a sour gas environment.
  • SSC sulfide stress cracking
  • a steel material used for oil and gas wells containing hydrogen sulfide is required to possess SSC resistance.
  • the true nature of this SSC is hydrogen embrittlement. Hydrogen embrittlement is more likely to occur as the strength of the steel material becomes higher. It has been therefore difficult to simultaneously satisfy the high strength and the high SSC resistance requirements.
  • Japanese Examined Patent Publication (Kokoku) No.6-104849 describes a technology that achieves high strength, while SSC resistance is secured, by optimizing the steel components and the microstructure.
  • the upper limit of the strength level that can be achieved by this technology presumably remains at a yield strength level of 120 ksi.
  • Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication (Kokai) No.4-66645 discloses a technology that particularly addresses the interaction between Cr and Ni, and secures SSC performance and toughness with a higher strength by controlling the contents of these components. Nonetheless, the strength level that can be achieved by this technology is also, presumably, at the yield strength level of 120 ksi.
  • the yield strength of 120 ksi that is, the level that has been achieved so for, is not sufficient to cope with the future needs, and development of a new type of steel is necessary.
  • the present invention aims at providing a steel material having an excellent SSC resistance with a high strength of at least 120 ksi in terms of the yield strength, that has been difficult to achieve in the past.
  • the inventor of the present invention conducted a series of studies to solve the problems described above. As a result, the present inventor has acquired the knowledge necessary and sufficient to constitute the present invention.
  • the microstructure When the strength of the steel material becomes high, SSC occurs from the grain boundary. To suppress such a rupture, the microstructure must first be uniform. To acquire a high strength of at least 120 ksi and a high SSC resistance, there is no other selection but to use tempered martensite as the microstructure, and this structure, must be as uniform as possible.
  • any heterogeneous phase having different characteristics is contained in the microstructure, the boundary of this heterogeneous phase or the heterogeneous phase itself functions as a breaking start point, and a sufficient SSC resistance cannot be obtained. Uniformity of this structure is substantially determined by the condition of quenching. In other words whether or not the heterogeneous phase develops depends on whether or not a sufficient and uniform quenched martensite structure is obtained throughout the steel material. Needless to say, a complete full martensitic microstructure is preferred. In consideration of thick steel materials or the limitation of the contents of elements capable of contributing to hardenability, that will be described later, the present inventor has examined the condition that is essential to the high strength level to which the present invention is directed. Fig. 1 shows the result.
  • a 25 mm-thick sheet material is subjected to quenching with water cooling from the austenite temperature of 900 to 930°C.
  • the hardness at the center portion of the thickness that is, the most distant from the quenched end of the steel material, and the hardness of the portion just below the material surface that is just below the quenched end are measured. Hardenability is evaluated in terms of the ratio of the hardness of the former to that of the latter.
  • a test specimen is machined from the center portion of the thickness to evaluate the SSC resistance.
  • the present inventor has acquired from Fig. 1 the knowledge that, when the ratio of the hardness of the center portion of the thickness to the hardness just below the plate surface is at least 95%, sufficient SSC resistance can be obtained even at a high strength of 120 ksi or more.
  • the present inventor has also acquired the knowledge that, in order to sufficiently harden a steel material having a thickness of about 25 mm, an index ⁇ (2.7C + Mn + 2Mo) calculated from the C, Mn and Mo contents must be at least 2.0.
  • the present inventor has examined the relationship between the strength that governs SSC performance, and the contents of the alloy elements, on the premise of the uniform microstructure without the heterogeneous phase, and has discovered the results shown in Fig. 2, wherein the relationship between Mo content and yield strength YS of the steel material after tempering is plotted.
  • the contents of Mn and P affecting SSC performance was controlled to the lowest level that can be accomplished industrially. The relationship can be shown extremely clearly.
  • the present inventor has examined the relationship between YS and the Cr content under the condition that the microstructure after the quenching is kept uniform, the content of SSC resistance deteriorating elements such as P and Mn are also kept at a sufficiently low level and constant, and moreover, the useful Mo content is kept constant.
  • the present inventor has found that the SSC resistance varies greatly in the Cr content range of 0.2 to 0.25% as shown in Fig. 3.
  • the SSC threshold stress can be improved by about 10 ksi by limiting the Cr content to not greater than 0.28.
  • Chromium (Cr) has been utilized positively in the past as the element necessary for securing hardenability.
  • Cr is an element that is detrimental to SSC in a high strength region exceeding 120 ksi, because Cr rather weakens the grain boundary strength as the carbide precipitating element and affects SSC harmfully. Therefore Cr content should be restricted.
  • the present inventor has examined in detail the influences of Mn and Mo after P is set to a low level and Cr is restricted. As a result, the present inventor has found that both components interact as shown in Fig. 4.
  • the SSC resistance depends solely on the Mo content.
  • the Mo content must be increased so as to correspond to the increase of the Mn content.
  • the Mn content exceeds 0.5%, the SSC resistance cannot be improved and further even when the Mo content is increased. Therefore, in order to make the most of the utility of Mo, the Mn content must be limited to 0.5% or below, and preferably to less than 0.3%.
  • the present invention has been completed on the basis of the observations described above.
  • the gist of the present invention resides in the following points.
  • the content of each component is expressed in percent by weight.
  • Carbon is an essential element for securing simultaneously the intended high strength and the SSC resistance.
  • the strength and the SSC resistance depend on hardenability.
  • the C content is less than 0.10%, quenching becomes incomplete and the strength drops. Even if required strength can be secured by adjusting the tempering condition, a sufficient SSC resistance cannot be acquired.
  • the C content exceeds 0.40%, on the other hand, the SSC resistance gets into saturation and susceptibility to quench crack and delayed fracture increases. Therefore, an appropriate range of the C content is set to the range of 0.10 to 0.40%.
  • Si Silicon exists as a residue of a deoxidizer used in the steel making process. When the Si content exceeds 0.5%, the steel becomes brittle and the SSC resistance deteriorates. Therefore, the upper limit is set to 0.5%.
  • Mn Manganese is an element detrimental to the SSC resistance and should not be added. However, since Mn has the function of improving hardenability, up to 0.5% as the upper limit of Mn may be contained in case that the C and Mo contents for improving hardenability are small and hardenability is not sufficient. When Mn is contained in the amount exceeding 0.5%, a satisfactory SSC resistance cannot be obtained even when complete quenching is conducted. Therefore the upper limit is set to 0.5%. Incidentally the preferred content of Mn is less than 0.3%.
  • Phosphorus is an impurity element which deteriorates the SSC resistance as it segregates in the grain boundary. Therefore, the P content must be restricted to as low as possible.
  • the upper limit of the P content is set to 0.015% as an allowable level that can be attained stably according to existing refining technologies in view of the cost.
  • S Sulfur is also an element that segregates in the grain boundary and deteriorates the SSC resistance. It is a basic requirement in the present invention to inhibit the Mn content that fixes S. Therefore, the S content should be reduced as low as possible. Since remarkable deterioration of the SSC resistance is not observed at a S content of less than 0.0050%, the upper limit is set to 0.0050%.
  • Molybdenum is one of the essential elements in the present invention. It is the element that restricts the grain boundary segregation of P and improves the temper softening resistance. Therefore, Mo is a suitable element for obtaining the high strength. At least 0.5% of Mo must be contained in order to secure a sufficient SSC resistance in the high strength region of YS ⁇ 120 ksi as shown in Fig. 2. The higher YS, the greater the Mo amount that is to be contained. The preferred range is at least 1.0%. When Mo is contained in a greater amount, the effect gets into saturation, and freedom of strength adjustment becomes small. Therefore, the upper limit is set to 2.5%.
  • Al Aluminum is necessary for sufficiently deoxidizing the steel during the steel making process, and at least 0.005% of Al should be contained. When a greater amount of Al is contained, however, the amounts of alumina type inclusions increase with the result that the susceptibility to SSC is likely to increase. Therefore, the upper limit is set to 0.1%.
  • Titanium is contained in order to let B, that will be described later, sufficiently exhibit its hardenability enhancing function.
  • N must be fixed as TiN in advance in order to prevent precipitation of BN.
  • at least 0.005%, and moreover, at least 3.4 times the N content, of Ti must be added.
  • the upper limit is set to 0.1%.
  • Niobium is the element effective for improving the SSC resistance because it reduces the grain boundary segregation of P through its grain refining effect. Therefore, at least 0.01% of Nb is contained. However, even when a greater amount of Nb is contained, the grain refining effect gets into saturation. On the contrary, the SSC resistance drops due to the drop of the grain boundary strength resulting from coarsening of carbides. Hence, the upper limit is set to 0.1%.
  • N Nitrogen is an impurity element that hinders the hardenability improving effect of B and should be restricted to as low as possible.
  • the upper limit is set to 0.01% as the allowable level that can be attained industrially and stably by the existing refining technologies in view of the cost.
  • B Boron is the element that remarkably improves hardenability, and is one of the essential elements in the present invention for securing hardenability. If the B content is less than 0.0005%, sufficient hardenability cannot be secured. Therefore, the lower limit is set to 0.0005%. If the B content exceeds 0.0050%, on the other hand, the hardenability improving effect gets into saturation, and precipitation of carbo-borides becomes remarkable and the SSC resistance gets deteriorated, on the contrary. Therefore, the upper limit is set to 0.0050%.
  • Mo - 0.15YS:
  • the index ⁇ that is calculated from the contents (wt%) of the alloy elements contributing to hardenability, such as C, Mn and Mo, is set to at least 2.0, as shown in Fig. 1, in order to secure sufficient hardenability.
  • the upper limit is calculated as 6.11 from each of the upper limit contents of C, Mn and Mo.
  • the steel material of the present invention may contain at least one element selected from the following elements, whenever necessary.
  • Chromium is a useful element for improving hardenability, but need not be contained if sufficient hardenability can be secured by other elements such as Mo. In the steel material having a yield strength of 120 ksi or more, the Cr content exceeding 0.2% deteriorates the SSC resistance. Therefore, its upper limit is set to 0.2%.
  • W Tungsten has the function of improving both hardenability and temper softening resistance. However, its effect is not sufficient if its content is less than 0.01%. When the content exceeds 0.5%, the effect gets into saturation. Therefore the suitable range of the W content is set to 0.01 to 0.5%.
  • V Vanadium has the function of improving temper softening resistance. When its content is greater than 0.01%, it is effective for improving the strength. When an excessive amount of V is contained, however, the SSC resistance gets deteriorated. Therefore, the upper limit is set to 0.3%.
  • Zr Zirconium has an effect of restricting grain boundary segregation of P. At least 0.001% of Zr must be contained in order to obtain the effect. Zr is an expensive element and, if contained too much, Zr increases the amounts of oxides and possibly increases the SSC susceptibility. Therefore, the upper limit is set to 0.010%.
  • Ca, Mg and REM These elements mitigate the stress concentration by spheroidizing the morphology of inclusions, at the same time, mitigate the grain boundary segregation of S by fixing it. If the content of these elements is less than 0.001%, the effect is small. On the other hand, at an excessive content, the amounts of oxides increase and the SSC susceptibility is possibly enhanced. Therefore, the upper limit of these element is set to 0.010%.
  • the steel having the alloy composition described above is molten in a converter or an electric furnace and cast. It is then shaped by an ordinary hot rolling method into a desired shape such as a pipe, a sheet or rod, is subjected to quenching and tempering, and is refined to a desired strength.
  • the austenitizing temperature for quenching is at least [Ac 3 point + 20°C] and not higher than 1,000°C. If it is lower than Ac 3 point + 20°C, austenitizing of the steel material is not sufficient and a uniform martensite structure cannot be obtained easily.
  • the austenitizing temperature exceeds 1,000°C, on the other hand, the grain growth becomes remarkable and the area of the grain boundary decreases . In consequence, the SSC resistance deteriorating effect of the segregation elements such as P becomes remarkable. Therefore, the suitable austenitizing temperature is within the range of [Ac 3 + 20°C] to 1,000°C.
  • the typical Ac 3 point of the steel material according to the present invention is 830°C.
  • the steel material quenched from this austenitizing temperature must have a uniform structure in order to acquire a satisfactory SSC resistance. It is necessary that the hardness of the portion that is most distant from the quenched end has a value of at least 95% in terms of the ratio to the hardness of the portion immediately below the quenched end. In the chemical composition of the present invention, expected hardenability can be secured even in a thick material having a thickness of about 25 mm.
  • a suitable range of the tempering temperature is 620 to 720°C. Under the low temperature condition of lower than 620°C, YS becomes excessively high and the value ⁇ described above becomes low. In consequence, the satisfactory SSC resistance cannot be obtained.
  • the tempering temperature exceeds 720°C, on the other hand, the temperature is in the dual phase region, and uniformity of the microstructure is lost with the result of an increase of the SSC susceptibility. Therefore, the range of 630 to 720°C is set as the suitable condition for a tempering temperature.
  • Fig. 5 shows the measurement result of the threshold stress for crack occurrence ( ⁇ th) of a steel material, that satisfies the microstructure and the chemical compositions of the present invention and is refined to YS of 117 to 120 ksi, while the applied stress is varied by a NACE TM0177-A constant load SSC test. It can be thus said that the structural factors of the present invention improve not only the SSC resistance of the steel material having YS ⁇ 120 ksi but also that of the steel material having YS of less than 120 ksi due to the improvement of ⁇ th.
  • Each steel material having a chemical composition tabulated in Table 1 was molten in a vacuum melting furnace, and the resulting ingot was hot rolled to a plate having a thickness of 25 mm.
  • the plate was heated to 900 to 1,025°C for austenitizing, and was then subjected to quenching treatment by water.
  • the hardness at the center of the thickness and the hardness of a portion just below the surface were measured. Hardenability was evaluated by calculating their ratio.
  • tempering was conducted at 630 to 730°C. A round rod tensile test specimen was machined from the center of the thickness of this plate, and the tensile test was carried out.
  • a test specimen for a sulfide stress cracking test which had a round rod shape having a length of 25 mm at parallel portions and a diameter of 6.2 mm and was stipulated in NACE-TM0177-A, was also machined from the center of the thickness. This test was carried out in a corrosive solution containing 0.5% acetic acid + 5% NaCl and containing H 2 S saturated at a partial pressure of 1 atm at 25°C, for 720 hours while a constant stress corresponding to 80% of the yield strength was loaded to the specimen.
  • Hardenability was evaluated as “good” when the hardness of the center portion of the thickness was greater than 95% of the hardness of the portion immediately below the surface.
  • the SSC resistance was evaluated as “good” for those specimens which did not undergo rupture during the test for 720 hours.
  • the test result was tabulated in Tables 2 and 3.
  • Nos. 1 to 11 and Nos. 101 to 104 represent the test results that fell within the range of the present invention. These specimens satisfied both high strength of YS 120 ksi and excellent SSC resistance.
  • a steel material for an oil well that satisfies both a high strength of at least 120 ksi in terms of a yield strength and excellent SSC resistance can be produced.

Abstract

This invention provides a high-strength steel material for an oil well, excellent in strength and SSC resistance, and having a yield strength of at least 120 ksi. The steel material contains C: 0.10 to 0.40%, Si ≦ 0.5%, Mn ≦ 0.5%, P ≦ 0.015%, S ≦ 0.0050%, Mo: 0.5 to 2.5%, A1: 0.005 to 0.1%, Ti: 0.005 to 0.1% and at least 3.4 times N, Nb: 0.01 to 0.1%, N ≦ 0.01% and B: 0.0005 to 0.0050%, wherein the yield strength expressed by ksi and the Mo content satisfy the following relation (1), the balance of the C, Mn and Mo contents satisfies the following relation (2), and the steel material may contain, whenever necessary, at least one of Cr ≦ 0.2%, W ≦ 0.5%, V: 0.01 to 0.3%, Zr: 0.001 to 0.01%, Ca: 0.001 to 0.01%, Mg: 0.001 to 0.01% and REM: 0.001 to 0.01%. α = Mo - 0.15YS ≧ -18.9 β = 2.7C + Mn + 2Mo ≧ 2.0

Description

    TECHNICAL FIELD:
  • This invention relates to a high-strength steel material such as a steel pipe, for example, casing, tubing, drill pipe, for an oil well, excellent in both strength and sulfide stress cracking (hereinafter referred to as "SSC") resistance, that is used in oil and gas wells while it is exposed to a sour gas environment.
  • BACKGROUND ART:
  • A steel material used for oil and gas wells containing hydrogen sulfide is required to possess SSC resistance. The true nature of this SSC is hydrogen embrittlement. Hydrogen embrittlement is more likely to occur as the strength of the steel material becomes higher. It has been therefore difficult to simultaneously satisfy the high strength and the high SSC resistance requirements.
  • With such a background, technical development has been done to obtain steel materials excellent in the SSC resistance and having high yield strength. For example, Japanese Examined Patent Publication (Kokoku) No.6-104849 describes a technology that achieves high strength, while SSC resistance is secured, by optimizing the steel components and the microstructure. However, the upper limit of the strength level that can be achieved by this technology presumably remains at a yield strength level of 120 ksi. Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication (Kokai) No.4-66645 discloses a technology that particularly addresses the interaction between Cr and Ni, and secures SSC performance and toughness with a higher strength by controlling the contents of these components. Nonetheless, the strength level that can be achieved by this technology is also, presumably, at the yield strength level of 120 ksi.
  • Market needs for oil well pipes have required, in recent years, a new type of steel material that has a yield strength of higher than about 125 ksi while it provides a sufficient SSC resistance. Demands for such a steel material are expected to grow in future.
  • Therefore, the yield strength of 120 ksi, that is, the level that has been achieved so for, is not sufficient to cope with the future needs, and development of a new type of steel is necessary.
  • DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION:
  • In view of the background described above, the present invention aims at providing a steel material having an excellent SSC resistance with a high strength of at least 120 ksi in terms of the yield strength, that has been difficult to achieve in the past.
  • The inventor of the present invention conducted a series of studies to solve the problems described above. As a result, the present inventor has acquired the knowledge necessary and sufficient to constitute the present invention.
  • When the strength of the steel material becomes high, SSC occurs from the grain boundary. To suppress such a rupture, the microstructure must first be uniform. To acquire a high strength of at least 120 ksi and a high SSC resistance, there is no other selection but to use tempered martensite as the microstructure, and this structure, must be as uniform as possible.
  • If any heterogeneous phase having different characteristics is contained in the microstructure, the boundary of this heterogeneous phase or the heterogeneous phase itself functions as a breaking start point, and a sufficient SSC resistance cannot be obtained. Uniformity of this structure is substantially determined by the condition of quenching. In other words whether or not the heterogeneous phase develops depends on whether or not a sufficient and uniform quenched martensite structure is obtained throughout the steel material. Needless to say, a complete full martensitic microstructure is preferred. In consideration of thick steel materials or the limitation of the contents of elements capable of contributing to hardenability, that will be described later, the present inventor has examined the condition that is essential to the high strength level to which the present invention is directed. Fig. 1 shows the result.
  • In Fig. 1, a 25 mm-thick sheet material is subjected to quenching with water cooling from the austenite temperature of 900 to 930°C. Next, the hardness at the center portion of the thickness, that is, the most distant from the quenched end of the steel material, and the hardness of the portion just below the material surface that is just below the quenched end are measured. Hardenability is evaluated in terms of the ratio of the hardness of the former to that of the latter. At the same chance, a test specimen is machined from the center portion of the thickness to evaluate the SSC resistance.
  • The present inventor has acquired from Fig. 1 the knowledge that, when the ratio of the hardness of the center portion of the thickness to the hardness just below the plate surface is at least 95%, sufficient SSC resistance can be obtained even at a high strength of 120 ksi or more. The present inventor has also acquired the knowledge that, in order to sufficiently harden a steel material having a thickness of about 25 mm, an index β (2.7C + Mn + 2Mo) calculated from the C, Mn and Mo contents must be at least 2.0.
  • The present inventor has examined the relationship between the strength that governs SSC performance, and the contents of the alloy elements, on the premise of the uniform microstructure without the heterogeneous phase, and has discovered the results shown in Fig. 2, wherein the relationship between Mo content and yield strength YS of the steel material after tempering is plotted. The contents of Mn and P affecting SSC performance was controlled to the lowest level that can be accomplished industrially. The relationship can be shown extremely clearly. The present inventor has found that to secure sufficient SSC resistance in a high strength material of YS ≧ 120 ksi, the Mo content must be at least 0.5%, and the α value expressed by the relation with the yield strength YS, that is, α = Mo (wt%) - 0.15YS (ksi), must be at least -18.9.
  • However, there is the case where the target cannot be achieved even after the uniform microstructure described above is obtained and, moreover, even after the effect of the effective element Mo is exploited. As a result of the analysis of this case, the present inventor has found that even a slight difference in the Cr content exerts great influence on the high strength material as the object of the present invention.
  • The present inventor has examined the relationship between YS and the Cr content under the condition that the microstructure after the quenching is kept uniform, the content of SSC resistance deteriorating elements such as P and Mn are also kept at a sufficiently low level and constant, and moreover, the useful Mo content is kept constant. As a result, the present inventor has found that the SSC resistance varies greatly in the Cr content range of 0.2 to 0.25% as shown in Fig. 3. In Fig. 3, the SSC threshold stress can be improved by about 10 ksi by limiting the Cr content to not greater than 0.28.
  • Chromium (Cr) has been utilized positively in the past as the element necessary for securing hardenability. However, it should be understood that Cr is an element that is detrimental to SSC in a high strength region exceeding 120 ksi, because Cr rather weakens the grain boundary strength as the carbide precipitating element and affects SSC harmfully. Therefore Cr content should be restricted.
  • Furthermore, the present inventor has examined in detail the influences of Mn and Mo after P is set to a low level and Cr is restricted. As a result, the present inventor has found that both components interact as shown in Fig. 4. In the region where the Mn content is 0.3% or below, the SSC resistance depends solely on the Mo content. Within the range of the Mn content of 0.3 to 0.5%, however, the Mo content must be increased so as to correspond to the increase of the Mn content. When the Mn content exceeds 0.5%, the SSC resistance cannot be improved and further even when the Mo content is increased. Therefore, in order to make the most of the utility of Mo, the Mn content must be limited to 0.5% or below, and preferably to less than 0.3%.
  • The present invention has been completed on the basis of the observations described above. The gist of the present invention resides in the following points.
  • (1) A high-strength steel material for an oil well, excellent in sulfide stress cracking resistance, containing, in terms of mass%:
  • C: 0.10 to 0.40%,   Si ≦ 0.5%,
  • Mn ≦ 0.5%,   P ≦ 0.015%,
  • S ≦ 0.0050%,   Mo: 0.5 to 2.5%,
  • Al: 0.005 to 0.1%,
  • Ti: 0.005 to 0.1% and at least 3.4 times N%,
  • Nb: 0.01 to 0.1%,   N ≦ 0.01% and
  • B: 0.0005 to 0.0050%,
  •    wherein the yield strength YS expressed by ksi and the Mo content satisfy the following relation (1) and the balance of the C, Mn and Mo contents satisfies the following relation (2). α = Mo - 0.15YS ≧ -18.9 β = 2.7C + Mn + 2Mo ≧ 2.0
  • (2) A high-strength steel material for an oil, excellent in sulfide stress cracking resistance, containing, in terms of mass%:
  • C: 0.10 to 0.40%,   Si ≦ 0.5%,
  • Mn ≦ 0.5%,   P ≦ 0.015%,
  • S ≦ 0.0050%,   Mo: 0.5 to 2.5%,
  • Al: 0.005 to 0.1%,
  • Ti: 0.005 to 0.1% and at least 3.4 times N%,
  • Nb: 0.01 to 0.1%,   N ≦ 0.01% and
  • B: 0.0005 to 0.0050%,
  •    wherein the yield strength YS expressed by ksi and the Mo content satisfy the following relation (1) and the balance of C, Mn and Mo contents satisfies the following relation (2); and
       wherein the steel material contains further at least one of the following elements:
    • Cr ≦ 0.2%,   W ≦ 0.5%
    • V: 0.01 to 0.3%,   Zr: 0.001 to 0.010%,
    • Ca: 0.001 to 0.01%,   Mg: 0.001 to 0.01% and
    • REM: 0.001 to 0.01%. α = Mo - 0.15YS ≧ -18.9 β = 2.7C + Mn + 2Mo ≧ 2.0
  • (3) A high-strength steel material for an oil well, excellent in sulfide stress cracking resistance, containing, in terms of mass%:
  • C: 0.10 to 0.40%,   Si ≦ 0.5%,
  • Mn < 0.3 %,   P ≦ 0.015%,
  • S ≦ 0.0050%,   Mo: 0.5 to 2.5%,
  • Al: 0.005 to 0.1%,
  • Ti: 0.005 to 0.1% and at least 3.4 times N%,
  • Nb: 0.01 to 0.1%,   N ≦ 0.01% and
  • B: 0.0005 to 0.0050%,
  •    wherein the yield strength YS expressed by ksi and the Mo content satisfy the following relation (1) and the balance of the C, Mn and Mo contents satisfies the following relation (2). α = Mo - 0.15YS ≧ -18.9 β = 2.7C + Mn + 2Mo ≧ 2.0
  • (4) A high-strength steel material for an oil well, excellent in sulfide stress cracking resistance, containing, in terms of mass%:
  • C: 0.10 to 0.40%,   Si ≦ 0.5%,
  • Mn< 0.3%,   P ≦ 0.015%,
  • S ≦ 0.0050%,   Mo: 0.5 to 2.5%,
  • Al: 0.005 to 0.1%,
  • Ti: 0.005 to 0.1% and at least 3.4 times N%,
  • Nb: 0.01 to 0.1%,   N ≦ 0.01% and
  • B: 0.0005 to 0.0050%,
  •    wherein the yield strength YS expressed by ksi and the Mo content satisfy the following relation (1) and the balance of the C, Mn and Mo contents satisfies the following relation (2); and
       wherein said steel material further contains at least-one of the following elements:
    • Cr ≦ 0.2%,   W ≦ 0.5%,
    • V: 0.01 to 0.3%,   Zr: 0.001 to 0.010%,
    • Ca: 0.001 to 0.01%,   Mg: 0.001 to 0.01% and
    • REM: 0.001 to 0.01%.
    α = Mo - 0.15YS ≧ -18.9 β = 2.7C + Mn + 2Mo ≧ 2.0
  • (5) A high-strength steel material for an oil well, excellent in sulfide stress cracking resistance and having a yield strength of at least 120 ksi, containing, in terms of mass%:
  • C: 0.10 to 0.40%,   Si ≦ 0.5%,
  • Mn< 0.5%,   P ≦ 0.015%,
  • S ≦ 0.0050%,   Mo: 0.5 to 2.5%,
  • Al: 0.005 to 0.1%,
  • Ti: 0.005 to 0.1% and at least 3.4 times N%,
  • Nb: 0.01 to 0.1%,   N ≦ 0.01% and
  • B: 0.0005 to 0.0050%,
       wherein the yield strength YS expressed by ksi and the Mo content satisfy the following relation (1) and the balance of the C, Mn and Mo contents satisfies the following relation (2). α = Mo - 0.15YS ≧ -18.9 β = 2.7C + Mn + 2Mo ≧ 2.0
  • (6) A high-strength steel material for an oil well, excellent in sulfide stress cracking resistance and having a yield strength of at least 120 ksi, containing, in terms of mass%:
  • C: 0.10 to 0.40%,   Si ≦ 0.5%,
  • Mn < 0.5%,   P ≦ 0.015%,
  • S ≦ 0.0050%,   Mo: 0.5 to 2.5%,
  • Al: 0.005 to 0.1%,
  • Ti: 0.005 to 0.1% and at least 3.4 times N%,
  • Nb: 0.01 to 0.1%,   N ≦ 0.01% and
  • B: 0.0005 to 0.0050%,
  •    wherein the yield strength YS expressed by ksi and the Mo content satisfy the following relation (1) and the balance of the C, Mn and Mo contents satisfies the following relation (2); and
       wherein said steel material further contains at least one of the following elements:
    • Cr ≦ 0.2%,   W ≦ 0.5%,
    • V: 0.01 to 0.3%,   Zr: 0.001 to 0.010%,
    • Ca: 0.001 to 0.01%,   Mg: 0.001 to 0.01% and
    • REM: 0.001 to 0.01%.
    α = Mo - 0.15YS ≧ -18.9 β = 2.7C + Mn + 2Mo ≧ 2.0
  • (7) A high-strength steel material for an oil well, excellent in sulfide stress cracking resistance and having a yield strength of at least 120 ksi, containing, in terms of mass%:
  • C: 0.10 to 0.40%,   Si ≦ 0.5%,
  • Mn< 0.3%,   P ≦ 0.015%,
  • S ≦ 0.0050%,   Mo: 1.0 to 2.5%,
  • Al: 0.0050 to 0.1%,
  • Ti: 0.005 to 0.1% and at least 3.4 times N%,
  • Nb: 0.01 to 0.1%,   N ≦ 0.01% and
  • B: 0.0005 to 0.0050%,
  •    wherein the yield strength YS expressed by ksi and the Mo content satisfy the following relation (1) and the balance of the C, Mn and Mo contents satisfies the following relation (2). α = Mo - 0.15YS ≧ -18.9 β = 2.7C + Mn + 2Mo ≧ 2.0
  • (8) A high-strength steel material for an oil well, excellent in sulfide stress cracking resistance and having a yield strength of at least 120 ksi, containing, in terms of mass%:
  • C: 0.10 to 0.40%,   Si ≦ 0.5%,
  • Mn < 0.3%,   P ≦ 0.015%,
  • S ≦ 0.0050%,   Mo: 1.0 to 2.5%,
  • Al: 0.005 to 0.1%,
  • Ti: 0.0050 to 0.1% and at least 3.4 times N%,
  • Nb: 0.01 to 0.1%,   N ≦ 0.01% and
  • B: 0.0005 to 0.0050%,
  •    wherein the yield strength YS expressed by ksi and the Mo content satisfy the following relation (1) and the balance of the C, Mn and Mo contents satisfies the following relation (2); and
       wherein said steel material further contains at least one of the following elements:
    • Cr ≦ 0.2%,   W ≦ 0.5%,
    • V: 0.01 to 0.3%,   Zr: 0.001 to 0.010%,
    • Ca: 0.001 to 0.01%,   Mg: 0.001 to 0.01% and
    • REM: 0.001 to 0.01%.
    α = Mo - 0.15YS ≧ -18.9 β = 2.7C + Mn + 2Mo ≧ 2.0
  • (9) A method of producing a high-strength steel material for an oil well, excellent in sulfide stress cracking resistance, said method comprising the steps of hot processing the steel containing the components according to any of (1) through (8) and having the balance of the C, Mn and Mo contents satisfying the following relation (2);
       heating for austenitizing the steel material to a temperature within the range of [Ac3 point + 20°C] to 1,000°C;
       quenching the steel material to obtain a microstructure in which the hardness as-quenched at the remotest position in the steel from the cooled surface thereof is at least 95% of the hardness of the cooled surface; and
       tempering the steel material at a temperature of 620 to 720°C. β = 2.7C + Mn + 2Mo ≧ 2.0
  • (10) A high-strength steel material for an oil well, excellent in sulfide stress cracking, according to any of (1) through (9),
  • wherein a threshold stress for crack occurrence determined by a constant load type sulfide stress cracking test according to NACE TM0177-A is at least 80% of the yield strength.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS:
  • Fig. 1 is a graph showing a ratio of the hardness at the center portion of the thickness in the as-quenched state to the hardness of the portion immediately below the surface layer, by a hardenability index β, and showing also the relationship between the SSC resistance of the steel material after quenching and β.
  • Fig. 2 is a graph showing the SSC resistance of a steel having high hardenability by the relationship between the Mo content and YS.
  • Fig. 3 is a graph showing the SSC resistance of a steel having high hardenability and a constant Mo content in terms of the relationship between YS and a Cr content.
  • Fig. 4 is a graph showing the SSC resistance of a steel having an equivalent YS in association with the Mn and Mo contents.
  • Fig. 5 is a graph showing the SSC resistance in terms of the ratio of a threshold stress for crack ocurrence to YS as an index of the SSC resistance when YS changes.
  • BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION:
  • Hereinafter, the present invention will be explained in detail.
  • First, the reasons for limitation of the alloy components in the present invention will be explained. The content of each component is expressed in percent by weight.
  • C: Carbon is an essential element for securing simultaneously the intended high strength and the SSC resistance. The strength and the SSC resistance depend on hardenability. When the C content is less than 0.10%, quenching becomes incomplete and the strength drops. Even if required strength can be secured by adjusting the tempering condition, a sufficient SSC resistance cannot be acquired. When the C content exceeds 0.40%, on the other hand, the SSC resistance gets into saturation and susceptibility to quench crack and delayed fracture increases. Therefore, an appropriate range of the C content is set to the range of 0.10 to 0.40%.
  • Si: Silicon exists as a residue of a deoxidizer used in the steel making process. When the Si content exceeds 0.5%, the steel becomes brittle and the SSC resistance deteriorates. Therefore, the upper limit is set to 0.5%.
  • Mn: Manganese is an element detrimental to the SSC resistance and should not be added. However, since Mn has the function of improving hardenability, up to 0.5% as the upper limit of Mn may be contained in case that the C and Mo contents for improving hardenability are small and hardenability is not sufficient. When Mn is contained in the amount exceeding 0.5%, a satisfactory SSC resistance cannot be obtained even when complete quenching is conducted. Therefore the upper limit is set to 0.5%. Incidentally the preferred content of Mn is less than 0.3%.
  • P: Phosphorus is an impurity element which deteriorates the SSC resistance as it segregates in the grain boundary. Therefore, the P content must be restricted to as low as possible. The upper limit of the P content is set to 0.015% as an allowable level that can be attained stably according to existing refining technologies in view of the cost.
  • S: Sulfur is also an element that segregates in the grain boundary and deteriorates the SSC resistance. It is a basic requirement in the present invention to inhibit the Mn content that fixes S. Therefore, the S content should be reduced as low as possible. Since remarkable deterioration of the SSC resistance is not observed at a S content of less than 0.0050%, the upper limit is set to 0.0050%.
  • Mo: Molybdenum is one of the essential elements in the present invention. It is the element that restricts the grain boundary segregation of P and improves the temper softening resistance. Therefore, Mo is a suitable element for obtaining the high strength. At least 0.5% of Mo must be contained in order to secure a sufficient SSC resistance in the high strength region of YS ≧ 120 ksi as shown in Fig. 2. The higher YS, the greater the Mo amount that is to be contained. The preferred range is at least 1.0%. When Mo is contained in a greater amount, the effect gets into saturation, and freedom of strength adjustment becomes small. Therefore, the upper limit is set to 2.5%.
  • Al: Aluminum is necessary for sufficiently deoxidizing the steel during the steel making process, and at least 0.005% of Al should be contained. When a greater amount of Al is contained, however, the amounts of alumina type inclusions increase with the result that the susceptibility to SSC is likely to increase. Therefore, the upper limit is set to 0.1%.
  • Ti: Titanium is contained in order to let B, that will be described later, sufficiently exhibit its hardenability enhancing function. In other words, N must be fixed as TiN in advance in order to prevent precipitation of BN. For this purpose, at least 0.005%, and moreover, at least 3.4 times the N content, of Ti must be added. However, a greater Ti content promotes precipitation of TiN and enhances SSC susceptibility. Therefore, the upper limit is set to 0.1%.
  • Nb: Niobium is the element effective for improving the SSC resistance because it reduces the grain boundary segregation of P through its grain refining effect. Therefore, at least 0.01% of Nb is contained. However, even when a greater amount of Nb is contained, the grain refining effect gets into saturation. On the contrary, the SSC resistance drops due to the drop of the grain boundary strength resulting from coarsening of carbides. Hence, the upper limit is set to 0.1%.
  • N: Nitrogen is an impurity element that hinders the hardenability improving effect of B and should be restricted to as low as possible. The upper limit is set to 0.01% as the allowable level that can be attained industrially and stably by the existing refining technologies in view of the cost.
  • B: Boron is the element that remarkably improves hardenability, and is one of the essential elements in the present invention for securing hardenability. If the B content is less than 0.0005%, sufficient hardenability cannot be secured. Therefore, the lower limit is set to 0.0005%. If the B content exceeds 0.0050%, on the other hand, the hardenability improving effect gets into saturation, and precipitation of carbo-borides becomes remarkable and the SSC resistance gets deteriorated, on the contrary. Therefore, the upper limit is set to 0.0050%. α = Mo - 0.15YS:
  • When the value α, that is calculated as the function of the yield strength YS (ksi) and the Mo content (wt%), exceeds -18.9 as shown in Fig. 2, an excellent SSC resistance can be obtained. When it is below -18.9, a satisfactory SSC resistance cannot be obtained even when the individual components satisfy the respective conditions. For this reason, the present invention stipulates a ≧ -18.9 as the essential requirement of the invention in addition to the component conditions described above. β = 2.7C + Mn + 2Mo:
  • In addition to the component conditions described above, the index β, that is calculated from the contents (wt%) of the alloy elements contributing to hardenability, such as C, Mn and Mo, is set to at least 2.0, as shown in Fig. 1, in order to secure sufficient hardenability. The upper limit is calculated as 6.11 from each of the upper limit contents of C, Mn and Mo.
  • In addition to the elements described above, the steel material of the present invention may contain at least one element selected from the following elements, whenever necessary.
  • Cr: Chromium is a useful element for improving hardenability, but need not be contained if sufficient hardenability can be secured by other elements such as Mo. In the steel material having a yield strength of 120 ksi or more, the Cr content exceeding 0.2% deteriorates the SSC resistance. Therefore, its upper limit is set to 0.2%.
  • W: Tungsten has the function of improving both hardenability and temper softening resistance. However, its effect is not sufficient if its content is less than 0.01%. When the content exceeds 0.5%, the effect gets into saturation. Therefore the suitable range of the W content is set to 0.01 to 0.5%.
  • V: Vanadium has the function of improving temper softening resistance. When its content is greater than 0.01%, it is effective for improving the strength. When an excessive amount of V is contained, however, the SSC resistance gets deteriorated. Therefore, the upper limit is set to 0.3%.
  • Zr: Zirconium has an effect of restricting grain boundary segregation of P. At least 0.001% of Zr must be contained in order to obtain the effect. Zr is an expensive element and, if contained too much, Zr increases the amounts of oxides and possibly increases the SSC susceptibility. Therefore, the upper limit is set to 0.010%.
  • Ca, Mg and REM: These elements mitigate the stress concentration by spheroidizing the morphology of inclusions, at the same time, mitigate the grain boundary segregation of S by fixing it. If the content of these elements is less than 0.001%, the effect is small. On the other hand, at an excessive content, the amounts of oxides increase and the SSC susceptibility is possibly enhanced. Therefore, the upper limit of these element is set to 0.010%.
  • In the present invention, the steel having the alloy composition described above is molten in a converter or an electric furnace and cast. It is then shaped by an ordinary hot rolling method into a desired shape such as a pipe, a sheet or rod, is subjected to quenching and tempering, and is refined to a desired strength.
  • The heat-treating condition in the present invention will be explained as follows.
  • The austenitizing temperature for quenching is at least [Ac3 point + 20°C] and not higher than 1,000°C. If it is lower than Ac3 point + 20°C, austenitizing of the steel material is not sufficient and a uniform martensite structure cannot be obtained easily. When the austenitizing temperature exceeds 1,000°C, on the other hand, the grain growth becomes remarkable and the area of the grain boundary decreases . In consequence, the SSC resistance deteriorating effect of the segregation elements such as P becomes remarkable. Therefore, the suitable austenitizing temperature is within the range of [Ac3 + 20°C] to 1,000°C. Incidentally, the typical Ac3 point of the steel material according to the present invention is 830°C.
  • As described above, further, the steel material quenched from this austenitizing temperature must have a uniform structure in order to acquire a satisfactory SSC resistance. It is necessary that the hardness of the portion that is most distant from the quenched end has a value of at least 95% in terms of the ratio to the hardness of the portion immediately below the quenched end. In the chemical composition of the present invention, expected hardenability can be secured even in a thick material having a thickness of about 25 mm.
  • A suitable range of the tempering temperature is 620 to 720°C. Under the low temperature condition of lower than 620°C, YS becomes excessively high and the value α described above becomes low. In consequence, the satisfactory SSC resistance cannot be obtained. When the tempering temperature exceeds 720°C, on the other hand, the temperature is in the dual phase region, and uniformity of the microstructure is lost with the result of an increase of the SSC susceptibility. Therefore, the range of 630 to 720°C is set as the suitable condition for a tempering temperature.
  • The YS value can be secured within the predetermined range due to the heat treatment temperature range described above, for example, by controlling the quenching temperature, and the relation α = Mo - 0.15YS ≧ -18.9 can be satisfied.
  • As described above, it is possible to obtain a high strength, SSC-resistant steel material satisfying YS 120 ksi, which has not been achieved in the past, by optimizing the microstructure and the components. When the present invention is applied to the strength region of YS of lower than 120 ksi, the SSC resistance ca also be improved. Fig. 5 shows the measurement result of the threshold stress for crack occurrence (σth) of a steel material, that satisfies the microstructure and the chemical compositions of the present invention and is refined to YS of 117 to 120 ksi, while the applied stress is varied by a NACE TM0177-A constant load SSC test. It can be thus said that the structural factors of the present invention improve not only the SSC resistance of the steel material having YS ≧ 120 ksi but also that of the steel material having YS of less than 120 ksi due to the improvement of σth.
  • EXAMPLE:
  • Each steel material having a chemical composition tabulated in Table 1 was molten in a vacuum melting furnace, and the resulting ingot was hot rolled to a plate having a thickness of 25 mm. The plate was heated to 900 to 1,025°C for austenitizing, and was then subjected to quenching treatment by water. The hardness at the center of the thickness and the hardness of a portion just below the surface were measured. Hardenability was evaluated by calculating their ratio. Subsequently, tempering was conducted at 630 to 730°C. A round rod tensile test specimen was machined from the center of the thickness of this plate, and the tensile test was carried out.
  • A test specimen for a sulfide stress cracking test, which had a round rod shape having a length of 25 mm at parallel portions and a diameter of 6.2 mm and was stipulated in NACE-TM0177-A, was also machined from the center of the thickness. This test was carried out in a corrosive solution containing 0.5% acetic acid + 5% NaCl and containing H2S saturated at a partial pressure of 1 atm at 25°C, for 720 hours while a constant stress corresponding to 80% of the yield strength was loaded to the specimen. Additional tests were carried out by decreasing the applied stress step-wise by 5%YS, whenever necessary, for those specimens which underwent rupture at the applied stress of 80%YS, and by increasing the applied stress step-wise by 5%YS for those specimens which did not undergo rupture. In this way, a threshold stress for crack occurrence (σth) was determined.
  • Hardenability was evaluated as "good" when the hardness of the center portion of the thickness was greater than 95% of the hardness of the portion immediately below the surface. The SSC resistance was evaluated as "good" for those specimens which did not undergo rupture during the test for 720 hours. The test result was tabulated in Tables 2 and 3.
  • Nos. 1 to 11 and Nos. 101 to 104 represent the test results that fell within the range of the present invention. These specimens satisfied both high strength of YS 120 ksi and excellent SSC resistance.
  • On the other hand, Nos. 18 to 30 and Nos. 105 to 107 of Comparative Examples could not provide excellent SSC resistance because their components were outside the range of the present invention. The components of Nos. 12, 13, 14, 16 and 17 of Comparative Examples were within the range of the present invention but the α values were outside the range of the present invention. Nos. 15 and 31 of Comparative Examples could not provide sufficient SSC resistance because the tempering temperature and the austenitizing temperature were outside the range of the present invention, respectively.
  • In Nos. 108 and 109 tabulated in Table 3, YS was less than 120 ksi but σth was higher than that of Comparative Examples Nos. 113 and 114 having an equivalent YS value. Therefore, the SSC resistance was improved. Nos. 110 and 111 had the YS values higher than 120 ksi and their σth values, were as high as 85% of YS. On the other hand, in Comparative Example No. 112, YS remained at 85% of σ th though YS was low. No. 115 had insufficient SSC resistance.
    Figure 00170001
    Figure 00180001
    Figure 00190001
  • INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY
  • According to the present invention, as described above, a steel material for an oil well that satisfies both a high strength of at least 120 ksi in terms of a yield strength and excellent SSC resistance can be produced.

Claims (10)

  1. A high-strength steel material, for an oil well, excellent in sulfide stress cracking resistance, containing, in terms of mass%:
    C: 0.10 to 0.40%,   Si ≦ 0.5%,
    Mn ≦ 0.5%,   P ≦ 0.015%,
    S ≦ 0.0050%,   Mo: 0.5 to 2.5%,
    Al: 0.005 to 0.1%,
    Ti: 0.005 to 0.1% and at least 3.4 times N%,
    Nb: 0.01 to 0.1%,   N ≦ 0.01% and
    B: 0.0005 to 0.0050%,
       wherein the yield strength YS expressed by ksi and the Mo content satisfy the following relation (1) and the balance of the C, Mn and Mo contents satisfies the following relation (2). α = Mo - 0.15YS ≧ -18.9 β = 2.7C + Mn + 2Mo ≧ 2.0
  2. A high-strength steel material, for an oil, excellent in sulfide stress cracking resistance, containing, in terms of mass%:
    C: 0.10 to 0.40%,   Si ≦ 0.5%,
    Mn ≦ 0.5%,   P ≦ 0.015%,
    S ≦ 0.0050%,   Mo: 0.5 to 2.5%,
    Al: 0.005 to 0.1%,
    Ti: 0.005 to 0.1% and at least 3.4 times N%,
    Nb: 0.01 to 0.1%,   N < 0.01% and
    B: 0.0005 to 0.0050%,
       wherein the yield strength YS expressed by ksi and the Mo content satisfy the following relation (1) and the balance of C, Mn and Mo contents satisfies the following relation (2); α = Mo - 0.15YS > -18.9 β = 2.7C + Mn + 2Mo ≧ 2.0 and
       wherein said steel material contains further at least one of the following elements:
    Cr ≦ 0.2%,   W ≦ 0.5%
    V: 0.01 to 0.3%,   Zr: 0.001 to 0.010%,
    Ca: 0.001 to 0.01%,   Mg: 0.001 to 0.01% and
    REM: 0.001 to 0.01%.
  3. A high-strength steel material, for an oil well, excellent in sulfide stress cracking resistance, containing, in terms of mass%:
    C: 0.10 to 0.40%,   Si ≦ 0.5%,
    Mn < 0.3%,   P ≦ 0.015%,
    S ≦ 0.0050%,   Mo: 0.5 to 2.5%,
    Al: 0.005 to 0.1%,
    Ti: 0.005 to 0.1% and at least 3.4 times N%,
    Nb: 0.01 to 0.1%,   N ≦ 0.01% and
    B: 0.0005 to 0.0050%,
       wherein the yield strength YS expressed by ksi and the Mo content satisfy the following relation (1) and the balance of the C, Mn and Mo contents satisfies the following relation (2). α = Mo - 0.15YS ≧ -18.9 β = 2.7C + Mn + 2Mo ≧ 2.0
  4. A high-strength steel material, for an oil well, excellent in sulfide stress cracking resistance, containing, in terms of mass%:
    C: 0.10 to 0.40%,   Si ≦ 0.5%,
    Mn< 0.3%,   P ≦ 0.015%,
    S≦ 0.0050%,   Mo: 0.5 to 2.5%,
    Al: 0.005 to 0.1%,
    Ti: 0.005 to 0.1% and at least 3.4 times N%,
    Nb: 0.01 to 0.1%,   N ≦ 0.01% and
    B: 0.0005 to 0.0050%,
       wherein the yield strength YS expressed by ksi and the Mo content satisfy the following relation (1) and the balance of the C, Mn and Mo contents satisfies the following relation (2); and
       Wherein said steel material contains further at least one of the following elements:
    Cr ≦ 0.2%,   W ≦ 0.5%,
    V: 0.01 to 0.3%,   Zr: 0.001 to 0.010%,
    Ca: 0.001 to 0.01%,   Mg: 0.001 to 0.01% and
    REM: 0.001 to 0.01%. α = Mo - 0.15YS ≧ -18.9 β = 2.7C + Mn + 2Mo ≧ 2.0
  5. A high-strength steel material, for an oil well, excellent in sulfide stress cracking resistance and having a yield strength of at least 120 ksi, containing, in terms of mass%:
    C: 0.10 to 0.40%,   Si ≦ 0.5%,
    Mn < 0.5%,   P ≦ 0.015%,
    S ≦ 0.0050%,   Mo: 0.5 to 2.5%,
    Al: 0.005 to 0.1%,
    Ti: 0.005 to 0.1% and at least 3.4 times N%,
    Nb: 0.01 to 0.1%,   N ≦ 0.01% and
    B: 0.0005 to 0.0050%,
       wherein the yield strength YS expressed by ksi and the Mo content satisfy the following relation (1) and the balance of the C, Mn and Mo contents satisfies the following relation (2). α = Mo - 0.15YS ≧ -18.9 β = 2.7C + Mn + 2Mo ≧ 2.0
  6. A high-strength steel material, for an oil well, excellent in sulfide stress cracking resistance and having a yield strength of at least 120 ksi, containing, in terms of mass%:
    C: 0.10 to 0.40%,   Si ≦ 0.5%,
    Mn ≦ 0.5%,   P ≦ 0.015%,
    S ≦ 0.0050%,   Mo: 0.5 to 2.5%,
    Al: 0.005 to 0.1%,
    Ti: 0.005 to 0.1% and at least 3.4 times N%,
    Nb: 0.01 to 0.1%,   N ≦ 0.01% and
    B: 0.0005 to 0.0050%,
       wherein the yield strength YS expressed by ksi and the Mo content satisfy the following relation (1) and the balance of the C, Mn and Mo contents satisfies the following relation (2); and
       wherein said steel material further contains at least one of the following elements:
    Cr ≦ 0.2%,   W ≦ 0.5%,
    V: 0.01 to 0.3%,   Zr: 0.001 to 0.010%,
    Ca: 0.001 to 0.01%,   Mg: 0.001 to 0.01% and
    REM: 0.001 to 0.01%. α = Mo - 0.15YS ≧ -18.9 β = 2.7C + Mn + 2Mo ≧ 2.0
  7. A high-strength steel material for an oil well, excellent in sulfide stress cracking resistance and having a yield strength of at least 120 ksi, containing, in terms of mass%:
    C: 0.10 to 0.40%,   Si ≦ 0.5%,
    Mn < 0.3%,   P ≦ 0.015%,
    S ≦ 0.0050%,   Mo: 1.0 to 2.5%,
    Al: 0.0050 to 0.1%,
    Ti: 0.005 to 0.1% and at least 3.4 times N%,
    Nb: 0.01 to 0.1%,   N ≦ 0.01% and
    B: 0.0005 to 0.0050%,
       wherein the yield strength YS expressed by ksi and the Mo content satisfy the following relation (1) and the balance of the C, Mn and Mo contents satisfies the following relation (2). α = Mo - 0.15YS ≧ -18.9 β = 2.7C + Mn + 2Mo ≧ 2.0
  8. A high-strength steel material for an oil well, excellent in sulfide stress cracking resistance and having a yield strength of at least 120 ksi, containing, in terms of mass%:
    C: 0.10 to 0.40%,   Si ≦ 0.5%,
    Mn < 0.3%,   P ≦ 0.015%,
    S ≦ 0.0050%,   Mo: 1.0 to 2.5%,
    Al: 0.005 to 0.1%,
    Ti: 0.0050 to 0.1% and at least 3.4 times N%,
    Nb: 0.01 to 0.1%,   N ≦ 0.01% and
    B: 0.0005 to 0.0050%,
       wherein the yield strength YS expressed by ksi and the Mo content satisfy the following relation (1) and the balance of the C, Mn and Mo contents satisfies the following relation (2); and
       wherein said steel material further contains at least one of the following elements:
    Cr ≦ 0.2%,   W ≦ 0.5%,
    V: 0.01 to 0.3%,   Zr: 0.001 to 0.010%,
    Ca: 0.001 to 0.01%,   Mg: 0.001 to 0.01% and
    REM: 0.001 to 0.01%. α = Mo - 0.15YS ≧ -18.9 β = 2.7C + Mn + 2Mo ≧ 2.0
  9. A method of producing a high-strength steel material, for an oil well, excellent in sulfide stress cracking resistance, said method comprising the steps of:
    hot processing said steel containing said components according to any of claims 1 through 8 and having the balance of the C, Mn and Mo contents satisfying the following relation (2); heating for austenitizing said steel material to a temperature within the range of [Ac3 point + 20°C] to 1,000°C;
    quenching said steel material to obtain a microstructure in which the hardness as-quenched at the remotest position of said steel material from the cooled surface thereof is at least 95% of the hardness of the cooled surface; and
    tempering said steel material at a temperature of 620 to 720°C.
    β = 2.7C + Mn + 2Mo ≧ 2.0
  10. A high-strength steel material for an oil well excellent in sulfide stress cracking, according to any of claims 1 through 9, wherein a threshold stress for crack occurrence determined by a constant load type sulfide stress cracking test according to NACE TM0177-A is at least 80% of the yield strength.
EP00922970A 1999-05-06 2000-05-02 Steel product for oil well having high strength and being excellent in resistance to sulfide stress cracking Withdrawn EP1197571A4 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP12549799 1999-05-06
JP12549799 1999-05-06
PCT/JP2000/002917 WO2000068450A1 (en) 1999-05-06 2000-05-02 Steel product for oil well having high strength and being excellent in resistance to sulfide stress cracking

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1197571A1 true EP1197571A1 (en) 2002-04-17
EP1197571A4 EP1197571A4 (en) 2002-09-11

Family

ID=14911579

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP00922970A Withdrawn EP1197571A4 (en) 1999-05-06 2000-05-02 Steel product for oil well having high strength and being excellent in resistance to sulfide stress cracking

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (1) US20020104592A1 (en)
EP (1) EP1197571A4 (en)
JP (1) JP4123722B2 (en)
AR (1) AR023265A1 (en)
MX (1) MXPA01011029A (en)
WO (1) WO2000068450A1 (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1911857A1 (en) * 2005-07-08 2008-04-16 Sumitomo Metal Industries, Ltd. Low-alloy steel for oil well tube having excellent sulfide stress cracking resistance
WO2010100020A1 (en) * 2009-03-03 2010-09-10 Vallourec Mannesmann Oil & Gas France Low alloy steel with a high yield strength and high sulphide stress cracking resistance
EP3133182A4 (en) * 2014-04-18 2017-10-11 Kabushiki Kaisha Kobe Seiko Sho (Kobe Steel, Ltd.) Hot-rolled wire
EP3153597A4 (en) * 2014-06-09 2018-01-24 Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Corporation Low alloy steel pipe for oil well

Families Citing this family (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP4609138B2 (en) * 2005-03-24 2011-01-12 住友金属工業株式会社 Manufacturing method of oil well pipe steel excellent in sulfide stress cracking resistance and oil well seamless steel pipe
JP4943325B2 (en) * 2005-06-10 2012-05-30 新日本製鐵株式会社 Expandable tubular oil well pipe with excellent toughness after pipe expansion and method for producing the same
JP5421062B2 (en) * 2008-10-23 2014-02-19 株式会社神戸製鋼所 Hardened steel plate and high strength member
EP2799571B1 (en) * 2011-12-27 2021-04-07 Posco Austenitic steel having excellent machinability and ultra-low temperature toughness in weld heat-affected zone, and method of manufacturing the same
BR112014030346B1 (en) * 2012-06-20 2020-05-05 Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Corp tubular materials from oil fields and production methods
CA2888154C (en) * 2012-11-05 2018-10-30 Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Corporation Low alloy steel for oil country tubular goods having excellent sulfide stress cracking resistance and manufacturing method therefor
CN114855084B (en) * 2022-04-29 2023-07-04 南京钢铁股份有限公司 Hot-rolled round steel for 120ksi steel grade high-strength high-toughness high-grade sulfur-resistant drill rod joint and preparation method thereof

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH01150148A (en) * 1987-12-08 1989-06-13 Alps Electric Co Ltd Electrophotographic organic photoconductor
JPH06322478A (en) * 1993-02-26 1994-11-22 Nippon Steel Corp High strength steel excellent in sulfide stress cracking resistance and its production
EP0828007A1 (en) * 1995-05-15 1998-03-11 Sumitomo Metal Industries, Ltd. Process for producing high-strength seamless steel pipe having excellent sulfide stress cracking resistance

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS634043A (en) * 1986-06-20 1988-01-09 Sumitomo Metal Ind Ltd High-tensile steel for oil well excellent in resistance to sulfide cracking
JP2579094B2 (en) * 1991-12-06 1997-02-05 新日本製鐵株式会社 Manufacturing method of oil well steel pipe with excellent sulfide stress cracking resistance
JPH06116635A (en) * 1992-10-02 1994-04-26 Kawasaki Steel Corp Production of high strength low alloy steel for oil well use, excellent in sulfide stress corrosion cracking resistance
JPH0967624A (en) * 1995-08-25 1997-03-11 Sumitomo Metal Ind Ltd Production of high strength oil well steel pipe excellent in sscc resistance
JP4134377B2 (en) * 1998-05-21 2008-08-20 住友金属工業株式会社 Manufacturing method of high strength steel with excellent resistance to sulfide stress cracking
JP6104849B2 (en) * 2014-06-30 2017-03-29 クリナップ株式会社 Kitchen sink

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH01150148A (en) * 1987-12-08 1989-06-13 Alps Electric Co Ltd Electrophotographic organic photoconductor
JPH06322478A (en) * 1993-02-26 1994-11-22 Nippon Steel Corp High strength steel excellent in sulfide stress cracking resistance and its production
EP0828007A1 (en) * 1995-05-15 1998-03-11 Sumitomo Metal Industries, Ltd. Process for producing high-strength seamless steel pipe having excellent sulfide stress cracking resistance

Non-Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
PATENT ABSTRACTS OF JAPAN vol. 013, no. 409 (P-931), 11 September 1989 (1989-09-11) -& JP 01 150148 A (ALPS ELECTRIC CO LTD), 13 June 1989 (1989-06-13) *
PATENT ABSTRACTS OF JAPAN vol. 1995, no. 02, 31 March 1995 (1995-03-31) -& JP 06 322478 A (NIPPON STEEL CORP), 22 November 1994 (1994-11-22) *
See also references of WO0068450A1 *

Cited By (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1911857A1 (en) * 2005-07-08 2008-04-16 Sumitomo Metal Industries, Ltd. Low-alloy steel for oil well tube having excellent sulfide stress cracking resistance
US7670547B2 (en) 2005-07-08 2010-03-02 Sumitomo Metal Industries, Ltd. Low alloy steel for oil country tubular goods having high sulfide stress cracking resistance
EP1911857A4 (en) * 2005-07-08 2010-03-24 Sumitomo Metal Ind Low-alloy steel for oil well tube having excellent sulfide stress cracking resistance
NO343352B1 (en) * 2005-07-08 2019-02-04 Sumitomo Metal Ind Low alloy steel for oilfield pipes with excellent resistance to sulfide stress cracking and use of V in the low alloy steel
WO2010100020A1 (en) * 2009-03-03 2010-09-10 Vallourec Mannesmann Oil & Gas France Low alloy steel with a high yield strength and high sulphide stress cracking resistance
FR2942808A1 (en) * 2009-03-03 2010-09-10 Vallourec Mannesmann Oil & Gas LOW-ALLOY STEEL WITH HIGH ELASTICITY LIMIT AND HIGH RESISTANCE TO CRUSHING UNDER SULFIDE STRESS.
EA019473B1 (en) * 2009-03-03 2014-03-31 Валлурек Маннесманн Ойл Энд Гэс Франс Low alloy steel with a high yield strength and high sulphide stress cracking resistance
US9394594B2 (en) 2009-03-03 2016-07-19 Vallourec Oil And Gas France Low alloy steel with a high yield strength and high sulphide stress cracking resistance
EP3133182A4 (en) * 2014-04-18 2017-10-11 Kabushiki Kaisha Kobe Seiko Sho (Kobe Steel, Ltd.) Hot-rolled wire
EP3153597A4 (en) * 2014-06-09 2018-01-24 Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Corporation Low alloy steel pipe for oil well
US10233520B2 (en) 2014-06-09 2019-03-19 Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Corporation Low-alloy steel pipe for an oil well

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
MXPA01011029A (en) 2003-06-30
US20020104592A1 (en) 2002-08-08
EP1197571A4 (en) 2002-09-11
WO2000068450A1 (en) 2000-11-16
AR023265A1 (en) 2002-09-04
JP4123722B2 (en) 2008-07-23

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
AU2005264481B2 (en) Steel for steel pipe
EP0649915B1 (en) High-strength martensitic stainless steel and method for making the same
EP0639691B2 (en) Rotor for steam turbine and manufacturing method thereof
EP1873270B1 (en) Low alloy steel
EP0787813B1 (en) A low mn-low Cr ferritic heat resistant steel excellent in strength at elevated temperatures
EP2267177A1 (en) High-strength steel plate and process for producing same
WO2009154235A1 (en) Steel for heat treatment
EP0828010B1 (en) High strength and high-toughness heat-resistant cast steel
US20180066344A1 (en) Wire rod for use in bolts that has excellent acid pickling properties and resistance to delayed fracture after quenching and tempering, and bolt
US6743305B2 (en) High-strength high-toughness precipitation-hardened steel
WO1998010112A1 (en) Age hardenable alloy with a unique combination of very high strength and good toughness
US20120145289A1 (en) Piston Ring Material For Internal Combustion Engine
EP1048744A1 (en) Bearing steel excellent in rolling fatigue life
JPH05320827A (en) Steel for spring excellent in fatigue property and steel wire for spring as well as spring
EP1197571A1 (en) Steel product for oil well having high strength and being excellent in resistance to sulfide stress cracking
EP1275745B1 (en) Low-alloy heat-resistant steel, process for producing the same, and turbine rotor
EP0770696B1 (en) High strength and high toughness heat resisting steel and its manufacturing method
EP0825270A1 (en) Bearing material
JP2021031695A (en) Hot work-tool steel excellent in toughness
EP0225425B1 (en) Low alloy steel having good stress corrosion cracking resistance
JP4212132B2 (en) Ferritic heat resistant steel having martensitic structure and method for producing the same
JP2001089826A (en) Hot working tool steel excellent in wear resistance
EP0931845A1 (en) Material for gas turbine disk
US8747575B2 (en) 655 MPa grade martensitic stainless steel having high toughness and method for manufacturing the same
JPH11350076A (en) Precipitation strengthening type ferritic heat resistant steel

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20011206

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

Effective date: 20020731

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A4

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20030207

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20040102