EP1159395A1 - Detergent particles having coating or partial coating layers - Google Patents

Detergent particles having coating or partial coating layers

Info

Publication number
EP1159395A1
EP1159395A1 EP00916149A EP00916149A EP1159395A1 EP 1159395 A1 EP1159395 A1 EP 1159395A1 EP 00916149 A EP00916149 A EP 00916149A EP 00916149 A EP00916149 A EP 00916149A EP 1159395 A1 EP1159395 A1 EP 1159395A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
detergent
particle
coating layer
coating
particles
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP00916149A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1159395B1 (en
Inventor
Paul R. Mort, Iii
Scott William Capeci
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Procter and Gamble Co
Original Assignee
Procter and Gamble Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Procter and Gamble Co filed Critical Procter and Gamble Co
Publication of EP1159395A1 publication Critical patent/EP1159395A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1159395B1 publication Critical patent/EP1159395B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D17/00Detergent materials or soaps characterised by their shape or physical properties
    • C11D17/0039Coated compositions or coated components in the compositions, (micro)capsules
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D3/00Other compounding ingredients of detergent compositions covered in group C11D1/00
    • C11D3/02Inorganic compounds ; Elemental compounds
    • C11D3/12Water-insoluble compounds
    • C11D3/124Silicon containing, e.g. silica, silex, quartz or glass beads
    • C11D3/1246Silicates, e.g. diatomaceous earth
    • C11D3/128Aluminium silicates, e.g. zeolites
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D3/00Other compounding ingredients of detergent compositions covered in group C11D1/00
    • C11D3/16Organic compounds
    • C11D3/38Products with no well-defined composition, e.g. natural products
    • C11D3/386Preparations containing enzymes, e.g. protease or amylase
    • C11D3/38672Granulated or coated enzymes
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D3/00Other compounding ingredients of detergent compositions covered in group C11D1/00
    • C11D3/39Organic or inorganic per-compounds
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D3/00Other compounding ingredients of detergent compositions covered in group C11D1/00
    • C11D3/50Perfumes
    • C11D3/502Protected perfumes
    • C11D3/505Protected perfumes encapsulated or adsorbed on a carrier, e.g. zeolite or clay
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D1/00Detergent compositions based essentially on surface-active compounds; Use of these compounds as a detergent
    • C11D1/02Anionic compounds

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to detergent particles having coating or partial coating.
  • the present invention also relates to detergent composition of both the conventional non-compact type or low dosage compact detergent products.
  • Granular detergent products are typically produced from one of two manufacturing methods. The first involves the spray-drying of a aqueous detergent slurry in a spray drying tower to produce detergent granules while the second involves dry mixing va ⁇ ous components after which they are agglomerated with a binder such as surfactant. The resultant detergent particles are then dried to achieve an acceptable moisture content such that the finished product is flowable and non-caking in the package once delivered to the consumer.
  • the factors which impact these flow characte ⁇ stics include chemical composition and type and length in the drying process.
  • a detergent particle that has improved surface, appearance and flow properties is provided.
  • the particles of the present invention have improved surface properties m that they are smoother and have a generally more uniform surface and appearance than p ⁇ or art detergent particles. Further, the appearance of the particles have been improved m that they appear b ⁇ ghter and whiter than currently available detergent particles and have improved flow properties where the particles have reduced lumping and caking profiles.
  • a detergent particle having a coating layer of a water-soluble mate ⁇ al is provided.
  • the detergent particle comprises a particle core of a detergent active mate ⁇ al such as conventional detergent particles of surfactant and carbonate blends or individual detergent ingredients such as enzymes, bleaching agents, etc.
  • This particle core is then at least partially covered by a particle coating layer of a water soluble matenal which imparts the aforementioned improved properties an a reduction in the surface area of the particle.
  • a particle coating layer of a water soluble matenal which imparts the aforementioned improved properties an a reduction in the surface area of the particle.
  • Particularly preferred are non-hydratable inorganic coating materials including double salt combinations of alkali metal carbonates and sulfates.
  • the particle coating layer may also include detergent adjunct ingredients such as b ⁇ ghteners, chelants, nonionic surfactants, co-builders, etc. Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide a detergent particle having improved appearance and flow characte ⁇ sttcs by coating a detergent core mate ⁇ al with a layer of water soluble inorganic mate ⁇ als.
  • the word "particles” means the entire size range of a detergent final product or component or the entire size range of discrete particles, agglomerates, or granules in a final detergent product or component admixture. It specifically does not refer to a size fraction (i.e., representing less than 100% of the entire size range) of any of these types of particles unless the size fraction represents 100% of a discrete particle m an admixture of particles.
  • the entire size range of discrete particles of that type have the same or substantially similar composition regardless of whether the particles are in contact with other particles.
  • the agglomerates themselves are considered as discrete particles and each discrete particle may be comp ⁇ sed of a composite of smaller p ⁇ mary particles and binder compositions.
  • the phrase “geomet ⁇ c mean particle diameter” means the geomet ⁇ c mass median diameter of a set of discrete particles as measured by any standard mass-based particle size measurement technique, preferably by dry sieving.
  • the phrase “geomet ⁇ c standard deviation” or “span” of a particle size distribution means the geomet ⁇ c breadth of the best-fitted log-normal function to the above-mentioned particle size data which can be accomplished by the ratio of the diameter of the 84 13 percentile divided by the diameter of the 50 th percentile of the cumulative dist ⁇ bution (D S4 ⁇ 3 /D 50 ), See Gotoh et al, Powder Technology Handbook, pp. 6-11, Marcel Dekker 1997.
  • the phrase “builder” means any inorganic material having “builder” performance in the detergency context, and specifically, organic or inorganic material capable of removing water hardness from washing solutions.
  • the term “bulk density” refers to the uncompressed, untapped powder bulk density, as measured by pouring an excess of powder sample through a funnel into a smooth metal vessel (e.g., a 500 ml volume cylinder), scraping off the excess from the heap above the rim of the vessel, measuring the remaining mass of powder and dividing the mass by the volume of the vessel.
  • compositions and “granular detergent composition” are intended to include both final products and additives/components of a detergent composition. That is, the compositions produced by the processes claimed herein may be complete laundry detergent compositions or they may be additives that are used along with other detergent ingredients for laundering fabrics and the like.
  • surface area mean the total amount of surface of a powder available for gas adso ⁇ tion and thus includes both internal (i.e. that within cracks and crevices) and external surface area. Surface area is measured using BET multi point surface area analysis.
  • the novel detergent particles of the present invention comprise a particle core which is at least partially coated with a water soluble coating material.
  • the particle core may comprise a detergent particle, agglomerate, flake etc.
  • the particle core will preferably comprise a blend of surfactant ingredients, particularly anionic surfactants with dry detergent ingredients such as carbonates, aluminosilicate builders, silicate builder materials, alkali metal sulfates, chelants and various other dry detergent ingredients in minor amounts.
  • the particle core may comprise an individual detergent ingredient such as an enzyme, bleaching agents, perfume or mixtures thereof.
  • Particularly preferred particle cores include detergent agglomerates formed by an agglomeration of a highly viscous surfactant paste or a liquid acid precursor of a surfactant and the aforementioned dry detergent ingredients.
  • the agglomeration of the surfactant material and dry detergent material may be carried out in a high or moderate speed mixer after which an optional low or moderate speed mixer may be employed for further agglomeration, if necessary.
  • the agglomeration may be earned out in a single mixer that can be low, moderate or high speed.
  • the particular mixer used in the present process should include pulverizing or grinding and agglomeration tools so that both techniques can be carried forth simultaneously in a single mixer.
  • the first processing step can be successfully completed, under the process parameters desc ⁇ bed herein, in a Lodige KMTM (Ploughshare) 600 moderate speed mixer, Lodige CBTM high speed mixer, or mixers made by Fukae, Drais, Schugi or similar brand mixer.
  • the Lodige KMTM (Ploughshare) 600 moderate speed mixer which is a preferred mixer for use in the present invention, comp ⁇ ses a ho ⁇ zontal, hollow static cylinder having a centrally mounted rotating shaft around which several plough- shaped blades are attached.
  • the shaft rotates at a speed of from about 15 ⁇ m to about 140 ⁇ m, more preferably from about 80 ⁇ m to about 120 ⁇ m.
  • the g ⁇ ndmg or pulvenzing is accomplished by cutters, generally smaller in size than the rotating shaft, which preferably operate at about 3600 ⁇ m
  • Other mixers similar in nature which are suitable for use in the process include the Lodige PloughshareTM mixer and the Drais® K-T 160 mixer
  • the mean residence time of the va ⁇ ous starting detergent ingredients m the low, moderate or high speed mixer is preferably m range from about 0.05 minutes to about 15 minutes, most preferably the residence time is about 0.5 to about 5 minutes.
  • This agglomeration is typically followed by a drying step.
  • This drying step may be earned out in a wide va ⁇ ety of equipment including, but not limited to a fluid bed drying apparatus.
  • dryer characte ⁇ stics include fixed or vibrating; rectangular bed or round bed; and straight or se ⁇ entme dryers. Manufacturers of such dryers include Niro, Bepex, Spray Systems and Glatt.
  • apparatus such as a fluidized bed can be used for drying while an airlift can be used for cooling should it be necessary.
  • the air lift can also be used to force out the "fine" particles so that they can be recycled to the particle agglomeration process
  • the particles of the present invention compnse at least about 50% by weight of particles having a geomet ⁇ c mean particle diameter of from about 500 microns to about 1500 microns and preferably have a geomet ⁇ c standard deviation of from about 1 to about 2.
  • the geomet ⁇ c standard deviation is from about 1.0 to about 1 7, preferably from about 1 0 to about 1.4.
  • the granular detergent composition resulting from the processes may comprise fine particles, wherein "fine particles” are defined as particles that have a geomet ⁇ c mean particle diameter that is less than about 1.65 standard deviations below the chosen geomet ⁇ c mean particle diameter of the granular detergent composition Large particles may also exist wherein "large particles” are defined as particles that have a geomet ⁇ c mean particle diameter that is greater than about 1 65 standard deviations above the chosen geomet ⁇ c mean particle diameter of the granular detergent composition.
  • the fine particles are preferably separated from the granular detergent composition and returned to the process by adding them to at least one of the mixers and/or the fluid bed dryer as desc ⁇ bed in detail below
  • the large particles are preferably separated from the granular detergent composition and then fed to a g ⁇ nder where their geomet ⁇ c mean particle diameter is reduced. After the geomet ⁇ c mean particle diameter of the large particles is reduced, the large particles are returned to the process by adding them to at least one of the mixers and/or the fluid bed dryer.
  • the agglomeration may comprise the step of spraying an additional binder in the mixers to facilitate production of the desired detergent particles.
  • a binder is added for pu ⁇ oses of enhancing agglomeration by providing a "binding" or "sticking" agent for the detergent components.
  • the binder is preferably selected from the group consisting of water, anionic surfactants, nonionic surfactants, polyethylene glycol, polyvinyl pyrrohdone polyacrylates, cit ⁇ c acid and mixtures thereof.
  • Other suitable binder mate ⁇ als including those listed herein are desc ⁇ bed in Beerse et al, U.S. Patent No. 5,108,646 (Procter & Gamble Co.), the disclosure of which is inco ⁇ orated herein by reference.
  • Another optional processing step to form the particle core of the present invention includes continuously adding a coating agent such as zeolites, recycled "fines" as described above and fumed silica to the mixer to improve the particle color, increase the particle "whiteness or facilitate free flowabihty of the resulting detergent particles and to prevent over agglomeration
  • a coating agent such as zeolites, recycled "fines" as described above and fumed silica
  • the fines are preferably m the approximate size range of 0.1 to 0.5 times the mean particle size of the larger particles.
  • the particle coating layer will also improve the integrity of the fines layering and provide abrasion and att ⁇ tion resistance du ⁇ ng handling.
  • the detergent starting matenals can be fed into a pre-mixer, such as a Lodige CB mixer or a twm-screw extruder, p ⁇ or to ente ⁇ ng m the mixer.
  • a pre-mixer such as a Lodige CB mixer or a twm-screw extruder, p ⁇ or to ente ⁇ ng m the mixer. This step, although optional, does indeed facilitate agglomeration.
  • particle cores which comprise tower blown particles.
  • the core particle is formed by the preparation of a slurry of surfactant mate ⁇ als, water and dry starting detergent materials.
  • the resultant slurry is then passed to a tower where the slurry is sprayed into a stream of air at a temperature typically ranging from about 175°C to about 225°C to dry the detergent slurry and form detergent particles Typically, resultant densities of these particles range from about 200 to about 500 g/L.
  • the particle coating layer of the present invention is a water soluble coating mate ⁇ al.
  • the particle coating layer imparts dramatically new surface and appearance properties on the detergent particles of the present invention.
  • the coated particles of the present invention have an appearance which is b ⁇ ghter and/or whiter than current detergent particles. This provides a more favorable response from consumers who prefer white detergent products.
  • the particle coating layer of the present invention imparts a dramatically improved feel to the particles of the present invention.
  • the coated particles of the present invention have a glassy, smoother feel than prior art detergent products. This again provides a more favorable response from consumers who prefer a rounded, uniform product. Additionally, the coated particles of the present invention provide improved sound to a detergent product containing the particles of the present invention.
  • the coated particles have a c ⁇ sper sound than current detergent products, thereby leaving the consumer with a more favorable overall impression of the product.
  • the coated particles of the present invention provide improved clumping and flowabihty profiles to detergent products containing the particles of the present invention.
  • the particle coating layer provides a coating which is c ⁇ sper and non-tacky.
  • LAS linear alkyl benzene sulfonates
  • surfactant actives i.e. greater than about 25 wt % surfactant active
  • the particle coating layer of the present invention at least partially coats the particle core While the desired state is for particles which are completely coated by the particle coating, it is, of course, anticipated that complete coverage will not be possible m all cases in a continuous, high speed manufactu ⁇ ng process. While it is rather difficult to quantify the extent of the coating layer coverage, it is observed that increasing the amount of coating solids, either by increasing the solids concentration in the solution or by spraying on more of the solution, results in improved benefits and the appearance of a more uniform coverage. The benefits of increased coverage is balanced with the cost of drying excess water in the process. Accordingly, in preferred embodiments of the present invention, adequate coverage is achieved by applying coating solids at more than about 3 wt.% and most preferably more than about 5 wt.% of the particle core mass.
  • the particle coating layer of the present invention comp ⁇ ses a water soluble coating mate ⁇ al.
  • the coating mate ⁇ al is not an alkali metal silicate as presents stability problems in the detergent composition and has a tendency to form insoluble residues in the processing of the detergent.
  • the water soluble coating mate ⁇ al is applied to provide a smoother more uniform appearance to the resultant detergent particles.
  • the coating mate ⁇ al may be selected from a wide va ⁇ ety of mate ⁇ als provided the coating imparts the appearance, flowabihty and surface properties described herein.
  • Preferred mate ⁇ als include inorganic salts and organic salts, polymers and combinations thereof. Suitable organic salts include alkali metal carboxylates such as citrates and acetates.
  • Inorganic salts may include silicates, boron salts, phosphate salts, magnesium salts and va ⁇ ous other glass forming or crystalline inorganic salts. Most preferred are non-hydratmg materials. By non-hydrating it is intended that the mate ⁇ al does not have a strong tendency to react with environmental water such as moisture present in composition or humidity in the air to form higher hydrate phases.
  • a non-hydrating coating means a coating layer in which at least 40 wt.% of the coating consists of a non-hydrating inorganic mate ⁇ al, preferably more than about 60 wt.% and most preferably more than about 80 wt.% non-hydrating.
  • the non-hydratmg mate ⁇ al is preferably selected from alkali and/or alkaline earth metal sulfate and carbonate salts or mixtures of the two.
  • a highly preferred mate ⁇ als are double salts of sulfate and carbonate having the formula M n X n :MS0 4 :MC0 3 , where MX can a salt compound such as a metal halide, and the molar fractions of MS0 4 and MC0 3 are both at least 10 mol% of the formula.
  • the molar ratio of MS0 4 :MC0 3 is from about 90: 10 to about 10:90 and more preferably from about 75:25 to about 60:40 where M independently represents an alkali or alkaline earth metal and n is an integer or fraction thereof from 0 to 5.
  • M independently represents an alkali or alkaline earth metal
  • n is an integer or fraction thereof from 0 to 5.
  • these highly preferred mate ⁇ als are the water-free sulfates and water-free carbonate minerals that are formed naturally by evaporative deposition, such as Hanksite, KNa22(S04)9(C03)2Cl , and Tychite, Na6Mg2(C03)4(S04).
  • An especially preferred mate ⁇ al is a 2: 1 molar ratio of the double salt Na 2 S0 4 :Na 2 C0 3 otherwise known as "Burkeite", Na6(C03)(S04)2.
  • the particle coating layer may also include an detergent adjunct ingredient in addition to the particle coating mate ⁇ al.
  • detergent adjunct ingredients may include a wide va ⁇ ety of ingredients, including but not limited to optical b ⁇ ghteners, pigments or dyes, chelants, nonionic surfactants, pH control agents, detergency co-builders and mixtures of these mate ⁇ als.
  • pigments or dyes such as titanium dioxide, bluing agents such as copper sulfate, zinc thiosulfate and Ultrama ⁇ ne blue, Sparkle enhancers such as mica flake, and co- builders such as citrates and nonionic surfactants.
  • the particles of the present invention are produced by coating the particle core as desc ⁇ bed hereinbefore with the particle coating mate ⁇ al in a coating mixer.
  • the coating mixer may be any of a number of mixers including high, moderate, and low speed mixers such as a Lodige KMTM (Ploughshare) 600 moderate speed mixer, Lodige CBTM high speed mixer, or mixers made by Fukae, Drais, Schugi or similar brand mixer Particularly preferred for use in the present invention are low speed drum mixers and low shear fluidized bed mixers.
  • the mixer is preferably followed m sequence by a drying apparatus, for example a fluid bed, wherein the coated particles are then dried to achieve the coated particles of the present invention.
  • the coating mixer is an fluidized bed.
  • the preferred particle core of detergent agglomerates, spray-d ⁇ ed particles or most preferably mixtures thereof is passed into a fluid bed dryer having multiple internal "stages" or "zones".
  • a stage or zone is any discrete area within the dryer, and these terms are used interchangeably herein.
  • the process conditions withm a stage may be different or similar to the other stages in the dryer. It is understood that two adjacent dryers are equivalent to a single dryer having multiple stages.
  • the va ⁇ ous feed streams of particle core and coating material can be added at the different stages, depending on, for example, the particle size and moisture level of the feed stream. Feeding different streams to different stages can minimize the heat load on the dryer, and optimize the particle size and shape as defined herein
  • the fluid bed mixer of the present invention comprises a first coating zone where the particle coating mate ⁇ al of the present invention is applied.
  • the coating zone involves the spraying of the coating mate ⁇ al m aqueous or slurry form onto the fluidized particles.
  • the bed is typically fluidized with heated air in order to dry or partially dry moisture from the spray coating as it is applied.
  • the spraying is achieved via nozzles capable of de ve ⁇ ng a fine or atomized spray of the coating mixture to achieve complete coverage of the particles.
  • the droplet size from the atomizer is less than about 100 um. This atomization can be achieved either through a conventional two-fluid nozzle with atomizing air, or alternatively by means of a conventional pressure nozzle.
  • the solution or slurry rheology is typically characte ⁇ zed by a viscosity of less than about 500 centipoise, preferably less than about 200 centipoise.
  • the nozzle location is placed at or above the fluidized height of the particles m the fluid bed.
  • the fluidized height is typically determined by a weir or overflow gate height.
  • the coating zone of the fluid bed is then typically followed by a drying zone and a cooling zone.
  • An alternative embodiment uses an agitated fluid bed, which includes mechanical and/or pneumatic mixing elements in addition to the conventional bed that is fluidized air passing through holes in a distributor plate.
  • the advantage of the agitated bed is that it can be used to apply additional shear as a means to control granular shape and smoothness while performing the coating operation.
  • Typical conditions within a fluid bed or agitated fluid bed apparatus of the present invention include (i) from about 1 to about 20 minutes of mean residence time, (ii) from about 100 to about 600 mm of depth of unfluidized bed, (iii) preferably not more than about 100 micron of droplet spray size, (iv) from about 175 to about 250 mm of spray height, (v) from about 0.4 to about 2.0 m/s of fluidizing velocity and (vi) from about 12 to about 100 °C of bed temperature.
  • the conditions in the fluid bed may vary depending on a number of factors.
  • the coated particles exiting the coating mixer may comprise in and of themselves a fully formulated detergent composition or in preferred embodiments may be admixed with additional ingredients, such as bleaching agents, enzymes, perfumes, non-coated detergent particles, and various other ingredients to produce a fully formulated detergent composition.
  • the coated particles of the present invention have improved surface properties in that the particles are more uniform in shape and smoother on the surface than the uncoated spray-dried or agglomerated detergent particles. These features are reflected in a reduction of the overall surface area of particles having the coating of the present invention as opposed to particles not having the coatings of the present invention.
  • the coatings of the present invention reduce total surface area by smoothing irregularities and filling crevices on the surface of the particles.
  • the coatings of the present invention provide a reduction in overall surface area as measured by the formula:
  • the surface area of the particles of the present invention are measured according to the following procedure. Detergent Particles are placed into a Micromeritics VacPrep 061 , available from Micromeritics of Norcross, Georgia, for pre-test preparation. The particles are placed under a vacuum of approximately 500 millitorr and heated to a temperature of between 80 and 100 C C for approximately 16 hours.
  • the BET multi-point surface area is then measured m a Micromeritics Gemini 2375 surface area analyzer using a mixture " of helium and nitrogen gases and the following general conditions: Evacuation rate - 500.0 mmHg/min: Analysis Mode - Equilibration: Evacuation Time - 1.0 min.; Saturation Pressure - 771.77 mml ⁇ g; Equilibration Time - 5 sec. Helium Nitrogen Pressure - 15 psig; Helium and Nitrogen purity 99.9%, free space is measured and P/Po points cover 0.05 to 0.3 with 5 data points taken.
  • the coated particles of the present invention may be treated with a post coating gloss treatment to provide a gloss layer on the coated detergent particle.
  • the gloss layer may comprise inorganic salt materials, chelating materials, polymeric materials and mixtures thereof.
  • Preferred inorganic materials are sulfate salts such as magnesium sulfate
  • preferred chelants are diamines such as ethylene diamine disuccinic acids (EDDS)
  • preferred polymers include acrylic polymers and copolymers such as acrylic/maleic copolymers.
  • the surfactant system of the detergent composition may include anionic, nonionic, zwitterionic, ampholytic and cationic classes and compatible mixtures thereof.
  • Detergent surfactants are described in U.S. Patent 3,664,961, Norris, issued May 23, 1972, and in U.S. Patent 3,919,678, Laughlin et al., issued December 30, 1975, both of which are inco ⁇ orated herein by reference.
  • Cationic surfactants include those described in U.S. Patent 4,222,905, Cockrell, issued September 16, 1980, and in U.S. Patent 4,239,659, Mu ⁇ hy, issued December 16, 1980, both of which are also inco ⁇ orated herein by reference.
  • Nonlimiting examples of surfactant systems include the conventional Ci 1 -Ci g alkyl benzene sulfonates ("LAS") and primary, branched-chain and random C j Q-C20 alkyl sulfates ("AS"), the C10-C1 8 secondary (2,3) alkyl sulfates of the formula CH 3 (CH 2 ) x (CHOS0 3 ⁇ M + ) CH3 and CH3 (CH2) y (CHOS0 3 " M + ) CH 2 CH 3 where x and (y + 1) are integers of at least about 7, preferably at least about 9, and M is a water-solubilizing cation, especially sodium, unsaturated sulfates such as oleyl sulfate, the C I Q-CI g alkyl alkoxy sulfates (“AE X S”; especially EO 1-7 ethoxy sulfates), Ci Q-C I g alkyl alkoxy carboxylates (especially the EO 1
  • the conventional nonionic and amphoteric surfactants such as the C 12" 18 alkyl ethoxylates ("AE") including the so-called narrow peaked alkyl ethoxylates and Cg-C ] ⁇ alkyl phenol alkoxylates (especially ethoxylates and mixed ethoxy/propoxy), C 1 2-C1 g betaines and sulfobetaines ("sultaines"), C ⁇ ⁇ -C ⁇ amine oxides, and the like, can also be included in the surfactant system.
  • the Ci o-Cj g N-alkyl polyhydroxy fatty acid amides can also be used. Typical examples include the N-methylglucamides. See WO 9,206,154.
  • sugar-de ⁇ ved surfactants include the N-alkoxy polyhydroxy fatty acid amides, such as Cjo-Cig N-(3-methoxypropyl) glucamide.
  • the N-propyl through N-hexyl C ⁇ -C ⁇ g glucamides can be used for low sudsing.
  • C 0-C20 conventional soaps may also be used. If high sudsing is desired, the branched-chain C ⁇ -C J g soaps may be used. Mixtures of anionic and nonionic surfactants are especially useful. Other conventional useful surfactants are listed in standard texts.
  • the detergent composition can, and preferably does, include a detergent builder.
  • Builders are generally selected from the va ⁇ ous water-soluble, alkali metal, ammonium or substituted ammonium phosphates, polyphosphates, phosphonates, polyphosphonates, carbonates, silicates, borates, polyhydroxy sulfonates, polyacetates, carboxylates, and polycarboxylates.
  • the alkali metal especially sodium, salts of the above.
  • Preferred for use herein are the phosphates, carbonates, silicates, C, seemingly , 0 fatty acids, polycarboxylates, and mixtures thereof. More preferred are sodium t ⁇ polyphosphate, tetrasodium pyrophosphate, citrate, tartrate mono- and di-succinates, sodium silicate, and mixtures thereof (see below).
  • inorganic phosphate builders are sodium and potassium t ⁇ polyphosphate, pyrophosphate, polyme ⁇ c metaphosphate having a degree of polymenzation of from about 6 to 21, and orthophosphates.
  • polyphosphonate builders are the sodium and potassium salts of ethylene diphosphonic acid, the sodium and potassium salts of ethane 1-hydroxy-l, 1 -diphosphonic acid and the sodium and potassium salts of ethane,
  • nonphosphorus, inorganic builders are sodium and potassium carbonate, bicarbonate, sesquicarbonate, tetraborate decahydrate, and silicates having a weight ratio of S ⁇ O» to alkali metal oxide of from about 0.5 to about 4.0, preferably from about 1.0 to about 2.4.
  • Water-soluble, nonphosphorus organic builders useful herein include the va ⁇ ous alkali metal, ammonium and substituted ammonium polyacetates, carboxylates, polycarboxylates and polyhydroxy sulfonates.
  • polyacetate and polycarboxylate builders are the sodium, potassium, lithium, ammonium and substituted ammonium salts of ethylene diamme tetraacetic acid, nit ⁇ lot ⁇ acetic acid, oxydisuccimc acid, melhtic acid, benzene polycarboxyhc acids, and cit ⁇ c acid.
  • Polyme ⁇ c polycarboxylate builders are set forth in U S. Patent 3,308,067, Diehl, issued March 7, 1967, the disclosure of which is inco ⁇ orated herein by reference.
  • Such mate ⁇ als include the water-soluble salts of homo- and copolymers of aliphatic carboxylic acids such as maleic acid, itaconic acid, mesaconic acid, fuma ⁇ c acid, acomtic acid, citraconic acid and methylenemalonic acid. Some of these materials are useful as the water-soluble anionic polymer as hereinafter desc ⁇ bed, but only if m intimate admixture with the nonsoap anionic surfactant
  • polycarboxylates for use herein are the polyacetal carboxylates described in U.S. Patent 4,144,226, issued March 13, 1979 to Crutchfield et al., and U.S. Patent 4,246,495, issued March 27, 1979 to Crutchfield et al., both of which are inco ⁇ orated herein by reference
  • These polyacetal carboxylates can be prepared by bnngmg together under polyme ⁇ zation conditions an ester of glyoxyhc acid and a polyme ⁇ zation initiator.
  • polyacetal carboxylate ester is then attached to chemically stable end groups to stabilize the polyacetal carboxylate against rapid depolyme ⁇ zation in alkaline solution, converted to the corresponding salt, and added to a detergent composition.
  • Particularly preferred polycarboxylate builders are the ether carboxylate builder compositions compnsmg a combination of tartrate monosuccmate and tartrate disuccmate descnbed m U.S. Patent 4,663,071, Bush et al., issued May 5, 1987, the disclosure of which is inco ⁇ orated herein by reference
  • Water-soluble silicate solids represented by the formula M being an alkali metal, and having a S ⁇ O»:M»0 weight ratio of from about 0 5 to about 4.0, are useful salts in the detergent granules of the invention at levels of from about 2% to about 15% on an anhydrous weight basis, preferably from about 3% to about 8% Anhydrous or hydrated particulate silicate can be utilized, as well.
  • any number of additional ingredients can also be included as components in the granular detergent composition.
  • these include other detergency builders, bleaches, bleach activators, suds boosters or suds suppressors, anti-tarnish and anti-corrosion agents, soil suspending agents, soil release agents, germicides, pH adjusting agents, nonbuilder alkalinity sources, chelatmg agents, smectite clays, enzymes, enzyme-stabilizing agents and perfumes. See U.S. Patent 3,936,537, issued February 3, 1976 to Baskerville, Jr. et al, inco ⁇ orated herein by reference.
  • Bleaching agents and activators are desc ⁇ bed m U S. Patent 4,412,934, Chung et al, issued November 1, 1983, and in U.S Patent 4,483,781, Hartman, issued November 20, 1984, both of which are inco ⁇ orated herein by reference
  • Chelatmg agents are also desc ⁇ bed in U S Patent 4,663,071, Bush et al., from Column 17, line 54 through Column 18, line 68, inco ⁇ orated herein by reference
  • Suds modifiers are also optional ingredients and are desc ⁇ bed in U S Patents 3,933,672, issued January 20, 1976 to Bartoletta et al., and 4,136,045, issued January 23, 1979 to Gault et al., both inco ⁇ orated herein by reference.
  • Suitable smectite clays for use herein are described in U.S. Patent 4,762,645, Tucker et al., issued August 9, 1988, Column 6, line 3 through Column 7, line 24, inco ⁇ orated herein by reference.
  • Suitable additional detergency builders for use herein are enumerated in the Baskerville patent, Column 13, line 54 through Column 16, line 16, and in U.S. Patent 4,663,071, Bush et al., issued May 5, 1987, both inco ⁇ orated herein by reference.
  • a detergent agglomerate composition was made using the following formula using dry neutralization of HLAS in a high- speed mixer, followed by paste agglomeration with a pre-neutralized NaLAS paste in a second medium speed mixer, followed by spray-on of a Burkeite solution (5% solids basis) in a fluid bed dryer.
  • Coated Product 107% ⁇ Solution made up of 1.5 wt% Na2C03, 3.5 wt% Na2S04 and 12.5 wt% H20.
  • the spray solution can be made from a burkeite starting material, dissolved in water at -28.5 wt % solids, or by dissolving a mixture of Sodium Carbonate and Sodium Sulfate salts in a ratio of -30:70 with a total salt solids loading of -28.5 wt % in water.
  • the solution is atomized to form droplets which coat or partially coat the particle core agglomerates, then the water is evaporated at a bed temperature of about 40 to 80 °C. Upon evaporation, the salts co-precipitate to form the Burkeite coating.
  • a granular detergent composition was made using the following formula using a spray-dried core granule, followed by spray-on of a Potassium Citrate solution (5% solids basis) in a fluid bed dryer.
  • the spray solution was made by co-dissolving Potassium Carbonate and Citric Acid in water.
  • the solution is atomized to form droplets which coat or partially coat the core agglomerates, then the water is evaporated at a bed temperature of about 40 to 80 degrees Centigrade.
  • the organic salt, Potassium Citrate forms a coating or partial- coating layer on the surface of the spray-dried granules.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Inorganic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Dispersion Chemistry (AREA)
  • Detergent Compositions (AREA)

Abstract

A detergent particle having a coating layer of a water-soluble material is provided. The detergent particle comprises a particle core of a detergent active material. This particle core is then at least partially covered by a particle coating layer of a water soluble material that reduces the surface area of the particle. Particularly preferred are non-hydratable inorganic coating materials including double salt combinations of alkali metal carbonates and sulfates. The particle coating layer may also include detergent adjunct ingredients such as brighteners, chelants, nonionic surfactants, co-builders, etc.

Description

DETERGENT PARTICLES HAVING COATING OR PARTIAL COATING LAYERS
Field of the Invention The present invention relates to detergent particles having coating or partial coating. The present invention also relates to detergent composition of both the conventional non-compact type or low dosage compact detergent products.
Background of the Invention Recently, there has been considerable interest within the detergent industry for laundry detergents which have the convenience, aesthetics and solubility of liquid laundry detergent products, but retain the cleaning performance and cost of granular detergent products. The problems, however, associated with past granular detergent compositions with regard to aesthetics, solubility and user convenience are formidable. Such problems have been exacerbated by the advent of "compact" or low dosage granular detergent products which typically do not dissolve m washing solutions as well as their liquid laundry detergent counteφarts. These low dosage detergents are currently m high demand as they conserve resources and can be sold in small packages which are more convenient for consumers pπor to use, but less convenient upon dispensing into the washing machine as compared to liquid laundry detergent which can be simply poured directly from the bottle as opposed to "scooped" from the box and then dispensed into the washing solution.
Granular detergent products are typically produced from one of two manufacturing methods. The first involves the spray-drying of a aqueous detergent slurry in a spray drying tower to produce detergent granules while the second involves dry mixing vaπous components after which they are agglomerated with a binder such as surfactant. The resultant detergent particles are then dried to achieve an acceptable moisture content such that the finished product is flowable and non-caking in the package once delivered to the consumer. In both processes, the factors which impact these flow characteπstics include chemical composition and type and length in the drying process. Many surfactant mateπals included in granular detergents, including linear alkyl benzene sulfonates ("LAS"), ethoxylated alkyl sulfates and nonionic surfactants, tend to be relatively "sticky" in nature, difficult to fully dry and lead to lumping, caking and flowabihty problems m the finished product. Accordingly, there exists a need to reduce the flowabihty problems associated with these "sticky" surfactants in finished detergent products.
In addition, detergent processes in which inorganic mateπals are incorporated into the process are well known. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,576,285 discloses the use of inorganic double salts as dry mix ingredients in an agglomeration process as well as the dry coating of alummosihcates, carbonates and silicates as flow control agents. In these processes, the coating material is applied as a dry ingredient and merely dusts or sticks to the outside of the particles rather than as a true coating adheπng to the particle itself This patent also discloses the spraying of liquid binder mateπals such as water, surfactants, polymers, etc. into the mixers or fluid bed of a detergent process Additional patents teach spraying vaπous mateπals including alkali metal silicates and surfactants into a detergent making process including PCT applications W097/22685 and WO99/00475 and German patent application DE 4435743. However, in the case of silicate coatings, the hygroscopic nature of the silicate can lead to moisture uptake dunng storage of the detergent, especially m humid conditions; moisture adsoφtion results m caking and lumping of the detergent powder, causing poor scoop and flow properties and degraded aesthetics of the product. Accordingly, the need remains for a detergent particle having improved flow properties and aesthetics and which may be included m detergent compositions.
Summary of the Invention This need is met by the present invention wherein a detergent particle that has improved surface, appearance and flow properties is provided. The particles of the present invention have improved surface properties m that they are smoother and have a generally more uniform surface and appearance than pπor art detergent particles. Further, the appearance of the particles have been improved m that they appear bπghter and whiter than currently available detergent particles and have improved flow properties where the particles have reduced lumping and caking profiles In accordance with the present invention, a detergent particle having a coating layer of a water-soluble mateπal is provided. The detergent particle comprises a particle core of a detergent active mateπal such as conventional detergent particles of surfactant and carbonate blends or individual detergent ingredients such as enzymes, bleaching agents, etc. This particle core is then at least partially covered by a particle coating layer of a water soluble matenal which imparts the aforementioned improved properties an a reduction in the surface area of the particle. Particularly preferred are non-hydratable inorganic coating materials including double salt combinations of alkali metal carbonates and sulfates. The particle coating layer may also include detergent adjunct ingredients such as bπghteners, chelants, nonionic surfactants, co-builders, etc. Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide a detergent particle having improved appearance and flow characteπsttcs by coating a detergent core mateπal with a layer of water soluble inorganic mateπals. It is a further object of the present invention to provide a detergent particle having an outer layer of a water-soluble non-hydratable material via coating in a mixer with solutions of the inorganic materials. These and other objects features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from a reading of the following detailed descπption and the appended claims.
Detailed Descnption of the Preferred Embodiments Definitions
As used herein, the word "particles" means the entire size range of a detergent final product or component or the entire size range of discrete particles, agglomerates, or granules in a final detergent product or component admixture. It specifically does not refer to a size fraction (i.e., representing less than 100% of the entire size range) of any of these types of particles unless the size fraction represents 100% of a discrete particle m an admixture of particles. For each type of particle component in an admixture, the entire size range of discrete particles of that type have the same or substantially similar composition regardless of whether the particles are in contact with other particles. For agglomerated components, the agglomerates themselves are considered as discrete particles and each discrete particle may be compπsed of a composite of smaller pπmary particles and binder compositions.
As used herein, the phrase "geometπc mean particle diameter" means the geometπc mass median diameter of a set of discrete particles as measured by any standard mass-based particle size measurement technique, preferably by dry sieving. As used herein, the phrase "geometπc standard deviation" or "span" of a particle size distribution means the geometπc breadth of the best-fitted log-normal function to the above-mentioned particle size data which can be accomplished by the ratio of the diameter of the 84 13 percentile divided by the diameter of the 50th percentile of the cumulative distπbution (DS4 ι3/D50), See Gotoh et al, Powder Technology Handbook, pp. 6-11, Marcel Dekker 1997. As used herein, the phrase "builder" means any inorganic material having "builder" performance in the detergency context, and specifically, organic or inorganic material capable of removing water hardness from washing solutions. As used herein, the term "bulk density" refers to the uncompressed, untapped powder bulk density, as measured by pouring an excess of powder sample through a funnel into a smooth metal vessel (e.g., a 500 ml volume cylinder), scraping off the excess from the heap above the rim of the vessel, measuring the remaining mass of powder and dividing the mass by the volume of the vessel.
As used herein, "composition" and "granular detergent composition" are intended to include both final products and additives/components of a detergent composition. That is, the compositions produced by the processes claimed herein may be complete laundry detergent compositions or they may be additives that are used along with other detergent ingredients for laundering fabrics and the like.
As used herein, "surface area" mean the total amount of surface of a powder available for gas adsoφtion and thus includes both internal (i.e. that within cracks and crevices) and external surface area. Surface area is measured using BET multi point surface area analysis.
Particle Core
The novel detergent particles of the present invention comprise a particle core which is at least partially coated with a water soluble coating material. In preferred embodiments, the particle core may comprise a detergent particle, agglomerate, flake etc. Thus, the particle core will preferably comprise a blend of surfactant ingredients, particularly anionic surfactants with dry detergent ingredients such as carbonates, aluminosilicate builders, silicate builder materials, alkali metal sulfates, chelants and various other dry detergent ingredients in minor amounts. Alternatively, the particle core may comprise an individual detergent ingredient such as an enzyme, bleaching agents, perfume or mixtures thereof.
Particularly preferred particle cores include detergent agglomerates formed by an agglomeration of a highly viscous surfactant paste or a liquid acid precursor of a surfactant and the aforementioned dry detergent ingredients. The agglomeration of the surfactant material and dry detergent material may be carried out in a high or moderate speed mixer after which an optional low or moderate speed mixer may be employed for further agglomeration, if necessary.
Alternatively, the agglomeration may be earned out in a single mixer that can be low, moderate or high speed. The particular mixer used in the present process should include pulverizing or grinding and agglomeration tools so that both techniques can be carried forth simultaneously in a single mixer. To that end, it has been found that the first processing step can be successfully completed, under the process parameters descπbed herein, in a Lodige KM™ (Ploughshare) 600 moderate speed mixer, Lodige CB™ high speed mixer, or mixers made by Fukae, Drais, Schugi or similar brand mixer. The Lodige KM™ (Ploughshare) 600 moderate speed mixer, which is a preferred mixer for use in the present invention, compπses a hoπzontal, hollow static cylinder having a centrally mounted rotating shaft around which several plough- shaped blades are attached. Preferably, the shaft rotates at a speed of from about 15 φm to about 140 φm, more preferably from about 80 φm to about 120 φm. The gπndmg or pulvenzing is accomplished by cutters, generally smaller in size than the rotating shaft, which preferably operate at about 3600 φm Other mixers similar in nature which are suitable for use in the process include the Lodige Ploughshare™ mixer and the Drais® K-T 160 mixer
Preferably, the mean residence time of the vaπous starting detergent ingredients m the low, moderate or high speed mixer is preferably m range from about 0.05 minutes to about 15 minutes, most preferably the residence time is about 0.5 to about 5 minutes. In this way, the density of the resulting detergent agglomerates is at the desired level. This agglomeration is typically followed by a drying step. This drying step may be earned out in a wide vaπety of equipment including, but not limited to a fluid bed drying apparatus. Examples of dryer characteπstics include fixed or vibrating; rectangular bed or round bed; and straight or seφentme dryers. Manufacturers of such dryers include Niro, Bepex, Spray Systems and Glatt. By way of example, apparatus such as a fluidized bed can be used for drying while an airlift can be used for cooling should it be necessary. The air lift can also be used to force out the "fine" particles so that they can be recycled to the particle agglomeration process
The particles of the present invention compnse at least about 50% by weight of particles having a geometπc mean particle diameter of from about 500 microns to about 1500 microns and preferably have a geometπc standard deviation of from about 1 to about 2. Preferably the geometπc standard deviation is from about 1.0 to about 1 7, preferably from about 1 0 to about 1.4. The granular detergent composition resulting from the processes may comprise fine particles, wherein "fine particles" are defined as particles that have a geometπc mean particle diameter that is less than about 1.65 standard deviations below the chosen geometπc mean particle diameter of the granular detergent composition Large particles may also exist wherein "large particles" are defined as particles that have a geometπc mean particle diameter that is greater than about 1 65 standard deviations above the chosen geometπc mean particle diameter of the granular detergent composition. The fine particles are preferably separated from the granular detergent composition and returned to the process by adding them to at least one of the mixers and/or the fluid bed dryer as descπbed in detail below Likewise, the large particles are preferably separated from the granular detergent composition and then fed to a gπnder where their geometπc mean particle diameter is reduced. After the geometπc mean particle diameter of the large particles is reduced, the large particles are returned to the process by adding them to at least one of the mixers and/or the fluid bed dryer. The agglomeration may comprise the step of spraying an additional binder in the mixers to facilitate production of the desired detergent particles. A binder is added for puφoses of enhancing agglomeration by providing a "binding" or "sticking" agent for the detergent components. The binder is preferably selected from the group consisting of water, anionic surfactants, nonionic surfactants, polyethylene glycol, polyvinyl pyrrohdone polyacrylates, citπc acid and mixtures thereof. Other suitable binder mateπals including those listed herein are descπbed in Beerse et al, U.S. Patent No. 5,108,646 (Procter & Gamble Co.), the disclosure of which is incoφorated herein by reference.
Another optional processing step to form the particle core of the present invention includes continuously adding a coating agent such as zeolites, recycled "fines" as described above and fumed silica to the mixer to improve the particle color, increase the particle "whiteness or facilitate free flowabihty of the resulting detergent particles and to prevent over agglomeration When employing recycled fines as the coating agent, the fines are preferably m the approximate size range of 0.1 to 0.5 times the mean particle size of the larger particles. The particle coating layer will also improve the integrity of the fines layering and provide abrasion and attπtion resistance duπng handling. In addition, the detergent starting matenals can be fed into a pre-mixer, such as a Lodige CB mixer or a twm-screw extruder, pπor to enteπng m the mixer. This step, although optional, does indeed facilitate agglomeration.
Also particularly preferred in the present invention are particle cores which comprise tower blown particles. In this process, the core particle is formed by the preparation of a slurry of surfactant mateπals, water and dry starting detergent materials. The resultant slurry is then passed to a tower where the slurry is sprayed into a stream of air at a temperature typically ranging from about 175°C to about 225°C to dry the detergent slurry and form detergent particles Typically, resultant densities of these particles range from about 200 to about 500 g/L.
Particle Coating Layer
As described hereinbefore, the particle coating layer of the present invention is a water soluble coating mateπal. The particle coating layer imparts dramatically new surface and appearance properties on the detergent particles of the present invention. The coated particles of the present invention have an appearance which is bπghter and/or whiter than current detergent particles. This provides a more favorable response from consumers who prefer white detergent products. In addition, the particle coating layer of the present invention imparts a dramatically improved feel to the particles of the present invention. The coated particles of the present invention have a glassy, smoother feel than prior art detergent products. This again provides a more favorable response from consumers who prefer a rounded, uniform product. Additionally, the coated particles of the present invention provide improved sound to a detergent product containing the particles of the present invention. The coated particles have a cπsper sound than current detergent products, thereby leaving the consumer with a more favorable overall impression of the product. Most importantly, the coated particles of the present invention provide improved clumping and flowabihty profiles to detergent products containing the particles of the present invention. The particle coating layer provides a coating which is cπsper and non-tacky. While effective at improving flowabihty in all detergent products, it is particularly effective at preventing clumping in products containing surfactants which are more difficult to dry to a non- tacky state including nonionic surfactants, linear alkyl benzene sulfonates ("LAS"), and ethoxylated alkyl sulfates or in detergent products containing high amounts of surfactant actives (i.e. greater than about 25 wt % surfactant active).
The particle coating layer of the present invention at least partially coats the particle core While the desired state is for particles which are completely coated by the particle coating, it is, of course, anticipated that complete coverage will not be possible m all cases in a continuous, high speed manufactuπng process. While it is rather difficult to quantify the extent of the coating layer coverage, it is observed that increasing the amount of coating solids, either by increasing the solids concentration in the solution or by spraying on more of the solution, results in improved benefits and the appearance of a more uniform coverage. The benefits of increased coverage is balanced with the cost of drying excess water in the process. Accordingly, in preferred embodiments of the present invention, adequate coverage is achieved by applying coating solids at more than about 3 wt.% and most preferably more than about 5 wt.% of the particle core mass.
The particle coating layer of the present invention compπses a water soluble coating mateπal. In preferred embodiments the coating mateπal is not an alkali metal silicate as presents stability problems in the detergent composition and has a tendency to form insoluble residues in the processing of the detergent. The water soluble coating mateπal is applied to provide a smoother more uniform appearance to the resultant detergent particles. The coating mateπal may be selected from a wide vaπety of mateπals provided the coating imparts the appearance, flowabihty and surface properties described herein. Preferred mateπals include inorganic salts and organic salts, polymers and combinations thereof. Suitable organic salts include alkali metal carboxylates such as citrates and acetates. Inorganic salts may include silicates, boron salts, phosphate salts, magnesium salts and vaπous other glass forming or crystalline inorganic salts. Most preferred are non-hydratmg materials. By non-hydrating it is intended that the mateπal does not have a strong tendency to react with environmental water such as moisture present in composition or humidity in the air to form higher hydrate phases. For the puφoses of the present invention, a non-hydrating coating means a coating layer in which at least 40 wt.% of the coating consists of a non-hydrating inorganic mateπal, preferably more than about 60 wt.% and most preferably more than about 80 wt.% non-hydrating.
The non-hydratmg mateπal is preferably selected from alkali and/or alkaline earth metal sulfate and carbonate salts or mixtures of the two. A highly preferred mateπals are double salts of sulfate and carbonate having the formula MnXn:MS04:MC03, where MX can a salt compound such as a metal halide, and the molar fractions of MS04 and MC03 are both at least 10 mol% of the formula. More preferred, the molar ratio of MS04:MC03 is from about 90: 10 to about 10:90 and more preferably from about 75:25 to about 60:40 where M independently represents an alkali or alkaline earth metal and n is an integer or fraction thereof from 0 to 5. Examples of these highly preferred mateπals are the water-free sulfates and water-free carbonate minerals that are formed naturally by evaporative deposition, such as Hanksite, KNa22(S04)9(C03)2Cl , and Tychite, Na6Mg2(C03)4(S04). An especially preferred mateπal is a 2: 1 molar ratio of the double salt Na2S04:Na2C03 otherwise known as "Burkeite", Na6(C03)(S04)2.
The particle coating layer may also include an detergent adjunct ingredient in addition to the particle coating mateπal. These detergent adjunct ingredients may include a wide vaπety of ingredients, including but not limited to optical bπghteners, pigments or dyes, chelants, nonionic surfactants, pH control agents, detergency co-builders and mixtures of these mateπals.
Particularly preferred are pigments or dyes such as titanium dioxide, bluing agents such as copper sulfate, zinc thiosulfate and Ultramaπne blue, Sparkle enhancers such as mica flake, and co- builders such as citrates and nonionic surfactants.
Coated Particles
The particles of the present invention are produced by coating the particle core as descπbed hereinbefore with the particle coating mateπal in a coating mixer. The coating mixer may be any of a number of mixers including high, moderate, and low speed mixers such as a Lodige KM™ (Ploughshare) 600 moderate speed mixer, Lodige CB™ high speed mixer, or mixers made by Fukae, Drais, Schugi or similar brand mixer Particularly preferred for use in the present invention are low speed drum mixers and low shear fluidized bed mixers. When employing a low speed drum mixer in the present invention, the mixer is preferably followed m sequence by a drying apparatus, for example a fluid bed, wherein the coated particles are then dried to achieve the coated particles of the present invention.
In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the coating mixer is an fluidized bed. The preferred particle core of detergent agglomerates, spray-dπed particles or most preferably mixtures thereof is passed into a fluid bed dryer having multiple internal "stages" or "zones". A stage or zone is any discrete area within the dryer, and these terms are used interchangeably herein. The process conditions withm a stage may be different or similar to the other stages in the dryer. It is understood that two adjacent dryers are equivalent to a single dryer having multiple stages. The vaπous feed streams of particle core and coating material can be added at the different stages, depending on, for example, the particle size and moisture level of the feed stream. Feeding different streams to different stages can minimize the heat load on the dryer, and optimize the particle size and shape as defined herein
Typically, the fluid bed mixer of the present invention comprises a first coating zone where the particle coating mateπal of the present invention is applied. The coating zone involves the spraying of the coating mateπal m aqueous or slurry form onto the fluidized particles. The bed is typically fluidized with heated air in order to dry or partially dry moisture from the spray coating as it is applied. The spraying is achieved via nozzles capable of de veπng a fine or atomized spray of the coating mixture to achieve complete coverage of the particles. Typically, the droplet size from the atomizer is less than about 100 um. This atomization can be achieved either through a conventional two-fluid nozzle with atomizing air, or alternatively by means of a conventional pressure nozzle. To achieve this type of atomization, the solution or slurry rheology is typically characteπzed by a viscosity of less than about 500 centipoise, preferably less than about 200 centipoise. To achieve best results, the nozzle location is placed at or above the fluidized height of the particles m the fluid bed. The fluidized height is typically determined by a weir or overflow gate height. The coating zone of the fluid bed is then typically followed by a drying zone and a cooling zone. Of course, one ot ordinary skill m the art will recognize that alternative arrangements are also possible to achieve the resultant coated particles of the present invention
An alternative embodiment uses an agitated fluid bed, which includes mechanical and/or pneumatic mixing elements in addition to the conventional bed that is fluidized air passing through holes in a distributor plate. The advantage of the agitated bed is that it can be used to apply additional shear as a means to control granular shape and smoothness while performing the coating operation.
Typical conditions within a fluid bed or agitated fluid bed apparatus of the present invention include (i) from about 1 to about 20 minutes of mean residence time, (ii) from about 100 to about 600 mm of depth of unfluidized bed, (iii) preferably not more than about 100 micron of droplet spray size, (iv) from about 175 to about 250 mm of spray height, (v) from about 0.4 to about 2.0 m/s of fluidizing velocity and (vi) from about 12 to about 100 °C of bed temperature. Once again, one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that the conditions in the fluid bed may vary depending on a number of factors. The coated particles exiting the coating mixer may comprise in and of themselves a fully formulated detergent composition or in preferred embodiments may be admixed with additional ingredients, such as bleaching agents, enzymes, perfumes, non-coated detergent particles, and various other ingredients to produce a fully formulated detergent composition.
As previously stated, the coated particles of the present invention have improved surface properties in that the particles are more uniform in shape and smoother on the surface than the uncoated spray-dried or agglomerated detergent particles. These features are reflected in a reduction of the overall surface area of particles having the coating of the present invention as opposed to particles not having the coatings of the present invention. The coatings of the present invention reduce total surface area by smoothing irregularities and filling crevices on the surface of the particles. The coatings of the present invention provide a reduction in overall surface area as measured by the formula:
(Surface Area of Non-Coated Particles) - (Surface Area of Coated Particles)/(Surface Area of Non-Coated Particles) * 100 = Percent of Surface Area Reduction
of at least about 10%, more preferably at least about 20% and most preferably at least about 30%. A reduction in surface area as provided by the present invention leads to improved flow properties and to improved overall aesthetics by providing a more reflective surface. Surface Area Test Method The surface area of the particles of the present invention are measured according to the following procedure. Detergent Particles are placed into a Micromeritics VacPrep 061 , available from Micromeritics of Norcross, Georgia, for pre-test preparation. The particles are placed under a vacuum of approximately 500 millitorr and heated to a temperature of between 80 and 100CC for approximately 16 hours. The BET multi-point surface area is then measured m a Micromeritics Gemini 2375 surface area analyzer using a mixture "of helium and nitrogen gases and the following general conditions: Evacuation rate - 500.0 mmHg/min: Analysis Mode - Equilibration: Evacuation Time - 1.0 min.; Saturation Pressure - 771.77 mmlϊg; Equilibration Time - 5 sec. Helium Nitrogen Pressure - 15 psig; Helium and Nitrogen purity 99.9%, free space is measured and P/Po points cover 0.05 to 0.3 with 5 data points taken.
In an optional embodiment of the present invention, the coated particles of the present invention may be treated with a post coating gloss treatment to provide a gloss layer on the coated detergent particle. The gloss layer may comprise inorganic salt materials, chelating materials, polymeric materials and mixtures thereof. Preferred inorganic materials are sulfate salts such as magnesium sulfate, preferred chelants are diamines such as ethylene diamine disuccinic acids (EDDS), while preferred polymers include acrylic polymers and copolymers such as acrylic/maleic copolymers.
DETERGENT COMPONENTS The surfactant system of the detergent composition may include anionic, nonionic, zwitterionic, ampholytic and cationic classes and compatible mixtures thereof. Detergent surfactants are described in U.S. Patent 3,664,961, Norris, issued May 23, 1972, and in U.S. Patent 3,919,678, Laughlin et al., issued December 30, 1975, both of which are incoφorated herein by reference. Cationic surfactants include those described in U.S. Patent 4,222,905, Cockrell, issued September 16, 1980, and in U.S. Patent 4,239,659, Muφhy, issued December 16, 1980, both of which are also incoφorated herein by reference.
Nonlimiting examples of surfactant systems include the conventional Ci 1 -Ci g alkyl benzene sulfonates ("LAS") and primary, branched-chain and random C j Q-C20 alkyl sulfates ("AS"), the C10-C18 secondary (2,3) alkyl sulfates of the formula CH3(CH2)x(CHOS03 ~M+) CH3 and CH3 (CH2)y(CHOS03 "M+) CH2CH3 where x and (y + 1) are integers of at least about 7, preferably at least about 9, and M is a water-solubilizing cation, especially sodium, unsaturated sulfates such as oleyl sulfate, the C I Q-CI g alkyl alkoxy sulfates ("AEXS"; especially EO 1-7 ethoxy sulfates), Ci Q-C I g alkyl alkoxy carboxylates (especially the EO 1-5 ethoxycarboxylates), the Ci o-i 8 glycerol ethers, the Cj Q-CI g alkyl polyglycosides and their corresponding sulfated polyglycosides, and C12-C18 alpha-sulfonated fatty acid esters. If desired, the conventional nonionic and amphoteric surfactants such as the C 12" 18 alkyl ethoxylates (" AE") including the so-called narrow peaked alkyl ethoxylates and Cg-C]^ alkyl phenol alkoxylates (especially ethoxylates and mixed ethoxy/propoxy), C12-C1 g betaines and sulfobetaines ("sultaines"), Cι ø-Cι amine oxides, and the like, can also be included in the surfactant system. The Ci o-Cj g N-alkyl polyhydroxy fatty acid amides can also be used. Typical examples include the N-methylglucamides. See WO 9,206,154. Other sugar-deπved surfactants include the N-alkoxy polyhydroxy fatty acid amides, such as Cjo-Cig N-(3-methoxypropyl) glucamide. The N-propyl through N-hexyl C^-C^g glucamides can be used for low sudsing. C 0-C20 conventional soaps may also be used. If high sudsing is desired, the branched-chain C \ -C J g soaps may be used. Mixtures of anionic and nonionic surfactants are especially useful. Other conventional useful surfactants are listed in standard texts.
The detergent composition can, and preferably does, include a detergent builder. Builders are generally selected from the vaπous water-soluble, alkali metal, ammonium or substituted ammonium phosphates, polyphosphates, phosphonates, polyphosphonates, carbonates, silicates, borates, polyhydroxy sulfonates, polyacetates, carboxylates, and polycarboxylates. Preferred are the alkali metal, especially sodium, salts of the above. Preferred for use herein are the phosphates, carbonates, silicates, C, „ , 0 fatty acids, polycarboxylates, and mixtures thereof. More preferred are sodium tπpolyphosphate, tetrasodium pyrophosphate, citrate, tartrate mono- and di-succinates, sodium silicate, and mixtures thereof (see below).
Specific examples of inorganic phosphate builders are sodium and potassium tπpolyphosphate, pyrophosphate, polymeπc metaphosphate having a degree of polymenzation of from about 6 to 21, and orthophosphates. Examples of polyphosphonate builders are the sodium and potassium salts of ethylene diphosphonic acid, the sodium and potassium salts of ethane 1-hydroxy-l, 1 -diphosphonic acid and the sodium and potassium salts of ethane,
1,1,2-tπphosphonιc acid. Other phosphorus builder compounds are disclosed m U.S. Patents 3,159,581; 3,213,030; 3,422,021; 3,422,137; 3,400,176 and 3,400,148, all of which are incoφorated herein by reference.
Examples of nonphosphorus, inorganic builders are sodium and potassium carbonate, bicarbonate, sesquicarbonate, tetraborate decahydrate, and silicates having a weight ratio of SιO» to alkali metal oxide of from about 0.5 to about 4.0, preferably from about 1.0 to about 2.4. Water-soluble, nonphosphorus organic builders useful herein include the vaπous alkali metal, ammonium and substituted ammonium polyacetates, carboxylates, polycarboxylates and polyhydroxy sulfonates. Examples of polyacetate and polycarboxylate builders are the sodium, potassium, lithium, ammonium and substituted ammonium salts of ethylene diamme tetraacetic acid, nitπlotπacetic acid, oxydisuccimc acid, melhtic acid, benzene polycarboxyhc acids, and citπc acid. Polymeπc polycarboxylate builders are set forth in U S. Patent 3,308,067, Diehl, issued March 7, 1967, the disclosure of which is incoφorated herein by reference. Such mateπals include the water-soluble salts of homo- and copolymers of aliphatic carboxylic acids such as maleic acid, itaconic acid, mesaconic acid, fumaπc acid, acomtic acid, citraconic acid and methylenemalonic acid. Some of these materials are useful as the water-soluble anionic polymer as hereinafter descπbed, but only if m intimate admixture with the nonsoap anionic surfactant
Other suitable polycarboxylates for use herein are the polyacetal carboxylates described in U.S. Patent 4,144,226, issued March 13, 1979 to Crutchfield et al., and U.S. Patent 4,246,495, issued March 27, 1979 to Crutchfield et al., both of which are incoφorated herein by reference These polyacetal carboxylates can be prepared by bnngmg together under polymeπzation conditions an ester of glyoxyhc acid and a polymeπzation initiator. The resulting polyacetal carboxylate ester is then attached to chemically stable end groups to stabilize the polyacetal carboxylate against rapid depolymeπzation in alkaline solution, converted to the corresponding salt, and added to a detergent composition. Particularly preferred polycarboxylate builders are the ether carboxylate builder compositions compnsmg a combination of tartrate monosuccmate and tartrate disuccmate descnbed m U.S. Patent 4,663,071, Bush et al., issued May 5, 1987, the disclosure of which is incoφorated herein by reference
Water-soluble silicate solids represented by the formula M being an alkali metal, and having a SιO»:M»0 weight ratio of from about 0 5 to about 4.0, are useful salts in the detergent granules of the invention at levels of from about 2% to about 15% on an anhydrous weight basis, preferably from about 3% to about 8% Anhydrous or hydrated particulate silicate can be utilized, as well.
Any number of additional ingredients can also be included as components in the granular detergent composition. These include other detergency builders, bleaches, bleach activators, suds boosters or suds suppressors, anti-tarnish and anti-corrosion agents, soil suspending agents, soil release agents, germicides, pH adjusting agents, nonbuilder alkalinity sources, chelatmg agents, smectite clays, enzymes, enzyme-stabilizing agents and perfumes. See U.S. Patent 3,936,537, issued February 3, 1976 to Baskerville, Jr. et al, incoφorated herein by reference.
Bleaching agents and activators are descπbed m U S. Patent 4,412,934, Chung et al, issued November 1, 1983, and in U.S Patent 4,483,781, Hartman, issued November 20, 1984, both of which are incoφorated herein by reference Chelatmg agents are also descπbed in U S Patent 4,663,071, Bush et al., from Column 17, line 54 through Column 18, line 68, incoφorated herein by reference Suds modifiers are also optional ingredients and are descπbed in U S Patents 3,933,672, issued January 20, 1976 to Bartoletta et al., and 4,136,045, issued January 23, 1979 to Gault et al., both incoφorated herein by reference.
Suitable smectite clays for use herein are described in U.S. Patent 4,762,645, Tucker et al., issued August 9, 1988, Column 6, line 3 through Column 7, line 24, incoφorated herein by reference. Suitable additional detergency builders for use herein are enumerated in the Baskerville patent, Column 13, line 54 through Column 16, line 16, and in U.S. Patent 4,663,071, Bush et al., issued May 5, 1987, both incoφorated herein by reference.
The following examples are presented for illustrative puφoses only and are not to be construed as limiting the scope of the appended claims in any way.
In the following examples all levels are quoted as % by weight of the composition:
Example I
In this example of coating by a non-hydrating inorganic salt, a detergent agglomerate composition was made using the following formula using dry neutralization of HLAS in a high- speed mixer, followed by paste agglomeration with a pre-neutralized NaLAS paste in a second medium speed mixer, followed by spray-on of a Burkeite solution (5% solids basis) in a fluid bed dryer.
High Speed Mixer (Dry Neutralization)
Na2C03 59% HLAS 23%
Dry-neutralized intermediate 82%
Medium Speed Mixer (Paste Agglomeration)
Dry-neutralized intermediate 82% NaLAS paste 18%
Agglomerate core particle 100%
Fluid Bed Coating and Drying Agglomerate core particle 100%
Fine particle "dusting", (Zeolite, Na2C03) 2%
Spray on solution* (wet basis) 17.5%
Evaporation -12.5%
Net coating solids (Burkeite) 5%
Coated Product 107% Solution made up of 1.5 wt% Na2C03, 3.5 wt% Na2S04 and 12.5 wt% H20.
In this example, the spray solution can be made from a burkeite starting material, dissolved in water at -28.5 wt % solids, or by dissolving a mixture of Sodium Carbonate and Sodium Sulfate salts in a ratio of -30:70 with a total salt solids loading of -28.5 wt % in water. The solution is atomized to form droplets which coat or partially coat the particle core agglomerates, then the water is evaporated at a bed temperature of about 40 to 80 °C. Upon evaporation, the salts co-precipitate to form the Burkeite coating.
Example II
In this example of coating by an organic salt, a granular detergent composition was made using the following formula using a spray-dried core granule, followed by spray-on of a Potassium Citrate solution (5% solids basis) in a fluid bed dryer.
Fluid Bed Coating and Drying
Spray-dried core particle 100%
Spray on solution* (wet basis) 9%
Evaporation -3%
Net coating solids (Potassium Citrate) 6%
Coated Product 106% *Solution made up of 3.1 wt % K2C03, 2.9% Citric Acid and 3 wt % H20.
In this example, the spray solution was made by co-dissolving Potassium Carbonate and Citric Acid in water. The solution is atomized to form droplets which coat or partially coat the core agglomerates, then the water is evaporated at a bed temperature of about 40 to 80 degrees Centigrade. Upon evaporation, the organic salt, Potassium Citrate forms a coating or partial- coating layer on the surface of the spray-dried granules.

Claims

WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:
1. A detergent particle characteπzed by: i) a particle core characteπzed by a detergent active material, and ii) a particle coating layer at least partially coveπng said particle core, said particle coating layer characteπzed by a water soluble coating mateπal; wherein said particle coating layer provides a surface area reduction of at least 10%.
2. The detergent particle as claimed m Claim 1, wherein said coating matenal is a water soluble, non-hydrating inorganic mateπal.
3. The detergent particle as claimed in any of claims 1-2 wherein said water soluble non- hydratmg matenal is selected from the group consisting of alkali metal carbonate salts, alkali metal sulfate salts, and mixtures thereof.
4. The detergent particle as claimed in any of claims 1-3, wherein said water soluble, non- hydrating inorganic mateπal is the double salt Na24:Na2Cθ3 m a weight ratio of Na2S04 to Na2C03 of from 80:20 to 20:80.
5. The detergent particle as claimed in any of claims 1-4 wherein the weight ratio of Na2S0 to Na2C03 of from 75:25 to 60:40.
6. The detergent particle as claimed in any claims 1-5 wherein said particle coating layer further includes a detergent adjunct matenal.
7. The detergent particle as claimed m any of claims 1-6 wherein said detergent adjunct matenal is selected from the group consisting of bnghteners, pigments, chelants, nonionic surfactants, pH control ingredients, detergency co-builders and mixtures thereof.
8. The detergent particle as claimed m any of claims 1-7 wherein said detergent active in said particle core is selected from the group consisting of bleaching agents, enzymes and mixtures thereof.
. The detergent particle as claimed in any of claims 1-8 wherein said detergent active material in said particle core is characterized by a blend of surfactants and dry detergent ingredients.
10. The detergent particle as claimed in any of claims 1-9 wherein said blend of surfactants and dry detergent ingredients is characterized by a blend of anionic surfactants and alkali metal carbonates.
11. The detergent particle as claimed in any of claims 1-10 wherein said blend is further characterized by a detergent builder material.
12. The detergent particle as claimed in any of claims 1-11 wherein said particle coating layer provides a surface area reduction of at least 20%.
13. The detergent particle as claimed in any of claims 1-12 wherein said particle coating layer provides a surface area reduction of at least 30%.
14. A detergent composition characterized by: a) from 1% to 99% of a detergent particle having a particle core characterized by a detergent active material, and a particle coating layer at least partially covering said particle core, said particle coating layer providing a surface area reduction of at least 10%; and b) the balance detergent adjunct ingredients.
EP00916149A 1999-03-09 2000-03-08 Detergent particles having coating or partial coating layers Expired - Lifetime EP1159395B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12344499P 1999-03-09 1999-03-09
US123444P 1999-03-09
US12777199P 1999-04-05 1999-04-05
US127771P 1999-04-05
PCT/US2000/005987 WO2000053719A1 (en) 1999-03-09 2000-03-08 Detergent particles having coating or partial coating layers

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1159395A1 true EP1159395A1 (en) 2001-12-05
EP1159395B1 EP1159395B1 (en) 2006-08-09

Family

ID=26821564

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP00916149A Expired - Lifetime EP1159395B1 (en) 1999-03-09 2000-03-08 Detergent particles having coating or partial coating layers

Country Status (6)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1159395B1 (en)
JP (1) JP2002538292A (en)
AT (1) ATE335804T1 (en)
AU (1) AU3729800A (en)
DE (1) DE60029932D1 (en)
WO (1) WO2000053719A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6790821B1 (en) 1999-06-21 2004-09-14 The Procter & Gamble Company Process for coating detergent granules in a fluidized bed
DE19954959A1 (en) * 1999-11-16 2001-05-17 Henkel Kgaa Enveloped particulate peroxo compounds
EP2441821A1 (en) * 2010-10-14 2012-04-18 Unilever Plc, A Company Registered In England And Wales under company no. 41424 of Unilever House Laundry detergent particles
US9284517B2 (en) 2010-10-14 2016-03-15 Conopco Inc. Laundry detergent particle
MY164216A (en) 2010-10-14 2017-11-30 Unilever Nv Laundry detergent particles
IN2013MN00626A (en) * 2010-10-14 2015-06-12 Unilever Plc
AU2011315793B2 (en) 2010-10-14 2014-03-06 Unilever Plc Laundry detergent particles
CN103154226B (en) 2010-10-14 2014-12-31 荷兰联合利华有限公司 Manufacture of coated particulate detergents
CN103154228B (en) 2010-10-14 2015-04-08 荷兰联合利华有限公司 Laundry detergent particles
EP2627760B1 (en) 2010-10-14 2016-08-10 Unilever PLC Laundry detergent particles
CN114774206A (en) * 2014-04-10 2022-07-22 宝洁公司 Composite detergent particles and laundry detergent composition comprising the same

Family Cites Families (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2233393A2 (en) * 1973-06-18 1975-01-10 Solvay Peroxy based detergent compsns. - contg. acetylated dioxime activator coated with mixed alkali metal (bi)carbonates and sulphates for storage stability
GR76050B (en) * 1981-02-04 1984-08-03 Unilever Nv
GB8818613D0 (en) * 1988-08-05 1988-09-07 Paterson Zochonis Uk Ltd Detergents
US5707953A (en) * 1993-04-19 1998-01-13 Akzo Nobel N.V. Fluidized bed coated amidoperoxyacid bleach composition
DE4315380A1 (en) * 1993-05-08 1994-11-10 Solvay Interox Gmbh Stabilized alkali metal peroxy salts and process for their preparation
EP0651053A1 (en) * 1993-11-03 1995-05-03 The Procter & Gamble Company Laundry detergent compositions
US5576285A (en) * 1995-10-04 1996-11-19 The Procter & Gamble Company Process for making a low density detergent composition by agglomeration with an inorganic double salt
DE19651446A1 (en) * 1996-12-11 1998-06-18 Henkel Kgaa Enveloped enzyme preparation with improved solubility

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO0053719A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP1159395B1 (en) 2006-08-09
JP2002538292A (en) 2002-11-12
ATE335804T1 (en) 2006-09-15
AU3729800A (en) 2000-09-28
DE60029932D1 (en) 2006-09-21
WO2000053719A1 (en) 2000-09-14

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7022660B1 (en) Process for preparing detergent particles having coating or partial coating layers
EP1187903B1 (en) Process for coating detergent granules in a fluidized bed
US6900169B2 (en) Process for coating detergent granules in a fluidized bed
US6767882B1 (en) Process for producing coated detergent particles
EP0858500A1 (en) Process for making a low density detergent compositon by agglomeration with an inorganic double salt
US6858572B1 (en) Process for producing coated detergent particles
WO1996006922A1 (en) Agglomeration process for making a detergent composition utilizing spray drying towers
EP1159395B1 (en) Detergent particles having coating or partial coating layers
WO1997030145A1 (en) Process for making a low density detergent composition by agglomeration with an inorganic double salt
EP1159390B2 (en) Process for producing coated detergent particles
US6894018B1 (en) Process for making granular detergent in a fluidized bed granulator having recycling of improperly sized particles
EP1005522B1 (en) Process for making a low density detergent composition by controlling nozzle height in a fluid bed dryer
WO2000078909A1 (en) Process for producing coated detergent particles
CA2375406C (en) Processes for making granular detergent in a fluidized bed granulator having recycling of improperly sized particles
EP1187904B1 (en) Process for making a granular detergent composition
US6906022B1 (en) Granular detergent compositions having homogenous particles and process for producing same
EP1115837B1 (en) Granular detergent compositions having homogenous particles and process for producing same
US6951837B1 (en) Process for making a granular detergent composition

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20010917

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20031112

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU NL PT SE

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU NL PT SE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060809

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060809

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.

Effective date: 20060809

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060809

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060809

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060809

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060809

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 60029932

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20060921

Kind code of ref document: P

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20061109

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20061109

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20061110

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20061120

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20070109

NLV1 Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

EN Fr: translation not filed
PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20070510

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20070308

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20070511

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20061110

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060809

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060809

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20070308

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20110221

Year of fee payment: 12

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20120308

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120308