EP1137903B1 - Hydrocarbon gas processing - Google Patents
Hydrocarbon gas processing Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP1137903B1 EP1137903B1 EP99963989A EP99963989A EP1137903B1 EP 1137903 B1 EP1137903 B1 EP 1137903B1 EP 99963989 A EP99963989 A EP 99963989A EP 99963989 A EP99963989 A EP 99963989A EP 1137903 B1 EP1137903 B1 EP 1137903B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- stream
- feed
- components
- column
- point
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F25—REFRIGERATION OR COOLING; COMBINED HEATING AND REFRIGERATION SYSTEMS; HEAT PUMP SYSTEMS; MANUFACTURE OR STORAGE OF ICE; LIQUEFACTION SOLIDIFICATION OF GASES
- F25J—LIQUEFACTION, SOLIDIFICATION OR SEPARATION OF GASES OR GASEOUS OR LIQUEFIED GASEOUS MIXTURES BY PRESSURE AND COLD TREATMENT OR BY BRINGING THEM INTO THE SUPERCRITICAL STATE
- F25J3/00—Processes or apparatus for separating the constituents of gaseous or liquefied gaseous mixtures involving the use of liquefaction or solidification
- F25J3/02—Processes or apparatus for separating the constituents of gaseous or liquefied gaseous mixtures involving the use of liquefaction or solidification by rectification, i.e. by continuous interchange of heat and material between a vapour stream and a liquid stream
- F25J3/0228—Processes or apparatus for separating the constituents of gaseous or liquefied gaseous mixtures involving the use of liquefaction or solidification by rectification, i.e. by continuous interchange of heat and material between a vapour stream and a liquid stream characterised by the separated product stream
- F25J3/0233—Processes or apparatus for separating the constituents of gaseous or liquefied gaseous mixtures involving the use of liquefaction or solidification by rectification, i.e. by continuous interchange of heat and material between a vapour stream and a liquid stream characterised by the separated product stream separation of CnHm with 1 carbon atom or more
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F25—REFRIGERATION OR COOLING; COMBINED HEATING AND REFRIGERATION SYSTEMS; HEAT PUMP SYSTEMS; MANUFACTURE OR STORAGE OF ICE; LIQUEFACTION SOLIDIFICATION OF GASES
- F25J—LIQUEFACTION, SOLIDIFICATION OR SEPARATION OF GASES OR GASEOUS OR LIQUEFIED GASEOUS MIXTURES BY PRESSURE AND COLD TREATMENT OR BY BRINGING THEM INTO THE SUPERCRITICAL STATE
- F25J3/00—Processes or apparatus for separating the constituents of gaseous or liquefied gaseous mixtures involving the use of liquefaction or solidification
- F25J3/02—Processes or apparatus for separating the constituents of gaseous or liquefied gaseous mixtures involving the use of liquefaction or solidification by rectification, i.e. by continuous interchange of heat and material between a vapour stream and a liquid stream
- F25J3/0204—Processes or apparatus for separating the constituents of gaseous or liquefied gaseous mixtures involving the use of liquefaction or solidification by rectification, i.e. by continuous interchange of heat and material between a vapour stream and a liquid stream characterised by the feed stream
- F25J3/0209—Natural gas or substitute natural gas
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F25—REFRIGERATION OR COOLING; COMBINED HEATING AND REFRIGERATION SYSTEMS; HEAT PUMP SYSTEMS; MANUFACTURE OR STORAGE OF ICE; LIQUEFACTION SOLIDIFICATION OF GASES
- F25J—LIQUEFACTION, SOLIDIFICATION OR SEPARATION OF GASES OR GASEOUS OR LIQUEFIED GASEOUS MIXTURES BY PRESSURE AND COLD TREATMENT OR BY BRINGING THEM INTO THE SUPERCRITICAL STATE
- F25J3/00—Processes or apparatus for separating the constituents of gaseous or liquefied gaseous mixtures involving the use of liquefaction or solidification
- F25J3/02—Processes or apparatus for separating the constituents of gaseous or liquefied gaseous mixtures involving the use of liquefaction or solidification by rectification, i.e. by continuous interchange of heat and material between a vapour stream and a liquid stream
- F25J3/0204—Processes or apparatus for separating the constituents of gaseous or liquefied gaseous mixtures involving the use of liquefaction or solidification by rectification, i.e. by continuous interchange of heat and material between a vapour stream and a liquid stream characterised by the feed stream
- F25J3/0219—Refinery gas, cracking gas, coke oven gas, gaseous mixtures containing aliphatic unsaturated CnHm or gaseous mixtures of undefined nature
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F25—REFRIGERATION OR COOLING; COMBINED HEATING AND REFRIGERATION SYSTEMS; HEAT PUMP SYSTEMS; MANUFACTURE OR STORAGE OF ICE; LIQUEFACTION SOLIDIFICATION OF GASES
- F25J—LIQUEFACTION, SOLIDIFICATION OR SEPARATION OF GASES OR GASEOUS OR LIQUEFIED GASEOUS MIXTURES BY PRESSURE AND COLD TREATMENT OR BY BRINGING THEM INTO THE SUPERCRITICAL STATE
- F25J3/00—Processes or apparatus for separating the constituents of gaseous or liquefied gaseous mixtures involving the use of liquefaction or solidification
- F25J3/02—Processes or apparatus for separating the constituents of gaseous or liquefied gaseous mixtures involving the use of liquefaction or solidification by rectification, i.e. by continuous interchange of heat and material between a vapour stream and a liquid stream
- F25J3/0228—Processes or apparatus for separating the constituents of gaseous or liquefied gaseous mixtures involving the use of liquefaction or solidification by rectification, i.e. by continuous interchange of heat and material between a vapour stream and a liquid stream characterised by the separated product stream
- F25J3/0238—Processes or apparatus for separating the constituents of gaseous or liquefied gaseous mixtures involving the use of liquefaction or solidification by rectification, i.e. by continuous interchange of heat and material between a vapour stream and a liquid stream characterised by the separated product stream separation of CnHm with 2 carbon atoms or more
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F25—REFRIGERATION OR COOLING; COMBINED HEATING AND REFRIGERATION SYSTEMS; HEAT PUMP SYSTEMS; MANUFACTURE OR STORAGE OF ICE; LIQUEFACTION SOLIDIFICATION OF GASES
- F25J—LIQUEFACTION, SOLIDIFICATION OR SEPARATION OF GASES OR GASEOUS OR LIQUEFIED GASEOUS MIXTURES BY PRESSURE AND COLD TREATMENT OR BY BRINGING THEM INTO THE SUPERCRITICAL STATE
- F25J2200/00—Processes or apparatus using separation by rectification
- F25J2200/02—Processes or apparatus using separation by rectification in a single pressure main column system
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F25—REFRIGERATION OR COOLING; COMBINED HEATING AND REFRIGERATION SYSTEMS; HEAT PUMP SYSTEMS; MANUFACTURE OR STORAGE OF ICE; LIQUEFACTION SOLIDIFICATION OF GASES
- F25J—LIQUEFACTION, SOLIDIFICATION OR SEPARATION OF GASES OR GASEOUS OR LIQUEFIED GASEOUS MIXTURES BY PRESSURE AND COLD TREATMENT OR BY BRINGING THEM INTO THE SUPERCRITICAL STATE
- F25J2200/00—Processes or apparatus using separation by rectification
- F25J2200/30—Processes or apparatus using separation by rectification using a side column in a single pressure column system
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F25—REFRIGERATION OR COOLING; COMBINED HEATING AND REFRIGERATION SYSTEMS; HEAT PUMP SYSTEMS; MANUFACTURE OR STORAGE OF ICE; LIQUEFACTION SOLIDIFICATION OF GASES
- F25J—LIQUEFACTION, SOLIDIFICATION OR SEPARATION OF GASES OR GASEOUS OR LIQUEFIED GASEOUS MIXTURES BY PRESSURE AND COLD TREATMENT OR BY BRINGING THEM INTO THE SUPERCRITICAL STATE
- F25J2200/00—Processes or apparatus using separation by rectification
- F25J2200/70—Refluxing the column with a condensed part of the feed stream, i.e. fractionator top is stripped or self-rectified
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F25—REFRIGERATION OR COOLING; COMBINED HEATING AND REFRIGERATION SYSTEMS; HEAT PUMP SYSTEMS; MANUFACTURE OR STORAGE OF ICE; LIQUEFACTION SOLIDIFICATION OF GASES
- F25J—LIQUEFACTION, SOLIDIFICATION OR SEPARATION OF GASES OR GASEOUS OR LIQUEFIED GASEOUS MIXTURES BY PRESSURE AND COLD TREATMENT OR BY BRINGING THEM INTO THE SUPERCRITICAL STATE
- F25J2200/00—Processes or apparatus using separation by rectification
- F25J2200/76—Refluxing the column with condensed overhead gas being cycled in a quasi-closed loop refrigeration cycle
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F25—REFRIGERATION OR COOLING; COMBINED HEATING AND REFRIGERATION SYSTEMS; HEAT PUMP SYSTEMS; MANUFACTURE OR STORAGE OF ICE; LIQUEFACTION SOLIDIFICATION OF GASES
- F25J—LIQUEFACTION, SOLIDIFICATION OR SEPARATION OF GASES OR GASEOUS OR LIQUEFIED GASEOUS MIXTURES BY PRESSURE AND COLD TREATMENT OR BY BRINGING THEM INTO THE SUPERCRITICAL STATE
- F25J2200/00—Processes or apparatus using separation by rectification
- F25J2200/90—Details relating to column internals, e.g. structured packing, gas or liquid distribution
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F25—REFRIGERATION OR COOLING; COMBINED HEATING AND REFRIGERATION SYSTEMS; HEAT PUMP SYSTEMS; MANUFACTURE OR STORAGE OF ICE; LIQUEFACTION SOLIDIFICATION OF GASES
- F25J—LIQUEFACTION, SOLIDIFICATION OR SEPARATION OF GASES OR GASEOUS OR LIQUEFIED GASEOUS MIXTURES BY PRESSURE AND COLD TREATMENT OR BY BRINGING THEM INTO THE SUPERCRITICAL STATE
- F25J2205/00—Processes or apparatus using other separation and/or other processing means
- F25J2205/02—Processes or apparatus using other separation and/or other processing means using simple phase separation in a vessel or drum
- F25J2205/04—Processes or apparatus using other separation and/or other processing means using simple phase separation in a vessel or drum in the feed line, i.e. upstream of the fractionation step
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F25—REFRIGERATION OR COOLING; COMBINED HEATING AND REFRIGERATION SYSTEMS; HEAT PUMP SYSTEMS; MANUFACTURE OR STORAGE OF ICE; LIQUEFACTION SOLIDIFICATION OF GASES
- F25J—LIQUEFACTION, SOLIDIFICATION OR SEPARATION OF GASES OR GASEOUS OR LIQUEFIED GASEOUS MIXTURES BY PRESSURE AND COLD TREATMENT OR BY BRINGING THEM INTO THE SUPERCRITICAL STATE
- F25J2210/00—Processes characterised by the type or other details of the feed stream
- F25J2210/12—Refinery or petrochemical off-gas
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F25—REFRIGERATION OR COOLING; COMBINED HEATING AND REFRIGERATION SYSTEMS; HEAT PUMP SYSTEMS; MANUFACTURE OR STORAGE OF ICE; LIQUEFACTION SOLIDIFICATION OF GASES
- F25J—LIQUEFACTION, SOLIDIFICATION OR SEPARATION OF GASES OR GASEOUS OR LIQUEFIED GASEOUS MIXTURES BY PRESSURE AND COLD TREATMENT OR BY BRINGING THEM INTO THE SUPERCRITICAL STATE
- F25J2220/00—Processes or apparatus involving steps for the removal of impurities
- F25J2220/60—Separating impurities from natural gas, e.g. mercury, cyclic hydrocarbons
- F25J2220/66—Separating acid gases, e.g. CO2, SO2, H2S or RSH
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F25—REFRIGERATION OR COOLING; COMBINED HEATING AND REFRIGERATION SYSTEMS; HEAT PUMP SYSTEMS; MANUFACTURE OR STORAGE OF ICE; LIQUEFACTION SOLIDIFICATION OF GASES
- F25J—LIQUEFACTION, SOLIDIFICATION OR SEPARATION OF GASES OR GASEOUS OR LIQUEFIED GASEOUS MIXTURES BY PRESSURE AND COLD TREATMENT OR BY BRINGING THEM INTO THE SUPERCRITICAL STATE
- F25J2235/00—Processes or apparatus involving steps for increasing the pressure or for conveying of liquid process streams
- F25J2235/60—Processes or apparatus involving steps for increasing the pressure or for conveying of liquid process streams the fluid being (a mixture of) hydrocarbons
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F25—REFRIGERATION OR COOLING; COMBINED HEATING AND REFRIGERATION SYSTEMS; HEAT PUMP SYSTEMS; MANUFACTURE OR STORAGE OF ICE; LIQUEFACTION SOLIDIFICATION OF GASES
- F25J—LIQUEFACTION, SOLIDIFICATION OR SEPARATION OF GASES OR GASEOUS OR LIQUEFIED GASEOUS MIXTURES BY PRESSURE AND COLD TREATMENT OR BY BRINGING THEM INTO THE SUPERCRITICAL STATE
- F25J2240/00—Processes or apparatus involving steps for expanding of process streams
- F25J2240/02—Expansion of a process fluid in a work-extracting turbine (i.e. isentropic expansion), e.g. of the feed stream
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F25—REFRIGERATION OR COOLING; COMBINED HEATING AND REFRIGERATION SYSTEMS; HEAT PUMP SYSTEMS; MANUFACTURE OR STORAGE OF ICE; LIQUEFACTION SOLIDIFICATION OF GASES
- F25J—LIQUEFACTION, SOLIDIFICATION OR SEPARATION OF GASES OR GASEOUS OR LIQUEFIED GASEOUS MIXTURES BY PRESSURE AND COLD TREATMENT OR BY BRINGING THEM INTO THE SUPERCRITICAL STATE
- F25J2245/00—Processes or apparatus involving steps for recycling of process streams
- F25J2245/02—Recycle of a stream in general, e.g. a by-pass stream
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F25—REFRIGERATION OR COOLING; COMBINED HEATING AND REFRIGERATION SYSTEMS; HEAT PUMP SYSTEMS; MANUFACTURE OR STORAGE OF ICE; LIQUEFACTION SOLIDIFICATION OF GASES
- F25J—LIQUEFACTION, SOLIDIFICATION OR SEPARATION OF GASES OR GASEOUS OR LIQUEFIED GASEOUS MIXTURES BY PRESSURE AND COLD TREATMENT OR BY BRINGING THEM INTO THE SUPERCRITICAL STATE
- F25J2290/00—Other details not covered by groups F25J2200/00 - F25J2280/00
- F25J2290/40—Vertical layout or arrangement of cold equipments within in the cold box, e.g. columns, condensers, heat exchangers etc.
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02C—CAPTURE, STORAGE, SEQUESTRATION OR DISPOSAL OF GREENHOUSE GASES [GHG]
- Y02C20/00—Capture or disposal of greenhouse gases
- Y02C20/40—Capture or disposal of greenhouse gases of CO2
Abstract
Description
- This invention relates to a process for the separation of a gas containing hydrocarbons.
- Ethylene, ethane, propylene, propane and/or heavier hydrocarbons can be recovered from a variety of gases, such as natural gas, refinery gas, and synthetic gas streams obtained from other hydrocarbon materials such as coal, crude oil, naphtha, oil shale, tar sands, and lignite. Natural gas usually has a major proportion of methane and ethane, i.e., methane and ethane together comprise at least 50 mole percent of the gas. The gas also contains relatively lesser amounts of heavier hydrocarbons such as propane, butanes, pentanes and the like, as well as hydrogen, nitrogen, carbon dioxide and other gases.
- The present invention is generally concerned with the recovery of ethylene, ethane, propylene, propane and heavier hydrocarbons from such gas streams. A typical analysis of a gas stream to be processed in accordance with this invention would be, in approximate mole percent, 92.12% methane, 3.96% ethane and other C2 components, 1.05% propane and other C3 components, 0.15% iso-butane, 0.21% normal butane, 0.11% pentanes plus, with the balance made up of nitrogen and carbon dioxide. Sulfur containing gases are also sometimes present.
- The historically cyclic fluctuations in the prices of both natural gas and its natural gas liquid (NGL) constituents have at times reduced the incremental value of ethane, ethylene, propane, propylene, and heavier components as liquid products. Competition for processing rights has forced plant operators to maximize the processing capacity and recovery efficiency of their existing gas processing plants. Available processes for separating these materials include those based upon cooling and refrigeration of gas, oil absorption, and refrigerated oil absorption. Additionally, cryogenic processes have become popular because of the availability of economical equipment that produces power while simultaneously expanding and extracting heat from the gas being processed. Depending upon the pressure of the gas source, the richness (ethane, ethylene, and heavier hydrocarbons content) of the gas, and the desired end products, each ofthese processes or a combination thereof may be employed.
- The cryogenic expansion process is now generally preferred for natural gas liquids recovery because it provides maximum simplicity with ease of start up, operating flexibility, good efficiency, safety, and good reliability. U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,157,904; 4,171,964; 4,185,978; 4,251,249; 4,278,457; 4,519,824; 4,617,039; 4,687,499; 4,689,063; 4,690,702; 4,854,955; 4,869,740; 4,889,545; 5,275,005; 5,555,748; 5,568,737; 5,771,712; 5,799,507; 5,881,569; 5,890,378; reissue U.S. Pat. No. 33,408; and co-pending application no. 09/054,802 describe relevant processes (although the description of the present invention in some cases is based on different processing conditions than those described in the cited U.S. patents and patent applications).
- In a typical cryogenic expansion recovery process, a feed gas stream under pressure is cooled by heat exchange with other streams of the process and/or external sources of refrigeration such as a propane compression-refrigeration system. As the gas is cooled, liquids may be condensed and collected in one or more separators as high-pressure liquids containing some of the desired C2+ components. Depending on the richness of the gas and the amount of liquids formed, the high-pressure liquids may be expanded to a lower pressure and fractionated. The vaporization occurring during expansion of the liquids results in further cooling of the stream. Under some conditions, pre-cooling the high pressure liquids prior to the expansion may be desirable in order to further lower the temperature resulting from the expansion. The expanded stream, comprising a mixture of liquid and vapor, is fractionated in a distillation (demethanizer) column. In the column, the expansion cooled stream(s) is (are) distilled to separate residual methane, nitrogen, and other volatile gases as overhead vapor from the desired C2 components, C3 components, and heavier hydrocarbon components as bottom liquid product.
- If the feed gas is not totally condensed (typically it is not), at least a portion of the vapor remaining from the partial condensation can be passed through a work expansion machine or engine, or an expansion valve, to a lower pressure at which additional liquids are condensed as a result of further cooling of the stream. The pressure after expansion is essentially the same as the pressure at which the distillation column is operated. The combined vapor-liquid phases resulting from the expansion are supplied as a feed to the column. In recent years, the preferred processes for hydrocarbon separation involve feeding this expanded vapor-liquid stream at a mid-column feed point, with an upper absorber section providing additional rectification of the vapor phase.
- The source of the reflux stream for the upper rectification section is typically a portion of the above mentioned vapor remaining after partial condensation of the feed gas, but withdrawn prior to work expansion. An alternate source for the upper reflux stream may be provided by a recycled stream of residue gas supplied under pressure. Regardless of its source, this vapor stream is usually cooled to substantial condensation by heat exchange with other process streams, e.g., the cold fractionation tower overhead. Some or all of the high-pressure liquid resulting from partial condensation of the feed gas may be combined with this vapor stream prior to cooling. The resulting substantially condensed stream is then expanded through an appropriate expansion device, such as an expansion valve, to the pressure at which the demethanizer is operated. During expansion, a portion of the liquid will usually vaporize, resulting in cooling of the total stream. The flash expanded stream is then supplied as top feed to the demethanizer. Typically, the vapor portion of the expanded stream and the demethanizer overhead vapor combine in an upper separator section in the fractionation tower as residual methane product gas. Alternatively, the cooled and expanded stream may be supplied to a separator to provide vapor and liquid streams, so that thereafter the vapor is combined with the tower overhead and the liquid is supplied to the column as a top column feed.
- The purpose of this process is to perform a separation that produces a residue gas leaving the process which contains substantially all of the methane in the feed gas with essentially none of the C2 components and heavier hydrocarbon components, and a bottoms fraction leaving the demethanizer which contains substantially all of the C2 components and heavier hydrocarbon components with essentially no methane or more volatile components while meeting plant specifications for maximum permissible carbon dioxide content. The present invention provides a means for providing a new plant or modifying an existing processing plant to achieve this separation at significantly lower capital cost by reducing the size of or eliminating the need for a product treating system for removal of carbon dioxide. Alternatively, the present invention, whether applied in a new facility or as a modification to an existing processing plant, can be used to recover more C2 components and heavier hydrocarbon components in the bottom liquid product for a given carbon dioxide concentration in the feed gas than other processing schemes.
- US-A-5755115, which discloses a process according to the preamble of
claim 1, discloses an improvement in the partial inter-reboiling of NGL fractionation columns or zones which enables a dramatic improvement in heat recovery and reduction in hot utilities by auto-reboiling to be obtained. In particular, it discloses a process for interreboiling a column comprising: - (a) an interreboiler, connected to the column at draw and return stages in a stripping section of the column, to heat and return a column sidedraw;
- (b) locating the draw stage of the interreboiler at least 2 theoretical stages above the return stage; and
- (c) interreboiling in the interreboiler during the operation of the column to effect indirect heat transfer from a stream of two or more components to a column stream from the draw stage and passing through the interreboiler In an example there are seven theoretical stages between the stripping section draw tray and the return tray.
-
- The present invention provides a process for the separation of a gas stream, said process having the features of
claim 1 of the accompanying claims. - It has been found that embodiments of the above process permit C2 recoveries in excess of 84 percent to be maintained while maintaining the carbon dioxide content of the bottom liquid product within specifications and providing essentially complete rejection of methane to the residue gas stream. The present invention, although applicable at lower pressures and warmer temperatures, is particularly advantageous when processing feed gases at pressures in the range of 4137 to 6895 kPa(a) [600 to 1000 psia] or higher under conditions requiring column overhead temperatures of -84°C [-120°F] or colder.
- The present invention uses a modified reboiler scheme that can be applied to any type of NGL recovery system. In a typical reboiler or side reboiler application in a distillation column, the entire column down-flowing liquid stream is withdrawn from the tower and passed through a heat exchanger, then returned to the column at essentially the same point in the column. As explained above in the modified reboiler system of the invention, a portion of the column down-flowing liquid is withdrawn from a point higher in the column, i.e., separated from the return point by at least one theoretical stage. Even though the flow rate of the liquid may be lower, it is usually much colder and can have advantages in improving recovery or reducing exchanger size.
- It has been found that when the present invention is applied to prior art processes for NGL recovery, the recovery of C2 components and heavier components is improved by one to two percent. The improvement in recovery is much greater, however, when it is desirable to reduce the carbon dioxide content in the recovered NGL product. Recovery of ethane in a typical NGL recovery plant also results in recovery of at least some of the carbon dioxide contained in the feed gas because carbon dioxide falls in between methane and ethane in relative volatility. Therefore, as ethane recovery increases, so does the recovery of carbon dioxide in the NGL product. By applying the modified reboilerscheme of the present invention, the applicants have found that it is possible to significantly improve recovery of ethane in the NGL product compared to use of the conventional reboiler or side reboiler systems when the column is reboiled to meet the desired carbon dioxide content in the NGL product.
- For a better understanding of the present invention, reference is made to the following examples and drawings. Referring to the drawings:
- FIG. 1 is a flow diagram of a prior art cryogenic natural gas processing plant;
- FIG. 2 is a flow diagram of an alternative adaptation of the prior art cryogenic natural gas processing plant;
- FIG. 3 is a flow diagram which does not form part of the present invention illustrating how the processing plants of FIGS. 1 and 2 can be adapted to be a natural gas processing plant;
- FIG. 4 is a flow diagram illustrating an alternative adaptation of FIGS. 1 and 2 to be a natural gas processing plant in accordance with the present invention;
- FIG. 5 is a flow diagram illustrating how an alternative prior art process can be adapted to be a natural gas processing plant in accordance with the present invention;
- FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating the modified reboiler scheme of the present invention for a processing plant wherein the scheme includes a thermosiphon system;
- FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating the modified reboiler scheme of the present invention for a processing plant wherein the scheme includes a pumped system;
- FIG. 8 is a diagram illustrating the modified reboiler scheme of the present invention for a processing plant wherein the scheme includes a pumped system; and
- FIG. 9 is a diagram illustrating the modified reboiler scheme of the present invention for a processing plant wherein the scheme includes a split column system.
-
- In the following explanation of the above figures, tables are provided summarizing flow rates calculated for representative process conditions. In the tables appearing herein, the values for flow rates (in kilogram [pound] moles per hour) have been rounded to the nearest whole number for convenience. The total stream rates shown in the tables include all non-hydrocarbon components and hence are generally larger than the sum of the stream flow rates for the hydrocarbon components. Temperatures indicated are approximate values rounded to the nearest degree. It should also be noted that the process design calculations performed for the purpose of comparing the processes depicted in the figures are based on the assumption of no heat leak from (or to) the surroundings to (or from) the process. The quality of commercially available insulating materials makes this a very reasonable assumption and one that is typically made by those skilled in the art.
- FIG. 1 is a process flow diagram showing the design of a processing plant to recover C2+ components from natural gas using prior art according to U.S. Pat. No. 4,157,904. Because this is a large plant designed for 28.3x106 Sm3 [1.0 billion cubic feet] of feed gas per day, the demethanizer (fractionation tower) is to be constructed in two sections,
absorber column 17 andstripper column 19. In this simulation of the process, inlet gas enters the plant at 30°C [86°F] and 4226 kPa(a) [613 psia] asstream 31. If the inlet gas contains a concentration of sulfur compounds which would prevent the product streams from meeting specifications, the sulfur compounds are removed by appropriate pretreatment of the feed gas (not illustrated). In addition, the feed stream is usually dehydrated to prevent hydrate (ice) formation under cryogenic conditions. Solid desiccant has typically been used for this purpose. - The
feed stream 31 is cooled inexchanger 10 by heat exchange with cool residue gas at -73°C [-99°F] (stream 37a), demethanizer reboiler liquids at -1°C [31°F] (stream 42), demethanizer lower side reboiler liquids at -21°C [-5°F] (stream 41) and demethanizer upper side reboiler liquids at -73°C [-99°F] (stream 40). Note that in all cases exchanger 10 is representative of either a multitude of individual heat exchangers or a single multi-pass heat exchanger, or any combination thereof. (The decision as to whether to use more than one heat exchanger for the indicated cooling services will depend on a number of factors including, but not limited to, inlet gas flow rate, heat exchanger size, stream temperatures, etc.) The cooledstream 31a entersseparator 11 at -63°C [-82°F] and 4158 kPa(a) [603 psia] where the vapor (stream 32) is separated from the condensed liquid (stream 35). - The vapor (stream 32) from
separator 11 is divided into two streams, 33 and 34.Stream 33, containing about 18 percent of the total vapor, is combined with the condensed liquid fromseparator 11. The combinedstream 36 passes throughheat exchanger 12 in heat exchange relation with the demethanizeroverhead vapor stream 37 resulting in cooling and substantial condensation of the stream. The substantially condensedstream 36a at -95°C [-139°F] is then flash expanded through an appropriate expansion device, such asexpansion valve 13, to the operating pressure (approximately 2296 kPa(a) [333 psia]) ofabsorber column 17 of the fractionation tower. During expansion a portion of the stream is vaporized, resulting in cooling of the total stream. In the process illustrated in FIG. 1, the expandedstream 36b leavingexpansion valve 13 reaches a temperature of -101°C[-151°F] and is supplied to separator section 17a in the upper region ofabsorber tower 17. The liquids separated therein become the top feed totheoretical stage 1 in rectifyingsection 17b. (An alternative routing for the separator liquid (stream 35) in accordance with U.S. Pat. No.4,278,457 is indicated by a dashed line whereby at least a portion of the liquid is expanded to approximately 2296 kPa(a) [333 psia] byexpansion valve 16, coolingstream 35 to producestream 35a that is then supplied to the rectifying section inabsorber tower 17 at a bottom feed point or tostripper tower 19 at an upper feed point.) - The remaining 82 percent of the vapor from separator 11 (stream 34) enters a
work expansion machine 14 in which mechanical energy is extracted from this portion of the high pressure feed. Themachine 14 expands the vapor substantially isentropically from a pressure of about 4158 kPa(a) [603 psia] to a pressure of about 2296 kPa(a) [333 psia], with the work expansion cooling the expandedstream 34a to a temperature of approximately -87°C [-125°F]. The typical commercially available expanders are capable of recovering on the order of 80-85% of the work theoretically available in an ideal isentropic expansion. The work recovered is often used to drive a centrifugal compressor (such as item 15), that can be used to re-compress the residue gas (stream 37c), for example. The expanded and partially condensedstream 34a is supplied as feed to the distillation column at a lower feed point (belowtheoretical stage 7 in this case). - The liquids (stream 38) from the bottom of
absorber column 17 at -88°C [-127°F] are supplied bypump 18 tostripper column 19 at a top feed point (stream 38a). The operating pressure of stripper column 19 (2365 kPa(a) [343 psia]) is slightly higher than the operating pressure ofabsorber column 17 so that the pressure difference between the two towers provides the motive force for the overhead vapors (stream 39) at -87°C [-125°F] from the top ofstripper column 19 to flow to the bottom feed point onabsorber column 17. - The demethanizer in
absorber tower 17 andstripper tower 19 is a conventional distillation column containing a plurality of vertically spaced trays, one or more packed beds, or some combination of trays and packing. As is often the case in natural gas processing plants, the absorber tower may consist of two sections. The upper section 17a is a separator wherein the partially vaporized top feed is divided into its respective vapor and liquid portions, and wherein the vapor rising from the lower distillation or rectifyingsection 17b is combined with the vapor portion (if any) of the top feed to form the cold residuegas distillation stream 37 which exits the top of the tower. The lower, rectifyingsection 17b and thestripper column 19 contain the trays and/or packing and provide the necessary contact between the liquids falling downward and the vapors rising upward. Thestripper column 19 also includes reboilers which heat and vaporize portions of the liquids flowing down the column to provide the stripping vapors which flow up the column. - The liquid product (stream 43) exits the bottom of the tower at 6□C [43□F], based on a typical specification of a methane to ethane ratio of 0.0237:1 on a molar basis in the bottom product and is pumped to approximately 3792 kPa(a) [550 psia] (
stream 43a) inpump 20. (The discharge pressure of the pump is usually set by the ultimate destination of the liquid product. Generally the liquid product flows to storage and the pump discharge pressure is set so as to prevent any vaporization ofstream 43a as it warms to ambient temperature.) - The residue gas (stream 37) passes countercurrently to the incoming feed gas in: (a)
heat exchanger 12 where it is heated to -73°C [-99°F] (stream 37a), (b)heat exchanger 10 where it is heated to 26°C [79°F] (stream 37b), and (c)heat exchanger 21 where it is heated to 43°C [ 110°F] (stream 37c). The residue gas is then re-compressed in two stages. The first stage iscompressor 15 driven byexpansion machine 14, and the second stage iscompressor 22 driven by a supplemental power source. Afterstream 37e is cooled to 46°C [115°F] (stream 37f) by cooler 23 and to 30°C [86°F] byheat exchanger 21, the residue gas product (stream 37g) flows to the sales pipeline at 4351 kPa(a) [631 psia], sufficient to meet line requirements (usually on the order of the inlet pressure). - A summary of stream flow rates and energy consumption for the process illustrated in FIG. 1 is set forth in the following table:
(FIG. 1) Stream Flow Summary - (kg-Moles/Hr) Stream Methane Ethane Propane Butanes+ C. Dioxide Total 31 55058 2367 628 281 478 59768 32 53976 2048 371 67 449 57861 35 1082 319 257 214 29 1907 33 9986 379 68 12 83 10704 34 43990 1669 303 55 366 47157 38 4999 2147 614 279 210 8265 39 4951 138 6 0 41 5152 40 2979 2825 655 283 404 7146 37 55010 358 20 2 309 56655 43 48 2009 608 279 169 3113 Stream Flow Summary - (Lb. Moles/Hr) Stream Methane Ethane Propane Butanes+ C. Dioxide Total 31 121383 5218 1384 619 1054 131766 32 118997 4514 817 147 990 127561 35 2386 704 567 472 64 4205 33 22015 835 151 27 183 23599 34 96982 3679 666 120 807 103962 38 11021 4734 1353 616 462 18222 39 10916 304 12 1 90 11359 40 6568 6227 1444 625 891 15755 37 121278 788 43 4 682 124903 43 105 4430 1341 615 372 6863 Recoveries Ethane 84.89% Propane 96.90% Butanes+ 99.33% Power Residue Compression 33,124 kW [44,408 HP] - As shown in Table I, the prior art illustrated in FIG. 1 achieves 84.89% ethane recovery using the available residue compression horsepower (33,566 kW [45,000 HP] maximum). However, the carbon dioxide concentration in the ethane product (the methane, ethane, and carbon dioxide stream that results when the bottoms liquid product is subsequently fractionated to separate the C2 components and lighter components from the C3 components and heavier hydrocarbon components) is 7.59 mole percent, which exceeds the plant owner's specification of 6.0 mole percent maximum. Thus, this plant design would require the addition of a treating system to remove carbon dioxide from the hydrocarbons in order to produce a marketable liquid product. There are many options for removing the carbon dioxide (treating the incoming feed gas, treating the total liquid product, treating the ethane product after fractionation, etc.), but all of these options will add not only to the capital cost of the plant (due to the cost of installing the treating system) but also to the operating expense of the plant (due to energy and chemical consumption in the treating system).
- One way to keep the ethane product within the carbon dioxide specification is to operate the demethanizer in a manner to strip the carbon dioxide from the bottom liquid product, by adding more reboil heat to the column using the side reboilers and/or the bottom reboiler. FIG. 2 represents such an alternative operating scheme for the process depicted in FIG. 1. The process of FIG. 2 has been applied to the same feed gas composition and conditions as described above for FIG. 1. However, in the simulation of the process of FIG. 2 the process operating conditions have been adjusted to control the bottom temperature of
stripper column 19 such that the carbon dioxide content of the ethane product is within specification. - In the simulation of this process, as in the simulation for the process of FIG. 1, operating conditions were selected to keep the ethane recovery level as high as possible without exceeding the available residue gas compression horsepower. The
feed stream 31 is cooled inexchanger 10 by heat exchange with cool residue gas at -71°C [-96°F] (stream 37a), demethanizer reboiler liquids at 10°C [50°F] (stream 42), demethanizer lower side reboiler liquids at 3°C [38°F] (stream 41) and demethanizer upper side reboiler liquids at -36°C [-32°F] (stream 40). The cooledstream 31a entersseparator 11 at -58°C [-72°F] and 4137 kPa(a) [600 psia] where the vapor (stream 32) is separated from the condensed liquid (stream 35). - The vapor (stream 32) from
separator 11 is divided into two streams, 33 and 34.Stream 33, containing about 17 percent of the total vapor, is combined with the condensed liquid fromseparator 11. The combinedstream 36 passes throughheat exchanger 12 in heat exchange relation with the demethanizeroverhead vapor stream 37 resulting in cooling and substantial condensation of the stream. The substantially condensedstream 36a at -91°C [-132°F] is then flash expanded throughexpansion valve 13. As the stream is expanded to the operating pressure of absorber column 17 (2248 kPa(a) [326 psia]), it is cooled to a temperature of approximately -102°C [-152°F] (stream 36b). The expandedstream 36b is supplied to the tower as the top feed. - The remaining 83 percent of the vapor from separator 11 (stream 34) enters
work expansion machine 14 in which mechanical energy is extracted from this portion of the high pressure feed. Themachine 14 expands the vapor substantially isentropically from a pressure of about 4137 kPa(a) [600 psia] to the operating pressure of absorber tower 17 (2248 kPa(a) [326 psia]), with the work expansion cooling the expandedstream 34a to a temperature of approximately -83°C [-118°F]. The expanded and partially condensedstream 34a is supplied as a feed to the distillation column at a lower feed point. - The liquids (stream 38) from the bottom of
absorber column 17 at -85°C [-120°F] are supplied bypump 18 tostripper column 19 at a top feed point (stream 38a). The operating pressure of stripper column 19 (2317 kPa(a) [336 psia]) is slightly higher than the operating pressure ofabsorber column 17 so that the pressure difference between the two towers provides the motive force for the overhead vapors (stream 39) at -83°C [-118°F] from the top ofstripper column 19 to flow to the bottom feed point onabsorber column 17. - The liquid product (stream 43) exits the bottom of
tower 19 at 13°C [56°F]. This stream is pumped to approximately 3792 kPa(a) [550 psia] (stream 43a) inpump 20. The residue gas (stream 37) passes countercurrently to the incoming feed gas in: (a)heat exchanger 12 where it is heated to -71°C [-96°F] (stream 37a), (b)heat exchanger 10 where it is heated to 21°C [70°F] (stream 37b), and (c)heat exchanger 21 where it is heated to 38°C [101°F] (stream 37c). The residue gas is then re-compressed in two stages,compressor 15 driven byexpansion machine 14 andcompressor 22 driven by a supplemental power source. Afterstream 37e is cooled to 46°C [115°F] (stream 37f) by cooler 23 and to 30°C [86°F] byheat exchanger 21, the residue gas product (stream 37g) flows to the sales pipeline at 4351 kPa(a) [631 psia]. - A summary of stream flow rates and energy consumption for the process illustrated in FIG. 2 is set forth in the following table:
(FIG. 2) Stream Flow Summary - (kg-Moles/Hr) Stream Methane Ethane Propane Butanes+ C. Dioxide Total 31 55058 2367 628 281 478 59768 32 54550 2203 470 106 464 58748 35 508 164 158 175 14 1020 33 9410 380 81 18 80 10134 34 45141 1823 389 88 384 48614 38 3103 1743 612 280 128 5875 39 3102 111 5 1 25 3254 40 855 3063 720 293 625 5556 37 55057 735 21 2 375 57147 43 1 1632 607 279 103 2621 Stream Flow Summary - (Lb. Moles/Hr) Stream Methane Ethane Propane Butanes+ C. Dioxide Total 31 121383 5218 1384 619 1054 131766 32 120263 4857 1037 233 1023 129517 35 1120 361 347 386 31 2249 33 20745 838 179 40 176 22342 34 99518 4019 858 193 847 107175 38 6842 3841 1349 615 284 12953 39 6839 244 12 1 56 7174 40 1886 6752 1588 645 1377 12248 37 121380 1621 47 5 826 125987 43 3 3597 1337 614 228 5779 Recoveries Ethane 68.94% Propane 96.61 % Butanes+ 99.25% Power Residue Compression 33,298 kW [44,641 HP] - The carbon dioxide concentration in the ethane product for the FIG. 2 process is 5.95 mole percent, complying with the plant owner's specification of 6.0 mole percent maximum. Note, however, that the methane to ethane ratio in the bottom product is 0.0008:1 on a molar basis, versus the allowable ratio of 0.0237:1, indicating the degree of over-stripping required to control the carbon dioxide content of the liquid product at the required level. Comparison of the recovery levels displayed in Tables I and II shows that operating the FIG. 2 process in this manner to reduce the carbon dioxide content in the ethane product causes a substantial reduction in liquids recovery. The FIG. 2 process reduces ethane recovery from 84.89% to 68.94%, propane recovery from 96.90% to 96.61%, and butanes+ recovery from 99.33% to 99.25%.
- There are two factors at work in the FIG. 2 process that result in less liquids recovery from the bottom of
stripper tower 19 compared to the FIG. 1 process. First, when the temperature at the bottom ofstripper column 19 is raised from 6°C [43°F] in the FIG. 1 process to 13°C [56°F] in the FIG. 2 process, the temperatures at each point in the column increase relative to their corresponding values in the FIG. 1 process. This reduces the amount of cooling that the tower liquid streams (streams 40, 41, and 42) can supply to the feed gas inheat exchanger 10. As a result, the cooled feed stream (stream 31a) enteringseparator 11 is warmer (-58°C [-72°F] for the FIG. 2 process versus -63°C [-82°F] for the FIG. 1 process), which in turn results in the lower ethane retention inabsorber column 17 reflected by the ethane content of stream 38 (1743 kg-Moles/Hr [3841 Lb. Moles/Hr] for the FIG. 2 process versus 2147 kg-Moles/Hr [4734 Lb. Moles/Hr] for the FIG. 1 process). Second, the higher temperatures instripper column 19 cause the temperatures inabsorber column 17 to be higher, resulting in less methane liquid entering stripper column 19 (3103 kg-Moles/Hr [6842 Lb. Moles/Hr] instream 38 for the FIG. 2 process versus 4999 kg-Moles/Hr [ 11021 Lb. Moles/Hr] for the FIG. 1 process). When this liquid methane is subsequently vaporized by the side reboilers and main reboiler attached tostripper column 19, the methane vapor helps to strip the carbon dioxide from the liquids flowing down the column. With less methane available in the FIG. 2 process to strip the carbon dioxide, more of the ethane in the liquids must be vaporized to serve as stripping gas. Since the relative volatilities for carbon dioxide and ethane are very similar, the ethane vapor is a much less effective stripping agent than the methane vapor, which reduces the stripping efficiency in the column. - FIG. 3 illustrates a flow diagram of a process in which the feed gas composition and conditions considered in the process presented in FIG. 3 are the same as those in FIG. 1. Accordingly, the FIG. 3 process can be compared with that of the FIG. 1 process to illustrate the advantages of arranging the withdrawal point and the lower point at which the heated distillation stream is returned at theoretical stages that are separated from one another by at least one theoretical stage.
- In the simulation of the FIG. 3 process, inlet gas enters at 30°C [86°F] and a pressure of 4226 kPa(a) [613 psia] as
stream 31. Thefeed stream 31 is cooled inexchanger 10 by heat exchange with cool residue gas at -73°C [-99°F] (stream 37a), demethanizer reboiler liquids at -1°C [30°F] (stream 42), demethanizer side reboiler liquids at -20°C [-4°F] (stream 41) and a portion of the liquids from the bottom of the absorber column at -89°C [-128°F] (stream 45). The cooledstream 31a entersseparator 11 at -64°C [-84°F] and 4158 kPa(a) [603 psia] where the vapor (stream 32) is separated from the condensed liquid (stream 35). - The vapor (stream 32) from
separator 11 is divided into gaseous first and second streams, 33 and 34.Stream 33, containing about 19 percent of the total vapor, is combined with the condensed liquid (stream 35) to formstream 36. Combinedstream 36 passes throughheat exchanger 12 in heat exchange relation with the cold residue gas (stream 37) where it is cooled to -94°C [-138°F]. The resulting substantially condensedstream 36a is then flash expanded through an appropriate expansion device, such asexpansion valve 13, to the operating pressure (approximately 2286 kPa(a) [332 psia]) ofabsorber tower 17. During expansion a portion of the stream is vaporized, resulting in cooling of the total stream. In the process illustrated in FIG. 3, the expandedstream 36b leavingexpansion valve 13 reaches a temperature of -101°C [-151°F] and is supplied toabsorber column 17 as the top column feed. The vapor portion (if any) ofstream 36b combines with the vapors rising from the top fractionation stage of the column to formdistillation stream 37, which is withdrawn from an upper region of the tower. - Returning to the gaseous
second stream 34, the remaining 81 percent of the vapor fromseparator 11 enters awork expansion machine 14 in which mechanical energy is extracted from this portion of the high pressure feed. Themachine 14 expands the vapor substantially isentropically from a pressure of about 4158 kPa(a) [603 psia] to a pressure of about 2286 kPa(a) [332 psia], with the work expansion cooling the expandedstream 34a to a temperature of approximately -88°C [-127°F]. The expanded and partially condensedstream 34a is thereafter supplied as feed toabsorber column 17 at a lower column feed point. - Alternatively as shown by the dashed line, the condensed liquid (stream 35) from
separator 11 could be flash expanded through an appropriate expansion device, such asexpansion valve 16, to the operating pressure ofabsorber tower 17, coolingstream 35 to producestream 35a. The expandedstream 35a leavingexpansion valve 16 could then be supplied toabsorber tower 17 at a lower column feed point or tostripper tower 19 at an upper column feed point. - The liquids (stream 38) from the bottom of
absorber column 17enter pump 18 at -89°C [-128°F] and are pumped to higher pressure (stream 38a) and divided into two portions. One portion (stream 44), containing about 55% of the total liquid, is supplied tostripper column 19 at a top feed point. The operating pressure of stripper column 19 (2355 kPa(a) [342 psia]) is slightly higher than the operating pressure ofabsorber column 17 so that the pressure difference between the two towers provides the motive force for the overhead vapors (stream 39) at -86°C [-123°F] from the top ofstripper column 19 to flow to the bottom feed point onabsorber column 17. - The other portion (stream 45), containing the remaining 45% of the pumped
liquid stream 38a, is directed toheat exchanger 10 where it supplies part of the feed gas cooling as it is heated to -29°C [-20°F] and partially vaporized. The heated stream 45a is thereafter supplied tostripper column 19 at a mid-column feed point, separated from the top feed point wherestream 44 enters the column by at least one theoretical stage. In this case, the partially vaporized stream flows to the same point on the column that was used for the upper side reboiler return (theoretical stage 8 in stripper tower 19) in the FIG. 1 process, which is the equivalent of seven theoretical stages lower than the liquid stream withdrawal point in the fractionation system (the top feed point wherestream 44 enters stripper column 19). - The liquid product (stream 43) exits the bottom of
tower 19 at 5°C [42°F]. This stream is pumped to approximately 3792 kPa(a) [550 psia] (stream 43a) inpump 20. The residue gas (stream 37) passes countercurrently to the incoming feed gas in: (a)heat exchanger 12 where it is heated to -73°C [-99°F] (stream 37a), (b)heat exchanger 10 where it is heated to 27°C [80°F] (stream 37b), and (c)heat exchanger 21 where it is heated to 40°C [105°F] (stream 37c). The residue gas is then re-compressed in two stages,compressor 15 driven byexpansion machine 14 andcompressor 22 driven by a supplemental power source. Afterstream 37e is cooled to 46°C [115°F] (stream 37f) by cooler 23 and to 30°C [86°F] byheat exchanger 21, the residue gas product (stream 37g) flows to the sales pipeline at 4351 kPa(a) [631 psia]. - A summary of stream flow rates and energy consumption for the process illustrated in FIG. 3 is set forth in the following table:
(FIG. 3) Stream Flow Summary - (kg-Moles/Hr) Stream Methane Ethane Propane Butanes+ C. Dioxide Total 31 55058 2367 628 281 478 59768 32 53838 2014 353 62 445 57663 35 1220 353 275 219 33 2105 33 10229 383 67 12 85 10956 34 43609 1631 286 50 360 46707 38 5400 2202 616 279 253 8768 44 2970 1211 339 153 139 4823 45 2430 991 277 126 114 3945 39 5352 164 6 0 71 5611 37 55010 329 18 2 296 56611 43 48 2038 610 279 182 3157 Stream Flow Summary - (Lb. Moles/Hr) Stream Methane Ethane Propane Butanes+ C. Dioxide Total 31 121383 5218 1384 619 1054 131766 32 118694 4440 779 136 982 127126 35 2689 778 605 483 72 4640 33 22552 844 148 26 187 24154 34 96142 3596 631 110 795 102972 38 11906 4855 1357 616 557 19330 44 6548 2670 746 339 306 10632 45 5358 2185 611 277 251 8698 39 11800 362 13 1 156 12370 37 121277 725 40 4 653 124806 43 106 4493 1344 615 401 6960 Recoveries Ethane 86.12% Propane 97.10% Butanes+ 99.41 % Power Residue Compression 33,128 kW [44,413 HP] - A comparison of Tables I and III shows that, compared to the prior art, the present embodiment improves ethane recovery from 84.89% to 86.12%, propane recovery from 96.90% to 97.10%, and butanes+ recovery from 99.33% to 99.41%. Comparison of Tables I and III further shows that the improvement in yields was achieved using equivalent horsepower (utility) requirements.
- By using the modified reboiler approach, the column liquid flowing to heat exchanger 10 (stream 45) is colder than the corresponding
stream 40 of the FIG. 1 process. This increases the cooling available to the inlet gas, because not only can considerably more duty be obtained from the liquids with this scheme, but the liquids are available at a colder temperature level than would be possible with a conventional reboiler scheme. The result is increased C2+ component and heavier hydrocarbon component recoveries for the FIG. 3 process while using essentially the same amount of residue gas compression horsepower as the prior art FIG. 1 process. - In those cases where the carbon dioxide content of the liquid product is an issue (due to more stringent product specifications imposed by the client as in the FIG. 2 prior art process described previously, for instance), the present invention offers very significant recovery and efficiency advantages over the prior art process depicted in FIG. 2. The operating conditions of the FIG. 3 process can be altered to reduce the carbon dioxide content in the liquid product of the present invention as illustrated in FIG. 4. The feed gas composition and conditions considered in the process presented in FIG. 4 are the same as those in FIGS. 1 and 2. Accordingly, the FIG. 4 process can be compared with that of the FIGS. 1 and 2 processes to illustrate the advantages of the present invention.
- In the simulation of the FIG. 4 process, the inlet gas cooling and separation scheme is essentially the same as that used in FIG. 3. The main difference is that the plant controls have been adjusted to increase the proportion of the liquids from the bottom of absorber tower 17 (stream 45) that are heated in
heat exchanger 10 and supplied tostripper tower 19 at a mid-column feed point. The plant controls have also been adjusted to raise the bottom temperature ofstripper column 19 slightly (from 5°C [42°F] in the FIG. 3 process to 7°C [45°F] in the FIG. 4 process) to maintain the methane to ethane ratio in the bottom product at the specified 0.0237:1 molar ratio. The increased quantity of heated stream 45a enteringstripper tower 19 and the higher bottoms temperature both increase the stripping inside the tower, which results in warmer temperatures for the FIG. 4 process relative to the FIG. 3 process throughout bothabsorber column 17 andstripper column 19, with the net effect of reducing the carbon dioxide content of the liquid product,stream 43, leavingstripper column 19. The warmer column temperatures also result in a slight reduction in the refrigeration that is available from the process streams to be applied to the column feed streams. In particular, this requires slightly reducing the proportion of the separator feed gas (stream 32) that is directed toheat exchanger 12 viastream 33, thereby reducing the quantity ofstream 36b entering at the top feed point ofabsorber tower 17. - A summary of stream flow rates and energy consumption for the process illustrated in FIG. 4 is set forth in the following table:
(FIG. 4) Stream Flow Summary - (kg-Moles/Hr) Stream Methane Ethane Propane Butanes+ C. Dioxide Total 31 55058 2367 628 281 478 59768 32 53801 2005 349 60 444 57610 35 1257 362 279 221 34 2158 33 9953 371 65 11 82 10658 34 43848 1634 284 49 362 46952 38 5190 2256 618 280 280 8642 44 2595 1128 309 140 140 4321 45 2595 1128 309 140 140 4321 39 5142 253 10 1 154 5578 37 55010 364 20 2 352 56704 43 48 2003 608 279 126 3064 Stream Flow Summary - (Lb. Moles/Hr) Stream Methane Ethane Propane Butanes+ C. Dioxide Total 31 121383 5218 1384 619 1054 131766 32 118612 4421 770 133 980 127009 35 2771 797 614 486 74 4757 33 21943 818 143 25 181 23497 34 96669 3603 627 108 799 103512 38 11442 4976 1362 616 616 19052 44 5721 2488 681 308 308 9527 45 5721 2488 681 308 308 9527 39 11337 561 21 1 338 12297 37 121278 803 43 4 776 125011 43 105 4415 1341 615 278 6755 Recoveries Ethane 84.61% Propane 96.96% Butanes+ 99.39% Power Residue Compression 33,247 kW [44,573 HP] - The carbon dioxide concentration in the ethane product for the FIG. 4 process is 5.80 mole percent, well below the specification required by the client. Comparison of the recovery levels displayed in Tables I and IV shows that the present invention allows achieving the required carbon dioxide content while maintaining almost the same liquids recovery efficiency as the FIG. 1 process. Although the ethane recovery decreases slightly from 84.89% to 84.61%, the propane recovery and the butanes+ recovery both increase slightly, from 96.90% to 96.96% and from 99.33% to 99.39%, respectively. Comparison of Tables I and IV further shows that maintaining the product yields was achieved using essentially the same horsepower (utility) requirements.
- Comparison of the recovery levels displayed in Tables II and IV shows that the present invention allows achieving much higher liquids recovery efficiency than the FIG. 2 process when it is operated in a fashion to limit the carbon dioxide content of its liquid product. Compared to the FIG. 2 process, the FIG. 4 process raises the ethane recovery from 68.94% to 84.61%, almost 15.7 percentage points higher. The propane recovery and the butanes+ recovery also increase somewhat, from 96.61% to 96.96% and from 99.25% to 99.39%, respectively. Comparison of Tables II and IV further shows that the higher the product yields were not simply the result of increasing the horsepower (utility) requirements. To the contrary, when the present invention is employed as in Example 2, not only do the ethane, propane, and butanes+ recoveries increase over those of the prior art process, but liquid recovery efficiency also increases by 23 percent (in terms of ethane recovered per unit of horsepower expended).
- As with the process of FIG. 3, a significant benefit achieved by the embodiment of FIG. 4 is that the modified reboiler scheme provides colder column liquids for use in refrigerating the incoming feed streams. This increases the cooling available to the inlet gas, as not only can considerably more duty be obtained from the liquid in this case, but at a colder temperature level. At the same time, more methane is introduced lower in
stripper column 19 than would otherwise be there when reboiling the column to meet the carbon dioxide content. (Note thatstream 45 in the FIG. 4 process contains 2595 kg-Moles/Hr [5721 Lb. Moles/Hr] of methane and is introduced attheoretical stage 8 ofstripper column 19, whereasstream 40 in the FIG. 2 process contains only 855 kg-Moles/Hr [1886 Lb. Moles/Hr] of methane and is introduced at the top of stripper column 19). The additional methane provided by the present invention in the FIG. 4 process helps to strip the carbon dioxide from the liquids flowing downward in the stripping column. The quantity of carbon dioxide in the NGL product can be adjusted by appropriate control of the quantity of liquid withdrawn to feed the modified reboiler system instead of feeding the top of the stripping column. - FIG. 5 is a flow diagram illustrating how the process and apparatus described and depicted in U.S. Pat. No. 5,568,737 can be adapted to be a natural gas processing plant in accordance with the present invention. FIGS. 6, 7, 8, and 9 are diagrams showing some of the alternative methods for implementing the modified reboiler scheme. FIG. 6 shows a typical thermosiphon type application wherein the partial flow of liquid from
fractionation tower 50 to reboiler 57 could be controlled viavalve 58 inliquid draw line 61. The liquid portion not withdrawn from the column simply overflowschimney tray 51 ontodistributor 52 for packing (or trays) 53 below. The heated stream in line 61a fromreboiler 57 is returned tofractionation tower 50 at a lower point which contains an appropriate feed distribution mechanism, such aschimney tray 54 anddistributor 55, to mix the heated stream with the down-flowing tower liquids from packing 53 and supply the mixture to packing (or trays) 56. FIGS. 7 and 8 show typical pumped adaptations wherein the total liquid down-flow is withdrawn inliquid draw line 61 and pumped to higher pressure bypump 60. The flow of the pumped liquid in line 61a is then divided viaappropriate control valves line 62 flowing toreboiler 57. The heated stream inline 62a fromreboiler 57 is returned tofractionation tower 50 at a lower point as described previously for the FIG. 6 embodiment. In the FIG. 7 embodiment, the liquid that does not flow to the reboiler (in line 63) is returned tochimney tray 51 from which the liquid was initially withdrawn, whereupon it can overflowchimney tray 51 ontodistributor 52 for packing (or trays) 53 below. In the FIG. 8 embodiment, the liquid that does not flow to the reboiler (in line 63) is returned belowchimney tray 51 from which the liquid was initially withdrawn, directly todistributor 52 that supplies the liquid to packing (or trays) 53 below. FIG. 9 shows how the pumped system described for FIG. 8 can be implemented in a split column approach, such asupper column 65 andlower column 50, which is the same as that used in FIGS. 3 and 4. - One skilled in the art will recognize that the present invention gains some of its benefit by providing a colder stream to the side reboiler(s) and/or reboiler(s), allowing additional cooling of the column feed or feeds. This additional cooling reduces utility requirements for a given product recovery level, or improves product recovery levels for a given utility consumption, or some combination thereof. Further, one skilled in the art will recognize that the present invention also benefits by introducing greater quantities of methane lower in the demethanizer to assist in stripping carbon dioxide from the down-flowing liquids. With more methane available for stripping the liquids, correspondingly less ethane is needed for stripping, allowing more retention of ethane in the bottom liquid product. Therefore, the present invention is generally applicable to any process dependent on cooling any number of feed streams and supplying the resulting feed stream(s) to the column for distillation.
- In accordance with this invention, the cooling of the demethanizer feed streams may be accomplished in many ways. In the process of FIGS. 3 and 4, feed
stream 36 is cooled and substantially condensed by the demethanizeroverhead vapor stream 37, while the demethanizer liquids (streams residue feed stream 48 is also cooled and substantially condensed by portions of the distillation column overhead vapor stream (streams 46 and 37), while the demethanizer liquids (streams 40 and 42) are used only for gas stream cooling. However, demethanizer liquids could be used to supply some or all of the cooling and substantial condensation ofstream 36 in FIGS. 3 through 5 and/orstream 48 in FIG. 5 in addition to or instead of gas stream cooling. Further, any stream at a temperature colder than the feed stream being cooled may be utilized. For instance, a side draw of vapor from the demethanizer could be withdrawn and used for cooling. Other potential sources of cooling include, but are not limited to, flashed high pressure separator liquids and mechanical refrigeration systems. The selection of a source of cooling will depend on a number of factors including, but not limited to, inlet gas composition and conditions, plant size, heat exchanger size, potential cooling source temperature, etc. One skilled in the art will also recognize that any combination of the above cooling sources or methods of cooling may be employed in combination to achieve the desired feed stream temperature(s). - In accordance with this invention, the use of external refrigeration to supplement the cooling available to the inlet gas from other process streams may be employed, particularly in the case of an inlet gas richer than that used in Examples 1 and 2. The use and distribution of demethanizer liquids for process heat exchange, and the particular arrangement of heat exchangers for inlet gas cooling must be evaluated for each particular application, as well as the choice of process streams for specific heat exchange services.
- The high pressure liquid in FIGS. 3 through 5 (stream 35) need not all be combined with the portion of the separator vapor (stream 33) flowing to
heat exchanger 12. Alternatively, this liquid stream (or a portion thereof) may be expanded through an appropriate expansion device, such asexpansion valve 16, and fed to a lower mid-column feed point on the distillation column (absorber tower 17 orstripper tower 19 in FIGS. 3 and 4,fractionation tower 17 in FIG. 5). The liquid stream may also be used for inlet gas cooling or other heat exchange service before or after the expansion step prior to flowing to the demethanizer. - It will also be recognized that the relative amount of feed found in each branch of the column feed streams will depend on several factors, including gas pressure, feed gas composition, the amount of heat which can economically be extracted from the feed and the quantity of horsepower available. More feed to the top of the column may increase recovery while decreasing power recovered from the expansion machine thereby increasing the recompression horsepower requirements. Increasing feed lower in the column reduces the horsepower consumption but may also reduce product recovery. The mid-column feed positions depicted in FIGS. 3 and 4 are the preferred feed locations for the process operating conditions described. However, the relative locations of the mid-column feeds may vary depending on inlet composition or other factors such as desired recovery levels and amount of liquid formed during inlet gas cooling. Moreover, two or more of the feed streams, or portions thereof, may be combined depending on the relative temperatures and quantities of individual streams, and the combined stream then fed to a mid-column feed position. FIGS. 3 and 4 are the preferred embodiment for the compositions and pressure conditions shown. Although individual stream expansion is depicted in particular expansion devices, alternative expansion means may be employed where appropriate. For example, conditions may warrant work expansion of the substantially condensed portion of the feed stream (36a in FIGS. 3 through 5) or the substantially condensed recycle stream (48b in FIG. 5).
- FIGS. 3 and 4 depict a fractionation tower constructed in two sections (17 and 19) because of the size of the plant. The decision whether to construct the fractionation tower as a single vessel (such as 17 in FIG. 5) or multiple vessels will depend on a number of factors such as plant size, the distance to fabrication facilities, etc.
Claims (6)
- A process for the separation of a gas stream (31) containing methane, C2 components, C3 components, heavier hydrocarbon components and carbon dioxide into a volatile residue gas fraction (37) containing a major portion of said methane and a relatively less volatile fraction (43) containing a major portion of said C2 components, C3 components and heavier hydrocarbon components, which process comprises:producing at least a first feed stream (36, 48) either by treating the gas stream (31) in one or more heat exchange steps (10) or by recompressing (15,22) the volatile residue gas fraction (37) and withdrawing a portion (48) thereof, and cooling the first feed stream under pressure to condense substantially all of it;expanding the substantially condensed first feed stream to a lower pressure whereby it is further cooled, and thereafter supplying the expanded stream (36b, 48c) to a fractionation tower (17) at a top feed point;treating the gas stream (31) in one or more heat exchange steps (10) to produce at least a second feed stream (34) that has been cooled under pressure;expanding (14) said second feed stream to a lower pressure whereby it is further cooled, and thereafter supplying said expanded stream (34a) to said fractionation tower at a mid-column feed point;withdrawing a liquid distillation stream (45, 40) from said fractionation tower at a withdrawal point on said fractionation tower, heating (10) said stream and returning said heated distillation stream (45a, 40a) to a lower point on said fractionation tower; andsupplying said feed streams (36b or 48c, 34a) to said fractionation tower in quantities and at temperatures and maintaining the overhead temperature of said fractionation tower at a value such that the major portions of the C2 components, C3 components and heavier hydrocarbon components of said feed gas are recovered in said relatively less volatile fraction (43); characterized by reducing the carbon dioxide in said relatively less volatile fraction by (a) increasing the quantity of said heated distillation stream (45a) returning to the fractionation tower and (b) arranging the lower point at which the heated distillation stream is returned separated from the withdrawal point by at least one theoretical stage, said withdrawal point and said lower point not being at adjacent theoretical stages, whereby the heated distillation stream (45a) is relatively methane-rich and maintains the recovery efficiency of said C2 components, C3 components and heavier hydrocarbon components almost the same.
- The process of claim 1, wherein more than 84% of the C2 components are recovered in the relatively less volatile fraction.
- The process of claim 1 or 2, wherein said liquid distillation stream (38) is pumped (18) after being withdrawn from said fractionation tower (17).
- The process of claim 3, wherein: said pumped liquid distillation stream (38a) is divided into at least a first portion (45) and a second portion (44); said first portion (45) is heated; and said heated first portion (45a) is returned to a lower point on said fractionation tower (17, 19), the lower point at which the heated distillation stream is returned being separated from the withdrawal point by at least one theoretical stage, said withdrawal point and said lower point not being at adjacent theoretical stages.
- The process of any preceding claim wherein said liquid distillation stream (45,40) is directed in heat exchange relation with at least a portion of said gas stream (31) or said feed streams (36, 48, 34), to supply said cooling thereto and thereby heat said liquid distillation stream.
- The process of any preceding claim, wherein said gas stream (31) is treated in one or more heat exchange steps and divided to produce the first and second feed streams (36,34).
Applications Claiming Priority (5)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11050298P | 1998-12-01 | 1998-12-01 | |
US110502P | 1998-12-01 | ||
US09/439,508 US6182469B1 (en) | 1998-12-01 | 1999-11-12 | Hydrocarbon gas processing |
US439508 | 1999-11-12 | ||
PCT/US1999/028023 WO2000033006A1 (en) | 1998-12-01 | 1999-11-24 | Hydrocarbon gas processing |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1137903A1 EP1137903A1 (en) | 2001-10-04 |
EP1137903B1 true EP1137903B1 (en) | 2005-05-11 |
Family
ID=26808081
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP99963989A Expired - Lifetime EP1137903B1 (en) | 1998-12-01 | 1999-11-24 | Hydrocarbon gas processing |
Country Status (20)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US6182469B1 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1137903B1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN1154830C (en) |
AR (1) | AR023066A1 (en) |
AT (1) | ATE295519T1 (en) |
AU (1) | AU751881B2 (en) |
BR (1) | BR9915807A (en) |
CA (1) | CA2351423C (en) |
CO (1) | CO5100991A1 (en) |
DE (1) | DE69925306D1 (en) |
EA (1) | EA003854B1 (en) |
EG (1) | EG22416A (en) |
ID (1) | ID29883A (en) |
MY (1) | MY125613A (en) |
NO (1) | NO322415B1 (en) |
PE (1) | PE20001473A1 (en) |
SA (1) | SA00201021B1 (en) |
TW (1) | TW512142B (en) |
UA (1) | UA46176C2 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2000033006A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (124)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6278035B1 (en) * | 2000-03-17 | 2001-08-21 | Ronald D. Key | Process for C2 recovery |
WO2002014763A1 (en) * | 2000-08-11 | 2002-02-21 | Fluor Corporation | High propane recovery process and configurations |
WO2002029341A2 (en) * | 2000-10-02 | 2002-04-11 | Elcor Corporation | Hydrocarbon gas processing |
US6367286B1 (en) * | 2000-11-01 | 2002-04-09 | Black & Veatch Pritchard, Inc. | System and process for liquefying high pressure natural gas |
US6712880B2 (en) | 2001-03-01 | 2004-03-30 | Abb Lummus Global, Inc. | Cryogenic process utilizing high pressure absorber column |
US6526777B1 (en) | 2001-04-20 | 2003-03-04 | Elcor Corporation | LNG production in cryogenic natural gas processing plants |
UA76750C2 (en) * | 2001-06-08 | 2006-09-15 | Елккорп | Method for liquefying natural gas (versions) |
US6742358B2 (en) | 2001-06-08 | 2004-06-01 | Elkcorp | Natural gas liquefaction |
US6516631B1 (en) | 2001-08-10 | 2003-02-11 | Mark A. Trebble | Hydrocarbon gas processing |
FR2831656B1 (en) * | 2001-10-31 | 2004-04-30 | Technip Cie | METHOD AND PLANT FOR SEPARATING A GAS CONTAINING METHANE AND ETHANE WITH TWO COLUMNS OPERATING UNDER TWO DIFFERENT PRESSURES |
US7051552B2 (en) * | 2001-11-09 | 2006-05-30 | Floor Technologies Corporation | Configurations and methods for improved NGL recovery |
US6823692B1 (en) | 2002-02-11 | 2004-11-30 | Abb Lummus Global Inc. | Carbon dioxide reduction scheme for NGL processes |
US6941771B2 (en) * | 2002-04-03 | 2005-09-13 | Howe-Baker Engineers, Ltd. | Liquid natural gas processing |
ATE365897T1 (en) * | 2002-05-08 | 2007-07-15 | Fluor Corp | CONFIGURATION AND METHOD FOR OBTAINING LIQUID NATURAL GAS USING A SUPERCOOLED REFLUX PROCESS |
EA007771B1 (en) * | 2002-05-20 | 2007-02-27 | Флуор Корпорейшн | Ngl recovery plant and method for operating thereof |
AU2002326688B2 (en) * | 2002-08-15 | 2007-02-15 | Fluor Technologies Corporation | Low pressure NGL plant configurations |
US6945075B2 (en) * | 2002-10-23 | 2005-09-20 | Elkcorp | Natural gas liquefaction |
US7069744B2 (en) * | 2002-12-19 | 2006-07-04 | Abb Lummus Global Inc. | Lean reflux-high hydrocarbon recovery process |
US7484385B2 (en) * | 2003-01-16 | 2009-02-03 | Lummus Technology Inc. | Multiple reflux stream hydrocarbon recovery process |
BRPI0407806A (en) * | 2003-02-25 | 2006-02-14 | Ortloff Engineers Ltd | hydrocarbon gas processing |
US6889523B2 (en) | 2003-03-07 | 2005-05-10 | Elkcorp | LNG production in cryogenic natural gas processing plants |
US7107788B2 (en) * | 2003-03-07 | 2006-09-19 | Abb Lummus Global, Randall Gas Technologies | Residue recycle-high ethane recovery process |
US7155931B2 (en) * | 2003-09-30 | 2007-01-02 | Ortloff Engineers, Ltd. | Liquefied natural gas processing |
CN100565061C (en) * | 2003-10-30 | 2009-12-02 | 弗劳尔科技公司 | Flexible NGL process and method |
US7159417B2 (en) * | 2004-03-18 | 2007-01-09 | Abb Lummus Global, Inc. | Hydrocarbon recovery process utilizing enhanced reflux streams |
US7204100B2 (en) * | 2004-05-04 | 2007-04-17 | Ortloff Engineers, Ltd. | Natural gas liquefaction |
EP1771694A1 (en) * | 2004-07-01 | 2007-04-11 | Ortloff Engineers, Ltd | Liquefied natural gas processing |
RU2272973C1 (en) * | 2004-09-24 | 2006-03-27 | Салават Зайнетдинович Имаев | Method of low-temperature gas separation |
US20060130520A1 (en) * | 2004-12-17 | 2006-06-22 | Abb Lummus Global Inc. | Method for recovery of natural gas liquids for liquefied natural gas |
US20060130521A1 (en) * | 2004-12-17 | 2006-06-22 | Abb Lummus Global Inc. | Method for recovery of natural gas liquids for liquefied natural gas |
DE602006016740D1 (en) * | 2005-02-24 | 2010-10-21 | Twister Bv | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR COOLING A NATURAL GAS FLOW AND SEPARATING THE COOLED ELECTRICITY IN DIFFERENT PARTS |
US9080810B2 (en) * | 2005-06-20 | 2015-07-14 | Ortloff Engineers, Ltd. | Hydrocarbon gas processing |
US20100011810A1 (en) * | 2005-07-07 | 2010-01-21 | Fluor Technologies Corporation | NGL Recovery Methods and Configurations |
US9726425B2 (en) * | 2006-04-12 | 2017-08-08 | Shell Oil Company | Method and apparatus for liquefying a natural gas stream |
KR101407771B1 (en) * | 2006-06-02 | 2014-06-16 | 오르트로프 엔지니어스, 리미티드 | Liquefied natural gas processing |
CN101479549B (en) * | 2006-06-27 | 2011-08-10 | 氟石科技公司 | Ethane recovery methods and configurations |
US8677780B2 (en) * | 2006-07-10 | 2014-03-25 | Fluor Technologies Corporation | Configurations and methods for rich gas conditioning for NGL recovery |
EP2076726A2 (en) * | 2006-10-24 | 2009-07-08 | Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V. | Method and apparatus for treating a hydrocarbon stream |
US7777088B2 (en) * | 2007-01-10 | 2010-08-17 | Pilot Energy Solutions, Llc | Carbon dioxide fractionalization process |
US8590340B2 (en) * | 2007-02-09 | 2013-11-26 | Ortoff Engineers, Ltd. | Hydrocarbon gas processing |
US9869510B2 (en) * | 2007-05-17 | 2018-01-16 | Ortloff Engineers, Ltd. | Liquefied natural gas processing |
US8919148B2 (en) * | 2007-10-18 | 2014-12-30 | Ortloff Engineers, Ltd. | Hydrocarbon gas processing |
US9243842B2 (en) | 2008-02-15 | 2016-01-26 | Black & Veatch Corporation | Combined synthesis gas separation and LNG production method and system |
US8973398B2 (en) | 2008-02-27 | 2015-03-10 | Kellogg Brown & Root Llc | Apparatus and method for regasification of liquefied natural gas |
US8640494B2 (en) * | 2008-05-15 | 2014-02-04 | Jose Lourenco | Method to produce natural gas liquids NGLs at gas Pressure Reduction Stations |
US20090282865A1 (en) | 2008-05-16 | 2009-11-19 | Ortloff Engineers, Ltd. | Liquefied Natural Gas and Hydrocarbon Gas Processing |
US20090293537A1 (en) * | 2008-05-27 | 2009-12-03 | Ameringer Greg E | NGL Extraction From Natural Gas |
EP2297377B1 (en) * | 2008-05-30 | 2017-12-27 | Colorado State University Research Foundation | Plasma-based chemical source device and method of use thereof |
WO2011123124A1 (en) | 2010-03-31 | 2011-10-06 | Colorado State University Research Foundation | Liquid-gas interface plasma device |
US8994270B2 (en) | 2008-05-30 | 2015-03-31 | Colorado State University Research Foundation | System and methods for plasma application |
US8575843B2 (en) * | 2008-05-30 | 2013-11-05 | Colorado State University Research Foundation | System, method and apparatus for generating plasma |
CN101290184B (en) * | 2008-06-05 | 2010-10-13 | 北京国能时代能源科技发展有限公司 | Chemical industry tail gas liquefied separation method and equipment |
US8381544B2 (en) * | 2008-07-18 | 2013-02-26 | Kellogg Brown & Root Llc | Method for liquefaction of natural gas |
US8584488B2 (en) * | 2008-08-06 | 2013-11-19 | Ortloff Engineers, Ltd. | Liquefied natural gas production |
WO2010027986A1 (en) * | 2008-09-03 | 2010-03-11 | Ameringer Greg E | Ngl extraction from liquefied natural gas |
EP2350546A1 (en) * | 2008-10-07 | 2011-08-03 | Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company | Helium recovery from natural gas integrated with ngl recovery |
EP2364413B1 (en) * | 2008-11-10 | 2016-06-15 | 1304338 Alberta Ltd | Method to increase gas mass flow injection rates to gas storage caverns using lng |
US9939195B2 (en) * | 2009-02-17 | 2018-04-10 | Ortloff Engineers, Ltd. | Hydrocarbon gas processing including a single equipment item processing assembly |
US9052136B2 (en) * | 2010-03-31 | 2015-06-09 | Ortloff Engineers, Ltd. | Hydrocarbon gas processing |
US9052137B2 (en) | 2009-02-17 | 2015-06-09 | Ortloff Engineers, Ltd. | Hydrocarbon gas processing |
US9939196B2 (en) * | 2009-02-17 | 2018-04-10 | Ortloff Engineers, Ltd. | Hydrocarbon gas processing including a single equipment item processing assembly |
US9074814B2 (en) * | 2010-03-31 | 2015-07-07 | Ortloff Engineers, Ltd. | Hydrocarbon gas processing |
WO2010096223A1 (en) * | 2009-02-17 | 2010-08-26 | Ortloff Engineers, Ltd. | Hydrocarbon gas processing |
US8881549B2 (en) * | 2009-02-17 | 2014-11-11 | Ortloff Engineers, Ltd. | Hydrocarbon gas processing |
US9080811B2 (en) * | 2009-02-17 | 2015-07-14 | Ortloff Engineers, Ltd | Hydrocarbon gas processing |
US9933207B2 (en) * | 2009-02-17 | 2018-04-03 | Ortloff Engineers, Ltd. | Hydrocarbon gas processing |
US8434325B2 (en) | 2009-05-15 | 2013-05-07 | Ortloff Engineers, Ltd. | Liquefied natural gas and hydrocarbon gas processing |
US20100287982A1 (en) * | 2009-05-15 | 2010-11-18 | Ortloff Engineers, Ltd. | Liquefied Natural Gas and Hydrocarbon Gas Processing |
US20110067441A1 (en) * | 2009-09-21 | 2011-03-24 | Ortloff Engineers, Ltd. | Hydrocarbon Gas Processing |
US8222822B2 (en) | 2009-10-27 | 2012-07-17 | Tyco Healthcare Group Lp | Inductively-coupled plasma device |
US9021832B2 (en) | 2010-01-14 | 2015-05-05 | Ortloff Engineers, Ltd. | Hydrocarbon gas processing |
US9068774B2 (en) * | 2010-03-31 | 2015-06-30 | Ortloff Engineers, Ltd. | Hydrocarbon gas processing |
US9057558B2 (en) * | 2010-03-31 | 2015-06-16 | Ortloff Engineers, Ltd. | Hydrocarbon gas processing including a single equipment item processing assembly |
EA026653B1 (en) | 2010-03-25 | 2017-05-31 | Дзе Юниверсити Оф Манчестер | Refrigeration process |
EP2552340A4 (en) | 2010-03-31 | 2015-10-14 | Univ Colorado State Res Found | Liquid-gas interface plasma device |
US10113127B2 (en) | 2010-04-16 | 2018-10-30 | Black & Veatch Holding Company | Process for separating nitrogen from a natural gas stream with nitrogen stripping in the production of liquefied natural gas |
US8667812B2 (en) * | 2010-06-03 | 2014-03-11 | Ordoff Engineers, Ltd. | Hydrocabon gas processing |
CA2819128C (en) | 2010-12-01 | 2018-11-13 | Black & Veatch Corporation | Ngl recovery from natural gas using a mixed refrigerant |
US10451344B2 (en) | 2010-12-23 | 2019-10-22 | Fluor Technologies Corporation | Ethane recovery and ethane rejection methods and configurations |
CA2728716C (en) * | 2011-01-18 | 2017-12-05 | Jose Lourenco | Method of recovery of natural gas liquids from natural gas at ngls recovery plants |
US10852060B2 (en) | 2011-04-08 | 2020-12-01 | Pilot Energy Solutions, Llc | Single-unit gas separation process having expanded, post-separation vent stream |
CA2763081C (en) * | 2011-12-20 | 2019-08-13 | Jose Lourenco | Method to produce liquefied natural gas (lng) at midstream natural gas liquids (ngls) recovery plants. |
US9683776B2 (en) * | 2012-02-16 | 2017-06-20 | Kellogg Brown & Root Llc | Systems and methods for separating hydrocarbons using one or more dividing wall columns |
US10139157B2 (en) | 2012-02-22 | 2018-11-27 | Black & Veatch Holding Company | NGL recovery from natural gas using a mixed refrigerant |
CA2772479C (en) | 2012-03-21 | 2020-01-07 | Mackenzie Millar | Temperature controlled method to liquefy gas and a production plant using the method. |
CA2790961C (en) | 2012-05-11 | 2019-09-03 | Jose Lourenco | A method to recover lpg and condensates from refineries fuel gas streams. |
CA2787746C (en) | 2012-08-27 | 2019-08-13 | Mackenzie Millar | Method of producing and distributing liquid natural gas |
JP6289471B2 (en) * | 2012-08-30 | 2018-03-07 | フルーア・テクノロジーズ・コーポレイション | Configuration and method for offshore NGL recovery |
CA2798057C (en) | 2012-12-04 | 2019-11-26 | Mackenzie Millar | A method to produce lng at gas pressure letdown stations in natural gas transmission pipeline systems |
DE102013200572A1 (en) * | 2013-01-16 | 2014-07-17 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Liquefied natural gas regasification apparatus and related method |
US9532826B2 (en) | 2013-03-06 | 2017-01-03 | Covidien Lp | System and method for sinus surgery |
US9555145B2 (en) | 2013-03-13 | 2017-01-31 | Covidien Lp | System and method for biofilm remediation |
CA2813260C (en) | 2013-04-15 | 2021-07-06 | Mackenzie Millar | A method to produce lng |
US9581385B2 (en) | 2013-05-15 | 2017-02-28 | Linde Engineering North America Inc. | Methods for separating hydrocarbon gases |
US20140366577A1 (en) | 2013-06-18 | 2014-12-18 | Pioneer Energy Inc. | Systems and methods for separating alkane gases with applications to raw natural gas processing and flare gas capture |
MX2016003093A (en) | 2013-09-11 | 2016-05-26 | Ortloff Engineers Ltd | Hydrocarbon gas processing. |
CA2923447C (en) | 2013-09-11 | 2022-05-31 | Ortloff Engineers, Ltd. | Hydrocarbon processing |
EP3044528A1 (en) | 2013-09-11 | 2016-07-20 | Ortloff Engineers, Ltd | Hydrocarbon gas processing |
US10563913B2 (en) | 2013-11-15 | 2020-02-18 | Black & Veatch Holding Company | Systems and methods for hydrocarbon refrigeration with a mixed refrigerant cycle |
US9574822B2 (en) | 2014-03-17 | 2017-02-21 | Black & Veatch Corporation | Liquefied natural gas facility employing an optimized mixed refrigerant system |
WO2015158395A1 (en) * | 2014-04-17 | 2015-10-22 | Statoil Petroleum As | Extraction of natural gas liquids and cooling of treated recompressed gas |
CA2958091C (en) * | 2014-08-15 | 2021-05-18 | 1304338 Alberta Ltd. | A method of removing carbon dioxide during liquid natural gas production from natural gas at gas pressure letdown stations |
CA2976071C (en) * | 2015-02-09 | 2020-10-27 | Fluor Technologies Corporation | Methods and configuration of an ngl recovery process for low pressure rich feed gas |
RU2585333C1 (en) * | 2015-04-20 | 2016-05-27 | Андрей Владиславович Курочкин | Method for preparation of associated petroleum gas |
RU2576704C1 (en) * | 2015-04-20 | 2016-03-10 | Андрей Владиславович Курочкин | Method for preparation of hydrocarbon gas |
WO2017045055A1 (en) | 2015-09-16 | 2017-03-23 | 1304342 Alberta Ltd. | A method of preparing natural gas at a gas pressure reduction stations to produce liquid natural gas (lng) |
US10006701B2 (en) | 2016-01-05 | 2018-06-26 | Fluor Technologies Corporation | Ethane recovery or ethane rejection operation |
DE102016003305A1 (en) * | 2016-03-17 | 2017-09-21 | Linde Aktiengesellschaft | Process for separating an ethane-rich fraction from natural gas |
US10330382B2 (en) | 2016-05-18 | 2019-06-25 | Fluor Technologies Corporation | Systems and methods for LNG production with propane and ethane recovery |
US10551119B2 (en) | 2016-08-26 | 2020-02-04 | Ortloff Engineers, Ltd. | Hydrocarbon gas processing |
US10551118B2 (en) | 2016-08-26 | 2020-02-04 | Ortloff Engineers, Ltd. | Hydrocarbon gas processing |
US10533794B2 (en) | 2016-08-26 | 2020-01-14 | Ortloff Engineers, Ltd. | Hydrocarbon gas processing |
WO2018049128A1 (en) | 2016-09-09 | 2018-03-15 | Fluor Technologies Corporation | Methods and configuration for retrofitting ngl plant for high ethane recovery |
US11543180B2 (en) | 2017-06-01 | 2023-01-03 | Uop Llc | Hydrocarbon gas processing |
US11428465B2 (en) | 2017-06-01 | 2022-08-30 | Uop Llc | Hydrocarbon gas processing |
US11015865B2 (en) | 2018-08-27 | 2021-05-25 | Bcck Holding Company | System and method for natural gas liquid production with flexible ethane recovery or rejection |
MY195957A (en) | 2019-03-11 | 2023-02-27 | Uop Llc | Hydrocarbon Gas Processing |
CN110118468B (en) * | 2019-05-10 | 2020-02-11 | 西南石油大学 | Ethane recovery method with self-cooling circulation and suitable for rich gas |
EP3771872A1 (en) * | 2019-08-02 | 2021-02-03 | Linde GmbH | Method and system for providing a natural gas product |
US11643604B2 (en) * | 2019-10-18 | 2023-05-09 | Uop Llc | Hydrocarbon gas processing |
WO2022005270A1 (en) * | 2020-07-01 | 2022-01-06 | Drl Engineering Sdn Bhd | Split deethaniser fractionation |
CN112452095B (en) * | 2020-11-10 | 2022-11-08 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Improved tail gas rectification method |
FR3127558A1 (en) * | 2022-07-29 | 2023-03-31 | L'air Liquide, Societe Anonyme Pour L'etude Et L'exploitation Des Procedes Georges Claude | Method and apparatus for the low temperature separation of a CO2-containing gas to produce a CO2-rich fluid |
WO2023222637A1 (en) * | 2022-05-18 | 2023-11-23 | L'air Liquide, Societe Anonyme Pour L'etude Et L'exploitation Des Procedes Georges Claude | Method and apparatus for low-temperature separation of a gas containing co2 to produce a co2-rich fluid |
Family Cites Families (25)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4171964A (en) | 1976-06-21 | 1979-10-23 | The Ortloff Corporation | Hydrocarbon gas processing |
US4157904A (en) | 1976-08-09 | 1979-06-12 | The Ortloff Corporation | Hydrocarbon gas processing |
US4251249A (en) | 1977-01-19 | 1981-02-17 | The Randall Corporation | Low temperature process for separating propane and heavier hydrocarbons from a natural gas stream |
US4185978A (en) | 1977-03-01 | 1980-01-29 | Standard Oil Company (Indiana) | Method for cryogenic separation of carbon dioxide from hydrocarbons |
US4278457A (en) | 1977-07-14 | 1981-07-14 | Ortloff Corporation | Hydrocarbon gas processing |
USRE33408E (en) | 1983-09-29 | 1990-10-30 | Exxon Production Research Company | Process for LPG recovery |
US4519824A (en) | 1983-11-07 | 1985-05-28 | The Randall Corporation | Hydrocarbon gas separation |
FR2571129B1 (en) | 1984-09-28 | 1988-01-29 | Technip Cie | PROCESS AND PLANT FOR CRYOGENIC FRACTIONATION OF GASEOUS LOADS |
US4617039A (en) | 1984-11-19 | 1986-10-14 | Pro-Quip Corporation | Separating hydrocarbon gases |
FR2578637B1 (en) | 1985-03-05 | 1987-06-26 | Technip Cie | PROCESS FOR FRACTIONATION OF GASEOUS LOADS AND INSTALLATION FOR CARRYING OUT THIS PROCESS |
US4687499A (en) | 1986-04-01 | 1987-08-18 | Mcdermott International Inc. | Process for separating hydrocarbon gas constituents |
US4710214A (en) * | 1986-12-19 | 1987-12-01 | The M. W. Kellogg Company | Process for separation of hydrocarbon gases |
US4869740A (en) | 1988-05-17 | 1989-09-26 | Elcor Corporation | Hydrocarbon gas processing |
US4854955A (en) | 1988-05-17 | 1989-08-08 | Elcor Corporation | Hydrocarbon gas processing |
US4889545A (en) | 1988-11-21 | 1989-12-26 | Elcor Corporation | Hydrocarbon gas processing |
US4895584A (en) * | 1989-01-12 | 1990-01-23 | Pro-Quip Corporation | Process for C2 recovery |
US5275005A (en) | 1992-12-01 | 1994-01-04 | Elcor Corporation | Gas processing |
US5568737A (en) | 1994-11-10 | 1996-10-29 | Elcor Corporation | Hydrocarbon gas processing |
US5566554A (en) * | 1995-06-07 | 1996-10-22 | Kti Fish, Inc. | Hydrocarbon gas separation process |
US5555748A (en) | 1995-06-07 | 1996-09-17 | Elcor Corporation | Hydrocarbon gas processing |
BR9609099A (en) | 1995-06-07 | 1999-02-02 | Elcor Corp | Process and device for separating a gas stream |
US5799507A (en) | 1996-10-25 | 1998-09-01 | Elcor Corporation | Hydrocarbon gas processing |
US5983664A (en) | 1997-04-09 | 1999-11-16 | Elcor Corporation | Hydrocarbon gas processing |
US5890378A (en) | 1997-04-21 | 1999-04-06 | Elcor Corporation | Hydrocarbon gas processing |
US5881569A (en) | 1997-05-07 | 1999-03-16 | Elcor Corporation | Hydrocarbon gas processing |
-
1999
- 1999-11-12 US US09/439,508 patent/US6182469B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1999-11-24 DE DE69925306T patent/DE69925306D1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1999-11-24 UA UA2001064042A patent/UA46176C2/en unknown
- 1999-11-24 ID IDW00200101194A patent/ID29883A/en unknown
- 1999-11-24 CA CA002351423A patent/CA2351423C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1999-11-24 CN CNB998139645A patent/CN1154830C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1999-11-24 WO PCT/US1999/028023 patent/WO2000033006A1/en active IP Right Grant
- 1999-11-24 BR BR9915807-8A patent/BR9915807A/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1999-11-24 AT AT99963989T patent/ATE295519T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1999-11-24 AU AU20316/00A patent/AU751881B2/en not_active Ceased
- 1999-11-24 EA EA200100598A patent/EA003854B1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1999-11-24 EP EP99963989A patent/EP1137903B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1999-11-29 EG EG151699A patent/EG22416A/en active
- 1999-11-29 PE PE1999001192A patent/PE20001473A1/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 1999-11-30 CO CO99075238A patent/CO5100991A1/en unknown
- 1999-12-01 AR ARP990106118A patent/AR023066A1/en active IP Right Grant
- 1999-12-03 MY MYPI99005203A patent/MY125613A/en unknown
-
2000
- 2000-01-11 TW TW088121022A patent/TW512142B/en active
- 2000-03-05 SA SA00201021A patent/SA00201021B1/en unknown
-
2001
- 2001-05-31 NO NO20012672A patent/NO322415B1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
NO20012672D0 (en) | 2001-05-31 |
BR9915807A (en) | 2001-08-21 |
CN1329709A (en) | 2002-01-02 |
CN1154830C (en) | 2004-06-23 |
AU751881B2 (en) | 2002-08-29 |
CO5100991A1 (en) | 2001-11-27 |
ID29883A (en) | 2001-10-18 |
PE20001473A1 (en) | 2000-12-25 |
ATE295519T1 (en) | 2005-05-15 |
EA003854B1 (en) | 2003-10-30 |
UA46176C2 (en) | 2002-05-15 |
US6182469B1 (en) | 2001-02-06 |
WO2000033006A1 (en) | 2000-06-08 |
AU2031600A (en) | 2000-06-19 |
SA00201021B1 (en) | 2006-05-28 |
EA200100598A1 (en) | 2001-12-24 |
NO322415B1 (en) | 2006-10-02 |
EG22416A (en) | 2003-01-29 |
TW512142B (en) | 2002-12-01 |
CA2351423A1 (en) | 2000-06-08 |
AR023066A1 (en) | 2002-09-04 |
CA2351423C (en) | 2004-05-11 |
DE69925306D1 (en) | 2005-06-16 |
EP1137903A1 (en) | 2001-10-04 |
NO20012672L (en) | 2001-07-18 |
MY125613A (en) | 2006-08-30 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP1137903B1 (en) | Hydrocarbon gas processing | |
US6915662B2 (en) | Hydrocarbon gas processing | |
US8919148B2 (en) | Hydrocarbon gas processing | |
US4869740A (en) | Hydrocarbon gas processing | |
US7191617B2 (en) | Hydrocarbon gas processing | |
AU688179B2 (en) | Hydrocarbon gas processing | |
US5799507A (en) | Hydrocarbon gas processing | |
US5983664A (en) | Hydrocarbon gas processing | |
US5881569A (en) | Hydrocarbon gas processing | |
US5890377A (en) | Hydrocarbon gas separation process | |
AU2001294914A1 (en) | Hydrocarbon gas processing | |
US5771712A (en) | Hydrocarbon gas processing | |
US5890378A (en) | Hydrocarbon gas processing | |
US20110067441A1 (en) | Hydrocarbon Gas Processing | |
US11906244B2 (en) | Hydrocarbon gas processing | |
MXPA01005440A (en) | Hydrocarbon gas processing |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20010521 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Free format text: AL PAYMENT 20010521;LT PAYMENT 20010521;LV PAYMENT 20010521;MK PAYMENT 20010521;RO PAYMENT 20010521;SI PAYMENT 20010521 |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20021113 |
|
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: ELKCORP |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL LT LV MK RO SI |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20050511 Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED. Effective date: 20050511 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20050511 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20050511 Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20050511 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20050511 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 69925306 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20050616 Kind code of ref document: P |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20050811 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20050811 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20050811 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20050812 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20050822 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20051019 |
|
LTIE | Lt: invalidation of european patent or patent extension |
Effective date: 20050511 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20051124 Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20051124 Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20051124 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20051130 Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20051130 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20060214 |
|
EN | Fr: translation not filed | ||
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20051124 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
NLS | Nl: assignments of ep-patents |
Owner name: ORTLOFF ENGINEERS, LTD. Effective date: 20070314 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20051130 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20050511 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Payment date: 20131126 Year of fee payment: 15 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: V1 Effective date: 20150601 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20150601 |