EP1093561A1 - Passive selbstschutzvorrichtung für bewegliche objekte wie zum beispiel einen helikopter - Google Patents

Passive selbstschutzvorrichtung für bewegliche objekte wie zum beispiel einen helikopter

Info

Publication number
EP1093561A1
EP1093561A1 EP99926581A EP99926581A EP1093561A1 EP 1093561 A1 EP1093561 A1 EP 1093561A1 EP 99926581 A EP99926581 A EP 99926581A EP 99926581 A EP99926581 A EP 99926581A EP 1093561 A1 EP1093561 A1 EP 1093561A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
decoy
helicopter
hostile
protection device
passive self
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP99926581A
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1093561B1 (de
Inventor
Joel Bansard
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Alkan SAS
Original Assignee
Alkan SAS
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Alkan SAS filed Critical Alkan SAS
Publication of EP1093561A1 publication Critical patent/EP1093561A1/de
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1093561B1 publication Critical patent/EP1093561B1/de
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41WEAPONS
    • F41HARMOUR; ARMOURED TURRETS; ARMOURED OR ARMED VEHICLES; MEANS OF ATTACK OR DEFENCE, e.g. CAMOUFLAGE, IN GENERAL
    • F41H11/00Defence installations; Defence devices
    • F41H11/02Anti-aircraft or anti-guided missile or anti-torpedo defence installations or systems
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41WEAPONS
    • F41AFUNCTIONAL FEATURES OR DETAILS COMMON TO BOTH SMALLARMS AND ORDNANCE, e.g. CANNONS; MOUNTINGS FOR SMALLARMS OR ORDNANCE
    • F41A27/00Gun mountings permitting traversing or elevating movement, e.g. gun carriages
    • F41A27/06Mechanical systems
    • F41A27/08Bearings, e.g. trunnions; Brakes or blocking arrangements
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41WEAPONS
    • F41AFUNCTIONAL FEATURES OR DETAILS COMMON TO BOTH SMALLARMS AND ORDNANCE, e.g. CANNONS; MOUNTINGS FOR SMALLARMS OR ORDNANCE
    • F41A27/00Gun mountings permitting traversing or elevating movement, e.g. gun carriages
    • F41A27/28Electrically-operated systems

Definitions

  • Passive self-protection device for a mobile machine such as a helicopter
  • the present invention relates to a passive self-protection device for a mobile vehicle such as a helicopter.
  • a constant concern in the field of armament techniques is to best protect mobile devices such as ships, land vehicles, planes and helicopters against "hostiles" such as trajectory-corrected rockets or missiles .
  • decoy launchers for this purpose, making it possible to fire cartridges containing, depending on the type of hostile, infrared decoys or electromagnetic decoys.
  • the decoys drawn deflect the hostile from its target, thus avoiding partial or total destruction of the latter.
  • decoy launchers constitute passive self-protection devices because they do not make it possible to destroy the hostile.
  • the present invention aims to provide means for optimizing the decoy sequences for such devices, in order to improve their protection.
  • This object of the invention is achieved with a passive self-protection device for a mobile machine such as a helicopter, comprising at least one decoy thrower mounted orientably on said machine, slaved to a hostile detector and to a navigation center. , remarkable in that it comprises means for developing a dynamic decoy library from the information provided by said detector and by said control unit, in order to define decoy sequences in which the orientation and timing of the shots of said launcher lures are optimized.
  • FIG. 1 is a front view of the chassis of a decoy launcher of the device according to the invention mounted on a motorized gimbal, this chassis being shown in position "zero";
  • FIG. 2 is a partial side view of the assembly shown in Figure 1, the frame of the decoy launcher being shown in three positions: minimum roll position (dashed line), zero position (solid line), and position maximum roll (broken line);
  • - Figure 3 is a top view of the assembly shown in Figures 1 and 2, the frame of the decoy launcher being shown in three positions: minimum yaw position (dashed line), zero position (solid line), and position maximum yaw (broken line);
  • - Figure 4 is a side view of a helicopter equipped with two decoy launchers of the device according to the invention (only one of them being visible in this figure);
  • - Figure 5 is a front view of the helicopter of Figure 4;
  • FIG. 6 is a top view of the helicopter of Figure 4;
  • FIG. 7 is a flowchart describing the operation of the device according to the invention.
  • identical reference numerals represent identical or analogous members or sets of members. It will be noted that the following has chosen to describe the invention when it is incorporated into a helicopter, since it is a fact that it is particularly suitable for this type of mobile vehicle. That said, this choice is in no way limiting, and it should be borne in mind that the invention could also be advantageously incorporated into other mobile devices such as ships or land vehicles, or even into planes.
  • top and bottom are understood with respect to the vertical, represented where appropriate by an axis ZZ ', Z being located downwards and Z' upwards.
  • This chassis has substantially the shape of a parallelepiped box open on one of its faces 2. It is intended to receive a charger (not shown) comprising cartridges of electromagnetic or infrared decoys. In the case of a helicopter, it is preferable to use special cartridges with suitable payload, which also makes it possible to reduce the reaction forces when firing.
  • the bottom of the chassis 1, opposite its opening, comprises electrical members (power amplifiers, etc., not shown) allowing the ignition of the decoy cartridges. These electrical components are connected to the interior of the helicopter by connection components (not shown).
  • the chassis 1 is rotatably mounted around a horizontal axis 3 on a plate 4, itself rotatably mounted around a vertical axis 5 on a support 6.
  • the support 6 is fixed on an appropriate part 7 of the helicopter.
  • a first electric motor 8, of the “torque” or “step-by-step” type, fixed on the plate 4, is intended to rotate the chassis 1 about its axis 3.
  • a second electric motor 9, similar to the motor 8, is fixed on the support 6 and is intended to pivot around the vertical axis 5 the assembly formed by the plate 4, the chassis 1 and the motor 8.
  • FIG. 2 represents three possible positions of the chassis 1, the plate 4 being in its “zero” position, that is to say in a middle position between its two extreme positions.
  • the position of the chassis 1 which is shown in solid lines is its zero position.
  • the position of the chassis 1 which is shown in phantom is an extreme downward position, also called the minimum roll position.
  • FIG. 3 represents three possible positions of the chassis 1 corresponding to three possible positions of the plate 4.
  • the position of the chassis 1 which is shown in solid lines is its zero position.
  • the position of the frame 1 which is shown in phantom is an extreme position in the direction of clockwise rotation, also called minimum yaw position.
  • the position of the chassis 1 which is shown in broken lines is an extreme position in the anti-clockwise rotation direction, also called maximum yaw position, symmetrical with the minimum yaw position with respect to the zero position.
  • the minimum and maximum yaw positions are inclined by an angle ⁇ of about 75 ° relative to the zero position.
  • Each of these two decoy launchers is mounted on a motorized gimbal such as that which has just been described.
  • each decoy-cardan launcher assembly has been represented by a simple rectangle.
  • the two decoy launchers are preferably placed symmetrically with respect to the main line 13 of the helicopter, at a sufficient distance from the air inlets 14 of the apparatus. They can be fixed on any sufficiently rigid part of the device, such as landing gear supports, as shown.
  • FIGS. 5 and 6 show the deflections of the roll and lace decoy launchers, corresponding respectively to FIGS. 2 and 3 described above.
  • the extreme angles of roll ⁇ and of yaw ⁇ shown are preferably respectively about 60 ° and 75 °.
  • the decoy launchers then each have a maximum clearance of approximately 120 ° in roll and 150 ° in yaw, which a priori makes it possible to draw decoys in almost all directions of space.
  • the maximum deflections of the decoy launchers are likely to vary from one helicopter to another, and on the other hand that for a given helicopter, the authorized firing directions can vary according to a certain number of parameters.
  • the firing of electromagnetic decoys towards the front of an advancing helicopter is also prohibited, in order to prevent any penetration of metallic flakes into the air intakes.
  • shots into the mobile wing of a helicopter are prohibited when infrared decoys are used.
  • the management of shots from the orientable decoy launchers of the device according to the invention can quickly prove to be very complex, and in any case impossible to optimize manually. This is the reason why the invention also provides a system for optimizing the decoy sequences.
  • the optimization system includes a CT fire calculator interface with:
  • the hostile detector D which can be a radar, makes it possible to identify a hostile by virtue of a plurality of antennas A1, A2, A3, A4 located at the periphery of the helicopter.
  • the detector D is also of a type making it possible to identify the category of the hostile.
  • Such a detector available in the prior art, must at least make it possible to differentiate a hostile with electromagnetic guidance from a hostile with infrared guidance.
  • detector D can also allow other characteristics of the hostile to be identified more precisely.
  • the information sent by the CN navigation center to the CT fire computer concerns essentially the attitudes (Euler angles) of the helicopter, its speed and the position of its center of gravity.
  • the firing computer CT can determine the exact position of the hostile in the helicopter frame of reference, or even in a frame of reference absolute.
  • the static decoy library B contains various subroutines which can be used by the CT computer to order decoy sequences. This library is static in the sense that the various subroutines are predefined.
  • the information sent by the PC control station to the CT shooting computer essentially depends on instructions imposed manually by the pilot and concerning the shooting conditions: activation / deactivation of the optimization system, firing prohibitions depending on the circumstances (flight in formation for example), etc.
  • the information sent by the position encoders C8, C9 and C8 ', C9' to the firing computer CT allows it to know at all times the orientation of the chassis 1 and the.
  • These position encoders can be, for example, optical or potentiometric sensors.
  • the CT fire calculator interrogates the library B to find the subroutine adapted to this category, then it calculates in real time the orientation and timing of the launcher's shots, taking into account the information provided by the hostile detector D and by the CN navigation center.
  • the firing computer CT thus creates a dynamic decoy library from the static library B and information supplied by the hostile detector D and by the navigation center CN, making it possible to define a decoy sequence including the efficiency is optimized depending on the nature of said hostile and the relative movements of the helicopter and the ostile.
  • the CT firing computer knows their orientations at all times. By comparing these to the calculated orientations to be reached, the computer determines the movement orders to be sent to the engines of the decoy launcher.
  • the CT shooting computer also checks that the direction of fire to be achieved is compatible with the instructions imposed by the pilot, provided by the PC control station.
  • the firing computer CT determines a new firing orientation which approaches the ideal firing direction.
  • the firing computer CT sends it a firing order.
  • FIG. 8 shows an example of a decoy sequence, in the case of a hovering helicopter and an infrared-guided hostile arriving on the starboard side of the helicopter. As can be seen in this figure, the hostile initially follows a trajectory 20 directed towards the turbines of the helicopter 10.
  • the LL launcher located on the starboard side of the aircraft pulls three lures L1, L2, L3 directed more and more towards the front of the helicopter, so as to gradually deviate the initial trajectory 20 of the hostile towards trajectories avoidance 21, 22, 23.
  • the infrared signatures of the decoys are progressively separated from that of the helicopter, and the hostile is prevented from reaching its target.
  • the time interval separating each lure shot in this example can be of the order of half a second.
  • the decoy sequence described above would no longer be suitable if the helicopter was advancing, because then the infrared signature of the helicopter would risk joining the infrared signatures of the decoys fired last.
  • the dynamic library means exposed above would then make it possible to modify the decoy sequence according to the movements of the helicopter so as, for example, to deviate the trajectory of the hostile towards the rear of the apparatus.
  • the dynamic library means described above would make it possible to switch directly from the starboard decoy launcher to the port decoy launcher, or vice versa, so as to ensure the continuity of the decoy vis-à-vis the hostile.
  • the two decoy launchers are set to their zero position by electrical or mechanical means (not shown), and the firing orders are sent manually by the pilot via the PC control station.
  • the present invention makes it possible to define decoy sequences in which the orientation and the timing of the shots of the decoy launchers are optimized according to the nature of the hostile and the relative movements of this hostile and of the 'helicopter.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Aviation & Aerospace Engineering (AREA)
  • Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
  • Remote Sensing (AREA)
  • Toys (AREA)
  • Aiming, Guidance, Guns With A Light Source, Armor, Camouflage, And Targets (AREA)
EP99926581A 1998-07-03 1999-07-01 Passive selbstschutzvorrichtung für bewegliche objekte wie zum beispiel einen helikopter Expired - Lifetime EP1093561B1 (de)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
FR9808545 1998-07-03
FR9808545A FR2780774B1 (fr) 1998-07-03 1998-07-03 Dispositif d'autoprotection passive pour engin mobile tel qu'un helicoptere
PCT/FR1999/001584 WO2000002000A1 (fr) 1998-07-03 1999-07-01 Dispositif d'autoprotection passive pour engin mobile tel qu'un helicoptere

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1093561A1 true EP1093561A1 (de) 2001-04-25
EP1093561B1 EP1093561B1 (de) 2003-09-24

Family

ID=9528238

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP99926581A Expired - Lifetime EP1093561B1 (de) 1998-07-03 1999-07-01 Passive selbstschutzvorrichtung für bewegliche objekte wie zum beispiel einen helikopter

Country Status (5)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1093561B1 (de)
DE (1) DE69911608T2 (de)
ES (1) ES2209448T3 (de)
FR (1) FR2780774B1 (de)
WO (1) WO2000002000A1 (de)

Families Citing this family (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1117801B1 (de) * 1998-10-02 2006-11-29 Kosan Biosciences, Inc. Polyketid synthase enzyme und rekombinante dna konstrukte dafür, zur herstellung von mit fk-506 und fk-520 verwandten verbindungen
WO2000066008A1 (en) 1999-05-04 2000-11-09 Cardiothoracic Systems, Inc. Surgical instruments for accessing and stabilizing a localized portion of a beating heart
DE10008198A1 (de) * 2000-02-23 2001-08-30 Krauss Maffei Wegmann Gmbh & C An einem Kampffahrzeug angeordnete Wurfanlage für Nebelkerzen, Sprengkörper u. dgl.
DE10117007A1 (de) * 2001-04-04 2002-10-17 Buck Neue Technologien Gmbh Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Schutz von mobilen militärischen Einrichtungen
DE10247350A1 (de) * 2002-10-10 2004-04-22 Krauss-Maffei Wegmann Gmbh & Co. Kg Einrichtung zum Schutz von Objekten gegen als Lenk-Flugkörper ausgebildete Munitionen
CA2510293C (en) 2002-12-17 2011-07-19 Council Of Scientific And Industrial Research Flavoured sugarcane juice in aseptic unit packs
DE10346001B4 (de) 2003-10-02 2006-01-26 Buck Neue Technologien Gmbh Vorrichtung zum Schützen von Schiffen vor endphasengelenkten Flugkörpern
US20100326262A1 (en) * 2007-11-08 2010-12-30 Galanti Benjamin J Chaff Pod Dispenser
DE102008038603C5 (de) 2008-08-21 2018-04-19 Krauss-Maffei Wegmann Gmbh & Co. Kg Gegenschussanlage
DE102013104501A1 (de) 2013-05-02 2014-11-06 B. Braun Avitum Ag Vorrichtung zur extrakorporalen Blutbehandlung

Family Cites Families (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2383419A1 (fr) * 1977-03-07 1978-10-06 Lacroix E Valise lance-leurres pour la deception des systemes de guidage d'armes
US4307650A (en) * 1978-07-05 1981-12-29 Messerschmitt-Boelkow-Blohm Gesellschaft Mit Beschraenkter Haftung Weapons system for the ballistic and guided attack on multiple targets, especially by an aircraft
GB2138546A (en) * 1982-09-03 1984-10-24 Wallop Ind Ltd Decoy systems
DE3612183A1 (de) * 1986-04-11 1987-10-22 Wegmann & Co Verfahren zur ablenkung von durch radar- und/oder infrarotstrahlung gelenkten flugkoerpern, insbesondere zum schutz von seeschiffen und schiffsverbaenden sowie einrichtung zur durchfuehrung des verfahrens
DE3705700A1 (de) * 1987-02-23 1988-09-01 Buck Chem Tech Werke Werfereinheit
SE469196B (sv) * 1991-10-02 1993-05-24 Nobeltech Electronics Ab Faellarenhet samt faellarsystem innefattande minst en saadan faellarenhet
DE9320382U1 (de) * 1993-07-07 1994-06-01 BST Schutztechnik GmbH, 85521 Ottobrunn Selbstschutzanlage für Gefechtsfeldfahrzeuge

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO0002000A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
FR2780774B1 (fr) 2001-03-09
EP1093561B1 (de) 2003-09-24
DE69911608T2 (de) 2004-07-01
FR2780774A1 (fr) 2000-01-07
WO2000002000A1 (fr) 2000-01-13
ES2209448T3 (es) 2004-06-16
DE69911608D1 (de) 2003-10-30

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0081421B1 (de) Verfahren zur Endphasenlenkung und dieses Verfahren verwendender Lenkflugkörper
EP0318359B1 (de) Vorrichtung zum Ausspreizen der Leitflügel eines Geschosses
EP3150957B1 (de) Artillerieprojektil mit einer gesteuerten phase
EP1745309B1 (de) Flugzeug-antiraketen-schutzsystem
EP0655599B1 (de) Flugabwehrsystem und Flugabwehrkörper dafür
EP1093561A1 (de) Passive selbstschutzvorrichtung für bewegliche objekte wie zum beispiel einen helikopter
EP0441670A1 (de) Regeleinrichtung des Rollverhaltens eines durch Leitwerk stabilisierten Projektiles
CA2943770C (fr) Viseur optronique a blindage modulable
WO2016198809A1 (fr) Dispositif de largage de drones, procédé de largage
EP1600728B1 (de) Flugkörper zur Geländeaufklärung
EP1448947B1 (de) Beobachtungs- und kampfsystem
WO2014076403A1 (fr) Véhicule aérien à décollage vertical et vol horizontal
FR2830238A1 (fr) Lancement aerien de vehicule de transport de charge utile a partir d'un aeronef de transport
FR2863584A1 (fr) Systeme optronique modulaire embarquable sur un porteur
FR3033544A1 (fr) Drone a voilure tournante de type tricopter
EP1092941A1 (de) Einrichtung zur Veränderung der Flugrichtung eines rotationsstabilisierten Lenkgeschosses
EP0236160B1 (de) Radarantenne mit geringem Platzbedarf
EP1866597B1 (de) System zur zielbestimmung und/oder -beleuchtung und für die luftaufklärung
FR2964946A1 (fr) Petit engin volant sans pilote
EP2508836B1 (de) Kopf für Zielsuchgerät einer Rakete, und entsprechendes Zielsuchgerät
FR2675114A1 (fr) Dispositif a engin volant pour le survol d'une zone, notamment en vue de sa surveillance.
WO2021122277A1 (fr) Ensemble modulaire d'aéronefs autonomes pour former un groupe aérien multi-mission et aéronefs correspondants
EP0799148A1 (de) Aerodynamischer bremsschild für raumfahrzeug und damit ausgerüstete satelliten
FR2707386A1 (fr) Système d'observation aérienne à drone captif.
FR3081440A1 (fr) Drone de signalisation et d’information

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20010110

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20010731

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): DE ES FR GB IT SE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.

Effective date: 20030924

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: TRGR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: FRENCH

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69911608

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20031030

Kind code of ref document: P

GBT Gb: translation of ep patent filed (gb section 77(6)(a)/1977)

Effective date: 20040209

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FD4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2209448

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20040625

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 18

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 19

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20180502

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20180830

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20180710

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20180718

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20180716

Year of fee payment: 20

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R071

Ref document number: 69911608

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: PE20

Expiry date: 20190630

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

Effective date: 20190630

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20200721

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

Effective date: 20190702