EP0985016B1 - Compositions detergentes contenant des granules tensioactives non ioniques - Google Patents

Compositions detergentes contenant des granules tensioactives non ioniques Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0985016B1
EP0985016B1 EP98930715A EP98930715A EP0985016B1 EP 0985016 B1 EP0985016 B1 EP 0985016B1 EP 98930715 A EP98930715 A EP 98930715A EP 98930715 A EP98930715 A EP 98930715A EP 0985016 B1 EP0985016 B1 EP 0985016B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
weight
nonionic
surfactant
detergent composition
structurant
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP98930715A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP0985016A1 (fr
Inventor
Harmannus Unilever Research Vlaardingen TAMMES
Remy Antal Unilever Research VERBURGH
Gilbert Martin Unilever Research VERSCHELLING
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Unilever PLC
Unilever NV
Original Assignee
Unilever PLC
Unilever NV
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=10813433&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP0985016(B1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Unilever PLC, Unilever NV filed Critical Unilever PLC
Publication of EP0985016A1 publication Critical patent/EP0985016A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0985016B1 publication Critical patent/EP0985016B1/fr
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11—ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11D—DETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D17/00—Detergent materials or soaps characterised by their shape or physical properties
    • C11D17/0034—Fixed on a solid conventional detergent ingredient
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11—ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11D—DETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D11/00—Special methods for preparing compositions containing mixtures of detergents
    • C11D11/0082—Special methods for preparing compositions containing mixtures of detergents one or more of the detergent ingredients being in a liquefied state, e.g. slurry, paste or melt, and the process resulting in solid detergent particles such as granules, powders or beads
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11—ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11D—DETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D17/00—Detergent materials or soaps characterised by their shape or physical properties
    • C11D17/06—Powder; Flakes; Free-flowing mixtures; Sheets

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to particulate laundry detergent compositions which include nonionic-surfactant-containing granular compositions.
  • nonionic surfactant in particulate laundry detergent compositions as it gives good oily soil detergency and can reduce foam levels, which is beneficial in detergent compositions for use in automatic washing machines.
  • Particulate laundry detergent compositions are typically produced by the spray-drying process or by an agglomeration process. These processes are well known to the skilled person and have their own particular problems and advantages. There may be problems during manufacture of compositions having nonionic surfactant in spray drying processes due to breakdown of nonionic surfactant leading to the emission of smoke. Problems of poor dispersion in wash water have been encountered with granular detergents manufactured in agglomeration processes, which may be due to unfavourable interactions between nonionic surfactant and other detergent components.
  • nonionic surfactant to granular detergent compositions made by either process after the granulates are formed.
  • nonionic surfactant there is now interest in adding particles containing nonionic surfactant to such granular compositions.
  • most nonionic surfactants are liquids or waxy solids, they need to be borne on a carrier.
  • Nonionic-surfactant-containing particles are disclosed for example in JP 08 027498A (Kao), which discloses a silica-based carrier having an oil absorption capacity of at least 80 ml/g and capable of providing a particle having up to 50% by weight of nonionic surfactant. It is desired however to provide a greater carrying capacity.
  • JP 07 268 398A discloses a nonionic surfactant containing granular composition having up to 70 % by weight of nonionic surfactant and less than 5% by weight silica.
  • such granules contain a quantity of aluminosilicate.
  • the inventors have discovered unfavourable interactions between nonionic surfactant and aluminosilicates leading to poor dispersion if large quantities of aluminosilicate are present. Further, where large quantities of nonionic surfactant are included, there is frequently a problem of leaching out of the surfactant from the composition in storage. There may also be problems of low particle strength.
  • nonionic-surfactant-containing granules can be manufactured having a high content of nonionic surfactant and containing low quantities of aluminosilicate, the particles showing low leaching tendency and good strength.
  • the present invention is concerned with a particulate detergent composition including a specific granular component: a nonionic-surfactant-containing granular composition comprising more than 55% by weight of nonionic surfactant, at least 5% by weight of silica having an oil absorption capacity of at least 1.0 ml/g and, optionally, less than 10% by weight of aluminosilicate.
  • the present invention provides a particulate detergent composition composed of at least two different granular components:
  • the high-nonionic granule comprises at least 59% by weight of nonionic surfactant.
  • Nonionic surfactants that may be used include the primary and secondary alcohol ethoxylates, especially C 8 -C 20 aliphatic alcohols ethoxylated with an average of 1-20 moles of ethylene oxide per mole of alcohol, and more especially the C 9 -C 15 primary and secondary aliphatic alcohol ethoxylated with an average of from 1-10 moles of ethylene oxide per mole of alcohol.
  • Non-ethoxylated nonionic surfactants include alkyl polyglycosides, glycerol monoethers, and polyhydroxy amides (glucamide).
  • Oil absorption capacity is a parameter which is well known and can be measured by the technique described in DIN ISO 787/5.
  • the oil absorption capacity is at least 1.5 ml/g, more preferably at least 2.0 ml/g and most preferably at least 2.5 ml/g.
  • the granule contains at least 10%, more preferably at least 15%, of silica.
  • the high-nonionic granule contains aluminosilicate, less than 5% by weight is present.
  • Crystalline aluminosilicates (zeolites) are preferred.
  • Aluminosilicates are materials having the general formula: 0.8-1.5 M 2 O. Al 2 O 3 . 0.8-6 SiO 2 where M is a monovalent cation, preferably sodium. These materials contain some bound water and are required to have a calcium ion exchange capacity of at least 50 mg CaO/g.
  • the preferred sodium aluminosilicates contain 1.5-3.5 SiO 2 units in the formula above. They can be prepared readily by reaction between sodium silicate and sodium aluminate, as amply described in the literature.
  • the zeolite which may be used in the nonionic-surfactant-containing granules to be used in the present invention may be the commercially available zeolite A (zeolite 4A) now widely used in laundry detergent powders.
  • the zeolite incorporated in the nonionic-surfactant-containing granules of the invention is maximum aluminium zeolite P (zeolite MAP) as described and claimed in EP 384 070B (Unilever), and commercially available as Doucil (Trade Mark) MAP from Crosfield Chemicals Ltd, UK.
  • Zeolite MAP is defined as an alkali metal aluminosilicate of zeolite P type having a silicon to aluminium ratio not exceeding 1.33, preferably within the range of from 0.90 to 1.33, preferably within the range of from 0.90 to 1.20. Especially preferred is zeolite MAP having a silicon to aluminium ratio not exceeding 1.07, more preferably about 1.00. the calcium binding capacity of zeolite MAP is generally at least 150 mg CaO per g of anhydrous material.
  • the nonionic-surfactant-containing granules of the present invention may contain other material.
  • the granules may contain a structurant, which may also be considered as a binder, in order to improve the strength of the granules.
  • the granules may contain about 2 to 15% by weight of a structurant.
  • Suitable structurants include, for example, soaps, sugars, succinates, silicates, citrates, or polymers such as polyethylene/propylene glycol of molecular weight 1000 to 12 000, polyacrylate of molecular weight 30 000 to 200 000, polyvinyl alcohol of molecular weight 30 000 to 200 000, or acrylate/maleate copolymers, eg Sokalan (Trade Mark) CP5 ex BASF and mixtures thereof.
  • Especially preferred structurants are selected from the following list: polyethylene glycol, soap, maltose, glucose, sucrose, polyvinyl alcohol, and acrylate/maleate copolymer in admixture with glucose, sodium chloride or trisodium citrate.
  • the granules may optionally contain from 0 to 5% of anionic surfactant, such as alkyl benzene sulphonates, particularly linear alkyl benzene sulphonates having an alkyl chain length of C 8 -C 15 , primary and secondary alkyl sulphates, particularly C 8 -C 15 primary alcohol sulphates, alkyl ether sulphates, olefin sulphonates, alkyl xylene sulphonates, dialkyl sulphosuccinates and fatty acid ester sulphonates.
  • layering agents such as layered silicate and/or zeolite may be included at a level of about 0 to 10 % by weight as long as the total quantity of zeolite remains below 10% by weight.
  • the nonionic-surfactant-containing granules of the present invention preferably have a bulk density in the range of from 400 to 800 g/l.
  • the granule sizes are preferably in the range of from 200 to 1000 micrometres.
  • the nonionic-surfactant-containing granules are manufactured by any suitable method.
  • the components are granulated together in a mechanical mixer.
  • a high-speed mixer/densifier or granulator is used.
  • One method comprises granulating together in a mixer greater than 55% by weight of nonionic surfactant, at least 5% by weight of silica having an oil absorption capacity of at least 1.0 ml/g, less than 10% by weight of aluminosilicate.
  • the liquid components may be introduced by spraying them in while the mixer is running.
  • a relatively large quantity of structurant (5-15% by weight, preferably 5-10% by weight) is preferably used to give granules of adequate stability as measured by their nonionic surfactant leaching tendency (see below). It has been found that structurant can only be included in place of some nonionic surfactant. Accordingly, the carrying capacity of the granules is reduced compared to the theoretical maximum.
  • the inventors have discovered that a two-step process can be used, as a result of which less structurant is required.
  • a further subject of the present invention is a method for the production of, a nonionic-surfactant-containing granular composition containing more than 55% by weight of nonionic surfactant, at least 5% by weight of silica having an oil absorption capacity of at least 1.0 ml/g, from 5 to 15% by weight of a structurant and optionally less than 10% by weight of aluminosilicate, comprising the steps of:
  • the solid components can be added in the second step, but preferably at least 80%, more preferably at least 90% by weight of the solid components are incorporated in the first step. Preferably, at least 75% by weight of nonionic surfactant is added in the first step.
  • all of the silica is included in the first step.
  • at least 70% by weight of the structurant is added in the second step, more preferably at least 80% by weight.
  • the structurant comprises soap
  • it may be produced in situ by neutralisation of fatty acid, by, for example, caustic soda or soda ash. This also applies to the one-step process.
  • nonionic-surfactant-containing granules proceeds as follows.
  • the first step it is believed that small particles of generally spherical shape are produced, having nonionic surfactant mainly in the pores of solid material.
  • the second step it is believed that such small particles are agglomerated into larger agglomerations by the addition of further nonionic surfactant and/or structurant.
  • the two-step process for production of nonionic surfactant granules can be used to produce granules of stability similar to or greater than for the first-step process but having lower quantities of structurant (in the region of 2 to 10%, preferably less than 5% by weight of structurant) or particles having similar levels of structurant (from 5 to 15% by weight, preferably from 5 to 10% by weight) and having similar or greater stability as measured by nonionic leaching tendency.
  • the first and second steps may be carried out in a high shear mixer.
  • the components may be mixed in an Eirich Mixer, for example an Eirich RVO2 Granulator.
  • Eirich Mixer for example an Eirich RVO2 Granulator.
  • Other equipment suitable for use in the present invention include the Fukae mixer, produced by Fukae Powtech Co. of Japan, the Diosna V Series supplied by Dierks & Sohne Germany, the Pharma Matrix ex TK Fielder Ltd England, the Fuji V-C Series produced by Fuji Sangyo Company Japan and the Roto produced by Zanchetta & Company Srl, Italy.
  • Other suitable equipment can include the Lödige Series CB for continuous high shear granulation available from Morton Machine Company Scotland, the Drais T160 Series manufactured by Drais Maschinene GmbH, Mannheim Germany.
  • High shear mixing can be achieved by the skilled person in a manner well known in the art. For example, where a Lödige Mixer is used, a rotation speed of 500-3000 rpm may be used.
  • the detergent compositions of the invention contain at least one other granular component in addition to the nonionic-surfactant-containing granular component (high-nonionic granule).
  • the other component is selected from the following list:
  • the nonionic-surfactant-containing granules can be mixed with conventional surfactant-containing base powders in order to increase the nonionic surfactant content of the overall composition. Steps such as spraying nonionic surfactant onto base powder can then be reduced or avoided. High total quantities of nonionic surfactant in the mixture can be obtained.
  • the nonionic-surfactant-containing granules can be mixed with conventional base powders containing little or no nonionic surfactant, or with builder granules, in order to effectively separate nonionic surfactant from aluminosilicate builder.
  • conventional base powders containing little or no nonionic surfactant or with builder granules, in order to effectively separate nonionic surfactant from aluminosilicate builder.
  • builder granules in order to effectively separate nonionic surfactant from aluminosilicate builder.
  • the base powders or builder granules may be manufactured by any suitable process. For example, they may be produced by spray-drying, spray-drying followed by densification in a batch or continuous high speed mixer/densifier or by a wholly non-tower route comprising granulation of components in a mixer/densifier, preferably in a low shear mixer/densifier such as a pan granulator or fluidised bed mixer. Methods of manufacturing a high anionic-detergent-active granular component are also discussed below.
  • the separately produced granular components may be dry-mixed together in any suitable apparatus.
  • the nonionic-surfactant-containing granules may be present at a level of up to 50% by weight, preferably from 2 to 50% by weight, the other granular component or components constituting the remaining 50 to 98% by weight of the totality of granular components.
  • the other granular components may be, for example, a base powder alone, a base powder plus another high-active granule, or a number of separate granules (eg a builder granule , a high-anionic granule).
  • the amount of nonionic-surfactant-containing granules is more preferably up to 40% by weight, but may be present at levels of as low as from 2 to 10% by weight.
  • the individual granular components may be of any suitable bulk density.
  • the inventors have found that, where a given formulation of detergent composition is produced by dry-mixing at least two granular components having different surfactant levels, the detergent composition has better powder properties such as stability than if the formulation were produced with all the components in a single granule.
  • a method of producing a detergent component containing at least 60% by weight of anionic surfactant is set forth in WO 97/32002A (Unilever).
  • the process comprises the steps of feeding a paste material comprising water and an anionic surfactant into a drying zone, heating the paste material in the drying zone to reduce the water content thereof and subsequently cooling the paste material in a cooling zone to form detergent particles, characterised by introducing a layering agent into the cooling zone during the cooling step.
  • This process may be carried out in a machine manufactured by VRV Impianti SpA, having a heating surface area of 1.2 m 2 .
  • the heating zones are maintained at a temperature in the region of 120-190°C, for example 170°C. Cooling is achieved using ambient process water at 15°C.
  • the apparatus is used with tip speed of the blades of 30 m/s.
  • a method of producing a detergent component containing at least 75% by weight of anionic surfactant is set forth in WO 96/06916A and WO 96/06917A.
  • a paste material comprising water in an amount of more than 10% by weight of the paste and the surfactant is fed into a drying zone, the paste is heated to a temperature in excess of 130°C to reduce the water content to more than 10% by weight and the material is subsequently cooled to form detergent particles.
  • the granules containing anionic surfactant may suitably be present at a level of from 5 to 35% by weight, preferably from 5 to 20% by weight.
  • the detergent composition of the present invention may comprise only the specified granular components. In this form, it may provide a complete detergent composition for use in fabric washing or it may provide a component for a complete detergent, additional powdered components being dry-mixed with the granular component(s). The totality of the granular components is thus analogous to a conventional base powder.
  • Suitable components which may be post-dosed to the mixture of granular components will be discussed further below.
  • the mixture of granular components may be subjected to a step in which small quantities of ingredients (for example perfume) are sprayed onto the granular material.
  • ingredients for example perfume
  • the totality of the specified granular components provides at least 40% by weight, preferably at least 50% by weight of the final composition, the remaining less than 60%, preferably less than 50% by weight, if present, being constituted by postdosed or sprayed-on ingredients.
  • the quantity of anionic surfactant present is in the range of from 3 to 30 % by weight of the total (final) composition.
  • the invention also encompasses compositions in which the surfactant component is composed substantially wholly of nonionic surfactant. If both types of surfactant are present, the weight ratio of nonionic to anionic surfactant is preferably within the range of from 3:1 to 1:3.
  • the total quantity of detergent surfactant is preferably at least 10% by weight, more preferably at least 12% by weight, and most preferably at least 15% by weight.
  • the present invention may especially be used to achieve higher surfactant loadings than may otherwise be possible, for example, greater than 20%, without loss of powder properties.
  • the detergent compositions of the invention also contain one or more detergency builders.
  • the total amount of detergency builder in the compositions will suitably range from 5 to 80 wt %, preferably from 10 to 60 wt %.
  • Builders are normally wholly or predominantly included in the granular components.
  • Builder-containing granular components may contain less than 5% of detergent surfactant, preferably substantially no surfactant.
  • inorganic builders that may be present include, sodium carbonate, amorphous aluminosilicates, layered silicates and phosphate builders, for example, sodium orthophosphate, pyrophosphate and tripolyphosphate.
  • Organic builders that may additionally be present include polycarboxylate polymers such as polyacrylates and acrylic/maleic copolymers; monomeric polycarboxylates such as citrates, gluconates, oxydisuccinates, glycerol mono-di- and trisuccinates, carboxymethyloxysuccinates, carboxymethyl-oxymalonates, dipicolinates, hydroxyethylimino-diacetates, alkyl- and alkyenylmalonates and succinates; and sulphonated fatty acid salts.
  • polycarboxylate polymers such as polyacrylates and acrylic/maleic copolymers
  • monomeric polycarboxylates such as citrates, gluconates, oxydisuccinates, glycerol mono-di- and trisuccinates, carboxymethyloxysuccinates, carboxymethyl-oxymalonates, dipicolinates, hydroxyethylimino-diacetates, alkyl
  • Especially preferred organic builders are citrates, suitably used in amounts of from 5 to 30 wt %, preferably from 10 to 25 wt %; and acrylic polymers, more especially acrylic/maleic copolymers, suitably used in amounts of from 0.5 to 15 wt %, preferably from 1 to 10 wt %.
  • Builders both inorganic and organic, are preferably present in alkali metal salt, especially sodium salt, form.
  • compositions according to the invention may also suitably contain a bleach system. It is preferred that the compositions of the invention contain peroxy bleach compounds capable of yielding hydrogen peroxide in aqueous solution, for example inorganic or organic peroxyacids, and inorganic persalts such as the alkali metal perborates, percarbonates, perphosphates, persili-cates and persulphates. Bleach ingredients are generally post-dosed as powders.
  • Sodium percarbonate may have a protective coating against destabilisation by moisture.
  • Sodium percarbonate having a protective coating comprising sodium metaborate and sodium silicate is disclosed in GB 2 123 044 (Kao).
  • the peroxy bleach compound for example sodium percarbonate, is suitably present in an amount of from 5 to 35 wt %, preferably from 10 to 25 wt %.
  • the peroxy bleach compound for example sodium percarbonate, may be used in conjunction with a bleach activator (bleach precursor) to improve bleaching action at low wash temperatures.
  • the bleach precursor is suitably present in an amount of from 1 to 8 wt %, preferably from 2 to 5 wt %.
  • Preferred bleach precursors are peroxycarboxylic acid precursors, more especially peracetic acid precursors and peroxybenzoic acid precursors; and peroxycarbonic acid precursors.
  • An especially preferred bleach precursor suitable for use in the present invention is N, N, N', N'-tetracetyl ethylenediamine (TAED).
  • a bleach stabiliser may also be present.
  • Suitable bleach stabilisers include ethylenediamine tetraacetate (EDTA), ethylenediamine disuccinate (EDDS), and the aminopolyphosphonates such as ethylenediamine tetramethylene phosphonate (EDTMP) and diethylenetriamine pentamethylene phosphonate (DETPMP).
  • compositions of the present invention may also include a bleach catalyst, such as manganese cyclononane derivative.
  • a bleach catalyst such as manganese cyclononane derivative.
  • compositions of the present invention may also contain soil release polymers, for example sulphonated and unsulphonated PET/POET polymers, both end-capped and non-end-capped, and polyethylene glycol/polyvinyl alcohol graft copolymers such as Sokalan (Trade Mark) HP22.
  • soil release polymers for example sulphonated and unsulphonated PET/POET polymers, both end-capped and non-end-capped, and polyethylene glycol/polyvinyl alcohol graft copolymers such as Sokalan (Trade Mark) HP22.
  • compositions of the invention may also contain dye transfer inhibiting polymers, for example, polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP), vinyl pyrrolidone copolymers such as PVP/PVI, polyamine-N-oxides, PVP-NO etc.
  • PVP polyvinyl pyrrolidone
  • PVD vinyl pyrrolidone copolymers
  • PVP/PVI polyamine-N-oxides
  • PVP-NO polyamine-N-oxides
  • compositions of the invention may also contain alkali metal, preferably sodium, carbonate, in order to increase detergency and ease processing.
  • alkali metal preferably sodium, carbonate
  • Sodium carbonate may suitably be present in amounts ranging from 1 to 60 wt %, preferably from 2 to 40 wt %. However, compositions containing little or no sodium carbonate are also within the scope of the invention.
  • Sodium carbonate may be included in granular components, or post-dosed, or both.
  • the detergent composition may contain water-soluble alkali metal silicate, preferably sodium silicate having a SiO 2 :Na 2 O mole ratio within the range of from 1.6:1 to 4:1.
  • the water-soluble silicate maybe present in an amount of from 1 to 20 wt %, preferably 3 to 15 wt % and more preferably 5 to 10 wt %, based on the aluminosilicate (anhydrous basis).
  • antiredeposition agents such as cellulosic polymers; fluorescers; photobleaches; inorganic salts such as sodium sulphate; foam control agents or foam boosters as appropriate; enzymes (proteases, lipases, amylases, cellulases) ; dyes; coloured speckles; perfumes; and fabric conditioning compounds.
  • Ingredients which are normally but not exclusively postdosed may include bleach ingredients, bleach precursor, bleach catalyst, bleach stabiliser, photobleaches, alkali metal carbonate, water-soluble crystalline or amorphous alkaline metal silicate, layered silicates, anti-redeposition agents, soil release polymers, dye transfer inhibitors, fluorescers, inorganic salts, foam control agents, foam boosters, proteolytic, lipolytic, amylitic and cellulytic enzymes, dyes, speckles, perfume, fabric conditioning compounds and mixtures thereof.
  • the dynamic flow-rate or DFR is measured by the following method.
  • the apparatus used consists of a cylindrical glass tube having an internal diameter of 35 mm and a length of 600 mm.
  • the tube is securely champed in a position such that its longitudinal axis is vertical. Its lower end is terminated by means of a smooth cone of polyvinyl chloride having an internal angle of 15° and a lower outlet orifice of diameter 22.5 mm.
  • a first beam sensor is positioned 150 mm above the outlet, and a second beam sensor is positioned 250 mm above the first sensor.
  • the outlet orifice is temporarily closed, for example, by covering with a piece of card, and powder is poured through a funnel into the top of the cylinder until the powder level is about 10 cm higher than the upper sensor; a spacer between the funnel and the tube ensures that filling is uniform.
  • the averaging and calculation are carried out electronically and a direct read-out of the DFR value obtained.
  • the mean diameter (RRd) of the particles is measured by seive analysis and calculated according to the Rosin Rammler method.
  • Example 1 a powder (Example 1) made by mixing a nonionic-surfactant-containing granule and a builder granule is compared with a powder of similar formulation (Comparative Example A) prepared as a single granulate.
  • Nonionic granule N1 Comparative Powder A
  • a nonionic-surfactant-containing granule N1 and a fully formulated powder A were made by mixing the components listed in an Eirich RV02 granulator.
  • Builder granule B1 was made by continuously dosing zeolite and trisodium citrate into a Lödige CB30 mixer, together with 40% Sokalan CP5 solution ex BASF. A typical speed of 1500 rpm was used. The powder was further densified in a Lödige KM 300, after which the powder was continuously dried in a fluid bed, using air with a temperature of 100-120°C. The resulting product was sieved and the fraction ⁇ 2000 ⁇ m was kept. Ingredients B1 (Weight %) Zeolite MAP (anh) 41.3 Trisodium citrate 31.7 Sokalan CP5 13.8 Water 13.2
  • Nonionic granule N1 was dosed together with builder granule B1 and dense sodium carbonate into a V-blender and mixed to make Powder 1: Ingredients [wt%] Powder 1 Nonionic granule N1 39.7 Builder granule B1 49.3 Dense sodium carbonate 10.9
  • Powder A Comparative 1 Invention BD [g/l] 622 723 DFR [ml/s] 110 130 BD after 1 week storage at 37°C [g/l] 621 748 DFR after 1 week storage at 37°C [ml/s] 109 135 Rosin Rammler mean diameter [ ⁇ m] 808 617 Paper filter, 1 week, [mg] 468 32 Paper filter, 1 week [mg/g nonionic in sample] 2.2 0.15 Polyamide filter, 1 week [mg] 135.9 30.3 Polyamide filter, 1 week [mg/g nonionic in sample] 20.5 4.6 Insolubles [%] >20 4
  • Powder 1, according to the invention has improved storage properties. That is, the leaching out of nonionic surfactant is very much less than with the comparative Powder A, which has a comparable overall composition and particle size distribution. Further, flow properties are improved over comparative Powder A, and Powder 1 dissolves more efficiently in the dissolution test than the comparative Example A of the same overall composition.
  • nonionic granules within and outside the invention were combined with a builder granule to form powders.
  • Nonionic granules containing soap as structurant were prepared in a Fukae FS30 granulator. The following procedure was used.
  • Solid raw materials (zeolite, silica) were dosed into the granulator and pre-mixed (if applicable) for 10 seconds, using an agitator speed of 100 rpm and a chopper speed of 3000 rpm.
  • a mixture of nonionic and fatty acid, heated to approximately 60°C was added on top of the solids, after which 50% NaOH solution was sprinkled on top.
  • the mixture was granulated, using agitator speeds of 100-200 rpm and a chopper speed of 200 rpm. Typical granulation times were 0.5 to 2.5 mins.
  • the resulting powder was layered with silica or zeolite and removed from the granulator.
  • compositions of the granules are shown in the following table.
  • compositions N2 to N4 according to the invention have a high nonionic surfactant level. This is due to the use of the silica carrier in place of zeolite.
  • the compositions N2 to N4 according to the invention have a lower zeolite level than the composition NX which is comparative. They have similar particle size distributions to comparative composition NX. It is clear that the compositions according to the invention which have high silica levels and low zeolite levels generally have similar flow properties to the comparative example.
  • the product of the invention has similar or better storage properties when measured in terms of the leaching of nonionic surfactant into polyamide or paper filters. This is particularly apparent when the weight increase of the filters is given in terms of the nonionic surfactant available.
  • the resulting powder was dried in a Aeromatic Strea-1 fluid bed at a temperature of 80°C.
  • the resulting powder B2 had the following composition: Ingredients B2 (wt%) Zeolite 4A (anh) 55.2 Sodiumcarbonate 12.2 Sokalan CP5 10.7 Moisture 21.9
  • Nonionic granules N3, N4 and NX were mixed in various proportions with builder granules B2 and/or other 5 ingredients to provide fully formulated powdered detergent compositions having suitable levels of surfactant (20%) and builder for use in fabric washing.
  • a nonionic-surfactant-containing granular composition N6 according to the present invention was manufactured in a two-step process according to the invention.
  • the storage stability of this composition was compared to a similar granule N5 prepared as described previously for granules N2-N4.
  • the two step process was carried out as follows:
  • Granulation time was 15 secs, using an agitator speed of 200 rpm and a chopper speed of 3000 rpm. The powder was discharged and left to cool.
  • N6 The formulation and storage stability of N6 was compared to the stability of N5.
  • Nonionic surfactant (Synperonic A7) 67.5 64.7 Soap 2.8 7.8 Water etc.
  • the structurant (soap) level in N6 is clearly lower than in N5. Furthermore, the surfactant level in N6 is higher. Not withstanding those two facts the storage stability of N6 is better.
  • nonionic granules and anionic granules can be used in conjunction with a base powder of low surfactant content, and/or a builder granule, to prepare detergent powders of high bulk density and high surfactant content having excellent powder properties.
  • PAS Primary alcohol sulphate
  • granules were prepared using a dryer/granulator supplied by VRV SpA, according to the following process.
  • PAS paste containing 70% neutralised coco PAS and 30% water was dried in a dryer/granulator supplied by VRV SpA, Italy, using the following conditions.
  • the temperature of the material entering the drying zone was set at 60°C and a small negative pressure was applied to the drying zone.
  • a throughput in the flash drier of 120 kg/hr of paste was used.
  • the temperature of the wall of the drying zone was initially 140°C.
  • the heat transfer areas of the drying and cooling zones were 10 m 2 and 5m 2 respectively.
  • the temperature of the wall of the drying zone was raised in steps to 170°C.
  • the throughput was increased in steps to 430 kg/hr at 170°C.
  • the process conditions were stabilised for 15 minutes.
  • the particles then passed to a cooling zone operated at a temperature of 30°C.
  • Linear alkylbenzene sulphonate (LAS) granules were also produced in the same apparatus, by neutralising LAS acid with sodium carbonate. Furthermore, zeolite MAP was dosed as a layering agent and sodium sulphate was dosed as well.
  • a 1.2 m 2 VRV flash-drier machine was used having three equal jacket sections. Dosing ports for liquids and powders were situated just prior to the first hot section, with mid-jacket dosing ports available in the final two sections. Zeolite was added via this port in the final section. An electrically-powered oil heater provided the heating to the first two jacket sections. Ambient process water at 15°C was used for cooling the jacket in the final section.
  • Make-up air flow through the reactor was controlled between 10 and 50 m 3 /kg hr by opening a bypass on the exhaust vapour extraction fan. All experiments were carried out with the motor at full-speed giving a tip speed of about 30 m/s. Screw-feeders were calibrated to dose sodium carbonate and zeolite MAP for layering. The sodium carbonate and liquids were added just prior to the first hot section and zeolite layering was added into the third section which was cold.
  • the minimum level of zeolite was added to give free-flowing granules leaving the drier.
  • a jacket temperature of 145°C was used in the first two sections, with an estimated throughput of components 60 to 100 kg/hr.
  • a degree of neutralisation of alkyl benzene sulphonate of greater than 95 was achieved.
  • the granules A1 and A2 had the following compositions: Ingredients (wt%) A2 A1 NaPAS 90 NaLAS 81 Zeolite 4A 10 Sodium carbonate 5 Water 2 5 Miscellaneous 3 5
  • Dense STP granules B3 STP powder was continuously brought in a Schugi Flexomix granulator, while spraying on a 10% alkaline silicate solution. The exiting material was cooled in a fluid bed, resulting in a granular powder of bulk density 744 g/l having the following composition: Ingredients (wt%) B3 (wt%) STP 85.0 sodium silicate 2.3 water 12.7
  • Dense zeolite granules B4 Dense zeolite granules B4:
  • Zeolite MAP was continuously fed into a Lödige CB30 granulator, together with 40% Sokalan CP5 solution and water.
  • the CB30 was typically operated at a speed of 1500 rpm.
  • the resulting powder was continuously dried in a Niro fluid bed, using an air temperature of 200°C.
  • the resulting powder had a BD of 850 g/l and the following composition: Ingredients (wt%) B4 (wt%) Zeolite MAP (anh) 62.2 Sokalan CP5 20.7 water 17.1
  • Example 7 shows how standard low active sodium polyphosphate or zeolite built compositions can be post-dosed with anionic and nonionic surfactant containing granular compositions to boost the active level, to give powder compositions with acceptable flow rates.
  • Example 5 shows how a powder composition can be made entirely out of nonionic granules, builder containing granules and post-dosed ingredients, to give a product with a good flow rate.
  • Examples 6 and 8 show how builder containing granules, nonionic surfactant containing granular compositions and anionic surfactant containing granules can be mixed with post-dosed ingredients to provide fully formulated compositions with good flow rates.
  • Granules were prepared by dosing the silica powder into a Moulinex Multi Moulinette kitchen mixer.
  • a mixture containing 85 wt% nonionic (Synperonic A7 ex ICI) and 15 wt% fatty acid (Pristerene 4916 ex Unichema) was dosed at a temperature of around 60°C.
  • a stoichiometric amount of 50% NaOH solution was dosed to neutralise the fatty acid.
  • the mixture was granulated for 10 seconds, discharged and left to cool. In all cases powders with good granulometry were obtained.
  • Nonionic surfactant levels were obtained: Powder Silica Oil absorption of silica [ml/g] Nonionic level in powder [wt%] N7 Sorbosil TC15 2.8 64 N8 Sipernat D17 2.3 57 N9 Sipernat 50 3.3 66 N10 Aerosil 380 3.5 65 N11 Zeosyl 200 2.6 61 NY (Comparative) Zeolite MAP 0.6 28
  • N12 and N13 for use in detergent compositions according to the invention were produced, on a larger scale using a continuous granulation process.
  • N12 contained soap as a structurant
  • N13 contained glucose.
  • the process route consisted of a Lödige CB30, followed by a Niro fluid bed and a Mogensen sieve.
  • the Lödige CB30 was operated at 1500 rpm. Water was used to cool the CB30 jacket during the process.
  • the air flow in the Niro fluid bed was 900-1000 m 3 /hr.
  • the total flow of powder exiting the process was in the order of 600 kg/h.
  • Granule N12 Sorbosil TC15 was continuously dosed into the CB30, into which also a mixture of nonionic surfactant (Synperonic A7 ex ICI) and fatty acid (Pristerene 4916) was dosed via dosing pipes. At the same time 50% NaOH was dosed to neutralise the fatty acid. This set of solid and liquid materials was mixed and granulated in the CB30 after which the resulting powder was entered in the fluid bed and cooled with ambient air. Fines were filtered from the air stream with a cyclone and filter bags. Coarse particles (>1400 ⁇ m) were separated from the product by the Mogensen sieve.
  • Granule N13 Sorbosil TC15 was continously dosed into the CB30, into which also a nonionic surfactant (Synperonic A7 ex ICI) was dosed via dosing pipes. At the same time a 40% glucose solution was was dosed. This set of solid and liquid materials was mixed and granulated in the CB30 after which the resulting powder was entered in the fluid bed and treated with air which had a temperature of 80-120°C. Fines were filtered from the air stream with a cyclone and filter bags. Coarse particles (>1400 ⁇ m) were separated from the product by the Mogensen sieve.
  • the resulting granules had the formulations and properties shown in the table below.
  • a spray-dried detergent base powder F2 was prepared by making a slurry containing NaLAS, Synperonic A7, STP, silicate and water and drying the slurry in a countercurrent spray-drying tower to produce base powder F2 having the following composition: Ingredients F2 (wt%) NaLAS 27.4 Nonionic 3.1 STP 43.6 Silicate 11.6 Moisture, salts etc 14.3
  • nonionic surfactant was sprayed onto powder F2 by dosing 1880 g of this powder into an Eirich RV02 mixer and adding 120 g of Synperonic A7 while the mixer was operated at 400 rpm.
  • the granule N13 was used as the source of additional nonionic surfactant.
  • the flow rates of the invention products are substantially higher than of the comparative examples indicating that the use of separate nonionic granules is beneficial.
  • This Example illustrates the production of further nonionic granules containing a range of structurants using a two-step process.
  • Nonionic granules N14 to N19 were prepared via the two step process in a Moulinex Multi Moulinette kitchen mixer. Silica and nonionic surfactant were dosed in the Moulinex and mixed together for 10 seconds, after which the mixture was cooled to approximately 30°C. In the second step aqueous solutions of a structurant were added and the mixture was granulated for another 10 seconds. The resulting powder was dried in a Aeromatic Strea-1 fluid bed at 80°C.
  • Free-flowing granules with the following levels of nonionic surfactant and structurant were produced: Powder N14 N15 N16 N17 N18 N19 Structurant level [wt%] maltose 12.4 citrate /CP5 12.4 glucose /CP5 9.2 NaCl /CP5 6.0 PVA 4.5 sugar 4.6 Nonionic level [wt%] 55.0 56.3 58.9 60.1 61.1 61.2
  • Base powder F3 was prepared by making a slurry containing water, NaLAS, STP, silicate, sodium sulphate, SCMC and fluorescer. This slurry was spray-dried in a countercurrent spray-drying tower, resulting in the following composition: Ingredients F3 (wt%) NaLAS 37.9 STP 23.3 Silicate 11.0 Sodium sulphate 17.3 Moisture, minors 10.5
  • Base powder F4 was prepared by using a Lödige CB30 mixer, in which the various ingredients were mixed together, followed by a densification step in a Lödige KM300 mixer. The resulting powders were cooled in a fluid bed. In the CB30 mixer, phosphate and sodium carbonate were dosed as solid components.
  • the CB30 was operated at 1500 rpm and the exiting powder was layered with zeolite MAP prior to entering the KM300. After cooling in the fluid bed, powder was collected with the following composition: Ingredients [wt%] Base powder F4 NaLAS 21.1 STP 54.3 Sodium carbonate 12.3 zeolite MAP (anh) 4.0 Sokalan CP5 2.6 Moisture, minors etc 5.7
  • Builder granule B5 was prepared by the process described above for builder granule B3 (see Examples 7 to 10). Ingredients [wt%] Builder granule B5 STP 89.3 Silicate 1.8 Moisture, minors etc 8.9
  • Anionic granule A3 was prepared by the process described earlier for granule A2 (Examples 5 to 8), using a 2m 2 VRV machine: Composition [wt%] A3 NaLAS 70 Zeolite 4A 20 Zeolite MAP 5 Moisture, NDOM etc 5

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Detergent Compositions (AREA)

Claims (18)

  1. Composition détergente particulaire caractérisée en ce qu'elle est composée d'au moins deux composants granulaires différents :
    (a) un composant granulaire contenant un tensioactif non ionique caractérisé en ce qu'il comprend :
    (a1) plus de 55 % en poids de tensioactif non ionique,
    (a2) au moins 5 % en poids de silice ayant une capacité d'absorption d'huile d'au moins 1,0 ml/g,
    (a3) éventuellement, moins de 10 % en poids d'aluminosilicate,
    (b) au moins un autre composant granulaire.
  2. Composition détergente selon la revendication 1, caractérisée en ce que le composant granulaire (b) est choisi parmi :
    (b1) une poudre de base agglomérée ou séchée par pulvérisation contenant un tensioactif anionique, un adjuvant et éventuellement, un tensioactif non ionique,
    (b2) un granule d'adjuvant, et/ou
    (b3) un granule contenant au moins 60 % en poids de tensioactif anionique.
  3. Composition détergente selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, caractérisée en ce que le composant granulaire contenant un tensioactif non ionique (a) contient au moins 59 % en poids de tensioactif non ionique.
  4. Composition détergente selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, caractérisée en ce que le composant granulaire contenant un tensioactif non ionique (a) contient au moins 10 % en poids de silice.
  5. Composition détergente selon la revendication 4, caractérisée en ce que le composant granulaire contenant un tensioactif non ionique (a) contient au moins 15 % en poids de silice.
  6. Composition détergente selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, caractérisée en ce que la silice dans le composant granulaire contenant un tensioactif non ionique (a) possède une capacité d'absorption d'huile d'au moins 1,5 g/l.
  7. Composition détergente selon la revendication 6, caractérisée en ce que la silice dans le composant granulaire contenant un tensioactif anionique (a) possède une capacité d'absorption d'huile d'au moins 2,0 g/l.
  8. Composition détergente selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, caractérisée en ce que le composant granulaire contenant un tensioactif non ionique (a) contient moins de 5 % en poids d'aluminosilicate.
  9. Composition détergente selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, caractérisée en ce que le composant granulaire contenant un tensioactif non ionique (a) contient de 2 à 15 % en poids d'un agent structurant.
  10. Composition détergente selon la revendication 9, caractérisée en ce que le composant granulaire contenant un tensioactif non ionique (a) contient un agent structurant choisi parmi les savons, les sucres, les succinates, les silicates, les citrates, les polyéthylène/propylèneglycol de masse moléculaire valant de 1000 à 12.000, les polyacrylates de masse moléculaire valant de 30.000 à 200.000, les poly(alcools vinyliques) de masse moléculaire valant de 30.000 à 200.000, les copolymères acrylate/maléate et leurs mélanges.
  11. Composition détergente selon la revendication 10, caractérisée en ce que le composant granulaire contenant un tensioactif non ionique (a) contient un agent structurant choisi parmi le polyéthylèneglycol, le savon, le maltose, le glucose, le saccharose, le poly(alcool vinylique) et un copolymère acrylate/ maléate en mélange avec le glucose, le chlorure de sodium ou le citrate trisodique.
  12. Composition détergente selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, caractérisée en ce qu'elle comprend de 2 à 50 % en poids du composant granulaire contenant un tensioactif non ionique (a) et de 50 à 98 % en poids d'un ou plusieurs autres composants granulaires (b), les pourcentages étant rapportés à la quantité totale des composants granulaires (a) et (b).
  13. Procédé pour la préparation d'une composition granulaire contenant un tensioactif non ionique contenant plus de 55 % en poids de tensioactif non ionique, au moins 5 % en poids de silice ayant une capacité d'absorption d'huile d'au moins 1,0 ml/g, de 5 à 15 % en poids d'un agent structurant et éventuellement moins de 10 % en poids d'aluminosilicate, caractérisé en ce qu'il comprend les étapes qui consistent à :
    (i) mélanger de 70 à 100 % en poids des composants solides, de 70 à 100 % en poids du tensioactif non ionique et moins de 50 % en poids de l'agent structurant, et
    (ii) ajouter le reste du tensioactif non ionique et des composants solides et encore mélanger.
  14. Procédé selon la revendication 13, caractérisé en ce que l'on ajoute au moins 80 % en poids, de préférence au moins 90 % en poids, des composants solides dans l'étape (i).
  15. Procédé selon la revendication 13 ou 14, caractérisé en ce que l'on ajoute de 2 à 10 % en poids de l'agent structurant aux composants dans le malaxeur dans l'étape (i).
  16. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 13 à 15, caractérisé en ce que l'on ajoute au moins 70 % en poids de l'agent structurant dans l'étape (ii).
  17. Composition granulaire contenant un tensioactif non ionique contenant plus de 55 % en poids de tensioactif non ionique, au moins 5 % en poids de silice ayant une capacité d'absorption d'huile d'au moins 1,0 ml/g, de 5 à 15 % en poids d'un agent structurant et éventuellement moins de 10 % en poids d'aluminosilicate, préparée par un procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 13 à 16.
  18. Composition détergente particulaire selon la revendication 1, caractérisée en ce que la composition granulaire contenant un tensioactif non ionique (a) est préparée par un procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 13 à 16.
EP98930715A 1997-05-30 1998-05-11 Compositions detergentes contenant des granules tensioactives non ioniques Expired - Lifetime EP0985016B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB9711353 1997-05-30
GBGB9711353.4A GB9711353D0 (en) 1997-05-30 1997-05-30 Nonionic surfactant containing granular composition and detergent compositions containing it
PCT/EP1998/002983 WO1998054281A1 (fr) 1997-05-30 1998-05-11 Compositions detergentes contenant des granules tensioactives non ioniques

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0985016A1 EP0985016A1 (fr) 2000-03-15
EP0985016B1 true EP0985016B1 (fr) 2001-10-24

Family

ID=10813433

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP98930715A Expired - Lifetime EP0985016B1 (fr) 1997-05-30 1998-05-11 Compositions detergentes contenant des granules tensioactives non ioniques

Country Status (12)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0985016B1 (fr)
AR (1) AR015701A1 (fr)
AU (1) AU8105598A (fr)
BR (1) BR9809889A (fr)
CA (1) CA2291638A1 (fr)
DE (1) DE69802188T2 (fr)
ES (1) ES2166168T3 (fr)
GB (1) GB9711353D0 (fr)
IN (1) IN190311B (fr)
TR (1) TR200000109T2 (fr)
WO (1) WO1998054281A1 (fr)
ZA (1) ZA984217B (fr)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2020222996A1 (fr) * 2019-04-29 2020-11-05 The Procter & Gamble Company Procédé de fabrication d'une composition de détergent destiné au lavage du linge
RU2773345C1 (ru) * 2019-04-29 2022-06-02 Дзе Проктер Энд Гэмбл Компани Способ получения композиции моющего средства для стирки

Families Citing this family (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB9825558D0 (en) * 1998-11-20 1999-01-13 Unilever Plc Granular detergent components and particulate detergent compositions containing them
GB9825563D0 (en) 1998-11-20 1999-01-13 Unilever Plc Particulate laundry detergent compositions containing anionic surfactant granules
GB9825560D0 (en) 1998-11-20 1999-01-13 Unilever Plc Particulate laundry detergent compositons containing nonionic surfactant granules
GB9826097D0 (en) 1998-11-27 1999-01-20 Unilever Plc Detergent compositions
GB9913547D0 (en) 1999-06-10 1999-08-11 Unilever Plc Particulate detergent composition containing zeolite
GB0006037D0 (en) * 2000-03-13 2000-05-03 Unilever Plc Detergent composition
GB0409959D0 (en) * 2004-05-05 2004-06-09 Unilever Plc Detergent composition
DE102005018925A1 (de) * 2005-04-22 2006-10-26 Henkel Kgaa Wasch- oder Reinigungsmittel
MX2012000482A (es) * 2009-07-09 2012-01-27 Procter & Gamble Proceso continuo para fabricar una composicion detergen te de lavanderia.

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2954487B2 (ja) * 1994-07-13 1999-09-27 花王株式会社 非イオン性粉末洗浄剤組成物
JPH0995694A (ja) * 1995-09-29 1997-04-08 Lion Corp 粒状ノニオン洗剤組成物およびその製造方法

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2020222996A1 (fr) * 2019-04-29 2020-11-05 The Procter & Gamble Company Procédé de fabrication d'une composition de détergent destiné au lavage du linge
CN113728083A (zh) * 2019-04-29 2021-11-30 宝洁公司 用于制备衣物洗涤剂组合物的方法
RU2773345C1 (ru) * 2019-04-29 2022-06-02 Дзе Проктер Энд Гэмбл Компани Способ получения композиции моющего средства для стирки

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
BR9809889A (pt) 2000-07-04
ZA984217B (en) 1999-11-19
WO1998054281A1 (fr) 1998-12-03
DE69802188D1 (de) 2001-11-29
IN190311B (fr) 2003-07-12
AU8105598A (en) 1998-12-30
EP0985016A1 (fr) 2000-03-15
GB9711353D0 (en) 1997-07-30
DE69802188T2 (de) 2002-03-14
TR200000109T2 (tr) 2000-08-21
ES2166168T3 (es) 2002-04-01
AR015701A1 (es) 2001-05-16
CA2291638A1 (fr) 1998-12-03

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6221831B1 (en) Free flowing detergent composition containing high levels of surfactant
US6369020B1 (en) Granular detergent components and particulate detergent compositions containing them
EP0985014B2 (fr) Compositions detergentes
CA2351760C (fr) Compositions detergentes de blanchisserie contenant des granules de tensioactif anionique
EP0985026B1 (fr) Compositions detergentes particulaires
EP0985016B1 (fr) Compositions detergentes contenant des granules tensioactives non ioniques
AU768794B2 (en) Particulate detergent composition containing zeolite
AU730912B2 (en) Phosphate-built detergent compositions
EP1185603B1 (fr) Composition granulaire de detergence contenant une zeolithe map
CA2290399C (fr) Compositions detergentes particulaires a ecoulement fluide

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19991203

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): DE ES FR GB IT

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20010115

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): DE ES FR GB IT

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69802188

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20011129

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: IF02

ET Fr: translation filed
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2166168

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

PLBQ Unpublished change to opponent data

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OPPO

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

PLBF Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OBSO

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: SUED-CHEMIE AG

Effective date: 20020722

PLBF Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OBSO

PLBF Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OBSO

PLBQ Unpublished change to opponent data

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OPPO

PLAB Opposition data, opponent's data or that of the opponent's representative modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009299OPPO

R26 Opposition filed (corrected)

Opponent name: SUED-CHEMIE AG

Effective date: 20020722

PLCK Communication despatched that opposition was rejected

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREJ1

PLBN Opposition rejected

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009273

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: OPPOSITION REJECTED

27O Opposition rejected

Effective date: 20031007

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20110526

Year of fee payment: 14

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20110607

Year of fee payment: 14

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20110525

Year of fee payment: 14

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20110527

Year of fee payment: 14

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20110525

Year of fee payment: 14

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20120511

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120511

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20130131

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 69802188

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20121201

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120511

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120531

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20121201

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20130820

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120512