EP0960399B2 - Procede et appareil de traitement de documents - Google Patents

Procede et appareil de traitement de documents Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0960399B2
EP0960399B2 EP97927796A EP97927796A EP0960399B2 EP 0960399 B2 EP0960399 B2 EP 0960399B2 EP 97927796 A EP97927796 A EP 97927796A EP 97927796 A EP97927796 A EP 97927796A EP 0960399 B2 EP0960399 B2 EP 0960399B2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
bills
bill
evaluation device
pocket
user
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP97927796A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP0960399A4 (fr
EP0960399B1 (fr
EP0960399A1 (fr
Inventor
Lars R. Stromme
Frank M. Csulits
Bradford T. Graves
William J. Jones
Robert L. Klein
Richard A. Mazur
Douglas U. Mennie
Heinz W. Schreiter
Matthew L. Anderson
Mark C. Munro
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Cummins Allison Corp
Original Assignee
Cummins Allison Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=27361048&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP0960399(B2) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Cummins Allison Corp filed Critical Cummins Allison Corp
Priority to EP99113458A priority Critical patent/EP0952556A3/fr
Priority to EP01121852A priority patent/EP1168254A3/fr
Priority to EP02008595.7A priority patent/EP1227446B2/fr
Publication of EP0960399A4 publication Critical patent/EP0960399A4/xx
Publication of EP0960399A1 publication Critical patent/EP0960399A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0960399B1 publication Critical patent/EP0960399B1/fr
Publication of EP0960399B2 publication Critical patent/EP0960399B2/fr
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07D—HANDLING OF COINS OR VALUABLE PAPERS, e.g. TESTING, SORTING BY DENOMINATIONS, COUNTING, DISPENSING, CHANGING OR DEPOSITING
    • G07D7/00—Testing specially adapted to determine the identity or genuineness of valuable papers or for segregating those which are unacceptable, e.g. banknotes that are alien to a currency
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07D—HANDLING OF COINS OR VALUABLE PAPERS, e.g. TESTING, SORTING BY DENOMINATIONS, COUNTING, DISPENSING, CHANGING OR DEPOSITING
    • G07D11/00—Devices accepting coins; Devices accepting, dispensing, sorting or counting valuable papers
    • G07D11/20—Controlling or monitoring the operation of devices; Data handling
    • G07D11/24—Managing the stock of valuable papers
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07D—HANDLING OF COINS OR VALUABLE PAPERS, e.g. TESTING, SORTING BY DENOMINATIONS, COUNTING, DISPENSING, CHANGING OR DEPOSITING
    • G07D11/00—Devices accepting coins; Devices accepting, dispensing, sorting or counting valuable papers
    • G07D11/50—Sorting or counting valuable papers

Definitions

  • An apparatus for counting and verifying documents which is provided with a digital control network is known from US-A-5,430,664 .
  • the digital control network coordinates the operations of counting and verifying documents.
  • a transport mechanism moves documents along a guide path through the apparatus.
  • Sensors are located along the guide path for determining optical and magnetic characteristics of the documents and producing signals relative thereto.
  • the measured signals are sampled and digitized by an analog-to digital converter under the control of a microprocessor. Multiple samples of the sensor signals are accumulated within memory as each document passes adjacent to the sensors.
  • the accumulated values are compared with reference values in order to verify each document which passes adjacent to the sensors.
  • Documents are counted after verification. individual piece counts and monetary values of such piece counts are provided and counterfeit documents, such as passed for United States currency, can be detected.
  • US-A-4,653,647 discloses a device according to the preamble of claim 1.
  • the present invention provides a device and a method according to the independent claims.
  • FIG. 1 depicts an exterior perspective view
  • FIG. 2 is a side view of a multi-pocket document evaluation device 10 such as a currency discriminator according to one embodiment of the present invention.
  • the currency discriminator 10 is compact having a height (H) of about 17 1 ⁇ 2 inches (44.5 cm), width (W) of about 13 1 ⁇ 2 inches (34.3 cm), and a depth (D) of about 15 inches (38.1 cm) and weighs approximately 35 lbs. (16 kg).
  • the evaluation device 10 may be rested upon a tabletop.
  • currency bills are fed, one by one, from a stack of currency bills placed in an input receptacle 12 into a transport mechanism.
  • the transport mechanism includes a transport plate or guide plate 240 for guiding currency bills to one of a plurality of output receptacles 217a and 217b.
  • a bill Before reaching the output receptacles 217a. 217b a bill can be, for example, evaluated, analyzed, authenticated, discriminated, counted and/or otherwise processed. The results of the above process or processes may be used to determine to which output receptacle 217a, 217b a bill is directed.
  • documents such as currency bills are transported, scanned, and identified at a rate equal to or greater than 600 bills per minute. In another embodiment, documents such as currency bills are transported, scanned, and identified at a rate equal to or greater than 800 bills per minute. In another embodiment, documents such as currency bills are transported, scanned, and identified at a rate equal to or greater than 1000 bills per minute.
  • the identification may include the determination of the denomination of each bill.
  • the input receptacle 12 for receiving a stack of bills to be processed is formed by downwardly sloping and converging walls 205 and 206 (see FIG. 2 ) formed by a pair of removable covers (not shown) which snap onto a frame.
  • the converging wall 206 supports a removable hopper (not shown) that includes vertically disposed side walls (not shown).
  • One embodiment of an input receptacle is described and illustrated in more detail in PCT patent application Publication No. WO 96/10800 published on April 11, 1996.
  • the currency discriminator 10 in FIG. 1 has a touch panel display 15 in one embodiment of the present invention which displays appropriate "functional" keys when appropriate.
  • the touch panel display 15 simplifies the operation of the multi-pocket currency discriminator 10.
  • the touch panel display 15 may be a full graphics display. Alternatively or additionally physical keys or buttons may be employed.
  • the currency bills are moved in seriatim from the bottom of a stack of bills along a curved guideway 211 (shown in FIG. 2 ) which receives bills moving downwardly and rearwardly and changes the direction of travel to a forward direction.
  • a stripping wheel 220 (shown in FIG. 3 ) mounted on a stripping wheel shaft 219 aids in feeding the bills to the curved guideway 211.
  • the curvature of the guideway 211 corresponds substantially to the curved periphery of a drive roll 223 so as to form a narrow passageway for the bills along the rear side of the drive roll 223.
  • An exit end of the curved guideway 211 directs the bills onto the transport plate 240 which carries the bills through an evaluation section and to one of the output receptacles 217a, 217b.
  • Stacking of the bills in one embodiment is accomplished by a pair of driven stacking wheels 212a and 213a for the first or upper output receptacle 217a and by a pair of stacking wheels 212b and 213b for the second or bottom output receptacle 217b.
  • the stacker wheels 212a,b and 213a,b are supported for rotational movement about respective shafts 215a,b journalled on a rigid frame and driven by a motor (not shown).
  • Flexible blades of the stacker wheels 212a and 213a deliver the bills onto a forward end of a stacker plate 214a.
  • the flexible blades of the stacker wheels 212b and 213b deliver the bills onto a forward end of a stacker plate 214b.
  • a diverter 260 directs the bills to either the first or second output receptacle 217a, 217b. When the diverter is in a lower position, bills are directed to the first output receptacle 217a. When the diverter 260 is in an upper position, bills proceed in the direction of the second output receptacle 217b.
  • a bill 20 being transported by the drive roll 223 engages the transport plate 240.
  • Bills are positively driven along the transport plate 240 by means of a transport roll arrangement comprising both driven and passive rolls.
  • a pair of O-rings 244 and 245 fit into grooves formed in a drive roll 241 and in the drive roll 223.
  • the pair of O-rings 244 and 245 engage the bill 20 continuously between the two driven upper rolls 223 and 241 and assist in holding the bill 20 flat against the transport plate 240.
  • Such an embodiment aids to the performance of the sensors of the evaluation region 247.
  • Rolls 223 and 241 are driven by a motor (not shown) via a belt 21.
  • Such an arrangement is illustrated in more detail in United States patent application Serial No. 08/450,505 referred to above,
  • Passive rolls 250, 251 are mounted on an underside of the transport plate 240 in such a manner as to be freewheeling about their respective axes 254 and 255 and biased into counter-rotating contact with their corresponding driven upper rolls 223 and 241.
  • the passive rolls 250 and 251 preferably have high-friction rubber surfaces and are biased into contact with their respective driven upper rolls 223 and 241 by means of a pair of H-shaped leaf springs 252 and 253 (see FIG. 5 ).
  • the central portion of each leaf spring is fastened to the transport plate 240, which is fastened rigidly to the machine frame, so that the relatively stiff arms of the H-shaped springs exert a constant biasing pressure against the passive rolls 250 and 251 and push them against the corresponding upper rolls 223 and 241.
  • the driven and passive transport rolls are preferably coplanar with a flat upper surface of the transport plate 240 so that currency bills can be positively driven along the top surface of the plate in a flat manner.
  • the bills are firmly gripped under uniform pressure between the driven and passive rolls.
  • the H-shaped leaf springs 252 and 253 aid in reducing bill twisting or skewing.
  • the O-rings 244, 245 are also effective in ensuring that central portions of the bills are held flat.
  • the distance between the axes of the two driven upper rolls 223 and 241 and the corresponding counter-rotating passive rolls 250 and 251 is selected to be just short of a length of a narrow dimension of the currency bills.
  • FIG. 6 depicts various shafts of the multi-pocket document evaluation device 10 according to one embodiment of the present invention.
  • the distance between the shafts should preferably be less than the width of the bills that are to be evaluated.
  • the transport plate 240 is substantially flat and linear.
  • the uncomplicated surfaces of the transport plate 240 have no protruding features.
  • the bills are delivered to an appropriate output receptacle 217a or 217b after being evaluated without the use of belts contacting the bills.
  • the transport plate 240 has a first substantially planar region 240a defining a first plane. The evaluation of bills is performed in the first substantially planar region 240a.
  • the first substantially planar region 240a ends at a point 300.
  • the transport plate 240 also has a second substantially planar region 240b defining a second plane.
  • the second substantially planar region 240b begins at the point 300.
  • the second substantially planar region extends up to a diverting flange 240d.
  • the first and second substantially planar regions 240a and 240b substantially define the entire region of the transport path from the evaluation mechanism to the plurality of output receptacles 217a.b.
  • the second substantially planar region 240b does not deviate from the first substantially planar region 240a by more than about 90 degrees. In a second embodiment, the second region 240b does not deviate from the first region 240a by more than about 60 degrees. In a third embodiment, the second region 240b does not deviate from the first region 240a by more than about 45 degrees. In a fourth embodiment, the second region 240b does not deviate from the first region 240a by more than about 30 degrees. As depicted in FIG. 7a , the second region 240b is substantially planar with the first region 240a, deviating from the first region 240a by an angle of ⁇ degrees where ⁇ is about 26 degrees.
  • the transport plate 240 also has a third substantially planar region 240c defining a third plane.
  • the third substantially planar region 240c does not deviate by more than about 45 degrees from the first region 240a. In another embodiment, the third region 240c does not deviate by more than about 25 degrees from the first region 240a. As depicted in FIG. 7a , the third region 240c deviates from the first region 240a by an angle of ⁇ degrees where ⁇ is about 16 degrees.
  • the transport plate 240 has a plurality of apertures 25 therein.
  • aperturcs 25 are present only where necessary to facilitate the functioning of passive rolls and driven rolls and a diverter 260.
  • apertures 25 are present only where necessary to facilitate the functioning of passive and driven rolls, diverter 260, and various sensors such as scanheads, doubles detectors, and document location sensors.
  • Apertures for sensors may covered with materials that do not interfere with the functioning of corresponding sensors while nonetheless facilitating the transport plate in appearing smooth and continuous to passing bills. For example, when optical sensors are being employed, corresponding apertures may contain lenses that are flush with the transport surface of the transport plate. Likewise, materials that do not interfere with the operation of magnetic sensors may be employed to cover any apertures created to facilitate their operation.
  • the transport plate may be constructed from a material that does not interfere with the operation of such sensors so that no apertures need be created in the first place, e.g. , a clear plastic transport plate permitting the functioning of optical sensors.
  • Apertures 25c and 25d may contain lenses that are flush with the transport surface of the transport plate. Where apertures 25c and 25d contain such lenses, the transport plate 240a effectively contains only apertures 25a and 25b ( i.e ., apertures only for the transport rolls and the diverter).
  • Apertures 25a and 25b in a second region 240b of the transport plate 240 are shown in FIG. 7d .
  • This clean and unobstructed of transport plate 240 facilitates a reduction in the jamming of the currency bills as well as facilitating the ease with which jammed bills can be removed from the system 10.
  • the transport plate 240 has a unitary and integral construction. Such an embodiment is depicted in FIGs. 2 and 7a-7e . However, the transport plate 240 may be constructed of a plurality of individual plates. Such an alternate embodiment is illustrated in FIGs. 10a , 10b , 11a , and 11b . Referring to FIG. 11b , a portion of a transport plate 240' is depicted in which one of a plurality of individual plates is illustrated. The transport plate 240' includes the portion depicted in FIG. 11b and another portion 240'' (see FIG. 10a ) in the vicinity of the evaluation region. In one embodiment, the transport plate 240" is comprised of a molded plastic plate.
  • the portion of the transport plate 240' depicted in FIG. 11b has a first substantially planar region 240e defining a first plane.
  • the substantially planar region 240e begins after the bills have been evaluated.
  • the substantially planar region 240e may optionally be slightly angled at a point 301' to assist in preventing bills from getting caught in the area between the evaluating mechanism and the substantially planar region 240e.
  • the first substantially planar region 240e ends at a point 300'.
  • the transport plate 240' also has a second substantially planar region 240f defining a second plane.
  • the second substantially planar region 240f begins at the point 300'.
  • the second substantially planar region extends up to a diverting flange 240g.
  • the first and second substantially planar regions 240e and 240f define substantially the entire path from the evaluation region to the plurality of output receptacles 217a,b.
  • FIGs. 8a-8c and 9a-9c illustrate, respectively, first and second follower plates 262 and 278. As illustrated, these plates are substantially free from surface features and are substantially smooth like the transport plate 240.
  • the follower plates 262 and 278 are positioned in spaced relation to transport plate 240 so as to define a currency pathway there between.
  • the follower plates 262 and 278 and the transport plate such a 240 or 240' contribute to defining a pathway that is free and unencumbered between the roll 251 and the output receptacles 217a and 217b for the bill. As illustrated, the follower plates 262 and 278 have apertures only where necessary for accommodation of passive rolls 268, 270, 284, and 286.
  • FIG. 9a illustrates a bill 20 between the driven rolls 280 and 282 and their respective passive rolls 284 and 286.
  • the passive rolls 284. 286 are biased by H-springs 288, 289 into passive counter-rotating contact with the driven rolls 280, 282, respectively, in a manner similar to that described above in connection with passive rolls 250, 251.
  • Bills are then directed to the lower output receptacle 217b via the stacker wheels 212b and 213b.
  • a sensor 235b Also illustrated in FIG. 9a is a sensor 235b. Sensor 235b may be used to detect when bills pass by the sensor. The above description of sensor 235a in connection with FIG. 8a likewise applies to sensor 235b.
  • the multi-pocket document evaluation devices 10 of FIGs. 12-14 includes passive rolls 250, 251 which are mounted on an underside of the transport plate 240 and are biased into counter-rotating contact with their corresponding driven upper rolls 223 and 241.
  • Other embodiments includes a plurality of follower plates which are substantially free from surface features and are substantially smooth like the transport plate 240.
  • the follower plates 262 and 278 are positioned in spaced relation to transport plate 240 so as to define a currency pathway there between.
  • follower plates 262 and 278 have apertures only where necessary for accommodation of passive rolls 268, 270, 284, and 286.
  • sensors may be employed to detect bills or security threads printed or coated with thermochromatic materials (materials that change color with a change in temperature). Examples of threads incorporating thermochromatic materials are described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,465,301 .
  • the scanhead 18a also includes a photodetector 26a mounted directly over the center of the illuminated strip for sensing the light reflected off the strip.
  • a lower scanhead 18b includes a pair of LEDs 22b. directing light upwardly through an optical mask on top of the lens 283 onto a bill traversing the flat guide plate 240 above the scanhead.
  • no call bills are delivered to an output receptacle separate from the one or more output receptacles receiving identified bills.
  • the operation of the discriminator need not be suspended until all the bills placed in the input receptacle have been processed.
  • the value of any no call bills may then be added to the appropriate counters after the stack of bills has been processed through a reconciliation process.
  • One embodiment that may be used for stopping the transport mechanism in response to the detection of an unidentified bill or a bill meeting some other criteria such as being a suspect bill. denomination change, etc., is described in more detail in U.S. Pat. No. 5,295,196 .
  • one or more sensors retrieve information from passing bills. This information is processed by a signal processor such as a CPU.
  • the position of bills in the transport mechanism is monitored. This monitoring of bill positioned is accomplished via the use of an optical encoder as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,295,196 . If the denomination of the bill is identified, the signal processor generates a signal indicative of the determined denomination. If the denomination of the bill is not determined, the signal processor generates a no call signal.
  • a suspect signal is generated or a particular type of suspect signal is generated indicative of the reason why the bill is believed to be suspect, e.g., failure of a magnetic test, failure of a UV test, etc.
  • error signals may be generated for other reasons including the detection of various minor errors such as a denomination change or stranger condition or the detection a major error such as doubles or chains.
  • the authenticating and discriminating unit 406 determines that a bill is a fake
  • the flagged bill is routed to a specific one of the output receptacles.
  • the operation of the discriminator may or may not then be suspended.
  • the no call bill may be transported to one of the output receptacles 408', 408".
  • suspect bills may be delivered to a specific one of the two output receptacles (i.e ., a reject receptacle) and no calls and identified bills may be sent to the other output receptacle.
  • the operation of the discriminator need not be suspended when a suspect bill is encountered but may be suspended when a no call bill is encountered. If the operation is suspended at the time the no call bill is detected and the operator determines that the no call bill is acceptable. the operator returns the bill to the output receptacle from which it was removed (if it was removed) and selects a selection element (not shown) corresponding to the denomination of the flagged bill. Appropriate counters (not shown) are incremented, the discriminator system 403 resumes operation.
  • the operator determines that the flagged bill is unacceptable, the operator removes the bill without replacement from the output receptacle and selects a continuation element (not shown).
  • the discriminator system 403 resumes operation without incrementing the counters associated with the various denomination and/or the total value counters.
  • no call bills are delivered to a specific output receptacle separate from the output receptacle receiving identified bills.
  • the operation of the discriminator need not be suspended until all the bills placed in the input receptacle 404 have been processed.
  • the operation of the discriminator need not be suspended when a no call is encountered but may be suspended when a suspect bill is detected so that the operator may remove any suspect bills from the discriminator.
  • the value of any no call bills may then be added to the appropriate counters after the stack of bills has been processed through a reconciliation process.
  • the flagged bill when the transport mechanism is to be stopped in response to a bill being flagged, the flagged bill may be located at a predetermined position within an output receptacle. e.g ., last bill, in stacker wheel, or alternatively, the transport mechanism may be stopped before the flagged bill is transported to one of the output receptacles.
  • the system 403 may correspond, for example, to the discriminators described above having two output pockets such as those shown in FIGs. 1-2, and 10 .
  • the discrimination system is selectively programmable among several operating modes so that an operator may select, for example, which bills to flag, in which pocket to direct the flagged or unflagged bills, and/or which stopping conditions to activate or de-activate.
  • the several operating modes will be discussed in detail below.
  • the system may be programmed to deliver a flagged bill into a selected pocket and suspend operation of the machine to allow for inspection of the bill, as described in relation to FIG. 17 . or the machine may be programmed to "off-sort'' flagged or unflagged bills into a different pocket and either stop to allow for inspection of the "off-sorted" bill or continue processing the stack of bills without stopping.
  • a bill may be flagged and the discriminator systems described above such as those in conjunction with FIGs, 1-2, 10a-10b, 12-14, and 17-18 may be stopped upon encountering an unidentified or "no call" bill, as discussed above, or for any number of other stopping conditions.
  • these discriminator systems may stop upon the occurrence of minor errors or major errors, both of which will be discussed in detail below.
  • These discriminator systems may include an audio alarm to provide an audible signal upon the occurrence of one or more of the minor or major error conditions.
  • the audio alarm is programmable to permit the operator to selectively activate or de-activate the audio alarm for any or all of the minor or major error conditions.
  • a "no call" condition occurs when the discriminating device is unable to identify or determine the denomination of a note, the unidentified note being termed a no call.
  • a "Suspect Document” is a note that fails one or more authentication tests based on a variety of monitored parameters.
  • a discriminating device may permit the operator to enable or disable the detection of Suspect Documents, by for example, enabling or disabling one or more the authentication tests.
  • a "Separate Series" condition occurs when a note is identified as having a different series than prior bills or a target series. For example, when a new-series $100 bill (i.e. , a 1996-series $100 bill) is scanned in a stack of previously scanned old-series $100 bills, the condition "Separate Series" may occur. This function may be employed in conjunction with the modes described below where it is desired to discriminate of notes based on their series, e.g ., to discriminate between a 1993-series $50 bills and 1950-series $50 bills or to discriminate between all pre-1996 series U.S. notes from all 1996 and later series U.S. notes.
  • An "Reverse-Oriented" condition occurs when a machine is operating in a Forward/Reverse Orientation mode and a document having a forward/reverse orientation other than a target forward/reverse orientation is detected.
  • the discrimination device may permit the setting of limits on the number of bills based on various conditions. For example, it may be desirable to gather $20 bills into stacks of fifty bills. Accordingly, if for example bills are being processed such that $20 bills and only $20 are being directed into the first output receptacle, the device may halt after fifty $20 bills have been delivered into the first pocket. The display may then indicate that a strap limit has been reached for the first output pocket. Various strap limits may be factory-preset or user-set. Alternatively, "Strap Limits" may be determined by combining the number of notes delivered to two or more of the output pockets.
  • the "Stacker Full” condition occurs when either or both of the pockets are at or near capacity and are not to receive additional notes.
  • the discriminating device may be programmed to halt after 300 notes have been delivered to either of the pockets.
  • the "stacker full” condition thereby will occur upon delivery of the 300th note.
  • the pockets are designed to receive 600 currency notes, the "stacker full” condition will occur upon delivery of the 600th note.
  • pocket 1 to allow the operator to inspect the note, or the machine may be programmed to off-sort the flagged note into the other pocket (e.g., pocket 2).
  • the machine may be designed to either stop (present the note into pocket 2) and allow the operator to inspect the note, or continue processing the remaining notes in the stack.
  • the machine Upon encountering other minor errors such as "no call”, “suspect document”, and “separate series", the machine will stop, presenting the flagged bills into one of the pockets. Alternatively, one or more of these conditions may cause flagged bills to be off-sorted into pocket 2 without causing the system to stop. The system may permit the operator to select how these bills are to be handled via a set-up option.
  • the discriminator automatically selects the target denominations
  • the machine will designate $1 as the target note and will deliver $1 bills into pocket 1 until encountering the first non-$1 bill.
  • the first non-$1 bill which may for example be a $5 bill, will then be "presented" into pocket 1.
  • the operator may then remove all $1 bills from pocket 1 and then select an appropriate continuation key.
  • the machine will designate $5 as the new target note and will proceed to deliver $5 bills into pocket 1 until encountering the first non-$5 bill, and so on until the entire stack has been processed.
  • the discriminator automatically selects the target series and denomination
  • the machine will designate 1996-series $100 bills as the target note and will deliver 1996-series $100 bills into pocket 1 until encountering the first non-1996-series $100 bill.
  • the first non-1996-series $100 bill which may, for example, be a 1995-series $5 bill, will then be off-sorted into pocket 2,
  • the machine then continues to process notes, delivering 1996-series $100 bills into pocket 1 and 1995-series $5 bills into pocket 2, until encountering the next separate series condition ( i.e., a bill other than a 1996-series $100 or a 1995-series $5).
  • target series are defined by series or group of series without regard to denomination.
  • factory default or user defined series categories may be defined.
  • a "new series” group may be defined to include all bills having a series of 1996 or later. This group may include for example, 1996-series $100s and 1997-series $50s and $20s).
  • An "old-series” group may be defined as all other bills.
  • a "series 1" group may be defined to include, for example. all 1996-series and later $100s, all 1997-series and later $50s and $20s, and all $1s, $2, $5, and $10 regardless of series).
  • Counter Mode is designed to accommodate a stack of notes in any configuration, where the operator desires to determine the number or total value of notes in a stack.
  • the discriminator will process the stack, placing notes into pocket 1 until encountering a "stacker full” or “strap limit” condition, in which case the discriminator will automatically begin to place the notes into pocket 2. Thereafter, upon encountering the "stacker full” or “strap limit” condition in pocket 2, the machine will again switch pockets and begin delivering bills into pocket 1 if pocket 1 has been cleared by the operator. If pocket 1 has not been cleared and the "stacker full” or “strap limit” condition thereby exists in both pockets 1 and 2, the machine will stop, requiring the operator to remove the bills from either pocket 1 or pocket 2 before continuing.
  • FIG. 37 an example of the operating parameters selection screen for a Sort 3 mode is illustrated.
  • $5 bills having any face orientation, any forward/reverse orientation, or any series
  • the first non-$5 bill becomes the second target denomination and is off-sorted into pocket 2.
  • $5 bills are delivered to pocket 1 and target 2 denominated bills are delivered to pocket 2.
  • the denomination change bill will be presented into pocket 2 (C2,R12) and the denomination of the flagged bill will become the new target 2 denomination (C2,R10).
  • the target 1 denomination will remain $5 as box C2,R5 indicates that this denomination should not be updated.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Inspection Of Paper Currency And Valuable Securities (AREA)
  • Financial Or Insurance-Related Operations Such As Payment And Settlement (AREA)
  • Separation, Sorting, Adjustment, Or Bending Of Sheets To Be Conveyed (AREA)

Claims (32)

  1. Un dispositif d'évaluation de devise pour recevoir une pile de billets de monnaie et évaluer rapidement la totalité des billets présents dans la pile, ledit dispositif comprenant :
    un réceptacle d'entrée (12, 404) pour recevoir une pile de billets à évaluer ;
    une pluralité de réceptacles de sortie (217a, b, 408) pour recevoir lesdits billets après que lesdits billets aient été évalués ;
    un mécanisme de transport (M, N) pour transporter lesdits billets, un à la fois, depuis ledit réceptacle d'entrée vers lesdits réceptacles de sortie, en suivant un chemin de transport ;
    une unité de discrimination (406) pour évaluer lesdits billets, ladite unité de discrimination comprenant un détecteur positionné sur ledit chemin de transport entre ledit réceptacle d'entrée et ledit réceptacle de sortie, ladite unité de discrimination déterminant la dénomination desdits billets ;
    des moyens (406) pour étiqueter un billet satisfaisant ou non à un ou plusieurs critères, ledit critère est le fait que ladite unité de discrimination détermine la dénomination d'un billet et dans lequel lesdits moyens d'étiquetage d'étiquettes des billets dont les dénominations n'ont pas été déterminées par ladite unité de discrimination,
    caractérisé par une interface de routage (61, 556) comprenant un dispositif de récupération de données, ledit dispositif de récupération de données recevant de l'information depuis un utilisateur dudit dispositif d'évaluation, spécifiant à quels réceptacles de sortie des billets étiquetés par lesdits moyens d'étiquetage doivent être dirigés ; ladite interface de routage permettant audit utilisateur de diriger des billets étiquetés vers un ou plusieurs d'un groupe quelconque de ladite pluralité de réceptacles de sortie.
  2. Le dispositif d'évaluation de devise selon la revendication 1, comprenant en outre une interface de contrôle d'étiquetage, ladite interface de contrôle d'étiquetage comprenant un dispositif de récupération de données d'étiquetage, lesdites dispositifs de récupération de données d'étiquetage recevant l'information depuis un utilisateur dudit dispositif d'évaluation, spécifiant si ledit dispositif d'évaluation devrait suspendre le fonctionnement en se basant sur la détection d'un billet satisfaisant ou non auxdits critères.
  3. Le dispositif d'évaluation de devise selon la revendication 2, dans lequel ledit dispositif de récupération de données d'étiquetage reçoit de l'information depuis ledit utilisateur, spécifiant une position prédéterminée à laquelle ledit billet étiqueté doit être placé lorsque le fonctionnement du dispositif d'évaluation est suspendu.
  4. Le dispositif d'évaluation de devise selon la revendication 3, dans lequel ledit dispositif de récupération de données d'étiquetage permet à l'utilisateur de spécifier qu'un billet étiqueté doit être le dernier billet fourni à un desdits réceptacles de sortie lorsque le fonctionnement desdits dispositifs d'évaluation est suspendu.
  5. Le dispositif d'évaluation de devise selon la revendication 2 ou 3, dans lequel ledit dispositif de récupération de données d'étiquetage permet audit utilisateur de spécifier que le fonctionnement dudit dispositif d'évaluation doit être suspendu avant qu'un billet étiqueté ait été délivré à un desdits réceptacles de sortie.
  6. Le dispositif d'évaluation de devise selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 5, dans lequel ledit dispositif de récupération de données comprend un écran tactile.
  7. Le dispositif d'évaluation de devise selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 6, dans lequel l'unité de discrimination est adaptée pour détecter l'occurrence d'une pluralité de conditions d'erreurs ; et comprenant une interface permettant à un utilisateur du dispositif d'évaluation de spécifier comment ladite pluralité de conditions d'erreur doit être traitée.
  8. Le dispositif d'évaluation de devise selon la revendication 7, dans lequel ladite interface permet audit utilisateur de spécifier, pour chacune desdites conditions d'erreur, à quel réceptacle de sortie ou réceptacles de sortie avec un billet déclenchant en particulier une condition d'erreur doit être dirigé, l'interface permettant à l'utilisateur de diriger un billet déclenchant une condition d'erreur particulière vers l'un quelconque ou tout groupe des réceptacles de sortie.
  9. Le dispositif d'évaluation de devise selon la revendication 7 ou 8, dans lequel ladite interface permet audit utilisateur de diriger des billets déclenchant diverses conditions d'erreurs vers différents réceptacles de sortie.
  10. Le dispositif d'évaluation selon l'une quelconque des revendications 7 à 9, dans lequel ladite interface permet audit utilisateur de spécifier pour chacune desdites conditions d'erreur si ledit dispositif d'évaluation devrait suspendre le fonctionnement.
  11. Le dispositif d'évaluation selon l'une quelconque des revendications 7 à 10, dans lequel ladite interface permet audit utilisateur de spécifier que lors de l'occurrence d'une condition d'erreur (1) particulière, le fonctionnement dudit dispositif d'évaluation devrait être suspendu ou (2) un billet déclenchant ladite condition d'erreur particulière être évacué par tri vers un réceptacle de sortie sans suspendre le fonctionnement dudit dispositif d'évaluation.
  12. Le dispositif d'évaluation de devise selon l'une quelconque des revendications 7 à 10, dans lequel ladite interface permet audit utilisateur de spécifier que lors de l'occurrence d'un état d'erreur particulier si le fonctionnement dudit dispositif d'évaluation devrait être suspendu de manière qu'un billet déclenchant une condition d'erreur particulière est stoppé (1) avant d'être délivré dans l'un desdits réceptacles de sortie, de manière que ledit billet soit placé à l'intérieur dudit mécanisme de transport ou (2) après être délivré dans l'un desdits réceptacles de sortie, de manière que ledit billet soit le dernier billet délivré dans ledit réceptacle de sortie.
  13. Le dispositif d'évaluation de devise selon l'une quelconque des revendications 8, 11, ou 12, dans lequel ladite condition d'erreur particulière est une condition d'erreur étrangère.
  14. Le dispositif d'évaluation de devise selon l'une quelconque des revendications 8, 11, ou 12, dans lequel ladite condition d'erreur particulière est une condition d'erreur de changement de dénomination.
  15. Le dispositif d'évaluation de devise selon l'une quelconque des revendications 8, 11, ou 12, dans lequel ladite condition d'erreur particulière est une condition d'erreur de série séparée.
  16. Le dispositif d'évaluation de devise selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 15, dans lequel ledit dispositif de récupération de données est adapté pour recevoir de l'information venant d'un utilisateur dudit dispositif d'évaluation spécifiant à quels réceptacles de sortie des billets d'une ou plusieurs dénominations et des billets dont les dénominations n'ont pas été déterminées par ladite unité de discrimination doivent être dirigés ; ladite interface de routage permettant audit utilisateur de diriger les billets dont les dénominations n'ont pas été déterminées vers l'un quelconque ou un groupe quelconque de ladite pluralité des réceptacles de sortie.
  17. Le dispositif d'évaluation de devise selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 15 adapté pour détecter des billets suspects et dans lequel ledit dispositif de récupération de données est adapté pour recevoir de l'information venant d'un utilisateur dudit dispositif d'évaluation spécifiant à quels réceptacles de sortie (1) des billets d'une ou plusieurs dénominations, (2) des billets dont les dénominations ont été déterminées par ladite unité de discrimination, et (3) des billets qui sont déterminés comme étant suspects doivent être dirigés ; ladite interface de routage permettant audit utilisateur de diriger des billets dont des dénominations n'ont pas été déterminées et des billets qui sont déterminés comme étant suspects vers l'un quelconque ou un groupe quelconque de ladite pluralité de réceptacles de sortie incluant l'autorisation audit utilisateur de diriger des billets dont les dénominations n'ont pas été déterminées et des billets qui sont déterminés comme étant suspects, vers des différents réceptacles de sortie.
  18. Un dispositif d'évaluation de devise qui discrimine la dénomination des billets de devise, comprenant :
    la réception d'une pile de billets à évaluer dans un réceptacle d'entrée (12, 404) et du dispositif d'évaluation;
    le transport desdits billets, un à la fois dudit réceptacle d'entrée à une pluralité de réceptacles de sortie (217a,b, 408) ;
    la détermination de la dénomination desdits billets sous la commande du dispositif d'évaluation ;
    l'étiquetage d'un billet satisfaisant ou non à un ou plusieurs critères, la détermination par ladite unité de discrimination de la dénomination d'un billet et dans lequel les billets dont les dénominations n'ont pas été déterminées par ladite unité de discrimination sont étiquetés ; et
    la réception d'une information depuis un utilisateur dudit dispositif d'évaluation via une interface de routage (61, 556), l'information spécifiant à quels réceptacles parmi les réceptacles de sortie des billets étiquetés doivent être dirigés ; ladite interface de routage permettant audit utilisateur de diriger des billets étiquetés vers l'un quelconque ou un groupe quelconque de ladite pluralité des réceptacles de sortie.
  19. Le procédé selon la revendication 18, comprenant en outre la réception d'information depuis un utilisateur dudit dispositif d'évaluation, spécifiant si ledit dispositif d'évaluation devrait suspendre le fonctionnement en se basant sur la détection d'un billet satisfaisant ou non auxdits critères.
  20. Le procédé selon la revendication 19, comprenant la réception d'information depuis ledit utilisateur, spécifiant une position prédéterminée à laquelle ledit billet étiqueté doit être placé lorsque le fonctionnement dudit dispositif d'évaluation est suspendu.
  21. Le procédé selon la revendication 20, comprenant la spécification par l'utilisateur du fait qu'un billet étiqueté doit être le dernier billet délivré à l'un desdits réceptacles de sortie lorsque le fonctionnement dudit dispositif d'évaluation est suspendu.
  22. Le procédé selon la revendication 19 ou 20, comprenant la spécification par ledit utilisateur du fait que le fonctionnement dudit dispositif d'évaluation doit être suspendu avant qu'un billet étiqueté ait été délivré à l'un desdits réceptacles de sortie.
  23. Le procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 18 à 22, dans lequel ladite interface de routage comprend un écran tactile.
  24. Le procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 18 à 23, comprenant la détection de l'occurrence d'une pluralité de conditions d'erreurs ; et
    la permission à un utilisateur dudit dispositif d'évaluation de spécifier comment ladite pluralité de conditions d'erreur doit être traitée.
  25. Le procédé selon la revendication 24, comprenant l'autorisation auxdits utilisateurs de spécifier pour chacune desdites conditions d'erreur auquel le réceptacle de sortie ou réceptacle(s) de sortie un billet déclenchant une condition d'erreur particulière doit être dirigé y compris l'autorisation à l'utilisateur de diriger un billet déclenchant une condition d'erreur particulière vers l'un quelconque ou un groupe quelconque des réceptacles de sortie.
  26. Le procédé selon la revendication 24 ou 25, comprenant l'autorisation audit utilisateur de diriger les billets déclenchant différentes conditions d'erreur vers différents réceptacles de sortie.
  27. Le procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 24 à 26, comprenant l'autorisation audit utilisateur de spécifier pour chacune desdites conditions d'erreur si ledit dispositif d'évaluation devrait suspendre le fonctionnement.
  28. Le procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 24 à 27, comprenant l'autorisation audit utilisateur de spécifier que lors de l'occurrence d'une condition d'erreur particulière (1) le fonctionnement dudit dispositif d'évaluation devrait être suspendu ou (2) un billet déclenchant ladite condition d'erreur particulière devrait être évacué par tri vers un réceptacle de sortie sans suspendre le fonctionnement dudit dispositif d'évaluation.
  29. Le procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 24 à 27, comprenant l'autorisation audit utilisateur de spécifier le fait que lors de l'occurrence d'une condition d'erreur particulière si le fonctionnement dudit dispositif d'évaluation devrait ou non être suspendu, de manière qu'un billet déclenchant une condition d'erreur particulière soit stoppé (1) avant d'être fourni dans l'un desdits réceptacles de sortie, de manière que ledit billet soit placé dans ledit mécanisme de transport ou (2) après être délivré dans l'un desdits réceptacles de sortie, de manière que ledit billet soit le dernier billet délivré dans ledit réceptacle de sortie.
  30. Le procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 25, 28, ou 29, dans lequel ladite condition d'erreur particulière est sélectionnée depuis une condition d'erreur étrangère, une condition d'erreur de changement de dénomination et une condition d'erreur de série séparée.
  31. Le procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 18 à 30, comprenant la réception d'une information depuis un utilisateur du dispositif d'évaluation spécifiant à quels réceptacles de sortie des billets d'une ou plusieurs dénominations et des billets dont les dénominations ont été déterminées par ladite unité de discrimination sont à diriger et permettre audit utilisateur de diriger les billets dont les dénominations ont été déterminées vers l'un quelconque ou un groupe quelconque de ladite pluralité des réceptacles de sortie.
  32. Le procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 18 à 31 comprenant la détection des suspects et la réception d'information depuis un utilisateur dudit dispositif d'évaluation spécifiant auxquels réceptacles de sortie (1) des billets d'une ou plusieurs dénominations, (2) des billets dont les dénominations ont été déterminées par ladite unité de discrimination, et (3) des billets qui ont été déterminés comme étant suspects doivent être dirigés et permettre audit utilisateur de diriger des billets dont les dénominations ont été déterminées et des billets qui sont déterminés comme étant suspects vers l'un quelconque ou un groupe de ladite pluralité de réceptacles de sortie incluant l'autorisation audit utilisateur de diriger des billets dont les dénominations n'ont pas été déterminées et des billets qui sont déterminés comme étant suspects, à différents réceptacles de sortie.
EP97927796A 1996-05-29 1997-05-28 Procede et appareil de traitement de documents Expired - Lifetime EP0960399B2 (fr)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP99113458A EP0952556A3 (fr) 1996-05-29 1997-05-28 Procédé et appareil de traitement de documents
EP01121852A EP1168254A3 (fr) 1996-05-29 1997-05-28 Procédé et appareil de traitement de documents
EP02008595.7A EP1227446B2 (fr) 1996-05-29 1997-05-28 Procédé et appareil de traitement de documents

Applications Claiming Priority (7)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US1856396P 1996-05-29 1996-05-29
US18563P 1996-05-29
US3495497P 1997-01-16 1997-01-16
US34954P 1997-01-16
US3834097P 1997-02-27 1997-02-27
US38340P 1997-02-27
PCT/US1997/009041 WO1997045810A1 (fr) 1996-05-29 1997-05-28 Procede et appareil de traitement de documents

Related Child Applications (6)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP99113458A Division EP0952556A3 (fr) 1996-05-29 1997-05-28 Procédé et appareil de traitement de documents
EP02008595.7A Division EP1227446B2 (fr) 1996-05-29 1997-05-28 Procédé et appareil de traitement de documents
EP01121852A Division EP1168254A3 (fr) 1996-05-29 1997-05-28 Procédé et appareil de traitement de documents
EP99113458.6 Division-Into 1999-07-12
EP01121852.6 Division-Into 2001-09-11
EP02008595.7 Division-Into 2002-04-16

Publications (4)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0960399A4 EP0960399A4 (fr) 1999-12-01
EP0960399A1 EP0960399A1 (fr) 1999-12-01
EP0960399B1 EP0960399B1 (fr) 2002-04-17
EP0960399B2 true EP0960399B2 (fr) 2010-03-03

Family

ID=27361048

Family Applications (4)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP01121852A Withdrawn EP1168254A3 (fr) 1996-05-29 1997-05-28 Procédé et appareil de traitement de documents
EP99113458A Ceased EP0952556A3 (fr) 1996-05-29 1997-05-28 Procédé et appareil de traitement de documents
EP97927796A Expired - Lifetime EP0960399B2 (fr) 1996-05-29 1997-05-28 Procede et appareil de traitement de documents
EP02008595.7A Expired - Lifetime EP1227446B2 (fr) 1996-05-29 1997-05-28 Procédé et appareil de traitement de documents

Family Applications Before (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP01121852A Withdrawn EP1168254A3 (fr) 1996-05-29 1997-05-28 Procédé et appareil de traitement de documents
EP99113458A Ceased EP0952556A3 (fr) 1996-05-29 1997-05-28 Procédé et appareil de traitement de documents

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP02008595.7A Expired - Lifetime EP1227446B2 (fr) 1996-05-29 1997-05-28 Procédé et appareil de traitement de documents

Country Status (5)

Country Link
EP (4) EP1168254A3 (fr)
AU (1) AU3216897A (fr)
CA (1) CA2256760C (fr)
DE (2) DE69737666T2 (fr)
WO (1) WO1997045810A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (36)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6363164B1 (en) 1996-05-13 2002-03-26 Cummins-Allison Corp. Automated document processing system using full image scanning
US7187795B2 (en) 2001-09-27 2007-03-06 Cummins-Allison Corp. Document processing system using full image scanning
US8162125B1 (en) 1996-05-29 2012-04-24 Cummins-Allison Corp. Apparatus and system for imaging currency bills and financial documents and method for using the same
US20050276458A1 (en) 2004-05-25 2005-12-15 Cummins-Allison Corp. Automated document processing system and method using image scanning
US7753189B2 (en) 2003-08-01 2010-07-13 Cummins-Allison Corp. Currency processing device, method and system
IT245737Y1 (it) * 1998-10-21 2002-03-22 Mediatel Internat Service Sas Dispositivo per la verifica di autenticita' di banconote e schedaelettronica per l'impiego di detto dispositivo.
DE19958017B4 (de) * 1999-12-02 2013-08-14 Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh Vorrichtung zum Sortieren von Banknoten
US8701857B2 (en) 2000-02-11 2014-04-22 Cummins-Allison Corp. System and method for processing currency bills and tickets
US7978899B2 (en) 2005-10-05 2011-07-12 Cummins-Allison Corp. Currency processing system with fitness detection
GB0004077D0 (en) * 2000-02-21 2000-04-12 Rue De Int Ltd Document sorter and method
JP2001344635A (ja) 2000-06-02 2001-12-14 Birukon Kk 紙葉類識別計数機およびその識別計数方法
DE10030221A1 (de) * 2000-06-20 2002-01-03 Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh Vorrichtung zum Bearbeiten von Blattgut
GB0100033D0 (en) * 2001-01-02 2001-02-14 Rue De Int Ltd Document handling apparatus and method
US7647275B2 (en) 2001-07-05 2010-01-12 Cummins-Allison Corp. Automated payment system and method
US8944234B1 (en) 2001-09-27 2015-02-03 Cummins-Allison Corp. Apparatus and system for imaging currency bills and financial documents and method for using the same
US8437530B1 (en) 2001-09-27 2013-05-07 Cummins-Allison Corp. Apparatus and system for imaging currency bills and financial documents and method for using the same
US8437529B1 (en) 2001-09-27 2013-05-07 Cummins-Allison Corp. Apparatus and system for imaging currency bills and financial documents and method for using the same
US8428332B1 (en) 2001-09-27 2013-04-23 Cummins-Allison Corp. Apparatus and system for imaging currency bills and financial documents and method for using the same
US6896118B2 (en) 2002-01-10 2005-05-24 Cummins-Allison Corp. Coin redemption system
US8627939B1 (en) 2002-09-25 2014-01-14 Cummins-Allison Corp. Apparatus and system for imaging currency bills and financial documents and method for using the same
US7762380B2 (en) 2006-03-09 2010-07-27 Cummins-Allison Corp. Currency discrimination system and method
CA2624638C (fr) 2006-06-01 2010-08-10 Cummins-Allison Corp. Systeme incline de traitement de devises
GB2459223B (en) 2007-03-09 2012-07-11 Cummins Allison Corp Document imaging and processing system
US8401268B1 (en) 2007-03-09 2013-03-19 Cummins-Allison Corp. Optical imaging sensor for a document processing device
US8417017B1 (en) 2007-03-09 2013-04-09 Cummins-Allison Corp. Apparatus and system for imaging currency bills and financial documents and method for using the same
EP2150942B1 (fr) 2007-04-24 2016-05-11 Talaris Holdings Limited Procédé et appareil pour trier des articles
US8437532B1 (en) 2009-04-15 2013-05-07 Cummins-Allison Corp. Apparatus and system for imaging currency bills and financial documents and method for using the same
US8929640B1 (en) 2009-04-15 2015-01-06 Cummins-Allison Corp. Apparatus and system for imaging currency bills and financial documents and method for using the same
US8391583B1 (en) 2009-04-15 2013-03-05 Cummins-Allison Corp. Apparatus and system for imaging currency bills and financial documents and method for using the same
US8544656B2 (en) 2010-03-03 2013-10-01 Cummins-Allison Corp. Currency bill processing device and method
CN102610032A (zh) * 2011-01-20 2012-07-25 浙江方泰电器有限公司 一种纸币两腔半清分机
US9141876B1 (en) 2013-02-22 2015-09-22 Cummins-Allison Corp. Apparatus and system for processing currency bills and financial documents and method for using the same
US8973817B1 (en) 2013-03-15 2015-03-10 Cummins-Allison Corp. Apparatus, method, and system for loading currency bills into a currency processing device
US11734983B1 (en) 2018-12-18 2023-08-22 Cummins-Allison Corp. Banknote transport mechanisms and methods
CN117999592A (zh) * 2021-07-16 2024-05-07 克兰佩门特创新股份有限公司 在通用操作中回收钞票并在进给操作期间存储钞票的回收辊的双重使用
DE102022214101A1 (de) 2022-12-21 2024-06-27 Giesecke+Devrient Currency Technology Gmbh Verfahren zur Herstellung von Akkumulatoren und Stapel-Vorrichtung zur Herstellung von Akkumulatoren

Citations (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2061232A (en) † 1979-10-19 1981-05-13 Radioelectrique Comp Ind Counting bank notes
DE3139447C2 (de) † 1980-10-31 1983-06-16 Laurel Bank Machine Co., Ltd., Tokyo Aufnahmevorrichtung für Zahlungsmittel, wie Geldscheine und dgl.
EP0130825A2 (fr) † 1983-07-01 1985-01-09 De La Rue Systems Limited Procédé et dispositif de détection de feuilles
EP0132329A2 (fr) † 1983-07-25 1985-01-30 De La Rue Systems Limited Dispositif d'alimentation en feuille
DE2760269C2 (de) † 1977-07-01 1987-03-05 Gao Gesellschaft Fuer Automation Und Organisation Mbh, 8000 Muenchen Verfahren zum automatischen Sortieren von dünnem Blattgut
US4787518A (en) † 1983-09-14 1988-11-29 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Paper sheet sorting apparatus
DE3412725C2 (fr) † 1983-04-04 1989-03-09 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Jp
DE2731531C2 (fr) † 1976-08-04 1990-06-13 Brandt Inc., Watertown, Wis., Us
US5051900A (en) † 1988-09-19 1991-09-24 Hitachi, Ltd. Automatic bill collecting method in automatic teller machine
US5230653A (en) † 1991-04-10 1993-07-27 Laurel Bank Machines Co., Ltd. Currency sorting apparatus
US5295196A (en) † 1990-02-05 1994-03-15 Cummins-Allison Corp. Method and apparatus for currency discrimination and counting
EP0706156A2 (fr) † 1990-02-05 1996-04-10 Cummins-Allison Corporation Méthode et appareil destiné à la discrimination et au comptage de valeurs

Family Cites Families (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3280974A (en) 1961-08-23 1966-10-25 John B Riddle Method and apparatus for recognizing printed currency
US3870629A (en) 1973-10-11 1975-03-11 Umc Ind Paper currency validator
US4503963A (en) * 1979-09-13 1985-03-12 Rowe International, Inc. Control circuit for bill and coin changer
US4356473A (en) 1980-09-23 1982-10-26 Gte Laboratories Incorporated Monetary document profile location and predetermined selected path apparatus
US4593184A (en) 1983-08-19 1986-06-03 Brandt, Incorporated Counterfeit detection circuit
US4784274A (en) * 1983-10-03 1988-11-15 Kabushiki Kaisha Nippon Coinco Bill device
US4617458A (en) 1985-02-11 1986-10-14 Brandt, Inc. Counterfeit detection circuit
US5119025A (en) 1990-07-26 1992-06-02 Eastman Kodak Company High-sensitivity magnetorresistive magnetometer having laminated flux collectors defining an open-loop flux-conducting path
US5151607A (en) 1991-05-02 1992-09-29 Crane Timothy T Currency verification device including ferrous oxide detection
US5430664A (en) * 1992-07-14 1995-07-04 Technitrol, Inc. Document counting and batching apparatus with counterfeit detection
US5402895A (en) * 1993-09-28 1995-04-04 Brandt, Inc. Magnetic facing system
CA2184807C (fr) 1994-03-08 2000-09-26 Bradford T. Graves Methode et materiel pour discriminer entre billets de banque
CA2188700C (fr) * 1994-10-04 2000-12-12 Douglas U. Mennie Methode de discrimination de billets de banque ayant un mecanisme de detection de blocage et de debourrage et methode de debourrer un blocage

Patent Citations (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE2731531C2 (fr) † 1976-08-04 1990-06-13 Brandt Inc., Watertown, Wis., Us
DE2760269C2 (de) † 1977-07-01 1987-03-05 Gao Gesellschaft Fuer Automation Und Organisation Mbh, 8000 Muenchen Verfahren zum automatischen Sortieren von dünnem Blattgut
GB2061232A (en) † 1979-10-19 1981-05-13 Radioelectrique Comp Ind Counting bank notes
DE3139447C2 (de) † 1980-10-31 1983-06-16 Laurel Bank Machine Co., Ltd., Tokyo Aufnahmevorrichtung für Zahlungsmittel, wie Geldscheine und dgl.
DE3412725C2 (fr) † 1983-04-04 1989-03-09 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Jp
EP0130825A2 (fr) † 1983-07-01 1985-01-09 De La Rue Systems Limited Procédé et dispositif de détection de feuilles
EP0132329A2 (fr) † 1983-07-25 1985-01-30 De La Rue Systems Limited Dispositif d'alimentation en feuille
US4787518A (en) † 1983-09-14 1988-11-29 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Paper sheet sorting apparatus
US5051900A (en) † 1988-09-19 1991-09-24 Hitachi, Ltd. Automatic bill collecting method in automatic teller machine
US5295196A (en) † 1990-02-05 1994-03-15 Cummins-Allison Corp. Method and apparatus for currency discrimination and counting
EP0706156A2 (fr) † 1990-02-05 1996-04-10 Cummins-Allison Corporation Méthode et appareil destiné à la discrimination et au comptage de valeurs
US5230653A (en) † 1991-04-10 1993-07-27 Laurel Bank Machines Co., Ltd. Currency sorting apparatus

Non-Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
DE LA RUE SYSTEMS (3100 SERIES) OPERATOR INSTRUCTIONS - 1986 †
DE LA RUE SYSTEMS (3110 MK II) FLYER - 1987 †
DE LA RUE SYSTEMS (3120) FLYER - 1987 †
DECLARATION BY MR. D. C. REEVES †
GELDINSTITUTE-3-1983, S. 114, 116 †
USE OF THE DIAGNOSTICS FUNCTION (3110 MKII/3120 MACHINES)-1986 †

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP0952556A3 (fr) 1999-11-03
EP0960399A4 (fr) 1999-12-01
DE69712105T2 (de) 2002-08-22
EP0952556A2 (fr) 1999-10-27
CA2256760C (fr) 2009-12-15
EP1227446B1 (fr) 2007-04-25
EP1227446A3 (fr) 2002-11-27
DE69737666D1 (de) 2007-06-06
EP0960399B1 (fr) 2002-04-17
DE69712105D1 (de) 2002-05-23
EP0960399A1 (fr) 1999-12-01
CA2256760A1 (fr) 1997-12-04
WO1997045810A1 (fr) 1997-12-04
EP1227446A2 (fr) 2002-07-31
EP1168254A2 (fr) 2002-01-02
EP1168254A3 (fr) 2002-02-06
EP1227446B2 (fr) 2015-11-11
DE69737666T2 (de) 2007-08-16
AU3216897A (en) 1998-01-05

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0960399B2 (fr) Procede et appareil de traitement de documents
US6311819B1 (en) Method and apparatus for document processing
US7232024B2 (en) Currency processing device
US6955253B1 (en) Apparatus with two or more pockets for document processing
US6959800B1 (en) Method for document processing
US6913130B1 (en) Method and apparatus for document processing
US6278795B1 (en) Multi-pocket currency discriminator
US6868954B2 (en) Method and apparatus for document processing
US6866134B2 (en) Method and apparatus for document processing
US20040182675A1 (en) Currency processing device having a multiple stage transport path and method for operating the same
US7735621B2 (en) Multiple pocket currency bill processing device and method
EP0731954B1 (fr) Methode et dispositif de tri, d'authentification et de comptage de documents
EP0807906B2 (fr) Procédé et appareil pour identifier et compter des documents
US7779982B2 (en) Currency processing and strapping systems and methods
US8714335B2 (en) Currency processing and strapping systems and methods
CA2329166C (fr) Appareil pour traiter un document
JP2003296783A (ja) 紙幣計数装置
CA2178199C (fr) Methode et dispositif de tri, d'authentification et de comptage de documents

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19981120

A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

Effective date: 19990915

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A4

Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: SCHREITER, HEINZ, W.

Inventor name: MENNIE, DOUGLAS, U.

Inventor name: MAZUR, RICHARD, A.

Inventor name: KLEIN, ROBERT, L.

Inventor name: JONES, WILLIAM, J.

Inventor name: GRAVES, BRADFORD, T.

Inventor name: CSULITS, FRANK, M.

Inventor name: STROMME, LARS, R.

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20000718

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

RAP3 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: CUMMINS-ALLISON CORPORATION

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: IF02

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: SCHREITER, HEINZ, W.

Inventor name: MENNIE, DOUGLAS, U.

Inventor name: MAZUR, RICHARD, A.

Inventor name: KLEIN, ROBERT, L.

Inventor name: JONES, WILLIAM, J.

Inventor name: GRAVES, BRADFORD, T.

Inventor name: CSULITS, FRANK, M.

Inventor name: STROMME, LARS, R.

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69712105

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20020523

PLBQ Unpublished change to opponent data

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OPPO

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

PLBQ Unpublished change to opponent data

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OPPO

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

PLBF Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OBSO

PLBF Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OBSO

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: DE LA RUE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED

Effective date: 20030117

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: GIESECKE & DEVRIENT GMBH

Effective date: 20030117

Opponent name: DE LA RUE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED

Effective date: 20030117

PLAX Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2

PLAX Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2

PLBB Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition received

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS3

RDAF Communication despatched that patent is revoked

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREV1

APBP Date of receipt of notice of appeal recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA2O

APAH Appeal reference modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCREFNO

APAY Date of receipt of notice of appeal deleted

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDNOA2O

APBA Date of receipt of statement of grounds of appeal deleted

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDNOA3O

APBM Appeal reference recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREFNO

APBP Date of receipt of notice of appeal recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA2O

APBQ Date of receipt of statement of grounds of appeal recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA3O

APBU Appeal procedure closed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA9O

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20080605

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20080530

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20090527

Year of fee payment: 13

PUAH Patent maintained in amended form

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009272

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: PATENT MAINTAINED AS AMENDED

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20100129

27A Patent maintained in amended form

Effective date: 20100303

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B2

Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090602

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20080514

Year of fee payment: 12

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20091201

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20100528

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090528

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100528

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100604