EP0942958B1 - Process for the production of a detergent composition - Google Patents

Process for the production of a detergent composition Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0942958B1
EP0942958B1 EP97950085A EP97950085A EP0942958B1 EP 0942958 B1 EP0942958 B1 EP 0942958B1 EP 97950085 A EP97950085 A EP 97950085A EP 97950085 A EP97950085 A EP 97950085A EP 0942958 B1 EP0942958 B1 EP 0942958B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
starting material
process according
bulk density
mixer
detergent
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP97950085A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0942958A1 (en
EP0942958B2 (en
Inventor
Cornelis Elisabeth Johannes Van Lare
Gilbert Martin Verschelling
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Unilever PLC
Unilever NV
Original Assignee
Unilever PLC
Unilever NV
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=10803825&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP0942958(B1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Unilever PLC, Unilever NV filed Critical Unilever PLC
Publication of EP0942958A1 publication Critical patent/EP0942958A1/en
Publication of EP0942958B1 publication Critical patent/EP0942958B1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0942958B2 publication Critical patent/EP0942958B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D11/00Special methods for preparing compositions containing mixtures of detergents
    • C11D11/0082Special methods for preparing compositions containing mixtures of detergents one or more of the detergent ingredients being in a liquefied state, e.g. slurry, paste or melt, and the process resulting in solid detergent particles such as granules, powders or beads
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D17/00Detergent materials or soaps characterised by their shape or physical properties
    • C11D17/06Powder; Flakes; Free-flowing mixtures; Sheets
    • C11D17/065High-density particulate detergent compositions

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a process for the production of a detergent composition.
  • the invention is concerned with a process for the production of a detergent composition having a medium or low bulk density and to detergent compositions thereby produced.
  • detergent compositions have been produced by a spray-drying process in which the components of the composition are mixed with water to form an aqueous crutcher slurry which is then sprayed into a spray-drying tower and contacted with hot air to remove water whereby detergent particles, often referred to as a "base" powder are obtained.
  • the particles so obtained have a high porosity.
  • powders produced by this method typically have a bulk density of 300 to 550 g/l or even up to 650 g/l.
  • Spray-dried powders generally provide good powder delivery characteristics such as dispensing and dissolution. However, the capital and operating costs of the spray-drying process are high. Nevertheless there remains a significant consumer demand for such low density powders.
  • detergent powders having a high bulk density have been produced by mechanical mixing processes. Bulk densities of 700 to 900 g/l and even higher have been obtained.
  • powders are produced by densifying a spray-dried base powder in one or more mechanical mixers, optionally with the addition of further components, or by mixing the components of the composition in a continuous or batch mixing process without the use of a spray-drying step.
  • Powders having a high bulk density have a low packing volume which is advantageous for storage and distribution operations and also for the consumer. Furthermore, if a spray-drying step is not employed, the capital and operating costs are typically much lower and the process uses less energy and so provides an environmental benefit. The avoidance of a spray-drying step in the detergent production process is therefore often desirable.
  • EP-A-367 339 discloses a process for the production of a detergent composition having a high bulk density in which a particulate starting material is treated in a high speed mixer, a moderate speed mixer wherein the material is brought into or maintained in a deformable state, and then dried and/or cooled.
  • the starting material may be a spray-dried base powder or the components of the composition may be employed without a prior spray-drying step in the detergent production process.
  • WO-A-97/02338 (Unilever : unpublished at the priority date of the present application) discloses that a low bulk density, for example less than 700 g/l, may be obtained by a process in which a spray-drying step is not employed, if the composition is formulated with a component having a low bulk density.
  • this process is relatively unsuitable for use with starting materials which are either available commercially in a form in which the particle density is high or which are themselves produced by spray-drying (the latter normally producing relatively porous particles).
  • EP-A-544 365 discloses granulation of porous spray-dried detergent free starting material of 300 micron particle size in a "recycler" high speed mixer/densifier with a liquid binder comprising a primary alcohol sulphate anionic surfactant, a nonionic surfactant and water.
  • medium or low bulk density powders may be obtained by a new process of mechanical mixing of a powder which contains little or no detergent active material and which consists of particles having a predetermined average particle size and high particle porosity together with a liquid component comprising a detergent active material or a precursor therefor.
  • a first aspect of the present invention provides a process for the production of a detergent composition having a bulk density of no more than 750 g/l, e.g. no more than 700 or 650 g/l, the process comprising mixing a particulate starting material which contains no more than 10% by weight of the starting material of detergent active material and which starting material has a d 50 average particle diameter of from 100 ⁇ m to 1000 ⁇ m and a particle porosity of at least 0.4, together with a liquid component comprising a detergent active material or a precursor therefor in a mixer/granulator having both a stirring and a cutting action.
  • the present invention further extends to a detergent composition prepared by a process according to the present invention.
  • the present invention derives from the unexpected observation that the bulk density of the resultant product is dependent upon the rotational speed of mixing. This is also a function of the particular mixer of choice but essentially, the lower the speed of the mixer, the lower the bulk density of the product.
  • the first advantage is that by choosing a powder starting material which already possesses the required average particle size and porosity medium or low bulk density powders may be prepared.
  • NTR non-tower route
  • the detergent composition resulting from the process of the present invention has a bulk density of 400 to 650 g/l, preferably 450 to 650 g/l and more preferably 500 to 600 g/l. It is further preferred that the resultant detergent composition has a particle porosity of at least 0.2 and more preferably at least 0.25.
  • the particulate starting material is dosed at a level of from 10 to 75 wt%, preferably from 20 to 40 wt%, of the composition resulting from the mechanical mixing process.
  • particle size distributions in terms of average (e.g. d 50 ) particle diameters
  • they may be expressed in terms of their Rosin Rammler number. This is calculated by fitting the particle size distribution to an n-power distribution according to the following formula:- where R is the cumulative percentage of powder above a certain size D.
  • D r is the average granule size and n is a measure of the particle size distribution.
  • D r and n are the Rosin Rammler fits to a measured particle size distribution.
  • a high n value means narrow particle size distribution and low values mean a broad particle size distribution.
  • the process may be a continuous process or may be performed batch-wise.
  • a suitable type of mixer/granulator for use in the process of the invention is bowl-shaped and preferably has a substantially vertical stirrer axis.
  • mixers of the Fukae (Trade Mark) FS0G series manufactured by Fukae Powtech Kogyo Co., Japan are essentially in the form of a bowl-shaped vessel accessible via a top part, provided near its base with a stirrer having a substantially vertical axis, and a cutter positioned on a side wall.
  • the stirrer and cutter may be operated independently of one another, and at separately variable speeds.
  • Granulation is preferably effected by running the mixer using both stirrer and cutter; a relatively short residence time (for example, 5-8 minutes for a 35kg batch) is generally sufficient.
  • the final bulk density can be controlled by choice of residence time and stirrer rate.
  • the stirrer is operated at a rate of 25 to 250 rpm, e.g. from 100 rpm to 200 rpm or even as low as 30 to 50 rpm. However, this speed is dependent on the size of the apparatus.
  • the cutter is suitably operated at a rate of 200 to 3500 rpm, preferably 300 to 3000 rpm.
  • the cutter is suitably operated at a rate of 200 to 2500 rpm, preferably 300 to 2200 rpm.
  • a batch process typically involves pre-mixing of solid components, addition of liquids, granulation, optional addition of a layering material suitable for controlling the granulation end-point, and product discharge.
  • the rate of stirring and/or cutting is suitably adjusted according to the stage of the process.
  • the mixing step is preferably carried out at a controlled temperature somewhat above ambient, preferably above 30°C. Suitably the temperature is within the range 30 to 45°C.
  • the amount of detergent active material in the particulate starting material is no more than 10% by weight of that material.
  • the amount of detergent active material in the particulate starting material is suitably no more than 5% by weight thereof and preferably no more than 1% by weight thereof.
  • the particulate starting material may be substantially or totally free of any detergent active material.
  • the particulate starting material may be one prepared by spray-drying.
  • starting materials having the required parameters may be obtained by other means, e.g. involving granulation.
  • the d 50 average particle diameter of the particulate starting material is from 100 ⁇ m to 1000 ⁇ m. This is important for controlling the particle size distribution in the final product. Preferably though, this average particle diameter is from 150 ⁇ m to 800 ⁇ m, especially from 200 ⁇ m to 700 ⁇ m. Preferably, 90% by weight of the particles in the starting material have a particulate diameter in the region of 100 ⁇ m to 1000 ⁇ m.
  • the particle porosity of the particulate starting material is at least 0.4 but is preferably at least 0.45, e.g. from 0.45 to 0.55. Most preferably it is at least 0.50.
  • such particulate starting material may comprise a spray-dried material, that is to say some or all of the starting material is formed by a spray-drying process.
  • the particle porosity can be derived from the following experiments:
  • the solids density of the particles is needed (eq. 2). This is measured using helium pycnometry, e.g. by using a penta pycnometer supplied by Quantachrome.
  • the particle porosity can easily be derived.
  • powder flow is defined in terms of the dynamic flow rate (DFR), in ml/s, measured by means of the following procedure.
  • the apparatus used consists of a cylindrical glass tube having an internal diameter of 35 mm and a length of 600 mm. The tube is securely clamped in a position such that its longitudinal axis is vertical. Its lower end is terminated by means of a smooth cone of polyvinyl chloride having an internal angle of 15° and a lower outlet orifice of diameter 22.5 mm.
  • a first beam sensor is positioned 150 mm above the outlet, and a second beam sensor is positioned 250 mm above the first sensor.
  • the outlet orifice is temporarily closed, for example, by covering with a piece of card, and powder is poured through a funnel into the top of the cylinder until the powder level is about 10 cm higher than the upper sensor; a spacer between the funnel and the tube ensures that filling is uniform.
  • the averaging and calculation are carried out electronically and a direct read-out of the DFR value obtained.
  • the particulate starting material preferably comprises a builder, most preferably aluminosilicate, for example zeolite 4A or zeolite A24 or a salt, preferably an inorganic salt.
  • Salts preferably sodium, of phosphates, for example sodium tripolyphosphate (STP), carbonate, bicarbonate and sulphate are also suitable.
  • solid materials may also be incorporated in the particulate starting material, although they may alternatively or additionally be dosed at any appropriate stage(s) of the mechanical mixing.
  • the liquid component preferably contains at least one liquid nonionic surfactant. It may also contain one or more acid precursors of anionic surfactants and/or fatty acids. The acid precursor(s) can then be neutralised to form the corresponding anionic surfactant(s) and the fatty acid(s) saponified by dosing one or more suitable alkaline materials at an appropriate stage during the mechanical mixing process.
  • suitable alkaline materials include alkali metal carbonates, e.g. Na 2 CO 3 . and hydroxides, e.g. NaOH. Such alkaline materials may be dosed in solid form or as aqueous solutions. It is also possible to partially neutralise/saponify such precursors or fatty acids in the liquid component prior to the mechanical mixing step.
  • the detergent composition suitably comprise anionic detergent active.
  • anionic detergent active This may be incorporated as a preneutralised material, desirably as a component of the particulate starting material, or may be neutralised in situ.
  • the acid precursor of the active is preferably neutralised using a solid neutralising agent, for example carbonate, which is desirably a component of the particulate starting material.
  • the detergent active material present in the composition may be selected for anionic, cationic, ampholytic, zwitterionic or nonionic detergent active materials or mixtures thereof.
  • suitable synthetic anionic detergent compounds are sodium and potassium (C 9 -C 20 ) benzene sulphonates, particularly sodium linear secondary alkyl (C 10 -C 15 ) benzene sulphonates (LAS); sodium or potassium alkyl sulphates (PAS); and sodium alkyl glyceryl ether sulphates, especially those ethers of the higher alcohols derived from tallow or coconut oil and synthetic alcohols derived from petroleum.
  • Suitable nonionics which may be employed include, in particular the reaction products of compounds having a hydrophobic group and a reactive hydrogen atom, for example, aliphatic alcohols, acids, amines or alkyl phenols with alkylene oxides, especially ethylene oxide either alone or with propylene oxide.
  • Specific nonionic detergent compounds are alkyl (C 6 -C 22 ) phenol ethylene oxide condensates, generally having 5 to 25 EO, i.e. 5 to 25 units of ethylene oxide per molecule, and the condensation products of aliphatic (C 8 -C 18 ) primary or secondary linear or branched alcohols with ethylene oxide, generally 5 to 50 EO.
  • the level of detergent active material present in the composition may be in the range from 1 to 50% by weight depending on the desired applications.
  • Nonionic material may be present in particulate starting material at a level which is less than 10% by weight more preferably less than 5% by weight and/or employed as the liquid binder in the mixing process optionally with another liquid component, for example water.
  • the particulate starting material constitutes 30 to 70% of the detergent composition.
  • a layering material may be employed during the mixing step to control granule formation and reduce or prevent over-agglomeration.
  • Suitable materials include aluminosilicates, for example zeolite 4A.
  • the layering material is suitably present at a level of 1 to 4 wt %.
  • the composition may be used as a complete composition in its own right or may be mixed with other components or mixtures and thus may form a major or minor part of a final product.
  • the composition may be blended with for example a spray-dried base powder.
  • Conventional additional components such as enzymes, bleach and perfume may also be admixed with the composition as desired to produce a fully formulated product.
  • the resulting powders had the following properties: Properties Base Powder 1 Base Powder 2 BD, [g/l] 629 370 DFR, [ml/s] 115 88 d 50 [ ⁇ m] 210 279 [ ⁇ m] 242 299 [-] 2.7 2.4 Moisture Content [%] 5-7 7 Particle Porosity 0.51 0.70
  • Sokalan CP5 is a polyacrylate/polymaleate copolymer.
  • the spray-dried zeolite-based porous carriers were subsequently used as base powders in NTR processes as described in Examples 1 and 2.
  • the PAS adjunct used in the trial had the following composition: PAS 45 wt% Zeolite 38 wt% Carbonate 9 wt% Water + other components 8 wt%
  • the resulting powder had the following properties: Properties BD [g/l] 404 DFR [ml/s] 111 d 50 [ ⁇ m] 303 RRd ( ⁇ m] 349 RRn [-] 2.9 Moisture content [%] 5.9 Particle porosity 0.67
  • the spray-dried STP-based carrier was used to formulate powders in Examples 3 and 4.
  • the STP-based carrier was used in a batch NTR process using a Fukae FS30 mixer as follows: Example 3 (kg) Example 4 (kg) Reference Standard STP 0 0 4.7 Spray-dried STP carrier 4.7 4.7 0 Sodium carbonate 5.2 5.2 5.2 Zeolite 4A (Wessalith P) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 LAS acid 3.3 3.3 3.3 Zeolite 4A layering 0 0.3 0 Pre-mixing Pre-mix time (sec.) 10 10 10 10 RPM (agitator/chopper) 100/3000 Mixing 100/3000 100/3000 RPM (agitator) 100 200 100 RPM (chopper) 3000 3000 3000 Mixing time (sec) 120 120 120 Powder properties BD [g/l] 576 688 846 DFR [ml/s] 110 119 132 RRd ( ⁇ m] 486 373 680 RRn [-] 1.72 1.70 1.19

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Detergent Compositions (AREA)
  • Glanulating (AREA)

Description

    Technical field
  • The present invention relates to a process for the production of a detergent composition. In particular the invention is concerned with a process for the production of a detergent composition having a medium or low bulk density and to detergent compositions thereby produced.
  • Background to the invention
  • Conventionally, detergent compositions have been produced by a spray-drying process in which the components of the composition are mixed with water to form an aqueous crutcher slurry which is then sprayed into a spray-drying tower and contacted with hot air to remove water whereby detergent particles, often referred to as a "base" powder are obtained. The particles so obtained, have a high porosity. Thus powders produced by this method typically have a bulk density of 300 to 550 g/l or even up to 650 g/l.
  • Spray-dried powders generally provide good powder delivery characteristics such as dispensing and dissolution. However, the capital and operating costs of the spray-drying process are high. Nevertheless there remains a significant consumer demand for such low density powders.
  • In recent years, detergent powders having a high bulk density have been produced by mechanical mixing processes. Bulk densities of 700 to 900 g/l and even higher have been obtained. Typically such powders are produced by densifying a spray-dried base powder in one or more mechanical mixers, optionally with the addition of further components, or by mixing the components of the composition in a continuous or batch mixing process without the use of a spray-drying step.
  • Powders having a high bulk density have a low packing volume which is advantageous for storage and distribution operations and also for the consumer. Furthermore, if a spray-drying step is not employed, the capital and operating costs are typically much lower and the process uses less energy and so provides an environmental benefit. The avoidance of a spray-drying step in the detergent production process is therefore often desirable.
  • However, such high density powders typically have a much lower porosity than a conventional spray-dried powder which may impair the delivery of the powder into the wash liquor. Additionally, the production of powders having a low to medium bulk density, for example less than about 700 g/l, has not hitherto been readily achievable on a commercial scale without the use of a spray-drying step.
  • EP-A-367 339 discloses a process for the production of a detergent composition having a high bulk density in which a particulate starting material is treated in a high speed mixer, a moderate speed mixer wherein the material is brought into or maintained in a deformable state, and then dried and/or cooled. The starting material may be a spray-dried base powder or the components of the composition may be employed without a prior spray-drying step in the detergent production process.
  • WO-A-97/02338 (Unilever : unpublished at the priority date of the present application) discloses that a low bulk density, for example less than 700 g/l, may be obtained by a process in which a spray-drying step is not employed, if the composition is formulated with a component having a low bulk density. However, this process is relatively unsuitable for use with starting materials which are either available commercially in a form in which the particle density is high or which are themselves produced by spray-drying (the latter normally producing relatively porous particles).
  • EP-A-544 365 discloses granulation of porous spray-dried detergent free starting material of 300 micron particle size in a "recycler" high speed mixer/densifier with a liquid binder comprising a primary alcohol sulphate anionic surfactant, a nonionic surfactant and water.
  • We have now found that medium or low bulk density powders may be obtained by a new process of mechanical mixing of a powder which contains little or no detergent active material and which consists of particles having a predetermined average particle size and high particle porosity together with a liquid component comprising a detergent active material or a precursor therefor.
  • Definition of the invention
  • Thus, a first aspect of the present invention provides a process for the production of a detergent composition having a bulk density of no more than 750 g/l, e.g. no more than 700 or 650 g/l, the process comprising mixing a particulate starting material which contains no more than 10% by weight of the starting material of detergent active material and which starting material has a d50 average particle diameter of from 100µm to 1000µm and a particle porosity of at least 0.4, together with a liquid component comprising a detergent active material or a precursor therefor in a mixer/granulator having both a stirring and a cutting action.
  • The present invention further extends to a detergent composition prepared by a process according to the present invention.
  • Detailed description of the invention
  • The present invention derives from the unexpected observation that the bulk density of the resultant product is dependent upon the rotational speed of mixing. This is also a function of the particular mixer of choice but essentially, the lower the speed of the mixer, the lower the bulk density of the product.
  • This new process has two distinct but separate advantages. The first advantage is that by choosing a powder starting material which already possesses the required average particle size and porosity medium or low bulk density powders may be prepared.
  • The second advantage is obtainable in manufacturing scenarios where both spray-drying and mechanical mixture agglomeration facilities are available. By affording the possibility of using a spray-dried product as a starting material in a mechanical agglomeration process, the present invention provides a further degree of flexibility in such a modular approach to the production of detergent powder products. As used herein, the abbreviation "NTR" means "non-tower route", i.e. a powder produced by mixing rather than in a spray-drying tower even if the starting materials are themselves produced by spray drying.
  • Suitably, the detergent composition resulting from the process of the present invention has a bulk density of 400 to 650 g/l, preferably 450 to 650 g/l and more preferably 500 to 600 g/l. It is further preferred that the resultant detergent composition has a particle porosity of at least 0.2 and more preferably at least 0.25.
  • Suitably, the particulate starting material is dosed at a level of from 10 to 75 wt%, preferably from 20 to 40 wt%, of the composition resulting from the mechanical mixing process.
  • Instead of expressing particle size distributions in terms of average (e.g. d50) particle diameters, if they are capable of being fitted to a Rosin-Rammler distribution, they may be expressed in terms of their Rosin Rammler number. This is calculated by fitting the particle size distribution to an n-power distribution according to the following formula:-
    Figure 00050001
    where R is the cumulative percentage of powder above a certain size D. Dr is the average granule size and n is a measure of the particle size distribution. Dr and n are the Rosin Rammler fits to a measured particle size distribution. A high n value means narrow particle size distribution and low values mean a broad particle size distribution.
  • The process may be a continuous process or may be performed batch-wise.
  • A suitable type of mixer/granulator for use in the process of the invention is bowl-shaped and preferably has a substantially vertical stirrer axis. Especially preferred are mixers of the Fukae (Trade Mark) FS0G series manufactured by Fukae Powtech Kogyo Co., Japan; this apparatus is essentially in the form of a bowl-shaped vessel accessible via a top part, provided near its base with a stirrer having a substantially vertical axis, and a cutter positioned on a side wall. The stirrer and cutter may be operated independently of one another, and at separately variable speeds.
  • Other similar mixers found to be suitable for use in the process of the invention are the Diosna (Trade Mark) V series ex Dierks & Sohne, Germany; and the Pharma Matrix (Trade Mark) ex T K Fielder Ltd., England. Other similar mixers suitable for use in the process of the invention include the Fuji (Trade Mark) VG-C series ex Fuji Sangyo Co., Japan; and the Roto (Trade Mark) ex Zanchetta & Co srl, Italy.
  • Granulation is preferably effected by running the mixer using both stirrer and cutter; a relatively short residence time (for example, 5-8 minutes for a 35kg batch) is generally sufficient. The final bulk density can be controlled by choice of residence time and stirrer rate.
  • Suitably the stirrer is operated at a rate of 25 to 250 rpm, e.g. from 100 rpm to 200 rpm or even as low as 30 to 50 rpm. However, this speed is dependent on the size of the apparatus. Independently the cutter is suitably operated at a rate of 200 to 3500 rpm, preferably 300 to 3000 rpm. For example, the cutter is suitably operated at a rate of 200 to 2500 rpm, preferably 300 to 2200 rpm. A batch process typically involves pre-mixing of solid components, addition of liquids, granulation, optional addition of a layering material suitable for controlling the granulation end-point, and product discharge. The rate of stirring and/or cutting is suitably adjusted according to the stage of the process. The mixing step is preferably carried out at a controlled temperature somewhat above ambient, preferably above 30°C. Suitably the temperature is within the range 30 to 45°C.
  • The amount of detergent active material in the particulate starting material is no more than 10% by weight of that material. However, the amount of detergent active material in the particulate starting material is suitably no more than 5% by weight thereof and preferably no more than 1% by weight thereof. The particulate starting material may be substantially or totally free of any detergent active material. Suitably, the particulate starting material may be one prepared by spray-drying. However, starting materials having the required parameters may be obtained by other means, e.g. involving granulation.
  • The d50 average particle diameter of the particulate starting material is from 100µm to 1000µm. This is important for controlling the particle size distribution in the final product. Preferably though, this average particle diameter is from 150µm to 800µm, especially from 200µm to 700µm. Preferably, 90% by weight of the particles in the starting material have a particulate diameter in the region of 100µm to 1000µm.
  • The particle porosity of the particulate starting material is at least 0.4 but is preferably at least 0.45, e.g. from 0.45 to 0.55. Most preferably it is at least 0.50. In any event, such particulate starting material may comprise a spray-dried material, that is to say some or all of the starting material is formed by a spray-drying process.
  • The measurement of- particle porosity is based on the well known Kozeny-Carman relation for air flow through a packed bed of powder: vh ΔP =k πD2 bed 4η Dp 2 ε3 bed (1-εbed ) 2 In which:
  • v =
    air flow
    ΔP =
    pressure drop over the bed
    Dbed =
    bed diameter
    h =
    bed height
    Dp =
    particle diameter
    εbed =
    bed porosity
    η =
    gas viscosity
    k =
    empirical constant, equal to 180 for granular solids
  • The bulk density of a powder can be described by the following equation: Bulk Density = rsol • (1 - εbed) • (1 - εparticle) In which:
  • rsol =
    solids density of the materials in the particle
    εparticle =
    particle porosity
  • Based on these equations, the particle porosity can be derived from the following experiments:
  • A glass tube with a diameter of 16.3 mm, containing a glass filter (pore diameter 40-90µm) as support for the powder, is filled with a known amount of powder (particle size between 355 and 710µm). The height of the powder bed is recorded. An air flow of 375 cm3/min is flowed through the bed of powder. The pressure drop over the bed is measured. The pressure drop over the empty tube should also be measured at the specified air flow.
  • This measurement is repeated with the same quantity of powder, but now a more dense bed packing is achieved by gentle tapping of the tube containing the powder. Again the pressure drop is measured at the specified air flow.
  • In order to be able to derive the particle porosity from these measurements, also the solids density of the particles is needed (eq. 2). This is measured using helium pycnometry, e.g. by using a penta pycnometer supplied by Quantachrome.
  • Based on the above described measurements and equations, the particle porosity can easily be derived.
  • For the purposes of the present invention, powder flow is defined in terms of the dynamic flow rate (DFR), in ml/s, measured by means of the following procedure. The apparatus used consists of a cylindrical glass tube having an internal diameter of 35 mm and a length of 600 mm. The tube is securely clamped in a position such that its longitudinal axis is vertical. Its lower end is terminated by means of a smooth cone of polyvinyl chloride having an internal angle of 15° and a lower outlet orifice of diameter 22.5 mm. A first beam sensor is positioned 150 mm above the outlet, and a second beam sensor is positioned 250 mm above the first sensor.
  • To determine the DFR of a powder sample, the outlet orifice is temporarily closed, for example, by covering with a piece of card, and powder is poured through a funnel into the top of the cylinder until the powder level is about 10 cm higher than the upper sensor; a spacer between the funnel and the tube ensures that filling is uniform. The outlet is then opened and the time t (seconds) taken for the powder level to fall from the upper sensor to the lower sensor is measured electronically. The measurement is normally repeated two or three times and an average value taken. If V is the volume (ml) of the tube between the upper and lower sensors, the DFR (ml/s) is given by the following equation: DFR = Vt ml/s
  • The averaging and calculation are carried out electronically and a direct read-out of the DFR value obtained.
  • The particulate starting material preferably comprises a builder, most preferably aluminosilicate, for example zeolite 4A or zeolite A24 or a salt, preferably an inorganic salt. Salts, preferably sodium, of phosphates, for example sodium tripolyphosphate (STP), carbonate, bicarbonate and sulphate are also suitable.
  • Other solid materials (if required) may also be incorporated in the particulate starting material, although they may alternatively or additionally be dosed at any appropriate stage(s) of the mechanical mixing.
  • The liquid component preferably contains at least one liquid nonionic surfactant. It may also contain one or more acid precursors of anionic surfactants and/or fatty acids. The acid precursor(s) can then be neutralised to form the corresponding anionic surfactant(s) and the fatty acid(s) saponified by dosing one or more suitable alkaline materials at an appropriate stage during the mechanical mixing process. Suitable alkaline materials include alkali metal carbonates, e.g. Na2CO3. and hydroxides, e.g. NaOH. Such alkaline materials may be dosed in solid form or as aqueous solutions. It is also possible to partially neutralise/saponify such precursors or fatty acids in the liquid component prior to the mechanical mixing step.
  • The detergent composition suitably comprise anionic detergent active. This may be incorporated as a preneutralised material, desirably as a component of the particulate starting material, or may be neutralised in situ. In the latter case the acid precursor of the active is preferably neutralised using a solid neutralising agent, for example carbonate, which is desirably a component of the particulate starting material.
  • The detergent active material present in the composition may be selected for anionic, cationic, ampholytic, zwitterionic or nonionic detergent active materials or mixtures thereof. Examples of suitable synthetic anionic detergent compounds are sodium and potassium (C9-C20) benzene sulphonates, particularly sodium linear secondary alkyl (C10-C15) benzene sulphonates (LAS); sodium or potassium alkyl sulphates (PAS); and sodium alkyl glyceryl ether sulphates, especially those ethers of the higher alcohols derived from tallow or coconut oil and synthetic alcohols derived from petroleum.
  • Suitable nonionics which may be employed include, in particular the reaction products of compounds having a hydrophobic group and a reactive hydrogen atom, for example, aliphatic alcohols, acids, amines or alkyl phenols with alkylene oxides, especially ethylene oxide either alone or with propylene oxide. Specific nonionic detergent compounds are alkyl (C6-C22) phenol ethylene oxide condensates, generally having 5 to 25 EO, i.e. 5 to 25 units of ethylene oxide per molecule, and the condensation products of aliphatic (C8-C18) primary or secondary linear or branched alcohols with ethylene oxide, generally 5 to 50 EO.
  • The level of detergent active material present in the composition may be in the range from 1 to 50% by weight depending on the desired applications. Nonionic material may be present in particulate starting material at a level which is less than 10% by weight more preferably less than 5% by weight and/or employed as the liquid binder in the mixing process optionally with another liquid component, for example water.
  • Suitably the particulate starting material constitutes 30 to 70% of the detergent composition.
  • Optionally, a layering material may be employed during the mixing step to control granule formation and reduce or prevent over-agglomeration. Suitable materials include aluminosilicates, for example zeolite 4A. The layering material is suitably present at a level of 1 to 4 wt %.
  • The composition may be used as a complete composition in its own right or may be mixed with other components or mixtures and thus may form a major or minor part of a final product. The composition may be blended with for example a spray-dried base powder. Conventional additional components such as enzymes, bleach and perfume may also be admixed with the composition as desired to produce a fully formulated product.
  • The present invention will now be further illustrated by the following non-limiting Examples.
  • EXAMPLES
  • All Examples used the following equipment: a Fukae FS30 for batch NTR experiments.
  • Unless stated otherwise herein, all amounts expressed as percentages are on a weight basis and based on the total weight of the detergent composition or component prior to the addition of any post-dosed ingredients.
  • Production of zeolite-NTR powders according to the invention
  • The following slurries were spray dried to produce powders of high porosity and low bulk density (BD):
    Slurry 1 (wt%) Slurry 2 (wt%)
    Zeolite A24 40.0 43.8
    LAS 0.0 1.3
    Sokalan CP5 10.0 5.0
    water 50.0 49.9
  • The resulting powders had the following properties:
    Properties Base Powder 1 Base Powder 2
    BD, [g/l] 629 370
    DFR, [ml/s] 115 88
    d50 [µm] 210 279
    [µm] 242 299
    [-] 2.7 2.4
    Moisture Content [%] 5-7 7
    Particle Porosity 0.51 0.70
  • Sokalan CP5 is a polyacrylate/polymaleate copolymer.
  • The spray-dried zeolite-based porous carriers were subsequently used as base powders in NTR processes as described in Examples 1 and 2.
  • Examples 1 & 2
  • Both base powders were used in a batch NTR trial on a Fukae.
    Formulation Example 1 (wt%) Example 2 (wt%) Reference (wt%)
    Base Powder 1 43.4
    Base Powder 2 46.4
    Zeolite A24 46.4
    PAS adjunct 31.9 33.8 33.9
    Nonionic 7EO 9.4 10.0 10.0
    Nonionic 3EO 6.3 6.6 6.6
    Fatty acid 2.5 2.6 2.6
    NaOH 0.6 0.7 0.7
    Zeolite A24 layering 5.6 0.0 0.0
    Premix
    Agitator rpm 200
    Chopper rpm 3000
    Time [sec] 10
    Granulation
    Agitator rpm 100
    Chopper rpm 3000
    Time [min] 1-0.5 1 1
    Layering [sec] 10
    Powder properties
    DFR [ml/s] 140 90 55
    RRd [µm] 492-574 366 1015
    RRn 2.6 1.9 1.6
  • The PAS adjunct used in the trial had the following composition:
    PAS 45 wt%
    Zeolite 38 wt%
    Carbonate 9 wt%
    Water + other components 8 wt%
  • Production of STP-NTR powders according to the invention
  • The following slurries were spray dried to produce powders of high porosity and low BD:
    Composition Wt%
    STP (Rhodiaphos H5) 38.8
    LAS 1.1
    50% NaOH soln 0.3
    45% Alkaline silicate soln 12.0
    Water 47.9
  • The resulting powder had the following properties:
    Properties
    BD [g/l] 404
    DFR [ml/s] 111
    d50 [µm] 303
    RRd (µm] 349
    RRn [-] 2.9
    Moisture content [%] 5.9
    Particle porosity 0.67
  • The spray-dried STP-based carrier was used to formulate powders in Examples 3 and 4.
  • Examples 3 & 4
  • The STP-based carrier was used in a batch NTR process using a Fukae FS30 mixer as follows:
    Example 3 (kg) Example 4 (kg) Reference
    Standard STP 0 0 4.7
    Spray-dried STP carrier 4.7 4.7 0
    Sodium carbonate 5.2 5.2 5.2
    Zeolite 4A (Wessalith P) 1.0 1.0 1.0
    LAS acid 3.3 3.3 3.3
    Zeolite 4A layering 0 0.3 0
    Pre-mixing
    Pre-mix time (sec.) 10 10 10
    RPM (agitator/chopper) 100/3000 Mixing 100/3000 100/3000
    RPM (agitator) 100 200 100
    RPM (chopper) 3000 3000 3000
    Mixing time (sec) 120 120 120
    Powder properties
    BD [g/l] 576 688 846
    DFR [ml/s] 110 119 132
    RRd (µm] 486 373 680
    RRn [-] 1.72 1.70 1.19
  • Again the powders produced with porous carriers have a lower BD and a narrower particle size distribution as indicated by the higher RRn value.

Claims (13)

  1. A process for the production of a detergent powder composition having a bulk density of no more than 750 g/l, the process comprising mixing a particulate starting material which contains no more than 10% by weight of the starting material of detergent active material together with a liquid component comprising a detergent active material or a precursor therefor in a mixer/granulator having both a stirring and a cutting action characterised in that the starting material has a d50 average particle diameter of from 100µm to 1000µm and a particle porosity of at least 0.4.
  2. A process according to claim 1 characterised in that the bulk density of the product detergent powder composition is controlled to a predetermined value by setting the operational speed of the mixer/granulator.
  3. A process according to claim 1 or claim 2 characterised in that the starting material has a d50 average particle diameter of from 150µm to 800µm.
  4. A process according to any preceding claim characterised in that the starting material has a d50 average particle diameter of from 200µm to 700µm.
  5. A process according to any preceding claim characterised in that the starting material comprises a material formed by spray drying.
  6. A process according to any preceding claim characterised in that the mixer/granulator is a high speed mixer/densifier into which are dosed the starting material and the liquid component to form a granular material.
  7. A process according to claim 6 characterised in that the material produced by mixing is subsequently dried and/or cooled.
  8. A process according to any preceding claim characterised in that the mixer/granulator comprises a bowl-shaped vessel and a stirrer which rotates about a vertical stirrer axis or a horizontal hollow cylinder with in the middle a rotating shaft with blades.
  9. A process according to any preceding claim characterised in that the particle porosity of the starting material is at least 0.45.
  10. A process according to any preceding claim characterised in that the particle porosity of the starting material is at least 0.50.
  11. A detergent powder composition prepared by a process according to claim 1.
  12. A composition according to claim 11 characterised by a bulk density of no more than 700 g/l.
  13. A composition according to claim 11 characterised by a bulk density of no more than 650 g/l.
EP97950085A 1996-12-02 1997-10-29 Process for the production of a detergent composition Expired - Lifetime EP0942958B2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GBGB9625066.7A GB9625066D0 (en) 1996-12-02 1996-12-02 Process for the production of a detergent composition
GB9625066 1996-12-02
PCT/EP1997/006073 WO1998024876A1 (en) 1996-12-02 1997-10-29 Process for the production of a detergent composition

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0942958A1 EP0942958A1 (en) 1999-09-22
EP0942958B1 true EP0942958B1 (en) 2001-12-19
EP0942958B2 EP0942958B2 (en) 2006-12-13

Family

ID=10803825

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP97950085A Expired - Lifetime EP0942958B2 (en) 1996-12-02 1997-10-29 Process for the production of a detergent composition

Country Status (14)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0942958B2 (en)
CN (1) CN1188505C (en)
AR (1) AR009644A1 (en)
AU (1) AU721831B2 (en)
BR (1) BR9714494A (en)
CA (1) CA2273849C (en)
DE (1) DE69709398T3 (en)
EA (1) EA001453B1 (en)
ES (1) ES2169882T3 (en)
GB (1) GB9625066D0 (en)
ID (1) ID22478A (en)
TR (1) TR199901756T2 (en)
WO (1) WO1998024876A1 (en)
ZA (1) ZA979825B (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2020222996A1 (en) * 2019-04-29 2020-11-05 The Procter & Gamble Company A process for making a laundry detergent composition
RU2773345C1 (en) * 2019-04-29 2022-06-02 Дзе Проктер Энд Гэмбл Компани Method for producing detergent composition for laundry

Families Citing this family (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6492319B1 (en) 1998-08-20 2002-12-10 The Procter & Gamble Company High density detergent-making process involving a moderate speed mixer/densifier
CA2341405A1 (en) * 1998-09-18 2000-03-30 Millard Edward Sullivan Continuous process for making a detergent composition
US6794354B1 (en) 1998-09-18 2004-09-21 The Procter & Gamble Company Continuous process for making detergent composition
WO2000018874A1 (en) * 1998-09-25 2000-04-06 The Procter & Gamble Company Granular detergent composition having improved appearance and solubility
TR200100848T2 (en) * 1998-09-25 2002-03-21 The Procter & Gamble Company Gran l detergent composition with a better appearance and ‡ ”weight
CA2346926A1 (en) * 1998-10-26 2000-05-04 Christopher Andrew Morrison Processes for making granular detergent composition having improved appearance and solubility
AU5879900A (en) * 1999-06-21 2001-01-09 Procter & Gamble Company, The Process for producing coated detergent particles
US6951837B1 (en) 1999-06-21 2005-10-04 The Procter & Gamble Company Process for making a granular detergent composition
US6767882B1 (en) 1999-06-21 2004-07-27 The Procter & Gamble Company Process for producing coated detergent particles

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0270240B1 (en) * 1986-10-31 1993-09-22 Unilever Plc Detergent powders and process for preparing them

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0367339B1 (en) * 1988-11-02 1996-03-13 Unilever N.V. Process for preparing a high bulk density granular detergent composition
GB9125035D0 (en) * 1991-11-26 1992-01-22 Unilever Plc Detergent compositions and process for preparing them
GB9513327D0 (en) * 1995-06-30 1995-09-06 Uniliver Plc Process for the production of a detergent composition

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0270240B1 (en) * 1986-10-31 1993-09-22 Unilever Plc Detergent powders and process for preparing them

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2020222996A1 (en) * 2019-04-29 2020-11-05 The Procter & Gamble Company A process for making a laundry detergent composition
RU2773345C1 (en) * 2019-04-29 2022-06-02 Дзе Проктер Энд Гэмбл Компани Method for producing detergent composition for laundry

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
ZA979825B (en) 1999-04-30
EA199900516A1 (en) 2000-02-28
BR9714494A (en) 2000-03-21
TR199901756T2 (en) 1999-11-22
DE69709398D1 (en) 2002-01-31
CN1245530A (en) 2000-02-23
ID22478A (en) 1999-10-21
EP0942958A1 (en) 1999-09-22
AU721831B2 (en) 2000-07-13
CN1188505C (en) 2005-02-09
EP0942958B2 (en) 2006-12-13
CA2273849C (en) 2007-04-10
CA2273849A1 (en) 1998-06-11
ES2169882T3 (en) 2002-07-16
DE69709398T2 (en) 2002-06-20
GB9625066D0 (en) 1997-01-22
AR009644A1 (en) 2000-04-26
EA001453B1 (en) 2001-04-23
WO1998024876A1 (en) 1998-06-11
AU5316898A (en) 1998-06-29
DE69709398T3 (en) 2007-04-19

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5160657A (en) Detergent compositions and process for preparing them
EP0451894B2 (en) High bulk density granular detergent compositions and process for preparing them
CA2242420C (en) Process for the production of a detergent composition
EP0983338B1 (en) Granular detergent compositions and their production
EP0942958B1 (en) Process for the production of a detergent composition
WO1994002573A1 (en) Process and compositions for compact detergents
US7098177B1 (en) Process for producing detergent particles
AU677238B2 (en) Process for making high density granular detergent and composition made by the process
US5990073A (en) Process for the production of a detergent composition
AU1878592A (en) Agglomeration of high active pastes to form surfactant granules useful in detergent compositions
AU739651B2 (en) Process for the production of a detergent composition
EP0660873B2 (en) High density granular detergent composition
PL191480B1 (en) Process for preparing granular detergent compositions
EP1115837A1 (en) Granular detergent compositions having homogenous particles and process for producing same
MXPA96005754A (en) Procedure for the manufacture of a high-density detergent composition from detergent ingredients

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19990525

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): BE DE ES FR GB IT

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20000216

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): BE DE ES FR GB IT

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: IF02

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69709398

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20020131

ET Fr: translation filed
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2169882

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

PLBF Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OBSO

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: HENKEL KGAA

Effective date: 20020910

PLBF Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OBSO

PLBF Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OBSO

APBP Date of receipt of notice of appeal recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA2O

APAY Date of receipt of notice of appeal deleted

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDNOA2O

APBP Date of receipt of notice of appeal recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA2O

APAA Appeal reference recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS REFN

APBQ Date of receipt of statement of grounds of appeal recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA3O

APAH Appeal reference modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCREFNO

APBU Appeal procedure closed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA9O

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20061026

Year of fee payment: 10

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20061031

Year of fee payment: 10

PUAH Patent maintained in amended form

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009272

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: PATENT MAINTAINED AS AMENDED

27A Patent maintained in amended form

Effective date: 20061213

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B2

Designated state(s): BE DE ES FR GB IT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20070324

ET3 Fr: translation filed ** decision concerning opposition
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20071029

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20121029

Year of fee payment: 16

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20121107

Year of fee payment: 16

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20121025

Year of fee payment: 16

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20121025

Year of fee payment: 16

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: *UNILEVER N.V.

Effective date: 20131031

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20131029

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 69709398

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20140501

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20131029

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20140630

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20131031

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140501

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20131031