EP0660873B2 - High density granular detergent composition - Google Patents

High density granular detergent composition Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0660873B2
EP0660873B2 EP93922135A EP93922135A EP0660873B2 EP 0660873 B2 EP0660873 B2 EP 0660873B2 EP 93922135 A EP93922135 A EP 93922135A EP 93922135 A EP93922135 A EP 93922135A EP 0660873 B2 EP0660873 B2 EP 0660873B2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
granular
particle size
water
dispensing
alkyl
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP93922135A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0660873A4 (en
EP0660873B1 (en
EP0660873A1 (en
Inventor
Paul Van Dijk
Jose Luis Vega
Paul Amaat Raymond G. France
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Procter and Gamble Co
Original Assignee
Procter and Gamble Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=27234905&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP0660873(B2) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Procter and Gamble Co filed Critical Procter and Gamble Co
Priority to EP93922135A priority Critical patent/EP0660873B2/en
Priority claimed from PCT/US1993/008151 external-priority patent/WO1994005761A1/en
Publication of EP0660873A1 publication Critical patent/EP0660873A1/en
Publication of EP0660873A4 publication Critical patent/EP0660873A4/en
Publication of EP0660873B1 publication Critical patent/EP0660873B1/en
Priority to GR20010400400T priority patent/GR3036040T3/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0660873B2 publication Critical patent/EP0660873B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Definitions

  • EP-A-184794 published on 18th June, 1986 (Henkel) describes a process of loading an adsorbant carrier with nonionic surfactant in a Loedige mixer which increases the bulk density.
  • the carrier is typically prepared by spray drying.
  • EP-A-327963 published on 16th August, 1989 (Henkel) describes a basic post tower densification process in which the spray dried component is pulverised prior to reagglomerating in a granulation step.
  • EP-A-0 367 339 published on May 9 th , 1990 describes a two-stage agglomeration process.
  • EP-A-0 342 043 published on November 15th 1989 describes granular laundry detergent compositions which may be satisfactorily released from the dispensing compartment of an automatic washing machine.
  • the mean particle size of the granular particles of the finished product should not be so great that the rate of dissolution is slow.
  • the invention provides a specific detergent composition having excellent dispensing and dissolving properties, namely a detergent composition as defined in claim 1.
  • the required properties are achieved by mixing most (or all) of the detergent components in the form of granular powders, in order to give a mixed particulate material having a defined mean particle size and bulk density.
  • the bulk density is then further increased by spraying a liquid, and dusting with a finely particulate flow aid In one or more rotating drums or mixers in order to "round off the particles by filling pores and surface irregularities.
  • the granular components used in the present invention are made from a wide range of ingredients useful for their detergency which are chosen according to the demands of the product formulator. Suitable ingredients are described below.
  • composition of the invention comprise from 5 to 20% of organic surfactant comprising mixed anionic surfactant systems having a Krafft temperature less than 40°C, the anionic surfactant systems comprising sulphate and/or sulphonate salts.
  • Surfactants are selected from the group consisting of anionic, zwitterionic, ampholytic and cationic surfactants, and mixtures thereof.
  • Anionic surfactants are preferred.
  • Surfactants useful herein are listed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,664,961, Norris, issued May 23, 1972, and In U.S. Pat. No. 3,916,678, Laughlin et al., Issued Dec. 30,1975.
  • Useful cationic surfactants also include those described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,222,905, Cockrell, issued Sept. 16, 1980, and in U.S. Pat. 4,239,659, Murphy, issued Dec. 16, 1980.
  • cationic surfactants are generally less compatible with the aluminosilicate materials herein, and thus are preferably used at low levels, if at all, in the present compositions.
  • the following are representative examples of surfactants useful in the present compositions.
  • Water-soluble salts of the higher fatty acids are useful anionic surfactants in the compositions herein.
  • Soaps can be made by direct saponification of fats and oils or by the neutralization of free fatty acids.
  • Particularly useful are the sodium and potassium salts of the mixtures of fatty acids derived from coconut oil and tallow, i.e., sodium or potassium tallow and coconut soap.
  • Useful anionic surfactants also include the water-soluble salts, preferably the alkali metal, ammonium and alkylolammonium salts, of organicsulfuric reaction products having in their molecular structure an alkyl group containing from 10 to 20 carbon atoms and a sulfonic acid or sulfuric acid ester group.
  • alkyl is the alkyl portion of acyl groups.
  • this group of synthetic surfactants are the sodium and potassium alkyl sulfates, especially those obtained by sulfating the higher alcohols (C 8 -C 18 carbon atoms) such as those produced by reducing the glycerides of tallow or coconut oil; and the sodium and potassium alkyl benzene sulfonates in which the alkyl group contains from 9 to 15 carbon atoms, in straight or branched chain configuration, e.g., those of the type described in U. S. Pat. Nos. 2,220,099 and 2,477,383.
  • anionic surfactants herein are the sodium alkyl glyceryl ether sulfonates, especially those ethers of higher alcohols derived from tallow and coconut oil; sodium coconut oil fatty acid monoglyceride sulfonates and sulfates; sodium or potassium salts of alkyl phenol ethylene oxide ether sulfates containing from 1 to 10 units of ethylene oxide per molecule and wherein the alkyl groups contain from 8 to 12 carbon atoms; and sodium or potassium salts of alkyl ethylene oxide ether sulfates containing from 1 to 10 units of ethylene oxide per molecule and wherein the alkyl group contains from 10 to 20 carbon atoms.
  • Other useful anionic surfactants herein include the water-soluble salts of esters of alpha-sulfonated fatty acids containing from 6 to 20 carbon atoms in the fatty acid group and from 1 to 10 carbon atoms in the ester group; water-soluble salts of 2-acyloxy-alkane-1-sulfonic acids containing from 2 to 9 carbon atoms in the acyl group and from 9 to 23 carbon atoms in the alkane moiety; alkyl ether sulfates containing from 10 to 20 carbon atoms in the alkyl group and from 1 to 30 moles of ethylene oxide; water-soluble salts of olefin sulfonates containing from 12 to 24 carbon atoms; and beta-alkyloxy alkane sulfonates containing from 1 to 3 carbon atoms in the alkyl group and from 8 to 20 carbon atoms in the alkane moiety.
  • MES C16-18 methyl ester sulphonates
  • Water-soluble nonionic surfactants are also useful as secondary surfactant in the compositions of the invention.
  • Such nonionic materials include compounds produced by the condensation of alkylene oxide groups,(hydrophilic in nature) with an organic hydrophobic compound, which may be aliphatic or alkyl aromatic in nature.
  • the length of the polyoxyalkylene group which is condensed with any particular hydrophobic group can be readily adjusted to yield a water-soluble compound having the desired degree of balance between hydrophilic and hydrophobic elements.
  • Suitable nonionic surfactants include the polyethylene oxide condensates of alkyl phenols, e.g., the condensation products of alkyl phenols having an alkyl group containing from 6 to 16 carbon atoms, in either a straight chain or branched chain configuration, with from 4 to 25 moles of ethylene oxide per mole of alkyl phenol.
  • Preferred nonionics are the water-soluble condensation products of aliphatic alcohols containing from 8 to 22 carbon atoms, in either straight chain or branched configuration, with from 4 to 25 moles of ethylene oxide per more of alcohol. Particularly preferred are the condensation products of alcohols having an alkyl group containing from 9 to 15 carbon atoms with from 4 to 25 moles of ethylene oxide per mole of alcohol; and condensation products of propylene glycol with ethylene oxide.
  • nonionic surfactants are based upon natural renewable sources such as glucose.
  • Alkyl polyglucoside (APG) preferably those containing from 10 to 20 carbon atoms and an average of from 1 to 4 glucose groups.
  • nonionic surfactants based on glucose amides which contain an alkyl group with from 10 to 20 carbon atoms, for example tallow N-methyl glucamine.
  • Polyhydroxy fatty acid amides may be produced by reacting a fatty acid ester and an N-alkyl polyhydroxy amine.
  • the preferred amine for use in the present invention is N-(R1)-CH2(CH2OH)4-CH2-OH and the preferred ester is a C12-C20 fatty acid methyl ester.
  • Most preferred is the reaction product of N-mehtyl glucamine with C12-C20 fatty acid methyl ester.
  • Semi-polar nonionic surfactants include water-soluble amine oxides containing one alkyl moiety of from 10 to 18 carbon atoms and 2 moieties selected from the group consisting of alkyl groups and hydroxyalkyl groups containing from 1 to 3 carbon atoms; water-soluble phosphine oxides containing one alkyl moiety of 10 to 18 carbon atoms and 2 moieties selected from the group consisting of alkyl groups and hydroxyalkyl groups containing from 1 to 3 carbon atoms; and water-soluble sulfoxides containing one alkyl moiety of from 10 to 18 carbon atoms and a moiety selected from the group consisting of alkyl and hydroxyalkyl moieties of from 1 to 3 carbon atoms.
  • Ampholytic surfactants include derivatives of aliphatic or aliphatic derivatives of heterocyclic secondary and tertiary amines in which the aliphatic moiety can be either straight or branched chain and wherein one of the aliphatic substituents contains from 8 to 18 carbon atoms and at least one aliphatic substituent contains an anionic water-solubilizing group.
  • Zwitterionic surfactants include derivatives of aliphatic quaternary ammonium phosphonium, and sulfonium compounds in which one of the aliphatic substituents contains from 8 to 18 carbon atoms.
  • Particularly preferred surfactants herein include tallow alkyl sulfates; coconutalkyl glyceryl ether sulfonates; alkyl ether sulfates wherein the alkyl moiety contains from 14 to 18 carbon atoms and wherein the average degree of ethoxylation is from 1 to 4; olefin or paraffin sulfonates containing from 14 to 16 carbon atoms; alkyldimethylamine oxides wherein the alkyl group contains from 11 to 16 carbon atoms; alkyldimethylammonio propane sulfonates and alkyldimethylammonio hydroxy propane sulfonates wherein the alkyl group contains from 14 to 18 carbon atoms; soaps of higher fatty acids containing from 12 to 18 carbon atoms; condensation products of C9-C15 alcohols with from 3 to 8 moles of ethylene oxide, and mixtures thereof.
  • Useful cationic surfactants include water-soluble quaternary ammonium compounds of the form R 4 R 5 R 6 R 7 N + X - , wherein R 4 is alkyl having from 10 to 20, preferably from 12-18 carbon atoms, and R 5 , R 6 and R 7 are each C 1 to C 7 alkyl preferably methyl; X - is an anion, e.g. chloride.
  • Examples of such trimethyl ammonium compounds include C 12- - 14 alkyl trimethyl ammonium chloride and cocalkyl trimethyl ammonium methosulfate.
  • alpha-olefin sulphonates include: alpha-olefin sulphonates; triethanolammonium C 11 -C 13 alkylbenzene sulfonate; alkyl sulfates, (tallow, coconut, palm, synthetic origins, e.g.
  • compositions of the invention comprise from 5 to 20% of sodium aluminosilicate.
  • Any compatible detergency builder or combination of builders or powder can be used in the compositions of the present invention.
  • the detergent compositions herein can contain crystalline aluminosilicate ion exchange material of the formula Na z [(AlO 2 ) z ⁇ (SiO 2 ) y ] ⁇ xH 2 O wherein z and y are at least 6, the molar ratio of z to y is from 1.0 to 0.4 and z is from 10 to 264.
  • Amorphous hydrated aluminosilicate materials useful herein have the empirical formula M z (zAlO 2 ⁇ ySiO 2 ) wherein M is sodium, potassium, ammonium or substituted ammonium, z is from 0.5 to 2 and y is 1, said material having a magnesium ion exchange capacity of at least 50 milligram equivalents of CaCO 3 hardness per gram of anhydrous aluminosilicate. Hydrated sodium Zeolite A with a particle size of from 1 to 10 microns is preferred.
  • the aluminosilicate ion exchange builder materials herein are in hydrated form and contain from 10% to 28% of water by weight if crystalline, and potentially even higher amounts of water if amorphous. Highly preferred crystalline aluminosilicate ion exchange materials contain from 18% to 22% water in their crystal matrix.
  • the crystalline aluminosilicate ion exchange materials are further characterized by a particle size diameter of from 0.1 micron to 10 microns. Amorphous materials are often smaller, e.g., down to less than 0.01 micron.
  • Preferred ion exchange materials have a particle size diameter of from 0.2 micron to 4 microns.
  • particle size diameter herein represents the average particle size diameter by weight of a given ion exchange material as determined by conventional analytical techniques such as, for example, microscopic determination utilizing a scanning electron microscope.
  • the crystalline aluminosilicate ion exchange materials herein are usually further characterized by their calcium ion exchange capacity, which is at least 200 mg equivalent of CaCO 3 water hardness/g of aluminosilicate, calculated on an anhydrous basis, and which generally is in the range of from 300 mg eq./g to 352 mg eq./g.
  • the aluminosilicate ion exchange materials herein are still further characterized by their calcium ion exchange rate which is at least 129.68 x 10 -3 g/Vmin/g/l (2 grains Ca ++ /gallon/minute/gram/gallon) of aluminosilicate (anhydrous basis), and generally lies within the range of from 129.68 ⁇ 10 -3 to 389.04 ⁇ 10 -3 g/l/min/g/l (2 grains/gallon/minute/gram/gallon to 6 grains/gallon/minute/gram/gallon), based on calcium ion hardness.
  • Optimum aluminosilicate for builder purposes exhibit a calcium ion exchange rate of at least 259.36 ⁇ 10 -3 g/l/min/g/l (4 grains/gallon/minut/gram/gallon).
  • the amorphous aluminosilicate ion exchange materials usually have a Mg ++ exchange of at least 50 mg eq. CaCO 3 /g (12 mg Mg ++ /g) and a Mg ++ exchange rate of at least 1 grain/gallon/minute/gram/gallon. Amorphous materials do not exhibit an observable diffraction pattern when examined by Cu radiation (1.54 Angstrom Units).
  • Aluminosilicate ion exchange materials useful in the practice of this invention are commercially available.
  • the aluminosilicates useful in this invention can be crystalline or amorphous in structure and can be naturally occurring aluminosilicates or synthetically derived.
  • a method for producing aluminosilicate ion exchange materials is discussed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,985,669, Krummel et al., issued Oct. 12, 1976.
  • Preferred synthetic crystalline aluminosilicate ion exchange materials useful herein are available under the designations Zeolite A, Zeolite B, and Zeolite X.
  • the crystalline aluminosilicate ion exchange material has the formula Na 12 [(AlO 2 ) 12 (SiO2) 12 ]xH 2 O wherein x is from 20 to 30, especially 27 and has a particle size generally less than 5 microns.
  • the granular detergents of the present invention can contain neutral or alkaline salts which have a pH in solution of seven or greater, and can be either organic or inorganic in nature.
  • the builder salt assists in providing the desired density and bulk to the detergent granules herein. While some of the salts are inert, many of them also function as detergency builder materials in the laundering solution.
  • neutral water-soluble salts examples include the alkali metal, ammonium or substituted ammonium chlorides, fluorides and sulfates.
  • the alkali metal, and especially sodium, salts of the above are preferred.
  • Sodium sulfate is typically used in detergent granules and is a particularly preferred saft.
  • Citric acid and, in general, any other organic or inorganic acid may be incorporated into the granular detergents of the present Invention as long as it is chemically compatible with the rest of the agglomerate composition.
  • water-soluble salts include the compounds commonly known as detergent builder materials.
  • Builders are generally selected from the various water-soluble, alkali metal, ammonium or substituted ammonium phosphates, polyphosphates, phosphonates, polyphosphonates, carbonates, silicates, borates, and polyhyroxysulfonates.
  • alkali metal especially sodium, salts of the above.
  • inorganic phosphate builders are sodium and potassium tripolyphosphate, pyrophosphate, polymeric metaphosphate having a degree of polymerization of from 6 to 21, and orthophosphate.
  • polyphosphonate builders are the sodium and potassium salts of ethylene diphosphonic acid, the sodium and potassium salts of ethane 1-hydroxy-1,1-diphosphonic acid and the sodium and potassium salts of ethane, 1,1,2-triphosphonic acid.
  • Other phosphorus builder compounds are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,159,581; 3,213,030; 3,422,021; 3,422,137; 3,400,176 and 3,400,148.
  • nonphosphorus, inorganic builders are sodium and potassium carbonate, bicarbonate, sesquicarbonate, tetraborate decahydrate, and silicate having a molar ratio of SiO 2 to alkali metal oxide of from 0.5 to 4.0, preferably from 1.0 to 2.4.
  • Layered silicates of the type manufactured by Hoechst AG, Frankfurt, Germany and sold under the trade name SKS-6 are also useful in the present invention.
  • organic polymers are also useful as builders to improve detergency. Included among such polymers may be mentioned sodium carboxy-lower alkyl celluloses, sodium lower alkyl celluloses and sodium hydroxy-lower alkyl celluloses, such as sodium carboxymethyl cellulose, sodium methyl cellulose and sodium hydroxypropyl cellulose, polyvinyl alcohols (which often also include some polyvinyl acetate), polyacrylamides, polyacrylates and various copolymers, such as those of maleic and acrylic acids. Molecular weights for such polymers vary widely but most are within the range of 2,000 to 100,000.
  • Polymeric polycarboxyate builders are set forth in U.S. Patent 3,308,067, Diehl, issued March 7, 1967. Such materials include the water-soluble salts of homo-and copolymers of aliphatic carboxylic acids such as maleic acid, itaconic acid, mesaconic acid, fumaric acid, aconitic acid, citraconic acid and methylenemalonic acid.
  • compositions of the present invention can be included in the compositions of the present invention. These include flow aids, color speckles, bleaching agents and bleach activators, suds boosters or suds suppressors, antitamish and anticorrosion agents, soil suspending agents, soil release agents, softening clays, dyes, fillers, optical brighteners, germicides, pH adjusting agents, nonbuilder alkalinity sources, hydrotropes, enzymes, enzyme-stabilizing agents, chelating agents and perfumes.
  • flow aids color speckles, bleaching agents and bleach activators, suds boosters or suds suppressors, antitamish and anticorrosion agents, soil suspending agents, soil release agents, softening clays, dyes, fillers, optical brighteners, germicides, pH adjusting agents, nonbuilder alkalinity sources, hydrotropes, enzymes, enzyme-stabilizing agents, chelating agents and perfumes.
  • Optical brighteners may be incorporated either directly into one (or more) of the granular components, or a solution or slurry of optical brightener may be sprayed into the rotating drum or mixer during the process of the compositions of the present Invention.
  • Particulate suds suppressors may also be Incorporated in the finished composition by mixing according to the present invention.
  • the suds suppressing activlty of these particles is based on fatty acids or silicones.
  • the granular components may be prepared and mixed by any conventional means. Typically the mixing process may be carried out continuously by metering each component by weight on to a moving belt, and blending them in a rotating drum or mixer.
  • the mean particle size of the mixed granular components must be greater than 400 micrometers, and the bulk density must be greater than 600 g/l.
  • the individual granular components are prepared by processes other than spray drying such as agglomeration, compaction, encapsulation etc.
  • spray drying such as agglomeration, compaction, encapsulation etc.
  • One particularly preferred process of agglomerating high active surfactant pastes with builders and other powders is described in the Applicants' co-pending European Application No. EPA 510746 published on 28th October 1992.
  • None of the granular components is prepared by spray drying of slurries comprising organic surfactants. Such spray dried components generally require a pulverisation step in order to prepare a high bulk density component.
  • composition of the invention is made by a process which is carried out in one or more drum(s) or mixer (s) in which the bulk density of the product is increased without losing the benefits of good dispensing properties and rapid rate of dissolution
  • the granular particles are rolled within the drum/mixer in the "wet" state causing them to become rounded and Increasingly regular in shape (le more spherical) and particle size. This results in a finished composition with a density of at least 750 g/l, preferably greater than 800 g/l.
  • Suitable equipment includes various rotating drums or mixers with a rotating shaft, such as ribbon blenders or low shear mixers supplied by Lödige Machinenbau GmbH, Paderbom, Germany (especially those mixers supplied under the Trade Mark Loedige KM).
  • a low shear mixer comprises mixing tools, often of the "ploughshare” type mounted on to the rotating shaft. If a low shear mixer is used, the rotational speed of the shaft should be less than 250 rpm.
  • the liquid sprayed on to the mix of granular components comprises nonionic surfactant.
  • nonionic surfactants have been described hereinabove. Particularly preferred are the condensation products of alcohols having an alkyl group containing from 9 to 15 carbon atoms with from 4 to 25 moles of ethylene oxide per mole of alcohol; and condensation products of propylene glycol with ethylene oxide.
  • High Speed Cutters or Choppers may be advantageously used in order to prevent large balls of product from forming when wet, but pulverisation of the powders (which could occur when they are dry) should be avoided.
  • the high speed cutters or choppers may be mounted on a shaft which is oriented radially with respect to the wall of the mixer, and preferably the shaft rotates at a speed greater than 1000rpm.
  • the process must be differentiated from a more conventional agglomeration process. This can clearly be seen by observing the increase in mean particle size from beginning to end of the process.
  • the mean particle size does not increase by more than about 60% of the initial mean particle size. Preferably it does not increase by more than 40%, and more preferably it does not increase by more than 20% of the initial mean particle size.
  • mean particle size as defined herein is calculated by sieving a sample of the composition into a number of fractions (typically 5 fractions) on a series of Tyler sieves. The weight fractions thereby obtained are plotted against the aperture size of the sieves. The mean particle size is taken to be the theoretical aperture size through which 50% by weight of the sample would pass.
  • the finely divided flow aid (such as zeolites, carbonates, silicates, silicas) is added to the mix of granular components, preferably towards the end of the process. These dusting agents are the only components which are added as a dust. It is therefore particularly important that the flow aids selected do not gel upon contact with water (as some forms of finely divided silicates would). This careful selection of finely divided flow aid enables the bulk density to be further increased without losing the benefits of the good dispensing properties.
  • the present invention provides detergent compositions with very high bulk densities, which also have the characteristics of excellent dispensing properties and a rapid rate of dissolution.
  • the method of making the composition is very flexible with regard to the formulations that can be processed. Indeed any chemical that can be incorporated into a granular particle may be incorporated into a high bulk density composition by the process defined hereinabove.
  • compositions of the present invention comprise mixed anionic surfactant sytems having a Krafft temperature less than 40°C, the anionic surfactant systems comprising sulphate and/or sulphonate salts, in order to achieve a good rate of dissolution at mean particle size of 550-750micrometers.
  • compositions are nil-phosphate and nil-linear alkyl benzene sulphonate (nil-LAS) for environmental reasons.
  • a mixture of granular raw materials is prepared according to the following composition : % by weight Anionic surfactant agglomerate 30.0 Layered silicate compacted granule 17.7 Percarbonate 24.7 TAED agglomerate 9.2 Suds suppressor agglomerate 2.2 Perfume encapsulate 0.2 Granular soil release polymer 0.6 Granular dense soda ash 8.6 Granular acrylic-maleic copolymer 3.2 Enzymes 3.6 100
  • the anionic surfactant agglomerate is prepared by agglomeration of a 78% active C45AS/C35A 3 S 80:20 paste and a phosphonate solution (35%) onto a powder mixture containing zeolite/ carbonate/ MgSO 4 / CMC at ratios 17/13/1/1 in a high shear mixer.
  • the wet agglomerate is dried in a fluid bed dryer to an equilibrium relative humidity of about 12% at 20°C.
  • the final agglomerate contains 30% anionic surfactant and 2% phosphonate and has an average particle size of about 500mm with less than 5% through Tyler 65.
  • the bulk density of the agglomerates is 750g/L.
  • the mixture of the granular components has a bulk density of 780g/L and a particle size distribution as follows : Tyler Sieve no. micrometers % by weight of product on sieve 14 1180 2 20 850 13 35 425 68 65 212 97 100 150 99
  • the mean particle size of the mixture of granular ingredients is about 525 micrometers.
  • the mixture of granular ingredients described above is placed inside a 600L rotating drum that operates at 15 rpm.
  • a mixture of nonionic surfactant (C25E3) and a 20% aqueous solution of optical brightener (Pinopal CBS-X Trade Name, supplied by Ciba-Geigy) at ratios of 14:1 are sprayed onto the granular mixture while operating the drum to a level of 7%.
  • the spraying time is about 7 minutes.
  • zeolite is slowly added to the mixer to a level of about 8%, taking about 2 minutes. Once the addition of zeolite is finished, the mixer is allowed to rotate for about 30 seconds and is then stopped. The product is removed by opening the gate and further rotating the drum for about 10 seconds.
  • the product has a density after 2 days ageing of 910g/L.
  • the particle size distribution is : Tyler Sieve no. micrometers % by weiqht of product on sieve 14 1180 5 20 850 23 35 425 87 65 212 99 100 150 99.5
  • the mean particle size of the product is about 640 micrometers. This represents an increase in mean particle size of 22%.
  • the dissolution profile of the anionic surfactant measured according to the method also described in Section B shows the time for dissolution of 50% of the anionic surfactant to be 1.8 minutes.
  • a mixture of granular raw materials is prepared according to the following composition : % by weight Anionic surfactant agglomerate 53.3 Granular silicate 3.2 Granular dense soda ash 11.0 Granular sodium citrate 18.1 Granular acrylic-maleic copolymer 7.9 Suds suppressor agglomerate 2.0 Enzymes 4.5 100
  • the anionic surfactant agglomerate is prepared via agglomeration of a 78% active LAS/TAS/C35E 3 S 74:24: 2 paste onto a powder mixture containing zeolite / carbonate / CMC at ratios of 20/10/1 in a high shear mixer.
  • the wet agglomerate is dried in a fluid bed dryer to an equilibrium relative humidity of aout 12% at 20°C.
  • the final agglomerate contains 35% anionic surfactant, has an average particle size of 600 micrometers with 8% particles smaller than 212 micrometers and a bulk density of 740g/L.
  • the mixture of the granular components has a bulk density of 740g/L and the following particle size distribution: Tyler Sieve no. micrometers % by weight of product on sieve 14 1180 5 20 850 17 35 425 66 65 212 97 100 150 99
  • the mean particle size of the mixture of granular ingredients is about 525 micrometers.
  • the above mixture (50kg) is placed in a Lödige FM 130 D.
  • the shaft rotates at about 160 rpm and the chopper speed is 3000 rpm.
  • a mixture of nonionic surfactant (C45E7) and 20% aqueous solution of an optical brightener at a ratio of 14:1 are sprayed onto the mixture of powders while both the shaft and the chopper are operated.
  • a total of 5.2kg of the liquid mixture is added in an interval of about 1 and a half minutes. Immediatly after, 0.3kg of perfume is also sprayed on.
  • 5kg of finely divided zeolite is added to the mixer.
  • the addition time is about 2 minutes and after addition, the unit is operated without the chopper for another half a minute.
  • the product is discharged through the opening in the bottom of the mixer.
  • the density of the product after 2 days is 897g/L.
  • the particle size distribution is : Tyler Sieve no. micrometers % by weight of product on sieve 14 1180 17 20 850 41 35 425 78 65 212 94 100 150 98
  • the mean particle size of the product is about 740 micrometers. This represents an increase in mean particle size of about 40%.
  • the dissolution profile of the anionic surfactant measured according to the method also described in Section B shows the time for dissolution of 50% of the anionic surfactant to be 1.0 minutes.
  • a mixture of granular raw materials is prepared according to the following composition : % by weight Anionic surfactant agglomerate 12.0 Blown powder 49.2 Silicate 3.2 Granular dense soda ash 11.0 Granular sodium citrate 18.1 Suds suppressor agglomerate 2.0 Enzymes 4.5 100
  • the anionic surfactant agglomerate is prepared via dry neutralisation of acid LAS onto a powder mixture containing zeolite / carbonate at a ratio of 1/1 in a high shear mixer.
  • the agglomerate contains 30% anionic surfactant, has an average particle size of 500 micrometers with 16% particles smaller than 212 micrometers and a bulk density of 740g/L.
  • the blown powder is made via spray-drying a mixture containing : % by weight Anionic surfactant paste 40.0 Zeolite 44.0 Acrylic-maleic co-polymer 16.0 where the anionic surfactant paste is 50% surfactant active and contains LAS and TAS at ratios 2.4 :1.
  • the mixture of the raw material components has a bulk density of 670g/L and the following particle size distribution : Tyler Sieve no. micrometers % by weight of product on sieve 14 1180 4 20 850 11 35 425 33 65 212 64 100 150 86
  • the mean particle size of the mixture of ingredients is about 370 micrometers.
  • the above mixture (50kg) is placed in a Lödige FM 130 D.
  • the shaft rotates at about 160 rpm and the chopper speed is 3000 rpm.
  • a mixture of nonionic surfactant (C45E7) and 20% aqueous solution of an optical brightener at a ratio of 14:1 are sprayed onto the mixture of powders while both the shaft and the chopper are operated.
  • a total of 5.2kg of the liquid mixture is added in an interval of about 1 and a half minutes. Immediatly after, 0.3kg of perfume is also sprayed on. Then 5kg of finely divided zeolite is added to the mixer. The addition time is about 2 minutes and after addition, the unit is operated with the chopper for another 3 minutes. The product is discharged through the opening in the bottom of the mixer.
  • the density of the product after 2 days is 847g/L.
  • the particle size distribution is : Tyler Sieve no. micrometers % by weight of product on sieve 14 1180 7 20 850 13 35 425 47 65 212 75 100 150 88
  • the mean particle size of the product is about 400 micrometers.
  • the dissolution profile of the anionic surfactant measured according to the method also described in Section B shows the time for dissolution of 50% of the anionic surfactant to be 0.8 minutes.

Abstract

A process in which the bulk density of a particulate detergent material is increased starting from an initial bulk density of at least 600 g/l, by spraying a liquid onto the particles and dusting with a fine powder in one or more rotating drum(s) or mixer(s), characterised in that the particulate detergent material initially has a mean particle size greater than 400 micrometers, and that the increase in the mean particle size during the process is not greater than 60 %. The invention also discloses a detergent composition having excellent dispensing and dissolving properties.

Description

    BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • There is a trend amongstcommercially available granular detergents towards higher bulk densities. This gives benefits both for consumer convenience and for reduction of packaging materials.
  • Many of the prior art attempts to move in this direction have met with problems of poor solubility properties arising from low rate of dissolution or the formation of gels. A consequence of this in a typical washing process can be poor dispensing of the product, either from the dispensing drawer of a washing machine, or from a dosing device placed with the laundry inside the machine. This poor dispensing is often caused by gelling of particles which have high levels of surfactant upon contact with water. The gel prevents a proportion of the detergent powder from being solubillsed In the wash waterwhich reduces the effectiveness of the powder. Another adverse consequence arises even if the powder is well dispensed and dispersed in the washing water if it does not dissolve rapidly. The wash cycle has a limited duration during which the detergent can act upon the laundry. If the cleaning action is delayed because the powder is slow to dissolve, this, too, will limit the effectiveness of the powder.
  • The process engineer and formulator have frequently found that the need for good dispensing and the need for good dissolution rate have placed conflicting demands upon them. The solution has generally been to find a compromise which gives adequate dispensing and adequate dissolution rate. For example, poor dispensing of high bulk density granular detergents is often associated with surfactant rich particles having a high specific surface area, either due to high porosity or a small particle size (especially "fines"). However, decreasing the porosity and/or increasing the average particle size cause the dissolution rate to decrease.
  • Various methods for increasing bulk density are described in the prior art - in many cases by using processes which density spray dried powders.
  • EP-A-184794 published on 18th June, 1986 (Henkel) describes a process of loading an adsorbant carrier with nonionic surfactant in a Loedige mixer which increases the bulk density. The carrier is typically prepared by spray drying.
  • EP-A-327963 published on 16th August, 1989 (Henkel) describes a basic post tower densification process in which the spray dried component is pulverised prior to reagglomerating in a granulation step.
  • EP-A-0 367 339 published on May 9th, 1990 describes a two-stage agglomeration process.
  • EP-A-0 342 043 published on November 15th 1989 describes granular laundry detergent compositions which may be satisfactorily released from the dispensing compartment of an automatic washing machine.
  • Processes have also been developed whereby a spray drying step has been completely eliminated. This has been achieved by making particles which comprise surfactants and builders by, for example, extrusion or agglomeration of viscous pastes.
  • US-A-4 666 740 issued on May 19th 1987, and US-A-4 411 809 issued on October 25th 1983, both disclose laundry detergents having high bulk density which are made by a process of agglomeration with normally liquid or pasty surfactant and coated with powdered zeolite. The surfactant used for the agglomeration, as well as to provide a sticky surface on which the zeolite adheres is predominantly nonionic detergent.
  • However all of the prior art processes suffer either from the presence of very small particles (fines) which tend to gel and cause poor dispensing properties, or from the presence of large, low porosity particles which overcome the dispensing problem, but which are slow to dissolve in the wash process.
  • It is the aim of the present invention to provide a detergent composition that has three key properties:
    • i) a high bulk density
    • ii) good dispensing properties
    • iii) and dissolves rapidly.
  • This can be made by firstly dry mixing most (or all) of the components of the finished detergent composition in a granular form, and subsequently increasing the bulk density by spraying on a liquid into one or more rotating drums or mixers.
  • These initial particles must be granular (not dust), and they are not passed through a pulverisation step. This is key to achieving the benefits in dispensing properties.
  • It is also an essential feature of the present invention that the mean particle size of the granular particles of the finished product should not be so great that the rate of dissolution is slow.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The invention provides a specific detergent composition having excellent dispensing and dissolving properties, namely a detergent composition as defined in claim 1.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • The required properties are achieved by mixing most (or all) of the detergent components in the form of granular powders, in order to give a mixed particulate material having a defined mean particle size and bulk density. The bulk density is then further increased by spraying a liquid, and dusting with a finely particulate flow aid In one or more rotating drums or mixers in order to "round off the particles by filling pores and surface irregularities.
  • It is an essential feature of the process of preparation of the product of the present Invention that the powder at the inlet of the rotating drums/mixers is in a granular form (with little or no fines), and not pulverised as a dust. This feature gives the dispensing benefits (because the absence of fine powder/dust avoids gel formation upon contact with water).
  • Preparation of the Mix of Granular Components
  • The granular components used in the present invention are made from a wide range of ingredients useful for their detergency which are chosen according to the demands of the product formulator. Suitable ingredients are described below.
  • Surfactants
  • The composition of the invention comprise from 5 to 20% of organic surfactant comprising mixed anionic surfactant systems having a Krafft temperature less than 40°C, the anionic surfactant systems comprising sulphate and/or sulphonate salts.
  • Surfactants are selected from the group consisting of anionic, zwitterionic, ampholytic and cationic surfactants, and mixtures thereof. Anionic surfactants are preferred. Surfactants useful herein are listed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,664,961, Norris, issued May 23, 1972, and In U.S. Pat. No. 3,916,678, Laughlin et al., Issued Dec. 30,1975. Useful cationic surfactants also include those described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,222,905, Cockrell, issued Sept. 16, 1980, and in U.S. Pat. 4,239,659, Murphy, issued Dec. 16, 1980. However, cationic surfactants are generally less compatible with the aluminosilicate materials herein, and thus are preferably used at low levels, if at all, in the present compositions. The following are representative examples of surfactants useful in the present compositions.
  • Water-soluble salts of the higher fatty acids, i.e., "soaps", are useful anionic surfactants in the compositions herein. This includes alkali metal soaps such as the sodium, potassium, ammonium, and alkylammonium salts of higher fatty acids containing from about 8 to about 24 carbon atoms, and preferably from about 12 to about 18 carbon atoms. Soaps can be made by direct saponification of fats and oils or by the neutralization of free fatty acids. Particularly useful are the sodium and potassium salts of the mixtures of fatty acids derived from coconut oil and tallow, i.e., sodium or potassium tallow and coconut soap.
  • Useful anionic surfactants also include the water-soluble salts, preferably the alkali metal, ammonium and alkylolammonium salts, of organicsulfuric reaction products having in their molecular structure an alkyl group containing from 10 to 20 carbon atoms and a sulfonic acid or sulfuric acid ester group. (included in the term "alkyl" is the alkyl portion of acyl groups.) Examples of this group of synthetic surfactants are the sodium and potassium alkyl sulfates, especially those obtained by sulfating the higher alcohols (C8-C18 carbon atoms) such as those produced by reducing the glycerides of tallow or coconut oil; and the sodium and potassium alkyl benzene sulfonates in which the alkyl group contains from 9 to 15 carbon atoms, in straight or branched chain configuration, e.g., those of the type described in U. S. Pat. Nos. 2,220,099 and 2,477,383.
  • Other anionic surfactants herein are the sodium alkyl glyceryl ether sulfonates, especially those ethers of higher alcohols derived from tallow and coconut oil; sodium coconut oil fatty acid monoglyceride sulfonates and sulfates; sodium or potassium salts of alkyl phenol ethylene oxide ether sulfates containing from 1 to 10 units of ethylene oxide per molecule and wherein the alkyl groups contain from 8 to 12 carbon atoms; and sodium or potassium salts of alkyl ethylene oxide ether sulfates containing from 1 to 10 units of ethylene oxide per molecule and wherein the alkyl group contains from 10 to 20 carbon atoms.
  • Other useful anionic surfactants herein include the water-soluble salts of esters of alpha-sulfonated fatty acids containing from 6 to 20 carbon atoms in the fatty acid group and from 1 to 10 carbon atoms in the ester group; water-soluble salts of 2-acyloxy-alkane-1-sulfonic acids containing from 2 to 9 carbon atoms in the acyl group and from 9 to 23 carbon atoms in the alkane moiety; alkyl ether sulfates containing from 10 to 20 carbon atoms in the alkyl group and from 1 to 30 moles of ethylene oxide; water-soluble salts of olefin sulfonates containing from 12 to 24 carbon atoms; and beta-alkyloxy alkane sulfonates containing from 1 to 3 carbon atoms in the alkyl group and from 8 to 20 carbon atoms in the alkane moiety.
  • Also useful are the sulphonation products of fatty acid methyl esters containing a alkyl group with from 10 to 20 carbon atoms. Preferred are the C16-18 methyl ester sulphonates (MES)
  • Water-soluble nonionic surfactants are also useful as secondary surfactant in the compositions of the invention. Such nonionic materials include compounds produced by the condensation of alkylene oxide groups,(hydrophilic in nature) with an organic hydrophobic compound, which may be aliphatic or alkyl aromatic in nature. The length of the polyoxyalkylene group which is condensed with any particular hydrophobic group can be readily adjusted to yield a water-soluble compound having the desired degree of balance between hydrophilic and hydrophobic elements.
  • Suitable nonionic surfactants include the polyethylene oxide condensates of alkyl phenols, e.g., the condensation products of alkyl phenols having an alkyl group containing from 6 to 16 carbon atoms, in either a straight chain or branched chain configuration, with from 4 to 25 moles of ethylene oxide per mole of alkyl phenol.
  • Preferred nonionics are the water-soluble condensation products of aliphatic alcohols containing from 8 to 22 carbon atoms, in either straight chain or branched configuration, with from 4 to 25 moles of ethylene oxide per more of alcohol. Particularly preferred are the condensation products of alcohols having an alkyl group containing from 9 to 15 carbon atoms with from 4 to 25 moles of ethylene oxide per mole of alcohol; and condensation products of propylene glycol with ethylene oxide.
  • Other useful nonionic surfactants are based upon natural renewable sources such as glucose. Alkyl polyglucoside (APG), preferably those containing from 10 to 20 carbon atoms and an average of from 1 to 4 glucose groups. Also useful are nonionic surfactants based on glucose amides which contain an alkyl group with from 10 to 20 carbon atoms, for example tallow N-methyl glucamine.
  • Polyhydroxy fatty acid amides may be produced by reacting a fatty acid ester and an N-alkyl polyhydroxy amine. The preferred amine for use in the present invention is N-(R1)-CH2(CH2OH)4-CH2-OH and the preferred ester is a C12-C20 fatty acid methyl ester. Most preferred is the reaction product of N-mehtyl glucamine with C12-C20 fatty acid methyl ester.
  • Methods of manufacturing polyhydroxy fatty acid amides have been described in WO-A-92 6073, published on 16th April, 1992. This application describes the preparation of polyhydroxy fatty acid amides in the presence of solvents. In a highly preferred embodiment of the invention N-mehtyl glucamine is reacted with a C12-C20 mehtyl ester. It also says that the formulator of granular detergent compositions may find it convenient to run the amidation reaction in the presence of solvents which comprise alkoxylated, especially ethoxylated (EO 3-8) C12-C14 alcohols (page 15, lines 22-27). This directly yields nonionic surfactant systems which are preferred in the present invention, such as those comprising N-methyl glucamide and C12-C14 alcohols with an average of 3 ethoxylate groups per molecule.
  • Semi-polar nonionic surfactants include water-soluble amine oxides containing one alkyl moiety of from 10 to 18 carbon atoms and 2 moieties selected from the group consisting of alkyl groups and hydroxyalkyl groups containing from 1 to 3 carbon atoms; water-soluble phosphine oxides containing one alkyl moiety of 10 to 18 carbon atoms and 2 moieties selected from the group consisting of alkyl groups and hydroxyalkyl groups containing from 1 to 3 carbon atoms; and water-soluble sulfoxides containing one alkyl moiety of from 10 to 18 carbon atoms and a moiety selected from the group consisting of alkyl and hydroxyalkyl moieties of from 1 to 3 carbon atoms.
  • Ampholytic surfactants include derivatives of aliphatic or aliphatic derivatives of heterocyclic secondary and tertiary amines in which the aliphatic moiety can be either straight or branched chain and wherein one of the aliphatic substituents contains from 8 to 18 carbon atoms and at least one aliphatic substituent contains an anionic water-solubilizing group.
  • Zwitterionic surfactants include derivatives of aliphatic quaternary ammonium phosphonium, and sulfonium compounds in which one of the aliphatic substituents contains from 8 to 18 carbon atoms.
  • Particularly preferred surfactants herein include tallow alkyl sulfates; coconutalkyl glyceryl ether sulfonates; alkyl ether sulfates wherein the alkyl moiety contains from 14 to 18 carbon atoms and wherein the average degree of ethoxylation is from 1 to 4; olefin or paraffin sulfonates containing from 14 to 16 carbon atoms; alkyldimethylamine oxides wherein the alkyl group contains from 11 to 16 carbon atoms; alkyldimethylammonio propane sulfonates and alkyldimethylammonio hydroxy propane sulfonates wherein the alkyl group contains from 14 to 18 carbon atoms; soaps of higher fatty acids containing from 12 to 18 carbon atoms; condensation products of C9-C15 alcohols with from 3 to 8 moles of ethylene oxide, and mixtures thereof.
  • Useful cationic surfactants include water-soluble quaternary ammonium compounds of the form R4R5R6R7N+X-, wherein R4 is alkyl having from 10 to 20, preferably from 12-18 carbon atoms, and R5, R6 and R7 are each C1 to C7 alkyl preferably methyl; X- is an anion, e.g. chloride. Examples of such trimethyl ammonium compounds include C12--14 alkyl trimethyl ammonium chloride and cocalkyl trimethyl ammonium methosulfate.
  • Specific preferred surfactants for use herein include: alpha-olefin sulphonates; triethanolammonium C11-C13 alkylbenzene sulfonate; alkyl sulfates, (tallow, coconut, palm, synthetic origins, e.g. C45, etc.); sodium alkyl, sulfates; methyl ester sulphonate; sodium coconut alkyl glyceryl ether sulfonate; the sodium salt of a sulfated condensation product of a tallow alcohol with about 4 moles of ethylene oxide; the condensation product of a coconut fatty alcohol with 6 moles of ethylene oxide; the condensation product of tallow fatty alcohol with 11 moles of ethylene oxide; the condensation of a fatty alcohol containing from 14 to 15 carbon atoms with 7 moles of ethylene oxide; the condensation product of a C12-C13 fatty alcohol with 3 moles of ethylene oxide; 3-(N,N-dimethyl-N-coconutalkylammonio)-2-hydroxypropane-1-sulfonate; 3-(N,N-dimethyl-N-coconutalkylammonio)-propane-1-sulfonate; 6- (N-dodecylbenzyl-N,N-dimethylammonio) hexahoate; dodecyldimethylamine oxide; coconutalkyldimethylamine oxide; and the water-soluble sodium and potassium salts of coconut and tallow fatty acids.
  • Detergency Builders
  • The compositions of the invention comprise from 5 to 20% of sodium aluminosilicate.
  • Any compatible detergency builder or combination of builders or powder can be used in the compositions of the present invention.
  • The detergent compositions herein can contain crystalline aluminosilicate ion exchange material of the formula

            Naz[(AlO2)z·(SiO2)y]·xH2O

    wherein z and y are at least 6, the molar ratio of z to y is from 1.0 to 0.4 and z is from 10 to 264. Amorphous hydrated aluminosilicate materials useful herein have the empirical formula

            Mz(zAlO2·ySiO2)

    wherein M is sodium, potassium, ammonium or substituted ammonium, z is from 0.5 to 2 and y is 1, said material having a magnesium ion exchange capacity of at least 50 milligram equivalents of CaCO3 hardness per gram of anhydrous aluminosilicate. Hydrated sodium Zeolite A with a particle size of from 1 to 10 microns is preferred.
  • The aluminosilicate ion exchange builder materials herein are in hydrated form and contain from 10% to 28% of water by weight if crystalline, and potentially even higher amounts of water if amorphous. Highly preferred crystalline aluminosilicate ion exchange materials contain from 18% to 22% water in their crystal matrix. The crystalline aluminosilicate ion exchange materials are further characterized by a particle size diameter of from 0.1 micron to 10 microns. Amorphous materials are often smaller, e.g., down to less than 0.01 micron. Preferred ion exchange materials have a particle size diameter of from 0.2 micron to 4 microns. The term "particle size diameter" herein represents the average particle size diameter by weight of a given ion exchange material as determined by conventional analytical techniques such as, for example, microscopic determination utilizing a scanning electron microscope.
    The crystalline aluminosilicate ion exchange materials herein are usually further characterized by their calcium ion exchange capacity, which is at least 200 mg equivalent of CaCO3 water hardness/g of aluminosilicate, calculated on an anhydrous basis, and which generally is in the range of from 300 mg eq./g to 352 mg eq./g. The aluminosilicate ion exchange materials herein are still further characterized by their calcium ion exchange rate which is at least 129.68 x 10-3 g/Vmin/g/l (2 grains
    Ca++/gallon/minute/gram/gallon) of aluminosilicate (anhydrous basis), and generally lies within the range of from 129.68 × 10-3 to 389.04 × 10-3 g/l/min/g/l (2 grains/gallon/minute/gram/gallon to 6 grains/gallon/minute/gram/gallon), based on calcium ion hardness. Optimum aluminosilicate for builder purposes exhibit a calcium ion exchange rate of at least 259.36 × 10-3 g/l/min/g/l (4 grains/gallon/minut/gram/gallon).
  • The amorphous aluminosilicate ion exchange materials usually have a Mg++ exchange of at least 50 mg eq. CaCO3/g (12 mg Mg++/g) and a Mg++ exchange rate of at least 1 grain/gallon/minute/gram/gallon. Amorphous materials do not exhibit an observable diffraction pattern when examined by Cu radiation (1.54 Angstrom Units).
  • Aluminosilicate ion exchange materials useful in the practice of this invention are commercially available. The aluminosilicates useful in this invention can be crystalline or amorphous in structure and can be naturally occurring aluminosilicates or synthetically derived. A method for producing aluminosilicate ion exchange materials is discussed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,985,669, Krummel et al., issued Oct. 12, 1976. Preferred synthetic crystalline aluminosilicate ion exchange materials useful herein are available under the designations Zeolite A, Zeolite B, and Zeolite X. In an especially preferred embodiment, the crystalline aluminosilicate ion exchange material has the formula

            Na12[(AlO2)12(SiO2)12]xH2O

    wherein x is from 20 to 30, especially 27 and has a particle size generally less than 5 microns.
  • The granular detergents of the present invention can contain neutral or alkaline salts which have a pH in solution of seven or greater, and can be either organic or inorganic in nature. The builder salt assists in providing the desired density and bulk to the detergent granules herein. While some of the salts are inert, many of them also function as detergency builder materials in the laundering solution.
  • Examples of neutral water-soluble salts include the alkali metal, ammonium or substituted ammonium chlorides, fluorides and sulfates. The alkali metal, and especially sodium, salts of the above are preferred. Sodium sulfate is typically used in detergent granules and is a particularly preferred saft. Citric acid and, in general, any other organic or inorganic acid may be incorporated into the granular detergents of the present Invention as long as it is chemically compatible with the rest of the agglomerate composition.
  • Other useful water-soluble salts include the compounds commonly known as detergent builder materials. Builders are generally selected from the various water-soluble, alkali metal, ammonium or substituted ammonium phosphates, polyphosphates, phosphonates, polyphosphonates, carbonates, silicates, borates, and polyhyroxysulfonates. Preferred are the alkali metal, especially sodium, salts of the above.
  • Specific examples of inorganic phosphate builders are sodium and potassium tripolyphosphate, pyrophosphate, polymeric metaphosphate having a degree of polymerization of from 6 to 21, and orthophosphate. Examples of polyphosphonate builders are the sodium and potassium salts of ethylene diphosphonic acid, the sodium and potassium salts of ethane 1-hydroxy-1,1-diphosphonic acid and the sodium and potassium salts of ethane, 1,1,2-triphosphonic acid. Other phosphorus builder compounds are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,159,581; 3,213,030; 3,422,021; 3,422,137; 3,400,176 and 3,400,148.
  • Examples of nonphosphorus, inorganic builders are sodium and potassium carbonate, bicarbonate, sesquicarbonate, tetraborate decahydrate, and silicate having a molar ratio of SiO2 to alkali metal oxide of from 0.5 to 4.0, preferably from 1.0 to 2.4. Layered silicates of the type manufactured by Hoechst AG, Frankfurt, Germany and sold under the trade name SKS-6 are also useful in the present invention.
  • As mentioned above chemical ingredients normally used in detergents such as zeolite, carbonate, silica, silicate, citrate, phosphate, perborate, percarbonate etc. and process acids such as starch, can be used in preferred embodiments of the present invention.
  • Polymers
  • Also useful are various organic polymers, some of which also may function as builders to improve detergency. Included among such polymers may be mentioned sodium carboxy-lower alkyl celluloses, sodium lower alkyl celluloses and sodium hydroxy-lower alkyl celluloses, such as sodium carboxymethyl cellulose, sodium methyl cellulose and sodium hydroxypropyl cellulose, polyvinyl alcohols (which often also include some polyvinyl acetate), polyacrylamides, polyacrylates and various copolymers, such as those of maleic and acrylic acids. Molecular weights for such polymers vary widely but most are within the range of 2,000 to 100,000.
  • Polymeric polycarboxyate builders are set forth in U.S. Patent 3,308,067, Diehl, issued March 7, 1967. Such materials include the water-soluble salts of homo-and copolymers of aliphatic carboxylic acids such as maleic acid, itaconic acid, mesaconic acid, fumaric acid, aconitic acid, citraconic acid and methylenemalonic acid.
  • Optionals
  • Other ingredients commonly used In detergent compositions can be included in the compositions of the present invention. These Include flow aids, color speckles, bleaching agents and bleach activators, suds boosters or suds suppressors, antitamish and anticorrosion agents, soil suspending agents, soil release agents, softening clays, dyes, fillers, optical brighteners, germicides, pH adjusting agents, nonbuilder alkalinity sources, hydrotropes, enzymes, enzyme-stabilizing agents, chelating agents and perfumes.
  • Optical brighteners may be incorporated either directly into one (or more) of the granular components, or a solution or slurry of optical brightener may be sprayed into the rotating drum or mixer during the process of the compositions of the present Invention.
  • Particulate suds suppressors may also be Incorporated in the finished composition by mixing according to the present invention. Preferably the suds suppressing activlty of these particles is based on fatty acids or silicones.
  • Mixing
  • The granular components may be prepared and mixed by any conventional means. Typically the mixing process may be carried out continuously by metering each component by weight on to a moving belt, and blending them in a rotating drum or mixer. The mean particle size of the mixed granular components must be greater than 400 micrometers, and the bulk density must be greater than 600 g/l.
  • In order to achieve these physical characteristics of the granular component mix, and in order to maintain the dispensing benefits of the present Invention, it is preferred that the individual granular components are prepared by processes other than spray drying such as agglomeration, compaction, encapsulation etc. One particularly preferred process of agglomerating high active surfactant pastes with builders and other powders is described in the Applicants' co-pending European Application No. EPA 510746 published on 28th October 1992.
  • None of the granular components is prepared by spray drying of slurries comprising organic surfactants. Such spray dried components generally require a pulverisation step in order to prepare a high bulk density component.
  • The Drum/Mixer Process
  • The composition of the invention is made by a process which is carried out in one or more drum(s) or mixer (s) in which the bulk density of the product is increased without losing the benefits of good dispensing properties and rapid rate of dissolution
  • Without wishing to be bound by theory the granular particles are rolled within the drum/mixer in the "wet" state causing them to become rounded and Increasingly regular in shape (le more spherical) and particle size. This results in a finished composition with a density of at least 750 g/l, preferably greater than 800 g/l.
  • Suitable equipment includes various rotating drums or mixers with a rotating shaft, such as ribbon blenders or low shear mixers supplied by Lödige Machinenbau GmbH, Paderbom, Germany (especially those mixers supplied under the Trade Mark Loedige KM). Such a low shear mixer comprises mixing tools, often of the "ploughshare" type mounted on to the rotating shaft. If a low shear mixer is used, the rotational speed of the shaft should be less than 250 rpm.
  • It is preferred that the liquid sprayed on to the mix of granular components comprises nonionic surfactant. Useful nonionic surfactants have been described hereinabove. Particularly preferred are the condensation products of alcohols having an alkyl group containing from 9 to 15 carbon atoms with from 4 to 25 moles of ethylene oxide per mole of alcohol; and condensation products of propylene glycol with ethylene oxide.
  • Other liquid ingredients may also be sprayed on to the mix of granular components either separately or premixed. Typically perfume and slurries of optical brightener may be sprayed. Although any optical brightener may be added in this way, it has been found that Colour index Fluorescent Brightener number 351 (as published by the Society of Dyers and Colourists and the American Association of Textile Chemists and Colourists) gives particular benefits of colour stability.
  • High Speed Cutters or Choppers may be advantageously used in order to prevent large balls of product from forming when wet, but pulverisation of the powders (which could occur when they are dry) should be avoided. The high speed cutters or choppers may be mounted on a shaft which is oriented radially with respect to the wall of the mixer, and preferably the shaft rotates at a speed greater than 1000rpm.
  • The process must be differentiated from a more conventional agglomeration process. This can clearly be seen by observing the increase in mean particle size from beginning to end of the process. In the present invention, the mean particle size does not increase by more than about 60% of the initial mean particle size.
    Preferably it does not increase by more than 40%, and more preferably it does not increase by more than 20% of the initial mean particle size.
  • The term mean particle size as defined herein is calculated by sieving a sample of the composition into a number of fractions (typically 5 fractions) on a series of Tyler sieves. The weight fractions thereby obtained are plotted against the aperture size of the sieves. The mean particle size is taken to be the theoretical aperture size through which 50% by weight of the sample would pass.
  • The finely divided flow aid (such as zeolites, carbonates, silicates, silicas) is added to the mix of granular components, preferably towards the end of the process. These dusting agents are the only components which are added as a dust. It is therefore particularly important that the flow aids selected do not gel upon contact with water (as some forms of finely divided silicates would). This careful selection of finely divided flow aid enables the bulk density to be further increased without losing the benefits of the good dispensing properties.
  • Finished Compositions
  • The present invention provides detergent compositions with very high bulk densities, which also have the characteristics of excellent dispensing properties and a rapid rate of dissolution. The method of making the composition is very flexible with regard to the formulations that can be processed. Indeed any chemical that can be incorporated into a granular particle may be incorporated into a high bulk density composition by the process defined hereinabove.
  • The compositions of the present invention comprise mixed anionic surfactant sytems having a Krafft temperature less than 40°C, the anionic surfactant systems comprising sulphate and/or sulphonate salts, in order to achieve a good rate of dissolution at mean particle size of 550-750micrometers.
  • Furthermore most preferred compositions are nil-phosphate and nil-linear alkyl benzene sulphonate (nil-LAS) for environmental reasons.
  • EXAMPLES EXAMPLE I
  • A mixture of granular raw materials is prepared according to the following composition :
    % by weight
    Anionic surfactant agglomerate 30.0
    Layered silicate compacted granule 17.7
    Percarbonate 24.7
    TAED agglomerate 9.2
    Suds suppressor agglomerate 2.2
    Perfume encapsulate 0.2
    Granular soil release polymer 0.6
    Granular dense soda ash 8.6
    Granular acrylic-maleic copolymer 3.2
    Enzymes 3.6
    100
  • The anionic surfactant agglomerate is prepared by agglomeration of a 78% active C45AS/C35A3S 80:20 paste and a phosphonate solution (35%) onto a powder mixture containing zeolite/ carbonate/ MgSO4/ CMC at ratios 17/13/1/1 in a high shear mixer.
  • 44 parts of the paste/phosphonate are mixed with 66 parts of the powder mixture.
  • The wet agglomerate is dried in a fluid bed dryer to an equilibrium relative humidity of about 12% at 20°C. The final agglomerate contains 30% anionic surfactant and 2% phosphonate and has an average particle size of about 500mm with less than 5% through Tyler 65. The bulk density of the agglomerates is 750g/L.
  • The mixture of the granular components has a bulk density of 780g/L and a particle size distribution as follows :
    Tyler Sieve no. micrometers % by weight of product on sieve
    14 1180 2
    20 850 13
    35 425 68
    65 212 97
    100 150 99
  • The mean particle size of the mixture of granular ingredients is about 525 micrometers.
  • The mixture of granular ingredients described above is placed inside a 600L rotating drum that operates at 15 rpm. A mixture of nonionic surfactant (C25E3) and a 20% aqueous solution of optical brightener (Pinopal CBS-X Trade Name, supplied by Ciba-Geigy) at ratios of 14:1 are sprayed onto the granular mixture while operating the drum to a level of 7%. The spraying time is about 7 minutes.
  • Immediately afterwards, perfume is sprayed on at a level of 0.5% while rotating the drum. Then, without stopping the rotation of the drum, zeolite is slowly added to the mixer to a level of about 8%, taking about 2 minutes. Once the addition of zeolite is finished, the mixer is allowed to rotate for about 30 seconds and is then stopped. The product is removed by opening the gate and further rotating the drum for about 10 seconds.
  • The product has a density after 2 days ageing of 910g/L. The particle size distribution is :
    Tyler Sieve no. micrometers % by weiqht of product on sieve
    14 1180 5
    20 850 23
    35 425 87
    65 212 99
    100 150 99.5
  • The mean particle size of the product is about 640 micrometers. This represents an increase in mean particle size of 22%.
  • The dispensing results of this product according to the method described in Section B is
    Dispensing residue (%)
    2L/min 24
    3 L/min 2
  • The dissolution profile of the anionic surfactant measured according to the method also described in Section B shows the time for dissolution of 50% of the anionic surfactant to be 1.8 minutes.
  • EXAMPLE II
  • A mixture of granular raw materials is prepared according to the following composition :
    % by weight
    Anionic surfactant agglomerate 53.3
    Granular silicate 3.2
    Granular dense soda ash 11.0
    Granular sodium citrate 18.1
    Granular acrylic-maleic copolymer 7.9
    Suds suppressor agglomerate 2.0
    Enzymes 4.5
    100
  • The anionic surfactant agglomerate is prepared via agglomeration of a 78% active LAS/TAS/C35E3S 74:24: 2 paste onto a powder mixture containing zeolite / carbonate / CMC at ratios of 20/10/1 in a high shear mixer. The wet agglomerate is dried in a fluid bed dryer to an equilibrium relative humidity of aout 12% at 20°C. The final agglomerate contains 35% anionic surfactant, has an average particle size of 600 micrometers with 8% particles smaller than 212 micrometers and a bulk density of 740g/L.
  • The mixture of the granular components has a bulk density of 740g/L and the following particle size distribution:
    Tyler Sieve no. micrometers % by weight of product on sieve
    14 1180 5
    20 850 17
    35 425 66
    65 212 97
    100 150 99
  • The mean particle size of the mixture of granular ingredients is about 525 micrometers.
  • The above mixture (50kg) is placed in a Lödige FM 130 D. The shaft rotates at about 160 rpm and the chopper speed is 3000 rpm. A mixture of nonionic surfactant (C45E7) and 20% aqueous solution of an optical brightener at a ratio of 14:1 are sprayed onto the mixture of powders while both the shaft and the chopper are operated.
    A total of 5.2kg of the liquid mixture is added in an interval of about 1 and a half minutes. Immediatly after, 0.3kg of perfume is also sprayed on. Then 5kg of finely divided zeolite is added to the mixer. The addition time is about 2 minutes and after addition, the unit is operated without the chopper for another half a minute. The product is discharged through the opening in the bottom of the mixer.
  • The density of the product after 2 days is 897g/L. The particle size distribution is :
    Tyler Sieve no. micrometers % by weight of product on sieve
    14 1180 17
    20 850 41
    35 425 78
    65 212 94
    100 150 98
  • The mean particle size of the product is about 740 micrometers. This represents an increase in mean particle size of about 40%.
  • The dispensing results of this product according to the method described in Section B is
    Dispensing residue (%) ,
    2 L/min 14
    3 L/min 0
  • The dissolution profile of the anionic surfactant measured according to the method also described in Section B shows the time for dissolution of 50% of the anionic surfactant to be 1.0 minutes.
  • COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE III
  • A mixture of granular raw materials is prepared according to the following composition :
    % by weight
    Anionic surfactant agglomerate 12.0
    Blown powder 49.2
    Silicate 3.2
    Granular dense soda ash 11.0
    Granular sodium citrate 18.1
    Suds suppressor agglomerate 2.0
    Enzymes 4.5
    100
  • The anionic surfactant agglomerate is prepared via dry neutralisation of acid LAS onto a powder mixture containing zeolite / carbonate at a ratio of 1/1 in a high shear mixer. The agglomerate contains 30% anionic surfactant, has an average particle size of 500 micrometers with 16% particles smaller than 212 micrometers and a bulk density of 740g/L.
  • The blown powder is made via spray-drying a mixture containing :
    % by weight
    Anionic surfactant paste 40.0
    Zeolite 44.0
    Acrylic-maleic co-polymer 16.0
    where the anionic surfactant paste is 50% surfactant active and contains LAS and TAS at ratios 2.4 :1.
  • The mixture of the raw material components has a bulk density of 670g/L and the following particle size distribution :
    Tyler Sieve no. micrometers % by weight of product on sieve
    14 1180 4
    20 850 11
    35 425 33
    65 212 64
    100 150 86
  • The mean particle size of the mixture of ingredients is about 370 micrometers.
  • The above mixture (50kg) is placed in a Lödige FM 130 D. The shaft rotates at about 160 rpm and the chopper speed is 3000 rpm. A mixture of nonionic surfactant (C45E7) and 20% aqueous solution of an optical brightener at a ratio of 14:1 are sprayed onto the mixture of powders while both the shaft and the chopper are operated.
  • A total of 5.2kg of the liquid mixture is added in an interval of about 1 and a half minutes. Immediatly after, 0.3kg of perfume is also sprayed on. Then 5kg of finely divided zeolite is added to the mixer. The addition time is about 2 minutes and after addition, the unit is operated with the chopper for another 3 minutes. The product is discharged through the opening in the bottom of the mixer.
  • The density of the product after 2 days is 847g/L. The particle size distribution is :
    Tyler Sieve no. micrometers % by weight of product on sieve
    14 1180 7
    20 850 13
    35 425 47
    65 212 75
    100 150 88
  • The mean particle size of the product is about 400 micrometers.
  • The dispensing results of this product according to the method described in Section B is
    Dispensing residue (%)
    2 L/min 102
    3 L/min 84
  • The dissolution profile of the anionic surfactant measured according to the method also described in Section B shows the time for dissolution of 50% of the anionic surfactant to be 0.8 minutes.
  • Section B - Test Methods
  • Rate of Dissolution of Anionic Surfactants under Stressed Conditions (Sotax Method)
  • Equipment
    1. 1) Sotax cup (1L)
    2. 2) Distilled water
    3. 3) Electrical stirrer motor with variable speed (IKA-Werk RW 20 DZM)
    4. 4) Stainless steel propeller stirrer (Sotax no 3990-2)
    5. 5) 6 disposable filter type units with pore size 0.22 micron (25 mm diam., Millex No. SLGSO25NB Millipore).
    6. 6) Plastic syringes (2 mL) and disposable needles (21 x 1½)
    7. 7) Sample collectors (15 mL glass tubes)
    8. 8) Set of Tyler sieves and sieving equipment (Rotap)
    9. 9) Thermostated bath
    Sample Preparation
  • Take a representative sample of 10g of the detergent composition.
  • Experimental Procedure
    1. 1) Place the cup containing 1 L of water (or desired solution) in the bath at the desired temperature. Allow the temperature of the water to reach that of the bath.
    2. 2) Place the impeller in the cup at 33 mm from the bottom.
    3. 3) Prepare 5 syringes with a filter unit and a needle. Prepare 1 syringe with needle without the filter.
    4. 4) Set the mixer speed to 200 r.p.m.
    5. 5) Quickly add 10 g of the product to be tested. Start the stopwatch.
    6. 6) Remove, at precise intervals of 10 sec., 30 sec., 1 min. , 2,5 min. and 5 min, about 2 mL samples with the syringes. For adequate sampling, the needle has to be ± 4 cm below the surface of the liquid.
    7. 7) After taking the 5 min. sample, increase the speed of the impeller to 300 r.p.m.
    8. 8) After 10 minutes take another sample through the filter.
    9. 9) Take a sample of the liquid with the syringe without filter. The difference between the result of this and the previous one is an indication of the solubility that can be expected at this temperature. Care must be taken that during this time, the system does not increase its temperature due to the vigorous stirring action.
    10. 10) Carry out the analytical determination of the content of active ingredient (CatSO3 analysis or similar). When using a turbidimetric end point indication for the titration, care must be taken that there is no interference in the unfiltered sample due to the presence of insolubles.
    11. 11) Calculate the percent dissolved in each sample by using the unfiltered sample as 100 % (by CatSO3 analysis, even the undissolved surfactant will be titrated).
    12. 12) Plot the percent dissolved versus time for the first period of time (up to 5 min.). Calculate the percent solubility at the experimental conditions from the filtered sample at 10 min.
    Dispensing under Stressed Conditions (Zanussi (TM) Method) Equipment
    1. 1) DispenserZanussi shower type dispenser.
      The mainwash compartment will be used.
    2. 2) Water City water.
    3. 3) Water Temperature 20±1 °C.
    4. 4) Water Flow 2 ± 0.05 L per 60±1 seconds.
      The test runs for 2 minutes. Calibrate the water flow rate using a measuring cylinder or similar receiver.
    5. 5) Sample Mass 150±0.5g of the test product.
    Experimental Procedure
    1. 1) Calibrate the equipment for above operating conditions. Ensure that the whole experimental rig is horizontal and that none of the nozzles of the dispenser are blocked.
    2. 2) Weigh the required amount of product to be tested in a cup. Ensure that the sample is representative of the entire product (avoid segregation when filling the cup).
    3. 3) Weigh the dispenser drawer after ensuring that it is properly dried.
    4. 4) Place a vertical positioning screen in the mainwash section of the dispenser, so that it blocks the width of the drawer at a distance of 12.5 cm from the end of the drawer furthest from the water exit. Pour the product into the dispenser between the vertical positioning screen and the end of the drawer furthest from the water exit. The powder should be poured in such a way as to keep the powder surface as level as possible. Remove the screen.
    5. 5) Place the dispenser drawer gently in its slot, ensuring it is fully home.
    6. 6) Start water at the calibrated flow rate. Ensure that water is flowing entirely in the mainwash compartment.
    7. 7) Stop the water flow after 2 minutes and wait until the water drain from the drawer is completely stopped.
    8. 8) Remove the drawer from the slot and drain any excess water by slight tilting of the drawer. Ensure that no product falls from the drawer. There should be no water in any other compartment of the drawer. If some water is found, the system needs rechecking to ensure that all the water flow goes in the mainwash compartment.
    9. 9) Weigh the dispenser drawer with total residues.
    10. 10) Repeat the determination at least 5 times.
    11. 11) Average the wet residues. The result is expressed in %wt of the initial amount of dry product.
    Accuracy and Assessment
  • Significant differences between products can be assessed when the average percent residues differ in 10% or more. A product is considered to show good dispensing profile if under th is stressed test is below 30% residue at 2 Umin (and/or below 10% residue at 3 L/min).

Claims (1)

  1. A granular detergent composition having a mean particle size greater than 400 µm and having a bulk density of at least 750g/1, preferably at least 800g/l which comprises:
    a) from 5% to 20% of organic surfactant comprising mixed anionic surfactant systems having a Krafft temperature less than 40°C, the anionic surfactant systems comprising sulphate and/or sulphonate salts;
    b) from 5% to 20% of sodium aluminosilicate
    whereby no granular components are present which are prepared by spray drying and comprise organic surfactant;
    the dispensing residue being less than 30% when a 150g sample of the detergent composition is poured into drawer of a Zanussi (TM) shower-type dispenser, and 4 litres of water at a temperature of 20°C is passed though the said drawer from the nozzles of the dispenser at a rate of 2 litres/minute, after which the portion of the detergent composition remaining in said dispensing drawer is weighed, and the resulting weight expressed as a percentage of the initial 150g sample and averaged over at least 5 repetitions of the test, the resulting percentage being the dispensing residue;
    and the rate of dissolution of the detergent, composition being at least 50% of the sulphate/sulphonate salts passing into solution in less than 3 minutes when 10g sample is dissolved in 1 litre of distilled water at a temperature of 20°C in a 1 litre Sotax cup, and with a Sotax stirring propellor no. 3990-2 rotating at 200 rpm about a vertical axis, the bottom of the said stirring propellor being located 33 mm above the bottom of the cup.
EP93922135A 1992-09-01 1993-08-30 High density granular detergent composition Expired - Lifetime EP0660873B2 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP93922135A EP0660873B2 (en) 1992-09-01 1993-08-30 High density granular detergent composition
GR20010400400T GR3036040T3 (en) 1992-09-01 2001-06-14 Process for making high density granular detergent and compositions made by the process.

Applications Claiming Priority (6)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP92870138 1992-09-01
EP92870138 1992-09-01
EP93200460 1993-02-18
EP93200460 1993-02-18
PCT/US1993/008151 WO1994005761A1 (en) 1992-09-01 1993-08-30 Process for making high density granular detergent and compositions made by the process
EP93922135A EP0660873B2 (en) 1992-09-01 1993-08-30 High density granular detergent composition

Publications (4)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0660873A1 EP0660873A1 (en) 1995-07-05
EP0660873A4 EP0660873A4 (en) 1995-08-09
EP0660873B1 EP0660873B1 (en) 2001-06-06
EP0660873B2 true EP0660873B2 (en) 2006-05-31

Family

ID=27234905

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP93922135A Expired - Lifetime EP0660873B2 (en) 1992-09-01 1993-08-30 High density granular detergent composition

Country Status (2)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0660873B2 (en)
GR (1) GR3036040T3 (en)

Citations (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4338204A (en) 1979-09-29 1982-07-06 The Procter & Gamble Company Detergent softener containing anionic, amine, and water soluble cationic
US4397777A (en) 1977-02-08 1983-08-09 Colgate Palmolive Company Heavy duty laundry detergent
US4404128A (en) 1981-05-29 1983-09-13 The Procter & Gamble Company Enzyme detergent composition
EP0181180A2 (en) 1984-11-03 1986-05-14 The Procter & Gamble Company Detergent compositions
EP0384480A2 (en) 1989-02-23 1990-08-29 Kao Corporation Process for continously drying paste material for a high-density detergent
EP0451894A1 (en) 1990-04-09 1991-10-16 Unilever N.V. High bulk density granular detergent compositions and process for preparing them
WO1992006163A1 (en) 1990-10-06 1992-04-16 The Procter & Gamble Company Detergent compositions
WO1993002176A1 (en) 1991-07-25 1993-02-04 Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft Auf Aktien Method of producing high-bulk-density washing agents with improved dissolving speed
WO1993023523A1 (en) 1992-05-21 1993-11-25 Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft Auf Aktien Continuous production process of a granulated washing and/or cleaning agent
EP0578871A1 (en) 1992-07-15 1994-01-19 The Procter & Gamble Company Process and compositions for compact detergents
EP0578872A1 (en) 1992-07-15 1994-01-19 The Procter & Gamble Company Detergent compositions
EP0714432B1 (en) 1993-08-18 1998-04-08 Unilever Plc Granular detergent compositions containing zeolite and process for their preparation

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4411809A (en) * 1976-12-02 1983-10-25 Colgate Palmolive Company Concentrated heavy duty particulate laundry detergent
DE3424987A1 (en) * 1984-07-06 1986-02-06 Unilever N.V., Rotterdam METHOD FOR PRODUCING A POWDERED DETERGENT WITH INCREASED SHOULDER WEIGHT
US4970017A (en) * 1985-04-25 1990-11-13 Lion Corporation Process for production of granular detergent composition having high bulk density
GB8810821D0 (en) * 1988-05-06 1988-06-08 Unilever Plc Detergent compositions & process for preparing them
GB8811447D0 (en) * 1988-05-13 1988-06-15 Procter & Gamble Granular laundry compositions
GB8907187D0 (en) * 1989-03-30 1989-05-10 Unilever Plc Detergent compositions and process for preparing them

Patent Citations (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4397777A (en) 1977-02-08 1983-08-09 Colgate Palmolive Company Heavy duty laundry detergent
US4338204A (en) 1979-09-29 1982-07-06 The Procter & Gamble Company Detergent softener containing anionic, amine, and water soluble cationic
US4404128A (en) 1981-05-29 1983-09-13 The Procter & Gamble Company Enzyme detergent composition
EP0181180A2 (en) 1984-11-03 1986-05-14 The Procter & Gamble Company Detergent compositions
EP0384480A2 (en) 1989-02-23 1990-08-29 Kao Corporation Process for continously drying paste material for a high-density detergent
EP0451894A1 (en) 1990-04-09 1991-10-16 Unilever N.V. High bulk density granular detergent compositions and process for preparing them
WO1992006163A1 (en) 1990-10-06 1992-04-16 The Procter & Gamble Company Detergent compositions
WO1993002176A1 (en) 1991-07-25 1993-02-04 Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft Auf Aktien Method of producing high-bulk-density washing agents with improved dissolving speed
WO1993023523A1 (en) 1992-05-21 1993-11-25 Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft Auf Aktien Continuous production process of a granulated washing and/or cleaning agent
EP0578871A1 (en) 1992-07-15 1994-01-19 The Procter & Gamble Company Process and compositions for compact detergents
EP0578872A1 (en) 1992-07-15 1994-01-19 The Procter & Gamble Company Detergent compositions
EP0714432B1 (en) 1993-08-18 1998-04-08 Unilever Plc Granular detergent compositions containing zeolite and process for their preparation

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP0660873A4 (en) 1995-08-09
EP0660873B1 (en) 2001-06-06
GR3036040T3 (en) 2001-09-28
EP0660873A1 (en) 1995-07-05

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0656825B1 (en) Process for making compact detergent compositions
JPH0798960B2 (en) High bulk density granular detergent composition and method for producing the same
EP0578871B1 (en) Process and compositions for compact detergents
US5663136A (en) Process for making compact detergent compositions
EP0777724A1 (en) Agglomeration process for making a detergent composition utilizing spray drying towers
CA2143628C (en) Process for making high density granular detergent and compositions made by the process
US5691294A (en) Flow aids for detergent powders comprising sodium aluminosilicate and hydrophobic silica
EP0618290B1 (en) Flow aids for detergent powders comprising sodium aluminosilicate and hydrophobic silica
AU768794B2 (en) Particulate detergent composition containing zeolite
CA2231577C (en) Process for making granular detergents
US5998356A (en) Process for making granular detergents
EP0660873B2 (en) High density granular detergent composition
WO1995010595A1 (en) Continuous process for making high density detergent granules
EP0700427B1 (en) Detergent compositions
AU7203994A (en) Process for continuous production of high density detergent agglomerates in a single mixer/densifier

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19950314

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IE IT LI LU NL PT SE

A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched
AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A4

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IE IT LI LU NL PT SE

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19970917

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Free format text: 7C 11D 3/12 A, 7C 11D 17/00 B, 7C 11D 17/06 B

RTI1 Title (correction)

Free format text: HIGH DENSITY GRANULAR DETERGENT COMPOSITION

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IE IT LI LU NL PT SE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20010606

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 201900

Country of ref document: AT

Date of ref document: 20010615

Kind code of ref document: T

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: RITSCHER & SEIFERT

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69330311

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20010712

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

ET Fr: translation filed
ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed

Owner name: ING. C. GREGORJ S.P.A.

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2157223

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: T3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: PT

Ref legal event code: SC4A

Free format text: AVAILABILITY OF NATIONAL TRANSLATION

Effective date: 20010806

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: IF02

PLBQ Unpublished change to opponent data

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OPPO

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

PLBF Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OBSO

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: HENKEL KGAA

Effective date: 20020304

Opponent name: UNILEVER PLC

Effective date: 20020301

NLR1 Nl: opposition has been filed with the epo

Opponent name: HENKEL KGAA

Opponent name: UNILEVER PLC

PLBF Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OBSO

PLBF Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OBSO

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Payment date: 20030624

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Payment date: 20030701

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Payment date: 20030704

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Payment date: 20030729

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20030805

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20031006

Year of fee payment: 11

APBP Date of receipt of notice of appeal recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA2O

APBQ Date of receipt of statement of grounds of appeal recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA3O

PLAB Opposition data, opponent's data or that of the opponent's representative modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009299OPPO

PLBQ Unpublished change to opponent data

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OPPO

R26 Opposition filed (corrected)

Opponent name: HENKEL KGAA

Effective date: 20020304

Opponent name: UNILEVER PLC

Effective date: 20020301

NLR1 Nl: opposition has been filed with the epo

Opponent name: HENKEL KGAA

Opponent name: UNILEVER PLC

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20040830

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20040830

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20040831

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20040831

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20040831

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20040831

APAA Appeal reference recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS REFN

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20050228

EUG Se: european patent has lapsed
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: PT

Ref legal event code: MM4A

Free format text: LAPSE DUE TO NON-PAYMENT OF FEES

Effective date: 20050228

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: EBP

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20050624

Year of fee payment: 13

APBU Appeal procedure closed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA9O

APAH Appeal reference modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCREFNO

PUAH Patent maintained in amended form

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009272

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: PATENT MAINTAINED AS AMENDED

27A Patent maintained in amended form

Effective date: 20060531

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B2

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IE IT LI LU NL PT SE

NLR2 Nl: decision of opposition

Effective date: 20060531

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GR

Ref legal event code: EP

Ref document number: 20060402726

Country of ref document: GR

NLR3 Nl: receipt of modified translations in the netherlands language after an opposition procedure
ET3 Fr: translation filed ** decision concerning opposition
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: DC2A

Date of ref document: 20060829

Kind code of ref document: T5

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20070710

Year of fee payment: 15

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Payment date: 20070702

Year of fee payment: 15

PLAB Opposition data, opponent's data or that of the opponent's representative modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009299OPPO

NLV4 Nl: lapsed or anulled due to non-payment of the annual fee

Effective date: 20090301

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090301

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090304

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20090806

Year of fee payment: 17

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20090804

Year of fee payment: 17

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20090708

Year of fee payment: 17

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20090831

Year of fee payment: 17

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20090910

Year of fee payment: 17

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20090812

Year of fee payment: 17

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: THE *PROCTER & GAMBLE CY

Effective date: 20100831

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20100830

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20110502

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100830

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 69330311

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20110301

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100831

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110301

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100831

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100830

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20111019

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100831