EP0933419B1 - Debittering of olive oil - Google Patents
Debittering of olive oil Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP0933419B1 EP0933419B1 EP19990200161 EP99200161A EP0933419B1 EP 0933419 B1 EP0933419 B1 EP 0933419B1 EP 19990200161 EP19990200161 EP 19990200161 EP 99200161 A EP99200161 A EP 99200161A EP 0933419 B1 EP0933419 B1 EP 0933419B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- olive oil
- aqueous phase
- polyphenols
- process according
- previous
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C11—ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
- C11B—PRODUCING, e.g. BY PRESSING RAW MATERIALS OR BY EXTRACTION FROM WASTE MATERIALS, REFINING OR PRESERVING FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES, e.g. LANOLIN, FATTY OILS OR WAXES; ESSENTIAL OILS; PERFUMES
- C11B3/00—Refining fats or fatty oils
- C11B3/006—Refining fats or fatty oils by extraction
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C11—ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
- C11B—PRODUCING, e.g. BY PRESSING RAW MATERIALS OR BY EXTRACTION FROM WASTE MATERIALS, REFINING OR PRESERVING FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES, e.g. LANOLIN, FATTY OILS OR WAXES; ESSENTIAL OILS; PERFUMES
- C11B3/00—Refining fats or fatty oils
- C11B3/001—Refining fats or fatty oils by a combination of two or more of the means hereafter
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C11—ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
- C11B—PRODUCING, e.g. BY PRESSING RAW MATERIALS OR BY EXTRACTION FROM WASTE MATERIALS, REFINING OR PRESERVING FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES, e.g. LANOLIN, FATTY OILS OR WAXES; ESSENTIAL OILS; PERFUMES
- C11B3/00—Refining fats or fatty oils
- C11B3/02—Refining fats or fatty oils by chemical reaction
Definitions
- the present invention is concerned with non-bitter olive oil with a high content of antioxidants and with processes for preparing such olive oil.
- Olive oil is appreciated as a salad oil and as a frying oil for its delicious taste, not only in the traditional olive oil consuming countries, the Mediterranean area, but to an increasing extent also in Western Europe and the USA.
- olive oil is prepared by harvesting the olive fruits and subjecting these to malaxation: crushing and kneading the olives with water so that a mash is obtained containing the whole content of the olive fruit including an aqueous phase.
- the mash contains also enzymes, including oil hydrolysing lipases, which originate from the olive fruits.
- the aqueous phase with all olive enzymes is separated from the oil phase e.g. by decanting, as soon as possible, anyway within one hour.
- the bitter taste of olive oil is caused by so-called polyphenols, compounds which are native to olive oil.
- Those olive oil derived polyphenols comprise relatively apolar, oil soluble phenolic compounds as well as relatively polar, water soluble phenolic compounds. In the context of the present invention both groups are denoted as polyphenols.
- the bitter taste is caused mainly by the more apolar polyphenols.
- Apolar polyphenols comprise the compounds oleuropein, ligstroside and their aglycons. These are the main bitter polyphenols (Grasas y Aceites, 46, 1995, 299-303).
- the less bitter ones are polar polyphenols and comprise tyrosol, hydroxytyrosol, caffeic acid and vanillic acid.
- Polyphenols are potent antioxidants. Recently it was found that they play a role in enhancing the oxidation stability of olive oil (Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. (1995) 5:, 306-314). Moreover it has been discovered that a diet comprising food containing a substantial amount of olive oil polyphenols helps to prevent the harmful oxidation of low-density lipoproteins (LDL) in the blood. In a population with a high polyphenol intake the incidence of coronary heart disease is relatively low. Therefore the presence of polyphenols in an edible oil, including olive oil, and preferably at high levels, is much desirable. However, when the polyphenols content in olive oil raises over 300 ppm, the oil becomes unacceptably bitter, which correlates with a (K225) bitter index value over 0.3.
- LDL low-density lipoproteins
- the present invention enables the reduction of bitterness not by usual removing bitter compounds from the olive oil, but predominantly by transforming them into compounds with reduced bitterness.
- the process according to the present invention starts with olive oil which possesses a relatively high content of bitter polyphenols.
- the process comprises the following steps: preparing an emulsion of olive oil with an aqueous phase, exposing the olive oil to the dispersed aqueous phase for at least 30 seconds and removing the aqueous phase from the olive oil, characterized in that the emulsified aqueous phase is maintained at a pH of at least 5.5, preferably of at least 6, more preferably of at least 7, still more preferably of at least 8 for at least 30 seconds of the exposure time.
- Hydrolysis at a pH > 5.5 has been found to be essential for the conversion of bitter fat soluble polyphenols into less bitter water soluble polyphenols within a proper period of time. At said pH such conversion has been found to occur after at least 30 seconds exposure of the olive oil to an aqueous phase.
- the pH may not remain constant during the process. During exposure it may sink temporarily below the required minimum value of 5.5.
- a minimum exposure time of 30 seconds, preferably 2 minutes, more preferably 5 minutes to a pH of at least 5.5 is required for debittering.
- the full effect is attained after still longer exposure times, preferably at least 30 minutes. Generally, after 120 minutes no further debittering effect is observed.
- the aqueous phase consists of water, which contains reactive ions which are able to sustain the maintenance of the proper pH.
- reactive ions which are able to sustain the maintenance of the proper pH.
- the resulting pH is too low for suitable polyphenols hydrolysis. It has been found that use of common hard drinking water provides the proper conditions for obtaining the found debittering effect.
- the presence of acid-binding reactive ions is believed first to constitute a pH > 5.5, and then to maintain it for a time which is long enough to hydrolyse the bitter polyphenols into less bitter polyphenols.
- Such acid-binding ions are found in hard drinking water which is produced from natural resources, particularly from surface water and from water pumped from deep ground layers.
- Such ions are e.g. one or more of the ions in the group constituted by carbonate, sulphate, magnesium and calcium. Maintenance of the required pH can be supported further by the presence of a proper buffer substance such as a (pH 8) citric acid/phosphate buffer.
- Polyphenols originating from olive oil will migrate to the emulsion's aqueous phase.
- This aqueous phase may be separated by settling and decantation or by centrifugation, but preferably the aqueous phase is removed from the olive oil by evaporating the water under reduced pressure (vacuum drying).
- the polyphenols and possibly other ingredients in the aqueous phase phase are forced to get dispersed in the olive oil and then cause some turbidity.
- the oil/aqueous phase emulsion is filtered by a membrane using established membrane filtration technology such as known for the production of drinking water.
- the pores of the membrane allow passage of the water molecules, but not of the larger polyphenol molecules which stay in the olive oil.
- Use of membrane filtration also retains desirable olive oil volatiles, which otherwise would be evaporated when using the previously mentioned vacuum drying technique.
- the ratio of aqueous phase and olive oil in the emulsion preferably is 1 : 10 to 4 : 1, more preferably 1 : 4 to 2 : 1. Large amounts of water are not functional, and even not desired, because removal of water at the end needs energy and time. The best results are obtained when the emulsion has a continuous oil phase.
- a stirrer with a relatively large diameter and a relatively low stirring rate is suitable, e.g. a paddle type stirrer or a ribbon stirrer, preferably a stirrer with baffles.
- an olive oil can be prepared with polyphenol contents as high as 300 - 1000 ppm, while nevertheless the bitter index K225 is not higher than 0.3 and as high as 200 - 300 ppm, while the bitter index is not higher than 0.2.
- An olive oil which has been debittered according to the present invention can be recognized by its polyphenols composition as detected by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).
- HPLC high performance liquid chromatography
- the bitter polyphenols show up at a retention time of 40 - 52 minutes. Before treatment substantial peaks are found in that part of the HPLC spectrum. After the treeatment those peaks are still visible but are much reduced. At the same time the peaks for water soluble polyphenols, which show up at 7 - 20 minutes retention time, have increased. The decrease and increase respectively of said peaks is characteristic for olive oil as an effect of the treatment according to the invention.
- the invention therefore provides an olive oil which is characterized in that it contains at least 200 ppm of polyphenols, while the weight ratio of apolar polyphenols and polar polyphenols is less than 3, preferably less than 2, more preferably less than 1.
- a surprising additional benefit of the found process is that the treated olive oil may exhibit unexpected flavour improvements.
- Native Andalusian olive oil for example, may show flavour defects. These defects have disappeared fully or to a large extent after the treatment of the invention using common hard drinking water.
- the drop in ppm values is relatively large, and is ascribed to the hydrolysed polyphenols being lighter molecules.
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Microbiology (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
- Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Edible Oils And Fats (AREA)
Description
- The present invention is concerned with non-bitter olive oil with a high content of antioxidants and with processes for preparing such olive oil.
- Olive oil is appreciated as a salad oil and as a frying oil for its delicious taste, not only in the traditional olive oil consuming countries, the Mediterranean area, but to an increasing extent also in Western Europe and the USA.
- Traditionally, olive oil is prepared by harvesting the olive fruits and subjecting these to malaxation: crushing and kneading the olives with water so that a mash is obtained containing the whole content of the olive fruit including an aqueous phase. The mash contains also enzymes, including oil hydrolysing lipases, which originate from the olive fruits.
In order to avoid undesired olive oil hydrolysis the aqueous phase with all olive enzymes is separated from the oil phase e.g. by decanting, as soon as possible, anyway within one hour. - Many olive oils after separation of the aqueous phase still possess a strong bitter taste. Bitter olive oil often can be made fit for consumption by washing the crude oil with water which reduces the bitter taste to an acceptable level. This usual washing treatment employs a centrifuge for a quick final water separation. The contact time between water and oil therefore is very short, usually less than 30 seconds, practically only 10 seconds.
- The bitter taste of olive oil is caused by so-called polyphenols, compounds which are native to olive oil. Those olive oil derived polyphenols comprise relatively apolar, oil soluble phenolic compounds as well as relatively polar, water soluble phenolic compounds. In the context of the present invention both groups are denoted as polyphenols. The bitter taste is caused mainly by the more apolar polyphenols. Apolar polyphenols comprise the compounds oleuropein, ligstroside and their aglycons. These are the main bitter polyphenols (Grasas y Aceites, 46, 1995, 299-303). The less bitter ones are polar polyphenols and comprise tyrosol, hydroxytyrosol, caffeic acid and vanillic acid. These water soluble polyphenols, which largely have the same beneficial properties (nutritional, oil stability) as the oil soluble ones, have a much lesser contribution to the bitter taste. The average polyphenols content of freshly pressed olive oil ranges from 100 - 300 ppm. The content depends on type of olives and on the time of harvesting. Up to now an olive oil which contains more than 300 ppm polyphenols is too bitter for consumption.
- Polyphenols are potent antioxidants. Recently it was found that they play a role in enhancing the oxidation stability of olive oil (Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. (1995) 5:, 306-314). Moreover it has been discovered that a diet comprising food containing a substantial amount of olive oil polyphenols helps to prevent the harmful oxidation of low-density lipoproteins (LDL) in the blood. In a population with a high polyphenol intake the incidence of coronary heart disease is relatively low. Therefore the presence of polyphenols in an edible oil, including olive oil, and preferably at high levels, is much desirable. However, when the polyphenols content in olive oil raises over 300 ppm, the oil becomes unacceptably bitter, which correlates with a (K225) bitter index value over 0.3.
- The water washings used for reducing bitterness unfortunately also remove a substantial part of the valuable polyphenols from the olive oil. Co-pending non-prepublished patent application EP 849 353 describes a process for an olive oil which contains 300 - 1000 ppm of polyphenols, while the bitter index K225 is not higher than 0.3 or, alternatively, containing 200 - 300 ppm of polyphenols, while the bitter index is not higher than 0.2. The native polyphenols are hydrolyzed employing a time consuming enzymatic process at a pH (5) which is optimal for enzyme activity.
The aim of the present invention is to provide an improved process for obtaining non-bitter olive oils with a high content of polyphenols. - We have found a new method for converting the olive oil derived oil soluble polyphenols into less bitter water soluble ones.
- The present invention enables the reduction of bitterness not by usual removing bitter compounds from the olive oil, but predominantly by transforming them into compounds with reduced bitterness.
The process according to the present invention starts with olive oil which possesses a relatively high content of bitter polyphenols. The process comprises the following steps: preparing an emulsion of olive oil with an aqueous phase, exposing the olive oil to the dispersed aqueous phase for at least 30 seconds and removing the aqueous phase from the olive oil, characterized in that the emulsified aqueous phase is maintained at a pH of at least 5.5, preferably of at least 6, more preferably of at least 7, still more preferably of at least 8 for at least 30 seconds of the exposure time. - Hydrolysis at a pH > 5.5 has been found to be essential for the conversion of bitter fat soluble polyphenols into less bitter water soluble polyphenols within a proper period of time. At said pH such conversion has been found to occur after at least 30 seconds exposure of the olive oil to an aqueous phase. The pH may not remain constant during the process. During exposure it may sink temporarily below the required minimum value of 5.5. A minimum exposure time of 30 seconds, preferably 2 minutes, more preferably 5 minutes to a pH of at least 5.5 is required for debittering. The full effect is attained after still longer exposure times, preferably at least 30 minutes. Generally, after 120 minutes no further debittering effect is observed. Preferably, the aqueous phase consists of water, which contains reactive ions which are able to sustain the maintenance of the proper pH.
The presence of fatty acids originating from partial hydrolysis of the olive oil, has a pH lowering effect. The resulting pH is too low for suitable polyphenols hydrolysis.
It has been found that use of common hard drinking water provides the proper conditions for obtaining the found debittering effect. The presence of acid-binding reactive ions is believed first to constitute a pH > 5.5, and then to maintain it for a time which is long enough to hydrolyse the bitter polyphenols into less bitter polyphenols. - Such acid-binding ions are found in hard drinking water which is produced from natural resources, particularly from surface water and from water pumped from deep ground layers. Such ions are e.g. one or more of the ions in the group constituted by carbonate, sulphate, magnesium and calcium. Maintenance of the required pH can be supported further by the presence of a proper buffer substance such as a (pH 8) citric acid/phosphate buffer.
- Polyphenols originating from olive oil will migrate to the emulsion's aqueous phase. This aqueous phase may be separated by settling and decantation or by centrifugation, but preferably the aqueous phase is removed from the olive oil by evaporating the water under reduced pressure (vacuum drying). The polyphenols and possibly other ingredients in the aqueous phase phase are forced to get dispersed in the olive oil and then cause some turbidity.
More preferably, the oil/aqueous phase emulsion is filtered by a membrane using established membrane filtration technology such as known for the production of drinking water. The pores of the membrane allow passage of the water molecules, but not of the larger polyphenol molecules which stay in the olive oil. Use of membrane filtration also retains desirable olive oil volatiles, which otherwise would be evaporated when using the previously mentioned vacuum drying technique. - When an aqueous phase is selected which contains already a large amount of water soluble polyphenols, less migration of water soluble polyphenols from the olive oil into the aqueous phase will occur.
- While normally olive oil is substantially depleted with polyphenols as an effect of the usual washing treatment, said embodiments of the invented process retain polyphenols, but remove bitterness by converting the bitter principle rather than by removing its substance.
- The ratio of aqueous phase and olive oil in the emulsion preferably is 1 : 10 to 4 : 1, more preferably 1 : 4 to 2 : 1. Large amounts of water are not functional, and even not desired, because removal of water at the end needs energy and time. The best results are obtained when the emulsion has a continuous oil phase.
- Obviously, it is vital that the mixture of aqueous phase and oil is vigorously stirred to ensure close contact of both phases. For obtaining a fine emulsion a powerful stirring device is required which is able to dissipate 0.1 - 5 kW, preferably 0.5 - 2 kW of energy for each 1000 kg of olive oil. Table I shows the effect of stirring on debittering.
Energy dissipation in 1000 kg olive oil (kW) Debittering attained after minutes 0.025 60 0.25 45 1 5 - For said energy dissipation a stirrer with a relatively large diameter and a relatively low stirring rate is suitable, e.g. a paddle type stirrer or a ribbon stirrer, preferably a stirrer with baffles.
- For the debittering process an emulsion temperature of about 25°C is most advantageous.
- With the present invention an olive oil can be prepared with polyphenol contents as high as 300 - 1000 ppm, while nevertheless the bitter index K225 is not higher than 0.3 and as high as 200 - 300 ppm, while the bitter index is not higher than 0.2.
- An olive oil which has been debittered according to the present invention can be recognized by its polyphenols composition as detected by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The bitter polyphenols show up at a retention time of 40 - 52 minutes. Before treatment substantial peaks are found in that part of the HPLC spectrum. After the treeatment those peaks are still visible but are much reduced. At the same time the peaks for water soluble polyphenols, which show up at 7 - 20 minutes retention time, have increased. The decrease and increase respectively of said peaks is characteristic for olive oil as an effect of the treatment according to the invention.
- Consequently a further effect of the invented process is that the olive oil's ratio of apolar polyphenols and polar polyphenols shifts to more beneficial lower molar ratios, preferably being below 3 (see Table II).
Obviously, absolute ratios depend on the initial ratio in untreated olive oil, which may vary widely. - The invention therefore provides an olive oil which is characterized in that it contains at least 200 ppm of polyphenols, while the weight ratio of apolar polyphenols and polar polyphenols is less than 3, preferably less than 2, more preferably less than 1.
- A surprising additional benefit of the found process is that the treated olive oil may exhibit unexpected flavour improvements. Native Andalusian olive oil, for example, may show flavour defects. These defects have disappeared fully or to a large extent after the treatment of the invention using common hard drinking water.
- The invention is illustrated by the following example:
- Two volumes of extra virgin Andalusian olive oil and one volume of regular hard drinking water obtained from the local (city of Vlaardingen) tap water supply and having a pH of 8 were thoroughly mixed at a temperature of 25°C using a mixing device which dissipated 1 kW of energy per ton of oil. After 30 minutes the headspace pressure was reduced to 10 mbar, the water was evaporated from the mixture and the oil became dry.
A tasting panel assessed the oil on bitterness before and after the treatment using a scale ranging from 0 (excellent) to 4 (unacceptable bitterness). The oil was rated 4 before the treatment and 0 thereafter.
The content of polyphenols was measured by standard High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC). See Table II.POLYPHENOLS CONTENT by HPLC BEFORE TREATMENT AFTER TREATMENT polar polyphenols mmol/kg 0.54 1.47 apolar polyphenols mmol/kg 1.67 0.5 total polyphenols mmol/kg 2.21 1.97 ratio apolar/polar polyph. 3.1 0.3 total polyphenols (ppm) 665 365 - The drop in ppm values is relatively large, and is ascribed to the hydrolysed polyphenols being lighter molecules.
- The values for K270 (0.18) and free fatty acids (0.45) showed that the treated oil still complied with requirements for extra virgin olive oil.
- The preceding example was repeated, but using instead of hard drinking water demineralised water, having a pH of 6.5. At the onset of emulsion formation the pH of the aqueous phase immediately and definitely dropped below 5.5. Even after one hour of stirring, the tasting panel noticed no significant bitterness reduction.
Claims (9)
- A process for treating olive oil which comprises the following steps:preparing an emulsion of olive oil with an aqueous phase,exposing the olive oil to the dispersed aqueous phase for at least 30 seconds andremoving the aqueous phase from the olive oil,
- A process according to claim 1, characterized in that the aqueous phase consists of water, which contains reactive ions which are able to neutralize substances which have a pH lowering activity.
- A process according to one of the previous claims, characterized in that said pH level is maintained for at least 2 minutes, preferably for at least 5 minutes, more preferably for at least 30 minutes.
- A process according to one of the previous claims, characterized in that the aqueous phase does not contain a substantial amount of debittering enzyme.
- A process according to one of the previous claims, characterized in that the aqueous phase to be added contains olive oil derived polyphenols.
- A process according to one of the previous claims, characterized in that the ratio of aqueous phase and olive oil in the emulsion is 1 : 10 to 4 : 1, preferably 1 : 4 to 2 : 1.
- A process according to one of the previous claims, characterized in that the aqueous phase is removed by evaporating the water under reduced pressure conditions.
- A process according to one of the previous claims, characterized in that the aqueous phase is removed by membrane filtration.
- A process according to one of the previous claims, characterized in that the aqueous phase substantially consists of tap water.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP19990200161 EP0933419B1 (en) | 1998-01-28 | 1999-01-21 | Debittering of olive oil |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP98200235 | 1998-01-28 | ||
EP98200235 | 1998-01-28 | ||
EP19990200161 EP0933419B1 (en) | 1998-01-28 | 1999-01-21 | Debittering of olive oil |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP0933419A1 EP0933419A1 (en) | 1999-08-04 |
EP0933419B1 true EP0933419B1 (en) | 2003-01-02 |
Family
ID=26149993
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP19990200161 Expired - Lifetime EP0933419B1 (en) | 1998-01-28 | 1999-01-21 | Debittering of olive oil |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP0933419B1 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2014193567A1 (en) * | 2013-04-26 | 2014-12-04 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Method for debittering olives |
Families Citing this family (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CA2356291A1 (en) | 1998-12-22 | 2000-06-29 | Unilever Plc | Food compositions fortified with anti-oxidants |
CA2355778A1 (en) | 1998-12-23 | 2000-07-06 | Unilever Plc | Fortification of food products with olive fruit ingredients |
WO2014154914A1 (en) * | 2013-03-26 | 2014-10-02 | Asociación Empresarial De Investigación Centro Tecnológico Nacional Agroalimentario "Extremadura" (Ctaex) | Method for increasing the content of phenolic compounds in olive oils |
Family Cites Families (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
IT1286564B1 (en) * | 1996-03-05 | 1998-07-15 | Comiter Trading & Services S R | A PRODUCT BASED ON EXTRA VIRGIN OLIVE OIL, VIRGIN OLIVE OIL OR ENRICHED AND INTEGRATED OLIVE OIL, AND A PROCEDURE FOR |
ES2155653T3 (en) * | 1996-12-20 | 2001-05-16 | Unilever Nv | REDUCTION OF THE OLIVE OIL AMARGOR. |
-
1999
- 1999-01-21 EP EP19990200161 patent/EP0933419B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2014193567A1 (en) * | 2013-04-26 | 2014-12-04 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Method for debittering olives |
US9713339B2 (en) | 2013-04-26 | 2017-07-25 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Method for debittering olives |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP0933419A1 (en) | 1999-08-04 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6162480A (en) | Fortification of a vegetable fat with antioxidants | |
US6033706A (en) | Refining of edible oil retaining maximum antioxidative potency | |
FI68951C (en) | FOERFARANDE FOER ATT MINSKA KOLESTEROLMAENGDEN I AEGGULA | |
US5998641A (en) | Debittering of olive oil | |
MX2007000412A (en) | Process of extracting citrus fiber from citrus vesicles. | |
US6187356B1 (en) | Debittering of olive oil | |
AU763067B2 (en) | Fortification of food products with olive fruit ingredients | |
SK8792001A3 (en) | Food compositions fortified with anti-oxidants | |
EP0839001B1 (en) | Flavouring of edible oils | |
EP0933419B1 (en) | Debittering of olive oil | |
EP0849353B1 (en) | Debittering of olive oil | |
EP1042435B1 (en) | Olive oil containing food composition | |
US3567469A (en) | Process for the production of dehydrated products | |
KR100366607B1 (en) | Manufacturing method of onion grain syrup | |
EP1221286B1 (en) | Method for the preparation of oil having increased polyphenol content | |
CN110452769A (en) | The method that fresh ginger extracts pure oil of ginger and ginger flavored oils | |
EP1430781B1 (en) | Process for the production of olive oil | |
JPH0453448A (en) | Flavorous oil and production thereof | |
MXPA01006507A (en) | Fortification of food products with olive fruit ingredients | |
AU2021254754A1 (en) | Processes and methods for producing an edible cream from olives | |
JPS6036741B2 (en) | Preparation method for adjusted fine coconut milk | |
JPS6126342B2 (en) | ||
MXPA00005467A (en) | Olive oil containing food composition |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): ES FR GR IT PT |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 19990731 |
|
AKX | Designation fees paid |
Free format text: ES FR GR IT PT |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: 8566 |
|
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: UNILEVER N.V. |
|
RIN1 | Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected) |
Inventor name: GROOT, WILLEM A, UNILEVER RESEARCH VLAARDINGEN Inventor name: GUDE, MICHAEL, UNILEVER RESEARCH VLAARDINGEN Inventor name: TURKSMA, HESSEL, UNILEVER RESEARCH VLAARDINGEN Inventor name: VAN PUTTE, KAREL P.A.M., UNILEVER RESEARCH VLAARD Inventor name: KNOOPS, ALBERTJE JOHANNA Inventor name: VAN BUUREN, JAN, UNILEVER RESEARCH VLAARDINGEN |
|
GRAG | Despatch of communication of intention to grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20020516 |
|
GRAG | Despatch of communication of intention to grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA |
|
GRAH | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA |
|
GRAH | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): ES FR GR IT PT |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GR Ref legal event code: EP Ref document number: 20030400437 Country of ref document: GR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: PT Ref legal event code: SC4A Free format text: AVAILABILITY OF NATIONAL TRANSLATION Effective date: 20030213 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2189341 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 |
|
ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20031003 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Payment date: 20090126 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Payment date: 20090105 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Payment date: 20090129 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20090128 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20090119 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: PT Ref legal event code: MM4A Free format text: LAPSE DUE TO NON-PAYMENT OF FEES Effective date: 20100721 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20100930 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100201 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100721 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100121 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FD2A Effective date: 20110408 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20110324 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100122 |