EP0933419A1 - Debittering of olive oil - Google Patents

Debittering of olive oil Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0933419A1
EP0933419A1 EP99200161A EP99200161A EP0933419A1 EP 0933419 A1 EP0933419 A1 EP 0933419A1 EP 99200161 A EP99200161 A EP 99200161A EP 99200161 A EP99200161 A EP 99200161A EP 0933419 A1 EP0933419 A1 EP 0933419A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
olive oil
aqueous phase
polyphenols
process according
previous
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP99200161A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0933419B1 (en
Inventor
Jan Unilever Research Vlaardingen Van Buuren
Albertje Johanna Knoops
Karel P.A.M. Unilever Research Vlaard. van Putte
Hessel Unilever Research Vlaardingen Turksma
Michael Unilever Research Vlaardingen Gude
Andreas Th.J Unilever Research Vlaardingen Groot
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Unilever NV
Original Assignee
Unilever PLC
Unilever NV
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Unilever PLC, Unilever NV filed Critical Unilever PLC
Priority to EP19990200161 priority Critical patent/EP0933419B1/en
Publication of EP0933419A1 publication Critical patent/EP0933419A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0933419B1 publication Critical patent/EP0933419B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11BPRODUCING, e.g. BY PRESSING RAW MATERIALS OR BY EXTRACTION FROM WASTE MATERIALS, REFINING OR PRESERVING FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES, e.g. LANOLIN, FATTY OILS OR WAXES; ESSENTIAL OILS; PERFUMES
    • C11B3/00Refining fats or fatty oils
    • C11B3/006Refining fats or fatty oils by extraction
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11BPRODUCING, e.g. BY PRESSING RAW MATERIALS OR BY EXTRACTION FROM WASTE MATERIALS, REFINING OR PRESERVING FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES, e.g. LANOLIN, FATTY OILS OR WAXES; ESSENTIAL OILS; PERFUMES
    • C11B3/00Refining fats or fatty oils
    • C11B3/001Refining fats or fatty oils by a combination of two or more of the means hereafter
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11BPRODUCING, e.g. BY PRESSING RAW MATERIALS OR BY EXTRACTION FROM WASTE MATERIALS, REFINING OR PRESERVING FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES, e.g. LANOLIN, FATTY OILS OR WAXES; ESSENTIAL OILS; PERFUMES
    • C11B3/00Refining fats or fatty oils
    • C11B3/02Refining fats or fatty oils by chemical reaction

Definitions

  • the present invention is concerned with non-bitter olive oil with a high content of antioxidants and with processes for preparing such olive oil.
  • Olive oil is appreciated as a salad oil and as a frying oil for its delicious taste, not only in the traditional olive oil consuming countries, the Mediterranean area, but to an increasing extent also in Western Europe and the USA.
  • olive oil is prepared by harvesting the olive fruits and subjecting these to malaxation: crushing and kneading the olives with water so that a mash is obtained containing the whole content of the olive fruit including an aqueous phase.
  • the mash contains also enzymes, including oil hydrolysing lipases, which originate from the olive fruits.
  • the aqueous phase with all olive enzymes is separated from the oil phase e.g. by decanting, as soon as possible, anyway within one hour.
  • the bitter taste of olive oil is caused by so-called polyphenols, compounds which are native to olive oil.
  • Those olive oil derived polyphenols comprise relatively apolar, oil soluble phenolic compounds as well as relatively polar, water soluble phenolic compounds. In the context of the present invention both groups are denoted as polyphenols.
  • the bitter taste is caused mainly by the more apolar polyphenols.
  • Apolar polyphenols comprise the compounds oleuropein, ligstroside and their aglycons. These are the main bitter polyphenols (Grasas y Aceites, 46, 1995, 299-303).
  • the less bitter ones are polar polyphenols and comprise tyrosol, hydroxytyrosol, caffeic acid and vanillic acid.
  • Polyphenols are potent antioxidants. Recently it was found that they play a role in enhancing the oxidation stability of olive oil (Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. (1995) 5:, 306-314). Moreover it has been discovered that a diet comprising food containing a substantial amount of olive oil polyphenols helps to prevent the harmful oxidation of low-density lipoproteins (LDL) in the blood. In a population with a high polyphenol intake the incidence of coronary heart disease is relatively low. Therefore the presence of polyphenols in an edible oil, including olive oil, and preferably at high levels, is much desirable. However, when the polyphenols content in olive oil raises over 300 ppm, the oil becomes unacceptably bitter, which correlates with a (K225) bitter index value over 0.3.
  • LDL low-density lipoproteins
  • the present invention enables the reduction of bitterness not by usual removing bitter compounds from the olive oil, but predominantly by transforming them into compounds with reduced bitterness.
  • the process according to the present invention starts with olive oil which possesses a relatively high content of bitter polyphenols.
  • the process comprises the following steps: preparing an emulsion of olive oil with an aqueous phase, exposing the olive oil to the dispersed aqueous phase for at least 30 seconds and removing the aqueous phase from the olive oil, characterized in that the emulsified aqueous phase is maintained at a pH of at least 5.5, preferably of at least 6, more preferably of at least 7, still more preferably of at least 8 for at least 30 seconds of the exposure time.
  • Hydrolysis at a pH > 5.5 has been found to be essential for the conversion of bitter fat soluble polyphenols into less bitter water soluble polyphenols within a proper period of time. At said pH such conversion has been found to occur after at least 30 seconds exposure of the olive oil to an aqueous phase.
  • the pH may not remain constant during the process. During exposure it may sink temporarily below the required minimum value of 5.5.
  • a minimum exposure time of 30 seconds, preferably 2 minutes, more preferably 5 minutes to a pH of at least 5.5 is required for debittering.
  • the full effect is attained after still longer exposure times, preferably at least 30 minutes. Generally, after 120 minutes no further debittering effect is observed.
  • the aqueous phase consists of water, which contains reactive ions which are able to sustain the maintenance of the proper pH.
  • reactive ions which are able to sustain the maintenance of the proper pH.
  • the resulting pH is too low for suitable polyphenols hydrolysis. It has been found that use of common hard drinking water provides the proper conditions for obtaining the found debittering effect.
  • the presence of acid-binding reactive ions is believed first to constitute a pH > 5.5, and then to maintain it for a time which is long enough to hydrolyse the bitter polyphenols into less bitter polyphenols.
  • Such acid-binding ions are found in hard drinking water which is produced from natural resources, particularly from surface water and from water pumped from deep ground layers.
  • Such ions are e.g. one or more of the ions in the group constituted by carbonate, sulphate, magnesium and calcium. Maintenance of the required pH can be supported further by the presence of a proper buffer substance such as a (pH 8) citric acid/phosphate buffer.
  • Polyphenols originating from olive oil will migrate to the emulsion's aqueous phase.
  • This aqueous phase may be separated by settling and decantation or by centrifugation, but preferably the aqueous phase is removed from the olive oil by evaporating the water under reduced pressure (vacuum drying).
  • the polyphenols and possibly other ingredients in the aqueous phase phase are forced to get dispersed in the olive oil and then cause some turbidity.
  • the oil/aqueous phase emulsion is filtered by a membrane using established membrane filtration technology such as known for the production of drinking water.
  • the pores of the membrane allow passage of the water molecules, but not of the larger polyphenol molecules which stay in the olive oil.
  • Use of membrane filtration also retains desirable olive oil volatiles, which otherwise would be evaporated when using the previously mentioned vacuum drying technique.
  • the ratio of aqueous phase and olive oil in the emulsion preferably is 1 : 10 to 4 : 1, more preferably 1 : 4 to 2 : 1. Large amounts of water are not functional, and even not desired, because removal of water at the end needs energy and time. The best results are obtained when the emulsion has a continuous oil phase.
  • a stirrer with a relatively large diameter and a relatively low stirring rate is suitable, e.g. a paddle type stirrer or a ribbon stirrer, preferably a stirrer with baffles.
  • an olive oil can be prepared with polyphenol contents as high as 300 - 1000 ppm, while nevertheless the bitter index K225 is not higher than 0.3 and as high as 200 - 300 ppm, while the bitter index is not higher than 0.2.
  • An olive oil which has been debittered according to the present invention can be recognized by its polyphenols composition as detected by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).
  • HPLC high performance liquid chromatography
  • the bitter polyphenols show up at a retention time of 40 - 52 minutes. Before treatment substantial peaks are found in that part of the HPLC spectrum. After the treeatment those peaks are still visible but are much reduced. At the same time the peaks for water soluble polyphenols, which show up at 7 - 20 minutes retention time, have increased. The decrease and increase respectively of said peaks is characteristic for olive oil as an effect of the treatment according to the invention.
  • the invention therefore provides an olive oil which is characterized in that it contains at least 200 ppm of polyphenols, while the weight ratio of apolar polyphenols and polar polyphenols is less than 3, preferably less than 2, more preferably less than 1.
  • a surprising additional benefit of the found process is that the treated olive oil may exhibit unexpected flavour improvements.
  • Native Andalusian olive oil for example, may show flavour defects. These defects have disappeared fully or to a large extent after the treatment of the invention using common hard drinking water.
  • the drop in ppm values is relatively large, and is ascribed to the hydrolysed polyphenols being lighter molecules.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Edible Oils And Fats (AREA)

Abstract

Process for debittering olive oil comprising the exposure of olive oil which contains bitter polyphenols for at least 30 seconds to a finely dispersed aqueous phase, preferably consisting of hard drinking water, of which the pH is at least 5.5.

Description

  • The present invention is concerned with non-bitter olive oil with a high content of antioxidants and with processes for preparing such olive oil.
  • STATE OF THE ART
  • Olive oil is appreciated as a salad oil and as a frying oil for its delicious taste, not only in the traditional olive oil consuming countries, the Mediterranean area, but to an increasing extent also in Western Europe and the USA.
  • Traditionally, olive oil is prepared by harvesting the olive fruits and subjecting these to malaxation: crushing and kneading the olives with water so that a mash is obtained containing the whole content of the olive fruit including an aqueous phase. The mash contains also enzymes, including oil hydrolysing lipases, which originate from the olive fruits.
    In order to avoid undesired olive oil hydrolysis the aqueous phase with all olive enzymes is separated from the oil phase e.g. by decanting, as soon as possible, anyway within one hour.
  • Many olive oils after separation of the aqueous phase still possess a strong bitter taste. Bitter olive oil often can be made fit for consumption by washing the crude oil with water which reduces the bitter taste to an acceptable level. This usual washing treatment employs a centrifuge for a quick final water separation. The contact time between water and oil therefore is very short, usually less than 30 seconds, practically only 10 seconds.
  • The bitter taste of olive oil is caused by so-called polyphenols, compounds which are native to olive oil. Those olive oil derived polyphenols comprise relatively apolar, oil soluble phenolic compounds as well as relatively polar, water soluble phenolic compounds. In the context of the present invention both groups are denoted as polyphenols. The bitter taste is caused mainly by the more apolar polyphenols. Apolar polyphenols comprise the compounds oleuropein, ligstroside and their aglycons. These are the main bitter polyphenols (Grasas y Aceites, 46, 1995, 299-303). The less bitter ones are polar polyphenols and comprise tyrosol, hydroxytyrosol, caffeic acid and vanillic acid. These water soluble polyphenols, which largely have the same beneficial properties (nutritional, oil stability) as the oil soluble ones, have a much lesser contribution to the bitter taste. The average polyphenols content of freshly pressed olive oil ranges from 100 - 300 ppm. The content depends on type of olives and on the time of harvesting. Up to now an olive oil which contains more than 300 ppm polyphenols is too bitter for consumption.
  • Polyphenols are potent antioxidants. Recently it was found that they play a role in enhancing the oxidation stability of olive oil (Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. (1995) 5:, 306-314). Moreover it has been discovered that a diet comprising food containing a substantial amount of olive oil polyphenols helps to prevent the harmful oxidation of low-density lipoproteins (LDL) in the blood. In a population with a high polyphenol intake the incidence of coronary heart disease is relatively low. Therefore the presence of polyphenols in an edible oil, including olive oil, and preferably at high levels, is much desirable. However, when the polyphenols content in olive oil raises over 300 ppm, the oil becomes unacceptably bitter, which correlates with a (K225) bitter index value over 0.3.
  • The water washings used for reducing bitterness unfortunately also remove a substantial part of the valuable polyphenols from the olive oil. Co-pending non-prepublished patent application EP 849 353 describes a process for an olive oil which contains 300 - 1000 ppm of polyphenols, while the bitter index K225 is not higher than 0.3 or, alternatively, containing 200 - 300 ppm of polyphenols, while the bitter index is not higher than 0.2. The native polyphenols are hydrolyzed employing a time consuming enzymatic process at a pH (5) which is optimal for enzyme activity.
    The aim of the present invention is to provide an improved process for obtaining non-bitter olive oils with a high content of polyphenols.
  • STATEMENT OF INVENTION
  • We have found a new method for converting the olive oil derived oil soluble polyphenols into less bitter water soluble ones.
  • The present invention enables the reduction of bitterness not by usual removing bitter compounds from the olive oil, but predominantly by transforming them into compounds with reduced bitterness.
    The process according to the present invention starts with olive oil which possesses a relatively high content of bitter polyphenols. The process comprises the following steps: preparing an emulsion of olive oil with an aqueous phase, exposing the olive oil to the dispersed aqueous phase for at least 30 seconds and removing the aqueous phase from the olive oil, characterized in that the emulsified aqueous phase is maintained at a pH of at least 5.5, preferably of at least 6, more preferably of at least 7, still more preferably of at least 8 for at least 30 seconds of the exposure time.
  • DETAILS OF THE INVENTION
  • Hydrolysis at a pH > 5.5 has been found to be essential for the conversion of bitter fat soluble polyphenols into less bitter water soluble polyphenols within a proper period of time. At said pH such conversion has been found to occur after at least 30 seconds exposure of the olive oil to an aqueous phase. The pH may not remain constant during the process. During exposure it may sink temporarily below the required minimum value of 5.5. A minimum exposure time of 30 seconds, preferably 2 minutes, more preferably 5 minutes to a pH of at least 5.5 is required for debittering. The full effect is attained after still longer exposure times, preferably at least 30 minutes. Generally, after 120 minutes no further debittering effect is observed. Preferably, the aqueous phase consists of water, which contains reactive ions which are able to sustain the maintenance of the proper pH.
    The presence of fatty acids originating from partial hydrolysis of the olive oil, has a pH lowering effect. The resulting pH is too low for suitable polyphenols hydrolysis.
    It has been found that use of common hard drinking water provides the proper conditions for obtaining the found debittering effect. The presence of acid-binding reactive ions is believed first to constitute a pH > 5.5, and then to maintain it for a time which is long enough to hydrolyse the bitter polyphenols into less bitter polyphenols.
  • Such acid-binding ions are found in hard drinking water which is produced from natural resources, particularly from surface water and from water pumped from deep ground layers. Such ions are e.g. one or more of the ions in the group constituted by carbonate, sulphate, magnesium and calcium. Maintenance of the required pH can be supported further by the presence of a proper buffer substance such as a (pH 8) citric acid/phosphate buffer.
  • Polyphenols originating from olive oil will migrate to the emulsion's aqueous phase. This aqueous phase may be separated by settling and decantation or by centrifugation, but preferably the aqueous phase is removed from the olive oil by evaporating the water under reduced pressure (vacuum drying). The polyphenols and possibly other ingredients in the aqueous phase phase are forced to get dispersed in the olive oil and then cause some turbidity.
    More preferably, the oil/aqueous phase emulsion is filtered by a membrane using established membrane filtration technology such as known for the production of drinking water. The pores of the membrane allow passage of the water molecules, but not of the larger polyphenol molecules which stay in the olive oil. Use of membrane filtration also retains desirable olive oil volatiles, which otherwise would be evaporated when using the previously mentioned vacuum drying technique.
  • When an aqueous phase is selected which contains already a large amount of water soluble polyphenols, less migration of water soluble polyphenols from the olive oil into the aqueous phase will occur.
  • While normally olive oil is substantially depleted with polyphenols as an effect of the usual washing treatment, said embodiments of the invented process retain polyphenols, but remove bitterness by converting the bitter principle rather than by removing its substance.
  • The ratio of aqueous phase and olive oil in the emulsion preferably is 1 : 10 to 4 : 1, more preferably 1 : 4 to 2 : 1. Large amounts of water are not functional, and even not desired, because removal of water at the end needs energy and time. The best results are obtained when the emulsion has a continuous oil phase.
  • Obviously, it is vital that the mixture of aqueous phase and oil is vigorously stirred to ensure close contact of both phases. For obtaining a fine emulsion a powerful stirring device is required which is able to dissipate 0.1 - 5 kW, preferably 0.5 - 2 kW of energy for each 1000 kg of olive oil. Table I shows the effect of stirring on debittering.
    Energy dissipation in 1000 kg olive oil (kW) Debittering attained after minutes
    0.025 60
    0.25 45
    1 5
  • For said energy dissipation a stirrer with a relatively large diameter and a relatively low stirring rate is suitable, e.g. a paddle type stirrer or a ribbon stirrer, preferably a stirrer with baffles.
  • For the debittering process an emulsion temperature of about 25°C is most advantageous.
  • With the present invention an olive oil can be prepared with polyphenol contents as high as 300 - 1000 ppm, while nevertheless the bitter index K225 is not higher than 0.3 and as high as 200 - 300 ppm, while the bitter index is not higher than 0.2.
  • An olive oil which has been debittered according to the present invention can be recognized by its polyphenols composition as detected by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The bitter polyphenols show up at a retention time of 40 - 52 minutes. Before treatment substantial peaks are found in that part of the HPLC spectrum. After the treeatment those peaks are still visible but are much reduced. At the same time the peaks for water soluble polyphenols, which show up at 7 - 20 minutes retention time, have increased. The decrease and increase respectively of said peaks is characteristic for olive oil as an effect of the treatment according to the invention.
  • Consequently a further effect of the invented process is that the olive oil's ratio of apolar polyphenols and polar polyphenols shifts to more beneficial lower molar ratios, preferably being below 3 (see Table II).
    Obviously, absolute ratios depend on the initial ratio in untreated olive oil, which may vary widely.
  • The invention therefore provides an olive oil which is characterized in that it contains at least 200 ppm of polyphenols, while the weight ratio of apolar polyphenols and polar polyphenols is less than 3, preferably less than 2, more preferably less than 1.
  • A surprising additional benefit of the found process is that the treated olive oil may exhibit unexpected flavour improvements. Native Andalusian olive oil, for example, may show flavour defects. These defects have disappeared fully or to a large extent after the treatment of the invention using common hard drinking water.
  • The invention is illustrated by the following example:
  • Example
  • Two volumes of extra virgin Andalusian olive oil and one volume of regular hard drinking water obtained from the local (city of Vlaardingen) tap water supply and having a pH of 8 were thoroughly mixed at a temperature of 25°C using a mixing device which dissipated 1 kW of energy per ton of oil. After 30 minutes the headspace pressure was reduced to 10 mbar, the water was evaporated from the mixture and the oil became dry.
    A tasting panel assessed the oil on bitterness before and after the treatment using a scale ranging from 0 (excellent) to 4 (unacceptable bitterness). The oil was rated 4 before the treatment and 0 thereafter.
    The content of polyphenols was measured by standard High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC). See Table II.
    POLYPHENOLS CONTENT by HPLC BEFORE TREATMENT AFTER TREATMENT
    polar polyphenols mmol/kg 0.54 1.47
    apolar polyphenols mmol/kg 1.67 0.5
    total polyphenols mmol/kg 2.21 1.97
    ratio apolar/polar polyph. 3.1 0.3
    total polyphenols (ppm) 665 365
  • The drop in ppm values is relatively large, and is ascribed to the hydrolysed polyphenols being lighter molecules.
  • The values for K270 (0.18) and free fatty acids (0.45) showed that the treated oil still complied with requirements for extra virgin olive oil.
  • Comparison example
  • The preceding example was repeated, but using instead of hard drinking water demineralised water, having a pH of 6.5. At the onset of emulsion formation the pH of the aqueous phase immediately and definitely dropped below 5.5. Even after one hour of stirring, the tasting panel noticed no significant bitterness reduction.

Claims (9)

  1. A process for treating olive oil which comprises the following steps:
    preparing an emulsion of olive oil with an aqueous phase,
    exposing the olive oil to the dispersed aqueous phase for at least 30 seconds and
    removing the aqueous phase from the olive oil, characterized in that the emulsified aqueous phase is maintained at a pH of at least 5.5, more preferably at least 7, for at least 30 seconds of the exposure time.
  2. A process according to claim 1, characterized in that the aqueous phase consists of water, which contains reactive ions which are able to neutralize substances which have a pH lowering activity.
  3. A process according to one of the previous claims, characterized in that said pH level is maintained for at least 2 minutes, preferably for at least 5 minutes, more preferably for at least 30 minutes.
  4. A process according to one of the previous claims, characterized in that the aqueous phase does not contain a substantial amount of debittering enzyme.
  5. A process according to one of the previous claims, characterized in that the aqueous phase to be added contains olive oil derived polyphenols.
  6. A process according to one of the previous claims, characterized in that the ratio of aqueous phase and olive oil in the emulsion is 1 : 10 to 4 : 1, preferably 1 : 4 to 2 : 1.
  7. A process according to one of the previous claims, characterized in that the aqueous phase is removed by evaporating the water under reduced pressure conditions.
  8. A process according to one of the previous claims, characterized in that the aqueous phase is removed by membrane filtration.
  9. A process according to one of the previous claims, characterized in that the aqueous phase substantially consists of tap water.
EP19990200161 1998-01-28 1999-01-21 Debittering of olive oil Expired - Lifetime EP0933419B1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP19990200161 EP0933419B1 (en) 1998-01-28 1999-01-21 Debittering of olive oil

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP98200235 1998-01-28
EP98200235 1998-01-28
EP19990200161 EP0933419B1 (en) 1998-01-28 1999-01-21 Debittering of olive oil

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0933419A1 true EP0933419A1 (en) 1999-08-04
EP0933419B1 EP0933419B1 (en) 2003-01-02

Family

ID=26149993

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP19990200161 Expired - Lifetime EP0933419B1 (en) 1998-01-28 1999-01-21 Debittering of olive oil

Country Status (1)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0933419B1 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2000036936A2 (en) * 1998-12-22 2000-06-29 Unilever N.V. Food compositions fortified with anti-oxidants
US6942890B1 (en) 1998-12-23 2005-09-13 Jan Van Buuren Fortification of food products with olive fruit ingredients
WO2014154914A1 (en) * 2013-03-26 2014-10-02 Asociación Empresarial De Investigación Centro Tecnológico Nacional Agroalimentario "Extremadura" (Ctaex) Method for increasing the content of phenolic compounds in olive oils

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2014193567A1 (en) * 2013-04-26 2014-12-04 The Regents Of The University Of California Method for debittering olives

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1997032947A1 (en) * 1996-03-05 1997-09-12 Comiter Trading & Services S.R.L. A product based on olive oil, enriched and supplemented with antioxidants
EP0849353A1 (en) * 1996-12-20 1998-06-24 Unilever N.V. Debittering of olive oil

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1997032947A1 (en) * 1996-03-05 1997-09-12 Comiter Trading & Services S.R.L. A product based on olive oil, enriched and supplemented with antioxidants
EP0849353A1 (en) * 1996-12-20 1998-06-24 Unilever N.V. Debittering of olive oil

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
BRENES M ET AL: "BIOCHEMICAL CHANGES IN PHENOLIC COMPOUNDS DURING SPANISH-STYLE GREEN OLIVE PROCESSING", JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, vol. 43, no. 10, 1 October 1995 (1995-10-01), pages 2702 - 2706, XP002041724 *

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2000036936A2 (en) * 1998-12-22 2000-06-29 Unilever N.V. Food compositions fortified with anti-oxidants
WO2000036936A3 (en) * 1998-12-22 2000-09-08 Unilever Nv Food compositions fortified with anti-oxidants
US6746706B1 (en) 1998-12-22 2004-06-08 Lipton, Division Of Conopco, Inc. Food compositions fortified with anti-oxidants
US6942890B1 (en) 1998-12-23 2005-09-13 Jan Van Buuren Fortification of food products with olive fruit ingredients
WO2014154914A1 (en) * 2013-03-26 2014-10-02 Asociación Empresarial De Investigación Centro Tecnológico Nacional Agroalimentario "Extremadura" (Ctaex) Method for increasing the content of phenolic compounds in olive oils

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP0933419B1 (en) 2003-01-02

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6162480A (en) Fortification of a vegetable fat with antioxidants
US6033706A (en) Refining of edible oil retaining maximum antioxidative potency
FI68951C (en) FOERFARANDE FOER ATT MINSKA KOLESTEROLMAENGDEN I AEGGULA
US5998641A (en) Debittering of olive oil
MX2007000412A (en) Process of extracting citrus fiber from citrus vesicles.
US6187356B1 (en) Debittering of olive oil
AU763067B2 (en) Fortification of food products with olive fruit ingredients
JP2007504821A (en) Reduced sugar citrus juice drink
SK8792001A3 (en) Food compositions fortified with anti-oxidants
EP0839001B1 (en) Flavouring of edible oils
EP0933419B1 (en) Debittering of olive oil
EP0849353B1 (en) Debittering of olive oil
EP1042435B1 (en) Olive oil containing food composition
US3567469A (en) Process for the production of dehydrated products
KR20190066702A (en) Hemp seed beverage and manufacture method the same
KR100366607B1 (en) Manufacturing method of onion grain syrup
EP1221286B1 (en) Method for the preparation of oil having increased polyphenol content
CN110452769A (en) The method that fresh ginger extracts pure oil of ginger and ginger flavored oils
EP1430781B1 (en) Process for the production of olive oil
JPH0453448A (en) Flavorous oil and production thereof
MXPA01006507A (en) Fortification of food products with olive fruit ingredients
WO2021211695A1 (en) Processes and methods for producing an edible cream from olives
JPS6036741B2 (en) Preparation method for adjusted fine coconut milk
MXPA00005467A (en) Olive oil containing food composition

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): ES FR GR IT PT

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19990731

AKX Designation fees paid

Free format text: ES FR GR IT PT

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: 8566

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: UNILEVER N.V.

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: GROOT, WILLEM A, UNILEVER RESEARCH VLAARDINGEN

Inventor name: GUDE, MICHAEL, UNILEVER RESEARCH VLAARDINGEN

Inventor name: TURKSMA, HESSEL, UNILEVER RESEARCH VLAARDINGEN

Inventor name: VAN PUTTE, KAREL P.A.M., UNILEVER RESEARCH VLAARD

Inventor name: KNOOPS, ALBERTJE JOHANNA

Inventor name: VAN BUUREN, JAN, UNILEVER RESEARCH VLAARDINGEN

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20020516

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): ES FR GR IT PT

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GR

Ref legal event code: EP

Ref document number: 20030400437

Country of ref document: GR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: PT

Ref legal event code: SC4A

Free format text: AVAILABILITY OF NATIONAL TRANSLATION

Effective date: 20030213

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2189341

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

ET Fr: translation filed
PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20031003

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20090126

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Payment date: 20090105

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Payment date: 20090129

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20090128

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20090119

Year of fee payment: 11

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: PT

Ref legal event code: MM4A

Free format text: LAPSE DUE TO NON-PAYMENT OF FEES

Effective date: 20100721

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20100930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100201

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100721

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100121

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20110408

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110324

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100122