EP0923114B1 - Process for self-aligned implantation - Google Patents

Process for self-aligned implantation Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0923114B1
EP0923114B1 EP99200531A EP99200531A EP0923114B1 EP 0923114 B1 EP0923114 B1 EP 0923114B1 EP 99200531 A EP99200531 A EP 99200531A EP 99200531 A EP99200531 A EP 99200531A EP 0923114 B1 EP0923114 B1 EP 0923114B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
gate
self
source
drain
spacer
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP99200531A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0923114A2 (en
EP0923114A3 (en
Inventor
Ricardo Alves Donaton
Karen Irma Josef Maex
Rita Verbeeck
Philippe Jansen
Rita Rooyackers
Ludo Deferm
Mikhail Rodionovich Baklanov
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Interuniversitair Microelektronica Centrum vzw IMEC
Original Assignee
Interuniversitair Microelektronica Centrum vzw IMEC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Interuniversitair Microelektronica Centrum vzw IMEC filed Critical Interuniversitair Microelektronica Centrum vzw IMEC
Priority claimed from EP96870078A external-priority patent/EP0750338B1/en
Publication of EP0923114A2 publication Critical patent/EP0923114A2/en
Publication of EP0923114A3 publication Critical patent/EP0923114A3/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0923114B1 publication Critical patent/EP0923114B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H10SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; ELECTRIC SOLID-STATE DEVICES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • H10DINORGANIC ELECTRIC SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES
    • H10D30/00Field-effect transistors [FET]
    • H10D30/01Manufacture or treatment
    • H10D30/021Manufacture or treatment of FETs having insulated gates [IGFET]
    • H10D30/0212Manufacture or treatment of FETs having insulated gates [IGFET] using self-aligned silicidation
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H10SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; ELECTRIC SOLID-STATE DEVICES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • H10DINORGANIC ELECTRIC SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES
    • H10D30/00Field-effect transistors [FET]
    • H10D30/01Manufacture or treatment
    • H10D30/021Manufacture or treatment of FETs having insulated gates [IGFET]
    • H10D30/0218Manufacture or treatment of FETs having insulated gates [IGFET] having pocket halo regions selectively formed at the sides of the gates
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H10SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; ELECTRIC SOLID-STATE DEVICES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • H10DINORGANIC ELECTRIC SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES
    • H10D30/00Field-effect transistors [FET]
    • H10D30/01Manufacture or treatment
    • H10D30/021Manufacture or treatment of FETs having insulated gates [IGFET]
    • H10D30/0223Manufacture or treatment of FETs having insulated gates [IGFET] having source and drain regions or source and drain extensions self-aligned to sides of the gate
    • H10D30/0227Manufacture or treatment of FETs having insulated gates [IGFET] having source and drain regions or source and drain extensions self-aligned to sides of the gate having both lightly-doped source and drain extensions and source and drain regions self-aligned to the sides of the gate, e.g. lightly-doped drain [LDD] MOSFET or double-diffused drain [DDD] MOSFET
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H10SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; ELECTRIC SOLID-STATE DEVICES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • H10PGENERIC PROCESSES OR APPARATUS FOR THE MANUFACTURE OR TREATMENT OF DEVICES COVERED BY CLASS H10
    • H10P50/00Etching of wafers, substrates or parts of devices
    • H10P50/20Dry etching; Plasma etching; Reactive-ion etching
    • H10P50/28Dry etching; Plasma etching; Reactive-ion etching of insulating materials
    • H10P50/282Dry etching; Plasma etching; Reactive-ion etching of insulating materials of inorganic materials
    • H10P50/283Dry etching; Plasma etching; Reactive-ion etching of insulating materials of inorganic materials by chemical means
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H10SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; ELECTRIC SOLID-STATE DEVICES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • H10DINORGANIC ELECTRIC SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES
    • H10D62/00Semiconductor bodies, or regions thereof, of devices having potential barriers
    • H10D62/10Shapes, relative sizes or dispositions of the regions of the semiconductor bodies; Shapes of the semiconductor bodies
    • H10D62/17Semiconductor regions connected to electrodes not carrying current to be rectified, amplified or switched, e.g. channel regions
    • H10D62/351Substrate regions of field-effect devices
    • H10D62/357Substrate regions of field-effect devices of FETs
    • H10D62/364Substrate regions of field-effect devices of FETs of IGFETs
    • H10D62/371Inactive supplementary semiconductor regions, e.g. for preventing punch-through, improving capacity effect or leakage current

Definitions

  • the present invention is related to the use of an etching process of CoSi 2 layers as a process step for self-aligned pocket implantation in semiconductor devices.
  • CoSi 2 cobalt disilicide
  • TiSi 2 is known to be very reactive with chemicals such as NH 4 OH- and HF-based solutions. CoSi 2 is much more robust in that respect. Wet etching of CoSi 2 has even been considered very difficult in general.
  • US-A-5 162 259 discloses the etching of oxide sidewall spacers on CoSi 2 regions using diluted Hf suffered with ammonium fluoride. This process has been disclosed in the frame of fabrication of CMOS SRAM having buried contacts.
  • An object of the present invention is to improve the process of self-aligned pocket implantation using an etching process of CoSi 2 layers in semiconductor manufacturing process.
  • this object is to suggest to use a specific process step based on selective etching of CoSi 2 , while the other conventional process steps are still maintained. Accordingly, it is aimed is to affect as less as possible the global costs of a whole process integration in active transistors fabrication.
  • the present invention is related to a process of a self-aligned pocket implantation in an active transistor having a small gate length comprising the steps of:
  • the dopants are of the opposite kind than the source and drain implants, in order to reduce drain induced barrier lowering.
  • the dopants are of the same kind than the source and drain implants, in order to reduce the series resistance.
  • This last processes can be easily integrated in conventional CMOS process integration for devices having gate lengths less than 0.35 ⁇ m.
  • the present invention is related to a full integration process in order to fabricate active transistors using self-aligned pocket implantation.
  • a full semiconductor integration process in order to fabricate active transistors is known to use self-aligned pocket implantation.
  • the full integration process starts with the definition of active area and field area, generally using local oxidation schemes.
  • Wells to adjust for threshold voltage, to reduce anti-punch trough current and control the immunity versus latch-up can be implanted prior or after the active area and field definition process.
  • a high quality gate oxide will be thermally grown, followed by a chemical vapor deposition of a polycrystalline or amorphous Si layer. This layer will be implanted and annealed as not to destroy the gate during subsequent patterning.
  • an implantation oxide is thermally grown.
  • N-type and P-type lightly doped source and drain (LDD) are then implanted with respectively P or As and B or BF 2 .
  • An oxide layer is deposited uniformly over the wafer and subsequently etched without mask definition by an anisotropic dry etch. Due to the anisotropic etch, a spacer is formed at the poly sidewalls. The etch is performed until complete removal of the oxide on poly and source-drain regions. After cleaning, a new oxide is thermally grown. The gate and source-drain regions are then implanted and annealed.
  • the implantation oxide is removed, typically by a critical HF etch before Ti or Co sputtering for silicidation.
  • Ti-sputtering is commonly used for dimensions equal and larger than 0.35 ⁇ m and Co-sputtering and Co alloys for smaller dimensions.
  • the silicidation consists commonly of a first initial heating and reaction step, followed by a selective etch based on ammoniumhydroxide for Ti-silicide and based on sulphuric acid for Co-silicide, and a final reaction step for complete formation of a low resistance silicide.
  • the implantation oxide of the junctions is removed by a wet chemical etch e.g. HF 2% (in H 2 O).
  • a wet chemical etch e.g. HF 2% (in H 2 O).
  • Co is sputtered on the surface and the subsequent silicidation is performed using a two step heat treatment with a selective etch after the first heat treatment. Up to this process step, all steps are common for a Co-silicide semiconductor manufacturing process.
  • n-type and p-type lightly doped source (3) and drain (4) (LDD) are then implanted with respectively P or As and B or BF 2 (see fig. 1a)
  • An oxide layer is deposited (Low Pressure Chemical Vapor Deposition) uniformly over the wafer and subsequently etched without mask definition by an anisotropic dry etch. Due to the anisotropic etch, a spacer (5) is formed at the poly sidewalls. The etch is performed until complete removal of the oxide on poly and source-drain regions. After cleaning, a new oxide (6) is thermally grown. The gate and source-drain regions are then implanted and annealed (see fig. 1b).
  • the implantation oxide is removed, typically by a critical HF etch before Co or Co-alloy sputtering for silicidation.
  • the silicidation consists of a first initial heating and reaction step, followed by a selective etch based on a sulphuric acid hydrogen peroxide solution, and a final reaction step for complete formation of a low resistance silicide (see fig. 1c).
  • the oxide spacer is etched selectively towards the Co-silicide by the right choice of the pH of an aqueous HF chemical etch.
  • a fast oxide etching HF based solution with a pH close to neutral.
  • the etch rate of the Co-silicide in a near neutral HF based solution is nearly independent of the HF concentration.
  • a HF solution with HF concentration higher than 2% is required to etch the spacer in a short time and to reduce the time during which the Co-silicide is in contact with the etch solution.
  • the pH of the solution is required to be higher than 3 to obtain a significantly low etch rate of the Co-silicide during the exposure time.
  • the advantage of the newly proposed manufacturing process is the use of a Co-silicide layer, with well controlled etching characteristics to commonly available chemicals as hydrogen fluoride (HF) and sulphuric acid (H 2 SO 4 ).
  • HF hydrogen fluoride
  • H 2 SO 4 sulphuric acid
  • the H-based solution is a buffered HF(BHF) solution.
  • BHF solution is formed by mixing 1 part of HF 50% and 7 parts of NH 4 F 40%.
  • the pH of this solution is higher than 3.
  • BHF etch of the oxide spacer is selective towards the gate oxide etch with a ratio about 3:1.
  • the etching time in this case is 20 seconds.
  • CMOS manufacturing process is continued.
  • An intermediate layer dielectric is deposited, which is patterned for contact windows, filled with a conductor and finally interconnected by one or more metal layers, each separated by an intermediate metal dielectric (see fig. 1e).

Landscapes

  • Insulated Gate Type Field-Effect Transistor (AREA)
  • Electrodes Of Semiconductors (AREA)
  • Metal-Oxide And Bipolar Metal-Oxide Semiconductor Integrated Circuits (AREA)

Description

    Field of the invention
  • The present invention is related to the use of an etching process of CoSi2 layers as a process step for self-aligned pocket implantation in semiconductor devices.
  • State of the art
  • The use of cobalt disilicide (CoSi2) in microelectronics applications is becoming more and more important. In CMOS technology, with scaling down of dimensions, especially for CMOS technology manufacturing transistor with a gate length smaller than 0.35 µm, CoSi2 has become an attractive material due to its better characteristics when compared to the more frequently used TiSi2.
  • The interaction of a silicide film with chemicals and reactive gasses during further processing is an important issue to maintain the integrity of the film in the fully integrated structure. TiSi2 is known to be very reactive with chemicals such as NH4OH- and HF-based solutions. CoSi2 is much more robust in that respect. Wet etching of CoSi2 has even been considered very difficult in general.
  • The process described in the IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, Vol. 30, No. 12, pp. 180-181, focuses on creation of a simplified process for self-aligned pocket implantation using only one masking step by inverting the standard process sequence is and starts with formation of a double spacer, self-aligned silicidation, masking step, junction implant in the silicide, second space removal, lightly doped region implantation, mask stripping and junction anneal. Moreover, the refractory metal is used for shallow implant formation by dopant diffusion out of the refractory metal silicide and for withstanding high temperatures. The main problem with this process is indeed the fact that the standard process sequence is inverted and the junction anneal as last step can be problematic due to diffusion of the implants, which is the main reason for introducing two spacers.
  • Although in IEEE Electron Devices Letters, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 174-176, a self-aligned pocket implantation process for 0.2 submicron is presented, it must be made clear that TI-silicide suffers from the so-called narrow line effect. Consequently small gate lengths can be obtained only with non-classical expensive CMOS processing steps. In this presented process also an extra isotropic etchiing process using plasma is needed for removal of the SiN spacer, thereby introducing the danger of destroying the gate quality due to plasma charging.
  • US-A-5 162 259 discloses the etching of oxide sidewall spacers on CoSi2 regions using diluted Hf suffered with ammonium fluoride. This process has been disclosed in the frame of fabrication of CMOS SRAM having buried contacts.
  • Aims of the present invention
  • An object of the present invention is to improve the process of self-aligned pocket implantation using an etching process of CoSi2 layers in semiconductor manufacturing process.
  • More particularly, this object is to suggest to use a specific process step based on selective etching of CoSi2, while the other conventional process steps are still maintained. Accordingly, it is aimed is to affect as less as possible the global costs of a whole process integration in active transistors fabrication.
  • Main characteristics of the present invention
  • The present invention is related to a process of a self-aligned pocket implantation in an active transistor having a small gate length comprising the steps of:
    • defining an active area within a semiconductor substrate with a source region, a drain region and a gate region;
    • defining a silicon oxide sidewall spacer in between said source and said gate regions and in between said drain and said gate regions;
    • forming a self-aligned CoSi2 top layer selectively on said exposed drain, gate, and source regions;
    • selectively etching the silicon oxide spacer using a HF-based solution having a pH between 3 and 8.5 by tuning the HF-based solution so as to have a high etch rate for the oxide spacer with a minimum etch rate for the CoSi2 layer;
    • implanting dopants in the source and drain regions in order to achieve a self-aligned pocket implantation.
  • According to one preferred embodiment, the dopants are of the opposite kind than the source and drain implants, in order to reduce drain induced barrier lowering.
  • According to another preferred embodiment the dopants are of the same kind than the source and drain implants, in order to reduce the series resistance.
  • This last processes can be easily integrated in conventional CMOS process integration for devices having gate lengths less than 0.35 µm.
  • Description of the figures
  • Figures 1
    represent cross section views of an active transistor according to the several steps of the formation of semiconductor having a self-aligned pocket implantation using selective removal of oxide spacer compared to CoSi2 layers.
    Detailed description of the present invention
  • The present invention is related to a full integration process in order to fabricate active transistors using self-aligned pocket implantation.
  • In the prior art, a full semiconductor integration process in order to fabricate active transistors is known to use self-aligned pocket implantation. The full integration process starts with the definition of active area and field area, generally using local oxidation schemes. Wells to adjust for threshold voltage, to reduce anti-punch trough current and control the immunity versus latch-up can be implanted prior or after the active area and field definition process. Afterwards, after cleaning and conditioning the Si surface a high quality gate oxide will be thermally grown, followed by a chemical vapor deposition of a polycrystalline or amorphous Si layer. This layer will be implanted and annealed as not to destroy the gate during subsequent patterning.
  • After gate patterning, an implantation oxide is thermally grown. N-type and P-type lightly doped source and drain (LDD) are then implanted with respectively P or As and B or BF2. An oxide layer is deposited uniformly over the wafer and subsequently etched without mask definition by an anisotropic dry etch. Due to the anisotropic etch, a spacer is formed at the poly sidewalls. The etch is performed until complete removal of the oxide on poly and source-drain regions. After cleaning, a new oxide is thermally grown. The gate and source-drain regions are then implanted and annealed.
  • After source/drain formation, the implantation oxide is removed, typically by a critical HF etch before Ti or Co sputtering for silicidation. Ti-sputtering is commonly used for dimensions equal and larger than 0.35 µm and Co-sputtering and Co alloys for smaller dimensions. The silicidation consists commonly of a first initial heating and reaction step, followed by a selective etch based on ammoniumhydroxide for Ti-silicide and based on sulphuric acid for Co-silicide, and a final reaction step for complete formation of a low resistance silicide.
  • After silicidation, an intermediate layer dielectric is deposited, which is then patterned for contact windows, filled with a conductor and finally interconnected by one or more metal layers, each separated by an intermediate metal dielectric.
  • With shrinking dimensions, it is noticed that the control of the gate on the carriers conducting the current under the gate reduces, due to the physical phenomenon called drain induced barrier lowering. The effect of drain induced barrier lowering can be countered by locally increasing the well dopant density for narrow gates. This can be done by implanting the well dopant at the same time as the LDD implantation but with a slightly deeper projected range or by a large angle tilted implant (LATID). This approach is called halo-implantation. This solution is very effective in decreasing the transistor leakage current for a maximum drive current, but due to the counterdoping the junction capacitance between source/drain regions and the substrate is increased and the depth of the source/drain regions is reduced. A better solution therefore is a pocket implantation self-aligned towards gate and silicide. The silicide has a larger stopping power towards implantation, about 1.5 times better than Si, so the well dopant implantation exceeds the projected range of the LDD, but not the junction depth and therefore it reduces the junction capacitance and does not reduce the depth.
  • The implantation can only be performed after the silicidation of the source/drain regions and requires therefore the use of disposable spacers. For a process using Ti-silicided, two types of disposable spacers have been reported: first, the use of a TiN spacer by Pfiester et al. from Motorola in "An integrated 0.5 µm CMOS disposable TiN LDD/Salicide spacer technology", IEDM 89, 781-784, wherein a TiN layer is therefore deposited by chemical vapor deposition in nitrogen ambient, and subsequently etched in an anisotropic plasma to form a spacer at the polysilicon gate sidewall. The spacer is removed during the selective etch based on ammoniumhydroxide after the first silicidation step. Secondly, the use of a SiN spacer by Hori et al. from Matsushita in "A Self-Aligned Pocket Implantation (SPI) Technology for 0.2 µm Dual Gate CMOS," IEDM 91, 641 - 644. In this case, the SiN spacer is formed by low pressure chemical vapor deposition of a uniform SiN layer and subsequent etch in an anisotropic plasma to form a spacer at the polysilicon gate sidewall. The spacer needs then to be removed after Ti-silicide formation. Only an isotropic plasma can remove the spacer selectively towards the Ti-silicide.
  • The main drawback shown in the first reference is that the deposition of a thick TiN layer and the subsequent anisotropic etching to obtain a spacer is not standardly available in a semiconductor manufacturing environment.
  • The main drawback of the second solution is extra development of an isotropic SiN etching process and the danger to destroy gate quality due to plasma charging.
  • The process according to the present invention is based on the use of the conventional semiconductor manufacturing process steps, as described in the prior art until gate formation and anneal.
  • After anneal, the implantation oxide of the junctions is removed by a wet chemical etch e.g. HF 2% (in H2O). Co is sputtered on the surface and the subsequent silicidation is performed using a two step heat treatment with a selective etch after the first heat treatment. Up to this process step, all steps are common for a Co-silicide semiconductor manufacturing process.
  • According to a preferred embodiment described in relation with figs. 1, the full integration process starts with the definition of active area and field area, generally using local oxidation schemes. Wells to adjust for threshold voltage, to reduce anti-punch through current and control the immunity versus latch-up can be implanted prior or after the active area and field definition process. Afterwards, after cleaning and conditioning the Si surface a high quality gate oxide will be thermally grown, followed by a chemical vapor deposition of a polycrystalline or amorphous Si layer. This layer will be implanted and annealed as not to destroy the gate during subsequent patterning.
  • After gate (1) patterning, an implantation oxide (2) is thermally grown. n-type and p-type lightly doped source (3) and drain (4) (LDD) are then implanted with respectively P or As and B or BF2 (see fig. 1a)
  • An oxide layer is deposited (Low Pressure Chemical Vapor Deposition) uniformly over the wafer and subsequently etched without mask definition by an anisotropic dry etch. Due to the anisotropic etch, a spacer (5) is formed at the poly sidewalls. The etch is performed until complete removal of the oxide on poly and source-drain regions. After cleaning, a new oxide (6) is thermally grown. The gate and source-drain regions are then implanted and annealed (see fig. 1b).
  • After junction formation, the implantation oxide is removed, typically by a critical HF etch before Co or Co-alloy sputtering for silicidation. The silicidation consists of a first initial heating and reaction step, followed by a selective etch based on a sulphuric acid hydrogen peroxide solution, and a final reaction step for complete formation of a low resistance silicide (see fig. 1c).
  • After Co-silicidation, the oxide spacer is etched selectively towards the Co-silicide by the right choice of the pH of an aqueous HF chemical etch. To improve the process window for the selective etch, it is preferable to use a fast oxide etching HF based solution with a pH close to neutral. The etch rate of the Co-silicide in a near neutral HF based solution is nearly independent of the HF concentration. To achieve an acceptable process window towards manufacturing yield and quality, a HF solution with HF concentration higher than 2% is required to etch the spacer in a short time and to reduce the time during which the Co-silicide is in contact with the etch solution. The pH of the solution is required to be higher than 3 to obtain a significantly low etch rate of the Co-silicide during the exposure time.
  • The advantage of the newly proposed manufacturing process is the use of a Co-silicide layer, with well controlled etching characteristics to commonly available chemicals as hydrogen fluoride (HF) and sulphuric acid (H2SO4).
  • For the selective etch of an oxide spacer, available in most standard semiconductor manufacturing processes, HF solutions with a pH > 3 and preferably with a pH > 5.5 can be tuned to have a high etch rate for the oxide spacer and a minimum etchrate for the Co-silicide layer, as described in the annexed Table 1.
  • Moreover, this manufacturing process requires a minimum of process development, as the used chemicals are already used in the conventional process and the influence of this wet chemical etchant on gate oxide quality has already been extensively studied.
  • Preferably, the H-based solution is a buffered HF(BHF) solution. The BHF solution is formed by mixing 1 part of HF 50% and 7 parts of NH4F 40%. The pH of this solution is higher than 3. Moreover the BHF etch of the oxide spacer is selective towards the gate oxide etch with a ratio about 3:1. The etching time in this case is 20 seconds.
  • After removal of the oxide spacer, a pocket implantation is performed, self-aligned towards the gate and the source-drain junctions. This pocket implantation counters the drain induced barrier lowering phenomenon for small gatelength CMOS devices, allows for maximum drive current and a minimum leakage current, and does not increase the junction capacitance of source and drain junctions considerably (see fig. 1d)
  • For nMOS devices a B pocket implantation at 40 keV is performed and for pMOS devices a P pocket implantation at 100 keV.
  • After pocket implantation, conventional CMOS manufacturing process is continued. An intermediate layer dielectric is deposited, which is patterned for contact windows, filled with a conductor and finally interconnected by one or more metal layers, each separated by an intermediate metal dielectric (see fig. 1e). Table 1
    Composition pH etch rate (nm/s)
    ml ml ml
    HF 49% H2O HF2% 1.5 0.22
    20 470
    HF 49% H2O H2SO4 HF2%
    20 370 100 0 2.15
    HF49% H2O H2SO4 (no HF)
    0 390 100 0 0
    HF 49% H2O H2SO4 HF2%
    20 460 10 0.5 0.38
    HF 49% H2O NH4OH HF2% 8.5 0
    20 430 40
    HF 49% H2O NH4OH HF2% 3 0.15
    20 450 20
    HF 49% H2O NH4OH HF2% 4 0.13
    20 440 30
    HF49% H2O NH4OH HF2% 5 0.1
    20 435 35
    HF49% H2O NH4OH HF2% 2.5 0.13
    20 455 15
    HF49% H2O HCl HF2% 0.52 0.34
    40 930 30
    HF49% H2O HCl HF2% 0.22 0.38
    40 900 60
    HF49% H2O HCl HF2% 0.04 0.42
    40 870 90
    HF49% H2O HCl HF2% -0.08 0.47
    40 840 120
    HF49% H2O
    5 485 HF0.5% 0.18
    B-HF (from the bottle) 4.5 0.045
    500
    B-HF H2O BHF 1/12.5 4 0.08
    40 460
    B-HF H2O NH4OH BHF 1/12.5 6 0.04
    40 450 10
    B-HF H2O H2SO4 BHF 1/12.5 1.5 0.14
    40 450 10
    B-HF H2O BHF 1/7.5 4 0.07
    60 390
    B-HF H2O NH4OH BHF 1/7.5 5.5 0.07
    60 380 10
    B-HF H2O H2SO4 BHF 1/7.5 2.5 0.09
    60 380 10

Claims (4)

  1. Process of a self-aligned pocket implantation in an active transistor having a small gate length comprising the steps of:
    - defining an active area within a semiconductor substrate with a source region, a drain region and a gate;
    - defining a silicon oxide sidewall spacer in between said source region and said gate and in between said drain region and said gate;
    - forming a self-aligned CoSi2 top layer selectively on said exposed drain, and source regions and gate
    - selectively etching the silicon oxide sidewall spacer using a HF-based solution having a pH between 3 and 8.5 by tuning the HF-based solution so as to have a high etch rate for the oxide spacer with a minimum etch rate for the CoSi2 layer;
    - implanting dopants in the source and drain regions in order to achieve a self-aligned pocket implantation.
  2. Process of self-aligned pocket implantation according to claim 1 wherein the dopants are of the opposite kind than the source and drain implants.
  3. Process of self-aligned pocket implantation according to claim 1 wherein the dopants are of the same kind than the source and drain implants.
  4. Use of the process as claimed in anyone of the preceding claims in a CMOS process integration having gate length dimensions less than 0.35 µm.
EP99200531A 1995-06-19 1996-06-19 Process for self-aligned implantation Expired - Lifetime EP0923114B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US242695P 1995-06-19 1995-06-19
US2426 1995-06-19
EP96870078A EP0750338B1 (en) 1995-06-19 1996-06-19 Etching process of CoSi2 layers and process for the fabrication of Schottky-barrier detectors using the same

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP96870078A Division EP0750338B1 (en) 1995-06-19 1996-06-19 Etching process of CoSi2 layers and process for the fabrication of Schottky-barrier detectors using the same

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0923114A2 EP0923114A2 (en) 1999-06-16
EP0923114A3 EP0923114A3 (en) 2000-02-02
EP0923114B1 true EP0923114B1 (en) 2007-01-03

Family

ID=26144401

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP99200531A Expired - Lifetime EP0923114B1 (en) 1995-06-19 1996-06-19 Process for self-aligned implantation

Country Status (1)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0923114B1 (en)

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5162259A (en) * 1991-02-04 1992-11-10 Motorola, Inc. Method for forming a buried contact in a semiconductor device
US5320974A (en) * 1991-07-25 1994-06-14 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Method for making semiconductor transistor device by implanting punch through stoppers

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP0923114A2 (en) 1999-06-16
EP0923114A3 (en) 2000-02-02

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5710450A (en) Transistor with ultra shallow tip and method of fabrication
US6312995B1 (en) MOS transistor with assisted-gates and ultra-shallow “Psuedo” source and drain extensions for ultra-large-scale integration
US6495437B1 (en) Low temperature process to locally form high-k gate dielectrics
US6518136B2 (en) Sacrificial polysilicon sidewall process and rapid thermal spike annealing for advance CMOS fabrication
US6403434B1 (en) Process for manufacturing MOS transistors having elevated source and drain regions and a high-k gate dielectric
US6248637B1 (en) Process for manufacturing MOS Transistors having elevated source and drain regions
US5998849A (en) Semiconductor device having highly-doped source/drain regions with interior edges in a dislocation-free state
EP1205980A1 (en) A method for forming a field effect transistor in a semiconductor substrate
US6372589B1 (en) Method of forming ultra-shallow source/drain extension by impurity diffusion from doped dielectric spacer
US20020003273A1 (en) Igfet with silicide contact on ultra-thin gate
US6756277B1 (en) Replacement gate process for transistors having elevated source and drain regions
US6524920B1 (en) Low temperature process for a transistor with elevated source and drain
JPH07142726A (en) Manufacture of field effect transistor
EP0750338A2 (en) Etching process of CoSi2 layers
JP2874626B2 (en) Method for manufacturing semiconductor device
KR0183490B1 (en) Fabrication process for semiconductor device having mos type field effect transistor
US7247919B1 (en) Method and device to reduce gate-induced drain leakage (GIDL) current in thin gate oxides MOSFETs
US6258646B1 (en) CMOS integrated circuit and method for implanting NMOS transistor areas prior to implanting PMOS transistor areas to optimize the thermal diffusivity thereof
KR0175419B1 (en) Manufacture of semiconductor integrated circuit
US6855592B2 (en) Method for manufacturing semiconductor device
EP0923114A2 (en) Process for self-aligned implantation
JP2897555B2 (en) Method for manufacturing semiconductor device
JP2004247735A (en) Method for forming local wiring of semiconductor device using selective epitaxial growth
KR100315451B1 (en) Method for forming gate electrode and salicide contact of semiconductor devices
JPH07135313A (en) Fet transistor and its fabrication

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19990304

AC Divisional application: reference to earlier application

Ref document number: 750338

Country of ref document: EP

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE DE ES FR GB IT NL

PUAL Search report despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): AT BE DE ES FR GB IT NL

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Free format text: 7H 01L 21/266 A, 7H 01L 21/336 B

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20010502

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AC Divisional application: reference to earlier application

Ref document number: 0750338

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: P

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE DE ES FR GB IT NL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20070103

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20070103

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69636818

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20070215

Kind code of ref document: P

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20070414

NLV1 Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act
ET Fr: translation filed
PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20071005

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20070103

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20070103

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20150527

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20150521

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20150526

Year of fee payment: 20

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R071

Ref document number: 69636818

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: PE20

Expiry date: 20160618

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

Effective date: 20160618