EP0835202A1 - Self-signaling short circuit link for a protected railway section - Google Patents

Self-signaling short circuit link for a protected railway section

Info

Publication number
EP0835202A1
EP0835202A1 EP96937115A EP96937115A EP0835202A1 EP 0835202 A1 EP0835202 A1 EP 0835202A1 EP 96937115 A EP96937115 A EP 96937115A EP 96937115 A EP96937115 A EP 96937115A EP 0835202 A1 EP0835202 A1 EP 0835202A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
short circuit
inductance
detection device
alternating current
rails
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP96937115A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0835202B1 (en
Inventor
Franciscus Antonius Bernardus Maria Van Dommelen
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Railpro BV
Original Assignee
Railpro BV
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Railpro BV filed Critical Railpro BV
Publication of EP0835202A1 publication Critical patent/EP0835202A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0835202B1 publication Critical patent/EP0835202B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B61—RAILWAYS
    • B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
    • B61L23/00—Control, warning or like safety means along the route or between vehicles or trains
    • B61L23/06—Control, warning or like safety means along the route or between vehicles or trains for warning men working on the route

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a detection device for a short circuit link to be applied between or across the rails of a section of railway track, comprising a source of electrical energy and a monitoring device connected to the rails for measuring and monitoring the short circuit resistance caused by the short circuit link.
  • a detection device for a short circuit link to be applied between or across the rails of a section of railway track, comprising a source of electrical energy and a monitoring device connected to the rails for measuring and monitoring the short circuit resistance caused by the short circuit link.
  • the protection of a network of railways by automatic signalling of the presence of trains is generally known.
  • the tracks of the network are divided into electrically insulated sections, which are connected to the so- called track circuiting loop, by which it can be established if there is a train on this section.
  • This track circuiting loop consists of a source of alternating current connected to the rails at one end of the section and a relay (the so-called track circuit relay) connected to the rails at the other end of the section.
  • the object of the invention is to avoid the disadvantages described above and improve safety during work on the track.
  • the electrical energy source is an alternating current source and the monitoring device comprises a resonant circuit and an evaluation device for the evaluation of the resonance produced in the resonant circuit.
  • This system itself can indicate that the short circuit resistance meets the requirements imposed and can provide a local signal of this to the person applying the short circuit. There is a local continuous signal, so that it is not necessary to walk regularly to the signal to check that the signal is at danger, which could easily be forgotten when busy with the work. Safety is thus improved considerably and there is not complete dependence on test protocols.
  • the source of electrical energy preferably provides alternating current, which works together with a resonant circuit in the monitoring device; this allows very low short circuit resistances to be measured reliably. These measurement results are fed to an evaluation device for the evaluation of the resonance produced by the resonant circuit. Moreover, by using a resonant circuit it is always observed when this circuit, across which it is measured, is defective. For, both a short circuit and an interruption will de detected.
  • a reliable choice for the frequency of the alternating current source can be made between 15 and 25 kHz. This frequency is preferably 17 kHz.
  • the resonant circuit comprises an inductance and a capacitor in series and is connected at one end to an output terminal of the alternating current source, the other output of which is connected to one rail.
  • the other end of the resonant circuit is connected to the other rail.
  • the inductance is connected to a comparator for the comparison of the inductance output signal with a reference signal.
  • the level of the resonant voltage across the inductance is measured, for which the inductance is connected to the comparator through an RMS converter. Thereby an additional reliability is achieved by using an extra selection criterion, i.e. the enrgy contents.
  • a pulse generator is provided to control the intermittent switching of the series connection of the alternating current source and the resonant circuit formed by the inductance and capacitor onto the rails, when the comparator is connected to a pulse decoder.
  • the intermittent operation not only saves energy, but by using the pulse generator produces measurements at regular intervals. This frequency can also be used as an additional safety criterion. Moreover, by using the intermittent operation the measurement is insensitive for EM interferences.
  • the detection equipment is also connected to a signalling device that can, if required, provide an external signal.
  • FIG. 1 - a part of the track of a railway network
  • Fig. 2 - a preferred version of the detection device according to the invention.
  • the part of the track shown in Fig. 1 is divided into sections electrically insulated from each other, of which only sections a, b and c are shown in Fig. 1.
  • Fig. 1 illustrates the track circuit for section b only, this track circuit consists of an alternating current source Wl whose output terminals are connected at one end of section b to rails SI and S2 respectively.
  • a track circuit relay Rl is connected to these rails SI and S2 at the other end of this section.
  • section b When work has to be carried out on section b, this section has to be made safe or protected reliably. This protection is achieved, by simulating the presence of a train on the section, for which a short circuit link is placed across the rails SI and S2.
  • a track can be short-circuited in the following ways.
  • the short circuit lance in its simplest form, consists of a metal rod whose ends make contact with the rails SI and S2 with the lowest possible transition resistance by, for example, penetration of the corrosion layer of the rails.
  • a test procedure can, for example, include walking regularly to the signal and checking that the signal is at danger.
  • - Short-circuiting cable with magnets Such a cable is used, for example, by drivers when they observe that an unsafe situation exists on another track. This method is less reliable. Only when the first method is used does the track remain accessible to any works trains.
  • the invention provides a self-signalling short circuit lance, which enables continuous, reliable, local signalling that the conditions for short circuit resistance are being met.
  • the preferred version of a circuit of a short circuit lance is shown in Fig. 2.
  • Fig. 2 shows a part of a section b with the rails SI and S2. Between the rails SI and S2 a short circuit lance KL is fitted.
  • the detection device DT associated with the short circuit lance KL is connected to the rails SI and S2. While a short circuit lance is shown in the version illustrated, the detection device is also suitable for a short-circuiting cable with rail clamps. This method is used when a short circuit lance cannot be used, as for example, at points systems. It is also possible to check if a stationary (works) train, for example a fitting vehicle, produces an adequate short circuit. In addition, adequate short-circuiting by a short-circuiting cable with magnets can also be checked.
  • the detection device DT has an electrical energy source providing alternating current connected by one terminal to the rail SI.
  • This alternating current source W2 places a nearly constant alternating voltage on the rails SI and S2.
  • Measurements have shown voltages of various amplitudes and with frequencies up to 5 kHz on the track.
  • OTC sections are also used for protection, using a voltage with a frequency of 10 kHz. Tramways also use frequencies of from 9.5 to 14.5 kHz for train detection.
  • the frequency of the alternating current source W2 has therefore been selected as higher than 15 kHz. It is advantageous to select a frequency below 25 kHz for the alternating current source W2, to avoid high frequency problems caused by self inductances and capacities in the system. Seventeen kHz is an exceptionally suitable frequency, it is relatively low and does not occur in the track. Moreover, there are no frequencies in the track that have 17 kHz as a higher harmonic. At the same time there is some tolerance around 17 kHz, this allows standard components to be used.
  • the other output terminal of the alternating current source W2 is connected to the other rail S2 through a resonant circuit, this consists of the inductance L and the capacitor C.
  • a resonant circuit this consists of the inductance L and the capacitor C.
  • the level of the output voltage from the band-pass filter B can be measured and compared with a reference value that has been previously set to correspond to a short circuit that meets the requirements imposed. It is certainly preferable to base the comparison on the resonated voltage, since this will result in a measurement and comparison of greater accuracy and reliability. For this reason the output of the band-pass filter B is connected to an RMS converter RMSC, this generates the effective value of the output voltage from the band-pass filter B.
  • the RMS converter output voltage is fed to the comparator CO for comparison with a reference signal REF. When the short circuit meets the applicable conditions, the comparator input signal CO will be greater than the reference signal applied to the comparator. A signal will then appear at the comparator output that indicates a safeguarded situation.
  • a switch SW is inserted in the connection between the LC circuit and the rail S2, this is controlled by a pulse generator that is not shown. By means of this switch SW the measurement is performed intermittently. Two measurements per second is a suitable choice. Since the measurement is carried out twice a second the adequacy of the short circuit will also be determined twice a second. If this is the case the pulse detector PD connected to the comparator CO gives a safe signal to the signalling device SI. The pulse detector will be operated synchronously with the switch SW. The pulsed detection measurement is described below.
  • the measurement circuit consisting of the capacitor C and the inductance L is brought into resonance, this causes an increase in the voltage across the inductance.
  • the level of the voltage increase is a measure of the short circuit value.
  • the voltage across the inductance is measured. It is applied to the input of a 17 kHz band-pass filter, this filters out the 17 kHz signal. Thus, only signals at a frequency of 17 kHz can appear at the output of the band-pass filter.
  • the alternating voltage occurring at the band-pass filter outlet is converted to its RMS value by the RMS converter RMSC.
  • This converter determines the energy content of the 17 kHz voltage appearing across the inductance.
  • the signal from the RMS converter is a direct current voltage whose level corresponds to the actual effective value of the alternating voltage of 17 kHz voltage. Interfering voltages with a frequency of 17 kHz will be reduced to a very low level and later rejected.
  • the RMS converter output signal will also be alternated with the 2 Hz of the pulsed measurement.
  • the RMS value from the converter is applied to the comparator CO and compared within it to the value set in advance for the comparator.
  • the output of the comparator will be high when the measurement voltage is switched on and the short circuit is satisfactory.
  • the comparator output will be low. With a proper short circuit the comparator output will also be alternately high and low.
  • the pulse detector PD is connected to the output of the comparator CO. Only if the output is a square wave can the safe signal be given. All other situations produce an alarm.
  • Pulsed measurement is used for the following reasons: - To save energy, a smaller battery;
  • the entire detection circuit is switched at the rate of interruption of the measurement voltage.
  • the comparator determines if the signal is sufficiently high and low at the pulse rate used, which is checked.
  • the output is also controlled at the same rate, which must also receive an alternating voltage, if it is to deliver a safety signal. In this way the reliability of the system is increased greatly.
  • a continuous or intermittent light signal can be used that is clearly visible to the personnel carrying out the work.
  • the signalling device can also be so constructed that external signalling is possible, for example to the traffic controller. Transmission and reception are also possible. In an alarm situation, both light and audible warning signals could be generated.
  • An electronic solution could be considered, such as a reliable transistor or FET circuit, but switching of light and audible signals through the break contacts of a so-called B relay is another possible method. In a safe situation the self-signalling short circuit lance should hold the B relay in the powered state. An electronic solution could be preferable for various reasons.
  • An additional test button will be included in the detection device circuit to test that an alarm signal will be given.
  • connection and attachment of the self-signalling short circuit system and the short circuit lance should only be removed using one unique key.
  • a reliable short circuit measurement is guaranteed by the increase in the voltage across the inductance. This increase only takes place if there is a circuit of sufficiently low ohmic value between the measuring unit, the short circuit lance and the rails.
  • the following faults can appear in a properly placed short circuit: loss of the supply voltage loss of the 17 kHz alternating voltage defective pulse generator (continuously open or closed) open circuit in the LC circuit short circuit in the capacitor or inductance defective RMS converter defective pulse detector. In all these cases no safety signal will be given.
  • the detection device can possibly be constructed with the additional feature of indicating that the short circuit is unsatisfactory or that the measuring unit is defective.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Train Traffic Observation, Control, And Security (AREA)
  • Testing Of Short-Circuits, Discontinuities, Leakage, Or Incorrect Line Connections (AREA)
  • Electric Propulsion And Braking For Vehicles (AREA)
  • Protection Of Static Devices (AREA)
  • Refuge Islands, Traffic Blockers, Or Guard Fence (AREA)
  • Curtains And Furnishings For Windows Or Doors (AREA)
  • Measuring Instrument Details And Bridges, And Automatic Balancing Devices (AREA)

Abstract

Detection device for a short circuit link to be applied between or across the rails of a section of railway track. The device comprises a source of electrical energy and a monitoring device which are connected to the rails for measuring and monitoring the short circuit resistance caused by the short circuit link. The electrical energy source is an alternating current source and the monitoring device comprises a resonant circuit and an evaluation device for the evaluation of the resonance produced in the resonant circuit.

Description

Self-signalling short circuit link for a protected railway section.
The invention relates to a detection device for a short circuit link to be applied between or across the rails of a section of railway track, comprising a source of electrical energy and a monitoring device connected to the rails for measuring and monitoring the short circuit resistance caused by the short circuit link. The protection of a network of railways by automatic signalling of the presence of trains is generally known. For this purpose the tracks of the network are divided into electrically insulated sections, which are connected to the so- called track circuiting loop, by which it can be established if there is a train on this section. This track circuiting loop consists of a source of alternating current connected to the rails at one end of the section and a relay (the so-called track circuit relay) connected to the rails at the other end of the section. When there is a train on the section the alternating current source is short circuited through the train axles, so that less current flows to the relay and thus it drops out. The signal allowing access to this section will go to red and prevent train movements.
Whenever work is to be carried out on a section it is usual to place a short circuit link between both rails, which simulates the presence of a train on this section, so that the track circuit relay drops out.
The protection during work described above has, however, the disadvantage that, using a test procedure, a check has to be made that the track circuit relay actually has dropped out. This means, in practice, that it is necessary first to walk to the signal to make certain that the signal has been brought to danger by the connection of the short circuit link.
It is known from Patent Abstracts of Japan, vol. 018, no. 620, M-1711, 25 November 1994, JP-A-6,239,236 to use a rail short circuit device for checking the connecting condition between the right and left rails of a railway track and a short circuit member or link. This known device comprises a signal transmitting circuit and a signal detecting circuit connected to the right and left rails respectively. It is detected whether the signal from the signal transmitting circuit is received by the signal detecting circuit or not. This is only a course criterion. It is possible that for some reason the short circuit resistance may change and become so high that the track circuit relay again closes, meaning that the area protected for work is again accessible to trains. Such a dangerous situation cannot be detected by the above known rail short circuit device.
The object of the invention is to avoid the disadvantages described above and improve safety during work on the track.
This object is achieved according to the invention, in that the electrical energy source is an alternating current source and the monitoring device comprises a resonant circuit and an evaluation device for the evaluation of the resonance produced in the resonant circuit.
This system itself can indicate that the short circuit resistance meets the requirements imposed and can provide a local signal of this to the person applying the short circuit. There is a local continuous signal, so that it is not necessary to walk regularly to the signal to check that the signal is at danger, which could easily be forgotten when busy with the work. Safety is thus improved considerably and there is not complete dependence on test protocols.
The source of electrical energy preferably provides alternating current, which works together with a resonant circuit in the monitoring device; this allows very low short circuit resistances to be measured reliably. These measurement results are fed to an evaluation device for the evaluation of the resonance produced by the resonant circuit. Moreover, by using a resonant circuit it is always observed when this circuit, across which it is measured, is defective. For, both a short circuit and an interruption will de detected.
A reliable choice for the frequency of the alternating current source can be made between 15 and 25 kHz. This frequency is preferably 17 kHz.
In a preferred version of the invention the resonant circuit comprises an inductance and a capacitor in series and is connected at one end to an output terminal of the alternating current source, the other output of which is connected to one rail. The other end of the resonant circuit is connected to the other rail. The inductance is connected to a comparator for the comparison of the inductance output signal with a reference signal. To improve the reliability of the short circuit resistance measurement the level of the resonant voltage across the inductance is measured, for which the inductance is connected to the comparator through an RMS converter. Thereby an additional reliability is achieved by using an extra selection criterion, i.e. the enrgy contents. The reliability of the measurement is improved even more by means of a band-pass filter, connected between the inductance and the RMS converter, which filters out interfering frequencies. In a further advantageous version of the invention a pulse generator is provided to control the intermittent switching of the series connection of the alternating current source and the resonant circuit formed by the inductance and capacitor onto the rails, when the comparator is connected to a pulse decoder.
The intermittent operation not only saves energy, but by using the pulse generator produces measurements at regular intervals. This frequency can also be used as an additional safety criterion. Moreover, by using the intermittent operation the measurement is insensitive for EM interferences.
For local signalling the detection equipment is also connected to a signalling device that can, if required, provide an external signal.
The invention will be explained more fully below making use of the drawings.
The drawings show: Fig. 1 - a part of the track of a railway network;
Fig. 2 - a preferred version of the detection device according to the invention. The part of the track shown in Fig. 1 is divided into sections electrically insulated from each other, of which only sections a, b and c are shown in Fig. 1. Fig. 1 illustrates the track circuit for section b only, this track circuit consists of an alternating current source Wl whose output terminals are connected at one end of section b to rails SI and S2 respectively. A track circuit relay Rl is connected to these rails SI and S2 at the other end of this section. When there is a train or other vehicle on this section b, the alternating current source Wl is short-circuited through its wheels and axles, so that relay R drops out as the criterion for the presence of a train or other vehicle on the section in question. This criterion is passed to the signalling equipment to show the section at danger, with the protection of this section also being passed to the traffic controller.
When work has to be carried out on section b, this section has to be made safe or protected reliably. This protection is achieved, by simulating the presence of a train on the section, for which a short circuit link is placed across the rails SI and S2.
Because of this, a short circuit link will also cause the relay to drop out or open and the section will be shown as occupied. Train detection is so adjusted that with a short circuit resistance of, for example, 0.3 Ohms the associated track circuit relay must drop out. To be certain that connecting a short circuit link has caused the track circuit relay to drop out the conditions required must, thus, be met. A track can be short-circuited in the following ways.
- Short circuit lance. The short circuit lance, in its simplest form, consists of a metal rod whose ends make contact with the rails SI and S2 with the lowest possible transition resistance by, for example, penetration of the corrosion layer of the rails. Until now a test procedure has still had to be used to check that the track circuit relay has actually dropped out. A test procedure can, for example, include walking regularly to the signal and checking that the signal is at danger. - Short-circuiting cable with magnets. Such a cable is used, for example, by drivers when they observe that an unsafe situation exists on another track. This method is less reliable. Only when the first method is used does the track remain accessible to any works trains.
The invention provides a self-signalling short circuit lance, which enables continuous, reliable, local signalling that the conditions for short circuit resistance are being met. The preferred version of a circuit of a short circuit lance is shown in Fig. 2.
Fig. 2 shows a part of a section b with the rails SI and S2. Between the rails SI and S2 a short circuit lance KL is fitted. The detection device DT associated with the short circuit lance KL is connected to the rails SI and S2. While a short circuit lance is shown in the version illustrated, the detection device is also suitable for a short-circuiting cable with rail clamps. This method is used when a short circuit lance cannot be used, as for example, at points systems. It is also possible to check if a stationary (works) train, for example a fitting vehicle, produces an adequate short circuit. In addition, adequate short-circuiting by a short-circuiting cable with magnets can also be checked.
The detection device DT has an electrical energy source providing alternating current connected by one terminal to the rail SI. This alternating current source W2 places a nearly constant alternating voltage on the rails SI and S2.
Measurements have shown voltages of various amplitudes and with frequencies up to 5 kHz on the track. OTC sections are also used for protection, using a voltage with a frequency of 10 kHz. Tramways also use frequencies of from 9.5 to 14.5 kHz for train detection.
Thus, the measurement frequency must be outside these ranges. The frequency of the alternating current source W2 has therefore been selected as higher than 15 kHz. It is advantageous to select a frequency below 25 kHz for the alternating current source W2, to avoid high frequency problems caused by self inductances and capacities in the system. Seventeen kHz is an exceptionally suitable frequency, it is relatively low and does not occur in the track. Moreover, there are no frequencies in the track that have 17 kHz as a higher harmonic. At the same time there is some tolerance around 17 kHz, this allows standard components to be used.
The other output terminal of the alternating current source W2 is connected to the other rail S2 through a resonant circuit, this consists of the inductance L and the capacitor C. By using this resonant circuit very low short circuit resistances can be measured. Whenever there is a proper short circuit there will be an increased voltage across the inductance in the LC circuit. The voltage across the inductance L will be passed to a band-pass filter B to filter out frequencies that are not relevant and cause interference.
The level of the output voltage from the band-pass filter B can be measured and compared with a reference value that has been previously set to correspond to a short circuit that meets the requirements imposed. It is certainly preferable to base the comparison on the resonated voltage, since this will result in a measurement and comparison of greater accuracy and reliability. For this reason the output of the band-pass filter B is connected to an RMS converter RMSC, this generates the effective value of the output voltage from the band-pass filter B. The RMS converter output voltage is fed to the comparator CO for comparison with a reference signal REF. When the short circuit meets the applicable conditions, the comparator input signal CO will be greater than the reference signal applied to the comparator. A signal will then appear at the comparator output that indicates a safeguarded situation.
A switch SW is inserted in the connection between the LC circuit and the rail S2, this is controlled by a pulse generator that is not shown. By means of this switch SW the measurement is performed intermittently. Two measurements per second is a suitable choice. Since the measurement is carried out twice a second the adequacy of the short circuit will also be determined twice a second. If this is the case the pulse detector PD connected to the comparator CO gives a safe signal to the signalling device SI. The pulse detector will be operated synchronously with the switch SW. The pulsed detection measurement is described below.
The measurement circuit consisting of the capacitor C and the inductance L is brought into resonance, this causes an increase in the voltage across the inductance. The level of the voltage increase is a measure of the short circuit value. The voltage across the inductance is measured. It is applied to the input of a 17 kHz band-pass filter, this filters out the 17 kHz signal. Thus, only signals at a frequency of 17 kHz can appear at the output of the band-pass filter.
The alternating voltage occurring at the band-pass filter outlet is converted to its RMS value by the RMS converter RMSC. This converter determines the energy content of the 17 kHz voltage appearing across the inductance. The signal from the RMS converter is a direct current voltage whose level corresponds to the actual effective value of the alternating voltage of 17 kHz voltage. Interfering voltages with a frequency of 17 kHz will be reduced to a very low level and later rejected. The RMS converter output signal will also be alternated with the 2 Hz of the pulsed measurement.
The RMS value from the converter is applied to the comparator CO and compared within it to the value set in advance for the comparator. Thus the output of the comparator will be high when the measurement voltage is switched on and the short circuit is satisfactory. At an unsatisfactory level the comparator output will be low. With a proper short circuit the comparator output will also be alternately high and low.
The pulse detector PD is connected to the output of the comparator CO. Only if the output is a square wave can the safe signal be given. All other situations produce an alarm.
Pulsed measurement is used for the following reasons: - To save energy, a smaller battery;
- The entire detection circuit is switched at the rate of interruption of the measurement voltage. The comparator determines if the signal is sufficiently high and low at the pulse rate used, which is checked. The output is also controlled at the same rate, which must also receive an alternating voltage, if it is to deliver a safety signal. In this way the reliability of the system is increased greatly.
Moreover, in this way the correct functioning of the measuring circuit can be checked each time.
In order to show that a proper short circuit has been applied, which complies with the requirements, a continuous or intermittent light signal can be used that is clearly visible to the personnel carrying out the work. The signalling device can also be so constructed that external signalling is possible, for example to the traffic controller. Transmission and reception are also possible. In an alarm situation, both light and audible warning signals could be generated. An electronic solution could be considered, such as a reliable transistor or FET circuit, but switching of light and audible signals through the break contacts of a so-called B relay is another possible method. In a safe situation the self-signalling short circuit lance should hold the B relay in the powered state. An electronic solution could be preferable for various reasons.
An additional test button will be included in the detection device circuit to test that an alarm signal will be given.
There should preferably be protection against removal of the short circuit link and/or the detection device by unauthorized persons. One possibility is that the connection and attachment of the self-signalling short circuit system and the short circuit lance should only be removed using one unique key.
A reliable short circuit measurement is guaranteed by the increase in the voltage across the inductance. This increase only takes place if there is a circuit of sufficiently low ohmic value between the measuring unit, the short circuit lance and the rails.
The following faults can appear in a properly placed short circuit: loss of the supply voltage loss of the 17 kHz alternating voltage defective pulse generator (continuously open or closed) open circuit in the LC circuit short circuit in the capacitor or inductance defective RMS converter defective pulse detector. In all these cases no safety signal will be given. The detection device can possibly be constructed with the additional feature of indicating that the short circuit is unsatisfactory or that the measuring unit is defective.

Claims

1. Detection device for a short circuit link to be applied between or across the rails of a section of railway track, comprising a source of electrical energy and a monitoring device connected to the rails for measuring and monitoring the short circuit resistance caused by the short circuit link, characterized in that the electrical energy source is an alternating current source and the monitoring device comprises a resonant circuit and an evaluation device for the evaluation of the resonance produced in the resonant circuit.
2. Detection device according to claim 1, characterized in that the frequency of the alternating current source lies between 15 and 25 kHz.
3. Detection device according to claim 2, characterized in that the frequency of the alternating current source equals 17 kHz.
4. Detection device according to claims 1, 2 or 3, characterized in that the resonant circuit comprises a series connection of an inductance and a capacitor, which is connected at one side to an output terminal of the alternating current source, of which the other output terminal is connected to the one rail and which is connected at the other side to the other rail and that the inductance is connected to a comparator for comparison of the inductance output signal with a reference signal.
5. Detection device according to claim 4, characterized in that the inductance is connected to the comparator through an RMS converter.
6. Detection device according to claim 5, characterized in that the RMS converter is connected to the inductance through a band-pass filter.
7. Detection device according to claim 4, 5 or 6, characterized in that a pulse generator is present to control the intermittent connection of the series connection of the alternating current source and the resonant circuit formed by the capacitor and the inductance to the rails and that the comparator output is connected to a pulse decoder.
8. Detector device according to one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the detector device is connected to a signalling device.
EP96937115A 1995-06-30 1996-06-28 Detection device for a short circuit link to be applied to a railway section Expired - Lifetime EP0835202B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
NL1000713 1995-06-30
NL1000713A NL1000713C2 (en) 1995-06-30 1995-06-30 Self-detecting short-circuit bridge for a secure railway section.
PCT/NL1996/000268 WO1997002169A1 (en) 1995-06-30 1996-06-28 Self-signaling short circuit link for a protected railway section

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0835202A1 true EP0835202A1 (en) 1998-04-15
EP0835202B1 EP0835202B1 (en) 2000-01-19

Family

ID=19761263

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP96937115A Expired - Lifetime EP0835202B1 (en) 1995-06-30 1996-06-28 Detection device for a short circuit link to be applied to a railway section

Country Status (10)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0835202B1 (en)
AT (1) ATE188929T1 (en)
DE (1) DE69606297T2 (en)
DK (1) DK0835202T3 (en)
HU (1) HUP9900325A3 (en)
NL (1) NL1000713C2 (en)
NO (1) NO976089L (en)
PL (1) PL324261A1 (en)
TR (1) TR199701747T1 (en)
WO (1) WO1997002169A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2431034A (en) * 2005-10-06 2007-04-11 Multiclip Co Ltd Track circuit apparatus for taking possession of a section of track by altering the circuit as an indication of an intention to take possession
NL1033077C2 (en) * 2006-12-18 2008-06-19 Dual Inventive V O F Detection device of a short-circuit bridge.
EP1935747B1 (en) 2006-12-18 2014-11-12 Dual Inventive Holding B.V. Device for detecting a short-circuit bridge
DK2067650T3 (en) 2007-12-04 2021-05-25 Volkerwessels Intellectuele Eigendom B V Short circuit device
NL1036399C2 (en) * 2009-01-09 2010-07-13 Dual Inventive B V DETECTION-DEVICE OF A SHORT-BRIDGE.
CN105676080B (en) * 2015-12-30 2019-07-23 中国神华能源股份有限公司 Railroad track insulation performance test method and test device
CN114966216B (en) * 2022-08-01 2022-11-29 中铁电气化勘测设计研究院有限公司 Steel rail longitudinal resistance and transition resistance measuring system

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3299424A (en) * 1965-05-07 1967-01-17 Jorgen P Vinding Interrogator-responder identification system
FR1574037A (en) * 1968-04-05 1969-07-11
JPH078648B2 (en) * 1990-03-23 1995-02-01 大同信号株式会社 Rail short circuit determination device for track circuit device
JPH06239236A (en) * 1993-02-19 1994-08-30 Sankooshiya:Kk Rail short circuit device

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO9702169A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE69606297T2 (en) 2000-09-14
NO976089L (en) 1998-02-18
WO1997002169A1 (en) 1997-01-23
ATE188929T1 (en) 2000-02-15
TR199701747T1 (en) 1998-04-21
DE69606297D1 (en) 2000-02-24
NO976089D0 (en) 1997-12-29
DK0835202T3 (en) 2000-05-08
EP0835202B1 (en) 2000-01-19
NL1000713C2 (en) 1996-12-31
HUP9900325A3 (en) 1999-11-29
HUP9900325A2 (en) 1999-05-28
PL324261A1 (en) 1998-05-11

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
KR100961899B1 (en) Detecting apparatus and the method of rail damage
EP1017577B1 (en) Railway wheel detector
EP0539046B1 (en) Railway track circuits
KR100669225B1 (en) AF Track Circuit
EP0835202B1 (en) Detection device for a short circuit link to be applied to a railway section
CN103318227A (en) System and method for monitoring coding of railway main tracks
JP5455745B2 (en) Abnormal rail identification device
NL1033581C2 (en) Detection device of a short-circuit bridge.
US11945484B2 (en) Shunt frequency check and transmit system
EP1935747B1 (en) Device for detecting a short-circuit bridge
EP2236386A1 (en) System for detecting the presence of an approaching train in a track section
EP3067246B1 (en) A device and a method for monitoring the operability of a signal connection
JP6960326B2 (en) Train information judgment device and railroad crossing control system at railroad crossings
KR20030062030A (en) Power line detector
US4250484A (en) Alarm system for detecting a plurality of different alarm conditions
AU2015100292A4 (en) A device and a method for monitoring the operability of a signal connection
KR101429258B1 (en) Portable train approaching warning device using railroad track, and method for train approaching warning in the same
GB2226418A (en) Testing alarm circuits
JP2002037071A (en) Ground element with self-diagnostic function
NL2001001C2 (en) Conductive bridge monitoring device for rails of track for rail vehicle, has signal recording device recording electrical signals in track circuit, and signal indicating device indicating voltage variations between rails
RU2278046C1 (en) Track circuit
ITMI20012819A1 (en) DEVICE FOR SIMULATING A RAILWAY TRACK
SU1122539A1 (en) Device for warning about approaching train
US20090309610A1 (en) Electrical safety devices
WO2024094809A1 (en) Railway detection system, railway infrastructure and method for detecting the presence of a railway vehicle

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19971223

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

RTI1 Title (correction)

Free format text: DETECTION DEVICE FOR A SHORT CIRCUIT LINK TO BE APPLIED TO A RAILWAY SECTION

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19990616

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.

Effective date: 20000119

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20000119

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: THE PATENT HAS BEEN ANNULLED BY A DECISION OF A NATIONAL AUTHORITY

Effective date: 20000119

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 188929

Country of ref document: AT

Date of ref document: 20000215

Kind code of ref document: T

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: TROESCH SCHEIDEGGER WERNER AG

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69606297

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20000224

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

ET Fr: translation filed
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20000419

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: T3

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20000628

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: THE PATENT HAS BEEN ANNULLED BY A DECISION OF A NATIONAL AUTHORITY

Effective date: 20000630

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Payment date: 20010611

Year of fee payment: 6

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20010628

Year of fee payment: 6

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20010710

Year of fee payment: 6

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Payment date: 20011228

Year of fee payment: 6

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: IF02

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20020628

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20020629

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20020630

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20020630

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20020731

EUG Se: european patent has lapsed
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: EBP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: HK

Ref legal event code: WD

Ref document number: 1010176

Country of ref document: HK

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Payment date: 20080627

Year of fee payment: 13

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20080624

Year of fee payment: 13

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20080624

Year of fee payment: 13

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20080626

Year of fee payment: 13

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20080630

Year of fee payment: 13

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20080701

Year of fee payment: 13

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: *RAILPRO B.V.

Effective date: 20090630

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20090628

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20100226

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090630

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090628

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100101

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090630

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090628

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090628

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20130611

Year of fee payment: 18

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: V1

Effective date: 20140101

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140101