EP0765187A1 - Improved wet scrubbing method and apparatus for removing sulfur oxides from combustion effluents - Google Patents

Improved wet scrubbing method and apparatus for removing sulfur oxides from combustion effluents

Info

Publication number
EP0765187A1
EP0765187A1 EP95925239A EP95925239A EP0765187A1 EP 0765187 A1 EP0765187 A1 EP 0765187A1 EP 95925239 A EP95925239 A EP 95925239A EP 95925239 A EP95925239 A EP 95925239A EP 0765187 A1 EP0765187 A1 EP 0765187A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
slurry
calcium carbonate
reaction tank
calcium
tower
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP95925239A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0765187A4 (en
Inventor
Jonas S. Klingspor
Even Bakke
Gerald E. Bresowar
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Alstom Power Inc
Original Assignee
ABB Flakt Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US08/257,698 external-priority patent/US5635149A/en
Application filed by ABB Flakt Inc filed Critical ABB Flakt Inc
Publication of EP0765187A1 publication Critical patent/EP0765187A1/en
Publication of EP0765187A4 publication Critical patent/EP0765187A4/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/34Chemical or biological purification of waste gases
    • B01D53/46Removing components of defined structure
    • B01D53/48Sulfur compounds
    • B01D53/50Sulfur oxides
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F23COMBUSTION APPARATUS; COMBUSTION PROCESSES
    • F23JREMOVAL OR TREATMENT OF COMBUSTION PRODUCTS OR COMBUSTION RESIDUES; FLUES 
    • F23J15/00Arrangements of devices for treating smoke or fumes
    • F23J15/02Arrangements of devices for treating smoke or fumes of purifiers, e.g. for removing noxious material
    • F23J15/04Arrangements of devices for treating smoke or fumes of purifiers, e.g. for removing noxious material using washing fluids
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/34Chemical or biological purification of waste gases
    • B01D53/46Removing components of defined structure
    • B01D53/48Sulfur compounds
    • B01D53/50Sulfur oxides
    • B01D53/501Sulfur oxides by treating the gases with a solution or a suspension of an alkali or earth-alkali or ammonium compound
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/34Chemical or biological purification of waste gases
    • B01D53/46Removing components of defined structure
    • B01D53/48Sulfur compounds
    • B01D53/50Sulfur oxides
    • B01D53/501Sulfur oxides by treating the gases with a solution or a suspension of an alkali or earth-alkali or ammonium compound
    • B01D53/502Sulfur oxides by treating the gases with a solution or a suspension of an alkali or earth-alkali or ammonium compound characterised by a specific solution or suspension
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/34Chemical or biological purification of waste gases
    • B01D53/46Removing components of defined structure
    • B01D53/48Sulfur compounds
    • B01D53/50Sulfur oxides
    • B01D53/501Sulfur oxides by treating the gases with a solution or a suspension of an alkali or earth-alkali or ammonium compound
    • B01D53/504Sulfur oxides by treating the gases with a solution or a suspension of an alkali or earth-alkali or ammonium compound characterised by a specific device
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F23COMBUSTION APPARATUS; COMBUSTION PROCESSES
    • F23JREMOVAL OR TREATMENT OF COMBUSTION PRODUCTS OR COMBUSTION RESIDUES; FLUES 
    • F23J15/00Arrangements of devices for treating smoke or fumes
    • F23J15/006Layout of treatment plant
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F23COMBUSTION APPARATUS; COMBUSTION PROCESSES
    • F23JREMOVAL OR TREATMENT OF COMBUSTION PRODUCTS OR COMBUSTION RESIDUES; FLUES 
    • F23J2215/00Preventing emissions
    • F23J2215/20Sulfur; Compounds thereof
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F23COMBUSTION APPARATUS; COMBUSTION PROCESSES
    • F23JREMOVAL OR TREATMENT OF COMBUSTION PRODUCTS OR COMBUSTION RESIDUES; FLUES 
    • F23J2217/00Intercepting solids
    • F23J2217/10Intercepting solids by filters
    • F23J2217/102Intercepting solids by filters electrostatic
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F23COMBUSTION APPARATUS; COMBUSTION PROCESSES
    • F23JREMOVAL OR TREATMENT OF COMBUSTION PRODUCTS OR COMBUSTION RESIDUES; FLUES 
    • F23J2219/00Treatment devices
    • F23J2219/40Sorption with wet devices, e.g. scrubbers

Definitions

  • the invention relates to improvements enabling the removal of sulfur oxides (SO x ) from combustion effluents with greater efficiency and with economies in capital and operating costs.
  • the technology for wet scrubbing combustion effluents to remove SO x provides gas-liquid contact in a number of different configurations. Among the most prominent are the single- and double-loop countercurrent spray towers and towers which employ both cocurrent and countercurrent sections.
  • the single-loop, open-tower systems employing calcium carbonate to react with the SO x are the simplest in construction and operation. These systems are often preferred because they can be operated with low pressure drop and have a low tendency to scale or plug.
  • the advantages of their simplicity and reliability have, however, been offset in some situations by their large size. For example, because they do not employ any trays or packings to improve contact between the effluent and the scrubbing liquid, tower heights are typically high and many levels of spray nozzles have been employed to assure good contact.
  • Open spray towers i.e., those not having packings, trays or other means for facilitating gas-liquid contact
  • Open spray towers are simple in design and provide high reliability. They are especially useful in coal-fired power stations where the evolution of chlorides has caused a number of problems, including reduced reactivity of the scrubbing solution and severe corrosion of scrubber internals.
  • Another factor favoring the use of open spray towers is their inherent low pressure loss and resulting fan power economy.
  • Calcium carbonate (commercially available in a number of forms including limestone) is a material of choice because it meets these criteria and, when properly processed, yields process byproducts that can be easily disposed of as landfill or sold as gypsum.
  • the height of the spray contacting zone in these towers is not given, but typical values will be on the order of from about 6 to about 15 meters, historically considered an important factor in engineering an efficient system which can be expected to reliably remove at least 95% of the SO x from combustion effluents.
  • the ratio of the quantity of slurry to the quantity of gas (L/G) is said to be arguably the single most significant design parameter.
  • the L/G affects the cost of pumping, the cost of holding tanks and other operational and economic factors.
  • the cost of pumping the limestone slurry increases proportionally with the tower height. It would be desirable to decrease L/G requirements and height for open spray towers.
  • Sulfur oxides (SO x ), principally SO 2 , are absorbed in the descending scrubbing slurry and collected in a reaction tank where solid calcium sulfite and solid calcium sulfate are formed.
  • the reaction tank is oxygenated to force the production of the sulfate. Once the crystals of sulfate are grown to a sufficient size, they are separated from the slurry in the reaction tank. ln a paper by K. R.
  • a scrubbing tower is depicted as including a hydrocyclone loop which separates a gypsum slurry from a wet scrubber into a coarse solids stream and a fine solids stream, with the fine solids stream being returned to the scrubber.
  • a hydrocyclone loop which separates a gypsum slurry from a wet scrubber into a coarse solids stream and a fine solids stream, with the fine solids stream being returned to the scrubber.
  • a scrubbing slurry composed of calcium carbonate, calcium sulfate, calcium sulfite, and other non-reacting solids flows downwardly while the SO x -laden effluent gas flows upwardly.
  • the SO x principally SO 2 , is absorbed in the descending scrubbing slurry and is collected in a reaction tank where calcium sulfite and calcium sulfate are formed.
  • the reaction tank is oxygenated to force the production of sulfate over sulfite.
  • blow down stream It is known to reduce the chloride content of the scrubbing slurry by the use of a blow down stream.
  • the blow down is taken from the reaction tank or from water recovered from gypsum recovered from the process.
  • the invention improves a single-loop, open-tower, counter ⁇ current limestone wet scrubbing process for reducing the concentration of SO x (principally SO 2 ) in flue gases.
  • SO x principally SO 2
  • the invention provides an improved apparatus capable of achieving the noted improvements and will be described in detail in the following description.
  • the process comprises: (a) directing a flow of flue gas containing SO x upwardly through a vertical scrubbing tower at a bulk flow velocity of greater than about 4.5, and preferably up to about 6, meters per second; (b) introducing into a vertical scrubbing section within said tower, a spray of droplets of an aqueous slurry of finely divided calcium carbonate, calcium sulfate, calcium sulfite, and other non-reactive solids, the calcium carbonate preferably having a weight median diameter of 6 ⁇ or less with 99% by weight less than 44 ⁇ , and a total molar ratio of calcium-containing to sulfur-containing compounds in the solids of at least 1.1 to 1.2, to contact the flue gas while descending through the tower countercurrently to the flow of flue gas; (c) collecting the slurry in a reaction tank after contact with the flue gas; (d) withdrawing slurry from the reaction tank, preferably after an average residence time of eight hours or less; (e) subject
  • the slurry be introduced from spray nozzles, alternating between upward and downward orientation from two spray levels spaced from about 1 to about 2 meters apart. It is also preferred that the total tower height in the spray contacting zone be less than about 6, and preferably less than about 4, meters in height, as it has been determined that height is not so important for reliably removing 95% or more of the SO x from combustion effluents. It is an advantage of the invention that the tower diameter can be relatively small, so that the operating bulk velocity of flue gas passing vertically through the spray contacting zone, based only on the cross sectional area and neglecting the area taken up by spray headers and nozzles, be no less than 4.5 and preferably up to 6 meters per second.
  • This higher velocity provides a means of suspending liquid in the tower without increasing tower height and without adding packing or trays for liquid holdup, and the liquid so suspended is more reactive due to the increased time for dissolution of the calcium carbonate.
  • a distinct advantage of the invention is to increase tower contacting time without adding tower height, while at the same time maintaining the simplicity of design, construction, operation, and maintenance of an open spray tower.
  • the median size of the calcium carbonate particles in the reaction tank is maintained within the range of from about 2 to about 6 ⁇ , and the weight median particle size of the finely-divided calcium carbonate as introduced is less than about 8 ⁇ , with at least 99% (e.g., 99.5 %) by weight of the particles being less than 44 ⁇ .
  • the molar ratio of calcium-containing to sulfur- containing compounds in the solid phase of the scrubber slurry be high. High ratios make more alkalinity available for SO x removal, thus improving the absorptive capacity of the liquid.
  • a high ratio is not economical because valuable calcium-containing compounds, specifically calcium carbonate, will be wasted with the removal of sulfur compounds via the dewatering system.
  • the invention permits operation with a scrubbing slurry in the spray tower for which the solid calcium carbonate concentration is much higher than economically viable for other systems.
  • the hydrocyclone is effective in increasing the relative concentration of available calcium and alkalinity in the tank.
  • the scrubbing tower comprises at least a first entrainment separator to remove a significant amount of the entrained moisture and to turn the direction of flow of the flue gases by at least 30° from the vertical axis of the tower.
  • the majority of droplets having diameters less than about 100 ⁇ are eliminated either by dropping them out of the effluent or consolidating them to form larger droplets which can more easily be removed by a downstream mist eliminator.
  • the first entrainment separator is preferably followed by a generally vertical mist eliminator.
  • the invention provides an improved wet scrubbing process for reducing the concentration of SO x in a flue gas, comprising: (a) directing a flow of flue gas upwardly through a scrubbing tower; (b) introducing a spray of an aqueous slurry of finely-divided calcium carbonate, calcium sulfate, calcium sulfite, and non-reactive solids to descend through the tower countercurrently to the flow of flue gas, the weight median size of the calcium carbonate particles being within the range of from about 2 to about 6 ⁇ ; (c) following contact with the flue gas, collecting the slurry in a reaction tank; (d) maintaining a high reactivity in the slurry by withdrawing slurry from the reaction tank and subjecting slurry withdrawn to treatment in a hydrocyclone to provide a recycle stream rich in fine particles of calcium carbonate and non-reactive solids and another stream rich in calcium sulfate, both of said streams containing dissolved chlorides, and dis
  • the process permits operation at pH values that also enhance reactivity.
  • the pH of the slurry in the reaction tank is within the range of from about 5.0 to about 6.3, and most preferably in the range of from about 5.8 to about 6.3.
  • the molar ratio of calcium-containing to sulfur-containing compounds in the recycle stream is maintained at a value greater than about 1.3, preferably above about 1.4. Also, it is preferable to maintain a suspended solids concentration of less than about 15%, and most preferably less than about 5%, in the recycle stream.
  • the process further includes determining the chloride content of the slurry, and discharging a portion of the recycle stream should the value exceed a predetermined maximum allowable chloride content. Even more preferably, the process includes determining the solids density of the recycle stream, and discharging a portion of the recycle stream whenever the solids density exceeds a predetermined control value. In this last matter, the fraction of non-reactive solids are controlled.
  • the invention provides an improved wet scrubbing apparatus for reducing the concentration of SO x in flue gases, comprising: (a) a scrubbing tower comprising a gas inlet duct, a gas outlet duct, and a vertical scrubbing section, configured to direct a flow of flue gas containing SO x upwardly through said scrubbing section; (b) an array of spray devices positioned within said scrubbing section configured to introduce a spray of an aqueous slurry of finely-divided calcium carbonate, calcium sulfate, calcium sulfite, and non-reactive solids to descend through the tower countercurrently to the flow of flue gas; (c) a reaction tank located below said array of spray devices to enable collection of the slurry after a period of contact with said flue gas within said vertical scrubbing section, said reaction tank being of a size suitable to permit reaction of the SO x with the calcium carbonate to form crystals of gypsum having a weight
  • Figure 1 is a schematic view of a preferred embodiment of the process of the invention employing a single-loop, open-tower, countercurrent limestone wet scrubber;
  • FIG 2 is a more detailed schematic view of a scrubbing tower of the type shown in Figure 1 ;
  • Figure 3 is a partial side elevational view of the arrangement of spray nozzles in two spray levels shown in the tower of Figure 2;
  • Figure 4 is a bottom plan view of the spray nozzles in the two spray levels for a spray tower of the type shown in Figure 2;
  • Figure 5 is a perspective view of the entrainment separator shown in the spray tower of Figures 1 and 2.
  • the improvements of the invention have preferred application to coal-fired utility boiler flue gases, and in some aspects are particularly effective for high chloride operations such as incinerators. While the advantages may be the greatest in these types of operations, the invention is by no means limited to them. Effluents from the combustion of all types of carbonaceous materials can be treated, also including natural gas, synthetic gas, fuel oils, bitumens and residual fuel oils, domestic and industrial solid or other combustible waste, and the like.
  • Figure 1 is a single-loop, open-tower, countercurrent limestone wet scrub- bing operation for removing sulfur oxides, principally as SO 2 , from combustion effluents.
  • Limestone is the preferred form of calcium carbonate but can be replaced with another form, if desired.
  • other forms of calcium carbonate include oyster shells, aragonite, calcite, chalk, marble, marl, and travertine. It can be mined or manufactured. In this description, the terms calci ⁇ um carbonate and limestone are used interchangeably.
  • the limestone is finely divided, preferably by grinding as described below, to achieve a weight median diameter of about 10 ⁇ or less, with 99% below 44 ⁇ . This is extremely fine for wet scrubbing in an open tower with a countercurrent flow of limestone slurry.
  • the more typical grind size of the prior art is a weight median diameter of 15 ⁇ or less with no more than 95% of the particles less than 44 ⁇ .
  • the preferred grind size of the invention will yield particles with a weight median particle size of less than about 8 ⁇ , with 90% (e.g., 99.5%) by weight of the particles being less than 44 ⁇ .
  • the use of a grind of the preferred size has several advantages.
  • FIG. 1 shows an effluent, such as from a coal-fired industrial or utility boiler, entering a suitable means 10 for removing particulates, such as an electrostatic precipitator or fabric filter, which removes entrained solids to a practical extent.
  • a suitable means 10 for removing particulates such as an electrostatic precipitator or fabric filter, which removes entrained solids to a practical extent.
  • the cleaned flue gas is then passed via duct 20 to wet scrubbing tower 100 wherein it flows upwardly, countercurrent to a spray of an aqueous slurry which contains finely-divided limestone discharged within a vertical scrubbing section 110 from two levels of spray nozzles. From the scrubbing section 110, the gas continues through gas outlet duct 120.
  • the tower is configured to direct a flow of flue gas upwardly through the vertical scrubbing section.
  • reaction tank 130 The scrubbing slurry falling through the vertical scrubbing section 110 is collected in reaction tank 130.
  • the reaction tank 130 is preferably of a size suitable to permit reaction of the SO 2 with the calcium carbonate to form crystals of gypsum having a weight median diameter at least 2, and preferably from 5 to 10, times as large as the particles of calcium carbonate added as feed.
  • the vertical scrubbing section 110 contains an array of spray devices positioned within it.
  • the array is configured to introduce a spray of an aqueous slurry of finely-divided calcium carbonate to descend through the tower countercurrently to the flow of flue gas.
  • the Figure illustrates a bank of spray nozzles which is shown to include two levels 112, 112'of nozzles. Each of the nozzles 114 (see Figure 2) is fed slurry from a header 116, 116', or 116". It is typical to also include a third level to permit one level to be off line for repair or cleaning while two remain in operation.
  • the nozzles are preferably arranged with a spacing between levels of from about 1 to less than about 2 meters and with the direction of flow from adja- cent nozzles in a given level alternating between upward and downward.
  • the preferred embodiments of the invention reduce the spacing between the nozzles, reduce the number of levels in use at any time (preferably to 2), and increase the rate of gas flow upwardly through the vertical scrubbing section.
  • the preferred flow patterns of both the slurry being sprayed and the effluent passing upward through the tower are illustrated in Figure 4.
  • nozzle is a centrifugal nozzle which forms a spray at an angle ⁇ of within the range of from about 90 to about 140°, preferably about 120°.
  • nozzle is a Whirljet 300 gallon per minute nozzle available from Spraying Systems Co., Wheaton, Illinois. Droplet sizes are preferably in the range of from about 100 to about 6000 ⁇ , typically about 2000 ⁇ , Sauter mean diameter as measured by a Malvern Particle Analyzer.
  • Each of the headers 116 is oriented at an angle with respect to the header in the next upper or lower rack.
  • the angle is preferably 90° when two or three racks are employed.
  • the resi ⁇ dence time in the reaction tank is reduced from the typical commercial value of about 15 hours or more down to less than about 8 hours, more typically about 6 hours. This is facilitated by the improved dissolution rate of fine calcium carbonate particles and, to some extent, the relatively fast precipitation rate of calcium sulfate to form gypsum particles.
  • the reactive properties of the slurry are, in turn, enhanced by the separation of calcium sulfate from calcium carbonate in the slurry and recycling the calcium carbonate to the slurry as very fine particles which dissolve rapidly in the reaction tank.
  • the reduction of the residence time in the reaction tank has a positive impact on overall process efficiency as well as a number of advantages in terms of processing ease, equip ⁇ ment sizing and quality of the byproduct gypsum.
  • the bulk gas velocities of the flue gas moving through the vertical scrubbing section 110 are above 4.5, and preferably up to about 6, meters per second. These gas velocities are high in the context of single-loop, open-tower wet limestone scrubbers and are employed by the invention preferably in combination with other innovative approaches to improve overall process efficiency.
  • the preferred scrubbing towers of the invention enable the treatment of flue gases with practical, low pressure drops and lower relative amounts of aqueous slurry, e.g. lower L/G ratios.
  • the sulfur oxides in the effluent are absorbed into the aqueous phase of the slurry, forming bisulfite and hydrogen ions. Some bisulfite oxidizes to sulfate, releasing even more hydrogen ions. As the droplets become saturated with hydrogen ions, calcium carbonate begins to dissolve at an increasing rate, thus forming calcium ions and bicarbonate. The finely-pulverized calcium carbonate is very effective at absorbing hydrogen ions, thereby improving the absorptive capacity of the aqueous phase in the tower spray zone.
  • the high gas velocities employed according to the preferred embodiments, and the preferred spray pattern tend to maintain the slurry droplets suspended with a degree of fluidization to achieve enhanced contact.
  • Figure 1 shows limestone being finely divided in a mill 170, classified by cyclone 172, captured by bag house 174 and metered through air lock 176 into the pressurized flow of air in line 178.
  • the limestone which is introduced into the reaction tank to replenish the calcium carbonate can be made within well-defined particle size ranges, free from large particles, those greater than about 44 ⁇ .
  • the exclusion of the large particles from the limestone introduced into the reaction tank is a principal feature permitting the reaction tank of the invention to be made substantially smaller than is presently employed in conventional scrubbers.
  • the air in line 178 facilitates supplying oxygen for the oxidation of sulfite and bisulfite ions to sulfate ions.
  • the tank is preferably stirred by conventional means which are not illustrated in the Figure.
  • slurry is withdrawn from reaction tank 130 for concentrating the reactive calcium carbonate for recycle and reducing the level of solids, principally by removing gypsum.
  • Figure 1 shows slurry being withdrawn from reaction tank 130 via line 183 and passed to hydrocyclone 181.
  • the hydrocyclone is especially effective in the operation of the invention because it can rapidly and effectively separate the very fine particles of limestone from the larger particles of calcium sulfate.
  • the particles of the calcium sulfate preferably have a weight average diameter of from about 25 to about 55 ⁇ .
  • the separation of the smaller particles of limestone provides a recycle stream 174 rich in calcium carbonate and a discharge stream 176 rich in calcium sulfate.
  • the weight average particle size of the calcium carbonate in the reaction tank and therefore in the recycle stream 184 is in the range of from about 2 to about 6 ⁇ .
  • Figure 1 shows the preferred form of the invention wherein the recycle stream is concentrated in terms of calcium carbonate and useful process water in hydrocyclone 181.
  • the preferred sizes for the calcium carbonate particles will have a weight median diameter in the range of from about 2 to about 6 ⁇ .
  • the calcium sulfate particles will have a weight median diameter within the range of from about 25 to about 55 ⁇ .
  • Reaction tank 130 is located below the array of spray devices to enable collection of the slurry after a period of contact with the flue gas within the vertical scrubbing section 110.
  • the reaction tank 130 is of a size suitable to permit reaction of the SO 2 with the calcium carbonate to form crystals of gypsum having a weight median diameter at least 2, and preferably from 5 to 10, times as large as the particles of calcium carbonate added as feed.
  • the solids concentration of calcium carbonate can be increased by about 20 to about 50% above the concentrations attainable in countercurrent designs of the prior art. It is a further advantage of the invention that the slurry will have a higher stoichiometric ratio of calcium-containing to sulfur-containing compounds than prior art systems, typically being at least 1.3 and preferably being about 1.4 or greater.
  • This system includes at least one pump 182 and associated conduit 183 for withdrawing slurry from the reaction tank and delivering slurry to the hydrocyclone.
  • the sulfur oxides in the effluent are absorbed into the aqueous phase of the slurry in vertical scrubbing section 110 and react with available alkalinity in ' the form of hydroxide ions to form bisulfite, which can be partially oxidized in the scrubbing section 110 and almost fully oxidized in the reaction tank 130 to form sulfate.
  • the alkalinity is principally derived from the dissolution of calcium carbonate to form bicarbonate and hydroxide ions, which occurs both in the scrubbing section 110 and in the reaction tank 130.
  • An oxygen sparge as conventional in the art, is preferably employed to assure sufficient reaction, although some oxygen can be obtained from the flue gas itself in the scrubbing section 110.
  • reaction tank 130 which collects the slurry. It is one of the novel and improved features of the invention that the residence time in the reaction tank is reduced from the typical commercial value of about 15 hours down to about 6 hours. The reduction of the residence time in the reaction tank has a number of advantages in terms of processing ease, equipment sizing and quality of the byproduct gypsum.
  • the pH of the slurry in the reaction tank 130 is preferably in the range of from about 5.0 to about 6.3, most preferably from about 5.8 to about 6.3. Higher pH indicates a higher available alkalinity in the slurry liquid and a correspondingly higher capacity of the liquid to absorb SO 2 . It is an advantage of the invention that, because the calcium carbonate is supplied as fine particles and is recycled as will be explained later, also in the form of fine particles, a higher available alkalinity is possible. Low pH is typically employed on systems of prior art to increase the rate of reaction of calcium carbonate, but this normally reduces the absorption of SO 2 in the scrubbing section because the decreased available alkalinity.
  • the small particle size of the present invention offers increased available alkalinity even at lower than desired pH, thereby offsetting to a large extent the impact of low pH on the scrubbing capacity of the slurry.
  • a spray slurry supply means comprising at least one pump 122 and associated conduit 124 for withdrawing slurry from the reaction tank 110 and delivering slurry to the array of spray devices positioned within the scrubbing section.
  • Figure 1 shows limestone being finely divided in a mill 170, classified by cyclone 172, captured by bag house 174 and metered through air lock 176 into the pressurized flow of air in line 178, which in turn is injected directly into the scrubber 100 or into the duct 20 immediately upstream of the scrubber.
  • the limestone from the baghouse 174 may be mixed in a tank and pumped to the reaction tank 130.
  • the size of the pulverized material can be closely controlled.
  • the size of the particles is particularly critical to the invention.
  • the makeup stream of calcium carbonate has a weight median particle size of about 8 ⁇ or less with 99% or more of the particles less than 44 ⁇ , as fed to replenish the calcium carbonate lost to the reaction with SO x and to the byproduct gypsum and with soluble chlorides as will be explained later.
  • the air in line 178 facilitates supplying oxygen for the oxidation of calcium sulfite to calcium sulfate.
  • the tank is preferably stirred by conventional means which are not illustrated in the Figure.
  • a slurry quality maintenance system depicted generally as 180.
  • calcium carbonate is supplied as finely-divided particles as described, and a hydrocyclone 181 is employed to remove a portion of the slurry in reaction tank 130 for the purposes of concentrating fine particles of calcium carbonate for recycle as well as for discharging gypsum.
  • the hydrocyclone 181 separates the slurry from the reaction tank into a recycle stream 184 rich in small particles of calcium carbonate and non-reactive solids and another containing a majority of relatively larger particles of calcium sulfate.
  • the preferred sizes for the calcium carbonate and non-reactive solids particles will have a weight median diameter in the range of from about 1 to about 8 ⁇ , preferably from about 2 to about 6 ⁇ .
  • the calcium sulfate particles will have a weight median diameter within the range of from about 25 to about 55 ⁇ .
  • the weight median diameters of particles of calcium sulfate will be at least 2, and more preferably from 5 to 10, times greater than those of calcium carbonate.
  • This system includes at least one pump 182 and associated conduit 183 for withdrawing slurry from the reaction tank and delivering slurry to the hydrocyclone.
  • a recycle conduit 184 is shown to lead from the hydrocyclone 181 to the reaction tank 130 to carry a recycle stream rich in calcium carbonate from the hydrocyclone.
  • An important feature of the system is achieving blow down from the recycle overflow, namely from recycle stream 184.
  • a discharge conduit 185 in communication with the recycle conduit 184 which is adapted to remove a portion of the recycle stream from the recycle conduit. It is preferred to provide a monitor for the chloride content of the slurry in line 183 or elsewhere, and to control the amount of slurry to blow down from line 185 to control the chloride content in the slurry within reasonable values, e.g., below about 30,000 mg/l, and preferably below 20,000 mg/l.
  • Stream 185 has the highest concentration of chlorides, being equal to the concentration in the reaction tank, and therefore is the best source of chloride purge in the system.
  • non-reactive solids in the reaction tank 130 which enter the system with the calcium carbonate or as entrained solids in the gas stream 20 and are composed of relatively small particles, with weight median sizes ranging from about 4 to about 12 ⁇ , will tend to accumulate preferentially in the recycle stream 184, with their concentration growing in the recycle tank 130.
  • Monitoring of these non-reactive solids in the recycle stream can be accomplished by chemical means (i.e., analysis for a characteristic specie, e.g., silica, iron, or others) or by physical means (i.e., either by particle size distribution analysis , total solids concentration, or some other suitable method).
  • the preferred means of control is to adjust the rate of stream 185 up or down as required to meet the most stringent limit for either chlorides or non-reactive solids. It is desirable to maintain the level of non-reactive solids generally below about 20% by weight, and preferentially below 15% of the total solids in the reaction tank 130. Solids thus removed from the reaction tank via conduit 185 may be disposed with the blow down liquid, separated from the liquid, or in some other way treated and made suitable for disposal or other uses. The blow down liquid may also be treated in some manner to make the stream suitable for disposal or for some other use.
  • blow down stream 185 It is not the intention of this invention to limit in any way the possible dispositions for the blow down stream 185, but rather to acknowledge that there are numerous methods for treating the stream, separating it into fractions, recycling all or a portion of it, and so forth. Such methods and means for treating stream 185 are beyond the scope of the present invention.
  • a calcium sulfate slurry recovery conduit 186 leading from the hydrocyclone to remove calcium sulfate slurry from the hydrocyclone wherein the calcium sulfate is present as particles larger in size than the particles of calcium carbonate.
  • Figure 1 shows the preferred form of the invention wherein the recycle stream 184 is fed back to the reaction tank 130.
  • An advantage of operating in this manner according to the invention is the ability to greatly increase the available alkalinity in the liquid droplets which come into contact with the SO x - laden effluent.
  • the stoichiometric ratio of calcium-containing to sulfur- containing compounds in recycle stream 184 will be in the range of from about 1.2 to about 2.0, most preferably from about 1.3 to about 1.4.
  • the concentration of suspended solids in the recycle stream will typically be in the range of from about 1 to about 10%, by weight, most typically from about 2 to about 6%. Separation of the majority of the calcium sulfate from the limestone by hydrocyclone 182, in addition to raising the noted stoichiometric ratio and the available alkalinity, also decreases the solids content of the slurry.
  • reaction tank has a high stoichiometric ratio of calcium-containing to sulfur-containing compounds, e.g. on the order of from about 1.1 to about 1.6, preferably from about 1.2 to about 1.3.
  • Preferred solids content of stream 183 coming from the reaction tank 130 is preferably within the range of from about 10 to about 20%, preferably between about 13 to about 17%. And, the solids content of stream 186 is preferably within the range of from about 30 to about 55%.
  • Stream 186 is fed to filter 188 or other suitable device to dewater the slurry.
  • the solid gypsum is of high quality and can be utilized for building materials.
  • the filtrate is drawn off by line 189 and can be recycled to the reaction tank 130 or any portion can be discharged as blow down, but it is an advantage of the invention that this stream need not be discharged to control the buildup of chloride in the system.
  • the scrubbed effluent is significantly freed of entrained droplets of liquid and diverted in direction of flow by entrainment separator 140.
  • problems of encrustation of the roof 102 of the tower and of mist eliminators of conventional construction would be experienced unless measures were taken.
  • the use of a more efficient mist eliminator in lieu of the entrainment separator 140 is not feasible, since at operating bulk velocities of 4.5 to 6 meters per second, no practical, high- efficiency mist eliminators are available, and commercial units which could be specified for this location tend to drain poorly and flood, thus increasing the potential for pluggage and low reliability.
  • the entrainment separator 140 is designed for the specific purposes required by this invention.
  • the entrainment separator 140 removes a significant amount of the entrained moisture and turns the direction of flow of the flue gases by at least 30° from the vertical axis of the tower, also producing a more uniform velocity profile into the vertical mist eliminator 150.
  • the majority (by weight) of droplets having diameters less than about 100 ⁇ are eliminated either by dropping them out of the effluent or consolidating them to form larger droplets which can more easily be removed by a downstream mist eliminator.
  • the entrainment separator 140 is preferably followed by a generally vertical mist eliminator, shown in the Figures as 150.
  • the bulk of the effluent flow is changed from vertical to near horizontal by the entrainment separator 140.
  • This has several advantages including the reduced impingement of slurry onto the roof 102 of the scrubbing tower, with prevention of the formation of deposits there which tend to grow larger in time, to an extent that they can break off in large pieces, often as much as a meter or more in diameter, and either damage the nozzle headers or fall through to the reaction tank 130 and ultimately cause plugging of the spray nozzles in 112 and 112'. Also, and importantly, it permits high-efficiency demisting of an essentially horizontal flow by vertical mist eliminator 150.
  • the high-efficiency horizontal flow mist eliminator 150 inherently drains well, thus allowing operation at higher velocities than for a similarly designed, vertical flow mist eliminator. It also achieves superior demisting in the horizontal flow orientation.
  • a high degree of demisting is an important feature of the invention, although not necessarily unique, since horizontal flow mist eliminators are commonly used in FGD systems and other industries where high- efficiency demisting is required.
  • the combination of the entrainment separator 140 with the high-efficiency mist eliminator 150 provides superior demisting by providing a relatively uniform velocity profile into the mist eliminator and by consolidating the majority of smaller droplets into larger droplets in the entrainment separator prior to final demisting in the high-efficiency mist eliminator.
  • Figure 5 illustrates a preferred form of an improved entrainment separator 140 which can effectively remove or consolidate a majority of the smaller droplets (i.e., less than 10O ⁇ diameter) and redirect the vertical flow of the effluent away from the upper wall surfaces of the tower.
  • Entrainment separator 140 is illustrated in Figure 2 as oriented at an angle y relative to the horizontal in scrub ⁇ bing tower 100. This angle will preferably be within the range of from about 10 to about 45°, e.g. about 20°.
  • the separator 140 utilizes single pass separator blades 142 to collect droplets by impingement and to turn the gas in a direction most suitable for further mist elimination.
  • the individual blades 142 are oriented at an angle ⁇ with regard to the lower surface of assemblies 144, 144', 144", etc., of the blades 142.
  • a blade of this type will be a parallelogram-shaped piece of from about 0.15 to about 0.23 meters in minor dimension and from about 0.6 to about 1.5 meters in major dimension. Spacing between individual blades will typically be from about 40 to about 70% of the minor dimension of the individual blades.
  • Angle ⁇ will preferably be within the range of from about 20 to about 40°, the exact value depending on the angle ⁇ and the desired degree of flow ' direction of the effluent stream.
  • the assemblies 144, etc. are constructed and oriented in a fashion that facilitates excellent drainage.
  • the individual assemblies are arranged in a pattern of chevrons as illustrated.
  • the assemblies 144, efc, are preferably oriented with respect to one another at an angle ⁇ , typically in the range of from about 125 to about 145°, and preferably about 140°.
  • the entrainment separator structure is supported by members 146 which run the lengths of each of the assemblies. Other arrangements of supporting structures are possible.
  • the structure of the entrainment separator 140 permits direct contact washing of the blades by means of fixed nozzle lances 147 having spray nozzles 148 capable of spraying wash water directly onto the blades from both the top and the bottom.
  • Washing is typically done by operating each washer header separately and sequentially with the others.
  • the wash water is of sufficient quality and is used in sufficient quantity to reduce the level of saturated, dis ⁇ solved salts on the separator surfaces. Together with the good drainage afford ⁇ ed by the chevron-shaped arrangement of assemblies 144, etc., the use of high quality wash water and frequent washing affords practically deposit-free opera- tion.
  • the separation efficiency of the first entrainment separator 140 need not be as high as multipass separators employed in the prior art because the ability to redirect the flow from vertical to horizontal enables the use of a high-efficiency, vertically-oriented mist eliminator 150.
  • the entrainment separator causes very low pressure drops, e.g. less than about 0.15 inches water column, and has other advantages in terms of cleanability, drainage, high bulk gas velocities, and direction of the gas flow from the upper wall surfaces of the tower and toward a highly-efficient, vertical mist eliminator 150.
  • the mist eliminator 150 is preferably of the baffle type, e.g. a zig-zag baffle.
  • the scrubbed and demisted effluent can then be discharged to the air such as by stack 160.
  • the demisted effluent is heated prior to discharge such as in a gas-to-gas heat exchanger in a vertical configuration as described in copending, commonly-assigned U.S. Patent Application S.N. 08/257,158 (attorney's docket number 1930-P0020), filed on June 9,1994, filed in the names of the inventors named herein.
  • the effect of the improvements of the invention in combination is to enable construction of a single-loop, wet-scrubbing, open spray tower which is about one half the empty weight of current open spray towers.
  • Total process efficiency is measured by the value of all resources expended to remove a unit of SO x from the untreated gas. These include both capital and operating resources.

Abstract

Sulfur oxides (SOx) are scrubbed from combustion effluents with aqueous limestone slurries single-loop, open-tower countercurrent limestone wet scrubbers. Effluent flow rates are greatly increased while L/G values and reaction tank (150) residence times are decreased. Improved entrainment eliminator design, nozzle (112) placement and spacing, and the use of a hydrocyclone (181) to separate and recycle smaller particles of limestone from the byproduct gypsum, facilitate these advantages. Limestone is reduced to very fine particles, e.g. about 8ν or less with more than 99 % of the particle by weight less than 44ν, and introduced into a scrubbing slurry which is contacted with SOx-laden effluent. Reactivity of the scrubbing slurry is maintained, even at reduced pH, by continuously operating a hydrocyclone to assure a molar ratio of calcium-containing to sulfur-containing compounds of greater than about 1.3 to 1 while keeping both a low chloride and low non-reactive solids content. The hydrocyclone removes large particles of calcium sulfate and provides a recycle stream (184) of fine calcium carbonate and non-reactive solids which is bled off as necessary to maintain both the desired low chloride and non-reactive solids levels.

Description

DESCRIPTION
IMPROVED WET SCRUBBING METHOD
AND APPARATUS FOR REMOVING
SULFUR OXIDES FROM COMBUSTION EFFLUENTS
Technical Field
The invention relates to improvements enabling the removal of sulfur oxides (SOx) from combustion effluents with greater efficiency and with economies in capital and operating costs.
The combustion of carbonaceous materials containing significant amounts of sulfur, including fossil fuels and waste, is being closely regulated by governments around the world. Combustion of these materials causes free radi¬ cals of sulfur and oxygen to combine at the elevated temperatures involved to produce a variety of oxides of sulfur which are referred to as a group as SOx. Regulations are in place in many countries to reduce the amounts of sulfur oxides released to the atmosphere to alleviate the problems associated with acid rain.
Numerous strategies are being employed to reduce the discharge of SOx to the atmosphere. Among these are methods for cleaning sulfur from fuels prior to combustion, methods for chemically tying up the sulfur during combustion, and methods for removing the sulfur oxides from combustion effluents. Among the methods for treating combustion effluents to remove SOx, are wet and dry scrubbing. Wet scrubbing technology is well developed and effective; however, very large equipment has been required and costs are proportional.
The technology for wet scrubbing combustion effluents to remove SOx provides gas-liquid contact in a number of different configurations. Among the most prominent are the single- and double-loop countercurrent spray towers and towers which employ both cocurrent and countercurrent sections.
The single-loop, open-tower systems employing calcium carbonate to react with the SOx are the simplest in construction and operation. These systems are often preferred because they can be operated with low pressure drop and have a low tendency to scale or plug. The advantages of their simplicity and reliability have, however, been offset in some situations by their large size. For example, because they do not employ any trays or packings to improve contact between the effluent and the scrubbing liquid, tower heights are typically high and many levels of spray nozzles have been employed to assure good contact.
In open spray towers, the ability of the scrubbing liquid to absorb SOx from the gas depends on the availability of alkalinity in the liquid. The most cost effective source of alkalinity for wet scrubbing systems is generally accepted to be calcium carbonate. Unfortunately, calcium carbonate solubility usually decreases with increasing alkalinity in the scrubbing liquid. Towers with packings and trays improve absorption by retaining calcium carbonate longer in the gas- liquid contacting zone, thereby providing a mechanism for more dissolution and, as a result, more efficient use of the scrubbing liquid. Open spray towers, on the other hand, are typically designed relatively taller to provide for as long a contact time as possible, often with multiple spray levels to facilitate the most efficient introduction of scrubbing liquid into the tower. It would be desirable to improve single-loop, open-tower wet scrubbing employing calcium carbonate for treating SOx-laden combustion effluents, by improving process efficiency with a correspondingly higher process economy while decreasing the overall size requirements of the tower, improving calcium carbonate utilization, maintaining high reliability, reducing energy consumption, and achieving high throughputs with high percentage SOx reduction.
It would also be desirable to improve single-loop, open-tower wet scrubbing employing calcium carbonate for treating SOx-laden combustion effluents, by increasing reactivity in the scrubbing slurry without reliance on chemical additives.
Background Art
The design and operation of single-loop, countercurrent spray towers utilizing limestone is discussed by Rader and Bakke, in Incorporating Full-Scale Experience Into Advanced Limestone Wet FGD Designs, presented at the IGCl' Forum 91, September 12, 1991 , Washington, D.C. ( "formerly the Industrial Gas Cleaning Institute, now the Institute of Clean Air Companies, Washington, DC) Open spray towers (i.e., those not having packings, trays or other means for facilitating gas-liquid contact) are simple in design and provide high reliability. They are especially useful in coal-fired power stations where the evolution of chlorides has caused a number of problems, including reduced reactivity of the scrubbing solution and severe corrosion of scrubber internals. Another factor favoring the use of open spray towers is their inherent low pressure loss and resulting fan power economy.
The use of a variety of reagents has been suggested, but the most preferred are those which are effective without high additive levels and can be purchased at low cost and stored and transported with minimal special handling. Calcium carbonate (commercially available in a number of forms including limestone) is a material of choice because it meets these criteria and, when properly processed, yields process byproducts that can be easily disposed of as landfill or sold as gypsum.
In single-loop, countercurrent, open scrubbing towers of the type discussed by Rader and Bakke, a scrubbing liquid based on calcium carbonate flows downwardly while the SOx-laden effluent flows upwardly. They summarize historical values for a range of parameters, including absorber gas velocity (giving a minimum of 6 and a maximum of 15 feet per second, i.e. about 2 to less than 5 meters per second), indicating that absorber gas velocity has a weak influence on the liquid-to-gas ratio (LJG), a key factor in both capital and operating expenses. The height of the spray contacting zone in these towers is not given, but typical values will be on the order of from about 6 to about 15 meters, historically considered an important factor in engineering an efficient system which can be expected to reliably remove at least 95% of the SOx from combustion effluents.
In conventional towers of this type, the ratio of the quantity of slurry to the quantity of gas (L/G) is said to be arguably the single most significant design parameter. The L/G affects the cost of pumping, the cost of holding tanks and other operational and economic factors. The cost of pumping the limestone slurry increases proportionally with the tower height. It would be desirable to decrease L/G requirements and height for open spray towers.
Sulfur oxides (SOx), principally SO2, are absorbed in the descending scrubbing slurry and collected in a reaction tank where solid calcium sulfite and solid calcium sulfate are formed. Desirably, the reaction tank is oxygenated to force the production of the sulfate. Once the crystals of sulfate are grown to a sufficient size, they are separated from the slurry in the reaction tank. ln a paper by K. R. Hegemann, et al., entitled THE BISCHOFF FLUE GAS DESULFURIZATION PROCESS (presented at the EPA and EPRI cosponsored First Combined FGD and Dry SO2 Control Symposium, October 25-28, 1988) a scrubbing tower is depicted as including a hydrocyclone loop which separates a gypsum slurry from a wet scrubber into a coarse solids stream and a fine solids stream, with the fine solids stream being returned to the scrubber. In U.S. Patent No. 5,215,672, Rogers, et al. describe a process similar to that of Hegemann, et al. in that it employs a hydrocyclone as a primary dewatering device. In the latter case, after separating a fine solids stream from a coarse solids stream rich in gypsum, water as part of a thickened fines stream is disposed of along with at least a portion of the fines removed. Neither of the descriptions of these approaches, however, indicates how the use of a hydrocyclone as a primary dewatering device can be employed to improve overall process efficiency with a correspondingly higher process economy while decreasing the overall size requirements of the tower, improving reagent utilization, maintaining high reliability, reducing energy consumption, and achieving high throughputs with high percentage SOx reduction.
The art has also provided packed towers. Rader and Bakke point out that while these types of towers have some advantage in terms of decreased operating costs, they present additional risks. The packings or other gas-liquid mixing means can become clogged or corroded and cause unacceptable bypass or pressure drop, resulting in prolonged periods of downtime. It would be advantageous to have an open tower which had the advantages of the packed towers, but which did not require the packings, and was smaller than open towers of conventional construction.
The prior art does not directly address the points necessary to achieve improvements that, in the context of single-loop, open-tower, countercurrent limestone wet scrubbers for SOx reduction, permit results comparable to achieved with packed towers but without the use of packings or the problems associated with them.
In single-loop, countercurrent, open scrubbing towers of the type discussed by Rader and Bakke, a scrubbing slurry composed of calcium carbonate, calcium sulfate, calcium sulfite, and other non-reacting solids flows downwardly while the SOx-laden effluent gas flows upwardly. The SOx, principally SO2, is absorbed in the descending scrubbing slurry and is collected in a reaction tank where calcium sulfite and calcium sulfate are formed. Desirably, the reaction tank is oxygenated to force the production of sulfate over sulfite. Once the crystals of sulfate are grown to a sufficient size, they are removed from the reaction tank and separated from the slurry. Soluble impurities, such as chlorides, are also withdrawn. These scrubbing towers are relatively economical to construct and operate, but costs in both areas are dependent on the reactivity of the scrubbing slurry. Indeed, the costs are detrimentally impacted by high dissolved chloride concentrations in the scrubbing slurry which suppress the reactivity of the calcium carbonate.
It is known to reduce the chloride content of the scrubbing slurry by the use of a blow down stream. Typically, the blow down is taken from the reaction tank or from water recovered from gypsum recovered from the process.
For example, in U.S. Patent No. 3,995,006, Downs, et al. withdraw slurry from an absorber sump, pass the slurry to a hydrocyclone separator, to separate a stream high in fine particles of calcium sulfite from a stream high in relatively larger particles of calcium carbonate. Following a second separation of the calcium sulfite, a thickened stream containing the calcium sulfite is discharged. In most situations, the discharge of large amounts of water in this manner controls the buildup of chloride in the system. However, the discharge of large amounts of water is undesirable from both the environmental and economic standpoints. In U.S. Patent No. 5,215,672, Rogers, er a/, describe a process similar to that of Downs, et al. in that it employs a hydrocyclone to separate unreacted calcium carbonate from calcium salts formed by reaction with the SOx scrubbed from a combustion effluent. In this case, after separating a fine solids stream from a coarse solids stream rich in gypsum, water as part of a thickened fines stream is disposed of along with at least a portion of the fines removed. While blow down in this fashion is sufficient to control the buildup of chloride in the system if sufficient water is removed, this scheme will eliminate a proportionally high amount of fine solids. Rogers, et al. seek to dispose of the fines as waste. However, it will be apparent from the description of the present invention, that reversing this strategy, while still blowing down a portion of the water to control chlorides, can facilitate increased reactivity in the system.
In a paper by Rosenberg and Koch, published in the 93rd Bimonthly Report of the Stack Gas Emissions Control Coordination Center Group, July
1989, a hydrocyclone loop installed on an FGD (flue gas desulfurization) plant in the Netherlands, like that in Rogers, et al., separates a gypsum slurry from a wet scrubber into a coarse solids stream and a fine solids stream, with all of the fine solids stream being returned to the scrubber. By operating in this manner, blow down is not taken from this stream and must be taken elsewhere. The process diagram of Figure 2 of that paper, shows blowdown being taken from a vacuum belt filter. Removal of water from this point in the process will control chloride, but it does so by removing higher amounts of water than necessary, since the water so removed has been diluted by fresh makeup water used to wash the gypsum.
The prior art does not directly address the points necessary to achieve reactivity improvements in the context of single-loop, open-tower, countercurrent limestone wet scrubbers for SOx reduction. Disclosure of the Invention
It is an object of the invention to provide improved processes and apparatus for wet scrubbing combustion effluents, especially from coal-fired boilers, to remove sulfur oxides.
It is another object of a preferred embodiment of the invention to provide improved single-loop, open-tower, countercurrent limestone wet scrubbers for SOx reduction.
It is a further object of the invention to enable operation of single-loop, open-tower, countercurrent limestone wet scrubbers at reduced L/G values.
It is a yet further object of the invention to reduce the size of single-loop, open-tower, countercurrent limestone wet scrubbers.
It is another specific object of the invention to increase the velocity of the flue gas through single-loop, open-tower, countercurrent limestone wet scrub¬ bers.
It is yet another object of the invention to improve the design and location of entrainment separators and mist eliminators in single-loop, open-tower, coun¬ tercurrent limestone wet scrubbers to effectively demist scrubbed effluents and change their direction away from the roof of the scrubbing tower.
It is a yet further object of the invention to improve the operation of single- loop, open-tower, countercurrent limestone wet scrubbers to reduce the residence time of gypsum crystals in the scrubber and enable the use of a hydrocyclone to separate them from smaller particles of limestone. It is still another object of a preferred embodiment of the invention to im¬ prove the operation of single-loop, open-tower, countercurrent limestone wet scrubbers by reducing the residence time of gypsum crystals in the scrubber and enabling the use of a hydrocyclone to maintain operation at high stoichiometric ratios of calcium to sulfur while fostering high utilization of calcium carbonate.
It is a still further object of a preferred embodiment of the invention to im¬ prove the process efficiency of single-loop, open-tower, countercurrent limestone wet scrubbers by achieving effective liquid to gas contact within a scrubbing zone of reduced height utilizing a reduced number of spray levels.
It is a yet another object of a preferred embodiment of the invention to im¬ prove the operation of single-loop, open-tower, countercurrent limestone wet scrubbers by improving the arrangement of the spray nozzles to minimize the amount of gas passing through without being treated and to achieve effective gas-liquid contact with a reduced number of spray nozzles.
It is a further object of a preferred embodiment of the invention to improve the operation of single-loop, open-tower, countercurrent limestone wet scrubbers by maintaining a high reactivity in the scrubbing slurry, improving limestone utilization, and providing an overall improvement in process efficiency.
It is still a further object of the invention to improve the operation of single- loop, open-tower, countercurrent wet scrubbers by providing an efficient means for purging chloride from the scrubbing liquor.
These and other objects are accomplished by the invention which provides both improved processes and apparatus for wet scrubbing, particularly the scrubbing of effluents from the combustion of sulfur-containing fuels such as coal and solid waste. -10-
In one aspect, the invention improves a single-loop, open-tower, counter¬ current limestone wet scrubbing process for reducing the concentration of SOx (principally SO2) in flue gases. In another, the invention provides an improved apparatus capable of achieving the noted improvements and will be described in detail in the following description. The process, in summary, comprises: (a) directing a flow of flue gas containing SOx upwardly through a vertical scrubbing tower at a bulk flow velocity of greater than about 4.5, and preferably up to about 6, meters per second; (b) introducing into a vertical scrubbing section within said tower, a spray of droplets of an aqueous slurry of finely divided calcium carbonate, calcium sulfate, calcium sulfite, and other non-reactive solids, the calcium carbonate preferably having a weight median diameter of 6μ or less with 99% by weight less than 44μ, and a total molar ratio of calcium-containing to sulfur-containing compounds in the solids of at least 1.1 to 1.2, to contact the flue gas while descending through the tower countercurrently to the flow of flue gas; (c) collecting the slurry in a reaction tank after contact with the flue gas; (d) withdrawing slurry from the reaction tank, preferably after an average residence time of eight hours or less; (e) subjecting slurry withdrawn from the reaction tank to a dewatering treatment, preferably in a hydrocyclone, to provide a recycle stream composed of the hydrocyclone overflow rich in fine particles of calcium carbonate and having a total molar ratio of calcium-containing to sulfur- containing compounds of 1.3 or greater and another stream composed of the hydrocyclone underflow rich in calcium sulfate particles, preferably having a weight median diameter of from about 25 to about 55μ; (f) returning to the process a major portion of the recycle stream rich in calcium carbonate; and (g) introducing fresh calcium carbonate and other non-reactive solids as feed into the system in amounts sufficient to replace the calcium withdrawn and not recycled as well as that dissolved and reacted with the SOx absorbed in the liquid phase in the scrubber tower, said finely-divided calcium carbonate having a weight median particle size of less than about 10μ as introduced. It is preferred that the slurry be introduced from spray nozzles, alternating between upward and downward orientation from two spray levels spaced from about 1 to about 2 meters apart. It is also preferred that the total tower height in the spray contacting zone be less than about 6, and preferably less than about 4, meters in height, as it has been determined that height is not so important for reliably removing 95% or more of the SOx from combustion effluents. It is an advantage of the invention that the tower diameter can be relatively small, so that the operating bulk velocity of flue gas passing vertically through the spray contacting zone, based only on the cross sectional area and neglecting the area taken up by spray headers and nozzles, be no less than 4.5 and preferably up to 6 meters per second. This higher velocity provides a means of suspending liquid in the tower without increasing tower height and without adding packing or trays for liquid holdup, and the liquid so suspended is more reactive due to the increased time for dissolution of the calcium carbonate. Hence a distinct advantage of the invention is to increase tower contacting time without adding tower height, while at the same time maintaining the simplicity of design, construction, operation, and maintenance of an open spray tower.
In the more preferred embodiments, the median size of the calcium carbonate particles in the reaction tank is maintained within the range of from about 2 to about 6μ, and the weight median particle size of the finely-divided calcium carbonate as introduced is less than about 8μ, with at least 99% (e.g., 99.5 %) by weight of the particles being less than 44μ.
It is advantageous for all countercurrent, open spray towers, packed towers, or towers with trays, that the molar ratio of calcium-containing to sulfur- containing compounds in the solid phase of the scrubber slurry be high. High ratios make more alkalinity available for SOx removal, thus improving the absorptive capacity of the liquid. However, in current processes, a high ratio is not economical because valuable calcium-containing compounds, specifically calcium carbonate, will be wasted with the removal of sulfur compounds via the dewatering system. The invention permits operation with a scrubbing slurry in the spray tower for which the solid calcium carbonate concentration is much higher than economically viable for other systems. When utilizing the preferred conditions of particle size and gas-liquid contact, the hydrocyclone is effective in increasing the relative concentration of available calcium and alkalinity in the tank.
In the preferred embodiments, the scrubbing tower comprises at least a first entrainment separator to remove a significant amount of the entrained moisture and to turn the direction of flow of the flue gases by at least 30° from the vertical axis of the tower. In its preferred form, the majority of droplets having diameters less than about 100μ are eliminated either by dropping them out of the effluent or consolidating them to form larger droplets which can more easily be removed by a downstream mist eliminator. The first entrainment separator is preferably followed by a generally vertical mist eliminator.
In another aspect, the invention provides an improved wet scrubbing process for reducing the concentration of SOx in a flue gas, comprising: (a) directing a flow of flue gas upwardly through a scrubbing tower; (b) introducing a spray of an aqueous slurry of finely-divided calcium carbonate, calcium sulfate, calcium sulfite, and non-reactive solids to descend through the tower countercurrently to the flow of flue gas, the weight median size of the calcium carbonate particles being within the range of from about 2 to about 6μ; (c) following contact with the flue gas, collecting the slurry in a reaction tank; (d) maintaining a high reactivity in the slurry by withdrawing slurry from the reaction tank and subjecting slurry withdrawn to treatment in a hydrocyclone to provide a recycle stream rich in fine particles of calcium carbonate and non-reactive solids and another stream rich in calcium sulfate, both of said streams containing dissolved chlorides, and discharging calcium sulfate as solids and a portion of the recycle stream rich in calcium carbonate and non-reactive solids to remove soluble chlorides and non-reactive solids; and (f) introducing fresh calcium carbonate as feed into the system in amounts sufficient to replace the calcium withdrawn due to said separation of said calcium sulfate and said portion of said recycle stream discharged, said finely-divided calcium carbonate having a weight median particle size of less than about 10μ as introduced.
The process permits operation at pH values that also enhance reactivity.
Preferably the pH of the slurry in the reaction tank is within the range of from about 5.0 to about 6.3, and most preferably in the range of from about 5.8 to about 6.3.
Desirably, the molar ratio of calcium-containing to sulfur-containing compounds in the recycle stream is maintained at a value greater than about 1.3, preferably above about 1.4. Also, it is preferable to maintain a suspended solids concentration of less than about 15%, and most preferably less than about 5%, in the recycle stream. Preferably, the process further includes determining the chloride content of the slurry, and discharging a portion of the recycle stream should the value exceed a predetermined maximum allowable chloride content. Even more preferably, the process includes determining the solids density of the recycle stream, and discharging a portion of the recycle stream whenever the solids density exceeds a predetermined control value. In this last matter, the fraction of non-reactive solids are controlled.
In another of its aspects, the invention provides an improved wet scrubbing apparatus for reducing the concentration of SOx in flue gases, comprising: (a) a scrubbing tower comprising a gas inlet duct, a gas outlet duct, and a vertical scrubbing section, configured to direct a flow of flue gas containing SOx upwardly through said scrubbing section; (b) an array of spray devices positioned within said scrubbing section configured to introduce a spray of an aqueous slurry of finely-divided calcium carbonate, calcium sulfate, calcium sulfite, and non-reactive solids to descend through the tower countercurrently to the flow of flue gas; (c) a reaction tank located below said array of spray devices to enable collection of the slurry after a period of contact with said flue gas within said vertical scrubbing section, said reaction tank being of a size suitable to permit reaction of the SOx with the calcium carbonate to form crystals of gypsum having a weight median particle diameter at least two times that of the particles of calcium carbonate added as feed; (d) means for supplying calcium carbonate with a weight median particle size of less than about 10μ with 99% or more of the particles less than 44μ as feed to said reaction tank; (e) a spray slurry supply means comprising at least one pump and associated conduit for withdrawing slurry from the reaction tank and delivering slurry to said array of spray devices positioned within said scrubbing section; (f) a slurry quality maintenance system including a hydrocyclone capable of separating said slurry in said reaction tank into a stream rich in small particles of calcium carbonate and non-reactive solids and relatively larger particles of calcium sulfate, at least one pump and associated conduit for withdrawing slurry from the reaction tank and delivering slurry to a hydrocyclone, a recycle conduit leading from said hydrocyclone to said reaction tank to carry a recycle stream rich in calcium carbonate and non- reactive solids from said hydrocyclone, a calcium sulfate slurry recovery conduit leading from said hydrocyclone to remove slurry rich in calcium sulfate from said hydrocyclone, and a discharge conduit in communication with said recycle conduit and adapted to remove a portion of said recycle stream from said recycle conduit.
One effect of these improvements is a tower which is about one half the weight and volume of the current open-tower scrubbers. Process efficiency is improved with a correspondingly higher process economy while reagent utilization is improved, high reliability is maintained, energy consumption is reduced, and high throughputs with high percentage SOx reduction are achieved. Brief Description of the Drawings
The invention will be better understood and its advantages will be better appreciated from the following detailed description, especially when read in light of the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Figure 1 is a schematic view of a preferred embodiment of the process of the invention employing a single-loop, open-tower, countercurrent limestone wet scrubber;
Figure 2 is a more detailed schematic view of a scrubbing tower of the type shown in Figure 1 ;
Figure 3 is a partial side elevational view of the arrangement of spray nozzles in two spray levels shown in the tower of Figure 2;
Figure 4 is a bottom plan view of the spray nozzles in the two spray levels for a spray tower of the type shown in Figure 2; and
Figure 5 is a perspective view of the entrainment separator shown in the spray tower of Figures 1 and 2.
Industrial Applicability
The improvements of the invention have preferred application to coal-fired utility boiler flue gases, and in some aspects are particularly effective for high chloride operations such as incinerators. While the advantages may be the greatest in these types of operations, the invention is by no means limited to them. Effluents from the combustion of all types of carbonaceous materials can be treated, also including natural gas, synthetic gas, fuel oils, bitumens and residual fuel oils, domestic and industrial solid or other combustible waste, and the like.
The following description is centered on the preferred embodiment of Figure 1 which is a single-loop, open-tower, countercurrent limestone wet scrub- bing operation for removing sulfur oxides, principally as SO2, from combustion effluents.
Limestone is the preferred form of calcium carbonate but can be replaced with another form, if desired. In addition to limestone, other forms of calcium carbonate include oyster shells, aragonite, calcite, chalk, marble, marl, and travertine. It can be mined or manufactured. In this description, the terms calci¬ um carbonate and limestone are used interchangeably.
It is important to note that almost all accessible forms of calcium carbonate found in nature contain minor quantities of relatively inert materials, such as free silica, magnesium carbonate or dolomite, iron oxides, alumina, and so forth. In principle, it is always desired to find very pure forms for the limestone wet scrubbing process, but in practice, some impurities are always present which form non-reactive solids in the wet scrubbing process. Other sources of non- reactive solids entering the process are fly ash escaping the particulate collector 10 and caught by the scrubber 100.
The limestone is finely divided, preferably by grinding as described below, to achieve a weight median diameter of about 10μ or less, with 99% below 44μ. This is extremely fine for wet scrubbing in an open tower with a countercurrent flow of limestone slurry. The more typical grind size of the prior art is a weight median diameter of 15μ or less with no more than 95% of the particles less than 44μ. In further contrast to the prior art, it is noted that the preferred grind size of the invention will yield particles with a weight median particle size of less than about 8μ, with 90% (e.g., 99.5%) by weight of the particles being less than 44μ. The use of a grind of the preferred size has several advantages.
The preferred process arrangement of Figure 1 shows an effluent, such as from a coal-fired industrial or utility boiler, entering a suitable means 10 for removing particulates, such as an electrostatic precipitator or fabric filter, which removes entrained solids to a practical extent. The cleaned flue gas is then passed via duct 20 to wet scrubbing tower 100 wherein it flows upwardly, countercurrent to a spray of an aqueous slurry which contains finely-divided limestone discharged within a vertical scrubbing section 110 from two levels of spray nozzles. From the scrubbing section 110, the gas continues through gas outlet duct 120. The tower is configured to direct a flow of flue gas upwardly through the vertical scrubbing section. The scrubbing slurry falling through the vertical scrubbing section 110 is collected in reaction tank 130. The reaction tank 130 is preferably of a size suitable to permit reaction of the SO2 with the calcium carbonate to form crystals of gypsum having a weight median diameter at least 2, and preferably from 5 to 10, times as large as the particles of calcium carbonate added as feed.
Maintenance of this differential in particle sizes facilitates the preferred embodiment which calls for withdrawing a stream of slurry from the reaction tank, preferably after an average residence time of about 6 hours, and concentrating it in terms of calcium carbonate (as fine particles, preferably having a weight median diameter of less than about 6μ) and removing gypsum.
The vertical scrubbing section 110 contains an array of spray devices positioned within it. The array is configured to introduce a spray of an aqueous slurry of finely-divided calcium carbonate to descend through the tower countercurrently to the flow of flue gas. The Figure illustrates a bank of spray nozzles which is shown to include two levels 112, 112'of nozzles. Each of the nozzles 114 (see Figure 2) is fed slurry from a header 116, 116', or 116". It is typical to also include a third level to permit one level to be off line for repair or cleaning while two remain in operation.
The nozzles are preferably arranged with a spacing between levels of from about 1 to less than about 2 meters and with the direction of flow from adja- cent nozzles in a given level alternating between upward and downward. The preferred embodiments of the invention reduce the spacing between the nozzles, reduce the number of levels in use at any time (preferably to 2), and increase the rate of gas flow upwardly through the vertical scrubbing section. The preferred flow patterns of both the slurry being sprayed and the effluent passing upward through the tower are illustrated in Figure 4.
The preferred form of nozzle is a centrifugal nozzle which forms a spray at an angle α of within the range of from about 90 to about 140°, preferably about 120°. One suitable nozzle is a Whirljet 300 gallon per minute nozzle available from Spraying Systems Co., Wheaton, Illinois. Droplet sizes are preferably in the range of from about 100 to about 6000μ, typically about 2000μ, Sauter mean diameter as measured by a Malvern Particle Analyzer.
Each of the headers 116 is oriented at an angle with respect to the header in the next upper or lower rack. The angle is preferably 90° when two or three racks are employed.
It is one of the novel and improved features of the invention that the resi¬ dence time in the reaction tank is reduced from the typical commercial value of about 15 hours or more down to less than about 8 hours, more typically about 6 hours. This is facilitated by the improved dissolution rate of fine calcium carbonate particles and, to some extent, the relatively fast precipitation rate of calcium sulfate to form gypsum particles. The reactive properties of the slurry are, in turn, enhanced by the separation of calcium sulfate from calcium carbonate in the slurry and recycling the calcium carbonate to the slurry as very fine particles which dissolve rapidly in the reaction tank. The reduction of the residence time in the reaction tank has a positive impact on overall process efficiency as well as a number of advantages in terms of processing ease, equip¬ ment sizing and quality of the byproduct gypsum.
The bulk gas velocities of the flue gas moving through the vertical scrubbing section 110 are above 4.5, and preferably up to about 6, meters per second. These gas velocities are high in the context of single-loop, open-tower wet limestone scrubbers and are employed by the invention preferably in combination with other innovative approaches to improve overall process efficiency. The preferred scrubbing towers of the invention enable the treatment of flue gases with practical, low pressure drops and lower relative amounts of aqueous slurry, e.g. lower L/G ratios.
The sulfur oxides in the effluent are absorbed into the aqueous phase of the slurry, forming bisulfite and hydrogen ions. Some bisulfite oxidizes to sulfate, releasing even more hydrogen ions. As the droplets become saturated with hydrogen ions, calcium carbonate begins to dissolve at an increasing rate, thus forming calcium ions and bicarbonate. The finely-pulverized calcium carbonate is very effective at absorbing hydrogen ions, thereby improving the absorptive capacity of the aqueous phase in the tower spray zone. The high gas velocities employed according to the preferred embodiments, and the preferred spray pattern, tend to maintain the slurry droplets suspended with a degree of fluidization to achieve enhanced contact.
Figure 1 shows limestone being finely divided in a mill 170, classified by cyclone 172, captured by bag house 174 and metered through air lock 176 into the pressurized flow of air in line 178. By pulverizing the limestone immediately before introduction into the scrubber, the limestone which is introduced into the reaction tank to replenish the calcium carbonate can be made within well-defined particle size ranges, free from large particles, those greater than about 44μ. In fact, it is typically possible and routinely achieved with dry pulverizing calcium carbonate particles of weight median size less than about 8μ and with 99% or more less than 44μ. The exclusion of the large particles from the limestone introduced into the reaction tank is a principal feature permitting the reaction tank of the invention to be made substantially smaller than is presently employed in conventional scrubbers.
The air in line 178 facilitates supplying oxygen for the oxidation of sulfite and bisulfite ions to sulfate ions. The tank is preferably stirred by conventional means which are not illustrated in the Figure.
On the other side of the process as illustrated in Figure 1 , slurry is withdrawn from reaction tank 130 for concentrating the reactive calcium carbonate for recycle and reducing the level of solids, principally by removing gypsum. Figure 1 shows slurry being withdrawn from reaction tank 130 via line 183 and passed to hydrocyclone 181. The hydrocyclone is especially effective in the operation of the invention because it can rapidly and effectively separate the very fine particles of limestone from the larger particles of calcium sulfate. The particles of the calcium sulfate preferably have a weight average diameter of from about 25 to about 55μ. The separation of the smaller particles of limestone provides a recycle stream 174 rich in calcium carbonate and a discharge stream 176 rich in calcium sulfate. Preferably, the weight average particle size of the calcium carbonate in the reaction tank and therefore in the recycle stream 184 is in the range of from about 2 to about 6μ.
Figure 1 shows the preferred form of the invention wherein the recycle stream is concentrated in terms of calcium carbonate and useful process water in hydrocyclone 181. The preferred sizes for the calcium carbonate particles will have a weight median diameter in the range of from about 2 to about 6μ. The calcium sulfate particles will have a weight median diameter within the range of from about 25 to about 55μ. Reaction tank 130 is located below the array of spray devices to enable collection of the slurry after a period of contact with the flue gas within the vertical scrubbing section 110. The reaction tank 130 is of a size suitable to permit reaction of the SO2 with the calcium carbonate to form crystals of gypsum having a weight median diameter at least 2, and preferably from 5 to 10, times as large as the particles of calcium carbonate added as feed.
By virtue of the difference in particle sizes between the calcium carbonate and the gypsum, and the means employed for separating the gypsum and concentrating the calcium carbonate as will be explained in detail below, the solids concentration of calcium carbonate can be increased by about 20 to about 50% above the concentrations attainable in countercurrent designs of the prior art. It is a further advantage of the invention that the slurry will have a higher stoichiometric ratio of calcium-containing to sulfur-containing compounds than prior art systems, typically being at least 1.3 and preferably being about 1.4 or greater. This system includes at least one pump 182 and associated conduit 183 for withdrawing slurry from the reaction tank and delivering slurry to the hydrocyclone.
The sulfur oxides in the effluent are absorbed into the aqueous phase of the slurry in vertical scrubbing section 110 and react with available alkalinity in ' the form of hydroxide ions to form bisulfite, which can be partially oxidized in the scrubbing section 110 and almost fully oxidized in the reaction tank 130 to form sulfate. The alkalinity is principally derived from the dissolution of calcium carbonate to form bicarbonate and hydroxide ions, which occurs both in the scrubbing section 110 and in the reaction tank 130. An oxygen sparge, as conventional in the art, is preferably employed to assure sufficient reaction, although some oxygen can be obtained from the flue gas itself in the scrubbing section 110. The reaction occurs to some extent in the falling droplets, but is ef¬ fected mainly in reaction tank 130 which collects the slurry. It is one of the novel and improved features of the invention that the residence time in the reaction tank is reduced from the typical commercial value of about 15 hours down to about 6 hours. The reduction of the residence time in the reaction tank has a number of advantages in terms of processing ease, equipment sizing and quality of the byproduct gypsum.
The pH of the slurry in the reaction tank 130 is preferably in the range of from about 5.0 to about 6.3, most preferably from about 5.8 to about 6.3. Higher pH indicates a higher available alkalinity in the slurry liquid and a correspondingly higher capacity of the liquid to absorb SO2. It is an advantage of the invention that, because the calcium carbonate is supplied as fine particles and is recycled as will be explained later, also in the form of fine particles, a higher available alkalinity is possible. Low pH is typically employed on systems of prior art to increase the rate of reaction of calcium carbonate, but this normally reduces the absorption of SO2 in the scrubbing section because the decreased available alkalinity. The small particle size of the present invention offers increased available alkalinity even at lower than desired pH, thereby offsetting to a large extent the impact of low pH on the scrubbing capacity of the slurry.
Associated with the reaction tank 130 and the array of spray devices positioned within the vertical scrubbing section 110, is a spray slurry supply means comprising at least one pump 122 and associated conduit 124 for withdrawing slurry from the reaction tank 110 and delivering slurry to the array of spray devices positioned within the scrubbing section.
Figure 1 shows limestone being finely divided in a mill 170, classified by cyclone 172, captured by bag house 174 and metered through air lock 176 into the pressurized flow of air in line 178, which in turn is injected directly into the scrubber 100 or into the duct 20 immediately upstream of the scrubber.
Alternatively, the limestone from the baghouse 174 may be mixed in a tank and pumped to the reaction tank 130. By pulverizing the limestone at or near the point of injection, the size of the pulverized material can be closely controlled. The size of the particles is particularly critical to the invention. Preferably, the makeup stream of calcium carbonate has a weight median particle size of about 8μ or less with 99% or more of the particles less than 44μ, as fed to replenish the calcium carbonate lost to the reaction with SOx and to the byproduct gypsum and with soluble chlorides as will be explained later.
The air in line 178 facilitates supplying oxygen for the oxidation of calcium sulfite to calcium sulfate. The tank is preferably stirred by conventional means which are not illustrated in the Figure.
Also associated with the reaction tank 130 is a slurry quality maintenance system depicted generally as 180. To maintain a high reactivity in the system, calcium carbonate is supplied as finely-divided particles as described, and a hydrocyclone 181 is employed to remove a portion of the slurry in reaction tank 130 for the purposes of concentrating fine particles of calcium carbonate for recycle as well as for discharging gypsum. The hydrocyclone 181 separates the slurry from the reaction tank into a recycle stream 184 rich in small particles of calcium carbonate and non-reactive solids and another containing a majority of relatively larger particles of calcium sulfate. The preferred sizes for the calcium carbonate and non-reactive solids particles will have a weight median diameter in the range of from about 1 to about 8μ, preferably from about 2 to about 6μ. The calcium sulfate particles will have a weight median diameter within the range of from about 25 to about 55μ. Preferably, the weight median diameters of particles of calcium sulfate will be at least 2, and more preferably from 5 to 10, times greater than those of calcium carbonate. This system includes at least one pump 182 and associated conduit 183 for withdrawing slurry from the reaction tank and delivering slurry to the hydrocyclone.
A recycle conduit 184 is shown to lead from the hydrocyclone 181 to the reaction tank 130 to carry a recycle stream rich in calcium carbonate from the hydrocyclone. An important feature of the system is achieving blow down from the recycle overflow, namely from recycle stream 184. A discharge conduit 185 in communication with the recycle conduit 184 which is adapted to remove a portion of the recycle stream from the recycle conduit. It is preferred to provide a monitor for the chloride content of the slurry in line 183 or elsewhere, and to control the amount of slurry to blow down from line 185 to control the chloride content in the slurry within reasonable values, e.g., below about 30,000 mg/l, and preferably below 20,000 mg/l. Higher chloride contents tend to slow the dissolution of calcium carbonate and lower the available alkalinity in the scrubbing slurry. Stream 185 has the highest concentration of chlorides, being equal to the concentration in the reaction tank, and therefore is the best source of chloride purge in the system.
It also can occur that non-reactive solids in the reaction tank 130 which enter the system with the calcium carbonate or as entrained solids in the gas stream 20 and are composed of relatively small particles, with weight median sizes ranging from about 4 to about 12μ, will tend to accumulate preferentially in the recycle stream 184, with their concentration growing in the recycle tank 130. Monitoring of these non-reactive solids in the recycle stream can be accomplished by chemical means (i.e., analysis for a characteristic specie, e.g., silica, iron, or others) or by physical means (i.e., either by particle size distribution analysis , total solids concentration, or some other suitable method). It is a feature of the invention to adjust the blow down stream 185 in such a manner to control chlorides as described above, control the concentration of non-reactive solids in the reaction tank, or to simultaneously control both. The preferred means of control is to adjust the rate of stream 185 up or down as required to meet the most stringent limit for either chlorides or non-reactive solids. It is desirable to maintain the level of non-reactive solids generally below about 20% by weight, and preferentially below 15% of the total solids in the reaction tank 130. Solids thus removed from the reaction tank via conduit 185 may be disposed with the blow down liquid, separated from the liquid, or in some other way treated and made suitable for disposal or other uses. The blow down liquid may also be treated in some manner to make the stream suitable for disposal or for some other use. It is not the intention of this invention to limit in any way the possible dispositions for the blow down stream 185, but rather to acknowledge that there are numerous methods for treating the stream, separating it into fractions, recycling all or a portion of it, and so forth. Such methods and means for treating stream 185 are beyond the scope of the present invention.
Also provided is a calcium sulfate slurry recovery conduit 186 leading from the hydrocyclone to remove calcium sulfate slurry from the hydrocyclone wherein the calcium sulfate is present as particles larger in size than the particles of calcium carbonate.
Figure 1 shows the preferred form of the invention wherein the recycle stream 184 is fed back to the reaction tank 130. An advantage of operating in this manner according to the invention is the ability to greatly increase the available alkalinity in the liquid droplets which come into contact with the SOx- laden effluent. By utilizing the recycle stream directly from the hydrocyclone, at which point it is highly enriched with very fine particles of calcium carbonate and a high pH and a high stoichiometric ratio of calcium to sulfur, it is possible to treat effluents rich in sulfur oxides in very short contact times.
Preferably, the stoichiometric ratio of calcium-containing to sulfur- containing compounds in recycle stream 184 will be in the range of from about 1.2 to about 2.0, most preferably from about 1.3 to about 1.4. The concentration of suspended solids in the recycle stream will typically be in the range of from about 1 to about 10%, by weight, most typically from about 2 to about 6%. Separation of the majority of the calcium sulfate from the limestone by hydrocyclone 182, in addition to raising the noted stoichiometric ratio and the available alkalinity, also decreases the solids content of the slurry.
One advantage of the combination of techniques employed in the process of the invention, is that the reaction tank has a high stoichiometric ratio of calcium-containing to sulfur-containing compounds, e.g. on the order of from about 1.1 to about 1.6, preferably from about 1.2 to about 1.3. When this advantage is coupled with a further feature of the calcium carbonate being present as very small particles, it becomes possible to achieve better overall process efficiency with economies of equipment sizing and raw material utilization.
Preferred solids content of stream 183 coming from the reaction tank 130 is preferably within the range of from about 10 to about 20%, preferably between about 13 to about 17%. And, the solids content of stream 186 is preferably within the range of from about 30 to about 55%. Stream 186 is fed to filter 188 or other suitable device to dewater the slurry. The solid gypsum is of high quality and can be utilized for building materials. The filtrate is drawn off by line 189 and can be recycled to the reaction tank 130 or any portion can be discharged as blow down, but it is an advantage of the invention that this stream need not be discharged to control the buildup of chloride in the system.
The scrubbed effluent is significantly freed of entrained droplets of liquid and diverted in direction of flow by entrainment separator 140. At the high gas velocities enabled by the invention, problems of encrustation of the roof 102 of the tower and of mist eliminators of conventional construction would be experienced unless measures were taken. The use of a more efficient mist eliminator in lieu of the entrainment separator 140 is not feasible, since at operating bulk velocities of 4.5 to 6 meters per second, no practical, high- efficiency mist eliminators are available, and commercial units which could be specified for this location tend to drain poorly and flood, thus increasing the potential for pluggage and low reliability. Hence, the entrainment separator 140 is designed for the specific purposes required by this invention.
Preferably, the entrainment separator 140 removes a significant amount of the entrained moisture and turns the direction of flow of the flue gases by at least 30° from the vertical axis of the tower, also producing a more uniform velocity profile into the vertical mist eliminator 150. In its preferred form, the majority (by weight) of droplets having diameters less than about 100μ are eliminated either by dropping them out of the effluent or consolidating them to form larger droplets which can more easily be removed by a downstream mist eliminator.
The entrainment separator 140 is preferably followed by a generally vertical mist eliminator, shown in the Figures as 150. The bulk of the effluent flow is changed from vertical to near horizontal by the entrainment separator 140. This has several advantages including the reduced impingement of slurry onto the roof 102 of the scrubbing tower, with prevention of the formation of deposits there which tend to grow larger in time, to an extent that they can break off in large pieces, often as much as a meter or more in diameter, and either damage the nozzle headers or fall through to the reaction tank 130 and ultimately cause plugging of the spray nozzles in 112 and 112'. Also, and importantly, it permits high-efficiency demisting of an essentially horizontal flow by vertical mist eliminator 150. The high-efficiency horizontal flow mist eliminator 150 inherently drains well, thus allowing operation at higher velocities than for a similarly designed, vertical flow mist eliminator. It also achieves superior demisting in the horizontal flow orientation. A high degree of demisting is an important feature of the invention, although not necessarily unique, since horizontal flow mist eliminators are commonly used in FGD systems and other industries where high- efficiency demisting is required. However, it is a unique feature that the combination of the entrainment separator 140 with the high-efficiency mist eliminator 150 provides superior demisting by providing a relatively uniform velocity profile into the mist eliminator and by consolidating the majority of smaller droplets into larger droplets in the entrainment separator prior to final demisting in the high-efficiency mist eliminator.
Figure 5 illustrates a preferred form of an improved entrainment separator 140 which can effectively remove or consolidate a majority of the smaller droplets (i.e., less than 10Oμ diameter) and redirect the vertical flow of the effluent away from the upper wall surfaces of the tower. Entrainment separator 140 is illustrated in Figure 2 as oriented at an angle y relative to the horizontal in scrub¬ bing tower 100. This angle will preferably be within the range of from about 10 to about 45°, e.g. about 20°.
The separator 140 utilizes single pass separator blades 142 to collect droplets by impingement and to turn the gas in a direction most suitable for further mist elimination. The individual blades 142 are oriented at an angle δ with regard to the lower surface of assemblies 144, 144', 144", etc., of the blades 142. Typically, a blade of this type will be a parallelogram-shaped piece of from about 0.15 to about 0.23 meters in minor dimension and from about 0.6 to about 1.5 meters in major dimension. Spacing between individual blades will typically be from about 40 to about 70% of the minor dimension of the individual blades. Angle δ will preferably be within the range of from about 20 to about 40°, the exact value depending on the angle δ and the desired degree of flow ' direction of the effluent stream.
The assemblies 144, etc., are constructed and oriented in a fashion that facilitates excellent drainage. The individual assemblies are arranged in a pattern of chevrons as illustrated. The assemblies 144, efc, are preferably oriented with respect to one another at an angle θ, typically in the range of from about 125 to about 145°, and preferably about 140°. The entrainment separator structure is supported by members 146 which run the lengths of each of the assemblies. Other arrangements of supporting structures are possible. The structure of the entrainment separator 140 permits direct contact washing of the blades by means of fixed nozzle lances 147 having spray nozzles 148 capable of spraying wash water directly onto the blades from both the top and the bottom. Washing is typically done by operating each washer header separately and sequentially with the others. The wash water is of sufficient quality and is used in sufficient quantity to reduce the level of saturated, dis¬ solved salts on the separator surfaces. Together with the good drainage afford¬ ed by the chevron-shaped arrangement of assemblies 144, etc., the use of high quality wash water and frequent washing affords practically deposit-free opera- tion.
It is a feature of the invention that the separation efficiency of the first entrainment separator 140 need not be as high as multipass separators employed in the prior art because the ability to redirect the flow from vertical to horizontal enables the use of a high-efficiency, vertically-oriented mist eliminator 150. Thus, even though the entrainment removal efficiency is lower than might be thought desirable for wet scrubbing towers, the entrainment separator causes very low pressure drops, e.g. less than about 0.15 inches water column, and has other advantages in terms of cleanability, drainage, high bulk gas velocities, and direction of the gas flow from the upper wall surfaces of the tower and toward a highly-efficient, vertical mist eliminator 150. The mist eliminator 150 is preferably of the baffle type, e.g. a zig-zag baffle.
The scrubbed and demisted effluent can then be discharged to the air such as by stack 160. In the an alternate embodiment, the demisted effluent is heated prior to discharge such as in a gas-to-gas heat exchanger in a vertical configuration as described in copending, commonly-assigned U.S. Patent Application S.N. 08/257,158 (attorney's docket number 1930-P0020), filed on June 9,1994, filed in the names of the inventors named herein. The effect of the improvements of the invention in combination is to enable construction of a single-loop, wet-scrubbing, open spray tower which is about one half the empty weight of current open spray towers. This difference in size coupled with improved SOx absorptive capacity afforded by the slurry results in an improvement in total process efficiency of roughly 30% or more over conventional systems. Total process efficiency is measured by the value of all resources expended to remove a unit of SOx from the untreated gas. These include both capital and operating resources.
The above description is for the purpose of teaching the person of ordinary skill in the art how to practice the invention, and it is not intended to detail all of those obvious modifications and variations of it which will become apparent to the skilled worker upon reading the description. It is intended, however, that all such obvious modifications and variations be included within the scope of the invention which is defined by the following claims. The claims are meant to cover the claimed elements and steps in any arrangement or sequence which is effective to meet the objectives there intended, unless the context specifically indicates the contrary.

Claims

1. A single-loop, open-tower, countercurrent limestone wet scrubbing process for reducing the concentration of SOx in flue gases, comprising:
(a) directing a flow of flue gas containing SOx upwardly through a vertical scrubbing tower at a bulk flow velocity of greater than about 4.5 meters per second;
(b) introducing into a vertical scrubbing section within said tower, a spray of droplets of an aqueous slurry of finely-divided calcium carbonate, calcium sulfate, and inert solids to contact the flue gas while descending through the tower countercurrently to the flow of flue gas;
(c) collecting the slurry in a reaction tank after contact with the flue gas;
(d) withdrawing slurry from the reaction tank;
(e) subjecting slurry withdrawn from the reaction tank to a treatment effective to provide a recycle stream rich in fine particles of calcium carbonate and another stream rich in calcium sulfate particles;
(f) returning to the process a major portion of the recycle stream rich in calcium carbonate; and
(g) introducing fresh calcium carbonate as feed into the system in amounts sufficient to replace the calcium withdrawn and not recycled, as well as that dissolved and reacted with the SOx absorbed in the liquid phase in the scrubbing section.
2. A process according to claim 1 wherein finely-divided calcium carbonate introduced as feed has a weight median particle size of less than about 8μ as introduced.
3. A process according to claim 1 wherein the pH of the slurry as introduced into the scrubbing tower is within the range of from about 5.0 to about 6.3.
4. A process according to claim 1 wherein a bulk flue gas flow rate through the scrubbing tower is up to about 6 meters per second.
5. A process according to claim 1 wherein the tower comprises a single pass entrainment separator effective to reduce the quantity of droplets and to turn the direction of flow of the flue gases to an orientation effective for efficient utilization of a vertically-oriented mist separator.
6. A process according to claim 5 wherein the tower further comprises a vertically-oriented mist eliminator, and said entrainment eliminator being effective to turn the direction of flow of the flue gases by at least 30° from the vertical axis of the tower.
7. A process according to claim 1 wherein the slurry withdrawn from the reaction tank is passed to a hydrocyclone to provide a recycle stream rich in fine particles of calcium carbonate having a weight median diameter of about 6μ or less and a molar ratio of calcium-containing to sulfur-containing compounds of at least 1.3, and a discharge stream rich in relatively larger particles of calcium sulfite having a weight median diameter of from about 25 to about 55μ.
8. A process according to claim 1 wherein the slurry is withdrawn from the reaction tank after an average residence time of less than about 8 hours.
9. A process according to claim 1 wherein at least a portion of the slurry in the recycle stream is fed back the reaction tank at a molar ratio of calcium-containing to sulfur-containing compounds of at least 1.3 and a solids concentration of less than 10%.
10. A process according to claim 9 wherein the molar ratio of calcium-containing to sulfur-containing compounds in the recycle stream is greater than about 1.4.
11. A process according to claim 9 wherein the recycle stream comprises less than 5% suspended solids.
12. A process according to claim 1 wherein the slurry is introduced by spray nozzles, arranged in two levels with a spacing between levels of less than about 2 meters, and with the direction of flow from adjacent nozzles alternating be¬ tween upward and downward.
13. A process according to claim 1 wherein the median size of the calcium carbonate particles in the reaction tank is maintained within the range of from about 2 to about 6μ, and the weight median particle size of the finely-divided calcium carbonate as introduced is less than about 8μ, with 99 % by weight of the particles being less than 44μ.
14. A process according to claim 1 wherein the pH of the slurry in the reaction tank is within the range of from about 5.8 to about 6.3.
15. A single-loop, open-tower, countercurrent limestone wet scrubbing process for reducing the concentration of SOx in flue gases, comprising:
(a) directing a flow of flue gas containing SOx upwardly through a vertical scrubbing tower at a bulk flow velocity of from greater than about 4.5 meters per second up to about 6 meters per second;
(b) introducing into a vertical scrubbing section within said tower, a spray of droplets of an aqueous slurry of finely-divided calcium carbonate, calcium sulfate, and inert solids to contact the flue gas while descending through the tower countercurrently to the flow of flue gas;
(c) collecting the slurry in a reaction tank after contact with the flue gas;
(d) withdrawing slurry from the reaction tank after an average residence time of less than about 8 hours; (e) subjecting slurry withdrawn from the reaction tank to a treatment effective to provide a recycle stream rich in fine particles of calcium carbonate and another stream rich in calcium sulfate particles;
(f) returning to the process a major portion of the recycle stream rich in calcium carbonate; and
(g) introducing fresh calcium carbonate as feed into the system in amounts sufficient to replace the calcium withdrawn and not recycled as well as that dissolved and reacted with the SOx absorbed in the liquid phase in the scrubbing section, the finely-divided calcium carbonate introduced as feed having a weight median particle size of less than about 10μ as introduced.
16. A process according to claim 15 wherein the pH of the slurry as introduced into the scrubbing tower is within the range of from about 5.0 to about 6.3.
17. A process according to claim 16 wherein the pH of the slurry in the reaction tank is maintained within the range of from about 5.8 to about 6.3.
18. A process according to claim 15 wherein the tower comprises a single-pass entrainment separator effective to reduce the quantity of moisture droplets and to turn the direction of flow of the flue gases to an orientation effective for efficient utilization of a vertically-oriented mist separator.
19. A process according to claim 18 wherein the tower further comprises a vertically-oriented mist eliminator, and said entrainment separator is effective to turn the direction of flow of the flue gases by at least 30° from the vertical axis of the tower.
20. A process according to claim 15 wherein the slurry withdrawn from the reaction tank is passed to a hydrocyclone to provide a recycle stream rich in fine particles of calcium carbonate having a weight median diameter of about 8μ or less and a molar ratio of calcium-containing to sulfur-containing compounds of at least 1.3, and a discharge stream rich in relatively larger particles of calcium sulfite having a weight median diameter of from about 25 to about 55μ.
21. A process according to claim 20 wherein at least a portion of the slurry in the recycle stream is fed back the reaction tank at a molar ratio of calcium-containing to sulfur-containing compounds of at least 1.3.
22. A process according to claim 21 wherein the molar ratio of calcium- containing to sulfur-containing compounds in the recycle stream is greater than about 1.4, and the recycle stream comprises less than 5% suspended solids.
23. A process according to claim 15 wherein the calcium carbonate is milled immediately prior to being supplied as feed to the slurry to maintain 99% of the calcium carbonate particles less than 44μ, the weight median size of the calcium carbonate particles in the reaction tank is maintained within the range of from about 2 to about 6μ, and the weight median particle size of the finely-divided calcium carbonate as introduced is less than about 8μ, with 99% by weight of the particles being less than 44μ.
24. A single-loop, open-tower, countercurrent limestone wet scrubbing process for reducing the concentration of SOx in flue gases, comprising:
(a) directing a flow of flue gas containing SOx upwardly through a vertical scrubbing tower; (b) introducing into a vertical scrubbing section within said tower, a spray of droplets of an aqueous slurry of finely-divided calcium carbonate, calcium sulfate, and inert solids, preferably having a weight median diameter of calcium carbonate of about 6μ or less and a molar ratio of calcium-containing to sulfur- containing compounds of at least 1.1 , to contact the flue gas while descending through the tower countercurrently to the flow of flue gas;
(c) after contact with the flue gas, collecting the slurry in a reaction tank maintained at a pH of from about 5.0 to about 6.3; (d) withdrawing slurry from the reaction tank after an average residence time in the reaction tank of less than about 6 hours;
(e) subjecting slurry withdrawn from the reaction tank to treatment in a hydrocyclone to provide a recycle stream rich in fine particles of calcium carbonate having a weight mean particle size of less than about 6 μ and another stream rich in calcium sulfate particles having a weight median diameter of from about 25 to about 55μ;
(f) returning to the process at least a portion of the recycle stream rich in calcium carbonate having a molar ratio of calcium-containing to sulfur-containing compounds of at least 1.4; and
(g) introducing fresh calcium carbonate as feed into the system in amounts sufficient to replace the calcium withdrawn and not recycled as well as that dissolved and reacted with the SOx absorbed in the liquid phase in the scrubbing section, said finely-divided calcium carbonate having a weight median particle size of less than about 8μ as introduced.
25. A process according to claim 24 wherein the tower comprises a single pass entrainment separator effective to turn the direction of flow of the flue gases to an orientation effective for efficient utilization of a vertically-oriented mist separator.
26. A process according to claim 24 wherein the slurry is introduced into the vertical scrubbing section by spray nozzles, arranged in two levels with a spacing between levels of less than about 2 meters, and with the direction of flow from adjacent nozzles alternating between upward and downward.
27. A process according to claim 24 wherein the calcium carbonate is milled immediately prior to being supplied as feed to the slurry to maintain 99% of the calcium carbonate particles less than 44μ, the weight median size of the calcium carbonate particles in the reaction tank is maintained within the range of from about 2 to about 6μ, and the weight median particle size of the finely-divided calcium carbonate as introduced is less than about 8μ, with 99% by weight of the particles being less than 44μ.
28. A single-loop, open-tower, countercurrent limestone wet scrubbing process for reducing the concentration of SOx in flue gases, comprising: (a) directing a flow of flue gas containing SOx upwardly through a vertical scrubbing tower at a bulk flow velocity of greater than about 4.5 meters per second;
(b) introducing into a vertical scrubbing section within said tower, a spray of droplets of an aqueous slurry of finely-divided calcium carbonate, calcium sulfate, and inert solids, to contact the flue gas while descending through the tower countercurrently to the flow of flue gas, said slurry being introduced by spray nozzles, arranged in two levels with a spacing between levels of less than about 2 meters, and with the direction of flow from adjacent nozzles alternating between upward and downward; (c) collecting the slurry in a reaction tank after contact with the flue gas;
(d) withdrawing slurry from the reaction tank;
(e) subjecting slurry withdrawn from the reaction tank to a treatment effective to provide a recycle stream rich in fine particles of calcium carbonate and another stream rich in calcium sulfate particles; (f) returning to the process at least a portion of the recycle stream rich in calcium carbonate; and
(g) introducing fresh calcium carbonate as feed into the system in amounts sufficient to replace the calcium withdrawn and not recycled as well as that dissolved and reacted with the SOx absorbed in the liquid phase in the scrubbing section.
29. A process for reducing the concentration of SOx in a flue gas by wet scrubbing, comprising:
(a) directing a flow of flue gas containing SOx upwardly through a scrubbing tower; (b) introducing a spray of an aqueous slurry of finely-divided calcium carbonate, calcium sulfate, calcium sulfite, and non-reactive solids to descend through the tower countercurrently to the flow of flue gas, the weight median size of the calcium carbonate particles being within the range of from about 1 to about 8μ;
(c) following contact with the flue gas, collecting the slurry in a reaction tank;
(d) maintaining a high reactivity in the slurry by withdrawing slurry from the reaction tank and subjecting slurry withdrawn to treatment in a hydrocyclone to provide a recycle stream rich in fine particles of calcium carbonate and another stream rich in calcium sulfate, both of said streams containing dissolved chlorides, and discharging the calcium sulfate as solids and a portion of the recycle stream to remove either soluble chlorides or non-reactive solids, or both ; and (f) introducing fresh calcium carbonate as feed into the system in amounts sufficient to replace the calcium withdrawn due to said separation of said calcium sulfate and said portion of said recycle stream discharged, said finely-divided calcium carbonate having a weight median particle size of less than about 10μ as introduced.
30. A process for reducing the concentration of SOxin combustion effluents, comprising:
(a) providing a scrubbing tower comprising a gas inlet duct, a gas outlet duct, and a vertical scrubbing section, configured to direct a flow of flue gas upwardly through said vertical scrubbing section; (b) positioning an array of spray devices within said scrubbing section, said array being configured to introduce a spray of an aqueous slurry of finely- divided calcium carbonate, calcium sulfate, calcium sulfite, and non-reactive solids to descend through the tower countercurrently to the flow of flue gas;
(c) supplying calcium carbonate with a weight median particle size of less than about 8μ as feed; (d) providing a reaction tank located below said array of spray devices to enable collection of the slurry after a period of contact with said flue gas within said vertical scrubbing section, said reaction tank being of a size suitable to permit reaction of the SOx with the calcium carbonate to form crystals of calcium sulfate having a weight median particle diameter at least 2 times larger than the particles of calcium as added as feed;
(e) withdrawing slurry from the reaction tank and delivering slurry to said array of spray devices positioned within said scrubbing section; and
(f) maintaining a low chloride content in the slurry in the reaction tank by withdrawing slurry from said reaction tank, passing the slurry withdrawn from the reaction tank to a hydrocyclone to provide a recycle stream rich in small particles of calcium carbonate and a stream rich in relatively larger particles of calcium sulfate, determining the chloride content of the recycle stream, and discharging a portion of the recycle stream in response to the determined chloride content.
31. A process for reducing the concentration of SOx in flue gases by wet scrubbing, comprising:
(a) directing a flow of flue gas containing SOx upwardly through a scrubbing tower,
(b) introducing a spray of an aqueous slurry of finely-divided calcium carbonate, calcium sulfate, calcium sulfite, and non-reactive solids to descend through the tower countercurrently to the flow of flue gas, the pH of the slurry in the reaction tank being within the range of from about 5.0 to about 6.3,
(c) collecting the slurry in a reaction tank,
(d) maintaining a low chloride content in the slurry in the reaction tank by withdrawing slurry from said reaction tank, passing the slurry withdrawn from the reaction tank to a hydrocyclone to provide a recycle stream rich in small particles of calcium carbonate and a stream rich in relatively larger particles of calcium sulfate, determining the chloride content of the recycle stream, and discharging a portion of the recycle stream in response to the chloride content; -40-
(e) returning a portion of the recycle stream, having a molar ratio of calcium-containing to sulfur-containing compounds greater than about 1.3, to the reaction tank;
(e) withdrawing the stream rich in calcium sulfate from the hydrocyclone to recover calcium sulfate; and
(f) introducing fresh calcium carbonate into the system in amounts sufficient to replace the calcium withdrawn, said finely-divided calcium carbonate having a weight median particle size of less than about 10μ.
32. A wet scrubbing apparatus for reducing the concentration of SOx in flue gases, comprising:
(a) a scrubbing tower comprising a gas inlet duct, a gas outlet duct, and a vertical scrubbing section, configured to direct a flow of flue gas upwardly through said scrubbing section;
(b) an array of spray devices positioned within said scrubbing section configured to introduce a spray of an aqueous slurry of finely-divided calcium carbonate to descend through the tower countercurrently to the flow of flue gas;
(c) a reaction tank located below said array of spray devices to enable collection of the slurry after a period of contact with said flue gas within said vertical scrubbing section, said reaction tank being of a size suitable to permit reaction of the SO2 with the calcium carbonate to form crystals of gypsum having a weight median particle diameter at least 2 times larger than the particles of calcium carbonate added as feed;
(d) means for supplying calcium carbonate with a weight median particle size of less than about 10μ as feed to said reaction tank; (e) a spray slurry supply means comprising at least one pump and associated conduit for withdrawing slurry from the reaction tank and delivering slurry to said array of spray devices positioned within said scrubbing section;
(f) a slurry quality maintenance system including a hydrocyclone capable of separating said slurry in said reaction tank into a stream rich in small particles of calcium carbonate and relatively larger particles of calcium sulfate, at least one pump and associated conduit for withdrawing slurry from the reaction tank and delivering slurry to a hydrocyclone, a recycle conduit leading from said hydrocyclone to said reaction tank to carry a recycle stream rich in calcium carbonate from said hydrocyclone, a discharge conduit in communication with said recycle conduit and adapted to remove a portion of said recycle stream from said recycle conduit, and a calcium sulfate slurry recovery conduit leading from said hydrocyclone to remove calcium sulfate slurry from said hydrocyclone.
EP95925239A 1994-06-09 1995-06-07 Improved wet scrubbing method and apparatus for removing sulfur oxides from combustion effluents Withdrawn EP0765187A4 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US257698 1981-04-27
US25716094A 1994-06-09 1994-06-09
US257160 1994-06-09
US08/257,698 US5635149A (en) 1994-06-09 1994-06-09 Wet scrubbing method and apparatus for removing sulfur oxides from combustion effluents
PCT/US1995/007167 WO1995033547A1 (en) 1994-06-09 1995-06-07 Improved wet scrubbing method and apparatus for removing sulfur oxides from combustion effluents

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0765187A1 true EP0765187A1 (en) 1997-04-02
EP0765187A4 EP0765187A4 (en) 1997-09-10

Family

ID=26945826

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP95925239A Withdrawn EP0765187A4 (en) 1994-06-09 1995-06-07 Improved wet scrubbing method and apparatus for removing sulfur oxides from combustion effluents

Country Status (17)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0765187A4 (en)
KR (1) KR970703798A (en)
AU (1) AU2943295A (en)
BG (1) BG63154B1 (en)
BR (1) BR9507951A (en)
CA (1) CA2190868A1 (en)
CZ (1) CZ353396A3 (en)
FI (1) FI964891A0 (en)
GE (1) GEP20002319B (en)
HU (1) HU221181B1 (en)
PH (1) PH31493A (en)
PL (1) PL317931A1 (en)
RU (1) RU2149679C1 (en)
SI (1) SI9520071A (en)
SK (1) SK151696A3 (en)
TW (1) TW349876B (en)
WO (1) WO1995033547A1 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN102000481B (en) * 2009-08-31 2012-10-10 宝山钢铁股份有限公司 Method for treating desulfurization ash

Families Citing this family (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6190630B1 (en) 1996-02-21 2001-02-20 Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. Flue gas treating process and apparatus
JP3354828B2 (en) * 1996-02-21 2002-12-09 三菱重工業株式会社 Smoke exhaust treatment method and apparatus
DE19652482A1 (en) * 1996-12-17 1998-06-18 Steag Ag Process for reducing the solids content of a suspension
DE19758526B4 (en) * 1997-08-23 2004-07-15 Lechler Gmbh + Co. Kg Drallsprühdüse
KR100303388B1 (en) * 1999-06-02 2001-09-24 세 영 모 Aaaaa
DE102005055550A1 (en) * 2005-11-18 2007-05-24 Merkl, Rupert, Dipl.-Ing. Apparatus and method for cleaning the exhaust gases in heating systems with simultaneous heat recovery and dust removal
US7524473B2 (en) 2007-03-23 2009-04-28 Alstom Technology Ltd Method of mercury removal in a wet flue gas desulfurization system
IT1392986B1 (en) * 2009-02-23 2012-04-02 Eberle ENERGY RECOVERY DEVICE.
CN102179126B (en) * 2011-04-06 2013-01-23 上海华畅环保设备发展有限公司 Flue gas cyclone dedusting and dewatering method for flue gas carbon dioxide gathering system and device thereof
DK2638952T3 (en) 2012-03-12 2022-10-17 Andritz Ab Method for controlling a gas purification system by measuring a parameter of an absorbent material
US20140314651A1 (en) 2013-02-27 2014-10-23 Fuel Tech, Inc. Process and Apparatus for Improving the Operation of Wet Scrubbers
RU2484890C1 (en) * 2012-04-10 2013-06-20 Федеральное государственное бюджетное образовательное учреждение высшего профессионального образования "Казанский государственный энергетический университет" (ФГБОУ ВПО "КГЭУ") Use of sludge formed at water treatment plant as sorbent for treatment of thermal power plant gas emissions
ITTV20120153A1 (en) * 2012-08-02 2014-02-03 Giorgio Eberle ENERGY RECOVERY PLANT.
CN103406017B (en) * 2013-08-19 2015-04-01 武汉龙净环保工程有限公司 Desulfurizing absorption tower and desulfurizing absorption method
CN103990374A (en) * 2014-05-12 2014-08-20 孙立刚 Novel desulfurization, denitrification, decarburization and dust removal purification combined device for coal-fired flue gas
CN105536399A (en) * 2015-12-15 2016-05-04 浙江百能科技有限公司 Flue gas purifying apparatus
US10161630B2 (en) 2016-12-01 2018-12-25 General Electric Technology Gmbh Systems and methods for testing flue gas cleaning systems
RU169760U1 (en) * 2016-12-20 2017-03-31 Федеральное государственное бюджетное образовательное учреждение высшего образования "Волгоградский государственный технический университет" (ВолгГТУ) ABSORBER

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0212523A2 (en) * 1985-08-15 1987-03-04 General Electric Company Process for the simultaneous absorption of sulfur oxides and production of ammonium sulfate
EP0246758A2 (en) * 1986-04-23 1987-11-25 Babcock-Hitachi Kabushiki Kaisha Method for controlling wetprocess flue gas desulfurization
EP0262396A2 (en) * 1986-09-20 1988-04-06 Heinz Dipl.-Ing. Hölter Process for the preparation of calcium sulphate dihydrate during flue-gas desulfurization
WO1989001820A1 (en) * 1987-08-22 1989-03-09 HÖLTER, Heinz Process for desulphurating flue gases from power station boiler furnaces

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3844349A (en) * 1973-01-26 1974-10-29 Mobil Oil Corp Petroleum production by steam injection
US4325923A (en) * 1978-07-26 1982-04-20 Rhone-Poulenc Industries Contacting of plural phases
DE3526008A1 (en) * 1985-07-20 1987-01-22 Metallgesellschaft Ag METHOD FOR REMOVING POLLUTANTS FROM SMOKE GAS
US5215672A (en) * 1992-09-01 1993-06-01 The Babcock & Wilcox Company Purification of FGD gypsum product

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0212523A2 (en) * 1985-08-15 1987-03-04 General Electric Company Process for the simultaneous absorption of sulfur oxides and production of ammonium sulfate
EP0246758A2 (en) * 1986-04-23 1987-11-25 Babcock-Hitachi Kabushiki Kaisha Method for controlling wetprocess flue gas desulfurization
EP0262396A2 (en) * 1986-09-20 1988-04-06 Heinz Dipl.-Ing. Hölter Process for the preparation of calcium sulphate dihydrate during flue-gas desulfurization
WO1989001820A1 (en) * 1987-08-22 1989-03-09 HÖLTER, Heinz Process for desulphurating flue gases from power station boiler furnaces

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See also references of WO9533547A1 *

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN102000481B (en) * 2009-08-31 2012-10-10 宝山钢铁股份有限公司 Method for treating desulfurization ash

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CZ353396A3 (en) 1997-05-14
TW349876B (en) 1999-01-11
WO1995033547A1 (en) 1995-12-14
FI964891A (en) 1996-12-05
BG101099A (en) 1997-10-31
EP0765187A4 (en) 1997-09-10
HU221181B1 (en) 2002-08-28
HUT77896A (en) 1998-09-28
SK151696A3 (en) 1997-08-06
CA2190868A1 (en) 1995-12-14
AU2943295A (en) 1996-01-04
PH31493A (en) 1998-11-03
PL317931A1 (en) 1997-04-28
RU2149679C1 (en) 2000-05-27
GEP20002319B (en) 2000-12-25
BR9507951A (en) 1997-09-02
KR970703798A (en) 1997-08-09
BG63154B1 (en) 2001-05-31
SI9520071A (en) 1997-06-30
HU9603356D0 (en) 1997-02-28
FI964891A0 (en) 1996-12-05

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5635149A (en) Wet scrubbing method and apparatus for removing sulfur oxides from combustion effluents
CN1089265C (en) Flue gas scrubbing apparatus
EP0765187A1 (en) Improved wet scrubbing method and apparatus for removing sulfur oxides from combustion effluents
US5686053A (en) Wet-type flue gas desulfurization plant and method making use of a solid desulfurizing agent
US5674459A (en) Hydrogen peroxide for flue gas desulfurization
EP0766598B1 (en) Improved entrainment separator for high velocity gases and reheating of scrubber gases
US5486341A (en) Entrainment separator for high velocity gases
CN1196001A (en) Process and device for scrubbing acidic gas by wet method
RU97100157A (en) REMOVED LIQUID SEPARATOR FOR HIGH-SPEED GASES AND FOR REPEATED HEATING OF GASES EXITING FROM SCRUBER
CN101306319A (en) Direct discharging flue gas treatment method
US5310528A (en) Method for purification of waste gases
EP0637988A1 (en) Method for purification of waste gases
US5770166A (en) Slurry thickening tank and absorption tower for use in wet flue gas desulfurization systems
WO2000066250A1 (en) Flue gas scrubbing apparatus
CN1153482A (en) Improved wet scrubbing method and apparatus for removing sulfur oxides from combustion effluents
MXPA96006215A (en) Improved method of wet deposition and apparatus to remove sulfur oxides from combust effluents
MXPA96006216A (en) Improved trailer separator for high speed and reheating gases of depuracy gases
WO1993003824A1 (en) Method for purification of waste gases

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19970108

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT DE DK ES GB GR IT NL PT SE

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: BRESOWAR, GERALD, E.

Inventor name: BAKKE, EVEN

Inventor name: KLINGSPOR, JONAS S.

A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

Effective date: 19970729

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A4

Designated state(s): AT DE DK ES GB GR IT NL PT SE

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19990901

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: ALSTOM POWER INC.

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20040103