EP0753055A1 - Enzymatic antimicrobial compositions - Google Patents

Enzymatic antimicrobial compositions

Info

Publication number
EP0753055A1
EP0753055A1 EP95915183A EP95915183A EP0753055A1 EP 0753055 A1 EP0753055 A1 EP 0753055A1 EP 95915183 A EP95915183 A EP 95915183A EP 95915183 A EP95915183 A EP 95915183A EP 0753055 A1 EP0753055 A1 EP 0753055A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
sep
chloroperoxidase
vanadium
enzymatic
hypochlorite
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP95915183A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Inventor
Philip Barnett
Dirk Herman Hondmann
Lambertus Henricus Simons
Pieter Ferdinand Ter Steeg
Ronald Wever
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Unilever PLC
Unilever NV
Original Assignee
Unilever PLC
Unilever NV
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Unilever PLC, Unilever NV filed Critical Unilever PLC
Priority to EP95915183A priority Critical patent/EP0753055A1/en
Publication of EP0753055A1 publication Critical patent/EP0753055A1/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N9/00Enzymes; Proenzymes; Compositions thereof; Processes for preparing, activating, inhibiting, separating or purifying enzymes
    • C12N9/0004Oxidoreductases (1.)
    • C12N9/0065Oxidoreductases (1.) acting on hydrogen peroxide as acceptor (1.11)
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61PSPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
    • A61P31/00Antiinfectives, i.e. antibiotics, antiseptics, chemotherapeutics
    • A61P31/04Antibacterial agents
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C09DYES; PAINTS; POLISHES; NATURAL RESINS; ADHESIVES; COMPOSITIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; APPLICATIONS OF MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • C09DCOATING COMPOSITIONS, e.g. PAINTS, VARNISHES OR LACQUERS; FILLING PASTES; CHEMICAL PAINT OR INK REMOVERS; INKS; CORRECTING FLUIDS; WOODSTAINS; PASTES OR SOLIDS FOR COLOURING OR PRINTING; USE OF MATERIALS THEREFOR
    • C09D5/00Coating compositions, e.g. paints, varnishes or lacquers, characterised by their physical nature or the effects produced; Filling pastes
    • C09D5/16Antifouling paints; Underwater paints
    • C09D5/1606Antifouling paints; Underwater paints characterised by the anti-fouling agent
    • C09D5/1612Non-macromolecular compounds
    • C09D5/1625Non-macromolecular compounds organic
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D3/00Other compounding ingredients of detergent compositions covered in group C11D1/00
    • C11D3/16Organic compounds
    • C11D3/38Products with no well-defined composition, e.g. natural products
    • C11D3/386Preparations containing enzymes, e.g. protease or amylase
    • C11D3/38654Preparations containing enzymes, e.g. protease or amylase containing oxidase or reductase
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12QMEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
    • C12Q1/00Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions
    • C12Q1/26Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving oxidoreductase
    • C12Q1/28Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving oxidoreductase involving peroxidase

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Proteomics, Peptides & Aminoacids (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
  • Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
  • Oncology (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Pharmacology & Pharmacy (AREA)
  • Communicable Diseases (AREA)
  • Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Agricultural Chemicals And Associated Chemicals (AREA)
  • Enzymes And Modification Thereof (AREA)
  • Measuring Or Testing Involving Enzymes Or Micro-Organisms (AREA)
  • Pharmaceuticals Containing Other Organic And Inorganic Compounds (AREA)

Abstract

An antimicrobial composition is provided, comprising a Vanadium haloperoxidase, a source of halide and hydrogen peroxide or a source of hydrogen peroxide. Preferably, the Vanadium haloperoxidase is a chloroperoxidase obtainable from Curvularia inaequalis.

Description


   <Desc/Clms Page number 1> 
 



   ENZYMATIC ANTIMICROBIAL COMPOSITIONS TECHNICAL FIELD
The present invention relates to the field of enzymatic antimicrobial   compositions   and their use. More in particular, it relates to enzymatic antimicrobial compositions comprising a Vanadium haloperoxidase, a source of hydrogen peroxide and a source of halide. The invention also relates to the production of Vanadium haloperoxidase by means of recombinant DNA technique, which may be used in enzymatic antimicrobial compositions. 



  BACKGROUND AND PRIOR ART
Various enzymatic antimicrobial compositions are known in the art. For instance, WO-A-94/04217 discloses stabilized dentifrice compositions which are capable of producing antimicrobially effective concentrations of hypothiocyanite ions (OSCN-). The compositions contain an oxidoreductase to produce hydrogen peroxide and a peroxidase enzyme capable of oxidising thiocyanate ions, which are normally present in saliva, to antimicrobial hypothiocyanite ions (OSCN-). Suitable peroxidases include lactoperoxidase, myeloperoxidase salivary peroxidase and chloroperoxidase. 



   Enzymatic antimicrobial compositions comprising a haloperoxidase are also disclosed in EP-A-500 387 (Exoxemis). It is described that haloperoxidases selectively bind to and inhibit the growth of target microbes in the presence of peroxide and halide. As suitable haloperoxidases EP-A-500 387 mentions myeloperoxidase (MPO), eosinophil oxidase (EPO), lactoperoxidase (LPO) and chloroperoxidase (CPO). It was reported that the ratio of halide to hydrogen peroxide is a critical factor with regard to the stability and functionality of the haloperoxidase. At very low ratios, hydrogen peroxide can inhibit the haloperoxidase function, whereas at very high ratios, the halide can block the 

 <Desc/Clms Page number 2> 

 enzymatic reaction. The ratio may vary over a broad range, but is preferably kept above about 50. 



   Because of unwanted side reactions of the hydrogen peroxide, the actual hydrogen peroxide concentration in the antimicrobial composition might be lower than expected. Therefore, the present inventors found it more desirable to have the possibility to employ a high starting concentration hydrogen peroxide in the antimicrobial composition, in combination with a conventional amount of halide. 



   Furthermore, there is a need for enzymatic antimicrobial compositions having a spectrum of antimicrobial activity which is different from that of the known enzymatic antimicrobial compositions. Preferably, the compositions should be capable of exhibiting antimicrobial activity against micro-organisms which are difficult to combat, e.g. Streptococcus faecalis. In other circumstances it may be desirable to combat also non-pathogenic microorganisms, because they may cause spoilage of food products. 



   Thus, the purpose of the present invention is to provide an enzymatic antimicrobial composition which obviates one or more of the above disadvantages. 



   We have now surprisingly found that particularly effective enzymatic antimicrobial compositions can be formulated when Vanadium haloperoxidases are used. 



   The prior art mentioned above includes a variety of haloperoxidases for use in antimicrobial compositions, but no particular attention has been paid so far to the class of Vanadium haloperoxidases. 



   Vanadium haloperoxidases are different from other haloperoxidases in that the prosthetic group in these enzymes has structural features similar to vanadate (vanadium V), whereas the other haloperoxidases are hemeperoxidases. 



   A further purpose of the invention was to clone the gene encoding a Vanadium haloperoxidase and to determine its sequence to allow its expression in other 

 <Desc/Clms Page number 3> 

 micro-organisms which are more convenient to grow and also to increase the amount of enzyme which can be produced using recombinant DNA techniques. 



   Some of the Vanadium bromoperoxidases are found in nature on the surface or seaweeds (Wever et al. 1991). 



  In the intact plant in seawater the Vanadium bromoperoxidase is accessible to added substrates and is able to release HOBr upon addition of hydrogen peroxide. The role of the enzyme has not been established, but it is likely that formation of the highly oxidizing HOBr in seawater is part of a defense system of the plant to prevent microbial or fungal growth on its surface. 



   After the discovery of the non-heme Vanadium bromoperoxidases from the seaweed Ascophyllum nodosum, it was shown that a large number of other seaweed species were also contains these enzymes. In particular, the bromoperoxidase from A. nodosum has been extensively studied and characterized (for reviews, see references 2-3). The prosthetic group in these enzymes has structural features similar to vanadate (Vanadium V). In the catalytic mechanism that was derived for this enzyme, hydrogen peroxide reacts with the enzyme to form a hydrogen peroxide-enzyme complex after which bromide and a proton reacted with the complex to form an enzyme-HOBr complex. It was shown (De Boer et al. , 1988) that this complex decayed to yield enzyme and HOBr. These vanadium bromo-peroxidases were also shown (De Boer et al., 1988)) to have a high operational stability in aqueous and organic media.

   For example, these enzymes were stable for three weeks under turnover conditions and could be stored for more than a month in organic solvents such as acetone, methanol, ethanol (present up to 60% v/v) and 1-propanol, without loss of activity. However, these enzymes have the disadvantage that for potential applications bromide should be present or added and further attempts to clone the genes coding for these bromo peroxidases from seaweeds and to determine their amino acid sequences have not been successful. 

 <Desc/Clms Page number 4> 

 



   The known existing heme-containing chloroperoxidase from   Caldariomyces     fumaao   is less suitable for preparing enzymatic antimicrobial compositions because of its inherent instability and its low pH optimum of 2.75 (J.R. Kanofsky, 1984), which seriously limits its application. Similar arguments prevent the application of the enzyme myeloperoxidase (MPO) from human white blood cells, which is also capable of generating HOC1 (A. R.J. 



  Bakkenist et al. , 1980). 



   Reports (see references 8,9) have already appeared that dematiaceous hyphomyctes secrete haloperoxidases with pronounced stability. In particular it was shown that the terrestrial fungus Curvularia inaequalis secretes a Vanadium chloroperoxidase (J.W.P.M. Van Schijndel et al, 1993) which possesses a high affinity for chloride and has a pH optimum for the chlorination reaction around pH 5.5. As with the bromoperoxidase from seaweed, the prosthetic group in the chloroperoxidase has structural features similar to vanadate (vanadium V). In a subsequent more detailed study (J.W.P.M. Van Schijndel et al. , 1994), it was shown that the enzyme kinetics of the oxidation of chloride by hydrogen peroxide resemble that of the vanadium bromoperoxidase from the seaweed A. nodosum.

   Further, three different methods showed that the enzyme produces an oxidized chlorine species (HOC1) as reaction product and was by itself resistant towards this product. The enzyme exhibits a high thermostability (Tm 90 C) and displays high stability in organic solvent such as 40 % methanol, ethanol and propanol. 



  DEFINITION OF THE INVENTION
In a first aspect, the present invention relates to an enzymatic antimicrobial composition comprising a Vanadium haloperoxidase, a source of halide and hydrogen peroxide or a source of hydrogen peroxide. 



   According to a second aspect, the present invention relates to the production of a Vanadium 

 <Desc/Clms Page number 5> 

 haloperoxidase by transforming a suitable host by means of an expression vector comprising an origin of replication, transcription and termination control sequences and at least part of the DNA sequence coding for a Vanadium haloperoxidase, cultivating the host under conditions which allow the expression of the structural gene and isolating the Vanadium haloperoxidase. 



  DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION (a) The Vanadium haloperoxidase
The enzymatic antimicrobial compositions according to the invention comprise, as a first constituent, a Vanadium haloperoxidase. The Vanadium haloperoxidase may in principle be chosen from the various Vanadium haloperoxidases which have been disclosed in the art. For example, one can use the Vanadium (non-heme) haloperoxidase produced from Curvularia inaequalis, such as described in US-A-4 707 466. Alternatively, one may isolate and purify the chloroperoxidase from Curvularia inaequalis (CBS 102.42) according to the method of J. W.P.M. Van Schijndel et al. (1993). 



   Other sources of Vanadium haloperoxidases include Drechslera biseptata (CBS 371.72), Drechslera   fuqax   (CBS 509.77), Drechslera nicotiae (CBS 655.74), Drechslera   subpapendorfii   (656.74), Embelisia   hyacinthi   (416.71), Embelisia   didymospora   (CBS 766, Ulocladium chartarum (200.67) and Ulocladium botrytis (452.72). 



   Alternatively, Vanadium haloperoxidase can be prepared by recombinant DNA techniques by transforming a suitable host by means of an expression vector comprising an origin of replication, transcription and termination control sequences and the DNA sequence coding for a Vanadium haloperoxidase, cultivating the host under conditions which allow the expression of the structural gene and isolating the Vanadium haloperoxidase. This is described in detail in the Examples below. 

 <Desc/Clms Page number 6> 

 



  (b) The source of halide ions. 



   The second constituent of the hygienic compositions according to the invention is a source of halide ions. These may be any halide ions, but a source of iodide or chloride ions are preferred because they are most effective. Sodium chloride is the most preferred source of halide ions. The halide may be added to the enzymatic antimicrobial compositions of the invention, or alternatively, the halide may be used which is naturally present in tap water and which is usually in the order of 2-5 mM. 



  (c) The source of hydrogen peroxide. 



   The hygienic compositions according to the invention further comprise a source of hydrogen peroxide, or a hydrogen peroxide-generating system. Examples of suitable hydrogen peroxide-generating systems are perborate or percarbonate salts, preferably sodium percarbonate or sodium perborate. 



   The hydrogen peroxide may also be provided by an enzymatic hydrogen peroxide generating system. The enzymatic hydrogen peroxide-generating system may in principle be chosen from the various enzymatic hydrogen peroxide-generating systems which have been disclosed in the art. For example, one may use an amine oxidase and an amine, an amino acid oxidase and an amino acid, lactate oxidase and lactate, cholesterol oxidase and cholesterol, uric acid oxidase and uric acid or a xanthine oxidase with xanthine. Preferred, however, is the combination of glucose oxidase and glucose. 



   The amount of glucose oxidase will depend on its specific activity and the activity of any residual catalase that may be present, but by way of example it can be stated generally that the detergent composition according to the invention will contain from 10 to 1000, preferably from 20 to 500 units glucose oxidase per g or ml of the detergent composition, a unit of enzyme activity being defined as the 

 <Desc/Clms Page number 7> 

 quantity required to convert 1  mol of substrate per minute under standard conditions. 



  (d) Other ingredients. 



   The enzymatic antimicrobial compositions of the invention generally comprise from 0.01 to 50 % by weight, preferably 0.1 to 5.0% by weight of one or more surfactants are wetting agents. Suitable surfactants or detergentactive compounds are soap or non-soap anionics, nonionics, cationics, amphoteric or zwitterionic compounds. The surfactant system usually comprises one or more anionic surfactants and one or more nonionic surfactants. The surfactant system may additionally contain amphoteric or zwitterionic detergent compounds, but this is not normally desired owing to their relatively high cost. 



   In general, the nonionic and anionic surfactants of the surfactant system may be chosen from the surfactants described "Surface Active Agents" Vol. 1, by Schwartz & Perry, Interscience 1949, Vol. 2 by Schwartz, Perry & Berch, Interscience 1958, in the current edition of "McCutcheon's Emulsifiers and Detergents" published by Manufacturing Confectioners Company or in "Tenside-Taschenbuch", H. Stache, 2nd Edn., Carl Hauser Verlag, 1981. 



   Suitable nonionic detergent compounds which may be used include, in particular, the reaction products of compounds having a hydrophobic group and a reactive hydrogen atom, for example, aliphatic alcohols, acids, amides or alkyl phenols with alkylene oxides, especially ethylene oxide either alone or with propylene oxide. 



  Specific nonionic detergent compounds are C6-C22 alkyl phenol-ethylene oxide condensates, generally 5 to 25 EO, i.e. 5 to 25 units of ethylene oxide per molecule, and the condensation products of aliphatic C8-C18 primary or secondary linear or branched alcohols with ethylene oxide, generally 5 to 40 EO. 

 <Desc/Clms Page number 8> 

 



   Suitable anionic detergent compounds which may be used are usually water-soluble alkali metal salts of organic sulphates and sulphonates having alkyl radicals containing from about 8 to about 22 carbon atoms, the term alkyl being used to include the alkyl portion of higher acyl radicals. Examples of suitable synthetic anionic detergent compounds are sodium and potassium alkyl sulphates, especially those obtained by sulphating higher C8-C18 alcohols, produced for example from tallow or coconut oil, sodium and potassium alkyl   C9-C20   benzene sulphonates, particularly sodium linear secondary alkyl C10-C15 benzene sulphonates; and sodium alkyl glyceryl ether sulphates, especially those ethers of the higher alcohols derived from tallow or coconut oil and synthetic alcohols derived from petroleum.

   The preferred anionic detergent compounds are sodium C11-C15 alkyl benzene sulphonates and sodium C12-C18 alkyl sulphates. 



   Also applicable are surfactants such as those described in EP-A-328 177 (Unilever), which show resistance to salting-out, the alkyl polyglycoside surfactants described in EP-A-070 074, and alkyl monoglycosides. 



   Preferred surfactant systems are mixtures of anionic with nonionic detergent active materials, in particular the groups and examples of anionic and nonionic surfactants pointed out in EP-A-346 995 (Unilever). 



  Especially preferred is surfactant system which is a mixture of an alkali metal salt of a C16-C18 primary alcohol sulphate together with a C12-C15 primary alcohol 3- 7 EO ethoxylate. 



   The nonionic detergent is preferably present in amounts greater than 10%, e. g. 25-90% by weight of the surfactant system. Anionic surfactants can be present for example in amounts in the range from about 5% to about 40% by weight of the surfactant system. 



   The enzymatic detergent compositions of present invention may also comprise other constituents normally used in antimicrobial compositions, such as thickening agents. Particularly useful in this respect are the 

 <Desc/Clms Page number 9> 

 combinations of surfactants disclosed in EP-A-314 232 (Unilever), which provide thickening gels upon dissolution with water. 



   The antimicrobial compositions of the invention may be employed to provide hygiene benefits for hardsurface cleaning and fabric washing, but also to provide hygiene and cleaning in industrial/institutional applications such as in hospitals and for cleaning and disinfecting medical equipment. Another application is in the dairy industry, for disinfecting milking equipment. The antimicrobial compositions can also be succesfully used in deodorants in view of their ability to combat bacteria which cause malodour. 



   The antimicrobial compositions of the invention may be used in the form of powders which are to be dissolved in water before use, but the can also be formulated as liquids products or gels. In those product forms it is important that the production of hypohalite is not initiated until the composition is used. This can be achieved by physically separating the enzyme and its substrate, e. g. by encapsulating the enzyme according to well known techniques. 



   When the enzymatic antimicrobial composition is used, it is diluted 5 to 100 times by addition of water to provide a medium having an effective antimicrobial activity. It is then brought into contact with the surface to be disinfected and allowed REFERENCES 1. R. Wever, M. G.M. Tromp. B.E. Krenn A. Marjani and M. van Tol. Brominating activity of the seaweed   Ascophyllum   nodosum : Impact on the biosphere. Envir. Sc. Techn. 25 (1991), 446-449. 



  2. R. Wever and K. Kustin. Vanadium : a biologically relevant element. Adv. Inorg. Chem. 35 (1990), 81-115. 



  3. D. Rehder. The bioinorganic chemistry of vanadium. 



  Ang. Chem. Ed. Engl. 30 (1991) 148-167. 

 <Desc/Clms Page number 10> 

 4. E. de Boer and R. Wever. The reaction mechanism of the novel vanadium bromoperoxidase, a steady-state kinetic analysis. J. Biol. Chem. 263 (1988), 12326-12332. 



  5. E. de Boer, H. Plat, M. G.M. Tromp, M.C.R. Franssen, H. C. val. der Plas, E. M. Meijer and H. E. Schoemaker. 



  Vanadium-containing bromoperoxidase : an example of an oxidoreductase with high operational stability in aqueous and organic media. Biotechn Bioeng. 30 (1987), 607-610. 



  6. J. R. Kanofsky. Singlet oxygen producion by chloroperoxidase-hydrogen peroxide-halide systems. J. 



  Biol. Chem. 259 (1984), 5596-5600. 



  7. A.R.J. Bakkenist, J. E.G. de Boer, H. Plat and R. 



  Wever. The halide complexes of myeloperoxidase and the mechanism of the halogenation reactions. Biochim. Biophys. 



  Acta 613 (1980), 337-348. 



  8. J. C. Hunter-Cevera and L. Sotos. Screening for a "new" enzyme in nature: haloperoxidase production by Death Valley dematiaceous hyphomycetes. Microb. Ecol. 12 (1986) 121-127. 



  9. T-N. E. Liu, T. M'Timkulu, J. Geigert, B. Wolf, S.L. 



  Neidleman, D. Silva and J.C. Hunter-Cevera. Isolation and characterization of a novel non-heme chloroperoxidase. 



  Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 142 (1987), 329-333. 



  10. J.W.P.M. Van Schijndel, E. G.M. Vollenbroek and R. 



  Wever. The chloroperoxidase from the fungus Curvularia inaequalis; a novel vanadium enzyme. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1161 (1993), 249-256. 



  11. Van Schijndel, J.W.P.M., Barnett, P. , Roelse, J., Vollenbroek, E. G.M. and Wever, R. Vanadium chloroperoxidase from the fungus Curvularia inaeaualis; stability and steady-state kinetics (1994) Eur. J.Biochem. 225, 151-157. 



  12. H. Schagger and G. Von Jagow (1987) Anal.Biochem. 166, 368-379. 



  13. P. Matsudaira (1987) J. Biol.Chem. 262,10035-10038. 



  14. Sambrook, J. , Fritch, E. F. and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: a Laboratory Manual, 2nd edn., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.). 



  15. R. Wever, H. Plat and E. de Boer (1985), Biochem. 



  Biophys. Acta 830,181-186. 

 <Desc/Clms Page number 11> 

 



   The invention will be further illustrated by means of the following non-limiting Examples. 



  EXAMPLE 1 Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of hypochlorite. 



  Materials: Bacterial strains used in this example were Escherichia coli NCTC 900, Pseudomonas   aeruginosa   ATCC 15442, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 13565, Streptococcus faecalis NCTC 1092 and Listeria innocua ATCC 33090 serotype 6B. 



  Bacteria were grown for 15 to 18 hours at 30 C in Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) broth-medium. After cultivation the strains were washed two times in citrate buffer pH 5.5 (20 mM Na3citrate-NaOH buffer + 10 mM NaCl). The bacterium suspensions were centrifuged in an Eppendorf centrifuge (14,000 rpm for 5 min), then the supernatants were removed and subsequently the bacterial pellet was resuspended in citrate buffer. This washing procedure was then repeated once more for each bacterial suspension. The twice washed bacterial suspension was then diluted with citrate buffer pH 5.5 to obtain a suspension of approximately 10 bacteria per ml. During the washing steps the cells were kept on ice. Buffers and BSA-solution (1% w/v in citrate buffer pH 5.5) were filter-sterilised and stored at 4 C.

   The hypochlorite solutions were made from a stock-solution (107,000 ppm) by dilution with sterile demineralised water. 



  Methodology: Using sterile techniques, a suspension of approximately 107 bacteria per ml in citrate buffer pH 5.5 was made. From this suspension aliquots of 1.9 ml were added to sterile tubes. Subsequently 0.1 ml of cold hypochlorite solutions of various concentrations were added to the tubes, in such a way that a hypochlorite dilution range is obtained. The tubes were mixed continuously with a magnetic stirrer. Also 

 <Desc/Clms Page number 12> 

 blank determinations were included where only sterile buffer was added instead of a hypochlorite solution. The samples were incubated for exactly 5 min at 30 C. After this incubation period 1 ml of the reaction mixture was taken and added to 9 ml cold BSA (1% w/v) solution and put on ice immediately. This was done to stop the reaction of hypochlorite with the microorganisms.

   Survival as Colony Forming Units (CFU) per ml was determined by diluting the sample from 10-1 to 10-5 and plating 100  l samples of the various dilutions on labelled BHI-agar plates. The plates were then incubated for 15-18 hours at 30 C. When there were no CFU detectable after this incubation period, the plates are incubated for another 24 hours at 30 C. 



  Definition: the Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MICvalue) is defined here as the concentration of hypochlorite which leads under the experimental conditions used to at least a log 6 reduction in colony forming units of the specific microorganism tested. 



  The results obtained are shown in Table I. The values found are in the same range as reported in the literature. 



  Table I. MIC values for various microorganisms. 
 EMI12.1 
 
<tb> 
<tb> 



  Microorganism <SEP> MIC-value <SEP> in <SEP> ppm
<tb> Escherichia <SEP> coli <SEP> 2-3
<tb> Staphylococcus <SEP> aureus <SEP> 2-3
<tb> Listeria <SEP> innocua <SEP> 2-3
<tb> Pseudomonas <SEP> aeruginosa <SEP> 2-3
<tb> Streptococcus <SEP> faecalis <SEP> 2-3
<tb> 
 

 <Desc/Clms Page number 13> 

 EXAMPLE 2 Minimal Inhibitory Concentration of hypochlorite and hypochlorite generated enzymatically by vanadiumchloroperoxidase (V-CPO) from Curvularia inaequalis. 



  In this example the killing effect of hypochlorite is compared to the killing effect of hypochlorite generated enzymatically by vanadium-chloroperoxidase (V-CPO) from Curvularia   inaequalis.   In order to make comparisons possible, a micropump was used. This was done to make the hypochlorite concentration during the experiment follow the same profile as in the situation were hypochlorite is generated enzymatically. Also the V-CPO activity was determined very carefully under the conditions of the experiment, this to know the amount of hypochlorite present at each time point of the experiment. 



  Materials: Bacterial strains used in this example were Escherichia coli NCTC 900, Pseudomonas   aeruginosa   ATCC 15442, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 13565, streptococcus faecalis NCTC 1092 and Listeria innocua ATCC 33090 serotype 6B. 



  Bacteria were grown for 15 to 18 hours at 30 C in Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) broth-medium. After cultivation the strains were washed two times in citrate buffer pH 5.5 (20 mM Na3citrate-NaOH buffer + 10 mM NaCl). The bacterium suspensions were centrifuged in an Eppendorf centrifuge (14000 rpm for 5 min), then the supernatant were removed and subsequently the bacterial pellet was resuspended in citrate buffer. This washing procedure was then repeated once more for each bacterial suspension. The twice washed bacterial suspension was then diluted with citrate buffer pH 5.5 to obtain a suspension of approximately 10 bacteria per ml. During the washing steps the cells were kept on ice. Buffers and BSA-solution (1% w/v in citrate buffer pH 5.5) were filter-sterilised and stored at 4 C.

   The hypochlorite solutions were made from a stock-solution (107,000 ppm) by dilution with sterile demineralised water. 

 <Desc/Clms Page number 14> 

 



  H202 solutions were made from a 30% stock solution by dilution with sterile demineralised water. Casitone was obtained from Difco. Chloroperoxidase from Curvularia   inaequalis   was purified according to van Schijdel et al. 



  (1993). Chloroperoxidase activity in the conversion of Clto HOC1 was determined spectrophotometrically in 20 mM sodium citrate buffer pH 5.5,10 mM NaCl, 100   M   H202, 50   M   monochlorodimedone at 30 C, by following the conversion of monochlorodimedone (e 290 nm = 20.2 mM-1.cm-1) to dichlorodimedone (e 290 nm = 0.2 mM-1.cm-1). 1 Unit of chloroperoxidase is defined as the amount of enzyme that converts 1  mol of monochlorodimedone (Sigma) per minute. 



  Methodology: Using sterile techniques, a suspension of approximately 107 bacteria per ml in citrate buffer pH 5.5 was made. From this suspension aliquots of 1.8 ml were added to a sterile reaction vessel, which was continuously stirred throughout the experiment with a magnetic stirrer. Subsequently 0.2 ml of V-CPO solutions of various concentrations (for calculations, see below) were added to the reaction vessels, in such a way that a V-CPO dilution range is obtained. Also blank determinations were included where 0.2 ml sterile buffer was added instead 0.2 ml of V-CPO solution. The reaction vessels was incubated at 30 C. Then 0.5 ml of a H202 stock solution was added, to start the VCPO reaction.

   The H202 stockconcentration used depended on the hypochlorite concentration produced, and was chosen in such a way that the endconcentration of H202 (at the end of the flux) was a fivefold molar excess compared to the endconcentration of hypochlorite. The samples were incubated for exactly 5 min at 30 C. After this incubation period 1 ml of the reaction mixture was taken and added to 9 ml cold BSA (1% w/v) solution and put on ice immediately. This was done to stop the reaction of hypochlorite with the microorganisms. Survival as Colony Forming Units (CFU) per ml was determined by diluting the sample from 10-1 to 10-5 and plating 100  l samples of the various dilutions on 

 <Desc/Clms Page number 15> 

 labelled BHI-agar plates. The plates were then incubated for 15-18 hours at 30 C.

   When there were no CFU detectable after this incubation period, the plates are incubated for another 24 hours at 30 C. 



  The MIC value obtained was compared to the MIC value that was obtained when the same hypochlorite amounts were added, using a micropump. This was done as follows: Using sterile techniques, a suspension of approximately 107 bacteria per ml in citrate buffer pH 5.5 was made. From this suspension aliquots of 1.8 ml were added to a sterile reaction vessel, which was continuously stirred throughout the experiment with a magnetic stirrer. The reaction vessels were incubated at 30 C. Then 0.2 ml of a H202 stock solution was added. The H202 stock concentration used depended on the hypochlorite concentration produced, and was chosen in such a way that the end concentration of H202 (at the end of the flux) was a five-fold molar excess compared to the endconcentration of hypochlorite.

   Then a flux of 0.5 ml of a hypochlorite solutions of a known concentration was applied over 5 min (flow: 0.1 ml per min) at 30 C. A series of experiments were done, each using various hypochlorite solutions of a different concentration, so that a range of hypochlorite end concentrations was obtained (for calculations see below). 



  After the incubation period of 5 minutes, 1 ml of the reaction mixture was taken and added to 9 ml cold BSA (1% w/v) solution and put on ice immediately. This was done to stop the reaction of hypochlorite with the microorganisms. 



  Survival as Colony Forming Units (CFU) per ml was determined by diluting the sample from 10-1 to 10-5 and plating 100  l samples of the various dilutions on labelled BHI-agar plates. The plates were then incubated for 15-18 hours at 30 C. When there were no CFU detectable after this incubation period, the plates are incubated for another 24 hours at 30 C. 

 <Desc/Clms Page number 16> 

 



  The similarity of the hypochlorite profiles obtained in the experiments described above with V-CPO respectively with hypochlorite from a stock solution were confirmed by using the same experimental set-up (as for the blank experiments without the microorganisms added) coupled to a spectrophotometer, in which the hypochlorite concentrations in time could be followed at 290 nm, making use of the conversion of monochlorodimedone (e 290nm = 20.2 mM-1.cm-1) to dichlorodimedone (e 290nm = 0.2 mM-1.cm-1). 



  Calculations: The endconcentration of hypochlorite generated with V-CPO was calculated as follows: With 0.01 U per ml of V-CPO 0.01 mol of hypochlorite per ml per min is generated, which is equivalent to 0.05 mol hypochlorite per ml per 5 min. due to the dilution effect of the flux of 0.5 ml, which is added to 2.0 ml initial volume, the endconcentration after 5 minutes is (2.0/2.5) * 0.05  mol per ml = 0.04 mol hypochlorite per ml after 5 minutes. This concentration could subsequently be expressed as 0.04 mol hypochlorite per ml = 0.04 * 52.5 ppm hypochlorite = 2.10 ppm hypochlorite. Other hypochlorite endconcentrations were obtained by increasing or decreasing the V-CPO concentration. The endconcentration of hypochlorite added was calculated as follows: Since a flux of 0.5 ml is added to a reaction volume of 2.0 ml, the endvolume is 2.5 ml, which corresponds to diluting fivefold.

   In order to obtain a hypochlorite end concentration of 2.10 ppm, a stock solution of 10.50 ppm was used. Other hypochlorite concentrations were obtained by increasing or decreasing the hypochlorite stock solution. 



  Definition: the Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MICvalue) is defined here as the concentration of hypochlorite which leads under the experimental conditions used to at least a log 6 reduction in colony forming units of the specific microorganism tested. 

 <Desc/Clms Page number 17> 

 



  The results are shown in Table II. The killing effects of various endconcentrations of hypochlorite, either produced by V-CPO or at the end of- the hypochlorite flux, are compared. As can be concluded from Table II, hypochlorite produced enzymatically by V-CPO already gives total inhibition of growth at hypochlorite concentrations as low as 0.4 ppm for all organisms tested except for Staphylococcus aureus, whereas 2 ppm hypochlorite is needed to obtain the same growth inhibition. This shows that vanadium-containing haloperoxidase is a more efficient hygienic component than would have been expected from just its hypochlorite producing capacity. Also it is apparent that V-CPO gives killing of all microorganisms tested, pathogenic or non-pathogenic, whereas heme-containing haloperoxidase are claimed to give only efficient killing of pathogenic bacteria (see EP-A-500 387). 



  Table II. MIC values for various microorganisms. 
 EMI17.1 
 
<tb> 
<tb> 



  Microorganism <SEP> MIC-value <SEP> with <SEP> MIChypochlorite <SEP> value
<tb> (in <SEP> ppm) <SEP> with <SEP> VCPO <SEP> ( <SEP> in <SEP> 
<tb> ppm)
<tb> Escherichia <SEP> coli <SEP> 2 <SEP> 0.4
<tb> Staphylococcus <SEP> aureus <SEP> 2-3 <SEP> 1.6
<tb> Listeria <SEP> innocua <SEP> 2 <SEP> 0.4
<tb> Pseudomonas <SEP> aeruginosa <SEP> 2 <SEP> 0.4
<tb> Streptococcus <SEP> faecalis <SEP> 2 <SEP> 0.4
<tb> 
 EXAMPLE 3 Killing efficiencies of hypochlorite and hypochlorite generated enzymatically by V-CPO in the presence of protein hydrolysate. 

 <Desc/Clms Page number 18> 

 



  For obtaining hygiene it is known that in situations encountered in practice, overdosing of hypochlorite is necessary, since this reactive molecule will not only react with microorganisms, but also with other compounds that are present. Therefor it was important to test the behaviour of vanadium-containing haloperoxidase in a fluid containing e. g. a protein hydrolysate. 



  Materials: The bacterial strain used in this example was Escherichia coli NCTC 900. Bacteria were grown for 15 to 18 hours at 30 C in Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) broth-medium. After cultivation the strains were washed two times in citrate buffer pH 5.5 (20 mM Na3citrate-NaOH buffer + 10 mM   NaCl).   



  The bacterium suspensions were centrifuged in an Eppendorf centrifuge (14,000 rpm for 5 min), then the supernatants were removed and subsequently the bacterial pellet was resuspended in citrate buffer. This washing procedure was then repeated once more for each bacterial suspension. The twice washed bacterial suspension was then diluted with citrate buffer pH 5.5 to obtain a suspension of approximately 108 bacteria per ml. During the washing steps the cells were kept on ice. Buffers and BSA-solution (1% w/v in citrate buffer pH 5.5) were filter-sterilised and stored at 4 C. The hypochlorite solutions were made from a stock-solution (107,000 ppm) by dilution with sterile demi. 



  H202 solutions were made from a 30% stock solution by dilution with sterile demineralised water. Casitone was obtained from Difco. Chloroperoxidase from Curvularia inaequalis was isolated and purified according to Van Schijndel et al. , 1993. 



  Methodology: Using sterile techniques, a suspension of approximately 108 bacteria per ml in citrate buffer pH 5.5 was made. From this suspension aliquots of 1.3 ml were added to a sterile reaction vessel, which was continuously stirred throughout the experiment with a magnetic stirrer. Then 0.5 ml of a 

 <Desc/Clms Page number 19> 

 0.5 mg per ml casitone (in citrate buffer pH 5.5) solution, respectively 0.5 ml citrate buffer pH 5.5 were added. 



  Subsequently 0.2 ml of V-CPO solutions of various concentrations (for calculations see Example 2) were added to the react-on vessels, in such a way that end concentrations of 3.2 ppm hypochlorite or 6.5 ppm hypochlorite were achieved. Also blank determinations were included were 0.2 ml sterile buffer was added instead 0.2 ml of a V-CPO solution. The reaction vessels were incubated at 30 C. Then 0.5 ml of a H202 solution was added (the concentration was chosen so that a fivefold molar excess of hydrogen peroxide was obtained at the end of the flux), to start the V-CPO reaction. The samples were incubated for exactly 5 min at 30 C. After this incubation period 1 ml of the reaction mixture was taken and added to 9 ml cold BSA (1% w/v) solution and put on ice immediately. This was done to stop the reaction of hypochlorite with the microorganisms.

   Survival as Colony Forming Units (CFU) per ml was determined by diluting the sample from 10-1 to 10-6 and plating 100  l samples of the various dilutions on labelled BHI-agar plates. The plates were then incubated for 15-18 hours at 30 C. When there were no CFU detectable after this incubation period, the plates are incubated for another 24 hours at 30 C. 



  The killing efficiencies obtained was compared to the killing efficiencies obtained when the same hypochlorite amounts were added, using a micropump. This was done as follows: Using sterile techniques, a suspension of approximately 108 bacteria per ml in citrate buffer pH 5.5 was made. From this suspension aliquots of 1.3 ml were added to a sterile reaction vessel, which was continuously stirred throughout the experiment with a magnetic stirrer. Then 0.5 ml of a 0.5 mg per ml casitone solution (in citrate buffer pH 5.5), respectively 0.5 ml citrate buffer pH 5.5 were added. 



  Subsequently 0.2 ml of sterile citrate buffer pH 5.5 was 

 <Desc/Clms Page number 20> 

 added. The reaction vessels were incubated at 30 C. Then a flux of 0.5 ml of hypochlorite solutions, yielding an endconcentration of 3.2 ppm hypochlorite respectively 6.5 ppm hypochlorite (for calculations on the concentration see Example 2) were applied over 5 min (flow:   0 .1   ml per min) at 30 C. After the incubation period of 5 min 1 ml of the reaction mixture was taken and added to 9 ml cold BSA (1% w/v) solution and put on ice immediately. This was done to stop the reaction of hypochlorite with the microorganisms. Survival as Colony Forming Units (CFU) per ml was determined by diluting the sample from 10-1 to 10-6 and plating 100  l samples of the various dilutions on labelled BHI-agar plates. The plates were then incubated for 15-18 hours at 30 C.

   When there were no CFU detectable after this incubation period, the plates are incubated for another 24 hours at 30 C. The results are shown in Table III. 



  Table III. The influence of casitone on the killing efficiencies of HC10, generated by V-CPO. 
 EMI20.1 
 
<tb> 
<tb> casitone <SEP> log <SEP> log <SEP> log <SEP> log
<tb> concen- <SEP> reductio <SEP> reduction <SEP> reduction <SEP> reduction
<tb> tration <SEP> n <SEP> with <SEP> with <SEP> 3.2 <SEP> with <SEP> 6.5 <SEP> with <SEP> 6.5
<tb> (mg/ml) <SEP> 3.2 <SEP> ppm <SEP> ppm <SEP> ppm <SEP> ppm
<tb> hypochlo <SEP> hypochlorit <SEP> hypochlori <SEP> hypochlori
<tb> rite <SEP> e <SEP> te <SEP> te
<tb> generate <SEP> generated
<tb> d <SEP> by <SEP> V- <SEP> by <SEP> V-CPO
<tb> CPO
<tb> 0.0 <SEP> 8.0 <SEP> 8.2 <SEP> 8.0 <SEP> 8.2
<tb> (= <SEP> total <SEP> (= <SEP> total <SEP> (= <SEP> total <SEP> (= <SEP> total <SEP> 
<tb> kill) <SEP> kill) <SEP> kill) <SEP> kill)
<tb> 0.1 <SEP> 5.0 <SEP> 0.5 <SEP> 8.0 <SEP> 1.0
<tb> (= <SEP> total
<tb> kill)

  
<tb> 
 

 <Desc/Clms Page number 21> 

 EXAMPLE 4 Comparison between the killing efficiencies of Vanadium containing haloperoxidase and a heme-containing haloperoxidase. 



  Materials: Bacterial strains used in this example were Escherichia coli NCTC 900, Streptococcus faecalis NCTC 1092 and Listeria innocua ATCC 33090 serotype 6B. Bacteria were grown for 15 to 18 hours at 30 C in Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) broth-medium. After cultivation the strains were washed two times in citrate buffer pH 5.5 (20 mM Na3citrate-NaOH buffer + 10 mM NaCl). The bacterium suspensions were centrifuged in an Eppendorf centrifuge (14,000 rpm for 5 min), then the supernatants were removed and subsequently the bacterial pellet was resuspended in citrate buffer. This washing procedure was then repeated once more for each bacterial suspension. The twice washed bacterial suspension was then diluted with citrate buffer pH 5.5 to obtain a suspension of approximately 107 bacteria per ml. During the washing steps the cells were kept on ice.

   Buffers and BSA-solution (1% w/v in citrate buffer pH 5.5) were filter-sterilised and stored at 4 C. 



  Chloroperoxidase from Curvularia inaequalis was purified according to van Schijndel et al. , (1993). The hemecontaining chloroperoxidase was obtained from Sigma (ex   Caldariomyces     fumaqo).   Chloroperoxidase activity in the conversion of Cl- to HOC1 was determined spectrophotometrically in 20 mM sodium citrate buffer pH 5.5,10 mM NaCl, 100   M   H202, 50  M monochlorodimedone at 30 C, by following the conversion of monochlorodimedone (e 290 nm = 20.2   mM-l.cm-1)   to dichlorodimedone (e 290 nm = 0.2 mM-1.cm-1). 1 Unit of chloroperoxidase is defined as the amount of enzyme that converts 1  mol of monochlorodimedone (Sigma) per minute. The same assay (and activity definition) was used for both enzymes, in order to be able to dose the two enzymes at equeal activity. 

 <Desc/Clms Page number 22> 

 



  Methodology: Using sterile techniques a suspension of approximately 107 bacteria per ml in 20 mM sodium citrate buffer pH 5.5, 10 mM NaCl was made. From this suspension aliquots of 1.9 ml were added to sterile tubes. Subsequently 0.1 ml of stock solutions of vanadium-containing chloroperoxidase respectively of heme-containing chloroperoxidase were added to the tubes, in such a way that a dilution range for both enzymes was obtained. Also blank determinations were included where only sterile buffer was added instead of an enzyme stock solution. Then 0.5 ml of an 25 mM H202 stock solution was added. The sample were incubated for exactly 5 min at 30 C. After this incubation period 1 ml of the reaction mixture was taken and added to 9 ml cold BSA (1% w/v) solution and put on ice immediately.

   Survival as Colony Forming Units (CFU) per ml was determined by diluting the sample from 10-1 to 10-5 and plating 100  l samples of the various dilutions on labelled BHI-agar plates. The plates were then incubated for 15-18 hours at 30 C. When there were no CFU detectable after this incubation period, the plates are incubated for another 24 hours at 30 C. 



  The results are presented in Table IV. The data clearly show that vanadium-containing chloroperoxidase provides a by far more effective hygienic system than the hemecontaining chloroperoxidase, even when they are dosed at equal activity. 

 <Desc/Clms Page number 23> 

 Table IV. 
 EMI23.1 
 
<tb> 
<tb> 



  10 <SEP> mM <SEP> NaCl <SEP> vanadium <SEP> heme <SEP> log <SEP> reduction
<tb> chloro- <SEP> chloroperoxidase <SEP> peroxidase
<tb> (U <SEP> per <SEP> ml) <SEP> (U <SEP> per <SEP> ml)
<tb> E <SEP> coli <SEP> 0.000 <SEP> 0.0
<tb> 0.00156 <SEP> 4.0
<tb> 0.0030 <SEP> 5.0
<tb> 0.0060 <SEP> 7.0(=total <SEP> kill)
<tb> 0.012 <SEP> 7.0(=total <SEP> kill)
<tb> 0.025 <SEP> 7.0(=total <SEP> kill)
<tb> 0.050 <SEP> 7.0(=total <SEP> kill)
<tb> 0.10 <SEP> 7.0(=total <SEP> kill)
<tb> 0.000 <SEP> 0.0
<tb> 0.00156 <SEP> 0.1
<tb> 0.0030 <SEP> 0.1
<tb> 0.0060 <SEP> 0.1
<tb> 0.012 <SEP> 0.2
<tb> 0.025 <SEP> 1.0
<tb> 0.050 <SEP> 1.2
<tb> 0.10 <SEP> 1.2
<tb> 
 

 <Desc/Clms Page number 24> 

 
 EMI24.1 
 
<tb> 
<tb> L.

   <SEP> innocua <SEP> 0.000 <SEP> 0.0
<tb> 0.00156 <SEP> 7.0 <SEP> (total <SEP> kill)
<tb> 0.0030 <SEP> 7.0 <SEP> (total <SEP> kill)
<tb> 0.0060 <SEP> 7.0 <SEP> (total <SEP> kill)
<tb> 0.012 <SEP> 7.0 <SEP> (total <SEP> kill)
<tb> 0.025 <SEP> 7.0(total <SEP> kill)
<tb> 0.050 <SEP> 7.0(total <SEP> kill)
<tb> 0.10 <SEP> 7.0(total <SEP> kill)
<tb> 0.00 <SEP> 0.0
<tb> 0.00156 <SEP> 0.0
<tb> 0.0030 <SEP> 0.0
<tb> 0.0060 <SEP> 0.0
<tb> 0.012 <SEP> 0.0
<tb> 0.025 <SEP> 0.0
<tb> 0.050 <SEP> 0.0
<tb> 0.10 <SEP> 0.0
<tb> S.

   <SEP> faecalis <SEP> 0.00 <SEP> 0.0
<tb> 0.00156 <SEP> 5.0
<tb> 0.0030 <SEP> 5.0
<tb> 0.0060 <SEP> 7.0(total <SEP> kill)
<tb> 0.012 <SEP> 7.0(total <SEP> kill)
<tb> 0.025 <SEP> 7.0 <SEP> (total <SEP> kill)
<tb> 0.050 <SEP> 7.0(total <SEP> kill)
<tb> 0.10 <SEP> 7.0(total <SEP> kill)
<tb> 0.00 <SEP> 0.0
<tb> 0.00156 <SEP> 0.0
<tb> 0.0030 <SEP> 0.1
<tb> 0.0060 <SEP> 0.1
<tb> 0.012 <SEP> 0.1
<tb> 0.025 <SEP> 0.1
<tb> 0.050 <SEP> 0.1
<tb> 0.10 <SEP> 0.9
<tb> 
 

 <Desc/Clms Page number 25> 

 EXAMPLE 5 The effect of various hydrogen peroxide sources on the inhibitory action of V-CPO. 



  In the previous examples hydrogen peroxide, which is one of the substrates in the V-CPO reaction, was added from a stock solution. In this example the effects of using other hydrogenperoxide sources is described. Oxidases were assayed at 30 C in a Biological Oxygen Monitor YSI Model 5300 (Oxygen chamber model 5301) in which oxygen consumption was monitored, using citrate buffer pH 5.5 (20 mM Na3citrate-NaOH buffer + 10 mM NaCl) as a buffer. The Buffer were saturated with air at 30 C. As a substrate for glucose oxidases 15 g.l-1 (end concentration) glucose was used. The bacterial strain used in this example was Escherichia coli NCTC 900. Bacteria were grown for 15 to 18 hours at 30 C in Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) brothmedium. After cultivation the strains were washed two times in citrate buffer pH 5.5 (20 mM Na3citrate-NaOH buffer + 10 mM NaCl).

   The bacterium suspensions were centrifuged in an Eppendorf centrifuge (14,000 rpm for 5 min), then the supernatant were removed and subsequently, the bacterial pellet was resuspended in citrate buffer. This washing procedure was then repeated once more for each bacterial suspension. The twice washed bacterial suspension was then diluted with citrate buffer pH 5.5 to obtain a suspension of approximately 108 bacteria per ml. During the washing steps the cells were kept on ice. Buffers and BSA-solution (1% w/v in citrate buffer pH 5.5) were filter-sterilised and stored at 4 C. The hypochlorite solutions were made from a stock-solution (107,000 ppm) by dilution with sterile demi. H202 solutions were made from a 30% stock solution by dilution with sterile demineralised water. 



  Casitone was obtained from Difco. Chloroperoxidase from Curvularia   inaegualis   was isolated and purified according   to Van Schijndel et al., (1993). oxidase ex   Aspergillus niger was obtained from Sigma. 

 <Desc/Clms Page number 26> 

 



  Methodology: Using sterile techniques, a suspension of approximately 108 bacteria per ml in citrate buffer pH 5.5 was made. From this suspension aliquots of 1.3 ml were added to a sterile reaction vessel, which was continuously stirred throughout the experiment with a magnetic stirrer. Then 0.5 ml of a 0.5 mg per ml casitone solution (in citrate buffer pH 5.5) was added. Subsequently, 0.2 ml of V-CPO solutions were added to the reaction vessels to give a final concentration of 6.5 ppm hypochlorite. Also blank determinations were included were 0.2 ml sterile buffer was added instead 0.2 ml of a V-CPO solution. The reaction vessels was incubated at 30 C. Then 0.5 ml of one following three hydrogen peroxide generating systems were added: 1.

   H202 from a 3 mM stock solution; 2. sodium percarbonate from a 3 mM stock solution; 3. a mixture of glucose oxidase (0.39 Units/ml) and 75 mg/ml glucose. 



  The samples were incubated for exactly 5 min at 30 C. After this incubation period 1 ml of the reaction mixture was taken and added to 9 ml cold BSA (1% w/v) solution and put on ice immediately. This was done to stop the reaction of hypochlorite with the microorganisms. Survival as Colony Forming Units (CFU) per ml was determined by diluting the sample from 10-1 to 10-6 and plating 100  l samples of the various dilutions on labelled BHI-agar plates. The plates were then incubated for 15-18 hours at 30 C. When there were no CFU detectable after this incubation period, the plates are incubated for another 24 hours at 30 C. The values obtained were compared to the MIC value that was obtained when exactly the same amounts of hypochlorite were added, using a micropump.

   This was done as follows: Using sterile techniques, a suspension of approximately 108 bacteria per ml in citrate buffer pH 5.5 was made. From this suspension aliquots of 1.3 ml were added to a sterile reaction vessel, which was continuously stirred throughout 

 <Desc/Clms Page number 27> 

 the experiment with a magnetic stirrer. Then 0.5 ml of a casitone solution (0.5 mg/ml in citrate buffer pH 5.5) was added. Subsequently 0.2 ml of sterile citrate buffer pH 5.5 was. The reaction vessels was incubated at 30 C. Then a flux of 0.5 ml of a hypochlorite solutions of 32.5 ppm was applied over 5 min (flow: 0.1 ml per min) at 30 C. After the incubation period of 5 min 1 ml of the reaction mixture was taken and added to 9 ml cold BSA (1% w/v) solution and put on ice immediately. This was done to stop the reaction of hypochlorite with the microorganisms.

   Survival as Colony Forming Units (CFU) per ml was determined by diluting the sample from 10-1 to 10-6 and plating 100  l samples of the various dilutions on labelled BHI-agar plates. The plates were then incubated for 15-18 hours at 30 C. When there were no CFU detectable after this incubation period, the plates are incubated for another 24 hours at 30 C. The results are shown in Table V. 

 <Desc/Clms Page number 28> 

 



  Table V. V-CPO reaction with different H202 sources. 
 EMI28.1 
 
<tb> 
<tb> hydrogen- <SEP> casitone <SEP> log <SEP> log <SEP> reduction
<tb> peroxide <SEP> concen- <SEP> reduction <SEP> at <SEP> 6.5 <SEP> ppm
<tb> source <SEP> tration <SEP> at <SEP> 6.5 <SEP> ppm <SEP> hypochlorite
<tb> (mg/ml) <SEP> hypo- <SEP> generated
<tb> chlorite <SEP> enzymatically
<tb> by <SEP> V-CPO
<tb> H202 <SEP> 0.0 <SEP> 8.2 <SEP> 8.0
<tb> stock <SEP> (= <SEP> total <SEP> (= <SEP> total
<tb> solution <SEP> kill) <SEP> kill)
<tb> per- <SEP> 0.0 <SEP> 8.0 <SEP> 8.2 <SEP> (=total
<tb> carbonate <SEP> (= <SEP> total <SEP> kill)
<tb> kill)
<tb> glucose <SEP> 0.0 <SEP> 6.4 <SEP> 6.4 <SEP> (= <SEP> total
<tb> oxidase <SEP> (= <SEP> total <SEP> kill)
<tb> kill)
<tb> H202 <SEP> 0.1 <SEP> 1.0 <SEP> 8.0 <SEP> (= <SEP> total
<tb> stock <SEP> kill)

  
<tb> solution
<tb> per- <SEP> 0.1 <SEP> 0.8 <SEP> 8.2 <SEP> (= <SEP> total
<tb> carbonate <SEP> kill)
<tb> glucose <SEP> 0.1 <SEP> 1.0 <SEP> 6.4 <SEP> (= <SEP> total
<tb> oxidase <SEP> kill)
<tb> 
 EXAMPLE 6 Method to determine the coding sequence of the chloro peroxidase gene (cDNA) and the gene from Curvularia   inaeaualis   (Centraal Bureau voor Schimmelcultures, the Netherlands, strain No 102.42) and possible expression systems. 



  Chloroperoxidase was isolated and purified from liquid cultures of C. inaequalis as described by Van Schijndel et 

 <Desc/Clms Page number 29> 

 al. , 1993), except that after DEAE chromatography two additional purification steps were performed using an FPLC system (Pharmacia LKB). First a phenyl-sepharose   Cl-4B   hydrophobic interaction column was used to bind the enzyme in the presence of 2 M NaCl in 50 mM   Tris-HC1   (pH 8.3), followed by elution with a descending gradient from 2 M NaCl in 50 mM   Tris-HC1   (pH 8.3). For the final purification a MonoQ HR 5/5 anion exchange column (ex Pharmacia LKB) was used to bind the enzyme, followed by elution with a gradient from 0 M to 0.5 M NaCl in 20 mM   piperazine-HC1   (pH 5.4).

   Subsequent concentration of the enzyme was carried out using rotation evaporation, followed by dialysis against 50 mM   Tris-S04   buffer (pH 8). The purified chloroperoxidase was enzymatically digested with the proteases Staphylococcus V8 and trypsin respectively, according to standard procedures known in the art, or chemically cleaved with CNBr (Gross, E. (1967), Methods Enzymology 11,238-255). The resulting peptides were separated using SDS-PAGE according to Laemmli (Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227,680-685) or on a tricine gel as according to Schagger and Von Jagow (1987) and subsequently transferred to PVDF membranes (Immobilon-P ex Millipore) using CAPS transfer buffer (10 mM 3-[cyclohexylamino]-1propanesulfonic acid, 10% methanol, pH 11) as described by Matsudaira (1987).

   After electrophoretic elution the membrane was rinsed for 5 min with deionized water, stained with 0.1% Coomassie Blue R-250 in 50% methanol for 5 min, and destained in 50% methanol, 10% acetic acid for 10 min at room temperature and air dried. Peptide bands were submitted to automatic Edmann sequencing on a Porton LF 3000 protein sequencer (Beckman Instruments, Inc., USA). 



  The results of the amino acid sequence determination are summarized in Figure 1. 



  Based on the amino acid sequences of the peptides fully degenerated oligonucleotides were designed (see Table VII). 



  These degenerated primers were used in Polymerase Chain 

 <Desc/Clms Page number 30> 

 Reaction (PCR) reactions, using first-strand cDNA as a template. First-strand cDNA was prepared as follows: For the isolation of RNA spores of C.   inaequalis   were inoculated into a fermentation medium containing 4 g yeast extract and 2 ml of a microelement solution (Van Schijndel et al. , 1993) per litre. After several days of growth the mycelium were harvested by filtration and lyophilized. The lyophilized C. inaequalis mycelia were ground under liquid nitrogen.

   RNA was extracted by adding an RNA extraction buffer (42 mM sodium citrate pH 7,0.83% N-laurylsarcosine, 50 mM beta-mercaptoethanol, 1% Triton X-100 and 4 M guanidine isothiocyanate), and incubating for 1 hour at room temperature. 0.1 Volumes of 2 M sodium acetate (pH 4) and 1 volume of phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1) was added and the mixture placed on ice for 15 min. After centrifugation for 10 min at 10000xg (4 C), the aqueous phase was collected, 1 volume of absolute alcohol was added and the mixture was incubated for 1 hour at -20 C followed by brief centrifugation at 10,000xg. The pellet was resuspended in an appropriate volume of RNA extraction buffer and fractionated by ultracetrifugation in a gradient of cesium chloride (Sambrook et al. , 1989). The pellet was carefully washed and stored in a 75% ethanol solution at - 70 C.

   For mRNA isolation the RNA was precipitated and resuspended in RNAse free water after which the mRNA was extracted using the polyAtract mRNA isolation kit (Promega corporation, USA). First strand cDNA synthesis was carried out on isolated mRNA from C. inaequalis using the Pharmacia first-strand cDNA synthesis kit (Pharmacia Biotech). Four 20-meric degenerated oligonucleotides were designed based on the amino acid sequences of chloroperoxidase peptides (see also Table VII) and used as primers in polymerase chain reactions with first strand cDNA from C. ineaqualis as a template. Polymerase chain reactions were performed using a thermocycler (Eppendorf mastercycler 5330) and Taq polymerase (Promega corporation).

   For optimal amplification of the chloroperoxidase encoding cDNA using the degenerated primers the polymerase chain reaction was performed at 46 C 

 <Desc/Clms Page number 31> 

 (annealing step) for 30 cycles. The two resulting specific fragments were ligated into a pUC18 vector, cloned and sequenced from both strands. Based on the DNA sequence results the following two specific primers were designed: 5'- CATAGCGATAGCGACGCGGA-3' and 5'- CTAACCCCGGCGCCAACATC-3' These two primers were used in polymerase chain reactions with first strand cDNA as a template. Thus a gene-specific DNA fragment was obtained joining the two known DNA sequences. This fragment was cloned in a pUC18 vector and subsequently sequenced. To obtain the 5' region of the mRNA encoding the chloroperoxidase the 5'-Amplifinder RACE kit (Clonetech corporation) was used.

   The genomic chloroperoxidase gene from C. ineaqualis was isolated as follows: C.   ineaqualis   genomic DNA was isolated from lyophilized mycelia which was ground under liquid nitrogen and extracted with an appropriate amount of extraction buffer (200 mM Tris-HC1, pH 8.5,25 mM EDTA, 250 mM NaCl, 1% SDS and 0.2 mg per ml proteinase K). After incubation overnight at room temperature 0.7 volumes of phenol and 0.3 volumes of chloroform were added and mixed vigorously. The tubes were centrifuged at 10,000xg and the aqueous layer was transferred to a clean tube. The genomic DNA was precipitated with 2 volumes of absolute ethanol. After centrifugation for 5 min at 5000xg the pellet was resuspended in 2 ml of 10 mM Tris-HC1, pH 8.0,1 mM EDTA and treated with RNAse (Boehringer Mannheim) as recommended by the manufacturer.

   The genomic DNA containing solution was extracted with phenol:chloroform:isoamylalcohol (25: 24:1) and after ethanol precipitation, finally dissolved in a suitable volume of 10 mM   Tris-HC1   pH 8,1 mM EDTA buffer. For Southern analysis of the genomic DNA, the 

 <Desc/Clms Page number 32> 

 DNA was digested with several combinations of restriction enzymes and after agarose gel electrophoresis blotted to a nitrocellulose membrane (Sambrook et al. , 1989). 



  Hybridization was carried out using a radiolabeled gene specific fragment (amplified with the two specific primers described above), which was made by random priming using alpha-32P labelled dATP (Sambrook et al. , 1989). Based on the results obtained a mini-library was made using genomic DNA digested with Pst I which was inserted in the vector pUC18. The library was screened with the same probe as described for the Southern blot. A positive clone was isolated and also partly sequenced from both strands to confirm the cDNA sequence results. The C. inaequalis chloroperoxidase encoding gene and its putative gene product are disclosed in Figure 2. 



  A chloroperoxidase production system in Saccharomyces cerevisiae was made as follows: The well known GAL1 inducible yeast promoter was obtained as an EcoRl BamHl fragment from the S. cerevisiae wild type GALL gene (Molecular and Cellular Biology 10,4757-4769, 1990) and cloned into the EcoRl BamHl sites of respectively plasmid YCplac33 and YEplac95 (Gietz and Sugino (1988) Gene 74,527-534). The plasmids obtained were named TNT1 respectively TNT2.

   A BamHl restriction site was created in front of the 5' begin of the C.   inaeaualis   chloroperoxidase gene by performing a PCR experiment using as a template the PstI EcoRI 5' fragment of the C. inaequalis chloroperoxidase gene subcloned into pUC18 and as primers the M13/pUC 22-mer reverse sequence primer and the primer : 5' GAG AGA GGA TCC ACT CAC TAC TTA CAA TCA CAC 3' The amplified fragment was digested with BamHI and EcoRI. 



  The EcoRI PvuII fragment from the C.   inaeaualis   chloroperoxidase gene, containing the 3' part of the gene, was subcloned into EcoRI SmaI digested pUC18. From this clone, after digesting it with EcoRI and XbaI, a fragment 

 <Desc/Clms Page number 33> 

 containing the 3' part of the C. inaequalis chloroperoxidase gene was purified. 



  A three point ligation was performed, which comprised either TNT1 or TNT2 digested each with BamHI and XbaI, and the 5' BamHI EcoRI fragment and the 3' EcoRI XbaI fragment. 



  After ligation and cloning the obtained plasmids were checked for their identity. Plasmids thus obtained were named TNT3 (derived from TNT1) respectively TNT4 (derived from TNT2). 



  Yeast strain BJ1991 was transformed with plasmids TNT3 respectively TNT4 according to procedures known in the art and selected for ura+ transformants. Ura+ transformants were replicated to YP-plates containing either glucose (2%) or galactose (2%). After growth some cells were taken from the plates and resuspended in 200  l 20 mM   Tris-HC1   pH 8.1. 



  After incubation for 5 minutes 10  l was taken from the fluid and spotted on a nitrocellulose filter. The nitrocellulose filters were incubated in 100 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 5.5), 1 mM orthodianisidine, 100 mM KBr and 2 mM   H202.   A clear colour formation was observed on all spots derived from galactose grown yeast strains, whereas no colour formation was observed for the glucose grown yeasts. This indicates that a galactose inducible production system for the Curvularia inaequalis chloroperoxidase gene in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae has been constructed.

   A similar assay, making use of 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 6.5), 100 mM KBr, 1 mM H202 and 40   M   phenol red (BDH), clearly showed a blue/purple colour formation with fluids from galactose grown yeast, whereas no colour changes occurred with fluids from glucose grown yeasts. To further confirm that a heterologous chloroperoxidase gene expression system in yeast was made that produced C.   inaegualis   chloroperxidase with the same functionality as the C.   inaequalis   chloroperoxidase, the recombinant enzyme was purified from galactose induced TNT3 or TNT4 transformed yeast strains. After growth in galactose containing medium, yeast cells were harvested and 

 <Desc/Clms Page number 34> 

 resuspended in 20 mM   Tris-HC1   (pH 8.1).

   Sterile glass beads were then added and the suspension was shaken vigorously. 



  After centrifugation for 15 minutes at 10,000xg the supernatant was taken and applied to a DEAE column as the recombinant enzyme was purified using essentially the purification protocol as for the wild type C. inaequalis enzyme (see above). After purification a recombinant chloroperoxidase was obtained with a specific activity of 22 U per mg protein (determined in 100 mM sodium acetate buffer pH 5.0,1 mM H202, 5 mM potassium chloride and 50  M MCD, see also van Schijndel et al. , 1993), which compares very well to the specific activity of approximately 20 U per of protein that was obtained with purified (see above) chloroperoxidase from C. inaequalis itself. The pH activity profiles of the wild type chloroperoxidase and the recombinant chloroperoxidase derived from yeast are shown in Figure 3.

   Figure 3 provides further evidence that the recombinant yeast produced enzyme has the same functionality as the wild type enzyme. 



  EXAMPLE 7 Screening for suitable haloperoxidases in other microorganisms. 



  The microorganisms used in this example are Curvularia inaeaualis (CBS 102.42), Drechslera biseptata (CBS 371.72), Drechslera fuqax (CBS 509.77), Drechslera nicotiae (CBS 655.74), Drechslera subpapendorfii (656.74), Embelisia hyacinth! (416.71), Embelisia didymospora (CBS 766, Ulocladium chartarum (200.67) and Ulocladium   botrvtis   (452.72). Various fungi are grown on agar plates. When the growth is completed the extracellular proteins are transferred (replica blotted) to a nitrocellulose filter, which was prewetted in 50 mM   Tris-HC1   buffer (pH 8.3). 



  After 15 minutes of incubation on the agar plates, the filter was tested for haloperoxidase activity by soaking the filter in 100 mM sodium acetate (pH 5.5) or potassium 

 <Desc/Clms Page number 35> 

 phosphate (pH 6.5 and 7.5), 1 mM orthodianisidine, 2 mM hydrogen peroxide in the presence and absence of 0.1 M potassium bromide. Thus the production of a bromoperoxidase and/or chloroperoxidase can be detected. To test whether the produced haloperoxidase is a vanadium-containing haloperoxidase, the test described above was repeated in the presence and absence of 10 and 100   M   sodium vanadate. 



  In the case of vanadium-containing haloperoxidases an increase in signal could be observed in situations where vanadate was supplemented. To test whether the chloroperoxidases identified are indeed similar to the vanadium haloperoxidase from C.   inaequalis,   small amounts of chloroperoxidases were purified (essentially as described in van Schijndel et al. , 1993) from Ulocladium chartarum, Embelisia didymospora and Drechslera subpapendorfii. The pH optima of these enzymes varied from pH 4.5-5.5. The chlorinating activity of these enzymes increased upon addition of vanadate, which clearly indicates that these enzymes are indeed vanadium haloperoxidases. To further test the similarity of the enzymes identified with C. inaequalis vanadiumchloroperoxidase, one of the haloperoxidases identified was further characterised.

   For this the chloroperoxidase produced by the fungus Drechslera biseptata (CBS 371.72) was chosen. It has properties similar to the chloroperoxidase from Curvularia inaequalis that is high thermostability and high affinity for its substrates. The EPR spectrum of the purified enzyme was also recorded. As for other vanadium haloperoxidases (de Boer et al. , 1988; Wever et al. , 1988), the oxidized enzyme is EPR silent; however upon reduction with sodium dithionite a typical vanadyl EPR spectrum was observed (data not shown). The isotropic EPR parameters go of 1.969 and Ao of 9.0 mT are almost the same as those found for the enzyme from C. inaequalis (Wever et al, 1985). Furthermore, the purified enzyme has been split into peptides using proteases and cyanogen bromide.

   The peptide maps show the same patterns suggesting that these two enzymes have a large sequence 

 <Desc/Clms Page number 36> 

 homology. This is indeed the case, two separated peptides of the enzymes which were obtained by treatment of the enzyme with a protease and which were purified, were sequenced. The sequences show a very large homology and therefore it can be concluded that the two enzymes are very similar. 



  Amino acid sequence of a peptide from C.   inaequalis :   (Asp)-leu-arg-gln-pro-tyr-asp-pro-thr-ala-pro-ile-glu-asp-g In-pro-gly-ile-val-arg-thr- Amino acid sequence of a similar peptide from D. biseptata Asp-leu-arg-gln-pro-tyr-asp-pro-thr-ala-pro-ile-glu-glu-gln -pro-gly-ile-val-arg-thr- Suitable vanadium containing haloperoxidases can thus be identified by using a replica technique in which the increase in activity after addition of vanadate is tested, and/or by (partially) purifying the enzyme and looking for increase in activity after addition of vanadate. 



  EXAMPLE 8 Further screening for suitable chloroperoxidases in other microorganisms, using antibodies. 



  The strains used in this example are: Curvularia   inaegualis   (CBS 102.42), Drechslera biseptata (CBS 371.72), Drechslera subpapendorfii (CBS 656.74), Embellissia   didymospora   (CBS 766.79) and Ulocladium chartarum (CBS 200.67). 



  The microorganisms were grown in two phases. First, 50 ml of sterile germination medium (as described in Van Schijndel, et al. , 1993) was inoculated with the spore mass of the microorganisms. The culture was shaken for 3 days at 23 C after which the culture was transferred to a 3 litre Erlenmeyer flask containing 1 litre of fermentation medium (5 g of casein hydrolysate (Gibco BRL), 3 g of yeast extract and 1 g of fructose per litre of deionized water). 

 <Desc/Clms Page number 37> 

 



  The medium, which was shaken at 23 C, was collected after 14-17 days, filtered and the chloroperoxidases were purified essentially according to Van Schijndel et al. 



  (1994). Polyclonal antibodies were raised (using Freunds complete adjuvans in the first injection and Freunds incomplete adjuvans in the booster injection) against the purified (according to van Schijndel et al. , 1994) chloroperoxidase from Curvularia inaequalis in a (2-monthold female) rabbit. The rabbit was bled 6 days after the last booster injection. The sera were heated for 30 min at 56 C to inactivate complement and then centrifuged. The supernatant was taken. A dilution series was made of each of the purified chloroperoxidases and also of bromoperoxidase from Ascophylum nodosum (purified according to Wever et al, 1985), starting with 50  l of each protein (of approximately 0.1 mg per ml), and each sample was diluted sequentially two times.

   The dilutions were spotted using a dot-blot apparatus (Bio-Rad) on a nitrocellulose filter, washed with 2% BSA and incubated sequentially with a 1:800 dilution of rabbit anti-chloroperoxidase antiserum, biotinylated goat anti-rabbit (dilution 1: 3000), alkaline phosphatase-conjugated streptavidin (dilution 1: 2000) and colour development reagent (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate, 4-NitroBlue Tetrazolium chloride (Boehringer Mannheim). All steps were performed according to standard protocols.

   The results obtained are shown in Table VI. 

 <Desc/Clms Page number 38> 

 Table VI 
 EMI38.1 
 
<tb> 
<tb> haloperoxidase <SEP> from <SEP> cross-reactivity <SEP> with
<tb> polyclonal <SEP> antibodies
<tb> raised <SEP> against <SEP> C.
<tb> inaequalis <SEP> chloroperoxidase
<tb> C. <SEP> inaequalis <SEP> yes
<tb> D. <SEP> biseptata <SEP> yes
<tb> D. <SEP> subpapendorfii <SEP> yes
<tb> E. <SEP> didymospora <SEP> yes
<tb> U. <SEP> chartarum <SEP> yes
<tb> bromoperoxidase <SEP> from <SEP> no
<tb> A. <SEP> nodosum
<tb> 
 Based on the results disclosed in Table VI it can be concluded that immunoassays with antibodies raised against C.   inaeaualis   chloroperoxidase is suitable to identify other suitable vanadium containing haloperoxidases. These haloperoxidases can be either in crude form, partially or totally purified.

   Purification techniques can be all techniques known in the art, like gelfiltration, ion exchange chromatography, hydrophobic interaction chromatography, precipitation techniques, (ultra)filtration techniques, affinity chromatography, gelelectrophoresis and others. 



  EXAMPLE 9 Further screening for suitable chloroperoxidases in other   microorganisms.   



  In this example it si described how a radio-active probe derived from the chloroperoxidase gene from Curvularia   inaequalis   can be used to detect homologous genes in other microorganisms. This was done as follows: 

 <Desc/Clms Page number 39> 

 Chromosomal DNA from C. inaequalis (CBS 102.42), Embelissia   didymospora   (CBS 766.79) and, Drechlera biseptata (CBS 371.72) was purified essentially as described for C. inaequalis chromosomal DNA (as described in example 6). For Southern analysis of the genomic DNA, the DNA was digested with several combinations of restriction enzymes and after agarose gel electrophoresis blotted to a nitrocellulose membrane (Sambrook et al. , 1989).

   Hybridization was carried out using a radiolabeled gene specific fragment, which was made by random priming using   alpha-32P   labelled dATP (Sambrook et al. 1989). The gene specific fragment used was amplified (before radio-active labelling) in a polymerase chain reaction, using first strand cDNA (see Example 6) as a template and making use of the primers: 5'-CACGATGGGGTCCGTTACAC and 5'-GTACCGCTATCGCTGCGCCTG The hybridisation conditions were as follows: In the prehybridisation and hybridisation 6 * SSPE, 5 * Denhardts, 0.5% SDS and 10 mg salmon sperm DNA were used as a buffer. Prehybridisation was done for 1 hour at 55 C, then the radioactive probe was boiled for 1 min and then directly added. Subsequently, hybridisation was continued overnight.

   The autoradiograph, which was obtained with Curvularia inaequalis and Drechlera biseptata DNA is presented as Figure 4. In the figure, lane 1: lambda DNA; lane 2: non-digested C. inaequalis genomic DNA; lane 3: idem, digested with EcoRI; lane 4: digested with BamHI; lane 5: EcoRI and BamHI; lane 6 digested with XbaI; lane 7 PstI; lane 8 XbaI and PstI; lanes 9 - 14: idem, using D. biseptata. As can be seen in the figure, a positive signal is obtained with chromosomal DNA from Drechslera biseptata, indicating a high degree of similarity of both genes. 



  Similar results were obtained with DNA from Embellisia didymospora. We therefor conclude that the chloroperoxidase gene, or parts derived from this gene, or probes based on 

 <Desc/Clms Page number 40> 

 the sequence of the C. inaequalis chloroperoxidase gene can be used to detect suitable vanadium haloperoxidases from other microorganisms. 



  Table VII. Oligonucleotide primers (20mers), based on amino acid sequences from the vanadium chloroperoxidase ex Curvularia   inaegualis.   



  I: inosine A/G: at this position at equal mix of A and G is used. 



  C/T: at this position at equal mix of C and T is used. 



  G/A/T/C: at this position at equal mix of G, A, C and T is used. 



  Oligo1: 5'-T A C/T A T G A A A/G C C I G T I G A A/G C A -3' Oligo 2: 5'-A G/A T/C T G I G C G/A T A I G C G/A T T G/A T C-3' Oligo 3:   5' -G   A C/T G A A/G A C I G C I G A A/G T A C/T G A-3' Oligo 4: 5'-A G/A I G C T/C T G I G C I C C G/A/T/C C C C A T-3'

Claims

CLAIMS 1. Enzymatic antimicrobial composition comprising a Vanadium haloperoxidase, a source of halide and hydrogen peroxide or a source of hydrogen peroxide.
2. Enzymatic antimicrobial composition according to claim 1, wherein the Vanadium haloperoxidase is a chloroperoxidase.
3. Enzymatic antimicrobial composition according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the Vanadium haloperoxidase is a chloroperoxidase obtainable from Curvularia inaequalis 4. Enzymatic antimicrobial composition according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the Vanadium haloperoxidase is a chloroperoxidase which is immunologically cross-reactive with the chloroperoxidase from Curvularia inaequalis CBS 102.42.
5. Enzymatic antimicrobial composition according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the source of hydrogen peroxide is an enzymatic hydrogen peroxide-generating system.
6. Enzymatic antimicrobial composition according to claim 5, wherein the enzymatic hydrogen peroxide-generating system is glucose/glucose oxidase or lactate/lactate oxidase.
7. Enzymatic antimicrobial composition according to any one of the preceding claims, said composition being essentially free from catalase activity. <Desc/Clms Page number 42>
8. Process for inhibiting microbial growth, comprising applying a composition according to any one of the preceding claims to a surface which is to be disinfected.
9. Use of Vanadium haloperoxidases as sanitizing agent.
10. DNA sequence comprising a structural gene coding for Vanadium chloroperoxidase from Curvularia inaegualis CBS 102.42.
11. DNA sequence comprising a structural gene for Vanadium chloroperoxidase from Curvularia inaequalis CBS 102.42 as shown in Figure 2.
12. Expression vector comprising an origin of replication, transcription and termination control sequences and at least part of the DNA sequence according to claim 10 or 11.
13. Process for preparing a Vanadium haloperoxidase by transforming a suitable host by means of an expression vector according to claim 12, cultivating the host under conditions which allow the expression of the structural gene and isolating the Vanadium haloperoxidase.
*****
EP95915183A 1994-03-31 1995-03-31 Enzymatic antimicrobial compositions Withdrawn EP0753055A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP95915183A EP0753055A1 (en) 1994-03-31 1995-03-31 Enzymatic antimicrobial compositions

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP94200893 1994-03-31
EP94200893 1994-03-31
PCT/EP1995/001229 WO1995027046A2 (en) 1994-03-31 1995-03-31 Enzymatic antimicrobial compositions containing haloperoxidases
EP95915183A EP0753055A1 (en) 1994-03-31 1995-03-31 Enzymatic antimicrobial compositions

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0753055A1 true EP0753055A1 (en) 1997-01-15

Family

ID=8216755

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP95915183A Withdrawn EP0753055A1 (en) 1994-03-31 1995-03-31 Enzymatic antimicrobial compositions

Country Status (12)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0753055A1 (en)
JP (1) JPH09511396A (en)
CN (1) CN1146782A (en)
AU (1) AU2215495A (en)
BR (1) BR9507226A (en)
CA (1) CA2182966A1 (en)
CZ (1) CZ288041B6 (en)
HU (1) HUT74967A (en)
NL (1) NL9401048A (en)
PL (2) PL181397B1 (en)
SK (1) SK123096A3 (en)
WO (1) WO1995027046A2 (en)

Families Citing this family (128)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE69737828T2 (en) * 1996-04-29 2008-03-06 Novozymes A/S LIQUID, NON-AQUEOUS ENZYMES CONTAINING COMPOSITIONS
ATE221729T1 (en) * 1996-05-09 2002-08-15 Novozymes As ANTIMICROBIAL PEROXIDASE COMPOSITIONS
AU6469698A (en) * 1997-03-24 1998-10-20 Clorox Company, The A chloroperoxidase enzyme system for generating hypochlorous acid and hypochlorite (in situ)
CA2295953A1 (en) * 1997-07-09 1999-01-21 The Procter & Gamble Company Cleaning compositions comprising an oxidoreductase
US6074631A (en) * 1997-08-14 2000-06-13 Novo Nordisk A/S Reduction of malodour
US6080391A (en) * 1997-08-14 2000-06-27 Novo Nordisk A/S Reduction of malodour
CN1265561A (en) * 1997-08-14 2000-09-06 诺沃挪第克公司 AntimicroBial composition containing a haloperoxidase, a hydrogen peroxide cource, a halide source and an ammonium source
US6025186A (en) * 1997-08-14 2000-02-15 Novo Nordisk A/S Reduction of malodor
US6492110B1 (en) 1998-11-02 2002-12-10 Uab Research Foundation Reference clones and sequences for non-subtype B isolates of human immunodeficiency virus type 1
US6232457B1 (en) 1998-09-10 2001-05-15 The Regents Of The University Of California Recombinant vanadium haloperoxidases and their uses
US6656715B1 (en) 1998-09-10 2003-12-02 The Regents Of The University Of California Recombinant minimal catalytic vanadium haloperoxidases and their uses
US6592867B2 (en) * 1998-11-09 2003-07-15 Novozymes A/S Antimicrobial composition containing an oxidoreductase and an enhancer of the N-hydroxyanilide-type
DE60041134D1 (en) * 1999-05-06 2009-01-29 Novozymes As ENZYMATIC PRESERVATION OF AQUEOUS LACQUERS
US7063970B1 (en) 1999-05-06 2006-06-20 Norozymes A/S Enzymatic preservation of water based paints
AU6557900A (en) * 1999-08-10 2001-03-05 Novozymes A/S Reduction of malodour in soiled animal litter
WO2001011969A1 (en) * 1999-08-13 2001-02-22 Novozymes A/S ENZYMATIC METHOD FOR KILLING OR INHIBITING MICROBIAL CELLS AT HIGH pH
US6410292B1 (en) 2000-04-14 2002-06-25 Novozymes A/S Nucleic acids encoding polypeptides having haloperoxidase activity
US6511835B1 (en) 2000-04-14 2003-01-28 Novozymes, A/S Nucleic acids encoding polypeptides having haloperoxidase activity
AU2001246403A1 (en) * 2000-04-14 2001-10-30 Novozymes A/S Polypeptides having haloperoxidase activity
US6509181B1 (en) 2000-04-14 2003-01-21 Novozymes, A/S Polypeptides having haloperoxide activity
US6410291B1 (en) 2000-04-14 2002-06-25 Novozymes A/S Polypeptides having haloperoxidase activity
AU2001246404A1 (en) 2000-04-14 2001-10-30 Novozymes A/S Polypeptides having haloperoxidase activity
AU2001246402A1 (en) 2000-04-14 2001-10-30 Novozymes A/S Polypeptides having haloperoxidase activity
WO2001079464A2 (en) * 2000-04-14 2001-10-25 Novozymes A/S Nucleic acids encoding polypeptides having haloperoxidase activity
WO2002047483A1 (en) * 2000-12-15 2002-06-20 Novozymes A/S Use of haloperoxidase, peroxide and carboxylic acid
IL162043A0 (en) * 2001-12-04 2005-11-20 Novozymes As Methods for killing spores
EP1497382A1 (en) * 2002-04-12 2005-01-19 Biolocus Aps Antifouling composition comprising an enzyme in the absence of its substrate
EP3219804B1 (en) 2007-04-24 2019-07-17 Novozymes North America, Inc. Detoxifying pre-treated lignocellulose-containing materials
JP2011500761A (en) * 2007-10-23 2011-01-06 ノボザイムス アクティーゼルスカブ Method for killing spores and for disinfecting or sterilizing equipment
EP2362732B1 (en) * 2008-10-23 2015-05-20 Getinge Disinfection AB A method of obtaining high-level disinfection in a washer disinfector, and a washer disinfector
US20120020946A1 (en) 2009-04-03 2012-01-26 Novozymes A/S Methods for Inactivating Viruses
WO2010122100A1 (en) 2009-04-22 2010-10-28 Novozymes A/S Methods for killing or inhibiting growth of mycobacteria
EP2510944A1 (en) * 2011-04-15 2012-10-17 National University of Ireland, Galway Treatment of bacterial infections
WO2013164429A1 (en) 2012-05-02 2013-11-07 Novozymes A/S Enzymatic solubilization of metals
EP2941485B1 (en) 2013-01-03 2018-02-21 Novozymes A/S Alpha-amylase variants and polynucleotides encoding same
EP2970830B1 (en) 2013-03-14 2017-12-13 Novozymes A/S Enzyme and inhibitor contained in water-soluble films
EP3569611A1 (en) 2013-04-23 2019-11-20 Novozymes A/S Liquid automatic dish washing detergent compositions with stabilised subtilisin
EP2992076B1 (en) 2013-05-03 2018-10-24 Novozymes A/S Microencapsulation of detergent enzymes
WO2014180953A1 (en) * 2013-05-08 2014-11-13 Novozymes A/S Animal feed enzymes
US20160083703A1 (en) 2013-05-17 2016-03-24 Novozymes A/S Polypeptides having alpha amylase activity
EP3309249B1 (en) 2013-07-29 2019-09-18 Novozymes A/S Protease variants and polynucleotides encoding same
CN106103708A (en) 2014-04-01 2016-11-09 诺维信公司 There is the polypeptide of alpha amylase activity
EP3406697B1 (en) 2014-04-11 2020-06-10 Novozymes A/S Detergent composition
CN106459937B (en) 2014-05-27 2024-09-10 诺维信公司 Method for producing lipase
WO2015181119A2 (en) 2014-05-27 2015-12-03 Novozymes A/S Lipase variants and polynucleotides encoding same
WO2016001319A1 (en) 2014-07-03 2016-01-07 Novozymes A/S Improved stabilization of non-protease enzyme
WO2016079110A2 (en) 2014-11-19 2016-05-26 Novozymes A/S Use of enzyme for cleaning
CN107636134A (en) 2015-04-10 2018-01-26 诺维信公司 Detergent composition
EP3280791A1 (en) 2015-04-10 2018-02-14 Novozymes A/S Laundry method, use of dnase and detergent composition
CN107835853B (en) 2015-05-19 2021-04-20 诺维信公司 Odor reduction
US10717576B2 (en) 2015-06-17 2020-07-21 Novozymes A/S Container for polypeptide
EP3317388B1 (en) 2015-06-30 2019-11-13 Novozymes A/S Laundry detergent composition, method for washing and use of composition
WO2017005816A1 (en) 2015-07-06 2017-01-12 Novozymes A/S Lipase variants and polynucleotides encoding same
WO2017046260A1 (en) 2015-09-17 2017-03-23 Novozymes A/S Polypeptides having xanthan degrading activity and polynucleotides encoding same
US11053486B2 (en) 2015-09-17 2021-07-06 Henkel Ag & Co. Kgaa Detergent compositions comprising polypeptides having xanthan degrading activity
EP3359658A2 (en) 2015-10-07 2018-08-15 Novozymes A/S Polypeptides
BR112018007474A2 (en) 2015-10-14 2018-10-30 Novozymes A/S ? cleaning water filtration membranes?
CN108291212A (en) 2015-10-14 2018-07-17 诺维信公司 Polypeptide variants
WO2017093318A1 (en) 2015-12-01 2017-06-08 Novozymes A/S Methods for producing lipases
WO2017117089A1 (en) 2015-12-28 2017-07-06 Novozymes Bioag A/S Heat priming of bacterial spores
BR112018069220A2 (en) 2016-03-23 2019-01-22 Novozymes As use of polypeptide that has dnase activity for tissue treatment
EP3464538A1 (en) 2016-05-31 2019-04-10 Novozymes A/S Stabilized liquid peroxide compositions
WO2017220422A1 (en) 2016-06-23 2017-12-28 Novozymes A/S Use of enzymes, composition and method for removing soil
WO2018002261A1 (en) 2016-07-01 2018-01-04 Novozymes A/S Detergent compositions
WO2018007573A1 (en) 2016-07-08 2018-01-11 Novozymes A/S Detergent compositions with galactanase
JP6858850B2 (en) 2016-07-13 2021-04-14 ザ プロクター アンド ギャンブル カンパニーThe Procter & Gamble Company Bacillus CIBI DNase mutant and its use
EP3519547A1 (en) 2016-09-29 2019-08-07 Novozymes A/S Spore containing granule
EP3519548A1 (en) 2016-09-29 2019-08-07 Novozymes A/S Use of enzyme for washing, method for washing and warewashing composition
US20210284933A1 (en) 2016-10-25 2021-09-16 Novozymes A/S Detergent compositions
CN110072986B (en) 2016-11-01 2023-04-04 诺维信公司 Multi-core particles
CA3043443A1 (en) 2016-12-01 2018-06-07 Basf Se Stabilization of enzymes in compositions
EP3551740B1 (en) 2016-12-12 2021-08-11 Novozymes A/S Use of polypeptides
WO2018184818A1 (en) 2017-04-06 2018-10-11 Novozymes A/S Cleaning compositions and uses thereof
CN111108183A (en) 2017-06-30 2020-05-05 诺维信公司 Enzyme slurry composition
MX2020002953A (en) 2017-09-20 2020-07-22 Novozymes As Use of enzymes for improving water absorption and/or whiteness.
US11414814B2 (en) 2017-09-22 2022-08-16 Novozymes A/S Polypeptides
CN111356762B (en) 2017-09-27 2024-09-17 诺维信公司 Lipase variants and microcapsule compositions comprising such lipase variants
WO2019076834A1 (en) 2017-10-16 2019-04-25 Novozymes A/S Low dusting granules
WO2019076833A1 (en) 2017-10-16 2019-04-25 Novozymes A/S Low dusting granules
BR112020008251A2 (en) 2017-10-27 2020-11-17 Novozymes A/S dnase variants
CN111247245A (en) 2017-10-27 2020-06-05 宝洁公司 Detergent compositions comprising polypeptide variants
EP3749758A1 (en) 2018-02-08 2020-12-16 Novozymes A/S Lipase variants and compositions thereof
CN111868239A (en) 2018-02-08 2020-10-30 诺维信公司 Lipase, lipase variants and compositions thereof
CN111770788B (en) 2018-03-13 2023-07-25 诺维信公司 Microencapsulation using amino sugar oligomers
CN112262207B (en) 2018-04-17 2024-01-23 诺维信公司 Polypeptides comprising carbohydrate binding activity in detergent compositions and their use for reducing wrinkles in textiles or fabrics
EP3781680A1 (en) 2018-04-19 2021-02-24 Novozymes A/S Stabilized cellulase variants
CN112272701B (en) 2018-04-19 2024-05-14 诺维信公司 Stabilized cellulase variants
WO2019238761A1 (en) 2018-06-15 2019-12-19 Basf Se Water soluble multilayer films containing wash active chemicals and enzymes
WO2020070199A1 (en) 2018-10-03 2020-04-09 Novozymes A/S Polypeptides having alpha-mannan degrading activity and polynucleotides encoding same
US20220017844A1 (en) 2018-12-03 2022-01-20 Novozymes A/S Low pH Powder Detergent Composition
CN113366103A (en) 2018-12-21 2021-09-07 诺维信公司 Polypeptides having peptidoglycan degrading activity and polynucleotides encoding same
AU2020242303A1 (en) 2019-03-21 2021-06-24 Novozymes A/S Alpha-amylase variants and polynucleotides encoding same
WO2020207944A1 (en) 2019-04-10 2020-10-15 Novozymes A/S Polypeptide variants
US20220186151A1 (en) 2019-04-12 2022-06-16 Novozymes A/S Stabilized glycoside hydrolase variants
EP3994255A1 (en) 2019-07-02 2022-05-11 Novozymes A/S Lipase variants and compositions thereof
CN114787329A (en) 2019-08-27 2022-07-22 诺维信公司 Detergent composition
CN114616312A (en) 2019-09-19 2022-06-10 诺维信公司 Detergent composition
US20220340843A1 (en) 2019-10-03 2022-10-27 Novozymes A/S Polypeptides comprising at least two carbohydrate binding domains
WO2021105336A1 (en) 2019-11-29 2021-06-03 Basf Se Compositions comprising polymer and enzyme
EP4077656A2 (en) 2019-12-20 2022-10-26 Novozymes A/S Polypeptides having proteolytic activity and use thereof
EP3892708A1 (en) 2020-04-06 2021-10-13 Henkel AG & Co. KGaA Cleaning compositions comprising dispersin variants
EP4133066A1 (en) 2020-04-08 2023-02-15 Novozymes A/S Carbohydrate binding module variants
US20230167384A1 (en) 2020-04-21 2023-06-01 Novozymes A/S Cleaning compositions comprising polypeptides having fructan degrading activity
EP3907271A1 (en) 2020-05-07 2021-11-10 Novozymes A/S Cleaning composition, use and method of cleaning
EP4172298A1 (en) 2020-06-24 2023-05-03 Novozymes A/S Use of cellulases for removing dust mite from textile
EP3936593A1 (en) 2020-07-08 2022-01-12 Henkel AG & Co. KGaA Cleaning compositions and uses thereof
JP2023538740A (en) 2020-08-25 2023-09-11 ノボザイムス アクティーゼルスカブ Variants of family 44 xyloglucanase
BR112023005128A2 (en) 2020-09-22 2023-04-25 Basf Se COMPOSITION, DETERGENT COMPOSITION, METHOD FOR PROVIDING A DETERGENT COMPOSITION WITH IMPROVED STABILITY AND/OR WASHING PERFORMANCE, AND, USE OF A COMPOSITION
CN116507725A (en) 2020-10-07 2023-07-28 诺维信公司 Alpha-amylase variants
EP4232539A2 (en) 2020-10-20 2023-08-30 Novozymes A/S Use of polypeptides having dnase activity
CN116615523A (en) 2020-10-28 2023-08-18 诺维信公司 Use of lipoxygenase
WO2022106400A1 (en) 2020-11-18 2022-05-27 Novozymes A/S Combination of immunochemically different proteases
WO2022106404A1 (en) 2020-11-18 2022-05-27 Novozymes A/S Combination of proteases
CN116829685A (en) 2021-01-28 2023-09-29 诺维信公司 Lipase with low malodor production
EP4291646A2 (en) 2021-02-12 2023-12-20 Novozymes A/S Alpha-amylase variants
EP4305146A1 (en) 2021-03-12 2024-01-17 Novozymes A/S Polypeptide variants
WO2022194673A1 (en) 2021-03-15 2022-09-22 Novozymes A/S Dnase variants
EP4060036A1 (en) 2021-03-15 2022-09-21 Novozymes A/S Polypeptide variants
WO2022268885A1 (en) 2021-06-23 2022-12-29 Novozymes A/S Alpha-amylase polypeptides
WO2023165507A1 (en) 2022-03-02 2023-09-07 Novozymes A/S Use of xyloglucanase for improvement of sustainability of detergents
AU2023228020A1 (en) 2022-03-04 2024-07-11 Novozymes A/S Dnase variants and compositions
WO2023194204A1 (en) 2022-04-08 2023-10-12 Novozymes A/S Hexosaminidase variants and compositions
EP4309500A1 (en) * 2022-07-18 2024-01-24 Acies Bio d.o.o. Peroxidase based biocontrol agents
WO2024017883A1 (en) * 2022-07-18 2024-01-25 Acies Bio D.O.O. Peroxidase based biocontrol agents
WO2024126483A1 (en) 2022-12-14 2024-06-20 Novozymes A/S Improved lipase (gcl1) variants
WO2024131880A2 (en) 2022-12-23 2024-06-27 Novozymes A/S Detergent composition comprising catalase and amylase
WO2024156628A1 (en) 2023-01-23 2024-08-02 Novozymes A/S Cleaning compositions and uses thereof
WO2024194245A1 (en) 2023-03-21 2024-09-26 Novozymes A/S Detergent compositions based on biosurfactants

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4707446A (en) * 1983-05-24 1987-11-17 Cetus Corporation Stable haloperoxidase method
AU642980B2 (en) * 1990-03-21 1993-11-04 Quest International B.V. Ultilization of enzymes
GB9015910D0 (en) * 1990-07-19 1990-09-05 Univ Bruxelles Novel use
JP3399549B2 (en) * 1990-11-16 2003-04-21 サントリー株式会社 Microbial peroxidase gene
JP4063317B2 (en) * 1991-02-21 2008-03-19 エクソゼミス,インコーポレイテッド Methods and compositions for infection treatment and plexus control
US5262151A (en) * 1991-11-25 1993-11-16 Montgomery Robert E Stabilized enzymatic antimicrobial compositions

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO9527046A2 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
PL181389B1 (en) 2001-07-31
JPH09511396A (en) 1997-11-18
NL9401048A (en) 1995-11-01
CN1146782A (en) 1997-04-02
AU2215495A (en) 1995-10-23
HU9602673D0 (en) 1996-11-28
SK123096A3 (en) 1997-06-04
CZ285096A3 (en) 1997-10-15
BR9507226A (en) 1997-09-09
WO1995027046A3 (en) 1995-11-30
PL316571A1 (en) 1997-01-20
WO1995027046A2 (en) 1995-10-12
CA2182966A1 (en) 1995-10-12
CZ288041B6 (en) 2001-04-11
PL181397B1 (en) 2001-07-31
HUT74967A (en) 1997-03-28

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0753055A1 (en) Enzymatic antimicrobial compositions
US5866393A (en) Haloperoxidases from curvularia verruculosa and nucleic acids encoding same
JP2801398B2 (en) Prevent dye transfer
JP2716233B2 (en) Detergent additive for fabric bleaching
Simons et al. Primary structure and characterization of the vanadium chloroperoxidase from the fungus Curvularia inaequails
MXPA98000419A (en) Haloperoxidasas of vervulular curvular and nucleic acids that codify for the mis
EP0912097A1 (en) Antimicrobial peroxidase compositions
US6426410B1 (en) Phenol oxidizing enzymes
US7160709B2 (en) Phenol oxidizing enzymes
MXPA01006388A (en) Phenol oxidizing enzymes.
US6372465B2 (en) Haloperoxidases with altered pH profiles
WO1999047651A1 (en) HALOPEROXIDASES WITH ALTERED pH PROFILES
WO2002020711A2 (en) Detergent compositions comprising phenol oxidizing enzymes
WO2000005349A1 (en) Phenol oxidizing enzymes
EP1066364A2 (en) Phenol oxidizing enzymes and their use
MXPA00008969A (en) HALOPEROXIDASES WITH ALTERED pH PROFILES
KR19990028959A (en) A haloperoxidase derived from CURVULARIA VERRUCULOSA and a nucleic acid encoding the same
DK164818B (en) Detergent additive, detergent composition and process for bleaching stains on textile

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19960820

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): CH DE ES FR GB IT LI NL SE

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN

18W Application withdrawn

Withdrawal date: 20010309