EP0729619B1 - Procede de modelisation automatique d'une partie d'un processus global a l'aide d'un ordinateur - Google Patents

Procede de modelisation automatique d'une partie d'un processus global a l'aide d'un ordinateur Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0729619B1
EP0729619B1 EP95900613A EP95900613A EP0729619B1 EP 0729619 B1 EP0729619 B1 EP 0729619B1 EP 95900613 A EP95900613 A EP 95900613A EP 95900613 A EP95900613 A EP 95900613A EP 0729619 B1 EP0729619 B1 EP 0729619B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
attributes
overall process
result
attribute
activity
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP95900613A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP0729619A1 (fr
Inventor
Rupert Maier
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Siemens AG
Original Assignee
Siemens AG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Siemens AG filed Critical Siemens AG
Publication of EP0729619A1 publication Critical patent/EP0729619A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0729619B1 publication Critical patent/EP0729619B1/fr
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
    • G06F30/20—Design optimisation, verification or simulation
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P90/00—Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
    • Y02P90/02—Total factory control, e.g. smart factories, flexible manufacturing systems [FMS] or integrated manufacturing systems [IMS]
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10S—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S707/00—Data processing: database and file management or data structures
    • Y10S707/99941—Database schema or data structure
    • Y10S707/99943—Generating database or data structure, e.g. via user interface

Definitions

  • the individual parts of the model to be modeled have one Variety of properties when defining or optimizing of the process must be taken into account (for example tools and aids used, lead times, responsibilities / processors, Relationships between the individual process elements, User, ).
  • the object underlying the invention is a Specify the method by which it is possible to be dependent a special question a process model from an overall model to generate automatically.
  • a great advantage of the method according to the invention is that Use of only two basic elements for modeling also complex overall processes. This makes the overall process very detailed shown but this also leads to the automatic modeled sub-process is very easy to understand, only contains the necessary information and clearly shows it can be.
  • the different questions of individual process participants are advantageously through the assignment of attributes to results and activities Model components, enables. So can be advantageous from a complex overall process depending on the most diverse previously entered attributes a very special one Sub-process that only takes the specific problem into account be modeled automatically.
  • Partial results which are the prerequisites for a part-time job deliver, summarized in an information node. This makes it easier the clarity of the automatically modeled process.
  • inventive representation of attributes as numbers and texts can advantageously be achieved, for example, that also lead time investigations or cost analyzes in the modeling of a sub-process can play a role.
  • the hierarchical order of the attributes can be advantageous achieve that automatically modeled processes more precisely can be focused on a question without doing so the clarity suffers.
  • Figure 1b shows examples of result attributes.
  • result attributes can be a result attribute "data”.
  • This data can branch into “paper” or “data processing”, where Paper can be sub-branched into lists, “reports”, “descriptions”, “Plans” and “Catalogs” and “Data Processing” further in a “hard disc” which in different formats can be described.
  • “Owner” a result attribute which is "Internal” or “External” can be located.
  • a “project phase” can also be provided as a result attribute, which can split up into “offer”, “planning” and "project planning phase”.
  • FIG. 2 shows, by way of example, how the method according to the invention can be used to present information which arises in the case of partial results and which are a prerequisite for a partial activity.
  • Figure 3 shows a sub-process according to the invention Procedure is generated automatically.
  • the partial results are in Figure 3 shown in rectangles, designated by E1 to E6 are. These individual rectangles or partial results are transferred to each other via sub-activities T1 to T8.
  • Figure 3 is based on the following initial situation. Here, for example determine which departments or which manufacturing processes are affected, if during the preparation for production it is determined that a particular pump model cannot be optimally processed and therefore another Pump type must be selected. The organizational department which makes this decision is the system technology. It will now result attributes as a default for the method according to the invention System technology and pump logically linked to the computer specified.
  • the activity attribute system technology is selected in order to be able to determine which activities from system technology are required to change the pump type Notify those affected.
  • the change made must be evaluated from the customer's perspective become. This happens in E1 with activity T1. Subsequently a message is sent to the T3 system technology another pump model should be used. Then in E2 the activity T5 corrects the corresponding pump model and it there is feedback T2 to customer requirements E1. From E2 then activity T4 is initiated, which is a change in Project documents initiated in E3. Furthermore, the changed Pump model communicated via T6 to the construction documents, which are in E4. Likewise, the electrotechnical Change documents E5 over T7 and the control system documents, that is, the scheduling to correct via T8 in E6.
  • This sub-process is automatically a whole process in one Method according to the invention based on the entered attributes System technology and pump generated as an AND link. So is the consistency automatically by the inventive method of the manufacturing process and a high degree of Clarity maintained.
  • FIG. 4 shows the entity relationship model of the invention as an example Procedures (data dependencies). It can be read from left to right and according to the well-known standard (Peter Chen: The Entity-Relationship Model, Toward a Unified View of Data, ACM Transactions on Database Systems, Vol 1, 1976).

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Geometry (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
  • General Factory Administration (AREA)
  • Input From Keyboards Or The Like (AREA)
  • Information Retrieval, Db Structures And Fs Structures Therefor (AREA)
  • Computer And Data Communications (AREA)

Claims (8)

  1. Procédé de modélisation automatique d'une partie d'un processus global d'un système technique à l'aide d'un ordinateur,
    a) dans lequel on utilise des résultats partiels (E) et des actions partielles (T) du processus global pour la modélisation du processus global,
    b) dans lequel une action partielle (T) est munie au moins d'un attribut d'action (Tool),
    c) dans lequel un résultat partiel (E) est muni au moins d'un attribut de résultat (Harddisk),
    d) dans lequel deux résultats partiels (E1, E2, E3) sont transformés l'un dans l'autre par une action partielle (T1)
    caractérisé en ce que le processus partiel est modélisé automatiquement par l'ordinateur en fonction d'au moins un attribut d'action et/ou attribut de résultat, par l'enchaínement logique des attributs d'action et/ou des attributs de résultat pour la modélisation du processus partiel.
  2. Procédé selon la revendication 1, dans lequel, au cas où plusieurs résultats partiels (E1, E2) sont la condition d'une action partielle (T1), ceux-ci sont regroupés dans un noeud d'information (IK), lequel est alors transformé en un résultat partiel (E3) par l'action partielle (T1).
  3. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans lequel un attribut représente un texte ou un chiffre.
  4. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans lequel des attributs sont préfédinis au choix pour la modélisation du processus global.
  5. Procédé selon la revendication 4, dans lequel des attributs sont classés de manière hiérarchique, de sorte qu'un processus partiel est modélisé de manière plus grossière en fonction d'un attribut prioritaire.
  6. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 4 à 5, dans lequel au moins deux processus globaux, dont des attributs communs ont été utilisés pour leur modélisation, forment un nouveau processus global.
  7. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans lequel un résultat partiel (E) est représenté graphiquement par une surface marquée et dans lequel une action partielle (T) est représentée graphiquement par une flèche de liaison.
  8. Procédé selon la revendication 7, dans lequel la représentation graphique du processus partiel modélisé est créée automatiquement à l'aide des surfaces marquées, des attributs fondamentaux et d'une surface de représentation disponible.
EP95900613A 1993-11-15 1994-11-10 Procede de modelisation automatique d'une partie d'un processus global a l'aide d'un ordinateur Expired - Lifetime EP0729619B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE4338989 1993-11-15
DE4338989 1993-11-15
PCT/DE1994/001326 WO1995014281A1 (fr) 1993-11-15 1994-11-10 Procede de modelisation automatique d'une partie d'un processus global a l'aide d'un ordinateur

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0729619A1 EP0729619A1 (fr) 1996-09-04
EP0729619B1 true EP0729619B1 (fr) 2003-02-12

Family

ID=6502649

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP95900613A Expired - Lifetime EP0729619B1 (fr) 1993-11-15 1994-11-10 Procede de modelisation automatique d'une partie d'un processus global a l'aide d'un ordinateur

Country Status (7)

Country Link
US (1) US5875319A (fr)
EP (1) EP0729619B1 (fr)
JP (1) JPH09505167A (fr)
AT (1) ATE232618T1 (fr)
DE (1) DE59410242D1 (fr)
ES (1) ES2192571T3 (fr)
WO (1) WO1995014281A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20020161776A1 (en) * 2001-02-01 2002-10-31 Stefano Lanfredi Presentation system for compression train configuration information
WO2005096189A1 (fr) * 2004-04-01 2005-10-13 Pipercove Software Pty Ltd Procede et logiciel informatique d'integration d'outils d'ingenierie systeme et de gestion de projets
CN1300649C (zh) * 2004-11-16 2007-02-14 冶金自动化研究设计院 一种复杂工业过程的组合建模方法
JP5234720B2 (ja) * 2007-04-26 2013-07-10 日本電信電話株式会社 プロセスモデル作成装置、方法及びそのプログラム
CN104239604B (zh) * 2014-07-21 2018-02-09 上海发电设备成套设计研究院 大型汽轮机部件结构强度设计监控方法

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5195178A (en) * 1990-04-27 1993-03-16 Bachman Information Systems, Inc. Adaptive window system for dynamically modeling information systems
CA2081546A1 (fr) * 1990-04-27 1991-10-28 Charles W. Bachman Systeme informatique de gestion d'information dynamique
US5241645A (en) * 1990-04-27 1993-08-31 Bachman Information Systems, Inc. Computer system for creating and manipulating subsets of dynamic information systems models
US5249300A (en) * 1990-04-27 1993-09-28 Bachman Information Systems, Inc. System and method of constructing models of complex business transactions using entity-set variables for ordered sets of references to user data

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
ATE232618T1 (de) 2003-02-15
WO1995014281A1 (fr) 1995-05-26
ES2192571T3 (es) 2003-10-16
JPH09505167A (ja) 1997-05-20
US5875319A (en) 1999-02-23
EP0729619A1 (fr) 1996-09-04
DE59410242D1 (de) 2003-03-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
DE69723489T2 (de) Verfahren und System zur Verwaltung von Bau- und Produktionsinformation
DE69031758T2 (de) Verfahren zur Organisation von und zum Zugriff auf Produkt beschreibenden Daten in Zusammenhang mit einem technischen Prozess
DE3855706T2 (de) Automatisierte Rechnung von Materialien
DE69602364T2 (de) Rechnersystem um semantische objektmodelle von existierenden relationellen datenbanksystemen herzustellen
DE19712946A1 (de) Methode zum Generieren einer Implementierung wiederverwendbarer Teile von Containern eines Workflow-Prozessmodells
DE19955718A1 (de) Paralleler Datenbank-Support für Workflow-Management-Systeme
DE10393595T5 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Liefern von Speicherressourcen
DE10051645A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Versionskontrolle und Protokollierung in einem Prozesssteuersystem
DE10206902A1 (de) Engineeringverfahren und Engineeringsystem für industrielle Automatisierungssysteme
DE10150387A1 (de) CAD-Datenmodell mit Entwurfsnotizen
DE19910311A1 (de) Automatisierungssystem mit wiederverwendbaren Automatisierungsobjekten und Verfahren zur Wiederverwendung von Automatisierungslösungen in Engineering-Werkzeugen
EP1166228B1 (fr) Utilisation de reseaux semantiques fractals pour tous types d'applications de base de donnees
DE19534819A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Konfigurieren einer Datenbank
EP0729619B1 (fr) Procede de modelisation automatique d'une partie d'un processus global a l'aide d'un ordinateur
DE4417393A1 (de) Eine Methode zur Herstellung spezifischer Programm-Systeme und Sammlungen von Unterstützungsprogrammen (Tools) zur Erleichterung von Programmsystem-Herstellungsarbeiten
DE10215653A1 (de) Verfahren und Anordung zur automatischen Erzeugung von Programmcodeabschnitten sowie ein entsprechendes Computerprogrammprodukt und ein entsprechendes computerlesbares Speichermedium
DE10056765A1 (de) Generieren von Statistiken für Datenbankabfragen mit Hilfe von Tensordarstellungen
DE69925108T2 (de) Ableitung einer objektklasse durch vererbung, instanzierung oder klonierung
EP1234231B1 (fr) Procede permettant de produire des interfaces utilisateur graphiques pour des programmes informatiques
WO2009030490A1 (fr) Système implanté sur un ordinateur et procédés pour la mémorisation structurée d'informations
DE112010005924T5 (de) Verfahren und System zum Weitergeben von Änderungen an einer Master-Einheit zu Duplikaten
EP1675045A1 (fr) Echange de données de description entre des projets à l'aide d'interfaces inter-projets
EP1561172A2 (fr) Dispositif offrant l'acces a des donnees
WO2000055773A2 (fr) Dispositif, procede et produit programme d'ordinateur destines au fonctionnement de processus d'affaires
DE69622078T2 (de) Animationsverfahren für zusammengesetzte Verhalten von Szenarien

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19960506

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE ES FR GB LI NL SE

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19980114

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE ES FR GB LI NL SE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20030212

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 59410242

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20030320

Kind code of ref document: P

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20030512

GBT Gb: translation of ep patent filed (gb section 77(6)(a)/1977)

Effective date: 20030501

NLV1 Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2192571

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

ET Fr: translation filed
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20031110

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20031130

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20031130

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20031130

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20031113

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: *SIEMENS A.G.

Effective date: 20031130

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20041111

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20050120

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20051108

Year of fee payment: 12

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20051111

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20051122

Year of fee payment: 12

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20060601

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20051111

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20061110

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20070731

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20061110

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20061130