EP0724056A1 - Remote control device using hertzian, infra-red waves or similar for controlling motorised locking mechanisms - Google Patents
Remote control device using hertzian, infra-red waves or similar for controlling motorised locking mechanisms Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP0724056A1 EP0724056A1 EP96440010A EP96440010A EP0724056A1 EP 0724056 A1 EP0724056 A1 EP 0724056A1 EP 96440010 A EP96440010 A EP 96440010A EP 96440010 A EP96440010 A EP 96440010A EP 0724056 A1 EP0724056 A1 EP 0724056A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- receiver
- transmitter
- code
- transmitted
- remote control
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 title 1
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 31
- 230000015654 memory Effects 0.000 claims description 19
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 claims description 13
- 230000000903 blocking effect Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 5
- 241000276495 Melanogrammus aeglefinus Species 0.000 description 3
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000006835 compression Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007906 compression Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000006866 deterioration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005855 radiation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012795 verification Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
- G07C—TIME OR ATTENDANCE REGISTERS; REGISTERING OR INDICATING THE WORKING OF MACHINES; GENERATING RANDOM NUMBERS; VOTING OR LOTTERY APPARATUS; ARRANGEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS FOR CHECKING NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
- G07C9/00—Individual registration on entry or exit
- G07C9/00174—Electronically operated locks; Circuits therefor; Nonmechanical keys therefor, e.g. passive or active electrical keys or other data carriers without mechanical keys
- G07C9/00182—Electronically operated locks; Circuits therefor; Nonmechanical keys therefor, e.g. passive or active electrical keys or other data carriers without mechanical keys operated with unidirectional data transmission between data carrier and locks
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
- G07C—TIME OR ATTENDANCE REGISTERS; REGISTERING OR INDICATING THE WORKING OF MACHINES; GENERATING RANDOM NUMBERS; VOTING OR LOTTERY APPARATUS; ARRANGEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS FOR CHECKING NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
- G07C9/00—Individual registration on entry or exit
- G07C9/00174—Electronically operated locks; Circuits therefor; Nonmechanical keys therefor, e.g. passive or active electrical keys or other data carriers without mechanical keys
- G07C9/00182—Electronically operated locks; Circuits therefor; Nonmechanical keys therefor, e.g. passive or active electrical keys or other data carriers without mechanical keys operated with unidirectional data transmission between data carrier and locks
- G07C2009/0023—Electronically operated locks; Circuits therefor; Nonmechanical keys therefor, e.g. passive or active electrical keys or other data carriers without mechanical keys operated with unidirectional data transmission between data carrier and locks with encription of the transmittted data signal
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
- G07C—TIME OR ATTENDANCE REGISTERS; REGISTERING OR INDICATING THE WORKING OF MACHINES; GENERATING RANDOM NUMBERS; VOTING OR LOTTERY APPARATUS; ARRANGEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS FOR CHECKING NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
- G07C9/00—Individual registration on entry or exit
- G07C9/00174—Electronically operated locks; Circuits therefor; Nonmechanical keys therefor, e.g. passive or active electrical keys or other data carriers without mechanical keys
- G07C9/00182—Electronically operated locks; Circuits therefor; Nonmechanical keys therefor, e.g. passive or active electrical keys or other data carriers without mechanical keys operated with unidirectional data transmission between data carrier and locks
- G07C2009/00261—Electronically operated locks; Circuits therefor; Nonmechanical keys therefor, e.g. passive or active electrical keys or other data carriers without mechanical keys operated with unidirectional data transmission between data carrier and locks the keyless data carrier having more than one function
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
- G07C—TIME OR ATTENDANCE REGISTERS; REGISTERING OR INDICATING THE WORKING OF MACHINES; GENERATING RANDOM NUMBERS; VOTING OR LOTTERY APPARATUS; ARRANGEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS FOR CHECKING NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
- G07C2209/00—Indexing scheme relating to groups G07C9/00 - G07C9/38
- G07C2209/08—With time considerations, e.g. temporary activation, valid time window or time limitations
Definitions
- the invention relates to a device for remote control by radio waves, infrared waves or the like, in particular of motorized closing systems, such as roller shutters, as defined in the preamble of claim 1.
- the present invention is able to find its application in all types of remote control devices by radio waves, infrared or the like and, in particular, when such a device makes it possible to manage the operation of the motorized closure system such as roller shutters of a dwelling.
- a certain number of remote control devices are already known which make it possible to manage, either by radio transmission or by infrared radiation, motorized locking systems, such as gates, garage doors or even roller shutters.
- motorized locking systems such as gates, garage doors or even roller shutters.
- a receiver which is able to perceive and interpret the order transmitted by a transmitter to control, in function, the partial or total opening or even the total closing or partial of said closure system.
- the order transmitted via this transmitter is coded through an appropriate coding unit, while the receiver itself has a unit decoding so that it executes the order transmitted by a transmitter, only if it recognizes the code.
- the code can be chosen by the user who, for this, intervenes, on the one hand, on a multitude of two-position switches at the transmitter.
- the combination thus produced is transferred, on the other hand, to the analog configuration switches associated with the receiver so that the latter is able to recognize the code of the transmitter.
- a device for the remote transmission of a safety command comprising a transmitter capable of transmitting coded messages and a receiver connected to the load to be controlled.
- This receiver is provided with a decryption unit for the transmitted code, as well as with a processing unit which, after verification and reading of said code, is able to transmit a control signal to said load.
- the transmitter's encryption module is broken down into a microprocessor and an EEPROM memory, this set making it possible to determine an evolving code according to a defined algorithm which, moreover, is known by the receiver's decryption and decoding unit.
- the code transmitted by the transmitter being systematically calculated on the basis of the code previously transmitted, the receiver, having the same calculation data, is capable, with each new transmission, of determining a code which must be identical to that received. Therefore, it is only after having noted the agreement of the code transmitted and the new code calculated by the receiver that the processing unit of the latter allows to act on the load so that the latter executes the command requested. It is observed that the code transmitted by the transmitter is broken down into a basic code and a dynamic code. It is precisely the latter that evolves in function of the algorithm known by the microprocessor. Thus, if for one reason or another, the receiver, located too far away from the transmitter, does not perceive the code transmitted by the latter, the two elements are no longer in phase.
- the receiver it stores the new dynamic code in memory which allows it, during a new transmission from the transmitter, to calculate the new dynamic code on the basis of the previous known in memory.
- this device presents only relative security since, knowing the algorithm applied by the microprocessor and after identification of the basic code, everyone is able to design a transmitter compatible with the receiver.
- the aim of the solution according to the present invention is to respond effectively to all of the aforementioned problems with a view to increasing the security of such remote control devices which emit either by radio waves or even by infrared for example.
- the invention solves the problem and consists of a device for remote control by infrared radio waves or the like, in particular of motorized closing systems, such as roller shutters, comprising a receiver associated with each closing system and provided, on the one hand, with a central processing unit capable of managing the operation of motor means and, on the other hand, with a decoding unit capable of interpreting the information transmitted by a transmitter through a coding unit, the transmitter and the receiver having an EEPROM memory at the level of which is programmed a code decomposing into at least two parts, one of which allows the identification of a transmitter in relation to a receiver and the other part of which, corresponding to the control key, is encrypted by the transmitter according to an algorithm defined and known by the decoding unit of the receiver, the EEPR memory OM of the receiver being; in addition, programmed to be able to recognize an initialization procedure transmitted to this receiver using appropriate control means in order to phase the second part of the code corresponding to the receiver to that of a transmitter previously identified with respect to the
- the advantages arising from the present invention consist in that only the first part of the code introduced at the level of the receiver and the transmitter is capable of being known. In fact, it is through this first part of the code that a receiver will recognize a transmitter that will be able to control it. As for the second part of the code, it is neither defined by the manufacturer nor by the user. It is the result of a calculation carried out through an algorithm known by the transmitter and the receiver, so that this second part of the code evolves with each transmission of order between the transmitter and the receiver.
- the initialization procedure is transmitted to the receiver by control means constituted, substantially, by the supply of electrical energy to said receiver.
- this first part of code can be determined as a function of manufacturing conditions (serial number, or other) so that it is known only by the manufacturer. Then, it must have the encryption algorithm known by the receiver. Finally, he must have knowledge of the receiver's initialization procedure and be able to access the control means making it possible to carry out this initialization procedure.
- the transmitter can also only transmit a limited number of times for a determined time the code from which this phasing results with the receiver.
- Figure 1 is a very schematic view of a closure system, especially a motorized shutter with which is associated a remote control device, according to the invention.
- the invention relates to a device 1 for remote control by radio waves, infrared waves or the like, in particular of motorized closing systems such as roller shutters 2.
- This device 1 comprises a receiver 3 and a transmitter 4 associated with each closure system 2.
- the receiver 3 comprises a central processing unit 5 programmable able to manage the operation of the motor means 6 of said closure system 2. In this regard, this management of the motor means 6 can be ensured through an interface of adequate power 7.
- This receiver 3 also receives a decoding unit 8 capable of interpreting the information transmitted by the transmitter 4 through a coding unit 9.
- the receiver 3 and the transmitter 4 both have an EEPROM 10, 11, associated with their decoding 8 and coding 9 unit, respectively, and which has knowledge of a code 12, 12A which is subdivided into at least two parts 13, 13A; 14, 14A.
- One 13, 13A of these parts of the code 12 called in the following description for the sake of ease of compression, first part 13, 13A, corresponds to an identification code of a transmitter 4 with respect to a receiver 3. More precisely, this first part 13, 13A of the code 12 is identical in each of the memories 10, 11.
- this second part 14, 14A of the code 12 is calculated and, therefore encrypted, by the coding unit 9 of the transmitter 4 according to a defined algorithm 15, 15A known by the receiver 3 so that it is able to calculate, in turn, this second part 14A of the code 12A and to identify it with the second part 14 of the code 12 transmitted by said transmitter 4.
- this second part 14 of the code 12 evolves with each transmission of information to the level of the receiver 3.
- the latter if is in phase with the transmitter 4, is able to recognize the encrypted code since this receiver 3 also has, in its EEPROM memory 10, the well-defined algorithm 15A which allows it to calculate it and ultimately identify it .
- the receiver 3 is not able, through its decoding unit 8, to decode the second part 14 of the code 12 which is transmitted to it by the transmitter 4 only if, beforehand, they have been put in phase so that, during each command, the calculation of the following code, through the algorithm 15, 15A, leads to a result which also agrees.
- the receiver 3 calculates the code which the transmitter 4 should normally transmit to it during this transmission d 'order. However, it may happen that an order is transmitted by the transmitter 4 without it being perceived by the receiver 3. At this time, it is obvious that the code at the level of the transmitter 4 has evolved compared to that of the receiver 3 that the receiver 3 will calculate during the next transmission. However, if the two devices are in phase, the receiver 3 must be able to find, by carrying out several successive calculations and by applying the common algorithm, the same code transmitted by the transmitter 4.
- the receiver 3 proceeds, through its decoding unit 8, to at most N rotations consisting in calculating at most N times the second part 14A of the code 12A and to compare it with the second part 14 of the code 12 transmitted by the transmitter 4. If during these N rotations of the calculation, the decoding unit 8 of the receiver 3 has not found the encrypted code transmitted by the transmitter 4, he interprets the transmission as being a hacking maneuver and puts himself in a blocking position.
- unlocking requires, according to the invention, the implementation of an initialization procedure and, therefore, of phasing of the second part 14, 14A of the code 12, 12A knowing that, in any case, the first part 13 of the code 12 at the transmitter 4 must have been previously granted to the first part 13A of the code 12A known by the receiver 3.
- This procedure for initializing the second part of the code is known by the EEPROM memory 10 of the receiver 3 so that the latter is able to recognize it when it is carried out by means of appropriate control means 16.
- This initialization procedure consists, in fact, in making the receiver 3 accept a second part of code 14 which is transmitted to it by a transmitter 4 respecting a first part of code 13 identical to that 13a known by this receiver 3.
- control means 16 are constituted by means for cutting off the supply of electrical energy 18 to the receiver 3.
- the initialization procedure itself it is based on the identification of sequences of cuts of this supply in electrical energy 18. More precisely, the EEPROM memory identifies as being an initialization procedure when it recognizes, during the power supply cut-off sequences 18, their number and their duration.
- the receiver 3 is able to accept the second part 14 of the code 12 transmitted by a transmitter 4.
- this is preferably only possible for a determined period of time "T1" beyond which this receiver 3 returns to a blocking position requiring the resumption of the initialization procedure. Consequently, the initialization procedure triggers time counting means "T1".
- the initialization procedure will most often be undertaken only because of loss or deterioration of this transmitter 4. Under these conditions, a new transmitter is then ordered from the manufacturer who, having knowledge of the first part of the code 13A of the receiver 3, will send the user a transmitter 4 of which the first part 13 code 12 will have been previously granted.
- the code 12, 12A comprises at least a third part 19, 19A which can be described as an after-sales service key and which is only known by the manufacturer.
- this after-sales service key can only be used, and therefore transmitted, by the transmitter 4 to the receiver 3 only a limited number of times during their phasing.
- this third part 19 of the code at the level of the transmitter 4 disappears and, therefore, is burned beyond a time “T2” defined after the design and programming of the transmitter 4.
- the transmitter 4 is not recognized by the receiver 3 with which it must be associated, this transmitter 4 becomes unusable with respect to said receiver 3 and it is necessary to recommend another transmitter 4 to the manufacturer.
- the time “T 2” will be determined so that it is sufficient for the user to have the possibility of receiving the transmitter 4 ordered from the manufacturer, this in the event of compliance with a normal shipping time. and, of course, carry out the receiver initialization procedure 3.
- this backup procedure is carried out by means of control means 16 identical to those making it possible to carry out the initialization procedure.
- said backup procedure is based on the identification of the number and duration of power supply cut-off sequences for the receiver 3.
- the receiver 3 accepts the command from a transmitter corresponding to a neighboring locking system only if this command is identified as the closing of said closing system 2.
- the initialization procedure and the backup procedure are identical.
- T1 time "T1" during which the receiver 3 becomes captive for the identification of a new transmitter 4 beyond this initialization or backup procedure, it is determined to be sufficient so that after the execution of the latter , the user has the possibility of ordering then receiving a new transmitter 4 from the manufacturer.
- the advantages resulting from the present invention consist essentially in that it leads to remote control closure systems of very high security compared to what exists at present.
- the present invention thus responds to an increasingly asserted need due to the generalization of such motorized closure systems. Also, it represents a clear progress compared to the state of the prior art.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Selective Calling Equipment (AREA)
- Lock And Its Accessories (AREA)
- Operating, Guiding And Securing Of Roll- Type Closing Members (AREA)
- Power-Operated Mechanisms For Wings (AREA)
Abstract
Description
L'invention a trait à un dispositif de commande à distance par ondes hertziennes, infrarouges ou analogues, en particulier de systèmes de fermeture motorisés, tels que des volets roulants, comme défini dans le préambule de la revendication 1.The invention relates to a device for remote control by radio waves, infrared waves or the like, in particular of motorized closing systems, such as roller shutters, as defined in the preamble of
La présente invention est à même de trouver son application dans tous les types de dispositifs de commande à distance par ondes hertziennes, infrarouges ou analogues et, tout particulièrement, lorsqu'un tel dispositif permet de gérer le fonctionnement du système de fermeture motorisé tel que des volets roulants d'une habitation.The present invention is able to find its application in all types of remote control devices by radio waves, infrared or the like and, in particular, when such a device makes it possible to manage the operation of the motorized closure system such as roller shutters of a dwelling.
L'on connaît déjà un certain nombre de dispositifs de commande à distance qui permettent de gérer, soit au travers d'une transmission radio, soit par rayonnement infrarouge, des systèmes de fermeture motorisés, tels que des portails, portes de garages ou encore des volets roulants. Ainsi, au niveau du système de fermeture proprement dit, est associé un récepteur lequel est à même de percevoir et d'interpréter l'ordre transmis par un émetteur pour commander, en fonction, l'ouverture partielle ou totale ou encore la fermeture totale ou partielle dudit système de fermeture.A certain number of remote control devices are already known which make it possible to manage, either by radio transmission or by infrared radiation, motorized locking systems, such as gates, garage doors or even roller shutters. Thus, at the level of the closing system proper, there is associated a receiver which is able to perceive and interpret the order transmitted by a transmitter to control, in function, the partial or total opening or even the total closing or partial of said closure system.
De manière à éviter que n'importe quel émetteur puisse commander ce système de fermeture, l'ordre transmis par l'intermédiaire de cet émetteur est codé au travers d'une unité de codage appropriée, tandis que le récepteur comporte, lui, une unité de décodage de sorte qu'il n'exécute l'ordre transmis par un émetteur, que s'il reconnaît le code.In order to avoid that any transmitter can control this closing system, the order transmitted via this transmitter is coded through an appropriate coding unit, while the receiver itself has a unit decoding so that it executes the order transmitted by a transmitter, only if it recognizes the code.
Selon un premier mode de réalisation connu, le code peut être choisi par l'utilisateur qui, pour cela, intervient, d'une part, sur une multitude de switchs à deux positions au niveau de l'émetteur. La combinaison ainsi réalisée est reportée, d'autre part, sur les switchs de configuration analogue associés au récepteur de sorte que celui-ci soit à même de reconnaître le code de l'émetteur.According to a first known embodiment, the code can be chosen by the user who, for this, intervenes, on the one hand, on a multitude of two-position switches at the transmitter. The combination thus produced is transferred, on the other hand, to the analog configuration switches associated with the receiver so that the latter is able to recognize the code of the transmitter.
L'inconvénient majeur de ce type de dispositif de commande à distance consiste en ce qu'il suffit de repérer la position des switchs, que ce soit au niveau de l'émetteur ou du récepteur et d'introduire le code ainsi lu, au niveau d'un autre émetteur qui pourra, à son tour, commander le système de fermeture. Or, il n'est pas rare que le récepteur soit aisément accessible depuis l'extérieur de l'habitation, tout particulièrement pour un aigrefin quelque peu habile.The major drawback of this type of remote control device is that it suffices to locate the position of the switches, whether at the transmitter or receiver and to introduce the code thus read, at the level of another transmitter which can, in turn, control the system of closing. However, it is not uncommon for the receiver to be easily accessible from outside the home, especially for a somewhat skillful haddock.
En outre, à chaque émission, il y a transmission du code qui, là encore, peut être capté au cours de cette opération par une personne non autorisée équipée de l'appareillage adéquat. Or, disposant, alors, de l'intégralité du code, il lui est aisé de se procurer un émetteur dans le commerce, d'y reporter ce code et de commander le système de fermeture, en vue, par exemple, d'accéder à l'intérieur d'une habitation.In addition, on each transmission, there is transmission of the code which, again, can be picked up during this operation by an unauthorized person equipped with the appropriate equipment. However, having, then, the entire code, it is easy for him to obtain a transmitter in the trade, to carry this code there and to order the closing system, with a view, for example, to gain access to the interior of a dwelling.
Il est, par ailleurs, connu par le document EP-A-0 372 285, un dispositif pour la transmission à distance de commande de sécurité comportant un émetteur à même de transmettre des messages codés et un récepteur connecté à la charge à commander. Ce récepteur est muni d'une unité de décryptage du code transmis, ainsi que d'une unité de traitement qui, après vérification et lecture dudit code, est à même de transmettre un signal de commande à ladite charge.It is, moreover, known from document EP-A-0 372 285, a device for the remote transmission of a safety command comprising a transmitter capable of transmitting coded messages and a receiver connected to the load to be controlled. This receiver is provided with a decryption unit for the transmitted code, as well as with a processing unit which, after verification and reading of said code, is able to transmit a control signal to said load.
Le module de cryptage de l'émetteur se décompose en un microprocesseur et une mémoire EEPROM, cet ensemble permettant de déterminer un code évolutif selon un algorithme défini qui, par ailleurs, est connu par l'unité de décryptage et de décodage du récepteur.The transmitter's encryption module is broken down into a microprocessor and an EEPROM memory, this set making it possible to determine an evolving code according to a defined algorithm which, moreover, is known by the receiver's decryption and decoding unit.
Ainsi, il y a lieu d'observer que le code transmis par l'émetteur étant systématiquement calculé à la base du code précédemment transmis, le récepteur, disposant des mêmes données de calcul, est apte, à chaque nouvelle émission, de déterminer un code qui doit être identique à celui réceptionné. De ce fait, ce n'est qu'après avoir constaté la concordance du code émis et du nouveau code calculé par le récepteur que l'unité de traitement de ce dernier permet d'agir sur la charge pour que celle-ci exécute la commande sollicitée. Il est observé que le code transmis par l'émetteur se décompose en un code de base et en un code dynamique. C'est précisément ce dernier qui évolue en fonction de l'algorithme connu par le microprocesseur. Ainsi, si pour une raison ou pour une autre, le récepteur, situé à une distance trop importante de l'émetteur, ne perçoit pas le code émis par ce dernier, les deux éléments ne sont plus en phase. Il est alors prévu, dans ce document antérieur, la possibilité pour le récepteur de se remettre en phase avec l'émetteur dès l'instant qu'il peut identifier le code de base. Si cette condition est remplie, il vient stocker en mémoire le nouveau code dynamique ce qui lui permet, lors d'une nouvelle émission de la part de l'émetteur, de calculer le nouveau code dynamique à la base du précédent connu en mémoire.Thus, it should be observed that the code transmitted by the transmitter being systematically calculated on the basis of the code previously transmitted, the receiver, having the same calculation data, is capable, with each new transmission, of determining a code which must be identical to that received. Therefore, it is only after having noted the agreement of the code transmitted and the new code calculated by the receiver that the processing unit of the latter allows to act on the load so that the latter executes the command requested. It is observed that the code transmitted by the transmitter is broken down into a basic code and a dynamic code. It is precisely the latter that evolves in function of the algorithm known by the microprocessor. Thus, if for one reason or another, the receiver, located too far away from the transmitter, does not perceive the code transmitted by the latter, the two elements are no longer in phase. It is then provided, in this prior document, the possibility for the receiver to get back in phase with the transmitter as soon as it can identify the basic code. If this condition is met, it stores the new dynamic code in memory which allows it, during a new transmission from the transmitter, to calculate the new dynamic code on the basis of the previous known in memory.
En conséquence, ce dispositif ne présente qu'une sécurité relative puisque, connaissant l'algorithme mis en application par le microprocesseur et après identification du code de base, tout un chacun est à même de concevoir un émetteur compatible avec le récepteur.Consequently, this device presents only relative security since, knowing the algorithm applied by the microprocessor and after identification of the basic code, everyone is able to design a transmitter compatible with the receiver.
La solution, selon la présente invention, a pour but de répondre, efficacement, à l'ensemble des problèmes précités en vue d'une sécurité accrue de tels dispositifs de commande à distance qui émettent soit par ondes hertziennes ou encore par infrarouge par exemple.The aim of the solution according to the present invention is to respond effectively to all of the aforementioned problems with a view to increasing the security of such remote control devices which emit either by radio waves or even by infrared for example.
L'invention, telle que caractérisée dans les revendications, résout le problème et consiste en un dispositif de commande à distance par ondes hertziennes infrarouges ou analogues, en particulier de systèmes de fermeture motorisés, tels que des volets roulants, comprenant un récepteur associé à chaque système de fermeture et pourvu, d'une part, d'une unité de traitement centrale à même de gérer le fonctionnement de moyens moteurs et, d'autre part, d'une unité de décodage apte à interpréter l'information transmise par un émetteur au travers d'une unité de codage, l'émetteur et le récepteur disposant d'une mémoire EEPROM au niveau de laquelle est programmé un code se décomposant en au moins deux parties dont l'une permet l'identification d'un émetteur par rapport à un récepteur et dont l'autre partie, correspondant à la clé de commande, est cryptée par l'émetteur selon un algorithme défini et connu par l'unité de décodage du récepteur, la mémoire EEPROM du récepteur étant; en outre, programmée pour être à même de reconnaître une procédure d'initialisation transmise à ce récepteur à l'aide de moyens de commande appropriés en vue de mettre en phase la deuxième partie du code correspondant au récepteur à celle d'un émetteur préalablement identifié par rapport à la première partie dudit code.The invention, as characterized in the claims, solves the problem and consists of a device for remote control by infrared radio waves or the like, in particular of motorized closing systems, such as roller shutters, comprising a receiver associated with each closing system and provided, on the one hand, with a central processing unit capable of managing the operation of motor means and, on the other hand, with a decoding unit capable of interpreting the information transmitted by a transmitter through a coding unit, the transmitter and the receiver having an EEPROM memory at the level of which is programmed a code decomposing into at least two parts, one of which allows the identification of a transmitter in relation to a receiver and the other part of which, corresponding to the control key, is encrypted by the transmitter according to an algorithm defined and known by the decoding unit of the receiver, the EEPR memory OM of the receiver being; in addition, programmed to be able to recognize an initialization procedure transmitted to this receiver using appropriate control means in order to phase the second part of the code corresponding to the receiver to that of a transmitter previously identified with respect to the first part of said code.
Les avantages découlant de la présente invention consistent en ce que seule la première partie du code introduite au niveau du récepteur et de l'émetteur est susceptible d'être connue. En fait, c'est au travers de cette première partie du code qu'un récepteur va reconnaître un émetteur qui sera en mesure de le commander. Quant à la seconde partie du code elle n'est définie ni par le fabricant, ni par l'utilisateur. Elle est le résultat d'un calcul mené au travers d'un algorithme connu par l'émetteur et le récepteur, de sorte que cette seconde partie du code évolue à chaque transmission d'ordre entre l'émetteur et le récepteur.The advantages arising from the present invention consist in that only the first part of the code introduced at the level of the receiver and the transmitter is capable of being known. In fact, it is through this first part of the code that a receiver will recognize a transmitter that will be able to control it. As for the second part of the code, it is neither defined by the manufacturer nor by the user. It is the result of a calculation carried out through an algorithm known by the transmitter and the receiver, so that this second part of the code evolves with each transmission of order between the transmitter and the receiver.
Ainsi, même en disposant d'un émetteur comportant une mémoire EEPROM au niveau de laquelle l'on a introduit une première partie de code correspondant à la première partie de code connue par la mémoire EEPROM d'un récepteur, celui-ci ne peut recevoir d'ordre de cet émetteur qu'après une procédure d'initialisation spécifique, ayant pour but de les mettre en phase.Thus, even with a transmitter comprising an EEPROM memory at the level of which a first part of code corresponding to the first part of code known by the EEPROM memory of a receiver has been introduced, the latter cannot receive order of this transmitter only after a specific initialization procedure, intended to put them in phase.
A ce propos et selon l'invention, la procédure d'initialisation est transmise au récepteur par des moyens de commande constitués, substantiellement, par l'alimentation en énergie électrique dudit récepteur.In this regard and according to the invention, the initialization procedure is transmitted to the receiver by control means constituted, substantially, by the supply of electrical energy to said receiver.
En conséquence, pour un aigrefin qui souhaite manoeuvrer le système de fermeture, il lui faut dérober le seul et unique émetteur qui est en phase avec le récepteur, sinon il lui faut disposer d'un émetteur dont tout d'abord, la mémoire EEPROM a connaissance de la première partie du code. Or, d'entrée, cette première partie de code peut être déterminée en fonction de conditions de fabrication (numéro de série, ou autre) de sorte qu'elle n'est connue que par le fabricant. Ensuite, il doit disposer de l'algorithme de cryptage connu par le récepteur. Finalement, il doit avoir connaissance de la procédure d'initialisation du récepteur et pouvoir accéder aux moyens de commande permettant d'effectuer cette procédure d'initialisation.Consequently, for a haddock who wishes to operate the closing system, he must steal the one and only transmitter which is in phase with the receiver, otherwise he must have a transmitter whose EEPROM memory has first of all knowledge of the first part of the code. However, from the outset, this first part of code can be determined as a function of manufacturing conditions (serial number, or other) so that it is known only by the manufacturer. Then, it must have the encryption algorithm known by the receiver. Finally, he must have knowledge of the receiver's initialization procedure and be able to access the control means making it possible to carry out this initialization procedure.
Selon une autre caractéristique de l'invention, l'émetteur ne peut, lui aussi, qu'émettre un nombre de fois limité pendant un temps déterminé le code d'où résulte cette mise en phase avec le récepteur.According to another characteristic of the invention, the transmitter can also only transmit a limited number of times for a determined time the code from which this phasing results with the receiver.
Il est évident, dans ces conditions, qu'au travers d'un dispositif de commande à distance selon l'invention, un aigrefin aura davantage de difficultés à commander un système de fermeture que dans le passé.It is obvious, under these conditions, that through a remote control device according to the invention, a haddock will have more difficulty in controlling a closure system than in the past.
L'invention est exposée ci-après plus en détail à l'aide de dessins représentant seulement un mode d'exécution.The invention is set out below in more detail with the aid of drawings representing only one embodiment.
La figure 1 est une vue très schématisée d'un système de fermeture, tout particulièrement d'un volet roulant motorisé auquel est associé un dispositif de commande à distance, conforme à l'invention.Figure 1 is a very schematic view of a closure system, especially a motorized shutter with which is associated a remote control device, according to the invention.
Ainsi, tel que représenté dans la figure 1 du dessin ci-joint, l'invention a trait à un dispositif 1 de commande à distance par ondes hertziennes, infrarouges ou analogues, en particulier de systèmes de fermeture motorisés tels que des volets roulants 2.Thus, as shown in FIG. 1 of the attached drawing, the invention relates to a
Ce dispositif 1 comporte un récepteur 3 et un émetteur 4 associés à chaque système de fermeture 2.This
Plus particulièrement, le récepteur 3 comporte une unité de traitement centrale 5 programmable à même de gérer le fonctionnement des moyens moteurs 6 dudit système de fermeture 2. A ce propos, cette gestion des moyens moteurs 6 peut être assurée au travers d'une interface de puissance 7 adéquate. Ce récepteur 3 reçoit, en outre, une unité de décodage 8 à même d'interpréter l'information transmise par l'émetteur 4 au travers d'une unité de codage 9.More particularly, the
Le récepteur 3 et l'émetteur 4 comportent, tous deux, une mémoire EEPROM 10, 11, associée à leur unité, respectivement de décodage 8 et de codage 9 et qui a connaissance d'un code 12, 12A lequel se subdivise en au moins deux parties 13, 13A ; 14, 14A. L'une 13, 13A de ces parties du code 12 dénommée dans la suite de la description pour une question de facilité de compression, première partie 13, 13A, correspond à un code d'identification d'un émetteur 4 par rapport à un récepteur 3. Plus précisément, cette première partie 13, 13A du code 12 est identique dans chacune des mémoires 10, 11. En outre, elle est susceptible d'être connue, notamment par le fabricant à qui il est possible, ainsi, de conformer un émetteur 4 par rapport à un récepteur 3.The
Quant à l'autre partie 14, 14A, dénommée deuxième partie dans la description, elle correspond à la clé de commande. En fait, cette seconde partie 14, 14A du code 12 est calculée et, donc cryptée, par l'unité de codage 9 de l'émetteur 4 selon un algorithme défini 15, 15A connu par le récepteur 3 de sorte que celui-ci soit à même de calculer, à son tour, cette seconde partie 14A du code 12A et de l'identifier à la deuxième partie 14 du code 12 transmis par ledit émetteur 4.As for the
Par conséquent, au travers de l'algorithme 15, défini dans la mémoire EEPROM 11 de l'émetteur 4, cette seconde partie 14 du code 12 évolue à chaque transmission d'information au niveau du récepteur 3. Celui-ci, s'il est en phase avec l'émetteur 4, est en mesure de reconnaître le code crypté puisque ce récepteur 3 dispose, lui aussi, dans sa mémoire EEPROM 10 de l'algorithme bien défini 15A qui lui permet de le calculer et finalement de l'identifier.Consequently, through the
Il est évident, cependant, que, tel qu'il vient d'être précisé, le récepteur 3 n'est en mesure au travers de son unité de décodage 8 de décoder la deuxième partie 14 du code 12 qui lui est transmise par l'émetteur 4 que si, au préalable, ils ont été mis en phase de sorte que, lors de chaque commande, le calcul du code suivant, au travers de l'algorithme 15, 15A, conduit à un résultat qui s'accorde également.It is obvious, however, that, as has just been specified, the
Par conséquent, à chaque transmission au travers de l'émetteur 4, le récepteur 3, au travers de son unité de décodage 8 et de sa mémoire EEPROM 10 calcule le code que doit normalement lui transmettre l'émetteur 4 au cours de cette transmission d'ordre. Cependant, il peut arriver qu'un ordre soit transmis par l'émetteur 4 sans qu'il ne soit perçu par le récepteur 3. A ce moment la, il est évident que le code au niveau de l'émetteur 4 a évolué par rapport à celui du récepteur 3 que va calculer le récepteur 3 lors de la transmission suivante. Or, si les deux appareils sont en phase, le récepteur 3 doit pouvoir retrouver, en procédant à plusieurs calculs successifs et en mettant en application l'algorithme commun, le même code transmis par l'émetteur 4. Aussi, il est prévu que lors d'une réception d'une commande émise par l'émetteur 4 associé, le récepteur 3 procède, au travers de son unité de décodage 8, à au plus N rotations consistant à calculer au plus N fois la deuxième partie 14A du code 12A et à la comparer à la deuxième partie 14 du code 12 transmis par l'émetteur 4. Si au cours de ces N rotations du calcul, l'unité de décodage 8 du récepteur 3 n'a pas retrouvé le code crypté transmis par l'émetteur 4, il interprète la transmission comme étant une manoeuvre de piratage et se met dans une position de blocage.Consequently, on each transmission through the transmitter 4, the
Tout comme l'association de tout nouvel émetteur 4 à un récepteur 3, le déblocage nécessite, selon l'invention, la mise en oeuvre d'une procédure d'initialisation et, donc, de mise en phase de la deuxième partie 14, 14A du code 12, 12A sachant que, de toute manière, la première partie 13 du code 12 au niveau de l'émetteur 4 doit avoir été accordée, préalablement, à la première partie 13A du code 12A connu par le récepteur 3.Like the association of any new transmitter 4 with a
Cette procédure d'initialisation de la deuxième partie du code est connue par la mémoire EEPROM 10 du récepteur 3 de sorte que celui-ci soit en mesure de la reconnaître lorsqu'elle est effectuée par l'intermédiaire de moyens de commande 16 appropriés. Cette procédure d'initialisation consiste, en fait, à faire accepter au récepteur 3 une deuxième partie de code 14 qui lui est transmise par un émetteur 4 respectant une première partie de code 13 identique à celle 13a connue par ce récepteur 3.This procedure for initializing the second part of the code is known by the
Avantageusement, ces moyens de commande 16 sont constitués par des moyens de coupure de l'alimentation en énergie électrique 18 du récepteur 3. Quant à la procédure d'initialisation même, elle est basée sur l'identification de séquences de coupures de cette alimentation en énergie électrique 18. Plus précisément, la mémoire EEPROM identifie comme étant une procédure d'initialisation lorsqu'elle reconnaît, lors des séquences de coupure de l'alimentation en énergie électrique 18, leur nombre et leur durée.Advantageously, these control means 16 are constituted by means for cutting off the supply of
Par conséquent, une fois cette procédure effectuée le récepteur 3 est en mesure d'accepter la seconde partie 14 du code 12 transmis par un émetteur 4. Cependant, cela n'est possible, préférentiellement, que pendant un laps de temps « T1 » déterminé au-delà duquel ce récepteur 3 se remet dans une position de blocage nécessitant la reprise de la procédure d'initialisation. Par conséquent, la procédure d'initialisation enclenche des moyens de décompte du temps « T1 ». Finalement, hormis lors de la fabrication du système de fermeture 2 et de la première affectation d'un émetteur 4 au récepteur 3 de ce système de fermeture 2, la procédure d'initialisation ne sera entreprise, le plus fréquemment, qu'en raison de perte ou de détérioration de cet émetteur 4. Dans ces conditions, un nouvel émetteur est, alors, commandé au fabricant qui, ayant connaissance de la première partie du code 13A du récepteur 3 expédiera à l'utilisateur un émetteur 4 dont la première partie 13 du code 12 aura été, préalablement, accordée.Consequently, once this procedure has been performed, the
Or, il peut se trouver qu'au cours de cette expédition, ce nouvel émetteur 4 soit dérobé et qu'il y ait, là encore, un risque de piratage. De manière à éviter ce risque ou, tout au moins, à le minimiser, le code 12, 12A comporte au moins une troisième partie 19, 19A que l'on peut qualifier de clé de service après-vente et qui n'est connue que par le fabricant. Préférentiellement, cette clé de service après-vente ne peut être utilisée, donc transmise, par l'émetteur 4 au récepteur 3 qu'un nombre de fois limité lors de leur mise en phase. En outre, cette troisième partie 19 du code au niveau de l'émetteur 4 vient à disparaître et, donc, est brûlée au-delà d'un temps « T2 » défini après la conception et la programmation de l'émetteur 4. Ainsi, si au cours de ce temps « T2 », l'émetteur 4 n'est pas reconnu par le récepteur 3 auquel il doit être associé, cet émetteur 4 devient inutilisable à l'égard dudit récepteur 3 et il est nécessaire de recommander un autre émetteur 4 au fabricant. En fait, le temps « T 2 » sera déterminé de telle sorte qu'il soit suffisant pour que l'utilisateur ait la possibilité de réceptionner l'émetteur 4 commandé au fabricant, ceci en cas de respect d'un temps d'expédition normal et, bien sûr, d'effectuer la procédure d'initialisation du récepteur 3.However, it may happen that during this expedition, this new transmitter 4 is stolen and there is, again, a risk of piracy. In order to avoid this risk or, at least to minimize it, the
Il faut observer qu'en cas de perte ou de détérioration d'un émetteur 4, il doit être possible, au travers d'une procédure de secours, connue par la mémoire EEPROM 10 du récepteur 3 de fermer le système de fermeture 2 si celui-ci est ouvert.It should be noted that in the event of loss or damage to a transmitter 4, it must be possible, through a backup procedure, known by the
Avantageusement, cette procédure de secours est effectuée par l'intermédiaire de moyens de commande 16 identiques à ceux permettant d'effectuer la procédure d'initialisation. Ainsi, ladite procédure de secours est basée sur l'identification du nombre et de la durée de séquences de coupures de l'alimentation du récepteur 3 en énergie électrique. En fait, au-delà de cette procédure de secours, le récepteur 3 accepte la commande d'un émetteur correspondant à un système de fermeture voisin uniquement si cette commande est identifiée comme la fermeture dudit système de fermeture 2.Advantageously, this backup procedure is carried out by means of control means 16 identical to those making it possible to carry out the initialization procedure. Thus, said backup procedure is based on the identification of the number and duration of power supply cut-off sequences for the
Avantageusement, la procédure d'initialisation et la procédure de secours sont identiques. Quant au temps « T1 » durant lequel le récepteur 3 devient captif pour l'identification d'un nouvel émetteur 4 au-delà de cette procédure d'initialisation ou de secours, il est déterminé suffisant pour qu'après l'exécution de cette dernière, l'usager ait la possibilité de commander puis réceptionner un nouvel émetteur 4 de la part du fabricant.Advantageously, the initialization procedure and the backup procedure are identical. As for the time "T1" during which the
Les avantages découlant de la présente invention consistent, essentiellement, en ce qu'elle conduit à des systèmes de fermeture à commande à distance d'une très grande sécurité comparativement à ce qui est existant à l'heure actuelle. La présente invention répond, ainsi, à un besoin de plus en plus affirmé en raison de la généralisation de tels systèmes de fermeture motorisés. Aussi, elle représente un net progrès par rapport à l'état de la technique antérieur.The advantages resulting from the present invention consist essentially in that it leads to remote control closure systems of very high security compared to what exists at present. The present invention thus responds to an increasingly asserted need due to the generalization of such motorized closure systems. Also, it represents a clear progress compared to the state of the prior art.
Claims (8)
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
FR9501067A FR2729777B1 (en) | 1995-01-25 | 1995-01-25 | DEVICE FOR REMOTE CONTROL BY HERTZIAN, INFRARED WAVES OR THE LIKE, OF MOTORIZED CLOSING SYSTEMS |
FR9501067 | 1995-01-25 |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP0724056A1 true EP0724056A1 (en) | 1996-07-31 |
EP0724056B1 EP0724056B1 (en) | 2001-07-18 |
Family
ID=9475654
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP96440010A Expired - Lifetime EP0724056B1 (en) | 1995-01-25 | 1996-01-25 | Remote control device using hertzian, infra-red waves or similar for controlling motorised locking mechanisms |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP0724056B1 (en) |
AT (1) | ATE203302T1 (en) |
DE (1) | DE69613865T2 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2160788T3 (en) |
FR (1) | FR2729777B1 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO1999067759A2 (en) * | 1998-06-22 | 1999-12-29 | Hörmann KG Antriebstechnik | Coding circuit and actuating or control device provided with said circuit for a signal actuated closing system |
Citations (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0099762A1 (en) * | 1982-06-04 | 1984-02-01 | Jacques Lewiner | Coded remote control devices |
US4618804A (en) * | 1984-06-28 | 1986-10-21 | Kanematsu-Gosho, Ltd. | Remote control apparatus for opening and shutting a blind |
FR2589187A1 (en) * | 1986-04-10 | 1987-04-30 | Kokusan Kinzoku Kogyo Kk | Locking and unlocking system for a car, controlled by a radio signal |
DE3636822C1 (en) * | 1986-10-29 | 1987-10-15 | Ruf Kg Wilhelm | Electronic remote actuation device, in particular for central locking systems of motor vehicles |
EP0372285A1 (en) * | 1988-12-06 | 1990-06-13 | DELTA ELETTRONICA s.p.a. | Devices for the remote transmission of controls in security |
EP0385070A1 (en) * | 1989-02-24 | 1990-09-05 | Daimler-Benz Aktiengesellschaft | Remote control system with a code transmitted by code words |
EP0535555A1 (en) * | 1991-10-04 | 1993-04-07 | Motorola, Inc. | Programming technique for vehicular remote control system |
EP0605996A1 (en) * | 1993-01-07 | 1994-07-13 | Ford Motor Company Limited | Remote controlled security system |
-
1995
- 1995-01-25 FR FR9501067A patent/FR2729777B1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
1996
- 1996-01-25 EP EP96440010A patent/EP0724056B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1996-01-25 AT AT96440010T patent/ATE203302T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1996-01-25 DE DE69613865T patent/DE69613865T2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1996-01-25 ES ES96440010T patent/ES2160788T3/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Patent Citations (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0099762A1 (en) * | 1982-06-04 | 1984-02-01 | Jacques Lewiner | Coded remote control devices |
US4618804A (en) * | 1984-06-28 | 1986-10-21 | Kanematsu-Gosho, Ltd. | Remote control apparatus for opening and shutting a blind |
FR2589187A1 (en) * | 1986-04-10 | 1987-04-30 | Kokusan Kinzoku Kogyo Kk | Locking and unlocking system for a car, controlled by a radio signal |
DE3636822C1 (en) * | 1986-10-29 | 1987-10-15 | Ruf Kg Wilhelm | Electronic remote actuation device, in particular for central locking systems of motor vehicles |
EP0372285A1 (en) * | 1988-12-06 | 1990-06-13 | DELTA ELETTRONICA s.p.a. | Devices for the remote transmission of controls in security |
EP0385070A1 (en) * | 1989-02-24 | 1990-09-05 | Daimler-Benz Aktiengesellschaft | Remote control system with a code transmitted by code words |
EP0535555A1 (en) * | 1991-10-04 | 1993-04-07 | Motorola, Inc. | Programming technique for vehicular remote control system |
EP0605996A1 (en) * | 1993-01-07 | 1994-07-13 | Ford Motor Company Limited | Remote controlled security system |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO1999067759A2 (en) * | 1998-06-22 | 1999-12-29 | Hörmann KG Antriebstechnik | Coding circuit and actuating or control device provided with said circuit for a signal actuated closing system |
WO1999067759A3 (en) * | 1998-06-22 | 2000-02-03 | Hoermann Kg Antriebstechnik | Coding circuit and actuating or control device provided with said circuit for a signal actuated closing system |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
FR2729777B1 (en) | 1997-03-14 |
DE69613865D1 (en) | 2001-08-23 |
ATE203302T1 (en) | 2001-08-15 |
EP0724056B1 (en) | 2001-07-18 |
ES2160788T3 (en) | 2001-11-16 |
FR2729777A1 (en) | 1996-07-26 |
DE69613865T2 (en) | 2002-04-04 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP1587044B1 (en) | Method for data transmission between bidirectional objects | |
EP0275789B1 (en) | Anti-theft device with adjustable code for automotive vehicles | |
EP2633506B1 (en) | Method of operating a mobile control unit of a home-automation installation | |
EP1476859B1 (en) | Method for matching bidirectional objects | |
EP0722157A1 (en) | Anti-theft protection system for valuables | |
EP0999327A1 (en) | Control device for the opening of a door | |
FR2834147A1 (en) | Domestic control transmitter/receiver matching system having receiver two transmitters matched with receiver responding each transmitter address and sending back/storing different address each transmitter | |
EP1476860B1 (en) | Method for defining a group from among bi-directional objects | |
EP1561192B1 (en) | Method for securing the recording mode of a home automation device | |
FR2761183A1 (en) | DEVICE FOR CONTROLLING A REMOTE ACTUATOR | |
EP0724056B1 (en) | Remote control device using hertzian, infra-red waves or similar for controlling motorised locking mechanisms | |
BE1003693A6 (en) | Security system for computer system. | |
FR2731035A1 (en) | ASSEMBLY CONSISTING OF AN ELECTRIC DOOR LOCK WITH ELECTRIC EMERGENCY FUNCTION AND ITS CONTROL MEANS, AND EQUIPMENT CONSISTING OF SEVERAL OF THESE ASSEMBLIES | |
FR2768227A1 (en) | Protecting information technology equipment | |
FR2877468A1 (en) | METHOD AND EQUIPMENT FOR MANAGING ACCESS CONTROL BADGES | |
EP4104479A1 (en) | Methods for controlling access and system implementing said methods | |
EP0531502A1 (en) | Device for authorized actuation of locking means | |
EP4407580A1 (en) | Access control system | |
EP4344181A1 (en) | Access control system | |
FR2691274A1 (en) | Surveillance system for household - has central control receiving coded radio signals from remote units and sending alarm to siren | |
FR2547670A1 (en) | Method of checking the status of the exits from a site and installation for surveillance of such a site | |
FR3009639A1 (en) | DOMOTIC REMOTE CONTROL, DOMOTIC COMMAND RECEIVING ELEMENT, AND METHOD OF OPERATING SUCH A REMOTE CONTROL AND A CONTROLLING RECEIVER | |
EP1671191A2 (en) | Security device and operating method thereof | |
FR2921778A1 (en) | User authenticating system for accessing service on e.g. Internet portal, has data processing unit comprising locking module for closing access to service when movable device is not situated in perimeter of data processing unit |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE ES IT LI NL |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 19960610 |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 19990729 |
|
GRAG | Despatch of communication of intention to grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA |
|
GRAG | Despatch of communication of intention to grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA |
|
GRAH | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA |
|
GRAH | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE ES IT LI NL |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20010718 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20010718 |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 203302 Country of ref document: AT Date of ref document: 20010815 Kind code of ref document: T |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 69613865 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20010823 |
|
ITF | It: translation for a ep patent filed | ||
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2160788 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 |
|
NLV1 | Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act | ||
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20020131 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20020131 Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20020131 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed | ||
BERE | Be: lapsed |
Owner name: ALIADE Effective date: 20020131 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20120126 Year of fee payment: 17 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20130122 Year of fee payment: 18 Ref country code: ES Payment date: 20130128 Year of fee payment: 18 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 69613865 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 69613865 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20140801 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20140801 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FD2A Effective date: 20150331 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20140126 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20140125 |