EP0715744B1 - Procede de prevention des reponses erronees de systemes optiques de detection, et appareil associe - Google Patents

Procede de prevention des reponses erronees de systemes optiques de detection, et appareil associe Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0715744B1
EP0715744B1 EP94925486A EP94925486A EP0715744B1 EP 0715744 B1 EP0715744 B1 EP 0715744B1 EP 94925486 A EP94925486 A EP 94925486A EP 94925486 A EP94925486 A EP 94925486A EP 0715744 B1 EP0715744 B1 EP 0715744B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
signal
source
optical radiation
optical
chaotic
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP94925486A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP0715744A1 (fr
Inventor
William Joseph Senior Hirst
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij BV
Original Assignee
Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij BV
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij BV filed Critical Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij BV
Priority to EP94925486A priority Critical patent/EP0715744B1/fr
Publication of EP0715744A1 publication Critical patent/EP0715744A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0715744B1 publication Critical patent/EP0715744B1/fr
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G08—SIGNALLING
    • G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
    • G08B17/00—Fire alarms; Alarms responsive to explosion
    • G08B17/12—Actuation by presence of radiation or particles, e.g. of infrared radiation or of ions

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method and apparatus for preventing the occurrence of false responses in optical detection devices, which are sensitive to changes or fluctuations in optical radiation emitted from a source.
  • optical detection devices examples include flame-detectors, smoke detectors and the like.
  • the response signal of such optical detection devices can be applied to provide a fire alarm signal or, for example, to supervise operation of burners, furnaces and the like.
  • Flame detectors in which radiation from the flames is sensed have been proposed, utilizing radiation derived from the flames in the visible light range, infra-red (I.R.) range, or ultraviolet (UV) range.
  • I.R. infra-red
  • UV ultraviolet
  • Known flame detectors to provide outputs representative of presence of a flame, and operating purely within the above referred to light ranges, frequently are not reliable, since signals are derived not only from radiation due to flames, but also caused by extraneous radiation, such as daylight, artificial light sources, radiant heaters providing I.R. radiation, and the like, or interruption of such extraneous radiations although no real flame - to be sensed - is present. It is therefore necessary to provide characteristic differences which distinguish flame radiation from extraneous disturbance radiation when evaluating the signals in order to prevent erroneous signals and malfunction.
  • the different spectral composition of radiation from flames is used in order to distinguish between radiation from flames and disturbing or interfering radiation.
  • Two photoelectric sensors with different spectral sensitivity are exposed to radiation from the flame; for example, one photoelectric sensor is sensitive to blue light, and one is sensitive to red light.
  • the photo cells may be serially connected. At the junction point between the two photo cells, a d-c signal will occur which depends on the spectral composition or the colour of the light radiation to which the sensors are exposed.
  • Such a flame detector while functioning properly under most conditions may, however, react to interfering radiation which by chance has the same, or similar spectral composition as radiation from a flame.
  • the invention therefore provides a method for preventing the occurrence of false responses in optical detection devices, which are sensitive to changes or fluctuations in optical radiation emitted from a source comprising the steps of:
  • the invention further provides an apparatus for preventing the occurrence of false responses in optical detection devices, which are sensitive to changes or fluctuations in optical radiation emitted from a source comprising means for receiving optical radiation emitted by a source; means for selecting a predetermined range of wavelengths; means for detecting changes in the received optical flux and deriving therefrom a signal having time series data (signal traces) at the detector output; characterized by means for analyzing the detected signal for its chaotic (i.e.
  • aperiodic behaviour by establishing the associated fractal dimension of the signal and using the existence of this fractal property of the said time series data of the optical radiation emitted by the said source to discriminate against those sources of fluctuating optical radiation which are periodic or intermittent; and means for only providing a response at the output of the optical detection device in case of chaotic behaviour of the source.
  • the emitted and received optical radiation is in the infra-red (I.R.) range.
  • the invention is based upon the following steps:
  • the invention is further based upon the fact that certain optical radiation e.g. flame flicker is chaotic, i.e aperiodic.
  • the chaotic behaviour of the flame can be objectively quantified by applying the concept of fractal dimension to the time series data from the detector output. Rotating or vibrating sources will be periodic, i.e. non-chaotic and will not have a fractal dimension, neither will beam interrupts.
  • the roughened perimeter could be enscribed by a polygon of N sides of equal length ⁇ .
  • the key property of the detected signal is chaotic behaviour.
  • the invention is based upon the idea of using the fractal property of the time series data of the optical radiation e.g. the I.R. emitted by a flame to discriminate against those sources of fluctuating I.R. which though not flame generated, do satisfy the frequency test of existing flame detectors.
  • US-A-4,866,420 discloses a method for preventing the occurrence of false responses in the detection of fires by comparing the flicker frequency spectrum of a real fire with a theoretical fire spectrum which comparison allows a discrimination against false fire signal if a predetermined deviation is reached.
  • EP-A-525592 discloses information processing systems using fractal dimension.
  • a narrowband optical bandpass filter 1 restricts the I.R. radiation from a source entering the detection device to a narrow range of wavelengths around 4.4 microns. These wavelengths are e.g. emitted by flames 3 or hot surfaces but are sufficiently strongly absorbed by the atmosphere for no contribution to be left in sunlight at the Earth's surface. Consequently, any such wavelengths entering the detector will have been produced locally - either in a flame or from a hot surface. The detector is effectively "solar blind".
  • the transmitted I.R. radiation is then detected by an I.R. detector 2.
  • This is very sensitive and inherently suited to detecting changes in I.R. flux.
  • the detector output is passed through an electrical bandpass filter 4 that restricts the transmitted signal to components in the range of 0.5 to 15 Hz. These frequencies are characteristic of flickering flames.
  • the resulting signal trace is markedly different from that generated by a flickering flame.
  • the chaotic behaviour of the flame can be quantified by applying the concept of fractal dimension to the time series data from the detector output.
  • the vertical axes represent relative intensity, whereas the horizontal axes represent time in seconds.
  • the trace length of a signal can be measured with progressively smaller step lengths (finer discrimination) by any means suitable for the purpose for recognizing chaotic behaviour and determining fractal dimension.
  • Fig. 2 An instructive way to consider the operation is shown in Fig. 2.
  • stepping along the trace using means for measuring the trace length of a signal with progressively finer discrimination, e.g. a pair of suitable frequency dividers set to a particular step length.
  • the measured length of the trace is the number of steps times the step length; obviously for large step lengths much detailed structure is missed out.
  • progressively smaller step lengths ever smaller features of the trace can be followed and the total length measured increases.
  • a plot of log (total measured length) against log(step length) will yield a straight line graph whose slope gives the fractal dimension.
  • Fig. 3 shows such a result for a flickering flame.
  • the horizontal axis represents Log 10 (step length) whereas the vertical axis represents Log 10 (total measured length).
  • fractal dimensions of time series data are established and determined by suitable algorithms.
  • a microprocessor in the detector head efficient algorithms can be implemented.
  • a plug-in replacement head could be applied for simple retrofitting to existing systems.
  • a control card could be used to handle the processing for several detector heads, interfacing them to the existing fire-detection system.
  • the present invention is not restricted to flame detection or hot surface changes detection, but the fractal test algorithm of the invention could also be applied to detect phenomena such as smoke (where the signal fluctuations due to real smoke, are chaotic, whereas those from obscuration of the beam or beam interrupts, are not), gas or other dispersing constituents of a mixture for which the signals representing fluctuations in concentration need to be distinguished from more periodic or intermittent confusing signals.

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Emergency Management (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Photometry And Measurement Of Optical Pulse Characteristics (AREA)
  • Measurement Of The Respiration, Hearing Ability, Form, And Blood Characteristics Of Living Organisms (AREA)
  • Fire-Detection Mechanisms (AREA)

Abstract

Procédé (et appareil associé) de prévention des réponses erronées de systèmes optiques de détection, sensibles à des variations ou fluctuations du rayonnement optique d'une source, dont les étapes sont: a) réception du rayonnement émanant de la source; b) sélection d'une plage prédéterminée de longueurs d'ondes; c) détection des variations du flux de rayonnement dont on tire un chronogramme du signal (trace du signal) à la sortie du capteur; d) analyse du signal détecté pour y déceler un comportement chaotique (p. ex. apériodique) en établissant la dimension fractale associée au signal et en utilisant ladite dimension fractale des données chronologiques du rayonnement de la source de rayonnement optique pour distinguer cette dernière des sources périodiques ou intermittentes de rayonnement optique fluctuant; et e) ne fournir de réponse à la sortie du détecteur optique qu'en cas de comportement chaotique de la source.

Claims (15)

  1. Procédé pour empêcher que surviennent de fausses réponses dans des systèmes de détection optique qui sont sensibles à des modifications ou à des fluctuations d'un rayonnement optique émis par une source, comportant les étapes consistant à:
    a) recevoir un rayonnement optique émis par une source;
    b) sélectionner une plage prédéterminée de longueurs d'onde;
    c) détecter des modifications dans le flux optique reçu et en dériver, à la sortie du détecteur, un signal présentant des données en succession temporelle (traces du signal); caractérisé par l'étape consistant à
    d) analyser le comportement chaotique (c'est-à-dire non périodique) du signal détecté en déterminant la dimension fractale associée au signal et en utilisant l'existence de cette propriété fractale desdites données en succession temporelle du rayonnement optique émis par ladite source, pour distinguer des sources de rayonnement optique fluctuant qui sont périodiques de celles qui sont intermittentes; et
    e) fournir une réponse à la sortie du dispositif de détection optique uniquement dans le cas d'un comportement chaotique de la source.
  2. Procédé selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que l'on mesure les dimensions fractales des traces du signal.
  3. Procédé selon la revendication 2, caractérisé en ce que les dimensions fractales sont mesurées par un algorithme.
  4. Procédé selon la revendication 3, caractérisé en ce que la longueur de la trace d'un signal est mesurée avec une discrimination progressivement plus fine.
  5. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 3, caractérisé en ce que le rayonnement optique émis et le rayonnement optique reçu sont dans la plage de l'infrarouge (I.R.).
  6. Procédé selon la revendication 5, caractérisé en ce que la source I.R. est une flamme et en ce que le dispositif de détection sensible à l'I.R. est un détecteur de flammes.
  7. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 6, caractérisé en ce que le dispositif de détection optique est un détecteur de fumée dans lequel des fluctuations du signal dues à une fumée réelle sont chaotiques, alors que celles provenant d'un obscurcissement du faisceau ou d'interruptions du faisceau ne le sont pas.
  8. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 6, caractérisé en ce que le dispositif de détection optique est un détecteur de gaz ou d'autres constituants dispersés d'un mélange, pour lesquels les signaux représentant des fluctuations de concentration doivent être distingués de signaux plus périodiques ou intermittents source de confusion.
  9. Appareil en vue d'empêcher que de fausses réponses surviennent dans des dispositifs de détection optique qui sont sensibles à des modifications ou à des fluctuations du rayonnement optique émis par une source, comprenant un moyen pour recevoir un rayonnement optique émis par une source; un moyen pour sélectionner une plage prédéterminée de longueurs d'onde; un moyen pour détecter des modifications dans le flux optique reçu et en dériver, à la sortie du détecteur, un signal présentant des données en succession temporelle (traces du signal); caractérisé par un moyen pour analyser le comportement chaotique (c'est-à-dire non périodique) du signal détecté en déterminant la dimension fractale associée au signal et en utilisant cette propriété fractale desdites données en succession temporelle du rayonnement optique émis par ladite source pour distinguer des sources de rayonnement optique fluctuant qui sont périodiques de celles qui sont intermittentes; et un moyen pour fournir une réponse à la sortie du dispositif de détection optique uniquement dans le cas d'un comportement chaotique de la source.
  10. Appareil selon la revendication 9, caractérisé par un moyen pour mesurer avec une discrimination de plus en plus fine la longueur de la trace d'un signal.
  11. Appareil selon les revendications 10 ou 11, caractérisé en ce qu'un microprocesseur est incorporé dans la tête du détecteur.
  12. Appareil selon l'une quelconque des revendications 9 à 11, caractérisé en ce que le rayonnement optique émis et le rayonnement optique reçu sont dans la plage de l'infrarouge (I.R.).
  13. Appareil selon la revendication 12, caractérisé en ce que la source I.R. est une flamme ou une surface chaude et en ce que le dispositif de détection sensible à l'I.R. est un détecteur de flammes.
  14. Appareil selon l'une quelconque des revendications 9 à 13, caractérisé en ce que le dispositif de détection optique est un détecteur de fumée dans lequel des fluctuations du signal, dues à une fumée réelle, sont chaotiques, alors que celles dues à un obscurcissement du faisceau ou à des interruptions du faisceau ne le sont pas.
  15. Appareil selon l'une quelconque des revendications 9 à 13, caractérisé en ce que le dispositif de détection optique est un détecteur de gaz ou d'autres constituants dispersés d'un mélange, pour lesquels les signaux représentant des fluctuations de concentration doivent être distingués de signaux plus périodiques ou intermittents, source de confusion.
EP94925486A 1993-08-31 1994-08-30 Procede de prevention des reponses erronees de systemes optiques de detection, et appareil associe Expired - Lifetime EP0715744B1 (fr)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP94925486A EP0715744B1 (fr) 1993-08-31 1994-08-30 Procede de prevention des reponses erronees de systemes optiques de detection, et appareil associe

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP93306865 1993-08-31
EP93306865 1993-08-31
PCT/EP1994/002888 WO1995006927A1 (fr) 1993-08-31 1994-08-30 Procede de prevention des reponses erronees de systemes optiques de detection, et appareil associe
EP94925486A EP0715744B1 (fr) 1993-08-31 1994-08-30 Procede de prevention des reponses erronees de systemes optiques de detection, et appareil associe

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0715744A1 EP0715744A1 (fr) 1996-06-12
EP0715744B1 true EP0715744B1 (fr) 1997-12-03

Family

ID=8214523

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP94925486A Expired - Lifetime EP0715744B1 (fr) 1993-08-31 1994-08-30 Procede de prevention des reponses erronees de systemes optiques de detection, et appareil associe

Country Status (8)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0715744B1 (fr)
AU (1) AU7537594A (fr)
CA (1) CA2170519A1 (fr)
DE (1) DE69407190T2 (fr)
DK (1) DK0715744T3 (fr)
NO (1) NO960783L (fr)
SG (1) SG97742A1 (fr)
WO (1) WO1995006927A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
AU2194101A (en) * 1999-12-10 2001-06-18 Durand Technology Limited Improvements in or relating to applications of fractal and/or chaotic techniques
DE102009048739B3 (de) * 2009-07-14 2012-03-29 Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur automatischen Waldbranderkennung

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4665390A (en) * 1985-08-22 1987-05-12 Hughes Aircraft Company Fire sensor statistical discriminator
US4866420A (en) * 1988-04-26 1989-09-12 Systron Donner Corp. Method of detecting a fire of open uncontrolled flames
US5051590A (en) * 1989-12-06 1991-09-24 Santa Barbara Research Center Fiber optic flame detection and temperature measurement system having one or more in-line temperature dependent optical filters
US5201321A (en) * 1991-02-11 1993-04-13 Fulton Keith W Method and apparatus for diagnosing vulnerability to lethal cardiac arrhythmias
US5185687A (en) * 1991-03-28 1993-02-09 Eaton Corporation Chaos sensing arc detection
JPH0535768A (ja) * 1991-07-26 1993-02-12 Hitachi Ltd フラクタル次元を応用した情報処理装置

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU7537594A (en) 1995-03-22
DE69407190D1 (de) 1998-01-15
DK0715744T3 (da) 1998-08-10
NO960783D0 (no) 1996-02-27
SG97742A1 (en) 2003-08-20
WO1995006927A1 (fr) 1995-03-09
CA2170519A1 (fr) 1995-03-09
EP0715744A1 (fr) 1996-06-12
NO960783L (no) 1996-03-12
DE69407190T2 (de) 1998-05-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7602304B2 (en) Multi-sensor device and methods for fire detection
CN100390827C (zh) 火灾及烟雾检测与控制方法
US6967582B2 (en) Detector with ambient photon sensor and other sensors
US4866420A (en) Method of detecting a fire of open uncontrolled flames
US5339070A (en) Combined UV/IR flame detection system
EP0233245B1 (fr) Discriminateur statistique pour detecteur d'incendies
CA2236784C (fr) Methode et appareil de detection d'incendie faisant appel a des bandes sprectrales chevauchantes
SE8304642D0 (sv) Apparat for detektering av miljostorningar
EP0064811B1 (fr) Détecteur de flammes
EP0588753B1 (fr) Procédé pour détecter un incendie
US6150659A (en) Digital multi-frequency infrared flame detector
AU703685B2 (en) Method of detecting a flame and flame detector for carrying out the method
EP1233386B1 (fr) Détecteurs d'incendie
EP1973085B1 (fr) Procédé de détection d'un incendie dans une zone sous surveillance
EP3159861B1 (fr) Améliorations apportées ou se rapportant à des détecteurs de flamme et procédés associés
EP0715744B1 (fr) Procede de prevention des reponses erronees de systemes optiques de detection, et appareil associe
KR20210049661A (ko) 광스펙트럼 분석을 이용한 화재감지 장치 및 방법
FI111666B (fi) Palohälytysjärjestelmä tulipalojen varhaiseksi toteamiseksi
US20210123864A1 (en) Fire detection apparatus and method using light spectrum analysis
EP0366298B1 (fr) Reconnaissance et traitement de formes d'ondes
EP0926647B1 (fr) Procédé pour détecter un incendie
JPS63284427A (ja) 火災検出装置
WO1999001723A1 (fr) Procede de distinction entre des effets d'incendie proche et des effets d'incendie eloigne
IL103094A (en) Method and apparatus for detecting a fire condition
JP2000067339A (ja) 火災検知装置

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19960228

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): DE DK FR GB IT NL SE

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19961107

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): DE DK FR GB IT NL SE

ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed

Owner name: JACOBACCI & PERANI S.P.A.

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69407190

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19980115

ET Fr: translation filed
PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 19980622

Year of fee payment: 5

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 19980702

Year of fee payment: 5

Ref country code: DK

Payment date: 19980702

Year of fee payment: 5

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 19980728

Year of fee payment: 5

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: T3

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19990301

NLV4 Nl: lapsed or anulled due to non-payment of the annual fee

Effective date: 19990301

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19990601

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: THE PATENT HAS BEEN ANNULLED BY A DECISION OF A NATIONAL AUTHORITY

Effective date: 19990830

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19990830

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19990830

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 19990830

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20000428

EUG Se: european patent has lapsed

Ref document number: 94925486.6

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: EBP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.

Effective date: 20050830