EP0711370B1 - Papierherstellung - Google Patents

Papierherstellung Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0711370B1
EP0711370B1 EP95921013A EP95921013A EP0711370B1 EP 0711370 B1 EP0711370 B1 EP 0711370B1 EP 95921013 A EP95921013 A EP 95921013A EP 95921013 A EP95921013 A EP 95921013A EP 0711370 B1 EP0711370 B1 EP 0711370B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
starch
suspension
sheet
paper
process according
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP95921013A
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0711370A1 (de
Inventor
Graham Greenwood
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Ciba Specialty Chemicals Water Treatments Ltd
Original Assignee
Ciba Specialty Chemicals Water Treatments Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Ciba Specialty Chemicals Water Treatments Ltd filed Critical Ciba Specialty Chemicals Water Treatments Ltd
Priority to EP01114439A priority Critical patent/EP1143068B1/de
Publication of EP0711370A1 publication Critical patent/EP0711370A1/de
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0711370B1 publication Critical patent/EP0711370B1/de
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
    • D21—PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
    • D21H—PULP COMPOSITIONS; PREPARATION THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES D21C OR D21D; IMPREGNATING OR COATING OF PAPER; TREATMENT OF FINISHED PAPER NOT COVERED BY CLASS B31 OR SUBCLASS D21G; PAPER NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • D21H23/00—Processes or apparatus for adding material to the pulp or to the paper
    • D21H23/02—Processes or apparatus for adding material to the pulp or to the paper characterised by the manner in which substances are added
    • D21H23/04—Addition to the pulp; After-treatment of added substances in the pulp
    • D21H23/06—Controlling the addition
    • D21H23/14—Controlling the addition by selecting point of addition or time of contact between components
    • D21H23/16—Addition before or during pulp beating or refining
    • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
    • D21—PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
    • D21H—PULP COMPOSITIONS; PREPARATION THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES D21C OR D21D; IMPREGNATING OR COATING OF PAPER; TREATMENT OF FINISHED PAPER NOT COVERED BY CLASS B31 OR SUBCLASS D21G; PAPER NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • D21H17/00—Non-fibrous material added to the pulp, characterised by its constitution; Paper-impregnating material characterised by its constitution
    • D21H17/20—Macromolecular organic compounds
    • D21H17/21—Macromolecular organic compounds of natural origin; Derivatives thereof
    • D21H17/24—Polysaccharides
    • D21H17/28—Starch

Definitions

  • This invention relates to the production of paper which is strengthened by starch.
  • a common alternative to this process involves shearing the flocculated suspension so as to degrade the flocs and then adding an aqueous suspension of micro-particulate anionic material and thereby reflocculating the suspension, and then draining the reflocculated suspension through the screen.
  • Such processes using cationic starch and colloidal silica are described in U.S. 4,388,150 and processes using cationic synthetic polymer and bentonite are described in EP-A-235,893.
  • Processes in which size is added after the flocculation with the cationic polymer are described in EP-A-499,448.
  • Processes using other polymers and suspensions suitable for these are described in WO95/02088.
  • the cellulosic thin stock is often formed in part from recycled paper which may include soluble starch (cationic or anionic or non-ionic) and so the thin stock, and the final sheet, often includes soluble starch.
  • the dry sheet may contain as much as 1% starch derived from recycled paper. It is, however, often desired to add starch to the thin stock.
  • water soluble cationic starch may be added as part or all of the solution of polymeric retention aid (see for instance U.S. 4,388,150).
  • the amount required for this purpose is usually not more than about 0.3% (dry weight starch based on the dry weight of paper).
  • starch it is often desired to add starch in order to strengthen the paper. For instance it is particularly desirable to include significant amounts of starch in fluting medium and liner board. These materials are usually substantially unfilled and increasing their strength makes them more suitable for use as packaging materials. It is also desirable to include significant amounts of starch in filled sheets as the inclusion of significant amounts of filler would otherwise tend to reduce the strength of the sheet.
  • starch in amounts of as much as 5 or 10% or even higher, but attempting to achieve this tends to make the process less efficient as regards energy consumption and/or rate of production, or can incur the risk of unacceptable increase in the chemical oxygen demand of the effluent from the process, because of increased starch in the effluent.
  • starch Various grades of starch are conveniently commercially available and include grades which are usually insoluble in the cellulosic suspension. They can be used either unmodified or chemically modified. Generally the starch is pre-solubilised at high temperature to render the starch soluble in the cellulosic suspension.
  • a starch insoluble we mean that it is insoluble in the cellulosic suspension and remains undissolved in the cellulosic suspension.
  • a starch is soluble we mean it is soluble in the cellulosic suspension.
  • Soluble cationic starch is reasonably substantive to the cellulosic fibres in amounts up to about 1 to 1.5% by weight of the starch, based on the dry weight of the paper. If the amount of cationic starch in the suspension is increased significantly above this, there may be little or no increase in the amount of starch which is retained in the paper and, instead, there is merely an increase in the amount of soluble cationic starch which is in the white water which drains through the screen. This is undesirable since it has to be removed before discharge as effluent, because of the high chemical oxygen demand that it may create in the effluent from the mill.
  • the soluble cationic starch can be made by chemical modification of starch or merely by cooking raw starch and adding a low molecular weight cationic polymer before, during or after the cooking.
  • Suitable low molecular weight cationic polymers have intrinsic viscosity below 1dl/g. Examples of such systems are in CA 787,294 and U.S 3,930,877.
  • the usual technique involves applying an unmodified starch solution on a size press at the end of the paper-making machine, i.e., after partial or complete drying of the sheet.
  • the application of a solution of starch at this point can result in high pick-up (for instance up to 7 or 10% is common).
  • the starch being concentrated more on the surface than in the centre of the sheet and it has the particular disadvantage that it necessitates redrying of the sheet, thus wasting heat energy and/or slowing down the process. It would therefore be desirable to be able to achieve these or higher levels of starch without providing unacceptable levels of soluble starch in the white water and without having to redry the sheet.
  • Another known method for providing significant loadings of starch in the paper involves applying a spray or a foam containing undissolved starch particles on to the wet sheet before it is carried through the driers, followed by cooking the starch during drying.
  • This process also has the disadvantage of tending to produce a higher concentration of starch on the surface than in the centre of the sheet.
  • its particular disadvantage is that it is very difficult to achieve uniform application of the starch by spraying or foam application for prolonged periods because of the tendency of the starch composition to cause blockages in the spray or foam applicators.
  • Brucato describes in U.S. 4,609,432 another method of obtaining strengthened paper, this time using two different cellulosic suspensions.
  • 90 to 98% of the fibre weight is provided by a first cellulosic suspension, usually of refined fibres, and 2 to 10% of the fibre weight is provided by adding to this first suspension a second cellulosic suspension which contains a heat-sensitive bonding agent (such as uncooked starch) for bonding the fibres and a polymer for adhering the bonding agent to the fibres of the second suspension.
  • a heat-sensitive bonding agent such as uncooked starch
  • the second suspension can contain the second cellulosic fibres together with 20 to 200% uncooked dry starch and 0.01 to 0.1% cationic polymer.
  • the cationic polymer is said to coat the starch particles and adhere them to the fibres of the second suspension.
  • a typical process uses a first suspension containing 95% of the total fibres and a second suspension containing 5% of the fibres, 0.012% polyethylene imine and 20% starch. A hand sheet was formed from this and was then dried and it appears that the starch is activated during the drying. Again there is no indication about how to conduct the process on a machine nor about retention.
  • Brucato quotes the same list of cationic polymers in both patents, namely polyethylene imines (which are preferred in U.S. 4,609,432), polyamide polyamine resins, urea formaldehyde resins, melamine formaldehyde resins and polyacrylamides. It seems that Brucato wants to use low molecular weight polymers since all the classes of polymers he mentions except for the polyacrylamides inevitably have very low molecular weight and the polyacrylamide he exemplifies is Separan CP7, a trade mark of Dow Chemical Co., and we believe that this material also has a relatively low molecular weight, of about 1 million.
  • the Brucato methods therefore require particular interaction between low molecular weight cationic polymer and other material within the suspension and do not result in the production of a flocculated or reflocculated suspension of the type that is attainable by the use of high molecular weight synthetic polymers or cationic starch optionally followed by anionic microparticulate material.
  • filler is included in a cellulosic suspension by adding a slurry of filler, insoluble starch particles and flocculating agent.
  • flocculating agents which are mentioned have very low molecular weight (for instance Magnafloc 1597 is a polyamine) some have a moderate molecular weight.
  • Suspending agent such as a gum, a synthetic organic polymer, or a swelling clay (e.g., bentonite) can be included and preferably the suspending agent is chosen so as to reduce the net charge in the composition close to zero. For instance if a cationic flocculant is used then an anionic suspending agent is usually required.
  • the amount of filler in the composition is preferably 30 to 40%, and the amounts of starch and flocculant (based on filler) are preferably 1 to 5% and 0.05 to 0.2% respectively, with the amount of starch in the final paper being said to be typically 0.05 to 1.5%.
  • the resultant flocculated suspension will contain the starch particles trapped in the filler flocs, and it is added to the cellulosic suspension which is then drained and heated, with consequential cooking of the starch.
  • the amount of filler ranges from 7 to 24% and the amount of starch is 4% based on filler, i.e., about 0.3 to 1% based on paper.
  • the problem to be solved by this invention is the provision of a method in which it is possible to include starch in the thin stock in such a way that relatively large amounts of starch can be retained in the paper without interfering significantly with efficient production of the paper and without creating unacceptable effluent discharges.
  • This first aspect of the invention must be conducted with the shearing and reflocculation with micro-particulate anionic material.
  • the particulate starch is included in that suspension of microparticulate anionic material,
  • the particles of the starch should be able to interact with the surfaces of the cellulosic fibres and, if present, the anionic microparticulate material. It is therefore desirable for the starch particles to be added as a slurry of substantially independent particles so that the particles can interact with the fibres or microparticulate anionic material substantially independent of each other.
  • the paper that is produced can be filled, and an advantage of the invention is that papers having good strength can be obtained even when they contain high amounts of filler, for instance more than 20% by weight or more than 40% by weight and even up to 60% by weight based on the dry weight of the paper.
  • Conventional fillers such as calcium carbonate or sulphate or talc or kaolin or other clays can be used.
  • Another very important feature of the invention is that it permits the production of unfilled paper, that is to say paper to which little or no deliberate addition of filler is made.
  • This substantially unfilled paper generally has a filler content of not more than 15%, and usually not more than 10% by weight of the dry sheet.
  • any filler which is included originates from recycled paper which is used in forming the cellulosic suspension but if desired small amounts, for instance up to 5% or perhaps 10% by weight based on the dry weight of the suspension can be deliberately added to the suspension.
  • the invention is therefore of particular value for the manufacture of fluting medium or liner board.
  • a unique characteristic of the invention is that we can achieve a high starch content in the dry sheet as a consequence of the inclusion of the undissolved starch in the cellulosic suspension without causing pollution problems. Thus we can easily obtain a content of at least 2% or 3% and typically 5% and even up to 10 or 15% by weight starch in the dry sheet.
  • starch particles e.g., above 80% or 90% or more
  • any starch particles that do drain into the white water can be tolerated as they can be insoluble in the white water and so can be recycled and trapped on a subsequent pass through the machine.
  • they can be removed by filtration before discharge.
  • this suspension may have been formed in conventional manner (apart from the addition of starch).
  • starch for instance it may have been made from a groundwood, mechanical or thermomechanical pulp and the thin stock, or the thick stock from which it is formed, may have been treated with bentonite before the addition of the retention aid.
  • the retention aid is often substantially non-ionic, for instance being formed from 0 to 10 mole percent anionic and/or cationic monomers and 90 to 100 mole percent non-ionic monomers.
  • the invention in this aspect, is not limited to the use of dirty pulps and includes the use of any suitable combination of pulp and high molecular weight retention aid (anionic, non-ionic or cationic) or dissolved cationic starch retention aid.
  • the retention aid and starch are usually added after the last point of high shear, e.g., in or immediately prior to the head box.
  • the flocculated suspension is subjected to shear so as to degrade the initial flocs and is then reflocculated, or subjected to super-coagulation, by the addition of anionic microparticulate material.
  • the shearing can be achieved merely as a result of turbulent flow from the point at which retention aid is added to the point at which the microparticulate material is added, but often the shearing is applied by passage through a device such as a centriscreen, fan pump or other deliberate shear mixing stage.
  • the shearing results in reduction of the size of the flocs, for instance as described in EP-A-235,893.
  • the starch particles are then added with the anionic microparticulate material.
  • the starch particles appear to become entrapped within the supercoagulation that occurs upon the addition of the microparticulate material and as a result good retention of the starch particles is obtained.
  • the slurry of starch and microparticulate material is usually free of any other significant solid phase and usually consists essentially only of water, the microparticulate material, the starch and any dispersing agent or other additives necessarily associated with the microparticulate material.
  • the ratio dry weight of starch to microparticulate material is generally in the range 5:1 to 100:1, often around 10:1 to 50:1, by weight.
  • the starch particles are injected into a slurry of the microparticulate material, or the microparticulate material is injected into a slurry of the starch particles, just before addition to the cellulosic suspension, although if desired the materials may be premixed and the resultant slurry pumped from the mixing station towards the addition point.
  • the addition point is usually in the headbox or at some other position after the last point of substantial shear since it is usually desirable that the reflocculated or supercoagulated structure should not be degraded excessively by subsequent shear prior to drainage.
  • the polymer that is added is an effective retention aid for the cellulosic suspension in order that the polymer will have adequate substantivity to the cellulosic fibres in the suspension.
  • Selection of an appropriate retention aid that is substantive to the cellulosic suspension can be conducted in conventional manner. It can be anionic, non-ionic or cationic. Best results are usually obtained when the retention aid is cationic and so preferably the suspension is one onto which the selected cationic retention aid is substantive.
  • Low molecular weight, coagulant-type polymer may be added at an earlier stage if required, in known manner but this is not considered as a retention aid in the context of the present invention.
  • Such coagulant polymers usually have intrinsic viscosity below 3dl/g and often below 1dl/g. They can have high cationic charge density, preferably above 4, and often above 5, meq/g.
  • the low molecular weight polymer is preferably formed of recurring units of which at least 70%, and generally at least 90%, are cationic.
  • Preferred polymers are homopolymers of diallyl dimethyl ammonium chloride and low molecular weight co-polymers of this with a minor amount (usually below 30% and preferably below 10%) acrylamide, low molecular weight homopolymers of dialkylaminoalkyl (meth) -acrylamide or -acrylate quaternary salt or acid addition salt and copolymers of these with small amounts (generally below 30% and preferably below 10%) acrylamide, polyethylene imines, polyamines, epichlorhydrin diamine condensation products, dicyandiamide polymers and other conventional low molecular weight cationic coagulant polymers.
  • the preferred retention aids for use in the invention are polymers which have intrinsic viscosity above 4dl/g and usually above 6dl/g, for instance 8-15dl/g or 8-20dl/g or higher.
  • intrinsic viscosity is measured at 25°C in 1M sodium chloride buffered at pH7 using a suspended level viscosmeter.
  • Non-ionic retention aids that can be used include polyacrylamide or other polymer of water soluble ethylenically unsaturated monomer or monomer blend, and polyethylene oxide.
  • Suitable anionic retention aids are polymers of anionic ethylenically unsaturated sulphonic or carboxylic monomer such as acrylic acid (usually as a sodium or other water soluble salt) optionally copolymerised with non-ionic ethylenically unsaturated monomer such as acrylamide.
  • the anionic polymer may be formed from, for instance, 3 to 50 mole percent, often 3 to 20 mole percent anionic monomer such as sodium acrylate with the balance being acrylamide.
  • Amphoteric polymers containing both anionic and cationic monomer units usually with acrylamide or other non-ionic monomer, can be used.
  • Cationic polymers are preferred.
  • the or each cationic high molecular weight polymer is usually a copolymer of ethylenically unsaturated cationic monomer, with the balance being other water soluble, generally non-ionic, ethylenically unsaturated monomer such as acrylamide.
  • the amount of cationic monomer is usually at least 2 or 3 mole%. Generally it is not more than 20 mole% but it can be up to 50 mole % or more.
  • the polymer can be wholly water soluble or it can be in the form of small particles of partially soluble cross-linked polymer as described in EP-A-202,780.
  • the or each high molecular weight cationic polymeric retention aid typically has a theoretical cationic charge density of not more than about 3meq/g, often not more than about 2meq/g. Generally it is at least about 0.1, or usually at least about 0.5, meg/g. In this specification, the theoretical cationic charge density is the charge density obtained by calculation from the monomeric composition which is intended to be used for forming the polymer.
  • Suitable cationic monomers include dialkyl aminoalkyl (meth) -acrylates and -acrylamides as acid addition or quaternary salts.
  • the alkyl groups may each contain 1-4 carbon atoms and the aminoalkyl group may contain 1-8 carbon atoms.
  • Particularly preferred are dialkylaminoethyl (meth) acrylates or acrylamides and dialkylamino-1,3-propyl (meth) acrylamides.
  • the retention aid Although it is usually preferred for the retention aid to have intrinsic viscosity above 8dl/g, in some instances it can be desirable to use as the retention aid a copolymer of diallyl dimethyl ammonium chloride and acrylamide and which has intrinsic viscosity at least 4dl/g, even though it may not be practicable to manufacture such a polymer to the IV 8dl/g and higher values that are preferred for other polymers.
  • the total amount of polymeric retention aid is usually 0.01 to 1%, generally 0.02 to 0.1% (200 to 1,000 gram per tonne dry weight of suspension), and is generally in the range 0.01 to 0.06% or 0.1%.
  • the amount depends, inter alia, on the choice of cellulosic thin stock. This may be formed from any convenient pulp or mixture of pulps.
  • the thin stock typically has a cellulosic fibre content of 0.2 to 2.0%, usually 0.3 to 1.5% by weight.
  • the retention aid of IV above 4dl/g (or cationic starch) and the amount of it which is used in the process must be such as to give good retention of fibre fines and filler (if present). Selection of the retention aid and its amount can be conducted in conventional manner by performing the process in the absence of starch with different amounts of different retention aids so as to select an effective combination of retention aid and its amount for the particular cellulosic suspension that is being treated. Naturally this test should be conducted with the subsequent addition of microparticulate anionic material. When the initial cellulosic suspension includes anionic trash, it can be desirable to treat the suspension initially with a cationic coagulant and/or bentonite so as to reduce the amount of polymeric retention aid that is required.
  • the amount of retention aid will always be greater than the amount required to precipitate or interact with anionic soluble material in the cellulosic suspension. If the retention performance is plotted against dosage of polymer in a typical combination it will be seen that as the dosage increases retention will be poor and will increase only gradually at low values, but will then increase significantly over a relatively small dosage range, and will not then increase further to any significant extent.
  • the dosage at which retention improved markedly is an indication of the demand of that suspension for that retention aid and in the invention the total amount of that retention aid should be at or above the amount at which retention has increased significantly. Accordingly this amount is above the stoichiometric amount required to react with any anionic polymeric material in the cellulosic suspension and any pulp from which it is formed. Generally the suspension is made without deliberate addition of anionic, polymeric materials.
  • the cellulosic suspension is flocculated we mean that it has the state which is typical of a cellulosic suspension which has been treated with an effective high molecular weight retention agent in an effective amount.
  • the starch in the particles must remain substantially undissolved prior to the start of drainage of the suspension, since otherwise dissolved starch is likely to drain from the suspension.
  • a simple way of determining whether or not the particles have remained substantially undissolved is to titrate the drainage water for dissolved starch. If the amount of dissolved starch in the drainage water is sufficiently low (after allowing for any dissolved starch introduced with the fibres from, for instance, recycled paper), this indicates that the particles have remained substantially . undissolved.
  • the amount of dissolved starch in the drainage water should represent less than 20%, preferably less than 10% and most preferably less than 5% of the amount of particulate starch in the suspension after discounting soluble starch originating elsewhere.
  • One way of providing that the particles remain substantially undissolved prior to drainage is to introduce the starch in ungelatinised, substantially water insoluble, form and to maintain the conditions in the suspension such that significant gelatinisation does not occur prior to the start of drainage. In such a process, it is necessary to gelatinise the starch during the draining and drying stages.
  • draining is completed at temperatures above ambient, and drying is conducted with the application of heat.
  • the draining and drying conditions and of the grade of ungelatinised starch it is possible to achieve appropriate gelatinisation during the drying stage, while the sheet is still moist. It can be desirable to apply deliberate heating to the wet sheet, even before final drainage is completed, so as to pre-warm it before entry to the drying stages.
  • the wet sheet may be passed under a steam hood or heater such as a Devroniser (trade mark), and this can facilitate full gelatinisation and dissolution of the starch.
  • the starch particles need to gelatinise while there is still some moisture in the sheet in order to allow gelatinisation to proceed satisfactorily and in order to allow the particles to spread in the sheet so as to tend to provide a film within the sheet, in contrast to mere spot bonds.
  • the starch gelatinising in the presence of moisture it will tend to migrate between the fibres so as to obtain more uniform distribution of the starch on and around and between the paper fibres.
  • the amount of moisture that should remain in the sheet when the starch is dissolving can be quite low, and only needs to be sufficient to allow migration of the gelatinised starch sufficient to give adequate distribution of the starch through the sheet.
  • a starch that has naturally a low temperature gelatinisation or that has been modified to reduce its temperature of gelatinisation, provided it remains substantially undissolved prior to drainage.
  • starch is an uncooked, raw starch such as raw maize, potato, corn, wheat or tapioca starch.
  • Pregelatinised or precooked (and therefore soluble) starch can be included as insoluble particles.
  • the dissolution of precooked starch in the particles of the suspension can be prevented by protecting the starch with a water impermeable shell or matrix that disintegrates during the subsequent draining or drying. Any material which provides sufficient water impermeability to prevent significant dissolution of the starch prior to draining can be used provided the shell or matrix will disintegrate to release the starch during draining and/or drying.
  • the shell or matrix does not have to provide long term water-impermeability. For instance a slow dissolving shell or matrix may be sufficient to protect the starch since even if the shell disintegrates partially within the headbox there may still be inadequate time for the enclosed starch particle to dissolve in the headbox.
  • the shell or matrix may be a thermoplastic material having a melting point such as to prevent premature disintegration of the shell or matrix.
  • a melting point such as to prevent premature disintegration of the shell or matrix.
  • the normal temperature of the suspension leading to the headbox is typically in the range 40-50°C and the ambient temperature around the drainage screen is typically in the same range.
  • the particles are provided with a coating or matrix which has a melting temperature at about or above the temperature of the headbox, substantially no melting will occur until the headbox and most of the melting and substantially all the dissolution of the starch will not occur until most of the draining has been completed.
  • Suitable thermoplastic materials that can be used include hydrocarbon waxes.
  • a pH sensitive shell or matrix may be used.
  • the cooked starch may be encapsulated or otherwise protected by polymer that is water insoluble and non-swellable at the pH of the starch dispersion which is provided to the mill, and this dispersion is added to the headbox which is at a pH at which the polymer swells or dissolves.
  • the protective polymer can be a copolymer of water soluble and water insoluble ethylenically unsaturated monomers such as methacrylic acid or other water soluble monomer and ethyl acrylate or other water insoluble monomer.
  • Methods of incorporating an active ingredient within particles of a protective matrix or within a shell are well known and can be used in the invention.
  • the mixture of the starch and protective material may be spray dried or a coacervate coating may be formed around starch particles.
  • the amount of starch that is included in the sheet will normally be at least 0.05% and usually at least 0.2% dry weight.
  • the greatest advantages of the process are achieved when the amount is above 2 or 3%, for instance 5%, 10% or even up to 12 or 15% by weight.
  • an advantage of the process of the invention is that the process can be operated either at high starch loadings or low starch loadings merely by altering the amount of starch, without making any significant changes in the remainder of the process.
  • the size of the particles is generally at least 90% by weight below 100 ⁇ m, preferably below 50 ⁇ m, often 5 to 50 ⁇ m.
  • the starch particles may have a size of at least 90% by weight up to 10 ⁇ m, generally 5-10 ⁇ m.
  • the starch is preferably granular, so that all three dimensions may be broadly similar.
  • the anionic microparticulate or colloidal material is preferably bentonite, that is to say an inorganic swelling clay, for instance as described in EP-A-235,893.
  • it can be colloidal silica (such as described in U.S. 4,643,801), polysilicate microgel (such as described in EP-A-359,552), polysilicic acid microgel as described in EP-A-348,366, or aluminum modified versions of any of these.
  • organic material can be used.
  • an anionic organic polymeric emulsion can be used.
  • the emulsified polymer particles may be insoluble due to being formed of a copolymer of, for instance, a water soluble anionic polymer and one or more insoluble monomers such as ethyl acrylate, but preferably the polymeric emulsion is a crosslinked microemulsion of water soluble monomeric material.
  • the particle size of the colloidal material is generally below 2 ⁇ m, preferably below 1 ⁇ m and most preferably below 0.1 ⁇ m.
  • the amount of colloidal material (dry weight based on the dry weight of the cellulosic suspension) is generally at least 0.03% and usually at least 0.1%. It can be up to, for instance 2% but is generally below 1%.
  • the choice and the amount of the anionic colloidal material should be such as to cause what is frequently referred to as "super coagulation".
  • the anionic microparticulate or colloidal material is preferably added to the suspension after the last point of high shear, for instance at the headbox, and the suspension can then be drained in conventional manner.
  • This screen may travel at conventional screen speeds which are normally in excess of 100 metres per minute and typically are in the range 700 to 1500 metres per minute.
  • the machine will include a drying zone in conventional manner but an advantage of the invention is that it is not necessary for the machine to be equipped with a size press or with any other means of applying starch to the wet sheet or to the dried sheet.
  • starch can be applied to the wet sheet or the dried sheet in conventional manner.

Landscapes

  • Paper (AREA)
  • Polarising Elements (AREA)
  • Glass Compositions (AREA)
  • Manufacturing Of Electric Cables (AREA)

Claims (11)

  1. Verfahren zur Herstellung von Papier auf einer Papierherstellungsmaschine, umfassend
    Bereitstellen einer Zellulose-Dünnstoffsuspension,
    Flockulieren der Suspension durch Zugabe einer wässerigen Lösung einer polymeren Retentionshilfe, ausgewählt aus gelöster kationischer Stärke und synthetischem Polymer mit einer IV oberhalb 4 dl/g, wodurch eine flockulierte Suspension gebildet wird,
    Ausüben von Scherwirkung auf die flockulierte Suspension und Reflockulieren der Scherwirkung ausgesetzten Suspension durch Zugabe einer wässerigen Suspension von mikroteilchenförmigem, anionischem Material, wodurch eine reflockulierte Suspension gebildet wird,
    Entwässern der flockulierten oder reflockulierten Suspension durch ein sich bewegendes Sieb unter Bildung eines nassen Bogens, und
    Befördern des Bogens durch eine erhitzte Trockenzone, wodurch ein trockener Bogen gebildet wird,
    dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass unlösliche Teilchen von Stärke zu der Zellulosesuspension als eine Aufschlämmung von im Wesentlichen frei dispergierten Teilchen zu einem Teil oder der gesamten wässerigen Suspension von mikroteilchenförmigem, anionischem Material gegeben werden,
    und die unlöslichen Stärketeilchen während des Trocknens erhitzt werden und lösliche Stärke in dem Bogen in Gegenwart von Feuchtigkeit freisetzen.
  2. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, wobei das anionische, mikroteilchenförmige Material aus anionischen quellenden Tonen, kolloidalem Siliziumdioxid, Polysilikat-Mikrogelen, Polykieselsäure-Mikrogelen und Aluminium-modifiziertem kolloidalem Siliziumdioxid, Aluminium-modifiziertem Polysilikat-Mikrogel und Aluminium-modifiziertem Polykieselsäure-Mikrogel ausgewählt sind.
  3. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1 oder Anspruch 2, wobei das Papier ein gefülltes Papier ist.
  4. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1 oder Anspruch 2, wobei das Papier ungefülltes Papier ist.
  5. Verfahren nach einem vorangehenden Anspruch, wobei die Stärke in den Teilchen nicht geliert ist, so dass vor der Entwässerung im Wesentlichen keine Auflösung von Stärke in die Suspension stattfindet und die Stärke während des Entwässerns und/oder Trocknens geliert wird.
  6. Verfahren nach einem vorangehenden Anspruch, wobei die Retentionshilfe ein synthetisches polymeres Material mit einer Grenzviskosität von mindestens 4 dl/g ist.
  7. Verfahren nach einem vorangehenden Anspruch, wobei die Retentionshilfe ein synthetisches polymeres Material mit einer Grenzviskosität von mindestens 8 dl/g ist.
  8. Verfahren nach einem vorangehenden Anspruch, wobei die polymere Retentionshilfe kationisch ist.
  9. Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 3 oder einem der Ansprüche 5 bis 8, wobei der Bogen 20 bis 60 Gewichtsprozent Füllstoff enthält.
  10. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1 oder Anspruch 2 oder einem der Ansprüche 4 bis 8, wobei der Bogen ein ungefüllter Bogen ist, der ein Wellmedium oder eine Deckenbahn ist.
  11. Verfahren nach einem vorangehenden Anspruch, wobei die Menge an Stärke in dem Bogen 2 bis 15% ist.
EP95921013A 1994-06-01 1995-06-01 Papierherstellung Expired - Lifetime EP0711370B1 (de)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP01114439A EP1143068B1 (de) 1994-06-01 1995-06-01 Papierherstellung

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB9410965 1994-06-01
GB9410965A GB9410965D0 (en) 1994-06-01 1994-06-01 Manufacture of paper
PCT/GB1995/001259 WO1995033096A1 (en) 1994-06-01 1995-06-01 Manufacture of paper

Related Child Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP01114439A Division EP1143068B1 (de) 1994-06-01 1995-06-01 Papierherstellung
EP01114439.1 Division-Into 2001-06-15

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0711370A1 EP0711370A1 (de) 1996-05-15
EP0711370B1 true EP0711370B1 (de) 2002-01-16

Family

ID=10756015

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP95921013A Expired - Lifetime EP0711370B1 (de) 1994-06-01 1995-06-01 Papierherstellung
EP01114439A Expired - Lifetime EP1143068B1 (de) 1994-06-01 1995-06-01 Papierherstellung

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP01114439A Expired - Lifetime EP1143068B1 (de) 1994-06-01 1995-06-01 Papierherstellung

Country Status (21)

Country Link
EP (2) EP0711370B1 (de)
JP (1) JP3801629B2 (de)
KR (1) KR100385038B1 (de)
AT (2) ATE212091T1 (de)
AU (1) AU688911B2 (de)
BR (1) BR9506248A (de)
CA (1) CA2167803C (de)
DE (2) DE69525018T2 (de)
DK (2) DK0711370T3 (de)
ES (2) ES2262578T3 (de)
FI (1) FI120631B (de)
GB (1) GB9410965D0 (de)
IL (1) IL113973A (de)
IN (1) IN190864B (de)
MX (1) MX9600430A (de)
NO (1) NO321456B1 (de)
NZ (1) NZ287496A (de)
PT (2) PT1143068E (de)
TW (1) TW275654B (de)
WO (1) WO1995033096A1 (de)
ZA (1) ZA954520B (de)

Families Citing this family (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5876563A (en) * 1994-06-01 1999-03-02 Allied Colloids Limited Manufacture of paper
GB9624031D0 (en) * 1996-11-19 1997-01-08 Allied Colloids Ltd Manufacture of paper
GB2323100B (en) * 1996-11-29 2001-06-06 Cellcat Gmbh Polysaccharide particles, method for producing them and their use
GB9719472D0 (en) * 1997-09-12 1997-11-12 Allied Colloids Ltd Process of making paper
US5942087A (en) * 1998-02-17 1999-08-24 Nalco Chemical Company Starch retention in paper and board production
US6099689A (en) * 1998-02-17 2000-08-08 Nalco Chemical Company Production of paper and board products with improved retention, drainage and formation
ID28511A (id) * 1998-08-28 2001-05-31 Ciba Spec Chem Water Treat Ltd Pembuatan kertas
DE10326738B4 (de) * 2003-06-13 2010-08-19 Papiertechnische Stiftung Verfahren zur Einbringung von Stärke als Masseadditiv und beim Sprühen bei der Herstellung von Papier, Pappe und Karton
BR112015007620A2 (pt) * 2012-10-05 2017-07-04 Specialty Minerals Michigan Inc suspensão de carga e uso na fabricação de papel
EP3260597B1 (de) 2016-06-22 2019-06-05 Buchmann Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung Mehrlagiges faserstofferzeugnis mit einer inhibierten migrationsrate von aromatischen oder gesättigten kohlenwasserstoffen und verfahren zu dessen herstellung
CN114150527B (zh) * 2021-12-17 2023-04-25 杭州绿邦科技有限公司 一种助留助滤剂

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4347100A (en) * 1981-05-21 1982-08-31 The Chemithon Corporation Strength of paper from mechanical or thermomechanical pulp
GB2223038A (en) * 1988-09-26 1990-03-28 Blue Circle Ind Plc Starch-flocculant compositions for papaermaking

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2729561A (en) * 1952-08-26 1956-01-03 John C Marrone Blowing dry starch into a papermaking furnish
EP0499448A1 (de) * 1991-02-15 1992-08-19 Ciba Specialty Chemicals Water Treatments Limited Papierherstellung
US5126014A (en) * 1991-07-16 1992-06-30 Nalco Chemical Company Retention and drainage aid for alkaline fine papermaking process

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4347100A (en) * 1981-05-21 1982-08-31 The Chemithon Corporation Strength of paper from mechanical or thermomechanical pulp
GB2223038A (en) * 1988-09-26 1990-03-28 Blue Circle Ind Plc Starch-flocculant compositions for papaermaking

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
NO960416L (no) 1996-03-25
BR9506248A (pt) 1996-04-23
WO1995033096A1 (en) 1995-12-07
IL113973A (en) 2000-06-01
JP3801629B2 (ja) 2006-07-26
CA2167803A1 (en) 1995-12-07
ES2170149T3 (es) 2002-08-01
NO321456B1 (no) 2006-05-15
GB9410965D0 (en) 1994-07-20
TW275654B (de) 1996-05-11
NZ287496A (en) 1998-05-27
FI120631B (fi) 2009-12-31
DK1143068T3 (da) 2006-09-11
IL113973A0 (en) 1995-10-31
AU688911B2 (en) 1998-03-19
DE69525018T2 (de) 2002-08-22
IN190864B (de) 2003-08-30
FI960396A0 (fi) 1996-01-29
NO960416D0 (no) 1996-01-31
EP1143068A3 (de) 2004-04-28
KR100385038B1 (ko) 2004-08-06
DE69534985D1 (de) 2006-06-14
PT1143068E (pt) 2006-07-31
EP1143068A2 (de) 2001-10-10
ES2262578T3 (es) 2006-12-01
ATE325925T1 (de) 2006-06-15
CA2167803C (en) 2005-11-01
DE69525018D1 (de) 2002-02-21
JPH09501208A (ja) 1997-02-04
AU2622795A (en) 1995-12-21
DK0711370T3 (da) 2002-04-22
EP0711370A1 (de) 1996-05-15
DE69534985T2 (de) 2006-11-02
EP1143068B1 (de) 2006-05-10
FI960396A (fi) 1996-03-25
PT711370E (pt) 2002-06-28
ZA954520B (en) 1996-06-03
MX9600430A (es) 1998-06-30
ATE212091T1 (de) 2002-02-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5876563A (en) Manufacture of paper
US6238520B1 (en) Manufacture of paper
JP5738845B2 (ja) 二重ポリマー系を用いた制御可能な充填剤の事前綿状塊凝集
CA2671973C (en) Swollen starch compositions for use in papermaking
EP0335576B1 (de) Verfahren zur Entwässerung von Pulpe
CA2168092C (en) Manufacture of paper
US5798023A (en) Combination of talc-bentonite for deposition control in papermaking processes
EP0711370B1 (de) Papierherstellung
PT1285130E (pt) Pasta para o fabrico de paperl e floculante compreendendo uma solução aquosa acídica de alumina
AU657391B2 (en) Production of paper and paperboard
MXPA96000430A (en) Manufacture of pa
AU2006201187B2 (en) Swollen starch compositions for use in papermaking
MXPA99004586A (en) Manufacture of paper

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19960111

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IE IT LI LU NL PT SE

RAP3 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: CIBA SPECIALTY CHEMICALS WATER TREATMENTS LIMITED

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20000306

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: IF02

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IE IT LI LU NL PT SE

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 212091

Country of ref document: AT

Date of ref document: 20020215

Kind code of ref document: T

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69525018

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20020221

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: T3

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Payment date: 20020521

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Payment date: 20020522

Year of fee payment: 8

ET Fr: translation filed
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: PT

Ref legal event code: SC4A

Free format text: AVAILABILITY OF NATIONAL TRANSLATION

Effective date: 20020313

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2170149

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GR

Ref legal event code: EP

Ref document number: 20020401425

Country of ref document: GR

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20030602

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20040107

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Payment date: 20050627

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20070316

Year of fee payment: 13

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20060601

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Payment date: 20080519

Year of fee payment: 14

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20080630

Year of fee payment: 14

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20080604

Year of fee payment: 14

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20080523

Year of fee payment: 14

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20080813

Year of fee payment: 14

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20080630

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20080630

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: *CIBA SPECIALTY CHEMICALS WATER TREATMENTS LTD

Effective date: 20090630

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: EBP

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20090601

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090601

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090630

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090601

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090630

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Payment date: 20100517

Year of fee payment: 16

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20100625

Year of fee payment: 16

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20100723

Year of fee payment: 16

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20100615

Year of fee payment: 16

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20100726

Year of fee payment: 16

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20100830

Year of fee payment: 16

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090601

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: PT

Ref legal event code: MM4A

Free format text: LAPSE DUE TO NON-PAYMENT OF FEES

Effective date: 20111202

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: V1

Effective date: 20120101

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20111202

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: EUG

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20120229

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 69525018

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20120103

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120103

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110630

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120101

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110602

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20130703

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110602