EP0642853B1 - Method of joining thin plates and device for carrying out the method - Google Patents

Method of joining thin plates and device for carrying out the method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0642853B1
EP0642853B1 EP94113827A EP94113827A EP0642853B1 EP 0642853 B1 EP0642853 B1 EP 0642853B1 EP 94113827 A EP94113827 A EP 94113827A EP 94113827 A EP94113827 A EP 94113827A EP 0642853 B1 EP0642853 B1 EP 0642853B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
force
die
values
plates
minimum
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Revoked
Application number
EP94113827A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0642853A1 (en
Inventor
Viktor Dipl-Ing Malina
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Tox Pressotechnik GmbH and Co KG
Original Assignee
Tox Pressotechnik GmbH and Co KG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=6497820&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP0642853(B1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Tox Pressotechnik GmbH and Co KG filed Critical Tox Pressotechnik GmbH and Co KG
Publication of EP0642853A1 publication Critical patent/EP0642853A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0642853B1 publication Critical patent/EP0642853B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Revoked legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B21MECHANICAL METAL-WORKING WITHOUT ESSENTIALLY REMOVING MATERIAL; PUNCHING METAL
    • B21DWORKING OR PROCESSING OF SHEET METAL OR METAL TUBES, RODS OR PROFILES WITHOUT ESSENTIALLY REMOVING MATERIAL; PUNCHING METAL
    • B21D39/00Application of procedures in order to connect objects or parts, e.g. coating with sheet metal otherwise than by plating; Tube expanders
    • B21D39/03Application of procedures in order to connect objects or parts, e.g. coating with sheet metal otherwise than by plating; Tube expanders of sheet metal otherwise than by folding
    • B21D39/031Joining superposed plates by locally deforming without slitting or piercing

Definitions

  • the invention is based on a method for connecting superimposed thin plates according to the preamble of claim 1 and on an apparatus for carrying out this method according to the preamble of claim 17.
  • Such processes are used in industrial mass production, for example in automobile construction. Monitoring the quality of the connection points or ensuring certain quality requirements for such connection points is therefore of particular importance in this process.
  • the occurrence of defects in the implementation of this method must be recognized and eliminated as quickly as possible in order to keep the rejects and machine downtimes as short as possible.
  • Such defects can be caused by a material breakage, in particular the stamp or the die. It is important to recognize every faulty connection point in order to sort out the corresponding part or to repeat a connection process.
  • a criterion for the quality of the connection or its lack is the remaining thickness of the remaining material in the area of the joint.
  • quality assurance consists in monitoring the stamp force with regard to a permissible maximum value and in measuring the residual material thickness after the connection has been made. As a result, only a part of the deficiencies that may occur is recorded. The subsequent measurement of the residual material thickness is also cumbersome and time-consuming.
  • the method according to the invention with the features of claim 1 and the device according to the invention with the features of claim 17 has the advantage that defects occurring to a much greater extent are detected and that no separate measurement of the residual material thickness has to be carried out.
  • the pressing force that is to say the punch or die force
  • the pressing force does not have to be absorbed in the form of a measuring curve against the working stroke during the entire joining process.
  • Every faulty connection is recognized.
  • Monitoring is carried out by comparison with predetermined maximum and minimum values. If the pressing force is below the specified minimum value, for example stamp or die break is displayed; on the other hand, if it exceeds the specified maximum value, this indicates plates that are too thick or material that is too hard to be joined.
  • the stripping force required to strip the connected plates from the punch is also measured. By measuring the stripping force, a lining of the material is determined, which is particularly important when using the invention in robot devices.
  • the pressing force is measured immediately after the squeezing process has ended. If the plates connected by the joining process at the joining point only have those for the Joining process characteristic residual floor thickness, the actual joining process is completed.
  • the pressing force assigned to the relevant working stroke is therefore particularly instructive for the joining process.
  • the measured forces are compared with a predetermined maximum value and a predetermined minimum value. If the measured value lies within the interval defined by the maximum and minimum value, the connection that has been made corresponds to the specified quality, but if it lies outside the interval, the connection is faulty. The comparison of the measured value with the interval is therefore sufficient to characterize the connection.
  • a signal when the predetermined maximum value is exceeded and when the predetermined minimum value is undershot, a signal is generated which can be used to control an optical and / or acoustic display device in order to draw attention to the presence of a defect.
  • the signal can also be used to control the interruption of the joining process, which can reduce waste and downtimes in production.
  • a signal is generated if the punch or the die does not cover the specified working stroke during the joining process.
  • the signal is advantageously a control signal with which an optical and / or acoustic display device is activated.
  • the signal can also be used to interrupt the joining process.
  • the maximum and minimum values are available in an electrical memory. This allows the values to be adjusted as required. There can also be several sets of values in the memory in order to quickly meet different requirements, for example when changing tools or materials.
  • the predetermined working stroke is available in a memory.
  • the working stroke can thus also be set using a computer having the memory.
  • the input of the values into the memory is protected. This ensures that changes can only be made by authorized persons.
  • the forces are measured at several joints at the same time, the values determined being evaluated by a common device.
  • the measured values determined are displayed optically.
  • the visual display makes it easier to distinguish between different types of errors so that the appropriate countermeasures can be taken.
  • the measured values determined can be saved in order to enable subsequent evaluation.
  • the measurement values are saved quality control, since the joining process can be checked in the event of later complaints.
  • the device according to the invention for carrying out the method with the features of claim 19 is advantageously adapted to the requirements of the method.
  • Force measuring devices are provided in the die holder, or in the punch holder, or on the stripper, preferably strain gauges or piezoelectric sensors are used, for example a piezo force transducer in the die holder, a piezo transverse dowel in the punch holder and a piezo measuring ring on the stripper.
  • a position detector ensures that the measurement is carried out exactly at the previously set working stroke.
  • the position indicator can advantageously be accommodated in a stamp stroke limiter.
  • the press 1 shown in FIG. 1 has a C-shaped frame 2, the lower part of which serves as a press table 3 on which the die holder 4 for the die 5 is arranged.
  • a stripping device 9 is arranged around the stamp holder 8 for stripping plates hanging on the stamp.
  • the punch 8 is moved up and down via a pressure cylinder 10 by a press drive 11 provided on the upper side of the C-shaped frame 2.
  • the die holder 4 there is a piezo force transducer with which the die force exerted by the die is determined.
  • a piezo transverse dowel 12 is provided in the stamp holder 7 to determine the stamping force exerted.
  • a piezo measuring ring 13 arranged around the pressure cylinder 10 is provided on the stripper 9 to determine the stripping force.
  • the pressure cylinder 10 has a position indicator 14, which activates the force measuring devices for a given stamp path to measure the stamp force and possibly the die force.
  • the position detector can also be included in the stroke limiter 15. The evaluation devices and the electrical connections between the evaluation devices and the measuring devices are not shown.
  • the diagram in FIG. 2 shows an example of the course of the stamp force as a function of the stamp path during a joining process.
  • the punch force increases steadily until the end of the joining process, but not linearly, but differently depending on the joining phase.
  • the various joining phases in the order of their sequence during the joining process, are first a combined sinking and pushing through, followed by upsetting and widthing, then filling in the upper contour of the die engraving, filling the ring channel of the die and finally backward extrusion to interlock the plate elements to be connected.
  • the stamp force is measured by the force measuring device on the value of the stamp path marked with I in the diagram, the measured value is marked with II.
  • An interval V is defined by the minimum value III and the maximum value IV.
  • the joining process that has taken place corresponds to the specified quality. If, on the other hand, the measured value VI exceeds the predetermined maximum value IV, the joining is faulty. Possible causes in this case are too thick a sheet, too much sheet layer, too high sheet strength or wrong tool combination. A faulty joining is also present if the measured value VII falls below the minimum value III. In this case the breakage of the punch or die, a missing sheet position or wrong tool combination can be the cause. Another possibility of an incorrect joining is indicated by the point marked with VIII. Here the position detector could not activate the force measuring device because the stamp did not cover the specified stamp path. The cause can either be a press force that is set too low, a press stroke that has not been carried out completely or the failure to reach the remaining floor thickness at the joining point.
  • the method according to the invention can also be used for methods with a rotary movement of the stamp.
  • the rotary movement is then determined by means of an angle encoder.
  • an acceleration measurement can also be carried out, for example by measuring the structure-borne noise generated during the stroke, in order to ensure compliance with a target value with a tolerance range. Accelerations that are too high lead to high material wear and an increased risk of tool breakage.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Control Of Presses (AREA)
  • Force Measurement Appropriate To Specific Purposes (AREA)

Description

Stand der TechnikState of the art

Die Erfindung geht aus von einem Verfahren zum Verbinden aufeinanderliegender dünner Platten nach der Gattung des Anspruchs 1 und von einer Vorrichtung zur Durchführung dieses Verfahrens nach der Gattung des Anspruchs 17.The invention is based on a method for connecting superimposed thin plates according to the preamble of claim 1 and on an apparatus for carrying out this method according to the preamble of claim 17.

Bei einem bekannten Kaltfügeverfahren dieser Art (DE 35 32 899) werden die übereinanderliegenden Plattenstücke beim gemeinsamen Durchsetzen entlang eines Teils ihrer Umrißlinien gestanzt und aus der Plattenebene herausgedrückt. Anschließend werden die herausgedrückten Plattenstücke durch eine Gegenkraft breitgequetscht, wobei ein Stanznocken erzeugt wird, welcher die zu verbindenden Plattenabschnitte hintergreift. Bei einem anderen bekannten Verfahren dieser Art (siehe DE-A-35 32 900, die dem Oberbegriff des Anspruchs 1 bzw. 17 entspricht) werden aus den zu verbindenden Plattenabschnitten Plattenstücke gemeinsam durchsetzt wobei infolge der Ausgestaltung der Matrize sich beim Stauchen der Plattenstücke ein Rückfließvorgang ergibt, der zu einer Hintergreifung der Plattenstücke an den übereinanderliegenden Plattenabschnitten führt.In a known cold joining method of this type (DE 35 32 899), the plate pieces lying one above the other are punched out and pushed out along the part of their contour lines and pushed out of the plane of the plate. The pressed-out plate pieces are then squeezed out broadly by a counterforce, producing a punching cam which engages behind the plate sections to be connected. In another known method of this type (see DE-A-35 32 900, which corresponds to the preamble of claim 1 and 17, respectively), plate pieces are interspersed together from the plate sections to be connected results, which leads to an engagement of the plate pieces on the superimposed plate sections.

Derartige Verfahren werden in der industriellen Massenproduktion eingesetzt, beispielsweise im Automobilbau. Ein Überwachen der Qualität der Verbindungsstellen bzw. das Sicherstellen bestimmter Güteanforderungen an solche Verbindungsstellen, ist daher bei diesem Verfahren von besonderer Bedeutung. Das Auftreten von Mängeln bei der Durchführung dieses Verfahrens muß schnellstmöglich erkannt und beseitigt werden, um den Ausschuß und die Maschinenstillstandszeiten möglichst gering zu halten. Solche Mängel können durch einen Materialbruch, insbesondere des Stempels oder der Matrize, hervorgerufen sein. Es ist dabei wichtig, jede fehlerhafte Verbindungsstelle zu erkennen, um das entsprechende Teil aussortieren bzw. einen Verbindungsvorgang wiederholen zu können. Ein Kriterium für die Qualität der Verbindung bzw. deren Mangel ist dabei die verbleibende Restmaterialstärke im Bereich der Fügestelle. Bei den bekannten Verfahren besteht die Qualitätssicherung in einer Überwachung der Stempelkraft bezüglich eines zulässigen Maximalwertes und in einer nach erfolgter Verbindung durchgeführten Messung der Restmaterialstärke. Dadurch wird nur ein Teil der möglicherweise auftretenden Mängel erfaßt. Die nachfolgende Messung der Restmaterialstärke ist zudem umständlich und zeitaufwendig.Such processes are used in industrial mass production, for example in automobile construction. Monitoring the quality of the connection points or ensuring certain quality requirements for such connection points is therefore of particular importance in this process. The occurrence of defects in the implementation of this method must be recognized and eliminated as quickly as possible in order to keep the rejects and machine downtimes as short as possible. Such defects can be caused by a material breakage, in particular the stamp or the die. It is important to recognize every faulty connection point in order to sort out the corresponding part or to repeat a connection process. A criterion for the quality of the connection or its lack is the remaining thickness of the remaining material in the area of the joint. In the known methods, quality assurance consists in monitoring the stamp force with regard to a permissible maximum value and in measuring the residual material thickness after the connection has been made. As a result, only a part of the deficiencies that may occur is recorded. The subsequent measurement of the residual material thickness is also cumbersome and time-consuming.

Darstellung der ErfindungPresentation of the invention

Das erfindungsgemäße Verfahren mit den Merkmalen des Anspruchs 1 bzw. die erfindungsgemäße Vorrichtung mit den Merkmalen des Anspruchs 17 hat demgegenüber den Vorteil, daß in weit größerem Maße auftretende Mängel erfaßt werden und daß keine separate Messung der Restmaterialstärke mehr durchgeführt werden muß. Auch muß die Preßkraft, das heißt die Stempel- oder Matrizenkraft nicht während des gesamten Fügevorgangs in Form einer Meßkurve Preßkraft gegen Arbeitshub aufgenommen werden. Durch die Messung der Preßkraft unmittelbar nach Beendigung des Quetschvorgangs wird jede fehlerhafte Verbindung erkannt. Die Überwachung erfolgt durch Vergleich mit vorgegebenen Maximalwerten und Minimalwerten. Liegt die Preßkraft unterhalb des vorgegebenen Minimalwerts, so wird beispielsweise Stempel- oder Matrizenbruch angezeigt, überschreitet sie dagegen den vorgegebenen Maximalwert, so weist dies auf zu dicke Platten oder zu hartes Material der zu verbindenden Platten hin. Außer der Preßkraft wird auch die zum Abstreifen der verbundenen Platten vom Stempel erforderliche Abstreifkraft gemessen. Durch die Messung der Abstreifkraft wird ein Ausfuttern des Materials festgestellt, was insbesondere bei der Verwendung der Erfindung in Robotereinrichtungen wichtig ist.The method according to the invention with the features of claim 1 and the device according to the invention with the features of claim 17 has the advantage that defects occurring to a much greater extent are detected and that no separate measurement of the residual material thickness has to be carried out. Also, the pressing force, that is to say the punch or die force, does not have to be absorbed in the form of a measuring curve against the working stroke during the entire joining process. By measuring the pressing force immediately after the squeezing process has ended, every faulty connection is recognized. Monitoring is carried out by comparison with predetermined maximum and minimum values. If the pressing force is below the specified minimum value, for example stamp or die break is displayed; on the other hand, if it exceeds the specified maximum value, this indicates plates that are too thick or material that is too hard to be joined. In addition to the pressing force, the stripping force required to strip the connected plates from the punch is also measured. By measuring the stripping force, a lining of the material is determined, which is particularly important when using the invention in robot devices.

Bei einem durch DE 32 41 063 bekannten Verfahren wird zwar die Überwachung der an den Werkzeugen auftretenden Kräfte durch Vergleich mit einem Sollwert durchgeführt, wobei es sich allerdings um eine Kombinierte Stanzbiegeoperation o.dgl. handelt und Fehlerquellen nach Beendigung des gattungsgemäßen Quetschvorgangs nicht erfaßt werden.In a method known from DE 32 41 063, the forces occurring on the tools are monitored by comparison with a target value, but this is a combined punch-bending operation or the like. acts and sources of error are not detected after completion of the generic crushing process.

Nach einer weiteren vorteilhaften Ausgestaltung der Erfindung erfolgt die Messung der Preßkraft unmittelbar nach Beendigung des Quetschvorgangs. Weisen die durch den Fügeprozeß verbundenen Platten am Fügepunkt nur noch die für den Fügeprozeß charakteristische Restbodenstärke auf, so ist der eigentliche Fügeprozeß abgeschlossen. Die dem betreffenden Arbeitshub zugeordnete Preßkraft ist deshalb für den Fügeprozeß besonders aufschlußreich.According to a further advantageous embodiment of the invention, the pressing force is measured immediately after the squeezing process has ended. If the plates connected by the joining process at the joining point only have those for the Joining process characteristic residual floor thickness, the actual joining process is completed. The pressing force assigned to the relevant working stroke is therefore particularly instructive for the joining process.

Nach einer weiteren vorteilhaften Ausgestaltung der Erfindung werden die gemessenen Kräfte mit einem vorgegebenen Maximalwert und einem vorgegebenen Minimalwert verglichen. Liegt der Meßwert innerhalb des durch Maximal- und Minimalwert definierten Intervalls, so entspricht die erfolgte Verbindung der vorgegebenen Güte, liegt er dagegen außerhalb des Intervalls, so ist die Verbindung fehlerhaft. Der Vergleich des Meßwerts mit dem Intervall ist damit zur Charakterisierung der Verbindung ausreichend.According to a further advantageous embodiment of the invention, the measured forces are compared with a predetermined maximum value and a predetermined minimum value. If the measured value lies within the interval defined by the maximum and minimum value, the connection that has been made corresponds to the specified quality, but if it lies outside the interval, the connection is faulty. The comparison of the measured value with the interval is therefore sufficient to characterize the connection.

Nach weiteren vorteilhaften Ausgestaltungen der Erfindung wird bei Überschreiten des vorgegebenen Maximalwerts und bei Unterschreiten des vorgegebenen Minimalwerts ein Signal erzeugt, welches zum Ansteuern einer optischen und/oder akustischen Anzeigeeinrichtung dienen kann, um auf das Vorliegen eines Mangels aufmerksam zu machen. Das Signal kann auch zur Steuerung der Unterbrechung des Fügevorgangs verwendet werden, wodurch der Ausschuß und die Stillstandzeit der Fertigung verringert werden kann.According to further advantageous refinements of the invention, when the predetermined maximum value is exceeded and when the predetermined minimum value is undershot, a signal is generated which can be used to control an optical and / or acoustic display device in order to draw attention to the presence of a defect. The signal can also be used to control the interruption of the joining process, which can reduce waste and downtimes in production.

Nach einer weiteren vorteilhaften Ausgestaltung wird ein Signal erzeugt, falls der Stempel oder die Matrize beim Fügevorgang nicht den vorgegebenen Arbeitshub zurücklegt. Vorteilhafterweise ist das Signal ein Steuersignal, mit welchem eine optische und/oder akustische Anzeigeeinrichtung angesteuert wird. Das Signal kann ebenfalls zur Unterbrechung des Fügevorgangs dienen.According to a further advantageous embodiment, a signal is generated if the punch or the die does not cover the specified working stroke during the joining process. The signal is advantageously a control signal with which an optical and / or acoustic display device is activated. The signal can also be used to interrupt the joining process.

Nach einer weiteren vorteilhaften Ausgestaltung der Erfindung liegen die Maximal- und Minimalwerte abrufbar in einem elektrischen Speicher vor. Hierdurch können die Werte je nach Bedarf angepaßt werden. Es können auch mehrere Sätze von Werten im Speicher vorliegen, um unterschiedlichen Anforderungen, beispielsweise bei Werkzeug- oder Materialwechsel, schnell gerecht zu werden.According to a further advantageous embodiment of the invention, the maximum and minimum values are available in an electrical memory. This allows the values to be adjusted as required. There can also be several sets of values in the memory in order to quickly meet different requirements, for example when changing tools or materials.

Nach einer weiteren vorteilhaften Ausgestaltung der Erfindung liegt der vorgegebene Arbeitshub abrufbar in einem Speicher vor. Neben der Möglichkeit, den Arbeitshub manuell zum Beispiel mit Hilfe von Schaltern vorzugeben, kann somit auch der Arbeitshub über einen den Speicher aufweisenden Rechner eingestellt werden.According to a further advantageous embodiment of the invention, the predetermined working stroke is available in a memory. In addition to the possibility of specifying the working stroke manually, for example with the aid of switches, the working stroke can thus also be set using a computer having the memory.

Nach einer vorteilhaften Weiterbildung dieser Merkmale ist die Eingabe der Werte in den Speicher geschützt. Hierdurch ist gewährleistet, daß Änderungen nur durch Befugte vorgenommen werden können.According to an advantageous development of these features, the input of the values into the memory is protected. This ensures that changes can only be made by authorized persons.

Nach einer weiteren vorteilhaften Ausgestaltung der Erfindung werden die Kräfte an meheren Fügestellen gleichzeitig gemessen, wobei die ermittelten Werte von einer gemeinsamen Einrichtung ausgewertet werden.According to a further advantageous embodiment of the invention, the forces are measured at several joints at the same time, the values determined being evaluated by a common device.

Nach einer weiteren vorteilhaften Ausgestaltung der Erfindung werden die ermittelten Meßwerte optisch angezeigt. Die optische Anzeige erleichtert die Unterscheidung verschiedener Fehlerarten, um dadurch die geeigneten Gegenmaßnahmen vornehmen zu können. Hierfür können die ermittelten Meßwerte gespeichert werden, um eine nachträgliche Auswertung zu ermöglichen. Gleichzeitig dient die Speicherung der Meßwerte der Qualitätskontrolle, indem bei späteren Reklamationen der Fügevorgang nachgeprüft werden kann.According to a further advantageous embodiment of the invention, the measured values determined are displayed optically. The visual display makes it easier to distinguish between different types of errors so that the appropriate countermeasures can be taken. For this purpose, the measured values determined can be saved in order to enable subsequent evaluation. At the same time, the measurement values are saved quality control, since the joining process can be checked in the event of later complaints.

Die erfindungsgemäße Vorrichtung zur Durchführung des Verfahrens mit den Merkmalen des Anspruchs 19 ist an die Verfahrenserfordernisse vorteilhaft angepaßt. Kraftmeßeinrichtungen sind in der Matrizenaufnahme, bzw im Stempelhalter, oder am Abstreifer vorgesehen, wobei bevorzugt Dehnmeßstreifen oder piezo-elektrische Geber verwendet werden, zum Beispiel ein Piezo-Kraftaufnehmer in der Matrizenaufnahme, ein Piezo-Quermeßdübel im Stempelhalter und ein Piezo-Meßring am Abstreifer. Ein Positionmelder sorgt dafür, daß die Messung genau bei dem zuvor eingestellten Arbeitshub erfolgt. Vorteilhafterweise kann der Positionsmelder in einen Stempelhubbegrenzer aufgenommen sein.The device according to the invention for carrying out the method with the features of claim 19 is advantageously adapted to the requirements of the method. Force measuring devices are provided in the die holder, or in the punch holder, or on the stripper, preferably strain gauges or piezoelectric sensors are used, for example a piezo force transducer in the die holder, a piezo transverse dowel in the punch holder and a piezo measuring ring on the stripper. A position detector ensures that the measurement is carried out exactly at the previously set working stroke. The position indicator can advantageously be accommodated in a stamp stroke limiter.

Weitere Vorteile und vorteilhafte Ausgestaltung der Erfindung sind der nachfolgenden Beschreibung, der Zeichnung und den Ansprüchen entnehmbar.Further advantages and advantageous embodiments of the invention can be found in the following description, the drawing and the claims.

Zeichnungdrawing

Ein Ausführungsbeispiel der Erfindung ist in der Zeichnung dargestellt und im folgenden näher beschrieben.
Es zeigen:

  • Figur 1 eine Seitenansicht einer erfindungsgemäßen Vorrichtung im Teilschnitt und
  • Figur 2 ein Diagramm in dem die Stempelkraft (Ordinate) über dem Stempelweg (Abszisse) aufgetragen ist.
An embodiment of the invention is shown in the drawing and described in more detail below.
Show it:
  • Figure 1 is a side view of a device according to the invention in partial section and
  • Figure 2 is a diagram in which the stamp force (ordinate) is plotted against the stamp path (abscissa).

Beschreibung des AusführungsbeispielsDescription of the embodiment

Die in Figur 1 gezeigte Presse 1 weist einen C-förmigen Rahmen 2 auf, dessen unterer Teil als Pressentisch 3 dient, auf welchem die Matrizenaufnahme 4 für die Matrize 5 angeordnet ist. Am oberen Ausleger 6 des Rahmens 2 ist, der Matrizenaufnahme 4 gegenüberliegend, ein Stempelhalter 7 vorhanden, zur Aufnahme des Stempels 8. Um den Stempelhalter 8 ist eine Abstreifeinrichtung 9 angeordnet, zum Abstreifen von am Stempel hängenden Platten. Der Stempel 8 wird über einen Druckzylinder 10 von einem auf der Oberseite des C-förmigen Rahmens 2 vorhandenen Pressenantrieb 11 auf- und abbewegt.The press 1 shown in FIG. 1 has a C-shaped frame 2, the lower part of which serves as a press table 3 on which the die holder 4 for the die 5 is arranged. On the upper arm 6 of the frame 2, opposite the die holder 4, there is a stamp holder 7 for receiving the stamp 8. A stripping device 9 is arranged around the stamp holder 8 for stripping plates hanging on the stamp. The punch 8 is moved up and down via a pressure cylinder 10 by a press drive 11 provided on the upper side of the C-shaped frame 2.

In der Matrizenaufnahme 4 ist ein Piezo-Kraftaufnehmer vorhanden, mit welchem die durch die Matrize ausgeübte Matrizenkraft ermittelt wird. In dem Stempelhalter 7 ist ein Piezo-Quermeßdübel 12 vorhanden zur Ermittlung der ausgeübten Stempelkraft. Schließlich ist am Abstreifer 9 ein um den Druckzylinder 10 angeordneter Piezo-Meßring 13 vorhanden zur Ermittlung der Abstreifkraft. Der Druckzylinder 10 weist einen Positionsmelder 14 auf, der bei einem vorgegebenen Stempelweg die Kraftmeßeinrichtungen aktiviert die Stempelkraft und eventuell die Matrizenkraft zu messen. Der Positionsmelder kann auch in den Hubbegrenzer 15 aufgenommen sein. Nicht dargestellt sind die Auswerteeinrichtungen und die elektrischen Verbindungen zwischen den Auswerteeinrichtungen und den Meßeinrichtungen.In the die holder 4 there is a piezo force transducer with which the die force exerted by the die is determined. A piezo transverse dowel 12 is provided in the stamp holder 7 to determine the stamping force exerted. Finally, a piezo measuring ring 13 arranged around the pressure cylinder 10 is provided on the stripper 9 to determine the stripping force. The pressure cylinder 10 has a position indicator 14, which activates the force measuring devices for a given stamp path to measure the stamp force and possibly the die force. The position detector can also be included in the stroke limiter 15. The evaluation devices and the electrical connections between the evaluation devices and the measuring devices are not shown.

Das Diagramm von Figur 2 zeigt beispielhaft den Verlauf der Stempelkraft in Abhängigkeit vom Stempelweg bei einem Fügevorgang. Wie aus dem Schaubild ersichtlich steigt die Stempelkraft zwar stetig bis zum Ende des Fügevorgangs an, jedoch nicht linear, sondern je nach Fügephase unterschiedlich. Die verschiedenen Fügephasen sind in der Reihenfolge ihres Ablaufs beim Fügevorgang zunächst kombiniertes Einsenken und Durchsetzen, gefolgt von Stauchen und Breiten, dann Ausfüllen der oberen Kontur der Matrizengravur, Füllen des Ringkanals der Matrize und schließlich Napfrückwärtsfließpressen zum Verschränken der zu verbindenden Plattenelemente ineinander. An dem mit I im Diagramm markierten Wert des Stempelwegs wird die Stempelkraft durch die Kraftmeßeinrichtung gemessen, der Meßwert ist mit II gekennzeichnet. Durch den Minimalwert III und den Maximalwert IV ist ein Intervall V festgelegt. Liegt der Meßwert II innerhalb des Intervalls V, so entspricht der erfolgte Fügevorgang der vorgegebenen Güte. Übersteigt dagegen der Meßwert VI den vorgegebenen Maximalwert IV, so ist die Fügung fehlerhaft. Mögliche Ursachen sind in diesem Fall zu große Blechdicke, zuviel Blechlage, zu hohe Blechfestigkeit oder falsche Werkzeugkombination. Eine fehlerhafte Fügung liegt außerdem vor, wenn der Meßwert VII den Minimalwert III unterschreitet. In diesem Fall können Stempel- oder Matrizenbruch, eine fehlende Blechlage oder falsche Werkzeugkombination die Ursache sein. Eine weitere Möglichkeit einer fehlerhaften Fügung ist durch den mit VIII markierten Punkt angezeigt. Hier konnte der Positiondmelder nicht die Kraftmeßeinrichtung aktivieren, da der Stempel nicht den vorgegebenen Stempelweg zurückgelegt hat. Die Ursache kann entweder eine zu gering eingestellte Pressenkraft, ein nicht komplett ausgeführter Pressenhub oder das nicht Erreichen der Restbodenstarke im Fügepunkt sein.The diagram in FIG. 2 shows an example of the course of the stamp force as a function of the stamp path during a joining process. As can be seen from the diagram, the punch force increases steadily until the end of the joining process, but not linearly, but differently depending on the joining phase. The various joining phases, in the order of their sequence during the joining process, are first a combined sinking and pushing through, followed by upsetting and widthing, then filling in the upper contour of the die engraving, filling the ring channel of the die and finally backward extrusion to interlock the plate elements to be connected. The stamp force is measured by the force measuring device on the value of the stamp path marked with I in the diagram, the measured value is marked with II. An interval V is defined by the minimum value III and the maximum value IV. If the measured value II lies within the interval V, the joining process that has taken place corresponds to the specified quality. If, on the other hand, the measured value VI exceeds the predetermined maximum value IV, the joining is faulty. Possible causes in this case are too thick a sheet, too much sheet layer, too high sheet strength or wrong tool combination. A faulty joining is also present if the measured value VII falls below the minimum value III. In this case the breakage of the punch or die, a missing sheet position or wrong tool combination can be the cause. Another possibility of an incorrect joining is indicated by the point marked with VIII. Here the position detector could not activate the force measuring device because the stamp did not cover the specified stamp path. The cause can either be a press force that is set too low, a press stroke that has not been carried out completely or the failure to reach the remaining floor thickness at the joining point.

Das erfindungsgemäße Verfahren kann außer bei Pressen mit hin- und hergehender Stempelbewegung auch bei Verfahren mit einer Drehbewegung des Stempels verwendet werden. Anstelle der Hubbewegung wird dann die Drehbewegung mittels eines Drehwinkelgebers ermittelt. Zusätzlich zu der Kraftmessung kann noch eine Beschleunigungsmessung vorgenommen werden, beispielsweise durch Messung des beim Hub erzeugten Körperschalls, um auch hier die Einhaltung eines Sollwerts mit Toleranzbereich zu gewährleisten. Zu große Beschleunigungen führen zu hohem Materialverschleiß und erhöhter Werkzeugbruchgefahr.In addition to presses with a reciprocating stamp movement, the method according to the invention can also be used for methods with a rotary movement of the stamp. Instead of the stroke movement, the rotary movement is then determined by means of an angle encoder. In addition to the force measurement, an acceleration measurement can also be carried out, for example by measuring the structure-borne noise generated during the stroke, in order to ensure compliance with a target value with a tolerance range. Accelerations that are too high lead to high material wear and an increased risk of tool breakage.

BezugszahlenlisteList of reference numbers

11
PressePress
22nd
Rahmenframe
33rd
PressentischPress table
44th
MatrizenaufnahmeDie holder
55
Matrizedie
66
Auslegerboom
77
StempelhalterStamp holder
88th
Stempelstamp
99
AbstreiferWipers
1010th
DruckzylinderImpression cylinder
1111
PressenantriebPress drive
1212th
Piezo-QuermeßdübelPiezo dowel
1313
Piezo-MeßringPiezo measuring ring
1414
PositionsmelderPosition detector
1515
StempelhubbegrenzerStamp stroke limiter
II.
vorgegebener Stempelwegpredefined stamp path
II, VI, VIIII, VI, VII
mögliche Meßwertepossible measured values
IIIIII
MinimalwertMinimum value
IVIV
MaximalwertMaximum value
VV
Intervallinterval

Claims (23)

  1. Method of joining thin mating plates especially sheet metal or plate sections by cold joining in which the mating surfaces of the plates or plate sections to be joined are deep drawn and squeezed flat in a single working stroke by an interaction of the die (8) and the mold (5) with or without partial punching of the surfaces, characterized in that
    - the pressing force exercised on the plates as stamping force by the die (8) or as matrix force by the mold (5) is measured immediately after squeezing and that
    - the skimming force needed by the die (8) to skim off the joined plates or plate sections is measured.
  2. Method according to claim 1., characterized in that the measured values (II, VI, VII) for pressing force and skimming force are compared to a set maximum value (IV) and a set minimum value (III).
  3. Method according to claim 2., characterized in that a signal is effected when the maximum value (IV) is exceeded or the minimum value (III) falls short.
  4. Method according to one of the above claims characterized in that a signal is effected when either the die (8) or the mould (5) do not travel the set working stroke (I) in the joining process.
  5. Method according to claims 3. or 4., characterized in that the signal is a control signal controlling an acoustic and/or visual display.
  6. Method according to claims 3., 4., or 5., characterized in that the signal is used to interrupt the respective joining process.
  7. Method according to claim 6., characterized in that in the case of an interruption the process can only be continued after unlocking.
  8. Method according to one of the claims 2. through 7., characterized in that the maximum (IV) and minimum (III) values are stored in an electronic memory for recall.
  9. Method according to claim 8., characterized in that the maximum and minimum values can be adjusted by a force measuring device (12, 13) either manually or using a computer featuring the above mentioned memory.
  10. Method according to claims 8. or 9., characterized in that the memory stores different sets of maximum (IV) and minimum (III) values.
  11. Method according to one of the above claims, characterized in that a set working stroke (I) is stored in the electronic memory for recall.
  12. Method according to claim 11., characterized in that the set working stroke (I) can be adjusted at a position indicator (14) either manually or by a computer featuring a memory.
  13. Method according to one of the claims 8. through 12., characterized in that the input of the maximum (IV) and minimum (III) values and/or the set working stroke is protected against misuse or loss.
  14. Method according to one of the above claims characterized in that the forces are measured at several cold joining points at the same time, and the values are processed by the same data processing device.
  15. Method according to one of the above claims, characterized in that the elicited values (II, VI, VII) are displayed visually.
  16. Method according to one of the above claims, characterized in that the elicited values (II, VI, VII) are stored electronically.
  17. Device for carrying out the method according to one of the above claims using a mould (5) positioned in a mechanical press (1) and a die (8) driven to and fro at right angles to the plates to be joined, characterized in that a position indicator (14) and at least one force measuring device (12) for measuring the pressing force and a force measuring device for measuring the skimming force are present.
  18. Device according to claim 17., characterized in that a transmitter is connected motion-locking to the die (8) to effect a linear or rotary motion.
  19. Device according to claims 17. or 18., characterized in that one or several piezo elements serve as force measuring devices (12, 13).
  20. Device according to claim 17. or 18., characterized in that one or several strain gauges serve as force measuring devices (12, 13).
  21. Device according to one of the claims 17. through 20., characterized in that the force measuring device for measuring the pressing force is positioned in a mould mount (5) or on the press table (3).
  22. Device according to one of the claims 17. through 21., characterized in that the force measuring device (12) is positioned between die (8) and pressure cylinder (10).
  23. Device according to one of the claims 17. through 22., characterized in that the position indicator (14) is integrated into a stroke limiter (15).
EP94113827A 1993-09-15 1994-09-03 Method of joining thin plates and device for carrying out the method Revoked EP0642853B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE4331403A DE4331403A1 (en) 1993-09-15 1993-09-15 Method of joining thin plates and device for carrying out the method
DE4331403 1993-09-15

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0642853A1 EP0642853A1 (en) 1995-03-15
EP0642853B1 true EP0642853B1 (en) 1997-12-10

Family

ID=6497820

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP94113827A Revoked EP0642853B1 (en) 1993-09-15 1994-09-03 Method of joining thin plates and device for carrying out the method

Country Status (4)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0642853B1 (en)
JP (1) JPH07195133A (en)
CN (1) CN1111176A (en)
DE (2) DE4331403A1 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8650730B2 (en) 2009-02-23 2014-02-18 Btm Corporation Clinching tool

Families Citing this family (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE19718576A1 (en) * 1997-05-05 1998-11-12 Hahn Ortwin Device and method for mechanical joining techniques
DE19729368A1 (en) * 1997-07-09 1999-01-14 Ortwin Hahn Device and method for mechanically joining sheets, profiles and / or multi-sheet connections
US6276050B1 (en) 1998-07-20 2001-08-21 Emhart Inc. Riveting system and process for forming a riveted joint
US9015920B2 (en) 1997-07-21 2015-04-28 Newfrey Llc Riveting system and process for forming a riveted joint
DE19826290B4 (en) * 1998-02-25 2005-09-01 Salzgitter Ag Process for producing partial double sheet or multiple sheet metal structures
DE10308845B4 (en) * 2002-02-27 2007-01-18 Prokos Produktions-Kontroll-System Gmbh Method for monitoring forming processes
DE10312458B3 (en) * 2003-03-20 2004-08-19 Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung e.V. Compression level determination method for cold-formed compression coupling between components using eddy current measurements
DE10327886B4 (en) * 2003-06-20 2007-11-29 Prokos Produktions-Kontroll-System Gmbh Method and device for determining the ground thickness of clinch points of a clinch connection
JP2008290152A (en) * 2007-05-25 2008-12-04 Tox Pressotechnik Gmbh & Co Kg Clinching joining method
US9027220B2 (en) 2012-08-07 2015-05-12 Newfrey Llc Rivet setting machine
CN103302124B (en) * 2013-04-27 2015-08-19 太原科技大学 A kind of hot backward extrusion punch device with safeguard protection
US10328481B2 (en) 2014-03-18 2019-06-25 Btm Company Llc Clinching punch and apparatus
CN108297527B (en) * 2018-03-28 2024-05-28 昆明理工大学 Shaping hammer pre-pressing device and processing method for stamping foam metal interlayer in sandwich structure
WO2022113023A1 (en) * 2020-11-26 2022-06-02 Manz Italy S.R.L. Assembling method and apparatus to assemble a power storage device using impulsive welding action
DE102022210503A1 (en) 2022-10-05 2024-04-11 Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft Measuring device and measuring system for a sheet metal working tool and sheet metal working tool equipped therewith

Family Cites Families (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE921553C (en) * 1938-05-31 1954-12-20 Karlsruhe Augsburg Iweka Automatic device for pressure monitoring on crank, eccentric or toggle presses
DE1246652B (en) * 1962-02-10 1967-08-10 Mueller Fritz Transfer press
DE3241063A1 (en) * 1982-11-06 1984-05-10 Siegfried Ing.(grad.) 7321 Börtlingen Schwarz Method and device for monitoring the forces on a punching press or the like
DE3532900A1 (en) * 1985-09-14 1987-03-26 Eugen Rapp Method and apparatus for connecting thin plates
DE3532899A1 (en) * 1985-09-14 1987-03-26 Eugen Rapp METHOD AND DEVICE FOR CONNECTING PANELS BY PUNCHING CAMS
SE8800407D0 (en) * 1988-02-05 1988-02-05 Cerac Sa A METHOD FOR JOINING TWO OR SEVERAL OVERLAYING SHEET FORMED MEMBERS TOGETHER, METAL OR NON-METAL, AND AN APPARATUS FOR CARRYING OUT SAID METHOD
EP0432094B1 (en) * 1989-11-22 1993-12-08 Cybelec S.A. Process for controlling the operation of a hydraulic press

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8650730B2 (en) 2009-02-23 2014-02-18 Btm Corporation Clinching tool

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN1111176A (en) 1995-11-08
EP0642853A1 (en) 1995-03-15
DE4331403A1 (en) 1995-03-16
DE59404771D1 (en) 1998-01-22
JPH07195133A (en) 1995-08-01

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0642853B1 (en) Method of joining thin plates and device for carrying out the method
EP0370451B1 (en) Device for crimping terminals onto electrical leads
DE69015251T2 (en) Method and device for connecting a wire to a connection terminal.
EP1946864B1 (en) Online determination of the quality characteristics during self-piercing riveting or clinching
DE2520662C3 (en) Device for monitoring the pressing forces of the punches of a tablet press
EP2149450B1 (en) Powder press
EP2715884B1 (en) Process and arrangement for a weighted monitoring the wear of a hand tool for crimping workpieces
DE102008025074A1 (en) Clinching method
DE4120245A1 (en) ULTRASONIC WELDING PROCESS
DE3939956A1 (en) METHOD AND DEVICE FOR MONITORING THE PRESSING FORCE OF A TABLETING MACHINE
EP0403040A2 (en) Method and apparatus for making dimensionally stable pressed articles
DE19721272B4 (en) Electric pressing device
DE3241063A1 (en) Method and device for monitoring the forces on a punching press or the like
DE4214475A1 (en) Method and installation for joining thin plates - with punch force and displacement monitored during the entire joining process
EP3814125B1 (en) Methods for operating a stamping press and stamping presses for being operated according to the methods
DE102006015581B3 (en) Deformation process implementing method, involves determining temporal sequences of motor current as measure for force or torque of direct drive by integrating measuring device in direct drive
EP3281721A1 (en) Method for connecting at least two components by means of a self-piercing rivet device and manufacturing equipment
DE102008011375A1 (en) Driving device for press, has multiple eccentric shafts which are coupled over connecting rod at common plunger, so that movement of eccentric shafts is moved in working motion of plunger
DE102019125562A1 (en) PUNCHED RIVETING DEVICE AND METHOD FOR OPERATING A PUNCHED RIVETING DEVICE TO PREVENT INCORRECT MATERIAL USE
EP3620264A1 (en) Press machine comprising a drive controlled using recorded press data
DE2643759B2 (en) Procedure for monitoring cyclically recurring production processes
DE3244171C2 (en)
DE4107093C2 (en) Device for crack testing a molded part in a pressing device
EP1480767A1 (en) Method for reducing bending angle errors during die bending
DE10327886B4 (en) Method and device for determining the ground thickness of clinch points of a clinch connection

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT SE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19950901

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19951110

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT SE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRE;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.SCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 19971210

GBT Gb: translation of ep patent filed (gb section 77(6)(a)/1977)

Effective date: 19971211

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 59404771

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19980122

ET Fr: translation filed
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 19980310

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

PLBF Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OBSO

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: ECKOLD GMBH & CO. KG

Effective date: 19980909

PLBF Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OBSO

PLBQ Unpublished change to opponent data

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OPPO

PLAB Opposition data, opponent's data or that of the opponent's representative modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009299OPPO

R26 Opposition filed (corrected)

Opponent name: ECKOLD GMBH & CO. KG

Effective date: 19980909

PLBF Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OBSO

PLBF Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OBSO

RDAH Patent revoked

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS REVO

APAC Appeal dossier modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS NOAPO

APAE Appeal reference modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS REFNO

APCC Communication from the board of appeal sent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OBAPO

APCC Communication from the board of appeal sent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OBAPO

APCC Communication from the board of appeal sent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OBAPO

APCC Communication from the board of appeal sent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OBAPO

APCC Communication from the board of appeal sent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OBAPO

APAC Appeal dossier modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS NOAPO

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: IF02

RDAF Communication despatched that patent is revoked

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREV1

RDAF Communication despatched that patent is revoked

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREV1

APBP Date of receipt of notice of appeal recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA2O

APBC Information on closure of appeal procedure deleted

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDNOA9O

APBG Information on invitation to file observation in appeal deleted

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDOBA2O

APBI Information on receipt of observation in appeal deleted

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDOBA4O

APAY Date of receipt of notice of appeal deleted

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDNOA2O

APBP Date of receipt of notice of appeal recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA2O

APBQ Date of receipt of statement of grounds of appeal recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA3O

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20040831

Year of fee payment: 11

RAP2 Party data changed (patent owner data changed or rights of a patent transferred)

Owner name: TOX PRESSOTECHNIK GMBH & CO. KG

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20050903

APAH Appeal reference modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCREFNO

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20050903

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20070702

Year of fee payment: 14

PLBP Opposition withdrawn

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009264

APBU Appeal procedure closed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA9O

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20070926

Year of fee payment: 14

RDAG Patent revoked

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009271

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: PATENT REVOKED

27W Patent revoked

Effective date: 20080403