EP0631584A4 - Cancer diagnosis and therapy. - Google Patents

Cancer diagnosis and therapy.

Info

Publication number
EP0631584A4
EP0631584A4 EP92907799A EP92907799A EP0631584A4 EP 0631584 A4 EP0631584 A4 EP 0631584A4 EP 92907799 A EP92907799 A EP 92907799A EP 92907799 A EP92907799 A EP 92907799A EP 0631584 A4 EP0631584 A4 EP 0631584A4
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
seq
tumor suppressor
sample
gene
cells
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP92907799A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0631584A1 (en
Inventor
Ruth Sager
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Dana Farber Cancer Institute Inc
Original Assignee
Dana Farber Cancer Institute Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Dana Farber Cancer Institute Inc filed Critical Dana Farber Cancer Institute Inc
Publication of EP0631584A1 publication Critical patent/EP0631584A1/en
Publication of EP0631584A4 publication Critical patent/EP0631584A4/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12QMEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
    • C12Q1/00Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions
    • C12Q1/68Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving nucleic acids
    • C12Q1/6813Hybridisation assays
    • C12Q1/6841In situ hybridisation
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C07ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C07KPEPTIDES
    • C07K14/00Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof
    • C07K14/435Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from animals; from humans
    • C07K14/46Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from animals; from humans from vertebrates
    • C07K14/47Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from animals; from humans from vertebrates from mammals
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12QMEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
    • C12Q1/00Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions
    • C12Q1/68Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving nucleic acids
    • C12Q1/6876Nucleic acid products used in the analysis of nucleic acids, e.g. primers or probes
    • C12Q1/6883Nucleic acid products used in the analysis of nucleic acids, e.g. primers or probes for diseases caused by alterations of genetic material
    • C12Q1/6886Nucleic acid products used in the analysis of nucleic acids, e.g. primers or probes for diseases caused by alterations of genetic material for cancer
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N33/00Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
    • G01N33/48Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
    • G01N33/50Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing
    • G01N33/5005Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving human or animal cells
    • G01N33/5008Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving human or animal cells for testing or evaluating the effect of chemical or biological compounds, e.g. drugs, cosmetics
    • G01N33/5011Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving human or animal cells for testing or evaluating the effect of chemical or biological compounds, e.g. drugs, cosmetics for testing antineoplastic activity
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N33/00Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
    • G01N33/48Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
    • G01N33/50Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing
    • G01N33/53Immunoassay; Biospecific binding assay; Materials therefor
    • G01N33/574Immunoassay; Biospecific binding assay; Materials therefor for cancer
    • G01N33/57484Immunoassay; Biospecific binding assay; Materials therefor for cancer involving compounds serving as markers for tumor, cancer, neoplasia, e.g. cellular determinants, receptors, heat shock/stress proteins, A-protein, oligosaccharides, metabolites
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61KPREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K38/00Medicinal preparations containing peptides
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12QMEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
    • C12Q2600/00Oligonucleotides characterized by their use
    • C12Q2600/106Pharmacogenomics, i.e. genetic variability in individual responses to drugs and drug metabolism
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12QMEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
    • C12Q2600/00Oligonucleotides characterized by their use
    • C12Q2600/136Screening for pharmacological compounds

Definitions

  • the genes corresponding to these clones are expressed by all normal mammary epithelial cells, but not by any primary mammary tumors or mammary tumor cell lines.
  • One such gene encodes keratin 5, which is said to be a valuable marker to distinguish normal and primary tumor cells in culture.
  • keratin 5 is said to be a valuable marker to distinguish normal and primary tumor cells in culture.
  • fibronectin is also identified.
  • Tumor suppressor genes are proposed to play a key role in cancer protection, and it is suggested that tumor suppressor genes provide a vast untapped resource for anti-cancer therapy.
  • DNA methylation is a consistent feature of tumorigenesis (Jones et al.. Adv. Cancer Res . 54.:1- 23, 1990) but local sites of hypermethylation have also been found in tumor cells (Jones et al.. Adv. Cancer Res . 54.U-23, 1990; Baylin et al.. Blood 10 : 412-411 , 1987). Elevated expression of the DNA methyltransferase gene has recently been described in progressive stages of colon cancer (El-Deiry et al., Proc. Natl . Acad. Sci . USA 88.:3470-3474, 1991), suggesting a general mechanism for hypermethylation, but not explaining the specificity seen on particular genes.
  • This invention features novel methods for identifying cancerous cells present in a human, particularly in solid tumors.
  • the invention also features methods for identifying drugs useful for treatment of such cancer cells, and for treatment of the cancerous condition.
  • the invention provides a means for identifying cancer cells at an early stage of development, such that premalignant cells can be identified prior to their spreading throughout the human body. This allows early detection of potentially cancerous conditions, and treatment of those cancerous conditions prior to spread of the cancerous cells throughout the body, or prior to development of an irreversible cancerous condition.
  • Tumor suppressor genes have been divided into two general types, termed class I and class II.
  • Class I tumor suppressor genes are said to be those in which a genetic alteration (e.g., the deletion, addition or substitution of one or more nucleotides) in the coding sequence of the gene has been found to contribute to tumor cell development.
  • class II tumor suppressor genes are identified as those which have a lower level of expression in a cancer or precancer cell compared to a normal cell, which decreased level of expression is due to alteration in the regulation of expression of that gene, rather than to the loss of genetic information in the coding sequence of the gene.
  • a diagnostic test based upon levels of expression of either a class I or a class II gene, or of another marker gene that is identified as a candidate tumor suppressor gene by one of the differential screening methods described below, but which does not turn out to have tumor suppressor activity, is useful for detecting the presence of cancerous or pre-cancerous cells in a tissue sample from a patient.
  • a patient with a cancer characterized by a lower-than-normal level of expression of one or more tumor suppressor genes can be treated (e.g., with a drug or radiation, or by transforming one or more of the tumor suppressor genes into the cancerous cells) to induce a higher level of expression of such gene(s) in the cancerous cells, thus halting or reversing the growth of the cancer.
  • the invention features a method for identifying a cancer cell in a human by providing nucleic acid from a candidate tumor suppressor gene which specifically hybridizes to RNA expressed from such a gene in a cancer cell at a level less than one third the level of hybridization with the equivalent RNA expressed from that gene in a normal cell.
  • the method involves providing an antibody to the gene product of such a candidate tumor suppressor gene, which antibody specifically reacts (in the sense of an antibody-antigen reaction to form an immune complex) with the polypeptide expressed from the candidate tumor suppressor gene in a cancer cell, at a level less than one-third the level of reaction (i.e., binding) with the equivalent gene product expressed from that gene in a normal cell.
  • the method further features obtaining from the human a tissue sample which potentially includes the cancer cell to be detected, and contacting this sample with either (1) the nucleic acid probe, under conditions which would permit hybridization with the mRNA transcribed from the gene, or (2) the antibody, under conditions appropriate for immune complex formation between the antibody and its antigen.
  • the method involves determining the amount of hybridization of the nucleic acid or the amount of binding of the antibody with the tissue sample, compared to the amount of hybridization of that nucleic acid or binding of that antibody with a normal tissue sample which includes only normal cells.
  • An amount of hybridization or immune complex formation with the tissue sample less than one third the amount of hybridization or immune complex formation with the normal tissue sample is indicative of the presence of cancerous or pre-cancerous cells in the tissue sample.
  • the method of using a nucleic acid probe to determine the presence of cancerous cells in a tissue from a patient includes the steps of: providing a nucleic acid probe (i.e., a single- stranded nucleic acid such as DNA, or a double stranded nucleic acid which is made single-stranded prior to doing the hybridization step) comprising a nucleotide sequence at least 8 nucleotides in length (preferably at least 15 nucleotides, and more preferably at least 40 nucleotides, and up to all or nearly all of the coding sequence) which is identical to a portion of either strand of the coding sequence of a candidate tumor suppressor gene; obtaining from a patient a first tissue sample potentially comprising cancerous cells; providing a second tissue sample containing cells substantially all of which are non-cancerous; contacting the nucleic acid probe under high- stringency hybridizing conditions with RNA of each of said first and second tissue samples (e.g., in a northern blot or in situ
  • the diagnostic assay may be carried out with antibodies to the candidate tumor suppressor gene product, instead of a nucleic acid probe.
  • Such an assay would include the following steps: providing an antibody specific for the gene product of a candidate tumor suppressor gene, the gene product being present in cancerous tissue of a given tissue type (e.g., mammary, ovarian, bladder or prostate epithelium) at a level less than one third the level of the gene product in noncancerous tissue of the same tissue type; obtaining from a patient a first sample of tissue of the given tissue type, which sample potentially includes cancerous cells; providing a second sample of tissue of the same tissue type (which may be from the same patient or from a normal control, e.g.
  • a given tissue type e.g., mammary, ovarian, bladder or prostate epithelium
  • this second sample containing normal cells and essentially no cancerous cells; contacting the antibody with protein (which may be partially purified, in lysed but unfractionated cells, or in situ) of the first and second samples under conditions permitting immunocomplex formation between the antibody and any tumor suppressor gene product present in the samples; and comparing (a) the amount of immunocomplex formation in the first sample, with (b) the amount of immunocomplex formation in the second sample, wherein an amount of immunocomplex formation in the first sample less than one third (preferably less than one fourth, and more preferably less than one tenth) the amount of immunocomplex formation in the second sample indicates the presence of cancerous cells in the first sample of tissue.
  • protein which may be partially purified, in lysed but unfractionated cells, or in situ
  • the level of a candidate tumor suppressor gene product in a biological fluid (e.g., blood or urine) of a person may be determined as a way of monitoring the level of expression of the gene in cells of that person.
  • a biological fluid e.g., blood or urine
  • Such a method would include the steps of obtaining a sample of a biological fluid from the person, contacting the sample (or proteins from the sample) with an antibody specific for a candidate tumor suppressor gene product, and determining the amount of immune complex formation by the antibody, with the amount of immune complex formation being indicative of the level of the gene product in the sample.
  • This determination is particularly instructive when compared to the amount of immune complex formation by the same antibody in a control sample taken from a normal individual or cancer patient, or in one or more samples previously or subsequently obtained from the same person.
  • a candidate tumor suppressor gene By a candidate tumor suppressor gene is meant those genes which are found to be expressed to a significantly higher degree in normal cells than in cancerous or precancerous cells, as generally discussed above.
  • Such a candidate tumor suppressor gene is generally identified by northern analysis or its equivalent (for example, by in situ hybridization) as a gene whose expression is lower in a cancer cell compared to a normal cell. If the gene bears a disabling mutation in its coding sequence, then it is termed a "candidate class I tumor suppressor gene".
  • cancer cell If the coding sequence of the gene is intact, inasmuch as the DNA forming the exons of that gene is not significantly altered, a southern analysis of such a gene in a cancer cell does not reveal any significant difference in the tumor suppressor coding sequence in a cancer cell compared to a normal cell. In such genes, termed “candidate class II tumor suppressor genes", it is the regulatory mechanism of the gene that is altered in a cancerous cell compared to a normal cell.
  • class I tumor suppressor gene or class II tumor suppressor gene
  • class II tumor suppressor gene or class II tumor suppressor gene
  • hybridizing conditions conditions under which the nucleic acid used as a probe in the method is able to specifically hybridize with RNA expressed from a candidate tumor suppressor gene without significantly hybridizing to any other RNA expressed from either normal or cancerous human cells (e.g., conditions of high stringency, as described, for example, in Sambrook et al.. Molecular Cloning, a laboratory manual, 2nd Ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratories, Cold Spring
  • RNA specifically indicates the presence or absence of a candidate tumor suppressor gene transcript (usually mRNA) .
  • reaction of the antibody with the candidate tumor suppressor gene product (protein) is performed under normal antibody-antigen reaction conditions which allow specific recognition of the candidate tumor suppressor gene product by antibody, with little or no cross-reaction of the antibody with other proteins normally present in the cancerous or normal cells.
  • measurement of the amount of antigen-antibody immune complex formed in the sample is indicative of the amount of candidate tumor suppressor gene product present in that sample.
  • the candidate tumor suppressor gene is a gene encoding keratin 5, NB-1 gene product, fibronectin, connexin 26, glutathione-S- transferase pi, CaN19 protein (formerly called clone 19 gene product) , small proline-rich (spr-1) protein, amphireguiin, thymosin beta-4, gamma actin, calpactin light chain (pll) , HBpl7, myosin regulatory light chain, V-Fos transformation effector protein, or one of the following mitochondrial genome-encoded proteins: URF4, Co III, and ATPase ⁇ .
  • the candidate tumor suppressor gene may alternatively be one of the newly-identified genes herein referred to as U1-U10, partial sequences of which are given as SEQ ID NOs: 3-12. These genes are specifically described in detail below.
  • the amount of hybridization of the nucleic acid with RNA from precancerous or cancerous cells in the human is less than one third the level detected with a normal cell, more preferably less than one tenth the level, or even more preferably is undetectable.
  • the invention features a method for identifying a drug useful for treatment of a cancer cell.
  • the method includes the steps of identifying a candidate class II tumor suppressor gene, expression of which is suppressed [i.e., significantly diminished (e.g., by two thirds or more)] in a given type of cancerous cell from a given type of tissue, compared to a normal cell in the same type of tissue; providing a first and a second sample of that given type of cancerous cell; treating the second sample with a candidate drug; and determining the level of expression of the gene in the second sample after treatment with the candidate drug, wherein a drug which increases the level of expression of the gene in the second sample, compared to the level of expression of the gene in the untreated first sample, is potentially useful for treatment of the given type of cancer cell, and perhaps for other types of cancer cells, as well.
  • the candidate class II tumor suppressor gene and the level of expression of that gene are identified or determined as discussed herein.
  • Potentially useful drugs may be chosen from, for example, those which alter signal transduction pathways, or which facilitate demethylation of methylated residues on DNA. Such drugs may increase tumor suppressor gene expression by, for example, increasing tumor suppressor gene messenger RNA synthesis, or mRNA processing, or protein synthesis, or by decreasing RNA degradation or protein degradation.
  • the invention features methods for treating a patient who has cancer.
  • One such method involves the steps of identifying, in a human, a cell having a low level of expression of a candidate tumor suppressor gene compared to a normal cell, and treating that cell with a drug identified as one which raises the level of expression of that candidate tumor suppressor gene in the cell.
  • the method of treatment includes the steps of identifying a patient with a cancer cell characterized by a low level of expression of a candidate tumor suppressor gene, compared to the level of expression of such gene in a normal cell of the same tissue type as the cancer cell; and either treating the cancer cell with a compound which raises the level of expression of the gene in the cancer cell, or introducing into the cancer cell a nucleic acid encoding the gene.
  • the nucleic acid would include an expression control element permitting expression of the gene in the cancer cell. Treating patients with such drugs or gene therapy provides a means to control or eliminate their cancers.
  • the invention also includes an isolated DNA which hybridizes under high-stringency conditions to any one of the sequences shown as SEQ ID NOs: 3-12, including but not limited to an isolated DNA which has a sequence identical to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 3-12.
  • isolated DNA denotes a DNA that is free of the genes which, in the naturally-occurring genome of the organism from which the DNA of the invention is derived, flank the candidate tumor suppressor gene that hybridizes to the sequence shown in the applicable SEQ ID NO.
  • the term therefore includes, for example, a cDNA encoding the applicable candidate tumor suppressor gene product; a recombinant DNA which is incorporated into a vector, into an autonomously replicating plasmid or virus, or into the genomic DNA of a prokaryote or eukaryote; or a genomic DNA fragment produced by PCR or restriction endonuclease treatment. It also includes a recombinant DNA which is part of a hybrid gene encoding additional polypeptide sequence.
  • the Figure illustrates the DNA sequence of a cDNA encoding human connexin 26 (Cx26) , and the amino acid sequence deduced therefrom.
  • Candidate class I and class II tumor suppressor genes are generally described above. These candidate tumor suppressor genes can be identified as described by
  • the subtractive hybridization method described below may be used.
  • the subtractive hybridization method is particularly advantageous in screening for candidate tumor suppressor genes since it provides a positive selection procedure.
  • the medium, DFCI-1, described by Band and Sager, 86 Proc. Natl . Acad. Sci . , USA 1249, 1989 was used because of its ability to support similar growth of both normal and tumor-derived human mammary epithelial cells.
  • cDNA rather than genomic DNA was used for screening since the cDNAs are smaller and easier to manipulate than their genomic counterparts, and are present in multiple copies. Recovery of such cDNAs allows their use as probes to isolate the equivalent genomic DNA.
  • the cDNA can be expressed in a expression vector to produce the tumor suppressor gene product, and thus allow production of antibodies to that product for use in the methods described herein.
  • the cDNA may be genetically manipulated so that it encodes only a chosen portion of the full-length gene product, resulting in expression of a defined oligopeptide fragment of the tumor suppressor gene product that may be used to generate antibodies useful for detecting the full-length gene product.
  • the oligopeptides may be chemically synthesized. Design and production of such defined fragments may be accomplished by standard methods.
  • the normal cells used in the methods described herein were derived from a strain 76N established from discarded reduction mammoplasty tissue as described by Band and Sager, supra. These cells are diploid and senesce after 15-20 passages.
  • the tumor cells were derived from an aneuploid cell line established from a pleural effusion as described by Band et al.
  • any cells used for subtractive hybridization can be derived from any individuals, and substituted as described below.
  • Primary .tumor cells or metastatic cells can be used.
  • both parental cell populations were grown in DFCI-1 medium at similar population doubling times of about 30 hours. These cells were harvested at 70% confluency directly into 4M guanidium isothiocyanate. 0.5M sodium citrate, and 0.1M ⁇ -mercaptoethanol for RNA preparation.
  • the cDNA was synthesized using Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase from Bethesda Research Laboratories with an oligodeoxynucleotide oligo(dT) 12 _ 18 as a primer.
  • the 32 P pre-labeled SS cDNA from 76N cells was hybridized with a 10-fold excess of tumor poly(A) + mRNA from 21MT-2 cells (Band et al.. Cancer Research 1990).
  • FN fibronectin
  • 500 ng fibronectin (FN) mRNA, prepared by in vitro transcription was added to subtract out FN cDNA, which is present at high abundance in the mRNA of the normal cells.
  • the hybridization reaction mixture was loaded onto a hydroxylapatite column maintained at 60°C and eluted with 0.1M phosphate buffer (pH 6.8). After rerunning the effluent through the column three times, the effluent was collected and rehybridized as above (2nd subtraction) without added FN mRNA. The final effluent was concentrated to 100 ⁇ l, a sample was removed for quantitation, and the rest frozen for subsequent screening.
  • cDNA from 76N poly(A) + RNA was used to produce a recombinant library in the phagemid lambda Zap II (Stratagene Corp., La Jolla, CA) by procedures recommended by the vender.
  • the 76N library was screened by differential hybridization using the 32 P random-primer labelled subtracted cDNA probe against the tumor specific cDNA. After a secondary screening the differentially expressed clones were isolated, and the inserts were amplified by PCR from phage using T3 and T7 sequences as primers. After gel electrophoresis, the PCR products were purified by phenol/chloroform extraction from agarose and 32 P random-primer labelled for RNA northern analysis.
  • RNA (20ug) was heat denatured at 68°C for 15-20 min. followed by electrophoresis in 1.2% agarose- formaldehyde gels and transferred to nylon membranes
  • clones were recovered. After two rounds of screening, seven different clones showed unique or highly preferential expression in normal cells compared to tumor cells. The clones were identified by northern hybridization using standard techniques. The size range of mRNAs varied from 0.6 kb to almost 5 kb. These clones include genes expressed at rare to high abundance in mRNAs.
  • TTCCAG consensus splice accepter signal
  • This signal sequence is not present in the 5' region of the rat Cx26 sequence, which does not produce two transcripts.
  • the 3' untranslated regions contains a possible polyadenylation signal sequence AATAAA positioned 87 nucleotides upstream from the poly(A) + tail.
  • ATTTA putative instability sequence
  • the overall nucleotide homology between human and rat Cx26 is 86.2% within the open reading frame.
  • the amino acid sequence deduced from the human cDNA is 92.5% identical to rat Cx26.
  • the 5' and 3• untranslated regions show no significant similarity between human and rat.
  • Connexins are structural proteins that surround the channels of which gap junctions are composed; the channels in turn provide direct communication between adjacent cells.
  • Gap junctions have been postulated to play a growth regulatory role, on the basis of numerous correlations between growth control and junctional communication. Of these, one of the earliest and still the most striking is Stoker's experiment in which polyoma-transformed BHK cells were inhibited from colony formation by contact (later shown to be junctional communication) with a monolayer of normal BHK cells. Recent experiments by Loewenstein and coworkers and others have correlated post-translational modulation of junctional communication with growth inhibition. Our results, in contrast, suggest transcriptional regulation. This opens the possibility for experimental and clinical modulation at the level of transcription as described below.
  • a clone termed clone 2-3 encodes glutathione-S- transferase __i , identified by sequence comparison with known genes in GENBANK.
  • the DNA sequence for glutathione-S-transferase pi is provided by Moscow et al., 49 Cancer Research 1422, 1989.
  • This protein is a well-characterized enzyme, present in many cell types, that has detoxifying activity against many lipophilic toxic agents including carcinogens. We have found that it is down-regulated in a number of mammary tumor-derived cell lines, both primary and metastatic, but strongly expressed in normal and immortalized mammary epithelial cells grown in culture.
  • a clone originally termed clone 19, and now referred to as CaN19 represents a gene expressed in normal mammary epithelial cell strains but not in tumor- derived cell lines.
  • the DNA sequence (and corresponding amino acid sequence, or "gene product") of CaN19 is shown as SEQ ID NO: 1 below. Sequence comparisons have shown that CaN19 is a member of the S100 gene family, encoding small Ca " * " * " binding proteins (about 10 kD) with diverse functions. These proteins have two "EF hands", domains where Ca 2+ is bound, in contrast to calmodulin proteins which have four.
  • the S100 beta protein is a major constituent of glial cells, whereas related proteins are expressed in differentiated but not in undifferentiated PC 12 (rat pheochromocytoma) cells.
  • CaN19 is also related in structure to the small regulatory subunit of calpactin, pll.
  • MRP8 and MRP14 are also related and are S100 proteins expressed by macrophages during chronic inflammation. Calabretta et al., 261 J. Biol . Chem. 12628, 1986.
  • Another related protein, calcyclin has been found in serum-induced cycling cells, but not in quiescent cells, and in leukocytes from CML patients.
  • a related mouse protein is also cell cycle induced.
  • calcyclin expression might be cancer related is particularly interesting in view of our evidence that CaN19 is not expressed in breast tumor cells. CaN19 appears to be negatively regulated in tumors, in contrast to calcyclin. Other related proteins are described by Kligman and Hilt 13 TIBS 437, 1988.
  • genes which are useful in the present invention include NB-1 described by Yaswen et al., supra: keratin 5 as described by Trask et al. , supra. the DNA sequence of which is published in 8 Molecular Cell Biology 486, 1988; and small proline-rich protein (spr- 1) , the sequence of which is published in 18 Nucl . Acid Res. 4401-4407, 1990.
  • the latter gene is known to be expressed at higher levels following treatment with ultraviolet radiation, suggesting that the protein may have a DNA repair function.
  • spr-1 is a very promising gene for further investigation.
  • a single strand phagemid cDNA library from normal cell polyA + mRNA is hybridized with excess biotinylated tumor polyA + mRNA, and the resulting double stranded sequences are removed by binding to streptavidin.
  • the remaining single-stranded phagemid cDNAs are converted to double-stranded form and used to transform bacterial host cells.
  • the resulting subtracted cDNA library is differentially screened with total cDNA from normal and tumor cells. This method produced some 20 additional cloned cDNAs, including some which, upon partial sequencing, proved to have been previously identified by others, and some which appear to be novel.
  • genes which were found by this method to be candidate tumor suppressor genes potentially useful in the methods of the invention include genes encoding human amphiregulin (the full sequence of which can be found in GENBANK at locus HUMARXC, Accession #M30704) ; thymosin beta-4 (locus HUMTHYB4, Accession #M17733) ; gamma actin (locus HUMACTCGR, Accession ##X04098, K00791, M24241) ; calpactin light chain (pll) (locus HUMCALPAIL, Accession #M81457) ; HBpl7 (locus HUMHEPBP, Accession #M60047) , myosin regulatory light chain (locus HUMMRLCM, Accession #X54304) ; v-fos transformation effector protein (locus HUMFTE1A, Accession #M84711) ; and the mitochondrial genome-encoded proteins URF4 (locus HUMMTHS)
  • genes which, on the basis of the partial DNA sequences set forth as SEQ ID NOs: 3-12, respectively, appear to be novel sequences not previously entered into GENBANK.
  • the portion of the cDNAs so sequenced represents part of the coding region and/or part of the 3• untranslated region of each cDNA.
  • Still other genes can be identified as described above using northern analysis of isolated clones and determining whether tumor cell expression of the gene is reduced by at least 2/3 compared to normal cells.
  • genes described herein have been found to be expressed at a low but detectible level in at least some tumor cells (which is taken to be an indication that the coding sequence is intact in these cells) , and thus appear to be candidate class II rather than class I tumor suppressor genes in these tumors.
  • Another indication that a particular candidate tumor suppressor gene falls within class II in a particular tumor is a normal-appearing Southern blot of the tumor's genomic DNA when probed with the tumor suppressor gene cDNA.
  • Candidate class I tumor suppressor genes in which the coding sequence of the gene is altered in a way to yield no biologically active gene product or an altered gene product, could also be detected by the differential hybridization screening method of the invention if the genetic alterations are such that (1) no detectable mRNA is transcribed from the mutant gene, or (2) the mRNA transcribed from the gene is sufficiently different from wild type that it cannot hybridize to the hybridization probe utilized, or (3) the mRNA has an altered sequence resulting in a different location on a Northern gel than the normal mRNA, or (4) the mRNA is hydrolyzed by the cell rapidly after transcription.
  • the alternative method of detection disclosed herein in which an antibody to the wild type candidate tumor suppressor gene product is used to detect gene expression in cell samples, would also be useful for identifying candidate Class I tumor suppressor genes, and for detecting their expression in a given cell sample, if the mutations in the coding sequence of the gene are such that (1) no stable gene product is expressed by the mutant gene, or (2) the gene product that is expressed is so altered that the antibody utilized cannot bind to it.
  • Class II genes are of particular interest because the suppressor gene has not been lost, and may therefore be available for up-regulation by drugs or other treatment. Restoration of suppressor gene function by regulatory intervention offers new opportunities in the design of novel drugs for cancer therapy. Both Class I and Class II genes are immediately valuable for early diagnosis and prognosis, which are especially pressing needs in breast cancer where the course of the disease is so unpredictable. Some genes expressed preferentially in normal cells may not have tumor suppressor functions. They are nonetheless useful as diagnostic markers.
  • the candidate suppressor genes described herein represent just the "tip of the iceberg" with respect to loss-of-function genes that may be useful in diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy.
  • Genes with numerous and diverse functions are anticipated to participate in protecting the long-lived human species from cancer. They include DNA repair genes that maintain genomic integrity and stability, genes that promote irreversible steps in differentiation, and genes that regulate proliferation. Cancer starts at the cellular level, but becomes a systemic disease, and at that point, systemic mechanisms of protection play important roles. These include cell- cell communication by gap junctions, paracrine regulation by growth factors and cytokines, protection by the immune system, control of angiogenesis, and the regulation of tumor invasion. For each of these, specific genes encode key proteins whose loss may facilitate neoplasia.
  • the experimental system described herein allows early recognition of aberrant tumor suppressor and diagnostic genes.
  • both candidate class I and candidate class II tumor suppressor genes can be used for diagnosis of cancer. All of those genes described above, and other genes identified in a similar manner, are potentially useful for diagnosis of cancerous conditions. For example, they are particularly useful for identification of cancerous cells in solid tumors, such as in breast cancer.
  • a portion of that lump may be removed and analyzed by northern analysis or by in situ hybridization using the cloned gene (or antibodies to the gene product produced by standard techniques) to determine whether the level of expression of the candidate tumor suppressor gene is normal or at a reduced level. If it is at a reduced level, this will be indicative that the cells in that lump are cancerous or pre-cancerous and appropriate steps may be taken to either remove or treat those cells in vivo.
  • routine diagnosis can be obtained in a manner similar to a papsmear in which cells are taken from a human and tested by hybridization with any one or more of the above candidate tumor suppressor genes or by immune complex formation with antibodies to the gene products. Such testing will allow earlier diagnosis of cancerous conditions than has previously been possible.
  • the northern analysis and in situ hybridization or immune complex formation can be carried out by any of a number of standard techniques.
  • the DNA of a candidate tumor suppressor gene or its equivalent cDNA may be used as a probe for RNA transcribed from those genes in cells to be tested.
  • DNA which hybridizes to the RNA produced by such genes can also be used.
  • the cDNA or its equivalent may be placed in expression vectors to cause production of candidate tumor suppressor gene products which may be purified and used to isolate polyclonal or monoclonal antibodies to those candidate tumor suppressor gene products.
  • candidate tumor suppressor gene products which may be purified and used to isolate polyclonal or monoclonal antibodies to those candidate tumor suppressor gene products.
  • Those particular antibodies which are specific for (i.e., form readily detectible immune complexes with) the candidate tumor suppressor gene product can be identified by standard procedures. Generally, it is preferred that a specific monoclonal antibody be identified so that a large amount of that antibody can be readily produced and used in diagnostic procedures.
  • Immunoprecipitation by antibodies of candidate tumor suppressor gene products is performed by standard methodology such as western blotting.
  • diagnostic methods can be adapted for use as a way to monitor changes in the level of expression of a given candidate tumor suppressor gene in a given patient over time. This would be useful, for example, as a routine measure for monitoring for the presence of cancer in apparently healthy subjects, much as pap smears and mammograms are used.
  • This technique relies upon the normal expression of a given candidate tumor suppressor gene product in a readily obtainable biological fluid such as blood, urine, or saliva.
  • a baseline normal level of expression of the gene product would be established by analyzing samples taken from the subject over the years, or by comparison with standards obtained from other, disease-free individuals. A drop in the amount of the gene product present in a given sample would be an indication of the presence of tumor cells in the subject.
  • the method could be adapted to serve as a means for following the clinical progression of a tumor. wherein increases or decreases in the level of the gene product in the analyzed sample would be indicative of decreasing or increasing tumor load, respectively.
  • the above-described method for assaying a biological fluid will work reliably only if the candidate tumor suppressor gene product is normally a secreted protein. Whether or not a given gene product is secreted can be determined empirically (e.g., by using an antibody specific for the gene product) , or may be predicted by the presence of a secretion signal sequence in the cDNA (e.g., as taught by Von Heijne, 133 Eur. J. Biochem. 17- 21, 1983) in accordance with standard methods.
  • candidate class II tumor suppressor genes can be used to identify useful drugs for treatment of cancers. This may be accomplished by standard procedures by culturing cells which include tumor suppressor genes (which are either expressed at normal or subnormal levels) and treating those cells with a variety of drugs to determine which drugs increase the level of expression of the candidate tumor suppressor gene product within those cells. It is preferred that a cancerous cell be used in such a procedure since the increased level of expression of the candidate tumor suppressor gene product will be more readily detected in such a cell, and the drug may work only on genes the expression of which is lower than normal. Identification of the increase in tumor suppressor gene expression can be analyzed by standard northern or in situ analysis or by antibody testing.
  • the concomitant increase in a function of that gene may be detected by standard techniques. Two examples illustrating such a procedure are given below. In these examples, phorbol myristate acetate (PMA) is found to increase expression of the Cx26 tumor suppressor gene in tumor cells but not in normal cells, while azadeoxycytidine increases the level of expression of the CaN19 candidate tumor suppressor gene in tumor cells but not in normal cells.
  • PMA phorbol myristate acetate
  • the appropriate drug may be administered to humans who are identified as containing cells having a reduced level of the tumor suppressor gene product. This may be accomplished either by direct administration of the drug at the tumor site or by systemic treatment with the drug.
  • actinomycin D, cyclohexi ide, A23187, or okadaic acid were without noticeable effect on the level of expression of CaN19 mRNA in tumor cells.
  • exposure of mammary tumor cells to azadeoxycytidine induced the expression of CaN19-specific RNA.
  • the level of expression of CaN19 in normal cells was not affected by azadeoxycytidine treatment.
  • tumor suppressor genes of both class I and class II may be employed in gene therapy methods in order to increase the amount of the expression products of such genes in cancer cells.
  • gene therapy is particularly appropriate for use in cells, both cancerous and precancerous, in which the level of a particular tumor suppressor gene product is diminished compared to normal cells, it may also be useful to increase the level of expression of a given tumor suppressor gene even in those tumor cells in which the gene is expressed at a "normal" but perhaps not optimal level.
  • 21MT-2 cells a line of cultured breast tumor cells (developed in this laboratory) in which the level of Cx26 mRNA is undetectible, were transfected with a plasmid construct containing the full-length cDNA corresponding to Cx26 linked to appropriate expression control elements. Unlike the untransfected cells, the transfectants expressed significant amounts of Cx26 protein. Furthermore, the transfected cells were found to assemble the Cx26 protein into gap junctions that functioned in cell-cell communication in the same manner as described for normal mammary epithelial cells.
  • a virus or plasmid containing a copy of such a tumor suppressor gene linked to expression control elements and capable of replicating inside the tumor cells would then be injected into the patient, either locally at the site of the tumor or systemically (in order to reach any tumor cells that may have metastasized to other sites) . If the transfected gene is not permanently incorporated into the genome of each of the targeted tumor cells, the treatment may have to be repeated periodically.
  • ACGGTCATCC TTAACCAAGG CACTTCTTAA GCAGAAAATA TTGTTGAGGT TACCTTTGCT 180
  • GCTAAAGATC CAATCTTCTA ACGCCACAAC AGCATAGCAA ATCCTAGGAT AATTCACCTC 240
  • GGATTCTCAC AATAGCCGAC ATCAGAATTT GTGTTGAAGG AACTTGTCTC TTCATCTAAT 120
  • TTCGAATCCA TATTTCAAGC CTGGTAGAAT TGGCTTTTCT AGCAGAACCT TTCCAAAAGT 240 TTTATATTGA GATTCATAAC AACACCAAGA ATTGATTTTG TAGCCAACAT TCATTCAATC 300
  • GAGAGACTCC GCTGGACATT GCCAAGCGCC TCAAGCACGA GCACTGTGAG GAGCTGCTGA 960
  • CTTCGCGTGA CATCTACCAA TCCCCTGACC CCCACGCCGC CCCCACCCGT TGCCAAGACG 1500
  • CTCTCTGCAA CGGAAGCTCT GGGTCCTCTG TCCAATGCTA TGGTCCTGCA GCCCCCTGCA 1740

Abstract

A method for determining the presence of cancerous cells in a tissue from a patient, which method includes the steps of providing either (a) a nucleic acid probe including a nucleotide sequence at least 8 nucleotides in length which is identical to a portion or all of the coding sequence of a candidate tumor suppressor gene, or (b) an antibody specific for a candidate tumor suppressor gene product; obtaining from a patient a first tissue sample potentially including cancerous cells; providing a second tissue sample, substantially all of the cells of which are non-cancerous; and comparing, by use of either the probe or the antibody, the levels of expression of the candidate tumor suppressor gene in the first and second tissue sample, wherein an amount of hybridization or immune complex formation, as the case may be, in the first tissue sample less than one third that in the second tissue sample indicates the presence of cancerous cells in the first tissue sample; methods of treating a cancerous cell by increasing the level of expression of a candidate tumor suppression gene in the cell; novel candidate tumor suppressor genes; and their use in diagnosis and therapy.

Description

CANCER DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY Background of the Invention This invention relates to diagnosis and treatment of cancers, particularly, solid tumors. Sager, 246 Science 1406, 1989, discusses tumor suppressor genes. The loss of tumor suppressor genes, or their inactivation, is oncogenic. That is, the loss of DNA encoding a tumor suppressor gene product, or the lowering of expression of a tumor suppressor gene, gives rise to a cancerous condition. Sager generally describes the identification of candidate tumor suppressor genes. In particular, Sager describes the process of subtractive hybridization as a general method for recovering genes that are expressed in normal cells but not in closely related tumor cells. Sager further describes the isolation of three clones by subtractive hybridization of normal and cancerous mammary cells. The genes corresponding to these clones are expressed by all normal mammary epithelial cells, but not by any primary mammary tumors or mammary tumor cell lines. One such gene encodes keratin 5, which is said to be a valuable marker to distinguish normal and primary tumor cells in culture. Also identified is a gene encoding fibronectin, and a third gene identified as NB-1. Tumor suppressor genes are proposed to play a key role in cancer protection, and it is suggested that tumor suppressor genes provide a vast untapped resource for anti-cancer therapy.
Decreased DNA methylation is a consistent feature of tumorigenesis (Jones et al.. Adv. Cancer Res . 54.:1- 23, 1990) but local sites of hypermethylation have also been found in tumor cells (Jones et al.. Adv. Cancer Res . 54.U-23, 1990; Baylin et al.. Blood 10 : 412-411 , 1987). Elevated expression of the DNA methyltransferase gene has recently been described in progressive stages of colon cancer (El-Deiry et al., Proc. Natl . Acad. Sci . USA 88.:3470-3474, 1991), suggesting a general mechanism for hypermethylation, but not explaining the specificity seen on particular genes.
Summary of the Invention
This invention features novel methods for identifying cancerous cells present in a human, particularly in solid tumors. The invention also features methods for identifying drugs useful for treatment of such cancer cells, and for treatment of the cancerous condition. Unlike prior methods, the invention provides a means for identifying cancer cells at an early stage of development, such that premalignant cells can be identified prior to their spreading throughout the human body. This allows early detection of potentially cancerous conditions, and treatment of those cancerous conditions prior to spread of the cancerous cells throughout the body, or prior to development of an irreversible cancerous condition. Tumor suppressor genes have been divided into two general types, termed class I and class II. Class I tumor suppressor genes are said to be those in which a genetic alteration (e.g., the deletion, addition or substitution of one or more nucleotides) in the coding sequence of the gene has been found to contribute to tumor cell development. In contrast, class II tumor suppressor genes are identified as those which have a lower level of expression in a cancer or precancer cell compared to a normal cell, which decreased level of expression is due to alteration in the regulation of expression of that gene, rather than to the loss of genetic information in the coding sequence of the gene. A diagnostic test based upon levels of expression of either a class I or a class II gene, or of another marker gene that is identified as a candidate tumor suppressor gene by one of the differential screening methods described below, but which does not turn out to have tumor suppressor activity, is useful for detecting the presence of cancerous or pre-cancerous cells in a tissue sample from a patient. In addition, a patient with a cancer characterized by a lower-than-normal level of expression of one or more tumor suppressor genes can be treated (e.g., with a drug or radiation, or by transforming one or more of the tumor suppressor genes into the cancerous cells) to induce a higher level of expression of such gene(s) in the cancerous cells, thus halting or reversing the growth of the cancer.
Thus, in a first aspect the invention features a method for identifying a cancer cell in a human by providing nucleic acid from a candidate tumor suppressor gene which specifically hybridizes to RNA expressed from such a gene in a cancer cell at a level less than one third the level of hybridization with the equivalent RNA expressed from that gene in a normal cell.
Alternatively, the method involves providing an antibody to the gene product of such a candidate tumor suppressor gene, which antibody specifically reacts (in the sense of an antibody-antigen reaction to form an immune complex) with the polypeptide expressed from the candidate tumor suppressor gene in a cancer cell, at a level less than one-third the level of reaction (i.e., binding) with the equivalent gene product expressed from that gene in a normal cell. The method further features obtaining from the human a tissue sample which potentially includes the cancer cell to be detected, and contacting this sample with either (1) the nucleic acid probe, under conditions which would permit hybridization with the mRNA transcribed from the gene, or (2) the antibody, under conditions appropriate for immune complex formation between the antibody and its antigen. Finally, the method involves determining the amount of hybridization of the nucleic acid or the amount of binding of the antibody with the tissue sample, compared to the amount of hybridization of that nucleic acid or binding of that antibody with a normal tissue sample which includes only normal cells. An amount of hybridization or immune complex formation with the tissue sample less than one third the amount of hybridization or immune complex formation with the normal tissue sample is indicative of the presence of cancerous or pre-cancerous cells in the tissue sample.
The method of using a nucleic acid probe to determine the presence of cancerous cells in a tissue from a patient includes the steps of: providing a nucleic acid probe (i.e., a single- stranded nucleic acid such as DNA, or a double stranded nucleic acid which is made single-stranded prior to doing the hybridization step) comprising a nucleotide sequence at least 8 nucleotides in length (preferably at least 15 nucleotides, and more preferably at least 40 nucleotides, and up to all or nearly all of the coding sequence) which is identical to a portion of either strand of the coding sequence of a candidate tumor suppressor gene; obtaining from a patient a first tissue sample potentially comprising cancerous cells; providing a second tissue sample containing cells substantially all of which are non-cancerous; contacting the nucleic acid probe under high- stringency hybridizing conditions with RNA of each of said first and second tissue samples (e.g., in a northern blot or in situ hybridization assay) ; and comparing (a) the amount of hybridization of the probe with RNA of the first tissue sample, with (b) the amount of hybridization of the probe with RNA of the second tissue sample, wherein an amount of hybridization with the RNA of the first tissue sample less than one- third the amount of hybridization with the RNA of the second tissue sample indicates the presence of cancerous cells in the first tissue sample.
Alternatively, the diagnostic assay may be carried out with antibodies to the candidate tumor suppressor gene product, instead of a nucleic acid probe. Such an assay would include the following steps: providing an antibody specific for the gene product of a candidate tumor suppressor gene, the gene product being present in cancerous tissue of a given tissue type (e.g., mammary, ovarian, bladder or prostate epithelium) at a level less than one third the level of the gene product in noncancerous tissue of the same tissue type; obtaining from a patient a first sample of tissue of the given tissue type, which sample potentially includes cancerous cells; providing a second sample of tissue of the same tissue type (which may be from the same patient or from a normal control, e.g. another individual or cultured cells) , this second sample containing normal cells and essentially no cancerous cells; contacting the antibody with protein (which may be partially purified, in lysed but unfractionated cells, or in situ) of the first and second samples under conditions permitting immunocomplex formation between the antibody and any tumor suppressor gene product present in the samples; and comparing (a) the amount of immunocomplex formation in the first sample, with (b) the amount of immunocomplex formation in the second sample, wherein an amount of immunocomplex formation in the first sample less than one third (preferably less than one fourth, and more preferably less than one tenth) the amount of immunocomplex formation in the second sample indicates the presence of cancerous cells in the first sample of tissue.
In still another variation on the diagnostic assay of the invention, the level of a candidate tumor suppressor gene product in a biological fluid (e.g., blood or urine) of a person may be determined as a way of monitoring the level of expression of the gene in cells of that person. Such a method would include the steps of obtaining a sample of a biological fluid from the person, contacting the sample (or proteins from the sample) with an antibody specific for a candidate tumor suppressor gene product, and determining the amount of immune complex formation by the antibody, with the amount of immune complex formation being indicative of the level of the gene product in the sample. This determination is particularly instructive when compared to the amount of immune complex formation by the same antibody in a control sample taken from a normal individual or cancer patient, or in one or more samples previously or subsequently obtained from the same person.
By a candidate tumor suppressor gene is meant those genes which are found to be expressed to a significantly higher degree in normal cells than in cancerous or precancerous cells, as generally discussed above. Such a candidate tumor suppressor gene is generally identified by northern analysis or its equivalent (for example, by in situ hybridization) as a gene whose expression is lower in a cancer cell compared to a normal cell. If the gene bears a disabling mutation in its coding sequence, then it is termed a "candidate class I tumor suppressor gene". If the coding sequence of the gene is intact, inasmuch as the DNA forming the exons of that gene is not significantly altered, a southern analysis of such a gene in a cancer cell does not reveal any significant difference in the tumor suppressor coding sequence in a cancer cell compared to a normal cell. In such genes, termed "candidate class II tumor suppressor genes", it is the regulatory mechanism of the gene that is altered in a cancerous cell compared to a normal cell.
Once the candidate class I or class II tumor suppressor gene is demonstrated to play a role in suppressing formation of tumors in vivo or transformation of cells in vitro, it may be referred to as a bona fide "class I tumor suppressor gene" or "class II tumor suppressor gene", rather than as a "candidate". Such class II genes are useful in certain of the treatment methods of the invention, because they retain a viable coding sequence which can potentially be switched on by the appropriate treatment, and such switching on will result in increased tumor suppressing activity within the treated cell. Both class I and class II genes can be transformed into cancer cells or pre-cancerous cells in order to increase their level of expression in such cells, and thus slow or prevent neoplastic growth.
By "hybridizing conditions" is meant conditions under which the nucleic acid used as a probe in the method is able to specifically hybridize with RNA expressed from a candidate tumor suppressor gene without significantly hybridizing to any other RNA expressed from either normal or cancerous human cells (e.g., conditions of high stringency, as described, for example, in Sambrook et al.. Molecular Cloning, a laboratory manual, 2nd Ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratories, Cold Spring
Harbor, NY, 1989) . In this way, hybridization of the RNA specifically indicates the presence or absence of a candidate tumor suppressor gene transcript (usually mRNA) . Similarly, reaction of the antibody with the candidate tumor suppressor gene product (protein) is performed under normal antibody-antigen reaction conditions which allow specific recognition of the candidate tumor suppressor gene product by antibody, with little or no cross-reaction of the antibody with other proteins normally present in the cancerous or normal cells. In this way, measurement of the amount of antigen-antibody immune complex formed in the sample is indicative of the amount of candidate tumor suppressor gene product present in that sample. In preferred embodiments, the candidate tumor suppressor gene is a gene encoding keratin 5, NB-1 gene product, fibronectin, connexin 26, glutathione-S- transferase pi, CaN19 protein (formerly called clone 19 gene product) , small proline-rich (spr-1) protein, amphireguiin, thymosin beta-4, gamma actin, calpactin light chain (pll) , HBpl7, myosin regulatory light chain, V-Fos transformation effector protein, or one of the following mitochondrial genome-encoded proteins: URF4, Co III, and ATPaseδ. The candidate tumor suppressor gene may alternatively be one of the newly-identified genes herein referred to as U1-U10, partial sequences of which are given as SEQ ID NOs: 3-12. These genes are specifically described in detail below.
In other preferred embodiments, the amount of hybridization of the nucleic acid with RNA from precancerous or cancerous cells in the human is less than one third the level detected with a normal cell, more preferably less than one tenth the level, or even more preferably is undetectable. In a second aspect, the invention features a method for identifying a drug useful for treatment of a cancer cell. The method includes the steps of identifying a candidate class II tumor suppressor gene, expression of which is suppressed [i.e., significantly diminished (e.g., by two thirds or more)] in a given type of cancerous cell from a given type of tissue, compared to a normal cell in the same type of tissue; providing a first and a second sample of that given type of cancerous cell; treating the second sample with a candidate drug; and determining the level of expression of the gene in the second sample after treatment with the candidate drug, wherein a drug which increases the level of expression of the gene in the second sample, compared to the level of expression of the gene in the untreated first sample, is potentially useful for treatment of the given type of cancer cell, and perhaps for other types of cancer cells, as well.
Generally, the candidate class II tumor suppressor gene and the level of expression of that gene are identified or determined as discussed herein. Potentially useful drugs may be chosen from, for example, those which alter signal transduction pathways, or which facilitate demethylation of methylated residues on DNA. Such drugs may increase tumor suppressor gene expression by, for example, increasing tumor suppressor gene messenger RNA synthesis, or mRNA processing, or protein synthesis, or by decreasing RNA degradation or protein degradation.
In a related aspect, the invention features methods for treating a patient who has cancer. One such method involves the steps of identifying, in a human, a cell having a low level of expression of a candidate tumor suppressor gene compared to a normal cell, and treating that cell with a drug identified as one which raises the level of expression of that candidate tumor suppressor gene in the cell. Stated another way, the method of treatment includes the steps of identifying a patient with a cancer cell characterized by a low level of expression of a candidate tumor suppressor gene, compared to the level of expression of such gene in a normal cell of the same tissue type as the cancer cell; and either treating the cancer cell with a compound which raises the level of expression of the gene in the cancer cell, or introducing into the cancer cell a nucleic acid encoding the gene. Preferably, the nucleic acid would include an expression control element permitting expression of the gene in the cancer cell. Treating patients with such drugs or gene therapy provides a means to control or eliminate their cancers.
The invention also includes an isolated DNA which hybridizes under high-stringency conditions to any one of the sequences shown as SEQ ID NOs: 3-12, including but not limited to an isolated DNA which has a sequence identical to any one of SEQ ID NOs: 3-12. The term "isolated DNA" denotes a DNA that is free of the genes which, in the naturally-occurring genome of the organism from which the DNA of the invention is derived, flank the candidate tumor suppressor gene that hybridizes to the sequence shown in the applicable SEQ ID NO. The term therefore includes, for example, a cDNA encoding the applicable candidate tumor suppressor gene product; a recombinant DNA which is incorporated into a vector, into an autonomously replicating plasmid or virus, or into the genomic DNA of a prokaryote or eukaryote; or a genomic DNA fragment produced by PCR or restriction endonuclease treatment. It also includes a recombinant DNA which is part of a hybrid gene encoding additional polypeptide sequence.
Other features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following description of the preferred embodiments thereof, and from the claims. Detailed Description The drawing is first briefly described. Drawing
The Figure illustrates the DNA sequence of a cDNA encoding human connexin 26 (Cx26) , and the amino acid sequence deduced therefrom.
Candidate Tumor Suppressor Genes
Candidate class I and class II tumor suppressor genes are generally described above. These candidate tumor suppressor genes can be identified as described by
Sager, supra. or as described by Trask et al., 87 Proc.
Natl . Acad. Sci . USA 2319, 1990; Yaswen et al., 87 Proc.
Natl . Acad. Sci . USA 7360, 1990; and Lee et al., 88 Proc.
Natl . Acad. Sci . USA 2825, 1991, wherein specific subtractive hybridization methods are provided. All of these publications are herein incorporated by reference.
In addition, the subtractive hybridization method described below may be used. The subtractive hybridization method is particularly advantageous in screening for candidate tumor suppressor genes since it provides a positive selection procedure.
The following is a specific example of such a subtractive hybridization procedure used to screen for candidate tumor suppressor genes involved in breast cancer. This example is not limiting in the invention and those of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that many variations to this method can be used with equivalent efficacy in identifying useful candidate tumor suppressor genes.
Identification and Isolation of Candidate Genes
In this example the medium, DFCI-1, described by Band and Sager, 86 Proc. Natl . Acad. Sci . , USA 1249, 1989 was used because of its ability to support similar growth of both normal and tumor-derived human mammary epithelial cells. cDNA rather than genomic DNA was used for screening since the cDNAs are smaller and easier to manipulate than their genomic counterparts, and are present in multiple copies. Recovery of such cDNAs allows their use as probes to isolate the equivalent genomic DNA. Further, the cDNA can be expressed in a expression vector to produce the tumor suppressor gene product, and thus allow production of antibodies to that product for use in the methods described herein. The cDNA may be genetically manipulated so that it encodes only a chosen portion of the full-length gene product, resulting in expression of a defined oligopeptide fragment of the tumor suppressor gene product that may be used to generate antibodies useful for detecting the full-length gene product. Alternatively, the oligopeptides may be chemically synthesized. Design and production of such defined fragments may be accomplished by standard methods. The normal cells used in the methods described herein were derived from a strain 76N established from discarded reduction mammoplasty tissue as described by Band and Sager, supra. These cells are diploid and senesce after 15-20 passages. The tumor cells were derived from an aneuploid cell line established from a pleural effusion as described by Band et al. , 1 Genes, Chromosomes, and Cancer 48, 1989 and Band et al., 50 Cancer Research 7351, 1990. However, any cells used for subtractive hybridization can be derived from any individuals, and substituted as described below. Primary .tumor cells or metastatic cells can be used. In this example, both parental cell populations were grown in DFCI-1 medium at similar population doubling times of about 30 hours. These cells were harvested at 70% confluency directly into 4M guanidium isothiocyanate. 0.5M sodium citrate, and 0.1M β-mercaptoethanol for RNA preparation. Total RNA was extracted from the cells by lysis in the guanidium isothiocyanate mixture, and poly(A)+RNA purified by two cycles of affinity chromatography on oligo(dT) cellulose by standard technique. The cDNA was synthesized using Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase from Bethesda Research Laboratories with an oligodeoxynucleotide oligo(dT)12_18 as a primer. The 32P pre-labeled SS cDNA from 76N cells was hybridized with a 10-fold excess of tumor poly(A)+ mRNA from 21MT-2 cells (Band et al.. Cancer Research 1990). 500 ng fibronectin (FN) mRNA, prepared by in vitro transcription was added to subtract out FN cDNA, which is present at high abundance in the mRNA of the normal cells. The hybridization reaction mixture was loaded onto a hydroxylapatite column maintained at 60°C and eluted with 0.1M phosphate buffer (pH 6.8). After rerunning the effluent through the column three times, the effluent was collected and rehybridized as above (2nd subtraction) without added FN mRNA. The final effluent was concentrated to 100 μl, a sample was removed for quantitation, and the rest frozen for subsequent screening. cDNA from 76N poly(A)+ RNA was used to produce a recombinant library in the phagemid lambda Zap II (Stratagene Corp., La Jolla, CA) by procedures recommended by the vender. The 76N library was screened by differential hybridization using the 32P random-primer labelled subtracted cDNA probe against the tumor specific cDNA. After a secondary screening the differentially expressed clones were isolated, and the inserts were amplified by PCR from phage using T3 and T7 sequences as primers. After gel electrophoresis, the PCR products were purified by phenol/chloroform extraction from agarose and 32P random-primer labelled for RNA northern analysis.
Total RNA (20ug) was heat denatured at 68°C for 15-20 min. followed by electrophoresis in 1.2% agarose- formaldehyde gels and transferred to nylon membranes
(Zeta-probe, BioRad) ; prehybridization and hybridization were performed as described by Haskill et al., 87 Proc. Natl . Acad. Sci, USA 7732, 1990. Sequencing of cloned DNA was performed either directly or on exonuclease III- deleted derivatives. These deletion derivatives were generated using a Promega Erase-a-Base kit but can be generated by using other standard technique. Sequencing was carried out by a dideoxy chain termination method with T7 DNA polymerase (Pharmacia) . Parallel reactions were also performed with dGTP analogs (Pharmacia) when necessary to resolve sequence compressions.
In one subtraction, 50 clones were recovered. After two rounds of screening, seven different clones showed unique or highly preferential expression in normal cells compared to tumor cells. The clones were identified by northern hybridization using standard techniques. The size range of mRNAs varied from 0.6 kb to almost 5 kb. These clones include genes expressed at rare to high abundance in mRNAs. One clone, termed clone 1-3, is expressed in four normal strains but not in a series of tumor-derived lines. It has been shown by sequence comparison in GENBANK to encode the human homolog of rat connexin 26 (Cx26) , a gap junction protein the DNA sequence of which is provided by Zhang and Nicholson 109 Journal Cell Biology 3391, 1989. The DNA and deduced amino acid sequence of human connexin 26 (SEQ ID NO: 2) is given below in the Figure. This cDNA clone has a single long open reading frame that extends to a stop codon at base 881, and encodes a putative protein of 226 amino acid residues with a predicted molecular mass of -26,000 daltons.
Preceding the initiator ATC, 23 nucleotides upstream from ATG, is a consensus splice accepter signal (TTTCCAG) , raising the possibility that splicing occurs at this site to create two sizes of human Cx26 transcripts. This signal sequence is not present in the 5' region of the rat Cx26 sequence, which does not produce two transcripts. The 3' untranslated regions contains a possible polyadenylation signal sequence AATAAA positioned 87 nucleotides upstream from the poly(A)+ tail. At nucleotide positions 1326, 1623, 1664 and 2082 a putative instability sequence ATTTA, is present, which may be involved in posttranscriptional regulation. The overall nucleotide homology between human and rat Cx26 is 86.2% within the open reading frame. The amino acid sequence deduced from the human cDNA is 92.5% identical to rat Cx26. However, the 5' and 3• untranslated regions show no significant similarity between human and rat.
To confirm the intracellular location of gap junction proteins in human mammary epithelial cells, we examined cells by immunofluorescence using anti-Cx26 or anti-Cx43 antibodies. Specific fluorescent spots were found at membrane contact sites of 76N cells (a normal human mammary epithelial cell line) , whereas no fluorescence staining was observed with 21MT2 cells (a human breast tumor cell line) . When fixed cells were treated with preimmune serum, the immunoreaσtivity failed to show discrete punctate staining at the cell membrane. Failure to localize Cx26 or Cx43 protein at the junctional areas of 21MT2 cells is consistent with the lack of connexin mRNA expression observed in breast tumor cells. To assess the relative periodicity of connexin gene expression during the cell cycle, normal mammary epithelial cells were synchronized in Gχ by lovastatin (15 μM/24 hours) , released from lovastatin-induced arrest by the addition of 2 mM mevalonate, and then sampled at 3 hour intervals over the next 33 hours. Cx26 and Cx43 transcript levels were analyzed by Northern blot analysis of total RNA prepared from samples taken at indicated times. The progress of the cells through the cell cycle was monitored by [3H]thymidine incorporation and by the level of histone H4 mRNA in Northern blot analysis. Histone H4 was induced in S phase at 18 hour. The time of appearance of histone H4 message coincided with the peak period of DNA synthesis as measured by [3H]- thymidine incorporation. The upper Cx26 transcript increased at 6 hr. to a moderate steady state level until 21 hr, near the end of S phase, when both Cx26 transcripts showed a further increase in G2. In contrast to Cx26 mRNA, Cx43 epxression during the cell cycle was relatively invariant. Considering the assumed similarity of their functions, the expression of both connexins during the cell cycle might be expected to show a similar regulation pattern. Thus, the difference in cell cycle regulation of Cx26 and Cx43 is quite surprising. Connexins are structural proteins that surround the channels of which gap junctions are composed; the channels in turn provide direct communication between adjacent cells. Gap junctions have been postulated to play a growth regulatory role, on the basis of numerous correlations between growth control and junctional communication. Of these, one of the earliest and still the most striking is Stoker's experiment in which polyoma-transformed BHK cells were inhibited from colony formation by contact (later shown to be junctional communication) with a monolayer of normal BHK cells. Recent experiments by Loewenstein and coworkers and others have correlated post-translational modulation of junctional communication with growth inhibition. Our results, in contrast, suggest transcriptional regulation. This opens the possibility for experimental and clinical modulation at the level of transcription as described below.
A clone termed clone 2-3 encodes glutathione-S- transferase __i , identified by sequence comparison with known genes in GENBANK. The DNA sequence for glutathione-S-transferase pi is provided by Moscow et al., 49 Cancer Research 1422, 1989. This protein is a well-characterized enzyme, present in many cell types, that has detoxifying activity against many lipophilic toxic agents including carcinogens. We have found that it is down-regulated in a number of mammary tumor-derived cell lines, both primary and metastatic, but strongly expressed in normal and immortalized mammary epithelial cells grown in culture. A clone originally termed clone 19, and now referred to as CaN19, represents a gene expressed in normal mammary epithelial cell strains but not in tumor- derived cell lines. The DNA sequence (and corresponding amino acid sequence, or "gene product") of CaN19 is shown as SEQ ID NO: 1 below. Sequence comparisons have shown that CaN19 is a member of the S100 gene family, encoding small Ca"*"*" binding proteins (about 10 kD) with diverse functions. These proteins have two "EF hands", domains where Ca2+ is bound, in contrast to calmodulin proteins which have four. The S100 beta protein is a major constituent of glial cells, whereas related proteins are expressed in differentiated but not in undifferentiated PC 12 (rat pheochromocytoma) cells. CaN19 is also related in structure to the small regulatory subunit of calpactin, pll. MRP8 and MRP14 are also related and are S100 proteins expressed by macrophages during chronic inflammation. Calabretta et al., 261 J. Biol . Chem. 12628, 1986. Another related protein, calcyclin, has been found in serum-induced cycling cells, but not in quiescent cells, and in leukocytes from CML patients. A related mouse protein is also cell cycle induced. The possibility that calcyclin expression might be cancer related is particularly interesting in view of our evidence that CaN19 is not expressed in breast tumor cells. CaN19 appears to be negatively regulated in tumors, in contrast to calcyclin. Other related proteins are described by Kligman and Hilt 13 TIBS 437, 1988.
Other genes which are useful in the present invention include NB-1 described by Yaswen et al., supra: keratin 5 as described by Trask et al. , supra. the DNA sequence of which is published in 8 Molecular Cell Biology 486, 1988; and small proline-rich protein (spr- 1) , the sequence of which is published in 18 Nucl . Acid Res. 4401-4407, 1990. The latter gene is known to be expressed at higher levels following treatment with ultraviolet radiation, suggesting that the protein may have a DNA repair function. Thus, spr-1 is a very promising gene for further investigation.
In further experiments, an adaptation of the subtractive hybridization technique was used which proved to be less laborious and more efficient for cloning of candidate tumor suppressor genes, including rarely expressed genes, than the hydroxyapatite column method. This method utilizes a biotinylation-based subtraction procedure (Schweinfest et al., 7 Genet. Annal . Techn . Appl . 64-70, 1990; Swaroop et al., 19 Nucl . Acids Res . 1954, 1991), instead of hydroxyapatite as previously used. In this procedure, a single strand phagemid cDNA library from normal cell polyA+ mRNA is hybridized with excess biotinylated tumor polyA+ mRNA, and the resulting double stranded sequences are removed by binding to streptavidin. The remaining single-stranded phagemid cDNAs are converted to double-stranded form and used to transform bacterial host cells. The resulting subtracted cDNA library is differentially screened with total cDNA from normal and tumor cells. This method produced some 20 additional cloned cDNAs, including some which, upon partial sequencing, proved to have been previously identified by others, and some which appear to be novel. The previously-identified genes which were found by this method to be candidate tumor suppressor genes potentially useful in the methods of the invention include genes encoding human amphiregulin (the full sequence of which can be found in GENBANK at locus HUMARXC, Accession #M30704) ; thymosin beta-4 (locus HUMTHYB4, Accession #M17733) ; gamma actin (locus HUMACTCGR, Accession ##X04098, K00791, M24241) ; calpactin light chain (pll) (locus HUMCALPAIL, Accession #M81457) ; HBpl7 (locus HUMHEPBP, Accession #M60047) , myosin regulatory light chain (locus HUMMRLCM, Accession #X54304) ; v-fos transformation effector protein (locus HUMFTE1A, Accession #M84711) ; and the mitochondrial genome-encoded proteins URF4 (locus HUMMTHSXX, Accession #V00662) ; Co III (locus HUMMTHSXX, Accession #V00662) ; and ATPaseβ (locus HUMMTCG, Accession ##J01415, M12548, M58503, M63932, and M639333) . Also found by this method were several genes which, on the basis of the partial DNA sequences set forth as SEQ ID NOs: 3-12, respectively, appear to be novel sequences not previously entered into GENBANK. The portion of the cDNAs so sequenced represents part of the coding region and/or part of the 3• untranslated region of each cDNA. Still other genes can be identified as described above using northern analysis of isolated clones and determining whether tumor cell expression of the gene is reduced by at least 2/3 compared to normal cells.
Most or all of the genes described herein have been found to be expressed at a low but detectible level in at least some tumor cells (which is taken to be an indication that the coding sequence is intact in these cells) , and thus appear to be candidate class II rather than class I tumor suppressor genes in these tumors. Another indication that a particular candidate tumor suppressor gene falls within class II in a particular tumor is a normal-appearing Southern blot of the tumor's genomic DNA when probed with the tumor suppressor gene cDNA. (Small deletions or rearrangements might not be detected, of course.) Candidate class I tumor suppressor genes, in which the coding sequence of the gene is altered in a way to yield no biologically active gene product or an altered gene product, could also be detected by the differential hybridization screening method of the invention if the genetic alterations are such that (1) no detectable mRNA is transcribed from the mutant gene, or (2) the mRNA transcribed from the gene is sufficiently different from wild type that it cannot hybridize to the hybridization probe utilized, or (3) the mRNA has an altered sequence resulting in a different location on a Northern gel than the normal mRNA, or (4) the mRNA is hydrolyzed by the cell rapidly after transcription. The alternative method of detection disclosed herein, in which an antibody to the wild type candidate tumor suppressor gene product is used to detect gene expression in cell samples, would also be useful for identifying candidate Class I tumor suppressor genes, and for detecting their expression in a given cell sample, if the mutations in the coding sequence of the gene are such that (1) no stable gene product is expressed by the mutant gene, or (2) the gene product that is expressed is so altered that the antibody utilized cannot bind to it.
Diagnostic applications
Class II genes are of particular interest because the suppressor gene has not been lost, and may therefore be available for up-regulation by drugs or other treatment. Restoration of suppressor gene function by regulatory intervention offers new opportunities in the design of novel drugs for cancer therapy. Both Class I and Class II genes are immediately valuable for early diagnosis and prognosis, which are especially pressing needs in breast cancer where the course of the disease is so unpredictable. Some genes expressed preferentially in normal cells may not have tumor suppressor functions. They are nonetheless useful as diagnostic markers.
The candidate suppressor genes described herein represent just the "tip of the iceberg" with respect to loss-of-function genes that may be useful in diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy. Genes with numerous and diverse functions are anticipated to participate in protecting the long-lived human species from cancer. They include DNA repair genes that maintain genomic integrity and stability, genes that promote irreversible steps in differentiation, and genes that regulate proliferation. Cancer starts at the cellular level, but becomes a systemic disease, and at that point, systemic mechanisms of protection play important roles. These include cell- cell communication by gap junctions, paracrine regulation by growth factors and cytokines, protection by the immune system, control of angiogenesis, and the regulation of tumor invasion. For each of these, specific genes encode key proteins whose loss may facilitate neoplasia. The experimental system described herein allows early recognition of aberrant tumor suppressor and diagnostic genes.
As discussed above, both candidate class I and candidate class II tumor suppressor genes can be used for diagnosis of cancer. All of those genes described above, and other genes identified in a similar manner, are potentially useful for diagnosis of cancerous conditions. For example, they are particularly useful for identification of cancerous cells in solid tumors, such as in breast cancer. Once a lump is detected in a mammogram, or by other means in a breast, a portion of that lump may be removed and analyzed by northern analysis or by in situ hybridization using the cloned gene (or antibodies to the gene product produced by standard techniques) to determine whether the level of expression of the candidate tumor suppressor gene is normal or at a reduced level. If it is at a reduced level, this will be indicative that the cells in that lump are cancerous or pre-cancerous and appropriate steps may be taken to either remove or treat those cells in vivo.
Similarly, routine diagnosis can be obtained in a manner similar to a papsmear in which cells are taken from a human and tested by hybridization with any one or more of the above candidate tumor suppressor genes or by immune complex formation with antibodies to the gene products. Such testing will allow earlier diagnosis of cancerous conditions than has previously been possible.
Those of ordinary skill in this art will recognize that the northern analysis and in situ hybridization or immune complex formation can be carried out by any of a number of standard techniques. For example, the DNA of a candidate tumor suppressor gene or its equivalent cDNA may be used as a probe for RNA transcribed from those genes in cells to be tested. Similarly, DNA which hybridizes to the RNA produced by such genes can also be used.
The cDNA or its equivalent may be placed in expression vectors to cause production of candidate tumor suppressor gene products which may be purified and used to isolate polyclonal or monoclonal antibodies to those candidate tumor suppressor gene products. Those particular antibodies which are specific for (i.e., form readily detectible immune complexes with) the candidate tumor suppressor gene product can be identified by standard procedures. Generally, it is preferred that a specific monoclonal antibody be identified so that a large amount of that antibody can be readily produced and used in diagnostic procedures. Immunoprecipitation by antibodies of candidate tumor suppressor gene products is performed by standard methodology such as western blotting.
These diagnostic methods can be adapted for use as a way to monitor changes in the level of expression of a given candidate tumor suppressor gene in a given patient over time. This would be useful, for example, as a routine measure for monitoring for the presence of cancer in apparently healthy subjects, much as pap smears and mammograms are used. This technique relies upon the normal expression of a given candidate tumor suppressor gene product in a readily obtainable biological fluid such as blood, urine, or saliva. A baseline normal level of expression of the gene product would be established by analyzing samples taken from the subject over the years, or by comparison with standards obtained from other, disease-free individuals. A drop in the amount of the gene product present in a given sample would be an indication of the presence of tumor cells in the subject. Alternatively, the method could be adapted to serve as a means for following the clinical progression of a tumor. wherein increases or decreases in the level of the gene product in the analyzed sample would be indicative of decreasing or increasing tumor load, respectively. The above-described method for assaying a biological fluid will work reliably only if the candidate tumor suppressor gene product is normally a secreted protein. Whether or not a given gene product is secreted can be determined empirically (e.g., by using an antibody specific for the gene product) , or may be predicted by the presence of a secretion signal sequence in the cDNA (e.g., as taught by Von Heijne, 133 Eur. J. Biochem. 17- 21, 1983) in accordance with standard methods.
Screening for and Treatment with Transcription-activating Drugs As generally discussed above, candidate class II tumor suppressor genes can be used to identify useful drugs for treatment of cancers. This may be accomplished by standard procedures by culturing cells which include tumor suppressor genes (which are either expressed at normal or subnormal levels) and treating those cells with a variety of drugs to determine which drugs increase the level of expression of the candidate tumor suppressor gene product within those cells. It is preferred that a cancerous cell be used in such a procedure since the increased level of expression of the candidate tumor suppressor gene product will be more readily detected in such a cell, and the drug may work only on genes the expression of which is lower than normal. Identification of the increase in tumor suppressor gene expression can be analyzed by standard northern or in situ analysis or by antibody testing. Alternatively, rather than looking for expression of the tumor suppressor gene, the concomitant increase in a function of that gene may be detected by standard techniques. Two examples illustrating such a procedure are given below. In these examples, phorbol myristate acetate (PMA) is found to increase expression of the Cx26 tumor suppressor gene in tumor cells but not in normal cells, while azadeoxycytidine increases the level of expression of the CaN19 candidate tumor suppressor gene in tumor cells but not in normal cells.
Once the appropriate drug is identified, it may be administered to humans who are identified as containing cells having a reduced level of the tumor suppressor gene product. This may be accomplished either by direct administration of the drug at the tumor site or by systemic treatment with the drug.
Drug-induced Stimulation of CaN19 mRNA Expression In an analysis of the effects of certain drugs on induction of CaN19 expression, exponentially growing normal and tumor cells were treated with the following agents (5Br-cAMP, ImM; forskolin, lOuM; PMA, lOOng/ml; retinoic acid, luM; A23187, 0.5uM; actinomycin D, 5ug/ml; cycloheximide, 10 ug/ml; okadaic acid, 5ng/ml; TGF-,3, lng/ml; prolactin, lmg/ml; /3-estradiol, 2nM; 5-aza-2'- deoxycytidine, luM-lOOuM; all purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. except TGF-/? from Collaborative Research Inc.) (Lee et al., Mol . Cell . Biol . 10:1982-1988, 1990). To study the effect of azadeoxycytidine, cells were plated at low density (-25% confluency) and incubated in the presence of various concentrations of drug. Cells were washed, retreated with drug in fresh medium for another 2 days, and then harvested for RNA analysis (~70% confluency) . The steady state levels of mRNA were examined by Northern blot analysis with RNA extracted from normal and tumor cells at different time points (0, 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 hours) after each drug treatment. Additions of 5Br-cAMP, forskolin, PMA, retinoic acid. actinomycin D, cyclohexi ide, A23187, or okadaic acid were without noticeable effect on the level of expression of CaN19 mRNA in tumor cells. In contrast, exposure of mammary tumor cells to azadeoxycytidine induced the expression of CaN19-specific RNA. The level of expression of CaN19 in normal cells was not affected by azadeoxycytidine treatment. These findings suggest that DNA methylation plays a direct role in control of CaNl9 gene expression in tumor cells. Since aza-dCyd is a well-established DNA demethylating agent, it is very likely that treatment with this drug demethylated transcription binding sites in CaN19 and possibly in other unidentified genes as well. Although systemic treatment with aza-dCyd itself is said to be toxic and tumorigenic (Harrison et al., Proc. Natl . Acad. Sci . USA 80:6606-6610, 1983; Carr et al., Carcinogenesis 5_:1583- 1590, 1984) , these results provide insight into a possible mechanism for switching on candidate tumor suppressor genes in tumor cells, and suggest testing other DNA demethylating agents for antitumor potential.
Drug-induced Stimulation of Cx26 mRNA Expression
Two different breast cancer cell lines, one from a primary tumor and one from a metastatiσ cell line, were found to have significantly reduced levels (compared to levels in normal breast cells) of connexin 26 expression by northern analysis, as discussed above. A short treatment of these cells with phorbol myristate acetate (PMA) induced the expression of mRNA in these cells, while treatment with certain other drugs that affect signal transduction pathways was found to have no effect on Cx26 expression in these cells at the concentrations tested. Specifically, growing 21 PT cells (Band et al.. Cancer Research 1990; derived from a primary tumor) were treated with 100 ng/ l PMA, 1 mM dBc-cAMP, lμM retinoic acid, 5μg/ml actinomycin D, lOμg/ml cycloheximide, 5ng/ml okadaic acid, 2nM ,3-estradiol, or lng/ml TGF/3 at time zero in a series of dishes. At time points from 0 to 48 hours after exposure to drug, samples were taken for RNA extraction and northern blot analysis. In the PMA- treated cells, expression of connexin 26 was observed by 3 hours, peaking at 6-12 hours (at 25% normal cell levels) and decreasing by 24 hours. Similar results were obtained with 21MT-2 cells, another tumor cell line. In contrast, PMA treatment of normal cells did not increase the level of Cx26 gene expression above control levels. In order to see whether Cx26 mRNA stimulation in PMA-treated tumor cells leads to protein synthesis, immunofluorescence staining with anti-Cx26 antibody and scrape-loading dye transfer experiments were performed at various times after PMA treatment, using several mammary tumor cell lines. Cx26 proteins were not detected at cell to cell junctional areas nor was junctional communication detected between cells. Neither method was sensitive enough to detect a very weak signal, which might have resulted from the short half-life of the induced mRNA.
Gene Therapy
As generally discussed above, tumor suppressor genes of both class I and class II may be employed in gene therapy methods in order to increase the amount of the expression products of such genes in cancer cells. Although such gene therapy is particularly appropriate for use in cells, both cancerous and precancerous, in which the level of a particular tumor suppressor gene product is diminished compared to normal cells, it may also be useful to increase the level of expression of a given tumor suppressor gene even in those tumor cells in which the gene is expressed at a "normal" but perhaps not optimal level.
21MT-2 cells, a line of cultured breast tumor cells (developed in this laboratory) in which the level of Cx26 mRNA is undetectible, were transfected with a plasmid construct containing the full-length cDNA corresponding to Cx26 linked to appropriate expression control elements. Unlike the untransfected cells, the transfectants expressed significant amounts of Cx26 protein. Furthermore, the transfected cells were found to assemble the Cx26 protein into gap junctions that functioned in cell-cell communication in the same manner as described for normal mammary epithelial cells. These results indicate that, by transferring a candidate tumor suppressor gene along with expression control elements into a tumor cell which does not express the gene from its own genome, tumor cells can be induced to produce functional candidate tumor suppressor gene product at high levels. Gene therapy would be carried out according to generally accepted methods: for example, as described by Friedmann in Therapy for Genetic Disease, T. Friedman (ed.), Oxford Univ. Press, 1991, pp.105-121. Cells from a patient's tumor would first be analyzed by the diagnostic methods described above, in order to ascertain which if any of the candidate tumor suppressor genes are expressed at a significantly lower than normal level (or not at all) in the tumor cells. A virus or plasmid containing a copy of such a tumor suppressor gene linked to expression control elements and capable of replicating inside the tumor cells would then be injected into the patient, either locally at the site of the tumor or systemically (in order to reach any tumor cells that may have metastasized to other sites) . If the transfected gene is not permanently incorporated into the genome of each of the targeted tumor cells, the treatment may have to be repeated periodically.
Other embodiments are within the following claims.
SEQUENCE LISTING
(1) GENERAL INFORHAXION: (i) APPLICANT: Sager, Ruth (ii) TITLE OF INVENTION: CANCER DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY (ill) NUMBER OF SEQUENCES: 12 (iv) CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS:
(A) ADDRESSEE: Fish & Richardson
(B) STREET: 225 Franklin Street
(C) CITY: Boston
(D) STATE: Massachusetts
(E) COUNTRY: U.S.A.
(F) ZIP: 02110-2804
(V) COMPUTER READABLE FORM:
(A) MEDIUM TYPE: 3.5" Diskette, 1.44 Mb
(B) COMPUTER: IBM PS/2 Model 50Z or 55SX
(C) OPERATING SYSTEM: IBM P.C. DOS (Version 3.30)
(D) SOFTWARE: WordPerfect (Version 5.0)
(ri) CURRENT APPLICATION DATA:
(A) APPLICATION NUMBER:
(B) FILING DATE:
(C) CLASSIFICATION:
(▼ii) PRIOR APPLICATION DATA:
(A) APPLICATION NUMBER: 07/552,216
(B) FILING DATE: February 28, 1991
(Tiii) ATTORNEY/AGENT INFORMATION:
(A) NAME: Fraser, Janis K.
(B) REGISTRATION NUMBER: 34,819
(C) REFERENCE/DOCKET NUMBER: 00530/048002
(ix) TELECOMMUNICATION INFORMATION:
(A) TELEPHONE: (617) 542-5070
(B) TELEFAX: (617) 542-8906
(C) TELEX: 200154 (2 ) INFORMATION FOR SEQUENCE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: 1 :
(i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS :
(A) LENGTH: 452
(B) TYPE: nucleic acid
(C) STRANDEDNESS: double
(D) TOPOLOGY: linear
(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 1:
GCACGAGCTG GGTCTGTCTC TGCCACCTGG TCTGCCACAG ATCCATG ATG TGC AGT 56
Met Cys Ser 1
TCT CTG GAG CAG GCG CTG GCT GTG CTG GTC ACT ACC TTC CAC AAG TAC 104 Ser Leu Glu Gin Ala Leu Ala Val Leu Val Thr Thr Phe His Lys Tyr 5 10 15
TCC TGC CAA GAG GGC GAC AAG TTC AAG CTG AGT AAG GGG GAA ATG AAG 152 Ser Cys Gin Glu Gly Asp Lys Phe Lys Leu Ser Lys Gly Glu Met Lys 20 25 30 35
GAA CTT CTG CAC AAG GAG CTG CCC AGC TTT GTG GGG GAG AAA GTG GAT 200 Glu Leu Leu His Lys Glu Leu Pro Ser Phe Val Gly Glu Lys Val Asp 40 45 50
GAG GAG GGG CTG AAG AAG CTG ATG GGC AAC CTG GAT GAG AAC AGT GAC 248 Glu Glu Gly Leu Lys Lys Leu Met Gly Asn Leu Asp Glu Asn Ser Asp 55 60 65
CAG CAG GTG GAC TTC CAG GAG TAT GCT GTT TTC CTG GCA CTC ATC ACT 296 Gin Gin Val Asp Phe Gin Glu Tyr Ala Val Phe Leu Ala Leu lie Thr 70 75 80
GTC ATG TGC AAT GAC TTC TTC CAG GGC TGC CCA GAC CGA CCC 338
Val Met Cys Asn Asp Phe Phe Gin Gly Cys Pro Asp Arg Pro 85 90 95
TGAAGCAGAA CTCTTGACTC CCTGCCATGG ATCTCTTGGG CCCAGGACTG TTGATGCCTT 398 TGAGTTTTGT ATTCAATAAA CTTTTTTTGT CTGTTGAAAA AAAAAAAAAA AAAA 452 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQUENCE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: 2:
(i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS:
(A) LENGTH: 2261
(B) TYPE: nucleic acid
(C) STRANDEDNESS: double
(D) TOPOLOGY: linear
(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 2:
GATTTAATCC TATGACAAAC TAAGTTGGTT CTGTCTTCAC CTGTTTTGGT GAGGTTGTGT 60
AAGAGTTGGT GTTTGCTCAG GAAGAGATTT AAGCATGCTT GCTTACCCAG ACTCAGAGAA 120
GTCTCCCTGT TCTGTCCTAG CTAGTGATTC CTGTGTTGTG TGCATTCGTC TTTTCCAGAG 180
CAAACCGCCC AGAGTAGAAG ATG GAT TGG GGC ACG CTG CAG ACG ATC CTG GGG 233
Met Asp Trp Gly Thr Leu Gin Thr lie Leu Gly 1 5 10
GGT GTG AAC AAA CAC TCC ACC AGC ATT GGA AAG ATC TGG CTC ACC GTC 281 Gly Val Asn Lys His Ser Thr Ser lie Gly Lys lie Trp Leu Thr Val 15 20 25
CTC TTC ATT TTT CGC ATT ATG ATC CTC GTT GTG GCT GCA AAG GAG GTG 329 Leu Phe He Phe Arg He Met He Leu Val Val Ala Ala Lys Glu Val 30 35 40
TGG GGA GAT GAG CAG GCC GAC TTT GTC TGC AAC ACC CTG CAG CCA GGC 377 Trp Gly Asp Glu Gin Ala Asp Phe Val Cys Asn Thr Leu Gin Pro Gly 45 50 55
TGC AAG AAC GTG TGC TAC GAT CAC TAC TTC CCC ATC TCC CAC ATC CGG 425 Cys Lys Asn Val Cys Tyr Asp His Tyr Phe Pro He Ser His He Arg 60 65 70 75
CTA TGG GCC CTG CAG CTG ATC TTC GTG TCC AGC CCA GCG CTC CTA GTG 473 Leu Trp Ala Leu Gin Leu He Phe Val Ser Ser Pro Ala Leu Leu Val 80 85 90
GCC ATG CAC GTG GCC TAC CGG AGA CAT GAG AAG AAG AGG AAG TTC ATC 521 Ala Met His Val Ala Tyr Arg Arg His Glu Lys Lys Arg Lys Phe He 95 100 105
AAG GGG GAG ATA AAG AGT GAA TTT AAG GAC ATC GAG GAG ATC AAA ACC 569 Lys Gly Glu He Lys Ser Glu Phe Lys Gin He Glu Glu He Lys Thr 110 115 120
CAG AAG GTC CGC ATC GAA GGC TCC CTG TGG TGG ACC TAC ACA AGC AGC 617 Gin Lys Val Arg He Glu Gly Ser Leu Trp Trp Thr Tyr Thr Ser Ser 125 130 135 ATC TTC TTC CGG GTC ATC TTC GAA GCC GCC TTC ATG TAC GTC TTC TAT 665 He Phe Phe Arg Val He Phe Glu Ala Ala Phe Met Tyr Val Phe Tyr 140 145 150 155
GTC ATG TAC GAC GGC TTC TCC ATG CAG CGG CTG GTG AAG TGC AAC GCC 713 Val Met Tyr Asp Gly Phe Ser Met Gin Arg Leu Val Lys Cys Asn Ala 160 165 170
TGG CCT TGT CCC AAC ACT GTG GAC TGC TTT GTG TCC CGG CCC ACG GAG 761 Trp Pro Cys Pro Asn Thr Val Asp Cys Phe Val Ser Arg Pro Thr Glu 175 180 185
AAG ACT GTC TTC ACA GTG TTC ATG ATT GCA GTG TCT GGA ATT TGC ATC 809 Lys Thr Val Phe Thr Val Phe Met He Ala Val Ser Gly He Cys He 190 195 200
CTG CTG AAT GTC ACT GAA TTG TGT TAT TTG CTA ATT AGA TAT TGT TCT 857 Leu Leu Asn Val Thr Glu Leu Cys Tyr Leu Leu He Arg Tyr Cys Ser 205 210 215
GGG AAG TCA AAA AAG CCA GTT 878
Gly Lys Ser Lys Lys Pro Val 220 225
TAAATTGCCC AGTTGTTAGA TTAAGAAATA GACAGCATGA GAGGGATGAG GCAACCCGTG 938
CTCAGCTGTC AAGGCTCAGT CGCCAGCTCC CAACACAAAG ATTCTGACCT TAAATGCAAC 998
CATTTGAAAC CCCTGTAGGC CTCAGGTGAA ACTCCAGATG CCACAATGAG CGCTCCCCTA 1058
AAGCCTCAAA ACAAAGGCCT AATTCTATGC CTGTCTTAAT TTTCTTTCAC TTAAGTTAGT 1118
TCCACTGAGA CCCCATGTTA GGGGTTATTG GTGTAAGGTA CTTTCATATT TTAAACAGAG 1178
GATATCGGCA TTTGTTTCTT TCTCTGAGGA CAAGAGAAAG CCAGGTTCCA CAGAGGACAC 1238
AGAGAAGGTT TGGGTGTCCT CCTGGGGTTC TTTTTGCCAA CTTTCCCCAC GTTAAAGGTG 1298
AACGGTTCTT TCATTTGCTT TGGAAGTTTT AATCTCTAAC AGTGGACAAA GTTACCAGTG 1358
CCTTAAACTC TGTTACACTT TTTGGAAAAA ACTTTGTAGT ATGATAGGTT ATTTTGATGT 1418
AAAGATGTTC TGGATACCAT TATATGTTCC CCCTGTTTCA GAGGCTCAGA TAATATGTAA 1478
ATGGTATGTC ATTCGCTACT ATGATTTAAT TTGAAATATG GTCTTTTGGT TATGAATACT 1538
TTGCAGCACA GCTGAAGGCT GTCTGTTGTA TTCATTGTGG TCATAGCACC TAACAACATT 1598
GTAGCCTCAA TCGAGTGAGA CAGACTAGAA GTTCCTAGTC TTATGATAGC AAATGGCCTC 1658
ATGTCAAATA TTAGATGTAA TTTTGTGTAA GAAATACAGA CTGGATGTAC CACCAACTAC 1718
TACTAATGAC AGGCCTGTCC AACACATCTC CCTTTTCCAT GCTGTGGTAG CCAGCATCGG 1778
SUBSTITUTE SHEET AAAGAACGCT GATTTAAAGA GGTGAGCGGA ATTTTATTGA CACAGTACCA TTTAATGGGG 1838
AGACAAAAAT GGGGGCCAGG GGAGGGAGAA GTTTCTGTCG TTAAAAACGA GGGAAAGACT 1898
GGACTCTAAA TTCTGTTGAT TAAAGATGAG CTTTGTCTAC CTTCAAAAGT TTGTTTGCTT 1958
ACCCCCTTCA GCCTCTTTTT TAAGTGAAAA TATAACTAAT AACATGTGAA AAGAATAGAA 2018
GCTAAGGTTT AGATAAATAT TGAGCAGATC TATAGGAAGG AACCTGAATA TTGCCATTAT 2078
GCTTGACATG GTTTCCAAAA AATGGTACTC CACATACTTC AGTGAGGGTA AGTATTTTCC 2138
TGTCAAGAAT AGCATTGTAA AAGCATTTTG TAATAATAAA GAATAGCTTT AATGATATGC 2198
TTGTAACTAA AATAATTTTG TAATGTAAAT ACATTTAAAA CATTAAAATA TAATCTCTAT 2258
AAT 2261 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQUENCE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: 3: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS:
(A) LENGTH: 310
(B) TYPE: nucleic acid
(C) STRANDEDNESS: single
(D) TOPOLOGY: linear
(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 3:
GGGCGCCAGG GTCTTTGTGG ATTGCATGTT GACATTGACC GTGAGATTCG GCTTCAAACC 60
AATACTGCCT TTGGAATATG ACAGAATCAA TAGCCCAGAG AGCTTGTCAA AGACAGATCT 120
ACGGTCATCC TTAACCAAGG CACTTCTTAA GCAGAAAATA TTGTTGAGGT TACCTTTGCT 180
GCTAAAGATC CAATCTTCTA ACGCCACAAC AGCATAGCAA ATCCTAGGAT AATTCACCTC 240
CTCATTTGAC AAACAGAGCT GTAATTCACT TAACAAATTA CGCATTTCTA TCACGTTCAC 300
TACAGCTTAT 310 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQUENCE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: 4: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS:
(A) LENGTH: 111
(B) TYPE: nucleic acid
(C) STRANDEDNESS: single
(D) TOPOLOGY: linear
(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 4: GGCACGAGGA AGTATATGGG TATCCGAATG ATGTCACTCA CGTCCAGCAA AGCCAAAGAG 60 CTGAAGGACC GGCACCGGGA CTTCCCAGAC GTGGATCTCA GGAGCGTATA T 111
(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQUENCE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: 5: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS:
(A) LENGTH: 245
(B) TYPE: nucleic acid
(C) STRANDEDNESS: single
(D) TOPOLOGY: linear
(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 5:
CGAGCTGGAC CCCAAAGAAT ACAGTGGATG GAAAGACAAA CTGCACAGGC AGATGTTTGC 60
CTCATAACAG TCGTAAGTGG AGTCCTGGAA TTTGGACAAG TGCTGTTGGG ATATAGCAAC 120
TTATCTTTGA GTAATGTGAC TAAAGGAAAA AACTTTGACT TTGCCCAGGC ATGAAATTCT 180
TCCTAATGTC AGAACACAGT GCAACCCAGT CACACTGTGG CCAGTAAAAT ACTATTGCCT 240
CATAT 245
(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQUENCE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: 6: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS:
(A) LENGTH: 340
(B) TYPE: nucleic acid
(C) STRANDEDNESS: single
(D) TOPOLOGY: linear
(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 6:
CGAGCTGGTC ATGTGGTTGG CACTAGACTG GTGGCAGGGG CTTCTAGCTG ACTCGCACAG 60
GGATTCTCAC AATAGCCGAC ATCAGAATTT GTGTTGAAGG AACTTGTCTC TTCATCTAAT 120
ATGATAGCGG GAAAAGGAGA GGAAACTACT GCCTTTAGAA AATATAAGTA AAGTGATTAA 180
AATGCTCACG TTACCTTGAC ACATAGTTTT TCAGTCTATG GGTTTAGTTA CTTTACATGG 240
CAAGCATGTA ACTTATATTA ATAGTAATTT GTAAAGTTGG TTGGATAAGC TATCCCTGTT 300
TGCCGGTTCA TGGATTACTT CTCTATAAAA AATATATAT 340
(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQUENCE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: 7: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS:
(A) LENGTH: 76
(B) TYPE: nucleic acid
(C) STRANDEDNESS: single
(D) TOPOLOGY: linear
(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 7:
AAAAGGCACA TGGTCGTGAT GAAGTTATTA AAGTGGGTGA TACTGTGTGT TTCTTGGTAA 60 ATCCAGTCAG GTAACT 76
(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQUENCE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: 8: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS:
(A) LENGTH: 111
(B) TYPE: nucleic acid
(C) STRANDEDNESS: single
(D) TOPOLOGY: linear
(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 8:
GTTGCTTTGA GAGTGTTAGA CGAACCAGAG GGACACACAG TTTTGACGGT CTTTGGAGGA 60 CCGTTCAACA CCACCACTAC GTGACGATAT CGGTTTTAAC CGTTCGTCGT T 111
(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQUENCE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: 9: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS:
(A) LENGTH: 362
(B) TYPE: nucleic acid
(C) STRANDEDNESS: single
(D) TOPOLOGY: linear
(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 9:
TGGGCTAAGT AATTTAACTG GGTGTTTATA AAAGTAAAAG GCCAACATTT AATTATTTTG 60
CAAAGCAACC TAAGAGCTAA AGATGTAATT TTTCTTGCAA ATTGTAAATC TTTTGTGTCT 120
CTGAAGACTT CCCTTAAAAT TAGCTCTCTG AGTGAAAAAT CAAAAGAGAC AAAAGACATC 180
TTCGAATCCA TATTTCAAGC CTGGTAGAAT TGGCTTTTCT AGCAGAACCT TTCCAAAAGT 240 TTTATATTGA GATTCATAAC AACACCAAGA ATTGATTTTG TAGCCAACAT TCATTCAATC 300
AGTTATATCA GAGGAGTAGG AGAGAGGAAA CATTTGACTT ATCTGGAAAA GCAAATGTAC 360
TT 362
(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQUENCE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: 10: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS:
(A) LENGTH: 341
(B) TYPE: nucleic acid
(C) STRANDEDNESS: single
(D) TOPOLOGY: linear
(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 10:
GGCACGCGTT TCAGCACACT GAGTTGGGAA TTTCTTATCC CAGAAGACCA ACCAATTTCA 60
TATTTATTTA AGATTGATTC CATCCCCCGT TTTCAAGGAG AATCCCTGCA GTCTCCTTAA 120
AGGTAGAACA AATACTTCTA TTTTTTTTTC ACCATTGTGG GATTGGACTT TAAGAGGTGA 180
CTCTAAAAAA ACAGAGAACA AATATAGTGT CAGTTGTATT AAGCACGGAC CCATATATCA 240
TATTCCACTT AAAAAAATTG CAATTTCCTG TTGCACCTTT TGGCAACTTC TCTTTTCAAT 300
GTAGGGAAAA ACTTAGTCAC CCTGAAAACC CACAAAATAA A 341
(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQUENCE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: 11: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS:
(A) LENGTH: 321
(B) TYPE: nucleic acid
(C) STRANDEDNESS: single
(D) TOPOLOGY: linear
(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 11:
CTCATCGCTG GGATGCTGGT TCTAGAGGCA GCTGTCACGG GAGTTCCTGT TAAAGGTCAA 60
GACCCTGTCA AAGGCCGTGT TCCATCAATG GACAAGATCC CGTTAAAGGA CAAGTTTCAG 120
TTAAAGGTCA AGATAAAGTC AAAGCGCAAG AGCCAGTCAA AGGTCCAGTC TCCACTAAGC 180
CTGGCTCCTG CCCCATTATC TTGATCCGGT GCGCCATGTT GAATCCTCCT AACCGCTGCT 240
TGAAAGATAC TGACTGCCCA GGAATCAAGA AGTGCTGTGA AGGCTCTTGC GGGATGGCCT 300
SHEET GTTTCGTTCC CAGTGAGAGG G 321
(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQUENCE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: 12: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS:
(A) LENGTH: 4328
(B) TYPE: nucleic acid
(C) STRANDEDNESS: single
(D) TOPOLOGY: linear
(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 12:
GCCAGGTGAA GACCAACCCT GAGGAGAAGA AGTGCTTTGA CCTTATTTCA CATGACAGAA 60
CTTACCACTT TCAAGCTGAA GATGAACAGG AATGTCAAAT ATGGATGTCT GTGCTGCAAA 120
ATAGCAAAGA AGAAGCTT A AACAATGCAT TTAAGGGGGA TGACAATACT GGAGAAAATA 180
ACATCGTCCA AGAACTGACA AAGGAGATCA TCTCAGAAGT GCAGAGGATG ACGGGCAATG 240
ACGTCTGCTG TGACTGTGGG GCGCCAGATC CTACATGGCT TTCCACCAAC CTGGGCATCC 300
TGACCTGCAT CGAGTGTTCC GGAATCCACC GAGAGCTGGG GGTTCATTAT TCCAGGATGC 360
AGTCCCTGAC CTTAGATGTA CTGGGAACAT CTGAGCTGCT GCTCGCCAAG AATATTGGGA 420
ATGCAGGCTT TAATGAGATC ATGGAATGTT GCCTACCAGC TGAGGACTCA GTCAAACCCA 480
ACCCAGGCAG CGACATGAAT GCAAGAAAGG ACTACATCAC AGCCAAGTAC ATCGAGAGGA 540
GATACGCAAG GAAGAAGCAC GCGGATAACG CGGCGAAGCT TCACAGTCTT TGCGAGGCCG 600
TCAAAACGAG AGATATTTTT GGATTGCTCC AAGCTTATGC TGATGGTGTG GATCTTACGG 660
AAAAAATCCC ACTGGCCAAC GGACATGAGC CGGATGAAAC GGCCCTCCAC CTTGCAGTCA 720
GATCCGTGGA TCGAACCTCT CTTCACATTG TAGACTTTTT AGTTCAGAAC AGTGGGAACC 780
TGGATAAACA GACAGGGAAA GGCAGCACAG CCCTGCACTA CTGCTGCCTG ACCGACAATG 840
CCGAGTGCCT CAAGTTGCTC CTGCGGGGGA AGGCCTCCAT CGAGATAGCA AATGAGTCAG 900
GAGAGACTCC GCTGGACATT GCCAAGCGCC TCAAGCACGA GCACTGTGAG GAGCTGCTGA 960
CCCAAGCCTT ATCTGGAAGA TTTAATTCTC ACGTTCACGT TGAATATGAA TGGCGACTAC 1020
TCCACGAAGA CCTGGATGAA AGTGATGACG ACATGGATGA GAAATTGCAG CCCAGTCCCA 1080
ACCGGCGGGA AGACCGGCCC ATCAGCTTCT ACCAGCTGGG CTCCAACCAG CTTCAGTCTA 1140
SUBSTITUTE SHEET ACGCTGTATC TTTGGCCAGA GATGCTGCAA ACCTTGCCAA GGACAAGCAG AGGGCTTTCA 1200
TGCCCAGCAT CTTGCAGAAT GAGACTTACG GAGCCCTCCT GAGTGGCAGC CCACCTCCCG 1260
CCCAGCCTGC AGCCCCCAGC ACCACCAGCG CCCCCCCCGC TTCCTCCACG GAATGTTGGC 1320
AAAGTTCAGA CAGCCTCCTC TGCTAACACC CTGTGGAAGA CAAACTCTGT AAGTGTGGAC 1380
GGTGGAAGCC GGCAGCGATC TTCGTCAGAT CCGCCAGCTG TCCATCCACC GCTGCCCCCT 1440
CTTCGCGTGA CATCTACCAA TCCCCTGACC CCCACGCCGC CCCCACCCGT TGCCAAGACG 1500
CCCAGCGTAA TGGAAGCCTT GAGCCAGCCG AGCAAGCCTG CCCCGCCTGG GATCTCACAG 1560
ATCAGGCCCC CACCTCTGCC CCCACAGCCG CCCAGCCGCC TCCCGCAGAA GAAGCCTGCG 1620
CCAGGGGCTG ACAAGTCCAC CCCACTGACC AACAAAGGCC AACCGAGAGG ACCTGTGGAT 1680
CTCTCTGCAA CGGAAGCTCT GGGTCCTCTG TCCAATGCTA TGGTCCTGCA GCCCCCTGCA 1740
CCCATGCCTA GGAAGTCGCA GGCAACCAAG TTGAAGCCTA AGCGGGTGAA AGCGCTCTAT 1800
AACTGTGTGG CTGACAACCC CGATGAGCTC ACCTTCTCCG AGGGGGATGT GATCATCGTG 1860
GACGGGGAGG AGGACCAGGA GTGGTGGATT GGCCACATTG ATGGAGATCC TGGTCGCAAA 1920
GGCGCATTCC CGGTGTCATT TGTGCACTTT ATCGCTGACT GAATTGCTAC TGAACAAAAG 1980
CATTAACAGT TATGTTCCTG TTTCGTTATT GGTACCAAAA CTCTTGCCAG ATAACCAGTT 2040
TCATGAACTG TTTGTATGGC AGCCCATGTT CTCTAATGCC ACTGCTCTGT TTTAAAAACT 2100
CAGAGGCAAT TTTTACATAT CAGTAATTGT TTTTATAATT TGCATGGTTT TCATGAAACA 2160
TTGCTATGCA TTTATTAGGA AAAACTGAAT TTCCCAACAG GTGAACTGAA AAGTTATTTT 2220
AACTATTATA CATAATCAGA AAGATCCTGC CTCTACGGAA TTAGCTAAAC CTAAAAATGT 2280
TTGCATTAAT GAATAAATTC TTCCTGCATT CCTTGGCCCA GTTCTGGAGT TGGTGACCTT 2340
TATCACAATT ATATTTTAGG CGGCCAGTGA ACTGCTGCTT CAGAAGTCCA TAGCCCAGCT 2400
CTGAACTTTC TCGATAAATG CCATCAGTTC ACCTTTAAAG ACACACATTC CTTTGAAATC 2460
CACCCAGTGT TTAAAAAGCA ACTTGGAAAT TTACACATTA GCATTGTACT TTCTAGCCCT 2520
AATTTGTGAG GTTGCAGCTA TCATTATATT CTGCATGTAT GTATAACCTG TTGTGAACAA 2580
TCATACTTAA CAAAACTACT GATGGTTTAT GACAACGTAG GGTAACTACA GTTCATTCTG 2640
TTCCAGGTTA TATAAAACTG CATTTCCTGA ATTTGGTTAA AAACTAAGGA TGATGGATTC 2700
GAAAACAGTC TTTTAAATTA GTTTATATGC TTTAGGTGTT TTGGAATTTG CCTTCTTGAA 2760 CTTCCTGAGT CACACAGAAA GCAACTGTAC ACAGTAGAAT TCTGTGGCGC AGACCATGCT 2820 GTATTAACAC ATCACTTGCT GTTTCCTACT GAGTGTACCA CTGCCTTCCC TTCTAGCCCA 2880 GGAGAATGTT TACTCAGTTT AGTGTCTTGT ATTTCTATAA TACACCAACA GGAATGGTAG 2940 TCACACTGTC TTGAAATTGA ATCTGTCCAT CTGTTTATAA TCAAGAACAT ATCAGAAATA 3000 TATAGGTCCC AGGTAATACT CCCAAACATC CCACTTTTTA CTGTTTCAGG CCATCATATC 3060 ATTCTTAAGC TACTTGGGGT GGTAGTAGAG GATTAGGTTG TCTATTATAA AACCAAAACT 3120 CATTCGTTTA ATGAACTTGA CTGTCATACC TCTATTTAGT AATTGCGAGG GTAAGATTCA 3180 TAGTAGGAAT ATTGGAAATT TTGGCACTCT GAGAATAAAT AGGCATATGA TACCCACTTG 3240 GACTTTTAAC AAAAGTAAAG GAATAAATTT GCATATAGGT TTGGAAAGTG AGGCAGCAAT 3300 GCTGTTAACT GCATTTGTTG TGATGGTGCA TTTGATTGAA GCAGCTTGTC TTTATTATGC 3360 AAGACTGTGT AGAGTTTTTT TTTTTTTGGC ATTGTACTTT TTGTTTTTGT TATAAGGAAG 3420 ACAGAACAAA CTGGAATGTT TTATGATGTT GTATAGCAAT CGCTTTTTAC CTTTCAAAGT 3480
TCCGGGTAAA AATGTGTTAT ATCTGTAGTT TTTTGTTTTT GTTTTTTTTT AAAGCACTAC 3540
ATCTGTTTTC ACTAATTGTT AATTTCTGTT TGAACCCTTC ATTTAATTTT CTCATAGATT 3600
TAAGTAAACA AGGATGTATT TTGCACACGC TCGCACTTAT GTCTATTTTA ACAATCTCCT 3660
GCATCTGTAT TTTATAGTCA GCCTTTTGAC CACCTGGTGC CAGCTATATA AGGAATAAAG 3720
TTGATTCATA TCAACATTAG AACTCCAGTC CCAAACTAAT CTGTCAGGTT CACTGGTACA 3780
TAAATACCTA GGAAATATTT TTCCAGTCTA CATTTGGTGC TATGTGCAGT AACTAATAGT 3840
ACTCTTACCA GAGGAGAAAT TATATAACGA CCCTGCTAAT ATCTTTCTTA GTTATTTGCT 3900
CCTTCAAATT AAAAAAGCAA CTAAGAGAAA GAAAAACATT GTAGATATCT ATTTATATTT 3960
AAAGTTTATG AAACATGAAC TGCAGCTGCA GGATTCTGGC ATTTTGCATG CCATTCTCCA 4020
TCAGATCTGG GATGATGGCT CAGAACATGT ACACAGACTA AGAGTAACTG TGTGATCTGT 4080
TAAGGGGTGG ATAACATAAT ATGCAGCTTA GGATGCTATT TTGAGATGTA TGATATCAGT 4140
TCATTCACCT GATTACTTTG GTTGCAGCAC AACTGTATAT ATTGTATAAC CGAAATTGAT 4200
TATTTTCATT GTCCTTATGC AGTGATTTAT AATTAGAGCA TGTTTAATAA GTTTACTATT 4260
CTTGTTAACT AGTCATTTGA CTGGAAAAAA ATAAAATACT TTTAAATGGA AAAAAAAAAA 4320
SUBSTITUTESHEET AAAAAAAA 4328
SUBSTITUTE SHEET

Claims

Claims 1. A method for determining the presence of cancerous cells in a tissue from a patient, which method comprises the steps of: providing a nucleic acid probe comprising a nucleotide sequence at least 8 nucleotides in length which is identical to a portion of the coding sequence of a candidate tumor suppressor gene; obtaining from a patient a first tissue sample potentially comprising cancerous cells; providing a second tissue sample, substantially all of the cells which are non-cancerous; contacting said nucleic acid under stringent hybridizing conditions with RNA of each of said first and second tissue samples; and comparing (a) the amount of hybridization of said nucleic acid probe with said RNA of said first tissue sample, with (b) the amount of hybridization of said nucleic acid probe with said RNA of said second tissue sample, wherein an amount of hybridization with said RNA of said first tissue sample less than one third the amount of hybridization with said RNA of said second tissue sample indicates the presence of cancerous cells in said first tissue sample.
2. A method for determining the presence of cancerous cells in a tissue from a patient, which method comprises the steps of: providing an antibody specific for the gene product of a candidate tumor suppressor gene, said gene product being present in cancerous tissue of a given tissue type at a level less than one third the level of said gene product in noncancerous tissue of said given tissue type; obtaining from a patient a first sample of tissue of said given tissue type, said first sample potentially comprising cancerous cells; providing a second sample of tissue of said given tissue type, essentially all of the cells of which sample are non-cancerous; contacting said antibody with protein of said first and second samples under conditions permitting immunocomplex formation; and comparing (a) the amount of immunocomplex formation in said first sample, with (b) the amount of immunocomplex formation in said second sample, wherein an amount of immunocomplex formation in said first sample less than one third the amount of immunocomplex formation in said second sample indicates the presence of cancerous cells in said first sample of tissue.
3. The method of claim 1 or 2 wherein said candidate tumor suppressor gene is chosen from a gene encoding keratin 5, NB-1 gene product, fibronectin, connexin 26, glutathione-S-transferase i, CaN19 protein, small proline-rich (spr-1) protein, amphiregulin, thymosin beta-4, gamma actin, calpactin light chain (pll) , HBpl7, myosin regulatory light chain, v-fos transformation effector protein, or one of the following mitochondrial genome-encoded proteins: URF4, Co III, or ATPase.
4. The method of claim 1 or 2, wherein said candidate tumor suppressor gene comprises a sequence which hybridizes under stringent conditions to a sequence shown in SEQ ID NO: 3 (Ul) , SEQ ID NO: 4 (U2) , SEQ ID NO: 5 (U3) , SEQ ID NO: 6 (U4) , SEQ ID NO: 7 (U5) , SEQ ID NO: 8 (U6) , SEQ ID NO: 9 (U7) , SEQ ID NO: 10 (U8) , SEQ ID NO: 11 (U9) , or SEQ ID NO: 12 (U10) . 5. The method of claim 1 wherein said contacting step comprises performing a northern analysis or an in situ hybridization analysis.
6. A method for identifying a drug useful for treatment of a cancer, comprising the steps of: identifying a candidate class II tumor suppressor gene, expression of which is suppressed in a given type of cancer cell; providing a first and a second sample of said given type of cancer cell; determining the level of expression of said gene in said first sample; treating said second sample with a candidate drug; and determining the level of expression of said gene in said second sample after treatment with said candidate drug, wherein a drug which increases the level of expression of said gene in said second sample, compared to the level of expression of said gene in said untreated first sample, is potentially useful for treatment of said given type of cancer cell.
7. The method of claim 6, wherein said drug alters a signal transduction pathway in said given type of cancer cell.
8. The method of claim 6, wherein said drug increases synthesis or processing of the mRNA of said candidate tumor suppressor gene in said given type of cancer cell.
9. The method of claim 6, wherein said drug decreases degradation of the messenger RNA transcribed from said candidate tumor suppressor gene in said given type of cancer cell.
10. The method of claim 6, wherein said drug increases protein synthesis from mRNA transcribed from said candidate tumor suppressor gene in said given type of cancer cell.
11. The method of claim 6, wherein said drug decreases degradation of the gene product of said candidate tumor suppressor gene in said given type of cancer cell.
12. The method of claim 6, wherein said drug demethylates methylated residues on DNA.
13. A method for cancer cell treatment comprising the steps of: identifying a patient with cancer cells characterized by a low level of expression of a candidate class II tumor suppressor gene, compared to the level of expression of said gene in normal cells; and treating said patient with a compound which raises the level of expression of said gene in said cancer cells.
14. The method of claim 13 wherein said gene encodes keratin 5, NB-1 gene product, fibronectin, connexin 26, glutathione-S-transferase pi, CaN19 protein, small proline-rich (spr-1) protein, amphiregulin, thymosin beta-4, gamma actin, calpactin light chain (pll) , HBpl7, myosin regulatory light chain, v-fos transformation effector protein, or one of the following mitochondrial genome-encoded proteins: URF4, Co III, or ATPaseδ. 15. The method of claim 13, wherein said candidate tumor suppressor gene comprises a sequence which hybridizes under stringent conditions to a sequence shown in SEQ ID NO: 3 (Ul) , SEQ ID NO: 4 (U2) , SEQ ID NO: 5 (U3) , SEQ ID NO: 6 (U4) , SEQ ID NO: 7 (U5) , SEQ ID NO: 8 (U6), SEQ ID NO: 9 (U7) , SEQ ID NO: 10 (U8) , SEQ ID NO: 11 (U9) , or SEQ ID NO: 12 (U10) .
16. The method of claim 13, wherein said compound demethylates methylated residues in DNA.
17. A method for cancer cell treatment comprising the steps of: identifying a patient with a cancer cell characterized by a low level of expression of a candidate tumor suppressor gene, compared to the level of expression of said gene in normal cells of the same tissue type as said cancer cells; and introducing into said cancer cell a nucleic acid encoding a' candidate tumor suppressor gene.
18. The method of claim 17, wherein said nucleic acid includes an expression control element permitting expression of said candidate tumor suppressor gene in said cancer cell.
19. The method of claim 17, wherein said candidate tumor suppressor gene encodes keratin 5, NB-1 gene product, fibronectin, connexin 26, glutathione-S- transferase pi, CaN19 protein, spr-1 protein, amphiregulin, thymosin beta-4, gamma actin, calpactin light chain (pll), HBpl7, myosin regulatory light chain, v-fos transformation effector protein, or one of the following mitochondrial genome-encoded proteins: URF4, Co III, or ATPaseβ.
20. The method of claim 17, wherein said candidate tumor suppressor gene comprises a sequence which hybridizes under stringent conditions to a sequence Shown in SEQ ID NO: 3 (Ul) , SEQ ID NO: 4 (U2), SEQ ID NO: 5 (U3) , SEQ ID NO: 6 (U4) , SEQ ID NO: 7 (U5) , SEQ ID NO:
8 (U6) , SEQ ID NO: 9 (U7) , SEQ ID NO: 10 (U8) , SEQ ID NO: 11 (U9) , or SEQ ID NO: 12 (U10) .
21. An isolated DNA which hybridizes under stringent conditions to a DNA having the sequence shown in SEQ ID NO: 3 (Ul) .
22. An isolated DNA which hybridizes under stringent conditions to a DNA having the sequence shown in SEQ ID NO: 4 (U2) .
23. An isolated DNA which hybridizes under stringent conditions to a DNA having the sequence shown in SEQ ID NO: 5 (U3) .
24. An isolated DNA which hybridizes under stringent conditions to a DNA having the sequence shown in SEQ ID NO: 6 (U4) .
25. An isolated DNA which hybridizes under stringent conditions to a DNA having the sequence shown in SEQ ID NO: 7 (U5) .
26. An isolated DNA which hybridizes under stringent conditions to a DNA having the sequence shown in SEQ ID NO: 8 (U6) . 27. An isolated DNA which hybridizes under stringent conditions to a DNA having the sequence shown in SEQ ID NO: 9 (U7) .
28. An isolated DNA which hybridizes under stringent conditions to a DNA having the sequence shown in SEQ ID NO: 10 (U8) .
29. An isolated DNA which hybridizes under stringent conditions to a DNA having the sequence shown in SEQ ID NO: 11 (U9) .
30. An isolated DNA which hybridizes under stringent conditions to a DNA having the sequence shown in SEQ ID NO: 12 (U10) .
31. A method of determining the level of a candidate tumor suppressor gene product in a biological fluid, said method comprising obtaining a sample of a biological fluid from a person; contacting proteins in said sample with an antibody specific for a candidate tumor suppressor gene product; and determining the amount of immune complex formation by said antibody, said amount being indicative of the level of said gene product in said sample.
32. The method of claim 31, wherein said biological fluid is blood, urine, or saliva.
33. The method of claim 31, wherein said amount is compared to the amount of immune complex formation by said antibody in a normal control sample. 34. The method of claim 31, wherein said amount is compared to the amount of immune complex formation by said antibody in a sample previously or subsequently obtained from said person.
EP92907799A 1991-02-28 1992-02-28 Cancer diagnosis and therapy. Withdrawn EP0631584A4 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US66221691A 1991-02-28 1991-02-28
US662216 1991-02-28
PCT/US1992/001624 WO1992015602A1 (en) 1991-02-28 1992-02-28 Cancer diagnosis and therapy

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0631584A1 EP0631584A1 (en) 1995-01-04
EP0631584A4 true EP0631584A4 (en) 1998-07-01

Family

ID=24656852

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP92907799A Withdrawn EP0631584A4 (en) 1991-02-28 1992-02-28 Cancer diagnosis and therapy.

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0631584A4 (en)
CA (1) CA2104964A1 (en)
WO (1) WO1992015602A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (21)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CA2143188A1 (en) * 1992-09-01 1994-03-17 Ruth Sager Maspin, a novel serpin with tumor suppressing activity
MX9305855A (en) * 1992-09-24 1995-01-31 Tadatsugu Taniguchi FACTORS 1 AND 2 REGULATORS OF INTERFERON IN THE LATUMORIGENICITY DIAGNOSIS.
PH31414A (en) * 1994-02-24 1998-10-29 Boehringer Ingelheim Int Method of diagnosing cancer precancerous state, orsusceptibility to other forms of diseases by anal ysis of irf-1 specific rna in biopsy samples.
US6794185B1 (en) 1995-03-29 2004-09-21 Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. fohy030 nucleic acid molecules
US6251597B1 (en) 1996-03-29 2001-06-26 Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Methods for detecting fohy030
US5633161A (en) * 1995-03-29 1997-05-27 Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Murine gene fomy030 coding for tumor progression inhibitor
US6825320B1 (en) 1995-03-29 2004-11-30 Millenium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. FOHY03 polypeptides
US6312909B1 (en) 1996-03-29 2001-11-06 Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Compositions and methods for the diagnosis prevention and treatment of tumor progression
JP2000510330A (en) * 1996-04-05 2000-08-15 トーマス・ジェファーソン・ユニバーシティ Methods for diagnosis and prognosis of cancer
EP1332756A3 (en) * 1996-12-30 2003-12-10 The Johns Hopkins University School Of Medicine Compositions and methods for restoring a normal pattern of imprinting to cells
AU5722398A (en) * 1996-12-30 1998-07-31 Johns Hopkins University School Of Medicine, The Compositions and methods for restoring a normal pattern of imprinting to cells
MXPA01009369A (en) * 1999-03-15 2003-06-06 Eos Biotechnology Inc Novel methods of diagnosing colorectal cancer, compositions, and methods of screening for colorectal cancer modulators.
US6455668B1 (en) 2000-01-28 2002-09-24 Eos Biotechnology, Inc. Methods of diagnosing colorectal cancer, compositions, and methods of screening for colorectal cancer modulators
US6566502B1 (en) 2000-01-28 2003-05-20 Eos Biotechnology, Inc. Methods of diagnosing cancer, compositions, and methods of screening for cancer modulators
WO2001055317A2 (en) * 2000-01-31 2001-08-02 Human Genome Sciences, Inc. Nucleic acids, proteins, and antibodies
AU5867901A (en) * 2000-05-04 2001-11-12 Philogen S.R.L. Method for detecting tumors
US6682890B2 (en) 2000-08-17 2004-01-27 Protein Design Labs, Inc. Methods of diagnosing and determining prognosis of colorectal cancer
EP2087001B1 (en) 2006-11-02 2016-10-26 Acceleron Pharma, Inc. Alk1 receptor and ligand antagonists and uses thereof
US10059756B2 (en) 2006-11-02 2018-08-28 Acceleron Pharma Inc. Compositions comprising ALK1-ECD protein
US8642031B2 (en) 2006-11-02 2014-02-04 Acceleron Pharma, Inc. Antagonists of BMP9, BMP10, ALK1 and other ALK1 ligands, and uses thereof
CN113373219A (en) * 2020-03-09 2021-09-10 复旦大学附属华山医院 Detection method and application of tumor stem cells

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4888278A (en) * 1985-10-22 1989-12-19 University Of Massachusetts Medical Center In-situ hybridization to detect nucleic acid sequences in morphologically intact cells

Non-Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
ANISOWICZ ET AL.: "Functional diversity of gro gene expression in human fibroblasts and mammary epithelial cells", PROC.NATL.ACAD.SCI., vol. 85, 1988, USA, pages 9645 - 9649, XP002048606 *
BAND AND SAGER: "Distinctive traits of normal and tumor-derived human mammary epithelial cells expressed in a medium that supports long-term growth of both cell types", PROC.NATL.ACAD.SCI., vol. 86, 1989, USA, pages 1249 - 1253, XP002048605 *
LEE ET AL.: "Posistive selection of candidate tumor-suppressor genes by subtractive hybridization", PROC.NATL.ACAD.SCI., vol. 88, April 1991 (1991-04-01), USA, pages 2825 - 2829, XP002048608 *
See also references of WO9215602A1 *
YANCOPOULOS ET AL.: "Isolation of coordinately regulated genes that are expressed in discrete stages of B-cell development", PROC.NATL.ACAD.SCI., vol. 87, 1990, USA, pages 5759 - 5763, XP002048607 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO1992015602A1 (en) 1992-09-17
CA2104964A1 (en) 1992-08-29
EP0631584A1 (en) 1995-01-04

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0631584A1 (en) Cancer diagnosis and therapy
EP1064372B1 (en) Compounds and methods for therapy and diagnosis of lung cancer
CA1341576C (en) Diagnosis of retinoblastoma
US5527676A (en) Detection of loss of the wild-type P53 gene and kits therefor
EP0390323B1 (en) Detection of loss of the wild-type p53 gene
CA2443617C (en) Repeat sequences of the ca125 gene and their use for diagnostic and therapeutic interventions
US6800617B1 (en) Methods for restoring wild-type p53 gene function
US6677312B1 (en) Methods for restoring wild-type p53 gene function
WO1999038973A2 (en) Compounds for therapy and diagnosis of lung cancer and methods for their use
JP2008154589A (en) Method of detecting and treating tuberous sclerosis complex associated disorders
US5688641A (en) Cancer diagnosis using nucleic acid hybridization
KR20010022741A (en) ISOLATION OF A NOVEL SENESCENCE-FACTOR GENE, p23
US20030143667A1 (en) Repeat sequences of the CA125 gene and their use for diagnostic and therapeutic interventions
Bailleul et al. Chemical induction of oncogene mutations and growth factor activity in mouse skin carcinogenesis.
AU639532B2 (en) Diagnostic probe for detecting human stomach cancer
US6040173A (en) Nucleic acid encoding a novel mammalian protein associated with uncontrolled cell division
Posteraro et al. Compound heterozygosity for an out-of-frame deletion and a splice site mutation in the LAMB3 gene causes nonlethal junctional epidermolysis bullosa
US6537754B1 (en) Association of kinesin with sensitivity to chemotherapeutic drugs
AU1448895A (en) Association of kinesin with sensitivity to chemotherapeutic drugs
EP1151094A1 (en) Cervical cancer treatment
US5874234A (en) Assay for a novel mammalian protein associated with uncontrolled cell division
CA2464700A1 (en) Ibc-1 (invasive breast cancer-1), a putative oncogene amplified in breast cancer
CA2473474A1 (en) Alteration of rab38 function to modulate mammalian pigmentation
US20040002097A1 (en) Association of kinesin with sensitivity to chemotherapeutic drugs
JP2009195236A (en) Compound for immunotherapy and diagnosis of breast cancer and method for their use

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19930909

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): CH DE FR GB IT LI SE

A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

Effective date: 19980518

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A4

Designated state(s): CH DE FR GB IT LI SE

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 19980817