EP0598115B1 - Wasser-in-öl-emulsion-sprengstoffzusammensetzung - Google Patents

Wasser-in-öl-emulsion-sprengstoffzusammensetzung Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0598115B1
EP0598115B1 EP90912461A EP90912461A EP0598115B1 EP 0598115 B1 EP0598115 B1 EP 0598115B1 EP 90912461 A EP90912461 A EP 90912461A EP 90912461 A EP90912461 A EP 90912461A EP 0598115 B1 EP0598115 B1 EP 0598115B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
explosive composition
retaining agent
weight
explosive
prepared
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP90912461A
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0598115A4 (de
EP0598115A1 (de
Inventor
Akio Torii
Yukio Kato
Fumihiko Sumiya
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
NOF Corp
Original Assignee
NOF Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from JP02205522A external-priority patent/JP3019375B2/ja
Application filed by NOF Corp filed Critical NOF Corp
Publication of EP0598115A4 publication Critical patent/EP0598115A4/de
Publication of EP0598115A1 publication Critical patent/EP0598115A1/de
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0598115B1 publication Critical patent/EP0598115B1/de
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C06—EXPLOSIVES; MATCHES
    • C06B—EXPLOSIVES OR THERMIC COMPOSITIONS; MANUFACTURE THEREOF; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS EXPLOSIVES
    • C06B47/00—Compositions in which the components are separately stored until the moment of burning or explosion, e.g. "Sprengel"-type explosives; Suspensions of solid component in a normally non-explosive liquid phase, including a thickened aqueous phase
    • C06B47/14—Compositions in which the components are separately stored until the moment of burning or explosion, e.g. "Sprengel"-type explosives; Suspensions of solid component in a normally non-explosive liquid phase, including a thickened aqueous phase comprising a solid component and an aqueous phase
    • C06B47/145—Water in oil emulsion type explosives in which a carbonaceous fuel forms the continuous phase

Definitions

  • This invention relates to a water-in-oil emulsion explosive (hereinafter abbreviated as W/O explosive) composition having high underwater explosion energy, which can be used as an explosive for coal mining and in other mining industries.
  • W/O explosive water-in-oil emulsion explosive
  • Aluminum powder-containing W/O explosives are disclosed, for example, in the specifications of Japanese Patent Laid-open Application No. 110308/1979, U.S. Patent Nos. 3770522 and 3447978. These explosives each contain a glass microballoon (GMB) which acts as a gas retaining agent, and an aluminum powder.
  • GMB glass microballoon
  • One proposed technique of enhancing the underwater explosion energy of the W/O explosive compositions is to increase the content of inorganic oxidizer salt such as ammonium nitrate, sodium nitrate and potassium nitrate.
  • the W/O explosive compositions disclosed in the above three references may show enhanced power in the detonation velocity, sympathetic detonation and ballistic mortar value, but the amount of the aluminum powder to be added in combination with GMB is limited to about 20% by weight in view of production limitations. These explosives suffer a problem in that they do not explode if the content of the aluminum powder is increased. Moreover, the content of the inorganic oxidizer salt cannot be increased so much because of production limitations. Therefore the effect of the inorganic oxidizer salt is small.
  • GB-A-2132998 discloses an emulsion type explosive composition containing 5% by weight of aluminium powder and uses C25/250 glass microballoons as an inorganic gas-retaining agent.
  • EP-A-0237274 discloses an emulsion type explosive composition containing 1% by weight of aluminium powder. Neither of these known compositions involves a sufficient aluminium content to significantly increase the explosion energy compared with that of an emulsion not containing aluminium powder.
  • EP-A-0305104 discloses an emulsion type explosive composition containing 1.15% by weight of an organic gas-retaining agent.
  • This invention provides an explosive composition containing a water-in-oil emulsion including a continuous phase, consisting of a carbonaceous fuel component, a disperse phase consisting of an aqueous solution of inorganic oxidizer salt, an emulsifier and a gas-retaining agent having an average particle size of 10 to 4000 ⁇ m, said explosive composition being characterised in that:
  • the carbonaceous fuel which forms a continuous phase includes those conventionally employed in the W/O explosives; for example, in the first aspect of this invention, hydrocarbons such as paraffinic hydrocarbons, olefinic hydrocarbons, naphthenic hydrocarbons, aromatic hydrocarbons, saturated or unsaturated hydrocarbons, petroleum purified mineral oils, lubricants and liquid paraffin; hydrocarbon derivatives such as nitrohydrocarbon; waxes including those derived from fuel oils and/or petroleum such as purified or unpurified microcrystalline wax, paraffin wax and petrolatum, mineral waxes such as montan wax, animal waxes such as whale wax and insect waxes such as beeswax. These carbonaceous fuels can be used alone or in admixture.
  • hydrocarbons such as paraffinic hydrocarbons, olefinic hydrocarbons, naphthenic hydrocarbons, aromatic hydrocarbons, saturated or unsaturated hydrocarbons, petroleum purified mineral oils, lubricants and liquid paraffin
  • hydrocarbon derivatives such
  • Preferred carbonaceous fuels include microcrystalline wax and petrolatum in view of storage stability, and particularly preferred in microcrystalline wax.
  • preferred carbonaceous fuels to be used in the second aspect of this invention include waxes such as microcrystalline wax, paraffin wax and polyethylene wax; and fuel oils such as light oils of classification No. 2, which are conventionally used in the W/O explosives.
  • the waxes are particularly preferred in view of their texture such as hardness etc.
  • a low-molecular weight hydrocarbon polymer such as a petroleum resin, a low-molecular weight polyethylene and a low-molecular weight polypropylene may be added in combination with the carbonaceous fuel component.
  • the carbonaceous fuel is usually added in an amount of 1 to 10 % by weight based on the total amount of the W/O explosive.
  • the inorganic oxidizer salt which forms the disperse phase in the form of aqueous solution, includes those conventionally used in the W/O explosive compositions; for example, nitrates of alkali or alkaline earth metals such as ammonium nitrate, sodium nitrate and potassium nitrate; and inorganic chlorates or perchlorates such as sodium chlorate, ammonium perchlorate and sodium perchlorate. Usually ammonium nitrate is used alone or in admixture with other inorganic oxidizer salt.
  • the inorganic oxidizer salt is usually added in an amount of 5 to 90 % by weight, preferably 40 to 80 % by weight.
  • the water content in the W/O explosive composition according to this invention is preferably in the range of 3 to 30 % by weight, more preferably 7 to 30 % by weight.
  • any of those conventionally used in the W/O explosives can be used; for example, fatty acid esters of sorbitan such as sorbitan monolaurate, sorbitan monooleate, sorbitan monopalmitate, sorbitan monostearate, sorbitan sesquioleate, sorbitan dioleate and sorbitan trioleate; mono or diglycerides of fatty acids such as stearic acid monoglyceride; fatty acid esters of polyoxyethylene sorbitan, oxazoline derivatives, imidazoline derivatives, phosphoric acid esters, alkali or alkaline earth metal salts of fatty acids and primary, secondary or tertiary amine salts.
  • fatty acid esters of sorbitan such as sorbitan monolaurate, sorbitan monooleate, sorbitan monopalmitate, sorbitan monostearate, sorbitan sesquioleate, sorbitan dioleate and
  • emulsifiers may be used alone or in admixture.
  • Preferred of these emulsifiers are fatty acid esters of sorbitan.
  • the emulsifier is preferably added in an amount of 0.1 to 10 % by weight, more preferably 1 to 5 % by weight.
  • sensitizer which enhances detonation reliability and improves low-temperature detonating properties
  • those conventionally used in the W/O explosives such as monomethylamine nitrate, hydrazine nitrate and ethylenediamine nitrate can be used.
  • hydrazine nitrate is preferred since it can improve solubility of ammonium nitrate and has high explosion energy.
  • sensitizer it is preferably added in an mount of 1 to 40 % by weight, more preferably not more than 30 % by weight, most preferably not more than 20 % by weight in the W/O explosive composition. If the percentage of the sensitizer exceeds 40 % by weight, danger in handling the explosive composition will sometimes be increased.
  • a chelating agent such as sodium ethylenediaminetetraacetate so as to prevent decomposition of the hydrazine nitrate.
  • the chelating agent is preferably added in an amount of 0.1 to 10 % by weight based on the amount of the sensitizer.
  • the gas-retaining agent is an organic material.
  • the organic gas-retaining agent may be selected from various types of single hollow microspheres or bubble assemblies containing a plurality of cells; for example, carbonaceous hollow microspheres obtained from pitch, coal, etc.; synthetic resin hollow microspheres obtained from phenol resins, polyvinylidene chloride, epoxy resins, urea resins, etc.
  • the bubble assemblies containing a plurality of cells include milled powder and grains prepared by incorporating air into a raw material synthetic high polymer, for example, olefins such as ethylene, propylene and styrene; polymers of vinyl compounds such as vinylidene chloride, vinyl alcohols, vinyl acetate, and acrylic acid, methacrylic acid or esters thereof, or copolymers, modified polymers or mixed polymers thereof; synthetic polymers such as polyurethane, polyester, polyamide, urea resin, epoxy resin and phenol resin, by means of various techniques such as mechanical foaming, chemical foaming, micro-encapsulation, incorporation of an easily volatile material, etc., followed by milling.
  • olefins such as ethylene, propylene and styrene
  • polymers of vinyl compounds such as vinylidene chloride, vinyl alcohols, vinyl acetate, and acrylic acid, methacrylic acid or esters thereof, or copolymers, modified polymers or mixed polymers thereof
  • organic gas-retaining agents are those made from polystyrene, polyethylene or polyvinylidene chloride. These organic gas-retaining agents, unlike the inorganic gas-retaining agents such as glass, silica, etc., do not damage the emulsion membrane and can maintain the emulsion stable. These organic gas-retaining agents are superior to the inorganic ones, since they have low specific gravity, they do not assume a form of inactive additive, and they are easily available at low costs.
  • an explosive which can exhibit the designed detonation performance and has good storage stability can be provided.
  • the organic gas-retaining agent may be of single bubbles or assemblies of single bubbles, and the diameter of which is not critical.
  • one having an average particle size in the range of 10 to 4,000 ⁇ m is used. If one having an average particle size of less than 10 ⁇ m is used, it comes to have a greater specific gravity and must be added in an increased amount; whereas if one having an average size of greater than 4,000 ⁇ m is used, the underwater explosion energy will be lowered.
  • the particle shape of the gas-retaining agent may be any spherical, cylindrical, polyhedral, etc.
  • a suitable organic gas-retaining agent is selected depending on the application of the W/O explosive.
  • the organic gas-retaining agent is preferably added in an amount of 1 to 50 % by volume in the W/O explosive. If the content of the organic gas-retaining agent is less than 1 % by volume, cap-sensitivity of the resulting explosive composition will be lowered or the detonation will be interrupted; whereas if the content of the organic gas-retaining agent exceeds 50 % by volume, the underwater explosion energy tends to be lowered.
  • the aluminum powder is used as a fuel and also to improve underwater explosion energy.
  • Ordinary aluminum powders can be used, having a particle size of not more than 1 mm, preferably in the range of 0.01 to 1 mm, more preferably in the range of 0.03 to 0.1 mm. If an aluminum powder having a particle size of more than 1 mm is used, the underwater explosion energy will be lowered.
  • the particle shape of the aluminum powder may be any spherical, scaly, etc.
  • the aluminum powder can be used in a greater amount than in the prior art explosive compositions. If no sensitizer is added, the content of the aluminum powder is in the range of 10 to 70 % by weight, preferably in the range of 20 to 70 % by weight; whereas if a sensitizer is added, it is in the range of 10 to 70 % by weight. If the content of the aluminum powder is less than 10 % by weight, the fuel component will be insufficient to give reduced detonation performance; while if it exceeds 70 % by weight, inactive aluminum powder remains in the resulting composition to reduce the detonation performance.
  • the preferred compounding ratio of the respective components in the W/O explosive composition in the first aspect of this invention is as follows: 40 to 90 parts by weight of an inorganic oxidizer salt; 7 to 30 parts by weight of water; 0.5 to 10 parts by weight of a carbonaceous fuel; 0.5 to 10 parts by weight of an emulsifier; 1 to 40 parts by weight of a sensitizer; 1 to 50 % by volume of an organic gas-retaining agent having an average particle size of 10 to 4,000 ⁇ m ; and 10 to 70 % by weight of an aluminum powder having an average particle size of not more than 1 mm .
  • the preferred compounding ratio of the respective components in the second aspect of this invention is as follows: 40 to 90 parts by weight of an inorganic oxidizer salt; 7 to 30 parts by weight of water; 0.5 to 10 parts by weight of a carbonaceous fuel; 0.5 to 10 parts by weight of an emulsifier; 1 to 40 parts by weight of a sensitizer; 1 to 50 % by volume of an organic gas-retaining agent; and 10 to 70 % by weight of an aluminum powder.
  • the content of the inorganic oxidizer salt is less than 40 % by weight, the detonation performance of the resulting composition will be lowered; whereas if it exceeds 90 % by weight, solubility thereof will be reduced. If the water content is less than 7 % by weight, solubility of the inorganic oxidizer salt will be lowered; whereas if it exceeds 30 % by weight, the contents of the other components will relatively be smaller to easily lower the detonation performance of the resulting composition. Addition of the carbonaceous fuel in an amount of less than 0.5 % by weight cannot give a very fine emulsion to provide small contact area; whereas if it exceeds 10 % by weight, the content of the inorganic oxidizer salt will relatively be smaller.
  • the content of the emulsifier is less than 0.5 % by weight, stability of the emulsion tends to be lowered; whereas if it exceeds 10 % by weight, detonation performance of the resulting composition can hardly be improved.
  • the content of the sensitizer is less than 1 % by weight, the resulting composition shows insufficient denotation reliability; whereas if it exceeds 40 % by weight, danger in the handling of the resulting composition will be increased.
  • the content of the organic gas-retaining agent is less than 1 % by volume, cap-sensitivity of the resulting composition may be reduced and explosion may be interrupted; whereas if it exceeds 50 % by volume, the underwater explosion energy tends to be lowered.
  • the aluminum powder is added in an amount of more than or less than the specified range of 10 to 70 % by weight, the detonation performance of the resulting explosive composition tends to be lowered.
  • the present W/O explosive composition can be prepared, for example, in the following manner.
  • An inorganic oxidizer salt is dissolved in a hot water (ca. 60 to 100°C) to prepare an aqueous solution of inorganic oxidizer salt.
  • a carbonaceous fuel and an emulsifier are mixed by heating at a temperature where they assume a liquid state, usually at 70 to 90°C, to prepare a combustible material mixture.
  • the aqueous solution of the inorganic oxidizer salt and the combustible material mixture prepared above are mixed by stirring at a temperature of 60 to 90°C at a rate of about 600 to 6,000 rpm to provide a W/O emulsion.
  • an organic gas-retaining agent and an aluminum powder are admixed to the resulting W/O emulsion to give a W/O explosive composition.
  • the thus obtained W/O explosive composition characteristically shows a particularly enhanced underwater explosion energy owing to the organic gas-retaining agent employed as the gas-retaining agent and also aluminum powder incorporated therein, since the emulsion membrane cannot easily be damaged by the organic gas-retaining agent unlike by the inorganic gas-retaining agent, and since the organic gas-retaining agent has a smaller specific gravity than the inorganic gas-retaining agent, and thus the proportion of the emulsion will be greater to allow the aluminum powder to be incorporated in an increased amount.
  • the underwater explosion energy can be divided into shock energy (Es) and bubble energy (Eb).
  • Es shock energy
  • Eb bubble energy
  • the ratio of Eb to Es is usually about 3, and the combination of these two energy values Es and Eb is the total underwater explosion energy (see Encyclopedia of Explosives, Vol. 10, 1983, published by American Army Armament Research and Development Command).
  • the present W/O explosive composition is of high safety, since it is an emulsion type hydrated explosive.
  • a W/O explosive composition was prepared using ammonium nitrate as the inorganic oxidizer salt, sorbitan monooleate as the emulsifier, a microcrystalline wax as the carbonaceous fuel, single-bubble assemblies of polystyrene having an average particle size of 300 ⁇ m as the gas retaining agent, hydrazine nitrate as the sensitizer and an aluminum powder having an average particle size of 30 ⁇ m.
  • the proportion of the respective components are as shown in the following Tables 1 and 2.
  • the procedure of preparing the W/O explosive composition is as follows: Ammonium nitrate and hydrazine nitrate were dissolved in water by heating at about 85°C. Meanwhile, a mixture of the microcrystalline wax and sorbitan monooleate was melted at about 85°C, and the solution prepared above was added to the melted mixture, followed by stirring by an agitating blade to effect emulsification. The gas-retaining agent and aluminum powder were admixed to the resulting emulsion to provide a W/O explosive composition. Underwater explosion energy was determined for the thus obtained W/O explosive composition, and the results are also shown in Tables 1 and 2.
  • a W/O explosive composition was prepared in the same manner as in Examples 1 to 6, except that the aluminum powder was omitted.
  • the thus prepared W/O explosive composition was tested in the same manner as in Example 1, and the results are as shown in Table 3.
  • a W/O explosive composition was prepared in the same manner as in Example 3, except that the organic gas-retaining agent was replaced by GMB having an average particle size of 50 ⁇ m as the inorganic gas-retaining agent.
  • the thus prepared W/O explosive composition was tested in the same manner as in Examples 1 to 6, and the results are as shown in Table 3.
  • the W/O explosive compositions obtained in Examples 1 to 6 each showed a high total energy of 116 to 213 as the underwater explosion energy over the one obtained in Comparative Example 1, provided that the value of Comparative Example 1 is 100, and the explosive compositions obtained in Examples 5 and 6 each showed a value more than twice the value of the Comparative Example 1.
  • the W/O explosive composition of Comparative Example 1 showed only a low level of underwater explosion energy, since it does not contain an aluminum powder although it contains an organic gas-retaining agent.
  • the W/O explosive composition of Comparative Example 2 found difficulty in maintaining the shape of the W/O explosive and did not explode. This was because it uses a combination of an aluminum powder and GMB as the inorganic gas-retaining agent, and the aluminum powder was used in an increased amount.
  • the Es value of the W/O explosive (a standard W/O explosive composition) in Comparative Example 1 is about 0.7 MJ/kg; the Eb value thereof, about 2.1 MJ/kg; and the total energy, about 2.8 MJ/kg. Meanwhile, the total energy of the W/O explosive composition in each Example is increased to about 3.2 MJ/kg (Example 1) to 6.0 MJ/kg (Example 6).
  • a W/O explosive was prepared using the explosive composition as shown in Table 4 in the following manner: To 10.5 parts of water were added 74.4 parts of ammonium nitrate as the inorganic oxidizer salt, 10 parts of hydrazine nitrate as the sensitizer and 0.5 part of sodium ethylenediaminetetraacetate as the chelating agent, and they were dissolved well with heating at 90°C to prepare an aqueous solution of inorganic oxidizer salt. Meanwhile, 2.3 parts of Waxrex 602 as the carbonaceous fuel and 2.3 parts of sorbitan monooleate as the emulsifier were mixed with heating at 90°C to prepare a combustible material mixture. To the resulting mixture was added slowly the aqueous solution of inorganic oxidizer salt to effect emulsification by stirring at 650 rpm with heating at 90°C.
  • the resulting emulsion was further stirred at 1,600 rpm for one minute to provide a W/O emulsion.
  • 0.7 part of an organic gas-retaining agent having an average particle size of 300 ⁇ m and 11 parts of an aluminum powder were admixed to the W/O emulsion at 60 to 80°C to give a W/O explosive composition.
  • Underwater explosion energy was determined for the thus obtained W/O explosive composition, and the results are as shown in the following Table 7.
  • a W/O explosive composition was prepared as shown in Table 4 in the same manner as in Example 7, except that the sensitizer and chelating agent were omitted and that the content of the aluminum powder was changed. Performance of the resulting W/O explosive composition was evaluated, and the results are as shown in Table 7.
  • the explosive composition prepared here showed a higher total energy ratio than that prepared in Example 7.
  • a W/O explosive composition was prepared as shown in Table 4 substantially in the same manner as in Example 7, except that the content of the aluminum powder was increased. Performance of the resulting W/O explosive composition was evaluated, and the results are as shown in Table 7.
  • the explosive composition prepared here showed a higher total energy ratio than that prepared in Example 7.
  • a W/O explosive composition was prepared as shown in Table 5 substantially in the same manner as in Example 8, except that the content of the aluminum powder was increased. Performance of the resulting W/O explosive composition was evaluated, and the results are as shown in Table 8.
  • the explosive composition prepared here showed a higher total energy ratio than that prepared in Example 8.
  • a W/O explosive composition was prepared as shown in Table 5 substantially in the same manner as in Example 9, except that the content of the aluminum powder was increased. Performance of the resulting W/O explosive composition was evaluated, and the results are as shown in Table 8.
  • the explosive composition prepared here showed a higher total energy ratio than that prepared in Example 9.
  • a W/O explosive composition was prepared as shown in Table 5 substantially in the same manner as in Example 11, except that the content of the aluminum powder was increased. Performance of the resulting W/O explosive composition was evaluated, and the results are as shown in Table 8.
  • the explosive composition prepared here showed a slightly higher total energy ratio than that prepared in Example 11.
  • a W/O explosive composition was prepared as shown in Table 6 substantially in the same manner as in Example 10, except that the content of the aluminum powder was increased. Performance of the resulting W/O explosive composition was evaluated, and the results are as shown in Table 9.
  • the explosive composition prepared here showed a slightly higher total energy ratio than that prepared in Example 10.
  • a W/O explosive composition was prepared as shown in Table 6 substantially in the same manner as in Example 12, except that the content of the aluminum powder was increased. Performance of the resulting W/O explosive composition was evaluated, and the results are as shown in Table 9.
  • the explosive composition prepared here showed a slightly higher total energy ratio than that prepared in Example 12.
  • a W/O explosive composition was prepared as shown in Table 6 substantially in the same manner as in Example 13, except that the content of the aluminum powder was increased. Performance of the resulting W/O explosive composition was evaluated, and the results are as shown in Table 9.
  • the explosive composition prepared here showed a slightly higher total energy ratio than that prepared in Example 13.
  • a W/O explosive composition was prepared as shown in Table 10 in the same manner as in Example 1, except that the aluminum powder was omitted. Performance of the resulting W/O explosive composition was evaluated, and the results are as shown in Table 16.
  • the thus prepared explosive composition is a standard composition for calculating the respective energy ratio.
  • a W/O explosive composition was prepared as shown in Table 10 in the same manner as in Example 7, except that the content of the aluminum powder was reduced. Performance of the resulting W/O explosive composition was evaluated, and the results are as shown in Table 16.
  • the explosive composition prepared here showed a lower total energy ratio than that prepared in Example 7.
  • a W/O explosive composition was prepared as shown in Table 10 in the same manner as in Example 7, except that the content of the aluminum powder was increased. Performance of the resulting W/O explosive composition was evaluated, and the results are as shown in Table 16. This explosive composition did not explode.
  • a W/O explosive composition was prepared as shown in Table 11 substantially in the same manner as in Comparative Example 4, except that an aluminum powder having a greater particle size was used. Performance of the resulting W/O explosive composition was evaluated, and the results are as shown in Table 17. This explosive composition did not explode.
  • a W/O explosive composition was prepared as shown in Table 11 substantially in the same manner as in Comparative Example 5, except that an aluminum powder having a greater particle size was used. Performance of the resulting W/O explosive composition was evaluated, and the results are as shown in Table 17. This explosive composition did not explode.
  • a W/O explosive composition was prepared as shown in Table 11 substantially in the same manner as in Example 8, except that the content of the aluminum powder was reduced. Performance of the resulting W/O explosive composition was evaluated, and the results are as shown in Table 17.
  • the explosive composition prepared here showed a lower total energy ratio than that prepared in Example 8.
  • a W/O explosive composition was prepared as shown in Table 12 substantially in the same manner as in Example 8, except that the content of the aluminum powder was increased. Performance of the resulting W/O explosive composition was evaluated, and the results are as shown in Table 18. This explosive composition did not explode.
  • a W/O explosive composition was prepared as shown in Table 12 substantially in the same manner as in Comparative Example 8, except that an aluminum powder having a greater particle size was used. Performance of the resulting W/O explosive composition was evaluated, and the results are as shown in Table 18. This explosive composition did not explode.
  • a W/O explosive composition was prepared as shown in Table 12 substantially in the same manner as in Comparative Example 9, except that an aluminum powder having a greater particle size was used. Performance of the resulting W/O explosive composition was evaluated, and the results are as shown in Table 18. This explosive composition did not explode.
  • the explosive composition prepared here showed a lower total energy ratio than that prepared in Example 9.
  • a W/O explosive composition was prepared as shown in Table 13 substantially in the same manner as in Example 9, except that a resin microballoon (RMB) having a smaller average particle size was used as the gas-retaining agent. Performance of the resulting W/O explosive composition was evaluated, and the results are as shown in Table 19.
  • RMB resin microballoon
  • the explosive composition prepared here showed a lower total energy ratio than that prepared in Example 9.
  • a W/O explosive composition was prepared as shown in Table 13 substantially in the same manner as in Example 9, except that an expanded polystyrene foam having a greater average particle size was used as the gas-retaining agent. Performance of the resulting W/O explosive composition was evaluated, and the results are as shown in Table 19. This explosive composition did not explode.
  • a W/O explosive composition was prepared as shown in Table 14 substantially in the same manner as in Example 10, except that the organic gas-retaining agent used as the gas-retaining agent was replaced by a Shirasu microballoon (SMB) which is an inorganic gas-retaining agent. Performance of the resulting W/O explosive composition was evaluated, and the results are as shown in Table 20.
  • SMB Shirasu microballoon
  • the explosive composition prepared here showed a lower total energy ratio than that prepared in Example 10.
  • a W/O explosive composition was prepared as shown in Table 14 substantially in the same manner as in Example 10, except that a resin microballoon (RMB) having a smaller average particle size was used as the gas-retaining agent. Performance of the resulting W/O explosive composition was evaluated, and the results are as shown in Table 20.
  • RMB resin microballoon
  • the explosive composition prepared here showed a lower total energy ratio than that prepared in Example 10.
  • a W/O explosive composition was prepared as shown in Table 14 substantially in the same manner as in Example 10, except that an expanded polystyrene foam having a greater average particle size was used as the gas retaining agent. Performance of the resulting W/O explosive composition was evaluated, and the results are as shown in Table 20. This explosive composition did not explode.
  • a W/O explosive composition was prepared as shown in Table 15 substantially in the same manner as in Comparative Example 3, except that the content of the organic gas-retaining agent was increased. Performance of the resulting W/O explosive composition was evaluated, and the results are as shown in Table 21. This explosive composition did not explode.
  • a W/O explosive composition was prepared as shown in Table 15 substantially in the same manner as in Comparative Example 3, except that the organic gas-retaining agent was omitted.
  • a W/O explosive composition was prepared as shown in Table 15 substantially in the same manner as in Comparative Example 3, except that the content of the organic gas-retaining agent was increased. Performance of the resulting W/O explosive composition was evaluated, and the results are as shown in Table 21. This explosive composition did not explode.
  • a W/O explosive composition was prepared as shown in Table 15 substantially in the same manner as in Comparative Example 3, except that the organic gas-retaining agent and sensitizer were omitted. Performance of the resulting W/O explosive composition was evaluated, and the results are as shown in Table 21. This explosive composition did not explode.
  • Comparative Example 3 The total energy in Comparative Example 3 was about 2.8 MJ/kg; whereas those of Examples were in the range of 3.2 MJ/kg (Example 7) to 6.0 MJ/kg (Example 14). It can be seen that the total energy values of Examples are considerably higher than that in Comparative Example 3.
  • Example 1 2 3 Composition (%) by-weight) Aqueous oxidizer salt Ammonium nitrate 74 74 74 Water 10.5 10.5 10.5 Sensitizer Hydrazine nitrate 10.5 10.5 10.5 Emulsifier Sorbitan monooleate 2.2 2.2 2.2 Carbonaceous fuel Microcrystalline wax 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 Organic gas-retaining agent (Unit of the parenthesized values is volume %) 0.6 (18.5) 0.6 (17.7) 0.6 (16.6) Inorganic gas-retaining agent (Unit of the parenthesized values is volume %) - - - Aluminum powder (The parenthesized values are outer percentage) 10 (11) 20 (25) 30 (43) Performance Apparent specific gravity (g/cc) 1.17 1.29 1.34 Underwater Explosion energy Ratio of shock energy 101 122 130 Ratio of bubble energy 121 165 200 Rati

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Air Bags (AREA)
  • Solid Fuels And Fuel-Associated Substances (AREA)
  • Liquid Carbonaceous Fuels (AREA)
  • Colloid Chemistry (AREA)

Claims (7)

  1. Sprengstoffzusammensetzung, welche eine Wasser-in-Öl-Emulsion enthält, die eine kontinuierliche Phase aus einer kohlenstoffhaltigen Brennstoffkomponente, eine disperse Phase aus einer wäßrigen Lösung eines anorganischen, oxidierenden Salzes, einen Emulgator und ein Gas zurückhaltendes Mittel mit einer durchschnittlichen Teilchengröße von 10 bis 4000 µm umfaßt, wobei die Sprengstoffzusammensetzung dadurch gekennzeichnet ist, daß
    das Gas zurückhaltende Mittel ein organisches, Gas-zurückhaltendes Mittel umfaßt, und daß
    die Sprengstoffzusammensetzung 20 bis 70 Gew.-%, bezogen auf die Gesamtmenge der Sprengstoffzusammensetzung, eines Aluminiumpulvers mit einer durchschnittlichen Teilchengröße von nicht über 1 mm umfaßt.
  2. Sprengstoffzusammensetzung nach Anspruch 1, bei der das Aluminiumpulver eine kugelige oder Schuppen-Form aufweist.
  3. Sprengstoffzusammensetzung nach Anspruch 1 oder Anspruch 2, bei der das organische, Gas zurückhaltende Mittel mindestens eines ausgewählt unter Polystyrol, Polyethylen und Polyvinylidenchlorid ist.
  4. Sprengstoffzusammensetzung nach einem der vorhergehenden Ansprüche, das zusätzlich ein Sensibilisierungsmittel enthält.
  5. Sprengstoffzusammensetzung nach Anspruch 4, bei der das Sensibilisierungsmittel mindestens eines ausgewählt unter Monomethylamidnitrat, Hydrazinnitrat und Ethylendiaminnitrat ist.
  6. Sprengstoffzusammensetzung nach Anspruch 5, bei der das Sensibilisierungsmittel Hydrazinnitrat enthält und bei der die Sprengstoffzusammensetzung weiter ein Chelatierungsmittel aufweist, um eine Zersetzung des Sensibilisierungsmittels zu vermeiden.
  7. Sprengstoffzusammensetzung nach Anspruch 6, bei der der Gehalt an Hydrazinnitrat 1 bis 20 Gew.-%, bezogen auf die Gesamtmenge der Sprengstoffzusammensetzung und der Gehalt an Chelatisierungsmittel 0,1 bis 10 Gew.-%, bezogen auf die Menge an Hydrazinnitrat, beträgt.
EP90912461A 1989-08-23 1990-08-22 Wasser-in-öl-emulsion-sprengstoffzusammensetzung Expired - Lifetime EP0598115B1 (de)

Applications Claiming Priority (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP216656/89 1989-08-23
JP21665689 1989-08-23
JP205522/90 1990-08-01
JP02205522A JP3019375B2 (ja) 1989-08-23 1990-08-01 油中水型エマルション爆薬組成物
PCT/JP1990/001068 WO1991002706A1 (fr) 1989-08-23 1990-08-22 Emulsion huileuse explosive

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0598115A4 EP0598115A4 (de) 1993-01-18
EP0598115A1 EP0598115A1 (de) 1994-05-25
EP0598115B1 true EP0598115B1 (de) 1998-04-08

Family

ID=26515098

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP90912461A Expired - Lifetime EP0598115B1 (de) 1989-08-23 1990-08-22 Wasser-in-öl-emulsion-sprengstoffzusammensetzung

Country Status (4)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0598115B1 (de)
CA (1) CA2065848C (de)
DE (1) DE69032230T2 (de)
WO (1) WO1991002706A1 (de)

Families Citing this family (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2780726B1 (fr) * 1998-07-03 2000-08-25 Nobel Explosifs France Emulsions explosives encartouchees energetiques
US6113715A (en) * 1998-07-09 2000-09-05 Dyno Nobel Inc. Method for forming an emulsion explosive composition
DE10031917B4 (de) * 2000-06-07 2005-08-04 H. Hiendl Gmbh & Co. Kg Verwendung einer Wasser-in-Öl-Emulsion als Betontrennmittel
US9573857B2 (en) 2012-03-12 2017-02-21 University Of Central Florida Research Foundation, Inc. Compositions having aluminum particles dispersed in a continuous phase
CN103130590A (zh) * 2012-12-17 2013-06-05 薛世忠 一种低碳排放的炸药生产方法
FR3021313B1 (fr) * 2014-05-20 2016-06-17 Nitrates & Innovation Produit explosif en cartouche obtenu a partir de melange d'emulsion et de billes de polystyrene

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3151009A (en) * 1961-08-25 1964-09-29 Jr Harry A Toulmin Catalyzed metal fuel
GB1593741A (en) * 1977-06-24 1981-07-22 Alcan Res & Dev Aluminium powder blasting slurry sensitizer
ZW23483A1 (en) * 1982-11-04 1985-07-12 Aeci Ltd An emulsion explosive having a solid fuel component of ferrosilicon
JPS6090887A (ja) * 1983-10-21 1985-05-22 日本油脂株式会社 油中水型エマルシヨン爆薬組成物
JPH0637344B2 (ja) * 1986-03-10 1994-05-18 日本油脂株式会社 油中水型エマルシヨン爆薬組成物
JPH0684273B2 (ja) * 1987-08-25 1994-10-26 日本油脂株式会社 油中水型エマルション爆薬組成物

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO1991002706A1 (fr) 1991-03-07
DE69032230D1 (de) 1998-05-14
EP0598115A4 (de) 1993-01-18
CA2065848C (en) 1999-12-14
DE69032230T2 (de) 1998-08-06
EP0598115A1 (de) 1994-05-25
CA2065848A1 (en) 1991-02-24

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4543137A (en) Water-in-oil emulsion explosive composition
US4543136A (en) Water-in-oil emulsion explosive composition
JPS6214518B2 (de)
CA2965705C (en) Explosive composition for soft and wet ground and method of delivery
US4356044A (en) Emulsion explosives containing high concentrations of calcium nitrate
CA2076987A1 (en) Emulsion explosive
EP0598115B1 (de) Wasser-in-öl-emulsion-sprengstoffzusammensetzung
JP3019375B2 (ja) 油中水型エマルション爆薬組成物
EP0131471B1 (de) Explosivstoffe
US4698105A (en) Water-in-oil type emulsion explosives
JPH0637344B2 (ja) 油中水型エマルシヨン爆薬組成物
US4908080A (en) Water-in-oil type emulsion explosive with chelating agent
US4936932A (en) Aromatic hydrocarbon-based emulsion explosive composition
EP0372739A2 (de) Emulsionssprengstoffzusammensetzung auf der Basis von Nitroalkan
US5017251A (en) Shock-resistant, low density emulsion explosive
CA2127302C (en) Low density ammonium nitrate emulsion explosive
NZ250912A (en) Ammonium, sodium and/or calcium nitrate explosives with increased sensitivity
NZ225094A (en) Water-in-fuel emulsion explosive, with bentonite added as a viscosity-increasing agent
RU2286326C2 (ru) Модификатор эмульсионного взрывчатого вещества
NZ200238A (en) Water-in-oil emulsion blasting agent containing ca(no3)2
CA2052662A1 (en) Food grain sensitized emulsion explosives

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19920228

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): CH DE FR GB IT LI SE

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19950313

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: NOF CORPORATION

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): CH DE FR GB IT LI SE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 19980408

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 19980408

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69032230

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19980514

ET Fr: translation filed
ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed

Owner name: STUDIO TORTA S.R.L.

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 19990804

Year of fee payment: 10

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 19990810

Year of fee payment: 10

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 19990818

Year of fee payment: 10

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 19990823

Year of fee payment: 10

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20000822

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20000823

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20000822

EUG Se: european patent has lapsed

Ref document number: 90912461.2

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20010430

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20010501

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.

Effective date: 20050822