EP0479888A4 - Improved builder-containing aqueous cleaner/degreaser microemulsion compositions - Google Patents

Improved builder-containing aqueous cleaner/degreaser microemulsion compositions

Info

Publication number
EP0479888A4
EP0479888A4 EP19900910985 EP90910985A EP0479888A4 EP 0479888 A4 EP0479888 A4 EP 0479888A4 EP 19900910985 EP19900910985 EP 19900910985 EP 90910985 A EP90910985 A EP 90910985A EP 0479888 A4 EP0479888 A4 EP 0479888A4
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
sodium
removal
sulfonate
grease
composition
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP19900910985
Other versions
EP0479888B1 (en
EP0479888A1 (en
Inventor
Donald N. Vaneenam
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Buckeye International Inc
Original Assignee
Buckeye International Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Buckeye International Inc filed Critical Buckeye International Inc
Publication of EP0479888A1 publication Critical patent/EP0479888A1/en
Publication of EP0479888A4 publication Critical patent/EP0479888A4/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0479888B1 publication Critical patent/EP0479888B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11—ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11D—DETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D17/00—Detergent materials or soaps characterised by their shape or physical properties
    • C11D17/0008—Detergent materials or soaps characterised by their shape or physical properties aqueous liquid non soap compositions
    • C11D17/0017—Multi-phase liquid compositions
    • C11D17/0021—Aqueous microemulsions
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11—ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11D—DETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D3/00—Other compounding ingredients of detergent compositions covered in group C11D1/00
    • C11D3/43—Solvents

Definitions

  • This invention relates to cleaner/degreaser compositions and, more particularly, to stable, aqueous, builder-containing cleaner/degreaser compositions in the form of true microemulsions which exhibit enhanced cleaning and degreasing capability.
  • Such conventional compositions are generally deficient in cleaning action and especially in heavy duty grease, oil, wax, etc. cutting action, often smell objectionably strongly of volative solvent and can sometimes present conbustability problems in concentrated form. They also tend to be harsh on the hands and to defat the skin. Further, heavy scrubbing, mopping or other mechanical action is generally required to attain the desired cleaning/degreasing action, especially where excessive
  • Aqueous Cleaner/Degreaser Compositions which are formulated in the form of totally water soluble solutions.
  • Such compositions comprise (a) at least one sparingly water soluble organic solvent having certain defined characteristics; (b) a solubilizing additive consisting of from 0.1 to approximately 100 weight percent of a surfactant and from 0 to approximately 99.9 weight percent of a coupler, the solubilizing additive being present in an amount not exceeding approximately tenfold that required to completely solubilize the organic solvent; and (c) water.
  • compositions containing infinitely water soluble organic solvents exhibit markedly superior cleaning/ degreasing efficacy over that achievable with compositions containing infinitely water soluble organic solvents, problems are encountered in incorporating builders therein to further enhance their cleaning/ degreasing capability due to the "salting out" characteristics of conventional builders.
  • SUBSTITUTE SHEET this type which incorporate organic solvents of inherently limited aqueous solubility; the provision of such compositions which are nontoxic, nonhazardous in use and exhibit a low level of odor; the provision of such compositions which avoid soil redeposition and inhibit metal corrosion; and the provision of such improved builder-containing compositions which may be readily formulated from available components.
  • the present invention is directed to stable, aqueous cleaner/degreaser compositions which are formulated in the form of true microemulsions.
  • the compositions comprise: (a) at lease one sparingly water soluble organic solvent characterized by:
  • a solubilizing additive consisting of from approximately 0.1 to approximately 100 weight percent of a surfactant and from 0 to approximately 99.9 weight percent of a coupler, said solubilizing additive being present in an amount not substantially exceeding the amount required
  • SUBSTITUTE SHEET to transform the combination of said organic solvent and said builder from the form of a true macroemulsion to the form of a microemulsion and less than that required to form a true solution; and (d) water.
  • compositions of the invention exhibit improved cleaner/ degreaser efficacy over compositions which contain no builder component.
  • improved builder-containing aqueous cleaner/ degreaser compositions can be formulated in the form of stable microemulsions by combining at least one sparingly water soluble organic solvent having certain characteristics and being present in an amount exceeding its aqueous solubility with a builder, a solubilizing additive and water, the solubilizing additive being present in an amount not substantially exceeding the amount required to transform the combination of said organic solvent and said builder from the form of a true macroemulsion to the form of a microemulsion and less than that required to form a true solution.
  • microemulsion compositions in accordance with the present invention that the solubilizing additive be present in an amount not substantially exceeding that required to transform the combination of the organic solvent and builder from the form of a true macroemulsion to the form of a microemulsion and less than that required to form a
  • SUBSTITUTE SHEET microemulsions of the invention are clear and exhibit the Tyndall effect. It is believed that the aqueous phase of the microemulsions contains the dissolved builder. Due to the limited aqueous solubility of the organic solvents employed in the practice of the invention, it is unexpected that true microemulsions are formed.
  • microemulsion compositions of the invention provide additional advantages not conferred by cleaning/degreasing compositions which contain no builder component.
  • a builder component in the microemulsion compositions of the invention provides additional advantages not conferred by cleaning/degreasing compositions which contain no builder component.
  • such microemulsions not only achieve an enhanced cleaning/ degreasing efficacy but, moreover, they avoid soil redeposition and generally inhibit metal corrosion.
  • the compositions of the invention are particularly useful for cleaning/degreasing metallic surfaces.
  • microemulsions are more cost effective in their formulation since they generally contain lower amounts of the organic solvent component than do non-builder formulations.
  • the present invention permits the practical and effective use of normally hydrophobic (oliophilic) solvents in builder-containing compositions, which solvents have great affinity for and dissolving action against oleophilic soilants.
  • the sparingly water soluble organic solvent must have the following characteristics:
  • organic solvents include esters, alchohols, ketones, aldehydes, ethers and nitriles. These will generally contain one or more of the desired similar or dissimilar functional groups listed above. Examples of organic solvents containing similar
  • the organic solvent have a relatively low volatility or high flash point, exhibit a low level of odor, be chemically stable, nontoxic, nonhazardous and commercially available.
  • SUBSTITUTE SHEET invention (and comprising some of the solvents listed above) together with their aqueous ambient temperature solubility in wt.% include 2-phenoxyethanol (2.3) (marketed under the trade designation "Dowanol EPh”), l-phenoxy-2- propanol (1.1) (marketed under the trade designation
  • Dowanol PPh "Dowanol PPh"), -phenylethanol (1.6), acetophenone (0.5), benzyl alcohol ⁇ 4.4) , benzonitrile (1.0), n-butyl acetate (0.7), n-amyl acetate (0.25), benzaldehyde (0.3), N,N-di- ethylaniline (1.4), diethyl adipate (0.43), dimethyl-o- phthalate (0.43), n-amyl alcohol (2.7), N-phenylmorpholine (1-0), n-butoxyethyl acetate (EB acetate) (1.1), cyclo- hexanol (4.2), polypropylene glycol 1200 (2), cyclohexanone (2.3), isophorone (1.2), methylisobutyl ketone (2.0), methylisoamyl ketone (0.5), tri-n-butylphosphate (0.6), 1-nitropropane
  • the above-listed sparingly water soluble organic solvents are merely illus ⁇ trative and various other solvents meeting the criteria set out above may also be utilized in the practice of the inven ⁇ tion. Because of their performance characteristics, lack of odor, low volatility/high flash point, chemical stability and availability, 2-phenoxyethanol and l-phenoxy-2-propanol are the preferred organic solvents of choice. N-butoxyethyl acetate (EB acetate) and the dimethyl esters of mixed succinic, glutaric and adipic acids are also among the pre ⁇ ferred organic solvents.
  • EB acetate N-butoxyethyl acetate
  • dimethyl esters of mixed succinic, glutaric and adipic acids are also among the pre ⁇ ferred organic solvents.
  • a number of otherwise potent organic solvents having an aqueous solubility of less than approxi ⁇ mately 0.2 weight percent such as 2-(2-ethylhexoxy)ethanol (2-ethylhexyl cellosolve) having an aqueous solubility of only 0.095 wt.%, and 2,6-dimethyl -4-heptanone (diisobutyl ketone) (aq. sol. 0.05 wt. %), and organic solvents having
  • SUBSTITUTE SHEET an aqueous solubility in excess of approximately 6 weight percent such as propylene glycol monomethyl ether acetate (aq. sol. 16.5 wt.%), ethylene glycol diacetate (aq. sol. 14.3 wt.%), propylene carbonate (aq. sol. 19.6 wt.%) and N-methyl pyrrolidone (infinite aq. sol.) are not useful in the practice of the invention.
  • aqueous cleaner/ degreaser compositions of the invention in the form of microemulsions, an organic solvent meeting the required criteria is combined with a builder, a solubilizing additive and water.
  • a builder is a material that enhances or maintains the cleaning efficiency of surfactants and functions by inactivating water hardness, supplying alkalinity to assist cleaning, providing buffering to maintain alkalinity, pre ⁇ venting removed soil from redepositing during washing, and emulsifying oily and greasy soils. Any of the conventional builders known to the art may be used in the practice of the invention.
  • silicates such as alkali metal silicates and metasilicates, alkali metal hydroxides, alkali metal carbonates, bicarbonates and sesquicarbonates, phosphates such as alkali metal phosphates, pyrophosphates, tripolyphosphates, hexametaphosphates and tetraphosphates, borax and alkali metal borates.
  • builders which may be used in the practice of the invention may be mentioned sodium hydroxide, sodium metasilicate, sodium silicate (Na 2 0:2Si0 2 or Na 2 0:3Si ⁇ 2)# sodium carbonate, sodium sesquicarbonate, sodium bicarbonate, borax, trisodium phosphate, tetrasodium pyrophosphate, sodium tripolyphos- phate, sodium hexametaphosphate, sodium tetraphosphate, and sodium perborate.
  • Other builders known to the art may also be used.
  • the builder component will generally constitute from approximately 0.25 to 10.0 wt.% of the total composition.
  • the solubilizing additive component of the compositions of the invention consists of from
  • SUBSTITUTE SHEET approximately 0.1 to approximately 100 weight percent of a surfactant and from 0 to approximately 99.9 weight percent of a coupler and the solubilizing additive is present in the formulated composition in an amount necessary to form a microemulsion, i.e. an amount not substantially exceeding the amount required to transform the combination of the organic solvent and builder components from the form of a true macroemulsion to the form of a microemulsion and less than that required to form a true solution.
  • the amount of solubilizing additive employed is just suffi ⁇ cient to form a microemulsion.
  • the amount of solubilizing additive (surfactants or surfactant plus coupler) required to effect the formation of a microemulsion will vary depending upon the particular organic solvent and builder employed and can readily be determined by simple experi ⁇ mentation in each instance.
  • the solubilizing additive used in the practice of the invention may consist of a surfactant or a surfactant in combination with a coupler.
  • the term "coupler” is intended to mean a hydrotrope or a substance that increases the solubility in water of another material which is only partially water soluble, such as organic solvents or surfactants.
  • organic solvents or surfactants such as organic solvents or surfactants.
  • the use of a surfactant alone will suffice to render the organic solvent component of the compositions just completely (microcolloid- ally) soluble while in other instances the use of a surfac ⁇ tant in combination with a coupler may be utilized to achieve the desired microcolloidal solubilization of the organic solvent, i.e.
  • microcolloidal solubilization meaning to transform the combination of the organic solvent and builder from a true macroemulsion to the form of a microemulsion.
  • a surfactant alone or the combination of a surfactant and coupler is to be used is dependent upon the particular organic solvent and surfactant employed and can readily be determined in each particular case by simple experimentation.
  • Illustrative anionic surfactants for use in the invention include dodecylbenzene sulfonic acid, sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate, potassium dodecylbenzene sulfonate,triethanolamine dodecylbenzene sulfonate, morpholinium dodecylbenzene sulfonate, ammonium dodecylbenzene sulfonate, isopropylamine dodecylbenzene sulfonate, sodium tridecylbenzene sulfonate, sodium dinonylbenzene sulfonate, potassium didodecylbenzene sulfonate, dodecyl diphenyloxide disulfonic acid, sodium dodecyl diphenyloxide disulfonate, isopropylamine decyl diphenyloxide disulfonic acid, sodium dodecyl diphenyloxid
  • nonionic surfactants which may be employed may be mentioned octylphenoxypoly(ethyleneoxy)- (ll)ethanol, nonylphenoxypoly(ethyleneoxy)(13)ethanol, dodecylphenoxypoly(ethyleneoxy)(10)ethanol, polyoxyethylene (12) lauryl alcohol, polyoxyethylene (14) tridecyl alcohol, lauryloxypoly(ethyleneoxy)(10)ethyl methyl ether, undecyl- thiopol (ethyleneoxy)(12)ethanol, methoxypoly(oxyethylene- (10)/(oxypropylene(20))-2-propanol block copolymer,
  • Other known nonionic surfactants may likewise be used.
  • Illustrative useful cationic surfactants include a mixture of n-alkyl (C 12 50%, C 14 30%, C 16 17%, C 18 3%) dimethyl ethylbenzyl ammonium chlorides, hexadecyltrimethyl- ammonium methosulfate, didecyldimethylammonium bromide and a mixture of n-alkyl (68% C 12 , 32 * c 14 ⁇ dimethyl benzyl ammonium chlorides.
  • amphoteric surfactants include cocamidopropyl betaine, sodium palmityloamphopro- pionate, N-coco beta-aminopropionic acid, disodium N-lauryl- iminodipropionate, sodium coco imidazoline amphoglycinate and coco betaine.
  • Other cationic and amphoteric surfactants known to the art may also be utilized.
  • the preferred surfactants for general use in the practice of the invention include dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid and the sodium, potassium, triethanolamine, morpho ⁇ linium, ammonium and isopropylamine salts thereof, and morpholinium tallate.
  • the couplers which may be utilized in the practice of the invention include sodium benzene sulfonate, sodium toluene sulfonate, sodium xylene sulfonate, potassium ethylbenzene sulfonate, sodium cumene sulfonate, sodium octane-1-sulfonate, potassium dimethylnaphthalene sulfonate, ammonium xylene sulfonate, sodium n-hexyl diphenyoxide disulfonate, sodium 2-ethylhexyl sulfate, ammonium
  • SUBSTITUTE SHEET n-butoxyethyl sulfate, sodium 2-ethylhexanoate, sodium pelargonate, sodium n-butoxymethyl carboxylate, potassium mono/di phenoxyethyl phosphate, sodium mono/di n-butoxyethyl phosphate, triethanolamine trimethylolpropane phosphate, sodium capryloamphopropionate, disodium capryloiminodipro- pionate, and sodium capro imidazoline amphoylycinate.
  • couplers such as propylene glycol ethers (e.g. tripropyleneglycol monomethyl ether) can be used in the practice of the invention, but cannot be substituted for the sparingly water soluble organic solvent component. Additional couplers or hydrotropes known to the art may also be utilized.
  • solubilizing additive component of the compositions of the invention it will be understood that one or more surfactants from one or more compatible classes of surfactants may be employed or utilized in a mixed solubilizing surfactant system.
  • a combination of compatible anionic and nonionic surfactants may be employed.
  • a combination of compatible couplers may also be used as may a combination of one or more compatible surfactants from different classes of surfactants together with one or more couplers.
  • one may use a combination of blended surfactants and couplers to achieve the desired minimal solvent solubilization.
  • the compatibility of the various surfactants and of the various couplers with each other and in combination can be readily determined by simple experimentation.
  • a mixture of the sparingly soluble organic solvents may be employed in formulating the compositions of the invention.
  • each of the solvents should have nearly the same approximate water solubility so that they will solubilize in water at approximately the same point upon addition of the solubilizing additive.
  • SUBSTITUTE SHEET various optional adjuvants can be incorporated. These include chelants such as the sodium salts of ethylenedi- aminetetraacetic acid (Hampene 100 or Versene 100), thickeners such as carboxy acrylic polymers (Carbopol 940) or acrylic acid/alkyl methacrylate copolymers (Acrysol ICS-1) , fragrances, dyes, pH adjustants, defoaming agents, anti-corrosion additives and anti-rust additives. To prevent flash rusting when the compositions are used to clean and/or degrease metal surfaces, an anti flash-rusting additive such as an alkanolamine (e.g., mono-, di- or triethanolamine) may be incorporated.
  • alkanolamine e.g., mono-, di- or triethanolamine
  • the various components as brought together may first form an oily suspension which becomes an emulsion upon the addition of a surfactant/coupler, and is then finally transformed into a microemulsion through the addition of the final portion of the solubilizing coupler.
  • a surfactant/coupler For example, 2.0 wt. % sodium metasilicate, 7.5 wt. % l-phenoxy-2-propanol, 2.5 wt. % tripropyleneglycol monomethyl ether and 76.4 wt. % soft water are stirred to form an oily suspension having a pH of 13.3.
  • % dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid is added with stirring to form a creamy white emulsion having a pH of 13.1.
  • 7.2 wt. % sodium xylene sulfonate (40%) is then added with stirring whereupon some slight lightening of the emulsion occurs.
  • the addition of 1.8 wt. % sodium xylene sulfonate (40%) causes the emulsion to become still lighter but it remains opaque.
  • 0.2 wt. % sodium xylene sulfonate (40%) with stirring the white emulsion is transformed into a bluish microcolloidal microemulsion having a pH of 13.05.
  • microemulsions of the invention can also be formulated by combining the various components together in different sequence to transform any emulsion formed into a microemulsion.
  • the addition of an excess of the solubilizing additive to the formulation will cause the microemulsion to be converted
  • the concentration of the aqueous cleaner/degreaser solution refers, respectively, to the combined percentages of nonvolatile components and to the sum total of nonaqueous volatile and nonvolatile components.
  • the term “cloud point” indicates the temperature below which the composition exists as a clear, single phase microemulsion and above which phase separation (hetero ⁇ geneity) occurs.
  • a composition should preferably have a cloud point in excess of, for example 50°C, to have a viably safe, storage-stable shelf life under hot, summertime warehouse conditions.
  • compositions of the invention provide enhanced cleaning/degreasing efficacy over that achievable with compositions containing no builder or with available builder-containing compositions formulated in the form of total solutions.
  • compositions of the present invention were subjected as indicated to the definitive, semiquantitative degreasing test method described below in order to measure their cleaning/degreasing efficacy.
  • a magnetic stirrer (Fisher Scientific Co., Catalog No. 14-511-1A) provided with a vaned disc magnetic stir bar (7/8" (diameter) x 5/8" (height), 22 mm x 15 mm. Fisher Scientific Co., Catalog No. 14-511-98C) was used. In each instance, pre-cleaned, borosilicate glass microslides (3" x
  • the stirring disc was positioned off-center to accomodate each microslide, touching neither the beaker walls nor the microslide and rotating freely when in use.
  • the beaker containing the stirrer bar was filled to 40 ml. with the test cleaning/degreasing solution at the indicated concentration, placed atop the magnetic stirrer plate, and positioned off-center to accomo ⁇ date the glass microslide, and yet allow the vaned disc stirrer bar to rotate or spin freely.
  • the stirrer was turned on, the dial adjusted manually to the "3" stirring rate setting and the Vaseline thin film coated glass micro- slide was introduced into the test solution bath in such a manner that the coated side faced upward and was positioned away from the stirrer bar.
  • the time "0" was noted immediately on a watch or clock with a sweep second hand.
  • the glass microslide was briefly removed from the cleaner/degreaser solution bath and immediately “read” for "% Vaseline removed from the 1.0" x 1.0" treated area", an objective determina- ion, after which the microslide was immediately returned to
  • the duration of the degreasing test is determined by the time needed for complete, 100% removal of the Vaseline film from the glass microslide surface. 5
  • the accuracy of the above-described test method is of the order of + 5% as determined by replicate run averaging.
  • Example 2 An aqueous, cleaner/degreaser formulation in the 10 form of a microemulsion was prepared having the following composition:
  • the sodium metasilicate was dissolved in water with stirring.
  • the monoethanolamine, l-phenoxy-2-propanol and dodecyl ⁇ benzenesulfonic acid were added and stirring of the resultant emulsion/suspension was continued until the emulsion gradu ⁇ ally cleared to produce an irridescent (blue) microemulsion.
  • the microemulsion had a pH of 12.65, a total solids content of 2.5% and a total actives content of 7.3%. Upon heating, the microemulsion remained irridescent to 50°C, then devel ⁇ oped more turbidity up to 75°C and became a clear, colorless aqueous solution above about 75°C. It exhibited no cloud
  • composition readily removed the following soilant markings from alkyd enameled metal surfaces: black
  • Example 2 was repeated in formulating an aqueous cleaner/degreaser microemulsion having the following composition:
  • the composition was a bluish, irridescent microemulsion having a pH of 12.5, a total solids content of 4.4% and a total actives content of 8.4%.
  • the composi ⁇ tion remained an irridescent microemulsion to 48°C, became a turbid emulsion between 48-59°C and a clear, colorless solution above about 60°C.
  • Example 4 Example 2 was repeated in formulating an agueous, cleaner/degreaser microemulsion having the following composition:
  • composition was a bluish, irridescent microemulsion having a pH of 12.6, a total solids content of 3.98% and a total actives content of 7.98%. Upon heating, the composition remained an irridescent microemulsion to 39°C and became a clear, colorless solution above about 39°C. It exhibited no cloud point to 100°C.
  • Example 5 Example 2 was repeated in formulating an aqueous, cleaner/degreaser microemulsion having the following compo ⁇ sition:
  • the composition was a pale yellow, irridescent microemulsion having a pH of 12.5, a total solids content of 3.4% and a total actives content of 7.4%.
  • the composi- tion remained an irridescent microemulsion to 50°C and became a clear solution at temperatures above 50°C. It exhibited no cloud point.
  • Example 6 Example 2 was repeated in formulating an aqueous, cleaner/degreaser microemulsion having the following composition:
  • the composition was a bluish, irridescent microemulsion having a pH of 12.65, a total solids content of 4.6% and a total actives content of 9.1%. Upon heating, the composition remained an irridescent microemulsion to 51.5°C, was turbid in the range 50-60°C, and was a clear, colorless solution above about 60°C.
  • SUBSTITUTE SHEET The composition effected 100% removal of the markings set forth in Example 2 with slight smudging and also effected 100% removal of four coats of "Buckeye Citation" floor finish as in Example 2.
  • the composition was subjected to the degreasing test method of Example 1 with the following results: 20% removal of grease at 30 sec. 35% removal of grease at 1.0 min. 60% removal of grease at 2.0 min. 90% removal of grease at 3.0 min.
  • Example 7 A control composition was prepared by combining the following components in the amounts indicated: Component Wt. %
  • the composition was a clear, essentially colorless solution containing no builder component. It had a pH of 11.7, a total solids content of 1.844% and a total actives content of 7.344%. It exhibited no cloud point to 100°C.
  • composition quite easily removed the following percentages of the markings set forth in Example 2 from alkyd enameled metal surfaces: 85-90% removal of black Magic Marker felt pen
  • composition was subjected to the degreasing test method of Example 1 with the following results: 10-15% removal of grease at 15 sec.
  • aqueous, cleaner/degreaser formulation in the form of a microemulsion was prepared having the following composition: Component W l-Phenoxy-2-propanol (Dowanol PPh)
  • SUBSTITUTE SHEET had a pH of 12.1, a total solids content of 2.22% and a total actives content of 7.12%. Upon heating, the microemulsion remained irridescent to 37°C. and became a clear, colorless solution above about 37°C. It exhibited no cloud point.
  • composition effected 100% removal of the markings set forth in Example 2 with no smudging and also effected 100% removal of four coats of "Buckeye Citation" floor finish as in Example 2.
  • This composition was subjected to the degreasing test method of Example 1 with the following results 33% removal of grease at 15 sec. 60% removal of grease at 30 sec. 85-90% removal of grease at 45 sec. 100% removal of grease at 1.0 min.
  • Example 9 An aqueous, cleaner/degreaser formulation in the form of a microemulsion was prepared having the following composition:
  • SUBSTITUTE SHEET having a bluish, irridescent appearance.
  • the microemulsion had a pH of 12.3, a total solids content of 2.24% and a total actives content of 7.74%.
  • the micro ⁇ emulsion Upon heating, the micro ⁇ emulsion remained irridescent to 41°C. Above about 41°C it became a clear, colorless solution. It exhibited no cloud point.
  • composition effected 100% removal of the markings set forth in Example 2 with very slight tendency to smudge and also effected 100% removal of four coats of "Buckeye Citation" floor finish as in Example 2.
  • the microemulsion had a bluish, irridescent appearance, a pH of 12.3, a total solids content of 2.12% and a total actives content of 7.62%. Upon heating, the microemulsion remained irridescent to 44°C and above which it formed a clear, colorless solution. It exhibited no cloud point.
  • the composition effected 100% removal of all markings including auto grease as set forth in Example 2 and also effected 100% removal of four coats of "Buckeye Citation" floor finish as in Example 2.
  • the composition was subjected to the degreasing test method of Examplel with the following results: 1st attack on greased slide at 1-2 sec. 40% removal of grease at 15 sec. 70-75% removal of grease at 30 sec. 100% removal of greease at 45 sec.
  • Example 11 Examples 8 and 9 were repeated in preparing a microemulsion cleaner/degreaser formulation having the following composition: Component Wt. % l-Phenoxy-2-propanol
  • the microemulsion had a bluish, irridescent appearance, a pH of 12.4, a total solids contents of 2.22% and a total active content of 7.72% Upon heating, the microemulsion remained irridescent to 52.5°C and became a clear solution above 52,5°C It exhibited no cloud point
  • SUBSTITUTE SHEET The composition effected 100% removal of all markings set forth in Example 2 with no smudging and also effected 100% removal of four coats of "Buckeye Citation" floor finish as in Example 2. This composition was subjected to the degreasing test method of Example 1 with the following results: 20-25% removal of grease at 15 sec. 50% removal of grease at 30 sec. 75% removal of grease at 1.0 min. 85-90% removal of grease at 1.5 min.
  • Example 12 An aqueous, cleaner/degreaser formulation in the form of a microemulsion was prepared having the following composition:
  • tetrapotassium pyro- phosphate All of the above components except tetrapotassium pyro- phosphate were stirred together and the pH adjusted to 7.0 with a trace of sodium sesquicarbonate to obtain a clear, colorless aqueous solution.
  • the tetrapotassium pyrophos ⁇ phate was then added as granules and the solution immedi ⁇ ately changed to a bluish, irridescent microemulsion.
  • the microemulsion had a pH of 9.11, a total solids content of 2.11% and a total actives content of 6.115%. Upon heating, the microemulsion remained irridescent to 42°C. It exhibited no cloud point to 100°C and no flash point.
  • SUBSTITUTE SHEET The composition effected 100%, easy and fast removal of all markings set forth in Example 2.
  • Example 13 Example 12 was repeated in preparing a microemulsion cleaner/degreaser formulation having following composition:
  • microemulsion formed upon the addition of borax granules to the other components and the slow dissolution of the borax produced a gradual change from a clear, aqueous solution to a bluish, irridescent microemulsion.
  • the microemulsion had a pH of 8.93, a total solids content of 2.115% and a total actives content of 6.115%.
  • the microemulsion Upon heating, the microemulsion remained irridescent to 38°C, clearing at 38.5°C and becoming a clear, colorless solution above about 39°C. It exhibited no cloud point to 100 ⁇ C and no flash point.
  • Example 14 Example 12 was repeated in preparing a microemul ⁇ sion cleaner/degreaser formulation having the following composition:
  • the addition of the sodium carbonate in powder form to a clear, colorless aqueous solution of the other components produced the instantaneous development of a bluish, irridescent microemulsion.
  • the microemulsion had a pH of 10.75, a total solids content of 2.215% and a total actives content of 6.215%.
  • the microemulsion unlike those of Examples 12 and 13, was slightly viscous and had a Brookfield viscosity of 37 cps. at 21°C. Upon heating, the microemulsion remained irridescent to 60.5°C and became a clear, colorless aqueous solution above about 61°C. It exhibited no cloud point to 100°C.
  • composition effected 100%, fast removal of all markings set forth in Example 2.
  • Example 15 Example 2 was repeated in formulating an aqueous, cleaner/degreaser microemulsion having the following compo ⁇ sition:
  • the composition was a faint bluish, microemulsion having a pH of 12.86, a total solids content of 9.8% and a total actives content of 16.2%. It exhibited no cloud content of point to 100°C and no flash point.
  • the composition effected 75% removal of black Magic Marker markings from an alkyd enameled steel panel.
  • This composition at a 1:2 dilution with water was subjected to the degreasing test method of Example 1 with the following results:
  • Example 16 Example 2 was repeated in formulating an aqueous, cleaner/degreaser microemulsion having the following composition:
  • the composition was a faint, bluish, colloidal microemulsion having a pH of 13.23, a total solids content of 10.6% and a total actives content of 20.6%. It exhibited no cloud point and no flash point.
  • Example 17 Example 2 was repeated in formulating an aqueous having the following composition:
  • SUBSTITUTE SHEET The components formed a clear, aqueous solution rather than a microemulsion because the composition included an excess of solubilizing additive over that required to form a micro ⁇ emulsion. At a 1:5 dilution with water, the solution effected 0% removal of black Magic Marker markings from an alkyd enameled steel panel.
  • Example 18 Example 2 was repeated in formulating an aqueous microemulsion having the following composition: Component Wt. %
  • the organic solvent component propylene glycol mono-t- butuyl ether, has an aqueous solubility of 13.9 wt. % at 21°C.
  • the composition was a very faint bluish,
  • SUBSTITUTE SHEET colloidal microemulsion having a pH of 13.73, a total solids content of 7.2% and a total actives content of 16.7%. It had a cloud point of 28°C.
  • the composition effected 60% removal of black Magic Marker markings from an alkyd enameled steel surface.
  • Example 19 Example 2 was repeated in formulating an aqueous, cleaner/degreaser microemulsion having the following composition:
  • the composition was a slightly bluish, colloidal micro ⁇ emulsion having a pH 13.62, a total solids content of 10.7% and a total actives content of 20.7%. It had a cloud point of 26°C and no flash point. At a 1:5 dilution with water, the composition effected 100% removal of black Magic Marker markings from an alkyd enameled steel panel.
  • Example 20 Example 2 was repeated in formulating an aqueous, cleaner/degreaser microemulsion having the following composition: Component Wt. %
  • Chelating agent 5.0 (Hampene 100, 40%)
  • the composition was faint bluish microemulsion having a pH of 13.19, a total solids content of 9.3% and a total actives content of 19.3%. It had a cloud point in excess of 100°C and no flash point.
  • the composition effected 50% removal of black Magic Marker markings from an alkyd enameled steel panel.
  • Example 21 Example 2 was repeated in formulating an aqueous, cleaner/degreaser microemulsion having the following composition: Component Wt. %
  • Chelating agent 1.5 (Hampene 100, 40%)
  • the composition was a faint bluish microemulsion having a pH of 13.05 a total solids content of 8.7% and a total actives content of 18.2%. It had a cloud point of approxi ⁇ mately 75°C and no flash point.
  • the composition effected approximately 95% of black Magic Marker markings from an alkyd enameled steel panel.
  • Example 21 was repeated in formulating an aqueous microemulsion containing no builder component and having the following composition:
  • the small amount of sodium hydroxide was included to partially neutralize the dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid and cause salt formation.
  • the composition was a faint opalescent microemulsion having a pH of 7.0, a total solids content of 5.9% and a total actives content of 15.4%. It had a cloud point in excess of 100°C and exhibited no flash point.
  • the composition effected only 0-5% removal of black Magic Marker markings from an alkyd enameled steel panel.
  • Example 23 Example 2 was repeated in formulating an aqueous, cleaner/degreaser microemulsion having the following composition:
  • the composition was a bluish, opalescent microemulsion having a pH of 11.27, a total solids content of 8.4% and a total actives content of 17.9%. It had a cloud point in excess of 100°C and exhibited no flash point.
  • the composition effected 60% removal of black Magic Marker markings from an alkyd enameled steel panel.
  • the composition at a 1:2 dilution with water was subjected to the degreasing test method of Example 1 with the following results:
  • Example 2 was repeated in formulating an aqueous, cleaner/degreaser microemulsion having the following composition:
  • composition was a very faint microemulsion having a pH of 12.73, and a total solids and total actives content of 14.7%. It had a cloud point of 40°C and exhibited no flash point.
  • the composition effected 100% removal of black Magic Marker markings from an alkyd enameled steel panel.
  • Example 2 was repeated in preparing the following composition containing a highly water soluble organic solvent instead of a sparingly water soluble organic solvent: Component Wt. %
  • composition was a clear, very pale yellow solution having a pH of 12.53, a total solids content of 4.4% and a total actives content of 14.4%. It had a cloud point in excess of 100 ⁇ C.
  • the composition effected less than 5% removal of black Magic Marker mark ⁇ ings from an alkyd enameled steel panel.
  • Example 26 Example 2 was repeated in formulating an aqueous, cleaner/degreaser microemulsion having the following composition:
  • the composition was a bluish, irridescent microemulsion having a pH of 12.61, a total solids content of 5.1% and a total actives content of 15.1%. It had a cloud point in excess of 100 ⁇ C and exhibited no flash point.
  • composition ef ected 100% removal of black Magic Marker markings from an alkyd enameled steel panel.
  • Example 27 Example 2 was repeated in formulating an aqueous cleaner/degreaser microemulsion having the following composition:
  • the composition was a faint bluish microemulsion having a pH of 12.74, a total solids content of 6.66% and a total actives content of 16.66%. It had a cloud point of 65°C. At a dilution of 1:5 with water, the composition effected approximately 65% removal of black Magic Marker markings from an alkyd enameled steel panel.
  • Example 2 was repeated in formulating an aqueous, cleaner/degreaser microemulsion having the following composition:
  • the composition was a light bluish, irridescent micro ⁇ emulsion having a pH of 13.42, a total solids content of 7.04 and a total actives content of 16.04%. It had a cloud point above 100°C and no flash point. At a dilution of 1:5 with water, the composition effected 100% removal of black Magic Marker markings from an alkyd enameled steel panel.
  • aqueous, cleaner/degreaser formulation in the form of a microemulsion was prepared having the following composition:
  • the sodium metasilicate was dissolved in water with stirring.
  • the monoethanolamine was added followed by the addition of the l-phenoxy-2-propanol, tripropyleneglycol monomethyl ether and dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid with stirring. Stirring was continued until a homogeneous emulsion formed.
  • the Alkali Surfactant was then added and the emulsion was transformed into a microemulsion after which the defoaming agent was added.
  • the resulting micro ⁇ emulsion had a slightly bluish, irridescent appearance, a pH of 12.42, a total solids content of 5.7% and a total actives content of 16.2%. It exhibited a cloud point in excess of 100 ⁇ C.
  • the composition at a 1:2 dilution with water was subjected to the degreasing test method of Example 1 with the following results:

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Detergent Compositions (AREA)
  • Cleaning And De-Greasing Of Metallic Materials By Chemical Methods (AREA)

Abstract

Stable, aqueous cleaner/degreaser compositions formulated in the form of true microemulsions and containing a builder component comprise: (a) at least one sparingly water soluble organic solvent characterized by: (i) having a water solubility in the range of approximately 0.2 to approximately 6 weight percent; (ii) not being a hydrocarbon or halocarbon; (iii) having one or more similar or dissimilar oxygen, nitrogen, sulfur or phosphorus containing functional groups; (iv) being a solvent for hydrophobic soilants; and (v) being present in an amount exceeding its aqueous solubility; (b) a builder; (c) a solubilizing additive consisting of from approximately 0.1 to approximately 100 weight percent of a surfactant and from 0 to approximately 99.9 weight percent of a coupler, the solubilizing additive being present in an amount not substantially exceeding the amount required to transform the combination of the organic solvent and said builder from the form of a true macroemulsion to the form of a microemulsion and less than that required to form a true solution; and (d) water. Such compositions exhibit improved cleaning/degreasing efficacy over compositions containing no builder component.

Description

IMPROVED BUILDER-CONTAINING AQUEOUS CLEANER/DEGREASER MICROEMULSION COMPOSITIONS
Background of the Invention
This invention relates to cleaner/degreaser compositions and, more particularly, to stable, aqueous, builder-containing cleaner/degreaser compositions in the form of true microemulsions which exhibit enhanced cleaning and degreasing capability.
Heretofore, all of the conventional and available ready to use and concentrated water soluble, dilutable cleaner/degreaser compositions have expediently contained infinitely or highly water soluble organic solvents such as butyl cellosolve (ethylene glycol monobutyl ether) , butyl carbitol (diethylene glycol monobutyl ether), ethyl carbitol, propylene glycol monomethyl ether, dipropylene glycol monomethyl ether or isopropanol together with anionic or nonionic surfactants and conventional adjuvants such chelants, builders, perfumes, dyes, pH adjusters, etc., these components falling generally within the following compositional wt.% ranges:
2-10% Water soluble solvent(s) 1-3% Anionic or nonionic surfactant 0.1-3% Adjuvants OS Water 100.0%
Such conventional compositions are generally deficient in cleaning action and especially in heavy duty grease, oil, wax, etc. cutting action, often smell objectionably strongly of volative solvent and can sometimes present conbustability problems in concentrated form. They also tend to be harsh on the hands and to defat the skin. Further, heavy scrubbing, mopping or other mechanical action is generally required to attain the desired cleaning/degreasing action, especially where excessive
SUBSTITUTE SHEET soilant buildup has occurred. Most, even in their concentrated form, are ineffective in their capability to remove graffiti or the like.
In my copending, coassigned application Serial No. , , filed , 1989, and entitled Improved
Aqueous Cleaner/Degreaser Compositions, I disclose stable, aqueous cleaner/degreaser compositions which are formulated in the form of totally water soluble solutions. Such compositions comprise (a) at least one sparingly water soluble organic solvent having certain defined characteristics; (b) a solubilizing additive consisting of from 0.1 to approximately 100 weight percent of a surfactant and from 0 to approximately 99.9 weight percent of a coupler, the solubilizing additive being present in an amount not exceeding approximately tenfold that required to completely solubilize the organic solvent; and (c) water. While such compositions exhibit markedly superior cleaning/ degreasing efficacy over that achievable with compositions containing infinitely water soluble organic solvents, problems are encountered in incorporating builders therein to further enhance their cleaning/ degreasing capability due to the "salting out" characteristics of conventional builders.
There is a need, therefore, for improved builder- containing, aqueous cleaner/degreaser compositions which permit still further improvements in cleaner/degreasing activity.
Summary of the Invention
Among the several objects of the invention may be noted the provision of stable, aqueous cleaner/degreaser compositions containing builders which boost the cleaning/ degreasing action of such compositions; the provision of such compositions which are formulated in the form of stable microemulsions; the provision of compositions of
SUBSTITUTE SHEET this type which incorporate organic solvents of inherently limited aqueous solubility; the provision of such compositions which are nontoxic, nonhazardous in use and exhibit a low level of odor; the provision of such compositions which avoid soil redeposition and inhibit metal corrosion; and the provision of such improved builder-containing compositions which may be readily formulated from available components. Other objects and features will be in part apparent and in part pointed out hereinafter.
Briefly, the present invention is directed to stable, aqueous cleaner/degreaser compositions which are formulated in the form of true microemulsions. The compositions comprise: (a) at lease one sparingly water soluble organic solvent characterized by:
(i) having a water solubility in the range of approximately 0.2 to approximately 6 weight percent; (ii) not being a hydrocarbon or halocarbon; (iii) having one or more similar or dissimilar oxygen, nitrogen, sulfur or phosphorous containing functional groups;
(iv) being a solvent for hydrophobic soilants; and (v) being present in an amount exceeding its aqueous solubility. (b) a builder;
(c) a solubilizing additive consisting of from approximately 0.1 to approximately 100 weight percent of a surfactant and from 0 to approximately 99.9 weight percent of a coupler, said solubilizing additive being present in an amount not substantially exceeding the amount required
SUBSTITUTE SHEET to transform the combination of said organic solvent and said builder from the form of a true macroemulsion to the form of a microemulsion and less than that required to form a true solution; and (d) water.
The compositions of the invention exhibit improved cleaner/ degreaser efficacy over compositions which contain no builder component.
Description of the Preferred Embodiments
In accordance with the present invention, it has been found that improved builder-containing aqueous cleaner/ degreaser compositions can be formulated in the form of stable microemulsions by combining at least one sparingly water soluble organic solvent having certain characteristics and being present in an amount exceeding its aqueous solubility with a builder, a solubilizing additive and water, the solubilizing additive being present in an amount not substantially exceeding the amount required to transform the combination of said organic solvent and said builder from the form of a true macroemulsion to the form of a microemulsion and less than that required to form a true solution. Surprisingly, as demonstrated by the experimental data presented hereinafter, it has been discovered that the incorporation of builders into such compositions formulated as microemulsions boosts or enhances the cleaning/degreasing efficacy as compared to compositions containing no builder component. As indicated, it is essential to the formation of microemulsion compositions in accordance with the present invention that the solubilizing additive be present in an amount not substantially exceeding that required to transform the combination of the organic solvent and builder from the form of a true macroemulsion to the form of a microemulsion and less than that required to form a
SUBSTITUTE SHEET microemulsions of the invention are clear and exhibit the Tyndall effect. It is believed that the aqueous phase of the microemulsions contains the dissolved builder. Due to the limited aqueous solubility of the organic solvents employed in the practice of the invention, it is unexpected that true microemulsions are formed.
The incorporation of a builder component in the microemulsion compositions of the invention provides additional advantages not conferred by cleaning/degreasing compositions which contain no builder component. Thus, such microemulsions not only achieve an enhanced cleaning/ degreasing efficacy but, moreover, they avoid soil redeposition and generally inhibit metal corrosion. Accordingly, the compositions of the invention are particularly useful for cleaning/degreasing metallic surfaces. Further, such microemulsions are more cost effective in their formulation since they generally contain lower amounts of the organic solvent component than do non-builder formulations. Also, the present invention permits the practical and effective use of normally hydrophobic (oliophilic) solvents in builder-containing compositions, which solvents have great affinity for and dissolving action against oleophilic soilants.
For use in the present invention, the sparingly water soluble organic solvent must have the following characteristics:
(a) it must have limited water solubility in the range of approximately 0.2 to 6 weight percent; (b) it must not be a hydrocarbon or halocarbon;
(c) it must have one or more similar or dissimilar oxygen, nitrogen, sulfur or phosphorous containing functional groups;
(d) it must be a solvent for hydrophobic soilants; and
(e) it must be present in an amount exceeding
SUBSTITUTE SHEET Organic solvents meeting these criteria provide superior cleaning/degreasing action when formulated in accordance with the invention.
The principal classes of organic solvents from
5 which useful organic solvents may be selected include esters, alchohols, ketones, aldehydes, ethers and nitriles. These will generally contain one or more of the desired similar or dissimilar functional groups listed above. Examples of organic solvents containing similar
10 functional groups from among those listed above include diethyl gluterate (2 ester groups), phenacyl acetone (2 keto groups), diethylethyl phosphonate (2 phosphonate ester groups), ethylenedipropionate (2 ester groups), decylene glycol (2 hydroxyl groups), m-dimethoxybenzene (2 ether
15 groups), adiponitrile (2 nitrile groups), ethylene glycol dibutyl ether (2 ether groups), and diethyl-o_-phthalate (2 ester groups). Among organic solvents containing dissimilar functional groups from among those listed above may be mentioned 2-phenoxyethanol (hydroxy, ether groups),
20 l-phenoxy-2-propanol (hydroxy, ether groups), N-phenyl- morpholine (amino, ether groups), isopropylacetoacetate (keto, ester groups), fi-πtethoxybenzyl alcohol (ether, hydroxy groups), 4*-methoxyacetophenone (ether, ketone groups), o_-nitrophenetole (nitro, ether groups),
25 2-hexoxyethanol (hydroxy, ether groups), ethylcyano- acetoacetate (cyano, keto, ester groups), p-anisaldehyde (ether, aldehyde groups), polypropylene glycol 1200 (ether, hydroxyl groups), n-butoxy acetate (ether, ester groups), and 2-phenylthioethanol (thioether, hydroxyl groups).
30 In addition to the criteria listed above, it is also desirable but not essential that the organic solvent have a relatively low volatility or high flash point, exhibit a low level of odor, be chemically stable, nontoxic, nonhazardous and commercially available.
35 The sparingly water soluble organic solvents which may be employed in the practice of the present
SUBSTITUTE SHEET invention (and comprising some of the solvents listed above) together with their aqueous ambient temperature solubility in wt.% include 2-phenoxyethanol (2.3) (marketed under the trade designation "Dowanol EPh"), l-phenoxy-2- propanol (1.1) (marketed under the trade designation
"Dowanol PPh"), -phenylethanol (1.6), acetophenone (0.5), benzyl alcohol {4.4) , benzonitrile (1.0), n-butyl acetate (0.7), n-amyl acetate (0.25), benzaldehyde (0.3), N,N-di- ethylaniline (1.4), diethyl adipate (0.43), dimethyl-o- phthalate (0.43), n-amyl alcohol (2.7), N-phenylmorpholine (1-0), n-butoxyethyl acetate (EB acetate) (1.1), cyclo- hexanol (4.2), polypropylene glycol 1200 (2), cyclohexanone (2.3), isophorone (1.2), methylisobutyl ketone (2.0), methylisoamyl ketone (0.5), tri-n-butylphosphate (0.6), 1-nitropropane (1.4), nitroethane (4.5), dimethyl esters of mixed succinic, glutaric and adipic acids (5.7) (marketed under the trade designation "DBE ester" by DuPont), diethyl glutarate (0.88), and diethyl malonate (2.08). As will be apparent to those skilled in the art, the above-listed sparingly water soluble organic solvents are merely illus¬ trative and various other solvents meeting the criteria set out above may also be utilized in the practice of the inven¬ tion. Because of their performance characteristics, lack of odor, low volatility/high flash point, chemical stability and availability, 2-phenoxyethanol and l-phenoxy-2-propanol are the preferred organic solvents of choice. N-butoxyethyl acetate (EB acetate) and the dimethyl esters of mixed succinic, glutaric and adipic acids are also among the pre¬ ferred organic solvents. As indicated, a number of otherwise potent organic solvents having an aqueous solubility of less than approxi¬ mately 0.2 weight percent such as 2-(2-ethylhexoxy)ethanol (2-ethylhexyl cellosolve) having an aqueous solubility of only 0.095 wt.%, and 2,6-dimethyl -4-heptanone (diisobutyl ketone) (aq. sol. 0.05 wt. %), and organic solvents having
SUBSTITUTE SHEET an aqueous solubility in excess of approximately 6 weight percent such as propylene glycol monomethyl ether acetate (aq. sol. 16.5 wt.%), ethylene glycol diacetate (aq. sol. 14.3 wt.%), propylene carbonate (aq. sol. 19.6 wt.%) and N-methyl pyrrolidone (infinite aq. sol.) are not useful in the practice of the invention.
In formulating the stable, aqueous cleaner/ degreaser compositions of the invention in the form of microemulsions, an organic solvent meeting the required criteria is combined with a builder, a solubilizing additive and water. As is known to those skilled in the art, a builder is a material that enhances or maintains the cleaning efficiency of surfactants and functions by inactivating water hardness, supplying alkalinity to assist cleaning, providing buffering to maintain alkalinity, pre¬ venting removed soil from redepositing during washing, and emulsifying oily and greasy soils. Any of the conventional builders known to the art may be used in the practice of the invention. These include silicates such as alkali metal silicates and metasilicates, alkali metal hydroxides, alkali metal carbonates, bicarbonates and sesquicarbonates, phosphates such as alkali metal phosphates, pyrophosphates, tripolyphosphates, hexametaphosphates and tetraphosphates, borax and alkali metal borates. Among specific builders which may be used in the practice of the invention may be mentioned sodium hydroxide, sodium metasilicate, sodium silicate (Na20:2Si02 or Na20:3Siθ2)# sodium carbonate, sodium sesquicarbonate, sodium bicarbonate, borax, trisodium phosphate, tetrasodium pyrophosphate, sodium tripolyphos- phate, sodium hexametaphosphate, sodium tetraphosphate, and sodium perborate. Other builders known to the art may also be used. The builder component will generally constitute from approximately 0.25 to 10.0 wt.% of the total composition. The solubilizing additive component of the compositions of the invention consists of from
SUBSTITUTE SHEET approximately 0.1 to approximately 100 weight percent of a surfactant and from 0 to approximately 99.9 weight percent of a coupler and the solubilizing additive is present in the formulated composition in an amount necessary to form a microemulsion, i.e. an amount not substantially exceeding the amount required to transform the combination of the organic solvent and builder components from the form of a true macroemulsion to the form of a microemulsion and less than that required to form a true solution. Preferably, the amount of solubilizing additive employed is just suffi¬ cient to form a microemulsion. The amount of solubilizing additive (surfactants or surfactant plus coupler) required to effect the formation of a microemulsion will vary depending upon the particular organic solvent and builder employed and can readily be determined by simple experi¬ mentation in each instance.
The solubilizing additive used in the practice of the invention may consist of a surfactant or a surfactant in combination with a coupler. As used herein, the term "coupler" is intended to mean a hydrotrope or a substance that increases the solubility in water of another material which is only partially water soluble, such as organic solvents or surfactants. In some instances, the use of a surfactant alone will suffice to render the organic solvent component of the compositions just completely (microcolloid- ally) soluble while in other instances the use of a surfac¬ tant in combination with a coupler may be utilized to achieve the desired microcolloidal solubilization of the organic solvent, i.e. microcolloidal solubilization meaning to transform the combination of the organic solvent and builder from a true macroemulsion to the form of a microemulsion. Whether or not a surfactant alone or the combination of a surfactant and coupler is to be used is dependent upon the particular organic solvent and surfactant employed and can readily be determined in each particular case by simple experimentation. The
SUBSTITUTE SHEET hard surface cleaning/degreasing. Illustrative anionic surfactants for use in the invention include dodecylbenzene sulfonic acid, sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate, potassium dodecylbenzene sulfonate,triethanolamine dodecylbenzene sulfonate, morpholinium dodecylbenzene sulfonate, ammonium dodecylbenzene sulfonate, isopropylamine dodecylbenzene sulfonate, sodium tridecylbenzene sulfonate, sodium dinonylbenzene sulfonate, potassium didodecylbenzene sulfonate, dodecyl diphenyloxide disulfonic acid, sodium dodecyl diphenyloxide disulfonate, isopropylamine decyl diphenyloxide disulfonate, sodium hexadecyloxypoly (ethyleneoxy)(10)ethyl sulfonate, potassium octylphenoxy- poly(ethyleneoxy)(9)ethyl sulfonate, sodium alpha C±2-1 olefin sulfonate, sodium hexadecane-1 sulfonate, sodium ethyl oleate sulfonate, potassium octadecenylsuccinate, sodium oleate, potassium laurate, triethanolamine myri- state, morpholinium tallate, potassium tallate, sodium lauryl sulfate, diethanolamine lauryl sulfate, sodium laureth (3) sulfate, ammonium laureth (2) sulfate, sodium nonylphenoxyρoly(ethyleneoxy)(4) sulfate, sodium diiso- butylsulfosuccinate, disodium laurylsulfosuccinate, tetrasodium N-laurylsulfosuccinimate, sodium decyloxypoly- (ethyleneoxy(5)methyl)carboxylate, sodium octylphenoxypoly- (ethyleneoxy(8)methyl)carboxylate, sodium mono decyloxypoly- (ethyleneoxy)(4)phosphate, sodium di decyloxypoly-
(ethyleneoxy)(6)phosphate, and potassium mono/di-octyl- ρhenoxypoly(ethyleneoxy)(9)ρhosphate. Other anionic surfactants known in the art may also be employed.
Among the useful nonionic surfactants which may be employed may be mentioned octylphenoxypoly(ethyleneoxy)- (ll)ethanol, nonylphenoxypoly(ethyleneoxy)(13)ethanol, dodecylphenoxypoly(ethyleneoxy)(10)ethanol, polyoxyethylene (12) lauryl alcohol, polyoxyethylene (14) tridecyl alcohol, lauryloxypoly(ethyleneoxy)(10)ethyl methyl ether, undecyl- thiopol (ethyleneoxy)(12)ethanol, methoxypoly(oxyethylene- (10)/(oxypropylene(20))-2-propanol block copolymer,
SUBSTITUTE SHEET nonyloxypoly(propyleneoxy)(4)/(ethyleneoxy)(16)ethanol, dodecyl polyglycoside, polyoxyethylene (9) monolaurate, polyoxyethylene (8) monoundecanoate, polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monostearate, polyoxyethylene (18) sorbitol monotallate, sucrose monolaurate, lauryldimethylamine oxide, myristyldimethylamine oxide, lauramidopropyl -N,N-dimethylamine oxide, 1:1 lauric diethanolamide, 1:1 coconut diethanolamide, 1:1 mixed fatty acid diethanol¬ amide, polyoxyethylene(6)lauramide, 1:1 soya diethanol- amidopoly(ethyleneoxy)(8) ethanol, coconut diethanolamide, "modified", and coconut diethanolamide, "long chain modified". Other known nonionic surfactants may likewise be used.
Illustrative useful cationic surfactants include a mixture of n-alkyl (C12 50%, C14 30%, C16 17%, C18 3%) dimethyl ethylbenzyl ammonium chlorides, hexadecyltrimethyl- ammonium methosulfate, didecyldimethylammonium bromide and a mixture of n-alkyl (68% C12, 32* c14^ dimethyl benzyl ammonium chlorides. Similarly useful amphoteric surfactants include cocamidopropyl betaine, sodium palmityloamphopro- pionate, N-coco beta-aminopropionic acid, disodium N-lauryl- iminodipropionate, sodium coco imidazoline amphoglycinate and coco betaine. Other cationic and amphoteric surfactants known to the art may also be utilized. The preferred surfactants for general use in the practice of the invention include dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid and the sodium, potassium, triethanolamine, morpho¬ linium, ammonium and isopropylamine salts thereof, and morpholinium tallate. The couplers which may be utilized in the practice of the invention include sodium benzene sulfonate, sodium toluene sulfonate, sodium xylene sulfonate, potassium ethylbenzene sulfonate, sodium cumene sulfonate, sodium octane-1-sulfonate, potassium dimethylnaphthalene sulfonate, ammonium xylene sulfonate, sodium n-hexyl diphenyoxide disulfonate, sodium 2-ethylhexyl sulfate, ammonium
SUBSTITUTE SHEET n-butoxyethyl sulfate, sodium 2-ethylhexanoate, sodium pelargonate, sodium n-butoxymethyl carboxylate, potassium mono/di phenoxyethyl phosphate, sodium mono/di n-butoxyethyl phosphate, triethanolamine trimethylolpropane phosphate, sodium capryloamphopropionate, disodium capryloiminodipro- pionate, and sodium capro imidazoline amphoylycinate. Certain water-soluble solvents known to the art as couplers such as propylene glycol ethers (e.g. tripropyleneglycol monomethyl ether) can be used in the practice of the invention, but cannot be substituted for the sparingly water soluble organic solvent component. Additional couplers or hydrotropes known to the art may also be utilized.
In regard to the solubilizing additive component of the compositions of the invention, it will be understood that one or more surfactants from one or more compatible classes of surfactants may be employed or utilized in a mixed solubilizing surfactant system. For example, a combination of compatible anionic and nonionic surfactants may be employed. Likewise, a combination of compatible couplers may also be used as may a combination of one or more compatible surfactants from different classes of surfactants together with one or more couplers. Thus, one may use a combination of blended surfactants and couplers to achieve the desired minimal solvent solubilization. The compatibility of the various surfactants and of the various couplers with each other and in combination can be readily determined by simple experimentation.
Similarly, but less preferably, a mixture of the sparingly soluble organic solvents may be employed in formulating the compositions of the invention. However, if a mixture of solvents is to be used, each of the solvents should have nearly the same approximate water solubility so that they will solubilize in water at approximately the same point upon addition of the solubilizing additive. In addition to the organic solvent and solubiliz¬ ing additive components of the compositions of the invention,
SUBSTITUTE SHEET various optional adjuvants can be incorporated. These include chelants such as the sodium salts of ethylenedi- aminetetraacetic acid (Hampene 100 or Versene 100), thickeners such as carboxy acrylic polymers (Carbopol 940) or acrylic acid/alkyl methacrylate copolymers (Acrysol ICS-1) , fragrances, dyes, pH adjustants, defoaming agents, anti-corrosion additives and anti-rust additives. To prevent flash rusting when the compositions are used to clean and/or degrease metal surfaces, an anti flash-rusting additive such as an alkanolamine (e.g., mono-, di- or triethanolamine) may be incorporated.
In formulating the compositions of the invention, the various components as brought together may first form an oily suspension which becomes an emulsion upon the addition of a surfactant/coupler, and is then finally transformed into a microemulsion through the addition of the final portion of the solubilizing coupler. For example, 2.0 wt. % sodium metasilicate, 7.5 wt. % l-phenoxy-2-propanol, 2.5 wt. % tripropyleneglycol monomethyl ether and 76.4 wt. % soft water are stirred to form an oily suspension having a pH of 13.3. 2.4 wt. % dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid is added with stirring to form a creamy white emulsion having a pH of 13.1. 7.2 wt. % sodium xylene sulfonate (40%) is then added with stirring whereupon some slight lightening of the emulsion occurs. The addition of 1.8 wt. % sodium xylene sulfonate (40%) causes the emulsion to become still lighter but it remains opaque. Upon the final addition of 0.2 wt. % sodium xylene sulfonate (40%) with stirring, the white emulsion is transformed into a bluish microcolloidal microemulsion having a pH of 13.05. The microemulsions of the invention can also be formulated by combining the various components together in different sequence to transform any emulsion formed into a microemulsion. The addition of an excess of the solubilizing additive to the formulation will cause the microemulsion to be converted
SUBSTITUTE SHEET into a solution and is to be avoided if optimum cleaning/ degreasing efficacy of the builder-containing formulations is to be achieved.
The concentration of the aqueous cleaner/degreaser solution, as indicated by the terms "total solids content" and "total actives content" in the working examples provided hereinafter refers, respectively, to the combined percentages of nonvolatile components and to the sum total of nonaqueous volatile and nonvolatile components. The term "cloud point" indicates the temperature below which the composition exists as a clear, single phase microemulsion and above which phase separation (hetero¬ geneity) occurs. For practical reasons, a composition should preferably have a cloud point in excess of, for example 50°C, to have a viably safe, storage-stable shelf life under hot, summertime warehouse conditions.
As shown by the experimental degreasing test data presented below, the compositions of the invention provide enhanced cleaning/degreasing efficacy over that achievable with compositions containing no builder or with available builder-containing compositions formulated in the form of total solutions.
The following examples illustrate the practice of the invention.
Example 1
In the following examples of illustrative cleaner/ degreaser compositions of the present invention, the compositions were subjected as indicated to the definitive, semiquantitative degreasing test method described below in order to measure their cleaning/degreasing efficacy.
A magnetic stirrer (Fisher Scientific Co., Catalog No. 14-511-1A) provided with a vaned disc magnetic stir bar (7/8" (diameter) x 5/8" (height), 22 mm x 15 mm. Fisher Scientific Co., Catalog No. 14-511-98C) was used. In each instance, pre-cleaned, borosilicate glass microslides (3" x
SUBSTITUTE SHEET 1", 1.0 mm thickness) were thinly smeared/rub-on coated with Vaseline brand white petroleum jelly on one side only to a distance of 1.0" from the bottom edge to provide a 1.0" x 1.0" coated area. The test cleaner/degreaser solutions were employed at full strength unless otherwise indicated and in an amount sufficient to fill a 50 ml Pyrex beaker containing the vaned disc magnetic stirrer bar to a level of 40 ml. Each test solution and surrounding air were maintained at 21 ± 0.5°C and the test solution stirring rate was determined by a setting of "3" on the stirrer dial of the magnetic stirrer. The stirring disc was positioned off-center to accomodate each microslide, touching neither the beaker walls nor the microslide and rotating freely when in use. The microslide, in each test, rested upright on the beaker bottom, was allowed to lean against the lip of the beaker at an approximately 75° angle and was positioned with the Vaseline coated face or area facing upward away from the vaned disc magnetic stirrer bar.
For each test, the beaker containing the stirrer bar was filled to 40 ml. with the test cleaning/degreasing solution at the indicated concentration, placed atop the magnetic stirrer plate, and positioned off-center to accomo¬ date the glass microslide, and yet allow the vaned disc stirrer bar to rotate or spin freely. The stirrer was turned on, the dial adjusted manually to the "3" stirring rate setting and the Vaseline thin film coated glass micro- slide was introduced into the test solution bath in such a manner that the coated side faced upward and was positioned away from the stirrer bar. The time "0" was noted immediately on a watch or clock with a sweep second hand. At appropriate time intervals, the glass microslide was briefly removed from the cleaner/degreaser solution bath and immediately "read" for "% Vaseline removed from the 1.0" x 1.0" treated area", an objective determina- ion, after which the microslide was immediately returned to
SUBSTITUTE SHEET 16
the stirred aqueous cleaner/degreaser bath. The duration of the degreasing test is determined by the time needed for complete, 100% removal of the Vaseline film from the glass microslide surface. 5 The accuracy of the above-described test method is of the order of + 5% as determined by replicate run averaging.
Example 2 An aqueous, cleaner/degreaser formulation in the 10 form of a microemulsion was prepared having the following composition:
Component Wt. % l-Phenoxy-2-propanol
(Dowanol PPh) 3.0
15 Monoethanolamine 1.8
Sodium metasilicate 1.5
Dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid 1.0
Soft H20 92.7
100.0
20 The sodium metasilicate was dissolved in water with stirring. The monoethanolamine, l-phenoxy-2-propanol and dodecyl¬ benzenesulfonic acid were added and stirring of the resultant emulsion/suspension was continued until the emulsion gradu¬ ally cleared to produce an irridescent (blue) microemulsion.
25 The microemulsion had a pH of 12.65, a total solids content of 2.5% and a total actives content of 7.3%. Upon heating, the microemulsion remained irridescent to 50°C, then devel¬ oped more turbidity up to 75°C and became a clear, colorless aqueous solution above about 75°C. It exhibited no cloud
30 point to 100°C.
The composition readily removed the following soilant markings from alkyd enameled metal surfaces: black
SUBSTITUTE SHEET Magic Marker, black and blue indelible ballpoint pen, #1 hardness pencil, red (waxy) crayon, and automotive grease smearings. Some trace smudge was left on the surface. The composition readily removed four coats of floor finish (trade designation "Buckeye Citation" by The Davies-Young Company) from vinyl tile upon 5 minutes contact time at room temperature, followed by swabbing action, a water rinse and air drying.
This composition was subjected to the degreasing test method of Example 1 with the following results:
1st attack on greased slide at 2-3 sec.
30% removal of grease at 30 sec.
60-65% removal of grease at 1.0 min.
100% removal of grease at 1.5 min.
Example 3
Example 2 was repeated in formulating an aqueous cleaner/degreaser microemulsion having the following composition:
Component W l-Phenoxy-2-propanol (Dowanol PPh)
Monoethanolamine
Sodium Metasilicate
Dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid Sodium xylene sulfonate (40%)
Soft H20
The composition was a bluish, irridescent microemulsion having a pH of 12.5, a total solids content of 4.4% and a total actives content of 8.4%. Upon heating, the composi¬ tion remained an irridescent microemulsion to 48°C, became a turbid emulsion between 48-59°C and a clear, colorless solution above about 60°C.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET The composition effected 100% removal of the markings set forth in Example 2 and also effected 100% removal of four coats of "Buckeye Citation" floor finish as in Example 2. This composition was subjected to the degreasing test method of Example 1 with the following results:
1st attack on greased slide at 2 sec.
33% removal of grease at 15 sec.
60% removal of grease at 30 sec. 80-85% removal of grease at 45 sec.
100% removal of grease at 1.0 min.
Example 4 Example 2 was repeated in formulating an agueous, cleaner/degreaser microemulsion having the following composition:
Component l-Phenoxy-2-propanol (Dowanol PPh)
Monoethanolamine Sodium metasilicate
Dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid
Sodium cuπtene sulfonate (45%)
Soft H20
100.0 The composition was a bluish, irridescent microemulsion having a pH of 12.6, a total solids content of 3.98% and a total actives content of 7.98%. Upon heating, the composition remained an irridescent microemulsion to 39°C and became a clear, colorless solution above about 39°C. It exhibited no cloud point to 100°C.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET The composition effected 100% removal of the markings set forth in Example 2 with no smudging, and also effected 100% removal of four coats of "Buckwye Citation" floor finish as in Example 2. This composition was subjected to the degreasing test method of Example 1 with the following results:
10% removal of grease at 15 sec.
25% removal of grease at 30 sec.
45-50% removal of grease at 1.0 min. 70% removal of grease at 1.5 min.
85-90% removal of grease at 2.0 min.
100% removal of grease at 2.5 min.
Example 5 Example 2 was repeated in formulating an aqueous, cleaner/degreaser microemulsion having the following compo¬ sition:
Component Wt. % l-Phenoxy-2-propano1
(Dowanol PPh) 3.5 Monoethanolamine 0.5
Sodium metasilicate 1.2
Dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid 1.2
Sodium Capryloamphopropionate,
50% Monateric CY-Na-50 2.0 Soft H20 91.6
100.00
The composition was a pale yellow, irridescent microemulsion having a pH of 12.5, a total solids content of 3.4% and a total actives content of 7.4%. Upon heating, the composi- tion remained an irridescent microemulsion to 50°C and became a clear solution at temperatures above 50°C. It exhibited no cloud point.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET The composition effected 100% removal of the markings set forth in Example 2 with no to very slight smudging, and also effected 95-100% removal of four coats of "Buckeye Citation" floor finish as in Example 2. This composition was subjected to the degreasing test method of Example 1 with the following results:
1st attack on greased slide at 3 sec.
20-25% removal of grease at 15 sec.
50% removal of grease at 30 sec. 85-90% removal of grease at 45 sec.
100% removal of grease at 1.0 min.
Example 6 Example 2 was repeated in formulating an aqueous, cleaner/degreaser microemulsion having the following composition:
Component Wt. % l-Phenoxy-2-propanol
(Dowanol PPh) 4.0
Sodium metasilicate 1.0 Sodium hydroxide (50%) 0.2
Dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid 1.5
Sodium xylene sulfonate (40%) 5.0
Monoethano1araine 0.5
Soft H20 87.8 100.00
The composition was a bluish, irridescent microemulsion having a pH of 12.65, a total solids content of 4.6% and a total actives content of 9.1%. Upon heating, the composition remained an irridescent microemulsion to 51.5°C, was turbid in the range 50-60°C, and was a clear, colorless solution above about 60°C.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET The composition effected 100% removal of the markings set forth in Example 2 with slight smudging and also effected 100% removal of four coats of "Buckeye Citation" floor finish as in Example 2. The composition was subjected to the degreasing test method of Example 1 with the following results: 20% removal of grease at 30 sec. 35% removal of grease at 1.0 min. 60% removal of grease at 2.0 min. 90% removal of grease at 3.0 min.
100% removal of grease at 3.33 min.
Example 7 A control composition was prepared by combining the following components in the amounts indicated: Component Wt. %
1—Phenoxy-1-propano1
(Dowanol PPh) 4.0
Dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid 1.7
Sodium hydroxide (50%) 0.5 Monoethanolamine 1.5
Soft H20 92.3
100.0
The composition was a clear, essentially colorless solution containing no builder component. It had a pH of 11.7, a total solids content of 1.844% and a total actives content of 7.344%. It exhibited no cloud point to 100°C.
The composition quite easily removed the following percentages of the markings set forth in Example 2 from alkyd enameled metal surfaces: 85-90% removal of black Magic Marker felt pen
80% removal of black indelible ballpoint pen 100% removal of blue indelible ballpoint pen
SUBSTITUTE SHEET 90% removal of #1 pencil 95% removal of red (waxy) crayon 100% removal of automobile grease smearings There was slight smudging with the black Magic Marker and black indelible ballpoint pen markings. The composition also effected 100% removal of four coats of "Buckeye Citation" floor finish as in Example 2.
The composition was subjected to the degreasing test method of Example 1 with the following results: 10-15% removal of grease at 15 sec.
25% removal of grease at 30 sec. 45% removal of grease at 1.0 min. 70-75% removal of grease at 2.0 min. 90% removal of grease at 3.0 min. 100% removal of grease at 3.5 min.
- am l 8 An aqueous, cleaner/degreaser formulation in the form of a microemulsion was prepared having the following composition: Component W l-Phenoxy-2-propanol (Dowanol PPh)
Dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid
Sodium hydroxide (50%) Monoethanolamine
Soft H20
Sodium metasilicate
100.0
All of the above components except the sodium metasilicate were stirred together to form an aqueous solution. The sodium metasilicate was then added as granules and upon dissolving in the solution, a microemulsion was formed having a bluish, irridescent appearance. The microemulsion
SUBSTITUTE SHEET had a pH of 12.1, a total solids content of 2.22% and a total actives content of 7.12%. Upon heating, the microemulsion remained irridescent to 37°C. and became a clear, colorless solution above about 37°C. It exhibited no cloud point.
The composition effected 100% removal of the markings set forth in Example 2 with no smudging and also effected 100% removal of four coats of "Buckeye Citation" floor finish as in Example 2. This composition was subjected to the degreasing test method of Example 1 with the following results 33% removal of grease at 15 sec. 60% removal of grease at 30 sec. 85-90% removal of grease at 45 sec. 100% removal of grease at 1.0 min.
Example 9 An aqueous, cleaner/degreaser formulation in the form of a microemulsion was prepared having the following composition:
100.0
All of the above components except the sodium metasilicate were stirred together to form a clear, aqueous solution. The sodium metasilicate was then added as granules and upon dissolving in the solution, a microemulsion was formed
SUBSTITUTE SHEET having a bluish, irridescent appearance. The microemulsion had a pH of 12.3, a total solids content of 2.24% and a total actives content of 7.74%. Upon heating, the micro¬ emulsion remained irridescent to 41°C. Above about 41°C it became a clear, colorless solution. It exhibited no cloud point.
The composition effected 100% removal of the markings set forth in Example 2 with very slight tendency to smudge and also effected 100% removal of four coats of "Buckeye Citation" floor finish as in Example 2.
This composition was subjected to the degreasing test method of Example 1 with the following results:
25-30% removal of grease at 15 sec.
60-65% removal of grease at 30 sec. 85-90% removal of grease at 45 sec.
100% removal of grease at 50 sec.
By comparison with the results set forth in Example 7, the above results show the enhanced degreasing activity achieved throught the incorporation of a builder.
Example 10
Examples 8 and 9 were repeated in preparing a microemulsion cleaner/degreaser formulation having the following composition:
100.0
SUBSTITUTE SHEET The microemulsion had a bluish, irridescent appearance, a pH of 12.3, a total solids content of 2.12% and a total actives content of 7.62%. Upon heating, the microemulsion remained irridescent to 44°C and above which it formed a clear, colorless solution. It exhibited no cloud point. The composition effected 100% removal of all markings including auto grease as set forth in Example 2 and also effected 100% removal of four coats of "Buckeye Citation" floor finish as in Example 2. The composition was subjected to the degreasing test method of Examplel with the following results: 1st attack on greased slide at 1-2 sec. 40% removal of grease at 15 sec. 70-75% removal of grease at 30 sec. 100% removal of greease at 45 sec.
Example 11 Examples 8 and 9 were repeated in preparing a microemulsion cleaner/degreaser formulation having the following composition: Component Wt. % l-Phenoxy-2-propanol
(Dowanol PPh) 4.0
Dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid 1.6
Sodium hydroxide (50%) 0.4 Monoethanolamine 1.5
Soft H20 92.0
Sodium metasilicate 0.5
100.0
The microemulsion had a bluish, irridescent appearance, a pH of 12.4, a total solids contents of 2.22% and a total active content of 7.72% Upon heating, the microemulsion remained irridescent to 52.5°C and became a clear solution above 52,5°C It exhibited no cloud point
SUBSTITUTE SHEET The composition effected 100% removal of all markings set forth in Example 2 with no smudging and also effected 100% removal of four coats of "Buckeye Citation" floor finish as in Example 2. This composition was subjected to the degreasing test method of Example 1 with the following results: 20-25% removal of grease at 15 sec. 50% removal of grease at 30 sec. 75% removal of grease at 1.0 min. 85-90% removal of grease at 1.5 min.
100% removal of grease at 2.0 min.
Example 12 An aqueous, cleaner/degreaser formulation in the form of a microemulsion was prepared having the following composition:
Component Wt. % l-Phenoxy-2-propano1
(Dowanol PPh) 4.0
Dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid 1.5 Sodium hydroxide (50%) 0.4
Soft H20 93.7
Tetrapostassium pyrophosphate 0.4
100.0
All of the above components except tetrapotassium pyro- phosphate were stirred together and the pH adjusted to 7.0 with a trace of sodium sesquicarbonate to obtain a clear, colorless aqueous solution. The tetrapotassium pyrophos¬ phate was then added as granules and the solution immedi¬ ately changed to a bluish, irridescent microemulsion. The microemulsion had a pH of 9.11, a total solids content of 2.11% and a total actives content of 6.115%. Upon heating, the microemulsion remained irridescent to 42°C. It exhibited no cloud point to 100°C and no flash point.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET The composition effected 100%, easy and fast removal of all markings set forth in Example 2.
This composition was subjected to the degreasing test method of Example 1 with the following results: 1st attack on greased slide at 2 sec.
45% removal of grease at 15 sec.
90-95% reemoval of grease at 30 sec.
100% removal of grease at 35 sec.
Example 13 Example 12 was repeated in preparing a microemulsion cleaner/degreaser formulation having following composition:
Component Wt. % l-Phenoxy-2-propanol 4.0 Dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid 1.5
Sodium hydroxide (50%) 0.4
Soft H20 93.7
Borax 0.4
100.0 The microemulsion formed upon the addition of borax granules to the other components and the slow dissolution of the borax produced a gradual change from a clear, aqueous solution to a bluish, irridescent microemulsion. The microemulsion had a pH of 8.93, a total solids content of 2.115% and a total actives content of 6.115%. Upon heating, the microemulsion remained irridescent to 38°C, clearing at 38.5°C and becoming a clear, colorless solution above about 39°C. It exhibited no cloud point to 100βC and no flash point.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET The composition effected 100% facile removal of all markings set forth in Example 2.
This composition was subjected to the degreasing test method of Example 1 with the following results: 1st attack on greased slide at 1-2 sec.
50-55% reraovl of grease at 15 sec. 80% removal of grease at 30 sec. 100% removal of grease at 40 sec.
Example 14 Example 12 was repeated in preparing a microemul¬ sion cleaner/degreaser formulation having the following composition:
100.0
The addition of the sodium carbonate in powder form to a clear, colorless aqueous solution of the other components produced the instantaneous development of a bluish, irridescent microemulsion. The microemulsion had a pH of 10.75, a total solids content of 2.215% and a total actives content of 6.215%. The microemulsion, unlike those of Examples 12 and 13, was slightly viscous and had a Brookfield viscosity of 37 cps. at 21°C. Upon heating, the microemulsion remained irridescent to 60.5°C and became a clear, colorless aqueous solution above about 61°C. It exhibited no cloud point to 100°C.
The composition effected 100%, fast removal of all markings set forth in Example 2.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET This composition was subjected to the degreasing test method of Example 1 with the following result: 1st attack in greased slide at 2 sec. 30-35% removal of grease at 15 sec. 60% removal of grease at 30 sec.
85-90% removal of grease at 40 sec. 100% removal of grease at 50 sec.
Example 15 Example 2 was repeated in formulating an aqueous, cleaner/degreaser microemulsion having the following compo¬ sition:
Component Wt. %
2-Phenoxyethanol 6.4
(Dowanol EPh) Dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid 2.5
Anhydrous sodium 3.5 metasilicate
100.0
The composition was a faint bluish, microemulsion having a pH of 12.86, a total solids content of 9.8% and a total actives content of 16.2%. It exhibited no cloud content of point to 100°C and no flash point.
At a 1:5 dilution with water, the composition effected 75% removal of black Magic Marker markings from an alkyd enameled steel panel. This composition at a 1:2 dilution with water was subjected to the degreasing test method of Example 1 with the following results:
SUBSTITUTE SHEET 1st attack on greased slide at 8 sec. 10% removal of grease at 30 sec. 30% removal of grease at 1.0 min. 55% removal of grease at 2.0 min. 80-85% removal of grease at 4.0 min.
100% removal of grease at 6.0 min.
Example 16 Example 2 was repeated in formulating an aqueous, cleaner/degreaser microemulsion having the following composition:
Component Wt. %
Anhydrous sodium 3.6 metasilicate
Dodecylbenzenesulfonic 2.80 acid
Chelating Agent 2.00
(Hampene 100)
Propy1eneglyco1 2.00 monomethyl ether Dipropyleneglyco1 0.95 monomethyl ether
Tripropyleneglycol 0.70 monomethyl ether l-Phenoxy-2-propanol 6.35 (Dowanol PPh)
Sodium xylene sulfonate 8.50
Soft H20 73.10
100.00
The composition was a faint, bluish, colloidal microemulsion having a pH of 13.23, a total solids content of 10.6% and a total actives content of 20.6%. It exhibited no cloud point and no flash point.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET At a 1:5 dilution with water, the composition effected 90% removal of black Magic Marker markings from an alkyd enameled steel panel.
This composition at a 1:2 dilution with water was subjected to the degreasing test method of Example 1 with the following results:
1st attack on greased slide at 5 sec. 15% removal of grease at 30 sec. 35% removal of grease at 1.0 min. 70% removal of grease at 2.0 min.
90% removal of grease at 3.0 min. 100% removal of grease at 3.75 min.
Example 17 Example 2 was repeated in formulating an aqueous having the following composition:
Component Wt. %
Anhydrous sodium 5.50 metasilicate
Dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid 5.00 Chelating agent 2.00
(Hampene 100)
Propyleneglycol 2.00 monomethyl ether
Dipropyleneglycol 0.95 monomethyl ether
Tripropyleneglycol 0.70 monomethyl ether l-Phenoxy-2-propanol 6.35
(Dowanol PPh) Sodium xylene sulfonate (40%) 8.5
Soft H20 69.0
100.0
SUBSTITUTE SHEET The components formed a clear, aqueous solution rather than a microemulsion because the composition included an excess of solubilizing additive over that required to form a micro¬ emulsion. At a 1:5 dilution with water, the solution effected 0% removal of black Magic Marker markings from an alkyd enameled steel panel.
The solution at a 1:2 dilution with water was subjected to the degreasing test method of Example 1 with the following results:
1st attack on greased slide at 2.5 min.
10% removal of grease at 4.5 min.
20-25% removal of grease at 10 min.
50% removal of grease at 20 min. 70% removal of grease at 30 min.
90-95% removal of grease at 50 min.
100% removal of grease at 65 min.
Example 18 Example 2 was repeated in formulating an aqueous microemulsion having the following composition: Component Wt. %
Anhydrous sodium 4.0 metasilicate
Dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid 2.0 Propylene glycol mono-t-butyl 9.5 ether (Arcosolve PTB)
Chelating agent (Hampene 100) 3.0
Soft H20 81.5
100.0 The organic solvent component, propylene glycol mono-t- butuyl ether, has an aqueous solubility of 13.9 wt. % at 21°C. The composition was a very faint bluish,
SUBSTITUTE SHEET colloidal microemulsion having a pH of 13.73, a total solids content of 7.2% and a total actives content of 16.7%. It had a cloud point of 28°C.
At a 1:5 dilution with water, the composition effected 60% removal of black Magic Marker markings from an alkyd enameled steel surface.
This composition at a 1:2 dilution with water became solution and was subjected to the degreasing test method of Example 1 with the following results: 1st attack on greased slide at 7 sec.
20-25% removal of grease at 1.0 min. 33% removal of grease at 2.0 min. 40% removal of grease at 3.0 min. 45-50% removal of grease at 4.0 min. 60% removal of grease at 5.0 min.
65-70% removal of grease at 6.0 min. 75% removal of grease at 7.0 min. 80% removal of grease at 8.0 min. 85% removal of grease at 9.0 min. 90% removal of grease at 10.0 min.
95% removal of grease at 12.0 min. 100% removal of grease at 13.5 min.
Example 19 Example 2 was repeated in formulating an aqueous, cleaner/degreaser microemulsion having the following composition:
Component Wt. %
Anhydrous sodium 2.0 metasilicate Nonylphenol ethoxylate 3.5
(T-Det N-14)
Chelating agent 2.0
(Hampene 100, 40%)
Dipropylenegycol 3.5 monomethyl ether
SUBSTITUTE SHEET l-Phenoxy-2-propanol 6.5
(Dowanol PPh)
Sodium xylene sulfonate (40%) 11.0
Soft H20 71.5 100.0
The composition was a slightly bluish, colloidal micro¬ emulsion having a pH 13.62, a total solids content of 10.7% and a total actives content of 20.7%. It had a cloud point of 26°C and no flash point. At a 1:5 dilution with water, the composition effected 100% removal of black Magic Marker markings from an alkyd enameled steel panel.
This composition at a 1:2 dilution with water was subjected to the degreasing test method of Example 1 with the following results:
1st attack on greased slide at 5 sec.
25% removal of grease at 20 sec.
60% removal of grease at 40 sec.
85-90% removal of grease at 1.0 min. 100% removal of grease at 1.5 min.
Example 20 Example 2 was repeated in formulating an aqueous, cleaner/degreaser microemulsion having the following composition: Component Wt. %
Anhydrous sodium 2.0 metasilicate
Dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid 1.5
Chelating agent 5.0 (Hampene 100, 40%)
Benzyl acohol 9.0
Tripropyleneglycol 1.0 monomethyl ether
SUBSTITUTE SHEET Sodium xylene sulfonate (40%) 9.5
Soft H20 7.2
100.0
The composition was faint bluish microemulsion having a pH of 13.19, a total solids content of 9.3% and a total actives content of 19.3%. It had a cloud point in excess of 100°C and no flash point.
At a 1:5 dilution with water, the composition effected 50% removal of black Magic Marker markings from an alkyd enameled steel panel.
This composition at a 1:2 dilution with water was subjected to the degreasing test method of Example 1 with the following results:
1st attack on greased slide at 4 sec. 35% removal of grease at 30 sec.
60% removal of grease at 1.0 min. 75-80% removal of grease at 1.5 min. 85-90% removal of grease at 2.0 min. 95% removal of grease at 2.5 min. 100% removal of grease at 2.75 min.
Example 21 Example 2 was repeated in formulating an aqueous, cleaner/degreaser microemulsion having the following composition: Component Wt. %
Anhydrous sodium 2.0 metasilicate
Dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid 2.5
Chelating agent 1.5 (Hampene 100, 40%)
Tripropyleneglycol 2.5 monomethyl ether l-Phenoxy-2-propanol 7.0
(Dowanol PPh)
SUBSTITUTE SHEET Sodium xylene sulfonate (40%) 9.0
Soft H20 75.5
100.0
The composition was a faint bluish microemulsion having a pH of 13.05 a total solids content of 8.7% and a total actives content of 18.2%. It had a cloud point of approxi¬ mately 75°C and no flash point.
At a 1:5 dilution with water, the composition effected approximately 95% of black Magic Marker markings from an alkyd enameled steel panel.
This composition at a 1:2 dilution with water was subjected to the degreasing test method of Example 1 with the following results:
1st attack on greased slide at 4 sec. 45% removal of grease at 30 sec.
65-70% removal of grease at 1.0 min.
80% removal of grease at 1.5 min.
90% removal of grease at 2.0 min.
100% removal of grease at 2.5 min.
Example 22
Example 21 was repeated in formulating an aqueous microemulsion containing no builder component and having the following composition:
Component Wt. % Dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid 2.5
Sodium hydroxide (50%) 0.4
Chelating agent 1.5
(Hampene 100, 40%)
Tripropyleneglycol 2.5 monomethyl ether l-Phenoxy-2-propanol 7.0
(Dowanol PPh)
SUBSTITUTE SHEET Sodium xylene sulfonate (40%) 6.5
Soft H20 7.96
100.0
The small amount of sodium hydroxide was included to partially neutralize the dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid and cause salt formation. The composition was a faint opalescent microemulsion having a pH of 7.0, a total solids content of 5.9% and a total actives content of 15.4%. It had a cloud point in excess of 100°C and exhibited no flash point.
At a 1:5 dilution with water, the composition effected only 0-5% removal of black Magic Marker markings from an alkyd enameled steel panel.
The composition at a 1:2 dilution with water was subjected to the degreasing test method of Example 1 with the following results:
1st attack on greased slide at 11 sec.
5-10% removal of grease at 30 sec.
30% removal of grease at 1.0 min. 55-60% removal of grease at 1.5 min.
70% removal of grease at 2.0 min.
85-90% removal of grease at 3.0 min
95% removal of grease at 4.0 min.
100% removal of grease at 4.5 min. Thus, by comparison with the composition of Example 21, the composition of this example containing no builder component was less effective than the builder-containing composition of Example 21.
Example 23 Example 2 was repeated in formulating an aqueous, cleaner/degreaser microemulsion having the following composition:
SUBSTITUTE SHEET Component Wt. %
Sodium tripolyphosphate 2.0
Dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid 2.5
Chelating agent
(Hampene 100, 40%) 1.5
Tripropyleneglycol monomethyl ether 2.5
100.0
The composition was a bluish, opalescent microemulsion having a pH of 11.27, a total solids content of 8.4% and a total actives content of 17.9%. It had a cloud point in excess of 100°C and exhibited no flash point.
At a 1:5 dilution with water, the composition effected 60% removal of black Magic Marker markings from an alkyd enameled steel panel. The composition at a 1:2 dilution with water was subjected to the degreasing test method of Example 1 with the following results:
1st attack on greased slide at 6 sec.
25% removal of grease at 30 sec. 40-45% removal of grease at 1.0 min.
65-70% removal of grease at 1.5 min.
80% removal of grease at 2.0 min.
90% removal of grease at 2.5 min.
100% removal of greast at 3.0 min.
Example 24
Example 2 was repeated in formulating an aqueous, cleaner/degreaser microemulsion having the following composition:
SUBSTITUTE SHEET Component Wt. %
Anhydrous sodium metasilicate 2.2
Dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid 2.5
Polyglycol 112-2(Dow) 10.0 Block ethylene oxide/ propylene oxide copolyol, terminated by glycerol)
Soft H20 85.3
100.0 The composition was a very faint microemulsion having a pH of 12.73, and a total solids and total actives content of 14.7%. It had a cloud point of 40°C and exhibited no flash point.
At a 1:5 dilution with water, the composition effected 100% removal of black Magic Marker markings from an alkyd enameled steel panel.
The composition at a 1:2 dilution with water was subjected to the degreasing test method of Example 1 with the following results: 1st attack on greased slide at 4 sec.
20% removal of grease at 30 sec.
55-60% removal of grease at 1.0 min.
80% removal of grease at 1.5 min.
100% removal of greast at 2.0 min.
Example 25
Example 2 was repeated in preparing the following composition containing a highly water soluble organic solvent instead of a sparingly water soluble organic solvent: Component Wt. %
Anhydrous sodium metasilicate 2.0 Dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid 2.4
SUBSTITUTE SHEET Ethylene glycol monobutyl ether (Butyl Cellosolve) 10.0
Soft H20 85.6
100.0 The composition was a clear, very pale yellow solution having a pH of 12.53, a total solids content of 4.4% and a total actives content of 14.4%. It had a cloud point in excess of 100βC.
At a 1:5 dilution with water, the composition effected less than 5% removal of black Magic Marker mark¬ ings from an alkyd enameled steel panel.
The composition at a 1:2 dilution with water was subjected to the degreasing test method of Example 1 with the following results: 1st attack on greased slide at 20 sec.
15% removal of grease at 1.0 min. 25-30% removal of grease at 20 min. 35-40% removal of grease at 3.0 min. 45% removal of grease at 4.0 min. 50-55% removal of grease at 6.0 min.
65% removal of grease at 10.0 min. 75% removal of grease at 15.0 min. 80% removal of grease at 20.0 min. 85% removal of grease at 25.0 min. 90% removal of grease at 30.0 min.
95% removal of grease at 35.0 min. 100% removal of grease at 39.0 min.
Example 26 Example 2 was repeated in formulating an aqueous, cleaner/degreaser microemulsion having the following composition:
SUBSTITUTE SHEET Component
Anhydrous sodium metasilicate
Dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid
Tripropyleneglycol monomethyl ether
Acetophenone
Soft H20
100.0
The composition was a bluish, irridescent microemulsion having a pH of 12.61, a total solids content of 5.1% and a total actives content of 15.1%. It had a cloud point in excess of 100βC and exhibited no flash point.
At a 1:5 dilution with water, the composition ef ected 100% removal of black Magic Marker markings from an alkyd enameled steel panel.
The composition at a 1:2 dilution with water was subjected to the degreasing test method of Example 1 with the following results:
1st attack on greased slide at 5 sec. 25-30% removal of grease at 30 sec.
70% removal of grease at 1.0 min. 100% removal of grease at 1.5 min.
Example 27 Example 2 was repeated in formulating an aqueous cleaner/degreaser microemulsion having the following composition:
Component Wt. %
Anhydrous sodium metasilicate 2. 0
Dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid 2.5 Cyc lohexano 1 8.5
SUBSTITUTE SHEET Tripropyleneglycol
100.0
The composition was a faint bluish microemulsion having a pH of 12.74, a total solids content of 6.66% and a total actives content of 16.66%. It had a cloud point of 65°C. At a dilution of 1:5 with water, the composition effected approximately 65% removal of black Magic Marker markings from an alkyd enameled steel panel.
The composition at a 1:2 dilution with water was subjected to the degreasing test method of Example 1 with the following results: 1st attack on greased slide at 1.5 sec.
5-10% removal of grease at 30 sec. 15% removal of grease at 1.0 min. 20% removal of grease at 2.0 min. 30% removal of grease at 3.0 min. 40% removal of grease at 4.0 min.
50-55% removal of grease at 5.0 min. 70% removal of grease at 6.0 min. 85% removal of grease at 7.0 min. 100% removal of grease at 8.0 min.
Example 28
Example 2 was repeated in formulating an aqueous, cleaner/degreaser microemulsion having the following composition:
Component Wt. % Anhydrous sodium metasilicate 2.0
2-Phenoxyethano1
(Dowanol EPh) 9.0
SUBSTITUTE SHEET Coco betaine (30%) 4.0
Sodium xylene sulfonate
(40%) 9.6
Soft H20 75.4 100.0
The composition was a light bluish, irridescent micro¬ emulsion having a pH of 13.42, a total solids content of 7.04 and a total actives content of 16.04%. It had a cloud point above 100°C and no flash point. At a dilution of 1:5 with water, the composition effected 100% removal of black Magic Marker markings from an alkyd enameled steel panel.
The composition at a 1:2 dilution with water was subjected to the degreasing test method of Example 1 with the following results:
1st attack on greased slide at 3 sec.
25-30% removal of greast at 30 sec.
65-70% removal of grease at 1.0 min.
100% removal of grease at 1.5 min.
Example 29
An aqueous, cleaner/degreaser formulation in the form of a microemulsion was prepared having the following composition:
Component Wt. % Monoethanolamine 0.5
Sodium Metasilicate 2.0 l-Phenσxy-2-propanol 7.0
(Dowanol PPh)
Tripropyleneglycol monomethyl 3.0 ether
Doodecylbenzenesulfonic acid 3.0
Soft H20 82.4
SUBSTITUTE SHEET Isodecyloxypropylimino- 2.0 dipropionic acid ("Alkali Surfactant", Tomah
Products, 35%) Defoaming agent
(Atsurf F-12) 0.1
100.0
The sodium metasilicate was dissolved in water with stirring. The monoethanolamine was added followed by the addition of the l-phenoxy-2-propanol, tripropyleneglycol monomethyl ether and dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid with stirring. Stirring was continued until a homogeneous emulsion formed. The Alkali Surfactant was then added and the emulsion was transformed into a microemulsion after which the defoaming agent was added. The resulting micro¬ emulsion had a slightly bluish, irridescent appearance, a pH of 12.42, a total solids content of 5.7% and a total actives content of 16.2%. It exhibited a cloud point in excess of 100βC. The composition at a 1:2 dilution with water was subjected to the degreasing test method of Example 1 with the following results:
1st attack on greased slide at 1 sec. 40% removal of grease at 15 sec. 75% removal of grease at 30 sec.
100% removal of grease at 65 sec. In view of the above, it will be seen that the several objects of the invention are achieved and other advantageous results attained. As various changes could be made in the above compositions without departing from the scope of the invention, it is intended that all matter contained in the above description or shown in the accompanying drawings shall be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET

Claims

WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:
1. A stable, aqueous cleaner/degreaser composition in the form of a microemulsion comprising:
(a) at least one sparingly water soluble organic solvent characterized by: (i) having a water solubility in the range of approximately 0.2 to approximately 6 weight percent; (ii) not being a hydrocarbon or halocarbon; (iii) having one or more similar or dissimilar oxygen, nitrogen, sulfur or phosphorous containing functional groups; (iv) being a solvent for hydrophobic soilants; and (v) being present in an amount exceeding its aqueous solubility;
(b) a builder;
(c) a solubilizing additive consisting of from approximately 0.1 to approximately 100 weight percent of a surfactant and from 0 to approximately 99.9 weight percent of a coupler, said solubilizing additive being present in an amount not substantially exceeding the amount required to transform the combination of said organic solvent and said builder from the form of a true macroemulsion to the form of a microemulsion and less than that required to form a true solution; and
(d) water.
2. A stable, aqueous cleaner/degreaser composition as set forth in claim 1 wherein said organic solvent has a water solubility in the range of approxi¬ mately 1 to approximately 2.5 weight percent.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET 3. A stable, aqueous cleaner/degreaser composition as set forth in claim 1 wherein said organic solvent is selected from the group consisting of esters, alcohols, ketones, aldehydes, ethers and nitriles.
4. A stable, aqueous cleaner/degreaser composition as set forth in claim 1 wherein said organic solvent is selected from the group consisting of 2-phenoxyethanol, l-phenoxy-2-propanol, β-phenylethanol, acetophenone, benzyl alcohol, butoxyethyl acetate, isophorone and the dimethyl esters of mixed succinic, glutaric and adipic acids.
5. A stable, aqueous cleaner/degreaser composition as set forth in claim 1 wherein said builder is selected from the group consisting of alkali metal hydroxides, alkali metal silicates and metasilicates, alkali metal carbonates, bicarbonates and sesquicarbonates, borax, alkali metal phosphates, pyrophosphates, tripoly- phosphates, hexametaphosphates and tetraphosphates, and alkali metal perborates.
6. A stable, aqueous cleaner/degreaser composition as set forth in claim 1 wherein said builder is sodium metasilicate.
7. A stable, aqueous cleaner/degreaser composition as set forth in claim 1 wherein said surfactant is selected from the group consisting of anionic, nonionic, cationic and amphoteric surfactants.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET 8. A stable, aqueous cleaner/degreaser composition as set forth in claim 1 wherein said surfactant is an anionic surfactant selected from the group consisting of dodecylbenzene sulfonic acid, sodium dodecylbenzene- sulfonate, potassium dodecylbenzene sulfonate, tri¬ ethanolamine dodecylbenzene sulfonate, morpholinium dodecylbenzene sulfonate, ammonium dodecylbenzene sulfonate, isopropylamine dodecylbenzene sulfonate, sodium tridecylbenzene sulfonate, sodium dinonylbenzene sulfonate, potassium didodecylbenzene sulfonate, dodecyl diphenyloxid disulfonic acid, sodium dodecyl diphenyloxide disulfonate, isopropylamine decyl diphenyloxide disulfonate, sodium hexadecyloxypoly(ethyleneoxy)(lθ)ethyl sulfonate, potassiu octylphenoxypoly(ethyleneoxy)(9)ethyl sulfonate, sodium alpha 12-14 olefin sulfonate, sodium hexadecane-1 sulfonate, sodium ethyl oleate sulfonate, potassium octadecenylsuccinate, sodium oleate, potassium laurate, triethanolamine myristate, morpholinium tallate, potassium tallate, sodium lauryl sulfate, diethanolamine lauryl sulfate, sodium laureth (3) sulfate, ammonium laureth (2) sulfate, sodium nonylphenoxyρoly(ethyleneoxy)(4) sulfate, sodium decyloxypoly(ethyleneoxy (5)methyl)carboxylate, sodium σctylphenoxypoly(ethyleneoxy (8)methyl)carboxylate, sodium mono decyloxypoly(ethyleneoxy)(4)phosphate, sodium didecyloxypoly(ethyleneoxy)(6)phosphate, and potassium mono/dioctylphenoxypoly(ethyleneoxy)(9)phosphate.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET 9. A stable, aqueous cleaner/degreaser composition as set forth in claim 1 wherein said coupler is selected from the group consisting of sodium benzene sulfonate, sodium toluene sulfonate, sodium xylene sulfonate, potassium ethylbenzene sulfonate, sodium cumene sulfonate, sodium octane-1-sulfonate, potassium dimethylnaphthalene sulfonate, ammonium xylene sulfonate, sodium n-hexyl diphenyoxide disulfonate, sodium 2-ethylhexyl sulfate, ammonium n-butoxyethyl sulfate, sodium 2-ethylhexanoate, sodium pelargonate, sodium n-butoxymethyl carboxylate, potassium mono/di phenoxyethyl phosphate, sodium mono/di n-butoxyethyl phosphate, triethanolamine trimethylolpropane phosphate, sodium capryloamphopropionate, disodium capryloiminodipro- pionate, and sodium capro imidazoline amphoylycinate.
10. A stable, aqueous cleaner/degreaser composition as set forth in claim 1 wherein said organic solvent is 2-phenoxyethanol.
11. A stable, aqueous cleaner/degreaser composition as set forth in claim 1 wherein said organic solvent is l-ρhenoxy-2-propanol.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET
EP90910985A 1989-06-29 1990-06-12 Improved builder-containing aqueous cleaner/degreaser microemulsion compositions Expired - Lifetime EP0479888B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US37391089A 1989-06-29 1989-06-29
US373910 1989-06-29
PCT/US1990/003317 WO1991000337A1 (en) 1989-06-29 1990-06-12 Improved builder-containing aqueous cleaner/degreaser microemulsion compositions

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0479888A1 EP0479888A1 (en) 1992-04-15
EP0479888A4 true EP0479888A4 (en) 1992-06-03
EP0479888B1 EP0479888B1 (en) 1996-12-18

Family

ID=23474397

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP90910985A Expired - Lifetime EP0479888B1 (en) 1989-06-29 1990-06-12 Improved builder-containing aqueous cleaner/degreaser microemulsion compositions

Country Status (9)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0479888B1 (en)
JP (1) JP2671234B2 (en)
AT (1) ATE146521T1 (en)
AU (1) AU6031790A (en)
CA (1) CA2057027C (en)
DE (1) DE69029472T2 (en)
DK (1) DK0479888T3 (en)
ES (1) ES2100884T3 (en)
WO (1) WO1991000337A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR960701189A (en) * 1993-03-30 1996-02-24 테릴 켄트 퀼리 CLEANING COMPOSITIONS AND METHOD OF USE
JPH08508523A (en) * 1993-03-30 1996-09-10 ミネソタ マイニング アンド マニュファクチャリング カンパニー Improved floor coating removal composition and method
BR9406028A (en) * 1993-03-30 1995-12-26 Minnesota Mining & Mfg Composition and cleaning process
BR9609495A (en) * 1995-07-18 1999-03-02 Unilever Nv Composition and processes for removing cooked fat on a metal surface and cleaning a parking area
US5922665A (en) * 1997-05-28 1999-07-13 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Aqueous cleaning composition including a nonionic surfactant and a very slightly water-soluble organic solvent suitable for hydrophobic soil removal
FR2795088B1 (en) * 1999-06-21 2002-05-24 Atofina COLD CLEANING COMPOSITIONS OF THE MICROEMULSION TYPE
US6407051B1 (en) * 2000-02-07 2002-06-18 Ecolab Inc. Microemulsion detergent composition and method for removing hydrophobic soil from an article
GB2400375A (en) * 2003-04-09 2004-10-13 Hassan Scott Lisa Non-emulsifying aqueous cleaner-degreaser
DE10353986A1 (en) * 2003-11-19 2005-06-30 Henkel Kgaa Surfactant granules with hydrophobic ingredients
EP2045320B1 (en) * 2007-09-19 2012-04-25 Bubbles & Beyond Gmbh Cleaning agent for removing paint layers on surfaces, method for manufacturing the agent and cleaning method
US8420586B2 (en) 2008-04-18 2013-04-16 Ecolab Usa Inc. Thickened oven cleaner comprising a glutamic acid salt or disodium ethanol diglycine chelant
US8329630B2 (en) 2008-04-18 2012-12-11 Ecolab Usa Inc. Ready to use thickened degreaser and associated methods
EP2304011B1 (en) * 2008-07-14 2013-03-27 The Procter & Gamble Company Solvent system for microemulsion or protomicroemulsion and compositions using the solvent system
DE102009014380A1 (en) 2009-03-26 2010-10-07 Bubbles And Beyond Gmbh Method and composition for cleaning objects
US20120252713A1 (en) * 2010-09-24 2012-10-04 Invista North America S.A.R.L. Composition for surface treatment and process
ES2428799B1 (en) * 2012-05-04 2014-09-29 Javier DÍAZ RODRIGUEZ Multi-surface cleaning degreasing product
WO2015193280A1 (en) * 2014-06-17 2015-12-23 Chemetall Gmbh Detergent for gentle removal of inks and markers
CN112481621B (en) * 2020-11-27 2023-07-25 德旭新材料(佛冈)有限公司 Metal cleaning agent and preparation method thereof

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2144763A (en) * 1983-08-11 1985-03-13 Procter & Gamble Liquid detergent compositions with magnesium salts
US4606840A (en) * 1983-09-13 1986-08-19 Societe Nationale Elf Aquitaine Aqueous composition for the dispersion of hydrophobic substances, particularly applicable to the cleaning of objects soiled by paint or the like

Family Cites Families (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4264466A (en) * 1980-02-14 1981-04-28 The Procter & Gamble Company Mulls containing chain structure clay suspension aids
JPS56145998A (en) * 1980-04-15 1981-11-13 Ube Industries Detergent
US4414128A (en) * 1981-06-08 1983-11-08 The Procter & Gamble Company Liquid detergent compositions
US4472291A (en) * 1983-03-07 1984-09-18 Rosano Henri L High viscosity microemulsions
JPS59176398A (en) * 1983-03-28 1984-10-05 マークテック株式会社 Liquid detergent
US4758377A (en) * 1985-09-24 1988-07-19 The Proctor & Gamble Company Viscous phase stable liquid scouring cleansers containing solvent
US5076954A (en) * 1986-05-21 1991-12-31 Colgate-Palmolive Company Stable microemulsion cleaning composition
CA1283511C (en) * 1986-09-02 1991-04-30 Colgate-Palmolive Laundry pre-spotter composition providing improved oily soil removal
US4769172A (en) * 1986-09-22 1988-09-06 The Proctor & Gamble Company Built detergent compositions containing polyalkyleneglycoliminodiacetic acid
AU605858B2 (en) * 1987-06-04 1991-01-24 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Aqueous-based composition for removing coatings
GB8802106D0 (en) * 1988-01-30 1988-02-24 Procter & Gamble Hard-surface cleaning compositions
US4921629A (en) * 1988-04-13 1990-05-01 Colgate-Palmolive Company Heavy duty hard surface liquid detergent

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2144763A (en) * 1983-08-11 1985-03-13 Procter & Gamble Liquid detergent compositions with magnesium salts
US4606840A (en) * 1983-09-13 1986-08-19 Societe Nationale Elf Aquitaine Aqueous composition for the dispersion of hydrophobic substances, particularly applicable to the cleaning of objects soiled by paint or the like

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO1991000337A1 (en) 1991-01-10
EP0479888B1 (en) 1996-12-18
JPH05500675A (en) 1993-02-12
DE69029472T2 (en) 1997-07-03
CA2057027A1 (en) 1990-12-30
DK0479888T3 (en) 1997-06-09
DE69029472D1 (en) 1997-01-30
JP2671234B2 (en) 1997-10-29
ES2100884T3 (en) 1997-07-01
AU6031790A (en) 1991-01-17
CA2057027C (en) 1999-04-06
ATE146521T1 (en) 1997-01-15
EP0479888A1 (en) 1992-04-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5158710A (en) Aqueous cleaner/degreaser microemulsion compositions
US5080831A (en) Aqueous cleaner/degreaser compositions
US5849682A (en) Cleaner/degreaser concentrate compositions
EP0479888B1 (en) Improved builder-containing aqueous cleaner/degreaser microemulsion compositions
US4983317A (en) All purpose cleaner concentrate composition
US5472629A (en) Thickened acid microemulsion composition
EP0525032B1 (en) Improved aqueous degreaser compositions
ES2211190T3 (en) CONCENTRATED DECAPANT COMPOSITION AND METHOD.
US5707952A (en) Thickened acid composition
US5294364A (en) Safe acidic hard surface cleaner
US4020016A (en) Cleaning compositions effective in dissolving soap curd
EP0506744A4 (en) Aqueous cleaner/degreaser emulsion compositions
CA2129399A1 (en) Microemulsion all purpose liquid cleaning compositions
JPH02289697A (en) Composition for cleaning rigid surface
PT90797B (en) Process for the preparation of a homogenous, concentrated and stabile cleaning product for all purposes containing a solvent derived from the ether of ethylene or propylene glycol
EP1379619A2 (en) Pine oil cleaning composition
JPH07305100A (en) Acidic microemulsion composition
US3932317A (en) Compositions for removing acrylic based coatings

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19911219

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB IT LI LU NL SE

A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

Effective date: 19920413

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A4

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB IT LI LU NL SE

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19950403

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB IT LI LU NL SE

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 146521

Country of ref document: AT

Date of ref document: 19970115

Kind code of ref document: T

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69029472

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19970130

ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed
ET Fr: translation filed
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: WILLIAM BLANC & CIE CONSEILS EN PROPRIETE INDUSTRI

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: T3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2100884

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: IF02

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20080626

Year of fee payment: 19

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20080630

Year of fee payment: 19

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20080521

Year of fee payment: 19

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20080624

Year of fee payment: 19

Ref country code: LU

Payment date: 20080702

Year of fee payment: 19

Ref country code: DK

Payment date: 20080626

Year of fee payment: 19

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20080731

Year of fee payment: 19

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20080617

Year of fee payment: 19

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20080627

Year of fee payment: 19

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20080730

Year of fee payment: 19

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20080627

Year of fee payment: 19

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20090625

Year of fee payment: 20

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: *BUCKEYE INTERNATIONAL INC.

Effective date: 20090630

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: EBP

NLV4 Nl: lapsed or anulled due to non-payment of the annual fee

Effective date: 20100101

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20100226

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090630

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090630

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090630

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100101

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090630

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090612

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: PE20

Expiry date: 20100611

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090630

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100101

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20090613

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090613

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

Effective date: 20100611

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090612

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090612

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090613