EP0392011B1 - HEAT-RESISTANT HIGH-Al AUSTENITIC STEEL HAVING EXCELLENT HOT WORKING PROPERTIES - Google Patents
HEAT-RESISTANT HIGH-Al AUSTENITIC STEEL HAVING EXCELLENT HOT WORKING PROPERTIES Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP0392011B1 EP0392011B1 EP88909133A EP88909133A EP0392011B1 EP 0392011 B1 EP0392011 B1 EP 0392011B1 EP 88909133 A EP88909133 A EP 88909133A EP 88909133 A EP88909133 A EP 88909133A EP 0392011 B1 EP0392011 B1 EP 0392011B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- percent
- steel
- ppm
- hot
- rem
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22C—ALLOYS
- C22C38/00—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
- C22C38/18—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
- C22C38/40—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22C—ALLOYS
- C22C30/00—Alloys containing less than 50% by weight of each constituent
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a high AI austenitic heat-resistant steel having a superior resistance to oxidation at high temperatures and resistance to corrosion at high temperatures and further an excellent hot workability.
- AI is added in an alloy and an oxide film comprised mostly of A1 2 0 3 is formed on the surface in a high temperature oxidizing atmosphere, extremely excellent oxidation resistance is displayed, it is known.
- Fe-Cr-AI alloy steels are used as members for sintering equipment and other members exposed to atmospheres of up to 1200 ° C.
- the above steels are basically low in strength at the high temperatures due to the ferrite phase and have therefore been limited in range of application as they could not be used at positions requiring strength at high temperatures.
- Fe-Ni-Cr or Ni-Cr and other austenitic heat-resistant steels are superior in high temperature strength and mechanical properties at ordinary temperatures, so have been widely used as high temperature members, but these steels have Cr 2 0 3 formed on their surfaces at high temperatures and this film is used to maintain excellent oxidation resistance, so at 1000 to 1100 ° C or more, where the film begins to vaporize as Cr0 3 , the oxidation resistance rapidly deteriorates. Further, the spalling resistance of the oxide film is also poor and in the case of continued heating or erosion, there is a large tendency of weight decrease of the material due to oxidation.
- Japanese Examined Patent Publication No. 55-43498 and Japanese Examined Patent Publication No. 56-11302 disclose, based on the way of thinking of conventional stainless steels, to precipitate some 6-ferrite in the austenite phase during solidification and to add La, Ce, and other rare earth elements so as to improve the hot workability, but high AI austenitic stainless steel, as mentioned above, is fundamentally much more susceptible to cracking under hot working compared with conventional stainless steel and with just the precipitation of 6-ferrite or addition of rare earth elements, sufficient hot workability cannot be obtained, and unless the concentration of the impurity elements causing deterioration of the hot workability is strictly controlled, it is impossible to prevent cracking occurring during hot working.
- Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 60-262945 proposes to hot roll the steel at a temperature range of from 31000 ° C to 1200 ° C, but unless the concentration of minute impurities is accurately controlled, even if the hot rolling method is specially tailored, edge cracks, flaws, etc. will appear in large numbers at the early part of the hot rolling and thus the effect cannot be said to be sufficient.
- FR-A-2,414,561 discloses an austenitic Fe-Ni-Cr-AI-rare earth metal (REM) steel with good high temperature oxidation resistance and forgeability, with composition ranges (%wt) 20-60 Fe, 20-60 Ni, 15-27 Cr, 4-6 Al, 0.001-0.1 "active elements” (REM, Y, Sc), and discloses that forgeability decreases above a certain content of these "active elements”.
- REM austenitic Fe-Ni-Cr-AI-rare earth metal
- the present invention provides a high AI austenitic heat-resistant steel which is superior in oxidation resistance and excellent in hot workability.
- the constituent components of the present invention will be explained below.
- the first aspect of the present invention includes 0.2 to 0.01 percent of C, 1 percent or less of Si, 2 percent or less of Mn, 15 to 25 percent of Ni, 12 to 25 percent of Cr, and over 4 percent to 6 percent of AI and no more than 100 ppm of Mg, and further contains one or more of Ca, Y, and a REM so as to satisfy the range shown by the following formula (1), with the remainder being Fe and unavoidable impurities.
- REM means La, Ce, and other rare earth elements (hereinafter referred to as REM).
- the steel further comprises 6-ferrite, precipitated during solidification, in a quantity of -15 to + 10 percent as calculated by the following formula: in which the chemical symbols represent percentages by weight of the respective elements.
- the present invention is characterized by improvement of the hot workability by addition of one or more of Ca, Y, and REM so as to satisfy the above formula (1) to an austenitic steel containing the above range of components.
- Ca, Y, and REM are important additive elements for improving the hot workability of high AI austenitic heat-resistant steels and are most effective elements not only for removing the S and O in the molten steel, but also for fixing the S and O segregating at the grain boundaries during cooling and thus suppressing deterioration of the hot workability.
- the hot workability rapidly deteriorates if the amount of Ca, Y, and REM added is insufficient compared with the S and O contents and the hot workability rapidly deteriorates if the amount of the Ca, Y, and REM added is too excessive compared with the S and O contents.
- the upper limit in the above formula (1) is limited to 30 ppm.
- Fig. 1 shows the relationship of the above formula (1) and the mean score of a hot impact test.
- the mean score of the hot impact test must be made 2 or less.
- the upper limit of formula (1) is made 30 and the lower limit -50.
- the effective range of addition for fixing the harmful S and O is 5 to 150 ppm of Ca, 10 to 750 ppm of Y, and 50 to 150 ppm of REM.
- the coefficients of the elements in the above formula (1) are found experimentally by evaluating the hot workability of steel ingots changed in the contents of the various elements within the range of composition of the present invention and making the effects of the elements the same.
- S and O are preferably extremely low from the viewpoint of the hot workability.
- the steel is sensitive to the contents of S and O. This is because the S and O segregate at the grain boundaries during solidification or cooling to lower the intergranular ductility, so the steel has a higher intergranular deformation resistance at high temperatures than conventional stainless steels and is more susceptible to intergranular cracking.
- the present invention restricts the allowable amount of Mg, which remarkably impairs the hot workability, in the above range of compositionn to 100 ppm.
- the thermodynamic stabilities of A1 2 0 3 and MgO are substantially the same, so the following equilibrium stands and the AI in the steal reduces the brick or slag containing MgO which enters the molten steel.
- the Mg impurities entering in from the materials or the furnace materials and slag exist stably in the molten steel since the thermodynamic equilibrium is maintained.
- Mg does not enter solid solution much at all in the austenitic solid phase, so concentrates during the solidification at the grain boundaries or in the NiAI intermetallic compounds and causes deterioration of the hot workability. Therefore, the determination of the allowable amount of the Mg is important for ensuring the hot workability of austenitic stainless steel containing over 4 percent to 6 percent by weight of AI and making production possible.
- Figure 2 shows the relationship between the content of Mg and the mean score of the hot impact test. From this figure, it is understood that if the content of the Mg is over 100 ppm, the hot workability becomes difficult. To prevent fine edge cracks, flaws, etc. during hot rolling, it is preferable that the content of Mg be suppressed to 50 ppm and the mean score of the hot impact test be made 1 or less.
- the second aspect of the present invention features, in addition to the features of the first aspect, the strict suppression of the contents of Pb and Bi, which remarkably impair the hot workability, in the above range of composition to no more than 10 ppm and 5 ppm, respectively.
- Pb and Bi are elements which impair the hot workability even in normal austenitic stainless steels, and austenitic heat-resistant steels containing over 4 percent to 6 percent by weight of AI are extremely sensitive to them. These elements do not enter solid solution much in the steel and segregate at the grain boundaries to remarkably reduce the intergranular ductility.
- the steel of the present invention inherently is very susceptible to cracking in the hot state and to prevent cracking the contents of Pb and Bi must be strictly limited to no more than 10 ppm and 5 ppm, respectively.
- the allowable amounts are much severer than with conventional stainless steels.
- Pb impurities are included in the industrial use iron alloys used as materials for the steel and are generally present in concentrations of tens of ppm. Further, they are contained in tens of ppm in the recycled AI materials as well in some cases. Further, while the content of Bi is less than Pb, Bi is inevitably included in the industrial use iron alloys. Therefore, these elements have to be positively reduced in amount or else it is impossible to keep them below the above allowable amounts. To reduce the amounts of Pb and Bi, it is effective to strictly select materials with low contents of these elements and to perform refining in a reduced pressure atmosphere.
- Figure 3 shows the relationship between the contents of Pb and Bi and the mean score of the hot impact test. From the figure, it is understood that the allowable amounts of Pb and Bi are 10 ppm and 5 ppm, respectively. To prevent fine edge cracks, flaws, etc. during hot rolling, it is preferable that the Pb and Bi be suppressed to 5 ppm and 3 ppm or less and that the mean score of the hot impact test be made 1 or less.
- the 6-ferrite phase includes a larger amount of AI than the austenite phase, so the concentration of AI in the austenite phase is reduced and the precipitation of Ni-Al intermetallic compounds in the grain boundaries or in the grains during cooling is delayed. Further, there is an effect of absorption of S, O, and other impurities, so no edge cracks occur even during more severe hot working with large reduction ratios or stress rates. Further, there is an effect of suppression of high temperature cracking during welding. However, if the 6-ferrite phase is precipitated 10 percent or more, the cold workability or the high temperature strength are deteriorated, so the amount of precipitation is preferably made less than 10 percent. Note that the amount of precipitation was measured using a commercially available ferrite meter. The amount of the 6-ferrite precipitating during solidification may be estimated by the following formula from the chemical composition. However, the range of application is the range of composition described in the claims:
- the 6-Ferr (%) found by formula (2) is less than 10 percent, the measured value of the 6-ferrite precipitating during actual solidification becomes less than 10 percent. However, even if less than 0 percent in formula (2), if over -15 percent, a 6-ferrite phase precipitates during actual solidification, so to make less than 10 percent of a 6-ferrite phase precipitated, the value given by formula (2) should be made over -15 percent and less than 10 percent.
- the upper limit is made 0.2 percent.
- Si is an element unavoidably included in steel and in general has the effect of improving the oxidation resistance, but in the steel of the present invention which has an AI 2 O 3 film formed on the surface, there is almost no effect by its addition and conversely if the content of Si is over 1 percent, the formation of the AI 2 O 3 film is inhibited. Therefore, the upper limit of the Si content is made 1 percent.
- Mn is an element unavoidably included in steel, but if the content exceeds 2 percent, the formation of the AI 2 O 3 film is inhibited, so the upper limit is made 2 percent.
- Ni is a basic element for making the steel of the present invention an austenitic steel. Due to the content of Cr and Al, 15 percent or more of Ni is necessary. However, if the content of Ni exceeds 35 percent, there is remarkable precipitation of Ni-Al intermetallic compounds and hot working becomes difficult. Therefore the range of Ni is made 15 to 35 percent.
- Cr is an essential element for obtaining a high degree of oxidation resistance. If the content of Cr is less than 12 percent, abnormal oxidation occurs in the early use and no A1 2 0 3 film is formed on the surface of the steel for maintaining the oxidation resistance. Cr is an element which plays an important role in the formation of the AI 2 O 3 film in the initial stages of use. However, if the content of the Cr exceeds 25 percent, a a-phase precipitates during use and embrittlement easily occurs and, further, it is necessary to add large amounts of Ni for formation of the austenite, promoting the precipitation of Ni-Al intermetallic compounds. Therefore, the content of Cr is made 12 to 25 percent.
- AI is the most important element for forming the A1 2 0 3 film on the surface of the steel of the present invention and for maintaining the heat resistance.
- the content of AI must be over 4 percent. If 4 percent or less, the AI 2 O 3 film is not formed, and oxide comprised mainly of Cr is formed, and the oxidation resistance drops remarkably compared with the case where an AI 2 O 3 film is formed.
- the content of the AI is over 6 percent, the deformation resistance in the hot state further rises and Ni-Al intermetallic compounds remarkably precipitate in the grains and at the grain boundaries, so hot working becomes de facto impossible even with the strict control of the impurities described in the present invention.
- impurity elements having an effect on the hot workability are Zn, Sb, Sn, and As, but these elements do not impair the hot workability in concentrations unavoidably present in normal austenitic stainless steels.
- the melting method is preferably one which gives sufficient consideration to the molten material and slag composition so that these do not enter.
- Figure 1 is a graph showing the relationship between formula (1) in the present invention and the mean score in the hot impact test, the points in the figure being data obtained from steels of Mg 50 ppm, Pb ⁇ 5 and Bi 3 3 ppm. At the top of the vertical axis, the hot workability is good and at the bottom the hot workability is poor.
- Figure 2 is a graph showing the relationship between the content of Mg in the steel and the mean score of the hot impact test, the points in the figure being data obtained from steel ingots which satisfy formula (1) and have Pb 5 5 ppm and Bi 3 3 ppm.
- Figure 3 is a graph showing the relationship between the contents of Pb and Bi in steel and the mean score of the hot impact test, the graph being prepared based on data obtained from steel ingots which satisfy formula (1) and have Mg 5 5 ppm.
- the steels of the compositions shown in Nos. 1 to 24 of Table 1 were melted in a vacuum or in the atmosphere (melted, then refined by AOD), with those melted in vacuum formed into ingots and those melted in the atmosphere continuously cast.
- All steel ingots had contents of Zn and Sn of 200 ppm or less each and Sb and As of 100 ppm or less each - contents of the degree contained in normal austenitic stainless steel.
- the hot workability was evaluated by a hot rolling experiment on the steel ingots produced by the same method as a hot impact test.
- a hot impact test unnotched Charpy test pieces were cut out from 5 mm below the surface of the steel ingots, heated to 1250 ° C, and held at that temperature for 10 minutes, then air cooled to a predetermined impact temperature and an impact given.
- the impact temperatures were 900, 1000, 1050, 1100, 1150, and 1200 ° C.
- the evaluations were made by ranking the steels in five stages based on the state of the cracking as shown in Table 2, and the mean value of the results at all the impact temperatures was used. The larger the mean score, the poorer the ductility at a high temperature and the worse the hot workability.
- the present invention provides an austenitic heat-resistant steel containing AI which is superior in heat resistance at high temperatures and further is particularly superior in hot workability, being free from cracking and flaws during hot rolling, hot forging, hot extrusion, and other hot working, so has industrially practical effects in many areas.
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Materials Engineering (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Metallurgy (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Heat Treatment Of Steel (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- The present invention relates to a high AI austenitic heat-resistant steel having a superior resistance to oxidation at high temperatures and resistance to corrosion at high temperatures and further an excellent hot workability.
- If AI is added in an alloy and an oxide film comprised mostly of
A1 203 is formed on the surface in a high temperature oxidizing atmosphere, extremely excellent oxidation resistance is displayed, it is known. For example, Fe-Cr-AI alloy steels are used as members for sintering equipment and other members exposed to atmospheres of up to 1200°C. However, the above steels are basically low in strength at the high temperatures due to the ferrite phase and have therefore been limited in range of application as they could not be used at positions requiring strength at high temperatures. - On the other hand, Fe-Ni-Cr or Ni-Cr and other austenitic heat-resistant steels are superior in high temperature strength and mechanical properties at ordinary temperatures, so have been widely used as high temperature members, but these steels have
Cr 203 formed on their surfaces at high temperatures and this film is used to maintain excellent oxidation resistance, so at 1000 to 1100°C or more, where the film begins to vaporize as Cr03, the oxidation resistance rapidly deteriorates. Further, the spalling resistance of the oxide film is also poor and in the case of continued heating or erosion, there is a large tendency of weight decrease of the material due to oxidation. - Numerous attempts have boon made up to now to add AI to the above steels so as to improve the austenitic heat-resistant steels. However, if the amount of AI added is small, no Al2O3 oxide film is formed on the alloy surface and the film which is formed is mainly composed of a spinel oxide film of Fe, Ni, and Cr. This oxide film is porous and relatively easily permeated by oxygen and nitrogen, so the speed of oxidation of the matrix just under the oxide film is high and further AIN precipitates below the same in a block form, so the AI is consumed and there is little effect of the addition of the same. To form a uniform Al2O3 film on the surface of an austenitic alloy and bring out a superior oxidation resistance, it is necessary to add a minimum of 4.0 percent in terms of weight in the alloy. This is described, for example, in Japanese Examined Patent Publication (Kokoku) No. 55-43498 etc.
- However, if AI is added in an austenitic steel, the hot workability rapidly deteriorates and serious cracking occurs during hot rolling, hot forging, hot extrusion, and other working. Further, there are cases where working is impossible. This cracking occurs at the grain boundaries near the surface and propagates along the grain boundaries to develop into large cracks. This is because the AI is in solid solution in the austenite phase, so the integranular deformation resistance in the hot state significantly rises and the intergranular strength falls relatively, to increase the susceptibility to cracking, and further the NiAI intermetallic compounds precipitate in the grains and at the grain boundaries during solidification or hot deformation, so the intergranular ductility falls.
- To improve the hot workability of such an austenitic stainless steel containing a high concentration of Al, Japanese Examined Patent Publication No. 55-43498 and Japanese Examined Patent Publication No. 56-11302 disclose, based on the way of thinking of conventional stainless steels, to precipitate some 6-ferrite in the austenite phase during solidification and to add La, Ce, and other rare earth elements so as to improve the hot workability, but high AI austenitic stainless steel, as mentioned above, is fundamentally much more susceptible to cracking under hot working compared with conventional stainless steel and with just the precipitation of 6-ferrite or addition of rare earth elements, sufficient hot workability cannot be obtained, and unless the concentration of the impurity elements causing deterioration of the hot workability is strictly controlled, it is impossible to prevent cracking occurring during hot working. Further, Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 60-262945 proposes to hot roll the steel at a temperature range of from 31000 ° C to 1200 ° C, but unless the concentration of minute impurities is accurately controlled, even if the hot rolling method is specially tailored, edge cracks, flaws, etc. will appear in large numbers at the early part of the hot rolling and thus the effect cannot be said to be sufficient.
- FR-A-2,414,561 discloses an austenitic Fe-Ni-Cr-AI-rare earth metal (REM) steel with good high temperature oxidation resistance and forgeability, with composition ranges (%wt) 20-60 Fe, 20-60 Ni, 15-27 Cr, 4-6 Al, 0.001-0.1 "active elements" (REM, Y, Sc), and discloses that forgeability decreases above a certain content of these "active elements".
- The present invention provides a high AI austenitic heat-resistant steel which is superior in oxidation resistance and excellent in hot workability. The constituent components of the present invention will be explained below. The first aspect of the present invention includes 0.2 to 0.01 percent of C, 1 percent or less of Si, 2 percent or less of Mn, 15 to 25 percent of Ni, 12 to 25 percent of Cr, and over 4 percent to 6 percent of AI and no more than 100 ppm of Mg, and further contains one or more of Ca, Y, and a REM so as to satisfy the range shown by the following formula (1), with the remainder being Fe and unavoidable impurities.
- In the formula, REM means La, Ce, and other rare earth elements (hereinafter referred to as REM).
The steel further comprises 6-ferrite, precipitated during solidification, in a quantity of -15 to + 10 percent as calculated by the following formula: in which the chemical symbols represent percentages by weight of the respective elements. - The present invention is characterized by improvement of the hot workability by addition of one or more of Ca, Y, and REM so as to satisfy the above formula (1) to an austenitic steel containing the above range of components.
- The addition of Ca, REM, etc. to a usual austenitic stainless steel or superalloy raises the closeness of adherence of the oxide film created by the high temperatures and improves the heat resistance and, simultaneously, also improves the hot workability, as is a known fact. This is because the S and O which segregate at the grain boundaries to lower the intergranular ductility are reduced at the refining stage and also because the elements remaining in the steel ingot are strongly bonded and fixed and their segregation unstably at the grain boundaries and reduction of the intergranular strength are suppressed.
- Even in an austenitic heat-resistant steel containing over 4 percent to 6 percent by weight of Al, the hot workability changes depending on the content of the S and O impurities, but the steel is more sensitive than normal stainless steel to this. Therefore, the content of the S and O in the steel must be reduced as much as possible and further Ca, Y, and REM which reduce and fix the S and O added. Further, it is industrially difficult to stably realize a content of S and O not causing cracking during hot working without the addition of Ca, Y, and REM and the cost also rises, so the addition of Ca, Y, and REM may be considered industrially essential.
- In this way, Ca, Y, and REM are important additive elements for improving the hot workability of high AI austenitic heat-resistant steels and are most effective elements not only for removing the S and O in the molten steel, but also for fixing the S and O segregating at the grain boundaries during cooling and thus suppressing deterioration of the hot workability.
- However, in a high AI austenitic heat-resistant steel, even if Ca, Y, and REM are added, the hot workability is not necessarily satisfied in some cases, it was learned. The present inventors delved into the reason for this and discovered that when the amount of the above elements added is too excessive, the hot workability conversely deteriorates and that there is a suitable range for the S and O amount.
- That is, in the austenitic heat-resistant steel of the range of composition of the present invention, since the susceptibility to cracking at hot working is fundamentally high, it is necessary to strictly suppress those elements which segregate at the grain boundaries and reduce the ductility.
- That is, the hot workability rapidly deteriorates if the amount of Ca, Y, and REM added is insufficient compared with the S and O contents and the hot workability rapidly deteriorates if the amount of the Ca, Y, and REM added is too excessive compared with the S and O contents. This is because Ca, Y, and REM are large in atomic radii and do enter solid solution in the steel much at all, so excessively added atoms segregate at the grain boundaries in an unstable state and the intergranular ductility is reduced. That is, excessive Ca, Y, and REM act as impurity elements having a detrimental effect on the hot workability. Therefore, the upper limit on the amount of Ca, Y, and REM added is determined with relation to the S and O contents.
- That is, in the above formula (1), if the value of the difference between the content of S and O and the content of the Ca, Y, and REM is over 30 ppm, the content of the Ca, Y, and REM is too little compared with the S and O, the effect of addition of the same is reduced, and the hot workability is rapidly deteriorated by the effects of the unfixed S and O.
- Therefore, to prevent insufficient addition, the upper limit in the above formula (1) is limited to 30 ppm.
- On the other hand, if an excessive amount is added so that the difference between the two becomes over -50 ppm, the oxidation resistance is further improved, but unstable Ca, Y, and REM segregate at the grain boundaries and the intergranular ductility is reduced, so conversely the hot workability is deteriorated. To prevent this excessive addition, the lower limit of the above formula (1) is limited to -50. The above relationship is shown in Fig. 1. That is, Fig. 1 shows the relationship of the above formula (1) and the mean score of a hot impact test. To enable normal hot working without occurrence of edge cracks etc., the mean score of the hot impact test must be made 2 or less. To satisfy this condition, the upper limit of formula (1) is made 30 and the lower limit -50. When performing severe hot working such as continuous hot rolling where the reduction ratio or the stress rate is high, it is preferable that the mean score of the hot impact test in Fig. 1 be 1 or less.
- Note that the effective range of addition for fixing the harmful S and O is 5 to 150 ppm of Ca, 10 to 750 ppm of Y, and 50 to 150 ppm of REM. The coefficients of the elements in the above formula (1) are found experimentally by evaluating the hot workability of steel ingots changed in the contents of the various elements within the range of composition of the present invention and making the effects of the elements the same.
- Further, S and O are preferably extremely low from the viewpoint of the hot workability. In steels like the steel of the present invention where a large amount of AI is contained, the steel is sensitive to the contents of S and O. This is because the S and O segregate at the grain boundaries during solidification or cooling to lower the intergranular ductility, so the steel has a higher intergranular deformation resistance at high temperatures than conventional stainless steels and is more susceptible to intergranular cracking.
- On the other hand, as mentioned above, the amounts of addition of Ca, Y, and REM should be reduced as much as possible within the range of effectiveness. Therefore, the value of (S) + (O) is preferably held below 100 ppm.
- In addition to the above features the present invention restricts the allowable amount of Mg, which remarkably impairs the hot workability, in the above range of compositionn to 100 ppm.
- In conventional general use stainless steels or superalloys, the addition of Mg is effective for improving the hot workability, but the present inventors discovered that in austenitic stainless steels containing over 4.0 percent to 6 percent by weight of Al, there is no effect of addition and conversely there is a strong tendency to cause deterioration of the hot workability and that the allowable content is extremely low. The inventors confirmed this allowable amount. Austenistic steels containing a high concentration of AI deteriorate in hot workability due to the Mg impurities because the Mg does not enter solid solution much at all in the austenite phase but concentrates at a high concentration at the grain boundaries along with the AI to reduce the intergranular ductility. In austenitic steels not containing Al, the Mg impurities do not mix in the molten steel much at all and the amount of Mg impurities remaining in the steel after solidification is extremely low. However, in austenitic steels containing high concentrations of Al, there is a good chance that the AI material, or the AI in the steel, will reduce the MgO in the furnace material or the slag and this will enter the molten steel. That is, in general industrial use AI materials contain several hundred ppm as impurities. Further, Mg is an alloy element added to Al, so when using recycled AI materials, it may be considered further that a high concentration of Mg impurities is contained. Also, at near 1500°C, the temperature of the molten steel, the thermodynamic stabilities of
A1 203 and MgO are substantially the same, so the following equilibrium stands and the AI in the steal reduces the brick or slag containing MgO which enters the molten steel. Further, the Mg impurities entering in from the materials or the furnace materials and slag exist stably in the molten steel since the thermodynamic equilibrium is maintained. However, Mg does not enter solid solution much at all in the austenitic solid phase, so concentrates during the solidification at the grain boundaries or in the NiAI intermetallic compounds and causes deterioration of the hot workability. Therefore, the determination of the allowable amount of the Mg is important for ensuring the hot workability of austenitic stainless steel containing over 4 percent to 6 percent by weight of AI and making production possible. - Figure 2 shows the relationship between the content of Mg and the mean score of the hot impact test. From this figure, it is understood that if the content of the Mg is over 100 ppm, the hot workability becomes difficult. To prevent fine edge cracks, flaws, etc. during hot rolling, it is preferable that the content of Mg be suppressed to 50 ppm and the mean score of the hot impact test be made 1 or less.
- The second aspect of the present invention features, in addition to the features of the first aspect, the strict suppression of the contents of Pb and Bi, which remarkably impair the hot workability, in the above range of composition to no more than 10 ppm and 5 ppm, respectively. Pb and Bi are elements which impair the hot workability even in normal austenitic stainless steels, and austenitic heat-resistant steels containing over 4 percent to 6 percent by weight of AI are extremely sensitive to them. These elements do not enter solid solution much in the steel and segregate at the grain boundaries to remarkably reduce the intergranular ductility. The steel of the present invention inherently is very susceptible to cracking in the hot state and to prevent cracking the contents of Pb and Bi must be strictly limited to no more than 10 ppm and 5 ppm, respectively. The allowable amounts are much severer than with conventional stainless steels. Pb impurities are included in the industrial use iron alloys used as materials for the steel and are generally present in concentrations of tens of ppm. Further, they are contained in tens of ppm in the recycled AI materials as well in some cases. Further, while the content of Bi is less than Pb, Bi is inevitably included in the industrial use iron alloys. Therefore, these elements have to be positively reduced in amount or else it is impossible to keep them below the above allowable amounts. To reduce the amounts of Pb and Bi, it is effective to strictly select materials with low contents of these elements and to perform refining in a reduced pressure atmosphere.
- In this way, Pb and Bi which enter the steel as impurities cause extreme deterioration of the hot workability of the steel of the present invention. Figure 3 shows the relationship between the contents of Pb and Bi and the mean score of the hot impact test. From the figure, it is understood that the allowable amounts of Pb and Bi are 10 ppm and 5 ppm, respectively. To prevent fine edge cracks, flaws, etc. during hot rolling, it is preferable that the Pb and Bi be suppressed to 5 ppm and 3 ppm or less and that the mean score of the hot impact test be made 1 or less.
- Next, the 6-ferrite produced during solidification with the range of composition of the present invention will be explained.
- The 6-ferrite phase includes a larger amount of AI than the austenite phase, so the concentration of AI in the austenite phase is reduced and the precipitation of Ni-Al intermetallic compounds in the grain boundaries or in the grains during cooling is delayed. Further, there is an effect of absorption of S, O, and other impurities, so no edge cracks occur even during more severe hot working with large reduction ratios or stress rates. Further, there is an effect of suppression of high temperature cracking during welding. However, if the 6-ferrite phase is precipitated 10 percent or more, the cold workability or the high temperature strength are deteriorated, so the amount of precipitation is preferably made less than 10 percent. Note that the amount of precipitation was measured using a commercially available ferrite meter. The amount of the 6-ferrite precipitating during solidification may be estimated by the following formula from the chemical composition. However, the range of application is the range of composition described in the claims:
- If the 6-Ferr (%) found by formula (2) is less than 10 percent, the measured value of the 6-ferrite precipitating during actual solidification becomes less than 10 percent. However, even if less than 0 percent in formula (2), if over -15 percent, a 6-ferrite phase precipitates during actual solidification, so to make less than 10 percent of a 6-ferrite phase precipitated, the value given by formula (2) should be made over -15 percent and less than 10 percent.
- Next, an explanation will be made of components of the present invention other than those mentioned above.
- C is an element unavoidably included in steel, but if the content is too high, large amounts of chromium carbides and σ-phases will precipitate during use at 600 to 900 ° C, making the material brittle, and further the high temperature deformation resistance will rise and the hot workability will deteriorate. Therefore, the upper limit is made 0.2 percent.
- Si is an element unavoidably included in steel and in general has the effect of improving the oxidation resistance, but in the steel of the present invention which has an AI2O3 film formed on the surface, there is almost no effect by its addition and conversely if the content of Si is over 1 percent, the formation of the AI2O3 film is inhibited. Therefore, the upper limit of the Si content is made 1 percent.
- Mn is an element unavoidably included in steel, but if the content exceeds 2 percent, the formation of the AI2O3 film is inhibited, so the upper limit is made 2 percent.
- Ni is a basic element for making the steel of the present invention an austenitic steel. Due to the content of Cr and Al, 15 percent or more of Ni is necessary. However, if the content of Ni exceeds 35 percent, there is remarkable precipitation of Ni-Al intermetallic compounds and hot working becomes difficult. Therefore the range of Ni is made 15 to 35 percent.
- Cr, like Al, is an essential element for obtaining a high degree of oxidation resistance. If the content of Cr is less than 12 percent, abnormal oxidation occurs in the early use and no
A1 203 film is formed on the surface of the steel for maintaining the oxidation resistance. Cr is an element which plays an important role in the formation of the AI2O3 film in the initial stages of use. However, if the content of the Cr exceeds 25 percent, a a-phase precipitates during use and embrittlement easily occurs and, further, it is necessary to add large amounts of Ni for formation of the austenite, promoting the precipitation of Ni-Al intermetallic compounds. Therefore, the content of Cr is made 12 to 25 percent. - AI is the most important element for forming the
A1 203 film on the surface of the steel of the present invention and for maintaining the heat resistance. To ensure the stable formation of the AI2O3 film, the content of AI must be over 4 percent. If 4 percent or less, the AI2O3 film is not formed, and oxide comprised mainly of Cr is formed, and the oxidation resistance drops remarkably compared with the case where an AI2O3 film is formed. However, when the content of the AI is over 6 percent, the deformation resistance in the hot state further rises and Ni-Al intermetallic compounds remarkably precipitate in the grains and at the grain boundaries, so hot working becomes de facto impossible even with the strict control of the impurities described in the present invention. - Other impurity elements having an effect on the hot workability are Zn, Sb, Sn, and As, but these elements do not impair the hot workability in concentrations unavoidably present in normal austenitic stainless steels. When included in excess, however, the deterioration of the hot workability is remarkable, so the melting method is preferably one which gives sufficient consideration to the molten material and slag composition so that these do not enter.
- Further, to further improve the creep strength or the oxidation resistance, it is possible to add Mo, W, Co, Ti, Nb, or Zr, but if these elements are added in excess, the hot deformation resistance will rise and the hot workability will be deteriorated.
- Figure 1 is a graph showing the relationship between formula (1) in the present invention and the mean score in the hot impact test, the points in the figure being data obtained from steels of
Mg 50 ppm, Pb < 5 andBi 3 3 ppm. At the top of the vertical axis, the hot workability is good and at the bottom the hot workability is poor. Figure 2 is a graph showing the relationship between the content of Mg in the steel and the mean score of the hot impact test, the points in the figure being data obtained from steel ingots which satisfy formula (1) and havePb 5 5 ppm andBi 3 3 ppm. Figure 3 is a graph showing the relationship between the contents of Pb and Bi in steel and the mean score of the hot impact test, the graph being prepared based on data obtained from steel ingots which satisfy formula (1) and haveMg 5 5 ppm. - Next, the advantageous effects of the invention will be shown specifically by examples.
- The steels of the compositions shown in Nos. 1 to 24 of Table 1 were melted in a vacuum or in the atmosphere (melted, then refined by AOD), with those melted in vacuum formed into ingots and those melted in the atmosphere continuously cast.
- All steel ingots had contents of Zn and Sn of 200 ppm or less each and Sb and As of 100 ppm or less each - contents of the degree contained in normal austenitic stainless steel.
- The hot workability was evaluated by a hot rolling experiment on the steel ingots produced by the same method as a hot impact test. In the hot impact test, unnotched Charpy test pieces were cut out from 5 mm below the surface of the steel ingots, heated to 1250 ° C, and held at that temperature for 10 minutes, then air cooled to a predetermined impact temperature and an impact given. The impact temperatures were 900, 1000, 1050, 1100, 1150, and 1200 ° C. The evaluations were made by ranking the steels in five stages based on the state of the cracking as shown in Table 2, and the mean value of the results at all the impact temperatures was used. The larger the mean score, the poorer the ductility at a high temperature and the worse the hot workability. For no edge cracks to occur at normal hot rolling, the value must be no more than 2. In the hot rolling experiment, steel ingots with shaved surfaces were held at 1250 ° C for one hour, then reduced a total of 90 percent by five passes and the state of the edge cracks examined.
- The results of the evaluation of the hot workability are shown in Table 3. From the results it will be seen that if the range of composition of the present invention is satisfied, it is possible to obtain austenitic heat-resistant steel superior in hot workability. Further, it was learned that steels which satisfy the above formula (2) and have less than 10 percent of the steel phase precipitated have a mean score in the hot impact test of no more than 1 and are further superior in hot workability.
- Part of the steel ingots of Table 1 were subjected to hot rolling, cold rolling, annealing, and surface grinding for an oxidation test. The size of the test pieces was 1 mmt x 20 mmw x 50 mmL. The test pieces were inserted in an atmosphere of 1200 ° C and automobile engine exhaust gases and held there for 30 minutes, then air cooled for 10 minutes, with this intermittent heating repeated 200 times, then the change in weight was measured. The results are shown in Table 4. From the results, it was learned that the steel of the present invention has a superior oxidation resistance.
- The present invention provides an austenitic heat-resistant steel containing AI which is superior in heat resistance at high temperatures and further is particularly superior in hot workability, being free from cracking and flaws during hot rolling, hot forging, hot extrusion, and other hot working, so has industrially practical effects in many areas.
Claims (4)
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP62099964A JPS63266045A (en) | 1987-04-24 | 1987-04-24 | High al austenitic heat resistant steel having excellent hot workability |
| PCT/JP1988/001078 WO1990004658A1 (en) | 1987-04-24 | 1988-10-22 | Heat-resistant high-al austenitic steel having excellent hot working properties |
Publications (3)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| EP0392011A1 EP0392011A1 (en) | 1990-10-17 |
| EP0392011A4 EP0392011A4 (en) | 1991-04-17 |
| EP0392011B1 true EP0392011B1 (en) | 1995-06-28 |
Family
ID=14261360
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP88909133A Expired - Lifetime EP0392011B1 (en) | 1987-04-24 | 1988-10-22 | HEAT-RESISTANT HIGH-Al AUSTENITIC STEEL HAVING EXCELLENT HOT WORKING PROPERTIES |
Country Status (5)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US5130085A (en) |
| EP (1) | EP0392011B1 (en) |
| JP (1) | JPS63266045A (en) |
| DE (1) | DE3854091T2 (en) |
| WO (1) | WO1990004658A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (11)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FR2683338B1 (en) * | 1991-10-31 | 1994-01-07 | Bendix Europe Services Technique | PRESSURE REGULATING DEVICE FOR HYDRAULIC CIRCUIT. |
| FR2683337B1 (en) * | 1991-10-31 | 1994-01-07 | Bendix Europe Services Technique | PRESSURE REGULATING DEVICE FOR HYDRAULIC CIRCUIT. |
| SE520617C2 (en) | 2001-10-02 | 2003-07-29 | Sandvik Ab | Ferritic stainless steel, foil made of steel, use of steel and foil, and method of making steel |
| SE525252C2 (en) * | 2001-11-22 | 2005-01-11 | Sandvik Ab | Super austenitic stainless steel and the use of this steel |
| DE102006055879A1 (en) * | 2006-11-24 | 2008-05-29 | Emitec Gesellschaft Für Emissionstechnologie Mbh | Housing material of an exhaust treatment component |
| US7754305B2 (en) * | 2007-01-04 | 2010-07-13 | Ut-Battelle, Llc | High Mn austenitic stainless steel |
| US7744813B2 (en) * | 2007-01-04 | 2010-06-29 | Ut-Battelle, Llc | Oxidation resistant high creep strength austenitic stainless steel |
| US10487377B2 (en) * | 2015-12-18 | 2019-11-26 | Heraeus Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG | Cr, Ni, Mo and Co alloy for use in medical devices |
| US11697869B2 (en) | 2020-01-22 | 2023-07-11 | Heraeus Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG | Method for manufacturing a biocompatible wire |
| US11479836B2 (en) | 2021-01-29 | 2022-10-25 | Ut-Battelle, Llc | Low-cost, high-strength, cast creep-resistant alumina-forming alloys for heat-exchangers, supercritical CO2 systems and industrial applications |
| US11866809B2 (en) | 2021-01-29 | 2024-01-09 | Ut-Battelle, Llc | Creep and corrosion-resistant cast alumina-forming alloys for high temperature service in industrial and petrochemical applications |
Family Cites Families (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPS5631345B2 (en) * | 1972-01-27 | 1981-07-21 | ||
| JPS5311235B2 (en) * | 1972-07-21 | 1978-04-20 | ||
| FR2414561B1 (en) * | 1978-01-17 | 1985-09-27 | Creusot Loire | AUSTENITIC ALLOYS OF THE IRON-NICKEL-CHROME-ALUMINUM-RARE EARTH TYPE |
| JPS5538025A (en) * | 1978-09-11 | 1980-03-17 | Toshiba Corp | On-load tap changing transformer |
| FR2526046B1 (en) * | 1982-04-29 | 1985-11-15 | Metalimphy | ALLOYS OF THE IRON-NICKEL-CHROME-ALUMINUM-RARE EARTH TYPE |
| JPS60262945A (en) * | 1984-06-11 | 1985-12-26 | Kawasaki Steel Corp | Oxidation resistant austenitic steel and its manufacture |
-
1987
- 1987-04-24 JP JP62099964A patent/JPS63266045A/en active Pending
-
1988
- 1988-10-22 EP EP88909133A patent/EP0392011B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1988-10-22 US US07/499,443 patent/US5130085A/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1988-10-22 DE DE3854091T patent/DE3854091T2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1988-10-22 WO PCT/JP1988/001078 patent/WO1990004658A1/en not_active Ceased
Non-Patent Citations (2)
| Title |
|---|
| Handbook of Stainless Steels, D.Peckner and I.M.Bernstein, McGraw- Hill, 1977, pages 14.1-14.5 and 14.13 * |
| Scandinavian Journal of Metallurgy 6 (1977), pages 176-184 * |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| DE3854091T2 (en) | 1995-11-09 |
| JPS63266045A (en) | 1988-11-02 |
| US5130085A (en) | 1992-07-14 |
| EP0392011A4 (en) | 1991-04-17 |
| WO1990004658A1 (en) | 1990-05-03 |
| DE3854091D1 (en) | 1995-08-03 |
| EP0392011A1 (en) | 1990-10-17 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| EP0306578B1 (en) | Ferritic stainless steel and process for producing | |
| US4204862A (en) | Austenitic heat-resistant steel which forms Al2 O3 film in high-temperature oxidizing atmosphere | |
| US11162160B2 (en) | Use of a nickel-chromium-iron-aluminum alloy | |
| EP4324939A1 (en) | High nickel alloy excellent in high welding temperature cracking resistance | |
| JP7223210B2 (en) | Precipitation hardening martensitic stainless steel sheet with excellent fatigue resistance | |
| EP0392011B1 (en) | HEAT-RESISTANT HIGH-Al AUSTENITIC STEEL HAVING EXCELLENT HOT WORKING PROPERTIES | |
| JP7187606B2 (en) | High-Ni alloy with excellent weld hot cracking resistance | |
| CN117043376B (en) | Duplex stainless steel wire and duplex stainless steel wire | |
| KR20240144297A (en) | High Ni alloy steel plate with excellent high temperature cracking resistance and its manufacturing method | |
| CN116529396A (en) | High Ni alloy excellent in weld high temperature cracking resistance | |
| EP2738281B1 (en) | High si-content austenitic stainless steel | |
| EP4269627A1 (en) | Precipitation-hardened martensitic stainless steel having excellent fatigue-resistance characteristics | |
| JP7584230B2 (en) | Ferritic stainless steel plates and welded structures | |
| CN116391055A (en) | Highly corrosion-resistant austenitic stainless steel and manufacturing method thereof | |
| JP7341016B2 (en) | Ferritic stainless cold rolled steel sheet | |
| JP2820255B2 (en) | High A1 austenitic heat-resistant steel with excellent hot workability | |
| KR100215727B1 (en) | Super duplex stainless steel with high wear-resistance | |
| JP7616857B2 (en) | Austenitic stainless steel sheet and method for producing same | |
| JP7799218B2 (en) | Ferritic stainless steel sheets and exhaust parts | |
| CN115885055B (en) | Ferritic stainless steel | |
| JP7657026B2 (en) | Cu-containing austenitic stainless steel castings | |
| JP2005133145A (en) | Austenitic stainless steel with excellent hot workability and corrosion resistance | |
| WO2026062616A1 (en) | Strip made of ferritic stainless steel and related production process | |
| JP3363628B2 (en) | Stainless steel excellent in corrosion resistance to molten salt and method for producing the same | |
| WO2025027959A1 (en) | High-ni alloy having excellent high temperature creep strength |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
| 17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 19900622 |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): DE FR GB SE |
|
| A4 | Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched |
Effective date: 19910228 |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A4 Designated state(s): DE FR GB SE |
|
| 17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 19920901 |
|
| GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): DE FR GB SE |
|
| REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 3854091 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 19950803 |
|
| ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
| PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
| 26N | No opposition filed | ||
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Payment date: 19960904 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 19961017 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 19961025 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 19961127 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 19971022 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 19971023 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: THE PATENT HAS BEEN ANNULLED BY A DECISION OF A NATIONAL AUTHORITY Effective date: 19971031 |
|
| GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 19971022 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 19980701 |
|
| EUG | Se: european patent has lapsed |
Ref document number: 88909133.6 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST |





