EP0388840B1 - Verfahren zur Erhöhung der Sicherheit einer elektronischen Frankiermaschine mit Fernaufwertung - Google Patents

Verfahren zur Erhöhung der Sicherheit einer elektronischen Frankiermaschine mit Fernaufwertung Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0388840B1
EP0388840B1 EP90105118A EP90105118A EP0388840B1 EP 0388840 B1 EP0388840 B1 EP 0388840B1 EP 90105118 A EP90105118 A EP 90105118A EP 90105118 A EP90105118 A EP 90105118A EP 0388840 B1 EP0388840 B1 EP 0388840B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
meter
code
postage
customer
entry
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Revoked
Application number
EP90105118A
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0388840A3 (de
EP0388840A2 (de
Inventor
John Gregory Haines
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Quadient Technologies France SA
Original Assignee
Neopost Technologies SA
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=23279508&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP0388840(B1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Neopost Technologies SA filed Critical Neopost Technologies SA
Publication of EP0388840A2 publication Critical patent/EP0388840A2/de
Publication of EP0388840A3 publication Critical patent/EP0388840A3/de
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0388840B1 publication Critical patent/EP0388840B1/de
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Revoked legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07F—COIN-FREED OR LIKE APPARATUS
    • G07F7/00—Mechanisms actuated by objects other than coins to free or to actuate vending, hiring, coin or paper currency dispensing or refunding apparatus
    • G07F7/08—Mechanisms actuated by objects other than coins to free or to actuate vending, hiring, coin or paper currency dispensing or refunding apparatus by coded identity card or credit card or other personal identification means
    • G07F7/10—Mechanisms actuated by objects other than coins to free or to actuate vending, hiring, coin or paper currency dispensing or refunding apparatus by coded identity card or credit card or other personal identification means together with a coded signal, e.g. in the form of personal identification information, like personal identification number [PIN] or biometric data
    • G07F7/1016—Devices or methods for securing the PIN and other transaction-data, e.g. by encryption
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07B—TICKET-ISSUING APPARATUS; FARE-REGISTERING APPARATUS; FRANKING APPARATUS
    • G07B17/00—Franking apparatus
    • G07B17/00016—Relations between apparatus, e.g. franking machine at customer or apparatus at post office, in a franking system
    • G07B17/0008—Communication details outside or between apparatus
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07B—TICKET-ISSUING APPARATUS; FARE-REGISTERING APPARATUS; FRANKING APPARATUS
    • G07B17/00—Franking apparatus
    • G07B17/00733—Cryptography or similar special procedures in a franking system
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07C—TIME OR ATTENDANCE REGISTERS; REGISTERING OR INDICATING THE WORKING OF MACHINES; GENERATING RANDOM NUMBERS; VOTING OR LOTTERY APPARATUS; ARRANGEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS FOR CHECKING NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
    • G07C9/00—Individual registration on entry or exit
    • G07C9/30—Individual registration on entry or exit not involving the use of a pass
    • G07C9/32—Individual registration on entry or exit not involving the use of a pass in combination with an identity check
    • G07C9/33—Individual registration on entry or exit not involving the use of a pass in combination with an identity check by means of a password
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07B—TICKET-ISSUING APPARATUS; FARE-REGISTERING APPARATUS; FRANKING APPARATUS
    • G07B17/00—Franking apparatus
    • G07B17/00016—Relations between apparatus, e.g. franking machine at customer or apparatus at post office, in a franking system
    • G07B17/0008—Communication details outside or between apparatus
    • G07B2017/00153—Communication details outside or between apparatus for sending information
    • G07B2017/00161—Communication details outside or between apparatus for sending information from a central, non-user location, e.g. for updating rates or software, or for refilling funds
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07B—TICKET-ISSUING APPARATUS; FARE-REGISTERING APPARATUS; FRANKING APPARATUS
    • G07B17/00—Franking apparatus
    • G07B17/00016—Relations between apparatus, e.g. franking machine at customer or apparatus at post office, in a franking system
    • G07B17/0008—Communication details outside or between apparatus
    • G07B2017/00153—Communication details outside or between apparatus for sending information
    • G07B2017/00169—Communication details outside or between apparatus for sending information from a franking apparatus, e.g. for verifying accounting
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07B—TICKET-ISSUING APPARATUS; FARE-REGISTERING APPARATUS; FRANKING APPARATUS
    • G07B17/00—Franking apparatus
    • G07B17/00185—Details internally of apparatus in a franking system, e.g. franking machine at customer or apparatus at post office
    • G07B17/00362—Calculation or computing within apparatus, e.g. calculation of postage value
    • G07B2017/00419—Software organization, e.g. separation into objects
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07B—TICKET-ISSUING APPARATUS; FARE-REGISTERING APPARATUS; FRANKING APPARATUS
    • G07B17/00—Franking apparatus
    • G07B17/00733—Cryptography or similar special procedures in a franking system
    • G07B2017/00822—Cryptography or similar special procedures in a franking system including unique details
    • G07B2017/0083—Postal data, e.g. postage, address, sender, machine ID, vendor
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07B—TICKET-ISSUING APPARATUS; FARE-REGISTERING APPARATUS; FRANKING APPARATUS
    • G07B17/00—Franking apparatus
    • G07B17/00733—Cryptography or similar special procedures in a franking system
    • G07B2017/00935—Passwords

Definitions

  • This invention relates generally to postage meters, and more particularly, to electronic postage meters capable of being remotely set.
  • GB-A-2 080 202 discloses a remote postage meter charging system wherein a remote data center computer processes telephone calls from postage meter users, requesting of them information unique to their meter. This information is used to verify the authenticity of the call, and to update the record of the user stored in the computer.
  • the computer formulates a combination based upon the identifying information and the amount of postage desired by the user.
  • the combination is transmitted back to the user, who enters it into the postage meter.
  • the postage meter compares the entered combination with an internally generated combination. If the entered combination matches the internally generated combination, the funding registers of the meter are increased by the new postage amount.
  • such procedures are not infallible, particularly when the postage meter has been stolen and in the possession of a persistent person.
  • the present invention provides a meter according to claim 1.
  • the meter for securely clearing the meter after it has been disabled without returning the meter to the factory, the meter generates a security lock code which is transmitted to a data center computer.
  • the data center computer compares the security lock code with an internally generated security lock code. If the codes agree, the data center computer then generates a security clear code which is transmitted to the meter.
  • the meter compares this code with an internally generated security clear code. If these codes agree, then the meter clears a security lock flag thereby enabling the meter. As a result, the customer can subsequently remotely set the meter.
  • Fig. 1 is a block diagram of a preferred postage meter 10 that can be remotely set in the field by the customer.
  • Meter 10 includes a print mechanism 12, accounting registers, and control electronics, all enclosed within a secure meter housing 13.
  • a keyboard 14 and a display 16 provide the user interface.
  • a connector 17 provides an electrical connection with a mailing machine for control of the printing process.
  • the control electronics includes a digital microprocessor 18 which controls the operation of the meter, including the basic functions of printing and accounting for postage, and optional features such as department accounting and remote setting.
  • the microprocessor is connected to a clock 20, a read only memory (ROM) 22, a random access memory (RAM) 24, and a battery augmented memory (BAM) 26.
  • ROM read only memory
  • RAM random access memory
  • BAM battery augmented memory
  • ROM 22 is primarily used for storing non-volatile information such as software and data/function tables necessary to run the microprocessor. The ROM can only be changed at the factory.
  • RAM 24 is used for intermediate storage of variables and other data during meter operation.
  • BAM 26 is primarily used to store accounting information that must be kept when the meter is powered down. The BAM is also used for storing certain flags and other information that is necessary to the functioning of the microprocessor. Such information includes meter identifying data such as the meter serial number and BAM initialization date, and a number of parameters relevant to the remote setting of the meter.
  • Fig. 2 is a detailed flowchart of the manner in which the security lock flag is set.
  • the customer may then continue the remote setting procedure.
  • the customer enters the remote setting code (step 48).
  • the meter checks whether the security lock flag has already been set (step 50). If so, then the customer is returned to step 48 as if the remote setting code were incorrect. If the security lock flag has not been set, then the meter determines whether the remote setting code is correct (step 52). If the code is correct, then the meter resets the counter to zero (step 53) and the customer may continue the remote setting procedure (which is not shown as it does not directly relate to the present procedure). If the code is not correct, then the meter checks to see whether the customer has already attempted over a predetermined number of allowed attempts (step 56).
  • the meter If the customer has attempted less than the predetermined number of allowed attempts, then the meter returns the customer to the step of entering the remote setting code. If the customer has attempted over the predetermined number of allowed attempts then the security lock flag in BAM is set and the meter returns the customer to the step of entering the remote setting code.
  • Fig. 3 is a high level flow chart of the process necessary for clearing the security lock flag in the meter.
  • a security lock code generated by the meter.
  • This security lock code is essentially a password to the data center computer, and is based upon a combination of factors, the combination of which only the data center computer would know.
  • the customer confirms the security lock code with the data center computer. Upon confirmation from the computer, the computer provides a security clear code back to the customer.
  • the security clear code is essentially a password from the data center computer to the meter stating that it is permissible to clear the security lock flag.
  • a third stage 62 the customer enters the security clear code to the meter. The meter confirms the security clear code and clears the security lock flag.
  • Fig. 4 is a detailed flowchart of stage 60 as shown in Fig. 3.
  • a first step 40′ (corresponding to step 40 of Figure 2), the customer presses a certain key sequence, causing the meter to enter a remote setting mode.
  • the meter enters the remote setting mode by setting a mode register located in BAM (step 42′).
  • the meter determines whether the security lock flag has been set (step 44′). If so, the meter then displays a message and other needed information and prompts for the security clear code (step 46′).
  • the meter displays the meter serial number, the meter BAM initialization date, and the encrypted security lock code.
  • the BAM initialization date is preferably a four digit number wherein the four digits YDDD express the date in which the meter was last initialized.
  • the DDD stands for the number of days since December 31, and Y is the least significant digit of the year in which the meter was initialized.
  • the meter displays the above numbers and the Control Register amount or some other meter specific identifying information.
  • the Control Register contains the amount of postage the meter has printed since the meter has been initialized plus the amount the meter is currently authorized to print. The customer should write these numbers down on a separate piece of paper for later use in the method.
  • CTID configuration transaction identifier
  • TID setting transaction identifier
  • Figs. 5a and 5b are detailed flowcharts of stage 61 as shown in Fig. 3.
  • the customer establishes communication with the data center computer over a standard telephone.
  • the customer may communicate to the data center computer on a touch tone telephone by pressing the key.
  • Alternative embodiments may utilize a telephone communications device that includes a user or meter interface and a modem, or by voice recognition over the telephone.
  • the customer first enters a request code for clearing the security extension flag (step 70).
  • the customer then enters the customer account number (step 72) and the meter serial number which was given above can be found on the exterior of the meter (step 74).
  • the data center computer determines whether the serial number is valid given the customer account number (step 76). If the serial number is valid then the customer may continue, otherwise the customer is notified (step 78) and is given the opportunity to decide whether to try again (step 80). If the customer does not decide to try again, the customer should then contact his agent in order to determine how to clear up this problem.
  • step 84 the customer enters the amount of the Control Register (step 84) obtained earlier in the procedure.
  • the customer then enters the security lock code which was also obtained from the meter in the procedure above (step 86).
  • the computer then generates a security lock code in a like manner (step 88) and compares that code to that entered by the customer (step 90). If the codes are not equal, then the customer is notified (step 92) and is given the opportunity to try again.
  • the computer determines whether the Control Register amount is valid (step 96).
  • the Control Register amount is valid if the amount is equal to any prior Control Register amounts stored on the computer.
  • the Control Register amount is not valid if it is greater than or equal to the present computer Control Register amount. If the Control Register amount is not valid, then the customer is notified and the occurrence of the invalid Control Register amount is logged in the computer (step 98).
  • control Register amount If the Control Register amount is valid, then the customer enters the current remote setting code (step 100). The computer then determines whether it is a valid code (step 102). If the remote setting code is not valid, then the computer passes the customer to a live operator for assistance (step 104). If the remote setting code is valid, then the computer generates a security extension code (step 106), increments the CTID (step 108), flags that this event has occurred (step 110), and displays or returns the security extension code to the customer for use further in this method (step 112).
  • Fig. 6 is a detailed flowchart of stage 62 shown above in Fig. 3.
  • the customer enters the security clear code obtained from the computer into the meter (step 120).
  • the meter then generates its own security clear code (step 122) and compares the computer generated code with the meter generated code (step 124). If the codes are not equal, then the customer is notified (step 126) and the customer is given an opportunity to try again or contact an agent (step 130). If the codes are equal, then the meter increments the CTID such that it is equal to the CTID stored in the computer (step 132), the meter clears the security lock flag (step 134) and the meter enters the remote setting mode by changing the mode register in BAM (step 136).
  • the security lock code and the security clear code are generated by an encryption routine, stored both in the meter ROM and in the data center computer.
  • the encryption routine is a nonlinear algorithm that generates a number that is apparently random to an outside person.
  • the encryption routine is performed by an encryption program in combination with a permanent encryption table. In the first and second embodiments, encryption routine uses a 16 digit (or 64 bit) key and a 16 digit input number.
  • the security lock code is generated by the encryption routine performed on the CTID as the key and a combination of the STID and Control Register amount as the input number.
  • the key is composed of the serial number and the BAM initialization and the input number is composed of the STID and the Control Register.
  • the security clear flag is generated by the encryption routine performed on the CTID as the key and a combination of the meter serial number and the STID as the input number.
  • the CTID is a 16 digit number that is stored in BAM.
  • the initial value of the CTID is obtained by performing an algorithm upon the BAM initialization date in combination with the meter serial number.
  • the BAM initialization date is used to prevent starting with the same CTID everytime the meter is initialized.
  • the algorithm is not stored in the meter for security reasons.
  • the initial CTID is stored in BAM during the initialization process at the factory.
  • the CTID is incremented by a non-linear algorithm within the meter after the security lock flag is cleared.
  • the codes generated by the encryption routine are 16-digits long.
  • the lower digits of the codes are then communicated to the customer by the meter or the data center computer.
  • the number of lower digits that are communicated is determined by the HSL value (see Appendix A for details).
  • the present invention provides a secure and efficient technique for allowing the meter to be cleared in the field.
  • the electronics of the resettable meter may be structured differently.
  • the security lock flag or another flag can be used to prevent other forms of memory modification when an improper code is entered a predetermined number of times.
  • the encryption key used to generate the request codes could be composed of a meter cycle counter instead of the meter serial number.
  • Other security measures may be implemented such as requiring periodic inspection of the meter.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Devices For Checking Fares Or Tickets At Control Points (AREA)
  • Arrangements For Transmission Of Measured Signals (AREA)
  • Selective Calling Equipment (AREA)

Claims (6)

  1. Elektronische Frankiermaschine, in der Daten in einem Speicher (26) gespeichert sind, die durch Eingabe eines Fernladekodes verändert werden können, wobei die Maschine enthält:
    (a) Mittel (18, 52 bis 56) zur Erfassung einer vorbestimmten Anzahl von Wiederholungen der Eingabe eines ungültigen Fernladekodes,
    (b) Verhinderungsmittel (18, 50, 58), die aufgrund der Erfassungsmittel selektiv die Veränderung der Daten im Speicher nach einer vorbestimmten Anzahl von Wiederholungen der Eingabe eines ungültigen Kodes zu verhindern,
    (c) Mittel (18, 122), um einen Frankiermaschinenkode zu erzeugen,
    (d) Mittel (14, 120) zur Eingabe eines nicht von der Frankiermaschine stammenden Kodes,
    (e) Vergleichsmittel (13, 124), die an die Mittel zur Erzeugung eines Kodes und an die Eingabemittel gekoppelt sind, um den Kode der Maschine und den Kode von außerhalb der Maschine miteinander zu vergleichen, gekennzeichnet durch
    (f) Freigabemittel (18, 134), die von den Vergleichsmitteln gesteuert werden, um die Verhinderungsmittel wirkungslos zu machen, wenn die beiden Kodes gleich sind.
  2. Elektronische Frankiermaschine nach Anspruch 1, die weiter aufweist:
    (a) zweite Mittel (18, 60) zur Erzeugung eines zweiten Frankiermaschinenkodes,
    (b) und Anzeigemittel (16, 46), die mit den zweiten Mitteln gekoppelt sind, um den zweiten Frankiermaschinenkode anzuzeigen.
  3. Elektronische Frankiermaschine nach Anspruch 1 oder Anspruch 2, die einen Frankierkreditbetrag im Speicher (26) enthält, der aus der Ferne durch Eingabe eines Fernladekodes durch den Benutzer der Frankiermaschine gesetzt werden kann, wobei die Verhinderungsmittel das Setzen des Frankierkreditbetrags aus der Ferne verhindern, wenn eine vorbestimmte Anzahl von Wiederholungen der Eingabe eines ungültigen Kodes erfolgt ist.
  4. Elektronische Frankiermaschine nach Anspruch 3, die weiter Druckmittel (12) zum Drucken von Frankierbeträgen aufweist, die den Frankierkreditbetrag nicht überschreiten.
  5. Elektronische Frankiermaschine nach Anspruch 4, bei der die Verhinderungsmittel weiter die Druckmittel am Drucken von Frankierbeträgen nach einer vorbestimmten Anzahl von Wiederholungen der Eingabe eines ungültigen Fernladekodes hindern.
  6. Elektronische Frankiermaschine nach Anspruch 3, die weiter Freigabemittel (18, 70) aufweist, um den Frankierkreditbetrag aus der Ferne nach Eingabe eines zweiten, nicht von der Maschine kommenden Kodes zu erlauben.
EP90105118A 1989-03-23 1990-03-19 Verfahren zur Erhöhung der Sicherheit einer elektronischen Frankiermaschine mit Fernaufwertung Revoked EP0388840B1 (de)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US32809989A 1989-03-23 1989-03-23
US328099 1989-03-23

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0388840A2 EP0388840A2 (de) 1990-09-26
EP0388840A3 EP0388840A3 (de) 1991-07-24
EP0388840B1 true EP0388840B1 (de) 1994-11-30

Family

ID=23279508

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP90105118A Revoked EP0388840B1 (de) 1989-03-23 1990-03-19 Verfahren zur Erhöhung der Sicherheit einer elektronischen Frankiermaschine mit Fernaufwertung

Country Status (2)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0388840B1 (de)
DE (1) DE69014361T2 (de)

Families Citing this family (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2251210B (en) * 1990-12-31 1995-01-18 Alcatel Business Systems Postage meter system
GB2251213A (en) * 1990-12-31 1992-07-01 Alcatel Business Systems Postage meter.
WO1994002913A1 (en) * 1992-07-21 1994-02-03 Bacon, Brian Equipment which includes electronics
US5878136A (en) * 1993-10-08 1999-03-02 Pitney Bowes Inc. Encryption key control system for mail processing system having data center verification
DE4344476A1 (de) * 1993-12-21 1995-06-22 Francotyp Postalia Gmbh Verfahren zur Verbesserung der Sicherheit von Frankiermaschinen
US5805711A (en) * 1993-12-21 1998-09-08 Francotyp-Postalia Ag & Co. Method of improving the security of postage meter machines
DE4446667C2 (de) 1994-12-15 1998-09-17 Francotyp Postalia Gmbh Verfahren zur Verbesserung der Sicherheit von Frankiermaschinen bei der Guthabenübertragung
US5680456A (en) * 1995-03-31 1997-10-21 Pitney Bowes Inc. Method of manufacturing generic meters in a key management system
US5742682A (en) * 1995-03-31 1998-04-21 Pitney Bowes Inc. Method of manufacturing secure boxes in a key management system
US5812666A (en) * 1995-03-31 1998-09-22 Pitney Bowes Inc. Cryptographic key management and validation system
US5585613A (en) * 1995-11-24 1996-12-17 Pitney Bowes Inc. Postage metering apparatus including means for guarding against printing a postage value without accouting therefor
US5590198A (en) * 1995-12-19 1996-12-31 Pitney Bowes Inc. Open metering system with super password vault access
DE19913067A1 (de) 1999-03-17 2000-09-21 Francotyp Postalia Gmbh Verfahren zur automatischen Installation von Frankiereinrichtungen und Anordnung zur Durchführung des Verfahrens

Family Cites Families (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3792446A (en) * 1972-12-04 1974-02-12 Pitney Bowes Inc Remote postage meter resetting method
US4097923A (en) * 1975-04-16 1978-06-27 Pitney-Bowes, Inc. Remote postage meter charging system using an advanced microcomputerized postage meter
US4376299A (en) * 1980-07-14 1983-03-08 Pitney Bowes, Inc. Data center for remote postage meter recharging system having physically secure encrypting apparatus and employing encrypted seed number signals
US4506344A (en) * 1982-06-04 1985-03-19 Pitney Bowes Inc. Hand held electronic postage meter having secure postage meter doors
CH675497A5 (de) * 1985-08-06 1990-09-28 Pitney Bowes Inc
US4831554A (en) * 1986-04-10 1989-05-16 Pitney Bowes Inc. Postage meter message printing system
US4787045A (en) * 1986-04-10 1988-11-22 Pitney Bowes Inc. Postage meter recharging system

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE69014361T2 (de) 1995-04-27
EP0388840A3 (de) 1991-07-24
DE69014361D1 (de) 1995-01-12
EP0388840A2 (de) 1990-09-26

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0388839B1 (de) Fernkonfiguration von Frankiermaschinen
US5107455A (en) Remote meter i/o configuration
US5369401A (en) Remote meter operation
US4812994A (en) Postage meter locking system
EP0588339B1 (de) Verfahren zur Kontenabrechnung mittels Chipkarten
EP0388840B1 (de) Verfahren zur Erhöhung der Sicherheit einer elektronischen Frankiermaschine mit Fernaufwertung
US5699415A (en) Method for matching the database between an electronic postage meter machine and a data center
CA2035969C (en) Remote resetting postage meter
US5077792A (en) Franking system
US4890323A (en) Data communication systems and methods
US5940511A (en) Method and apparatus for secure PIN entry
EP0574219A2 (de) Zugangskontrolle
US5367464A (en) Franking meter system
EP0388841B1 (de) Einstellung einer entfernt aufgestellten Frankiermaschine für den Notfall
CA2273859A1 (en) Authenticating system with microcircuit card
CA1263752A (en) Postage meter locking system
US6938023B1 (en) Method of limiting key usage in a postage metering system that produces cryptographically secured indicium
CN1196541B (zh) 使邮资计的可移去便携式储金卡自动无效的方法和设备
JPH06103425A (ja) Ｉｃクレジットカードシステム
JP3756241B2 (ja) メモリカード
JP3080202B2 (ja) Ｉｃクレジットカード及びｉｃカード端末
EP0690417A2 (de) Frankiermaschine mit elektronischer Zugangskontrollsicherheit
JP3085334B2 (ja) Ｉｃカード端末及びこれらを用いたｉｃプリペイドカードシステム
JPH06161354A (ja) Ｉｃカード端末及びそれを用いたシステム
JPH09212723A (ja) 個人情報取引装置

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): DE FR GB

PUAL Search report despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): DE FR GB

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19920113

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: NEOPOST INDUSTRIE

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19930621

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): DE FR GB

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69014361

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19950112

ET Fr: translation filed
PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: PITNEY BOWES, INC.

Effective date: 19950830

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 19951228

Year of fee payment: 7

PLBF Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OBSO

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 19960312

Year of fee payment: 7

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 19960318

Year of fee payment: 7

RDAH Patent revoked

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS REVO

RDAH Patent revoked

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS REVO

RDAG Patent revoked

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009271

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: PATENT REVOKED

GBPR Gb: patent revoked under art. 102 of the ep convention designating the uk as contracting state

Free format text: 960722

27W Patent revoked

Effective date: 19960722