EP0384299B1 - Thermally stabilized polyacrylonitrile polymer fibers for carbon fiber manufacture - Google Patents

Thermally stabilized polyacrylonitrile polymer fibers for carbon fiber manufacture Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0384299B1
EP0384299B1 EP90102972A EP90102972A EP0384299B1 EP 0384299 B1 EP0384299 B1 EP 0384299B1 EP 90102972 A EP90102972 A EP 90102972A EP 90102972 A EP90102972 A EP 90102972A EP 0384299 B1 EP0384299 B1 EP 0384299B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
precursor
carbon fiber
oxygen
air
filaments
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP90102972A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0384299A3 (en
EP0384299A2 (en
Inventor
Warren C. Schimpf
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Hexcel Corp
Original Assignee
Hexcel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Hexcel Corp filed Critical Hexcel Corp
Publication of EP0384299A2 publication Critical patent/EP0384299A2/en
Publication of EP0384299A3 publication Critical patent/EP0384299A3/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0384299B1 publication Critical patent/EP0384299B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D01NATURAL OR MAN-MADE THREADS OR FIBRES; SPINNING
    • D01FCHEMICAL FEATURES IN THE MANUFACTURE OF ARTIFICIAL FILAMENTS, THREADS, FIBRES, BRISTLES OR RIBBONS; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF CARBON FILAMENTS
    • D01F9/00Artificial filaments or the like of other substances; Manufacture thereof; Apparatus specially adapted for the manufacture of carbon filaments
    • D01F9/08Artificial filaments or the like of other substances; Manufacture thereof; Apparatus specially adapted for the manufacture of carbon filaments of inorganic material
    • D01F9/12Carbon filaments; Apparatus specially adapted for the manufacture thereof
    • D01F9/14Carbon filaments; Apparatus specially adapted for the manufacture thereof by decomposition of organic filaments
    • D01F9/20Carbon filaments; Apparatus specially adapted for the manufacture thereof by decomposition of organic filaments from polyaddition, polycondensation or polymerisation products
    • D01F9/21Carbon filaments; Apparatus specially adapted for the manufacture thereof by decomposition of organic filaments from polyaddition, polycondensation or polymerisation products from macromolecular compounds obtained by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds
    • D01F9/22Carbon filaments; Apparatus specially adapted for the manufacture thereof by decomposition of organic filaments from polyaddition, polycondensation or polymerisation products from macromolecular compounds obtained by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds from polyacrylonitriles
    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D01NATURAL OR MAN-MADE THREADS OR FIBRES; SPINNING
    • D01FCHEMICAL FEATURES IN THE MANUFACTURE OF ARTIFICIAL FILAMENTS, THREADS, FIBRES, BRISTLES OR RIBBONS; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF CARBON FILAMENTS
    • D01F9/00Artificial filaments or the like of other substances; Manufacture thereof; Apparatus specially adapted for the manufacture of carbon filaments
    • D01F9/08Artificial filaments or the like of other substances; Manufacture thereof; Apparatus specially adapted for the manufacture of carbon filaments of inorganic material
    • D01F9/12Carbon filaments; Apparatus specially adapted for the manufacture thereof
    • D01F9/14Carbon filaments; Apparatus specially adapted for the manufacture thereof by decomposition of organic filaments
    • D01F9/20Carbon filaments; Apparatus specially adapted for the manufacture thereof by decomposition of organic filaments from polyaddition, polycondensation or polymerisation products
    • D01F9/21Carbon filaments; Apparatus specially adapted for the manufacture thereof by decomposition of organic filaments from polyaddition, polycondensation or polymerisation products from macromolecular compounds obtained by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds
    • D01F9/22Carbon filaments; Apparatus specially adapted for the manufacture thereof by decomposition of organic filaments from polyaddition, polycondensation or polymerisation products from macromolecular compounds obtained by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds from polyacrylonitriles
    • D01F9/225Carbon filaments; Apparatus specially adapted for the manufacture thereof by decomposition of organic filaments from polyaddition, polycondensation or polymerisation products from macromolecular compounds obtained by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds from polyacrylonitriles from stabilised polyacrylonitriles

Definitions

  • This invention relates to a process for manufacturing carbon fiber by carbonizing a precursor comprising a polyacrylonitrile polymer, and more particularly to the stabilization of the precursor prior to carbonization.
  • Carbon fiber is useful in a variety of applications for which its mechanical, chemical and electrical properties are uniquely suited, particularly for making lightweight composites comprising the fiber in inorganic or organic matrices.
  • Such stabilization through oxidation is rate-limiting because of the risk of fusing the filaments or even causing an uncontrollable self-generating reaction (a "thermal runaway") if the precursor is heated too fast or too high during the stabilization. It is customary to use certain comonomers, such as acrylic acid, in forming the polyacrylonitrile polymer filaments in order to permit initiation of the oxidation reaction at a temperature lower than that otherwise required, e.g. between 200 and 400°C. There is risk of thermal runaway even at such lower temperatures, but the risk is less and there is obviously less risk of fusion of the filaments.
  • U.S. Patent 4,104,004 suggests dividing up the stabilization step so that the precursor is heated in separate temperature zones
  • U.S. Patents 3,775,520 and 3,954,950 while they suggest driving off residual solvent and producing controlled shrinkage by an initial brief heating step in an inert atmosphere prior to oxidizing the precursor, also limit the initial heating step to prevent stabilization from occurring.
  • US-A-3 961 888 discloses a process for the stabilisation of a PAN fiber, in which the fiber is first treated in an inert atmosphere until the reaction is essentially completed and subsequently treated in an oxygen containing atmosphere.
  • a process for manufacturing carbon fiber in which a polyacrylonitrile polymer in the form of a multitude of filaments is heated in an oxygen-containing atmosphere to form a stabilized and oxidized precursor that is then carbonized in an atmosphere substantially free of oxygen or a vacuum is characterized in that the polyacrylonitrile filaments are heated in an atmosphere that is substantially free of oxygen or a vacuum until the reduction in residual heat of reaction as measured by differential scanning calorimetry is from 10% to 35% to form a thermally stabilized carbon fiber precursor prior to the step of heating the filaments in an oxygen-containing atmosphere to oxidize the thermally-stabilized precursor.
  • the precursor is readily and safely stabilized in a form that is capable of being oxidized for subsequent carbonization below the range of temperatures ordinarily used for oxidation, or alternatively permits the use of conventional oxidation temperatures or even higher temperatures to achieve a faster rate of oxidation.
  • the carbonization conditions after oxidation follow the conventional procedures for making carbon fiber from polyacrylonitrile precursor.
  • the process of the invention can also be carried out in that the polyacrylonitrile filaments in the form of a band of closely spaced tows are moved in an atmosphere that is substantially free of oxygen or a vacuum through an oven maintained at a first range of temperatures to heat the filaments to form a thermally stabilized carbon fiber precursor and then are moved at a higher line speed in an oxygen-containing atmosphere through an oven maintained at a second range of temperatures to oxidize the thermally-stabilized precursor.
  • Polyacrylonitrile polymers conventionally used as precursors for carbon fiber manufacture, and conventional procedures for the manufacture of such precursors are well known, for instance from U.S. Patents 4,001,382, 4,009,248, 4,397,831 and 4,452,860. While the same polyacrylonitrile polymers are preferred as precursors for carbon fiber manufacture according to the invention, a greater variety of polyacrylonitrile polymers may be used. For example, polyacrylonitrile homopolymer may be used as a precursor and is readily stabilized by the process of this invention.
  • the atmosphere that is substantially free of oxygen consists essentially of nitrogen or other inert gas, although a vacuum may be also used.
  • the temperature to which the precursor is heated is preferably at least about 130°C, more preferably at least about 230°C but may be up to 500°C or higher without risk of thermal runaway.
  • one or more tows each comprising a multitude of continuous filaments traveling as a band are heated in a furnace or oven for stabilization in that inert atmosphere according to the invention.
  • the stabilization step takes from a few minutes up to about an hour or more depending on the temperature chosen and may be conducted in a series of steps, if desired.
  • the duration of the stabilization step may be pre-determined by a conventional technique that measures thermal rearrangement, such as by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC).
  • DSC differential scanning calorimetry
  • the reduction in residual heat of reaction measured by DSC in an inert atmosphere before and after the stabilization step is an appropriate measure of thermal rearrangement, and is from 10% to 35%, preferably by about 20%.
  • the diameter of filaments within the tow preferably ranges between 1 and 10 microns, although the magnitude of such diameter is not critical in accordance with this invention. Moreover, each tow may comprise between 500 and 20,000 filaments per tow. The conventional use of surface treatments on the filaments within the tow does not detract from the benefits of this invention.
  • the tows are may be oxidized at temperatures ranging surprisingly as low as room temperature or even lower, but it is preferred that oxidation take place in a gaseous medium containing oxygen such as air at temperatures ranging between 150°C and 300°C for a time sufficient to allow these thermally stabilized tows to be self supporting (i.e. to retain dimensional integrity) during carbonization. Too high a temperature during oxidation is undesirable unless such heating takes place in apparatus for carrying away thermal decomposition products of the fiber being oxidized.
  • the band of filaments While undergoing stabilization in the non-oxidizing atmosphere or oxidation, the band of filaments may be stretched to a length longer than its original length, held constant in length or allowed to shrink as desired.
  • the thermally stabilized and oxidized precursor tows are carbonized using conventional techniques for making carbon fibers.
  • the stabilized and oxidized precursor tow is heated in an inert atmosphere or vacuum at a temperature between about 500°C and 800°C for tar removal followed by heating at higher temperatures, also in nitrogen or other non-oxidizing atmosphere, to yield a carbonized fiber suitable for use with or without surface treatment according to conventional practice.
  • Figures 1 - 14 graphically display the results of tests made according to the examples.
  • the DSC apparatus used was a DuPont 910 DSC Module with a Model 1090 or like controller.
  • the X-axis in Figures 1 through 11C is temperature in degrees centigrade.
  • the Y-axis is heat flow in milliwatts.
  • Figures 13 and 14 show load (tension) in grams per denier versus time in minutes. The degree of reaction is determined using density.
  • Figure 12 shows the density versus the time in minutes.
  • the sample size in Figure 1 was 1.136 milligrams.
  • the rate of temperature increase was 10 degrees centigrade per minute and was in air.
  • the sample size in Figure 2 was 1.110 milligrams and the rate of temperature increase was 10 degrees centigrade per minute in nitrogen.
  • the sample type and rate of temperature increase are set forth below for the data in Figures 3 - 11C.
  • Figures 3 to 11C correspond to reference examples.
  • DSC was respectively in air and nitrogen.
  • DSC of Figures 3 and 4 was in nitrogen.
  • DSC was in air for Figures 5, 6 (both purge) and 7 and 8 (second heating).
  • Figure 9 of the DSC was in air (purge) and DSC was in nitrogen (Figure 10) and then in air in Figure 11.
  • Figure 11A was run in nitrogen; Figure 11B run in air; and Figure 11C is rerun in air after initial heating in nitrogen.
  • ABS Precursor and “CE Precursor, are standard carbon fiber precursors made from acrylonitrile and methacrylic acid (2 weight %) in the case of the AB precursor and acrylonitrile, methylacrylate and itaconic acid in case of the CE precursor.
  • the change in H D was 178 cal/g when heated in air after pretreatment in N 2 but only 49 cal/g when heated in N 2 after the same nitrogen pretreatment for the first sample and 277 cal/g when heated in air after pretreatment and only 74 cal/g when heated in N 2 after pretreatment for the second. Since the pretreatment heating was carried out in N 2 , it might be expected that the change in H D would be the same in both air and N 2 . However, from this data at least part of the oxidation reaction is not involved with or linked to the rearrangement reaction. If the sample 1 pretreatment (235°C/55 min) had been run in air instead of N 2 , the residual H D , air would be 740 cal/g.
  • the area under the curve was significantly reduced, from about 1000-1100 cal/g to about 250 cal/g for AB Precursor and 335 cal/g for CE Precursor.
  • the oxidation-initiation temperature was reduced about 20°C, indicating that the oxidation would be more rapid than non-prestabilized fiber ( Figures 7 and 8).
  • the position of the two major thermal peaks shifted. For the AB Precursor the shift was more dramatic, with the lower peak dropping from a typical 228°C to 212°C.
  • the position of the higher-temperature peak increased from 326°C to 360°C for AB Precursor while it decreased for CE Precursor from 330°C to 315°C.
  • FIG 11A shows the typical DSC curve for this polymer in nitrogen with a heat of decomposition of 124 cal/gm
  • Figure 11B shows the thermal curve in air.
  • the heat of reaction in air (1103 cal/gm) is typical of other acrylic polymers, but the homopolymer is characterized by a high initiation temperature (250°C) and rapid heat evolution rate (steep slope).
  • the initiation temperature drops to 155°C with the single peak splitting into two distinct peaks, the rate of heat evolution drops significantly as evidenced by a change in initial slope (note change in y-axis range between Figures 11B and 11C), and the overall heat of reaction has dropped to 237 cal/gm.
  • Those results indicate the polymer may make a much more suitable carbon fiber precursor from the standpoint of ease of processability, safety, and potentially, economics.
  • the fiber that has been prestabilized and oxidized does exhibit a higher density than the fiber that has just been oxidized at the same temperature for the same amount of time. This is believed due to the increase in reactivity after prestabilization since prestabilization alone results in a rate of density increase that is less than that due to oxidation in air (Table 2 and Figure 12). Looking at the density difference between the oxidized and prestabilized/oxidized fibers and assuming kinetics similar to the reaction kinetics of the AB Precursor for comparison purposes, the increase in oxidized fiber density due to prestabilization corresponds to a time savings of 40 minutes at 235°C. That is, in order to reach the same oxidized density as the prestabilized/oxidized fiber, the precursor fiber would have to be oxidized for 160 minutes at 235°C instead of stabilized/oxidized for a total of 120 minutes at 235°C.
  • Another way to monitor the reaction characteristics of an acrylic based precursor is to follow the tension that is generated as the fiber rearranges and oxidizes at elevated temperatures.
  • Tension vs time data were generated for AB and DuPont precursors and prestabilized fibers to further clarify changes in oxidation reaction characteristics that are caused by prestabilization in an inert atmosphere.
  • Figure 13 shows load/time data for AB precursor in air at 235°C, N 2 at 235°C, and for AB prestabilized for varying amounts of time and then run in air at 235°C. Comparing the samples run in air and N 2 (no stabilization), both samples show the characteristic drop in tension initially followed by a tension increase as the fiber begins to react. The tension increase due to the shrinkage of the sample run in N 2 is significantly less than in air, the difference presumably being due to the added shrinkage of the oxidation reactions occurring in air.
  • the prestabilized fibers show a sudden increase in tension when run in air possibly indicating an initial increase in the degree of reactivity.
  • These lower oxidation loads could be due to a lower overall oxidation reactivity for the prestabilized fibers that would agree with DTA results showing lower than expected residual heats of reaction in air after prestabilization.
  • the results for the DuPont T-42 type fiber are shown in Figure 14. This fiber is characteristically slower to react than AB as evidenced by the slow load buildup for the AB 10 Precursor. After prestabilization, the shrinkage characteristics of the fiber are greatly altered. The tension increase with time, while not as great as for AB Precursor, is similar in shape, indicating the fiber may oxidize more readily after prestabilization. As with the prestabilized AB Precursor samples, the T-42 type fibers show a rapid initial increase in tension (the greater the degree of prestabilization, the greater the rate of tension buildup).
  • the more highly prestabilized fiber has a lower load buildup than the other prestabilized fiber (similar to AB results) but both samples are significantly higher than the baseline indicating the prestabilization (even after as little as five minutes) results in an increase in oxidation reaction rate, but may reduce the number of sites available for reaction.
  • a set of AB fibers were stabilized in N 2 at 250°C for times ranging from 5 minutes to 6 hours. In each case, the sample was then divided in half, with half placed in an inert atmosphere and the other half stored in air, both at room temperature. In all cases, the sample in air continued to change color and slowly darken while the sample in N 2 remained golden brown. It was found that this reaction could be suspended by placing the partially darkened sample in N 2 and then reinitiated by exposing again to air. The fibers exposed to air after prestabilization were able to oxidize at room temperature. If oxidation type reactions were indeed occurring, it would be expected that the residual heat of reaction would decrease with increasing time of exposure to air at room temperature. A series of experiments was performed to determine if this was indeed the case.
  • a length of AB Precursor was stabilized in N 2 for 2 hours at 250°C; the fiber was divided in half with half exposed to room-temperature air for 3 hours and the other half exposed to air for 24 hours. The samples were then restored in N 2 and submitted for thermal analysis. In all cases, the thermal lab was careful to run the samples as quickly as possible after the N 2 seal was broken.
  • a sample of AB Precursor was stabilized for 16 hours at 250°C in N 2 and then divided with parts exposed for 0 hours, 1 hour, 3 hours, and 24 hours in air. Samples were then restored in N 2 and thermally analyzed.

Description

  • This invention relates to a process for manufacturing carbon fiber by carbonizing a precursor comprising a polyacrylonitrile polymer, and more particularly to the stabilization of the precursor prior to carbonization.
  • Carbon fiber is useful in a variety of applications for which its mechanical, chemical and electrical properties are uniquely suited, particularly for making lightweight composites comprising the fiber in inorganic or organic matrices.
  • Although the cost of carbon fiber has been decreasing significantly even while its properties and reliability have been improved, there are still problems in some aspects of its production. In particular, the stabilization step in which polyacrylonitrile polymer, in the form of a tow comprising a multitude of filaments, is heated in air or other oxygen-containing gaseous medium prior to carbonization, adversely limits the rate at which carbon fiber can be manufactured on a commercial scale.
  • Such stabilization through oxidation is rate-limiting because of the risk of fusing the filaments or even causing an uncontrollable self-generating reaction (a "thermal runaway") if the precursor is heated too fast or too high during the stabilization. It is customary to use certain comonomers, such as acrylic acid, in forming the polyacrylonitrile polymer filaments in order to permit initiation of the oxidation reaction at a temperature lower than that otherwise required, e.g. between 200 and 400°C. There is risk of thermal runaway even at such lower temperatures, but the risk is less and there is obviously less risk of fusion of the filaments.
  • However, to produce carbon fiber having uniform properties requires strict control of the amounts of the comonomer that is used to permit oxidation at lower temperatures, which presents production problems in addition to the rate limitation caused by the need to maintain a relatively low temperature.
  • The problems associated with the stabilization step have been extensively studied, for instance, in "Studies on Carbonization of Polyacrylonitrile Fibre - Part 5: Changes in Structure with Pyrolysis of Polyacrylonitrile Fibre: by Miyamichi, et al., Journal of Society of Fibre Science and Technology, Japan, 22, No. 12, 538 - 547 (1966).
  • U.S. Patent 4,104,004 suggests dividing up the stabilization step so that the precursor is heated in separate temperature zones, and U.S. Patents 3,775,520 and 3,954,950, while they suggest driving off residual solvent and producing controlled shrinkage by an initial brief heating step in an inert atmosphere prior to oxidizing the precursor, also limit the initial heating step to prevent stabilization from occurring. US-A-3 961 888 discloses a process for the stabilisation of a PAN fiber, in which the fiber is first treated in an inert atmosphere until the reaction is essentially completed and subsequently treated in an oxygen containing atmosphere.
  • There is still need for a process for manufacturing carbon fiber having uniform properties from a polyacrylonitrile polymer carbon fiber that reduces the risk of thermal runaway and fusion of the filaments while increasing the possible rates of reaction. It is also desirable to permit the use of polyacrylonitrile homopolymer, which is more economical to make than the comonomers conventionally used to reduce the temperature of oxidation.
  • According to the invention, a process for manufacturing carbon fiber in which a polyacrylonitrile polymer in the form of a multitude of filaments is heated in an oxygen-containing atmosphere to form a stabilized and oxidized precursor that is then carbonized in an atmosphere substantially free of oxygen or a vacuum, is characterized in that the polyacrylonitrile filaments are heated in an atmosphere that is substantially free of oxygen or a vacuum until the reduction in residual heat of reaction as measured by differential scanning calorimetry is from 10% to 35% to form a thermally stabilized carbon fiber precursor prior to the step of heating the filaments in an oxygen-containing atmosphere to oxidize the thermally-stabilized precursor.
  • By that process, the precursor is readily and safely stabilized in a form that is capable of being oxidized for subsequent carbonization below the range of temperatures ordinarily used for oxidation, or alternatively permits the use of conventional oxidation temperatures or even higher temperatures to achieve a faster rate of oxidation. The carbonization conditions after oxidation follow the conventional procedures for making carbon fiber from polyacrylonitrile precursor. The process of the invention can also be carried out in that the polyacrylonitrile filaments in the form of a band of closely spaced tows are moved in an atmosphere that is substantially free of oxygen or a vacuum through an oven maintained at a first range of temperatures to heat the filaments to form a thermally stabilized carbon fiber precursor and then are moved at a higher line speed in an oxygen-containing atmosphere through an oven maintained at a second range of temperatures to oxidize the thermally-stabilized precursor.
  • Polyacrylonitrile polymers conventionally used as precursors for carbon fiber manufacture, and conventional procedures for the manufacture of such precursors are well known, for instance from U.S. Patents 4,001,382, 4,009,248, 4,397,831 and 4,452,860. While the same polyacrylonitrile polymers are preferred as precursors for carbon fiber manufacture according to the invention, a greater variety of polyacrylonitrile polymers may be used. For example, polyacrylonitrile homopolymer may be used as a precursor and is readily stabilized by the process of this invention.
  • Preferably, the atmosphere that is substantially free of oxygen consists essentially of nitrogen or other inert gas, although a vacuum may be also used. The temperature to which the precursor is heated is preferably at least about 130°C, more preferably at least about 230°C but may be up to 500°C or higher without risk of thermal runaway. Typically, one or more tows each comprising a multitude of continuous filaments traveling as a band are heated in a furnace or oven for stabilization in that inert atmosphere according to the invention. The stabilization step takes from a few minutes up to about an hour or more depending on the temperature chosen and may be conducted in a series of steps, if desired.
  • The duration of the stabilization step may be pre-determined by a conventional technique that measures thermal rearrangement, such as by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The reduction in residual heat of reaction measured by DSC in an inert atmosphere before and after the stabilization step is an appropriate measure of thermal rearrangement, and is from 10% to 35%, preferably by about 20%.
  • The diameter of filaments within the tow preferably ranges between 1 and 10 microns, although the magnitude of such diameter is not critical in accordance with this invention. Moreover, each tow may comprise between 500 and 20,000 filaments per tow. The conventional use of surface treatments on the filaments within the tow does not detract from the benefits of this invention.
  • After being thermally stabilized, the tows are may be oxidized at temperatures ranging surprisingly as low as room temperature or even lower, but it is preferred that oxidation take place in a gaseous medium containing oxygen such as air at temperatures ranging between 150°C and 300°C for a time sufficient to allow these thermally stabilized tows to be self supporting (i.e. to retain dimensional integrity) during carbonization. Too high a temperature during oxidation is undesirable unless such heating takes place in apparatus for carrying away thermal decomposition products of the fiber being oxidized.
  • While undergoing stabilization in the non-oxidizing atmosphere or oxidation, the band of filaments may be stretched to a length longer than its original length, held constant in length or allowed to shrink as desired.
  • After oxidation, the thermally stabilized and oxidized precursor tows are carbonized using conventional techniques for making carbon fibers. For example, the stabilized and oxidized precursor tow is heated in an inert atmosphere or vacuum at a temperature between about 500°C and 800°C for tar removal followed by heating at higher temperatures, also in nitrogen or other non-oxidizing atmosphere, to yield a carbonized fiber suitable for use with or without surface treatment according to conventional practice.
  • The following examples and reference examples illustrate the invention, and Figures 1 - 14 graphically display the results of tests made according to the examples. The DSC apparatus used was a DuPont 910 DSC Module with a Model 1090 or like controller. The X-axis in Figures 1 through 11C is temperature in degrees centigrade. The Y-axis is heat flow in milliwatts. Figures 13 and 14 show load (tension) in grams per denier versus time in minutes. The degree of reaction is determined using density. Figure 12 shows the density versus the time in minutes.
  • The sample size in Figure 1 was 1.136 milligrams. The rate of temperature increase was 10 degrees centigrade per minute and was in air. The sample size in Figure 2 was 1.110 milligrams and the rate of temperature increase was 10 degrees centigrade per minute in nitrogen. The sample type and rate of temperature increase are set forth below for the data in Figures 3 - 11C. Figures 3 to 11C correspond to reference examples.
    Figure Sample Size Type Rate
    3 1.332 mg AB 10
    4 1.396 mg CE 10
    5 1.369 mg AB 10
    6 1.320 mg CE 10
    7 0.243 mg AB 10
    8 0.791 mg CE 10
    9 1.246 mg DUP 10
    10 8.826 mg DUP 10
    11 4.624 mg DUP 10
    11A 1.332 mg DUP 10
    11B 1.327 mg DUP 10
    11C 3.178 mg DUP 10
  • In Figures 1 and 2 DSC was respectively in air and nitrogen. DSC of Figures 3 and 4 was in nitrogen. DSC was in air for Figures 5, 6 (both purge) and 7 and 8 (second heating). Figure 9 of the DSC was in air (purge) and DSC was in nitrogen (Figure 10) and then in air in Figure 11. Figure 11A was run in nitrogen; Figure 11B run in air; and Figure 11C is rerun in air after initial heating in nitrogen.
  • Examples and reference examples
  • In the work described below "AB Precursor" and "CE Precursor, are standard carbon fiber precursors made from acrylonitrile and methacrylic acid (2 weight %) in the case of the AB precursor and acrylonitrile, methylacrylate and itaconic acid in case of the CE precursor.
  • Several experiments were initially run with varying degrees of nitrogen (N2) pretreatment and then analyzed thermally. As seen in Figures 1 and 2, the amount of change in heats of decomposition (HD) between precursor heated in air and heated in nitrogen (N2) were different. These differences are typical for acrylic polymers heated in oxygen containing and oxygen free atmospheres with the low HD (in N2) due to thermal rearrangement reactions and the large HD in air due to thermal rearrangement and oxidation reactions. Table 1 shows the results of two experiments where precursor was first pretreated in N2 at elevated temperatures. TABLE 1
    HEATS OF DECOMPOSITION IN AIR AND N2
    Air HD cal/gm N2
    AB Precursor (Baseline) 1121 165
    Pretreatment: 235°C, 55 min in N2 943 116
    Pretreatment: 235°C, 116 min in N2 (reference example) 844 90.8
  • The change in HD was 178 cal/g when heated in air after pretreatment in N2 but only 49 cal/g when heated in N2 after the same nitrogen pretreatment for the first sample and 277 cal/g when heated in air after pretreatment and only 74 cal/g when heated in N2 after pretreatment for the second. Since the pretreatment heating was carried out in N2, it might be expected that the change in HD would be the same in both air and N2. However, from this data at least part of the oxidation reaction is not involved with or linked to the rearrangement reaction. If the sample 1 pretreatment (235°C/55 min) had been run in air instead of N2, the residual HD, air would be 740 cal/g. The N2 preheat generated only 49 cal/g, but lowered the HD, air by 178 cal/g, so it appears that 129 cal/g of reaction with oxygen was by-passed by the N2 preheat. The N2 preheat for 116 min at 235°C generated 74 cal/g and lowered the HD, air by 277 cal/g so it by-passed 203 cal/g of the expected reaction with oxygen. It is evident that the chemical structure of the fiber is different when preheated in N2 prior to air oxidation.
  • Samples of four different polyacrylonitrile polymers were thermally analyzed in nitrogen and air to better define the mechanisms that were occurring. As part of the analysis, ground precursor fiber was first analyzed in nitrogen, up to about 430°C. The results are shown in Figure 3 (AB Precursor) and 4 (CE Precursor). The results were not unusual; an exponentially-increasing heat evolution peaking at about 285-290°C, followed by a rapid heat decrease to give about 100-135 cal/g evolved heat. The resultant thermally-stabilized powder was then reweighed and reanalyzed, this time in air. Normally the air oxidation curve will follow the route shown in Figure 5 (AB Precursor) and Figure 6 (CE Precursor). Instead, the curve shape was markedly changed. The area under the curve was significantly reduced, from about 1000-1100 cal/g to about 250 cal/g for AB Precursor and 335 cal/g for CE Precursor. In addition, the oxidation-initiation temperature was reduced about 20°C, indicating that the oxidation would be more rapid than non-prestabilized fiber (Figures 7 and 8). Additionally, the position of the two major thermal peaks shifted. For the AB Precursor the shift was more dramatic, with the lower peak dropping from a typical 228°C to 212°C. The position of the higher-temperature peak increased from 326°C to 360°C for AB Precursor while it decreased for CE Precursor from 330°C to 315°C.
  • These results suggest a major change in the oxidation reactions. There appear to be more oxidatively-active sites after the nitrogen pretreatment as evidenced by the decrease in initiation temperature. There also appears to be less overall oxidation, or possibly less dehydrogenation, as evidenced by the higher temperature which may imply more oxidative stability or may simply mean that the influence of the lower-temperature reactions is dissipated leaving only the higher-temperature part of the response.
  • The thermal analysis of DuPont T-42 polymer, a commercial grade polyacrylonitrile polymer fiber, in air (Figure 9) indicates that it would be a less suitable precursor than AB Precursor due to its high initiation temperature and rapid heat evolution rate. If the precursor is first prestabilized in N2 (Figure 10) and then reheated in air (Figure 11), the thermal response changes dramatically, similar to what has been seen with the other acrylic polymers. The reaction initiation temperature has decreased substantially, the single peak has split into two very distinct peaks, and the total heat of reaction is only 34 cal/gm.
  • PAN homopolymer, which is typically avoided at present as a carbon fiber precursor in commercial practice because of its slow reaction rate, high rate of that evolution once it begins to react, and high initiation temperature was also found to undergo dramatic changes in thermal characteristics once it was prestabilized. Figure 11A shows the typical DSC curve for this polymer in nitrogen with a heat of decomposition of 124 cal/gm, while Figure 11B shows the thermal curve in air. The heat of reaction in air (1103 cal/gm) is typical of other acrylic polymers, but the homopolymer is characterized by a high initiation temperature (250°C) and rapid heat evolution rate (steep slope). When the polymer is prestabilized by running the DSC in nitrogen and then rerun in air, the changes are dramatic (Figure 11C). The initiation temperature drops to 155°C with the single peak splitting into two distinct peaks, the rate of heat evolution drops significantly as evidenced by a change in initial slope (note change in y-axis range between Figures 11B and 11C), and the overall heat of reaction has dropped to 237 cal/gm. Those results indicate the polymer may make a much more suitable carbon fiber precursor from the standpoint of ease of processability, safety, and potentially, economics.
  • These data also suggest that the fiber will be more easily oxidized after prestabilization. As such, a fiber that has been prestabilized and oxidized for a given time at temperature will have a higher density than a fiber that is only oxidized for the same time at temperature. A set of experiments was run to determine if this is true; the results are shown in Table 2 below. TABLE 2
    DU PONT T-42 PRESTABILIZATION AND OXIDATION DENSITIES
    Conditions Density (g/cc)
    235°C, 2 hr, air 1.2688
    235°C, 1 hr, N2; then
    235°C, 1 hr, air 1.2904
    235°C, 1 hr, air
    235°C, 1 hr, N2 1.2101
  • The fiber that has been prestabilized and oxidized does exhibit a higher density than the fiber that has just been oxidized at the same temperature for the same amount of time. This is believed due to the increase in reactivity after prestabilization since prestabilization alone results in a rate of density increase that is less than that due to oxidation in air (Table 2 and Figure 12). Looking at the density difference between the oxidized and prestabilized/oxidized fibers and assuming kinetics similar to the reaction kinetics of the AB Precursor for comparison purposes, the increase in oxidized fiber density due to prestabilization corresponds to a time savings of 40 minutes at 235°C. That is, in order to reach the same oxidized density as the prestabilized/oxidized fiber, the precursor fiber would have to be oxidized for 160 minutes at 235°C instead of stabilized/oxidized for a total of 120 minutes at 235°C.
  • Another way to monitor the reaction characteristics of an acrylic based precursor is to follow the tension that is generated as the fiber rearranges and oxidizes at elevated temperatures. Tension vs time data were generated for AB and DuPont precursors and prestabilized fibers to further clarify changes in oxidation reaction characteristics that are caused by prestabilization in an inert atmosphere.
  • Figure 13 shows load/time data for AB precursor in air at 235°C, N2 at 235°C, and for AB prestabilized for varying amounts of time and then run in air at 235°C. Comparing the samples run in air and N2 (no stabilization), both samples show the characteristic drop in tension initially followed by a tension increase as the fiber begins to react. The tension increase due to the shrinkage of the sample run in N2 is significantly less than in air, the difference presumably being due to the added shrinkage of the oxidation reactions occurring in air.
  • The prestabilized fibers show a sudden increase in tension when run in air possibly indicating an initial increase in the degree of reactivity. The load build up quickly levels out for the 60 minute prestabilized fiber, followed by 30 minute, and 5 minute which has a final load after 60 minutes, similar to AB Precursor. These lower oxidation loads could be due to a lower overall oxidation reactivity for the prestabilized fibers that would agree with DTA results showing lower than expected residual heats of reaction in air after prestabilization.
  • The results for the DuPont T-42 type fiber are shown in Figure 14. This fiber is characteristically slower to react than AB as evidenced by the slow load buildup for the AB 10 Precursor. After prestabilization, the shrinkage characteristics of the fiber are greatly altered. The tension increase with time, while not as great as for AB Precursor, is similar in shape, indicating the fiber may oxidize more readily after prestabilization. As with the prestabilized AB Precursor samples, the T-42 type fibers show a rapid initial increase in tension (the greater the degree of prestabilization, the greater the rate of tension buildup). After 60 minutes, the more highly prestabilized fiber has a lower load buildup than the other prestabilized fiber (similar to AB results) but both samples are significantly higher than the baseline indicating the prestabilization (even after as little as five minutes) results in an increase in oxidation reaction rate, but may reduce the number of sites available for reaction. These results indicate that prestabilization can be used to make certain precursor fibers more reactive while also increasing the safety of the process by reducing the oxidation exotherm.
  • Another interesting finding from these experiments is that prestabilization changes fiber reactively sufficiently to cause a subsequent reaction in air at room temperature.
  • A set of AB fibers were stabilized in N2 at 250°C for times ranging from 5 minutes to 6 hours. In each case, the sample was then divided in half, with half placed in an inert atmosphere and the other half stored in air, both at room temperature. In all cases, the sample in air continued to change color and slowly darken while the sample in N2 remained golden brown. It was found that this reaction could be suspended by placing the partially darkened sample in N2 and then reinitiated by exposing again to air. The fibers exposed to air after prestabilization were able to oxidize at room temperature. If oxidation type reactions were indeed occurring, it would be expected that the residual heat of reaction would decrease with increasing time of exposure to air at room temperature. A series of experiments was performed to determine if this was indeed the case. In one set of experiments, a length of AB Precursor was stabilized in N2 for 2 hours at 250°C; the fiber was divided in half with half exposed to room-temperature air for 3 hours and the other half exposed to air for 24 hours. The samples were then restored in N2 and submitted for thermal analysis. In all cases, the thermal lab was careful to run the samples as quickly as possible after the N2 seal was broken. In the second experiment, a sample of AB Precursor was stabilized for 16 hours at 250°C in N2 and then divided with parts exposed for 0 hours, 1 hour, 3 hours, and 24 hours in air. Samples were then restored in N2 and thermally analyzed. The results are shown in Table 3 below: TABLE 3
    CHANGE IN Hair OF STABILIZED FIBERS AFTER VARYING AMOUNTS OF EXPOSURE TIME IN AIR
    Stabilization Conditions in N2 Air Exposure Time at Room Temperature (hr) H air
    2 hours at 250°C 3 684
    2 hours at 250°C 24 624
    16 hours at 250°C 0 678
    16 hours at 250°C 1 652
    16 hours at 250°C 3 605
    16 hours at 250°C 24 548
  • For both sets of these experiments, the heat of reaction decreased with time of exposure in air, indicating a reaction occurring at room temperature which is responsible for the color change we had noted. A stabilized fiber was also run to determine if free radicals are present, which might be initiating the reaction at room temperature in air. The results indicated the presence of some free radical activity, which is as yet unidentified.
    1 g/den = 0.883 cN/dtex

Claims (6)

  1. A process for manufacturing carbon fiber in which a polyacrylonitrile polymer in the form of a multitude of filaments is heated in an oxygen-containing atmosphere to form a stabilized and oxidized precursor that is then carbonized in an atmosphere substantially free of oxygen or a vacuum, is characterized in that the polyacrylonitrile filaments are heated in an atmosphere that is substantially free of oxygen or a vacuum until the reduction in residual heat of reaction as measured by differential scanning calorimetry is from 10% to 35% to form a thermally stabilized carbon fiber precursor prior to the step of heating the filaments in an oxygen-containing atmosphere to oxidize the thermally-stabilized precursor.
  2. A process for manufacturing carbon fiber as claimed in claim 1, further characterized in that the temperature to which the polyacrylonitrile filaments are heated in an atmosphere that is substantially free of oxygen or a vacuum is preferably at least 230°.
  3. A process for manufacturing carbon fiber as claimed in claim 1, further characterized in that the atmosphere that is substantially free of oxygen is nitrogen.
  4. A process for manufacturing carbon fiber as claimed in any of the preceding claims, further characterized in that the filaments are heated until the reduction in residual heat of reaction is about 20%.
  5. A process for manufacturing carbon fiber as claimed in any of the preceding claims, further characterized in that the thermally stabilized carbon fiber precursor in the form of a tow is heated in an oxygen-containing atmosphere at a temperature from 150°C to 300°C for a time sufficient to allow the tow to be self supporting.
  6. A process for manufacturing carbon fiber as claimed in any of the preceding claims, further characterized in that the polyacrylonitrile filaments in the form of a band of closely spaced tows are moved in an atmosphere that is substantially free of oxygen or a vacuum through an oven maintained at a first range of temperatures to heat the filaments to form a thermally stabilized carbon fiber precursor and then are moved at a higher line speed in an oxygen-containing atmosphere through an oven maintained at a second range of temperatures to oxidize the thermally-stabilized precursor.
EP90102972A 1989-02-23 1990-02-15 Thermally stabilized polyacrylonitrile polymer fibers for carbon fiber manufacture Expired - Lifetime EP0384299B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US31453889A 1989-02-23 1989-02-23
US314538 1989-02-23

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0384299A2 EP0384299A2 (en) 1990-08-29
EP0384299A3 EP0384299A3 (en) 1991-11-06
EP0384299B1 true EP0384299B1 (en) 1997-11-12

Family

ID=23220353

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP90102972A Expired - Lifetime EP0384299B1 (en) 1989-02-23 1990-02-15 Thermally stabilized polyacrylonitrile polymer fibers for carbon fiber manufacture

Country Status (7)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0384299B1 (en)
JP (1) JPH038812A (en)
KR (1) KR0147849B1 (en)
CA (1) CA2009546C (en)
DE (1) DE69031690T2 (en)
ES (1) ES2109224T3 (en)
IL (1) IL93475A (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2147776A1 (en) 2008-07-23 2010-01-27 SGL Carbon SE Method for manufacturing a compound material reinforced with fibre netting and compound material reinforced with fibre netting and its application
CN101922065A (en) * 2010-09-16 2010-12-22 中国科学院西安光学精密机械研究所 Method for pre-oxidizing polyacrylonitrile-based carbon fiber precursors
WO2011067390A1 (en) 2009-12-04 2011-06-09 Sgl Carbon Se Production of a 3d textile structure and semi-finished fiber product made of fiber composites

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5256344A (en) * 1989-02-23 1993-10-26 Hercules Incorporated Process of thermally stabilizing pan fibers
DE19517911A1 (en) * 1995-05-16 1996-11-21 Sgl Technik Gmbh Process for converting multi-dimensional sheet-like structures consisting of polyacrylonitrile fibers into the thermally stabilized state
JP7268285B2 (en) * 2017-10-10 2023-05-08 ディーキン ユニバーシティ Reactor, Apparatus and System for Prestabilizing Polyacrylonitrile (PAN) Precursors Used in Carbon Fiber Production
AU2017435381B2 (en) * 2017-10-10 2022-11-10 Deakin University Precursor stabilisation process
CN112708967B (en) * 2019-10-24 2022-10-11 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Pre-oxidation method of polyacrylonitrile-based fiber and preparation method of carbon fiber

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB1245123A (en) * 1968-06-04 1971-09-08 Rolls Royce A method of manufacturing carbon fibres
US3961888A (en) * 1968-09-18 1976-06-08 Celanese Corporation Acrylic fiber conversion utilizing a stabilization treatment conducted initially in an essentially inert atmosphere
US3775520A (en) * 1970-03-09 1973-11-27 Celanese Corp Carbonization/graphitization of poly-acrylonitrile fibers containing residual spinning solvent

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2147776A1 (en) 2008-07-23 2010-01-27 SGL Carbon SE Method for manufacturing a compound material reinforced with fibre netting and compound material reinforced with fibre netting and its application
WO2011067390A1 (en) 2009-12-04 2011-06-09 Sgl Carbon Se Production of a 3d textile structure and semi-finished fiber product made of fiber composites
DE102009047491A1 (en) 2009-12-04 2011-06-09 Sgl Carbon Se Production of a 3D textile structure and semifinished fiber products from fiber composites
CN101922065A (en) * 2010-09-16 2010-12-22 中国科学院西安光学精密机械研究所 Method for pre-oxidizing polyacrylonitrile-based carbon fiber precursors
CN101922065B (en) * 2010-09-16 2011-12-07 中国科学院西安光学精密机械研究所 Method for pre-oxidizing polyacrylonitrile-based carbon fiber precursors

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CA2009546C (en) 1996-05-28
IL93475A0 (en) 1990-11-29
EP0384299A3 (en) 1991-11-06
JPH038812A (en) 1991-01-16
ES2109224T3 (en) 1998-01-16
KR0147849B1 (en) 1998-08-01
KR900013120A (en) 1990-09-03
IL93475A (en) 1992-08-18
CA2009546A1 (en) 1990-08-23
DE69031690D1 (en) 1997-12-18
EP0384299A2 (en) 1990-08-29
DE69031690T2 (en) 1998-03-12

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Rahaman et al. A review of heat treatment on polyacrylonitrile fiber
US3392216A (en) Method for producing carbon structures from molten baked substances
EP0384299B1 (en) Thermally stabilized polyacrylonitrile polymer fibers for carbon fiber manufacture
US5256344A (en) Process of thermally stabilizing pan fibers
US3528774A (en) Formation of high modulus,high strength graphite yarns
GB2111524A (en) Starting pitches for carbon fibers
EP0486730A1 (en) Improved process for making mesophase pitch
US4474617A (en) Pitch for carbon fibers
JPS58136838A (en) Production of high-performance carbon fiber
EP0364244A1 (en) Improved process for the production of mesophase pitch
US4009991A (en) Process for producing carbon fibers
EP0402107A2 (en) Method for the preparation of carbon fibers
JPS6131157B2 (en)
GB2170491A (en) Method of producing graphite fiber and product thereof
JPH0150275B2 (en)
US4859381A (en) Process for preparing pitch-type carbon fibers
KR960005971B1 (en) Method for the preparation of carbon fiber
KR19990012606A (en) Manufacturing Method of High Softening Point Optical Isotropic Pitch
US4859382A (en) Process for preparing carbon fibers elliptical in section
Kalashnik The role of different factors in creation of the structure of stabilized acrylic fibres
EP0508318B1 (en) Process for producing optically isotropic pitch
US4490239A (en) Pitch for carbon fibers
US5643547A (en) Process for producing carbon fibers
JPS6278220A (en) Production of ribbon-like carbon fiber
KR920000199B1 (en) Process for producing liquid crystal pitch having anisotropy

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): DE ES FR GB

PUAL Search report despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): DE ES FR GB

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19920409

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19941124

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: HEXCEL CORPORATION

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): DE ES FR GB

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69031690

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19971218

ET Fr: translation filed
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2109224

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20000222

Year of fee payment: 11

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20010216

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: IF02

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20020212

Year of fee payment: 13

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20020213

Year of fee payment: 13

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20020227

Year of fee payment: 13

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20020916

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20030215

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20030902

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20031031

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST