EP0251621A2 - Fountain solutions and printing processes utilising them - Google Patents

Fountain solutions and printing processes utilising them Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0251621A2
EP0251621A2 EP87305517A EP87305517A EP0251621A2 EP 0251621 A2 EP0251621 A2 EP 0251621A2 EP 87305517 A EP87305517 A EP 87305517A EP 87305517 A EP87305517 A EP 87305517A EP 0251621 A2 EP0251621 A2 EP 0251621A2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
fountain solution
hydrotrope
composition according
surfactant
fountain
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP87305517A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0251621A3 (en
EP0251621B1 (en
EP0251621B2 (en
Inventor
Robert Bassemir
Ramasamy Krishnan
Arthur Lowell
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Sun Chemical Corp
Original Assignee
Sun Chemical Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=25377830&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP0251621(A2) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Sun Chemical Corp filed Critical Sun Chemical Corp
Priority to AT87305517T priority Critical patent/ATE72637T1/en
Publication of EP0251621A2 publication Critical patent/EP0251621A2/en
Publication of EP0251621A3 publication Critical patent/EP0251621A3/en
Publication of EP0251621B1 publication Critical patent/EP0251621B1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0251621B2 publication Critical patent/EP0251621B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B41PRINTING; LINING MACHINES; TYPEWRITERS; STAMPS
    • B41NPRINTING PLATES OR FOILS; MATERIALS FOR SURFACES USED IN PRINTING MACHINES FOR PRINTING, INKING, DAMPING, OR THE LIKE; PREPARING SUCH SURFACES FOR USE AND CONSERVING THEM
    • B41N3/00Preparing for use and conserving printing surfaces
    • B41N3/08Damping; Neutralising or similar differentiation treatments for lithographic printing formes; Gumming or finishing solutions, fountain solutions, correction or deletion fluids, or on-press development

Definitions

  • This invention relates to fountain solutions, more specifically to fountain solutions which contain or are used with alcohol substitutes.
  • the offset lithographic printing process employs planographic plates which transfer ink to a blanket roll which, in turn, then transfers the ink to a substrate thereby forming the printed images.
  • the plates are referred to as planographic since the image and non-image areas are in the same plane.
  • the plates are constructed so that with proper treatment the images are hydrophobic and oleophilic and thereby receptive to inks.
  • the non-image areas are hydrophilic and are water receptive. In order to maintain the hydrophilic characteristics on the non-image areas, and to prevent ink from accumulating on the non-image areas, it is necessary to continuously treat the plate with a water based fountain solution.
  • the aqueous fountain solution is used to maintain the non-image areas of a lithographic printing plate insensitive to ink. While an offset printing press is running, fountain solution is continuously applied to the printing plate just before the application of the printing ink, or as a water in ink emulsion.
  • the fountain solution has an affinity for the non-image, hydrophilic areas of the plate and immediately wets these areas. A complete and uniform film of fountain solution prevents the subsequent application of ink from covering the plate in the non-­image areas.
  • the fountain solution and ink on the plate are then both transferred to the blanket and then to the printing substrate and the process begins again.
  • Lithographic printing plates are developed to expose metal surface in the non-image areas while image areas are left coated with a hydrophobic polymer.
  • fountain solutions which contain highly polar liquids which will wet and coat the exposed metal surface of the non-image area of the plate. Plain water may temporarily perform fairly well, although various aqueous electrolytes, surfactants and water soluble polymers are generally required for good continuous performance. These additives promote plate wetting and fountain solution uniformity, as well as controlling the interaction of the fountain solution with the ink and the substrate.
  • Acid fountain solutions are the most widely used in commercial printing. Alkaline fountain solutions are primarily used for newspaper printing. While there is a trend toward more neutral pH fountain solutions, acidic solutions continue to be widely used because of the proven effectiveness of gum arabic, a water soluble polymer. Gum arabic is a protective colloid that desensitizes the non-image areas of the plate. Since gum arabic is best solubilized and most effective under acidic conditions, acidic fountain solutions continue to be preferred.
  • the conventional fountain solution distribution system includes a ductor roller which has intermittent or interrupted flow of the fountain solution from the reservoir to the dampening form rollers that contact the printing plate.
  • these conventional dampening systems use paper or molleton (cloth) covered rollers or specially treated rollers in the dampening system roller train to act as intermediate fountain solution reservoirs.
  • brushes can flick droplets of water onto form rollers or directly onto the plate or nozzles can similarly spray a fine-mist.
  • a growing number of lithographic presses are equipped with a continuous feed dampening system sold by Dahlgren Mfg. Co., Dallas, TX, under the tradename Dahlgren.
  • Other dampening systems of the direct continuous type include the system sold by Miehle-­Gross-Dexter, Chicago, IL, under the trademark Miehlematic, and by Harris Corp., Cleveland, OH, under the trademarks Duo-Trol and Microflow and by Miller Western Mfg. Co., Pittsburgh, PA, under the trademark Millermatic.
  • the printing plate is contacted only by inked rollers, that is, the fountain solution must be carried from the dampening unit rollers by means of one or more inked rollers, usually one of the form rollers, to the printing plate.
  • This type of system requires the assistance of a water transport additive such as a water soluble glycol as disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 3,625,715 or an alcohol such as disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 3,168,037, with isopropyl alcohol being almost universally used.
  • the excellent and more independent control of ink and water delivery to the printing plate accounts for the ever increasing use of this type of dampening system in lithographic printing. This, in turn, accounts for the extensive use of isopropyl alcohol in Dahlgren continuous dampening systems.
  • the fountain solution will contain between about 10 to 30 percent isopropyl alcohol depending upon the specific press, speed, type of form and substrate being printed. The use of isopropyl alcohol is the best compromise between good press and printing performance and cost of the fountain solution.
  • Another variety of a continuous contact dampening system is the Millermatic type wherein the fountain solution is applied to the printing plate by means of a dampener form roller that is not part of the inking system. With such an arrangement it would be expected that isopropyl alcohol would not be required because the inked form roller is not used to distribute the aqueous fountain solution. Because, however, of the excellent ink and water balance control, it is also common to use isopropyl alcohol as a constituent in the dampening solution used with the Millermatic type of dampener.
  • the typical fountain solution is made up from a fountain solution concentrate, water and an alcohol or alcohol substitute.
  • the fountain solution concentrate generally includes buffering salts, protective colloids, i.e. water-soluble resins or gums such as gum arabic or cellulose gum and frequently a surfactant (wetting agent).
  • the preferred fountain solutions are generally acidic and include acidic components such as phosphoric or citric acid to maintain a pH value between about 3.5 and 5.5, although neutral and basic fountain solutions are also useful.
  • Alcohol (isopropanol) and alcohol substitutes are commonly added to fountain solutions. These additions are required with certain types of continuous dampening systems (Dahlgren, Duo-Trol, Miehlematic, etc.). Even with conventional systems, smaller amounts of alcohol have proven to be beneficial. Generally speaking, alcohol will make a borderline dampening solution work better by solubilizing the surfactant and lowering the surface tension of the water, thereby increasing the wetting action of the dampening solution. Also, it minimizes the fountain solution use while maintaining moisture on the plate surface. Reduced water pickup makes it easier for the pressman to maintain the correct ink/water balance. Also, the rapid evaporation of the alcohol from the film of fountain solution on the blanket and printed sheet helps to minimize the paper's tendency to curl. Generally about 10 to 30% of a fountain solution can be isopropanol.
  • Patent 4,278,467 discloses an isopropyl alcohol-free fountain solution which includes an additive having a surface tension less than about 50 dynes/cm such as n-hexoxydiethylene glycol (n-hexyl cellosolve), n-hexoxydiethylene glycol (n-hexyl carbitol), 2-ethyl-1,3-hexanediol, n-butoxyethylene glycolacetate, n-butoxydiethylene-­ glycolacetate, 3-butoxy-2-propanol and mixtures thereof.
  • U.S. Patent 4,560,410 discloses a fountain solution containing a mixture of a polyol and/or glycol ether partially soluble in water with a polyol and/or glycol ether completely soluble in water.
  • fountain solutions contain alcohol and alcohol substitutes to dissolve surfactants in an aqueous system. It would be desirable to be able to dissolve surfactants in an aqueous system while eliminating or reducing alcohol or alcohol substitutes to avoid the environmental problems they cause as well as the lithographic problems caused by their evaporation.
  • this invention involves the use of a hydrotrope to increase the solubility of a surfactant in an aqueous fountain solution or fountain solution concentrate.
  • the hydrotrope is added to an aqueous fountain solution or fountain solution concentrate containing a surfactant.
  • the use of alcohol or alcohol substitutes can be eliminated or reduced and if used in combination with an alcohol substitute system, performance and effectiveness of the fountain solution can be enhanced.
  • the hydrotrope is a salt of a hard acid-soft base or soft acid-hard base and is an electrolyte generally with an inorganic and an organic ion. Descriptions of hard and soft acids and bases are contained in Survey Of Progress In Chemistry (edited by A. Scott, Academic Press, Vol 5, 1969, pp. 1-52).
  • the action of the hydrotrope is to assist in the solubilization of an insoluble phase (i.e. a surfactant) in a second phase (i.e. water).
  • the hydrotropes selected in addition do not increase the hydrophilic-lypophilic balance (HLB Value) of the fountain solution which would interfere with the lithographic printing process.
  • Suitable hydrotropes include, but are not limited to, sodium toluene sulfonate, sodium xylene sulfonate, sodium cumene sulfonate, ammonium xylene sulfonate, tetrabutyl ammonium bromide, cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide and sodium thiocyanate. Mixtures of hydrotropes may also be used.
  • the hydrotrope is used in an amount effective to increase the solubility of the surfactant, preferably to maintain the surfactant dissolved in the fountain solution and fountain solution concentrate.
  • amount of hydrotrope to surfactant is within the range of 1:1 to 10:1 by weight, preferably 4:1 to 6:1 by weight.
  • hydrotrope to increase the solubility of a surfactant reduces the dynamic surface tension of the fountain solution, thus enhancing its performance during lithographic printing.
  • an effective amount of hydrotrope will reduce the dynamic surface tension of the fountain solution by at least 5 dynes/cm, preferably at least 10 dynes/cm, as measured at a surface age of 200 milliseconds with a Sensadyne (TM) Surface Tensiometer 5000 manufactured by Chem-Dyne Research Corporation, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
  • the resultant fountain solution will generally have a dynamic surface tension of less than 40 dynes/cm, preferably 28 to 35 dynes/cm, as measured above.
  • Common commercial dampening solutions containing alcohol replacements generally have dynamic surface tensions in the range of from greater than 35 to 65 dynes/cm, as measured above.
  • the fountain solution or fountain solution concentrate contains surfactants or wetting agents which are added in amounts effective to lower the surface tension and to control emulsification ability and capacity thus making the fountain solution more efficient in dampening the lithographic plate.
  • surfactants or wetting agents which are added in amounts effective to lower the surface tension and to control emulsification ability and capacity thus making the fountain solution more efficient in dampening the lithographic plate.
  • a wide range of surfactants can be used, even surfactants which were previously unsuitable because of their low solubility in aqueous fountain solutions.
  • Suitable surfactants include non-ionic and/or ionic surfactants such block copolymers, alkyl phosphates, ethoxylated alcohols, fatty acids, amines, amides, fatty esters, alkanol amides, glycol esters, sorbitan fatty acid esters, ethoxylated alkyl phenols and ethoxylated acetylenic glycols, as well as mixtures thereof.
  • the amount of surfactant will range from 0.05 to 20% by weight of the fountain solution concentrate and from 0.001 to 1% by weight of the fountain solution.
  • the fountain solution or fountain solution concentrate generally contains several other ingredients. These can include protective colloids, i.e. water-soluble polymers, in particular water-­soluble gums which contain carboxyl and hydroxyl groups. Gum arabic is the oldest and most widely used polymer and is typically added as a 14° Baume' solution. Carboxymethyl cellulose, hydroxyethyl cellulose as well as styrene maleic anhydride copolymers, polyvinyl, pyrrolidone, and the like, may also be used. These polymers are generally used to protect the non-image areas of a plate from contamination from ink and to maintain the area hydrophilic. In general, the amount of protective colloid will range from 5 to 25% by weight of the fountain solution concentrate and 0.1 to 2% by weight of the fountain solution. The protective colloids are generally added to acidic fountain solutions.
  • protective colloids i.e. water-soluble polymers, in particular water-­soluble gums which contain carboxyl and hydroxyl groups. Gum arabic is the oldest and
  • the fountain solution or fountain solution concentrate can also contain buffering salts effective to maintain a desired pH.
  • the fountain solutions are preferably used as aqueous acidic solutions having a pH of about 3.5 to 5.5.
  • Phosphoric acid is a preferred acid for use in acidifying the formulation.
  • Other acids which can be used include inorganic as well as organic acids, such as acetic acid, nitric acid, hydrochloric acid, citric acid and the like.
  • the buffering salts can include ammonium acetate, magnesium nitrate, zinc nitrate, sodium sulfate and disodium hydrogen phosphate.
  • the fountain solution can also be neutral or alkaline as desired and contain suitable buffering salts to maintain a desired pH such as sodium hydrogen phthalate, potassium hydrogen phosphate and sodium or potassium silicates.
  • additives which may be used in the fountain solution or fountain solution concentrate include preservatives such as dimethoxane, phenol, sodium salicylate, and the like; corrosion inhibitors such as ammonium bichromite, magnesium nitrate and the like; anti-foaming agents; and dyes, as well as other additives which are common in the art.
  • the fountain solution or fountain solution concentrate can also contain an alcohol or alcohol substitute. While an alcohol such as isopropanol or alcohol substitutes can be used, the hydrotrope in combination with the surfactant reduces the dynamic surface tension sufficiently to be able to reduce or eliminate their use.
  • alcohol comprises less than 5% by volume of the fountain solution.
  • the addition of hydrotrope increases the efficiency of fountain solutions containing alcohol substitutes and also eliminates precipitation problems allowing the use of one step formulations which contain alcohol substitutes.
  • alcohol replacements can comprise up to 75% by volume of a fountain solution concentrate and up to 10% by volume of a fountain solution. Typical alcohol replacements include 2-butoxy ethanol, n-hexoxyethanol, ethylene glycol, 2-ethyl-1,3-hexanediol and mixtures thereof.
  • the fountain solution contains 1 to 10% by volume of the fountain solution concentrate (or etch).
  • the fountain solution concentrate is diluted with water, with additional dilution with an alcohol or alcohol replacement if desired to obtain the fountain solution which is ready for lithographic printing.
  • hydrotrope to the fountain solution resulting in increased solubility of the surfactant and a reduction in the dynamic surface tension at press speeds has resulted in a number of major advantages including a wider latitude with regards to the amount of water use (i.e. wider water balance) and the ability to greatly reduce the water usage.
  • advantages which have been observed include faster clean-up of the lithographic plates, reduced and more easily removed pilings on the non-image area of the blanket and cleaner fountain solution sumps due to reduced ink feedback.
  • a fountain solution concentrate was prepared containing 77% by weight water, 11% by weight gum arabic, 7% by weight magnesium nitrate, 1.4% by weight citric acid, 1.3% by weight phosphoric acid (85% solution), 1.2% by weight disodium hydrogen phosphate and 0.25% by weight block copolymer of ethylene oxide/propylene oxide plus 0.2% by weight preservatives and anti-foaming agents.
  • the dynamic surface tension of the diluted fountain solution containing hydrotrope was 29.5 dynes/cm at a surface renewal rate of 200 milliseconds as measured with a Sensadyne Surface Tensiometer 5000. Without the addition of hydrotrope, the fountain solution had a dynamic surface tension of 35 dynes/cm, as measured above, despite the fact that the hydrotrope is not surface active.
  • the addition to the fountain solution of 2 1/2 oz./gallon of hydrotrope (an aqueous solution containing 42% by weight of equal amounts of sodium cumene sulfonate, sodium toluene sulfonate and ammonium xylene sulfonate) provided a fountain solution which ran with a water balance of 5 notches (90-95) and catchup at 90 notches indicating the press could run.
  • the fountain solution, containing hydrotrope had a dynamic surface tension of 32 dynes/cm., as measured above.
  • a solvent-free fountain solution was prepared containing 2 1/2 oz./gallon of the fountain solution concentrate of Example 1 and 4 oz./gallon of an aqueous solution containing 38.6% by weight ammonium xylene sulfonate, 4.5% by weight 3,5-dimethyl-1-hexyn-3-ol and 3.5% by weight of 2,4,7,9-tetramethyl-5-decyne-4,7-diol and 53.4% by weight water.
  • the water balance was 75-85 notches with catchup at 70 on a Dahlgren dampening system.
  • the dynamic surface tension was 30.5 dynes/cm., as measured above.
  • a fountain solution concentrate was prepared containing 90% by weight of sodium toluene sulfonate (42% by weight aqueous solution) and 10% by weight 2,4,7,9-tetramethyl-5-decyne-4,7-diol.
  • a fountain solution containing 3 oz./gallon of the concentrate was run on a Chambon Press using a Dahlgren type dampening system. Inks of the various colors (cyan, magenta, yellow and black) all ran well on the lithographic press.
  • the dynamic surface tension of the fountain solution was 31 dynes/cm as measured above.

Abstract

A hydrotrope is added to an aqueous fountain solution or fountain solution concentrate containing a surfactant in order to increase the solubility of the surfactant.

Description

  • This invention relates to fountain solutions, more specifically to fountain solutions which contain or are used with alcohol substitutes.
  • The offset lithographic printing process employs planographic plates which transfer ink to a blanket roll which, in turn, then transfers the ink to a substrate thereby forming the printed images. The plates are referred to as planographic since the image and non-image areas are in the same plane. The plates are constructed so that with proper treatment the images are hydrophobic and oleophilic and thereby receptive to inks. The non-image areas are hydrophilic and are water receptive. In order to maintain the hydrophilic characteristics on the non-image areas, and to prevent ink from accumulating on the non-image areas, it is necessary to continuously treat the plate with a water based fountain solution.
  • The aqueous fountain solution is used to maintain the non-image areas of a lithographic printing plate insensitive to ink. While an offset printing press is running, fountain solution is continuously applied to the printing plate just before the application of the printing ink, or as a water in ink emulsion. The fountain solution has an affinity for the non-image, hydrophilic areas of the plate and immediately wets these areas. A complete and uniform film of fountain solution prevents the subsequent application of ink from covering the plate in the non-­image areas. The fountain solution and ink on the plate are then both transferred to the blanket and then to the printing substrate and the process begins again.
  • Lithographic printing plates are developed to expose metal surface in the non-image areas while image areas are left coated with a hydrophobic polymer. There are many fountain solutions which contain highly polar liquids which will wet and coat the exposed metal surface of the non-image area of the plate. Plain water may temporarily perform fairly well, although various aqueous electrolytes, surfactants and water soluble polymers are generally required for good continuous performance. These additives promote plate wetting and fountain solution uniformity, as well as controlling the interaction of the fountain solution with the ink and the substrate.
  • Acid fountain solutions are the most widely used in commercial printing. Alkaline fountain solutions are primarily used for newspaper printing. While there is a trend toward more neutral pH fountain solutions, acidic solutions continue to be widely used because of the proven effectiveness of gum arabic, a water soluble polymer. Gum arabic is a protective colloid that desensitizes the non-image areas of the plate. Since gum arabic is best solubilized and most effective under acidic conditions, acidic fountain solutions continue to be preferred.
  • Many lithographic presses have a fountain solution distribution system that is separate from the ink distribution system. Generally, the conventional fountain solution distribution system includes a ductor roller which has intermittent or interrupted flow of the fountain solution from the reservoir to the dampening form rollers that contact the printing plate. Often these conventional dampening systems use paper or molleton (cloth) covered rollers or specially treated rollers in the dampening system roller train to act as intermediate fountain solution reservoirs. Alternately brushes can flick droplets of water onto form rollers or directly onto the plate or nozzles can similarly spray a fine-mist.
  • A growing number of lithographic presses are equipped with a continuous feed dampening system sold by Dahlgren Mfg. Co., Dallas, TX, under the tradename Dahlgren. Other dampening systems of the direct continuous type include the system sold by Miehle-­Gross-Dexter, Chicago, IL, under the trademark Miehlematic, and by Harris Corp., Cleveland, OH, under the trademarks Duo-Trol and Microflow and by Miller Western Mfg. Co., Pittsburgh, PA, under the trademark Millermatic.
  • In the Dahlgren system, the printing plate is contacted only by inked rollers, that is, the fountain solution must be carried from the dampening unit rollers by means of one or more inked rollers, usually one of the form rollers, to the printing plate. This type of system requires the assistance of a water transport additive such as a water soluble glycol as disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 3,625,715 or an alcohol such as disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 3,168,037, with isopropyl alcohol being almost universally used. The excellent and more independent control of ink and water delivery to the printing plate accounts for the ever increasing use of this type of dampening system in lithographic printing. This, in turn, accounts for the extensive use of isopropyl alcohol in Dahlgren continuous dampening systems. Typically, the fountain solution will contain between about 10 to 30 percent isopropyl alcohol depending upon the specific press, speed, type of form and substrate being printed. The use of isopropyl alcohol is the best compromise between good press and printing performance and cost of the fountain solution.
  • Another variety of a continuous contact dampening system is the Millermatic type wherein the fountain solution is applied to the printing plate by means of a dampener form roller that is not part of the inking system. With such an arrangement it would be expected that isopropyl alcohol would not be required because the inked form roller is not used to distribute the aqueous fountain solution. Because, however, of the excellent ink and water balance control, it is also common to use isopropyl alcohol as a constituent in the dampening solution used with the Millermatic type of dampener.
  • The typical fountain solution is made up from a fountain solution concentrate, water and an alcohol or alcohol substitute. The fountain solution concentrate generally includes buffering salts, protective colloids, i.e. water-soluble resins or gums such as gum arabic or cellulose gum and frequently a surfactant (wetting agent). The preferred fountain solutions are generally acidic and include acidic components such as phosphoric or citric acid to maintain a pH value between about 3.5 and 5.5, although neutral and basic fountain solutions are also useful.
  • Alcohol (isopropanol) and alcohol substitutes are commonly added to fountain solutions. These additions are required with certain types of continuous dampening systems (Dahlgren, Duo-Trol, Miehlematic, etc.). Even with conventional systems, smaller amounts of alcohol have proven to be beneficial. Generally speaking, alcohol will make a borderline dampening solution work better by solubilizing the surfactant and lowering the surface tension of the water, thereby increasing the wetting action of the dampening solution. Also, it minimizes the fountain solution use while maintaining moisture on the plate surface. Reduced water pickup makes it easier for the pressman to maintain the correct ink/water balance. Also, the rapid evaporation of the alcohol from the film of fountain solution on the blanket and printed sheet helps to minimize the paper's tendency to curl. Generally about 10 to 30% of a fountain solution can be isopropanol.
  • Environmental concerns about press room emissions as well as the cost of alcohol have led to the use of alcohol substitutes. These can perform some, but generally not all, of the functions of isopropanol. Because of these concerns for isopropyl alcohol, a number of materials have been suggested as replacements in fountain solutions. Additives such as 2-butoxy ethanol and ethylene glycol have been used as substitutes for isopropyl alcohol. U.S. Patent 3,877,372 discloses a fountain solution which includes 2-butoxy ethanol and at least one of hexylene glycol and ethylene glycol, a silicone glycol copolymer and a defoamer type surfactant. U.S. Patent 4,278,467 discloses an isopropyl alcohol-free fountain solution which includes an additive having a surface tension less than about 50 dynes/cm such as n-hexoxydiethylene glycol (n-hexyl cellosolve), n-hexoxydiethylene glycol (n-hexyl carbitol), 2-ethyl-1,3-hexanediol, n-butoxyethylene glycolacetate, n-butoxydiethylene-­ glycolacetate, 3-butoxy-2-propanol and mixtures thereof. U.S. Patent 4,560,410 discloses a fountain solution containing a mixture of a polyol and/or glycol ether partially soluble in water with a polyol and/or glycol ether completely soluble in water.
  • The use of higher boiling solvents such as glycols, glycol ethers and glycol ether acetates as alcohol substitutes in fountain solutions has resulted in a higher dynamic surface tension because of the limited solubility of the surfactants in these systems. The higher dynamic surface tension reduces the performance and effectiveness of the fountain solution due to decreased wetting action at press speeds. In addition certain fountain solution concentrate systems containing alcohol substitute systems cannot be supplied in a one step form because of precipitation of one or more components when mixed with the alcohol substitutes. This type of one-step fountain solution concentrate is desirable because of the simplicity of metering it on existing dilution equipment.
  • Further, fountain solutions contain alcohol and alcohol substitutes to dissolve surfactants in an aqueous system. It would be desirable to be able to dissolve surfactants in an aqueous system while eliminating or reducing alcohol or alcohol substitutes to avoid the environmental problems they cause as well as the lithographic problems caused by their evaporation.
  • Briefly, this invention involves the use of a hydrotrope to increase the solubility of a surfactant in an aqueous fountain solution or fountain solution concentrate. The hydrotrope is added to an aqueous fountain solution or fountain solution concentrate containing a surfactant. By this invention the use of alcohol or alcohol substitutes can be eliminated or reduced and if used in combination with an alcohol substitute system, performance and effectiveness of the fountain solution can be enhanced.
  • It has now been found that when a hydrotrope is added with a surfactant to a fountain solution or fountain solution concentrate, the solubility of the surfactant is increased thus lowering the dynamic surface tension and enhancing the wetting action and performance of the fountain solution during the lithographic printing process.
  • The hydrotrope is a salt of a hard acid-soft base or soft acid-hard base and is an electrolyte generally with an inorganic and an organic ion. Descriptions of hard and soft acids and bases are contained in Survey Of Progress In Chemistry (edited by A. Scott, Academic Press, Vol 5, 1969, pp. 1-52). The action of the hydrotrope is to assist in the solubilization of an insoluble phase (i.e. a surfactant) in a second phase (i.e. water). Preferably the hydrotropes selected in addition do not increase the hydrophilic-lypophilic balance (HLB Value) of the fountain solution which would interfere with the lithographic printing process. Suitable hydrotropes include, but are not limited to, sodium toluene sulfonate, sodium xylene sulfonate, sodium cumene sulfonate, ammonium xylene sulfonate, tetrabutyl ammonium bromide, cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide and sodium thiocyanate. Mixtures of hydrotropes may also be used.
  • The hydrotrope is used in an amount effective to increase the solubility of the surfactant, preferably to maintain the surfactant dissolved in the fountain solution and fountain solution concentrate. Generally the amount of hydrotrope to surfactant is within the range of 1:1 to 10:1 by weight, preferably 4:1 to 6:1 by weight.
  • The use of the hydrotrope to increase the solubility of a surfactant reduces the dynamic surface tension of the fountain solution, thus enhancing its performance during lithographic printing. In general the addition of an effective amount of hydrotrope will reduce the dynamic surface tension of the fountain solution by at least 5 dynes/cm, preferably at least 10 dynes/cm, as measured at a surface age of 200 milliseconds with a Sensadyne (™) Surface Tensiometer 5000 manufactured by Chem-Dyne Research Corporation, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. The resultant fountain solution will generally have a dynamic surface tension of less than 40 dynes/cm, preferably 28 to 35 dynes/cm, as measured above. Common commercial dampening solutions containing alcohol replacements generally have dynamic surface tensions in the range of from greater than 35 to 65 dynes/cm, as measured above.
  • The fountain solution or fountain solution concentrate contains surfactants or wetting agents which are added in amounts effective to lower the surface tension and to control emulsification ability and capacity thus making the fountain solution more efficient in dampening the lithographic plate. A wide range of surfactants can be used, even surfactants which were previously unsuitable because of their low solubility in aqueous fountain solutions. Suitable surfactants include non-ionic and/or ionic surfactants such block copolymers, alkyl phosphates, ethoxylated alcohols, fatty acids, amines, amides, fatty esters, alkanol amides, glycol esters, sorbitan fatty acid esters, ethoxylated alkyl phenols and ethoxylated acetylenic glycols, as well as mixtures thereof. In general, the amount of surfactant will range from 0.05 to 20% by weight of the fountain solution concentrate and from 0.001 to 1% by weight of the fountain solution.
  • The fountain solution or fountain solution concentrate generally contains several other ingredients. These can include protective colloids, i.e. water-soluble polymers, in particular water-­soluble gums which contain carboxyl and hydroxyl groups. Gum arabic is the oldest and most widely used polymer and is typically added as a 14° Baume' solution. Carboxymethyl cellulose, hydroxyethyl cellulose as well as styrene maleic anhydride copolymers, polyvinyl, pyrrolidone, and the like, may also be used. These polymers are generally used to protect the non-image areas of a plate from contamination from ink and to maintain the area hydrophilic. In general, the amount of protective colloid will range from 5 to 25% by weight of the fountain solution concentrate and 0.1 to 2% by weight of the fountain solution. The protective colloids are generally added to acidic fountain solutions.
  • The fountain solution or fountain solution concentrate can also contain buffering salts effective to maintain a desired pH. The fountain solutions are preferably used as aqueous acidic solutions having a pH of about 3.5 to 5.5. Phosphoric acid is a preferred acid for use in acidifying the formulation. Other acids which can be used include inorganic as well as organic acids, such as acetic acid, nitric acid, hydrochloric acid, citric acid and the like. The buffering salts can include ammonium acetate, magnesium nitrate, zinc nitrate, sodium sulfate and disodium hydrogen phosphate. The fountain solution can also be neutral or alkaline as desired and contain suitable buffering salts to maintain a desired pH such as sodium hydrogen phthalate, potassium hydrogen phosphate and sodium or potassium silicates.
  • Other additives which may be used in the fountain solution or fountain solution concentrate include preservatives such as dimethoxane, phenol, sodium salicylate, and the like; corrosion inhibitors such as ammonium bichromite, magnesium nitrate and the like; anti-foaming agents; and dyes, as well as other additives which are common in the art.
  • The fountain solution or fountain solution concentrate can also contain an alcohol or alcohol substitute. While an alcohol such as isopropanol or alcohol substitutes can be used, the hydrotrope in combination with the surfactant reduces the dynamic surface tension sufficiently to be able to reduce or eliminate their use. Preferably alcohol comprises less than 5% by volume of the fountain solution. Advantageously the addition of hydrotrope increases the efficiency of fountain solutions containing alcohol substitutes and also eliminates precipitation problems allowing the use of one step formulations which contain alcohol substitutes. Generally alcohol replacements can comprise up to 75% by volume of a fountain solution concentrate and up to 10% by volume of a fountain solution. Typical alcohol replacements include 2-butoxy ethanol, n-hexoxyethanol, ethylene glycol, 2-ethyl-1,3-hexanediol and mixtures thereof.
  • Typically, the fountain solution contains 1 to 10% by volume of the fountain solution concentrate (or etch). The fountain solution concentrate is diluted with water, with additional dilution with an alcohol or alcohol replacement if desired to obtain the fountain solution which is ready for lithographic printing.
  • The addition of hydrotrope to the fountain solution resulting in increased solubility of the surfactant and a reduction in the dynamic surface tension at press speeds has resulted in a number of major advantages including a wider latitude with regards to the amount of water use (i.e. wider water balance) and the ability to greatly reduce the water usage. In addition, other advantages which have been observed include faster clean-up of the lithographic plates, reduced and more easily removed pilings on the non-image area of the blanket and cleaner fountain solution sumps due to reduced ink feedback.
  • Example 1
  • The addition of a hydrotrope allows one to prepare a composite one step fountain solution concentrate without precipitation of solids occurring.
  • The following formulation was prepared. A fountain solution concentrate was prepared containing 77% by weight water, 11% by weight gum arabic, 7% by weight magnesium nitrate, 1.4% by weight citric acid, 1.3% by weight phosphoric acid (85% solution), 1.2% by weight disodium hydrogen phosphate and 0.25% by weight block copolymer of ethylene oxide/propylene oxide plus 0.2% by weight preservatives and anti-foaming agents. Upon addition of 2 1/2 oz. (74 ml.) of the concentrate to 4 oz. (118 ml.) of alcohol replacement (containing 34% by weight ethylene glycol, 58% by weight 2-butoxyethanol, 4.6% by weight 3,5-dimethyl-1-hexyn-­3-ol and 2.9% by weight 2,4,7,9-tetramethyl-5-decyne-­4,7-diol) added per gallon (3.8 l) of water a precipitate was formed. The further addition of 3 oz. (89 ml.) of ammonium xylene sulfonate (42% by weight solution in water) led to solution of the precipitate and a uniform product.
  • The dynamic surface tension of the diluted fountain solution containing hydrotrope was 29.5 dynes/cm at a surface renewal rate of 200 milliseconds as measured with a Sensadyne Surface Tensiometer 5000. Without the addition of hydrotrope, the fountain solution had a dynamic surface tension of 35 dynes/cm, as measured above, despite the fact that the hydrotrope is not surface active.
  • In a sheet fed press trial, using a Dahlgren dampening system the above fountain solution with hydrotrope ran with a water balance of 15 notches (70-85) with catchup at 65 notches. A 15 notches water balance is a wide water balance which allows efficient lithographic performance.
  • Example 2
  • Utilizing a 2-step process (i.e. dilute concentrate with water then add alcohol replacement) on a Miehle Press a fountain solution containing 2 1/2 oz./gallon of the fountain solution concentrate of Example 1 with 2 1/2 oz./gallon of the alcohol replacement of Example 1 did not run with any water control on a Dahlgren dampening unit indicating the ink would not lithograph with this fountain solution. This fountain solution had a dynamic surface tension of 39 dynes/cm as measured above.
  • The addition to the fountain solution of 2 1/2 oz./gallon of hydrotrope (an aqueous solution containing 42% by weight of equal amounts of sodium cumene sulfonate, sodium toluene sulfonate and ammonium xylene sulfonate) provided a fountain solution which ran with a water balance of 5 notches (90-95) and catchup at 90 notches indicating the press could run. The fountain solution, containing hydrotrope had a dynamic surface tension of 32 dynes/cm., as measured above.
  • Example 3
  • In a fountain solution containing 2 oz./gallon of the fountain solution concentrate of Example 1 and 5% by volume of the fountain solution of isopropanol, the addition of 4 oz./gallon of an aqueous solution containing by weight 8.3% 3,5-dimethyl-­1-hexyn-3-ol, 8.3% 2,4,7,9-tetramethyl-5-decyne-­4,7-diol, 17.5% sodium cumene sulfonate, 17.5% ammonium xylene sulfonate and 48.4% water gave a wide water balance of 65 notches to 85 notches with a dynamic surface tension of 28 dynes/cm., as measured above. Without the addition of hydrotropes the water balance was 80 to 90 notches with a dynamic surface tension of 31 dynes/cm., as measured above.
  • Example 4
  • A solvent-free fountain solution was prepared containing 2 1/2 oz./gallon of the fountain solution concentrate of Example 1 and 4 oz./gallon of an aqueous solution containing 38.6% by weight ammonium xylene sulfonate, 4.5% by weight 3,5-dimethyl-1-hexyn-3-ol and 3.5% by weight of 2,4,7,9-tetramethyl-5-decyne-4,7-diol and 53.4% by weight water.
  • The water balance was 75-85 notches with catchup at 70 on a Dahlgren dampening system. The dynamic surface tension was 30.5 dynes/cm., as measured above.
  • Example 5
  • A fountain solution concentrate was prepared containing 90% by weight of sodium toluene sulfonate (42% by weight aqueous solution) and 10% by weight 2,4,7,9-tetramethyl-5-decyne-4,7-diol. A fountain solution containing 3 oz./gallon of the concentrate was run on a Chambon Press using a Dahlgren type dampening system. Inks of the various colors (cyan, magenta, yellow and black) all ran well on the lithographic press. The dynamic surface tension of the fountain solution was 31 dynes/cm as measured above.

Claims (13)

1. A composition that is a fountain solution or fountain solution concentrate and that comprises water and a surfactant characterised in that it also contains a hydrotrope in an amount effective to increase the solubility of the surfactant in the fountain solution.
2. A composition according to claim 1 wherein the ratio of hydrotrope:surfactant is within the range of 1:1 to 10:1 by weight, preferably 4:1 to 6:1 by weight.
3. A composition according to claim 1 or claim 2 wherein the addition of hydrotrope reduces the dynamic surface tension as measured at a surface age of 200 milliseconds of the resultant fountain solution by at least 5 dynes/cm to a dynamic surface tension of less than 40 dynes/cm and preferably by at least 10 dynes/cm to a dynamic surface tension of 28 to 35 dynes/cm,.
4. A composition according to any preceding claims wherein the hydrotrope does not increase the HLB value of the resultant fountain solution.
5. A composition according to any preceding claim in which the hydrotrope is a salt of a hard acid-soft base or of a soft acid-hard base and preferably is an electrolyte comprising an inorganic ion and an organic ion.
6. A composition according to any preceding claim wherein the hydrotrope is chosen from sodium toluene sulfonate, sodium xylene sulfonate, sodium cumene sulfonate, ammonium xylene sulfonate, tetrabutyl ammonium hydrogen sulfate, tetra phenyl phosphonium bromide, tetrabutyl ammonium bromide, cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide, sodium thiocyanate and mixtures thereof.
7. A composition according to any preceding claim wherein the surfactant is chosen block copolymers, alkyl phosphate, ethoxylated alcohols, fatty acids, amines, amides, fatty esters, alkanol amides, glycol esters, sorbitan fatty acid esters, ethoxylated alkyl phenols, ethoxylated acetylenic glycols and mixtures thereof.
8. A composition according to any preceding claim further comprising an alcohol replacement, preferably chosen from 2-butoxy ethanol, n-hexoxyethanol, ethylene glycol, 2-ethyl-1,3-hexane diol and mixtures thereof.
9. A composition according to any preceding claim further comprising less than 5% of alcohol.
10. A composition according to any preceding claim further comprising one or more additives selected from a protective colloid (preferably gum arabic or cellulose gum), an acid or a biocide.
11. A process for reducing the dynamic surface tension of an aqueous fountain solution containing a surfactant by adding to a fountain solution or fountain solution concentrate an amount of hydrotrope effective to increase the solubility of the surfactant.
12. A process according to claim 11 in which the resultant fountain solution or concentrate is a composition according to any preceding claim.
13. An offset lithographic printing process using a planographic plate that is treated during the process with a fountain solution, characterised in that the fountain solution is a fountain solution according to any of claim 1 to 10.
EP87305517A 1986-07-02 1987-06-22 Fountain solutions and printing processes utilising them Expired - Lifetime EP0251621B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AT87305517T ATE72637T1 (en) 1986-07-02 1987-06-22 DAMPING WATER AND USE IN PRINTING PROCESSES.

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US88112386A 1986-07-02 1986-07-02
US881123 1986-07-02

Publications (4)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0251621A2 true EP0251621A2 (en) 1988-01-07
EP0251621A3 EP0251621A3 (en) 1988-03-09
EP0251621B1 EP0251621B1 (en) 1992-02-19
EP0251621B2 EP0251621B2 (en) 1996-04-03

Family

ID=25377830

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP87305517A Expired - Lifetime EP0251621B2 (en) 1986-07-02 1987-06-22 Fountain solutions and printing processes utilising them

Country Status (6)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0251621B2 (en)
JP (1) JPS6325093A (en)
AT (1) ATE72637T1 (en)
CA (1) CA1305296C (en)
DE (1) DE3776730D1 (en)
FI (1) FI88901C (en)

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0358113A2 (en) * 1988-09-08 1990-03-14 Hoechst Aktiengesellschaft Fountain solution for offset printing
EP0397407A2 (en) * 1989-05-12 1990-11-14 Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. Lithographic plate finisher
EP0416861A1 (en) * 1989-09-05 1991-03-13 Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. Dampening solution composition for lithographic printing
EP0516372A1 (en) * 1991-05-29 1992-12-02 Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. Concentrated dampening water composition for lithographic printing
DE4220550A1 (en) * 1991-07-04 1993-01-14 Hostmann Steinberg Gmbh FUMENT LIQUID CONCENTRATE AND FUMENT LIQUID AND THEIR USE IN THE OFFSET PRINTING PROCESS
US6488754B2 (en) 2000-11-29 2002-12-03 Grain Processing Corporation Lithographic dampening solution and method for dampening a lithographic plate
US7097705B2 (en) * 2000-09-11 2006-08-29 Air Products And Chemicals, Inc. Cationic-anionic blends for dynamic surface tension reduction
EP1696268A2 (en) * 2005-02-28 2006-08-30 Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. Lithographic printing plate precursor, method for preparation of lithographic printing plate precursor, and lithographic printing method

Families Citing this family (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2673585B2 (en) * 1989-08-01 1997-11-05 富士写真フイルム株式会社 Concentrated fountain solution for lithographic printing
JP2673586B2 (en) * 1989-08-02 1997-11-05 富士写真フイルム株式会社 Damping water composition for lithographic printing plate, concentrated liquid used therefor and lithographic printing method using the same
CA2071442C (en) * 1991-07-04 1994-09-06 Fritz Laufs Damping-solution concentrate and damping solution and use thereof in the offset printing process
JP5272385B2 (en) * 2007-11-27 2013-08-28 Dic株式会社 Dampening water concentrated composition for lithographic printing
JP5288268B2 (en) * 2009-03-25 2013-09-11 富士フイルム株式会社 Dampening solution composition for lithographic printing and heat set-off ring printing method
WO2013043921A2 (en) 2011-09-23 2013-03-28 Sun Chemical Corporation Additives to litho inks to eliminate ink feedback

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3669660A (en) * 1970-05-21 1972-06-13 Polychrome Corp Lithographic plate developing composition and process of use thereof
GB2036993B (en) * 1978-02-06 1983-03-09 Napp Systems Inc Desensitizing solution and process for treating a diazo photosensitive printing plate
US4213887A (en) * 1979-07-16 1980-07-22 American Hoechst Corporation Lithographic plate finisher
US4560410A (en) * 1981-05-18 1985-12-24 Union Carbide Corporation Fountain solutions suitable for use in lithographic offset printing
JPS60147395A (en) * 1984-01-12 1985-08-03 Fuji Photo Film Co Ltd Plate surface cleaning agent for planographic plate

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
"Survey of Progress in Chemistry", vol. 5, 1969, ACADEMIC PRESS, pages: 1 - 52
W.LANG, SEIFEN-OLE-FETTE-WACHSE, vol. 103, 1977, pages 193 - 197

Cited By (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0358113A3 (en) * 1988-09-08 1990-09-26 Hoechst Aktiengesellschaft Fountain solution for offset printing
US5096487A (en) * 1988-09-08 1992-03-17 Hoechst Aktiengesellschaft Fountain composition for use in offset printing
EP0358113A2 (en) * 1988-09-08 1990-03-14 Hoechst Aktiengesellschaft Fountain solution for offset printing
US5163999A (en) * 1989-05-09 1992-11-17 Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. Dampening solution composition for lithographic printing
EP0397407A2 (en) * 1989-05-12 1990-11-14 Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. Lithographic plate finisher
EP0397407A3 (en) * 1989-05-12 1991-05-15 Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. Lithographic plate finisher
EP0416861A1 (en) * 1989-09-05 1991-03-13 Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. Dampening solution composition for lithographic printing
US5221330A (en) * 1991-05-29 1993-06-22 Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. Concentrated dampening water composition for lithographic printing
EP0516372A1 (en) * 1991-05-29 1992-12-02 Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. Concentrated dampening water composition for lithographic printing
DE4220550A1 (en) * 1991-07-04 1993-01-14 Hostmann Steinberg Gmbh FUMENT LIQUID CONCENTRATE AND FUMENT LIQUID AND THEIR USE IN THE OFFSET PRINTING PROCESS
US5282892A (en) * 1991-07-04 1994-02-01 Heidelberger Druckmaschinen Ag Dampening-solution concentrate and dampening solution and method of use thereof in the offset printing process
US7097705B2 (en) * 2000-09-11 2006-08-29 Air Products And Chemicals, Inc. Cationic-anionic blends for dynamic surface tension reduction
US6488754B2 (en) 2000-11-29 2002-12-03 Grain Processing Corporation Lithographic dampening solution and method for dampening a lithographic plate
EP1696268A2 (en) * 2005-02-28 2006-08-30 Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. Lithographic printing plate precursor, method for preparation of lithographic printing plate precursor, and lithographic printing method
EP1696268A3 (en) * 2005-02-28 2009-06-03 FUJIFILM Corporation Lithographic printing plate precursor, method for preparation of lithographic printing plate precursor, and lithographic printing method
US7858291B2 (en) 2005-02-28 2010-12-28 Fujifilm Corporation Lithographic printing plate precursor, method for preparation of lithographic printing plate precursor, and lithographic printing method
EP3086176A1 (en) * 2005-02-28 2016-10-26 Fujifilm Corporation A lithographic printing method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
FI88901B (en) 1993-04-15
FI88901C (en) 1993-07-26
CA1305296C (en) 1992-07-21
FI872905A0 (en) 1987-07-01
EP0251621A3 (en) 1988-03-09
EP0251621B1 (en) 1992-02-19
DE3776730D1 (en) 1992-03-26
JPS6325093A (en) 1988-02-02
EP0251621B2 (en) 1996-04-03
ATE72637T1 (en) 1992-03-15
FI872905A (en) 1988-01-03

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4854969A (en) Lithographic fountain solutions
US3877372A (en) Treatment of a printing plate with a dampening liquid
US4278467A (en) Substitutive additives for isopropyl alcohol in fountain solution for lithographic offset printing
EP0251621B1 (en) Fountain solutions and printing processes utilising them
US4764213A (en) Lithographic fountain solution containing mixed colloids
EP0336673B1 (en) Dampening water composition for lithographic printing and additive for dampening water
US3398002A (en) Universal fountain solution for planographic printing
US5296336A (en) Dampening solution for lithographic printing
US5523194A (en) Fount solutions for planographic printing processes
EP1297968B1 (en) Dampening water composition for lithographic printing plate and lithographic printing process
US4186250A (en) Method of desensitizing image-bearing lithographic plates
CA1070876A (en) Method, composition and emulsion for the treatment of image-bearing lithographic printing plates and coated plate
US4214531A (en) Method of treating image-bearing lithographic plates
US4266481A (en) Image-bearing lithographic plates with desensitizing coating
US4200688A (en) Method of treating image-bearing lithographic plates
US4013008A (en) Methods and solutions for improvement of offset printing
EP0077120B1 (en) Use s-119 in lithographic fountain solutions
US5387279A (en) Lithographic dampening solution
EP0504916B2 (en) Additive for lithographic dampening solution and use thereof
US5268025A (en) Non-alcohol fountain solution
EP0126773A1 (en) Lithographic water based fountain solution concentrates
JP2798780B2 (en) Lithographic printing ink additives
JPH02209294A (en) Damping water concentrated solution for planographic printing
GB2263255A (en) Fount solution for lithographic printing
WO1999050076A1 (en) Printing solution for lithographic printing

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE FR GB IT LI NL SE

PUAL Search report despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE FR GB IT LI NL SE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19880811

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19900301

ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed

Owner name: NOVELTY SERVICE ING. DI IORIO G.

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE FR GB IT LI NL SE

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 72637

Country of ref document: AT

Date of ref document: 19920315

Kind code of ref document: T

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 3776730

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19920326

ET Fr: translation filed
PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: HOECHST AG WERK KALLE-ALBERT

Effective date: 19921117

NLR1 Nl: opposition has been filed with the epo

Opponent name: HOECHST AG WERK KALLE-ALBERT.

EAL Se: european patent in force in sweden

Ref document number: 87305517.2

PUAH Patent maintained in amended form

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009272

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: PATENT MAINTAINED AS AMENDED

ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed

Owner name: NOVELTY SERVICE ING. DI IORIO G.

27A Patent maintained in amended form

Effective date: 19960403

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B2

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE FR GB IT LI NL SE

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 19960425

Year of fee payment: 10

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: AEN

Free format text: AUFRECHTERHALTUNG DES PATENTES IN GEAENDERTER FORM

NLR2 Nl: decision of opposition
NLR3 Nl: receipt of modified translations in the netherlands language after an opposition procedure
EN Fr: translation not filed
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Effective date: 19960830

ET3 Fr: translation filed ** decision concerning opposition

Free format text: CORRECTIONS

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: RN

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: FC

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 19970320

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 19970324

Year of fee payment: 11

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 19970324

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 19970327

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 19970422

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 19970624

Year of fee payment: 11

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19970630

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 19970630

Year of fee payment: 11

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19980622

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19980622

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19980623

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19980630

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19980630

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19990101

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 19980622

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

EUG Se: european patent has lapsed

Ref document number: 87305517.2

NLV4 Nl: lapsed or anulled due to non-payment of the annual fee

Effective date: 19990101

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19990401

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.

Effective date: 20050622