EP0142567B1 - Control apparatus for reverse osmosis process system - Google Patents
Control apparatus for reverse osmosis process system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP0142567B1 EP0142567B1 EP84901424A EP84901424A EP0142567B1 EP 0142567 B1 EP0142567 B1 EP 0142567B1 EP 84901424 A EP84901424 A EP 84901424A EP 84901424 A EP84901424 A EP 84901424A EP 0142567 B1 EP0142567 B1 EP 0142567B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- pressure
- fluid
- flow
- reverse osmotic
- pump
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D61/00—Processes of separation using semi-permeable membranes, e.g. dialysis, osmosis or ultrafiltration; Apparatus, accessories or auxiliary operations specially adapted therefor
- B01D61/02—Reverse osmosis; Hyperfiltration ; Nanofiltration
- B01D61/12—Controlling or regulating
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F2103/00—Nature of the water, waste water, sewage or sludge to be treated
- C02F2103/08—Seawater, e.g. for desalination
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02A—TECHNOLOGIES FOR ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02A20/00—Water conservation; Efficient water supply; Efficient water use
- Y02A20/124—Water desalination
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02A—TECHNOLOGIES FOR ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02A20/00—Water conservation; Efficient water supply; Efficient water use
- Y02A20/124—Water desalination
- Y02A20/131—Reverse-osmosis
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a control for use with a reverse osmotic treatment system. More particularly, the invention relates to an apparatus for controlling the flow of a product fluid from a reverse osmotic treatment system using a fluid pressurizing means such as a centrifugal pump.
- a reverse osmotic treatment system is equipped with a reverse osmotic apparatus using semipermeable membranes.
- An impure fluid boosted by a pressurizing means of pump type is fed to the reverse osmotic apparatus, which separates the feed fluid into a relatively pure portion which has passed through the semipermeable membrane and is substantially made of the solvent, and a portion with a higher concentration of the solute.
- the reverse osmotic treatment system is typically used in plants for desalinating salt waters such as brine, brackish and seawater.
- salt waters such as brine, brackish and seawater.
- the feed fluid In order to produce desalinated water, the feed fluid must be pressurized to a value exceeding its osmotic pressure.
- a system has recently been developed for desalinating a large volume of seawater with the reverse osmotic apparatus.
- the feed fluid is pressurized by a centrifugal pump in place of a reciprocating pump which is commonly employed in the small-scale system.
- This new type of reverse osmotic treatment system has a problem in connection with adjustment of the flow of the product solution (desalinated water when the feed solution is seawater, and a concentrated solution if the feed contains a chemical).
- FIG. 1 A typical configuration of the prior art technique for controlling the flow of product fluid from the reverse osmotic treatment using a centrifugal pump as a pressurizing means is shown in Fig. 1.
- the reverse osmotic treatment system shown is used to desalinate seawater.
- a centrifugal pump 1 driven by a motor 8 pressurizes the seawater and sends it to a reverse osmotic apparatus 4 composed of a plurality of reverse osmotic modules. Desalinated water coming out of the semipermeable membrane in each module is stored in a tank 6.
- a concentrated solution also comes out of the reverse osmotic apparatus but by a different channel and is squirted against a hydraulic turbine 7 of Pelton wheel type through a nozzle 7'.
- the power shaft of the turbine 7 is directly coupled to the rotor of the motor 8 and feeds back the rotary energy to the pump 1.
- the control system shown in Fig. 1 includes an indicator 2a which indicates the pressure detected by a pressure sensor at the inlet 2' of the reverse osmotic apparatus (the indicator may be replaced by a pressure indication control which indicates a set value of pressure as well as the detected pressure), and a pressure regulating valve 2 provided on the primary or feed line between the pump 1 and the reverse osmotic apparatus which is controlled either manually or automatically by the control 2a to provide a feed pressure which is equal to the set value.
- the control system further includes a flow indicator 3a which indicates the flow detected by a flow sensor at point 3' on the feed line (this indicator may be replaced by a flow indication control which indicates a set value of flow as well as the detected flow), and a flow regulating valve 3 with an integral nozzle 7' which is disposed at the terminal end of the concentration or secondary line and which is controlled either manually or automatically by the control 3a to provide a flow of the concentrated solution that is equal to the set value.
- the line on which the desalinated water flows is provided with a flowmeter 5 for measuring the flow of the desalinated water.
- the reverse osmotic treatment system is operated in such a manner that the recovery percentage or the ratio of the flow of desalinated water to that of the feed solution is held constant.
- complicated valve operations are necessary to achieve the newly set value of the desired flow of desalinated water.
- each of the valves 2 and 3 must be shifted bit by bit to avoid the hydraulic interference therebetwen.
- the final stage of valve adjustment is solely the responsibility of a skilled operator who makes the fine tuning by referring to the reading on the flowmeter 5.
- the pressure regulating valve 2 disposed on the feed line causes a pressure drop in the fluid, and this results in a corresponding decrease in the pressure of the fluid to be supplied to the reverse osmotic apparatus.
- a centrifugal pump having a relatively large capacity to compensate for the pressure drop caused by the valve becomes necessary, thus being accompanied by two disadvantages: lower efficiency of the production of desalinated water, and a relatively large power requirement.
- a further disadvantage of the prior art control system is its high cost due to the use of a relatively large number of components (i.e. two valves, a pressure sensor, a pressure indication control, a flow sensor, and a flow indication control). Also, it is desired to make automatic checking of the individual components of the reverse osmotic treatment system for a decrease in their performance. More desirably, such a decrease should be evaluated quantitatively.
- one object of the present invention is to provide a control of a relatively low cost which may be used to perform efficient and automatic control over the flow of product solution from the reverse osmotic treatment system.
- the control apparatus of the present invention With the control apparatus of the present invention, the previously required complicated valve operations are not necessary, especially in order to achieve a newly set value of a desired flow of desalinated water.
- a further object of the invention is to provide an apparatus for monitoring a membrane performance index of a reverse osmotic apparatus in a reverse osmotic treatment system.
- the monitoring apparatus according to this further object is defined in the independent claim 9 and in the appended claims 10 to 12.
- a still further object of the invention is to propose an apparatus for detecting deterioration or abnormality of a certain component of a reverse osmotic treatment system.
- a detecting apparatus is defined in the independent claim 13.
- a single operating means such as of valve type
- a channel for concentrated fluid at a point downstream of a reverse osmotic apparatus is used to establish a system pressure.
- the control system according to the present invention obviates a prior art pressure adjusting means of valve type positioned between a centrifugal pump and the reverse osmotic apparatus.
- the single pressure establishing means is provided with a suitable control signal that adjusts the pressure on the semipermeable membrane in the reverse osmotic apparatus to achieve the desired flow of product fluid or desalinated water.
- the present inventors have found that once the flow of desalinated water is set at a desired level, the pressure on the semipermeable membrane that achieves that flow setting can be determined. This pressure can be established by providing a corresponding operating input into the single pressure establishing means or valve disposed on the channel for concentrated fluid at a point downstream of the reverse osmotic apparatus.
- FIG. 2 An embodiment of the reverse osmotic treatment system to which the present invention is applied is described hereunder.
- the reverse osmotic treatment system shown is used to desalinate seawater.
- a centrifugal pump 1 receives pretreated seawater from an intake pump, pressurizes it and sends the pressurized seawater to a reverse osmotic apparatus 4 comprised of a plurality of reverse osmotic modules or units of semipermeable membrane type.
- the symbols Po, Qo and Co represent the pressure, flow and concentration of the discharged seawater, respectively.
- the hydraulic pressure P m of feed seawater or primary fluid at the interface with the semipermeable membrane in each module must be higher than the reverse osmotic pressure n M of the primary fluid near the interface.
- the difference between P m and n M is generally referred to as the reverse osmotic pressure.
- the reverse osmotic pressure is also dependent on the hydraulic pressure and osmotic pressure of the product fluid or desalinated water coming out of the reverse osmotic apparatus 4.
- the pressure, flow and concentration of desalinated water are respectively shown by P" Q, and C, in Fig. 2.
- the fluid of high concentration coming out of the reverse osmotic apparatus passes through a concentration or secondary line to be discharged from the system.
- concentration or secondary line The symbols P 2 , Q 2 and C 2 shown adjacent the secondary line represent the pressure, flow and concentration of the secondary fluid of high concentration, respectively.
- the secondary line is provided with a single system pressure establishing means or valve 3.
- the valve 3 includes a valve actuator 3b that operates in response to a signal supplied from a control unit 9 to be described later in this specification.
- the valve actuator 3b shown adjusts the valve stroke to define the opening or aperture area of a nozzle 7'.
- the system shown in Fig. 2 includes an energy recovery means.
- the nozzle 7' supplies a water jet to a hydraulic turbine 7 of Pelton wheel type for its rotation.
- the turbine 7 is mechanically coupled to a pump driving motor 8 and supplies part of the energy necessary for driving the pump 1.
- This energy recovery means has energy saving as its sole object and hence is not essential for achievement of the primary objective of the control system of the present invention.
- a temperature sensor 14 is provided on the primary fluid channel connecting the centrifugal pump 1 to the reverse osmotic apparatus 4. The output from the temperature sensor 14 is used for temperature calibration in the control unit to be described hereunder.
- valve 3 positioned alone downstream of the reverse osmotic apparatus is unable to establish the desired level of the desalinated water flow Q,. This is partly due to the replacement of a reciprocating pump with a centrifugal pump in recent times as a means for pressurizing fluids. With the centrifugal pump, a change in the opening of the valve 3 will cause a change in both the flow and pressure of the primary fluid (seawater) being discharged from the pump.
- a selected opening for the single valve is capable of providing the desired level of the flow of product fluid or desalinated water.
- the control unit according to the present invention is provided with two capabilities: one is to determine a pressure for establishing a desired preselected level of the flow of product fluid or desalinated water, and the other is to determine and provide a corresponding operating amount (stroke) for the valve so as to enable the establishment of that pressure.
- C M can be determined from C o , constant for the concentration of seawater, and Q o and Q 2 calculated in steps (3) and (4), respectively.
- a temperature sensor 14 is used to detect the temperature of the solution flowing through the feed line. If the temperature detected is T, the value of membrane performance index K, can be calibrated by the following formula: wherein
- membrane performance index K In the absence of a change in the temperature of the feed solution, a constant can be used as membrane performance index K.
- the pressure of desalinated water P, and its osmotic pressure ⁇ 1 maintain substantially fixed levels and hence can be regarded as two constants.
- the reverse osmotic pressure AP can be obtained.
- a preset value Q 1 of the flow of desalinated water generally has two corresponding values as P o or the discharge pressure of a pump. This is owing to the characteristic relation of the flow of desalinated water as against the pump discharge pressure or the pressure on the reverse osmotic apparatus.
- Graph 11 in Fig. 2 illustrates with curve 23 the pump discharge pressure vs. desalinated water flow. If the pump discharge pressure P o , hence the water pressure P m on the reverse osmotic apparatus, has a small value that is unable to overcome the osmotic pressure ⁇ M of feed solution in the reverse osmotic apparatus (i.e. ⁇ P ⁇ 0), desalinated water will not be produced.
- the osmotic pressure n M of the feed solution at the semipermeable membrane will also increase.
- the rate of increase in the pump discharge pressure is greater than that of increase in the osmotic pressure n M , and therefore, the reverse osmotic pressure AP continues to increase, causing a proportional increase in the flow of desalinated water.
- the rate of increase in the reverse osmotic pressure AP becomes zero, a maximum flow of desalinated water Q 1max is attained (see curve 23 in Fig. 2).
- a further increase in the pump discharge pressure will result in the decrease of the reverse osmotic pressure AP. This leads to a decreased flow of desalinated water.
- the flow of desalinated water becomes zero at a pressure corresponding to a point on the Q-H characteristic curve of the pump where the flow of primary fluid is zero.
- Characteristic curve 23 is obtained by plotting, according to the above procedure, values of pump discharge pressure P o corresponding to various settings of the flow of desalinated water Q 1 .
- Curve 22 in graph 11 illustrates the relation of Q 2 , the flow of the secondary fluid or solution of high concentration, as against the pump discharge pressure P o .
- This curve can be obtained by subtracting the P o -Q, characteristic curve 23 from the Q-H characteristic curve 21 of pump 1.
- the pump discharge pressure there are two calculated values of the pump discharge pressure that satisfy a specific set value of the flow of desalinated water Q 1 .
- the following two requirements for system operation are used as selection criteria.
- the first and principal requirement is that the recovery percentage, or the ratio of the flow of desalinated water to the flow of the primary fluid (Q,/Q o ), be within a tolerable range that guarantees normal operation of the reverse osmotic apparatus.
- the second requirement for selection is that the pump be drivable by less energy.
- P L1 is given by a 1 Q 0 2 and PL2 by a 2 Q 2 2 , wherein a 1 and a 2 are each a loss constant.
- Control unit 9 can be realized by combining digital or analog function generators that will generate the characteristic curves shown in Fig. 2.
- control unit 9 can be realized by a single function generator capable of generating a valve operating amount or stroke S that corresponds to the desired level of desalinated water flow setting Q 1 .
- valve stroke S may be read by using the set input Q 1 to access a lookup table of memory type.
- control unit 9 can be realized by a computer including a memory storing necessary system variables, an input device, typically of either keyboard or switch type, that enters desired values to be set in the system, and a data processor that processes input data by the procedures described in Sections (A) and (B).
- control system of the present invention has been described by reference to an embodiment wherein the system is applied to desalination of seawater.
- the present system may also be used to control a process for concentrating a chemical-containing fluid by a reverse osmotic apparatus.
- the amount to be controlled is not the flow of desalinated water, but the flow of a concentrated solution. From the preset value of the flow of concentrated solution and according to the procedure described in Section (A) with necessary modifications that will be obvious to those skilled in the art, the discharge pressure of a centrifugal pump and other system state variables that will achieve the present level of the flow of concentrated solution can be determined.
- a hydraulic turbine of Pelton wheel type that is driven by a water jet from the nozzle is used as an energy recovery means. If desired, this turbine may be replaced by a reverse running pump turbine. If the system is of such a small size that energy recovery will not provide any substantial cost saving, entire omission of the turbine and using the control valve 3 to simply discharge the concentrated solution out of the system would sometimes be advisable.
- the system of Fig. 2 depends on an open loop control. If necessary, means for detecting certain system state variables (e.g. pressure or flow) may be added for confirmatory or feedback purposes.
- An example of such means is a sensor for detecting the discharge pressure of the centrifugal pump. The output of this sensor is compared with a calculated value of the pump discharge pressure obtained in control unit 9 to recalculate or correct the set value of pump discharge pressure so as to correct the valve opening in order that the actual pump discharge pressure developed thereby will be equal to the corrected value.
- the control system described in Section I presupposes that the centrifugal pump 1 runs at a predetermined rotational speed, for example, the rated rpm.
- the Q-H performance of a pump depends on its rotational speed. Therefore, the flow Q 1 of product fluid as against the pump discharge pressure P o also varies with the pump speed.
- the power required for driving the pump depends on both the pump speed and its discharge.
- the rotational speed of the pump can be determined at an optimum level that minimizes the power requirement for establishing the desired level of the flow of product fluid, for example, desalinated water.
- a maximum flow of desalinated water or Q 1max can be provided at a specific pump discharge pressure P 01 (see pump performance curve 21 and P o -Q i characteristic curve 23 in Fig. 2).
- the value of Q 1max increases with higher pump speed.
- the power requirement for the pump to supply the fluid decreases with lower pump speed.
- an optimum pump speed can be found at a point on the P o -Q i characteristic curve having a maximum flow of product fluid (e.g. desalinated water) Q lmax which is equal to its desired value Q 1 .
- the power requirement for the pump can be minimized by running it at this optimum speed.
- curve 21 shows the Q-H performance characteristics (discharge pressure P o versus flow of feed fluid Q o ) of the pump at the rated speed N R .
- Curve 23 shows the discharge pressure P o versus flow of desalinated fluid Q 1 characteristics at the same speed N R .
- Curve 21-1 shows yQ-H performance characteristics of the pump at 0.9 N R , whereas curve 23-1 shows the P o -Q i characteristics corresponding to that curve.
- curves 21-2 and 23-2 respective show the Q-H performance characteristics of the pump and the P 0 -Q 1 characteristics.
- a dashed line 29 shows the pump speed vs. Q 1max -P 0 profile that is obtained by plotting the values of maximum flow (Q 1max ) on the P o vs. Q 1 characteristic curves for various pump speeds, namely, the values of maximum flow of desalinated water that can be provided at various pump speeds.
- Curve 31 shows the output characteristics of a pressure regulating valve 2 (see Fig. 1) provided on the feed line in the conventional system, and these characteristics indicate the pressure vs. flow of the primary fluid at the rated pump speed N R .
- a dashed line 32 represents optimum pump operating characteristics which are obtained by plotting the pump operating points capable of providing a maximum flow of desalinated water at various pump speeds.
- Curve 33 in graph (B) of Fig. 4 corresponds to the characteristic curve 23 in graph (A) and shows the pump speed vs. maximum flow (Q 1max ) profile.
- Curve 34, 34-1 and 34-2 in graph (C) in Fig. 4 show the relation of discharge (Q o ) from pump 1 and power requirement (HP) for respective pump speeds of N R , 0.9 NR AND 0.8 NR.
- point (d) is on the P 0 -Q 1 characteristic curve 23-1 for a pump speed of 0.9 N R and indicates the maximum flow of desalinated water Q' 1max that is obtained by the reverse osmotic treatment system at 0.9 N R , as well as the pump discharge pressure or the pressure at the inlet of the reverse osmotic apparatus P oa that develops when Q' 1max is obtained.
- the pump is operating at point (a) on the pump performance characteristic curve 21-1 for the same pump speed (0.9 N R ).
- This point (a) shows that the primary fluid is flowing at a rate of Q oa .
- the corresponding power requirement is Ha, as indicated by point (a) on the curve 34-1.
- the P o -Q i characteristic curve 23 for a pump speed of N R has two points (e) and (f) at which the flow of desalinated water is equal to the maximum flow Q' 1max for a speed of 0.9 N R .
- Point (e) shows that the pump discharge pressure or the pressure at the inlet of the reverse osmotic apparatus has a value P od which is greater than the value of P oa at point (d).
- a pump operating point corresponding to point (e) is point (g) on curve 21, and this latter point indicates that the flow of the feed fluid is Qo b .
- the recovery percentage or the ratio of the flow of product fluid (i.e. desalinated water) to the flow of feed fluid must be within a range that assures normal operation of the reverse osmotic apparatus.
- the critical recovery percentage that is tolerated by the system is generally in the range of 20 to 40%. If the system was so operated as to receive the feed fluid at a flow rate of Q ob (indicated by point (g)) and to provide desalinated water at a flow rate of Q, (indicated by point (e)), the recovery percentage (Q 1 /Q 0b ) would exceed its critical value. Therefore, the operating points (e) and (g) are excluded from the system requirements of the present invention.
- the pump operating point corresponding to point (f) is point (c) on curve 21, and this point indicates that the flow of the feed fluid is Q oc .
- the power requirement for providing this flow level is Hc which is indicated by point (b) on the power requirement curve 34 for a pump speed of N R .
- point (a) on curve 21-1 is also on curve 31 which indicates the output characteristics of the pressure regulating valve for a pump speed of N R .
- the pressure at the inlet of the reverse osmotic apparatus is P oa and the flow of the fluid that is fed to the reverse osmotic apparatus is Q oa .
- the flow of the desalinated water produced is equal to the value indicated by point (d) on curve 23-1 (P o -Q, characteristic curve for a speed of 0.9 N R ) that corresponds to pump operating point (a). This is because, in both cases, the fluid being fed into the reverse osmotic apparatus has the same pressure and flow.
- the pump operating point which corresponds to point (a) associated with the pressure regulating valve is found at point (b). Therefore, it can be seen that the pressure regulating valve has caused a pressure drop equal to the difference between P od indicated by point (b) and P oa indicated by point (a).
- the power requirement corresponding to the pump operating point (b) in graph (A) has a value Hb indicated by point (b) on the power requirement curve 34 in graph (C).
- the value Hb indicates the power required to provide a flow of desalinated water Q, from the system which is operated at a pump speed of N 3 using the second pressure regulating valve positioned on the feed line.
- the value Ha which is smaller than Hb and is indicated by point (a) on curve 34-1 refers to the power required to provide the same flow of desalinated water when the system is operated at a pump speed of 0.9 N R and without using the second pressure regulating valve.
- the system may be operated at an optimum pump speed where the point of the maximum flow of desalinated water on the corresponding Po-Q, characteristic curve is equal to the desired flow level.
- the pump runs at a specific operating point on the Q-H performance curve associated with that point of the maximum flow of desalinated water, and its discharge pressure is regulated by the single valve positioned downstream of the reverse osmotic apparatus.
- the above procedure presupposes that the recovery percentage is held within the tolerable range when the system is operated at any maximum flow point on the P o -Q, characteristics (e.g. point (d) on curve 23-1 in Fig. 4). If this requirement is not met by the reverse osmotic apparatus used, necessary modifications must be made to the data prepared in step (1) so that the recovery percentage of the modified data is within the tolerable limits. More specifically, the flow of desalinated water for the maximum recovery percentage tolerated by the specific reverse osmotic apparatus is selected as the maximum flow of desalinated water.
- a means for determining the optimum speed of the centrifugal pump can be realized by a digital or analog function generator which, in response to an input signal indicative of the desired level of the flow of desalinated water, produces a signal indicative of the optimum pump speed.
- Fig. 5 is a block diagram of the control unit for the reverse osmotic treatment system that is operated by the principle of the present invention that has been described by reference to Fig. 4.
- Reference numeral 35 represents an input device, typically of keyboard type, which provides a setting of the desired level of the desalinated water flow Q,.
- a device 36 is a function generator which produces a signal indicative of the optimum pump speed N in response to the signal that has been entered from input device 35 and which indicates the desired level of the flow of desalinated water Q,.
- motor speed control 38 coupled to the function generator controls a centrifugal pump driving motor 8 so that it rotates at optimum speed.
- Reference numeral 37 represents a function generator which, in response to the signal that has been entered from input device 35 and which indicates the desired flow level Q i , produces the value of the stroke which is a function of Q, and by which the valve 3 positioned downstream of the reverse osmotic apparatus must be shifted.
- the function generator 37 provides a command through a driver 18 to an actuator 3b of the valve 3 positioned on the secondary line and causes the valve to shift by the stroke indicated by said command.
- the system produces desalinated water at the desired flow rate Q, while the pump is running at the optimum speed and the fluid pressure is established by the valve 3.
- a flowmeter 5 is not essential to the present invention but may be used to measure the actual flow of desalinated water for confirmatory purposes.
- Fig. 6 shows a modification of the apparatus of Fig. 5.
- This modification is primarily characterized by a pressure sensor 2b that is provided on the supply or primary line for detecting the pressure of the fluid flowing through that line.
- This sensor 2b produces a signal indicative of the actual discharge pressure of the pump P o (REAL), which is fed back to the optimum pump speed generator 36.
- the generator 36 may include means for comparing the actual discharge pressure (as detected by sensor 2b) with the calculated pressure stored in the generator 36. In response to the result of this comparison, a pressure recalculating means (not shown) in the generator 36 modifies or updates the calculated pressure so that the recalculated value agrees with the actual pressure.
- the concentration or secondary line is provided with a pressure sensor 19 for detecting the pressure of the fluid flowing through that line.
- This sensor 19 feeds back to the stroke generator 37 a signal indicative of the actual pressure of the concentrated fluid P 2 (REAL).
- the stroke generator 37 recalculates the pressure so that the recalculated pressure is in agreement with the actual pressure.
- the control system of Fig. 6 has the advantage that it provides more precise system state variables.
- Each of the pressure sensors used as feedback elements may be replaced by a flowmeter. However, the use of a flowmeter is not cost effective since it is fairly expensive.
- a single feedback element rather than a plurality of elements may be used. For example, one of the primary and secondary fluid pressure sensors 2b and 19 may be omitted.
- any conventional driving means for the centrifugal pump such as engine, gas turbine and etc. can be substituted for the motor 8.
- the overall performance of the reverse osmotic treatment system is governed by the performance of three major components, i.e. the centrifugal pump, the membranes in the reverse osmotic apparatus and the fluid channels, and the deterioration of the last mentioned component is evaluated in terms of pressure loss.
- the deteriorations of these three components can be separately identified by comparing a combination or pattern of the state levels (pressure and/orflow) of the primary and secondary fluid passing through the feed or primary and secondary or concentration line in the reverse osmotic treatment system with a combination or pattern of the state levels of the fluid under normal or ideal operating conditions. The results of these comparisons are summarized in the following Decision Table I. Notes:
- a state level with a prime indicates a value other than the normal value which is due to a change in the performance of a certain component.
- the embodiment to be shown hereinafter uses a means for detecting the pressure of a fluid flowing through the primary or supply line, and a means for detecting the pressure of a fluid flowing through the secondary or concentration line.
- Each of the detected values of pressure is compared with the value calculated for normal operating conditions. The results of the comparison will identify which system component has experienced a deterioration in performance.
- the performance monitor or evaluating apparatus provides the latest information about the performance of the respective components of the control system. By using this information, the control systems shown in Figs. 2, 5 and 6 are able to maintain the flow control with high accuracy.
- this object is achieved by using a means that issues a visible and/or audible alarm in response to a signal indicative of the abnormality of a certain component.
- Fig. 7 is generally the same as Fig. 2 and shows a control unit 9 having the same capabilities as those of the control unit shown in Fig. 2.
- Reference numeral 2 denotes a pressure sensor that is provided on the supply or primary line for detecting the pressure of the primary fluid.
- Reference numeral 6 refers to a pressure sensor which is provided on the secondary or concentration line for detecting the pressure of the concentrated fluid.
- the detection signals from these sensors are fed to various performance monitors (Figs. 8, 10 and 12), as well as trouble type identifying and alarm devices (Fig. 13), all of which can be incorporated in the control unit 9 (but not shown in Fig. 7).
- Each of the graphs in Fig. 7 shows the characteristics of a deteriorated membrane in the reverse osmotic apparatus as compared with those of the normal membrane.
- valve 3 under normal conditions is the same as the value under such conditions where the overall performance of the system has changed as a result, for example, of deteriorated membrane performance.
- two system state levels e.g. P 2 and P 2 ' shall be compared at the same fluid temperature by using the necessary temperature compensation (temperature calibration for fluids having different temperatures).
- a solid line 25 shows the osmotic pressure vs. flow of desalinated water characteristics of the normal semipermeable membrane.
- the characteristics of the membrane change to those indicated by the dashed line.
- Q 1 represents the flow of desalinated water under normal conditions
- 0 1 ' the flow with deteriorated membrane performance
- Q 2 indicates the flow of concentrated solution under normal conditions
- Q 2 ' the flow with deteriorated membrane performance. Therefore, the following relations can be derived: When these relations are satisfied, the performance of a membrane in the reverse osmotic apparatus may well be regarded as having deteriorated.
- the trouble identifying device which will be described later (Fig. 13) identifies certain trouble as a drop in the performance of the semipermeable membrane when the device detects the relations shown above.
- Fig. 8 is a block diagram of the tracking device according to the present invention which monitors the performance of the membrane by the procedure described in (B).
- the pressure P o ' of the fluid in the feed line to a semipermeable membrane in the reverse osmotic apparatus is detected by detector 2, which sends the detected information into a pressure/flow converter 11a.
- the converter 11 a converts the pump discharge pressure or the pressure of the feed fluid P o ' to the corresponding flow of the feed fluid Q o ' in accordance with the Q-H characteristics of the pump (as indicated by curve 21 in Fig. 7).
- the pressure detector 2 also sends the signal P' o to a membrane interfacial pressure calculator 29 in the tracking device or monitor.
- the calculator 29 in response to both the signal P' o and the feed fluid flow signal Q' o from the pressure/flow converter 11a, produces a membrane interfacial pressure signal P' M in accordance with the correlation
- a second pressure detector 6 detects the pressure of the fluid in the concentration line from the reverse osmotic apparatus, and sends the detected signal to a concentrate flow calculator 6b in the tracking device.
- a desalinated waterflow calculator 30, in response to signal Q' o from 11 a and signal Q' 2 from 6b, determines the flow of desalinated water Q' i in accordance with the correlation Q' 1 Q' 0 -Q' 2 .
- a membrane interfacial concentration calculator 6c in response to signal Q' o from converter 11 a and signal Q' 2 from calculator 6b, produces a membrane interfacial concentration C' M in accordance with the correlation
- a concentration/osmotic pressure converter 12a in accordance with the concentration/osmotic pressure characteristics (see curve 24 in Fig. 7), converts the membrane interfacial concentration signal C' M to the corresponding osmotic pressure signal n' M .
- a membrane performance drop calculator 31 in response to the membrane interfacial pressure signal P' M , desalinated water flow signal Q' i and osmotic pressure signal ⁇ ' M from respective means 29, 30 and 12a, determines a membrane performance index K' in accordance with the correlations
- the calculator 31 may be so designed that it also responds to the reference membrane performance index K o having the normal value and being stored in the control unit, and calculates K o '/K o or the ratio of the present performance index to the normal performance index.
- This ratio represents the degree by which the performance of the membrane has deteriorated.
- Calculator 31 sends signal K o ' and/or K o '/K o to an indicator 32, which then indicates the present value of the membrane performance index and/or the degree by which the performance of the membrane has dropped.
- a memory 33 can be loaded with the membrane performance index K o and/or the performance drop K o '/K o from the calcualtor 31 periodically, at intervals selected by a timer 34.
- a history indicator 35 indicates the history of the membrane performance on the basis of the data read from the memory 33.
- Fig. 9 which is essentially the same as Fig. 2 illustrates various fluctuations in the system state levels that will occur when the system fluid channel is clogged by scales formed from components of the fluid.
- Q 1 and Q 1 ' are respectively written for the flow of desalinated water under normal conditions and the flow of desalinated water in the case of channel clogging, Q 1 is substantially equal to Q,'.
- This causes a decrease in the flow of the secondary fluid or concentrated solution, as is represented by the inequality Q 2 >Q 2 ' (wherein Q 2 is the flow of the concentrated solution under normal conditions, and Q 2 ' is the flow of that solution in the case of channel clogging). Since in this Section the valve opening A v is assumed to remain the same irrespective of the system performance, the decrease in the flow of the concentrated solution causes a decrease in the pressure thereof.
- a line clogging can be detected by checking to see if one of the following two sets of relations is satisfied:
- Fig. 10 is a block diagram of the device according to the present invention for evalulating the degree of channel clogging by monitoring the pressure loss in the channel.
- a feed pressure detector 2 sends a signal P o ' to a pressure/flow converter 11 a in the monitor.
- the converter 11a determines the feed flow Q o ' in accordance with the Q-H characteristics of the pump.
- a concentrate pressure detector 6 sends a signal P 2 ' to a concentrate flow calculator 6b, which derives the concentrate flow Q 2 ' in the manner described in (B).
- a calculator 6c determines the average concentration C' M of the feed fluid at the interface with the semipermeable membrane in accordance with the correlation
- a converter 12a determines the corresponding average osmotic pressure n' M of the feed solution in contact with the semipermeable membrane in accordance with the concentration vs. osmotic pressure characteristics.
- Q 1 ' is the desalinated water flow signal send from the calculator 30.
- the calculator 37 uses the derived reverse osmotic pressure AP', the osmotic pressure n' M from converter 12a, the constant for the osmotic pressure of desalinated water ⁇ 1 , and the constant for the pressure of desalinated water P 1 , the calculator 37 also determines the pressure of the feed solution in the semipermeable membrane P' M in accordance with the correlation Using the so determined pressure P' M signal P o ' from the detector 2 and signal Q o ' from converter 11a, the calculator 37 derives the coefficient a 1 ' for the pressure loss of the fluid in the feed line extending to the membranes in respective RO modules in accordance with the correlation The coefficient a 1 ' can be used as a measure for the clogging of the feed line.
- the calculator 37 uses the pressure P' M , signal P 2 ' from the detector 6 and signal Q 2 ' from the calculator 6b, in order to calculate the coefficient a 2 ' for the pressure loss of the fluid in the secondary (or concentration) line in accordance with the correlation
- the coefficient a 2 ' can be used as a measure for the clogging of the secondary line.
- the coefficients a 1 ' and a 2 ' can be used as a final output from the calculator 37.
- the output of the calculator 37 is fed to a pressure loss indicator 38, which then indicates the present value of the coefficient for the pressure loss of the fluid.
- the output of the calculator 37 may also be used as a input which is loaded into a memory 39 periodically at intervals selected by a timer 41.
- the data read from the memory 39 is sent to a history indicator 42, which then indicates the history of the pressure loss that has occurred in the system channel.
- Fig. 11 is generally the same as Fig. 2 and each of the graphs shown in the control unit 9 illustrate the characteristics for the case of the deterioration of the pump performance, as compared with those for the normal pump.
- the decrease in the velocity of the fluid passing through the nozzle is caused by a decrease in the pressure of the fluid in the secondary line, as P 2 >P 2 ' (wherein P 2 is the pressure of the fluid in the secondary line under normal pump conditions, and P 2 ' is the value for the case of the pump deterioration).
- the degree by which the performance of the centrifugal pump has deteriorated can be evaluated by various methods.
- the relative amount of decrease in the pump discharge (Q o '/Q o ) is used as a measure for the deterioration of the pump performance.
- the value of Q o '/Q o can be determined by the following procedure.
- Fig. 12 is a block diagram of the device according to the present invention which monitors the drop in the pump performance (as indicated by Q o '/Q o ) by following the procedure illustrated in (B) above.
- a first pressure detector 2 disposed on the feed line provides a membrane interfacial pressure calculator 44 in the monitor with a signal indicative of the pressure of the feed solution P o '.
- a second pressure detector 6 is disposed on the secondary line and provides a concentrate flow calculator 6b in the monitor with a signal indicative of the pressure of the concentrated solution P 2 '.
- the calculator 6b uses this pressure signal P 2 ' and a signal indicative of the present value of valve opening A v that is supplied from a nozzle opening calculator in the control unit (not shown), the calculator 6b determines Q 2 ' or the flow of the concentrated solution in accordance with the correlation
- a membrane interfacial pressure calculator 6c determines the membrane interfacial pressure C' M in accordance with the correlation
- a signal indicative of C' M is sent to a concentration/osmotic pressure converter 12a, which then converts the concentration C' M to the corresponding osmotic pressure n' M .
- a desalinated water flow calculator 45 in response to the membrane interfacial pressure signal P' M from the calculator 44, the signal ⁇ ' M from the converter 12a that represents the average concentration of the feed solution in contact with the semipermeable membrane, and the signal T from temperature detector 14 (see Fig. 11) that indicates the temperature of the fluid, calculates the flow of desalinated water Q,' in accordance with the correlation wherein K o , P, and ⁇ 1 are constants.
- a feed flow comparator 48 obtains a calculated value Q 0 ' calc of the flow of the feed solution by adding the calculated value Q 2 ' of the flow of the concentrated solution supplied from calculator 6b and the calculator 45.
- the comparator 48 also compares Q 0 ' calc with the estimated value Q o ' of the feed flow supplied from estimator 46. If the value of the difference ⁇ Q 0 obtained by subtracting Q 0 ' calc from Q o ' is greater than a predetermined positive value P, the comparator 48 furnishes a command signal to an updater 47, which then adds an increment signal into the estimator 46. In response to this increment signal, the estimator 46 provides another estimated value of the flow of desalinated water which is larger than the previously estimated value.
- the comparator 48 provides a command signal to the updater 47, which then adds a decrement signal into the estimator 46.
- the estimator provides another estimated value of the flow of desalinated water which is smaller than the firstly estimated value. The monitor uses either one of these freshly estimated values for performing the necessary recalculation.
- the comparator 48 uses Q o or the normal flow of the feed solution under normal pump conditions (for the temperature and valve opening which are the same as the respective present values) in order to calculate the ratio of the fimal estimated value Q o ' (indicative of the present value of the feed flow) to the normal feed flow Q o .
- the output signal Q o '/Q o from the comparator 48 may be loaded into a memory 50 periodically at intervals determined by a timer 51.
- a history indicator 52 By reading the stored data from the memory, a history indicator 52 will indicate the history of the fluctuation in the flow of the feed solution that has occurred due to the deterioration of the pump performance.
- control signals furnished to the valve actuator from the control unit be modified according to variations in the system performance.
- the respective monitors shown in (ii) (C), (iii) (C) and (iv) (C) may be used to achieve this purpose. More specifically, by combining with the control unit that has been described earlier in this specification in connection with Figs. 2 and 4, each of these monitors may be used as means for modifying the control signal applied to the valve actuator. For example, updating of the membrane performance index can be achieved by feeding the control unit with the present value of membrane performance index K o that has been evaluated by the membrane performance monitor. Using the updated index (indicating the current performance of the reverse osmotic apparatus), the control unit can modify the stroke signal to be applied to the valve actuator.
- control unit can be supplied with the current values of the channel pressure loss coefficients a, and a 2 (as evaluated by the channel clogging monitor) in place of the constants that were previously used as measures for the past performance of the channels.
- the control unit may perform another calculation to modify the stroke signal to be applied to the valve actuator.
- the evaluated value obtained by the pump performance monitor may be used by the control unit which then modifies the stroke signal to be supplied to the valve actuator.
- the ouptut from the respective monitors will enable the operator to determine whether three major components of the system (semipermeable membrane, flow channels and centrifugal pump) need inspection, repair or replacement.
- Fig. 13 is a block diagram of the trouble detecting device that will provide a visible and/or audible alarm indicating an abnormal drop in the performance of one of the three major components of the reverse osmotic treatment system.
- the principle of detecting the abnormality of the respective components has already been described in (ii) (A), (iii) (A) and (iv) (A).
- the detecting means consists of a pressure sensor 2 for detecting the pressure of the feed solution P o ' and a pressure sensor 6 for detecting the pressure of the concentrated solution P 2 '.
- the following relations can be used to identify which of the three components has deteriorated. If P o ⁇ P o ' and P 2 ⁇ P 2 ', the performance of the reverse osmotic apparatus has deteriorated. If P o ⁇ P o ' and P 2 >P 2 ', at least some part of the flow channels is clogged. If P o >P o ' and P 2 >P 2 ', the performance of the pump has deteriorated.
- normal values P o and P 2 are compared with the respective detected values P o ' and P 2 ', and they indicate the normal pressures of feed solution and concentrated solution for the case where system parameters (e.g. fluid temperature T and valve opening A") other than that relating to the component to be checked are the same.
- the values of P o and P 2 are either stored in the control system or can be calculated from associated parameters.
- a pressure sensor supplies a comparator 53 with a signal indicative of the present value P o ' of the pressure of feed solution.
- a pressure sensor 6 supplies a second comparator 55 with a signal indicative of the present value P 2 ' of the pressure of concentrated solution.
- An input device 56 (which may be of keyboard type and may be the same as the input device 35 shown in Fig. 5) supplies a normal pressure calculator 54 with a signal indicative of the present value Q 1 of the desired flow of desalinated water.
- the present value of valve opening A the present value of the temperature T of the feed solution as detected by temperature sensor 14 (see Figs.
- the calculator 54 calculates the normal value P o of the pressure of the feed solution and the normal value P 2 of the pressure of the concentrated solution which would be provided if normal operation of the system were performed with those values of A", T and Q 1 .
- the calculator 54 may be realized by part of the control unit shown in Fig. 2.
- the control unit of Fig. 2 derives from the present value of the desalinated water flow Q 1 and the detected temperature T, P o (the normal pressure of the feed solution) and P 2 (normal pressure of the concentrated solution) as intermediate output that precedes the operation of determining the final output, or the valve opening A v of the valve actuator. Needless to say, the determination of Po and P 2 presupposes the normal operation of the entire system.
- various values of P o and P 2 that correspond to a set of various levels of temperature and the flow of desalinated water may be prestored in a memory.
- the normal values P o and P 2 may be read out of the memory by accessing with an address signal that specifies the present detected value of temperature T and the current setting of the flow of desalinated water Q 1 .
- the signals indicative of the normal value P o and P 2 are respectively supplied into a feed pressure comparator 53 and a concentrate pressure comparator 55.
- the comparator 53 compares P o and P o ' which indicates the present value of the feed pressure that has been sent from the detector 2. If P o is greater than P o ' by a degree that exceeds a tolerable range l o (i.e. P 0 ⁇ P 0 '+I 0 ), the comparator 53 provides one input of an AND gate 57 (for checking a drop in the pump performance) with a signal (logical "1") through a line 53A.
- the comparator 53 provides one input of an AND gate 58 (for checking line clogging) and one input of an AND gate 59 (for checking a drop in the membrane performance) with a signal through a line 53B.
- the second comparator 55 compares P 2 with P 2 ' which indicates the present value of the concentrate pressure that has been sent from the detector 6. If P 2 (normal value) is greater than P 2 ' by a degree that exceeds a tolerable range I 2 (i.e.
- the comparator feeds a signal to the second inputs of AND gates 57 and 58 through a line 55A. If P 2 ' is greater than P 2 by a degree that exceeds the tolerable range 1 2 (i.e. P 2 +I 2 ⁇ P 2 '), the comparator 55 feeds a signal to the other input of AND gate 59 through a line 55B.
- the values of l o and I 2 indicate the widths of the dead zones of respective comparators 53 and 55. These comparators can be realized by operational amplifiers having hysteresis characteristics with dead zones of widths of l o and 1 2 .
- the magnitude of I 0 and 1 2 also indicate the severity of any trouble occurring in a certain component in the system.
- Each of the comparators 53 and 55 may be composed of two or more units of comparator having different ranges of dead zone. By using this configuration, problems of different severity that have occurred in the same component can be distinguished from each other.
- the AND gate 57 is enabled to supply a signal to an alarm 61 which then provides an audible and/or visible alarm indicating a drop in the performance of the pump.
- the AND gate 58 is enabled to supply a signal to an alarm 62 which then provides an audible and/or visible alarm indicating a line or channel clogging.
- the AND gate 59 is enabled to provide a signal to an alarm 63, which then provides an audible and/or visible alarm indicating a deteriorated or abnormal operation of certain reverse osmotic modules.
- the trouble detecting device of Fig. 13 enables the operator to know which of the three major components of the reverse osmotic treatment system has experienced a drop in their performance. If desired, two or more comparators having different widths of dead zone may be used for detecting trouble in each component. By so doing, the operator is able to know whether a particular component (reverse osmotic apparatus, pump or fluid channels) requires inspection, repair or replacement, as well as when such task should be carried out.
- feed pressure sensor 2 and concentrate pressure sensor 6 are used as detection means. If desired, flowmeters may be disposed on the feed line and/or concentration line together with these pressure sensors or as an alternative thereto (see Decision Table 1).
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Water Supply & Treatment (AREA)
- Nanotechnology (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Separation Using Semi-Permeable Membranes (AREA)
- Centrifugal Separators (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- The present invention relates to a control for use with a reverse osmotic treatment system. More particularly, the invention relates to an apparatus for controlling the flow of a product fluid from a reverse osmotic treatment system using a fluid pressurizing means such as a centrifugal pump.
- A reverse osmotic treatment system is equipped with a reverse osmotic apparatus using semipermeable membranes. An impure fluid boosted by a pressurizing means of pump type is fed to the reverse osmotic apparatus, which separates the feed fluid into a relatively pure portion which has passed through the semipermeable membrane and is substantially made of the solvent, and a portion with a higher concentration of the solute.
- The reverse osmotic treatment system is typically used in plants for desalinating salt waters such as brine, brackish and seawater. In order to produce desalinated water, the feed fluid must be pressurized to a value exceeding its osmotic pressure.
- A system has recently been developed for desalinating a large volume of seawater with the reverse osmotic apparatus. In this system, the feed fluid is pressurized by a centrifugal pump in place of a reciprocating pump which is commonly employed in the small-scale system. This new type of reverse osmotic treatment system has a problem in connection with adjustment of the flow of the product solution (desalinated water when the feed solution is seawater, and a concentrated solution if the feed contains a chemical).
- A typical configuration of the prior art technique for controlling the flow of product fluid from the reverse osmotic treatment using a centrifugal pump as a pressurizing means is shown in Fig. 1. The reverse osmotic treatment system shown is used to desalinate seawater. A
centrifugal pump 1 driven by amotor 8 pressurizes the seawater and sends it to a reverseosmotic apparatus 4 composed of a plurality of reverse osmotic modules. Desalinated water coming out of the semipermeable membrane in each module is stored in atank 6. A concentrated solution also comes out of the reverse osmotic apparatus but by a different channel and is squirted against ahydraulic turbine 7 of Pelton wheel type through a nozzle 7'. The power shaft of theturbine 7 is directly coupled to the rotor of themotor 8 and feeds back the rotary energy to thepump 1. - The control system shown in Fig. 1 includes an
indicator 2a which indicates the pressure detected by a pressure sensor at the inlet 2' of the reverse osmotic apparatus (the indicator may be replaced by a pressure indication control which indicates a set value of pressure as well as the detected pressure), and apressure regulating valve 2 provided on the primary or feed line between thepump 1 and the reverse osmotic apparatus which is controlled either manually or automatically by thecontrol 2a to provide a feed pressure which is equal to the set value. The control system further includes aflow indicator 3a which indicates the flow detected by a flow sensor at point 3' on the feed line (this indicator may be replaced by a flow indication control which indicates a set value of flow as well as the detected flow), and aflow regulating valve 3 with an integral nozzle 7' which is disposed at the terminal end of the concentration or secondary line and which is controlled either manually or automatically by thecontrol 3a to provide a flow of the concentrated solution that is equal to the set value. The line on which the desalinated water flows is provided with aflowmeter 5 for measuring the flow of the desalinated water. - In the prior art control, the reverse osmotic treatment system is operated in such a manner that the recovery percentage or the ratio of the flow of desalinated water to that of the feed solution is held constant. In some cases, it is desired to switch the system operation to such a mode that the desired flow of desalinated water is increased (or decreased) by a significant amount (e.g. tens of percent). However, with the prior art system, complicated valve operations are necessary to achieve the newly set value of the desired flow of desalinated water. For one thing, each of the
valves flowmeter 5. This is partly because it has been impossible to predict accurately the value of the feed pressure necessary to accomplish the desired flow of desalinated water although the flow of the feed solution can be determined by dividing the flow of desalinated water by a fixed recovery percentage. The time required to make full adjustment to a new operating mode is of the order of hours (typically 2 hours. - The
pressure regulating valve 2 disposed on the feed line causes a pressure drop in the fluid, and this results in a corresponding decrease in the pressure of the fluid to be supplied to the reverse osmotic apparatus. As a result, a centrifugal pump having a relatively large capacity to compensate for the pressure drop caused by the valve becomes necessary, thus being accompanied by two disadvantages: lower efficiency of the production of desalinated water, and a relatively large power requirement. - A further disadvantage of the prior art control system is its high cost due to the use of a relatively large number of components (i.e. two valves, a pressure sensor, a pressure indication control, a flow sensor, and a flow indication control). Also, it is desired to make automatic checking of the individual components of the reverse osmotic treatment system for a decrease in their performance. More desirably, such a decrease should be evaluated quantitatively.
- Therefore, one object of the present invention is to provide a control of a relatively low cost which may be used to perform efficient and automatic control over the flow of product solution from the reverse osmotic treatment system. With the control apparatus of the present invention, the previously required complicated valve operations are not necessary, especially in order to achieve a newly set value of a desired flow of desalinated water.
- In this aspect of the invention, there is provided a control apparatus as defined in
claim 1. Other features of the invention are mentioned inclaims 2 to 8. - A further object of the invention is to provide an apparatus for monitoring a membrane performance index of a reverse osmotic apparatus in a reverse osmotic treatment system. The monitoring apparatus according to this further object is defined in the
independent claim 9 and in the appendedclaims 10 to 12. - A still further object of the invention is to propose an apparatus for detecting deterioration or abnormality of a certain component of a reverse osmotic treatment system. According to this still further object, a detecting apparatus is defined in the independent claim 13.
- These and other objects of the present invention, as well as its features and advantages will become apparent by reading the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
-
- Fig. 1 is a schematic diagram of the prior art control for use with a reverse osmotic treatment system.
- Fig. 2 is a block diagram of the control for use with a reverse osmotic treatment system according to the operating principle of the present invention.
- Fig. 3 is a flowchart showing the operations for determining the valve opening (or aperture area) from the preset desired value of the flow of desalinated water.
- Fig. 4 contains various characteristic curves for illustrating how an optimum pump speed for achieving the desired flow of desalinated water can be determined.
- Fig. 5 is a diagram showing a control for use with a reverse osmotic treatment system which includes a means for controlling the pump to run at an optimum speed according to the present invention.
- Fig. 6 is similar to Fig. 5 and shows a control having feedback elements.
- Fig. 7 is generally the same as Fig. 2 and illustrates the characteristics for the case of a deteriorated reverse osmotic apparatus, in comparison with those for the normally operating apparatus.
- Fig. 8 is a block diagram of a device for monitoring the performance of the reverse osmotic apparatus.
- Fig. 9 is generally the same as Fig. 2 and illustrates the characteristics for the case of a line clogging, as compared with those for the normal conditions.
- Fig. 10 is a block diagram of a device for monitoring the pressure loss in fluid channels.
- Fig. 11 is generally the same as Fig. 2 and illustrates the characteristic for the case of a deteriorated centrifugal pump, in comparison with those for the normal pump.
- Fig. 12 is a block diagram of a device for monitoring the performance of the centrifugal pump.
- Fig. 13 is a block diagram of a device with alarms for providing selective and individual checking of deteriorated or abnormal performance of different components in the reverse osmotic treatment system.
- The preferred embodiments of the present invention are hereunder described in the following order.
-
- (i) Overview.
- (ii) Reverse osmotic treatment system.
- (iii) Control unit (Fig. 2).
- (A) Procedure for determining pump discharge pressure from the desired level of the flow setting of desalinated water.
- (B) Procedure for determining the valve opening from pump discharge pressure Po and other parameters.
- (C) Implementation of
control unit 9.
- (iv) Modifications.
-
- (i) Overview.
- (ii) Optimum speed of pump (Fig. 4).
- (iii) Control at optimum pump speed (Figs. 5 and 6).
-
- (i) Overview.
- (ii) Devices for detecting the deterioration of the membrane performance, determining the deteriorated membrane performance index, and monitoring the membrane performance.
- (A) Detecting a drop in the membrane performance.
- (B) Procedure for determining the membrane performance index Ko'.
- (C) Membrane performance monitor (Fig. 8).
- (iii) Detecting a drop in the system performance due to scale deposit in the fluid channel, and device for monitoring the pressure loss in the channel.
- (A) Detecting a drop in system performance due to clogged channel.
- (B) Procedure for determining the pressure loss of fluid in a channel.
- (C) Device for tracking or monitoring pressure loss (Fig. 10).
- (iv) Detecting a drop in the performance of the pump, and device for determining the degree of deterioration and monitoring the pump performance.
- (A) Detecting a drop in the pump performance.
- (B) Procedure for evaluating the degree of deterioration of pump performance.
- (C) Device for monitoring pump performance (Fig. 12).
- (v) Modifying the valve opening by the monitors.
- (vi) Trouble detecting device for the three system components (Fig. 13).
- According to the control system of the present invention, only a single operating means (such as of valve type) provided on a channel for concentrated fluid at a point downstream of a reverse osmotic apparatus is used to establish a system pressure. The control system according to the present invention obviates a prior art pressure adjusting means of valve type positioned between a centrifugal pump and the reverse osmotic apparatus. In the control system of the present invention, the single pressure establishing means is provided with a suitable control signal that adjusts the pressure on the semipermeable membrane in the reverse osmotic apparatus to achieve the desired flow of product fluid or desalinated water. The present inventors have found that once the flow of desalinated water is set at a desired level, the pressure on the semipermeable membrane that achieves that flow setting can be determined. This pressure can be established by providing a corresponding operating input into the single pressure establishing means or valve disposed on the channel for concentrated fluid at a point downstream of the reverse osmotic apparatus.
- An embodiment of the reverse osmotic treatment system to which the present invention is applied is described hereunder. Referring to Fig. 2, the reverse osmotic treatment system shown is used to desalinate seawater. A
centrifugal pump 1 receives pretreated seawater from an intake pump, pressurizes it and sends the pressurized seawater to a reverseosmotic apparatus 4 comprised of a plurality of reverse osmotic modules or units of semipermeable membrane type. The symbols Po, Qo and Co represent the pressure, flow and concentration of the discharged seawater, respectively. In order to produce desalinated water from the reverseosmotic apparatus 4, the hydraulic pressure Pm of feed seawater or primary fluid at the interface with the semipermeable membrane in each module must be higher than the reverse osmotic pressure nM of the primary fluid near the interface. The difference between Pm and nM is generally referred to as the reverse osmotic pressure. Stated more correctly, the reverse osmotic pressure is also dependent on the hydraulic pressure and osmotic pressure of the product fluid or desalinated water coming out of the reverseosmotic apparatus 4. The pressure, flow and concentration of desalinated water are respectively shown by P" Q, and C, in Fig. 2. The fluid of high concentration coming out of the reverse osmotic apparatus passes through a concentration or secondary line to be discharged from the system. The symbols P2, Q2 and C2 shown adjacent the secondary line represent the pressure, flow and concentration of the secondary fluid of high concentration, respectively. - According to the system of the present invention, the secondary line is provided with a single system pressure establishing means or
valve 3. Thevalve 3 includes avalve actuator 3b that operates in response to a signal supplied from acontrol unit 9 to be described later in this specification. Thevalve actuator 3b shown adjusts the valve stroke to define the opening or aperture area of a nozzle 7'. The system shown in Fig. 2 includes an energy recovery means. The nozzle 7' supplies a water jet to ahydraulic turbine 7 of Pelton wheel type for its rotation. Theturbine 7 is mechanically coupled to apump driving motor 8 and supplies part of the energy necessary for driving thepump 1. This energy recovery means has energy saving as its sole object and hence is not essential for achievement of the primary objective of the control system of the present invention. Atemperature sensor 14 is provided on the primary fluid channel connecting thecentrifugal pump 1 to the reverseosmotic apparatus 4. The output from thetemperature sensor 14 is used for temperature calibration in the control unit to be described hereunder. - It has heretofore been generally understood that the
valve 3 positioned alone downstream of the reverse osmotic apparatus is unable to establish the desired level of the desalinated water flow Q,. This is partly due to the replacement of a reciprocating pump with a centrifugal pump in recent times as a means for pressurizing fluids. With the centrifugal pump, a change in the opening of thevalve 3 will cause a change in both the flow and pressure of the primary fluid (seawater) being discharged from the pump. - According to the present invention, a selected opening for the single valve is capable of providing the desired level of the flow of product fluid or desalinated water.
- The control unit according to the present invention is provided with two capabilities: one is to determine a pressure for establishing a desired preselected level of the flow of product fluid or desalinated water, and the other is to determine and provide a corresponding operating amount (stroke) for the valve so as to enable the establishment of that pressure.
-
- AM: effective area of the semipermeable membranes in the reverse osmotic apparatus,
- K: performance index as determined by the physical properties, structure and temperature of the semipermeable membranes,
- ΔP: reverse osmotic pressure.
-
- PM: average pressure applied on the surface of the membrane in contact with the feed or primary fluid,
- P1: pressure of product fluid (desalinated water) on the secondary side of the membrane,
- πM: osmotic pressure of feed fluid near its interface with the membrane,
- π1: osmotic pressure of product fluid (desalinated water) on the secondary side of the membrane.
- For better understanding of the present invention, the procedure of determining the system pressure from a preset level of the flow of desalinated water is described hereunder. The procedure shown below relies on a particular algorithm for converging the discharge pressure Po of
centrifugal pump 1, but it may be readily understood by those skilled in the art that they can use any other algorithm that fits their specific need in view of the description in this specification. - (1) Set the flow of desalinated water Q, (routine 101 in Fig. 3).
- (2) Suppose or initialize the value of the discharge pressure Po of pump 1 (routine 101 in Fig. 3).
- (3) Use the performance characteristic (Head-Discharge or Q-H curve) of a centrifugal pump to determine Qo, the discharge from the pump or flow of feed seawater, that corresponds to the initial value of pressure Po. The pump performance curve is shown by
reference numeral 21 ingraph 11 in Fig. 2. The horizontal and vertical axes ofgraph 11 indicate the flow and pressure, respectively, of the feed seawater. - (4) According to continuity principles, Q2 or the flow of the secondary fluid or solution of high concentration is given by:
- (5) The concentration CM of feed solution near the surface of a semipermeable membrane is given by the following approximation:
-
- Therefore, CM can be determined from Co, constant for the concentration of seawater, and Qo and Q2 calculated in steps (3) and (4), respectively.
- The above will be a good approximation for the system for desalinating seawater, but if a more accurate value is desired, a better correlation that will be apparent to those skilled in the art may be used.
- (6) Since the osmotic pressure is a function of concentration, the concentration of feed solution CM can be used to determine the corresponding osmotic pressure nM.
Graph 12 in Fig. 2 illustrates the concentration vs. osmotic pressure profile bycurve 24. - (7) Temperature calibration:
- If the feed seawater is subject to a significant change in temperature, a
temperature sensor 14 is used to detect the temperature of the solution flowing through the feed line. If the temperature detected is T, the value of membrane performance index K, can be calibrated by the following formula: - Ko: constant as determined by the physical properties and structure of the semipermeable membrane,
- Dw: diffusion coefficient of water in the membrane,
- T: temperature of the feed solution,
- Graph 13 in Fig. 2 illustrates the T vs. Dw/K profile by
curve 28. - In the absence of a change in the temperature of the feed solution, a constant can be used as membrane performance index K.
- (8) By subtracting PL1, the pressure loss of fluid from the pump to the semipermeable membranes in the reverse
osmotic apparatus 4 from Po, the initial setting of pump discharge pressure obtained in step (2), PM or the pressure on the feed side of the membrane can be determined. The line pressure loss PL1 is dependent on the flow of feed fluid, as it can be determined from Qo (as obtained in step (3)) either empirically or by a suitable correlation (e.g. PL1=a1Q0 2). - (9) The reverse osmotic pressure AP is given by:
- In normal operation of the system, the pressure of desalinated water P, and its osmotic pressure π1 maintain substantially fixed levels and hence can be regarded as two constants. Using these constants, as well as nM and PM determined in steps (6) and (8), the reverse osmotic pressure AP can be obtained.
- (10) As already mentioned, the flow of desalinated water Q, is given by the equation:
graph 15 in Fig. 2 by astraight line 25. - (11) In this step, Q,, which has been set in step (1), is compared with Q1CALC (
routine 103 in Fig. 3). If the difference between the two values is greater than a tolerable limit, update the pump discharge pressure Po, and repeat the sequence of steps (2) thru (10), or Q1CALC obtaining routines 101 and 102, until the difference between the initially set Q1 and the determined Q1CALC becomes smaller than the tolerable limit. In other words, this updating operation is performed in such a manner that the value of Q1CALC obtained by calculation with the updated Po converges to the set value of Q,. It will be understood by those skilled in the art that various algorithms can be used for achieving this convergence. - A preset value Q1 of the flow of desalinated water generally has two corresponding values as Po or the discharge pressure of a pump. This is owing to the characteristic relation of the flow of desalinated water as against the pump discharge pressure or the pressure on the reverse osmotic apparatus.
Graph 11 in Fig. 2 illustrates withcurve 23 the pump discharge pressure vs. desalinated water flow. If the pump discharge pressure Po, hence the water pressure Pm on the reverse osmotic apparatus, has a small value that is unable to overcome the osmotic pressure πM of feed solution in the reverse osmotic apparatus (i.e. ΔP<0), desalinated water will not be produced. As the discharge pressure of the pump increases, the osmotic pressure nM of the feed solution at the semipermeable membrane will also increase. However, in the early stage, the rate of increase in the pump discharge pressure is greater than that of increase in the osmotic pressure nM, and therefore, the reverse osmotic pressure AP continues to increase, causing a proportional increase in the flow of desalinated water. When the rate of increase in the reverse osmotic pressure AP becomes zero, a maximum flow of desalinated water Q1max is attained (seecurve 23 in Fig. 2). A further increase in the pump discharge pressure will result in the decrease of the reverse osmotic pressure AP. This leads to a decreased flow of desalinated water. Finally, the flow of desalinated water becomes zero at a pressure corresponding to a point on the Q-H characteristic curve of the pump where the flow of primary fluid is zero. - To summarize, the characteristic curve for the flow of desalinated water vs. pump discharge pressure or water pressure on a semipermeable membrane in the reverse osmotic apparatus consists of two regions: one is the area where the flow of desalinated water increases with increasing pressure, and the other is the area where the flow of desalinated water is decreased by a further increase in pressure.
Characteristic curve 23 is obtained by plotting, according to the above procedure, values of pump discharge pressure Po corresponding to various settings of the flow of desalinated water Q1. -
Curve 22 in graph 11 (Fig. 2) illustrates the relation of Q2, the flow of the secondary fluid or solution of high concentration, as against the pump discharge pressure Po. This curve can be obtained by subtracting the Po-Q,characteristic curve 23 from the Q-Hcharacteristic curve 21 ofpump 1. - As already mentioned, there are two calculated values of the pump discharge pressure that satisfy a specific set value of the flow of desalinated water Q1. In orderto use only one value as a discharge pressure setting, the following two requirements for system operation are used as selection criteria. The first and principal requirement is that the recovery percentage, or the ratio of the flow of desalinated water to the flow of the primary fluid (Q,/Qo), be within a tolerable range that guarantees normal operation of the reverse osmotic apparatus. The second requirement for selection is that the pump be drivable by less energy.
- In this manner, Po, the pressure of the primary fluid or the discharge pressure of
pump 1 that provides the desired level of the flow of desalinated water Q1 and satisfies the two requirements for system operation has now been determined. Also, other system state variables including the corresponding flow of the primary fluid Qo and that of the secondary fluid (concentrated solution) have been determined. -
- (12) The pressure of concentrated solution P2 at nozzle 7' can be empirically determined from the three values determined in step (11), i.e. the discharge pressure Po of
pump 1, the flow of primary fluid Qo and the flow of concentrated solution Q2. Alternatively, the following correlation can be used for calculation of P2: - PL1: fluid pressure loss in line from
pump 1 to reverseosmotic apparatus 4, - PL2: fluid pressure loss in line from reverse osmotic apparatus to nozzle 7'.
- In the right side of the correlation, PL1 is given by a1Q0 2 and PL2 by a2Q2 2, wherein a1 and a2 are each a loss constant.
- If the line pressure loss of fluid is much smaller than the pump discharge pressure and there will not great fluctuation in the flow of primary fluid and concentrated solution, a constant may be used for both PL1 and PL2.
- (13) Nozzle 7' is a device for converting a hydraulic pressure to the kinetic energy of a water jet. The velocity (v) of a fluid squirted from the nozzle 7' can be determined by the following equation using P2 or the hydraulic pressure at nozzle inlet determined in step (12):
- a: constant,
- g: acceleration of gravity.
- This formula is visualized by
curve 26 ingraph 16 of Fig. 2. - (14) The opening or aperture Av of
control valve 3 can be calculated by the following equation using the flow of concentrated solution Q2 as determined in step (11) and the velocity of water jet v as determined in step (13): - (15) The operating amount or stroke S of the control valve can be determined from the valve opening vs. stroke characteristics of the valve by using Av determined instep (14).
Graph 17 in Fig. 2 shows a typical valve opening vs. stroke profile bycurve 27. A signal indicating the stroke S is fed toactuator 3b ofcontrol valve 3 through adriver 18, which, in turn, shifts the valve by stroke S to provide a valve opening corresponding to Av. As a result, thecontrol valve 3 having the opening Av develops system pressure and water flow equal to the vales set or calculated in step (11), thereby establishing the desired level of desalinated water flow. -
Control unit 9 can be realized by combining digital or analog function generators that will generate the characteristic curves shown in Fig. 2. In the simplest form,control unit 9 can be realized by a single function generator capable of generating a valve operating amount or stroke S that corresponds to the desired level of desalinated water flow setting Q1. Alternatively, valve stroke S may be read by using the set input Q1 to access a lookup table of memory type. In a more sophisticated form,control unit 9 can be realized by a computer including a memory storing necessary system variables, an input device, typically of either keyboard or switch type, that enters desired values to be set in the system, and a data processor that processes input data by the procedures described in Sections (A) and (B). - In the foregoing pages, the control system of the present invention has been described by reference to an embodiment wherein the system is applied to desalination of seawater. The present system may also be used to control a process for concentrating a chemical-containing fluid by a reverse osmotic apparatus. In this case, the amount to be controlled is not the flow of desalinated water, but the flow of a concentrated solution. From the preset value of the flow of concentrated solution and according to the procedure described in Section (A) with necessary modifications that will be obvious to those skilled in the art, the discharge pressure of a centrifugal pump and other system state variables that will achieve the present level of the flow of concentrated solution can be determined.
- In the reverse osmotic treatment system shown in Fig. 2, a hydraulic turbine of Pelton wheel type that is driven by a water jet from the nozzle is used as an energy recovery means. If desired, this turbine may be replaced by a reverse running pump turbine. If the system is of such a small size that energy recovery will not provide any substantial cost saving, entire omission of the turbine and using the
control valve 3 to simply discharge the concentrated solution out of the system would sometimes be advisable. - The system of Fig. 2 depends on an open loop control. If necessary, means for detecting certain system state variables (e.g. pressure or flow) may be added for confirmatory or feedback purposes. An example of such means is a sensor for detecting the discharge pressure of the centrifugal pump. The output of this sensor is compared with a calculated value of the pump discharge pressure obtained in
control unit 9 to recalculate or correct the set value of pump discharge pressure so as to correct the valve opening in order that the actual pump discharge pressure developed thereby will be equal to the corrected value. - The control system described in Section I presupposes that the
centrifugal pump 1 runs at a predetermined rotational speed, for example, the rated rpm. The Q-H performance of a pump depends on its rotational speed. Therefore, the flow Q1 of product fluid as against the pump discharge pressure Po also varies with the pump speed. The power required for driving the pump depends on both the pump speed and its discharge. Preferably, the rotational speed of the pump can be determined at an optimum level that minimizes the power requirement for establishing the desired level of the flow of product fluid, for example, desalinated water. - As will be understood from the description in Section I, when the pump is running at a specified speed, a maximum flow of desalinated water or Q1max can be provided at a specific pump discharge pressure P01 (see
pump performance curve 21 and Po-Qicharacteristic curve 23 in Fig. 2). The value of Q1max increases with higher pump speed. For a given value of Qo, the power requirement for the pump to supply the fluid decreases with lower pump speed. According to the finding of the present inventors, an optimum pump speed can be found at a point on the Po-Qi characteristic curve having a maximum flow of product fluid (e.g. desalinated water) Qlmax which is equal to its desired value Q1. The power requirement for the pump can be minimized by running it at this optimum speed. - The method of finding an optimum speed of the
centrifugal pump 1 is hereunder described by reference to Fig. 4. In graph (A) of Fig. 4,curve 21 shows the Q-H performance characteristics (discharge pressure Po versus flow of feed fluid Qo) of the pump at the rated speed NR. Curve 23 shows the discharge pressure Po versus flow of desalinated fluid Q1 characteristics at the same speed NR. Curve 21-1 shows yQ-H performance characteristics of the pump at 0.9 NR, whereas curve 23-1 shows the Po-Qi characteristics corresponding to that curve. Similarly, curves 21-2 and 23-2 respective show the Q-H performance characteristics of the pump and the P0-Q1 characteristics. A dashedline 29 shows the pump speed vs. Q1max-P0 profile that is obtained by plotting the values of maximum flow (Q1max) on the Po vs. Q1 characteristic curves for various pump speeds, namely, the values of maximum flow of desalinated water that can be provided at various pump speeds.Curve 31 shows the output characteristics of a pressure regulating valve 2 (see Fig. 1) provided on the feed line in the conventional system, and these characteristics indicate the pressure vs. flow of the primary fluid at the rated pump speed NR. As will be shown later in this specification, a dashedline 32 represents optimum pump operating characteristics which are obtained by plotting the pump operating points capable of providing a maximum flow of desalinated water at various pump speeds. -
Curve 33 in graph (B) of Fig. 4 corresponds to thecharacteristic curve 23 in graph (A) and shows the pump speed vs. maximum flow (Q1max) profile.Curve 34, 34-1 and 34-2 in graph (C) in Fig. 4 show the relation of discharge (Qo) frompump 1 and power requirement (HP) for respective pump speeds of NR, 0.9 NR AND 0.8 NR. - In graph (A), point (d) is on the P0-Q1 characteristic curve 23-1 for a pump speed of 0.9 NR and indicates the maximum flow of desalinated water Q'1max that is obtained by the reverse osmotic treatment system at 0.9 NR, as well as the pump discharge pressure or the pressure at the inlet of the reverse osmotic apparatus Poa that develops when Q'1max is obtained. In this instance, the pump is operating at point (a) on the pump performance characteristic curve 21-1 for the same pump speed (0.9 NR). This point (a) shows that the primary fluid is flowing at a rate of Qoa. The corresponding power requirement is Ha, as indicated by point (a) on the curve 34-1. As will be understood from the description that follows, if the maximum flow Q'1max that is obtained at a pump speed of 0.9 NR is equal to the desired level of desalinated flow Q1, 0.9 NR is the optimum pump speed at which the power requirement for the pump is minimized.
- In the embodiment shown, the Po-Qi
characteristic curve 23 for a pump speed of NR has two points (e) and (f) at which the flow of desalinated water is equal to the maximum flow Q'1max for a speed of 0.9 NR. Point (e) shows that the pump discharge pressure or the pressure at the inlet of the reverse osmotic apparatus has a value Pod which is greater than the value of Poa at point (d). A pump operating point corresponding to point (e) is point (g) oncurve 21, and this latter point indicates that the flow of the feed fluid is Qob. - The recovery percentage or the ratio of the flow of product fluid (i.e. desalinated water) to the flow of feed fluid must be within a range that assures normal operation of the reverse osmotic apparatus. For the desalination system of seawater the critical recovery percentage that is tolerated by the system is generally in the range of 20 to 40%. If the system was so operated as to receive the feed fluid at a flow rate of Qob (indicated by point (g)) and to provide desalinated water at a flow rate of Q, (indicated by point (e)), the recovery percentage (Q1/Q0b) would exceed its critical value. Therefore, the operating points (e) and (g) are excluded from the system requirements of the present invention.
- The pump operating point corresponding to point (f) is point (c) on
curve 21, and this point indicates that the flow of the feed fluid is Qoc. The power requirement for providing this flow level is Hc which is indicated by point (b) on thepower requirement curve 34 for a pump speed of NR. - In the illustrated example, point (a) on curve 21-1 is also on
curve 31 which indicates the output characteristics of the pressure regulating valve for a pump speed of NR. In this case, the pressure at the inlet of the reverse osmotic apparatus is Poa and the flow of the fluid that is fed to the reverse osmotic apparatus is Qoa. The flow of the desalinated water produced is equal to the value indicated by point (d) on curve 23-1 (Po-Q, characteristic curve for a speed of 0.9 NR) that corresponds to pump operating point (a). This is because, in both cases, the fluid being fed into the reverse osmotic apparatus has the same pressure and flow. The pump operating point which corresponds to point (a) associated with the pressure regulating valve is found at point (b). Therefore, it can be seen that the pressure regulating valve has caused a pressure drop equal to the difference between Pod indicated by point (b) and Poa indicated by point (a). The power requirement corresponding to the pump operating point (b) in graph (A) has a value Hb indicated by point (b) on thepower requirement curve 34 in graph (C). The value Hb indicates the power required to provide a flow of desalinated water Q, from the system which is operated at a pump speed of N3 using the second pressure regulating valve positioned on the feed line. The value Ha which is smaller than Hb and is indicated by point (a) on curve 34-1 refers to the power required to provide the same flow of desalinated water when the system is operated at a pump speed of 0.9 NR and without using the second pressure regulating valve. - As will be understood from the foregoing description, in order to minimize the power necessary for providing the desired level of the flow of product fluid or desalinated water, the system may be operated at an optimum pump speed where the point of the maximum flow of desalinated water on the corresponding Po-Q, characteristic curve is equal to the desired flow level. The pump runs at a specific operating point on the Q-H performance curve associated with that point of the maximum flow of desalinated water, and its discharge pressure is regulated by the single valve positioned downstream of the reverse osmotic apparatus.
- An example of the procedure for determining the optimum pump speed is hereunder described.
- (1) Prepare data on the maximum flow of desalinated water vs. pump discharge pressure for various pump speeds, as illustrated by
curve 29 in Fig. 4. - (2) Set the flow of desalinated water at a desired level.
- (3) Scan the data prepared in step (1) and compare the maximum flow of desalinated water for each of the checked pump speeds with the desired level of the flow of desalinated water.
- (4) Select a maximum flow of desalinated water which is closest to the desired level. Optimum pump speed is the value that corresponds to this selected maximum flow of desalinated water. The pump discharge pressure is determined at the same time.
- The above procedure presupposes that the recovery percentage is held within the tolerable range when the system is operated at any maximum flow point on the Po-Q, characteristics (e.g. point (d) on curve 23-1 in Fig. 4). If this requirement is not met by the reverse osmotic apparatus used, necessary modifications must be made to the data prepared in step (1) so that the recovery percentage of the modified data is within the tolerable limits. More specifically, the flow of desalinated water for the maximum recovery percentage tolerated by the specific reverse osmotic apparatus is selected as the maximum flow of desalinated water.
- A means for determining the optimum speed of the centrifugal pump can be realized by a digital or analog function generator which, in response to an input signal indicative of the desired level of the flow of desalinated water, produces a signal indicative of the optimum pump speed. Once the optimum pump speed and pump discharge pressure corresponding to the desired preset level of the flow of desalinated water are determined, the opening of the valve necessary for establishing the so determined pump discharge pressure can be automatically determined by the procedure described in Section I, (iii) (B).
- Fig. 5 is a block diagram of the control unit for the reverse osmotic treatment system that is operated by the principle of the present invention that has been described by reference to Fig. 4.
Reference numeral 35 represents an input device, typically of keyboard type, which provides a setting of the desired level of the desalinated water flow Q,. Adevice 36 is a function generator which produces a signal indicative of the optimum pump speed N in response to the signal that has been entered frominput device 35 and which indicates the desired level of the flow of desalinated water Q,. In response to this command,motor speed control 38 coupled to the function generator controls a centrifugalpump driving motor 8 so that it rotates at optimum speed.Reference numeral 37 represents a function generator which, in response to the signal that has been entered frominput device 35 and which indicates the desired flow level Qi, produces the value of the stroke which is a function of Q, and by which thevalve 3 positioned downstream of the reverse osmotic apparatus must be shifted. Thefunction generator 37 provides a command through adriver 18 to anactuator 3b of thevalve 3 positioned on the secondary line and causes the valve to shift by the stroke indicated by said command. As a result, the system produces desalinated water at the desired flow rate Q, while the pump is running at the optimum speed and the fluid pressure is established by thevalve 3. Aflowmeter 5 is not essential to the present invention but may be used to measure the actual flow of desalinated water for confirmatory purposes. - Fig. 6 shows a modification of the apparatus of Fig. 5. This modification is primarily characterized by a pressure sensor 2b that is provided on the supply or primary line for detecting the pressure of the fluid flowing through that line. This sensor 2b produces a signal indicative of the actual discharge pressure of the pump Po(REAL), which is fed back to the optimum
pump speed generator 36. Thegenerator 36 may include means for comparing the actual discharge pressure (as detected by sensor 2b) with the calculated pressure stored in thegenerator 36. In response to the result of this comparison, a pressure recalculating means (not shown) in thegenerator 36 modifies or updates the calculated pressure so that the recalculated value agrees with the actual pressure. - Similarly, the concentration or secondary line is provided with a
pressure sensor 19 for detecting the pressure of the fluid flowing through that line. Thissensor 19 feeds back to the stroke generator 37 a signal indicative of the actual pressure of the concentrated fluid P2(REAL). Thestroke generator 37 recalculates the pressure so that the recalculated pressure is in agreement with the actual pressure. - The control system of Fig. 6 has the advantage that it provides more precise system state variables. Each of the pressure sensors used as feedback elements may be replaced by a flowmeter. However, the use of a flowmeter is not cost effective since it is fairly expensive. A single feedback element rather than a plurality of elements may be used. For example, one of the primary and secondary
fluid pressure sensors 2b and 19 may be omitted. - Any conventional driving means for the centrifugal pump, such as engine, gas turbine and etc. can be substituted for the
motor 8. - The description in Sections I and II assumes that the system is operating under normal conditions and provides constant performance characteristics. This will justify the use of a predetermined constant as the membrane performance index Ko, and a predetermined pattern for the Q-H characteristic curve of the centrifugal pump. However, in the actual operation of the system, its performance will deteriorate for one reason or another. According to the present invention, there are provided devices that monitor the performance of the respective components of the system and determine the degree by which their performance has deteriorated.
- It is the understanding of the present inventors that the overall performance of the reverse osmotic treatment system is governed by the performance of three major components, i.e. the centrifugal pump, the membranes in the reverse osmotic apparatus and the fluid channels, and the deterioration of the last mentioned component is evaluated in terms of pressure loss. According to the finding of the present inventors, the deteriorations of these three components can be separately identified by comparing a combination or pattern of the state levels (pressure and/orflow) of the primary and secondary fluid passing through the feed or primary and secondary or concentration line in the reverse osmotic treatment system with a combination or pattern of the state levels of the fluid under normal or ideal operating conditions. The results of these comparisons are summarized in the following Decision Table I.
- A state level without prime indicates the value under normal conditions. For example, Po indicates the fluid pressure on the primary line under normal conditions.
- A state level with a prime indicates a value other than the normal value which is due to a change in the performance of a certain component.
- Po, Po': pressure of fluid in the primary line.
- P2, P2': pressure of fluid in the secondary line.
- Qo, Qo': flow of fluid in the primary line.
- Q2, Q2': flow of fluid in the secondary line.
- The embodiment to be shown hereinafter uses a means for detecting the pressure of a fluid flowing through the primary or supply line, and a means for detecting the pressure of a fluid flowing through the secondary or concentration line. Each of the detected values of pressure is compared with the value calculated for normal operating conditions. The results of the comparison will identify which system component has experienced a deterioration in performance. Also disclosed are devices for evaluating the degree by which the performance of respective components (e.g. the Q-H performance curve of the centrifugal pump, the membrane performance index, fluid pressure loss index) of the system has deteriorated.
- More specifically, the performance monitor or evaluating apparatus according to the present invention provides the latest information about the performance of the respective components of the control system. By using this information, the control systems shown in Figs. 2, 5 and 6 are able to maintain the flow control with high accuracy.
- If the performance of a certain component is greatly deteriorated and its operation is found to be abnormal, the entire system is preferably shut down for the purpose of inspecting, repairing and/or replacing that defective component. In the embodiment to be shown hereinafter, this object is achieved by using a means that issues a visible and/or audible alarm in response to a signal indicative of the abnormality of a certain component.
- Fig. 7 is generally the same as Fig. 2 and shows a
control unit 9 having the same capabilities as those of the control unit shown in Fig. 2.Reference numeral 2 denotes a pressure sensor that is provided on the supply or primary line for detecting the pressure of the primary fluid.Reference numeral 6 refers to a pressure sensor which is provided on the secondary or concentration line for detecting the pressure of the concentrated fluid. The detection signals from these sensors are fed to various performance monitors (Figs. 8, 10 and 12), as well as trouble type identifying and alarm devices (Fig. 13), all of which can be incorporated in the control unit 9 (but not shown in Fig. 7). Each of the graphs in Fig. 7 shows the characteristics of a deteriorated membrane in the reverse osmotic apparatus as compared with those of the normal membrane. - For better understanding of the present invention, the following description assumes that the opening Av of
valve 3 under normal conditions is the same as the value under such conditions where the overall performance of the system has changed as a result, for example, of deteriorated membrane performance. Similarly, two system state levels (e.g. P2 and P2') shall be compared at the same fluid temperature by using the necessary temperature compensation (temperature calibration for fluids having different temperatures). -
- (1) As stated in Section I, Q1 or the flow of desalinated water produced from the reverse osmotic apparatus is given by:
- In
graph 15 of Fig. 7, asolid line 25 shows the osmotic pressure vs. flow of desalinated water characteristics of the normal semipermeable membrane. For a given temperature, if the performance of the membrane is deteriorated and the production of desalinated water is subsequently reduced, the characteristics of the membrane change to those indicated by the dashed line. When the performance of the membrane deteriorates, the flow of desalinated water decreases whereas that of concentrated solution increases. In Fig. 7, Q1 represents the flow of desalinated water under normal conditions, 01' the flow with deteriorated membrane performance, whereas Q2 indicates the flow of concentrated solution under normal conditions, and Q2' the flow with deteriorated membrane performance. Therefore, the following relations can be derived: - (2) In the discussion of this section (ii), the opening Av of
valve 3 is assumed to be constant. Therefore, when the flow of concentrated solution increases, the velocity of the water jet issuing from the nozzle 7' and the pressure of the concentrated solution are increased from v to v', and from Po to P2', respectively, as illustrated ingraph 16. Therefore, - (3) The pressure loss of the fluid in the line (PL=PL1+PL2) fluctuates less than the degree by which the pressure of the concentrated solution is increased, and therefore, the dicharge pressure of the pump or the pressure of the solution in the primary line is also increased. Stated mathematically,
- (4) To summarize the pressure relations determined in (2) and (3),
- The trouble identifying device according to the present invention which will be described later (Fig. 13) identifies certain trouble as a drop in the performance of the semipermeable membrane when the device detects the relations shown above.
-
- (1) The velocity V' of a water jet issuing from nozzle 7' with the deteriorated membrane is determined by solving the correlation: V'=α√2gP2' using P2' which is the hydraulic pressure in the secondary line and detected by
pressure detector 6. - (2) The flow of concentrated fluid Q2' with the deteriorated membrane is determined by solving Q2'=AvV' using the valve aperture Av and the velocity V' determined in step (1).
- (3) The pump discharge or the flow of fluid in the primary line Qo' is determined from the performance characteristics of the pump (see
curve 21 in Fig. 7) using the detected pump discharge pressure Po'. - (4) The flow of desalinated water Q1' is determined by solving Q1'=Q0'-Q2' using Qo' and Q2' determined in steps (2) and (3).
- (5) Pressure loss in the primary line P'L1 is determined either empirically or by solving P'L1=a1(Q0')2 using Qo' determined in step (3). In the calculation formula, a1 is the pressure loss coefficient for the primary line. If desired, a constant may be used for P'L1 since the pressure loss occurring in the primary line is typically about 1/50 of the discharge pressure of the pump.
- (6) The pressure P'M that is applied on the surface of a semipermeable membrane in the reverse osmotic apparatus is determined by solving P'M=P0'-P'L1, using P'L1 determined in step (5) and the pump discharge pressure Po' detected by
pressure sensor 2. - (7) The concentration of the secondary solution C2' is determined by solving C2' =C0 · Q0'/Q2' using Q2' and Qo' determined in steps (2) and (3).
- (8) The average concentration C'M of the feed solution in contact with the surface of a semipermeable membrane in the reverse osmotic apparatus is determined by solving the approximation: C'M=(CO+C2')/2 using the constant for the concentration of seawater Co and the concentration of the secondary solution C2' determined in step (7). A better approximation may be used if a more accurate value of C'M is desired.
- (9) The osmotic pressure n'M is determined from C'M determined in step (8) by using the concentration (CM) vs. osmotic pressure nM characteristics (
curve 24 in Fig. 7). - (10). The reverse osmotic pressure AP' is determined by solving
- (11) The temperature-dependent membrane performance index K' is determined by solving K'=Q1'/ AMΔP' using Q, determined in step (4), AM the constant for the membrane area, and AP' determined in step (10).
- (12) The degree of deterioration of the performance of a membrane in the reverse osmotic apparatus is determined by calculating the ratio of K', the performance index of deteriorated membrane, to K, the performance index of the normal membrane for the same temperature. Alternatively, Ko' or the membrane performance index which is not dependent on temperature may be determined by solving K0'=K/(Dw/T) wherein (Dw/T) is a calculated value obtained from the temperature T detected by the
temperature detector 3. In this latter case, the degree by which the performance of the membrane has deteriorated can be determined by calculating Ko'/Ko using the performance index of the normal membrane Ko. - Fig. 8 is a block diagram of the tracking device according to the present invention which monitors the performance of the membrane by the procedure described in (B). The pressure Po' of the fluid in the feed line to a semipermeable membrane in the reverse osmotic apparatus is detected by
detector 2, which sends the detected information into a pressure/flow converter 11a. Theconverter 11 a converts the pump discharge pressure or the pressure of the feed fluid Po' to the corresponding flow of the feed fluid Qo' in accordance with the Q-H characteristics of the pump (as indicated bycurve 21 in Fig. 7). Thepressure detector 2 also sends the signal P'o to a membraneinterfacial pressure calculator 29 in the tracking device or monitor. Thecalculator 29, in response to both the signal P'o and the feed fluid flow signal Q'o from the pressure/flow converter 11a, produces a membrane interfacial pressure signal P'M in accordance with the correlationsecond pressure detector 6 detects the pressure of the fluid in the concentration line from the reverse osmotic apparatus, and sends the detected signal to aconcentrate flow calculator 6b in the tracking device. Using P'2 and the present value of valve aperture A, supplied from the control unit of the type as shown in Fig. 2, thecalculator 6b produces a signal Q'2 in accordance with the correlation Q'2=AvαV2gP'2. A desalinatedwaterflow calculator 30, in response to signal Q'o from 11 a and signal Q'2 from 6b, determines the flow of desalinated water Q'i in accordance with the correlation Q'1=Q'0-Q'2. A membraneinterfacial concentration calculator 6c, in response to signal Q'o fromconverter 11 a and signal Q'2 fromcalculator 6b, produces a membrane interfacial concentration C'M in accordance with the correlationosmotic pressure converter 12a, in accordance with the concentration/osmotic pressure characteristics (seecurve 24 in Fig. 7), converts the membrane interfacial concentration signal C'M to the corresponding osmotic pressure signal n'M. A membraneperformance drop calculator 31, in response to the membrane interfacial pressure signal P'M, desalinated water flow signal Q'i and osmotic pressure signal π'M fromrespective means calculator 31, further in response to a temperature signal T from a temperature signal 14 (Fig. 9), determines a temperature-independent membrane performance index Ko' in accordance with the correlation K0'=K'/(Dw/T). If desired, thecalculator 31 may be so designed that it also responds to the reference membrane performance index Ko having the normal value and being stored in the control unit, and calculates Ko'/Ko or the ratio of the present performance index to the normal performance index. This ratio represents the degree by which the performance of the membrane has deteriorated.Calculator 31 sends signal Ko' and/or Ko'/Ko to anindicator 32, which then indicates the present value of the membrane performance index and/or the degree by which the performance of the membrane has dropped. - A
memory 33 can be loaded with the membrane performance index Ko and/or the performance drop Ko'/Ko from thecalcualtor 31 periodically, at intervals selected by atimer 34. Ahistory indicator 35 indicates the history of the membrane performance on the basis of the data read from thememory 33. - Fig. 9 which is essentially the same as Fig. 2 illustrates various fluctuations in the system state levels that will occur when the system fluid channel is clogged by scales formed from components of the fluid.
- Particularly in the inner passages of the reverse osmotic modules would be most easily clogged. The clogged channel increases the pressure loss of the fluid and this eventually downgrades the performance of the entire system.
- When some part of the system channel is clogged, the discharge pressure of the pump is increased and the discharge from the pump is decreased (see
graph 11 in Fig. 9). When the pump discharge pressure and pump discharge under normal conditions are expressed by Po and Qo, whereas the respective values in the case of line clogging are expressed by Po' and Qo', the following relations are established: - When the discharge from the pump decreases, the membrane interfacial concentration CM increases to a value C'M. When membrane interfacial concentration is increased, the osmotic pressure of the feed fluid in contact with the semipermeable membrane is increased to a value n'M. This will be seen from the
characteristic curve 24 in Fig. 9. The corresponding change in the reverse osmotic pressure AP is very small since the increase in the pump discharge pressure (or the pressure of the feed fluid) is cancelled by the increase in the osmotic pressure of the feed fluid in contact with the membrane. Therefore, the change in the flow of desalinated water is also very small. When Q1 and Q1' are respectively written for the flow of desalinated water under normal conditions and the flow of desalinated water in the case of channel clogging, Q1 is substantially equal to Q,'. This causes a decrease in the flow of the secondary fluid or concentrated solution, as is represented by the inequality Q2>Q2' (wherein Q2 is the flow of the concentrated solution under normal conditions, and Q2' is the flow of that solution in the case of channel clogging). Since in this Section the valve opening Av is assumed to remain the same irrespective of the system performance, the decrease in the flow of the concentrated solution causes a decrease in the pressure thereof. This is expressed by P2>P2' (wherein P2 is the pressure of the concentrated solution under normal conditions and P2' is the corresponding value in the case of channel clogging). Also, the velocity of the water jet issuing from the nozzle is decreased from V to V'. -
-
- (1) Use output P'2 from
detector 6 to determine the velocity of water jet from the nozzle V' by the procedure described in (A). - (2) Determine the flow of concentrated solution Q2' from the present value of valve opening Av by the procedure described in (A).
- (3) Use the pump discharge pressure Po' from
detector 2 to determine the pump discharge (or flow of the feed fluid) Qo' in accordance with the Q-H characteristics of the pump. - (4) Determine the flow of desalinated water Q1' from Q2' and Qo'.
- (5) Determine the reverse osmotic pressure AP' by solving ΔP'=Q1'/AM · K.
- (6) Determine the membrane interfacial concentration C'M by solving
- (7) Use C'M to determine the osmotic pressure n'M of the feed fluid in contact with the semipermeable membrane.
- (8) Derive the membrane interfacial pressure P'M by solving
- (9) Use Po' and P'M to determine the pressure loss of the fluid in the supply line P'L1.
- (10) Use P2' and P'M to determine the pressure loss P'L2 in the secondary or concentration line.
- (11) Determine the primary and secondary pressure loss coefficients a,' and a2' by solving a1'=P'L1/ (Qo')2 and a2'=P'L2(Q2')2, respectively.
- Fig. 10 is a block diagram of the device according to the present invention for evalulating the degree of channel clogging by monitoring the pressure loss in the channel.
- A
feed pressure detector 2 sends a signal Po' to a pressure/flow converter 11 a in the monitor. Theconverter 11a determines the feed flow Qo' in accordance with the Q-H characteristics of the pump. Aconcentrate pressure detector 6 sends a signal P2' to aconcentrate flow calculator 6b, which derives the concentrate flow Q2' in the manner described in (B). In response to the feed flow signal Qo' fromconverter 11 a and the concentrate flow signal Q2' fromcalculator 6b, acalculator 30 determines the flow of desalinated water Q1' in accordance with the correlation Q1'=Q0'-Q2'. In response to the feed flow signal Qo' fromconverter 11a a and the concentrate flow signal Q2' fromconverter 6b, acalculator 6c determines the average concentration C'M of the feed fluid at the interface with the semipermeable membrane in accordance with the correlationcalculator 6c, aconverter 12a determines the corresponding average osmotic pressure n'M of the feed solution in contact with the semipermeable membrane in accordance with the concentration vs. osmotic pressure characteristics. In response to the feed pressure Po' fromdetector 2, the concentrate pressure P2' fromdetector 6, feed flow Q0' fromconverter 11 a the desalinated flow Q1' fromcalculator 30 the concentrate flow Q2' fromconverter 6b and the average osmotic pressure n'M fromconverter 12a, acalculator 37 calculates parameters that are associated with the pressure loss in the channel. First, thecalculator 37 derives the reverse osmotic pressure AP' in accordance with the correlation ΔP'=Q1'/AM · K wherein AM is the constant for the area of the semipermeable membrane, K is the membrane performance index calcibrated by using the fluid temperature T fed from thetemperature detector 14 in Fig. 9, and Q1' is the desalinated water flow signal send from thecalculator 30. Using the derived reverse osmotic pressure AP', the osmotic pressure n'M fromconverter 12a, the constant for the osmotic pressure of desalinated water π1, and the constant for the pressure of desalinated water P1, thecalculator 37 also determines the pressure of the feed solution in the semipermeable membrane P'M in accordance with the correlationdetector 2 and signal Qo' fromconverter 11a, thecalculator 37 derives the coefficient a1' for the pressure loss of the fluid in the feed line extending to the membranes in respective RO modules in accordance with the correlationcalculator 37 uses the pressure P'M, signal P2' from thedetector 6 and signal Q2' from thecalculator 6b, in order to calculate the coefficient a2' for the pressure loss of the fluid in the secondary (or concentration) line in accordance with the correlation - The coefficients a1' and a2' can be used as a final output from the
calculator 37. At the same time, or alternatively, thecalculator 37 may produce the sum of these two coefficients (a'=a1'+a2') as its output. The output of thecalculator 37 is fed to apressure loss indicator 38, which then indicates the present value of the coefficient for the pressure loss of the fluid. The output of thecalculator 37 may also be used as a input which is loaded into amemory 39 periodically at intervals selected by a timer 41. The data read from thememory 39 is sent to ahistory indicator 42, which then indicates the history of the pressure loss that has occurred in the system channel. - Fig. 11 is generally the same as Fig. 2 and each of the graphs shown in the
control unit 9 illustrate the characteristics for the case of the deterioration of the pump performance, as compared with those for the normal pump. - When the performance of the
centrifugal pump 1 has deteriorated, thesolid line 21 showing the normal Q-H characteristics shifts to the dashedline 21 as shown in Fig. 11. If Po and Qo respectively designate the normal pressure in the primary line (normal pump discharge pressure) and the normal flow of the fluid in the primary line (normal pump discharge) for the fluid temperature T and nozzle opening Ay, these system state levels decrease along a system operating characteristic curve 43 (for fluid temperature T and nozzle opening Ay) when the performance of the pump has deteriorated. In other words:graph 17 in Fig. 11), as indicated by the relation V>V' (wherein V is the velocity of the fluid passing through the nozzle under normal pump conditions, and V' is the value for the case of the pump deterioration). - The decrease in the velocity of the fluid passing through the nozzle is caused by a decrease in the pressure of the fluid in the secondary line, as P2>P2' (wherein P2 is the pressure of the fluid in the secondary line under normal pump conditions, and P2' is the value for the case of the pump deterioration).
- As will be readily understood, when the performance of the pump has deteriorated, one of the following two sets of relations is valid: Po>Po' and P2>P2', or Qo>Qo' and Q2>Q2'. The second set of relations for the fluid flow happens to be the same as those which are established when some part of the system channels is clogged. The first set of relations for the fluid pressure is unique to deterioration of the pump performance. Therefore, by using this first set of relations, it is possible to check whether certain trouble occurring is due to deterioration of the pump performance.
- The degree by which the performance of the centrifugal pump has deteriorated can be evaluated by various methods. In one method, the relative amount of decrease in the pump discharge (Qo'/Qo) is used as a measure for the deterioration of the pump performance. The value of Qo'/Qo can be determined by the following procedure.
- (1) Determine the velocity of the fluid at the nozzle V' from the detected pressure of concentrated solution P2'.
- (2) Determine the flow of concentrated solution Q2' from the present value of the nozzle opening Av and the value of V' determined in step (1).
- (3) Estimate or initialize Qo' for the present value of pump discharge in the case of pump deterioration.
- (4) Use the detected pump discharge pressure Po', the initial value Qo' set in step (3) and the coefficient a, for the pressure loss in the feed line, so as to determine the membrane interfacial pressure P'M by solving the equation
- (5) Use Co or the constant for the concentration of feed solution, Qo' as set in step (3) and Q2' as determined in step (2), so as to determine the membrane interfacial concentration C'M by the procedure described in (ii) (B).
- (6) Determine the corresponding osmotic pressure n'M from the membrane interfacial concentration C'M determined in step (5).
- (7) Use P'M and n'M respectively determined in steps (4) and (6), so as to determine the reverse osmotic pressure AP' by the procedure described in (ii) (B).
- (8) Using the membrane performance index K calibrated by the detected temperature T, the reverse osmotic pressure AP' determined in step (7) and Q2' determined in step (2), solve the equation:
- (9) Update the value of Qo' and repeat the sequence of steps (3) to (8) until the calculated value of pump discharge Q0' calc becomes equal to the initially set Q0'. The finally obtained value of Q0' calc(flnal) should represent the present value of pump discharge.
- (10) Calculate the ratio of the present value of pump discharge Q0' calc(final) to Qo which represents the discharge from the pump under normal pump conditions for the same nozzle opening and fluid flow.
- Fig. 12 is a block diagram of the device according to the present invention which monitors the drop in the pump performance (as indicated by Qo'/Qo) by following the procedure illustrated in (B) above.
- As shown in Fig. 12, a
first pressure detector 2 disposed on the feed line provides a membraneinterfacial pressure calculator 44 in the monitor with a signal indicative of the pressure of the feed solution Po'. Using the constant representing a1 or the coefficient for the pressure loss in the feed line, a signal indicative of Qo' which is an estimated value of the present flow of the feed solution that is supplied from afeed flow estimator 46, and a signal indicative of Po' which is the feed pressure that is supplied from thedetector 2, the calculator derives P'M or the average pressure of the feed fluid in the semipermeable membrane in accordance with the correlation P'M=P0'-a1(Q0')2. - As shown in Fig. 12, a
second pressure detector 6 is disposed on the secondary line and provides aconcentrate flow calculator 6b in the monitor with a signal indicative of the pressure of the concentrated solution P2'. Using this pressure signal P2' and a signal indicative of the present value of valve opening Av that is supplied from a nozzle opening calculator in the control unit (not shown), thecalculator 6b determines Q2' or the flow of the concentrated solution in accordance with the correlationcalculator 6b and the estimated value Qo' of the flow of the feed solution that is sent from anestimator 46, a membraneinterfacial pressure calculator 6c determines the membrane interfacial pressure C'M in accordance with the correlation - A signal indicative of C'M is sent to a concentration/
osmotic pressure converter 12a, which then converts the concentration C'M to the corresponding osmotic pressure n'M. A desalinatedwater flow calculator 45, in response to the membrane interfacial pressure signal P'M from thecalculator 44, the signal π'M from theconverter 12a that represents the average concentration of the feed solution in contact with the semipermeable membrane, and the signal T from temperature detector 14 (see Fig. 11) that indicates the temperature of the fluid, calculates the flow of desalinated water Q,' in accordance with the correlationfeed flow comparator 48 obtains a calculated value Q0' calc of the flow of the feed solution by adding the calculated value Q2' of the flow of the concentrated solution supplied fromcalculator 6b and thecalculator 45. Thecomparator 48 also compares Q0' calc with the estimated value Qo' of the feed flow supplied fromestimator 46. If the value of the difference ΔQ0 obtained by subtracting Q0' calc from Qo' is greater than a predetermined positive value P, thecomparator 48 furnishes a command signal to an updater 47, which then adds an increment signal into theestimator 46. In response to this increment signal, theestimator 46 provides another estimated value of the flow of desalinated water which is larger than the previously estimated value. If Qo' is smaller than Q0' calc and if the absolute value of the difference ΔQ0 is larger than the predetermined value, thecomparator 48 provides a command signal to the updater 47, which then adds a decrement signal into theestimator 46. In response to this decrement signal, the estimator provides another estimated value of the flow of desalinated water which is smaller than the firstly estimated value. The monitor uses either one of these freshly estimated values for performing the necessary recalculation. - If the difference OQo between Qo' and Q0' calc is smaller than the predetermined value (3 (indicating the correctness of the estimated value Qo'), the
comparator 48 uses Qo or the normal flow of the feed solution under normal pump conditions (for the temperature and valve opening which are the same as the respective present values) in order to calculate the ratio of the fimal estimated value Qo' (indicative of the present value of the feed flow) to the normal feed flow Qo. The ratio y=Qo'/Qo is sent to anindicator 49, which then indicates the present level of the degree by which the flow of the feed solution has been decreased. This degree can be used as a measure for the percent deterioration of the pump performance. - The output signal Qo'/Qo from the
comparator 48 may be loaded into amemory 50 periodically at intervals determined by a timer 51. By reading the stored data from the memory, ahistory indicator 52 will indicate the history of the fluctuation in the flow of the feed solution that has occurred due to the deterioration of the pump performance. - It is preferred that the control signals furnished to the valve actuator from the control unit be modified according to variations in the system performance. The respective monitors shown in (ii) (C), (iii) (C) and (iv) (C) may be used to achieve this purpose. More specifically, by combining with the control unit that has been described earlier in this specification in connection with Figs. 2 and 4, each of these monitors may be used as means for modifying the control signal applied to the valve actuator. For example, updating of the membrane performance index can be achieved by feeding the control unit with the present value of membrane performance index Ko that has been evaluated by the membrane performance monitor. Using the updated index (indicating the current performance of the reverse osmotic apparatus), the control unit can modify the stroke signal to be applied to the valve actuator. In a like manner, the control unit can be supplied with the current values of the channel pressure loss coefficients a, and a2 (as evaluated by the channel clogging monitor) in place of the constants that were previously used as measures for the past performance of the channels. Using the new data of channel pressure loss, the control unit may perform another calculation to modify the stroke signal to be applied to the valve actuator. Also, the evaluated value obtained by the pump performance monitor may be used by the control unit which then modifies the stroke signal to be supplied to the valve actuator. In the last mentioned case, it would be advisable to estimate the current Q-H characteristics of the pump on the basis of several operating points (for both pump discharge pressure and pump discharge) that have been detected by the pump performance monitor. A typical technique for this estimation is interpolation between the detected pump operating points.
- The ouptut from the respective monitors will enable the operator to determine whether three major components of the system (semipermeable membrane, flow channels and centrifugal pump) need inspection, repair or replacement.
- Fig. 13 is a block diagram of the trouble detecting device that will provide a visible and/or audible alarm indicating an abnormal drop in the performance of one of the three major components of the reverse osmotic treatment system. The principle of detecting the abnormality of the respective components has already been described in (ii) (A), (iii) (A) and (iv) (A).
- In the embodiment shown below, the detecting means consists of a
pressure sensor 2 for detecting the pressure of the feed solution Po' and apressure sensor 6 for detecting the pressure of the concentrated solution P2'. Referring again to Decision Table I, the following relations can be used to identify which of the three components has deteriorated. If Po<Po' and P2<P2', the performance of the reverse osmotic apparatus has deteriorated. If Po<Po' and P2>P2', at least some part of the flow channels is clogged. If Po>Po' and P2>P2', the performance of the pump has deteriorated. - In these relationships, normal values Po and P2 are compared with the respective detected values Po' and P2', and they indicate the normal pressures of feed solution and concentrated solution for the case where system parameters (e.g. fluid temperature T and valve opening A") other than that relating to the component to be checked are the same. The values of Po and P2 are either stored in the control system or can be calculated from associated parameters.
- Referring now to Fig. 13, a pressure sensor supplies a
comparator 53 with a signal indicative of the present value Po' of the pressure of feed solution. Apressure sensor 6 supplies asecond comparator 55 with a signal indicative of the present value P2' of the pressure of concentrated solution. An input device 56 (which may be of keyboard type and may be the same as theinput device 35 shown in Fig. 5) supplies a normal pressure calculator 54 with a signal indicative of the present value Q1 of the desired flow of desalinated water. Using the present value of valve opening A", the present value of the temperature T of the feed solution as detected by temperature sensor 14 (see Figs. 2 and 14) and the preset value of Q1 of the flow of desalinated water, the calculator 54 calculates the normal value Po of the pressure of the feed solution and the normal value P2 of the pressure of the concentrated solution which would be provided if normal operation of the system were performed with those values of A", T and Q1. The calculator 54 may be realized by part of the control unit shown in Fig. 2. As already mentioned, the control unit of Fig. 2 derives from the present value of the desalinated water flow Q1 and the detected temperature T, Po (the normal pressure of the feed solution) and P2 (normal pressure of the concentrated solution) as intermediate output that precedes the operation of determining the final output, or the valve opening Av of the valve actuator. Needless to say, the determination of Po and P2 presupposes the normal operation of the entire system. - Alternatively, various values of Po and P2 that correspond to a set of various levels of temperature and the flow of desalinated water may be prestored in a memory. In this case, the normal values Po and P2 may be read out of the memory by accessing with an address signal that specifies the present detected value of temperature T and the current setting of the flow of desalinated water Q1.
- The signals indicative of the normal value Po and P2 are respectively supplied into a
feed pressure comparator 53 and aconcentrate pressure comparator 55. Thecomparator 53 compares Po and Po' which indicates the present value of the feed pressure that has been sent from thedetector 2. If Po is greater than Po' by a degree that exceeds a tolerable range lo (i.e. P0≥P0'+I0), thecomparator 53 provides one input of an AND gate 57 (for checking a drop in the pump performance) with a signal (logical "1") through aline 53A. On the other hand, if the present value Po' is greater than the normal value Po by a degree that exceeds the tolerable range lo (i.e. P0+I0≤P0'), thecomparator 53 provides one input of an AND gate 58 (for checking line clogging) and one input of an AND gate 59 (for checking a drop in the membrane performance) with a signal through a line 53B. In a like manner, thesecond comparator 55 compares P2 with P2' which indicates the present value of the concentrate pressure that has been sent from thedetector 6. If P2 (normal value) is greater than P2' by a degree that exceeds a tolerable range I2 (i.e. P2≥P2'+I2), the comparator feeds a signal to the second inputs of ANDgates line 55A. If P2' is greater than P2 by a degree that exceeds the tolerable range 12 (i.e. P2+I2≤P2'), thecomparator 55 feeds a signal to the other input of ANDgate 59 through aline 55B. - The values of lo and I2 indicate the widths of the dead zones of
respective comparators comparators - For the purpose of simplicity, the following description will use the phrase "a detected pressure is larger (smaller) than the normal value", which is equivalent to saying that "a detected pressure is larger (smaller) than the normal value by a degree that exceeds the width of the dead zone of a comparator".
- If the detected value Po' of the pressure of the feed solution is smaller than the normal value Po, and if the detected value P2' of the pressure of the concentrated solution is also smaller than the normal value (Po>Po' and P2>P2'), the AND
gate 57 is enabled to supply a signal to analarm 61 which then provides an audible and/or visible alarm indicating a drop in the performance of the pump. - If Po' is larger than Po and P2' smaller than P2 (Po<Po' and P2>P2'), the AND
gate 58 is enabled to supply a signal to analarm 62 which then provides an audible and/or visible alarm indicating a line or channel clogging. - If Po' and P2' are larger than Po and P2, respectively, (Po<Po' and P2<P2'), the AND
gate 59 is enabled to provide a signal to analarm 63, which then provides an audible and/or visible alarm indicating a deteriorated or abnormal operation of certain reverse osmotic modules. - As will be understood from the foregoing description, the trouble detecting device of Fig. 13 enables the operator to know which of the three major components of the reverse osmotic treatment system has experienced a drop in their performance. If desired, two or more comparators having different widths of dead zone may be used for detecting trouble in each component. By so doing, the operator is able to know whether a particular component (reverse osmotic apparatus, pump or fluid channels) requires inspection, repair or replacement, as well as when such task should be carried out.
- In the embodiment of Fig. 13,
feed pressure sensor 2 and concentratepressure sensor 6 are used as detection means. If desired, flowmeters may be disposed on the feed line and/or concentration line together with these pressure sensors or as an alternative thereto (see Decision Table 1).
Claims (13)
Applications Claiming Priority (6)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP64386/83 | 1983-04-11 | ||
JP64385/83 | 1983-04-11 | ||
JP6438583A JPS59189910A (en) | 1983-04-11 | 1983-04-11 | Substance separation apparatus by semi-permeable membrane |
JP6438683A JPS59189911A (en) | 1983-04-11 | 1983-04-11 | Membrane separation apparatus equipped with abnormality discriminating apparatus and abnormality detecting apparatus |
JP74673/83 | 1983-04-27 | ||
JP7467383A JPS59199004A (en) | 1983-04-27 | 1983-04-27 | Material separation apparatus by semipermeable membrane |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP0142567A1 EP0142567A1 (en) | 1985-05-29 |
EP0142567A4 EP0142567A4 (en) | 1987-07-06 |
EP0142567B1 true EP0142567B1 (en) | 1990-12-05 |
Family
ID=27298467
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP84901424A Expired - Lifetime EP0142567B1 (en) | 1983-04-11 | 1984-04-10 | Control apparatus for reverse osmosis process system |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US4772385A (en) |
EP (1) | EP0142567B1 (en) |
CA (1) | CA1233128A (en) |
DE (2) | DE3490181T1 (en) |
GB (1) | GB2146263B (en) |
WO (1) | WO1984004049A1 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN105771655A (en) * | 2016-03-05 | 2016-07-20 | 马骏 | Multistage reverse osmosis filtering system based on Wheatstone bridge measurement principle |
Families Citing this family (28)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4680109A (en) * | 1985-05-17 | 1987-07-14 | Ebara Corporation | Membrane separator |
US4865726A (en) * | 1987-12-22 | 1989-09-12 | Promac B.V. | Device for making potable water |
JP2575975B2 (en) * | 1991-09-17 | 1997-01-29 | 株式会社東芝 | Filtration device |
SE505028C2 (en) * | 1992-05-13 | 1997-06-16 | Electrolux Ab | Method and apparatus for purifying water |
WO1994012267A1 (en) * | 1992-11-27 | 1994-06-09 | Global Water Technologies, Inc. | Desalinization system |
CN1093612A (en) * | 1993-11-12 | 1994-10-19 | 徐兆火 | The intelligent all control circuit device of drinking water treating machine |
US6258278B1 (en) | 1997-03-03 | 2001-07-10 | Zenon Environmental, Inc. | High purity water production |
US6267891B1 (en) | 1997-03-03 | 2001-07-31 | Zenon Environmental Inc. | High purity water production using ion exchange |
US6080316A (en) * | 1997-03-03 | 2000-06-27 | Tonelli; Anthony A. | High resistivity water production |
CH692479A5 (en) | 1997-07-08 | 2002-07-15 | Bucher Guyer Ag | Cross-flow filtration system and method for operating such a plant. |
US6083382A (en) * | 1998-01-14 | 2000-07-04 | Bird; Mark | Water desalination system |
US6796955B2 (en) * | 2002-02-14 | 2004-09-28 | Chf Solutions, Inc. | Method to control blood and filtrate flowing through an extracorporeal device |
US7632410B2 (en) * | 2003-08-21 | 2009-12-15 | Christopher Heiss | Universal water purification system |
US7410574B2 (en) * | 2004-03-03 | 2008-08-12 | Patent Innovations Llc | Magnetic particle filtration apparatus |
AU2007214125B2 (en) * | 2006-02-10 | 2010-04-01 | Danfoss A/S | A liquid treatment apparatus |
US8128821B2 (en) * | 2006-06-14 | 2012-03-06 | Fluid Equipment Development Company, Llc | Reverse osmosis system with control based on flow rates in the permeate and brine streams |
US8119008B2 (en) * | 2006-07-10 | 2012-02-21 | Christopher Heiss | Fluid purification methods and devices |
WO2009009465A1 (en) * | 2007-07-06 | 2009-01-15 | Christopher William Heiss | Electrocoagulation reactor and water treatment system and method |
WO2009037515A2 (en) * | 2007-09-20 | 2009-03-26 | Abdulsalam Al-Mayahi | Process and systems |
FR2922466B1 (en) * | 2007-10-19 | 2010-06-25 | Degremont | METHOD FOR ADVANCED MANAGEMENT OF A MEMBRANE FILTRATION UNIT, AND SYSTEM FOR IMPLEMENTING THE METHOD |
DE102009040049A1 (en) * | 2009-09-03 | 2011-03-10 | Krones Ag | Method for controlling a separation plant with a reverse osmosis element and reverse osmosis system |
US9314742B2 (en) * | 2010-03-31 | 2016-04-19 | Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc. | Method and system for reverse osmosis predictive maintenance using normalization data |
US8505324B2 (en) | 2010-10-25 | 2013-08-13 | Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc. | Independent free cooling system |
US9120580B2 (en) * | 2011-08-31 | 2015-09-01 | United Technologies Corporation | Ejector-driven fuel stabilization system |
US9856154B2 (en) * | 2012-03-27 | 2018-01-02 | Toray Industries, Inc. | Fresh water generation method |
GB2519129A (en) * | 2013-10-10 | 2015-04-15 | Ide Technologies Ltd | Pumping Apparatus |
PL3228552T3 (en) | 2016-04-04 | 2019-08-30 | Sig Technology Ag | Composite package, and package laminate and package jacket blank for a composite package |
KR101954820B1 (en) * | 2016-09-12 | 2019-03-06 | 두산중공업 주식회사 | Apparatus and method for analyzing influence on fouling in sea water desalination of membrane |
Family Cites Families (16)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3405058A (en) * | 1964-02-17 | 1968-10-08 | Wendell S. Miller | Purification of water |
US3365061A (en) * | 1965-10-04 | 1968-01-23 | Gulf General Atomic Inc | Portable reverse osmosis apparatus |
US3637081A (en) * | 1970-04-09 | 1972-01-25 | Puredesal Inc | Liquid treatment system |
US3946731A (en) * | 1971-01-20 | 1976-03-30 | Lichtenstein Eric Stefan | Apparatus for extracorporeal treatment of blood |
US3756408A (en) * | 1972-06-15 | 1973-09-04 | Osmonics Inc | Separation system |
FR2338091A1 (en) * | 1976-01-13 | 1977-08-12 | Sirulik Wilhelm | Kitchen ventilation cowl with fire prevention device - has spring loaded shutter held open by fusible pin and closing discharge conduit |
FR2338901A1 (en) * | 1976-01-22 | 1977-08-19 | Permo Sa | Desalination using reverse osmosis hollow fibre module - produces drinking water from automatically sequenced installation on ship |
DE2627366A1 (en) * | 1976-06-18 | 1977-12-29 | Erich Alhaeuser | High purity water treatment - with reverse osmosis appts. feeding ion exchanger through hydraulic accumulator |
US4113614A (en) * | 1976-12-10 | 1978-09-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | Automated hemodialysis treatment systems |
US4176057A (en) * | 1977-06-24 | 1979-11-27 | El Paso Environmental Systems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for recovering liquid and solid constituents of water solutions containing sparingly soluble solids |
US4169789A (en) * | 1978-06-01 | 1979-10-02 | Permo Sa | Process and apparatus for purifying sea water by reverse osmosis |
DE2838414C2 (en) * | 1978-09-02 | 1984-10-31 | Fresenius AG, 6380 Bad Homburg | Device for hemodialysis and for withdrawing ultrafiltrate |
DE2919315A1 (en) * | 1979-05-14 | 1980-11-20 | Cerwinsky Peter | Water purificn. for dialysis purposes - by softening in ion exchanger silver resin and reverse osmosis filter |
JPS5815030B2 (en) * | 1980-06-11 | 1983-03-23 | 工業技術院長 | How to start up a reverse osmosis desalination plant equipped with an energy recovery device |
US4637783A (en) * | 1980-10-20 | 1987-01-20 | Sri International | Fluid motor-pumping apparatus and method for energy recovery |
JPS58166904A (en) * | 1982-03-30 | 1983-10-03 | Kurita Water Ind Ltd | Membrane separator |
-
1984
- 1984-04-10 DE DE19843490181 patent/DE3490181T1/en active Pending
- 1984-04-10 EP EP84901424A patent/EP0142567B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1984-04-10 WO PCT/JP1984/000180 patent/WO1984004049A1/en active IP Right Grant
- 1984-04-10 GB GB08426165A patent/GB2146263B/en not_active Expired
- 1984-04-10 DE DE3490181A patent/DE3490181C2/de not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1984-04-10 US US06/668,521 patent/US4772385A/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1984-04-11 CA CA000451806A patent/CA1233128A/en not_active Expired
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN105771655A (en) * | 2016-03-05 | 2016-07-20 | 马骏 | Multistage reverse osmosis filtering system based on Wheatstone bridge measurement principle |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
GB2146263A (en) | 1985-04-17 |
EP0142567A4 (en) | 1987-07-06 |
US4772385A (en) | 1988-09-20 |
DE3490181T1 (en) | 1985-05-15 |
EP0142567A1 (en) | 1985-05-29 |
WO1984004049A1 (en) | 1984-10-25 |
DE3490181C2 (en) | 1993-06-03 |
GB8426165D0 (en) | 1984-11-21 |
CA1233128A (en) | 1988-02-23 |
GB2146263B (en) | 1987-07-01 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP0142567B1 (en) | Control apparatus for reverse osmosis process system | |
US4526513A (en) | Method and apparatus for control of pipeline compressors | |
CA2277380C (en) | A method for regulating fluid pressure | |
US20100200083A1 (en) | Flow rate controller | |
US6530262B1 (en) | Method and device for determining the existence of leaks in a system with flowing fluid | |
CA2226789C (en) | Method and apparatus for automatically balancing a blower in a blown film extrusion line | |
JP6737661B2 (en) | Reverse osmosis membrane treatment system and method of operating reverse osmosis membrane treatment system | |
JPH0523711B2 (en) | ||
JPS63270592A (en) | Fresh water generator by reverse-osmosis membrane module | |
US4680109A (en) | Membrane separator | |
JPH0929070A (en) | Membrane separator for water treatment | |
JP3311139B2 (en) | Membrane module system | |
JPH06277665A (en) | Producing apparatus for high purity water | |
CN109641186B (en) | Resistivity value adjusting device and resistivity value adjusting method | |
JP3327371B2 (en) | Membrane liquid concentrator | |
JP2005288220A (en) | Water quality modifying system | |
JPS60235605A (en) | Reverse osmotic membrane separation apparatus | |
JPH08309350A (en) | Water treatment method using reverse osmosis membrane | |
JP2022171929A (en) | Control method of water purification apparatus | |
JPS60235604A (en) | Reverse osmotic membrane separation device | |
US20170260983A1 (en) | System for pumping a fluid and method for its operation | |
JP3540627B2 (en) | Distributing valve control device | |
JP2002350199A (en) | Water-passing apparatus having flow rate calculation section for calculating flow rate by operation | |
JPH03284323A (en) | Method and apparatus for membrane separation | |
JP3393886B2 (en) | Process control equipment |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Designated state(s): FR |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 19850413 |
|
A4 | Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched |
Effective date: 19870706 |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 19880817 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): FR |
|
ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed | ||
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 19980428 Year of fee payment: 15 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 19991231 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST |