EP0084411B1 - Composition and method for cleaning hydrocarbon oil from hard surfaces - Google Patents

Composition and method for cleaning hydrocarbon oil from hard surfaces Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0084411B1
EP0084411B1 EP83300048A EP83300048A EP0084411B1 EP 0084411 B1 EP0084411 B1 EP 0084411B1 EP 83300048 A EP83300048 A EP 83300048A EP 83300048 A EP83300048 A EP 83300048A EP 0084411 B1 EP0084411 B1 EP 0084411B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
oil
carbon atoms
foregoing
water
cuttings
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired
Application number
EP83300048A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0084411A1 (en
Inventor
Michael Blezard
William H. Mcallister
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Solvay Solutions UK Ltd
Original Assignee
Albright and Wilson Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=10527518&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP0084411(B1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Albright and Wilson Ltd filed Critical Albright and Wilson Ltd
Publication of EP0084411A1 publication Critical patent/EP0084411A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0084411B1 publication Critical patent/EP0084411B1/en
Expired legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11—ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11D—DETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D1/00—Detergent compositions based essentially on surface-active compounds; Use of these compounds as a detergent
    • C11D1/38—Cationic compounds
    • C11D1/52—Carboxylic amides, alkylolamides or imides or their condensation products with alkylene oxides
    • C11D1/526—Carboxylic amides (R1-CO-NR2R3), where R1, R2 or R3 are polyalkoxylated
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11—ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11D—DETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D1/00—Detergent compositions based essentially on surface-active compounds; Use of these compounds as a detergent
    • C11D1/38—Cationic compounds
    • C11D1/52—Carboxylic amides, alkylolamides or imides or their condensation products with alkylene oxides
    • C11D1/523—Carboxylic alkylolamides, or dialkylolamides, or hydroxycarboxylic amides (R1-CO-NR2R3), where R1, R2 or R3 contain one hydroxy group per alkyl group
    • E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
    • E21B—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B21/00—Methods or apparatus for flushing boreholes, e.g. by use of exhaust air from motor
    • E21B21/06—Arrangements for treating drilling fluids outside the borehole
    • E21B21/068—Arrangements for treating drilling fluids outside the borehole using chemical treatment
    • E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
    • E21B—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B41/00—Equipment or details not covered by groups E21B15/00 - E21B40/00
    • E21B41/005—Waste disposal systems

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to methods of cleaning oil/rock mixtures in oil drilling operations and especially to cleaning of drilling oil from rock cuttings on offshore drilling rigs, removal of oil from the face of newly drilled holes prior to reinforcement with casing, and to the cleaning of oil muds from drilling rigs.
  • drilling fluid or drilling mud In the process of drilling for oil and gas, it is necessary for a number of reasons, to use a drilling fluid or drilling mud.
  • the types of drilling fluid or mud in common use are:
  • Oil based drilling media (b) may also contain water in the form of water in oil emulsion. It is customary in the art to refer to a drilling medium containing up to about 15% aqueous phase by volume as oil based. Those drilling media referred to as invert fluids or muds, (c) generally contain between 15% and 55% water. This patent application is particularly concerned with types (b and c) both of which are included in the term "oil” as used herein, together with crude and refined mineral oils.
  • drilling fluid One of the functions of drilling fluid is to carry drill cuttings from the drill bit to the surface, the cuttings are then removed by physical techniques, for example, by using shale shakers, screens, cyclones, and centrifuges. After removal of the cuttings the drilling fluid is re-used and the cuttings are disposed of. If the drilling is offshore then the cuttings are disposed of into the sea, where in the case of aqueous drilling fluids the cuttings disperse and settle without causing significant problems. However, in the case of oil drilling fluids the cuttings are oil wet and settle rapidly to the sea bed below the drilling rig and form an oily, sticky mass, which can interfere with drilling operations, for example, by hindering the movement of divers involved in sub-sea construction and maintenance work. It is thought that the swelling of clays in the cuttings is responsible for the formation of this mass. In addition, the cuttings cause oil pollution through gradual release of the oil.
  • One technique to remove oil from cuttings is to wash the cuttings with a solvent such as diesel, this has the effect of removing most of the oil but still leaves the surfaces contaminated with hydrocarbons, which can gradually be released to the environment.
  • Another way is to use a water miscible solvent, such as a glycol ether, but these are expensive.
  • Yet another way is to wash the cuttings in sea water using good agitation to dislodge the oil from the surface of the cuttings. This process can be used either as the sole process for removing the drilling oil from the cuttings, or as a second step to remove an oil solvent from cuttings previously washed with a hydrocarbon. This process can be improved by adding a surfactant to the sea water, to lower the oil/water interfacial tension.
  • the cuttings may then be discharged to the sea where they disperse and settle over a wide area of sea bed rather than accumulate directly in the area of the drilling operations.
  • the oil in water emulsion which is formed as a result of washing the cuttings may be discharged to the sea where fine dispersion of the oil will facilitate its breakdown by micro-organisms.
  • a commonly used surfactant for the foregoing purposes is a C9-11 alcohol six mole ethoxylate.
  • alkoxylated non-ionic surfactants are known in the detergent art which are sometimes used as ingredients of detergent or shampoo formulations for various purposes, usually in admixture with anionic or cationic surfactants.
  • Another category of known surfactant comprises the alkyl alkanolamides. These are not normally used as cleaning agents in their own right, but are widely used as minor ingredients of detergent and shampoo formulations to promote foaming.
  • An object of the present invention is to provide more effective methods of cleaning oil from rock cuttings.
  • An object of the present invention is to provide more effective methods of cleaning oil from rock cuttings.
  • a further object of our invention is to provide a method whereby oil can be separated from the emulsion resulting from cleaning of the cuttings.
  • our invention provides a method of removing oil from solid surfaces which comprises contacting the surfaces with an aqueous solution containing at least 0.5% by weight of a mixture of (A) from 5 to 95% by weight of at least one alkoxylated alcohol, carboxylic acid, alkylphenol, or nonionic phosphate ester, having in each case at least one alkyl group with from 6 to 22 carbon atoms and from 1 to 20 ethyleneoxy groups, with (B) from 95 to 5% by weight of at least one alkanolamide of the formula: wherein R is an alkyl group, having from 5 to 17 carbon atoms and x and y are each chosen from 0 and integers from 1 to 12, such that the average value of (x+y) is from 1 to 12.
  • (A) is primary straight or branched chain alcohol having from 6 to 18 carbon atoms and alkoxylated with from 1 to 10 ethylene-oxy groups.
  • a mixture of (A) and (B) is supplied as a concentrate which is dissolved in, or diluted with, water to provide the cleansing solution at the site of the rig.
  • Such concentrates optionally contain a solvent such as water or a water miscible alcohol, glycol or glycol ether, e.g. isopropanol, ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, polyethylene glycol, or any other mono-, di- or trihydroxy alcohol, or alcohol ether, having from 2 to 8 carbon atoms, as required to provide a fluid, pourable composition under the conditions likely to be encountered.
  • the concentrate may, additionally, contain minor proportions of hydrotropes, such as alkaline earth, sodium or potassium mono- di- or tri-alkyl benzene sulphonate salts having less than six aliphatic carbon atoms, e.g. toluene or xylene sulphonates, phosphate esters salts, preservatives, such as formalin, dyes and/or perfumes.
  • Water may be present in any convenient proportion between zero and the final working concentration of the cleaner. Generally, the lower the proportion of the water the greater the convenience for transport and storage of the concentrate. These considerations however must be balanced against the preference for a stable, pourable composition.
  • Organic solvents can add appreciably to the cost of the composition and are preferably, therefore used sparingly e.g. less than 50% and preferably less than 20% of the weight of the concentrate.
  • the concentrate may typically contain from 5 to 95% by weight of (A) and from 95 to 5% by weight of (B).
  • (A) is present in concentrations greater than 10% by weight, most preferably greater than 20% and usually greater than 30%.
  • (B) is also preferably present in concentrations of greater than 10% by weight, more preferably greater than 20% and usually greater than 30%.
  • each of A and B should be present in proportions of greater than 20% by weight, e.g. 20-60% together, optionally with up to 10% water and up to 10% of water miscible, hydroxyl containing solvent.
  • a suitable mixture contains from 40% to 60% of (A), from 60% to 40% of (B) and from 0 to 20% of solvent.
  • the concentrate is dissolved or dispersed in water at the site of application.
  • the concentrate When used at offshore locations, the concentrate may conveniently be dissolved or dispersed in sea water.
  • the concentrate is diluted to from 0.5% to 10% active matter by weight preferably from 1 to 6. We do not exclude higher concentrations, but they are unlikely to prove cost effective.
  • the component (A) in our concentrate may conveniently be an ethoxylated alcohol having from 8 to 14 carbon atoms and from 2 to 7 ethylene oxide groups.
  • the cuttings When used to clean rock cuttings, the cuttings are preferably agitated with the solution of the concentrate in water or brine, for a sufficient time to emulsify a substantial proportion of the oil.
  • the emulsion may then be separated from the cuttings which, when sufficiently clean, are dumped.
  • the emulsion may be discharged.
  • the oil is recovered from the emulsion by moderate heating. Typically temperatures in excess of 40°C e.g. 50 to 70°C are sufficient to break the emulsion and permit recovery of the separated oil phase.
  • the cleaning solution according to our invention may also be injected into bore holes to clean oil from the sides of the rock. This is necessary when a casing is to be bonded with cement to the sides of the bore hole.
  • the solution may also be used according to our invention to clean oil mud from the rigs themselves and generally to remove viscous hydrocarbon oils from hard surfaces.
  • A C9/C11 primary alcohol nominal 6 mole ethoxylate.
  • B coconut monoethanolamide+2 mole ethylene oxide.
  • A C10/C12 primary alcohol nominal 5 mole ethoxylate.
  • A C8 /C10 primary alcohol nominal 4 mole ethoxylate.
  • A nonyl phenol nominal 9 mole ethoxylate.
  • A oleic acid nominal 8 mole ethoxylate.
  • A mixture of mono and di- C8/C10 alkyl phosphate nominal 5.4 mole ethoxylate.
  • step c) The emulsion decanted in step c) and obtained using A (3.75%)+B (1.25%) was heated to 40°C and separated into distinct oil and aqueous phases.
  • a concentrate was prepared for use according to the invention consisting of 45% by weight of C10/C12 fatty alcohol 5 mole ethoxylate, 45% by weight coconut diethanolamide, 5% by weight propylene glycol, 5% by weight water.
  • the product was fluid and stable at temperatures between -5°C and 35°C and readily dispersed in sea water. When evaluated in the above cuttings cleaning test the results were as follows.
  • A C9/C11 primary alcohol nominal 6 mole ethoxylate. This is the surfactant most commonly used for cleaning oil mud cuttings.
  • step c) of the method and obtained using the formulation of Example 7 was heated to 50°C and separated into distinct oil and aqueous phases.
  • test solution used contained 7.5% of a C10/C12 fatty alcohol 5 mole ethoxylate, 7.5% coconut diethanolamide and 85% water.
  • the oil was substantially removed from the surface of the mild steel leaving a clean non-oily surface.
  • test solution was a commercial hydrocarbon solvent based degreaser believed to contain emulsifiers.
  • the mild steel was less thoroughly cleaned and the surface was oily.
  • A C9/C11 primary alcohol nominal 6 mole ethoxylate.
  • surfactant A is the same as A in Example 1.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Geology (AREA)
  • Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
  • General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Detergent Compositions (AREA)
  • Earth Drilling (AREA)

Description

  • The present invention relates to methods of cleaning oil/rock mixtures in oil drilling operations and especially to cleaning of drilling oil from rock cuttings on offshore drilling rigs, removal of oil from the face of newly drilled holes prior to reinforcement with casing, and to the cleaning of oil muds from drilling rigs.
  • In the process of drilling for oil and gas, it is necessary for a number of reasons, to use a drilling fluid or drilling mud. The types of drilling fluid or mud in common use are:
    • a) water based.
    • b) oil based.
    • c) water in oil emulsion based (invert).
  • Oil based drilling media (b) may also contain water in the form of water in oil emulsion. It is customary in the art to refer to a drilling medium containing up to about 15% aqueous phase by volume as oil based. Those drilling media referred to as invert fluids or muds, (c) generally contain between 15% and 55% water. This patent application is particularly concerned with types (b and c) both of which are included in the term "oil" as used herein, together with crude and refined mineral oils.
  • One of the functions of drilling fluid is to carry drill cuttings from the drill bit to the surface, the cuttings are then removed by physical techniques, for example, by using shale shakers, screens, cyclones, and centrifuges. After removal of the cuttings the drilling fluid is re-used and the cuttings are disposed of. If the drilling is offshore then the cuttings are disposed of into the sea, where in the case of aqueous drilling fluids the cuttings disperse and settle without causing significant problems. However, in the case of oil drilling fluids the cuttings are oil wet and settle rapidly to the sea bed below the drilling rig and form an oily, sticky mass, which can interfere with drilling operations, for example, by hindering the movement of divers involved in sub-sea construction and maintenance work. It is thought that the swelling of clays in the cuttings is responsible for the formation of this mass. In addition, the cuttings cause oil pollution through gradual release of the oil.
  • One technique to remove oil from cuttings is to wash the cuttings with a solvent such as diesel, this has the effect of removing most of the oil but still leaves the surfaces contaminated with hydrocarbons, which can gradually be released to the environment. Another way is to use a water miscible solvent, such as a glycol ether, but these are expensive. Yet another way is to wash the cuttings in sea water using good agitation to dislodge the oil from the surface of the cuttings. This process can be used either as the sole process for removing the drilling oil from the cuttings, or as a second step to remove an oil solvent from cuttings previously washed with a hydrocarbon. This process can be improved by adding a surfactant to the sea water, to lower the oil/water interfacial tension. The cuttings may then be discharged to the sea where they disperse and settle over a wide area of sea bed rather than accumulate directly in the area of the drilling operations. The oil in water emulsion which is formed as a result of washing the cuttings may be discharged to the sea where fine dispersion of the oil will facilitate its breakdown by micro-organisms.
  • A commonly used surfactant for the foregoing purposes is a C9-11 alcohol six mole ethoxylate. A variety of alkoxylated non-ionic surfactants are known in the detergent art which are sometimes used as ingredients of detergent or shampoo formulations for various purposes, usually in admixture with anionic or cationic surfactants.
  • Another category of known surfactant comprises the alkyl alkanolamides. These are not normally used as cleaning agents in their own right, but are widely used as minor ingredients of detergent and shampoo formulations to promote foaming.
  • Examples of prior art referring to the use of polyalkoxylated non-ionics surfactants and/or of alkyl alkanolamides as ingredients of various types of cleaning composition, or other products, include EP-A-0018630, AT-B-179693, DE-A-1621447, EP-A-0034393, GB-A-717866, US-A-2831814, US-A-4233174, FR-A-1413197, US―A―3031409, US―A―3507806, US―A―4002579, US―A― 4102825, US-A-3823094, US-A-4097306, US-A-4012341, US―A―4118404 and US-A-4233174. An object of the present invention is to provide more effective methods of cleaning oil from rock cuttings.
  • An object of the present invention is to provide more effective methods of cleaning oil from rock cuttings. A further object of our invention is to provide a method whereby oil can be separated from the emulsion resulting from cleaning of the cuttings.
  • We have discovered that a particular blend of an ethoxylated nonionic surfactant with an alkanolamide exhibits a synergistic effect permitting the more efficient cleaning of oil from rock cuttings. We have further discovered according to a preferred embodiment of our invention that when the emulsions of oil in water formed by cleaning according to our invention are heated, the emulsion is readily broken and the oil may then be recovered.
  • Accordingly, our invention provides a method of removing oil from solid surfaces which comprises contacting the surfaces with an aqueous solution containing at least 0.5% by weight of a mixture of (A) from 5 to 95% by weight of at least one alkoxylated alcohol, carboxylic acid, alkylphenol, or nonionic phosphate ester, having in each case at least one alkyl group with from 6 to 22 carbon atoms and from 1 to 20 ethyleneoxy groups, with (B) from 95 to 5% by weight of at least one alkanolamide of the formula:
    Figure imgb0001
    wherein R is an alkyl group, having from 5 to 17 carbon atoms and x and y are each chosen from 0 and integers from 1 to 12, such that the average value of (x+y) is from 1 to 12.
  • Preferably (A) is primary straight or branched chain alcohol having from 6 to 18 carbon atoms and alkoxylated with from 1 to 10 ethylene-oxy groups.
    • (A) may alternatively be normal or branched chain alkanoic or alkenoic acid having from 7 to 23 e.g. 8 to 20 carbon atoms, alkoxylated with from 1 to 10 ethylene-oxy groups; straight or branched chain alkyl phenol with from 6 to 12 aliphatic carbon atoms, alkoxylated with from 1 to 12 ethylene-oxy groups; nonionic phosphoric acid ester having at least one straight or branched chain alkyl group with from 6 to 22 carbon atoms, at least one alkoxy or polyalkoxy group with from 1 to 20 ethylene-oxy units.
    • (B) typically has from 1 to 4 ethyleneoxy groups. While we have discovered that monoethanolamides are particularly effective synergists, and may be preferred for use in warm climates, concentrated mixture of monoethanolamide with component (A) tend to be insufficiently fluid at low temperatures for convenient handling under the conditions which may be encountered in, for example, North Sea operations. For such low temperatures we prefer to use diethanolamides.
  • Typically, a mixture of (A) and (B) is supplied as a concentrate which is dissolved in, or diluted with, water to provide the cleansing solution at the site of the rig. Such concentrates optionally contain a solvent such as water or a water miscible alcohol, glycol or glycol ether, e.g. isopropanol, ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, polyethylene glycol, or any other mono-, di- or trihydroxy alcohol, or alcohol ether, having from 2 to 8 carbon atoms, as required to provide a fluid, pourable composition under the conditions likely to be encountered. The concentrate may, additionally, contain minor proportions of hydrotropes, such as alkaline earth, sodium or potassium mono- di- or tri-alkyl benzene sulphonate salts having less than six aliphatic carbon atoms, e.g. toluene or xylene sulphonates, phosphate esters salts, preservatives, such as formalin, dyes and/or perfumes. Water may be present in any convenient proportion between zero and the final working concentration of the cleaner. Generally, the lower the proportion of the water the greater the convenience for transport and storage of the concentrate. These considerations however must be balanced against the preference for a stable, pourable composition. Organic solvents can add appreciably to the cost of the composition and are preferably, therefore used sparingly e.g. less than 50% and preferably less than 20% of the weight of the concentrate.
  • The concentrate may typically contain from 5 to 95% by weight of (A) and from 95 to 5% by weight of (B). Preferably however (A) is present in concentrations greater than 10% by weight, most preferably greater than 20% and usually greater than 30%. (B) is also preferably present in concentrations of greater than 10% by weight, more preferably greater than 20% and usually greater than 30%. We generally prefer that each of A and B should be present in proportions of greater than 20% by weight, e.g. 20-60% together, optionally with up to 10% water and up to 10% of water miscible, hydroxyl containing solvent. A suitable mixture contains from 40% to 60% of (A), from 60% to 40% of (B) and from 0 to 20% of solvent.
  • The concentrate is dissolved or dispersed in water at the site of application. When used at offshore locations, the concentrate may conveniently be dissolved or dispersed in sea water. Typically, the concentrate is diluted to from 0.5% to 10% active matter by weight preferably from 1 to 6. We do not exclude higher concentrations, but they are unlikely to prove cost effective. The component (A) in our concentrate may conveniently be an ethoxylated alcohol having from 8 to 14 carbon atoms and from 2 to 7 ethylene oxide groups.
  • When used to clean rock cuttings, the cuttings are preferably agitated with the solution of the concentrate in water or brine, for a sufficient time to emulsify a substantial proportion of the oil. The emulsion may then be separated from the cuttings which, when sufficiently clean, are dumped. The emulsion may be discharged. However, according to a preferred embodiment of our invention the oil is recovered from the emulsion by moderate heating. Typically temperatures in excess of 40°C e.g. 50 to 70°C are sufficient to break the emulsion and permit recovery of the separated oil phase.
  • The cleaning solution according to our invention may also be injected into bore holes to clean oil from the sides of the rock. This is necessary when a casing is to be bonded with cement to the sides of the bore hole. The solution may also be used according to our invention to clean oil mud from the rigs themselves and generally to remove viscous hydrocarbon oils from hard surfaces.
  • The solution will be illustrated by the following examples:
    • The products were tested as follows:
    Cuttings wash test method
    • a) 43 grams of oil mud cuttings obtained from a North Sea drilling operation were added to 150 g of X% active matter surfactant solution in synthetic sea water.
    • b) This was stirred for 5 minutes using a "Janke & Kunkel" (Trade Mark) stirrer at setting 2 at 800 rpm.
    • c) The mixture was allowed to stand for five minutes after which time the liquid was decanted. This liquid contained the emulsified oil which could be separated by warming to above 40°C.
    • d) The mixture was then made up to 150 ml with standard sea water and stirred for a further minute as in b).
    • e) The mixture was then filtered through two layers of muslin.
    • f) 20 g of washed cuttings were weighed accurately (W1) into a 250 ml round bottomed flask and the water content was determined by the Dean and Stark method using 100-120 petroleum ether. The weight of water removed was determined as W2.
    • g) A further 10 g of the washed cuttings were accurately weighed (W3) into an evaporating dish and dried to constant weight (W4) at 110°C.
  • The weight of oil on the cuttings,
    Figure imgb0002
  • The weight of oil left on the cuttings expressed as a percentage of weight of dry cuttings+weight of oil
    Figure imgb0003
  • The test was performed in duplicate. It should be noted that we have found that the amount of oil removed from the surface of cuttings by any given surfactant or blend of surfactants is dependent on the age of the cuttings, more oil being removed from fresh cuttings than from aged cuttings.
  • Example 1
  • Using the test method above, the following results were obtained using oil mud cuttings from the North Sea.
    Figure imgb0004
  • A=C9/C11 primary alcohol nominal 6 mole ethoxylate.
  • B=coconut monoethanolamide+2 mole ethylene oxide.
  • Example 2
  • Figure imgb0005
  • A=C10/C12 primary alcohol nominal 5 mole ethoxylate.
  • B=coconut diethanolamide.
  • Example 3
  • Figure imgb0006
    A=C8/C10 primary alcohol nominal 4 mole ethoxylate.
  • B=coconut diethanolamide.
  • Example 4
  • Figure imgb0007
  • A=nonyl phenol nominal 9 mole ethoxylate.
  • B=coconut diethanolamide.
  • In addition the emulsion decanted in step c) and obtained using A (1.5%)=B (3.75%) was heated to 10°C and separated into distinct oil and aqueous phases.
  • Example 5
  • Figure imgb0008
    A=oleic acid nominal 8 mole ethoxylate.
  • B=coconut diethanolamide.
  • Example 6
  • Figure imgb0009
  • A=mixture of mono and di- C8/C10 alkyl phosphate nominal 5.4 mole ethoxylate.
  • B=coconut diethanolamide.
  • The emulsion decanted in step c) and obtained using A (3.75%)+B (1.25%) was heated to 40°C and separated into distinct oil and aqueous phases.
  • Example 7
  • A concentrate was prepared for use according to the invention consisting of 45% by weight of C10/C12 fatty alcohol 5 mole ethoxylate, 45% by weight coconut diethanolamide, 5% by weight propylene glycol, 5% by weight water. The product was fluid and stable at temperatures between -5°C and 35°C and readily dispersed in sea water. When evaluated in the above cuttings cleaning test the results were as follows.
    Figure imgb0010
  • A=C9/C11 primary alcohol nominal 6 mole ethoxylate. This is the surfactant most commonly used for cleaning oil mud cuttings.
  • The emulsion decanted in step c) of the method and obtained using the formulation of Example 7, was heated to 50°C and separated into distinct oil and aqueous phases.
  • Example 8
  • The following test was used to show the effectiveness of the blend of nonionic surfactants of types A and B as defined above, for removing oil from metal surfaces.
    • a) A mild steel plate was washed thoroughly in household detergent solution followed by rinsing under the tap and then with acetone.
    • b) One surface of the plate was coated evenly with 0.4 g of hydrocarbon oil, e.g. crude oil.
    • c) 0.6 g of test solution was then mixed intimately with the surface oil, and the plate was allowed to rest horizontally with the coated face uppermost for 15 minutes.
    • d) The surface was then washed with 200 cm3 of synthetic sea water from a laboratory wash bottle.
    • e) The amount of oil remaining on the plate was assessed visually.
  • In this test, the test solution used contained 7.5% of a C10/C12 fatty alcohol 5 mole ethoxylate, 7.5% coconut diethanolamide and 85% water. The oil was substantially removed from the surface of the mild steel leaving a clean non-oily surface.
  • In a further test, the test solution was a commercial hydrocarbon solvent based degreaser believed to contain emulsifiers. The mild steel was less thoroughly cleaned and the surface was oily.
  • Example 9
  • The test method described above (examples 1-7) was used, but the concentration of surfactant was changed.
    Figure imgb0011
  • A=C9/C11 primary alcohol nominal 6 mole ethoxylate.
  • This is the surfactant most commonly used for cleaning oil mud cuttings and over the wide concentration range studied was clearly less effective.
  • Alkyl distribution of alcohols used in the Examples
  • The following are typical distributions.
    Figure imgb0012
  • In Example 7, surfactant A is the same as A in Example 1.

Claims (21)

1. A method for the removal of oil from solid surfaces which comprises contacting the surfaces with an aqueous solution containing at least 0.5% by weight of a mixture of (A) from 5 to 95% by weight of at least one alkoxylated alcohol, carboxylic acid, alkyl phenol, or nonionic phosphate ester, having in each case an alkyl or alkenyl group with from 6 to 22 carbon atoms and from 1 to 20 ethylene oxide groups with (b) from 95 to 5% by wt. of at least one ethylolamide of the formula
Figure imgb0013
wherein R is an alkyl group having from 5 to 17 carbon atoms and x and y are each chosen from 0 and integers from 1 to 12, such that the average value of (x+y) is from 1 to 12.
2. A method according to claim 1 wherein (A) is a primary, straight or branched chain alcohol having from 6 to 18 carbon atoms ethoxylated with from 1 to 10 ethylene oxide groups.
3. A method according to claim 1 wherein (A) is a normal or branched chain alkanoic or alkenoic acid having from 8 to 20 carbon atoms alkoxylated with from 1 to 10 ethyleneoxy groups.
4. A method according to claim 1 wherein (A) is a straight or branched chain alkyl phenol having from 6 to 12 aliphatic carbon atoms alkoxylated with from 1 to 12 ethylene oxide groups.
5. A method according to claim 1 wherein (A) is a nonionic phosphoric acid ester having at least one straight or branched chain alkyl group having from 6 to 22 carbon atoms and at least one ethylene group or polyalkoxy group having up to 20 ethyleneoxy units.
6. A method according to any foregoing claims wherein (B) has from 1 to 4 ethyleneoxy groups.
7. A method according to claim 6 wherein (B) is an alkyl monoethanolamide.
8. A method according to claim 6 wherein (B) is an alkyl diethanolamide.
9. A method according to any foregoing claim wherein (A) and (B) are each present in a proportion of more than 20% of the total active weight of the mixture.
10. A method according to any foregoing claim wherein the aqueous solution is sea water.
11. A method according to any foregoing claim wherein the mixture is present in the aqueous solution in a concentration of from 0.5% to 10%.
12. A method according to any foregoing claim for washing oil rig cuttings.
13. A method according to any foregoing claims for washing structures.
14. A method according to claim 13 for cleaning surfaces of oil rigs.
15. A method according to any foregoing claim wherein the aqueous solution is recovered after washing and heated sufficiently to effect separation of any oil emulsified therein.
16. A concentrate for use in the preparation of aqueous solutions for use according to the method of any foregoing claim, consisting essentially of from 20% to 60% by wt. of (A), from 20% to 60% by wt. of (B), up to 10% by wt. of water and up to 10% by wt. of a water miscible, hydroxyl containing organic solvent.
17. A concentrate according to claim 16 wherein (a) is an ethoxylated alcohol having from 8 to 14 carbon atoms and from 2 to 7 ethyleneoxy groups.
18. A concentrate according to either of claims 16 and 17 wherein (b) is an alkyl diethanolamide.
19. A concentrate according to any of claims 16 to 18 wherein the solvent is a water miscible mono di-or tri-hydroxy alcohol or alcohol ether having from 2 to 8 carbon atoms.
20. Aqueous solutions for use in the method of any of claims 1 to 15 formed by dilution of a concentrate according to any of claims 16 to 19 with water, and containing at least 0.5% surface active matter.
21. Sea water for use in the method of any of claims 1 to 15 having dissolved therein a concentrate according to any of claims 16 to 19 and containing at least 0.5% surface active matter.
EP83300048A 1982-01-07 1983-01-06 Composition and method for cleaning hydrocarbon oil from hard surfaces Expired EP0084411B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB8200376 1982-01-07
GB8200376 1982-01-07

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0084411A1 EP0084411A1 (en) 1983-07-27
EP0084411B1 true EP0084411B1 (en) 1985-09-04

Family

ID=10527518

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP83300048A Expired EP0084411B1 (en) 1982-01-07 1983-01-06 Composition and method for cleaning hydrocarbon oil from hard surfaces

Country Status (11)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0084411B1 (en)
CA (1) CA1203450A (en)
DE (1) DE3360678D1 (en)
DK (1) DK3483A (en)
ES (1) ES8405878A1 (en)
GB (1) GB2116579B (en)
GR (1) GR77136B (en)
IE (1) IE53660B1 (en)
IN (1) IN158886B (en)
NO (1) NO830032L (en)
PH (1) PH19657A (en)

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0103779A3 (en) * 1982-09-20 1985-01-09 John E. Oliver Removing contaminates from a well fluid and well system
US5326407A (en) * 1992-03-26 1994-07-05 Institut Francais Du Petrole Process for washing solid particles comprising a sophoroside solution
US5501816A (en) * 1994-07-12 1996-03-26 Basf Corporation Aqueous based solvent free degreaser composition
WO2004050790A1 (en) * 2002-12-02 2004-06-17 Marquis Fluids Inc. Emulsified polymer drilling fluid and methods of preparation and use thereof
US7192527B2 (en) 2004-08-10 2007-03-20 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Processes for removing oil from solid wellbore materials and produced water
US7229952B2 (en) 2002-12-19 2007-06-12 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Additive packages for removing oil from solid materials recovered from a well bore

Families Citing this family (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2480613A (en) * 1944-11-09 1949-08-30 Vernon O Sipe Building wall of angular tile
DE4023334A1 (en) * 1990-07-23 1992-01-30 Henkel Kgaa LIQUID, POURABLE AND PUMPABLE SURFACTANT CONCENTRATE
SE468855B (en) * 1990-08-09 1993-03-29 Eriksson Tord Utveckling PROCEDURES FOR CLEANING AND DEATH, COMPOSITION INTENDED AS PRIOR MIXTURE AND WATER AND ELECTROLYTHEATIC MICROEMULSION
SE500534C2 (en) * 1990-11-12 1994-07-11 Eriksson Tord Utveckling Procedure for cleaning and degreasing
GB9623823D0 (en) * 1996-11-16 1997-01-08 Reckitt & Colmann Prod Ltd Improvements in or relating to organic compositions
US7951755B2 (en) 2002-12-02 2011-05-31 An-Ming Wu Emulsified polymer drilling fluid and methods of preparation
WO2006010375A1 (en) * 2004-07-27 2006-02-02 Rhodia Chimie Formulation for degreasing metal comprising a demulsifyiing agent, use of the agent, and process for degreasing metal.

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0018630A1 (en) * 1979-05-07 1980-11-12 Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft auf Aktien Washing agent for textiles

Family Cites Families (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
AT179693B (en) * 1951-04-02 1954-09-25 Metallgesellschaft Ag Acid emulsion cleaners for pickling and degreasing metals
NL168553C (en) * 1951-04-02 Takeda Chemical Industries Ltd PROCESS FOR THE MICROBIOLOGICAL PREPARATION OF CITRIC ACID.
US2831814A (en) * 1951-12-19 1958-04-22 Poor & Co Acid pickling of metals and compositions therefor
GB1213792A (en) * 1966-11-30 1970-11-25 Diversey Ltd Inhibition of corrosion of metallic surfaces
SE400575B (en) * 1974-12-13 1978-04-03 Nordnero Ab BATH FOR CELLING OF COPPER AND ITS ALLOYS
US4280915A (en) * 1977-06-23 1981-07-28 Nl Industries, Inc. Salt stable lubricant for water base drilling fluids
US4268406A (en) * 1980-02-19 1981-05-19 The Procter & Gamble Company Liquid detergent composition

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0018630A1 (en) * 1979-05-07 1980-11-12 Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft auf Aktien Washing agent for textiles

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0103779A3 (en) * 1982-09-20 1985-01-09 John E. Oliver Removing contaminates from a well fluid and well system
US5326407A (en) * 1992-03-26 1994-07-05 Institut Francais Du Petrole Process for washing solid particles comprising a sophoroside solution
US5501816A (en) * 1994-07-12 1996-03-26 Basf Corporation Aqueous based solvent free degreaser composition
WO2004050790A1 (en) * 2002-12-02 2004-06-17 Marquis Fluids Inc. Emulsified polymer drilling fluid and methods of preparation and use thereof
US7229952B2 (en) 2002-12-19 2007-06-12 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Additive packages for removing oil from solid materials recovered from a well bore
US7192527B2 (en) 2004-08-10 2007-03-20 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Processes for removing oil from solid wellbore materials and produced water
US7374690B2 (en) 2004-08-10 2008-05-20 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Processes for removing oil from solid wellbore materials and produced water

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DK3483D0 (en) 1983-01-06
GR77136B (en) 1984-09-07
GB2116579B (en) 1985-08-29
NO830032L (en) 1983-07-08
CA1203450A (en) 1986-04-22
EP0084411A1 (en) 1983-07-27
DE3360678D1 (en) 1985-10-10
IN158886B (en) 1987-02-07
GB2116579A (en) 1983-09-28
IE830026L (en) 1983-07-07
ES518812A0 (en) 1984-06-16
IE53660B1 (en) 1989-01-04
ES8405878A1 (en) 1984-06-16
DK3483A (en) 1983-07-08
PH19657A (en) 1986-06-09

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CA2394858C (en) Acid based micro-emulsions
US7902123B2 (en) Microemulsion cleaning composition
EP1814652B1 (en) Surfactant system method
RU2476254C2 (en) Method of crude oil emulsion separation
US5678631A (en) Process for removing solids from a well drilling system
CA1203450A (en) Composition and method for cleaning oil from hard surfaces
US3849316A (en) Spacer composition
CA2179720A1 (en) Solvent soaps and methods employing same
JP2001502749A (en) Easy disposal of working fluid based on w / o-type inverted emulsion
US6093689A (en) Asphalt and heavy oil degreaser
US6197734B1 (en) High wax content heavy oil remover
US4601836A (en) Phosphate ester/alcohol micellar solutions in well acidizing
US20040204324A1 (en) Drilling fluid
JP2001503093A (en) Use of improved multi-component mixtures for geological exploration
US5773390A (en) Chemical additive for removing solids from a well drilling system
US6300300B1 (en) Liquid cleaning, degreasing, and disinfecting concentrate and methods of use
WO1996001358A1 (en) A chemical additive and process for removing solids from a well drilling system
US12618021B2 (en) Degreasing composition comprising an anionic surfactant mixture
US20230020005A1 (en) Demulsified composition
WO2010029091A1 (en) A method of cleaning oil contaminated solid particulates

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19830106

AK Designated contracting states

Designated state(s): BE DE FR GB IT NL

ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed
GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Designated state(s): BE DE FR GB IT NL

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 3360678

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19851010

ET Fr: translation filed
PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: HENKEL KOMMANDITGESELLSCHAFT AUF AKTIEN

Effective date: 19860604

NLR1 Nl: opposition has been filed with the epo

Opponent name: HENKEL KOMMANDITGESELLSCHAFT AUF AKTIEN

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 19870131

Year of fee payment: 5

RDAG Patent revoked

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009271

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: PATENT REVOKED

GBPR Gb: patent revoked under art. 102 of the ep convention designating the uk as contracting state
27W Patent revoked

Effective date: 19880122

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: ALBRIGHT & WILSON LTD

Effective date: 19880131

NLR2 Nl: decision of opposition