EP0063575A1

EP0063575A1 - Dust mitigation system

Info

Publication number: EP0063575A1
Application number: EP81902834A
Authority: EP
Inventors: Ronald Peter Hansen
Original assignee: Individual
Current assignee: Individual
Priority date: 1980-10-24
Filing date: 1981-10-23
Publication date: 1982-11-03
Also published as: EP0063575A4; JPS57501565A; WO1982001481A1

Abstract

Procede de production de gouttelettes (6) d'eau chargees electriquement pour la reduction de la poussiere dispersee dans l'air et dispositif permettant l'application de ce procede. Le probleme pose par les court-circuits est resolu en utilisant un tube (1) d'alimentation long et pourvu d'un alesage etroit realise en un materiau non conducteur utilise conjointement avec un generateur de haute tension (3) presentant une resistance interne elevee et une charge de pulverisation isolee. Des variantes comprennent l'adjonction d'un deuxieme fluide tel que de l'air ou de l'huile afin de diminuer la conductivite de l'eau, la pulverisation d'eau dans un disque deflecteur charge ainsi que la modulation de l'amplitude de la tension appliquee.Method for producing electrically charged water droplets (6) for the reduction of dust dispersed in the air and device allowing the application of this method. The problem posed by short circuits is solved by using a long supply tube (1) provided with a narrow bore made of a non-conductive material used in conjunction with a high voltage generator (3) having a high internal resistance. and an isolated spray charge. Variants include the addition of a second fluid such as air or oil to decrease the conductivity of the water, the spraying of water into a charged deflector disc as well as the modulation of the amplitude applied voltage.

Description

This invention relates to novel forms of dust mitigatio systems and in particular to a method relying upon the distribution of an electrically charged fluid spray for use therein.

Environmental pollution by airborne dust particles is o increasing concern. Particulate substances emitted from material stockpiles, handling operations, and industrial processes can reach nuisance levels in most situations, and become a severe health hazard in extreme cases.

Hitherto, the available methods of alleviating such problems have been limited to:-

1. Total enclosure of the site, stockpile and/or handling operation.

2. Maintaining a high level of moisture and/or adhesiv substances in the material being handled, to prevent emissio of dust during handling or standing in stockpiles.

3. Continuous or intermittent application of water spr with or without chemical additives, to stockpiles and the vicinity of handling points.

In a majority of cases, (1) above is prohibitively cost or impracticable for other reasons.

Presence of high moisture levels in particulate materia as in (2) above frequently increases handling and flow probl and may degrade the value of the material. For example, ex¬ cessive moisture in coal materially reduces the combustion energy available. A.lso, unless supplemented by (3), surfaces of stockpiles or conveyor loads exposed to sun and wind can d out very rapidly, and dust fines may be generated from such surfaces even while the bulk of the material below retains excessive moisture content.

In drying conditions, continuous spraying of water plus additive on dust-nuisance areas can only effectively treat the principal source of such dust (the stockpile and handling system.) This is of limited effectiveness unless very high water volumes are applied, to a degree which may itself be an environmental nuisance to personnel working in the vicinity. The continuous application of such sprays may also cause an increase in the moisture content of the subject Traterial sufficient to degrade its end purpose. Some materials, such as flour or cement, cannot tolerate added moisture at all.

A disadvantage of such spray systems is that other majo sources of dust, such as roads and remote corners of the terminal site, may escape treatment altogether and remain a major source of dust over the entire area.

Once airborne, dust is extremely difficult to suppress in open-air conditions. All current methods of dust- mitigation are based on techniques of attempting to prevent dust becoming airborne.by the various methods outlined above. At the same time, dust from a number of other sources, including those beyond the site boundaries and hence outside the control of the operating authority, may be continually airborne and carried to considerable distances into adjacent residential, commercial, or natural areas.

The difficulty of suppressing airborne dust; is, in simple terms, related to the relative numbers of airborne dust particles and the number and size of water droplets necessary to effectively capture them. The added mass thus causes rapid movement ofthe water droplet to the ground.

Since the rate of fall of any particulate substance in air is related to its mass, density, and the viscosity of air any effective water spray must produce droplets of a sub¬ stantial size compared to the dust particles to be effective. To remove even a major proportion of airborne dust from a given air volume requires the spraying of a mass of water many times greater than the mass of dust particles. This is clearly impractical except in special circumstances.

However, if the water droplets can be charged, their dust-capture effect is increased by a very large factor.

Experiments have shown the dust captured by a given volu of water falling as discrete particles (droplets) relates approximately to the square of the applied voltage. The polar of the voltage has been found to be relatively insignificant, although for some dust materials small differences in capture efficiency were found, depending on whether the charge was positive or negative to earth.

Observations on dust particles falling freely between a pair of charged metal plates of opposite polarity have indicated that some substances can carry small charges generat spontaneously by air friction or other causes of a magnitude of the order of twenty millivolts or so. This is considered to account for observed differences in capture rates of positively charged and negatively charged water droplets.

Experiments involving the simplest form of our invention have been most satisfactory in that a quite unusual amount of dust was captured.

In a typical test by this method, approximately 250m mis of water was caused to fall through a dust cloud as discrete droplets along an insulated nylon guide thread through a small orifice to a collecting vessel. The average size of each droplet was about 0.05ml. An electric charge was applied to each droplet by a DC source of variable voltage. The quantity of dust collected was measured after each 250ml run to + 0 . 001 gram. Results were : -

Run No . 2. 5. 6 . 8

Water (gm) 250 248 246 253 250 254 250 244

No.of Droplets 5000 4960 4920 5060 5000 5080 5000 4880

Voltage (kv) 0 0 +10 -10 +15 -15 +24 -24

Dust captured 2 2 8 7 18 16 46 41 (dry wt. , mg)

Clearly, electrostatic charging of the water spray drople will greatly increase dust-capture effectiveness. This fact is very well known, but practical application requires that the spray nozzle be insulated.< from earth and supplied by a water source of very high electrical resistance to earth. In any conventional water supply the piping and the watercolumn therein constitute a low-resistance short-circuit.

In this context and throughout this specification "droplet" means any self-cohesive volume of water restrained by its surface tension only.

The necessarily high internal impedance R. of any practical high- oltage generator of electrostatic charge, when connected to such a spray nozzle, would result in almost complete loss of the applied potential, from the equation:-

Effective voltage = Resistance of leakage path (R-,)

X V. g

^RI ^{x R}l wherein R. is the internal impedance, R-. is the leakage resistance, and V is the voltage generated within the gener-

•6 ator.

Furthermore, any significant leakage currents in such a system will cause electrolytic corrosion of any conducting materials and possibly of adjacent metallic equipment. Measures involving supply of spray water to electrostatically charged nozzles from an insulated tank also present problems . The electrical capicity of such a large conductive mass creates the danger of electric shock, potentially lethal at the high voltages involved. There are also difficulties in replenishment of the tank during long periods of operation.

It is an object of our invention to provide a dust mitigation system which substantially overcomes the defects experienced in the prior art.

In accordance with the present invention therefore there is provided a method of producing electrically charged liquid droplets for dust mitigation purposes, in which said liquid is supplied by means of a relatively long and narrow-bore duct of substantially non-conductive material to a point of application of high electrical potential relative to earth, said duct having a ratio of length to cross-sectional area . satisfying the equation:-

Vs x R. x S

(1)

A (Vg - Vs) x 10⁶

Where L = length of duct (cm)

A = cross-section area (internal bore) ,

(sq. cm) S = conductivity of sprayed liquid or mixture of liquid and fluid. (microsiemens)

Vg = generated voltage

Vs = required nett voltage at spray nozzle, and

R. = internal resistance of generator (ohms)

In one embodiment of the invention, a substantially non- conductive second fluid, immiscible with the working liquid is injected into the working liquid supply line at a point at or near the point of earth potential, in such manner that the turbulent mixture so formed is substantially non-conducting. The non-conducting fluid may be air or oil.

In a further embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a method of electrically charging liquid droplets in a dust mitigation system, whereby the applied voltage is amplitude modulated at a rate substantially lower than the rate of generation of liquid droplets, the applied voltage being varied in peak potential, or in polarity to earth, or any combination thereof.

The invention will now be further described with referenc to the accompanying drawings, in which :-

Fig. 1 schematically represents the apparatus in its most elementary form.

Fig. 2 illustrates the addition of a surfactant wetting agent to the working fluid of the apparatus of Fig. 1.

Fig. 3 shows modifications required if the working fluid is of high conductivity.

Fig. 4 represents the apparatus when applied to boundary dust mitigation installations.

Fig. 5 is a plan view of a stockpile site layout.

Fig. 6 is a side elevation of a stockpile controlled by one embodiment of the invention.

Fig. 7 illustrates a variation of Fig. 1 where the spray nozzles are at or below the level ofthewater feed point.

Fig. 8 is a cross sectional elevation of the first fluid second fluid junction of the arrangement of Fig. 7, and Fig. 9 illustates a further variation of the present invention wherein the first fluid is subject to nil, electrical potential until departure from the delivery pipe.

A number of embodiments of our invention will now be described:-

The simplest form is a method for increasing the electrical resistance of the leakage path from the spray nozzle to earth to a magnitude sufficient for connection to a practical high-voltage generator with high internal resistance, when the conductivity of the water being used is low or moderate. See Figures 1 and 2.

With modern high-strength plastic materials, tubing can be constructed with very high electrical insulation values, yet capable of withstanding high fluid pressures. By accepting some loss of pressure from water flow (i.e. friction loss) in a relatively narrow-bore duct, an insulated spray nozzle can be supplied via a long length of such tubing without significantly reducing the electrical reistance to earth.

The duct may be linear, or for convenience coiled as a spiral, a helix or as a zig-zag within an insulated casing. The ratio of length to cross-sectional area will be determine by several factors:-

1. The conductivity of the water supply. 2. The internal impedance, of the power supply unit (voltage generator) .

3. The allowable leakage current to earth therefrom, determined by the considerations listed above.

4. The desired charge voltage on the water droplets.

In a typical case, the available water has a conductivity of 150 microsiemens, the desired voltage is 20 kilovolts at th spray nozzle, generator capacity is 24 kv, 2 ma DC, and the internal impedance ^■ is- - 12 x 10 ohms. Minimum leakage path resistance is 60 x 10 ohms. Hence, this required ratio of length: cross-sectional area = 9000:1

In its simplest form as shown in Figure 1, the invention includes an apparatus having a length of electrically non¬ conducting ducting (1) , said duct having a ratio of length to internal cross-section of bore satisfying the equation:-

L Vs x R. x S

(1)

A (Vg - Vs) x 10⁶

Where L = length of tubing (cm)

A = cross-section arc (internal bore) ,

(sq.cm.) S = conductivity of water supply

(microsiemens) Vg = generated voltage Vs = required nett voltage at spray nozzle, and

R. = internal resistance of generator (ohms)

The additional load on the generator, of charging curren to the water droplets, is very small compared to the leakage current via the water-filled tubing, and negligible for the purpose of determining _ above.

A

The duct is supplied with water (4) from a source at earth potential electrically, and feeds spray nozzles (2) insulated from earth. A transformer/rectifier unit or electrostatic generator (3) is connected between the nozzles (2) and earth, and supplied with electrical energy from a source (5) , usually mains voltage 230 volts 50 Kz. Water droplets (6) are emitted from the spray nozzles (2) bearing an electric charge of voltage determined by the equation:-

R;

Es = Eg x

R, + R, where Es is the spray droplet potential Eg is the generator voltage EL- and R2 are as above.

The charged droplets (6) will capture dust particles at a rate determined by the voltage Es, the viscosity of the air, the rate of fall of each droplet, the number and mass of dust particles present per unit volume of air, and by the hydrophobic or hydrophilic property of the dust particle surface, relative to the water being sprayed.

Generally, the voltage on the droplets is the determining factor in the rate of contact between each falling water droplet and dust particles. However, if the dust particle is hydrophobic, such particles may simply acquire a similar charge by contact with the droplet, and not be captured by wetting action. The now-charged dust particles will then be repelled by the like-charge effect, and capture efficiency will actually be reduced.

In such conditions, the form of the invention is slightly altered. A suitable surfactant wetting agent, being a polar compound with lipophilic and hydrophilic properties, may be added to the water supply at (4). Alternatively, as in Figure 2, a second line of tubing (7) may conduct the surfactant additive (8) to the water at spray nozzles (2) . Since the required proportion of such an additive to the water is only from 0.01% to 1.0% in most cases, relatively small-bore tubing is adequate for the surfactant supply line (8) , and hence of high resistance. The consequent reduction of earth-leakage resistance by the shunting effect of (7) is negligible.

A second embodiment of the invention is used in situations where the available water supply for dust mitigation is relatively impure, i.e. of high conductivity. See Figure 3.

In this arrangement, the water fee-dduct (1) is again of non-conducting material such as nylon, polyvinyl chloride, etc. but may be of any ratio of length to cross-section.

This supplies elevated and/or insulated spray nozzles (2) , vi an air-separator chamber (9) containing a cyclone separator element (12) and a float (10) .

The air outlet from the cyclone is conveyed via non-conducting tubing (11) through a suction-relief valve (13) to a small compressor unit (14) and injected again at the base of (1), Surfactant, if required, is injected at the spray nozzle (2) via non-conductive tubing (7) from a supply source (8) into the water outlet from (9) from which a has been removed by the action of cyclone separator (12) .

The injection of air into the flow of water in (1) redu the electrical conductivity of thewater column to an insignificant figure, such that the voltage output from the generator (3) may be connected directly to (2) without excessive loss by leakage current through (1) . The internal resistance of the generator may be made very high, so that accidental contact by personnel does not create an excessive hazard, the relative conductivity of the human body being low enough to effectively short-circuit the generator voltage wit only minute current flow through the person.

The capacity of the compressor (14) is small, since the nett pressure difference between its input and output is little more than the hydraulic head differential between (4)- and (2). The air volume required is only a fraction of the water flow rate. In one example an air volume of 10 percent of the water flow in a tube of 18mm internal diameter, raise the electrical resistance of a 10-metre length of the tubing plus water and air turbulent mixture to 180 x 10**-- ohms.

Should the air volume in the circuit fall below an amount determined primarily by the volume of (9) , the float (10) on the increasing level of water within the chamber (9) rises to block the air outlet exhaust path through the cyclone cone (12) . This' results in a nett suction in tubing (11) , and valve (13) then opens to admit atmospheric to the intake of compressor (14) . The increased air volume thus injected lowers the water level in (9), the float falls opening the escape path again to (11) , and recirculation of air is resumed.

A third embodiment of the present invention involves t application of low-frequency modulation of the applied charge. This important feature lies in the design of the electrostatic generator (3) shown schematically in Figures 1, 2 and 3.

In practical terms this can be achieved by applying a. voltage at mains frequency (50 Hz) and the appropriate volta (usually 10 - 50 Kv) , to a spray nozzle generating droplets at rates greater than 100 per second, preferably several times this rate.

The generator is so designed that the voltage applied to spray nozzles (2) may be modulated at low frequencies to change the magnitude and/or polarity of the charge imparted to water droplets (6) . By reversing polarity at a frequency significantly lower than the number of droplets emitted per second, the dust-capture effectiveness and precipitation efficiency are materially improved over a charged spray system of constant polarity.

Each charged droplet collects dust particles by the well-known effect of attraction of opposite charges. The charge on a water droplet induces opposite charges on the nearer surface of adjacent dust particles, and like charges on the far side. The net effect is a force of attraction between droplet and particle.

Droplets emitted during one half-cycle of the charging cycle are followed through the air by droplets of opposite charge emitted during the succeeding half-cycle. Due to variations of droplet size and velocity of emission, dronlets of opposite polarity intermingle in flight a short interval after emission, with an average spacing determined largely by the spray nozzle design and applied water pressure.

Thus for a short period in free flight, each droplet collects dust by the aforementioned action of electrostatic attraction. The rate of movement of dust particles towards water droplets is an inverse function of the mass of each dust particle, which is generally very much less than the mass of the droplet.

In addition, the charged droplets will move towards each other, but at a much slower rate due to their greater mass. Thus each droplet collects a number of dust particles before joining with another droplet of opposite charge, at which point the charge on each is neutralised. This increase in total agglomerated mass of water-plus-dust causes a sharp increase in the rate of fall through the air, which for small droplets is a function of size (mass) .

The precipitation rate to ground is therefore greatly increased and offsets the normal lowering of precipitation rate due to evaporative loss of mass from the surface of each droplet during fall. A further embodiment of the principles of our invention outlined above is illustrated at Figures 4, 5 and 6. In this application, it is possible to capture and precipate dust blown from a stockpile or handling operation without spraying water directly onto the stockpile of material or on the actual handling point.

The assembly shown schematically in Figure 1,2 or 3 may, instead of generating charged droplets (6) from spray nozzles (2) , have the fluid output from the top of (1) carried via an additional length of non-conducting tubing (21) to a length of tubing (15) , via a tee or Y junction piece (18) . The tubing (15) is suspended above ground by supporting masts (23) at a minimum height sufficient to clear all stacking cranes, conveyors, and handling equipment. • Support from the masts (23) is by tension insulators (20) and chain or wire stirrups (22) to eye-bolt anchors (19) in the end of each catenary section of tubing (15) , or other alternative supports providing electrical isolation of the suspended tubing from earth.

Tubing (15) completely surrounds the site in three or more sections, and has its upper surface perforated with fine orifices (17) such that thin jets of fluid are directed upward therefrom. These jets quickly disperse by the action of wind and fluid turbulence into separate droplets (16) .

Being effectively insulated at each end, tubing (15) is at substantially uniform potential along its length, said potential being that at the output terminal of the high voltage generator (3) as corrected for leakage resistance by equation 1 above. The ejected droplets thus carry charεes at a υotential approximately that of (2) in the arrangements of Figures 1, 2 or 3 as relevant.

Charged droplets ejected upwards before falling downward

/ form a curtain of charged water surrounding the site to a height somewhat higher than the supporting masts and catenary tubing. It has been found that this curtain captures nearly of the dust particles becoming airborne from the site without significant addition of water to the stockpiled material. Du capture isby the same process of electrostatic attraction out lined above relevant to the arrangements shown schematically Figures 1, 2 and 3.

A further embodiment of this invention is the non¬ conducting feedermethods described above, but in which the charge-modulation effect is produced by a pair of adjacent but separate spray nozzles or catenary-tube curtain sprays. Each such droplet emitter therein is connected to separate D.C. high voltage generators of opposite polarity, the emitte droplets of opposite charge then mingling in flight as previously described, to produce similar dust-capture effects.

A slight excess of negatively charged droplets is preferable in the air around such locations as it is now commonly accepted that a slight excess of negative ions in air has significant beneficial effects on human physiology. The converse, a slight excess of positive ions, has deleterio effects.

It is known that in dry dusty conditions an excess of positive ions is frequently created, and in fact many of the complaints around mineral-handling sites may be due to the resultant physiological disturbances that are not appreciated by the persons concerned. The systems described herein can improve this situation, as well as greatly improving the dust-mitigation effects of the spray.

Yet a further embodiment of the invention is illustrate by Figures 7 and 8. Where it is possible to locate spray nozzles below or near the same altitude as the water-feed point, (if necessary at some horizontal distance therefrom) the required reduction of conductivity may be achieved by t arrangement shown.

Water is supplied at moderate to high pressure at the feed point (4) , and passes through an orifice plate (25) or venturi section, with air inlet ports (26) . The velocity o the water, and the relative areas of the tubing (1) and venturi throat or orifice (25) are so arranged that a suitably large proportion of air aspirated into the liquid within tubing (1) , thus reducing electrical conductivity of the fluid column.

High voltage is applied at the spray head, in the sam manner as Figure 1. The leakage path to earth via the colu of air and liquid in (1) is of sufficiently high resistance to enable a high potential to be maintained at spray head (2) , from a source (3) of high internal resistance and low current output.

A further alternative arrangement is illustrated in

Figure 9. A jet nozzle (27) containing a venturi section or orifice plate (25) having air-aspiration ports (26) is connected to a water source (4) of high or moderate pressure

At a distance from the nozzle and on the same.axis, a deflector plate (28) of non-conducting material is mounted on a tubulor support (29) also of non-conducting material. Within the tubular member is a current limiting resistance o 80 to 300 -meg ohms (30) in series with the connection from a high voltage generator (3) via wiring (31) within the tubing to a small electrode (32) on the jet-contact face of the deflector plate (28).

Water emitted from the nozzle contains air bubbles sucked in through the ports (26), and the jet is therefore of high resistance. The jet impinges on the deflector plate (28) , and is broken up into spray droplets on impact. The shape of the emitted spray pattern is- determined by the profile and angular setting of the deflector plate (28) and may be designed thus to virtually any desired spray pattern, with a charge on the droplets determined by equation (1) , imparted by the electrode (32) .

• V Λ

Claims

The claims defining the invention are as follows:

Claim 1. A method of producing electrically charged liquid droplets for dust mitigation purposes, in which said liquid is supplied by means of a relatively long and narrow-bore duct of substantially non-conducted material to a point of application of high electrical potential relative to earth, said duct having a ratio of length to cross-sectional area satisfying the equation:

L _ Vs x R^ x S

(Vg - Vs) x 10

Where L = length of duct (cm)

A = cross-section area (internal bore) , (sq.cm)

S = conductivity of sprayed liquid or mixture of liquid and fluid (microsiemens)

Vg= generated voltage

Vs= required nett voltage at spray nozzle, and R.= internal resistance of generator (ohms)

Claim 2. A method as claimed in Claim 1, wherein a fluid, immiscible with said liquid, is introduced into said liquid at a point at or near the point of earth potential in said duct such that the turbulent mixture so formed is substan¬ tially non-conducting.

Claim 3. A method as claimed in Claim 1 or Claim 2, wherein the applied voltage is amplitude modulated at a rate substan- tailly lower than the rate of generation of liquid droplets, the applied voltage being varied in peak potential, or in polarity to earth, or in any combination thereof.

Claim 4. Apparatus for producing electrically charged liquid droplets for dust suppression, said apparatus including a spray-head insulated from earth, means to provide a high electrical potential to said spray-head, and a length of relatively long and non-conductive ducting connected to said spray-head for supplying said spray-head with be charged and sprayed, said ducting having a ratio of length to internal cross-sectional area of bore satisfying the equation

Where L = length of duct (cm)

A = cross-section area (internal bore) , (sq.cm)

Vg= generated voltage

Vs= required nett voltage at spray nozzle and R.= internal resistance of generator (ohms)

Claim 5. Apparatus for producing electrically charged liquid droplets for dust suppression in which the said liquid is of relatively high conductivity, said apparatus including a spray-head insulated from earth, means to provide a high electrical potential to said spray-head, a non-conductive duct for supplying said spray-head with said liquid via an air separator chamber containing a cyclone separator element and a float, wherein said liquid supply ducting may be of any suitable length and which conveys said liquid to said air separating chamber where air is removed from said liquid by action of the cyclone separator and passed by non-conductive tubing through a suction relief valve to air compressor for injection into said liquid supply ducting upstream of said air-separating chamber, in order to reduce the conductivity of said liquid to be sprayed.

Claim 6. Apparatus as claimed in Claim 4 or Claim 5, wherein a second duct is introduced into said liquid supply duct to supply a surfactant to said liquid in the proportion 0.005% to 3.0% by volume.

Claim 7. Apparatus for producing electrically charged liquid droplets for dust suppression as claimed in any one of Claims 4, 5 and 6 wherein said spray-head comprises electrically insulated perforated tubing for linear spraying apt

Claim 8. Apparatus for producing electrically charged liqui droplets for dust suppression comprising a spray-head insul¬ ated from earth, said spray-head being fed by spray liquid at moderate to high pressure, said liquid being forced through an orifice plate in the supply duct, said duct being provided with air inlet ports immediately adjacent to the spray-head side of the orifice plate, the arrangement causin the spray liquid to become suitably aspirated prior to passing through said spray-head to which a high electrical potential is applied.

Claim 9. Apparatus for producing electrically charged liqui droplets for dust suppression comprising a jet nozzle insul¬ ated from earth, said nozzle receiving spray liquid at mod¬ erate to high pressures, and a deflector plate insulated from earth spaced apart from said nozzle and arranged to deflect in droplet form aerated liquid emitted by said nozzle said deflector plate being provided with an electrode to impart a charge onto said droplets.

Claim 10. Apparatus as claimed in any one of Claims 4 to 9 wherein a low-frequency modulation is effected in the applied charge.