EP0037221B1 - Method and composition for inhibiting corrosion of metal surfaces in aqueous solutions - Google Patents

Method and composition for inhibiting corrosion of metal surfaces in aqueous solutions Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0037221B1
EP0037221B1 EP81301199A EP81301199A EP0037221B1 EP 0037221 B1 EP0037221 B1 EP 0037221B1 EP 81301199 A EP81301199 A EP 81301199A EP 81301199 A EP81301199 A EP 81301199A EP 0037221 B1 EP0037221 B1 EP 0037221B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
water
chromate
polymer
soluble
aqueous medium
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired
Application number
EP81301199A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0037221A1 (en
Inventor
Frederick Gottlieb Vogt
Patricia Timpano Sparrell
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
BetzDearborn Europe Inc
Original Assignee
Betz Europe Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US06/134,813 external-priority patent/US4329250A/en
Priority claimed from US06/134,812 external-priority patent/US4297317A/en
Application filed by Betz Europe Inc filed Critical Betz Europe Inc
Publication of EP0037221A1 publication Critical patent/EP0037221A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0037221B1 publication Critical patent/EP0037221B1/en
Expired legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23FNON-MECHANICAL REMOVAL OF METALLIC MATERIAL FROM SURFACE; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL; MULTI-STEP PROCESSES FOR SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL INVOLVING AT LEAST ONE PROCESS PROVIDED FOR IN CLASS C23 AND AT LEAST ONE PROCESS COVERED BY SUBCLASS C21D OR C22F OR CLASS C25
    • C23F11/00Inhibiting corrosion of metallic material by applying inhibitors to the surface in danger of corrosion or adding them to the corrosive agent
    • C23F11/08Inhibiting corrosion of metallic material by applying inhibitors to the surface in danger of corrosion or adding them to the corrosive agent in other liquids

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method and a composition for reducing corrosion of metal surfaces in contact with aqueous systems.
  • Chromates are widely referred to in the literature, and their effectiveness in reducing the rate of corrosion of metallic surfaces exposed to corroding aqueous mediums is well known. However, if used in low concentrations these inhibitors can cause considerable pitting and tuberculation. Indeed, if added in insufficient quantities to stop metal surface attach altogether, corrosion can become so severely localized and the intensity of attack so intense that perforations may occur more extensively than if no inhibitor treatment had been added.
  • U.S. Patent 4, 209, 398 discloses a water treatment composition
  • a water treatment composition comprising a polymer containing a structural unit that is derived from a monomer having an ethylenically unsaturated bond and one or more carboxyl radicals, at least a portion of which radicals have been modified.
  • Compounds such as inorganic phosphates, phosphonic acids, organic phosphoric acid esters and polyvalent metal salts are combined with the polymer for treating the particular system.
  • the polymer may be used in combination with conventional corrosion inhibitors for iron, steel, copper, copper alloys or other metals, conventional scale and contamination inhibitors, metal ion sequestering agents and other conventional water treating agents.
  • corrosion inhibitors there are can be enumerated chromates, bichromates, tungstate, molybdates, nitrites, borates, silicates, oxycarboxylic acids, amino acids, catechols, aliphatic amino surface active agents, benzotriazole, and mercaptobenzotriazole.
  • U.S. Patent 3,658,710 discloses a method of removing tubercles of corrosion from a substrate and inhibiting scale formation using organic polymers and silica and/or chromium compounds.
  • a second polymer, such as an organic phosphonate may also be used.
  • a chromate-based corrosion inhibitor for metal surfaces exposed to a corroding aqueous medium consists essentially of (i) water-soluble chromate and (ii) a particular type of water-soluble polymer comprised of units derived from acrylic acid or derivatives thereof (AA) and 2-hydroxy-propyl acrylate units (HPA).
  • AA acrylic acid or derivatives thereof
  • HPA 2-hydroxy-propyl acrylate units
  • methods according to the present invention would comprise the use of zinc-free corrosion inhibitor treatments comprising components (i) and (ii) as defined above.
  • methods according to the present invention would comprise the use of zinc-free and phosphate free corrosion inhibitors comprising the noted components (i) and (ii).
  • the present invention relates to a corrosion inhibitor treatment comprising water-soluble chromate AA/HPA wherein the chromate is added in an amount of less than 5 parts of active chromate per million parts of aqueous medium.
  • the present invention is considered to have applicability to any aqueous system. It is particularly useful in cooling water systems. Accordingly, the present invention will hereinafter be described as it relates to cooling water systems.
  • AA acrylic acid compound
  • the polymers are considered, more broadly, to have a mole ratio of AA:HPA of from about 1:4 to 36:1. This mole ratio is preferably 1:1 to 11:1, and most preferably 1:1 to 5:1.
  • the only criteria that is considered to be of importance with respect to mole ratios is that the copolymer should be water-soluble. As the proportion of hydroxylated alkyl acrylate moieties increases, the solubility of the copolymer decreases. It is noted that, from an efficacy point of view, the polymers having a mole ratio of AA:HPA of 1:1 to 5:1 are considered the best.
  • the polymers preferably have a molecular weight of from 1,000 to 50,000 with from 2,000 to 6,000 being most preferred.
  • the polymers utilized in accordance with the invention can be prepared by vinyl addition polymerization or by treatment of an acrylic acid or salt polymer. More specifically, acrylic acid or derivatives thereof or their water soluble salts, e.g., sodium, potassium, ammonium, etc. can be copolymerized with the hydroxy alkyl acrylate under standard copolymerization conditions utilizing free radical initiators such as benzoyl peroxide, azobisisobutyronitrile or redox initiators such as ferrous sulfate and ammonium persulfate. The molecular weight of the resulting copolymer can be controlled utilizing standard chain control agents such as secondary alcohols (isopropanol), mercaptans, halocarbons, etc. Copolymers falling within the scope of the invention are commercially available from, for example, National Starch Company.
  • the 2-hydroxypropyl acrylate can be prepared by reacting acrylic acid with propylene oxide.
  • the polymers of the invention may also be prepared by reacting a polyacrylic acid or derivative thereof with an appropriate amount of propylene oxide. The reaction takes place at the COOH or COM group of the units to provide the hydroxylated propyl acrylate unit.
  • the polymer prepared either by copolymerization of AA with hydroxypropyl acrylate (HPA) or reaction of AA with propylene oxide would be composed primarily of units having the structural formulas: wherein M is as earlier defined. It is noted that in aqueous solution with hydroxypropyl acrylate unit is in equilibrium with a minor amount of 1-methyl-2-hydroxyethyl acrylate.
  • chromate compounds which could be used in practicing methods according to the present invention are described in U.S. 2,900,222 to Kahler et al. These compounds would include alkali metals or any water-soluble compound that contains hexavalent chromate and provides chromate radical in water solutions.
  • Illustrative water-soluble chromate compounds are sodium chromate dihydrate, sodium chromate anhydrous, sodium chromate tetrahydrate, sodium chromate hexahydrate, sodium chromate decahydrate, potassium dichromate, potassium chromate, ammonium dichromate and chromic acid.
  • the amount of each constituent added to the cooling water would, of course, be, an effective amount for the purpose and would depend on such factors as the nature and severity of the corrosion problem being treated and the temperature and pH of the cooling water.
  • active polymer As little as about 0.5 part per million parts of cooling water (ppm) should be effective, while about 2 ppm is the preferred lower limit. Based on economic considerations, the polymer could be fed in amount as high as about 200 ppm, with about 50 ppm being the preferred upper limit.
  • ppm part per million parts of cooling water
  • active chromate that is, active hexavalent chromate ion
  • active chromate ion as little as about 0.5 ppm should be effective.
  • the upper limit would depend on such factors as cost and toxicity and is less than 5 ppm.
  • chromate and the polymer may however be added to the aqueous system separately or together.
  • the treatment is preferably used as an aqueous solution.
  • the constitutes are combined by simply adding them to water. Should long-term stability problems be experienced, a two-barrel treatment may be more desirable. Of course, the constituents could be combined in any relative proportions in dry form.
  • compositions according to the present invention could vary widely and preferably comprise, on a weight basis:
  • the cooling water it is possible for the cooling water to have a pH of about 5.5 to 9.5. More commonly, the pH is about 6.5 to 8.5, with about 6.5 to 7.5 being most common.
  • Corrosion rate was determined by weight loss measurement. Prior to immersion, coupons were scrubbed with a mixture of trisodium phosphate-pumice, rinsed with water, rinsed with isopropyl alcohol and then air dried. Weight measurement to the nearest milligram was made. At the end of one day, a weighed coupon was removed and cleaned. Cleaning consisted of immersion into a 50% solution of HCI for approximately 20 seconds, rinsing with tap water, scrubbing with a mixture of trisodium phosphate-pumice until clean and then rinsing with tap water and isopropyl alcohol. When dry, a second weight measurement to the nearest milligram was made. At the termination of tests, the remaining coupon was removed, cleaned and weighed.
  • the results of these tests are reported below in TABLE 1 in terms of per cent (%) corrosion inhibition of various treatments as compared to an untreated control test.
  • the polymer tested was an acrylic acid/hydroxypropyl acrylate copolymer (AA/HPA) having a mole ratio of AA to HPA of 3:1 and a nominal molecular weight of 6000.
  • the chromate compound used was sodium dichromate dihydrate. The amounts of chromate reported are active chromate dosages in ppm, and the pH of the test water was 8. The corrosion rates are reported in mils per year (mpy) and millimetres per year (mmpy).

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Preventing Corrosion Or Incrustation Of Metals (AREA)
  • Chemical Treatment Of Metals (AREA)

Description

  • The present invention relates to a method and a composition for reducing corrosion of metal surfaces in contact with aqueous systems.
  • Chromates are widely referred to in the literature, and their effectiveness in reducing the rate of corrosion of metallic surfaces exposed to corroding aqueous mediums is well known. However, if used in low concentrations these inhibitors can cause considerable pitting and tuberculation. Indeed, if added in insufficient quantities to stop metal surface attach altogether, corrosion can become so severely localized and the intensity of attack so intense that perforations may occur more extensively than if no inhibitor treatment had been added.
  • In Corrosion Inhibitors, 3rd edition; National Association of Corrosion Engineers; Houston, Texas (1977); p. 134, it is stated that the critical concentration for passivation by chromate in distilled water is 81 to 162 ppm and that the critical level for chromate increases as chloride and sulfate levels increase. Present practice in industrial water systems is to employ chromates alone in concentrations no lower than 200 ppm.
  • Economic and environmental considerations make it desirable to minimize chromate levels in water. This goal has been attained by combining the chromate with other compounds such as phosphate and zinc. For example, U.S. 2,711,391 to Kahler discloses the use of water-soluble chromate in combination with water-soluble phosphate. According to this reference, the combined treatment permits the use of lower levels of chromate than had theretofore been used. However, the lowest dosage rate for chromate achievable, according to Kahler, is 5 ppm. In fact, the reference specifically sets the preferred lower limit for chromate at 11 ppm. U.S. 2,900,222 to Kahler et al teaches the use of chromate compound at levels as low as 1 ppm, but only in combination with both water-soluble orthophosphate and water-soluble zinc compound. A problem related to supplemented chromate treatments such as those disclosed in the Kahler references is that the discharge of industrial waters containing heavy metals and/or phosphorous compounds is under strict environmental control. The quality of water discharged to natural waters is presently being regulated and is expected to be under greater scrutiny in the future.
  • U.S. Patent 4, 209, 398 (corresponding to DE-A-2 643 422) discloses a water treatment composition comprising a polymer containing a structural unit that is derived from a monomer having an ethylenically unsaturated bond and one or more carboxyl radicals, at least a portion of which radicals have been modified. Compounds such as inorganic phosphates, phosphonic acids, organic phosphoric acid esters and polyvalent metal salts are combined with the polymer for treating the particular system. The polymer may be used in combination with conventional corrosion inhibitors for iron, steel, copper, copper alloys or other metals, conventional scale and contamination inhibitors, metal ion sequestering agents and other conventional water treating agents. As such corrosion inhibitors there are can be enumerated chromates, bichromates, tungstate, molybdates, nitrites, borates, silicates, oxycarboxylic acids, amino acids, catechols, aliphatic amino surface active agents, benzotriazole, and mercaptobenzotriazole.
  • U.S. Patent 3,658,710 discloses a method of removing tubercles of corrosion from a substrate and inhibiting scale formation using organic polymers and silica and/or chromium compounds. A second polymer, such as an organic phosphonate may also be used.
  • According to the present invention, a chromate-based corrosion inhibitor for metal surfaces exposed to a corroding aqueous medium consists essentially of (i) water-soluble chromate and (ii) a particular type of water-soluble polymer comprised of units derived from acrylic acid or derivatives thereof (AA) and 2-hydroxy-propyl acrylate units (HPA). It was unexpectedly discovered that when combined with the polymer, very low levels of chromate could successfully be used for corrosion inhibition in aqueous mediums without the use of additional treatment compounds such as zinc and phosphate. In those systems treated with this two-component treatment, zinc, a heavy metal, and phosphate, a compound which causes eutrophication, are eliminated. Accordingly, not only would such a treatment be a less toxic, but it would also be less expensive than, for example, a four-component treatment which also includes zinc and phosphate.
  • In the context of permitting the deletion of zinc from a corrosion inhibitor treatment, methods according to the present invention would comprise the use of zinc-free corrosion inhibitor treatments comprising components (i) and (ii) as defined above. In the context of permitting the deletion of both zinc and phosphate, methods according to the present invention would comprise the use of zinc-free and phosphate free corrosion inhibitors comprising the noted components (i) and (ii).
  • From an environmental acceptability point of view, chromate levels of less than 5 ppm of active chromate are most desirable. However, at such low levels pitting is extremely severe. It was unexpectedly discovered that a corrosion inhibitor treatment comprising less than 5 ppm water-soluble chromate in combination with AA/HPA significantly reduced such pitting. Accordingly, the present invention relates to a corrosion inhibitor treatment comprising water-soluble chromate AA/HPA wherein the chromate is added in an amount of less than 5 parts of active chromate per million parts of aqueous medium.
  • Although the present invention is considered to have applicability to any aqueous system. It is particularly useful in cooling water systems. Accordingly, the present invention will hereinafter be described as it relates to cooling water systems.
  • The polymers according to the present invention are those effective for the purpose which contain essentially units derived from an acrylic acid compound (AA), i.e.,
    Figure imgb0001
    wherein R is a hydrogen or a lower alkyl of from 1 to 3 carbon atoms and R, = OH, NH2 or OM, where M is a water-soluble cation, e.g. NH4, alkali metal (K, Na); and units of 2-hydroxypropyl acrylate (HPA) as represented by the formula:
    Figure imgb0002
  • In terms of mole ratios, the polymers are considered, more broadly, to have a mole ratio of AA:HPA of from about 1:4 to 36:1. This mole ratio is preferably 1:1 to 11:1, and most preferably 1:1 to 5:1. The only criteria that is considered to be of importance with respect to mole ratios is that the copolymer should be water-soluble. As the proportion of hydroxylated alkyl acrylate moieties increases, the solubility of the copolymer decreases. It is noted that, from an efficacy point of view, the polymers having a mole ratio of AA:HPA of 1:1 to 5:1 are considered the best.
  • The polymers preferably have a molecular weight of from 1,000 to 50,000 with from 2,000 to 6,000 being most preferred.
  • The polymers utilized in accordance with the invention can be prepared by vinyl addition polymerization or by treatment of an acrylic acid or salt polymer. More specifically, acrylic acid or derivatives thereof or their water soluble salts, e.g., sodium, potassium, ammonium, etc. can be copolymerized with the hydroxy alkyl acrylate under standard copolymerization conditions utilizing free radical initiators such as benzoyl peroxide, azobisisobutyronitrile or redox initiators such as ferrous sulfate and ammonium persulfate. The molecular weight of the resulting copolymer can be controlled utilizing standard chain control agents such as secondary alcohols (isopropanol), mercaptans, halocarbons, etc. Copolymers falling within the scope of the invention are commercially available from, for example, National Starch Company.
  • The 2-hydroxypropyl acrylate can be prepared by reacting acrylic acid with propylene oxide.
  • The polymers of the invention may also be prepared by reacting a polyacrylic acid or derivative thereof with an appropriate amount of propylene oxide. The reaction takes place at the COOH or COM group of the units to provide the hydroxylated propyl acrylate unit.
  • The polymer prepared either by copolymerization of AA with hydroxypropyl acrylate (HPA) or reaction of AA with propylene oxide would be composed primarily of units having the structural formulas:
    Figure imgb0003
    wherein M is as earlier defined. It is noted that in aqueous solution with hydroxypropyl acrylate unit is in equilibrium with a minor amount of 1-methyl-2-hydroxyethyl acrylate.
  • Illustrative examples of chromate compounds which could be used in practicing methods according to the present invention are described in U.S. 2,900,222 to Kahler et al. These compounds would include alkali metals or any water-soluble compound that contains hexavalent chromate and provides chromate radical in water solutions. Illustrative water-soluble chromate compounds are sodium chromate dihydrate, sodium chromate anhydrous, sodium chromate tetrahydrate, sodium chromate hexahydrate, sodium chromate decahydrate, potassium dichromate, potassium chromate, ammonium dichromate and chromic acid.
  • The amount of each constituent added to the cooling water would, of course, be, an effective amount for the purpose and would depend on such factors as the nature and severity of the corrosion problem being treated and the temperature and pH of the cooling water.
  • In terms of active polymer, as little as about 0.5 part per million parts of cooling water (ppm) should be effective, while about 2 ppm is the preferred lower limit. Based on economic considerations, the polymer could be fed in amount as high as about 200 ppm, with about 50 ppm being the preferred upper limit.
  • In terms of active chromate, that is, active hexavalent chromate ion, as little as about 0.5 ppm should be effective. The upper limit would depend on such factors as cost and toxicity and is less than 5 ppm.
  • Methods for feeding corrosion inhibitors to cooling water are well known in the art such that details thereof are not considered necessary. The chromate and the polymer may however be added to the aqueous system separately or together. The treatment is preferably used as an aqueous solution. The constitutes are combined by simply adding them to water. Should long-term stability problems be experienced, a two-barrel treatment may be more desirable. Of course, the constituents could be combined in any relative proportions in dry form.
  • Based on experience, compositions according to the present invention could vary widely and preferably comprise, on a weight basis:
    • (i) 1 to 99% of AA/HPA polymer, and
    • (ii) 1 to 99% of active chromate (as defined above) of the total amount of polymer and active chromate. The most preferred relative proportions would be 10 to 90% AA/HPA and 10 to 90% active chromate of the total amount of polymer and active chromate.
  • It is possible for the cooling water to have a pH of about 5.5 to 9.5. More commonly, the pH is about 6.5 to 8.5, with about 6.5 to 7.5 being most common.
  • With respect to the best mode for practicing the present invention, it is believed that methods and compositions in accordance therewith could best be used, with significant economic advantage, in the following systems:
    • 1. in waters with low hardness, where low hardness is defined as less than 100 ppm of calcium carbonate and less than 100 ppm of magnesium as calcium carbonate;
    • 2. in waters with a negative Langelier Saturation Index, as defined in the "BETZ Handbood of Industrial Water Conditioning", Seventh Edition; Betz Laboratories, Inc., Trevose, Pennsylvania (1976); pp 178180;
    • 3. in waters with a corrosion and/or calcium phosphate deposition problem (the phosphate can be a constituent of the make up water); and
    • 4. in waters with a corrosion and/or calcium sulfate, silt or iron oxide fouling problem.
    Examples Example 1
  • To demonstrate the corrosion inhibition efficacy of the combination of chromate and AA/HPA polymer, various mixtures were prepared by dissolving varying ratios of the components in water. The combinations were tested using a spinner testing technique.
  • The tests were each conducted with two non-pretreated low carbon steel coupons which were immersed and rotated in aerated synthetic cooling water for a 3- or 4-day period. The water was adjusted to the desired pH and readjusted after one day if necessary; no further adjustments were made. Water temperature was 120°F (48.9°C), and rotational speed was maintained to give a water velocity of 1.3 feet per second (0.396 ms-1) past the coupons. The total volume of water was 17 liters. Cooling water was manufactured to give the following conditions:
    Figure imgb0004
  • Corrosion rate was determined by weight loss measurement. Prior to immersion, coupons were scrubbed with a mixture of trisodium phosphate-pumice, rinsed with water, rinsed with isopropyl alcohol and then air dried. Weight measurement to the nearest milligram was made. At the end of one day, a weighed coupon was removed and cleaned. Cleaning consisted of immersion into a 50% solution of HCI for approximately 20 seconds, rinsing with tap water, scrubbing with a mixture of trisodium phosphate-pumice until clean and then rinsing with tap water and isopropyl alcohol. When dry, a second weight measurement to the nearest milligram was made. At the termination of tests, the remaining coupon was removed, cleaned and weighed.
  • Corrosion rates were calculated by differential weight loss according to the following equation:
    Figure imgb0005
    where N = 3 or 4
  • The results of these tests are reported below in TABLE 1 in terms of per cent (%) corrosion inhibition of various treatments as compared to an untreated control test. The polymer tested was an acrylic acid/hydroxypropyl acrylate copolymer (AA/HPA) having a mole ratio of AA to HPA of 3:1 and a nominal molecular weight of 6000. The chromate compound used was sodium dichromate dihydrate. The amounts of chromate reported are active chromate dosages in ppm, and the pH of the test water was 8. The corrosion rates are reported in mils per year (mpy) and millimetres per year (mmpy).
    Figure imgb0006
  • It can be seen from TABLE 1 that the chromate-polymer combinations were quite effective in inhibiting corrosion, even at very low levels of active chromate.
  • Example 2
  • As already noted above, the use of insufficient amounts of chromate as a corrosion inhibitor can lead to rather sever pitting of metal surfaces. The ability of chromate-polymer combinations to reduce this pitting is demonstrated in the results of additional tests which were obtained in accordance with ASTM Pit Rating Methods. According to ASTM Pit Rating Methods, the density, size and depth of such localized corrosion is measured as described in "Measurement and Evaluation of Pitting Corrosion", Galvanic and Pitting Corrosion - Field and Laboratory Studies, ASTM Method STP-576, American Society for Testing and Materials, pp. 203-216 (1976). Testing procedures and conditions were substantially the same as those described in Example 1, with the exception that the coupons were additionally microscopically examined for pit rating.
  • The results of these tests are reported below in TABLES 2 and 3 in terms of ASTM Pit ratings. In TABLE 3, some corrosion rates and % corrosion inhibition values are also reported. The polymer tested was AA/HPA having a mole ratio of AA to HPA of 3:1 and a nominal molecular weight of 6000. The chromate was sodium dichromate dihydrate. The amounts of chromate reported are active chromate dosages. The ASTM pit ratings are in terms of density, in number of pits/square decimeter (dm2); pit sizes, in square millimeters (mm2), and pit depths, in millimetres (mm)
  • Figure imgb0007
    Figure imgb0008
  • As can be seen from TABLES 2 and 3, the chromate-polymer treatment signficantly reduced coupon pitting.

Claims (9)

1. A method for reducing the amount of corrosion of metal surfaces in contact with an aqueous medium characterised by adding to said aqueous medium an effective amount for the purpose of a zinc-free and phosphate-free
(i) water-soluble chromate, and
(ii) water-soluble polymer comprising units derived from acrylic acid or water-soluble salt thereof and units of 2-hydroxypropyl acrylate, wherein the units of said polymer have the followinq formulas:
Figure imgb0009
where R is a hydrogen or a lower alkyl of from 1 to 3 carbon atoms, R, is OH, NH2 or OM where M is a water-soluble cation, the mole ratio x:y of the former to the latter units is 1:4 to 36:1, the chromate and the polymer being added either separately or together and said water-soluble chromate being added in an amount of from 0.5 to less than 5 parts of active chromate per million parts of said aqueous medium.
2. A method as claimed in claim 1, characterised in that said polymer has a molecular weight of from 1,000 to 50,000.
3. A method as claimed in claim 1 or 2, characterised in that said mole ratio x:y is 1:1 to 11:1.
4. A method as claimed in any one of the preceding claims, characterised in that said water-soluble polymer is added in an amount of from 0.5 to 200 parts of polymer per million parts of aqueous medium.
5. A method as claimed in any one of the preceding claims, characterised in that said aqueous medium is cooling water.
6. A method as claimed in any one of the preceding claims, characterised in that the components (i) and (ii) are added to said aqueous medium together.
7. A composition for reducing the amount of corrosion of metal surfaces in contact with an aqueous medium characterised in that said composition is zinc-free and phosphate free and comprises in combination:
(i) water-soluble chromate, and
(ii) water-soluble polymer as defined in any of claims 1 to 3.
8. A composition as claimed in claim 7, characterised in that on a weight basis said chromate comprises 1 to 99% and said polymer comprises 1 to 99% of the total amount of water-soluble chromate and water-soluble polymer.
9. A composition as claimed in claim 7 or 8, characterised in that it comprises a stable aqueous solution of said components (i) and (ii).
EP81301199A 1980-03-28 1981-03-20 Method and composition for inhibiting corrosion of metal surfaces in aqueous solutions Expired EP0037221B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US06/134,813 US4329250A (en) 1980-03-28 1980-03-28 Low level chromate-based corrosion inhibition in aqueous mediums
US134813 1980-03-28
US06/134,812 US4297317A (en) 1980-03-28 1980-03-28 Low level chromate-based corrosion inhibition in aqueous mediums
US134812 1980-03-28

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0037221A1 EP0037221A1 (en) 1981-10-07
EP0037221B1 true EP0037221B1 (en) 1984-07-25

Family

ID=26832698

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP81301199A Expired EP0037221B1 (en) 1980-03-28 1981-03-20 Method and composition for inhibiting corrosion of metal surfaces in aqueous solutions

Country Status (5)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0037221B1 (en)
AU (1) AU533121B2 (en)
CA (1) CA1147137A (en)
DE (1) DE3164965D1 (en)
NZ (1) NZ194191A (en)

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE2643422A1 (en) * 1976-09-21 1978-03-30 Kurita Water Ind Ltd WATER TREATMENT PRODUCTS AND METHODS FOR TREATMENT OF WATER

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB1255964A (en) * 1968-02-28 1971-12-08 Grace W R & Co Composition and method for inhibiting scaling in aqueous systems
US3658710A (en) * 1971-01-13 1972-04-25 W E Zimmie Inc Method of removing tubercles using organic polymers and silica and/or chromium compounds
US4183772A (en) * 1978-01-30 1980-01-15 Union Carbide Corporation Composition and method for coating metal surfaces

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE2643422A1 (en) * 1976-09-21 1978-03-30 Kurita Water Ind Ltd WATER TREATMENT PRODUCTS AND METHODS FOR TREATMENT OF WATER

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP0037221A1 (en) 1981-10-07
AU5955780A (en) 1981-10-01
CA1147137A (en) 1983-05-31
AU533121B2 (en) 1983-11-03
NZ194191A (en) 1983-05-10
DE3164965D1 (en) 1984-08-30

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0033417B1 (en) Method of and composition for inhibiting corrosion
AU617792B2 (en) Method for controlling corrosion using molybdate compositions
JP2916000B2 (en) Inhibition of corrosion in aqueous systems using certain phosphonomethylamines.
EP0142929B1 (en) Water soluble polymers and methods of use thereof
CA1222749A (en) Process of inhibiting corrosion of metal surfaces and/or deposition of scale thereon
JPS60118295A (en) Polymer for treating service water and usage thereof
US4033896A (en) Method of corrosion inhibition and compositions therefor
US4446046A (en) Poly (alkenyl) phosphonic acid and methods of use thereof
JP3205563B2 (en) Inhibition of corrosion in aqueous systems using certain phosphonomethylamines.
EP0277412B1 (en) Inhibiting corrosion of iron base metals
EP0396243A1 (en) The inhibition of corrosion in aqueous systems
JPH0141705B2 (en)
EP0488538B1 (en) Corrosion inhibition
US4411865A (en) Method of corrosion inhibition in aqueous mediums
GB2087862A (en) Process for dispersing particulate material in aqueous systems
EP0037221B1 (en) Method and composition for inhibiting corrosion of metal surfaces in aqueous solutions
US4297317A (en) Low level chromate-based corrosion inhibition in aqueous mediums
US4329250A (en) Low level chromate-based corrosion inhibition in aqueous mediums
EP0017373B1 (en) Stable compositions for use as corrosion inhibitors and method of corrosion inhibition in aqueous media
JP4089648B2 (en) Corrosion prevention method
AU617791B2 (en) Method and compositions for controlling corrosion in low and high hardness water
CA1181196A (en) Isopropenyl phosphonic acid copolymers and methods of use thereof
EP0363439A1 (en) Treatment for water systems to inhibit corrosion and scale formation
KR850000599B1 (en) Corrosion inhibitor
JPS59193282A (en) Metal surface condition control

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Designated state(s): BE DE FR GB IT NL

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19810810

ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed
GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Designated state(s): BE DE FR GB IT NL

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 3164965

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19840830

ET Fr: translation filed
PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 19850328

Year of fee payment: 5

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 19860331

Year of fee payment: 6

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: BETZ EUROPE INC.

Effective date: 19870331

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Effective date: 19871001

NLV4 Nl: lapsed or anulled due to non-payment of the annual fee
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19871130

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Effective date: 19871201

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Effective date: 19890331

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 19890331

Year of fee payment: 9

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Effective date: 19900320

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee