EP0037221A1 - Method and composition for inhibiting corrosion of metal surfaces in aqueous solutions - Google Patents
Method and composition for inhibiting corrosion of metal surfaces in aqueous solutions Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP0037221A1 EP0037221A1 EP81301199A EP81301199A EP0037221A1 EP 0037221 A1 EP0037221 A1 EP 0037221A1 EP 81301199 A EP81301199 A EP 81301199A EP 81301199 A EP81301199 A EP 81301199A EP 0037221 A1 EP0037221 A1 EP 0037221A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- water
- chromate
- soluble
- polymer
- aqueous medium
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C23—COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
- C23F—NON-MECHANICAL REMOVAL OF METALLIC MATERIAL FROM SURFACE; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL; MULTI-STEP PROCESSES FOR SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL INVOLVING AT LEAST ONE PROCESS PROVIDED FOR IN CLASS C23 AND AT LEAST ONE PROCESS COVERED BY SUBCLASS C21D OR C22F OR CLASS C25
- C23F11/00—Inhibiting corrosion of metallic material by applying inhibitors to the surface in danger of corrosion or adding them to the corrosive agent
- C23F11/08—Inhibiting corrosion of metallic material by applying inhibitors to the surface in danger of corrosion or adding them to the corrosive agent in other liquids
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a method and a composition for reducing corrosion of metal surfaces in contact with aqueous systems.
- Chromates are widely referred to in the literature, and their effectiveness in reducing the rate of corrosion of metallic surfaces exposed to corroding aqueous mediums is well known. However, if used in low concentrations these inhibitors can cause considerable pitting and tuberculation. Indeed, if added in insufficient quantities to stop metal surface attack altogether, corrosion can become so severely localized and the intensity of attack so intense that perforations may occur more extensively than if no inhibitor treatment had been added.
- a chromate-based corrosion inhibitor for metal surfaces exposed to a corroding aqueous medium consists essentially of (i) water-soluble chromate and (ii) a particular type of water-soluble polymer comprised of moieties derived from acrylic acid or derivatives thereof (AA) and hydroxylated lower alkyl acrylate moieties (HAA). It was unexpectedly discovered that when combined with the polymer, very low levels of chromate could successfully be used for corrosion inhibition in aqueous mediums without the use of additional treatment compounds such as zinc and phosphate.
- zinc, a heavy metal, and phosphate a compound which causes eutrophication
- zinc, a heavy metal, and phosphate a compound which causes eutrophication
- methods according to the present invention would comprise the use of zinc-free corrosion inhibitor treatments comprising components (i) and (ii) as defined above.
- methods according to the present invention would comprise the use of zinc-free and phosphate free corrosion inhibitors comprising the noted components (i) and (ii).
- the present invention relates to a corrosion inhibitor treatment comprising water-soluble chromate AA/HAA wherein the chromate is added in an amount of less than 5 parts of active chromate per million parts of aqueous medium.
- the present invention is considered to have applicability to any aqueous system, it is particularly useful in cooling water systems. Accordingly, the present invention will hereinafter be described as it relates to cooling water systems.
- AA acrylic acid compound
- M is a water-soluble cation, e.g., NH 4 , alkali metal (K,
- the polymers are considered, most broadly, to have a mole ratio of AA:HAA of from about 1:4 to 36:1. This mole ratio is preferably about 1:1 to 11:1, and most preferably about 1:1 to 5:1.
- the only criteria that is considered to be of importance with respect to mole ratios is that the copolysier should be water-soluble. As the proportion of hydroxylated alkyl acrylate moieties increases, the solubility of the copolymer decreases. It is noted that, from an efficacy pointof view, the polymers having a mole ratio of AA:HAA of 1:1 to 5:1 are considered the best.
- the polymers preferably have a molecular weight of from about 1,000 to about 50,000 with from about 2,000 to about 6,000 being most preferred.
- the polymers utilized in accordance with the invention can be prepared by vinyl addition polymerization or by treatment of an acrylic acid or salt polymer. More specifically, acrylic acid or derivatives thereof or their water soluble salts, e.g., sodium, potassium, ammonium, etc. can be copolymerized with the hydroxy alkyl acrylate under standard copolymerization conditions utilizing free radical initiators such as benzoyl peroxide, azobisisobutyronitrile or redox initiators such as ferrous sulfate and ammonium persulfate. The molecular weight of the resulting copolymer can be controlled utilizing standard chain control agents such as secondary alcohols (isopropanol), mercaptans, halocarbons, etc. Copolymers falling within the scope of the invention are commercially available from, for example, National Starch Company.
- the hydroxy alkyl acrylate can be prepared by the addition reaction between the acrylic acid or its derivatives or water soluble salts and the oxide of the alkyl derivative desired.
- the preferred monomer of the present invention is the propyl derivative. Accordingly, to obtain the hydroxylated monomer, acrylic acid is reacted with propylene oxide to provide the hydroxypropyl acrylate monomer.
- the polymers of the invention may also be prepared by reacting a polyacrylic acid or derivative thereof with an appropriate amount of an alkylene oxide having from 2 to 6 carbon atoms such as ethylene oxide, propylene oxide and the like. The reaction takes place at the COOH or COM grqup of the moieties to provide the hydroxylated alkyl acrylate moiety.
- the polymer prepared either by copolymerization of AA with hydroxypropyl acrylate (HPA) or reaction of AA with propylene oxide would be composed primarily of units or moieties having the structural formulas: where M is as earlier defined. It is noted that in aqueous solution ) the hydroxypropyl acrylate moiety is in equilibrium with a minor amount of 1-methyl-2-hydroxyethyl acrylate.
- chromate compounds which could be used in practicing methods according to the present invention are described in U.S. 2,900,222 to Kahler et al which patent is incor-25 porated herein by reference. These compounds would include alkali metals or any water-soluble compound that contains hexavalent chromate and provides chromate radical in water solutions.
- Illustrative water-soluble chromate compounds are sodium chromate dihydrate, sodium chromate anhydrous, sodium chromate tetrahydrate, sodium chromate hexahydrate, sodium chromate decahydrate, potassium dichromate, potassium chromate, ammonium dichromate and chromic acid.
- the amount of each constituent added to the cooling water would, of course, be an effective amount for the purpose and would depend on such factors as the nature and severity of the corrosion problem being treated and the temperature and pH of the cooling water.
- active polymer As little as about 0.5 part per million parts of cooling water (ppm) should be effective, while about 2 ppm is the preferred lower limit. Based on economic considerations, the polymer could be fed in amounts as high as about 200 ppm, with about 50 ppm being the preferred upper limit.
- ppm part per million parts of cooling water
- active chromate that is, active hexavalent chromate ion
- active hexavalent chromate ion as little as about 0.5 ppm should be effective.
- the upper limit would depend on such factors as cost and toxicity and could be as high as about 150 ppm.
- the preferred upper limit is about 50 ppm. It is most preferred that the chromate be fed in amounts which are less than 5 ppm.
- chromate and the polymer may however be added to the aqueous system separately or together.
- the treatment is preferably used as an aqueous solution.
- the constitutes are combined by simply adding them to water. Should long-term stability problems be experienced, a two-barrel treatment may be more desirable. Of course, the constituents could be combined in any relative proportions in dry form.
- compositions according to the present invention could vary widely and preferably comprise, on a weight basis:
- the cooling water it is possible for the cooling water to have a pH of about 5.5 to 9.5. More commonly, the pH is about 6.5 to 8.5, with about 6.5 to 7.5 being most common.
- Corrosion rate was determined by weight loss measurement. Prior to immersion, coupons were scrubbed with a mixture of trisodium phosphate-pumice, rinsed with water, rinsed with isopropyl alcohol and then air dried. Weight measurement to the nearest milligram was made. At the end of one day, a weighed coupon was removed and cleaned. Cleaning consisted of immersion into a 50% solution of HC1 for approximately 20 seconds, rinsing with tap water, scrubbing with a mixture of trisodium phosphate-pumice until clean and then rinsing with tap water and isopropyl alcohol. When dry, a second weight measurement to the nearest milligram was made. At the termination of the tests, the remaining coupon was removed, cleaned and weighed.
- the results of these tests are reported below in TABLE 1 in terms of per cent ( p ) corrosion inhibition of various treatments as compared to an untreated control test.
- the polymer tested was an acrylic acid/hydroxypropyl acrylate copolymer (AA/HPA) having a mole ratio of AA to HPA of 3:1 and a nominal molecular weight of 6000.
- the chromate compound used was sodium dichromate dihydrate. The amounts of chromate reported are active chromate dosages in ppm, and the pH of the test water was 8. The corrosion rates are reported in mils per year (mpy).
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Materials Engineering (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Metallurgy (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Preventing Corrosion Or Incrustation Of Metals (AREA)
- Chemical Treatment Of Metals (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- The present invention relates to a method and a composition for reducing corrosion of metal surfaces in contact with aqueous systems.
- Chromates are widely referred to in the literature, and their effectiveness in reducing the rate of corrosion of metallic surfaces exposed to corroding aqueous mediums is well known. However, if used in low concentrations these inhibitors can cause considerable pitting and tuberculation. Indeed, if added in insufficient quantities to stop metal surface attack altogether, corrosion can become so severely localized and the intensity of attack so intense that perforations may occur more extensively than if no inhibitor treatment had been added.
- In Corrosion Inhibitors, 3rd edition; National Association of Corrosion Engineers; Houston, Texas (1977); p. 134, it is stated that the critical concentration for passivation by chromate in distilled water is 81 to 162 ppm and that-the critical level for chromate increases as chloride and sulfate levels increase. Present practice in industrial water systems is to employ chromates alone in concentrations no lower than 200 ppm.
- Economic and environmental considerations make it desirable to minimize chromate levels in water. This goal has been attained by combining the chromate with other compounds such as phosphate and zinc. For example, U.S. 2,711,391 to Kahler discloses the use of water-soluble chromate in combination with water-soluble phosphate. According to this reference, the combined treatment permits the use of lower levels of chromate than had theretofore been used. However, the lowest dosage rate for chromate achievable, according to Kahler, is 5 ppm. In fact,.the reference specifically sets the preferred lower limit for chromate at 11 ppm. U.S. 2,900,222 to Kahler et al teaches the use of chromate compound at levels as low as 1 ppm, but only in combination with both water-soluble orthophosphate and water-soluble zinc compound. A problem related to supplemented chromate treatments such as those disclosed in the Kahler references is that the discharge of industrial waters containing heavy metals and/or phosphorous compounds is under strict environmental control. The quality of water discharged to natural waters is presently being regulated and is expected to be under greater scrutiny in the future.
- According to the present invention, a chromate-based corrosion inhibitor for metal surfaces exposed to a corroding aqueous medium consists essentially of (i) water-soluble chromate and (ii) a particular type of water-soluble polymer comprised of moieties derived from acrylic acid or derivatives thereof (AA) and hydroxylated lower alkyl acrylate moieties (HAA). It was unexpectedly discovered that when combined with the polymer, very low levels of chromate could successfully be used for corrosion inhibition in aqueous mediums without the use of additional treatment compounds such as zinc and phosphate. In those systems treated with this essentially two-component treatment, according to a preferred embodiment of the invention, zinc, a heavy metal, and phosphate, a compound which causes eutrophication, can be eliminated. Accordingly, not only would such a treatment be less toxic, but it would also be less expensive than, for example, a four-component treatment which also includes zinc and phosphate.
- In the context of permitting the deletion of zinc from a corrosion inhibitor treatment, methods according to the present invention would comprise the use of zinc-free corrosion inhibitor treatments comprising components (i) and (ii) as defined above. In the context of permitting the deletion of both zinc and phosphate, methods according to the present invention would comprise the use of zinc-free and phosphate free corrosion inhibitors comprising the noted components (i) and (ii).
- From an enviromental acceptability point of view, chromate levels of less than 5 ppm of active chromate are most desirable. However, at such low levels pitting is extremely severe. It was unexpectedly discovered that a corrosion inhibitor treatment comprising less than 5 ppm water-soluble chromate in combination with AA/HAA significantly reduced such pitting. Accordingly, in a preferred embodiment the present invention relates to a corrosion inhibitor treatment comprising water-soluble chromate AA/HAA wherein the chromate is added in an amount of less than 5 parts of active chromate per million parts of aqueous medium.
- Although the present invention is considered to have applicability to any aqueous system, it is particularly useful in cooling water systems. Accordingly, the present invention will hereinafter be described as it relates to cooling water systems.
- The polymers according to the present invention are those effective for the purpose which contain essentially moieties derived from an acrylic acid compound (AA), i.e.,
- In terms of mole ratios, the polymers are considered, most broadly, to have a mole ratio of AA:HAA of from about 1:4 to 36:1. This mole ratio is preferably about 1:1 to 11:1, and most preferably about 1:1 to 5:1. The only criteria that is considered to be of importance with respect to mole ratios is
that the copolysier should be water-soluble. As the proportion of hydroxylated alkyl acrylate moieties increases, the solubility of the copolymer decreases. It is noted that, from an efficacy pointof view, the polymers having a mole ratio of AA:HAA of 1:1 to 5:1 are considered the best. - The polymers preferably have a molecular weight of from about 1,000 to about 50,000 with from about 2,000 to about 6,000 being most preferred.
- The polymers utilized in accordance with the invention can be prepared by vinyl addition polymerization or by treatment of an acrylic acid or salt polymer. More specifically, acrylic acid or derivatives thereof or their water soluble salts, e.g., sodium, potassium, ammonium, etc. can be copolymerized with the hydroxy alkyl acrylate under standard copolymerization conditions utilizing free radical initiators such as benzoyl peroxide, azobisisobutyronitrile or redox initiators such as ferrous sulfate and ammonium persulfate. The molecular weight of the resulting copolymer can be controlled utilizing standard chain control agents such as secondary alcohols (isopropanol), mercaptans, halocarbons, etc. Copolymers falling within the scope of the invention are commercially available from, for example, National Starch Company.
- The hydroxy alkyl acrylate can be prepared by the addition reaction between the acrylic acid or its derivatives or water soluble salts and the oxide of the alkyl derivative desired. For example, the preferred monomer of the present invention is the propyl derivative. Accordingly, to obtain the hydroxylated monomer, acrylic acid is reacted with propylene oxide to provide the hydroxypropyl acrylate monomer.
- The polymers of the invention may also be prepared by reacting a polyacrylic acid or derivative thereof with an appropriate amount of an alkylene oxide having from 2 to 6 carbon atoms such as ethylene oxide, propylene oxide and the like. The reaction takes place at the COOH or COM grqup of the moieties to provide the hydroxylated alkyl acrylate moiety.
- The polymer prepared either by copolymerization of AA with hydroxypropyl acrylate (HPA) or reaction of AA with propylene oxide would be composed primarily of units or moieties having the structural formulas:
- Illustrative examples of chromate compounds which could be used in practicing methods according to the present invention are described in U.S. 2,900,222 to Kahler et al which patent is incor-25 porated herein by reference. These compounds would include alkali metals or any water-soluble compound that contains hexavalent chromate and provides chromate radical in water solutions. Illustrative water-soluble chromate compounds are sodium chromate dihydrate, sodium chromate anhydrous, sodium chromate tetrahydrate, sodium chromate hexahydrate, sodium chromate decahydrate, potassium dichromate, potassium chromate, ammonium dichromate and chromic acid.
- The amount of each constituent added to the cooling water would, of course, be an effective amount for the purpose and would depend on such factors as the nature and severity of the corrosion problem being treated and the temperature and pH of the cooling water.
- In terms of active polymer, as little as about 0.5 part per million parts of cooling water (ppm) should be effective, while about 2 ppm is the preferred lower limit. Based on economic considerations, the polymer could be fed in amounts as high as about 200 ppm, with about 50 ppm being the preferred upper limit.
- In terms of active chromate, that is, active hexavalent chromate ion, as little as about 0.5 ppm should be effective. The upper limit would depend on such factors as cost and toxicity and could be as high as about 150 ppm. The preferred upper limit is about 50 ppm. It is most preferred that the chromate be fed in amounts which are less than 5 ppm.
- Methods for feeding corrosion inhibitors to cooling water are well known in the art such that details thereof are not considered necessary. The chromate and the polymer may however be added to the aqueous system separately or together. The treatment is preferably used as an aqueous solution. The constitutes are combined by simply adding them to water. Should long-term stability problems be experienced, a two-barrel treatment may be more desirable. Of course, the constituents could be combined in any relative proportions in dry form.
- Based on experience, compositions according to the present invention could vary widely and preferably comprise, on a weight basis:
- (i) about 1 to 99% of AA/HAA polymer, and
- (ii) about 1 to 99% of active chromate (as defined above) of the total amount of polymer and active chromate. The most preferred relative proportions would be about 10 to 90% AA/HAA and about 10 to 90% active chromate of the total amount of polymer and active chromate.
- It is possible for the cooling water to have a pH of about 5.5 to 9.5. More commonly, the pH is about 6.5 to 8.5, with about 6.5 to 7.5 being most common.
- With respect to the best mode for practicing the present invention, it is believed that methods and compositions in accordance therewith could best be used, with significant economic advantage, in the following systems:
- 1. in waters with low hardness, where low hardness is defined as less than 100 ppm of calcium as calcium carbonate and less than 100 ppm of magnesium as calcium carbonate;
- 2. in waters with a negative Langelier Saturation Index, as defined in the "BETZ Handbook of Industrial Water Conditioning", Seventh Edition; Betz Laboratories, Inc.; Trevose, Pennsylvania (1976); pp 178 - 180;
- 3. in waters with a corrosion and/or calcium phosphate deposition problem (the phosphate can be a constituent of the makeup water); and
- 4. in waters with a corrosion and/or calcium sulfate, silt or iron oxide fouling problem.
- To demonstrate the corrosion inhibition efficacy of the combination of chromate and AA/HAA polymer, various mixtures were prepared by dissolving varying ratios of the components in water. The combinations were tested using a spinner testing technique.
- The tests were each conducted with two non-pretreated low carbon steel coupons which were immersed and rotated in aerated synthetic cooling water for a 3- or 4-day period. The water was adjusted to the desired pH and readjusted after one day if necessary; no further adjustments were made. Water temperature was 120°F, and rotational speed was maintained to give a water velocity of 1.3 feet per second past the coupons. The total volume of water was 17 liters. Cooling water was manufactured to give the following conditions:
- Corrosion rate was determined by weight loss measurement. Prior to immersion, coupons were scrubbed with a mixture of trisodium phosphate-pumice, rinsed with water, rinsed with isopropyl alcohol and then air dried. Weight measurement to the nearest milligram was made. At the end of one day, a weighed coupon was removed and cleaned. Cleaning consisted of immersion into a 50% solution of HC1 for approximately 20 seconds, rinsing with tap water, scrubbing with a mixture of trisodium phosphate-pumice until clean and then rinsing with tap water and isopropyl alcohol. When dry, a second weight measurement to the nearest milligram was made. At the termination of the tests, the remaining coupon was removed, cleaned and weighed.
-
- The results of these tests are reported below in TABLE 1 in terms of per cent (p) corrosion inhibition of various treatments as compared to an untreated control test. The polymer tested was an acrylic acid/hydroxypropyl acrylate copolymer (AA/HPA) having a mole ratio of AA to HPA of 3:1 and a nominal molecular weight of 6000. The chromate compound used was sodium dichromate dihydrate. The amounts of chromate reported are active chromate dosages in ppm, and the pH of the test water was 8. The corrosion rates are reported in mils per year (mpy).
- It can be seen from TABLE 1 that the chromate-polymer combinations were quite effective in inhibiting corrosion, even at very low levels of active chromate.
- As already noted above, the use of insufficient amounts of chromate as a corrosion inhibitor can lead to rather severe pitting of metal surfaces. The ability of chromate-polymer combinations to reduce this pitting is demonstrated in the results of additional tests which were obtained in accordance with ASTM Pit Rating Methods. According to ASTM Pit Rating Methods, the density, size and depth of such localized corrosion is measured as described in "Measurement and Evaluation of Pitting Corrosion", Galvanic and Pitting Corrosion - Field and Laboratory Studies, ASTM Method STP-576, American Society for Testing and Materials, pp. 203 - 216 (1976), which work is incorporated herein by reference. Testing procedures and conditions were substantially the same as those described in Example 1, with the exception that the coupons were additionally microscopically examined for pit rating.
- The results of these tests are reported below in TABLES 2 and 3 in terms of ASTM Pit Ratings. In TABLE 3, some corrosion rates and % corrosion inhibition values are also reported. The polymer tested was AA/HPA having a mole ratio of AA to HPA of 3:1 and a nominal molecular weight of 6000. The chromate was sodium dichromate dihydrate. The amounts of chromate reported are active chromate dosages. The ASTM pit ratings are in terms of density, in number of pits/square decimeter (dm2); pit sizes, in square millimeters (mm2), and pit depths, in millimeters (mm).
- As can be seen from TABLES 2 and 3, the chromate-polymer treatment significantly reduced coupon pitting.
- Having thus described our invention what is claimed is:
Claims (11)
Applications Claiming Priority (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US134812 | 1980-03-28 | ||
US06/134,812 US4297317A (en) | 1980-03-28 | 1980-03-28 | Low level chromate-based corrosion inhibition in aqueous mediums |
US06/134,813 US4329250A (en) | 1980-03-28 | 1980-03-28 | Low level chromate-based corrosion inhibition in aqueous mediums |
US134813 | 1987-12-18 |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP0037221A1 true EP0037221A1 (en) | 1981-10-07 |
EP0037221B1 EP0037221B1 (en) | 1984-07-25 |
Family
ID=26832698
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP81301199A Expired EP0037221B1 (en) | 1980-03-28 | 1981-03-20 | Method and composition for inhibiting corrosion of metal surfaces in aqueous solutions |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP0037221B1 (en) |
AU (1) | AU533121B2 (en) |
CA (1) | CA1147137A (en) |
DE (1) | DE3164965D1 (en) |
NZ (1) | NZ194191A (en) |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB1255964A (en) * | 1968-02-28 | 1971-12-08 | Grace W R & Co | Composition and method for inhibiting scaling in aqueous systems |
US3658710A (en) * | 1971-01-13 | 1972-04-25 | W E Zimmie Inc | Method of removing tubercles using organic polymers and silica and/or chromium compounds |
GB2013726A (en) * | 1978-01-30 | 1979-08-15 | Amchem Prod | Metal-coating compositions and preparative methods for such compositions |
Family Cites Families (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE2643422A1 (en) * | 1976-09-21 | 1978-03-30 | Kurita Water Ind Ltd | WATER TREATMENT PRODUCTS AND METHODS FOR TREATMENT OF WATER |
-
1980
- 1980-06-24 AU AU59557/80A patent/AU533121B2/en not_active Ceased
- 1980-06-30 NZ NZ19419180A patent/NZ194191A/en unknown
- 1980-10-31 CA CA000363696A patent/CA1147137A/en not_active Expired
-
1981
- 1981-03-20 EP EP81301199A patent/EP0037221B1/en not_active Expired
- 1981-03-20 DE DE8181301199T patent/DE3164965D1/en not_active Expired
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB1255964A (en) * | 1968-02-28 | 1971-12-08 | Grace W R & Co | Composition and method for inhibiting scaling in aqueous systems |
US3658710A (en) * | 1971-01-13 | 1972-04-25 | W E Zimmie Inc | Method of removing tubercles using organic polymers and silica and/or chromium compounds |
GB2013726A (en) * | 1978-01-30 | 1979-08-15 | Amchem Prod | Metal-coating compositions and preparative methods for such compositions |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP0037221B1 (en) | 1984-07-25 |
CA1147137A (en) | 1983-05-31 |
DE3164965D1 (en) | 1984-08-30 |
AU533121B2 (en) | 1983-11-03 |
AU5955780A (en) | 1981-10-01 |
NZ194191A (en) | 1983-05-10 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US4406811A (en) | Composition and method for controlling corrosion in aqueous systems | |
US4689200A (en) | Systems inhibited against corrosion and/or scale deposition | |
AU617792B2 (en) | Method for controlling corrosion using molybdate compositions | |
US4606890A (en) | Process for conditioning metal surfaces | |
US4033896A (en) | Method of corrosion inhibition and compositions therefor | |
US4317744A (en) | Corrosion inhibitor | |
EP1208248B1 (en) | Corrosion inhibition method suitable for use in potable water | |
EP0277412B1 (en) | Inhibiting corrosion of iron base metals | |
EP0396243A1 (en) | The inhibition of corrosion in aqueous systems | |
JPH0141705B2 (en) | ||
EP0488538B1 (en) | Corrosion inhibition | |
US4411865A (en) | Method of corrosion inhibition in aqueous mediums | |
GB2087862A (en) | Process for dispersing particulate material in aqueous systems | |
US5344590A (en) | Method for inhibiting corrosion of metals using polytartaric acids | |
US4297317A (en) | Low level chromate-based corrosion inhibition in aqueous mediums | |
US4329250A (en) | Low level chromate-based corrosion inhibition in aqueous mediums | |
EP0037221B1 (en) | Method and composition for inhibiting corrosion of metal surfaces in aqueous solutions | |
EP0017373B1 (en) | Stable compositions for use as corrosion inhibitors and method of corrosion inhibition in aqueous media | |
CA2252060A1 (en) | Method and composition for corrosion and deposition inhibition in aqueous systems | |
JPH0128105B2 (en) | ||
AU617791B2 (en) | Method and compositions for controlling corrosion in low and high hardness water | |
EP0363439A1 (en) | Treatment for water systems to inhibit corrosion and scale formation | |
EP0257826A1 (en) | Method of inhibiting the corrosion of copper and copper alloys | |
US4867945A (en) | Method of inhibiting the corrosion of copper and copper alloys | |
CA1181196A (en) | Isopropenyl phosphonic acid copolymers and methods of use thereof |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Designated state(s): BE DE FR GB IT NL |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 19810810 |
|
ITF | It: translation for a ep patent filed |
Owner name: BARZANO' E ZANARDO ROMA S.P.A. |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Designated state(s): BE DE FR GB IT NL |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 3164965 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 19840830 |
|
ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 19850328 Year of fee payment: 5 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed | ||
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Payment date: 19860331 Year of fee payment: 6 |
|
BERE | Be: lapsed |
Owner name: BETZ EUROPE INC. Effective date: 19870331 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Effective date: 19871001 |
|
NLV4 | Nl: lapsed or anulled due to non-payment of the annual fee | ||
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 19871130 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Effective date: 19871201 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Effective date: 19890331 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 19890331 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Effective date: 19900320 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |