Classifications

• • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
  • D21—PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
  • D21H—PULP COMPOSITIONS; PREPARATION THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES D21C OR D21D; IMPREGNATING OR COATING OF PAPER; TREATMENT OF FINISHED PAPER NOT COVERED BY CLASS B31 OR SUBCLASS D21G; PAPER NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
  • D21H21/00—Non-fibrous material added to the pulp, characterised by its function, form or properties; Paper-impregnating or coating material, characterised by its function, form or properties
  • D21H21/50—Non-fibrous material added to the pulp, characterised by its function, form or properties; Paper-impregnating or coating material, characterised by its function, form or properties characterised by form
  • D21H21/52—Additives of definite length or shape
  • D21H21/54—Additives of definite length or shape being spherical, e.g. microcapsules, beads
• • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
  • C08—ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
  • C08F—MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS OBTAINED BY REACTIONS ONLY INVOLVING CARBON-TO-CARBON UNSATURATED BONDS
  • C08F8/00—Chemical modification by after-treatment
• • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
  • D21—PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
  • D21H—PULP COMPOSITIONS; PREPARATION THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES D21C OR D21D; IMPREGNATING OR COATING OF PAPER; TREATMENT OF FINISHED PAPER NOT COVERED BY CLASS B31 OR SUBCLASS D21G; PAPER NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
  • D21H17/00—Non-fibrous material added to the pulp, characterised by its constitution; Paper-impregnating material characterised by its constitution
  • D21H17/20—Macromolecular organic compounds
  • D21H17/33—Synthetic macromolecular compounds
  • D21H17/34—Synthetic macromolecular compounds obtained by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds
• • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
  • D21—PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
  • D21H—PULP COMPOSITIONS; PREPARATION THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES D21C OR D21D; IMPREGNATING OR COATING OF PAPER; TREATMENT OF FINISHED PAPER NOT COVERED BY CLASS B31 OR SUBCLASS D21G; PAPER NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
  • D21H17/00—Non-fibrous material added to the pulp, characterised by its constitution; Paper-impregnating material characterised by its constitution
  • D21H17/20—Macromolecular organic compounds
  • D21H17/33—Synthetic macromolecular compounds
  • D21H17/34—Synthetic macromolecular compounds obtained by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds
  • D21H17/37—Polymers of unsaturated acids or derivatives thereof, e.g. polyacrylates
  • D21H17/375—Poly(meth)acrylamide
• • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
  • D21—PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
  • D21H—PULP COMPOSITIONS; PREPARATION THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES D21C OR D21D; IMPREGNATING OR COATING OF PAPER; TREATMENT OF FINISHED PAPER NOT COVERED BY CLASS B31 OR SUBCLASS D21G; PAPER NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
  • D21H17/00—Non-fibrous material added to the pulp, characterised by its constitution; Paper-impregnating material characterised by its constitution
  • D21H17/20—Macromolecular organic compounds
  • D21H17/33—Synthetic macromolecular compounds
  • D21H17/34—Synthetic macromolecular compounds obtained by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds
  • D21H17/41—Synthetic macromolecular compounds obtained by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds containing ionic groups
  • D21H17/42—Synthetic macromolecular compounds obtained by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds containing ionic groups anionic
  • D21H17/43—Carboxyl groups or derivatives thereof

Definitions

• This invention is concerned with binder systems for use in the manufacture of high strength composites and the composites produced thereby, especially paper, paperboard, hardboard and insulation board.
• a latex in the manufacture of paper by wet-end addition, or as a beater additive, is well known.
• the latex has been an anionic latex but a water-soluble cationic deposition aid has' been used therewith. Because of the slightly anionic nature of pulp, it has been suggested that a low-: charge density cationic latex should be used in order to get good deposition on the fibers without the use of a deposition aid.
• a deposition aid Because of the slightly anionic nature of pulp, it has been suggested that a low-: charge density cationic latex should be used in order to get good deposition on the fibers without the use of a deposition aid.
• Combination of anionic and cationic wet-end additives in which both species are water soluble are known.
• This invention provides a method for preparing high strength composites by mixing an aqueous slurry of negatively charged, water-insoluble natural or synthetic fibers with a mixture of cationic and anionic polymers, removing water from the aqueous suspension to form a wet mat; and drying the mat by heating: characterized in that said mixture of polymers is a cationic latex containing a cationic water-insoluble copolymer and a co-additive, said copolymer being present as particles having pH independent bound charges at or near the particle surface in an amount from 0,07 to 0,6 milliequivalent per gram of copolymer, the copolymer particles of the latex being deformable at the temperature of the process and the co-additive is a water-soluble anionic polymer having a degree of polymerization above 3000, having an available charge of from 0,3 to 8 milliequivalents per gram of polymer, having an acyclic carbon-carbon chain backbone and having the capability of retaining its solubility
• Cationic structure particle latexes are described in French patent 2.308.660 and have been used as coating agent for hydrophobic carriers.
• the latex is added in an amount greater than that required to cause charge reversal on the fiber but less than the amount which would exceed the capacity of the fiber to hold a wet mat together during processing. That amount is usually from 0.5 to 2000 percent, preferably from 10 to 100 percent, solids basis calculated on the dry weight of the fiber.
• the cationic latex particles preferably have a charge density of from 0.1 to 0.6 milliequivalent, and most preferably from 0.15 to 0.5 milliequivalent, per gram of copolymer. Latexes with bound charge densities less than 0.1 meg/g tend to be insufficiently stable for some applications.
• the amount of co-additive is an amount greater than that required to cause essentially complete retention of the latex on the fiber but less than the amount which would be effective to cause substantial redispersion of components of the aqueous suspension.
• the optimum amount provides good strength with very little redispersion. That amount is usually from 0.05 to 160 percent by weight based on the dry weight of the fiber.
• the fiber is any kind of negatively charged, water insoluble, natural or synthetic fiber or blend of fibers which can be dispersed in aqueous slurry and includes crude, low quality "screenings," i.e., coarse by-product pulp from unbleached chemical pulp. either long or short fibers, or mixtures thereof are useful. Suitable also are glass fibers, reclaimed waste papers, cellulose from cotton and linen rags, straws and similar materials. Particularly useful fibers are the cellulosic and lignocellulosic fibers commonly known as wood pulp of the various kinds such as mechanical pulp, steam-heated mechanical pulp, chemimechanical pulp, semi-chemical pulp and chemical pulp.
• groundwood pulp unbleached sulfite pulp, bleached sulfite pulp, unbleached sulfate pulp and bleached sulfate pulp.
• these paper-making pulps latex in an amount of 5-2000 percent solids basis, calculated on the dry fiber weight, and co-additive in an amount of 0.15 to 160 weight percent based on dry fiber weight, one obtains fibrous webs having good formation.
• the invention also provides a fibrous web comprising a dried composite containing (a) a paper-making grade of fiber having an anionic charge, (b) from 5 to 2000 percent, solids basis calculated on the weight of the fiber, of a structured-paticle latex having a non-ionic copolymer core; the non-ionic core being encapsulated by a thin layer of a water-insoluble organic copolymer having bound charges of pH independent cationic groups; the latex having from 0.15 to 0.6 milliequivalent of bound charge per gram of polymer in the latex and (c) from 0.15 to 160 percent, based on the weight of the fiber, of a co-additive which is a water-soluble anionic polymer of an acrylamide having a degree of polymerization of from 3,000 to 10,000 and having an available charge of from 0.3 to 8 milliequivalents per gram of co-additive wherein the co-additive retains its water solubility in the presence of metal ions at a pH from
• the latex component is rather insensitive to the copolymer composition thereof provided that the glass transition temperature (Tg) of the copolymer is less than the temperature which will be used in the processing steps.
• Tg glass transition temperature
• the Tg will be room temperature or lower, even as low as -80°C, although polymers having Tg values up to about 100°C may be used.
• the wet mats are easier to handle when a hard latex copolymer is used, e.g., a copolymer having a Tg value greater than 0°C. Nevertheless, the copolymer in the latex must be deformable at the temperature to be used in the process.
• the latexes are represented by but not restricted to structured particle latexes having a non-ionic organic polymer core.
• the non-ionic organic polymer is for example a copolymer of a monovinylidene aromatic monomer, an aliphatic conjugated diene and comprising optionally other non-ionic monomers.
• the thin polymer layer is made of a water-insoluble copolymer encapsulated by a thin layer of a polymer having bound charges as pH independent cationic groups at or near the particle surface.
• One method of obtaining such latexes is by :copolymerizing under emulsion polymerization conditions an ethylenically unsaturated, activated-halogen monomer onto the particle surface of a non- ionic, organic polymer which is slightly cationic through the presence of adsorbed cationic surfactant.
• the resulting latex is reacted with a non-ionic nucleophile to form a latex suitable for use in the practice of this invention.
• the particle size will range from 500 to 5000 Angstroms, preferably from 800 to 3000 Angstroms.
• bound as applied to groups or charges is meant that they are not desorbable under the conditions of processing. A convenient test is by dialysis against deionized water.
• pH independent groups as applied to ionic groups is meant that the groups are predominantly in ionized form over a wide range in pH, e.g., 2-12.
• Representative of such groups are sulfonium, sulfoxonium, isothiouronium, pyridinium and quaternary ammonium groups.
• available charge is mean the amount of charge an ionizable group would provide to a polymer when completely ionized.
• non-ionic as applied to the monomers in this specification is meant that the monomers are not ionic per se nor do not become ionic by a simple change in pH.
• a monomer containing an amine group is non-ionic at high pH, the addition of a water-soluble acid reduces the pH and forms a water-soluble salt; hence, such a monomer is not included.
• the non-ionic nucleophiles are not similarly restricted, i.e., "non-ionic" as used with nucleophiles applies to such compounds which are non-ionic under conditions of use and tertiary amines, for example, are included.
• the co-additive utilized in this invention preferably has a degree of polymerization above 5000, and an available charge of from 0.7 to 4.5 milliequivalents per gram of polymer.
• Such water-soluble polymers may be natural or synthetic.
• the upper limit of the degree of polymerization is not critical provided that the co-additive has the requisite soiubility. In some cases, such as a partially cross-linked polymer, the DP value is indeterminate.
• co-additive are polymers such as water-soluble high molecular weight acrylamide polymers having pendant anionic groups represented by carboxyl, sulfate, sulfonate and the like, sodium polystyrene sulfonate, partially hydrolyzed copolymers of vinyl acetate and acrylic acid, sulfated polyvinyl alcohols, polyvinyl acetate polymers having pendant anionic groups represented by carboxyl, sulfate and sulfonate and copolymers of hydroxyethyl acrylate and sulfoethyl methacrylate.
• Various known methods can be used to obtain these anionic acrylamide polymers.
• polyacrylamide can be hydrolyzed to various levels.
• Other methods include direct copolymerization of substituted acrylamide monomers such as 2-acrylamido-2-methylpropane sulfonic acid with other hydrophilic monomers such as the ⁇ ,ß- ethylenically unsaturated carboxylic acids represented by acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, fumaric acid, maleic acid and itaconic acid.
• the preferred polymer co-additive has a molecular weight high enough to flocculate the fines but low enough to avoid poor formation. If the degree of polymerization is less than 3000, flocculation is inadequate and drainage and retention are poor. If the degree of polymerization is over 10,000, the flocculation is excellent but paper formation is unsatisfactory for some grades of paper.
• the optimum charge on the co-additive depends somewhat on the hardness of the water used, i.e., the concentration of multivalent cations such as Call in the water.
• concentration of multivalent cations such as Call in the water.
• polymers of low available charge content such as less than about one milliequivalent of available charge per gram (meg/g) of polymer, work best in hard water.
• meg/g milliequivalent of available charge per gram
• the anionic co-additive has greater than one milliequivalent of available charge per gram of polymer.
• the non-ionic copolymer core of the latexes operable in the practice of this invention for making papers having good formation preferably contains from 20 to 50 percent of an aliphatic, conjugated, diene (preferably 1,3-butadiene), from 20 to 80 percent of a monovinylidene aromatic compound (preferably styrene), from 0 to 5 percent of polar, non-ionic ethylenically unsaturated monomers and from 0 to 25 percent of other ethylenically unsaturated non-ionic monomers which when in the form of homopolymers are water-insoluble.
• an aliphatic, conjugated, diene preferably 1,3-butadiene
• a monovinylidene aromatic compound preferably styrene
• polar, non-ionic ethylenically unsaturated monomers from 0 to 25 percent of other ethylenically unsaturated non-ionic monomers which when in the form of homopolymers are water-
• the monovinylidene aromatic compounds are represented by styrene, substituted styrenes (e.g., styrene having halogen, alkoxy, cyano or alkyl substituents), vinyl naphthalene and the like.
• styrene a-methylstyrene, ar-methylstyrene, ar-ethylstyrene, a-ar-dimethylstyrene, ar,ar-dimethylstyrene, ar-t-butyistyrene, methoxystyrene, cyanostyrene, acetylstyrene, monochlorostyrene, dichlorostyrenes, other halostyrenes and vinylnaphthalene.
• monovinylidene aromatic monomer or compound is meant that to an aromatic ring in each molecule of the monomer or compound is attached one radical of the formula, wherein R is hydrogen or a lower alkyl such as an alkyl having from 1 to 4 carbon atoms.
• the aliphatic conjugated dienes operabie in the practice of this invention include butadiene and substituted butadiene and other acyclic-compounds having at least two sites of ethylenic unsaturation separated from each other by a single carbon-to-carbon bond.
• Specific examples are isoprene, chloroprene, 2,3-dimethy!butadiene-1,3, methylpentadiene, and especially 1,3-butadiene (often abbreviated butadiene).
• the polar, non-ionic, ethyienicaiiy unsaturated monomers are represented by the acrylamides such as acrylamide and methacrylamide; the hydroxyl-containing esters of ⁇ , ⁇ -ethylenically unsaturated, aiiphatic monocarboxyiic acids such as ;3-hydroxyethyl acrylate, A-hydroxyethyl methacrylate, ⁇ -hydroxypropyl me;hacrylate, 4-hydroxybutyl acrylate and 5-hydroxypentyl methacrylate.
• acrylamides such as acrylamide and methacrylamide
• the hydroxyl-containing esters of ⁇ , ⁇ -ethylenically unsaturated, aiiphatic monocarboxyiic acids such as ;3-hydroxyethyl acrylate, A-hydroxyethyl methacrylate, ⁇ -hydroxypropyl me;hacrylate, 4-hydroxybutyl acrylate and 5-hydroxypentyl methacrylate.
• the other ethylenically unsaturated non-ionic monomers which when in the form of homopolymers are water-insoluble are represented by the lower alkyl acrylate and methacrylate esters such as methyl-acrylate, ethyl acrylate, methyl methacrylate, ethyl methacrylate, isopropyl methacrylate; and the unsaturated nitriles such as acrylonitrile and methacrylonitrile.
• a known starting latex of a non-ionic polymer of a monovinylidene aromatic compound and an aliphatic conjugated diene is encapsulated with a thin layer of a copolymer of an ethylenically unsaturated activated-halogen monomer either by adding the activated-halogen monomer or a mixture of such monomers to the reaction mixture of the starting latex before all of the monomers are converted to polymer or by adding the activated-halogen monomer together with one or more hydrophobic monomers to a starting latex containing essentially no residual monomers, and initiating and continuing polymerization of the thus-added monomers to substantially complete conversion.
• the resulting latex having a particle size (diameter) of from 800 Angstroms to 3,000 Angstroms consists of the starting latex particle now encapsulated with a bound layer having a thickness of from a monomolecular layer of the copolymer to about 100 Angstroms.
• the latex according to the foregoing description can then be reacted with a low molecular weight, non-ionic, water-stable, nucleophilic compound which can diffuse through an aqueous phase, to form particles of polymer having pH independent cationic groups, i.e., onium ions, chemically attached at or near the particle surface.
• nucleophiiic compounds are pyridine, quinoline, isoquinoline, tetramethyl thiourea, tetraethyl thiourea, hydroxyethylmethyl sulfide, hydroxyethylethyl sulfide, dimethyl sulfide, diethyl sulfide, di-n-propyl sulfide, methyl-n-propyl sulfide, methylbutyl sulfide, dibutyl sulfide, trimethylene sulfide, thiacyclohexane, tetrahydrothiophene, N-methylpiperidine, N-ethylpyrrolidine, N-hydroxyethylpyrrolidine, trimethylphosphine, triethylphosphine, tri-n-butylphosphine, trimethylamine, triethylamine, tri-n-propylamine, tri-isobutyl
• the latex is stirred gently while the nucleophilic compound is added thereto, as the compound per se or in the form of a solution.
• gentle stirring may continue throughout the ensuing reaction, or optionally after dispersion of the compound in the latex, the stirring may be discontinued.
• the reaction is conveniently carried out at ambient temperature although temperatures from,0°C to 80°C can be used.
• the reaction occurs spontaneously at a rate which depends upon the reactivity of the activated halogen and of the nucleophile. It is preferred to carry out the reaction until a predominant porportion of the colloidal stability of the product is provided by the resulting chemically bound cationic groups.
• a catalyst is not required although with the less reactive materials, a small amount of iodide ion may be used to facilitate the reaction.
• any excess nucleophile commonly is removed by standard methods, e.g., dialysis, vacuum stripping and steam distillation.
• pH independent cationic groups can be substituted for cationic groups which are chemically bound to the latex particles according to the foregoing description by carrying out a further reaction with such cationic groups.
• a cationic structured-particle latex having sulfonium groups chemically bound to the structured-particles at or near the particle surface can be reacted with hydrogen peroxide at a temperature of from 20° to 80°C, preferably at ambient temperature, for a sufficient time to oxidize part or all of the sulfonium groups to sulfoxonium groups.
• hydrogen peroxide is used in excess, e.g., from 2 to 10 moles of hydrogen peroxide for each mole of sulfonium groups.
• the latexes can contain usual additives such as antifoamers, coalescing solvents, pigments, and pH adjusting agents. It is preferred that the latexes are soap-free but quantities up to about 0.1 milliequivalent per gram can be tolerated.
• the process to prepare the product of this invention preferably is carried out as follows: A dilute aqueous suspension of the fiber is formed in the normal manner for example in a concentration of from 0.5 to 6 percent.
• the latex is added at any convenient concentration, often in the concentration as supplied and the resulting mixture is stirred, usually for at least two minutes depending on the equipment available.
• the aqueous suspension usually is then diluted further, often with white water from the process.
• the co-additive is added as an aqueous solution at a concentration usually less than 1 percent solids and the mixture is stirred generally for near the minimum time to obtain thorough mixing. While the co-additive is usually the last component added at the wet-end of the process, it may be added at any time. Optional wet-end additives can be added at a suitable time.
• composite-forming composition at the wet-end in the present process include pigments, fillers, curing agents, waxes, oils and other common additives well known in the paper-making art.
• a composite is formed by flowing the resulting suspension over a porous support such as a screen to form a wet mat, dewatering the wet mat and completing drying by heating.
• the dewatering step includes draining and may include wet pressing. Pressing and heating may be carried out simultaneously to form a composite. Alternatively, ambient temperature pressing followed by heating to complete drying may be employed.
• other compacting, shaping, tempering and curing steps may be included. The temperatures used for hot pressing, curing and tempering or other heating steps often are from 100°C to 250°C, although higher or lower temperatures are operable.
• paper machines such as a Fourdriner machine, a cylinder machine or a laboratory sheet-forming apparatus are useful.
• the product of the process of this invention has improved internal bond strength compared to prior art methods.
• the properties are more sensitive to degree of bonding of polymer particles to fiber than to properties of the polymer composition.
• the properties of the resulting product depend markedly on the properties of the polymer phase.
• the process of the invention also is advantageous compared to prior art processes in that there is better retention; i.e., more of the suspended solids are removed from the aqueous suspension.
• the shear stability of the system allows mechanical working without redispersion of solids.
• the effluent from the process is lower in solids which allows the use of a higher level of recycle and minimizes discharge of pollutants to the environment.
• the "formation" of a sheet of paper refers to the uniformity of distribution of fibers in the sheet. Poor formation occurs when the fibers flocculate or clump together causing alternating heavy and light spots in the sheet. Besides diminishing the aesthetic appeal of the paper, poor formation tends to decrease in-plane strength properties such as tensile strength. Poor formation causes uneven surfaces which contribute to poor printability.
• the monomers shown for the base latex were polymerized under emulsion polymerization conditions using dodecylbenzyldimethyl- sulfonium chloride as emulsifier in amounts varying from 1.8 to 2.5 percent, 0.2 percent of dodecanethiol as chain transfer agent and 0.5 percent of a,a'-azobisisobutyronitrile as catalyst, the percentages being based on the total weight of monomers.
• the base latex particles were then capped (encapsulated) by adding the cap monomers of the kind and in the amount shown in Table I in a continuous manner over a period of about one hour for each 100 grams of the total monomeric components.
• Tensile values are recorded as breaking length, in meters, and are determined according to TAPPI Standard T 494-os-70 except the values are the average of 3 samples rather than 10 and the jaw gap is 5.08 cm rather than 20.32 cm.
• a common way to measure formation is to compare visually the sheet to be measured with a set of ten standard sheets specifically made with decreasing levels of uniformity of fiber distribution (formation) and ranked from 1 to 10 with 1 being the best and 10 the worst.
• optical instruments which are available commercially can be used for measuring formation.
• the internal bond strength of the products is measured by the delamination resistance test.
• a strip one inch in width of the product to be tested is placed between two strips of adhesive tape having sufficient adhesiveness that failure will occur in the paper when the two pieces of tape are pulled apart.
• Delamination is started by hand, then continued and measured by an Instron Tensile Tester using a jaw separation rate of 30.48 cm per minute.
• the average force resisting delamination over a length of about 10.16 cm is determined for each of two samples.
• the average of the two samples is recorded in ounces per inch of width, abbreviated oz/in. Those values are followed in parenthesis by conversion to metric units, i.e., grams per 2.54 centimeters (g/2.54 cm).
• the new tape is calibrated according to the initial tape and values are reported in values according to the initial tape.
• a steam-heated, mechanically-defibered pulp having a Canadian Standard Freeness (CSF) of 785 milliliters and a solids content of 24% was diluted to 1% solids with water having a hardness of 10.6 (as CaCo 3 , ppm) and an alkalinity of 48 (as CaCo 3 , ppm).
• the components shown in Table 11 were added to the resulting fiber suspension in the order shown and stirring was continued for the time indicated before the next step. About 3% of Latex A would be required to reach the charge reversal point of the pulp.
• the co-additive is a hydrolyzed polyacrylamide having a degree of polymerization of 25,000 and an available charge of 1.94 milliequivalents per gram of co-additive (meq/g).
• a sheet was formed on filter paper (12.5 cm in diameter) by filtering the resulting suspension through a Buchner funnel with vacuum from a water aspirator.
• the resulting wet sheet was removed from the funnel, placed between two clean filter papers and 4 blotters and pressed on a Williams press at 1715 psig (120 kg/sq cm). After the blotters and filter papers were removed, the resulting damp sheet was dried on a hot plate at 165°C for 5 minutes. The dried sheet was conditioned by being kept in a room maintained at 50% humidity and 23°C for at least 2 hours, generally overnight, before testing.
• the effluent from the filtration was analyzed for turbidity with spectrophotometer as a measurement of the white water clarity.
• the wavelength of light used was 425 nm and a cuvette diameter of 19 mm.
• Tensile values for the composite, drainage time, and clarity (percent transmission) of the effluent from the filtration are shown in Table III.
• a sheet was prepared in the same manner and with the same components except the latex and the co-additive were omitted.
• the drainage time, clarity and tensile results are shown in Table III.
• Example 1 illustrates the improvement in drainage time and clarity of the effluent (waste water) from the process and improvement in strength of the product provided by the invention.
• an aqueous dispersion containing 1393 parts of water having a hardness of 106 ppm (calculated as calcium carbonate) and an alkalinity of 48 ppm (calculated as calcium carbonate) and 7 parts (dry basis) of unbleached Canadian softwood kraft having a Canadian Standard Freeness (CFS) of 400 ml was stirred at such a rate that the kraft was just turning over gently.
• To the moving kraft suspension was added 1.4 parts (dry weight basis) of Latex A. After stirring at the same rate for an additional two minutes, a dilute aqueous solution (0.2% solids) of the specified co-additive was added in the amount shown and stirring was continued for an additional 30 seconds.
• the resulting furnish (pH 7-8) was made into a handsheet 30.48 x 30.48 cm on an M/K systems "Mini-Mill" handsheet machine using water for dilution of the description given above.
• the handsheet was pressed to a solids content of from 37 to 38% by placing the sheet and couching blotter between two pieces of wool felt and running the resulting sandwich through the press at medium speed using a press pressure of 80 psig (5.6 kg/sq cm).
• the pressed sheet was removed from the wool felts, and stripped from the couching blotter, then dried in a drier maintained at 220°F (104°C).
• the product was just cockle free, and contained about 95 percent solids.
• the co-additive used in the examples is a hydrolyzed polyacrylamide having 1.94 milliequivalent of available charge (carboxyl) per gram and a degree of polymerization of 25000, Data are shown in Table IV.
• Comparative Examples 2C2 and 2C4 were prepared in the same manner from the same components as described for Examples 2-10.
• the amounts of the latex were below that required (5.5%) to cause charge reversal on the fiber used.
• Comparative Examples 2C1, 2C3, 2C5, 5C and 8C were prepared in the same manner except no co-additive was included. Data for the comparative examples are included in Table IV.
• a sheet was prepared using the materials in the same amounts and by the process described in Examples 2-10 except the latex was Latex B (see Table I), the amount of the same co-additive was 0.6%, dry basis calculated on the weight of the fiber. The sheet was tested for delamination resistance (see Table V).
• Latex B was used instead of Latex B.
• Latex B and Latex X have the same average polymer composition but Latex B is a structured particle latex whereas Latex X has rather uniform composition throughout the particle as described above.
• Table V data are shown in Table V.
• Example 11 provides considerable improvement over a process using a latex having the bound charges throughout the particle rather than only near the particle surface even though the total charge was greater for Comparative Example 11 C.
• Sheets were prepared in the same manner as described in Example 11 except that for Latex B there were substituted Latex C, Latex D and Latex E, respectively.
• the latter three latexes differ from each other in the amount of nucleophile (dimethylaminoethanol) reacted with the capped latex and thus differ in the amount of bound charge. Data are shown in Table VI.
• Examples 12-14 show that the internal bond strength of the product increases as the bound charge on the latex increases.
• Sheets were prepared as described in Example 11 except that different latexes were used but in the same proportions.
• the major differences among the latexes relate to the composition in the base latex from which the structured particle latex was made (see Table I). Data are shown in Table VII.
• a sheet was prepared in the same manner as for Examples 15-22 except the latex and the co- additives were not included. Results are shown in Table VII.
• Examples 15-18 illustrate the process of the invention where the sulfonium group provides the bound charge rather than the quaternary ammonium group of Examples 1-14 and shows operability of the process over a broad composition of latex polymer (broad range of Tg values) at approximately equal bound charge. Within this series, there is little variation in internal bond strength in the products as shown by the delamination test.
• Examples 19-22 illustrate a higher level of bound charge in the latex and variations in the base latex (core composition) to provide increasing Tg values.
• the measured delamination resistance of the product sheets decreased under the conditions of these experiments.
• the heating time was increased to 12 minutes rather than one minute, the delamination resistance was 22.4 oz/in (635 g/2.54 cm); 18.5 oz/in (524 g/2.54 cm) and 14.8 oz/in (420 g/2.54 cm), for Examples 20, 21 and 22, respectively.
• These examples support the position that at the higher Tg values in the disclosed range for the latex used, higher temperatures and/or longer times should be selected or conversely at a given time/temperature condition in the process a latex with sufficiently low Tg value should be used.
• Sheets were prepared as described in Example 11 except a different latex was used in all these examples and the identity of the co-additive was changed but not the amount in all these examples except No. 25. Data are shown in Table VIII.
• the resulting furnish was made into a handsheet (30.48 x 30.48 cm) on a M/K Systems "Mini-Mill" handsheet machine using water for dilution of the description given above.
• the resulting wet sheet was placed between two pieces of clean filter paper and 4 blotters and pressed on a Williams press at 136 psig (9.52 kg/sq cm). After the blotters and filter papers were removed, the resulting damp sheet was dried on a hot plate at 165°C for 5 minutes.
• the resulting dry sheet was so strong that the delamination resistance could not be determined by the method disclosed in this specification.
• the co-additive used in the example was a hydrolyzed polyacrylamide having 1.94 milliequivalents of anionic group (carboxyl) per gram and a degree of polymerization of 5500.
• a sheet was prepared using the same materials in the same amounts and by the process described in Examples 2-10 except the amount of the same co-additive was 0.1 % and the latex was a latex prepared according to United States Patent No. 3,873,488 in a batch process from 65 parts of styrene, 30 parts of butadiene, 5 parts of acrylonitrile and 4 parts of vinylbenzylmethyldodecyl- sulfonium chloride with no added nonpolymerizable surface active material.
• the latex had a solids content of 23.9%, a particle size of 1090 angstroms (determined by light scattering) and 0.072 milliequivalent of bound charge per gram. of polymer.
• the estimated Tg was 25°C.
• the delamination resistance of the sheet was 19.3 oz/in (547 g/2.54 cm).
• This example illustrates the practice of the invention using a latex having a level of bound charge near the minimum suitable for this invention and also illustrates the use of a latex which is not prepared according to the method for making structured particle latexes.
• Sheets were prepared using the same material in the same amounts and by the process described for Examples 2-10 except the latex was as described below, a different co-additive was used in the amount shown in Table IX and deionized water was substituted for the water.
• the latex as described, at 23% solids and having a particle size of 880 angstroms, was a structured particle latex having 100 parts of a core copolymer of 40% of styrene, and 60% of butyl acrylate (core Tg -10°C) capped by 10 parts of a copolymer of 33% of vinylbenzyl chloride and 67% of butyl acrylate which was subsequently reacted with trimethylamine to provide 0.121 milliequivalent of bound charge per gram of latex, solids basis.
• the co-additive used in these examples was a hydrolyzed polyacrylamide having a degree of polymerization of 20,800 and an available charge of 3.48 milliequivalent (from carboxyl groups) per gram. Data are shown in Table IX.
• Sheets were prepared in the same manner as for Examples 31 and 32 except that both the latex and the co-additive were omitted in 31 C1 and the co-additive was omitted in 31 C2. Data are included in Table IX.
• Examples 31 and 32 illustrate the invention using a softer water, i.e., deionized water, a different co-additive and a latex having different composition than in the other examples of the invention.
• the resulting furnish was made into a handsheet (30.48 x 30.48 cm) on an M/K Systems "Mini-Mill" handsheet machine using water for dilution of the description given above.
• the handsheet was pressed to a solids content of from 37 to 38% by placing the sheet and couching blotter between two pieces of wool felt and running the resulting sandwich through the press at medium speed using a press pressure of 80 psig (5.6 kg/sq cm).
• the pressed sheet was removed from the wool felts, and stripped from the couching blotter, then dried in a drier maintained at 220° F (104°C).
• the product was just cockle free, and contained about 95 percent solids.
• the latex used in the foregoing experiment was a structured-particle latex having 80 percent of (a) a core copolymer of 35 percent of butadiene, 65 percent of styrene and 20 percent of (b) an encapsulating layer of 35 percent of butadiene, 15 percent of styrene and 50 percent of vinylbenzyl chloride which was reacted subsequent to polymerization with 2/(dimethylamino) ethanol to provide a bound quaternary ammonium charge of 0.365 milliequivalent per gram of polymer'in the latex.
• the co-additive (A) used in the example is a hydrolyzed polyacrylamide having 1.94 milliequivalent of available charge per gram and a degree of polymerization of 5500.
• the turbidity measurements are made on the effluent from the freeness (CSF) test and are indicative of the "white water” characteristics which are obtained in the paper making process.
• Comparative examples 33A and 34B were deficient in formation and therefore are unacceptable. While comparative example 33B indicated good formation, the transmission was low indicating poor flocculation onto the fibers and additionally the delamination resistance was low.
• Sheets were prepared as described in Examples 33 and 34 except different latexes and a different co-additive in two different amounts were used as shown in Table XI.
• the latexes used (Latex P and Latex Q) were structured particle latexes containing 70% of a core copolymer consisting of 65% of styrene and 35% of butadiene modified with 0.2% of dodecanethiol and the core was encapsulated (capped) with 30% of a copolymer of 50% of vinylbenzylchloride, 35% of butadiene and 15% of styrene which was subsequently reacted with an excess of dimethysulfide.
• Latex P was stopped for Latex P by vacuum distilling the excess dimethyl sulfide when the bound charge of sulfonium group was 0.195 milliequivalent per gram and for Latex Q when the bound charge was 0.388 milliequivalent per gram.
• the co-additive was a hydrolyzed polyacrylamide having an available charge of 3.3 milliequivalents per gram as carboxyl groups and having a degree of polymerization of 4100. Data are shown in Table XI.
• Examples 35-38 illustrate the practice of this invention using a different kind of cationic bound charge than in Examples 33 and 34 and also illustrate the use of widely differing amounts of bound charge.

Landscapes

• Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
• Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
• General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
• Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
• Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
• Polymers & Plastics (AREA)
• Organic Chemistry (AREA)
• Paper (AREA)

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Publications (2)

Family

ID=27124893

Family Applications (1)

Country Status (4)

Families Citing this family (3)

Family Cites Families (8)

• 1978
  • 1978-08-16 EP EP19780100676 patent/EP0000921B1/en not_active Expired
  • 1978-08-16 CA CA000309460A patent/CA1118165A/en not_active Expired
  • 1978-08-16 DE DE7878100676T patent/DE2861402D1/de not_active Expired
  • 1978-08-17 JP JP9956678A patent/JPS5455608A/ja active Granted

Also Published As

Similar Documents

Legal Events