EP0000039B1 - A data transmission process and system to permit substantial reduction of interference between a received first and second digital signal - Google Patents

A data transmission process and system to permit substantial reduction of interference between a received first and second digital signal Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0000039B1
EP0000039B1 EP78100063A EP78100063A EP0000039B1 EP 0000039 B1 EP0000039 B1 EP 0000039B1 EP 78100063 A EP78100063 A EP 78100063A EP 78100063 A EP78100063 A EP 78100063A EP 0000039 B1 EP0000039 B1 EP 0000039B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
digital information
information signal
signal
received
uncoded
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired
Application number
EP78100063A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0000039A1 (en
Inventor
Anthony Acampora
Douglas Otto John Reudink
Yu Shuan Yeh
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
AT&T Corp
Original Assignee
Western Electric Co Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Western Electric Co Inc filed Critical Western Electric Co Inc
Publication of EP0000039A1 publication Critical patent/EP0000039A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0000039B1 publication Critical patent/EP0000039B1/en
Expired legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L1/00Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
    • H04L1/004Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received by using forward error control
    • H04L1/0056Systems characterized by the type of code used
    • H04L1/0059Convolutional codes
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01QANTENNAS, i.e. RADIO AERIALS
    • H01Q25/00Antennas or antenna systems providing at least two radiating patterns
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04BTRANSMISSION
    • H04B7/00Radio transmission systems, i.e. using radiation field
    • H04B7/14Relay systems
    • H04B7/15Active relay systems
    • H04B7/204Multiple access
    • H04B7/2041Spot beam multiple access

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a data transmission process and system for effecting separation and substantial reduction of interference at a receiver between a first and a second received digital signal which use the same frequency spectrum and are received from the same general direction.
  • spot and area coverage beams can be desirable.
  • a separate spot coverage beam can be used for communication between the saltellite and each high traffic ground station while an area coverage beam can be used for communication between the satellite and a plurality of low traffic ground stations under conditions where it might not be desirable to interconnect the individual low traffic ground stations to a nearest high traffic ground station for access to the satellite system.
  • typical prior art techniques would be to use two satellites a few degrees apart in orbit, or, multiple spot beams at thd satellite on both up and down paths, or, separate bandwidths or polarizations, is possible, for the spot coverage beams and the area coverage beam.
  • An alternative technique to enable reception of only one signal of a plurality of signals concurrently received from a plurality of transmitters at an FM receiver would be to modulate the carrier of each transmitter with a separate frequency to provide a unique address that is assigned to an associated receiver as disclosed, for example, in U.S. Reissue Patent Re. 27,478. Such arrangement may be applicable to FM communication systems but does not appear applicable to a digital communication system.
  • the problem remaining in the prior art is to provide an improved technique which permits two digital signals using the same frequency spectrum and general transmission direction to be simultaneously transmitted on one radio channel or overlapping spot and area coverage beams with the ability for the signals to be separated at a receiving station intercepting both signals.
  • a communication system for carrying out the process is characterized in that the receiver is disposed in the path of a first uncoded digital information signal modulated to a predetermined frequency spectrum and a second digital information signal having a different informational content and a lower capacity than said first digital information, said second signal being encoded with a forward error correcting code and modulated to the predetermined frequency spectrum, said receiver comprising a detector capable of generating from the combined received signal of the interfering uncoded first digital information signal and coded second digital information signal the most likely digits representative of the desired first digital information signal and decoded second digital information signal.
  • uncoded digital information signal means that a stream of bits from a digital source is transmitted on a channel using some suitable modulation without being further processed.
  • the present invention has been and will be described primarily in relationship to a satellite communication system to enable the concurrent use of an area coverage satellite radiated beam and a plurality of spot coverage satellite radiated beams where all of the beams use the same frequency spectrum and the spot coverage beams are received within the area encompassed by the area coverage beam.
  • a satellite communication system to enable the concurrent use of an area coverage satellite radiated beam and a plurality of spot coverage satellite radiated beams where all of the beams use the same frequency spectrum and the spot coverage beams are received within the area encompassed by the area coverage beam.
  • inventive concept described can be equally applicable to other radiated wave transmission systems which comprise two or more beams which have different destinations but interfere with each other at one or more of the destinations.
  • the present invention can be used to increase the capacity of a radio channel by 50 percent by simultaneously transmitting an uncoded first digital signal and a coded second digital signal with reduced capacity on each radio channel according to the concept to be described hereinafter for the individual area and spot coverage beams.
  • a satellite communication system wherein the present invention is especially useful to permit the concurrent transmission from a satellite 10 of both an area coverage beam 12 and a plurality of spot coverage beams of which, for example, three beams 14a, 14b and 14c are shown with all beams being able to use the same frqeuency spectrum.
  • Spot coverage beams 14a, 14b and 14c are shown radiating from antennae 15a, 15b, and 15c, respectively, and directed at respective ground areas 16a, 16b and 16c which include, for example, high traffic ground stations 17a, 17b and 17c, respectively.
  • Area coverage beam 12 is shown radiating from an antenna 13 and directed at a ground area 18 which includes both the ground areas 16a, 16b and 16c and a plurality of low traffic ground stations of which, for example, four stations 19a-19d are shown.
  • each of the high traffic ground stations 17a-17c communicates with satellite 10 via a separate spot beam 14a-14c, respectively, while the low traffic ground stations 19a-19d communicate with satellite 10 via area coverage beam 12 using any suitable technique to assure that a particular message will be processed by only the appropriate one of stations 19a-19d.
  • Such arrangement permits low traffic ground stations 19a-19d to communicate with satellite 10 under conditions where it is not advantageous to connect a low traffic ground station 19 to a nearby one of high traffic ground stations 17a-17c.
  • each of ground stations 17a-17c will receive both the associated one of spot coverage beams 14a-14c and area coverage beam 12 since these beams emmanate from approximately the same point.
  • prior art arrangements such as, for example, side lobe suppression arrangements to select a wave received from a particular direction over waves received from other directions is not feasible.
  • the concurrent transmission of area coverage beam 12 and a plurality of spot coverage beams 14a-14c which use the same frequency spectrum without interference can be effected in accordance with the present invention by the typical arrangement shown in Fig. 2.
  • a separate source of data 20a-20c generates a digital signals destined to be transmitted via spot coverage beams 14a-14c, respectively.
  • the digital data signals generated by each of data sources 20a-20c are modulated to the desired frequency spectrum for transmission in separate modulators 21 a-21 c, respectively.
  • the outputs from modulators 21 a-21 c are amplified in power amplifiers 22a-22c, respectively, prior to being applied to the respective antennae 15a-15c for transmission via spot coverage beams 14a-14c, respectively.
  • the digital signals to be transmitted via area coverage beam 12 are similarly generated by a data source 20d but at a reduced data rate which is, for example, approximately one-half the rate of sources 20a-20c.
  • These latter signals are, however, first encoded in channel encoder 23 using a forward error correcting code such as, for example, a block or convolutional code prior to being sequentially modulated in modulator 21 d, amplified by power amplifier 22d and transmitted by antenna 13 in area coverage beam 12.
  • a forward error correcting code such as, for example, a block or convolutional code prior to being sequentially modulated in modulator 21 d, amplified by power amplifier 22d and transmitted by antenna 13 in area coverage beam 12.
  • a forward error correcting code such as, for example, a block or convolutional code prior to being sequentially modulated in modulator 21 d
  • power amplifier 22d amplified by power amplifier 22d and transmitted by antenna 13 in area coverage beam 12.
  • data sources 20a-20d, modulators 21 a-21 and power amplifiers 22a-22d can comprise any suitable means capable of providing the function described hereinabove.
  • channel encoder 23 can comprise any suitable means for encoding the digital data signals supplied by data source 20d into a forward error correcting code.
  • the code used is a convolutional code
  • an encoder of any desired constraint length and code rate may be used.
  • digital data signals for the area coverage beam are generated in data source 20d at the rate of one bit every T seconds for transmission over line 24 to encoder 23.
  • the received data signals are shifted into a three-bit shift register 25, or any other suitable means, at the rate of one bit every T seconds.
  • a first modulo-2 adder 26 operates on the information stored in all three bits in register 25 to produce a resultant first binary bit on transmission line 27 while, simultaneously, a second modulo-2 adder 28 operates on the first and third bits in register 25 to produce a resultant second binary bit on transmission line 29.
  • a commutator 30 first selects the signal on first transmission line 27 and then the signal on second transmission line 29 and thereby transmits two binary digits over line 31 to modulator 21 d for each data bit shifted into register 25. Therefore, for each data bit from data source 20d the encoder 23 generates two data bits at its output and the encoded data is then modulated and amplified prior to transmission via area coverage beam 12 to the ground stations disposed within ground area 18.
  • data sources 20a-20c generates two bits of data every T seconds for transmission via spot coverage beams 14a-14c, respectively, while data source 20d, generating one data bit every T seconds, in combination with encoder 23, which provides redundancy and generates two data bits for every data bit from source 20d, also generates two bits of data every T seconds for transmission via area coverage beam 12. Therefore, the data rate of all antenna radiated beams is the same with area coverage beam 12 having a lower capacity than each of spot coverage beams 14a-14c.
  • Separation of interfering uncoded spot beam and coded area beam signals is achieved in accordance with the present invention by providing a suitable detector at each of spot beam ground stations 17a-17c and area beam ground stations 1 9a-1 9d.
  • the receiver performs a suitable detection of the spot beam signal received by that ground station plus the received area beam signal, as will be described hereinafter. After the signals are separated the information content of the interfering area beam is discarded.
  • a suitable detection of the desired area beam signal plus the unwanted interfering spot beam signal is again performed and the information content of the interfering spot beam signal is discarded after separation.
  • a suitable detection process can comprise any process which will enable the separation of the two digital signals and the decoding of the forward error correcting coded signal. For example, where the two digital signals have different signal strengths at the receiver, separation may be achieved using a threshold detecting process. Alternatively, where the two received digital signals have approximately the same signal strength, a maximum-likelihood detection process may be performed. The type of detection process employed, however, will depend primarily on the amount of signal degradation which can be tolerated since each of the known detection processes would produce a certain amount of degradation in separating and decoding the two signals described hereinbefore.
  • the preferred method of separating and decoding a simultaneously received uncoded first digital signal and a forward error correcting encoded second digital signal with minimal degradation is accomplished using the technique of joint maximum-likelihood detection as will be described hereinafter.
  • Convolutional decoders and maximum-likelihood detection systems are well known in the art.
  • data is not decoded as soon as it is received from the channel. Instead, a sequence of data, having a -predetermined decoding depth, following the digit to be decoded is first collected. Then, by computing what are known as path metrics, a limited number of possible messages are selected, each extending throughout the decoding depth far beyond the digit presently to be decoded, with one such survivor sequence ending in each of the data states.
  • a correlation between each survivor sequence and the data actually received is computed for the entire decoding depth under consideration.
  • the highest correlated of the survivor sequences is then selected to be the sole survivor sequence.
  • the earliest received digit or digits within the decoding depth is then permanently decoded under the temporary assumption that the sole survivor sequence is the correct sequence.
  • decoding is accomplished by forming the log-likelihood function which hereinafter will be referred to as the path metric. Two samples are taken every T seconds and the path metric is formed for each possible source sequence, and that sequence for which the metric is largest is selected as the best estimate to the true transmitted sequence.
  • metric calculations are an application of dynamic programming techniques and that maximum-likelihood decoding can be performed without actually finding the path metric for each sequence.
  • the procedure for decoding the convolutionally encoded area beam signal is illustrated by the State diagram of Fig. 4.
  • the State is defined as the contents of the first two stages of shift register 25, which changes at a T-second rate.
  • this State can be reached from either of States 00 or 01, both transitions corresponding to a data bit 0 having entered the coder.
  • the input signal to the maximum-likelihood detector comprises two coded area beam channel symbols and two uncoded spot beam channel symbols every T seconds which interfere with each other. Therefore, in the State diagram of Fig. 4, four most- likely paths actually exist for each of the single paths shown for the transitions between States. More particularly, as shown for the transition from State 00 to State 00, the first two symbols for each of the four paths denote the source coding for this particular transition, which is common to each of the possible paths, while the last two symbols denote the four possible data symbols which may exist for the first and second spot beam symbols received during each T seconds. It is to be understood that each of the other transitions between States similarly comprises four possible paths with corresponding symbols to denote the possible received symbols.
  • the arrangement of Fig. 5 is exemplary only and is for purposes of exposition and not for purposes of limitation.
  • inventive concepts described are equally applicable to decode an interfering uncoded first beam and convolutionally coded second beam having different constraint lengths and rates or nonbinary or multilevel alphabets, transmissions, and the like, after the appropriate modification is made as will be easily determined by one skilled in the art once the constraint length and rate is known.
  • the present joint maximum-likelihood detector is segmented into four States, each State corresponding to a different one of the possible combinations of one's and zero's in the first two stages of register 25 in encoder 23.
  • a separate sample of the received waveform at each ground station is taken every T/2 seconds, and every T seconds the two samples which may be in digital or analog form, are made available at input 40 of the present detector, each sample comprising elements of the interfering area beam and spot beam signals.
  • the detector recursively computes in processors 41 a-41 d the path metric of the most likely path, of the eight paths, leading to each State. This computation is in the form: where
  • the detector computes the eight path metrics, finds the largest one of the eight path metrics, saves the largest path metric, and stores the path corresponding to the largest metric. This process will now be described in greater detail for processing the path metrics for State 00, and it is understood that a corresponding process is concurrently performed for processing the path metrics for the other States 01, 10 and 11.
  • the largest path metric for States 00, 01, 10 and 11 computed in the previous T second cycle is stored in storage devices 42a-42d, respectively, and have the respective designations M l -M 4 .
  • the outputs from storage devices 42a-42d are normalized in normalization means 43 by, for example, arbitrarily setting one of the four old metrics, M l -M 4 , equal to zero after first having effectively subtracted its value from the remaining three metrics.
  • These normalized old path metrics are designated M n1 -M n4 . This step prevents the successive path metrics from growing linearly with time.
  • the old path metric M n2 associated with State 01 is used together with the appropriate value of the two samples available at input 40 in correlator 44b to compute the path metrics for each of the four possible paths between State 01 at time to and State 00 at to,e t o +T. These four path metrics are indicated by the symbols M" 11 -M" 14 at the output of correlator 44b.
  • the eight path metrics computed in correlators 44a and 44b are compared in comparator 45 and the largest one of the eight metrics is determined.
  • the comparator 45 is strobed by a system clock 46 via a signal on lead 47 to provide the result of comparison at the appropriate sampling instance once every T seconds.
  • the value of the largest path metric for State 00 is transmitted from comparator 45 to storage means 42a via lead 48 where it is stored for use during the next processing cycle T.
  • the one of eight paths leading into a State having the largest value also indicates the most likely digital value for both the decoded area beam signal and the two sequential uncoded spot beam signals generated during a prescribed T second period by the associated data sources 20 at the satellite 10. For example, if comparator 45 determined that the largest path metric corresponded to the uppermost path between State 00 and State 00 in Fig.
  • the most likely value for the bit generated by data source 20d at satellite 10 during the corresponding T second interval would be a zero while the most likely value for the first and second sequential bits received via the interfering spot beam 14 during that same T second interval would be a 0, 0, respectively.
  • Fig. 5 the decoded binary value of the most likely bit received via interfering area beam 12 for State 00 is shown as being stored in a shift register 50a or other suitable means, while the binary values for the most likely first and second sequential bits for State 00 received via interfering spot beam 14 are stored in shift registers 51 a and 52a, respectively, or any other suitable means.
  • the outputs from comparators 45 in processors 41 b-41 similarly load registers 50b-50d, 51 b-51 d and 52b-52d for the most likely binary value for each decoded area beam bit and the first and second sequentially received spot beam bits, respectively, for the respective States 01, 10 and 11.
  • Each of shift registers 50a-50d, 51 a-51 and 52a-52d have a path memory length which preferably is about 4-5 equivalent constraint lengths, implying that, with high probability, all surviving paths have a common prefix.
  • the final state of any one of registers 50a-50d may be selected as the decoded most likely information digits for the received interfering area beam signal.
  • the final stage of any one of registers 51 a-51 d and 52a-52d may be selected as the most likely information digits for the first and second sequential digits, respectively, received via the interfering spot beam signal.
  • each group of registers 50a-50d, 51 a-51 d and registers 52a-52d can be used as a separate input to a separate well-known majority logic gate associated with a particular group of registers which functions to choose the output value indicated by the majority of the final stages of the associated group, and in the event of a tie to output a 0 or a 1.
  • a second alternative would be to select the final stage of the register within each group of registers indicating maximum likelihood.
  • the ground station performing the described joint maximum-likelihood detection process is, for example, a spot beam ground receiving station
  • the ground station performing the described joint maximum-likelihood detection process is, for example, a spot beam ground receiving station
  • registers 50a-50d for storing the decoded most likely area beam digits can be eliminated.
  • registers 50a-50d need be supplied.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Error Detection And Correction (AREA)
  • Radio Relay Systems (AREA)

Description

  • The present invention relates to a data transmission process and system for effecting separation and substantial reduction of interference at a receiver between a first and a second received digital signal which use the same frequency spectrum and are received from the same general direction.
  • In a domestic satellite communication system the coexistence of spot and area coverage beams can be desirable. For example, a separate spot coverage beam can be used for communication between the saltellite and each high traffic ground station while an area coverage beam can be used for communication between the satellite and a plurality of low traffic ground stations under conditions where it might not be desirable to interconnect the individual low traffic ground stations to a nearest high traffic ground station for access to the satellite system. To avoid signal degradation and permit separation of the overlapping spot coverage and area coverage beams especially at each spot coverage receiving station, typical prior art techniques would be to use two satellites a few degrees apart in orbit, or, multiple spot beams at thd satellite on both up and down paths, or, separate bandwidths or polarizations, is possible, for the spot coverage beams and the area coverage beam. See for example, Colloque Internation L'Espace et la Communication, Chiron, 1971, Paris; Kabisch et al, "Study of a possible regional telecommunication satellite system for Europe" at pages 279 to 292. Using separate bandwidths, however, results in inefficient use of the frequency spectrum and different polarizations may not be available where dual polarization beams are already used.
  • Various techniques have been devised to suppress interference between two beams arriving at a receiver from separate directions. In this regard see, for instance, U.S. Patents 2,520,184; 3,094,695; 3,369,235; and 3,987,444. Since the area and spot coverage beams transmitted from a satellite arrive at each spot beam ground station from the same direction, techniques for separating signals from different directions are not usable.
  • An alternative technique to enable reception of only one signal of a plurality of signals concurrently received from a plurality of transmitters at an FM receiver would be to modulate the carrier of each transmitter with a separate frequency to provide a unique address that is assigned to an associated receiver as disclosed, for example, in U.S. Reissue Patent Re. 27,478. Such arrangement may be applicable to FM communication systems but does not appear applicable to a digital communication system.
  • The problem remaining in the prior art is to provide an improved technique which permits two digital signals using the same frequency spectrum and general transmission direction to be simultaneously transmitted on one radio channel or overlapping spot and area coverage beams with the ability for the signals to be separated at a receiving station intercepting both signals.
  • The foregoing problem is solved, according to the invention, by the process characterized in claim 1.
  • A communication system for carrying out the process is characterized in that the receiver is disposed in the path of a first uncoded digital information signal modulated to a predetermined frequency spectrum and a second digital information signal having a different informational content and a lower capacity than said first digital information, said second signal being encoded with a forward error correcting code and modulated to the predetermined frequency spectrum, said receiver comprising a detector capable of generating from the combined received signal of the interfering uncoded first digital information signal and coded second digital information signal the most likely digits representative of the desired first digital information signal and decoded second digital information signal.
  • The term "uncoded digital information signal" as used in the application means that a stream of bits from a digital source is transmitted on a channel using some suitable modulation without being further processed.
  • The present invention has been and will be described primarily in relationship to a satellite communication system to enable the concurrent use of an area coverage satellite radiated beam and a plurality of spot coverage satellite radiated beams where all of the beams use the same frequency spectrum and the spot coverage beams are received within the area encompassed by the area coverage beam. However, it will be understood that such description is exemplary only and is for the purpose of exposition and not for purposes of limitation. It will be readily appreciated that the inventive concept described can be equally applicable to other radiated wave transmission systems which comprise two or more beams which have different destinations but interfere with each other at one or more of the destinations. Alternatively, the present invention can be used to increase the capacity of a radio channel by 50 percent by simultaneously transmitting an uncoded first digital signal and a coded second digital signal with reduced capacity on each radio channel according to the concept to be described hereinafter for the individual area and spot coverage beams.
  • In the drawings, in which like numerals represent like parts in the several views:
    • Fig. 1 diagrammatically illustrates a satellite communication system for providing both an area coverage beam and a plurality of spot coverage beams between the satellite and associated ground receiver stations;
    • Fig. 2 illustrates an arrangement according to the present invention to effect interference cancellation between the area coverage beam and each of the spot coverage beams at each of the receiver stations;
    • Fig. 3 depicts a typical prior art encoder for generating a constraint length=3, rate=1/2 binary convolutional code from an input stream of data;
    • Fig. 4 is a decoding diagram illustrating the allowable State transitions and channel symbols for both the convolutionally encoded area coverage beam signal and one interfering uncoded spot coverage beam signal of Fig. 2;
    • Fig. 5 is a block diagram of an arrangement for implementing the joint maximum-likelihood detector at a receiving station in accordance with the present invention.
  • In Fig. 1, a satellite communication system is illustrated wherein the present invention is especially useful to permit the concurrent transmission from a satellite 10 of both an area coverage beam 12 and a plurality of spot coverage beams of which, for example, three beams 14a, 14b and 14c are shown with all beams being able to use the same frqeuency spectrum. Spot coverage beams 14a, 14b and 14c are shown radiating from antennae 15a, 15b, and 15c, respectively, and directed at respective ground areas 16a, 16b and 16c which include, for example, high traffic ground stations 17a, 17b and 17c, respectively. Area coverage beam 12 is shown radiating from an antenna 13 and directed at a ground area 18 which includes both the ground areas 16a, 16b and 16c and a plurality of low traffic ground stations of which, for example, four stations 19a-19d are shown. In the satellite communication system of Fig. 1, each of the high traffic ground stations 17a-17c communicates with satellite 10 via a separate spot beam 14a-14c, respectively, while the low traffic ground stations 19a-19d communicate with satellite 10 via area coverage beam 12 using any suitable technique to assure that a particular message will be processed by only the appropriate one of stations 19a-19d. Such arrangement permits low traffic ground stations 19a-19d to communicate with satellite 10 under conditions where it is not advantageous to connect a low traffic ground station 19 to a nearby one of high traffic ground stations 17a-17c.
  • It can be seen from Fig. 1 that when area coverage beam 12 and spot coverage beams 14a-14c are transmitted concurrently and use the same frequency spectrum, each of ground stations 17a-17c will receive both the associated one of spot coverage beams 14a-14c and area coverage beam 12 since these beams emmanate from approximately the same point. Under such conditions the use of prior art arrangements such as, for example, side lobe suppression arrangements to select a wave received from a particular direction over waves received from other directions is not feasible.
  • The concurrent transmission of area coverage beam 12 and a plurality of spot coverage beams 14a-14c which use the same frequency spectrum without interference can be effected in accordance with the present invention by the typical arrangement shown in Fig. 2. There, a separate source of data 20a-20c generates a digital signals destined to be transmitted via spot coverage beams 14a-14c, respectively. The digital data signals generated by each of data sources 20a-20c are modulated to the desired frequency spectrum for transmission in separate modulators 21 a-21 c, respectively. The outputs from modulators 21 a-21 c are amplified in power amplifiers 22a-22c, respectively, prior to being applied to the respective antennae 15a-15c for transmission via spot coverage beams 14a-14c, respectively. The digital signals to be transmitted via area coverage beam 12 are similarly generated by a data source 20d but at a reduced data rate which is, for example, approximately one-half the rate of sources 20a-20c. These latter signals are, however, first encoded in channel encoder 23 using a forward error correcting code such as, for example, a block or convolutional code prior to being sequentially modulated in modulator 21 d, amplified by power amplifier 22d and transmitted by antenna 13 in area coverage beam 12. In this manner an area coverage beam of lower capacity is provided, and redundancy is added using coding at the transmitter such that the transmitted area coverage beam 12 occupies the entire spectral band used by the spot coverage beams 14a-14c. Coding provides the advantages of (1) reducing the area coverage beam transmitter power required to achieve some given bit error rate which is highly desirable for satellite communication, and (2) reduces the mutual interference between the area and spot beam signals.
  • It is to be understood that data sources 20a-20d, modulators 21 a-21 and power amplifiers 22a-22d can comprise any suitable means capable of providing the function described hereinabove. Similarly channel encoder 23 can comprise any suitable means for encoding the digital data signals supplied by data source 20d into a forward error correcting code. For example, where the code used is a convolutional code, an encoder of any desired constraint length and code rate may be used.
  • A typical prior art arrangement for encoder 23 to produce a convolutionally encoded area coverage signal having a simple constraint length K=3, rate=1/2 binary convolutional code is illustrated in Fig. 3. It is to be understood that such description is exemplary only and is for purposes of exposition and not for purposes of limitation. It will be readily appreciated that other constraint lengths and rates or codes and their implementations are equally applicable to permit channel separation at the receivers. In Fig. 3, digital data signals for the area coverage beam are generated in data source 20d at the rate of one bit every T seconds for transmission over line 24 to encoder 23. At encoder 23 the received data signals are shifted into a three-bit shift register 25, or any other suitable means, at the rate of one bit every T seconds. A first modulo-2 adder 26 operates on the information stored in all three bits in register 25 to produce a resultant first binary bit on transmission line 27 while, simultaneously, a second modulo-2 adder 28 operates on the first and third bits in register 25 to produce a resultant second binary bit on transmission line 29. During each T second, a commutator 30 first selects the signal on first transmission line 27 and then the signal on second transmission line 29 and thereby transmits two binary digits over line 31 to modulator 21 d for each data bit shifted into register 25. Therefore, for each data bit from data source 20d the encoder 23 generates two data bits at its output and the encoded data is then modulated and amplified prior to transmission via area coverage beam 12 to the ground stations disposed within ground area 18.
  • In the present arrangement, data sources 20a-20c generates two bits of data every T seconds for transmission via spot coverage beams 14a-14c, respectively, while data source 20d, generating one data bit every T seconds, in combination with encoder 23, which provides redundancy and generates two data bits for every data bit from source 20d, also generates two bits of data every T seconds for transmission via area coverage beam 12. Therefore, the data rate of all antenna radiated beams is the same with area coverage beam 12 having a lower capacity than each of spot coverage beams 14a-14c.
  • Separation of interfering uncoded spot beam and coded area beam signals is achieved in accordance with the present invention by providing a suitable detector at each of spot beam ground stations 17a-17c and area beam ground stations 1 9a-1 9d. At each spot beam ground station 1 7a-1 7c, the receiver performs a suitable detection of the spot beam signal received by that ground station plus the received area beam signal, as will be described hereinafter. After the signals are separated the information content of the interfering area beam is discarded. At each area beam ground station 19a-19d which experiences interference from a spot beam signal, a suitable detection of the desired area beam signal plus the unwanted interfering spot beam signal is again performed and the information content of the interfering spot beam signal is discarded after separation.
  • It is to be understood that a suitable detection process can comprise any process which will enable the separation of the two digital signals and the decoding of the forward error correcting coded signal. For example, where the two digital signals have different signal strengths at the receiver, separation may be achieved using a threshold detecting process. Alternatively, where the two received digital signals have approximately the same signal strength, a maximum-likelihood detection process may be performed. The type of detection process employed, however, will depend primarily on the amount of signal degradation which can be tolerated since each of the known detection processes would produce a certain amount of degradation in separating and decoding the two signals described hereinbefore.
  • Although the above detection methods can be used the preferred method of separating and decoding a simultaneously received uncoded first digital signal and a forward error correcting encoded second digital signal with minimal degradation is accomplished using the technique of joint maximum-likelihood detection as will be described hereinafter.
  • Convolutional decoders and maximum-likelihood detection systems are well known in the art. In this regard see, for example, U.S. Patents 3,789,360, 3,815,028 and 4,087,787. In the convolutional decoding process described in the above-mentioned references, data is not decoded as soon as it is received from the channel. Instead, a sequence of data, having a -predetermined decoding depth, following the digit to be decoded is first collected. Then, by computing what are known as path metrics, a limited number of possible messages are selected, each extending throughout the decoding depth far beyond the digit presently to be decoded, with one such survivor sequence ending in each of the data states. A correlation between each survivor sequence and the data actually received is computed for the entire decoding depth under consideration. The highest correlated of the survivor sequences is then selected to be the sole survivor sequence. The earliest received digit or digits within the decoding depth is then permanently decoded under the temporary assumption that the sole survivor sequence is the correct sequence.
  • More particularly, decoding is accomplished by forming the log-likelihood function which hereinafter will be referred to as the path metric. Two samples are taken every T seconds and the path metric is formed for each possible source sequence, and that sequence for which the metric is largest is selected as the best estimate to the true transmitted sequence.
  • As was shown in the prior art references cited hereinbefore, metric calculations are an application of dynamic programming techniques and that maximum-likelihood decoding can be performed without actually finding the path metric for each sequence. The procedure for decoding the convolutionally encoded area beam signal is illustrated by the State diagram of Fig. 4. The State is defined as the contents of the first two stages of shift register 25, which changes at a T-second rate. When considering State 00, at time to+T, this State can be reached from either of States 00 or 01, both transitions corresponding to a data bit 0 having entered the coder. If the partial metrics corresponding to each of the two merging paths are known up to and including time to=T, then since the two paths have merged, the most likely path leaving State 00 for t>to+T must contain, as a subset, the path with the greatest metric up to that point since future samples cannot affect past metrics.
  • At each of the spot beam ground stations 17a-17c and each of area beam ground stations 1 9a-1 9d having interference from a spot beam signal, the input signal to the maximum-likelihood detector comprises two coded area beam channel symbols and two uncoded spot beam channel symbols every T seconds which interfere with each other. Therefore, in the State diagram of Fig. 4, four most- likely paths actually exist for each of the single paths shown for the transitions between States. More particularly, as shown for the transition from State 00 to State 00, the first two symbols for each of the four paths denote the source coding for this particular transition, which is common to each of the possible paths, while the last two symbols denote the four possible data symbols which may exist for the first and second spot beam symbols received during each T seconds. It is to be understood that each of the other transitions between States similarly comprises four possible paths with corresponding symbols to denote the possible received symbols.
  • Fig. 5 is a block diagram of a typical arrangement for a novel joint maximum-likelihood detector capable of decoding a constraint length=3, rate=1/2 binary convolutional coded area beam 12 and uncoded spot beam 14 and providing a binary output every T seconds indicating both the two most likely information digits received via the interfering spot beam 14 and generated by the associated data source 20, and the decoded most likely information digit received in coded form via interfering area beam 12 and generated by data source 20d. It is to be understood that the arrangement of Fig. 5 is exemplary only and is for purposes of exposition and not for purposes of limitation. It will be readily appreciated that the inventive concepts described are equally applicable to decode an interfering uncoded first beam and convolutionally coded second beam having different constraint lengths and rates or nonbinary or multilevel alphabets, transmissions, and the like, after the appropriate modification is made as will be easily determined by one skilled in the art once the constraint length and rate is known.
  • As shown in Fig. 5, the present joint maximum-likelihood detector is segmented into four States, each State corresponding to a different one of the possible combinations of one's and zero's in the first two stages of register 25 in encoder 23. A separate sample of the received waveform at each ground station is taken every T/2 seconds, and every T seconds the two samples which may be in digital or analog form, are made available at input 40 of the present detector, each sample comprising elements of the interfering area beam and spot beam signals. During each clock cycle T, the detector recursively computes in processors 41 a-41 d the path metric of the most likely path, of the eight paths, leading to each State. This computation is in the form:
    Figure imgb0001
    where
    Figure imgb0002
  • As was stated hereinbefore, there are a total of eight paths leading to each of the four States. For each State the detector computes the eight path metrics, finds the largest one of the eight path metrics, saves the largest path metric, and stores the path corresponding to the largest metric. This process will now be described in greater detail for processing the path metrics for State 00, and it is understood that a corresponding process is concurrently performed for processing the path metrics for the other States 01, 10 and 11.
  • In Fig. 5, the largest path metric for States 00, 01, 10 and 11 computed in the previous T second cycle is stored in storage devices 42a-42d, respectively, and have the respective designations Ml-M4. The outputs from storage devices 42a-42d are normalized in normalization means 43 by, for example, arbitrarily setting one of the four old metrics, Ml-M4, equal to zero after first having effectively subtracted its value from the remaining three metrics. These normalized old path metrics are designated Mn1-Mn4. This step prevents the successive path metrics from growing linearly with time.
  • From Fig. 4 it can be seen that the transition into State 00, at time to+ T, can only be effected from prior States 00 and 01. Therefore, in processor 41 a of Fig. 5, the old path metrics Mn1 associated with State 00 is used together with the appropriate value of the two samples available at input 40 in correlator 44a to compute the path metrics for each for the four possible paths between State 00 at time to and State 00 at time to+T in Fig. 4. These four path metrics are indicated by the symbols M"11-M'14 at the output of correlator 44a. Similarly the old path metric Mn2 associated with State 01 is used together with the appropriate value of the two samples available at input 40 in correlator 44b to compute the path metrics for each of the four possible paths between State 01 at time to and State 00 at to,e to+T. These four path metrics are indicated by the symbols M"11-M"14 at the output of correlator 44b. The eight path metrics computed in correlators 44a and 44b are compared in comparator 45 and the largest one of the eight metrics is determined. The comparator 45 is strobed by a system clock 46 via a signal on lead 47 to provide the result of comparison at the appropriate sampling instance once every T seconds.
  • The value of the largest path metric for State 00 is transmitted from comparator 45 to storage means 42a via lead 48 where it is stored for use during the next processing cycle T. The one of eight paths leading into a State having the largest value also indicates the most likely digital value for both the decoded area beam signal and the two sequential uncoded spot beam signals generated during a prescribed T second period by the associated data sources 20 at the satellite 10. For example, if comparator 45 determined that the largest path metric corresponded to the uppermost path between State 00 and State 00 in Fig. 4, then the most likely value for the bit generated by data source 20d at satellite 10 during the corresponding T second interval would be a zero while the most likely value for the first and second sequential bits received via the interfering spot beam 14 during that same T second interval would be a 0, 0, respectively.
  • In Fig. 5, the decoded binary value of the most likely bit received via interfering area beam 12 for State 00 is shown as being stored in a shift register 50a or other suitable means, while the binary values for the most likely first and second sequential bits for State 00 received via interfering spot beam 14 are stored in shift registers 51 a and 52a, respectively, or any other suitable means. The outputs from comparators 45 in processors 41 b-41 similarly load registers 50b-50d, 51 b-51 d and 52b-52d for the most likely binary value for each decoded area beam bit and the first and second sequentially received spot beam bits, respectively, for the respective States 01, 10 and 11. Each of shift registers 50a-50d, 51 a-51 and 52a-52d have a path memory length which preferably is about 4-5 equivalent constraint lengths, implying that, with high probability, all surviving paths have a common prefix. Thus, the final state of any one of registers 50a-50d may be selected as the decoded most likely information digits for the received interfering area beam signal. Similarly the final stage of any one of registers 51 a-51 d and 52a-52d may be selected as the most likely information digits for the first and second sequential digits, respectively, received via the interfering spot beam signal. Alternatively, the last stage of each group of registers 50a-50d, 51 a-51 d and registers 52a-52d can be used as a separate input to a separate well-known majority logic gate associated with a particular group of registers which functions to choose the output value indicated by the majority of the final stages of the associated group, and in the event of a tie to output a 0 or a 1. A second alternative would be to select the final stage of the register within each group of registers indicating maximum likelihood.
  • Where the ground station performing the described joint maximum-likelihood detection process is, for example, a spot beam ground receiving station, only the most likely spot beam digits in registers 51 a-51 d and 52a-52d will be of interest for further processing and, therefore, registers 50a-50d for storing the decoded most likely area beam digits can be eliminated. Similarly at each area beam ground receiving station only registers 50a-50d need be supplied. However, as was stated previously, when the present invention is applied to increasing the capacity of a radio channel by transmitting a first uncoded signal and a second coded signal of lower capacity on the same channel with each signal using the same frequency spectrum, such combined signals will usually be destined for the same receiver and, therefore, registers 50a-50d will be required for generating the decoded most likely second signal digits along with registers 51 a-51 d and 52a-52d for generating the most likely first signal digits at the receiver.

Claims (6)

1. A data transmission process permitting the separation and substantial reduction of interference at a receiver between a first and a second digital information signal which use the same frequency spectrum and are received by the receiver from approximately the same direction characterized by
- at a remote transmitter:
transmitting the first digital information signal in uncoded form in a predetermined frequency band in a first direction while concurrently
transmitting the second digital information signal having a different informational content in coded form and at a lower information transmission capacity than said first information signal in said predetermined frequency band in said first direction, said code used comprising a forward error correc-. ting code, and
- at the receiver:
receiving said uncoded first digital information signal and said coded second digital information signal, and
performing a detection process on the uncoded first digital information signal and the coded second digital information signal for generating the most likely digits representative of the received first digital information signals and decoded second digital information signal.
2. The process according to Claim 1 characterized by its use in a communication system where said first digital information signal is in a radiated beam covering a first receiving area and said second digital information signal is in a second radiated beam covering a second receiving area which is at least partially overlapped by said first receiving area.
3. The process according to Claim 1 characterized in that said first digital information signal and said second digital information signal are in the same radio channel received by the receiver.
4. The process according to Claim 1 characterized in that said forward error correcting code is a convolutional code, and performing said detection process,
(1) computing likelihood functions for all possible transitions into each state of the convolutional code by using a first and a second sample of the received signal, which includes elements of the interfering first and second digital information signals, and the most recently computed most probable likelihood function for each possible state of the convolutional code to generate signals representative of the computed likelihood function,
(2) comparing the signals representative of the computed likelihood functions associated with each of said states as generated in step (1) for determining the most probable transition into each state; and
(3) in response to the signal generated in step (2), concurrently storing (a) the value of said signal for subsequent use in reiteration of the step of performing the detection process and (b) the most likely data sequence into each state over a predetermined length for any desired combination of the interfering first received digital information signal and the decoded second received digital information signal for producing an output stream of digital data corresponding to the most likely estimate of the desired digital signal.
5. A communication system for carrying out the process of Claim 1 characterized in that the receiver is disposed in the path of a first uncoded digital information signal (14a) modulated to a predetermined frequency spectrum and a second digital information signal (12) having a different informational content and a lower capacity than said first digital information, said second signal being encoded with a forward error correcting code and modulated to the predetermined frequency spectrum, said receiver comprising a detector (Fig. 5) capable of generating from the combined received signal of the interfering uncoded first digital information signal and coded second digital information signal the most likely digits representative of the desired first digital information signal and decoded second digital information signal.
6. The system according to Claim 5 characterized in that said forward error correcting code is a convolutional code having a predetermined plurality of possible states and an arbitrary code rate; and said detector is a joint maximum-likelihood detector comprising
first means (44a, 44b) capable of computing likelihood functions for all possible transitions into each of the plurality of possible states of the convolutional code in combination with all possible values of the interfering uncoded first digital information signal, said first means using both selective values of sequential first and second samples (40) of the received waveform, which comprise elements of both the uncoded first and coded second digital information signals, and signals (MII-MI4) representative of the most recently computed most probable states if the convolutional code and the associated most likely possible value for the received first digital information signal for computing the likelihood functions;
second means (45) connected to the output of said first means for comparing the signals representative of the likelihood functions associated with each state of the convolutional code and the associated possible values for the uncoded interfering first digital information signal and generating an output signal indicating the most probable transition into each state of said plurality of possible states and the most probable value for the first digital information signal;
third means (42a-42d) coupled between said second and first means capable of temporarily storing the most recently computed voltage signal generated by said first means representative of the most probable likelihood function for each state and associated most probable value of the first digital information signal for subsequent use by said first means for computing the likelihood functions for each possible transition during the next time interval; and
fourth means (50a-50d; 51 a-51 d; 52a-52d) responsive to the output of said second means for storing any combination of the most likely data sequence into each state of the convolutional code (50a-50d) and the most likely data sequence for each state for the first digital information signal over a predetermined length and for producing at an output terminal thereof a stream of data corresponding to the data for the desired uncoded first digital information signal (51 a-51 d1 and decoded second digital information signal (52a-52d).
EP78100063A 1977-06-03 1978-06-01 A data transmission process and system to permit substantial reduction of interference between a received first and second digital signal Expired EP0000039B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US803152 1977-06-03
US05/803,152 US4178550A (en) 1977-06-03 1977-06-03 Method and apparatus to permit substantial cancellation of interference between a received first and second signal

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0000039A1 EP0000039A1 (en) 1978-12-20
EP0000039B1 true EP0000039B1 (en) 1982-07-07

Family

ID=25185704

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP78100063A Expired EP0000039B1 (en) 1977-06-03 1978-06-01 A data transmission process and system to permit substantial reduction of interference between a received first and second digital signal

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (1) US4178550A (en)
EP (1) EP0000039B1 (en)
JP (1) JPS542614A (en)
AU (1) AU520073B2 (en)
CA (1) CA1102880A (en)
DE (1) DE2861935D1 (en)

Families Citing this family (21)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4346473A (en) * 1980-02-26 1982-08-24 Harris Corporation Error correction coding method and apparatus for multilevel signaling
GB2088676B (en) * 1980-11-14 1985-09-04 Plessey Co Ltd Transmission systems
JPS6077528A (en) * 1983-10-05 1985-05-02 Hitachi Ltd Decoder for convolutional code
JPS60134630A (en) * 1983-12-23 1985-07-17 Japan Radio Co Ltd Error correction method in data transmission
JPS60180222A (en) * 1984-02-27 1985-09-14 Nec Corp Code error correcting device
JPS60183822A (en) * 1984-03-02 1985-09-19 Nippon Telegr & Teleph Corp <Ntt> Maximum likelihood correction circuit
US4727504A (en) * 1984-07-05 1988-02-23 The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. Interference canceller and signal quantizer
GB8507903D0 (en) * 1985-03-26 1985-05-01 Tomlinson M Noise-reduction signal processing arrangement
ATE50429T1 (en) * 1985-06-14 1990-02-15 Philips Nv SYSTEM FOR TRANSMITTING WORDS SECURE BY COMBINATION OF A BLOCK CODE AND A RECURRENT CODE, TRANSMITTER DEVICE FOR USE IN SUCH SYSTEM, AND RECEIVER DEVICE FOR USE IN SUCH SYSTEM.
DE3644176A1 (en) * 1986-12-23 1988-07-14 Messerschmitt Boelkow Blohm METHOD FOR TRANSMITTING DATA BY MEANS OF A GEOSTATIONAL SATELLITE AND AT LEAST A SUBSATELLITE
US4884272A (en) * 1988-02-10 1989-11-28 Mcconnell Peter R H Maximum likelihood diversity receiver
US6011952A (en) * 1998-01-20 2000-01-04 Viasat, Inc. Self-interference cancellation for relayed communication networks
US6707916B1 (en) 1999-03-16 2004-03-16 Northrop Grumman Corporation Mitigation of false co-channel uplink reception in a processing satellite communication system using scrambling sequences
US6600921B1 (en) * 2000-02-16 2003-07-29 Hughes Electronics Corporation Dual coverage grid method
WO2001084176A1 (en) * 2000-05-03 2001-11-08 Magellan Corporation Low signal-to-noise ratio positioning system
US6788251B2 (en) 2000-05-03 2004-09-07 Thales Navigation, Inc. Method and apparatus for interference reduction in a positioning system
US6859641B2 (en) * 2001-06-21 2005-02-22 Applied Signal Technology, Inc. Adaptive canceller for frequency reuse systems
US6907093B2 (en) * 2001-08-08 2005-06-14 Viasat, Inc. Method and apparatus for relayed communication using band-pass signals for self-interference cancellation
US6725017B2 (en) 2001-12-05 2004-04-20 Viasat, Inc. Multi-channel self-interference cancellation method and apparatus for relayed communication
WO2006099443A1 (en) * 2005-03-15 2006-09-21 Atc Technologies, Llc Intra-system and/or inter-system reuse of feeder link frequencies including interference suppression systems and methods
EP2134016A1 (en) * 2007-03-30 2009-12-16 Panasonic Corporation Radio communication system, radio communication device, and radio communication method

Family Cites Families (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2520184A (en) * 1941-11-08 1950-08-29 Int Standard Electric Corp Electrical wave signaling system
US3094695A (en) * 1960-03-23 1963-06-18 Sperry Rand Corp Antenna side lobe suppression system
US3369235A (en) * 1966-02-08 1968-02-13 Gorham Corp Directionally selective energy receiving system
US3710255A (en) * 1969-03-21 1973-01-09 Raytheon Co Satellite communication system
US3815028A (en) * 1972-08-09 1974-06-04 Itt Maximum-likelihood detection system
US3789360A (en) * 1972-10-13 1974-01-29 Harris Intertype Corp Convolutional decoder
US3987444A (en) * 1974-08-12 1976-10-19 Hazeltine Corporation Interference rejection system for multi-beam antenna having single control loop
US4063038A (en) * 1975-11-24 1977-12-13 Digital Communications Corporation Error coding communication terminal interface

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPS542614A (en) 1979-01-10
DE2861935D1 (en) 1982-08-26
CA1102880A (en) 1981-06-09
US4178550A (en) 1979-12-11
AU3669478A (en) 1979-12-06
AU520073B2 (en) 1982-01-14
EP0000039A1 (en) 1978-12-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0000039B1 (en) A data transmission process and system to permit substantial reduction of interference between a received first and second digital signal
RU2191471C2 (en) Satellite communication system using encoding with parallel integration
CA2229453C (en) Data transmitting method, data transmitting system transmitter, and receiver
US5432822A (en) Error correcting decoder and decoding method employing reliability based erasure decision-making in cellular communication system
US4491943A (en) Method for transmitting time-sharing multidata
US5636242A (en) Diversity transmitter/receiver
US5235621A (en) Receiver systems
US6198719B1 (en) Bi-orthogonal code division multiple access system
US6711710B2 (en) Robust carrier identifying method and apparatus for bandwidth-on-demand (BOD) system
US4271524A (en) Spread spectrum FH-MFSK receiver
JP2001504646A (en) How to generate side information when time selective fading is present
US6556617B1 (en) Spread spectrum diversity transmitter/receiver
KR20110031148A (en) Method for transmitting a digital signal between at least two transmitters and at least one receiver, using at least one relay, and corresponding program product and relay device
CA2300657C (en) Mitigation of false co-channel uplink reception in a processing satellite communication system using stagger
EP3695534A1 (en) Signal overlay design and detection for satellite communication channels
US6683914B1 (en) Method for convolutive encoding and transmission by packets of a digital data series flow, and corresponding decoding method device
EP0909038B1 (en) Decoding of convolutional code with floating point ACS processing
JP2693488B2 (en) Diversity reception method
JP2966695B2 (en) Receiving machine
Clark et al. Two recent applications of error-correction coding to communications systems design
JPH11177641A (en) Control information assignment method, control method, transmission method, reception method and transmitter and receiver
WO1993012598A1 (en) Combination of two signals, the second appearing as a noise for the first one
AU1134299A (en) Matched filter simultaneously operating for two different type codes
US10419034B2 (en) Satellite communication system architecture for enhanced partial processing
JP2765037B2 (en) Antenna diversity receiver

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): BE DE FR GB NL SE

Designated state(s): BE DE FR GB NL SE

17P Request for examination filed
GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): BE DE FR GB NL SE

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 2861935

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19820826

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 19831231

Year of fee payment: 7

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 19840430

Year of fee payment: 7

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 19840503

Year of fee payment: 7

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 19840630

Year of fee payment: 7

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Effective date: 19850602

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 19850630

Year of fee payment: 8

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Effective date: 19860630

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: WESTERN ELECTRIC CY INC.

Effective date: 19860630

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Effective date: 19870101

NLV4 Nl: lapsed or anulled due to non-payment of the annual fee
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19870227

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Effective date: 19870303

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Effective date: 19881117

EUG Se: european patent has lapsed

Ref document number: 78100063.3

Effective date: 19860728

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT