EP0000039B1 - A data transmission process and system to permit substantial reduction of interference between a received first and second digital signal - Google Patents
A data transmission process and system to permit substantial reduction of interference between a received first and second digital signal Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP0000039B1 EP0000039B1 EP78100063A EP78100063A EP0000039B1 EP 0000039 B1 EP0000039 B1 EP 0000039B1 EP 78100063 A EP78100063 A EP 78100063A EP 78100063 A EP78100063 A EP 78100063A EP 0000039 B1 EP0000039 B1 EP 0000039B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- digital information
- information signal
- signal
- received
- uncoded
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L1/00—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
- H04L1/004—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received by using forward error control
- H04L1/0056—Systems characterized by the type of code used
- H04L1/0059—Convolutional codes
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01Q—ANTENNAS, i.e. RADIO AERIALS
- H01Q25/00—Antennas or antenna systems providing at least two radiating patterns
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04B—TRANSMISSION
- H04B7/00—Radio transmission systems, i.e. using radiation field
- H04B7/14—Relay systems
- H04B7/15—Active relay systems
- H04B7/204—Multiple access
- H04B7/2041—Spot beam multiple access
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a data transmission process and system for effecting separation and substantial reduction of interference at a receiver between a first and a second received digital signal which use the same frequency spectrum and are received from the same general direction.
- spot and area coverage beams can be desirable.
- a separate spot coverage beam can be used for communication between the saltellite and each high traffic ground station while an area coverage beam can be used for communication between the satellite and a plurality of low traffic ground stations under conditions where it might not be desirable to interconnect the individual low traffic ground stations to a nearest high traffic ground station for access to the satellite system.
- typical prior art techniques would be to use two satellites a few degrees apart in orbit, or, multiple spot beams at thd satellite on both up and down paths, or, separate bandwidths or polarizations, is possible, for the spot coverage beams and the area coverage beam.
- An alternative technique to enable reception of only one signal of a plurality of signals concurrently received from a plurality of transmitters at an FM receiver would be to modulate the carrier of each transmitter with a separate frequency to provide a unique address that is assigned to an associated receiver as disclosed, for example, in U.S. Reissue Patent Re. 27,478. Such arrangement may be applicable to FM communication systems but does not appear applicable to a digital communication system.
- the problem remaining in the prior art is to provide an improved technique which permits two digital signals using the same frequency spectrum and general transmission direction to be simultaneously transmitted on one radio channel or overlapping spot and area coverage beams with the ability for the signals to be separated at a receiving station intercepting both signals.
- a communication system for carrying out the process is characterized in that the receiver is disposed in the path of a first uncoded digital information signal modulated to a predetermined frequency spectrum and a second digital information signal having a different informational content and a lower capacity than said first digital information, said second signal being encoded with a forward error correcting code and modulated to the predetermined frequency spectrum, said receiver comprising a detector capable of generating from the combined received signal of the interfering uncoded first digital information signal and coded second digital information signal the most likely digits representative of the desired first digital information signal and decoded second digital information signal.
- uncoded digital information signal means that a stream of bits from a digital source is transmitted on a channel using some suitable modulation without being further processed.
- the present invention has been and will be described primarily in relationship to a satellite communication system to enable the concurrent use of an area coverage satellite radiated beam and a plurality of spot coverage satellite radiated beams where all of the beams use the same frequency spectrum and the spot coverage beams are received within the area encompassed by the area coverage beam.
- a satellite communication system to enable the concurrent use of an area coverage satellite radiated beam and a plurality of spot coverage satellite radiated beams where all of the beams use the same frequency spectrum and the spot coverage beams are received within the area encompassed by the area coverage beam.
- inventive concept described can be equally applicable to other radiated wave transmission systems which comprise two or more beams which have different destinations but interfere with each other at one or more of the destinations.
- the present invention can be used to increase the capacity of a radio channel by 50 percent by simultaneously transmitting an uncoded first digital signal and a coded second digital signal with reduced capacity on each radio channel according to the concept to be described hereinafter for the individual area and spot coverage beams.
- a satellite communication system wherein the present invention is especially useful to permit the concurrent transmission from a satellite 10 of both an area coverage beam 12 and a plurality of spot coverage beams of which, for example, three beams 14a, 14b and 14c are shown with all beams being able to use the same frqeuency spectrum.
- Spot coverage beams 14a, 14b and 14c are shown radiating from antennae 15a, 15b, and 15c, respectively, and directed at respective ground areas 16a, 16b and 16c which include, for example, high traffic ground stations 17a, 17b and 17c, respectively.
- Area coverage beam 12 is shown radiating from an antenna 13 and directed at a ground area 18 which includes both the ground areas 16a, 16b and 16c and a plurality of low traffic ground stations of which, for example, four stations 19a-19d are shown.
- each of the high traffic ground stations 17a-17c communicates with satellite 10 via a separate spot beam 14a-14c, respectively, while the low traffic ground stations 19a-19d communicate with satellite 10 via area coverage beam 12 using any suitable technique to assure that a particular message will be processed by only the appropriate one of stations 19a-19d.
- Such arrangement permits low traffic ground stations 19a-19d to communicate with satellite 10 under conditions where it is not advantageous to connect a low traffic ground station 19 to a nearby one of high traffic ground stations 17a-17c.
- each of ground stations 17a-17c will receive both the associated one of spot coverage beams 14a-14c and area coverage beam 12 since these beams emmanate from approximately the same point.
- prior art arrangements such as, for example, side lobe suppression arrangements to select a wave received from a particular direction over waves received from other directions is not feasible.
- the concurrent transmission of area coverage beam 12 and a plurality of spot coverage beams 14a-14c which use the same frequency spectrum without interference can be effected in accordance with the present invention by the typical arrangement shown in Fig. 2.
- a separate source of data 20a-20c generates a digital signals destined to be transmitted via spot coverage beams 14a-14c, respectively.
- the digital data signals generated by each of data sources 20a-20c are modulated to the desired frequency spectrum for transmission in separate modulators 21 a-21 c, respectively.
- the outputs from modulators 21 a-21 c are amplified in power amplifiers 22a-22c, respectively, prior to being applied to the respective antennae 15a-15c for transmission via spot coverage beams 14a-14c, respectively.
- the digital signals to be transmitted via area coverage beam 12 are similarly generated by a data source 20d but at a reduced data rate which is, for example, approximately one-half the rate of sources 20a-20c.
- These latter signals are, however, first encoded in channel encoder 23 using a forward error correcting code such as, for example, a block or convolutional code prior to being sequentially modulated in modulator 21 d, amplified by power amplifier 22d and transmitted by antenna 13 in area coverage beam 12.
- a forward error correcting code such as, for example, a block or convolutional code prior to being sequentially modulated in modulator 21 d, amplified by power amplifier 22d and transmitted by antenna 13 in area coverage beam 12.
- a forward error correcting code such as, for example, a block or convolutional code prior to being sequentially modulated in modulator 21 d
- power amplifier 22d amplified by power amplifier 22d and transmitted by antenna 13 in area coverage beam 12.
- data sources 20a-20d, modulators 21 a-21 and power amplifiers 22a-22d can comprise any suitable means capable of providing the function described hereinabove.
- channel encoder 23 can comprise any suitable means for encoding the digital data signals supplied by data source 20d into a forward error correcting code.
- the code used is a convolutional code
- an encoder of any desired constraint length and code rate may be used.
- digital data signals for the area coverage beam are generated in data source 20d at the rate of one bit every T seconds for transmission over line 24 to encoder 23.
- the received data signals are shifted into a three-bit shift register 25, or any other suitable means, at the rate of one bit every T seconds.
- a first modulo-2 adder 26 operates on the information stored in all three bits in register 25 to produce a resultant first binary bit on transmission line 27 while, simultaneously, a second modulo-2 adder 28 operates on the first and third bits in register 25 to produce a resultant second binary bit on transmission line 29.
- a commutator 30 first selects the signal on first transmission line 27 and then the signal on second transmission line 29 and thereby transmits two binary digits over line 31 to modulator 21 d for each data bit shifted into register 25. Therefore, for each data bit from data source 20d the encoder 23 generates two data bits at its output and the encoded data is then modulated and amplified prior to transmission via area coverage beam 12 to the ground stations disposed within ground area 18.
- data sources 20a-20c generates two bits of data every T seconds for transmission via spot coverage beams 14a-14c, respectively, while data source 20d, generating one data bit every T seconds, in combination with encoder 23, which provides redundancy and generates two data bits for every data bit from source 20d, also generates two bits of data every T seconds for transmission via area coverage beam 12. Therefore, the data rate of all antenna radiated beams is the same with area coverage beam 12 having a lower capacity than each of spot coverage beams 14a-14c.
- Separation of interfering uncoded spot beam and coded area beam signals is achieved in accordance with the present invention by providing a suitable detector at each of spot beam ground stations 17a-17c and area beam ground stations 1 9a-1 9d.
- the receiver performs a suitable detection of the spot beam signal received by that ground station plus the received area beam signal, as will be described hereinafter. After the signals are separated the information content of the interfering area beam is discarded.
- a suitable detection of the desired area beam signal plus the unwanted interfering spot beam signal is again performed and the information content of the interfering spot beam signal is discarded after separation.
- a suitable detection process can comprise any process which will enable the separation of the two digital signals and the decoding of the forward error correcting coded signal. For example, where the two digital signals have different signal strengths at the receiver, separation may be achieved using a threshold detecting process. Alternatively, where the two received digital signals have approximately the same signal strength, a maximum-likelihood detection process may be performed. The type of detection process employed, however, will depend primarily on the amount of signal degradation which can be tolerated since each of the known detection processes would produce a certain amount of degradation in separating and decoding the two signals described hereinbefore.
- the preferred method of separating and decoding a simultaneously received uncoded first digital signal and a forward error correcting encoded second digital signal with minimal degradation is accomplished using the technique of joint maximum-likelihood detection as will be described hereinafter.
- Convolutional decoders and maximum-likelihood detection systems are well known in the art.
- data is not decoded as soon as it is received from the channel. Instead, a sequence of data, having a -predetermined decoding depth, following the digit to be decoded is first collected. Then, by computing what are known as path metrics, a limited number of possible messages are selected, each extending throughout the decoding depth far beyond the digit presently to be decoded, with one such survivor sequence ending in each of the data states.
- a correlation between each survivor sequence and the data actually received is computed for the entire decoding depth under consideration.
- the highest correlated of the survivor sequences is then selected to be the sole survivor sequence.
- the earliest received digit or digits within the decoding depth is then permanently decoded under the temporary assumption that the sole survivor sequence is the correct sequence.
- decoding is accomplished by forming the log-likelihood function which hereinafter will be referred to as the path metric. Two samples are taken every T seconds and the path metric is formed for each possible source sequence, and that sequence for which the metric is largest is selected as the best estimate to the true transmitted sequence.
- metric calculations are an application of dynamic programming techniques and that maximum-likelihood decoding can be performed without actually finding the path metric for each sequence.
- the procedure for decoding the convolutionally encoded area beam signal is illustrated by the State diagram of Fig. 4.
- the State is defined as the contents of the first two stages of shift register 25, which changes at a T-second rate.
- this State can be reached from either of States 00 or 01, both transitions corresponding to a data bit 0 having entered the coder.
- the input signal to the maximum-likelihood detector comprises two coded area beam channel symbols and two uncoded spot beam channel symbols every T seconds which interfere with each other. Therefore, in the State diagram of Fig. 4, four most- likely paths actually exist for each of the single paths shown for the transitions between States. More particularly, as shown for the transition from State 00 to State 00, the first two symbols for each of the four paths denote the source coding for this particular transition, which is common to each of the possible paths, while the last two symbols denote the four possible data symbols which may exist for the first and second spot beam symbols received during each T seconds. It is to be understood that each of the other transitions between States similarly comprises four possible paths with corresponding symbols to denote the possible received symbols.
- the arrangement of Fig. 5 is exemplary only and is for purposes of exposition and not for purposes of limitation.
- inventive concepts described are equally applicable to decode an interfering uncoded first beam and convolutionally coded second beam having different constraint lengths and rates or nonbinary or multilevel alphabets, transmissions, and the like, after the appropriate modification is made as will be easily determined by one skilled in the art once the constraint length and rate is known.
- the present joint maximum-likelihood detector is segmented into four States, each State corresponding to a different one of the possible combinations of one's and zero's in the first two stages of register 25 in encoder 23.
- a separate sample of the received waveform at each ground station is taken every T/2 seconds, and every T seconds the two samples which may be in digital or analog form, are made available at input 40 of the present detector, each sample comprising elements of the interfering area beam and spot beam signals.
- the detector recursively computes in processors 41 a-41 d the path metric of the most likely path, of the eight paths, leading to each State. This computation is in the form: where
- the detector computes the eight path metrics, finds the largest one of the eight path metrics, saves the largest path metric, and stores the path corresponding to the largest metric. This process will now be described in greater detail for processing the path metrics for State 00, and it is understood that a corresponding process is concurrently performed for processing the path metrics for the other States 01, 10 and 11.
- the largest path metric for States 00, 01, 10 and 11 computed in the previous T second cycle is stored in storage devices 42a-42d, respectively, and have the respective designations M l -M 4 .
- the outputs from storage devices 42a-42d are normalized in normalization means 43 by, for example, arbitrarily setting one of the four old metrics, M l -M 4 , equal to zero after first having effectively subtracted its value from the remaining three metrics.
- These normalized old path metrics are designated M n1 -M n4 . This step prevents the successive path metrics from growing linearly with time.
- the old path metric M n2 associated with State 01 is used together with the appropriate value of the two samples available at input 40 in correlator 44b to compute the path metrics for each of the four possible paths between State 01 at time to and State 00 at to,e t o +T. These four path metrics are indicated by the symbols M" 11 -M" 14 at the output of correlator 44b.
- the eight path metrics computed in correlators 44a and 44b are compared in comparator 45 and the largest one of the eight metrics is determined.
- the comparator 45 is strobed by a system clock 46 via a signal on lead 47 to provide the result of comparison at the appropriate sampling instance once every T seconds.
- the value of the largest path metric for State 00 is transmitted from comparator 45 to storage means 42a via lead 48 where it is stored for use during the next processing cycle T.
- the one of eight paths leading into a State having the largest value also indicates the most likely digital value for both the decoded area beam signal and the two sequential uncoded spot beam signals generated during a prescribed T second period by the associated data sources 20 at the satellite 10. For example, if comparator 45 determined that the largest path metric corresponded to the uppermost path between State 00 and State 00 in Fig.
- the most likely value for the bit generated by data source 20d at satellite 10 during the corresponding T second interval would be a zero while the most likely value for the first and second sequential bits received via the interfering spot beam 14 during that same T second interval would be a 0, 0, respectively.
- Fig. 5 the decoded binary value of the most likely bit received via interfering area beam 12 for State 00 is shown as being stored in a shift register 50a or other suitable means, while the binary values for the most likely first and second sequential bits for State 00 received via interfering spot beam 14 are stored in shift registers 51 a and 52a, respectively, or any other suitable means.
- the outputs from comparators 45 in processors 41 b-41 similarly load registers 50b-50d, 51 b-51 d and 52b-52d for the most likely binary value for each decoded area beam bit and the first and second sequentially received spot beam bits, respectively, for the respective States 01, 10 and 11.
- Each of shift registers 50a-50d, 51 a-51 and 52a-52d have a path memory length which preferably is about 4-5 equivalent constraint lengths, implying that, with high probability, all surviving paths have a common prefix.
- the final state of any one of registers 50a-50d may be selected as the decoded most likely information digits for the received interfering area beam signal.
- the final stage of any one of registers 51 a-51 d and 52a-52d may be selected as the most likely information digits for the first and second sequential digits, respectively, received via the interfering spot beam signal.
- each group of registers 50a-50d, 51 a-51 d and registers 52a-52d can be used as a separate input to a separate well-known majority logic gate associated with a particular group of registers which functions to choose the output value indicated by the majority of the final stages of the associated group, and in the event of a tie to output a 0 or a 1.
- a second alternative would be to select the final stage of the register within each group of registers indicating maximum likelihood.
- the ground station performing the described joint maximum-likelihood detection process is, for example, a spot beam ground receiving station
- the ground station performing the described joint maximum-likelihood detection process is, for example, a spot beam ground receiving station
- registers 50a-50d for storing the decoded most likely area beam digits can be eliminated.
- registers 50a-50d need be supplied.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Error Detection And Correction (AREA)
- Radio Relay Systems (AREA)
Description
- The present invention relates to a data transmission process and system for effecting separation and substantial reduction of interference at a receiver between a first and a second received digital signal which use the same frequency spectrum and are received from the same general direction.
- In a domestic satellite communication system the coexistence of spot and area coverage beams can be desirable. For example, a separate spot coverage beam can be used for communication between the saltellite and each high traffic ground station while an area coverage beam can be used for communication between the satellite and a plurality of low traffic ground stations under conditions where it might not be desirable to interconnect the individual low traffic ground stations to a nearest high traffic ground station for access to the satellite system. To avoid signal degradation and permit separation of the overlapping spot coverage and area coverage beams especially at each spot coverage receiving station, typical prior art techniques would be to use two satellites a few degrees apart in orbit, or, multiple spot beams at thd satellite on both up and down paths, or, separate bandwidths or polarizations, is possible, for the spot coverage beams and the area coverage beam. See for example, Colloque Internation L'Espace et la Communication, Chiron, 1971, Paris; Kabisch et al, "Study of a possible regional telecommunication satellite system for Europe" at pages 279 to 292. Using separate bandwidths, however, results in inefficient use of the frequency spectrum and different polarizations may not be available where dual polarization beams are already used.
- Various techniques have been devised to suppress interference between two beams arriving at a receiver from separate directions. In this regard see, for instance, U.S. Patents 2,520,184; 3,094,695; 3,369,235; and 3,987,444. Since the area and spot coverage beams transmitted from a satellite arrive at each spot beam ground station from the same direction, techniques for separating signals from different directions are not usable.
- An alternative technique to enable reception of only one signal of a plurality of signals concurrently received from a plurality of transmitters at an FM receiver would be to modulate the carrier of each transmitter with a separate frequency to provide a unique address that is assigned to an associated receiver as disclosed, for example, in U.S. Reissue Patent Re. 27,478. Such arrangement may be applicable to FM communication systems but does not appear applicable to a digital communication system.
- The problem remaining in the prior art is to provide an improved technique which permits two digital signals using the same frequency spectrum and general transmission direction to be simultaneously transmitted on one radio channel or overlapping spot and area coverage beams with the ability for the signals to be separated at a receiving station intercepting both signals.
- The foregoing problem is solved, according to the invention, by the process characterized in claim 1.
- A communication system for carrying out the process is characterized in that the receiver is disposed in the path of a first uncoded digital information signal modulated to a predetermined frequency spectrum and a second digital information signal having a different informational content and a lower capacity than said first digital information, said second signal being encoded with a forward error correcting code and modulated to the predetermined frequency spectrum, said receiver comprising a detector capable of generating from the combined received signal of the interfering uncoded first digital information signal and coded second digital information signal the most likely digits representative of the desired first digital information signal and decoded second digital information signal.
- The term "uncoded digital information signal" as used in the application means that a stream of bits from a digital source is transmitted on a channel using some suitable modulation without being further processed.
- The present invention has been and will be described primarily in relationship to a satellite communication system to enable the concurrent use of an area coverage satellite radiated beam and a plurality of spot coverage satellite radiated beams where all of the beams use the same frequency spectrum and the spot coverage beams are received within the area encompassed by the area coverage beam. However, it will be understood that such description is exemplary only and is for the purpose of exposition and not for purposes of limitation. It will be readily appreciated that the inventive concept described can be equally applicable to other radiated wave transmission systems which comprise two or more beams which have different destinations but interfere with each other at one or more of the destinations. Alternatively, the present invention can be used to increase the capacity of a radio channel by 50 percent by simultaneously transmitting an uncoded first digital signal and a coded second digital signal with reduced capacity on each radio channel according to the concept to be described hereinafter for the individual area and spot coverage beams.
- In the drawings, in which like numerals represent like parts in the several views:
- Fig. 1 diagrammatically illustrates a satellite communication system for providing both an area coverage beam and a plurality of spot coverage beams between the satellite and associated ground receiver stations;
- Fig. 2 illustrates an arrangement according to the present invention to effect interference cancellation between the area coverage beam and each of the spot coverage beams at each of the receiver stations;
- Fig. 3 depicts a typical prior art encoder for generating a constraint length=3, rate=1/2 binary convolutional code from an input stream of data;
- Fig. 4 is a decoding diagram illustrating the allowable State transitions and channel symbols for both the convolutionally encoded area coverage beam signal and one interfering uncoded spot coverage beam signal of Fig. 2;
- Fig. 5 is a block diagram of an arrangement for implementing the joint maximum-likelihood detector at a receiving station in accordance with the present invention.
- In Fig. 1, a satellite communication system is illustrated wherein the present invention is especially useful to permit the concurrent transmission from a
satellite 10 of both anarea coverage beam 12 and a plurality of spot coverage beams of which, for example, threebeams Spot coverage beams antennae respective ground areas traffic ground stations 17a, 17b and 17c, respectively.Area coverage beam 12 is shown radiating from anantenna 13 and directed at aground area 18 which includes both theground areas stations 19a-19d are shown. In the satellite communication system of Fig. 1, each of the high traffic ground stations 17a-17c communicates withsatellite 10 via a separate spot beam 14a-14c, respectively, while the lowtraffic ground stations 19a-19d communicate withsatellite 10 viaarea coverage beam 12 using any suitable technique to assure that a particular message will be processed by only the appropriate one ofstations 19a-19d. Such arrangement permits lowtraffic ground stations 19a-19d to communicate withsatellite 10 under conditions where it is not advantageous to connect a low traffic ground station 19 to a nearby one of high traffic ground stations 17a-17c. - It can be seen from Fig. 1 that when
area coverage beam 12 and spot coverage beams 14a-14c are transmitted concurrently and use the same frequency spectrum, each of ground stations 17a-17c will receive both the associated one of spot coverage beams 14a-14c andarea coverage beam 12 since these beams emmanate from approximately the same point. Under such conditions the use of prior art arrangements such as, for example, side lobe suppression arrangements to select a wave received from a particular direction over waves received from other directions is not feasible. - The concurrent transmission of
area coverage beam 12 and a plurality of spot coverage beams 14a-14c which use the same frequency spectrum without interference can be effected in accordance with the present invention by the typical arrangement shown in Fig. 2. There, a separate source of data 20a-20c generates a digital signals destined to be transmitted via spot coverage beams 14a-14c, respectively. The digital data signals generated by each of data sources 20a-20c are modulated to the desired frequency spectrum for transmission in separate modulators 21 a-21 c, respectively. The outputs from modulators 21 a-21 c are amplified in power amplifiers 22a-22c, respectively, prior to being applied to therespective antennae 15a-15c for transmission via spot coverage beams 14a-14c, respectively. The digital signals to be transmitted viaarea coverage beam 12 are similarly generated by adata source 20d but at a reduced data rate which is, for example, approximately one-half the rate of sources 20a-20c. These latter signals are, however, first encoded inchannel encoder 23 using a forward error correcting code such as, for example, a block or convolutional code prior to being sequentially modulated in modulator 21 d, amplified bypower amplifier 22d and transmitted byantenna 13 inarea coverage beam 12. In this manner an area coverage beam of lower capacity is provided, and redundancy is added using coding at the transmitter such that the transmittedarea coverage beam 12 occupies the entire spectral band used by the spot coverage beams 14a-14c. Coding provides the advantages of (1) reducing the area coverage beam transmitter power required to achieve some given bit error rate which is highly desirable for satellite communication, and (2) reduces the mutual interference between the area and spot beam signals. - It is to be understood that data sources 20a-20d, modulators 21 a-21 and power amplifiers 22a-22d can comprise any suitable means capable of providing the function described hereinabove. Similarly
channel encoder 23 can comprise any suitable means for encoding the digital data signals supplied bydata source 20d into a forward error correcting code. For example, where the code used is a convolutional code, an encoder of any desired constraint length and code rate may be used. - A typical prior art arrangement for
encoder 23 to produce a convolutionally encoded area coverage signal having a simple constraint length K=3, rate=1/2 binary convolutional code is illustrated in Fig. 3. It is to be understood that such description is exemplary only and is for purposes of exposition and not for purposes of limitation. It will be readily appreciated that other constraint lengths and rates or codes and their implementations are equally applicable to permit channel separation at the receivers. In Fig. 3, digital data signals for the area coverage beam are generated indata source 20d at the rate of one bit every T seconds for transmission overline 24 toencoder 23. Atencoder 23 the received data signals are shifted into a three-bit shift register 25, or any other suitable means, at the rate of one bit every T seconds. A first modulo-2adder 26 operates on the information stored in all three bits inregister 25 to produce a resultant first binary bit ontransmission line 27 while, simultaneously, a second modulo-2adder 28 operates on the first and third bits inregister 25 to produce a resultant second binary bit ontransmission line 29. During each T second, acommutator 30 first selects the signal onfirst transmission line 27 and then the signal onsecond transmission line 29 and thereby transmits two binary digits over line 31 to modulator 21 d for each data bit shifted intoregister 25. Therefore, for each data bit fromdata source 20d theencoder 23 generates two data bits at its output and the encoded data is then modulated and amplified prior to transmission viaarea coverage beam 12 to the ground stations disposed withinground area 18. - In the present arrangement, data sources 20a-20c generates two bits of data every T seconds for transmission via spot coverage beams 14a-14c, respectively, while
data source 20d, generating one data bit every T seconds, in combination withencoder 23, which provides redundancy and generates two data bits for every data bit fromsource 20d, also generates two bits of data every T seconds for transmission viaarea coverage beam 12. Therefore, the data rate of all antenna radiated beams is the same witharea coverage beam 12 having a lower capacity than each of spot coverage beams 14a-14c. - Separation of interfering uncoded spot beam and coded area beam signals is achieved in accordance with the present invention by providing a suitable detector at each of spot beam ground stations 17a-17c and area beam ground stations 1 9a-1 9d. At each spot beam ground station 1 7a-1 7c, the receiver performs a suitable detection of the spot beam signal received by that ground station plus the received area beam signal, as will be described hereinafter. After the signals are separated the information content of the interfering area beam is discarded. At each area
beam ground station 19a-19d which experiences interference from a spot beam signal, a suitable detection of the desired area beam signal plus the unwanted interfering spot beam signal is again performed and the information content of the interfering spot beam signal is discarded after separation. - It is to be understood that a suitable detection process can comprise any process which will enable the separation of the two digital signals and the decoding of the forward error correcting coded signal. For example, where the two digital signals have different signal strengths at the receiver, separation may be achieved using a threshold detecting process. Alternatively, where the two received digital signals have approximately the same signal strength, a maximum-likelihood detection process may be performed. The type of detection process employed, however, will depend primarily on the amount of signal degradation which can be tolerated since each of the known detection processes would produce a certain amount of degradation in separating and decoding the two signals described hereinbefore.
- Although the above detection methods can be used the preferred method of separating and decoding a simultaneously received uncoded first digital signal and a forward error correcting encoded second digital signal with minimal degradation is accomplished using the technique of joint maximum-likelihood detection as will be described hereinafter.
- Convolutional decoders and maximum-likelihood detection systems are well known in the art. In this regard see, for example, U.S. Patents 3,789,360, 3,815,028 and 4,087,787. In the convolutional decoding process described in the above-mentioned references, data is not decoded as soon as it is received from the channel. Instead, a sequence of data, having a -predetermined decoding depth, following the digit to be decoded is first collected. Then, by computing what are known as path metrics, a limited number of possible messages are selected, each extending throughout the decoding depth far beyond the digit presently to be decoded, with one such survivor sequence ending in each of the data states. A correlation between each survivor sequence and the data actually received is computed for the entire decoding depth under consideration. The highest correlated of the survivor sequences is then selected to be the sole survivor sequence. The earliest received digit or digits within the decoding depth is then permanently decoded under the temporary assumption that the sole survivor sequence is the correct sequence.
- More particularly, decoding is accomplished by forming the log-likelihood function which hereinafter will be referred to as the path metric. Two samples are taken every T seconds and the path metric is formed for each possible source sequence, and that sequence for which the metric is largest is selected as the best estimate to the true transmitted sequence.
- As was shown in the prior art references cited hereinbefore, metric calculations are an application of dynamic programming techniques and that maximum-likelihood decoding can be performed without actually finding the path metric for each sequence. The procedure for decoding the convolutionally encoded area beam signal is illustrated by the State diagram of Fig. 4. The State is defined as the contents of the first two stages of
shift register 25, which changes at a T-second rate. When consideringState 00, at time to+T, this State can be reached from either ofStates path leaving State 00 for t>to+T must contain, as a subset, the path with the greatest metric up to that point since future samples cannot affect past metrics. - At each of the spot beam ground stations 17a-17c and each of area beam ground stations 1 9a-1 9d having interference from a spot beam signal, the input signal to the maximum-likelihood detector comprises two coded area beam channel symbols and two uncoded spot beam channel symbols every T seconds which interfere with each other. Therefore, in the State diagram of Fig. 4, four most- likely paths actually exist for each of the single paths shown for the transitions between States. More particularly, as shown for the transition from
State 00 toState 00, the first two symbols for each of the four paths denote the source coding for this particular transition, which is common to each of the possible paths, while the last two symbols denote the four possible data symbols which may exist for the first and second spot beam symbols received during each T seconds. It is to be understood that each of the other transitions between States similarly comprises four possible paths with corresponding symbols to denote the possible received symbols. - Fig. 5 is a block diagram of a typical arrangement for a novel joint maximum-likelihood detector capable of decoding a constraint length=3, rate=1/2 binary convolutional
coded area beam 12 and uncoded spot beam 14 and providing a binary output every T seconds indicating both the two most likely information digits received via the interfering spot beam 14 and generated by the associated data source 20, and the decoded most likely information digit received in coded form via interferingarea beam 12 and generated bydata source 20d. It is to be understood that the arrangement of Fig. 5 is exemplary only and is for purposes of exposition and not for purposes of limitation. It will be readily appreciated that the inventive concepts described are equally applicable to decode an interfering uncoded first beam and convolutionally coded second beam having different constraint lengths and rates or nonbinary or multilevel alphabets, transmissions, and the like, after the appropriate modification is made as will be easily determined by one skilled in the art once the constraint length and rate is known. - As shown in Fig. 5, the present joint maximum-likelihood detector is segmented into four States, each State corresponding to a different one of the possible combinations of one's and zero's in the first two stages of
register 25 inencoder 23. A separate sample of the received waveform at each ground station is taken every T/2 seconds, and every T seconds the two samples which may be in digital or analog form, are made available atinput 40 of the present detector, each sample comprising elements of the interfering area beam and spot beam signals. During each clock cycle T, the detector recursively computes in processors 41 a-41 d the path metric of the most likely path, of the eight paths, leading to each State. This computation is in the form: - As was stated hereinbefore, there are a total of eight paths leading to each of the four States. For each State the detector computes the eight path metrics, finds the largest one of the eight path metrics, saves the largest path metric, and stores the path corresponding to the largest metric. This process will now be described in greater detail for processing the path metrics for
State 00, and it is understood that a corresponding process is concurrently performed for processing the path metrics for theother States - In Fig. 5, the largest path metric for
States - From Fig. 4 it can be seen that the transition into
State 00, at time to+ T, can only be effected fromprior States State 00 is used together with the appropriate value of the two samples available atinput 40 in correlator 44a to compute the path metrics for each for the four possible paths betweenState 00 at time to andState 00 at time to+T in Fig. 4. These four path metrics are indicated by the symbols M"11-M'14 at the output of correlator 44a. Similarly the old path metric Mn2 associated withState 01 is used together with the appropriate value of the two samples available atinput 40 in correlator 44b to compute the path metrics for each of the four possible paths betweenState 01 at time to andState 00 at to,e to+T. These four path metrics are indicated by the symbols M"11-M"14 at the output of correlator 44b. The eight path metrics computed in correlators 44a and 44b are compared incomparator 45 and the largest one of the eight metrics is determined. Thecomparator 45 is strobed by asystem clock 46 via a signal onlead 47 to provide the result of comparison at the appropriate sampling instance once every T seconds. - The value of the largest path metric for
State 00 is transmitted fromcomparator 45 to storage means 42a vialead 48 where it is stored for use during the next processing cycle T. The one of eight paths leading into a State having the largest value also indicates the most likely digital value for both the decoded area beam signal and the two sequential uncoded spot beam signals generated during a prescribed T second period by the associated data sources 20 at thesatellite 10. For example, ifcomparator 45 determined that the largest path metric corresponded to the uppermost path betweenState 00 andState 00 in Fig. 4, then the most likely value for the bit generated bydata source 20d atsatellite 10 during the corresponding T second interval would be a zero while the most likely value for the first and second sequential bits received via the interfering spot beam 14 during that same T second interval would be a 0, 0, respectively. - In Fig. 5, the decoded binary value of the most likely bit received via interfering
area beam 12 forState 00 is shown as being stored in ashift register 50a or other suitable means, while the binary values for the most likely first and second sequential bits forState 00 received via interfering spot beam 14 are stored inshift registers 51 a and 52a, respectively, or any other suitable means. The outputs fromcomparators 45 in processors 41 b-41 similarly loadregisters 50b-50d, 51 b-51 d and 52b-52d for the most likely binary value for each decoded area beam bit and the first and second sequentially received spot beam bits, respectively, for therespective States shift registers 50a-50d, 51 a-51 and 52a-52d have a path memory length which preferably is about 4-5 equivalent constraint lengths, implying that, with high probability, all surviving paths have a common prefix. Thus, the final state of any one ofregisters 50a-50d may be selected as the decoded most likely information digits for the received interfering area beam signal. Similarly the final stage of any one of registers 51 a-51 d and 52a-52d may be selected as the most likely information digits for the first and second sequential digits, respectively, received via the interfering spot beam signal. Alternatively, the last stage of each group ofregisters 50a-50d, 51 a-51 d and registers 52a-52d can be used as a separate input to a separate well-known majority logic gate associated with a particular group of registers which functions to choose the output value indicated by the majority of the final stages of the associated group, and in the event of a tie to output a 0 or a 1. A second alternative would be to select the final stage of the register within each group of registers indicating maximum likelihood. - Where the ground station performing the described joint maximum-likelihood detection process is, for example, a spot beam ground receiving station, only the most likely spot beam digits in registers 51 a-51 d and 52a-52d will be of interest for further processing and, therefore, registers 50a-50d for storing the decoded most likely area beam digits can be eliminated. Similarly at each area beam ground receiving station only registers 50a-50d need be supplied. However, as was stated previously, when the present invention is applied to increasing the capacity of a radio channel by transmitting a first uncoded signal and a second coded signal of lower capacity on the same channel with each signal using the same frequency spectrum, such combined signals will usually be destined for the same receiver and, therefore, registers 50a-50d will be required for generating the decoded most likely second signal digits along with registers 51 a-51 d and 52a-52d for generating the most likely first signal digits at the receiver.
Claims (6)
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US803152 | 1977-06-03 | ||
US05/803,152 US4178550A (en) | 1977-06-03 | 1977-06-03 | Method and apparatus to permit substantial cancellation of interference between a received first and second signal |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP0000039A1 EP0000039A1 (en) | 1978-12-20 |
EP0000039B1 true EP0000039B1 (en) | 1982-07-07 |
Family
ID=25185704
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP78100063A Expired EP0000039B1 (en) | 1977-06-03 | 1978-06-01 | A data transmission process and system to permit substantial reduction of interference between a received first and second digital signal |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US4178550A (en) |
EP (1) | EP0000039B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JPS542614A (en) |
AU (1) | AU520073B2 (en) |
CA (1) | CA1102880A (en) |
DE (1) | DE2861935D1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (21)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4346473A (en) * | 1980-02-26 | 1982-08-24 | Harris Corporation | Error correction coding method and apparatus for multilevel signaling |
GB2088676B (en) * | 1980-11-14 | 1985-09-04 | Plessey Co Ltd | Transmission systems |
JPS6077528A (en) * | 1983-10-05 | 1985-05-02 | Hitachi Ltd | Decoder for convolutional code |
JPS60134630A (en) * | 1983-12-23 | 1985-07-17 | Japan Radio Co Ltd | Error correction method in data transmission |
JPS60180222A (en) * | 1984-02-27 | 1985-09-14 | Nec Corp | Code error correcting device |
JPS60183822A (en) * | 1984-03-02 | 1985-09-19 | Nippon Telegr & Teleph Corp <Ntt> | Maximum likelihood correction circuit |
US4727504A (en) * | 1984-07-05 | 1988-02-23 | The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. | Interference canceller and signal quantizer |
GB8507903D0 (en) * | 1985-03-26 | 1985-05-01 | Tomlinson M | Noise-reduction signal processing arrangement |
ATE50429T1 (en) * | 1985-06-14 | 1990-02-15 | Philips Nv | SYSTEM FOR TRANSMITTING WORDS SECURE BY COMBINATION OF A BLOCK CODE AND A RECURRENT CODE, TRANSMITTER DEVICE FOR USE IN SUCH SYSTEM, AND RECEIVER DEVICE FOR USE IN SUCH SYSTEM. |
DE3644176A1 (en) * | 1986-12-23 | 1988-07-14 | Messerschmitt Boelkow Blohm | METHOD FOR TRANSMITTING DATA BY MEANS OF A GEOSTATIONAL SATELLITE AND AT LEAST A SUBSATELLITE |
US4884272A (en) * | 1988-02-10 | 1989-11-28 | Mcconnell Peter R H | Maximum likelihood diversity receiver |
US6011952A (en) * | 1998-01-20 | 2000-01-04 | Viasat, Inc. | Self-interference cancellation for relayed communication networks |
US6707916B1 (en) | 1999-03-16 | 2004-03-16 | Northrop Grumman Corporation | Mitigation of false co-channel uplink reception in a processing satellite communication system using scrambling sequences |
US6600921B1 (en) * | 2000-02-16 | 2003-07-29 | Hughes Electronics Corporation | Dual coverage grid method |
WO2001084176A1 (en) * | 2000-05-03 | 2001-11-08 | Magellan Corporation | Low signal-to-noise ratio positioning system |
US6788251B2 (en) | 2000-05-03 | 2004-09-07 | Thales Navigation, Inc. | Method and apparatus for interference reduction in a positioning system |
US6859641B2 (en) * | 2001-06-21 | 2005-02-22 | Applied Signal Technology, Inc. | Adaptive canceller for frequency reuse systems |
US6907093B2 (en) * | 2001-08-08 | 2005-06-14 | Viasat, Inc. | Method and apparatus for relayed communication using band-pass signals for self-interference cancellation |
US6725017B2 (en) | 2001-12-05 | 2004-04-20 | Viasat, Inc. | Multi-channel self-interference cancellation method and apparatus for relayed communication |
WO2006099443A1 (en) * | 2005-03-15 | 2006-09-21 | Atc Technologies, Llc | Intra-system and/or inter-system reuse of feeder link frequencies including interference suppression systems and methods |
EP2134016A1 (en) * | 2007-03-30 | 2009-12-16 | Panasonic Corporation | Radio communication system, radio communication device, and radio communication method |
Family Cites Families (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2520184A (en) * | 1941-11-08 | 1950-08-29 | Int Standard Electric Corp | Electrical wave signaling system |
US3094695A (en) * | 1960-03-23 | 1963-06-18 | Sperry Rand Corp | Antenna side lobe suppression system |
US3369235A (en) * | 1966-02-08 | 1968-02-13 | Gorham Corp | Directionally selective energy receiving system |
US3710255A (en) * | 1969-03-21 | 1973-01-09 | Raytheon Co | Satellite communication system |
US3815028A (en) * | 1972-08-09 | 1974-06-04 | Itt | Maximum-likelihood detection system |
US3789360A (en) * | 1972-10-13 | 1974-01-29 | Harris Intertype Corp | Convolutional decoder |
US3987444A (en) * | 1974-08-12 | 1976-10-19 | Hazeltine Corporation | Interference rejection system for multi-beam antenna having single control loop |
US4063038A (en) * | 1975-11-24 | 1977-12-13 | Digital Communications Corporation | Error coding communication terminal interface |
-
1977
- 1977-06-03 US US05/803,152 patent/US4178550A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
1978
- 1978-05-11 CA CA303,154A patent/CA1102880A/en not_active Expired
- 1978-05-31 AU AU36694/78A patent/AU520073B2/en not_active Expired
- 1978-06-01 EP EP78100063A patent/EP0000039B1/en not_active Expired
- 1978-06-01 DE DE7878100063T patent/DE2861935D1/en not_active Expired
- 1978-06-02 JP JP6585978A patent/JPS542614A/en active Pending
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
JPS542614A (en) | 1979-01-10 |
DE2861935D1 (en) | 1982-08-26 |
CA1102880A (en) | 1981-06-09 |
US4178550A (en) | 1979-12-11 |
AU3669478A (en) | 1979-12-06 |
AU520073B2 (en) | 1982-01-14 |
EP0000039A1 (en) | 1978-12-20 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP0000039B1 (en) | A data transmission process and system to permit substantial reduction of interference between a received first and second digital signal | |
RU2191471C2 (en) | Satellite communication system using encoding with parallel integration | |
CA2229453C (en) | Data transmitting method, data transmitting system transmitter, and receiver | |
US5432822A (en) | Error correcting decoder and decoding method employing reliability based erasure decision-making in cellular communication system | |
US4491943A (en) | Method for transmitting time-sharing multidata | |
US5636242A (en) | Diversity transmitter/receiver | |
US5235621A (en) | Receiver systems | |
US6198719B1 (en) | Bi-orthogonal code division multiple access system | |
US6711710B2 (en) | Robust carrier identifying method and apparatus for bandwidth-on-demand (BOD) system | |
US4271524A (en) | Spread spectrum FH-MFSK receiver | |
JP2001504646A (en) | How to generate side information when time selective fading is present | |
US6556617B1 (en) | Spread spectrum diversity transmitter/receiver | |
KR20110031148A (en) | Method for transmitting a digital signal between at least two transmitters and at least one receiver, using at least one relay, and corresponding program product and relay device | |
CA2300657C (en) | Mitigation of false co-channel uplink reception in a processing satellite communication system using stagger | |
EP3695534A1 (en) | Signal overlay design and detection for satellite communication channels | |
US6683914B1 (en) | Method for convolutive encoding and transmission by packets of a digital data series flow, and corresponding decoding method device | |
EP0909038B1 (en) | Decoding of convolutional code with floating point ACS processing | |
JP2693488B2 (en) | Diversity reception method | |
JP2966695B2 (en) | Receiving machine | |
Clark et al. | Two recent applications of error-correction coding to communications systems design | |
JPH11177641A (en) | Control information assignment method, control method, transmission method, reception method and transmitter and receiver | |
WO1993012598A1 (en) | Combination of two signals, the second appearing as a noise for the first one | |
AU1134299A (en) | Matched filter simultaneously operating for two different type codes | |
US10419034B2 (en) | Satellite communication system architecture for enhanced partial processing | |
JP2765037B2 (en) | Antenna diversity receiver |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): BE DE FR GB NL SE Designated state(s): BE DE FR GB NL SE |
|
17P | Request for examination filed | ||
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): BE DE FR GB NL SE |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 2861935 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 19820826 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Payment date: 19831231 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 19840430 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 19840503 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Payment date: 19840630 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Effective date: 19850602 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Payment date: 19850630 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Effective date: 19860630 |
|
BERE | Be: lapsed |
Owner name: WESTERN ELECTRIC CY INC. Effective date: 19860630 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Effective date: 19870101 |
|
NLV4 | Nl: lapsed or anulled due to non-payment of the annual fee | ||
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 19870227 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Effective date: 19870303 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee | ||
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Effective date: 19881117 |
|
EUG | Se: european patent has lapsed |
Ref document number: 78100063.3 Effective date: 19860728 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |