CN1963386A - Checking method for width of peduncle thread - Google Patents
Checking method for width of peduncle thread Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN1963386A CN1963386A CN 200610070570 CN200610070570A CN1963386A CN 1963386 A CN1963386 A CN 1963386A CN 200610070570 CN200610070570 CN 200610070570 CN 200610070570 A CN200610070570 A CN 200610070570A CN 1963386 A CN1963386 A CN 1963386A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- width
- silk
- stem
- peduncle thread
- peduncle
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Landscapes
- Treatment Of Fiber Materials (AREA)
Abstract
This invention relates to silk width test method, which comprises the following steps: a, setting silk width values; b, putting the hard glue bar with different color to silk into materials silk different parts for cutting and taking the silk with glue slice from silk output mouth; c, picking out glue slice by human labor for mixing evenly for random 10 to 100 integral glue slice to measure its thickness by microcaliper to compute even value of thickness as the silk width.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to a kind of tobacco stem shred detection method, specifically a kind of checking method for width of peduncle thread.
Background technology
Traditional width of peduncle thread detection method in kind is: at the about 10g of silk cutting machine outlet grab sample, the picked at random stem is 10 then, surveys its thickness as for thickness gauge respectively, calculates 10 stem average thickness value, both has been the width of this stem.There are many deficiencies in this method, causes data testing accuracy low, poor accuracy.Be embodied in following several respects:
1, this method of testing is owing to cut back moisture of cut stem big (30%-36%), and stem is very soft, under the thickness gauge elevated pressures, produces bigger retraction, makes its detected value will be far smaller than actual value.
2, it is big to cut back stem difference in size, and under identical pressure, the pressure difference that is subjected to makes the contraction difference of stem when test.(for example: the stem of same thickness, area is little, the thickness of measuring is also corresponding little).
3, be subjected to the influence of factors such as different year, the hardness of stem itself is also different, causes the more little stem of hardness, shrinks greatly more during test, and test value is more little.
4, in test process, when the testing staff chose sample, all can there be certain difference in the size of each sample, time etc.Produce certain influence to detecting data.
Can there be certain deviation inevitably in the width of cutting the back stem, and therefore, the width of peduncle thread test data must be representative, eliminates experimental error as much as possible.
Summary of the invention
The present invention provides a kind of simple to operate for overcoming above-mentioned the deficiencies in the prior art, can eliminate the error that traditional detection method produces effectively, improves accuracy and stable checking method for width of peduncle thread that width of peduncle thread detects.
The objective of the invention is to adopt following technical proposals to realize: a kind of checking method for width of peduncle thread, adopt following steps:
A. set silk cutting machine width of peduncle thread value;
B. will put into the different parts of silk cutting machine charging offal with the bigger ebonite rod of stem color distortion, and carry out chopping, the stem that will have film picks out from the silk cutting machine outlet;
C. manually sort out film, mix, appoint at random and get 10-100 complete film, measure its thickness one by one, calculate this average thickness value, be the width of this batch stem with milscale.
Described glue rod is little, the easy cutting of elasticity, and after the cutting not breakable plurality of specifications and multiple color hot melt adhesive material or have other material of similarity to make with it.
The present invention is little owing to the film elasticity that cuts out, hardness is consistent, size is identical, be not subjected to moisture effects, thereby can reflect the actual conditions of width of peduncle thread truly, objectively, has eliminated the verify error that classic method produces.
The present invention adopts glue rod detection method to detect width of peduncle thread, can eliminate the error that influence caused that detection method in kind is subjected to factors such as moisture of cut stem, stalk sheet size, offal year and testing staff's sampling custom preferably.Its test data can be represented the actual conditions of width of peduncle thread preferably, and test data is more representative than real object method.
The present invention adopts glue rod detection method to detect width of peduncle thread, and the stability of its test data is better than detection method in kind far away, and detection efficiency obviously strengthens, and has improved accuracy and stability that width of peduncle thread detects.Avoided the each test result of real object method to exist, allowed operating personnel frequently adjust the drawback of tobacco cut width, and glue rod detection method is because each width of peduncle thread test errors is less relatively, thereby actual production is had more directive significance than large deviation.
The present invention is applied to the process certification behind the checking of the daily method of testing of width of peduncle thread and calibration and the equipment medium-capital overhauling, and effect is very desirable.
The present invention also can be applicable to the detection of leaf silk width, the posterior lobe silk is cut in solution presented serrate (being commonly called as " garland " phenomenon), causes the inaccurate problem of leaf silk width detection, and is respond well.
Description of drawings
Fig. 1 is real object method test width of peduncle thread test value;
Fig. 2 is a glue rod method width of peduncle thread test value.
Embodiment
The present invention is further described below in conjunction with drawings and Examples.
Embodiment 1:
1. prepare following material and equipment:
2# offal prescription stem; ZH-4 type paper thickness gauge; The glue rod; Milscale; The SQ35A silk cutting machine.
2. detection method
(1) we are set at 0.15mm, 0.17mm and 0.20mm respectively with the width of peduncle thread value, detect by traditional detection method in kind and glue rod indirect detection method respectively.
(2) glue rod indirect detection: the different parts of the ebonite rod being put into silk cutting machine charging offal, the stem that will have a film picks out from the silk cutting machine outlet that (film color will there were significant differences with stem, distinguish being easy to), manually sort out film, mix, appoint at random and get 50 complete films, measure its thickness one by one with milscale, this average thickness value, be the width (detect if adopt the glue rod of different size or different colours to put into the different position of filament cutter, will more help to carry out complete detection and Accurate Analysis) of this batch stem.
3 results and analysis
3.1 the contrast of two kinds of test result mean value and standard deviation
Setting width with silk cutting machine is that 0.17mm is an example, analytical table 1 and table 2 data, though all within the scope of 0.17mm ± 0.03mm, it is bigger that the width of peduncle thread that adopts real object method to test departs from actual value for the width of peduncle thread mean value of employing real object method and glue rod method test as can be seen; Its mark partially also is higher than glue rod method far away, and the dispersion degree of test data is higher.Detection method in kind is described owing to be subjected to the influence of factors such as moisture of cut stem, stalk sheet size, offal year and testing staff's sampling custom, cause departing from greatly, can not represent the actual conditions of width of peduncle thread preferably as the width of peduncle thread mean value and the actual value of criterion.And glue rod method can be eliminated real object method generation reasons of error preferably, and its test data is also more representative.
Table 1: real object method width of peduncle thread test value
| 0.16 0.17 0.21 0.11 0.13 | 0.16 0.13 0.14 0.19 0.12 | 0.14 0.15 0.14 0.2 0.13 | 0.14 0.14 0.15 0.12 0.12 | 0.1 0.17 0.08 0.09 0.15 | 0.13 0.1 0.16 0.2 0.12 | 0.23 0.13 0.24 0.19 0.16 | 0.17 0.09 0.12 0.13 0.21 | 0.09 0.1 0.16 0.23 0.21 | 0.19 0.18 0.12 0.17 0.22 |
| Remarks: filament cutter setting value: 0.17mm; Extreme difference: 0.16mm mean value: 0.152mm; Standard deviation: 0.041mm. | |||||||||
Table 2: glue rod method width of peduncle thread test value
| 0.19 0.18 0.15 0.2 0.16 | 0.18 0.17 0.18 0.17 0.15 | 0.18 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.22 | 0.19 0.16 0.19 0.17 0.18 | 0.2 0.2 0.17 0.13 0.18 | 0.2 0.2 0.17 0.18 0.16 | 0.2 0.17 0.16 0.2 0.2 | 0.19 0.17 0.16 0.16 0.2 | 0.18 0.18 0.17 0.18 0.16 | 0.17 0.17 0.18 0.18 0.18 |
| Remarks: filament cutter setting value: 0.17mm; Extreme difference: 0.09mm; Mean value: 0.177mm; Standard deviation: 0.017mm. | |||||||||
3.2 two kinds of test result data stability contrast
Can see from Fig. 1 and Fig. 2, adopt glue rod method to present better normal distribution state, and along with the more close mean value of test data, the frequency of appearance be higher than the width of peduncle thread value of real object method test.Illustrate that glue rod method is higher than real object method far away to the test data stability of width of peduncle thread.If carry out real object method and glue rod method contrast test repeatedly, can find that also the each test result of real object method also all exists than large deviation in various degree, allow operating personnel when the adjustment tobacco cut width, feel not have institute's thing from.And glue rod method is less relatively owing to each test errors, thereby actual production is had more directive significance.
3.3 two kinds of test result data standardized normal distribution probability contrasts
3.3.1 real object method
Press width of peduncle thread mean value 0.15mm, franchise ± 0.03mm is a span, calculate width of peduncle thread greater than 0.12mm less than the probability of 0.18mm.
P(0.12≤X≤0.18)＝P(-0.73≤μ≤0.73)＝F(0.73)-F(-0.73)＝0.7673-0.2358＝0.5315
That is: the probability that adopts real object method test width of peduncle thread to occupy between the 0.12mm-0.18mm is about 53%.
3.3.2 glue rod method
Press width of peduncle thread mean value 0.18mm, franchise ± 0.03mm is a span, calculate width of peduncle thread greater than 0.15mm less than the probability of 0.21mm.
P(0.15≤X≤0.21)＝P(-1.76≤μ≤1.76)＝F(1.76)-F(-1.76)＝0.96080-0.03920＝0.9216
That is: the probability that adopts real object method test width of peduncle thread to occupy between the 0.12mm-0.18mm is about 92%.
3.3.3 analyze: as can be seen from the aforementioned calculation result, adopt real object method test width of peduncle thread, even its mean value is also only had only 52% as the qualified probability of its every stem of standard value, and after adopting glue rod method, its qualification rate is higher than the object test method far away but up to 92%.The stability of gelatin rod method test data and detection efficiency are significantly better than the object test method on the other hand.
Embodiment 2: when using glue rod indirect detection as different from Example 1, appoint at random and get 10 complete films, measure one by one, calculate its mean value again.
Embodiment 3: when using glue rod indirect detection as different from Example 1, appoint at random and get 20 complete films, measure one by one, calculate its mean value again.
Embodiment 4: when using glue rod indirect detection as different from Example 1, appoint at random and get 30 complete films, measure one by one, calculate its mean value again.
Embodiment 5: when using glue rod indirect detection as different from Example 1, appoint at random and get 40 complete films, measure one by one, calculate its mean value again.
Embodiment 6: when using glue rod indirect detection as different from Example 1, appoint at random and get 60 complete films, measure one by one, calculate its mean value again.
Embodiment 7: when using glue rod indirect detection as different from Example 1, appoint at random and get 70 complete films, measure one by one, calculate its mean value again.
Embodiment 8: when using glue rod indirect detection as different from Example 1, appoint at random and get 80 complete films, measure one by one, calculate its mean value again.
Embodiment 9: when using glue rod indirect detection as different from Example 1, appoint at random and get 90 complete films, measure one by one, calculate its mean value again.
Embodiment 10: when using glue rod indirect detection as different from Example 1, appoint at random and get 100 complete films, measure one by one, calculate its mean value again.
During glue rod indirect detection, along with the increase of the quantity of the film that is extracted, the accuracy of data is high more, still, chooses about 50 and chooses 100 and differ and be not too big, can satisfy the requirement of data accuracy fully.So it is 50 that best complete film is chosen numeral.
The present invention has following characteristics:
(1) adopts glue rod detection method to detect width of peduncle thread, can eliminate the error that influence caused that detection method in kind is subjected to factors such as moisture of cut stem, stalk sheet size, offal year and testing staff's sampling custom preferably.Its test data can be represented the actual conditions of width of peduncle thread preferably, and test data is more representative than real object method.
(2) adopt glue rod detection method to detect width of peduncle thread, the stability of its test data is better than detection method in kind far away, and detection efficiency obviously strengthens, and has improved accuracy and stability that width of peduncle thread detects.Avoided the each test result of real object method to exist, allowed operating personnel frequently adjust the drawback of tobacco cut width, and glue rod detection method is because each width of peduncle thread test errors is less relatively, thereby actual production is had more directive significance than large deviation.
(3) this method of testing is applied to the checking of the daily method of testing of width of peduncle thread and the process certification behind calibration and the equipment medium-capital overhauling, and effect is very desirable.
(4) this method of testing of the present invention also can be applicable to the detection of leaf silk width, the posterior lobe silk is cut in solution presented serrate (being commonly called as " garland " phenomenon), causes the inaccurate problem of leaf silk width detection, and is respond well.
Claims (2)
1. a checking method for width of peduncle thread is characterized in that, adopts following steps:
A. set silk cutting machine width of peduncle thread value;
B. will put into the different parts of silk cutting machine charging offal with the bigger ebonite rod of stem color distortion, and carry out chopping, the stem that will have film picks out from the silk cutting machine outlet;
C. manually sort out film, mix, appoint at random and get 10-100 complete film, measure its thickness one by one, calculate this average thickness value, be the width of this batch stem with milscale.
2. according to the described checking method for width of peduncle thread of claim 1, it is characterized in that: described glue rod is little, the easy cutting of elasticity, and after the cutting not breakable plurality of specifications and multiple color hot melt adhesive material or have other material of similarity to make with it.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNB2006100705703A CN100434864C (en) | 2006-12-04 | 2006-12-04 | Checking method for width of peduncle thread |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNB2006100705703A CN100434864C (en) | 2006-12-04 | 2006-12-04 | Checking method for width of peduncle thread |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN1963386A true CN1963386A (en) | 2007-05-16 |
| CN100434864C CN100434864C (en) | 2008-11-19 |
Family
ID=38082530
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNB2006100705703A Active CN100434864C (en) | 2006-12-04 | 2006-12-04 | Checking method for width of peduncle thread |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN100434864C (en) |
Cited By (10)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN102162714A (en) * | 2010-12-23 | 2011-08-24 | 川渝中烟工业公司 | Method for detecting thickness of flattened stems |
| CN102829730A (en) * | 2012-09-05 | 2012-12-19 | 江苏中烟工业有限责任公司 | Measuring method for shredding width |
| CN103338660A (en) * | 2010-12-23 | 2013-10-02 | 菲利普莫里斯生产公司 | Tobacco cut filler including cut rolled stems |
| CN104266622A (en) * | 2014-10-20 | 2015-01-07 | 云南中烟工业有限责任公司 | Device for measuring shredding width accurately and using method thereof |
| CN104351942A (en) * | 2014-10-22 | 2015-02-18 | 浙江中烟工业有限责任公司 | Natural material for measuring cut tobacco width |
| CN104730214A (en) * | 2015-03-12 | 2015-06-24 | 红云红河烟草(集团)有限责任公司 | Method for testing tobacco cutting effect of tobacco cutter |
| CN104833287A (en) * | 2015-03-12 | 2015-08-12 | 红云红河烟草(集团)有限责任公司 | Method for detecting cutting width |
| CN106289139A (en) * | 2016-08-19 | 2017-01-04 | 云南中烟新材料科技有限公司 | A kind of method measuring expanded cabo slice thickness |
| CN110657728A (en) * | 2019-08-27 | 2020-01-07 | 红云红河烟草(集团)有限责任公司 | Dedicated width of cutting of TOBSPIN filament cutter detects positioning tool |
| CN115119952A (en) * | 2022-07-18 | 2022-09-30 | 云南中烟工业有限责任公司 | Method for predicting width of filamentous cut stems after tobacco stems are pressed |
Family Cites Families (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EP0931464A1 (en) * | 1998-01-23 | 1999-07-28 | Fabriques De Tabac Reunies S.A. | A process for providing cut filler for cigarettes |
| CN1199591C (en) * | 2003-07-31 | 2005-05-04 | 太原卷烟厂 | Method for treating shred of tobacco stems |
-
2006
- 2006-12-04 CN CNB2006100705703A patent/CN100434864C/en active Active
Cited By (14)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US9210951B2 (en) | 2010-12-23 | 2015-12-15 | Philip Morris Products S.A. | Tobacco cut filler including cut rolled stems |
| CN102162714B (en) * | 2010-12-23 | 2012-05-23 | 川渝中烟工业有限责任公司 | Method for detecting thickness of flattened stems |
| CN103338660A (en) * | 2010-12-23 | 2013-10-02 | 菲利普莫里斯生产公司 | Tobacco cut filler including cut rolled stems |
| CN102162714A (en) * | 2010-12-23 | 2011-08-24 | 川渝中烟工业公司 | Method for detecting thickness of flattened stems |
| CN102829730A (en) * | 2012-09-05 | 2012-12-19 | 江苏中烟工业有限责任公司 | Measuring method for shredding width |
| CN104266622A (en) * | 2014-10-20 | 2015-01-07 | 云南中烟工业有限责任公司 | Device for measuring shredding width accurately and using method thereof |
| CN104266622B (en) * | 2014-10-20 | 2017-01-25 | 云南中烟工业有限责任公司 | Device for measuring shredding width accurately and using method thereof |
| CN104351942A (en) * | 2014-10-22 | 2015-02-18 | 浙江中烟工业有限责任公司 | Natural material for measuring cut tobacco width |
| CN104730214A (en) * | 2015-03-12 | 2015-06-24 | 红云红河烟草(集团)有限责任公司 | Method for testing tobacco cutting effect of tobacco cutter |
| CN104833287A (en) * | 2015-03-12 | 2015-08-12 | 红云红河烟草(集团)有限责任公司 | Method for detecting cutting width |
| CN106289139A (en) * | 2016-08-19 | 2017-01-04 | 云南中烟新材料科技有限公司 | A kind of method measuring expanded cabo slice thickness |
| CN110657728A (en) * | 2019-08-27 | 2020-01-07 | 红云红河烟草(集团)有限责任公司 | Dedicated width of cutting of TOBSPIN filament cutter detects positioning tool |
| CN115119952A (en) * | 2022-07-18 | 2022-09-30 | 云南中烟工业有限责任公司 | Method for predicting width of filamentous cut stems after tobacco stems are pressed |
| CN115119952B (en) * | 2022-07-18 | 2023-03-10 | 云南中烟工业有限责任公司 | Method for predicting width of filamentous cut stems after tobacco stems are pressed |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN100434864C (en) | 2008-11-19 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN100434864C (en) | Checking method for width of peduncle thread | |
| Novaković et al. | A comparison between Warner-Bratzler shear force measurement and texture profile analysis of meat and meat products: A review | |
| CN107153104B (en) | A method of tobacco fill value is characterized by cigarette machine operating parameter | |
| Bryant et al. | Forest community analysis and the point-centered quarter method | |
| Niu et al. | Rapid determination of single-stalk and population lodging resistance strengths and an assessment of the stem lodging wind speeds for winter wheat | |
| CN105675539A (en) | Comprehensive evaluation method of quality of agricultural products | |
| Lien et al. | Non-destructive impact test for assessment of tomato maturity | |
| CN104142311A (en) | Method for predicting yield of rosin in loblolly pine by using near infrared spectrum technology | |
| Thursby et al. | A rapid, non-destructive method for estimating aboveground biomass of salt marsh grasses | |
| Aruna et al. | Assessing genotype-by-environment interactions and trait associations in forage sorghum using GGE biplot analysis | |
| CN108414376B (en) | Convenient nondestructive peach fruit hardness determination model establishing method | |
| CN108254621A (en) | A kind of method and device for measuring the plant physiology resistance under specific chucking power | |
| CN207066835U (en) | HDPE geomembranes detection experiment sample preparation instrument | |
| CN102914620A (en) | Determination method for ration of reconstituted tobacco finished product | |
| CN106323763A (en) | Detection method for betel nut fiber softness | |
| CN108572194A (en) | A kind of assay method and device of plant leaf blade water guide degree and intrinsic water guide degree based on physiology resistance | |
| CN105158042B (en) | A kind of measurement of tobacco leaf pliability and characterizing method | |
| CN108760489A (en) | The device and method that skin soft tissue biomechanical parameter measures | |
| CN110150142A (en) | A kind of quality thermostabilization method for breeding wheat | |
| CN109950166A (en) | The detection method of crystallite dimension | |
| CN102721619A (en) | Test method for bursting strength of tobaccos reconstituted by papermaking method | |
| CN102435574B (en) | Nondestructive grading method for lamb carcass output | |
| Hunton | The measurement of egg shell strength: A comparison of four methods | |
| CN114417230A (en) | Paper softness testing and analyzing system based on artificial intelligence antibacterial ecological cotton stained paper | |
| CN104977071A (en) | Lateral gram weight determining method of paper machine |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| C06 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| ASS | Succession or assignment of patent right |
Owner name: SHANDONG ZHONGYAN INDUSTRY CO., LTD. Free format text: FORMER OWNER: JIANGJUN TOBACCO GROUP CO. LTD. Effective date: 20070706 |
|
| C41 | Transfer of patent application or patent right or utility model | ||
| TA01 | Transfer of patent application right |
Effective date of registration: 20070706 Address after: 250100 Shandong city of Ji'nan Province East Ring Road No. 431 Applicant after: China Tobacco Shandong Industrial Corporation Address before: Licheng District 250100 Shandong city of Ji'nan Province General Road No. 80 Applicant before: Jiangjun Tobacco Group Co., Ltd. |
|
| C14 | Grant of patent or utility model | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant |