CN117057892A - Construction engineering bidding proving material round-robin variable auxiliary bid evaluation method - Google Patents
Construction engineering bidding proving material round-robin variable auxiliary bid evaluation method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN117057892A CN117057892A CN202310852655.0A CN202310852655A CN117057892A CN 117057892 A CN117057892 A CN 117057892A CN 202310852655 A CN202310852655 A CN 202310852655A CN 117057892 A CN117057892 A CN 117057892A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- current
- proving
- historical
- condition
- bid
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 349
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 100
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 26
- 238000012552 review Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 77
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 11
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 21
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 claims description 12
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000012797 qualification Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002860 competitive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000013500 performance material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/06—Buying, selling or leasing transactions
- G06Q30/08—Auctions
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F18/00—Pattern recognition
- G06F18/20—Analysing
- G06F18/22—Matching criteria, e.g. proximity measures
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F40/00—Handling natural language data
- G06F40/10—Text processing
- G06F40/194—Calculation of difference between files
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F40/00—Handling natural language data
- G06F40/30—Semantic analysis
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Artificial Intelligence (AREA)
- Audiology, Speech & Language Pathology (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Computational Linguistics (AREA)
- Finance (AREA)
- Accounting & Taxation (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
- Bioinformatics & Computational Biology (AREA)
- Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (AREA)
- Evolutionary Biology (AREA)
- Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The application discloses a construction engineering bid proving material round-robin variable auxiliary bid evaluation method, which comprises the following steps: acquiring the current proving material and at least one historical proving material of the bidder, and a historical review result and a historical bidding condition of each historical proving material; matching the current proving material with each historical proving material; responding to obtaining a matching proving material consistent with the current proving material from all the historical proving materials, obtaining a condition variable, and obtaining a current review result of the current proving material based on the condition variable and the historical review result of the matching proving material; the condition variable represents the difference between the current bidding condition and the historical bidding condition of the matching proving material; acquiring a material variable in response to the fact that the matching proving material is not obtained, and obtaining a current review result of the proving material based on the material variable and the current bidding condition; the material variable characterizes the difference between the current proof material and the historical proof material. By means of the scheme, the marking efficiency can be improved.
Description
Technical Field
The application relates to the technical field of bidding, in particular to a construction engineering bidding proving material round-robin variable auxiliary bid evaluation method.
Background
The bidding is a competitive purchasing mode commonly adopted in a plurality of industries such as construction engineering and the like, the mode accords with the market operation rule, is beneficial to fair competition and enables low price to be preferred, so the bidding method is widely applied to the fields such as purchase and sale of bulk goods, purchase and provision of engineering construction projects and service projects, and the like, bidders need to provide proof materials when bidding, in the prior art, each bidding flow needs to be checked on the proof materials by bid evaluation experts, and therefore a great deal of time is spent for evaluating the bidding inefficiency. Therefore, how to improve the marking efficiency is a problem to be solved.
Disclosure of Invention
The application provides a construction engineering bid proving material round-robin variable auxiliary bid evaluation method which can improve bid evaluation efficiency.
The first aspect of the embodiment of the application provides a construction engineering bid proving material round-robin variable auxiliary bid evaluation method, which comprises the following steps: acquiring the current proving material and at least one historical proving material of a bidder, and a historical review result and a historical bidding condition of each historical proving material; matching the current proving material with each historical proving material; responding to obtaining a matching proving material consistent with the current proving material from all the historical proving materials, obtaining a condition variable, and obtaining a current review result of the current proving material based on the condition variable and the historical review result of the matching proving material; the condition variable characterizes the difference between the current bidding condition and the historical bidding condition of the matching proving material; acquiring a material variable in response to the fact that the matching proving material is not obtained, and obtaining a current review result of the proving material based on the material variable and the current bidding condition; wherein the material variable characterizes a difference between the current proving material and the historical proving material.
A second aspect of the embodiment of the present application provides an analysis device, where the analysis device includes a processor, a memory, and a communication circuit, where the processor is coupled to the memory and the communication circuit, respectively, and the memory stores program data, and the processor implements the steps in the method according to any one of the preceding claims by executing the program data in the memory.
A third aspect of the embodiments of the present application provides a computer readable storage medium storing a computer program executable by a processor to implement steps in a method as described in any one of the above.
The beneficial effects of the application are as follows: the construction engineering bid proof material example-following variable auxiliary bid evaluation method comprises the steps of firstly matching the current proof material with each historical proof material, if the matching is consistent, matching the matched proof material, carrying out the next step, obtaining a condition variable, wherein the condition variable represents the difference between the current bid condition and the historical bid condition of the matched proof material, and obtaining the current evaluation result of the current proof material based on the condition variable and the historical evaluation result of the matched proof material; and if the matching is inconsistent, matching out a material variable, and obtaining a current review result of the current proving material based on the material variable and the current bidding condition. According to the method, the current proving material is matched with the historical proving material, and the current proving material which is already contained in the historical proving material is not required to be checked again manually, so that the efficiency of checking the material is improved; the evaluation result can be obtained according to the condition variable and the history evaluation result, and only the condition variable is required to be judged and the history evaluation result is quoted, so that a great amount of repeated labor in the traditional evaluation work of the evaluation expert is greatly reduced.
Drawings
In order to more clearly illustrate the embodiments of the application or the technical solutions in the prior art, the drawings that are required in the embodiments or the description of the prior art will be briefly described, it being obvious that the drawings in the following description are only some embodiments of the application, and that other drawings may be obtained according to these drawings without inventive effort for a person skilled in the art.
FIG. 1 is a schematic flow chart of an embodiment of a method for assisting bid evaluation by using a round-robin variable of a bid proving material for construction projects according to the present application;
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of an embodiment of an analysis device according to the present application;
FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of a computer readable storage medium according to an embodiment of the application.
Detailed Description
The following description of the embodiments of the present application will be made clearly and fully with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which it is evident that the embodiments described are only some, but not all embodiments of the application. All other embodiments, which can be made by those skilled in the art based on the embodiments of the application without making any inventive effort, are intended to be within the scope of the application.
The terms "system" and "network" are often used interchangeably herein. The term "and/or" is herein merely an association relationship describing an associated object, meaning that there may be three relationships, e.g., a and/or B, may represent: a exists alone, A and B exist together, and B exists alone. In addition, the character "/" herein generally indicates that the front and rear associated objects are an "or" relationship. Further, "a plurality" herein means two or more than two.
Referring to fig. 1, in an embodiment, the construction engineering bid proof material circulation variable auxiliary bid evaluation method includes:
s101: the current proving material and at least one historical proving material of the bidder are obtained, and a historical review result and a historical bidding condition of each historical proving material are obtained.
Specifically, the current proving material provided by a bidder and the historical proving material provided by the same bidder for at least one historical engineering are obtained, and at least one historical proving material is obtained, wherein the historical review result and the historical bidding condition of each historical proving material are bound with the historical proving material.
Alternatively, the bidder's current proof material may be a different material such as an enterprise qualification certificate, a business license, an enterprise safety production license, a builder certificate, a performance material, etc., and each material corresponds to a respective material type. The historical proving materials are materials adopted by the same bidder for the reviewed historical engineering, each historical proving material corresponds to a historical review result and a historical bidding condition respectively, the corresponding relation of the three materials is stored by using a database technology, such as MySQL and Oracle, namely, the information of the three materials is stored as different fields in a table respectively, and simultaneously, a unique ID number is allocated to each record for searching, or the corresponding relation of the three materials is realized by using an encryption technology.
In an application mode, in response to obtaining the current proving material provided by the bidder, obtaining the historical proving material provided by the same bidder for all the historical projects before a preset time period, and a historical review result and a historical bidding condition bound by the historical proving material.
In another application mode, in response to obtaining the current proving material provided by the bidder, determining the material type of the current proving material, obtaining the material of the same material type provided by the same bidder for each historical engineering, obtaining the historical proving material corresponding to each historical engineering, and obtaining the historical bidding condition corresponding to each historical engineering and the historical review result of the historical proving material.
It should be noted that, the historical proving material may be a material pre-stored in the same rating system, or may be a material acquired by the rating system from other associated terminals.
S102: and matching the current proving material with each historical proving material.
Specifically, the current proving material is matched with each historical proving material, and whether the current proving material can be matched with the completely consistent historical proving material is judged to be used as a matching proving material.
In one application, the present proof material and each historical proof material are converted into a fixed-bit number or character string by using a hash algorithm, and then compared.
In another application mode, text recognition and semantic analysis are performed on the current proving material and all the historical proving materials, and time information and text information of the current proving material and each historical proving material are compared.
S103: responding to obtaining a matching proving material consistent with the current proving material from all the historical proving materials, obtaining a condition variable, and obtaining a current review result of the current proving material based on the condition variable and the historical review result of the matching proving material; the condition variable characterizes the difference between the current bidding condition and the historical bidding condition of the matching proving material.
Specifically, the matched proving materials are materials which are consistent with the proving materials in all the historical proving materials, that is, the proving materials are contained in the historical proving materials, and the proving materials are not required to be checked manually, so that repeated labor for checking the proving materials is greatly reduced, and the marking efficiency is improved.
Further, in response to obtaining the matching proof material, matching the current bid-involving condition with the historical bid-involving condition, obtaining a condition variable, the condition variable representing a difference between the current bid-involving condition and the historical bid-involving condition.
In an application mode, semantic analysis is carried out on the current bid-calling condition and the historical bid-calling condition, a condition variable is determined based on a semantic analysis result, when the condition variable does not comprise condition difference information, the current evidence material and the historical evaluation result are prompted to a bid evaluation expert, and when the condition variable comprises the condition difference information, the condition difference information and the current evidence material which are included in the condition variable are prompted to the bid evaluation expert, and a manual evaluation result of the bid evaluation expert is obtained. Therefore, when the condition variable does not include the condition difference information, the evaluation expert only needs to determine whether to use the historical evaluation result, and when the condition variable includes the condition difference information, the evaluation expert only needs to determine whether the current proving material meets the condition difference information according to the condition difference information, and can determine the current evaluation result corresponding to the current proving material, so that the efficiency of manual evaluation is improved.
In another application mode, semantic analysis is carried out on the current bid-calling condition and the historical bid-calling condition, a condition variable is determined based on the semantic analysis result, when the condition variable does not comprise the condition difference information, a corresponding historical review result is used as a current review result, when the condition variable comprises the condition difference information, the condition difference information and the current proving material which are included in the condition variable are prompted to a bid evaluation expert, and a manual review result of the bid evaluation expert is obtained. Therefore, the evaluation expert only needs to determine whether the current proving material meets the condition difference information according to the condition difference information when the condition variable comprises the condition difference information, and can determine the current evaluation result corresponding to the current proving material, so that the efficiency of manual evaluation is improved.
In a further application mode, semantic analysis is carried out on the current bid-on condition and the historical bid-on condition, a condition variable is determined based on the semantic analysis result, when the historical review result is qualified, whether the current bid-on condition is higher than the historical bid-on condition is determined based on the condition variable, if so, the condition difference information and the current evidence material included in the condition variable are prompted to a bid evaluation expert, a manual review result of the bid evaluation expert is obtained, and otherwise, the corresponding historical review result is taken as the current review result; when the history evaluation result is unqualified, determining whether the current bidding condition is higher than the history bidding condition based on the condition variable, if so, taking the corresponding history evaluation result as the current evaluation result, otherwise, prompting the condition difference information and the current proving material included in the condition variable to a bid evaluation expert, and obtaining the manual evaluation result of the bid evaluation expert. Therefore, the bid evaluation expert only needs to manually evaluate the current proving material with the qualified historical evaluation result and the current bid-accepting condition higher than the historical bid-accepting condition, and manually evaluate the current proving material with the unqualified historical evaluation result and the current bid-accepting condition lower than the historical bid-accepting condition.
Therefore, only the condition variables which are based on the characteristic that the current bid-accepting condition and the historical bid-accepting condition are different are judged, and the historical evaluation result is quoted, so that the efficiency of the bid-accepting process is improved.
S104: acquiring a material variable in response to the fact that the matching proving material is not obtained, and obtaining a current review result of the proving material based on the material variable and the current bidding condition; wherein the material variable characterizes the difference between the current proving material and the historical proving material.
Specifically, the material variable is different parts in the current proving material and the historical proving material, for example, the historical proving material is a construction project construction total contractor grade, the current proving material is a construction project construction total contractor grade, and the material variable is a construction project construction total contractor grade.
In an application mode, prompting the current bidding conditions and the material variables to a bid evaluation expert, and checking the authenticity of the material variables and whether the current bidding conditions are met by the bid evaluation expert to obtain a current evaluation result.
In another application mode, the material variable is highlighted in the current proving material, the current proving material and the current bidding condition are prompted to a bid evaluation expert, and the bid evaluation expert examines the authenticity of the material variable and whether the current proving material meets the current bidding condition or not, so as to obtain a current evaluation result.
It can be understood that when the evaluation of the proof material is completed, the proof material is marked as a historical proof material, and the historical bidding condition and the historical bidding result of the historical proof material can be obtained, so that in the continuous circulation process, the material variable and the condition variable are gradually reduced, the historical evaluation result can be directly used, and the evaluation efficiency is improved.
It should be noted that, any engineering generally corresponds to a plurality of proving materials, and when the engineering obtains a plurality of proving materials, the current review result of each material can be obtained by executing the steps above with each material as the current proving material.
From the above, it can be seen that the construction engineering bid proof material example-following variable auxiliary evaluation method of the application firstly matches the current proof material with each historical proof material, if the matching is consistent, the matching proof material is matched, the next step is carried out, the condition variable is obtained, the condition variable characterizes the difference between the current bid condition and the historical bid condition of the matching proof material, and the current evaluation result of the current proof material can be obtained based on the condition variable and the historical evaluation result of the matching proof material; and if the matching is inconsistent, matching out a material variable, and obtaining a current review result of the current proving material based on the material variable and the current bidding condition. According to the method, the current proving material is matched with the historical proving material, and the current proving material which is already contained in the historical proving material is not required to be checked again manually, so that the efficiency of checking the material is improved; the evaluation result can be obtained according to the condition variable and the history evaluation result, and only the condition variable is required to be judged and the history evaluation result is quoted, so that a great amount of repeated labor in the traditional evaluation work of the evaluation expert is greatly reduced.
In one embodiment, the historical review results and the historical bidding criteria corresponding to the historical proving material are integrated into the digital label.
Step S101 obtains the current proof material and at least one history proof material of the bidder, and a history review result and a history bidding condition of each history proof material, including:
s201: and responding to the acquisition of the current proving material of the bidder for the current project, acquiring the historical proving material of the bidder for at least one historical project and a digital label corresponding to the historical proving material.
S202: and obtaining a history review result and a history bidding condition corresponding to each history proving material from the digital label.
Specifically, the historical proving material is respectively digitally signed in the form of a two-dimensional code or a character string to form a digital label, wherein the digital label comprises a historical evaluation result and a historical bidding condition corresponding to the historical proving material, and can also comprise information such as evaluation time, an evaluation place, an evaluation expert and the like. Therefore, as the digital labels such as the history review results and the history bidding conditions are formed for the history proving materials, the history review results and the history bidding conditions corresponding to each history proving material can be obtained from the digital labels, so that the tamper-proof and source uniqueness of the content is ensured.
In an embodiment, step S201, in response to obtaining the current proving material of the bidder for the current project, obtains the historical proving material of the bidder for at least one historical project, and the digital label corresponding to the historical proving material, includes:
(a) And determining a current time stamp corresponding to the current proving material aiming at the current proving material of the current project by responding to the obtained bidder.
(b) And acquiring historical proving materials of the bidder aiming at all the historical projects within a preset time length before the current time stamp, and digital labels corresponding to the historical proving materials.
Specifically, the current timestamp corresponding to the current proving material may include the identity of the signer of the current proving material, the signing date and other contents, so as to ensure the traceability of the current proving material. The current time stamp, that is, before the time stamp of the current proving material, the preset time length can be set to 3 months, half years or other time length, and the current time stamp is used for acquiring all the historical proving materials in the preset time length and digital labels corresponding to the historical proving materials, and is used for matching the current proving material with all the historical proving materials in the preset time length so as to cycle out all condition variables and material variables, so that the matching integrity and accuracy are improved, and when the number of samples of the historical proving materials is increased, the probability of matching with the current proving material is increased, and the marking efficiency is improved.
In one embodiment, step S103 obtains a condition variable, and obtains a current review result of the current certification material based on the condition variable and a history review result of the matching certification material, including:
s301: condition variables are obtained.
S302: and prompting the historical review results corresponding to the matching proving materials to the review mark expert in response to the condition variables not including the condition difference information, and obtaining the current review result obtained by the review mark expert based on the historical review results corresponding to the matching proving materials.
S303: and prompting the condition difference information and the current proving material to a bid evaluation expert in response to the condition variables including the condition difference information, acquiring a current evaluation result obtained by the bid evaluation expert based on the current proving material and the condition difference information, and generating a digital label corresponding to the current proving material by utilizing the current evaluation result and the current bid-inviting condition.
The condition difference information is at least related to qualification requirements of the current bid-inviting condition and the historical bid-inviting condition.
Specifically, the condition difference information is not included to indicate that the current bid-inviting condition is the same as the historical bid-inviting condition, the bid-reviving expert can obtain the current review result according to the prompted historical review result, for example, the current bid-inviting condition is the same as the historical bid-reviving condition, the current proving material and the historical proving material of the bidder are the same, the historical review result is qualified, the bid-reviving expert can qualify according to the historical review result, and the current review result is output to be qualified. Of course, the history review result may be cited by the review expert, or the history review result may be modified, that is, the review expert considers that the history review result is wrong, and may output a current review result different from the history review result.
The method comprises the steps that condition difference information indicates that the current bidding conditions are different from historical bidding conditions, a bid evaluation expert examines the condition difference information and the current proving material according to the prompted condition difference information, checks whether the current bidding conditions indicated by the condition difference information are matched with the current proving material or not, and outputs a current evaluation result.
The condition difference information is related to qualification requirements of the current bidding condition and the historical bidding condition, and can also be related to performance requirements in the current bidding condition and the historical bidding condition.
In one embodiment, after the step 302 obtains the current review result obtained based on the history review result corresponding to the matching proof material, the method further includes:
and responding to the historical review results corresponding to the matching proving material, and generating a digital label corresponding to the proving material by utilizing the current review results and the current bidding conditions.
Specifically, for the matching proof material, the rating expert may refer to the history rating result, may modify the history rating result, that is, the rating expert considers that the history rating result is wrong, and may output a current rating result different from the history rating result. And then carrying out digital signature on the review result and the bidding condition corresponding to the proof material to generate a digital label, which is beneficial to ensuring the untampereability and source uniqueness of the content. The proof material can be used as a historical proof material for the next engineering circulation, so that the condition variables of each circulation are reduced.
In an embodiment, step S104 obtains a material variable, and obtains a current review result of the current proving material based on the material variable and the current bidding condition, including:
s401: material variables are obtained.
S402: prompting the material difference information and the current bidding condition included in the material variable to a bid evaluation expert, acquiring a current evaluation result obtained by the bid evaluation expert based on the material difference information and the current bidding condition, and generating a digital label corresponding to the current proving material by utilizing the current evaluation result and the current bidding condition.
Wherein, the material difference information is related to the material content of the current proving material and the historical proving material.
Specifically, the bid evaluation expert performs manual evaluation according to the material variable and the bid-signing condition to obtain a current evaluation result, and performs digital signature to obtain a current evaluation result corresponding to the current proving material and a digital label of the bid-signing condition, so as to ensure the non-falsifiability and source uniqueness of the content. The proving material can be used as a historical proving material for the next engineering circulation, so that the material variable of each circulation is reduced.
The material difference information is at least related to the material content of the current proving material and the historical proving material, and can also be related to whether the applicant is consistent or not.
In an embodiment, generating a digital label corresponding to the current proving material by using the current review result and the current bidding condition includes:
(c) And acquiring the material content of the proof material, the bidder information of the bidder and the label evaluation information of the label evaluation expert.
(d) And carrying out digital signature on the material content, the bidder information, the bid evaluation information, the current evaluation result and the current bid-inviting condition to obtain a digital label corresponding to the current proving material.
Specifically, the digital label corresponding to the proof material comprises material content, bidder information, reviewer information, a review result and a bid-inviting condition, wherein the material content comprises professional categories, qualification grades, validity periods, bid section names and the like, the bidder information comprises unit names, enterprise types and the like, the reviewer information comprises a review expert name, review time, a review place and the like, and other digital signature content can also comprise traceability identification codes and numbers so as to ensure fairness, transparency and authenticity of the bidding process.
In one embodiment, step S102 matches the current proof material with each of the historical proof materials, including:
(e) And obtaining the material type of the current proving material and the material content of the current proving material.
(f) And matching the current proving material with all the historical proving materials matched with the same material type based on the material content.
Specifically, the present proving material may be classified into performance proving material, qualification proving material, economical strength proving material, etc. according to types, and each type includes different material contents. Based on the material content, the current proving material is matched with all the historical proving materials matched with the same material type, so that the efficiency of matching the current proving material with each historical proving material can be improved.
Referring to fig. 2, in an embodiment, the analysis device 200 includes a processor 210, a memory 220, and a communication circuit 230, where the processor 210 is coupled to the memory 220 and the communication circuit 230, respectively, the memory 220 stores program data, and the processor 210 executes the program data in the memory 220 to implement steps in any of the above methods, wherein detailed steps are described in the above embodiments and are not repeated herein.
Referring to fig. 3, in an embodiment, a computer readable storage medium 301 stores a computer program 302, the computer program 302 being executable by a processor to implement steps in any of the methods described above.
The computer readable storage medium 301 may be a device such as a usb disk, a removable hard disk, a Read-Only Memory (ROM), a random access Memory (RAM, random Access Memory), a magnetic disk, or an optical disk, which may store the computer program 302, or may be a server storing the computer program 302, which may send the stored computer program 302 to another device for running, or may also run the stored computer program 302 by itself.
The units described as separate units may or may not be physically separate, and units displayed as units may or may not be physical units, may be located in one place, or may be distributed over a plurality of network units. Some or all of the units may be selected according to actual needs to achieve the purpose of the embodiment.
In addition, each functional unit in the embodiments of the present application may be integrated in one processing unit, or each unit may exist alone physically, or two or more units may be integrated in one unit. The integrated units may be implemented in hardware or in software functional units.
The integrated units, if implemented in the form of software functional units and sold or used as stand-alone products, may be stored in a computer readable storage medium. Based on such understanding, the technical solution of the present application may be embodied in essence or a part contributing to the prior art or all or part of the technical solution in the form of a software product stored in a storage medium, including several instructions for causing a computer device (which may be a personal computer, a server, or a network device, etc.) or a processor (processor) to execute all or part of the steps of the methods of the embodiments of the present application.
The foregoing description is only of embodiments of the present application, and is not intended to limit the scope of the application, and all equivalent structures or equivalent processes using the descriptions and the drawings of the present application or directly or indirectly applied to other related technical fields are included in the scope of the present application.
Claims (10)
1. The method for assisting in evaluating the bid of the construction engineering bid proving material by using the circulation variables is characterized by comprising the following steps of:
acquiring the current proving material and at least one historical proving material of a bidder, and a historical review result and a historical bidding condition of each historical proving material;
matching the current proving material with each historical proving material;
responding to obtaining a matching proving material consistent with the current proving material from all the historical proving materials, obtaining a condition variable, and obtaining a current review result of the current proving material based on the condition variable and the historical review result of the matching proving material; the condition variable characterizes the difference between the current bidding condition and the historical bidding condition of the matching proving material;
acquiring a material variable in response to the fact that the matching proving material is not obtained, and obtaining a current review result of the proving material based on the material variable and the current bidding condition; wherein the material variable characterizes a difference between the current proving material and the historical proving material.
2. The construction engineering bid proof material circulation variable auxiliary bid evaluation method according to claim 1, wherein the history evaluation result and the history bid condition corresponding to the history proof material are integrated in a digital tag;
the obtaining the current proving material and at least one historical proving material of the bidder, and the historical review result and the historical bidding condition of each historical proving material comprises the following steps:
responding to the acquisition of the current proving material of the bidder aiming at the current project, acquiring the historical proving material of the bidder aiming at least one historical project and the digital label corresponding to the historical proving material;
and obtaining the history review result and the history bidding condition corresponding to each history proving material from the digital label.
3. The construction engineering bid proof material example variable auxiliary bid evaluation method according to claim 2, wherein the responding to the obtaining of the current proof material of the bidder for the current engineering, the obtaining of the history proof material of the bidder for at least one history engineering, and the digital label corresponding to the history proof material, comprises:
responding to the acquired current proving material of the current engineering, and determining a current time stamp corresponding to the current proving material by the bidder;
and acquiring historical proving materials of the bidder aiming at all historical projects within a preset time length before the current time stamp, and the digital label corresponding to the historical proving materials.
4. The construction engineering bid proof material example-following variable auxiliary bid evaluation method of claim 2, wherein the obtaining the condition variable, based on the condition variable and the history evaluation result of the matching proof material, obtains the current evaluation result of the current proof material, comprises:
acquiring the condition variable;
prompting a historical review result corresponding to the matching proving material to a review expert in response to the condition variable does not comprise condition difference information, and acquiring the current review result obtained by the review expert based on the historical review result corresponding to the matching proving material;
responding to the condition variables including the condition difference information, prompting the condition difference information and the current proving material to the rating expert, acquiring the current rating result obtained by the rating expert based on the current proving material and the condition difference information, and generating a digital label corresponding to the current proving material by utilizing the current rating result and the current bidding condition;
wherein the condition difference information is at least related to qualification requirements of the current bid-inviting condition and the historical bid-inviting condition.
5. The method for assisting bid evaluation of a construction engineering bid proof material according to claim 4, wherein after the current review result obtained based on the history review result corresponding to the matching proof material is obtained, further comprising:
and responding to the historical review result corresponding to the matching proving material, and generating a digital label corresponding to the proving material by utilizing the current review result and the current bidding condition.
6. The method for assisting in evaluating a bid amount of a bid proving material for construction engineering according to claim 2, wherein the obtaining the material amount, based on the material amount and the bid condition, includes:
acquiring the material variable;
prompting the material difference information and the current bidding condition included in the material variable to a bid evaluation expert, acquiring the current evaluation result obtained by the bid evaluation expert based on the material difference information and the current bidding condition, and generating a digital label corresponding to the current proving material by utilizing the current evaluation result and the current bidding condition;
wherein the material difference information is at least related to the material content of the current proving material and the historical proving material.
7. The method for assisting in evaluating a bid amount of a construction project according to any one of claims 4 to 6, wherein the generating a digital label corresponding to the bid amount by using the current evaluation result and the current bid condition comprises:
acquiring the material content of the current proving material, the bidder information of the bidder and the label evaluation information of the label evaluation expert;
and carrying out digital signature on the material content, the bidder information, the bid evaluation information, the current review result and the current bid-inviting condition to obtain a digital label corresponding to the current proving material.
8. The construction engineering bid proof material circulation variable auxiliary bid evaluation method of claim 1, wherein the matching the current proof material with each of the historical proof materials comprises:
acquiring the material type of the current proving material and the material content of the current proving material;
and matching the current proving material with all the historical proving materials matched with the same material type based on the material content.
9. An analysis device, characterized in that it comprises a processor, a memory and a communication circuit, the processor being coupled to the memory and the communication circuit, respectively, the memory having stored therein program data, the processor implementing the steps in the method according to any of claims 1-8 by executing the program data in the memory.
10. A computer readable storage medium, characterized in that it stores a computer program executable by a processor to implement the steps in the method according to any one of claims 1-8.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202310852655.0A CN117057892A (en) | 2023-07-12 | 2023-07-12 | Construction engineering bidding proving material round-robin variable auxiliary bid evaluation method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202310852655.0A CN117057892A (en) | 2023-07-12 | 2023-07-12 | Construction engineering bidding proving material round-robin variable auxiliary bid evaluation method |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN117057892A true CN117057892A (en) | 2023-11-14 |
Family
ID=88654296
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202310852655.0A Pending CN117057892A (en) | 2023-07-12 | 2023-07-12 | Construction engineering bidding proving material round-robin variable auxiliary bid evaluation method |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN117057892A (en) |
Citations (8)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN109784754A (en) * | 2019-01-29 | 2019-05-21 | 国网物资有限公司 | Based on requirement of invitation for bid and verify the assessment of bids qualification auditing system proved |
| CN110689282A (en) * | 2019-04-15 | 2020-01-14 | 国网山东省电力公司 | Artificial intelligence bid evaluation method and system based on big data analysis |
| KR20210065012A (en) * | 2019-11-26 | 2021-06-03 | 세종텔레콤 주식회사 | Certificate management server based on blockchain and method thereof and computer program |
| CN114445095A (en) * | 2022-02-07 | 2022-05-06 | 蚂蚁财富(上海)金融信息服务有限公司 | Material detection method, material detection device, storage medium and electronic equipment |
| CN115760161A (en) * | 2022-11-23 | 2023-03-07 | 贵州电网有限责任公司 | Method, system and equipment for verifying special qualification of bid document |
| CN115879829A (en) * | 2023-02-21 | 2023-03-31 | 广东省科技基础条件平台中心 | Evaluation expert screening method applied to platform innovation capability examination and verification |
| CN115907935A (en) * | 2023-01-09 | 2023-04-04 | 北京长城电子商务有限公司 | Online auxiliary review system |
| CN116384815A (en) * | 2023-03-27 | 2023-07-04 | 鲁班(北京)电子商务科技有限公司 | Bid object review method, electronic device and storage medium |
-
2023
- 2023-07-12 CN CN202310852655.0A patent/CN117057892A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (8)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN109784754A (en) * | 2019-01-29 | 2019-05-21 | 国网物资有限公司 | Based on requirement of invitation for bid and verify the assessment of bids qualification auditing system proved |
| CN110689282A (en) * | 2019-04-15 | 2020-01-14 | 国网山东省电力公司 | Artificial intelligence bid evaluation method and system based on big data analysis |
| KR20210065012A (en) * | 2019-11-26 | 2021-06-03 | 세종텔레콤 주식회사 | Certificate management server based on blockchain and method thereof and computer program |
| CN114445095A (en) * | 2022-02-07 | 2022-05-06 | 蚂蚁财富(上海)金融信息服务有限公司 | Material detection method, material detection device, storage medium and electronic equipment |
| CN115760161A (en) * | 2022-11-23 | 2023-03-07 | 贵州电网有限责任公司 | Method, system and equipment for verifying special qualification of bid document |
| CN115907935A (en) * | 2023-01-09 | 2023-04-04 | 北京长城电子商务有限公司 | Online auxiliary review system |
| CN115879829A (en) * | 2023-02-21 | 2023-03-31 | 广东省科技基础条件平台中心 | Evaluation expert screening method applied to platform innovation capability examination and verification |
| CN116384815A (en) * | 2023-03-27 | 2023-07-04 | 鲁班(北京)电子商务科技有限公司 | Bid object review method, electronic device and storage medium |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN111080409A (en) | Computer device, method, equipment and medium for pushing information | |
| CN107679103B (en) | Attribute analysis method and system for entity | |
| CN111191903A (en) | Early warning method and device for monitoring bid document, server and storage medium | |
| CN110750811B (en) | Data storage method, data verification method, device, equipment and medium | |
| CN110659926A (en) | Data value evaluation system and method | |
| Salutina et al. | Transformation of business technologies into digital platforms and evaluation of the effectiveness of their application | |
| CN114118681A (en) | Expert selection method and device | |
| CN114386935A (en) | Examination and verification method and device for bid document | |
| CN111932199A (en) | Intelligent bid evaluation decision-making method and system | |
| CN115600574A (en) | Automatic comparison method, device, equipment and medium for bid documents | |
| CN114037504A (en) | Collection, recruitment and bidding system based on Internet | |
| CN117057892A (en) | Construction engineering bidding proving material round-robin variable auxiliary bid evaluation method | |
| CN112669053A (en) | Fraud group identification method, device, equipment and medium based on sales data | |
| CN112288305A (en) | Bid evaluation data analysis system and bid evaluation data analysis method thereof | |
| CN111445265A (en) | House purchasing method and device based on block chain | |
| CN116012086A (en) | Commodity price estimating method, commodity price estimating device, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
| CN111427900B (en) | Label library updating method, device, equipment and readable storage medium | |
| CN104537546A (en) | Product quality monitoring method and device as well as product quality verification method and device | |
| CN113962786A (en) | Commodity bidding method, device and equipment based on block chain and storage medium | |
| CN109903058B (en) | Block chain-based card maintenance identification method and device | |
| CN114254985A (en) | Intelligent financial service method and system based on supply chain | |
| CN113139842A (en) | Form processing method, device and system | |
| CN112561460A (en) | Information processing method, system, equipment and computer storage medium | |
| CN112000697A (en) | Enterprise performance identification method for bid evaluation | |
| CN114911918A (en) | Recommendation method, model training method, device, equipment and storage medium |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination |