CN116562551A - Credit evaluation method and evaluation system for security service company - Google Patents
Credit evaluation method and evaluation system for security service company Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN116562551A CN116562551A CN202310454555.2A CN202310454555A CN116562551A CN 116562551 A CN116562551 A CN 116562551A CN 202310454555 A CN202310454555 A CN 202310454555A CN 116562551 A CN116562551 A CN 116562551A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- security
- security service
- service
- company
- guard
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 25
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 8
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 claims description 10
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000012795 verification Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 abstract description 7
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 abstract description 6
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 abstract description 6
- 238000004883 computer application Methods 0.000 abstract description 2
- 238000012552 review Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000007792 addition Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008520 organization Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012502 risk assessment Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0631—Resource planning, allocation, distributing or scheduling for enterprises or organisations
- G06Q10/06315—Needs-based resource requirements planning or analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
- G06Q10/06393—Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q40/00—Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
- G06Q40/03—Credit; Loans; Processing thereof
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/10—Services
- G06Q50/26—Government or public services
- G06Q50/265—Personal security, identity or safety
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Accounting & Taxation (AREA)
- Finance (AREA)
- Technology Law (AREA)
- Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a credit evaluation method and system of security service company, belonging to the computer application technical field, the method can obtain the proficiency of each security company in each level security task execution and the experience of executing the corresponding level or more difficulty task by analyzing the security tasks executed by each security company in the past period, and according to the proficiency, the recommendation of the security service company is carried out on the request service end, so that the request service end can accurately obtain the high quality security service task processing of the security service company which has abundant processing experience and processing capability for the corresponding security service, and the benign development of the security service industry is facilitated; in addition, the invention adjusts the follow-up recommendation result through the credit evaluation result of the security company, thereby leading the security enterprise with good enterprise credit to be able to develop preferentially and being beneficial to the benign development of security service industry.
Description
Technical Field
The invention belongs to the technical field of computer application, and particularly relates to a credit evaluation method and system for security service companies.
Background
The security service company is a company which provides services such as entrance guard, patrol, guard, escort, personal guard, security check, security technical protection, security risk assessment and the like for paid out security guards for enterprises and public institutions of the organization.
In the prior art, when an enterprise and public institution has a need for security services, a proper security service company is required to be selected to perform corresponding security service work, however, in the actual operation process, the enterprise and public institution having the need for security services can only acquire related information through network searching, acquaintance introduction and a way that the security service company promotes marketing, and a final selection judgment is made according to the related information, so that the enterprise and public institution having the need for security needs selects and obtains the proper security service company according to own needs, which is not beneficial to reasonable distribution of security resources, and is also not beneficial to smooth and high-quality completion of security services required by the corresponding enterprise and public institution.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to provide a credit evaluation method and an evaluation system for security service companies, which solve the problems that in the prior art, enterprises and public institutions with security requirements select to obtain proper security service companies according to the self requirements, so that reasonable distribution of security resources is not facilitated, and smooth and high-quality completion of security services required by corresponding enterprises and public institutions is also not facilitated.
The aim of the invention can be achieved by the following technical scheme:
a credit evaluation method for security service companies, comprising the steps of:
s1, calculating the credibility point Q of each security service company;
s2, obtaining task scores of security services requested by the service request terminal;
the service request terminal sends out service request information;
the control center acquires security service types and the number x1 of required security guards in the service request information;
according to the formula r=α×x x1 * hp calculates the task score R of the corresponding security service;
wherein hp is the average expertise score of the security service of the corresponding security service type when executed;
wherein alpha is a preset coefficient corresponding to the security service type;
x is a preset value which is more than 1 and less than or equal to 1.1;
s3, acquiring task execution records of each security service company in the past T1 time;
the T1 is a preset value;
the task execution record comprises security service types of security services executed by security service companies, the number of security personnel corresponding to the security services and the professional degree score H of the corresponding security personnel;
calculating and acquiring a task score Rp of each security service executed by a security service company in the past T1 time;
for a security service company, dividing the corresponding task scores Rp into a plurality of interval groups according to the sequence of the task scores Rp from small to large, wherein the value range of each interval group is not repeated;
judging the interval group where the task score R of the security service requested by the service request terminal is located in each security service company, and marking the interval group as a target interval group;
calculating to obtain a matching degree coefficient K corresponding to each security service company according to a formula K=Q×z (gamma 1×B1+gamma 2×B2);
the z is the number of times the security service company performs security service in the past T1 time;
b1 is the ratio of the security service times and z contained in the target interval group;
the B2 is the ratio of the security service times to z contained in the interval group which is larger than the target interval group;
both γ1 and γ2 are preset coefficients, and γ1+γ2=1;
and S4, recommending the security service companies to the corresponding service request terminals according to the sequence of the matching degree coefficient K from high to low.
As a further scheme of the invention, the method for calculating the trusted integral Q comprises the following steps:
s11, recording record information in a record information acquisition unit by each security service company through a corresponding security service terminal in a specified time;
the record information comprises security personnel identity information, security service object information and security personnel residence task information;
s12, acquiring a record information acquisition rate v1 corresponding to each security service terminal;
average update time t of record information corresponding to each security service terminal;
recording information accuracy v2 corresponding to each security service terminal;
the calculation method of the average update time t of the record information comprises the following steps:
taking the corresponding security service ending time, the time when error information is found after verification, the related information changing time and the like as starting points, taking the modification time of the corresponding record information in the record information acquisition unit as an end point, acquiring the interval time between the starting point and the end point, acquiring the average value of the interval time corresponding to each security service company in the past preset time T2, and taking the average value as the average updating time T;
s13, calculating to obtain a trusted integral Q corresponding to each security service company according to a formula Q= (ω1×v1+ω2×v2)/(ω 3*t);
the ω1, ω2 and ω3 are all preset parameters.
As a further aspect of the present invention, the trusted score Q is an enterprise public credit evaluation result.
As a further aspect of the present invention, the x has a value of 1.01.
As a further aspect of the present invention, the method for calculating the average professional score hp includes:
classifying the security services executed by each security service company recorded in the record information acquisition unit according to the security service type to which the security service belongs;
for the security services of the same type, the number x2 of security personnel corresponding to each security service and the professional degree score H corresponding to each security personnel are obtained, then the average value hp of the professional degree scores H of the x2 security personnel is calculated, and the average value is used as the average professional degree score hp of the security services of the corresponding type.
As a further aspect of the present invention, the method for calculating the professional degree score H of the security guard includes:
acquiring a security working period c1 of a security guard;
acquiring a class coefficient c2 of a security guard;
acquiring a security experience coefficient c3 of a security guard;
the level coefficient c2 of the security guard refers to that the security guard is endowed with preset coefficients from small to large according to no-evidence, primary security guard, middle security guard, high security guard, security manager and high security manager in sequence;
according to the formulaCalculating to obtain a professional degree score H of the corresponding security guard;
the beta 1 and the beta 2 are preset parameters;
the calculation method of the security experience coefficient c3 comprises the following steps:
acquiring the execution years of security tasks executed by corresponding security guards during a practitioner;
according to the security service type corresponding to the security task executed by the security guard, the preset coefficient alpha value corresponding to the security task executed by the security guard is marked as alpha 1, alpha 2, … and alpha n in sequence;
sequentially marking the execution years corresponding to the security tasks executed by the security guard as y1, y2, … and yn;
according to the formulaCalculating to obtain a security experience coefficient c3 of the corresponding security guard; wherein i is more than or equal to 1 and n is more than or equal to n.
The invention also discloses a credit evaluation system of the security service company, which is used for executing the credit evaluation method of the security service company.
The invention has the beneficial effects that:
1. the invention can obtain the proficiency of each security company in the execution of each level security task and the experience of executing the task with difficulty above the corresponding level by analyzing the security tasks executed by each security company in the past period, and recommend the security service company to the request service end according to the proficiency, so that the request service end can accurately obtain the high-quality security service tasks of the security service company with abundant processing experience and processing capacity for the corresponding security service, and is also beneficial to the benign development of the security service industry;
2. the invention adjusts the follow-up recommendation result through the credit evaluation result of the security company, thereby leading the security enterprise with good enterprise credit to be able to develop preferentially and being beneficial to the benign development of security service industry.
Detailed Description
The following description of the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention will be clear and complete, and it is obvious that the described embodiments are only some embodiments of the present invention, but not all embodiments. All other embodiments, which can be made by those skilled in the art based on the embodiments of the invention without making any inventive effort, are intended to be within the scope of the invention.
A credit rating system for a security service company, comprising:
the security service terminals are held by security service companies, and each security service company uploads the record information to the record information acquisition unit through the corresponding security service terminal;
the record information acquisition unit is used for storing record information uploaded by the security service terminal;
a service request terminal for sending service request information including security service type and number of people in need of the requested security service
And the control center is used for analyzing and acquiring the proper security service company corresponding to the service request terminal according to the record information stored by the record information acquisition unit and the service request information sent by the service request terminal.
The credit evaluation method of the security service company based on the credit evaluation system of the security service company comprises the following steps:
s1, calculating the credibility points of each security service company;
specifically, the method comprises the following steps:
s11, recording record information in a record information acquisition unit by each security service company through a corresponding security service terminal in a specified time;
the record information comprises security personnel identity information, security service object information, security personnel residence task information and the like;
s12, acquiring a record information acquisition rate v1 corresponding to each security service terminal;
average update time t of record information corresponding to each security service terminal;
recording information accuracy v2 corresponding to each security service terminal;
the calculation method of the average update time t of the record information comprises the following steps:
taking the corresponding security service ending time, the time when error information is found after verification, the related information changing time and the like as starting points, taking the modification time of the corresponding record information in the record information acquisition unit as an end point, acquiring the interval time between the starting point and the end point, acquiring the average value of the interval time corresponding to each security service company in the past preset time T2, and taking the average value as the average updating time T;
s13, calculating to obtain a trusted integral Q corresponding to each security service company according to a formula Q= (ω1×v1+ω2×v2)/(ω 3*t);
the omega 1, the omega 2 and the omega 3 are all preset parameters;
in one embodiment of the present invention, the trusted score Q can also directly use enterprise public credit assessment results;
s2, obtaining task scores of security services requested by the service request terminal;
the service request terminal sends out service request information;
the control center acquires security service types and the number x1 of required security guards in the service request information;
according to the formula r=α×x x1 * hp calculates the task score R of the corresponding security service;
wherein hp is the average expertise score of the security service of the corresponding security service type when executed;
wherein alpha is a preset coefficient corresponding to security service types, the alpha values corresponding to security services of different security service types are different, and the more important and the greater the risk, the greater the alpha value of the security service;
the x is a preset value greater than 1 and less than or equal to 1.1, and in one embodiment of the invention, the value of x is 1.01;
the security service types comprise guard, patrol, guard, escort, personal guard and the like;
the calculation method of the average professional degree score hp corresponding to the security service of the security service type comprises the following steps:
classifying the security services executed by each security service company recorded in the record information acquisition unit according to the security service type to which the security service belongs;
for the security services of the same type, the number x2 of security personnel corresponding to each security service and the professional degree score H corresponding to each security personnel are obtained, then the average value hp of the professional degree scores H of the x2 security personnel is calculated, and the average value is used as the average professional degree score hp of the security services of the corresponding type.
The calculation method of the professional degree score H of the security guard comprises the following steps:
acquiring a security working period c1 of a security guard;
acquiring a class coefficient c2 of a security guard;
acquiring a security experience coefficient c3 of a security guard;
the level coefficient c2 of the security guard refers to that the security guard is endowed with preset coefficients from small to large according to no-evidence, primary security guard, middle security guard, high security guard, security manager and high security manager in sequence;
in one embodiment of the present invention, the level coefficient c2 of the non-certification, primary security guard, intermediate security guard, high-level security guard, security manager and high-level security manager is set to 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 in order;
according to the formulaCalculating to obtain a professional degree score H of the corresponding security guard;
the beta 1 and the beta 2 are preset parameters;
the calculation method of the security experience coefficient c3 comprises the following steps:
acquiring the execution years of security tasks executed by corresponding security guards during a practitioner;
according to the security service type corresponding to the security task executed by the security guard, the preset coefficient alpha value corresponding to the security task executed by the security guard is marked as alpha 1, alpha 2, … and alpha n in sequence;
sequentially marking the execution years corresponding to the security tasks executed by the security guard as y1, y2, … and yn;
according to the formulaCalculating to obtain a security experience coefficient c3 of the corresponding security guard; wherein i is more than or equal to 1 and less than or equal to n;
s3, acquiring task execution records of each security service company in the past T1 time;
the T1 is a preset value;
the task execution record comprises security service types of security services executed by security service companies, the number of security personnel corresponding to the security services and the professional degree score H of the corresponding security personnel;
calculating and acquiring a task score Rp of each security service executed by a security service company in the past T1 time;
for a security service company, dividing the corresponding task scores Rp into a plurality of interval groups according to the sequence of the task scores Rp from small to large, wherein the value range of each interval group is not repeated;
judging the interval group where the task score R of the security service requested by the service request terminal is located in each security service company, and marking the interval group as a target interval group;
calculating to obtain a matching degree coefficient K corresponding to each security service company according to a formula K=Q×z (gamma 1×B1+gamma 2×B2);
the z is the number of times the security service company performs security service in the past T1 time;
b1 is the ratio of the security service times and z contained in the target interval group;
the B2 is the ratio of the security service times to z contained in the interval group which is larger than the target interval group;
both γ1 and γ2 are preset coefficients, and γ1+γ2=1;
and S4, recommending the security service companies to the corresponding service request terminals according to the sequence of the matching degree coefficient K from high to low.
The credit evaluation method of the security service company is characterized in that the proficiency of each security company in the execution of each level security task and the experience of the security service company in execution of the corresponding level or more difficulty task are obtained by analyzing the security tasks executed by each security company in the past period of time, and the request service end is recommended to the security service company according to the proficiency, so that the request service end can accurately obtain the high-quality security service tasks of the security service company which has abundant processing experience and processing capacity for the corresponding security service, and the benign development of the security service industry is facilitated.
In addition, the credit of the security company can be evaluated by the security company under the condition of collecting the recorded information, and the follow-up recommendation result is adjusted according to the evaluation result, so that the security enterprise with good enterprise credit can be preferentially developed, and the benign development of the security service industry is also facilitated.
In one embodiment of the present invention, after calculating the trusted points of each security service company in step S1, the trusted points of each security service company need to be audited by an auditing unit;
the auditing unit for auditing the trusted points of the security service company comprises the following steps:
after the branch office logs in the system, the enterprise supplementary record material can be checked;
after the review of the branch office is submitted, the company can review the items which do not pass the review, upload the materials again, and review the review items again by the branch office;
the office auditing is that the office mainly supervises and manages the deduction content of the office auditing and the supplementary recording, and the deduction content can be added. The submitted post-delivery is shown by the province hall;
the provincial hall shows that the provincial hall can show the credit scores of the security service companies participating in the credit evaluation.
In the description of the present specification, the descriptions of the terms "one embodiment," "example," "specific example," and the like, mean that a particular feature, structure, material, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment or example is included in at least one embodiment or example of the present invention. In this specification, schematic representations of the above terms do not necessarily refer to the same embodiments or examples. Furthermore, the particular features, structures, materials, or characteristics described may be combined in any suitable manner in any one or more embodiments or examples.
The foregoing is merely illustrative and explanatory of the invention, as various modifications and additions may be made to the particular embodiments described, or in a similar manner, by those skilled in the art, without departing from the scope of the invention or exceeding the scope of the invention as defined in the claims.
Claims (7)
1. A credit evaluation method of a security service company, comprising the steps of:
s1, calculating the credibility point Q of each security service company;
s2, obtaining task scores of security services requested by the service request terminal;
the service request terminal sends out service request information;
the control center acquires security service types and the number x1 of required security guards in the service request information;
according to the formula r=α×x x1 * hp calculates the task score R of the corresponding security service;
hp is the average professional score of the security service of the corresponding security service type when executing;
wherein alpha is a preset coefficient corresponding to the security service type; x is a preset value which is more than 1 and less than or equal to 1.1;
s3, acquiring task execution records of each security service company in the past T1 time;
the T1 is a preset value;
the task execution record comprises security service types of security services executed by security service companies, the number of security personnel corresponding to the security services and the professional degree score H of the corresponding security personnel;
calculating and acquiring a task score Rp of each security service executed by a security service company in the past T1 time;
for a security service company, dividing the corresponding task scores Rp into a plurality of interval groups according to the sequence of the task scores Rp from small to large, wherein the value range of each interval group is not repeated;
judging the interval group where the task score R of the security service requested by the service request terminal is located in each security service company, and marking the interval group as a target interval group;
calculating to obtain a matching degree coefficient K corresponding to each security service company according to a formula K=Q×z (gamma 1×B1+gamma 2×B2);
z is the number of security services performed by the security service company during the past T1 time;
b1 is the ratio of the security service times and z contained in the target interval group;
the B2 is the ratio of the security service times to z contained in the interval group which is larger than the target interval group; both γ1 and γ2 are preset coefficients, and γ1+γ2=1;
and S4, recommending the security service companies to the corresponding service request terminals according to the sequence of the matching degree coefficient K from high to low.
2. The credit evaluation method of a security service company according to claim 1, wherein the calculation method of the trusted score Q is:
s11, recording record information in a record information acquisition unit by each security service company through a corresponding security service terminal in a specified time;
the record information comprises security personnel identity information, security service object information and security personnel residence task information;
s12, acquiring a record information acquisition rate v1 corresponding to each security service terminal;
average update time t of record information corresponding to each security service terminal;
recording information accuracy v2 corresponding to each security service terminal;
the calculation method of the average update time t of the record information comprises the following steps:
taking the corresponding security service ending time, the time when error information is found after verification, the related information changing time and the like as starting points, taking the modification time of the corresponding record information in the record information acquisition unit as an end point, acquiring the interval time between the starting point and the end point, acquiring the average value of the interval time corresponding to each security service company in the past preset time T2, and taking the average value as the average updating time T;
s13, calculating to obtain a trusted integral Q corresponding to each security service company according to a formula Q= (ω1×v1+ω2×v2)/(ω 3*t);
the ω1, ω2 and ω3 are all preset parameters.
3. The credit rating method for a security service company according to claim 1, wherein the trusted score Q is an enterprise public credit rating result.
4. The credit rating system of a security service company according to claim 1, wherein the value of x is 1.01.
5. The credit evaluation method of a security service company according to claim 1, wherein the calculation method of the average professional score hp is:
classifying the security services executed by each security service company recorded in the record information acquisition unit according to the security service type to which the security service belongs;
for the security services of the same type, the number x2 of security personnel corresponding to each security service and the professional degree score H corresponding to each security personnel are obtained, then the average value hp of the professional degree scores H of the x2 security personnel is calculated, and the average value is used as the average professional degree score hp of the security services of the corresponding type.
6. The credit evaluation method of a security service company according to claim 5, wherein the calculating method of the professional degree score H of the security guard is:
acquiring a security working period c1 of a security guard;
acquiring a class coefficient c2 of a security guard;
acquiring a security experience coefficient c3 of a security guard;
the level coefficient c2 of the security guard refers to that the security guard is endowed with preset coefficients from small to large according to no-evidence, primary security guard, middle security guard, high security guard, security manager and high security manager in sequence;
according to the formulaCalculating to obtain a professional degree score H of the corresponding security guard;
the beta 1 and the beta 2 are preset parameters;
the calculation method of the security experience coefficient c3 comprises the following steps:
acquiring the execution years of security tasks executed by corresponding security guards during a practitioner;
according to the security service type corresponding to the security task executed by the security guard, the preset coefficient alpha value corresponding to the security task executed by the security guard is marked as alpha 1, alpha 2, … and alpha n in sequence;
sequentially marking the execution years corresponding to the security tasks executed by the security guard as y1, y2, … and yn;
according to the formulaCalculating to obtain a security experience coefficient c3 of the corresponding security guard; wherein i is more than or equal to 1 and n is more than or equal to n.
7. A credit evaluation system of a security service company for performing a credit evaluation method of a security service company according to any one of claims 1 to 6.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202310454555.2A CN116562551B (en) | 2023-04-25 | 2023-04-25 | Credit evaluation method and evaluation system for security service company |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202310454555.2A CN116562551B (en) | 2023-04-25 | 2023-04-25 | Credit evaluation method and evaluation system for security service company |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN116562551A true CN116562551A (en) | 2023-08-08 |
| CN116562551B CN116562551B (en) | 2024-03-08 |
Family
ID=87489074
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202310454555.2A Active CN116562551B (en) | 2023-04-25 | 2023-04-25 | Credit evaluation method and evaluation system for security service company |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN116562551B (en) |
Citations (8)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN108090103A (en) * | 2016-11-23 | 2018-05-29 | 航天信息股份有限公司 | The data managing method of security service supervision and management |
| US20180285898A1 (en) * | 2017-03-31 | 2018-10-04 | China Certification & Accreditation Association | System for examining service certifications with multi-sides based on customer experiences |
| CN108985536A (en) * | 2017-11-02 | 2018-12-11 | 方高山 | A kind of security operation system of fixed point free services its method |
| CN110706073A (en) * | 2019-09-30 | 2020-01-17 | 周健 | System and method for realizing automation and informatization operation of security service |
| CN111126874A (en) * | 2019-12-30 | 2020-05-08 | 重庆能工科技发展有限公司 | Construction worker analysis system and method based on big data |
| CN113240349A (en) * | 2021-06-21 | 2021-08-10 | 拼途(北京)信息技术有限公司 | Driver evaluation information processing method and device, electronic equipment and readable storage medium |
| KR20220070644A (en) * | 2020-11-23 | 2022-05-31 | 한상훈 | System for recommending company based machine learning |
| KR102451672B1 (en) * | 2021-09-01 | 2022-10-06 | 주식회사 시드파트원 | Online environmental service provider brokerage system and method |
-
2023
- 2023-04-25 CN CN202310454555.2A patent/CN116562551B/en active Active
Patent Citations (8)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN108090103A (en) * | 2016-11-23 | 2018-05-29 | 航天信息股份有限公司 | The data managing method of security service supervision and management |
| US20180285898A1 (en) * | 2017-03-31 | 2018-10-04 | China Certification & Accreditation Association | System for examining service certifications with multi-sides based on customer experiences |
| CN108985536A (en) * | 2017-11-02 | 2018-12-11 | 方高山 | A kind of security operation system of fixed point free services its method |
| CN110706073A (en) * | 2019-09-30 | 2020-01-17 | 周健 | System and method for realizing automation and informatization operation of security service |
| CN111126874A (en) * | 2019-12-30 | 2020-05-08 | 重庆能工科技发展有限公司 | Construction worker analysis system and method based on big data |
| KR20220070644A (en) * | 2020-11-23 | 2022-05-31 | 한상훈 | System for recommending company based machine learning |
| CN113240349A (en) * | 2021-06-21 | 2021-08-10 | 拼途(北京)信息技术有限公司 | Driver evaluation information processing method and device, electronic equipment and readable storage medium |
| KR102451672B1 (en) * | 2021-09-01 | 2022-10-06 | 주식회사 시드파트원 | Online environmental service provider brokerage system and method |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN116562551B (en) | 2024-03-08 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Wang et al. | Intellectual capital disclosure by Chinese and Indian information technology companies: A comparative analysis | |
| Alptekin et al. | Analysis of criteria influencing contractor selection using TOPSIS method | |
| US20050272022A1 (en) | Method and Apparatus for Project Valuation, Prioritization, and Performance Management | |
| Daniel et al. | Ranking of strategic plans in balanced scorecard by using electre method | |
| KR20120104856A (en) | System and method for recommendation and evaluation of talented person | |
| Nourani et al. | Business excellence: the managerial and value-creation efficiencies of the insurance companies | |
| CN112150291A (en) | Intelligent financial product recommendation system | |
| Hove et al. | Interaction of technological marketing and Porter’s five competitive forces on SME competitiveness in South Africa | |
| CN114881547A (en) | Team performance evaluation method and device for Internet projects | |
| CN115577969A (en) | Efficient multidimensional management method for enterprises | |
| CN114971693A (en) | Engineering cost consultation management system based on BIM | |
| CN113627701A (en) | Method and electronic device for scoring bid document | |
| CN116562551B (en) | Credit evaluation method and evaluation system for security service company | |
| CN107194552A (en) | A kind of intelligence bid platform | |
| Di Porto et al. | Heterogeneous paths to stability | |
| WO2021222461A1 (en) | Electronic reputation management | |
| CN109102391A (en) | Financial institution's ranking method, device and computer readable storage medium | |
| CN112465457A (en) | Supervision project management method, system, device and computer storage medium | |
| CN116645071A (en) | Intelligent resume management system for recruitment of personnel | |
| DE212017000034U1 (en) | Computer system for determining bonus rates and discounts, and storage therefor | |
| Lin | Gender wage gaps by college major in Taiwan: Empirical evidence from the 1997–2003 Manpower Utilization Survey | |
| CN115860393A (en) | Wisdom garden business recruitment management system | |
| Abdullahj et al. | Effects of standard costing on the profitability of telecommunication companies (study of MTN Nigeria) | |
| Gregersen et al. | Economics of public forestry incentive programs: a case study of cost-sharing in Minnesota | |
| Mozaffari et al. | A new framework for performance evaluation system using strategy map: A case study of Islamic Azad University of Semnan |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant |