CN115624109A - Broiler silage and preparation method and application thereof - Google Patents
Broiler silage and preparation method and application thereof Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN115624109A CN115624109A CN202211184469.6A CN202211184469A CN115624109A CN 115624109 A CN115624109 A CN 115624109A CN 202211184469 A CN202211184469 A CN 202211184469A CN 115624109 A CN115624109 A CN 115624109A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- fermented
- grass
- silage
- alfalfa
- jinling
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 241000287828 Gallus gallus Species 0.000 title claims abstract description 139
- 239000004460 silage Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 35
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 title abstract description 4
- 235000015696 Portulacaria afra Nutrition 0.000 claims abstract description 94
- 244000177175 Typha elephantina Species 0.000 claims abstract description 94
- 235000018747 Typha elephantina Nutrition 0.000 claims abstract description 94
- 241000219823 Medicago Species 0.000 claims abstract description 72
- 235000017587 Medicago sativa ssp. sativa Nutrition 0.000 claims abstract description 72
- 244000046146 Pueraria lobata Species 0.000 claims abstract description 58
- 235000010575 Pueraria lobata Nutrition 0.000 claims abstract description 58
- 239000004459 forage Substances 0.000 claims description 58
- 244000025254 Cannabis sativa Species 0.000 claims description 51
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 18
- 210000000579 abdominal fat Anatomy 0.000 claims description 17
- 238000002156 mixing Methods 0.000 claims description 17
- 238000000855 fermentation Methods 0.000 claims description 10
- 230000004151 fermentation Effects 0.000 claims description 10
- 239000002994 raw material Substances 0.000 claims description 7
- 239000000843 powder Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000005303 weighing Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 235000015099 wheat brans Nutrition 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000007605 air drying Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 235000019733 Fish meal Nutrition 0.000 claims description 2
- 235000019764 Soybean Meal Nutrition 0.000 claims description 2
- 240000008042 Zea mays Species 0.000 claims description 2
- 235000005824 Zea mays ssp. parviglumis Nutrition 0.000 claims description 2
- 235000002017 Zea mays subsp mays Nutrition 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000003795 chemical substances by application Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 235000005822 corn Nutrition 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000004467 fishmeal Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000004455 soybean meal Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000004575 stone Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 235000013330 chicken meat Nutrition 0.000 abstract description 106
- 239000000835 fiber Substances 0.000 abstract description 36
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 abstract description 26
- 241001465754 Metazoa Species 0.000 abstract description 18
- 241000288049 Perdix perdix Species 0.000 abstract description 16
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 abstract description 15
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 abstract description 9
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 abstract description 3
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 abstract description 2
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 42
- 230000002354 daily effect Effects 0.000 description 39
- 210000003743 erythrocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 27
- 238000003307 slaughter Methods 0.000 description 25
- 210000000265 leukocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 18
- 210000004369 blood Anatomy 0.000 description 17
- 239000008280 blood Substances 0.000 description 17
- 102000001554 Hemoglobins Human genes 0.000 description 16
- 108010054147 Hemoglobins Proteins 0.000 description 16
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 16
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 16
- 210000002966 serum Anatomy 0.000 description 13
- 235000021053 average weight gain Nutrition 0.000 description 11
- 235000013372 meat Nutrition 0.000 description 11
- 235000013325 dietary fiber Nutrition 0.000 description 9
- 210000000952 spleen Anatomy 0.000 description 9
- QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N atomic oxygen Chemical compound [O] QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 7
- 238000004820 blood count Methods 0.000 description 7
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 7
- 229910052760 oxygen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 7
- 239000001301 oxygen Substances 0.000 description 7
- 244000144977 poultry Species 0.000 description 7
- 235000013594 poultry meat Nutrition 0.000 description 7
- 239000001913 cellulose Substances 0.000 description 6
- 229920002678 cellulose Polymers 0.000 description 6
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 6
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 6
- 241000209504 Poaceae Species 0.000 description 5
- 235000021051 daily weight gain Nutrition 0.000 description 5
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 5
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 5
- 210000003205 muscle Anatomy 0.000 description 5
- 230000001737 promoting effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 208000035240 Disease Resistance Diseases 0.000 description 4
- 241000282887 Suidae Species 0.000 description 4
- 235000005911 diet Nutrition 0.000 description 4
- 230000037213 diet Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 4
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 4
- 235000016709 nutrition Nutrition 0.000 description 4
- 101100136092 Drosophila melanogaster peng gene Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 229920001202 Inulin Polymers 0.000 description 3
- 238000010171 animal model Methods 0.000 description 3
- 235000014590 basal diet Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 150000007514 bases Chemical class 0.000 description 3
- 230000037396 body weight Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 3
- 235000021050 feed intake Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 239000004615 ingredient Substances 0.000 description 3
- JYJIGFIDKWBXDU-MNNPPOADSA-N inulin Chemical compound O[C@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O[C@@]1(CO)OC[C@]1(OC[C@]2(OC[C@]3(OC[C@]4(OC[C@]5(OC[C@]6(OC[C@]7(OC[C@]8(OC[C@]9(OC[C@]%10(OC[C@]%11(OC[C@]%12(OC[C@]%13(OC[C@]%14(OC[C@]%15(OC[C@]%16(OC[C@]%17(OC[C@]%18(OC[C@]%19(OC[C@]%20(OC[C@]%21(OC[C@]%22(OC[C@]%23(OC[C@]%24(OC[C@]%25(OC[C@]%26(OC[C@]%27(OC[C@]%28(OC[C@]%29(OC[C@]%30(OC[C@]%31(OC[C@]%32(OC[C@]%33(OC[C@]%34(OC[C@]%35(OC[C@]%36(O[C@@H]%37[C@@H]([C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O%37)O)[C@H]([C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O%36)O)[C@H]([C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O%35)O)[C@H]([C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O%34)O)[C@H]([C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O%33)O)[C@H]([C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O%32)O)[C@H]([C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O%31)O)[C@H]([C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O%30)O)[C@H]([C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O%29)O)[C@H]([C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O%28)O)[C@H]([C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O%27)O)[C@H]([C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O%26)O)[C@H]([C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O%25)O)[C@H]([C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O%24)O)[C@H]([C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O%23)O)[C@H]([C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O%22)O)[C@H]([C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O%21)O)[C@H]([C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O%20)O)[C@H]([C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O%19)O)[C@H]([C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O%18)O)[C@H]([C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O%17)O)[C@H]([C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O%16)O)[C@H]([C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O%15)O)[C@H]([C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O%14)O)[C@H]([C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O%13)O)[C@H]([C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O%12)O)[C@H]([C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O%11)O)[C@H]([C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O%10)O)[C@H]([C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O9)O)[C@H]([C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O8)O)[C@H]([C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O7)O)[C@H]([C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O6)O)[C@H]([C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O5)O)[C@H]([C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O4)O)[C@H]([C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O3)O)[C@H]([C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O2)O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O1 JYJIGFIDKWBXDU-MNNPPOADSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 229940029339 inulin Drugs 0.000 description 3
- 235000019629 palatability Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 241000272814 Anser sp. Species 0.000 description 2
- IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Atomic nitrogen Chemical compound N#N IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 241000271566 Aves Species 0.000 description 2
- CURLTUGMZLYLDI-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon dioxide Chemical compound O=C=O CURLTUGMZLYLDI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 241001317575 Elephantopus Species 0.000 description 2
- 241000196324 Embryophyta Species 0.000 description 2
- 108090000790 Enzymes Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 102000004190 Enzymes Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 235000003332 Ilex aquifolium Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 235000002296 Ilex sandwicensis Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 235000002294 Ilex volkensiana Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 240000003183 Manihot esculenta Species 0.000 description 2
- 235000016735 Manihot esculenta subsp esculenta Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- RXUWDKBZZLIASQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Puerarin Natural products OCC1OC(Oc2c(O)cc(O)c3C(=O)C(=COc23)c4ccc(O)cc4)C(O)C(O)C1O RXUWDKBZZLIASQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 241000347391 Umbrina cirrosa Species 0.000 description 2
- 230000002411 adverse Effects 0.000 description 2
- 235000013339 cereals Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- HVYWMOMLDIMFJA-DPAQBDIFSA-N cholesterol Chemical compound C1C=C2C[C@@H](O)CC[C@]2(C)[C@@H]2[C@@H]1[C@@H]1CC[C@H]([C@H](C)CCCC(C)C)[C@@]1(C)CC2 HVYWMOMLDIMFJA-DPAQBDIFSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000004140 cleaning Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000000306 component Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000013329 compounding Methods 0.000 description 2
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 230000003203 everyday effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000013401 experimental design Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000009313 farming Methods 0.000 description 2
- 210000003746 feather Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 235000013305 food Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 230000036039 immunity Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000004060 metabolic process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 235000015097 nutrients Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 210000000056 organ Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 2
- HKEAFJYKMMKDOR-VPRICQMDSA-N puerarin Chemical compound O[C@@H]1[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O[C@H]1C1=C(O)C=CC(C2=O)=C1OC=C2C1=CC=C(O)C=C1 HKEAFJYKMMKDOR-VPRICQMDSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000012216 screening Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000004065 semiconductor Substances 0.000 description 2
- 210000002784 stomach Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 239000011232 storage material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 241000213006 Angelica dahurica Species 0.000 description 1
- 241001416181 Axis axis Species 0.000 description 1
- 244000063299 Bacillus subtilis Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000014469 Bacillus subtilis Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000016068 Berberis vulgaris Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 241000335053 Beta vulgaris Species 0.000 description 1
- 244000068645 Carya illinoensis Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000009025 Carya illinoensis Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 102000005575 Cellulases Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010084185 Cellulases Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 244000037364 Cinnamomum aromaticum Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000014489 Cinnamomum aromaticum Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 241000235646 Cyberlindnera jadinii Species 0.000 description 1
- 206010012559 Developmental delay Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 102000003951 Erythropoietin Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108090000394 Erythropoietin Proteins 0.000 description 1
- WQZGKKKJIJFFOK-GASJEMHNSA-N Glucose Natural products OC[C@H]1OC(O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H]1O WQZGKKKJIJFFOK-GASJEMHNSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 244000068988 Glycine max Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000010469 Glycine max Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229920002488 Hemicellulose Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 206010021137 Hypovolaemia Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 240000007594 Oryza sativa Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000007164 Oryza sativa Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 206010034203 Pectus Carinatum Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 241000191998 Pediococcus acidilactici Species 0.000 description 1
- 244000130556 Pennisetum purpureum Species 0.000 description 1
- 244000046052 Phaseolus vulgaris Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000010627 Phaseolus vulgaris Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 241000286209 Phasianidae Species 0.000 description 1
- 240000007164 Salvia officinalis Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000002912 Salvia officinalis Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000010521 absorption reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000654 additive Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000996 additive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 150000001413 amino acids Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000006053 animal diet Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000003674 animal food additive Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000433 anti-nutritional effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003115 biocidal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004071 biological effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000012503 blood component Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003139 buffering effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910002092 carbon dioxide Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000001569 carbon dioxide Substances 0.000 description 1
- 210000004027 cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000002421 cell wall Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000000038 chest Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 108010025790 chlorophyllase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 230000000052 comparative effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009264 composting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000012141 concentrate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005520 cutting process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000006378 damage Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000354 decomposition reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007123 defense Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000014113 dietary fatty acids Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000029087 digestion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 102000038379 digestive enzymes Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108091007734 digestive enzymes Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 201000010099 disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 208000037265 diseases, disorders, signs and symptoms Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 239000003792 electrolyte Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229940105423 erythropoietin Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 238000000556 factor analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000194 fatty acid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229930195729 fatty acid Natural products 0.000 description 1
- 150000004665 fatty acids Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 210000003608 fece Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000002657 fibrous material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000037406 food intake Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000012631 food intake Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000014105 formulated food Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000009472 formulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000005176 gastrointestinal motility Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000008103 glucose Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000036541 health Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005534 hematocrit Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004128 high performance liquid chromatography Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000003642 hunger Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000005286 illumination Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000002865 immune cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000012535 impurity Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000001727 in vivo Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000005764 inhibitory process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910052500 inorganic mineral Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007413 intestinal health Effects 0.000 description 1
- CJWQYWQDLBZGPD-UHFFFAOYSA-N isoflavone Natural products C1=C(OC)C(OC)=CC(OC)=C1C1=COC2=C(C=CC(C)(C)O3)C3=C(OC)C=C2C1=O CJWQYWQDLBZGPD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 150000002515 isoflavone derivatives Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 235000008696 isoflavones Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229920005610 lignin Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 210000004185 liver Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 244000144972 livestock Species 0.000 description 1
- 239000010871 livestock manure Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000014759 maintenance of location Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 208000030159 metabolic disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 230000000813 microbial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 244000005700 microbiome Species 0.000 description 1
- 239000011707 mineral Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052757 nitrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 235000021049 nutrient content Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000035764 nutrition Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000006180 nutrition needs Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000009304 pastoral farming Methods 0.000 description 1
- 244000052769 pathogen Species 0.000 description 1
- 210000002976 pectoralis muscle Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000011056 performance test Methods 0.000 description 1
- OXCMYAYHXIHQOA-UHFFFAOYSA-N potassium;[2-butyl-5-chloro-3-[[4-[2-(1,2,4-triaza-3-azanidacyclopenta-1,4-dien-5-yl)phenyl]phenyl]methyl]imidazol-4-yl]methanol Chemical group [K+].CCCCC1=NC(Cl)=C(CO)N1CC1=CC=C(C=2C(=CC=CC=2)C2=N[N-]N=N2)C=C1 OXCMYAYHXIHQOA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000001105 regulatory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000009566 rice Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000002020 sage Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229930182490 saponin Natural products 0.000 description 1
- 150000007949 saponins Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 235000017709 saponins Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000036186 satiety Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000019627 satiety Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000028327 secretion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004904 shortening Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007619 statistical method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003786 synthesis reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010998 test method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000001519 tissue Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000032258 transport Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000003462 vein Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 150000003712 vitamin E derivatives Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 235000019786 weight gain Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000004584 weight gain Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
- A23K—FODDER
- A23K50/00—Feeding-stuffs specially adapted for particular animals
- A23K50/70—Feeding-stuffs specially adapted for particular animals for birds
- A23K50/75—Feeding-stuffs specially adapted for particular animals for birds for poultry
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01K—ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; CARE OF BIRDS, FISHES, INSECTS; FISHING; REARING OR BREEDING ANIMALS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NEW BREEDS OF ANIMALS
- A01K67/00—Rearing or breeding animals, not otherwise provided for; New breeds of animals
- A01K67/02—Breeding vertebrates
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
- A23K—FODDER
- A23K10/00—Animal feeding-stuffs
- A23K10/10—Animal feeding-stuffs obtained by microbiological or biochemical processes
- A23K10/12—Animal feeding-stuffs obtained by microbiological or biochemical processes by fermentation of natural products, e.g. of vegetable material, animal waste material or biomass
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
- A23K—FODDER
- A23K10/00—Animal feeding-stuffs
- A23K10/20—Animal feeding-stuffs from material of animal origin
- A23K10/22—Animal feeding-stuffs from material of animal origin from fish
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
- A23K—FODDER
- A23K10/00—Animal feeding-stuffs
- A23K10/30—Animal feeding-stuffs from material of plant origin, e.g. roots, seeds or hay; from material of fungal origin, e.g. mushrooms
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
- A23K—FODDER
- A23K10/00—Animal feeding-stuffs
- A23K10/30—Animal feeding-stuffs from material of plant origin, e.g. roots, seeds or hay; from material of fungal origin, e.g. mushrooms
- A23K10/37—Animal feeding-stuffs from material of plant origin, e.g. roots, seeds or hay; from material of fungal origin, e.g. mushrooms from waste material
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
- A23K—FODDER
- A23K20/00—Accessory food factors for animal feeding-stuffs
- A23K20/20—Inorganic substances, e.g. oligoelements
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
- A23K—FODDER
- A23K30/00—Processes specially adapted for preservation of materials in order to produce animal feeding-stuffs
- A23K30/10—Processes specially adapted for preservation of materials in order to produce animal feeding-stuffs of green fodder
- A23K30/15—Processes specially adapted for preservation of materials in order to produce animal feeding-stuffs of green fodder using chemicals or microorganisms for ensilaging
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
- A23K—FODDER
- A23K40/00—Shaping or working-up of animal feeding-stuffs
- A23K40/10—Shaping or working-up of animal feeding-stuffs by agglomeration; by granulation, e.g. making powders
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
- Y02P60/00—Technologies relating to agriculture, livestock or agroalimentary industries
- Y02P60/80—Food processing, e.g. use of renewable energies or variable speed drives in handling, conveying or stacking
- Y02P60/87—Re-use of by-products of food processing for fodder production
Abstract
The invention relates to the field of silage processing, in particular to broiler silage and a preparation method and application thereof, the invention researches the influence of 3 feeds such as elephant grass (including Guijian elephant grass and purple elephant grass), alfalfa, kudzu and the like on the growth of Jinling partridge, and a large number of animal experiments prove that: the fermented feed with a single fiber source has no obvious promotion effect on the growth of the Jinling spotted chickens, and after reasonable formula optimization, the fermented purple elephant grass, the fermented alfalfa and the fermented kudzu vine silage have a good promotion effect on the growth of the Jinling spotted chickens, and simultaneously can effectively reduce the feed weight ratio of the silage and improve the utilization rate of the silage.
Description
[ technical field ] A method for producing a semiconductor device
The invention relates to the technical field of silage processing, in particular to broiler silage and a preparation method and application thereof.
[ background ] A method for producing a semiconductor device
Dietary fiber is composed of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin, structural compounds and non-structural compounds. In recent years, researches show that a large number of enzymes with biological activity and a plurality of functional substances are arranged on plant cell walls, and the components can effectively improve the absorption and utilization of nutrient substances by animal bodies, thereby promoting the healthy growth of animals. Fiber is an essential ingredient in poultry feed. On the one hand, poultry do not have the corresponding digestive enzymes and have a poor ability to digest fiber, and thus whether fiber is added or not is considered an anti-nutritional ingredient, and on the other hand, many types of fiber are considered to improve the quality of poultry manure, improve intestinal health, eliminate hunger, promote health and growth of poultry. In these studies it was found that different kinds of cellulases have a great effect on the decomposition of cellulose. They can also promote the development of organs of the broiler chickens, promote the secretion of related enzymes, promote the digestion of nutrient substances and improve the performance of the broiler chickens. Thus, fiber is considered a functional feed additive. Previous studies have investigated the effect of dietary fiber on animal growth and development, and found in the studies: different fiber source diets have different effects on the growth and development of animals. In the prior art, under the same feeding conditions, the FREIRE test shows that: the addition of a proper amount of alfalfa fiber can promote the growth of piglets; and the addition of a large amount of bean cakes can result in the reduction of the feed conversion rate. Therefore, it is recommended to select a suitable fiber source as a ration additive. FREIRE and others found that wheat bran fiber was effective in ensuring daily nitrogen retention in pigs when the pigs were fed daily a diet containing alfalfa fiber, soybean fiber, beet pulp and wheat bran fiber. The results of the juxiachun and the like for feeding white goose in Yangzhou by using the alfalfa and the rice hull grass powder as fiber sources show that: the two fiber sources have no influence on the growth performance of the Yangzhou white goose at 1-4 weeks. Therefore, different dietary fibers have different effects on different animals, and deep research and screening are required to obtain the dietary fiber feed suitable for different animals.
Because of the influence of the policy of banning grazing, how to realize the higher growth of economy becomes the difficult problem that awaits solution urgently, the above-mentioned problem has effectively been solved in the appearance of fermented silage, and in addition, adopt the fermentation process dietary fiber feed not only can improve the productivity of beasts and birds, but also can reduce the disease and take place, improve the internal condition of animal, promote beasts and birds meat egg class food product quality, reduce the discarded object and discharge, protect the environment and prevent pollution, be one of the most effective methods of solving antibiotic residue, promoting animal growth and reduction in production cost at present.
Earlier researches show that the fermented feed can improve the weight of the Jinling spotted chickens and improve the production performance and slaughtering performance of the Jinling spotted chickens, but whether certain influence is exerted on blood physiological indexes of the Jinling spotted chickens is not clear. In northern areas of China, due to the lack of pasture resources such as high-quality alfalfa and the like, the healthy and rapid development of poultry industry in the areas is limited. The fermented feed has the advantages of comprehensive nutrition, good palatability and the like, and is an ideal green and environment-friendly feed raw material. Therefore, the influence of the fermented feed on the production performance and slaughtering performance and the influence of the fermented forage grass on the physiological indexes of blood are researched, and a theoretical basis is provided for popularization and application in the feeding of the fermented forage grass, the food and the livestock.
[ summary of the invention ]
In view of the above, there is a need for a fermented feed for the production performance and slaughter performance of Jinling chicken, which is produced from a dietary fiber material and has a good effect of improving the meat quality of Jinling chicken.
In order to achieve the purpose, the technical scheme adopted by the invention is as follows:
the broiler silage comprises the following raw materials in percentage by weight: 57.52 percent of corn, 22.05 percent of soybean meal, 8.73 percent of wheat bran, 2.3 percent of fish meal, 1.4 percent of stone powder and 8 percent of fermented forage grass; the fermented forage grass consists of fermented purple elephant grass, fermented alfalfa and fermented kudzu.
Furthermore, the mass ratio of the fermented purple elephant grass, the fermented alfalfa and the fermented kudzu in the fermented forage grass is 1. Furthermore, the invention also comprises the application of the broiler silage in improving the weight of the Jinling spotted chicken and/or reducing the abdominal fat rate, wherein the mass ratio of the fermented purple elephant grass, the fermented alfalfa and the fermented kudzu in the fermented forage grass is 1.
The invention also comprises a method for preparing the broiler silage, which comprises the following steps:
(1) preparing fermented forage grass: respectively inoculating purple elephant grass, alfalfa and kudzu vine into silage agents for fermentation to obtain fermented purple elephant grass, fermented alfalfa and fermented kudzu vine, and then mixing the fermented purple elephant grass, the fermented alfalfa and the fermented kudzu vine according to a mass ratio of 1-2-6; the fermentation time of the purple elephant grass, the alfalfa and the kudzu is 25-30d;
(2) weighing the raw materials according to the weight percentage, fully mixing, stacking with fermented forage grass for 20-25d, taking out the stack retting product, air drying, crushing and granulating to obtain the silage.
The invention also comprises a method for feeding Jinling Huaji by using the broiler silage, which is characterized in that the method comprises the steps of feeding the just-born Jinling Huaji with a basic feed without adding fermented forage grass, and feeding the Jinling Huaji with the broiler silage added with the fermented forage grass instead of the basic feed after 1 week, wherein the silage is prepared by mixing the fermented purple elephant grass, the fermented alfalfa and the fermented kudzu according to the mass ratio of 1-2-6.
The invention has the following beneficial effects:
1. the invention researches the influence of 3 forage grasses such as elephant grass (including Guijian leading elephant grass and purple elephant grass), alfalfa, kudzu and the like on the growth of Jinling partridge chickens, and a large number of animal experiments prove that: the fermented forage grass with a single fiber source is adopted, and has no obvious promotion effect on the growth of the Jinling spotted chickens due to single nutritional ingredients, and after reasonable formula optimization, the fermented purple elephant grass, the fermented alfalfa and the fermented kudzu silage play a good promotion effect on the growth of the Jinling spotted chickens, and meanwhile, the feed weight ratio of the silage can be effectively reduced, and the utilization rate of the silage is improved, and continuous researches show that when the fermented purple elephant grass, the fermented alfalfa and the fermented kudzu silage are mixed according to the mass ratio of (2-6).
[ description of the drawings ]
FIG. 1 is a graph showing the effect of fermented feed from different fiber sources on the performance of chickens from Jinling;
FIG. 2 is a graph of the effect of fermented feed from different fiber sources on slaughter performance of Jinling spotted chickens;
FIG. 3 is a graph showing the effect of fermented feeds from different fiber sources on the physiological indicators of the blood of the Jinling spotted chickens.
[ detailed description ] embodiments
All of the features disclosed in this specification, or all of the steps in any method or process so disclosed, may be combined in any combination, except combinations of features and/or steps that are mutually exclusive.
Any feature disclosed in this specification (including any accompanying claims, abstract) is an example of a generic series of equivalent or similar features, unless expressly stated otherwise.
Example 1:
the present example mainly studies the influence of different fermented feeds on the growth of the jinling spotted maigre chickens, as follows:
1. test materials:
the Guangxi Jinling Huaji test field is provided by Guangxi Jinling farming and animal husbandry limited company, guangxi Dafuhua farming and animal husbandry limited company provides basic compound feed, and Guangxi Zhuang nationality autonomous region animal husbandry institute provides fermented alfalfa. The fermented forage grass types are respectively fermented purple elephant grass, fermented Guijian Zhenxiang elephant grass, fermented alfalfa and fermented kudzu, and are respectively marked as GG, GR, LM and LA. The composition and nutritional level of the air-dried basal diet and fermented feed are shown in table 1:
TABLE 1 air-dried basal diet composition and nutritional levels
In the embodiment, 1-day-old Jinling spotted chickens are selected, the feeding mode is cage culture, the culture environment is well ventilated, the natural illumination is realized, the humidity of about 65 percent is controlled and maintained, the chickens are fed freely and sufficiently, and the feeding times are 2 times/day.
2. Experiment design:
a random block experiment design is adopted, 1 day old Jinling flower chickens are selected, and 240 feathers of healthy Jinling flower chickens without obvious weight difference are selected and randomly divided into 5 experiment groups. One group of the four groups of fermented forage grass is used as a control group (fed by basic compound feed and recorded as CK), and the other four groups of fermented forage grass are respectively added from the first week and replace the feeding treatment of basic forage grains (the types of the added fermented forage grass are respectively fermented purple elephant grass, fermented Guiminyue elephant grass, fermented alfalfa and fermented kudzu and recorded as GG, GR, LM and LA). 48-feathered chickens were treated in each treatment group, with each 4-feathered chicken being housed in the same cage.
3. Test animals and test design
A random block experimental design is adopted, 1 day old Jinling spotted chickens are selected, and 240 feathers of healthy Jinling spotted chickens without obvious weight difference are selected and randomly divided into 5 experimental groups. One group of the four groups of fermented forage grass is used as a control group (fed by basic compound feed and recorded as CK), and the other four groups of fermented forage grass are respectively added from the first week and replace the feeding treatment of basic forage grains (the types of the added fermented forage grass are respectively fermented purple elephant grass, fermented Guiminyue elephant grass, fermented alfalfa and fermented kudzu and recorded as GG, GR, LM and LA). 48-feathered chickens were treated in each treatment group, with each 4-feathered chicken being housed in the same cage.
Example 2:
in this example, the influence of different fermented feeds in example 1 on the growth performance of the jingling partridge chickens was studied as follows:
1. the experimental animals and the design were carried out according to step 3 of example 1. The indexes of the test period for detecting the growth performance of the Jinling spotted chicken are as follows:
the feed feeding amount and the residual feeding amount in the trough are recorded every day for each group, all test chickens are weighed on an empty stomach, and the daily average weight gain and the feed weight ratio are calculated.
Average daily gain = (end weight-initial weight)/number of days tested
Daily average feed weight ratio = daily average feed intake/daily average gain
2. The results obtained are shown in FIG. 1:
compared with a control group, the daily weight gain of the Holly odorifera test group, the Holly odorifera test group and the Carya illinoensis test group which are added in the full period of the formal period is remarkably reduced (P is less than 0.05, F is not less than 11.079), and the reduction ratios are 14.57%, 14.63% and 5.93% respectively. Wherein the daily average weight gain of the fermented Guijian grassiness test group in the whole period of the official period is reduced most obviously.
Compared with a control group, the fermented purple elephant grass test group is added in the full period of the formal period, the fermented Guijian Xiangcao test group obviously increases the daily average feed weight ratio of the Jinling spotted chickens (P <0.05, F = 7.549), and the increase ratio is respectively 13.70% and 14.59%. Wherein the daily average material weight ratio of the fermented Guijian Xiangcao experimental group in the whole period of the formal period is increased most obviously.
For 10-14 weeks old chickens with the Jinling flowers, the fermented purple elephant grass test group, the fermented Guimin Xiangcao test group, the fermented alfalfa test group and the fermented kudzu vine test group are added, compared with a control group, the daily average weight gain is remarkably reduced (P is less than 0.05, F is not less than 8.929), the reduction ratio is respectively 11.68%, 16.57%, 16.13% and 14.38%, and the fermented Guimin Xiangcao is reduced most remarkably. Compared with a control group, the daily average material weight ratio of the fermented purple elephant grass test group, the fermented Guiminyue elephant grass test group, the fermented alfalfa test group and the fermented kudzu test group is remarkably increased (P is less than 0.05, F is not less than 4.973), the increasing ratios are respectively 10.14%, 17.05%, 16.13% and 14.06%, and the fermented Guiminyue elephant grass is most remarkably increased.
For the Jinling spotted chickens of 15-19 weeks old, the daily average weight gain of the fermented purple elephant grass group and the fermented Guijian Zhen elephant grass group is obviously reduced (P is less than 0.05, F is not less than 7.834) compared with the control group, and the reduction ratio is 17.49 percent and 12.53 percent. And the reduction of the fermented purple elephant grass group is most obvious. Compared with a control group, the daily average material weight ratio of the group added with the fermented purple elephant grass and the fermented GuiMin Zheng elephant grass is remarkably increased (P is less than 0.01, F is less than 7.861), and the increase ratio is 17.66 percent and 11.09 percent. And the rise of the fermented purple elephant grass group is most obvious.
3. The above results show that:
the fermented purple elephant grass, the fermented Guijian Zhenjiao elephant grass and the fermented alfalfa are added, and the fermented kudzu vine reduces the daily average weight gain of the Jinling spotted-brown chickens to different degrees compared with a control group. The fermented purple elephant grass, the fermented Guijian elephant grass and the fermented alfalfa are added, the fermented kudzu increases the daily average feed weight ratio of the Jinling spotted chickens in different degrees compared with a control group, and the daily gain is lower than that of the control group after the fermented alfalfa is added to the Jinling spotted chickens, which is different from the view point that the production performance of animals can be improved by adding alfalfa powder in single-stomach animal diet proposed by the Touris national culture. This may be related to the different dietary formulations and the quality of the different fiber sources. If the microbial mineral content of the feed is sufficient to meet the nutritional needs of the poultry, the addition of a different cellulose source will increase the cellulose content of the feed, reducing the production performance. The addition of fermented alfalfa may adversely affect the performance of chicken production, mainly because alfalfa contains a large amount of high saponins and fibers, and may also be associated with vitamin E analogues, chlorophyllase, isoflavones, and the like. The adverse effects can be effectively relieved after the fermented alfalfa is fed, and the effect is better than that of a group without any treatment. The addition of the purple elephant grass can obviously increase the daily weight gain of the Jinling spotted chickens, while the Guijian elephant grass can reduce the daily average weight gain of the Jinling spotted chickens, but compared with a control group, the fermented elephant grass has better palatability, and has the effects of promoting gastrointestinal motility, improving daily feed intake, accelerating growth speed, shortening marketing time and saving concentrate cost; the daily gain of the Jinling spotted chickens added with the puerarin is lower than that of a control group, the satiety can be improved by fermenting the kudzu, and the palatability of the feed can be influenced by some substances in the puerarin so as to limit the food intake of the feed.
Example 3:
this example investigates the effect of the different fermented feeds of example 1 on the slaughter performance of chickens from the holy gracils.
1. The experimental animals and the design were carried out according to step 3 of example 1, and the slaughter performance test method for the jinling pheasants was as follows:
at the end of the trial, 12 broilers of similar weight were randomly selected from each treatment group for slaughter. Taking each part of the carcass (longissimus dorsi, muscles on two sides of chest and meat on the inner side of waist), and measuring the dry matter content by adopting a weighing method; a sample of the tail fat was taken and its fatty acid value was measured by HPLC. All data were then statistically analyzed. In the test process, slaughter performance indexes such as live body weight, carcass weight, slaughter rate, half-bore rate, full-bore rate, pectoral muscle rate, leg muscle rate, abdominal fat rate and the like are measured. The carcasses and the sampling method are specified in the agricultural industry Standard of the people's republic of China, poultry production performance noun terms and measurement statistical method.
2. The experimental results of the chicken breast muscle slaughtering performance are shown in figure 2:
compared with a control group, the fermented purple elephant grass test group, the fermented Guimin elephant grass test group, the fermented alfalfa test group and the fermented kudzu vine test group are added in the full period of the formal period, the live weight of the Jinling spotted chickens is obviously reduced (P is less than 0.05, F is not greater than 4.746), and the reduction ratio is 15.50%, 7.50%, 11.50% and 11.00% respectively. And the test group added with the fermented purple elephant grass has the most obvious reduction.
Compared with a control group, the fermented purple elephant grass test group, the fermented Guijian Xiangcao test group, the fermented alfalfa test group and the fermented kudzu vine test group are added in the full period of the formal period, the carcasses of Jinling partridge chickens are remarkably reduced (P is less than 0.05, F is not less than 3.973), and the reduction ratios are respectively 16.13%, 9.14%, 11.83% and 11.29%. And the test group added with the fermented purple elephant grass has the most obvious reduction.
Compared with a control group, the slaughtering rate of the jinling partridge in the fermented Guimin introductive elephant grass test group is remarkably reduced (P <0.05, F = 2.408), and the reduction ratio is 1.59 percent respectively. Compared with the control group, the fermented purple elephant grass test group of the Jinling spotted chickens has a significantly reduced abdominal fat rate (P <0.05, F = 2.081) compared with the control group, and the reduction rate is 21.91%. Compared with the control group, the spleen coefficient of the fermented kudzu experimental group of the jinling partridge is remarkably increased (P <0.01, F = 6.384) and the increase rate is 42.86%.
3. The above results show that:
dressing percentage and total mortarless rate are considered as key indicators of chicken dressing performance. The requirement of meat production can be met only when the full-bore-cleaning rate is up to more than 60%. Growth performance, slaughter performance, feed conversion rate, muscle proportion, fat proportion and the like are all related to the feed. In the production of modern broiler chickens, on one hand, the chicken yield is reduced due to feed conversion, and on the other hand, the abdominal fat content is too high due to the development and metabolism disorder; the raising cost can be effectively reduced by reducing the abdominal fat of the broiler chickens. Therefore, it is an important issue to improve meat quality, especially to reduce or control excess abdominal fat. There have been many reports of studies on the effect of dietary fiber on meat quality, but there is still controversy about its specific mechanism. Research by Mohiti-Asli et al shows that when broiler chickens are fed with dietary fibers, addition of a proper amount (3% of cellulose and 8% of inulin) of dietary fibers or inulin helps to reduce abdominal fat content of the broiler chickens, but interaction exists between the cellulose and the inulin. Okrathok et al found that after 0.5%, 1.0% and 1.5% of modified cassava fiber is eaten by broilers, 1% of modified cassava fiber can reduce abdominal fat and cholesterol levels of meat, blood and liver. The test result shows that the addition of the fermented purple elephant grass has no significant influence on the slaughter rate and the full-bore rate of the broiler chickens, and the slaughter rate and the full-bore rate respectively reach more than 91% and 63%, which indicates that the addition of the fermented purple elephant grass does not influence the meat production performance of the broiler chickens. The result shows that the abdominal fat rate is obviously reduced on the basis of not influencing slaughtering performance by adding the fermented purple elephant grass in the daily ration.
Compared with a control group, the addition of the fermented Guimin Wei Xiangcao has obvious influence on the reduction of the broiler slaughter rate, and the complete evisceration rate has no obvious influence, which indicates that the addition of the fermented Guimin Wei Xiangcao influences the meat production performance of the Jinling Huaji. The result shows that the weight of the carcass is obviously increased on the basis that the slaughtering performance is influenced by adding the fermented Guimingxi elephantopus grass in the daily ration; the addition of the fermented alfalfa has no significant influence on the slaughter rate and the full-bore rate of the broiler chicken, and the slaughter rate and the full-bore rate respectively reach more than 91% and 63%, which indicates that the meat production performance of the broiler chicken is not influenced by the addition of the fermented alfalfa; the addition of the fermented kudzu has no significant influence on the slaughtering rate and the full-bore rate of the broiler chickens, and the slaughtering rate and the full-bore rate respectively reach more than 91% and 63%, which indicates that the addition of the fermented kudzu does not influence the meat production performance of the broiler chickens. The result shows that the spleen coefficient is obviously increased on the basis of not influencing slaughtering performance by adding the fermented kudzu in the daily ration.
Example 4:
this example investigates the effect of different fermented feeds of example 1 on the blood physiological indices of chickens from the Jinling.
1. The experimental animals and the design were carried out according to step 3 of example 1, and the blood physiological index test criteria were as follows:
randomly taking 12 chickens from each group, collecting blood of wing vein, centrifuging blood sample in a centrifuge of 2000r/min for 10min, collecting serum, and storing in a refrigerator at-25 deg.C for use. White Blood Cell (WBC) number, red Blood Cell (RBC) number, hemoglobin (HGB) content, hematocrit (HCV), mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV), mean corpuscular hemoglobin content (MCH), and mean corpuscular hemoglobin mass concentration (MCHC) were measured using an XD811 biochemical analyzer (shanghai sudada medical instruments).
2. The results of the experiment on the physiological indexes of the chicken blood are shown in figure 3:
compared with a control group, the white blood cell number of the Jinling spotted chickens is remarkably increased by adding fermented purple elephant grass in the feed (P <0.05, F = 9.646), and the increase rate is 70.39%. Compared with the control group, the white blood cell count of the Jinling partridge chickens is remarkably reduced (P is less than 0.01) by adding the fermented alfalfa into the diet, and the reduction ratio is 90.40%.
Compared with a control group, the average RBC hemoglobin concentration (MCHC) of the Jinling partridge chickens is remarkably reduced (P <0.05, F = 10.671) by adding the fermented Guimin pennisetum purpureum experimental group and the fermented alfalfa experimental group into the feed, and the reduction ratios are 4.91% and 11.53% respectively. The addition of the fermented alfalfa experimental group most remarkably reduces the average RBC hemoglobin concentration (MCHC) of the Jinling spotted chickens.
Compared with a control group, the average red blood cell volume (MCV) of the Jinling spotted deer is remarkably increased (P <0.05, F = 9.646) by adding fermented alfalfa into the diet, and the increase proportion is 21.11%; mean RBC hemoglobin concentration (MCHC) was very significantly reduced from the control group (P <0.01, f = 4.647) with a reduction rate of 11.53%; RBC volume distribution width CV (RDW-CV) was significantly increased (P <0.05, f = 6.819) over the control group with a 50.73% increase; RBC volume distribution width SD (RDW-SD) was significantly increased (P <0.05, f = 5.613) compared to the control group, with an increase ratio of 81.17%; platelet count (PLT) was very significantly increased compared to the control group (P <0.01, f = 15.981) with an increase rate of 600.60%.
Compared with a control group, the addition of the fermented kudzu in the feed has no obvious influence on the physiological indexes of the chicken serum, and the difference among the groups is not obvious (P is more than 0.05).
3. The results of this example show that:
the change of the content of various components in the serum is the result of the function change of animal tissues and organs or the normal metabolism change of substances. These variations can be divided into two categories: one is caused by blood components (e.g., leukocytes); the other is caused by hypovolemia. The factor affecting the ability of red blood cells to generate and release is erythropoietin. Erythrocytes play an important role in serum, not only for the transport of oxygen, but also for the synthesis of hemoglobin. The red blood cells can discharge oxygen and carbon dioxide from the cells, and are combined with water, electrolyte (such as glucose), amino acid and the like to participate in metabolism in vivo; it also has acid-base balance regulating and buffering effects. Both substances contain red blood cells and hemoglobin. Leukocytes play a very important role in the human body as one of the most important immune cells: it is the main defense system in the body; they can phagocytose foreign bodies, produce antibodies, treat body injuries, resist pathogens, and enhance immunity.
The results show that: the fermented purple elephant grass can increase the white blood cell count (P is less than 0.05) of the blood serum of the Jinling spotted chicken, but has the tendency of increasing the disease resistance; the fermented purple elephant grass can slightly reduce the number of serum red blood cells and hemoglobin, thereby reducing the functions of carrying oxygen and delivering oxygen, but has no significance (P > 0.05).
The fermented Guijianxiang elephantopus can improve the number of white blood cells in the serum of the Jinling spotted chicken, but the obvious difference is not obvious (P is more than 0.05), but the white blood cells have the tendency of increasing, so that the disease resistance of the organism is improved. The fermented Chinese angelica, cassia twig and common sage can slightly reduce the number of red blood cells and hemoglobin in blood serum, thereby reducing the functions of carrying oxygen and transporting oxygen, but has no significant difference (P > 0.05). Fermented GuiMin Yinxiao can obviously reduce the average RBC hemoglobin concentration and has obvious difference (P < 0.05).
The fermented alfalfa can obviously reduce the number of leucocytes in the serum of the Jinling partridge, and has obvious difference (P is less than 0.05), thereby reducing the disease resistance of organisms. Fermented alfalfa significantly reduces red blood cells in serum. Fermentation of alfalfa significantly increased serum red blood cells, mean red blood cell volume, RBC volume distribution width CV, RBC volume distribution width SD, platelet count, and significant differences (P < 0.05). Fermentation of alfalfa decreased mean RBC hemoglobin very significantly, with very significant differences (P < 0.01).
The fermented kudzu vine can increase the number of leucocytes in the serum of the Jinling partridge chicken, but the significant difference is not significant (P is more than 0.05), but the variation is increased, so that the disease resistance of the organism is improved. The fermentation of kudzu vine slightly reduces the number of red blood cells and hemoglobin in serum, thereby reducing the functions of oxygen carrying and transporting, but has no significant difference (P > 0.05). Therefore, different fiber sources added into the daily ration have different influences on the blood physiological indexes of the Jinling spotted chickens.
From examples 2 to 4, the following conclusions can be drawn: (1) The growth performance of the Jinling partridge chicken is remarkably reduced by adding fermented purple elephant grass, fermented Guijian peng elephant grass, fermented alfalfa and fermented kudzu; in the full period of the formal period, the initial weight and the final weight of the Jinling spotted chickens added with the fermented purple elephant grass experimental group are reduced most obviously; the daily average weight gain of the Jinling spotted chickens added with the fermented Guijian Xiangcao experimental group is reduced most obviously; the daily average feed weight ratio of the Jinling spotted chickens added with the fermented Guijian Xiangcao experimental group is increased most obviously; when the chickens are 10-14 weeks old, the daily average weight gain of the chickens in the Jinling Huaji added with the fermented Guijian Xiangcao experimental group is reduced most obviously; the daily average feed weight ratio of the Jinling spotted chickens added with the fermented Guijian Xiangcao experimental group is increased most obviously; compared with a control group at the age of 15-19 weeks, the average daily gain of the Jinling spotted chickens added with the fermented purple elephant grass experimental group is reduced most obviously; the daily average material weight ratio of the experimental group added with the fermented purple elephant grass is increased most remarkably; (2) The slaughtering performance of the Jinling spotted chickens can be obviously influenced by adding fermented purple elephant grass, fermented Guijian peng elephant grass, fermented alfalfa and fermented kudzu, and the live weight and the carcass weight can be obviously reduced; the live weight and carcass weight of the Jinling spotted chickens added with the fermented purple elephant grass test group are reduced most obviously; the slaughtering rate of the Jinling spotted chickens in the test group of adding the fermented Guijian Xiangcao is obviously reduced; the abdominal fat rate of the Jinling spotted chickens added with the fermented purple elephant grass test group is obviously reduced; the spleen coefficient of the Jinling flower chicken added with the fermented kudzu experimental group is remarkably increased; (3) The blood physiological indexes of the Jinling spotted chickens can be obviously influenced by adding the fermented purple elephant grass, the fermented Guijian peng elephant grass and the fermented alfalfa, but the influence of the experimental group added with the fermented kudzu vine on the blood physiological indexes of the Jinling spotted chickens is not obvious. Compared with a control group, the white blood cell count of the Jinling partridge chickens is obviously increased by adding the fermented purple elephant grass; the white blood cell number of the Jinling spotted chickens is remarkably reduced by adding the fermented alfalfa into the feed; the addition of the fermented alfalfa experimental group most obviously reduces the average RBC hemoglobin concentration (MCHC) of the Jinling spotted chickens; the average red blood cell volume (MCV) of the Jinling spotted chickens is obviously increased by adding the fermented alfalfa into the feed; mean RBC hemoglobin concentration (MCHC) is very significantly reduced; RBC volume distribution width CV (RDW-CV) is significantly increased; RBC volume distribution width SD (RDW-SD) is significantly increased; platelet count (PLT) was very significantly increased.
Data statistics for examples 2-4 single factor analysis of variance was performed on each index data using SPSS 23.0. The test data are expressed as "mean ± sem". The significance of the differences between groups was compared by the Least Significant Difference (LSD) method. P <0.01 indicates that the difference is very significant, P <0.05 indicates that the difference is significant, and P >0.05 indicates that the difference is not significant.
Example 5:
the present example mainly studies the influence of different fermentation fiber source combinations on the growth of jinling spotted maigre chickens, which is as follows:
from the studies of examples 2-4, we know that: the above several fermented fiber sources have a certain effect of reducing the growth performance of the chickens suffering from the jingling flower, but in the experiment, it is found that if different fiber sources are used in combination, the fermented fiber sources have a certain effect of promoting the growth of the chickens suffering from the jingling flower, which is completely different from the research result of the embodiment 2, therefore, the embodiment adopts different fiber source combinations to research the growth of the chickens suffering from the jingling flower, and specifically comprises the following steps:
a random block experiment design is adopted, 1 day old Jinling spotted chickens are selected, healthy Jinling spotted chickens without obvious weight difference are selected, and the Jinling spotted chickens are randomly divided into 12 experiment groups. One group served as a control group (basal formula feed, denoted CK) and the remaining four groups were fed with fermented forage separately from the first week of age and in place of the basal diet (the types of fermented forage added are shown in groups 1-11 of table 2). 48-feathered chickens were treated in each treatment group, with each 4-feathered chicken being housed in the same cage.
TABLE 2 different fermented forage grass experimental groups
Group of | Mass ratio of fermented forage grass |
Group 1 | Mixing fermented purple elephant grass with fermented Guimin Zhenjiao grass according to a ratio of 1 |
Group 2 | Mixing fermented purple elephant grass and fermented kudzu according to the ratio of 1 |
Group 3 | Mixing fermented purple elephant grass with fermented alfalfa according to the proportion of 1 |
Group 4 | Mixing fermented Guijianxiaohui and fermented kudzu according to the ratio of 1 |
Group 5 | Mixing fermented GuiMin Xiangxiang grasses and fermented alfalfa according to the proportion of 1 |
|
Mixing the fermented alfalfa and the fermented kudzu according to the proportion of 1 |
Group 7 | Mixing fermented purple elephant grass, fermented Guimin elephant grass and fermented kudzu vine according to a ratio of 1 |
|
1, mixing fermented purple elephant grass, fermented Guimin elephant grass and fermented alfalfa |
Group 9 | Mixing fermented purple elephant grass, fermented alfalfa and fermented kudzu according to a ratio of 1 |
|
Mixing fermented GuiMin Daiwei grasses, fermented alfalfa and fermented kudzu according to a ratio of 1 |
Group 11 | The fermented purple elephant grass, the fermented Guimin elephant grass, the fermented alfalfa and the fermented kudzu are mixed according to the ratio of 1 |
The feed feeding amount and the residual feeding amount in the trough are recorded every day for each group, all test chickens are weighed on an empty stomach, and the daily average weight gain, the feed weight ratio and the initial weight and the final weight are calculated.
Average daily gain = (end weight-initial weight)/number of days tested
Daily average feed weight ratio = daily average feed intake/daily average gain
The results obtained are shown in table 3:
TABLE 3 influence of different groups of forage on the performance of chickens from Jinling
As can be seen from table 3, the combination of the forage grasses from multiple plant sources has both promoting effect and crop inhibition compared with the effect of the forage grass from a single source on the growth performance of the jingling partridge chickens, and the experimental results show that the daily weight gain of the jingling partridge chickens can be significantly improved compared with that of the CK pigs by the forage grass proportion of the group 9 and the group 10, the daily weight gain of the jingling partridge chickens can be reduced to different degrees compared with that of the CK pigs by other experimental groups, and the feed weight ratio of the group 9 is lower than that of the group 10 in terms of the feed weight ratio; therefore, from the viewpoint of feed utilization, it is optimal to select group 9 mixed forage as a fiber source feed for the Jinling broiler. That is, it should be preferable that: adding fermented forage grass mixed with fermented purple elephant grass, fermented alfalfa and fermented kudzu in a mass ratio of 1.
Example 6:
in this example, the optimum ratio of the fermented fiber source feed composition is studied, specifically as follows:
designing an orthogonal experiment according to the mass ratio of the fermented purple elephant grass, the fermented alfalfa and the fermented kudzu vine, feeding the Jinling partridge chickens in groups by adopting the method of the embodiment 5, and taking the daily gain of 10-14 weeks as a screening index; the method comprises the following specific steps:
TABLE 4 levels of orthogonal experimental factors for different fermented forage grasses
The results of the orthogonal analysis of the above formulation are shown in Table 5:
TABLE 5 Quadrature experiments and results
Number of tests | Fermented purple elephant grass | Fermented alfalfa | Fermented kudzu vine | Daily average weight gain (g/d) |
1 | A | A | A | 19.2 |
2 | A | B | B | 19.5 |
3 | A | C | C | 21.3 |
4 | B | A | B | 18.1 |
5 | B | B | C | 17.3 |
6 | B | C | A | 18.6 |
7 | C | A | C | 16.8 |
8 | C | B | A | 15.1 |
9 | C | C | B | 17.6 |
r1 | 20.000 | 18.0333 | 17.633 | |
r2 | 18.000 | 17.300 | 18.400 | |
r3 | 16.500 | 19.167 | 18.467 | |
R | 3.500 | 1.867 | 0.834 |
As can be seen from the above table, the daily average weight gain in the experiment of group 3 is the highest, and reaches 21.3g/d, namely, the purple elephant grass is fermented: fermenting alfalfa: the mass ratio of the fermented kudzu is 1; except that the differences between the groups 7-9 and the CK group in the example 5 are not significant, the fermented forage grass combination of other groups can effectively increase the daily weight gain of the Jinling spotted chickens, which indicates that the fermented purple grass: fermenting alfalfa: the weight gain of the Jinling spotted chickens can be effectively improved by the mass ratio of the fermented kudzu to 1. From the extremely poor point, the fermented purple elephant grass is more than the fermented alfalfa is more than the fermented kudzu, thereby showing that the fermented purple elephant grass has the greatest influence on the daily gain of the Jinling spotted chicken.
Example 7:
this example studies the effect of fermented forage combinations on slaughter performance and blood performance of chickens from the daling.
From the studies of examples 3 and 4, it was found that the difference in the effects of fermented forage grass mainly on live body weight, carcass weight, abdominal fat percentage, spleen coefficient and white blood cells is significant, and therefore, in this example, the effects of the fermented fiber combination on the above-mentioned several indexes were mainly studied, specifically as follows:
the best group (group 3) from example 6 was selected and labeled as experimental group 1, the worst group (group 8) was labeled as experimental group 2, and the CK group without fermented fiber forage was compared in animal experiments, and the experimental design was performed as described in example 1, and the test methods were described in example 3 and example 4, and the results are shown in table 6.
TABLE 6 influence of different experimental groups on the muscle performance and blood index of the chickens with Jinling flowers
Group of | Live body weight (kg) | Carcass weight (kg) | Abdominal fat percentage (%) | Spleen factor (%) | White blood cell count (WBC) |
Experimental group 1 | 2.3 | 2.0 | 4.8 | 2.1 | 91 |
Experimental group 2 | 1.6 | 1.3 | 4.9 | 2.0 | 87 |
CK group | 1.8 | 1.5 | 6.1 | 0.13 | 53 |
As can be seen from table 6, the live weights and carcass weights of the jingling chickens in experimental group 1 were significantly higher than those of experimental group 2 and CK group, while the live weights and carcass weights of the jingling chickens in experimental group 2 were lower than those of CK group, indicating that after the fermented forage grass of experimental group 1 was used in combination, and fermented purple elephant grass: fermenting alfalfa: the fermented kudzu vine has the mass ratio of 1; from the perspective of abdominal fat rate, spleen coefficient and white blood cell count in blood, the abdominal fat rate of the experimental group 1 and the experimental group 2 is obviously lower than that of the CK group, and the spleen coefficient and the white blood cell count are obviously higher than that of the CK group, so that the fermented forage grass can effectively reduce the abdominal fat rate of the Jinling flower chicken, the chicken is firmer, the fat is less, the spleen coefficient and the white blood cell count in blood are obviously higher than that of the CK group, and the fermented forage grass can obviously improve the immunity of the Jinling flower chicken.
The fermented feed of the experimental examples 1 to 7 was prepared as follows:
1. preparing fermented forage grass:
removing impurities from the purple elephant grass, the guijian elephant grass, the alfalfa and the kudzu vine respectively, cleaning, cutting into pieces by a hay cutter, adding a silage micro-storage agent purchased from the market according to the instruction, putting into a scenting pool for composting, and taking out a fermentation product after 25-30 days to obtain the corresponding fermented forage grass.
The silage micro-storage agent (purchased from Yichun Strong microorganism science and technology Co., ltd.) of the embodiment comprises Candida utilis, bacillus subtilis and Pediococcus acidilactici.
2. Preparing fermented feed:
weighing each raw material according to the proportion in the table 1 of the application, retting the raw materials with corresponding fermented forage grass for 20-25d after fully mixing, taking out the retted product, air-drying, crushing and granulating to prepare the silage.
In conclusion, a large number of animal experiments prove that the fermented forage grass has a remarkable effect on the growth of the Jinling spotted chickens, and the fermented forage grass has no remarkable effect on the weight increase of the Rilingspotted chickens from the perspective of the forage grass of a single fiber source, and the weight of the Jinling spotted chickens can be remarkably increased after compounding, which indicates that the single fiber source forage grass has single nutrient content and cannot meet the growth requirement of the Jinling spotted chickens, and the fermented forage grass can remarkably increase the weight of the Jinling spotted chickens after compounding improvement and formula optimization, and the comparative experiments in the later period also find that different fiber sources: after the forage grass of the fermented purple elephant grass, the fermented alfalfa and the fermented kudzu vine is used in combination, the abdominal fat rate of the Jinling spotted chickens can be obviously reduced, the leukocyte content and the spleen coefficient in blood are improved, and the forage grass is rare excellent fermented forage grass.
The above examples are merely illustrative of several embodiments of the present invention, and the description thereof is more specific and detailed, but not to be construed as limiting the scope of the invention. It should be noted that various changes and modifications can be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit of the invention, and these changes and modifications are all within the scope of the invention. Therefore, the protection scope of the present invention should be subject to the appended claims.
Claims (6)
1. The broiler silage is characterized by comprising the following raw materials in percentage by weight: 57.52 percent of corn, 22.05 percent of soybean meal, 8.73 percent of wheat bran, 2.3 percent of fish meal, 1.4 percent of stone powder and 8 percent of fermented forage grass; the fermented forage grass consists of fermented purple elephant grass, fermented alfalfa and fermented kudzu.
2. The broiler silage as claimed in claim 1, wherein the mass ratio of fermented purple elephant grass, fermented alfalfa and fermented kudzu in the fermented forage grass is 1.
3. The broiler silage according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the mass ratio of the fermented purple elephant grass, the fermented alfalfa and the fermented kudzu in the fermented forage grass is 1.
4. Use of the broiler silage of claim 1 or 2 for increasing the weight and/or reducing the abdominal fat rate of a jinling Huaji.
5. A method for preparing silage for broiler chickens as claimed in claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the method is as follows:
(1) preparing fermented forage grass: respectively inoculating purple elephant grass, alfalfa and kudzu vine into silage agents for fermentation to obtain fermented purple elephant grass, fermented alfalfa and fermented kudzu vine, and then mixing the fermented purple elephant grass, the fermented alfalfa and the fermented kudzu vine according to a mass ratio of 1-2-6; the fermentation time of the purple elephant grass, the alfalfa and the kudzu is 25-30d;
(2) weighing the raw materials according to the weight percentage, fully mixing, stacking with fermented forage grass for 20-25d, taking out the stack retting product, air drying, crushing and granulating to obtain the silage.
6. A method for feeding Jinling Huaji with the broiler silage of claim 1 or 2, wherein the method is characterized in that the method comprises the step of feeding the Jinling Huaji which is just born with a basic feed without adding fermented forage grass, and after 1 week of age, the broiler silage with the fermented forage grass is used for feeding instead of the basic feed, and the broiler silage is prepared by mixing fermented purple elephant grass, fermented alfalfa and fermented kudzu according to the mass ratio of 1.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202211184469.6A CN115624109A (en) | 2022-09-27 | 2022-09-27 | Broiler silage and preparation method and application thereof |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202211184469.6A CN115624109A (en) | 2022-09-27 | 2022-09-27 | Broiler silage and preparation method and application thereof |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN115624109A true CN115624109A (en) | 2023-01-20 |
Family
ID=84904764
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN202211184469.6A Pending CN115624109A (en) | 2022-09-27 | 2022-09-27 | Broiler silage and preparation method and application thereof |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN115624109A (en) |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN101828637A (en) * | 2010-05-21 | 2010-09-15 | 中国农业大学 | Fodder grass type fermented total mixed ration for dairy cows and preparation method thereof |
CN107691874A (en) * | 2017-11-16 | 2018-02-16 | 广西壮族自治区畜牧研究所 | It is a kind of using purple napier grass, clover and kudzu as Jinling broiler feed of major ingredient and preparation method thereof |
CN113519705A (en) * | 2021-07-02 | 2021-10-22 | 合肥职业技术学院 | Silage and preparation method thereof |
-
2022
- 2022-09-27 CN CN202211184469.6A patent/CN115624109A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN101828637A (en) * | 2010-05-21 | 2010-09-15 | 中国农业大学 | Fodder grass type fermented total mixed ration for dairy cows and preparation method thereof |
CN107691874A (en) * | 2017-11-16 | 2018-02-16 | 广西壮族自治区畜牧研究所 | It is a kind of using purple napier grass, clover and kudzu as Jinling broiler feed of major ingredient and preparation method thereof |
CN113519705A (en) * | 2021-07-02 | 2021-10-22 | 合肥职业技术学院 | Silage and preparation method thereof |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
庞天德等: "发酵葛藤饲喂肉鸡效果研究", 饲料工业,, vol. 41, no. 15, pages 24 - 28 * |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Chanjula et al. | Effect of feeding rubber seed kernel and palm kernel cake in combination on nutrient utilization, rumen fermentation characteristics, and microbial populations in goats fed on Briachiaria humidicola hay-based diets | |
KR19990082623A (en) | Animal feed | |
KR20210043877A (en) | Method for preparing fermented total mixed ration using microbial strain complex | |
Shapawi et al. | Improving dietary red seaweed Kappaphycus alvarezii (Doty) Doty ex. P. Silva meal utilization in Asian seabass Lates calcarifer | |
Dutta et al. | Effect of supplementing tanniferous tree leaves mixture on immune response and GI nematodes in kids | |
Chimsung et al. | Fermented golden apple snails as an alternative protein source in sex-reversed red tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus x O. mossambicus) diets | |
Fraser et al. | Cereal processing and food utilization by sheep 1. The effect of processing on utilization of barley by early-weaned lambs | |
CN107912626A (en) | A kind of mulberry leaf feed for improving big porker growth performance and preparation method thereof | |
CN115380993B (en) | Clathrate compound containing baohuoside I, composition, preparation method and application thereof | |
CN111513210A (en) | Aquaculture feed | |
Akinfala et al. | Supplemental effects of feed additives on the utilization of whole cassava plant by growing pigs in the tropics | |
Aderolu et al. | Performance, organ relative weight, serum and haematology parameters in broiler finisher fed biodegraded brewers dried grain | |
Annongu et al. | Biochemical evaluation of Gmelina arborea fruit meal as a swine feedstuff | |
Korsakov et al. | Humic acids as the key to high productivity of broiler chickens. | |
CN115624109A (en) | Broiler silage and preparation method and application thereof | |
El-Sheikh et al. | The effect of using Vespa orientalis Linnaeus meal instead of soybean meal on the growth and feed utilization of V-line male rabbits | |
CN114304388A (en) | Grass meal feed and processing method thereof | |
CN107080045A (en) | A kind of healthy pig feed of the cultivation containing chlorella and preparation method | |
CN106819468A (en) | A kind of pig starter feed and preparation method thereof | |
Saka et al. | Performance characteristics and blood profile of West African dwarf goats fed diet containing graded level of malted sorghum sprout mixed with pineapple waste based diet | |
Đorđević et al. | Contemporary aspects of lucerne use in animal nutrition | |
Rahman et al. | Effects of exogenous multi enzyme on the growth, blood parameters and flesh compositions of Labeo rohita (H) | |
Adekanbi et al. | Performance and blood indices of West African dwarf goats fed graded levels of malted sorghum sprout with enzyme supplementation | |
CN108371248A (en) | A kind of roughage daily ration and its application containing sweet potato vine | |
Shihah et al. | The effect of using fermented lime (Citrus aurantifolia) waste powder (FLWP) on performance, lymphoid organs, and heterophil/lymphocyte ratio of broiler chickens |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination |