CN115545680A - Online review collaboration method and device and storage medium - Google Patents
Online review collaboration method and device and storage medium Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN115545680A CN115545680A CN202211506296.5A CN202211506296A CN115545680A CN 115545680 A CN115545680 A CN 115545680A CN 202211506296 A CN202211506296 A CN 202211506296A CN 115545680 A CN115545680 A CN 115545680A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- review
- terminal
- reviewer
- evaluation
- final confirmation
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000012552 review Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 748
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 70
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 13
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 122
- 238000012790 confirmation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 81
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 claims description 34
- 239000003999 initiator Substances 0.000 claims description 20
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 claims description 14
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000004140 cleaning Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 230000000977 initiatory effect Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- 230000001960 triggered effect Effects 0.000 abstract description 4
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 35
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 19
- 238000012827 research and development Methods 0.000 description 10
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 7
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000007726 management method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000012356 Product development Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000013500 data storage Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000013439 planning Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003814 drug Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000284 extract Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000835 fiber Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000002452 interceptive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003908 quality control method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012384 transportation and delivery Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/10—Office automation; Time management
- G06Q10/103—Workflow collaboration or project management
Abstract
The invention discloses an online review collaboration method, an online review collaboration device and a storage medium, which can improve software research and development quality, and the method comprises the following steps: responding to a review starting request initiated by a responsible person through a first terminal, starting the review of the software development full life cycle, and informing any reviewer to enter the review through a second terminal of the reviewer; after determining that any reviewer enters the review, displaying a review interface through the second terminal; receiving a personal evaluation result submitted by a submission button of a triggered evaluation interface of any one of the reviewers; after determining that personal evaluation results submitted by all the reviewers are received, notifying a responsible person through a first terminal to carry out final confirmation of the evaluation results; and receiving final confirmation information submitted by the responsible person through the first terminal, sending the final confirmation information to any reviewer through the second terminal, setting the review object passing the review into a published state based on the final confirmation information, and warehousing the published state in an asset library.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of computers, in particular to an online review collaboration method, an online review collaboration device and a storage medium.
Background
In the whole life cycle of software Development, from requirement proposing, requirement analyzing, architecture designing, code developing, testing to final delivery places, the nodes are not required to be evaluated, such as requirement evaluating, design evaluating, code evaluating and test case evaluating, and especially, in the case that the Product Development of enterprises introduces an Integrated Product Development (IPD) process, the evaluation of each link is more indispensable.
However, the current requirements evaluation, design evaluation and test case evaluation are usually performed completely on line, most of the evaluators do not have a uniform way or manner to fill in evaluation opinions, standardize evaluation examination items, perform pre-evaluation, record evaluation finding problems and the like, the participation and the input degree of each evaluator are difficult to control, the quality of the requirements, the design and the use cases in the research and development process cannot be ensured, the found problems are difficult to trace to the source and follow, and the software research and development quality is reduced.
Disclosure of Invention
Based on this, the invention aims to provide an online review collaboration method, an online review collaboration device and a storage medium, which are used for improving software research and development quality.
In a first aspect, the present invention provides an online review collaboration method, including:
responding to a review starting request initiated by a responsible person through a first terminal, starting the review of the software development full life cycle, and informing any reviewer to enter the review through a second terminal of the reviewer;
after determining that any reviewer enters the evaluation, displaying a review interface through the second terminal; the review interface provides a submission button, review buttons of various review work items and a support for any reviewer to fill review opinions and input time aiming at the review objects of the various review work items, and the review buttons provide details and check items for checking the review objects of the various review work items;
receiving a personal review result submitted by any reviewer triggering the submission button; the personal review result comprises review opinions, review findings and input time which are filled by any reviewer aiming at the check items of the review objects of the various review work items;
after determining that personal evaluation results submitted by all the reviewers are received, notifying the responsible person to carry out final confirmation of the evaluation results through the first terminal;
receiving final confirmation information submitted by the responsible person through the first terminal, sending the final confirmation information to any reviewer through the second terminal, setting a review object passing review to be in a published state based on the final confirmation information, and warehousing the review object in an asset library; the final confirmation information comprises the review history of the review objects of the various review work items and whether the review objects pass the review state.
In one possible design, in response to a review start request initiated by a principal through a first terminal, a review of the software development full life cycle is started, and before any reviewer is notified to enter the review through a second terminal of the reviewer, the method further includes:
responding to a review creation request initiated by a review initiator through a third terminal, acquiring preset review configuration information, and displaying the review configuration information through the third terminal; the review configuration information comprises relevant field information corresponding to various review work items, review workflow, review objects and review examination sheets related to the review objects;
receiving review creation information submitted by the review initiator through the third terminal; the review creation information comprises a responsible person, a plurality of reviewers, related review information, each target review object and the version of each target review object, and the review creation information is filled in by the review initiator referring to the review configuration information;
and informing the responsible person to start the review through the first terminal based on the review creation information.
In one possible design, the review interface further comprises a save button, and the save button supports that any reviewer saves the current review condition in the review process;
the review interface also supports any reviewer to modify the personal review result and to issue questions aiming at the review objects of all the review work items.
In one possible design, after determining that any reviewer enters the review and displays the review interface through the second terminal, the method further comprises:
acquiring the review condition of any reviewer in real time through the second terminal; the review condition comprises review progress, review details and problems initiated by the review objects aiming at the various review work items;
and responding to a viewing request initiated by the responsible person through the first terminal, and displaying the review condition through the first terminal.
In one possible design, after determining that all the reviewers submit the personal review results, notifying the responsible party through the first terminal to perform final confirmation of the review results, including:
after determining that personal evaluation results submitted by all the reviewers are received, determining whether the review mode of the review is a countersigning mode or a non-countersigning mode;
if the review mode of the review is determined to be the countersigning mode, counting the final review condition of the review based on the personal review results submitted by all the reviewers, and sending the final review condition to the first terminal so as to inform the responsible person of final confirmation of the review result; alternatively, the first and second electrodes may be,
and if the review mode of the review is determined to be the non-countersigning mode, sending the personal review results submitted by all the reviewers to the first terminal so as to inform the responsible person of final confirmation of the review results.
In one possible design, the method for setting the review object passing the review to be in the published status based on the final confirmation information comprises the following steps:
and setting the evaluation object passing the evaluation as a published state through a built-in process engine based on the final confirmation information, and warehousing the evaluation object into an asset library.
In one possible design, the method further includes:
modeling the personal evaluation result of any reviewer and the final confirmation information and extracting and cleaning the personal evaluation result and the final confirmation information into evaluation indexes of each dimension;
and carrying out measurement analysis on the evaluation indexes of all dimensions, determining the evaluation quality of the evaluation, and providing the evaluation optimization opinion of the evaluation based on the evaluation quality.
In a second aspect, the present invention further provides an online review collaboration apparatus, including:
the response unit is used for responding to a review starting request initiated by a responsible person through the first terminal and starting the review of the software development full life cycle;
a review unit to:
informing any reviewer to enter the review by a second terminal of the reviewer;
after determining that any reviewer enters the evaluation, displaying a review interface through the second terminal; the review interface provides a submission button, review buttons of various review work items and a support for any reviewer to fill review opinions and input time aiming at the review objects of the various review work items, and the review buttons provide details and check items for checking the review objects of the various review work items;
receiving a personal review result submitted by any reviewer triggering the submission button; the personal review result comprises review opinions, review findings and input time which are filled by any reviewer aiming at the check items of the review objects of the various review work items;
after determining that personal evaluation results submitted by all the reviewers are received, notifying the responsible person to carry out final confirmation of the evaluation results through the first terminal;
receiving final confirmation information submitted by the responsible person through the first terminal, sending the final confirmation information to any reviewer through the second terminal, setting a review object passing review to be in a published state based on the final confirmation information, and warehousing the review object in an asset library; the final confirmation information comprises the review history of the review objects of the various review work items and whether the review objects pass the review state.
In one possible design, the response unit is further configured to:
responding to a review creation request initiated by a review initiator through a third terminal, acquiring preset review configuration information, and displaying the review configuration information through the third terminal; the review configuration information comprises relevant field information corresponding to various review work items, review workflow, review objects and review examination sheets related to the review objects;
receiving review creation information submitted by the review initiator through the third terminal; the review creation information comprises a responsible person, a plurality of reviewers, relevant review information, each target review object and the version of each target review object, and the review creation information is filled in by the review initiator referring to the review configuration information;
and informing the responsible person to start the review through the first terminal based on the review creation information.
In one possible design, the review interface further comprises a save button, and the save button supports that any reviewer saves the current review condition in the review process;
the review interface also supports any reviewer to modify the personal review result and to issue questions aiming at the review objects of all the review work items.
In one possible design, the review unit is further configured to:
acquiring the review condition of any reviewer in real time through the second terminal; the review condition comprises review progress, review details and problems initiated by the review objects aiming at the various review work items;
and responding to a viewing request initiated by the responsible person through the first terminal, and displaying the review condition through the first terminal.
In one possible design, the review unit is specifically configured to:
after determining that personal evaluation results submitted by all the reviewers are received, determining whether the review mode of the review is a countersigning mode or a non-countersigning mode;
if the review mode of the review is determined to be the countersigning mode, counting the final review condition of the review based on the personal review results submitted by all the reviewers, and sending the final review condition to the first terminal so as to inform the responsible person of final confirmation of the review result; alternatively, the first and second electrodes may be,
and if the review mode of the review is determined to be the non-countersigning mode, sending the personal review results submitted by all the reviewers to the first terminal so as to inform the responsible person of final confirmation of the review results.
In one possible design, the review unit is specifically configured to:
and setting the review object passing the review into a published state by a built-in process engine based on the final confirmation information, and warehousing the published review object into an asset library.
In one possible design, the review unit is further configured to:
modeling the personal evaluation result of any reviewer and the final confirmation information and extracting and cleaning the personal evaluation result and the final confirmation information into evaluation indexes of each dimension;
and carrying out measurement analysis on the evaluation indexes of all dimensions, determining the evaluation quality of the evaluation, and providing the evaluation optimization opinion of the evaluation based on the evaluation quality.
In a third aspect, the present invention further provides an online review collaboration apparatus, including: at least one memory and at least one processor;
the at least one memory is for storing one or more programs;
the one or more programs, when executed by the at least one processor, implement the method as recited in any one of the possible designs of the first aspect above.
In a fourth aspect, the present invention also provides a computer-readable storage medium storing at least one program; the at least one program, when executed by a processor, performs the method of any one of the possible designs of the first aspect.
The invention has the following beneficial effects:
compared with the prior art, the method and the system have the advantages that the review of the software development full life cycle is started by responding to the review starting request initiated by the responsible person through the first terminal, and any reviewer is informed to enter the review through the second terminal of the reviewer; after determining that any reviewer enters the review, displaying a review interface through the second terminal; receiving a personal evaluation result submitted by a submission button of a triggered evaluation interface of any one of the reviewers; after determining that personal evaluation results submitted by all the reviewers are received, notifying a responsible person through a first terminal to carry out final confirmation of the evaluation results; the method comprises the steps of receiving final confirmation information submitted by a responsible person through a first terminal, sending the final confirmation information to any reviewer through a second terminal, setting a review object passing review to be in a published state based on the final confirmation information, and warehousing the review object in an asset library, so that review opinions can be filled in through a unified path, review check items can be standardized in a unified mode, follow-up pre-review, record of review found problems and the like can be facilitated, the participation degree and the input degree of each reviewer can be controlled, the quality of requirements, design and use cases in the research and development process can be guaranteed, the found problems can be traced and tracked, and the software research and development quality can be improved.
For a better understanding and practice, the invention is described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a schematic flow chart of an online review collaboration method provided by the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of an association relationship between a review object and a review discovery provided by the present invention;
FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of a problem "requirement change work item" initiated in a review process according to the present invention;
FIG. 4 is a schematic flow chart of another online review collaboration method provided by the present invention;
FIG. 5 is a schematic structural diagram of an online review collaboration device provided in the present invention;
FIG. 6 is a schematic structural diagram of another online review collaboration device provided by the present invention.
Detailed Description
The terms of orientation of up, down, left, right, front, back, top, bottom, and the like, referred to or may be referred to in this specification, are defined relative to their configuration, and are relative concepts. Therefore, it may be changed according to different positions and different use states. Therefore, these and other directional terms should not be construed as limiting terms.
The implementations described in the exemplary embodiments below are not intended to represent all implementations consistent with the present disclosure. Rather, they are merely examples of implementations consistent with certain aspects of the present disclosure.
The terminology used in the present disclosure is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the disclosure. As used in this disclosure, the singular forms "a", "an", and "the" are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It should also be understood that the term "and/or" as used in this disclosure refers to and encompasses any and all possible combinations of one or more of the associated listed items. Unless stated to the contrary, the present disclosure refers to the ordinal numbers "first", "second", etc., for distinguishing between a plurality of objects and not to define the sequence, priority, or importance of the plurality of objects.
In order to facilitate understanding of the technical solutions provided by the present invention, before describing the present invention, some terms in the present invention are first explained to facilitate understanding of those skilled in the art.
The work items related to the present invention refer to objects that can be operated and processed by a user, and can be divided into six types, i.e., requirements, tasks, texts (design documents can be written), workflows (problem reports/software changes), reviews, and test cases.
The invention relates to a review work item, which is one of work items, and supports the requirements, tasks, texts and test cases as review objects to be brought into review, so that a reviewer can review the work items, review comments are filled in according to a check sheet, and finally a review result is confirmed by a responsible person. For the review objects passing the review, the objects can be formally released into the asset library and can be subsequently worked on, such as assignment, planning, including baselines, and the like.
The evaluation object related by the invention refers to an object of which the evaluation work item needs to be evaluated. For example, requirements, tasks, texts, test cases can be included in the review as the review objects.
According to the review checklist, a single review checklist can be bound with one review object, namely, each different type of review object can be bound with one review checklist. The review examination sheet can be composed of a plurality of examination items and is used for providing a review basis for each review object, so that the reviewers can consider whether the review objects can pass the review one by one according to the examination items.
The review discovery of the invention refers to the processing condition that the problem can be checked in the review details aiming at the problem (workflow) initiated by the review object in the review process.
The countersigning mode refers to that the reviewer has a vote rejection right and strictly observes that all the review objects pass through and the review objects which do not pass through exist. In particular implementations, the review work items can support a countersign mode.
The invention relates to a non-countersignature mode, which means that a reviewer can carry out pre-review, fill in review opinions, then combine with off-line review, carry out final review by a responsible person and finally confirm whether the review passes or not. In particular implementations, the review work items may also support a non-countersign mode.
The responsible person involved in the invention, namely the responsible person of the evaluation work item, is the creator of the evaluation work item by default, and is responsible for starting evaluation and confirming the evaluation result and ending the evaluation. In the non-countersign mode, with certainty of the final review result.
The reviewers involved in the invention need to check the examination items for each review object in the review process and support the filling of opinions. Upon finding a problematic review object, the reviewer may initiate a problem (workflow) facilitating subsequent tracking.
Referring to fig. 1, the present invention provides an online review collaboration method, which includes the following steps:
s11, responding to a review starting request initiated by a responsible person through a first terminal, starting the review of the software development full life cycle, and informing any reviewer to enter the review through a second terminal of the reviewer.
In some embodiments, the online review collaboration device may preset review configuration information before performing step S11. The review configuration information may include, but is not limited to, relevant field information corresponding to various review work items, review workflow, review object, and review checklist associated with the review object.
The process of setting review configuration information will be described in detail below.
In specific implementation, the online review collaboration device may set various review work items first. For example, various review work items can be set according to the life cycle of software development, that is, the various review work items are used for reviewing various information (such as requirements, technical schemes, test cases, test plans, and the like) required to be reviewed in the life cycle of software development. The various evaluation work items can be various evaluation work items corresponding to the life cycle of software research and development, such as requirement evaluation work items, technical scheme evaluation work items and test evaluation work items. For example, in the stage of requirement design analysis, a requirement review work item is set for reviewing the rationality and the service value of the requirement. In the research and development design stage, technical scheme evaluation work items are set for evaluating the correctness, the rationality, the expansibility and the like of the technical scheme. And setting a test review work item at the stage after the requirement evaluation is finished and before the test acceptance, wherein the test review work item is used for enabling products, development and testers to participate in the review, reviewing whether the scene of the test case is reasonable, whether the full scene is covered, reviewing whether the test plan is reasonable and the like, so that the test quality is improved.
In specific implementation, after various review work items are set, the online review collaboration device may set related field information of the various review work items, for example, which field information the online review collaboration device has, and the field information may support customization according to actual conditions. Illustratively, the relevant field information may include, but is not limited to, review location, expected start time, expected end time, and related modules, among others. Then, the online review collaboration device further sets a review object corresponding to each type of review work item, that is, sets which types of work items are supported by each type of review work item to be included in the review object, for example, the requirement review work item can include business requirements and user stories into the review, but cannot include test cases into the review, and vice versa, and the test review work item should not include requirements into the review. Finally, the online review collaboration device sets the workflow types corresponding to the various review work items, that is, sets which types of workflows can be initiated by the various review work items in the review process, for example, as shown in fig. 2 and 3, the demand review work item can only initiate the demand change work item.
In the specific implementation, the on-line review collaboration device needs to set the review checklist of the review object in addition to the corresponding information of each review work item. For example, in the process of creating the review checklist, the online review collaboration device may set a check name, and then create new check items in the review checklist, such as whether the scene description is clear, whether there is an attached document, whether there is a filled-in market value, and the like. And after the online review collaboration device is set and stores the review examination sheet, associating the review examination sheet with the corresponding review object.
In the embodiment of the invention, the online review collaboration device is beneficial to standardizing review check items in a unified mode and helping reviewers fill in review comments through a unified path by presetting review configuration information, so that the online review collaboration device is convenient for doing pre-review and recording review discovery problems and the like subsequently, is beneficial to controlling the participation and input degree of each reviewer, ensures the quality of requirements, design and use cases in the research and development process, traces the source and follows the discovered problems, and can improve the software research and development quality.
In some embodiments, the online review collaboration device may fill out the review creation information by the review initiator before performing step S11. For example, the review initiator may initiate the review creation request through the third terminal. Accordingly, the online review collaboration device may receive a review authoring request from the third terminal. After responding to the request for creating the review initiated by the review initiator through the third terminal, the online review collaboration device can acquire the preset review configuration information and display the review configuration information through the third terminal so as to facilitate the reference of the review initiator.
In specific implementation, in the process of filling in the review creation information, the review initiator may refer to the review configuration information to fill in a responsible person, a plurality of reviewers and related review information corresponding to the review work item, where the related review information may include, but is not limited to, a predicted start date, predicted hours, a meeting location, a meeting number, and the like; the reviewer can also refer to the review configuration information to select the review object to be reviewed and its version (generally, the version is regarded as the latest version by default), such as the review object of requirements, design documents or test cases. After the review initiator fills in the review creation information, the review creation information can be submitted to the online review collaboration device through the third terminal.
For example, the online review collaboration device may display a filling interface of the review creation information through the third terminal. The review initiator can fill the review creation information in the filling interface and submit the filled review creation information to the online review collaboration device by triggering the creation button provided by the filling interface.
In specific implementation, after receiving the review creation information from the third terminal, the online review collaboration device may store the review creation information, and may notify the responsible person of opening the review through the first terminal based on the review creation information, for example, send a mail or a short message to the first terminal to notify the responsible person of opening the review, and open the review by the responsible person, otherwise, the reviewer cannot enter the review.
In the embodiment of the invention, the review establishing information is filled in by referring to the review configuration information by the review initiator, so that the review examination items are normalized in a unified mode, the review comments are filled in by the reviewers through a unified path, the follow-up pre-review, recording of review discovery problems and the like can be facilitated, the participation and the input degree of each reviewer can be controlled, the requirements, the quality of design and use cases in the research and development process can be ensured, the discovered problems can be traced and followed, and the software research and development quality can be improved. In addition, by selecting the versions of the review objects, the subsequent management and maintenance of the versions of the review objects can be facilitated.
In some embodiments, after receiving the message notifying the start of the review through the first terminal, the responsible person may initiate a review start request to the online review collaboration device through the first terminal. Correspondingly, after the online review collaboration device receives the review starting request from the first terminal, step S11 is executed to remind any reviewer to enter the review of the software development full life cycle.
For example, the online review collaboration device may display a review opening interface via the first terminal. The responsible person can initiate a review opening request to the online review collaboration device by triggering the opening review button provided by the review opening interface.
It should be noted that, the first terminal, the second terminal, and the third terminal may be terminals such as a mobile phone, a tablet, and a computer, which is not limited in the embodiment of the present invention.
And S12, after determining that any reviewer enters into review, displaying a review interface through the second terminal, wherein the review interface provides a submission button, review buttons of various review work items and examination items of review objects of various review work items for any reviewer to fill review comments, review findings and input time.
In particular implementations, the review button provides for viewing details and examination items of the review object for various types of review work items. The submit button is used to submit the personal review results of any of the reviewers. The review finds problems that have been initiated by the review object that includes various types of review work items.
In specific implementation, any reviewer can check the review objects and check items of various review work items through the review interface and fill in the review comments. During the period, any reviewer can also judge whether the review objects of various review work items have problems, and when the problems are found, a workflow can be initiated. After any reviewer finishes the review of the review objects of various review workitems, the invested time can be filled in, and the personal review result is submitted through a submission button which triggers a review interface.
In specific implementation, the review interface can also provide a press and save button to support that any reviewer can save the current review condition in the review process through the review interface, so that any reviewer can safely quit the review interface, incomplete review can be continuously filled when the system returns to the review interface again in the follow-up process, and the review experience of the reviewer is promoted.
In some embodiments, after performing step S12, the online review collaboration device may support the principal to view the review status of any reviewer in real-time. For example, the online review collaboration device may obtain, through the second terminal, the review condition of any reviewer in real time, where the review condition may include, but is not limited to, the review progress, the review details, and the questions that have been initiated by the review object for each type of review work item. When the responsible person wants to check the review condition of any reviewer, a check request can be sent to the online review collaboration device through the first terminal. Correspondingly, after receiving the viewing request from the first terminal, the online review collaboration device can respond to the viewing request, and display the review condition through the first terminal, for example, the review condition can be displayed in an Excel form through the first terminal.
And S13, receiving a personal evaluation result submitted by a submission button in a triggered evaluation interface of any one of the reviewers.
In particular, the personal review result includes the review opinions and the invested time of any reviewer for the review objects of all types of review work items.
In specific implementation, the review interface also supports any reviewer to modify the review result of the review person before submitting the personal review result, such as modifying the review opinion and the input time, and the like, and also supports any reviewer to issue problems for the review objects of various review work items, so that any reviewer can modify the review opinion and the input time according to the actual situation, the quality of requirements, design and use cases in the research and development process is ensured, the discovered problems are traced and tracked, and the software research and development quality can be improved.
And S14, after determining that the personal evaluation results submitted by all the reviewers are received, notifying the responsible person through the first terminal to finally confirm the evaluation results.
In specific implementation, after all the reviewers confirm to submit the personal review result, the online review collaboration device can automatically notify the responsible person of final confirmation of the review result through the first terminal.
In a specific implementation, the online review collaboration device may determine, after determining that the personal review results submitted by all the reviewers are received, whether the review mode of the review of the software development full life cycle is the countersigning mode or the non-countersigning mode, for example, when the review initiator fills the review creation information, the review mode of the review may be set, that is, the review creation information may further include the review mode of the review.
In specific implementation, after the online review collaboration device determines the review mode of the software development full-life-cycle review, the online review collaboration device can notify the responsible person of the final confirmation of the review result in a corresponding manner.
For example, if the online review collaboration device determines that the review mode of the review is the countersigning mode, the online review collaboration device counts the final review condition of the review based on the personal review results submitted by all the reviewers, and sends the final review condition to the first terminal to notify the responsible person of the final confirmation of the review result. It can be understood that when the review mode of the review is the countersigning mode, the online review collaboration device can automatically count the final review condition of the review, so that the responsible person can conveniently know the review result of any reviewer, obtain the final result according to a negative power, obtain the final confirmation information, and close the review after the responsible person confirms. The final confirmation information may include, but is not limited to, review histories and whether or not the review object of each type of review work item passed the review status.
Or if the online review collaboration device determines that the review mode of the review is the non-countersigning mode, the online review collaboration device sends the personal review results submitted by all the reviewers to the first terminal so as to inform the responsible person of the final confirmation of the review results. It can be understood that, when the review mode of the review is the non-meeting mode, the online review collaboration device sends the personal review results submitted by all the reviewers to the first terminal, so that the responsible person can conveniently summon all the reviewers offline to carry out a meeting, and in combination with the personal review result of any reviewer, namely the online pre-review result, the portion with disputed is selected according to the personal review result of any reviewer, such as the review comments or the issued questions, so as to purposefully carry out quick brainstorming.
In the embodiment of the invention, the responsible person is informed to finally confirm the evaluation result by adopting a response mode according to different evaluation modes, so that the participation degree and the input degree of any evaluation person can be controlled, the quality of requirements, designs and cases in the research and development process can be ensured, the discovered problems can be traced and followed, and the software research and development quality can be improved.
And S15, receiving final confirmation information submitted by the responsible person through the first terminal, sending the final confirmation information to any reviewer through the second terminal, setting the review object passing the review to be in a published state based on the final confirmation information, and warehousing the review object in an asset library.
In specific implementation, the online review collaboration device can display a review confirmation interface through the first terminal. The principal can submit the final confirmation information to the online review collaboration device by triggering a confirmation button provided by the review confirmation interface.
In specific implementation, the online review collaboration device can set the review object passing the review to be in a published state based on the final confirmation information through a built-in process engine, and store the review object in an asset library.
In the embodiment of the invention, the final confirmation information is submitted by the responsible person, so that the problems that the evaluation effect of any reviewer is uneven, the investment of any reviewer cannot be ensured, the responsible result cannot be ensured and the evaluation problem cannot be uniformly tracked can be solved.
In the embodiment of the invention, the final confirmation information is sent to any reviewer through the second terminal, so that the review object can review the review process on the detail page of the review object no matter whether the review object passes through or not, which versions are subjected to what kind of review, which problems are initiated in the review process, and the processing progress of each problem is what kind, so that the found problems can be traced and followed conveniently, and the software research and development quality can be improved. Because the assignment to the implementation project and the iterative planning can be supported after the requirement is issued, the reviewed object which passes the review is set to be in the issued state and is put into the asset library, the condition that the requirement which does not pass the review is arranged to a developer in advance for designing and coding can be avoided, and the condition of reworking caused by poor quality of the requirement can be reduced.
Under an applicable scenario provided by the embodiment of the present invention, as shown in fig. 1 and fig. 4, the online review collaboration method provided by the present invention may further include the following steps:
and S16, modeling the personal evaluation result and the final confirmation information of any reviewer and extracting and cleaning the individual evaluation result and the final confirmation information into evaluation indexes of each dimension.
Because only scattered data are scattered in each island under most conditions of current demand review, design review and test case review, information cannot be communicated, a uniform data link is established, and research and development efficiency measurement is difficult, namely bottleneck positions cannot be analyzed according to data statistics, and demand optimization, technical optimization and management flow optimization are performed.
Based on this, in the embodiment of the present invention, the online review collaboration device models and extracts the review indicators cleaned into each dimension through any information (such as the personal review result and the final confirmation information of any reviewer) generated in the review process, for example, through a built-in system or manually, so as to get through the information in the review process and establish a uniform data link. The review indexes of each dimension can include, but are not limited to, the required review rate, the pass rate and the review times of various review work items, the pass rate of different inspection items, the input working hours and the participation degree of reviewers, and the problem initiating situation, namely, the review indexes of each dimension can be designed from the aspects of reviewers, review objects, review inspection items, input working hours and the like.
S17, carrying out measurement analysis on the evaluation indexes of all dimensions, determining the evaluation quality of the software development whole life cycle evaluation, and providing the evaluation optimization suggestion based on the evaluation quality.
In specific implementation, the online review collaboration device can perform measurement analysis on the review indexes of all dimensions to analyze the review quality of the review, and then provide the review optimization opinions of the review based on the review quality, so that the research and development performance measurement can be performed, namely, the bottleneck position can be analyzed according to data statistics, and the demand optimization, the technology optimization and the management flow optimization can be performed.
For example, the requirement review rate of a project (review work item) is lower than 70%, and the project is not executed according to the requirement and needs to be noticed because the excessive requirements are not carefully filtered and the review process is not executed. Or the P85 evaluation times of the demands of a certain product manager are more than 3, and the quality of the demands output by the product manager is considered to be poor, so that the demands can pass through the product manager after being evaluated for many times, the scenes are insufficient, the business value is not available, and the demand analysis is not made by the product manager. Or, a certain reviewer has less than 1 review opinion filled in each review, and it is considered that the reviewer does not participate in the review seriously, and is difficult to give a specific opinion. Or, if the passing rate of the review item "requirement scene is considered to be comprehensive" is low, the requirement output under the dimension (a certain department or a certain project or a certain product manager) is considered to exist in the short board, and needs to be strengthened.
In the embodiment of the invention, the modeling is carried out on the personal review result and the final confirmation information of any reviewer, the review indexes of all dimensions are extracted and cleaned, the review indexes of all dimensions are measured and analyzed, the finding of short-board symptomatic medicine administration in the evaluation indexes is facilitated, the review quality of the review of the whole life cycle of software research and development is determined, and the review optimization suggestion of the review is provided based on the review quality, so that the quality control of the front end of each large main node (requirement initiation, design and case compiling) in the software research and development process can be facilitated, the targeted optimization can be carried out, the direction correctness can be ensured, the useless work is reduced, and the production of more valuable software is facilitated.
As can be seen from the above description, compared with the prior art, the method and the system of the invention start the review of the software development full life cycle by responding to the review start request initiated by the responsible person through the first terminal, and notify any reviewer to enter the review through the second terminal of any reviewer; after determining that any reviewer enters the review, displaying a review interface through the second terminal; receiving a personal evaluation result submitted by a submission button of a triggered evaluation interface of any one of the reviewers; after determining that personal evaluation results submitted by all the reviewers are received, notifying a responsible person through a first terminal to carry out final confirmation of the evaluation results; the method comprises the steps of receiving final confirmation information submitted by a responsible person through a first terminal, sending the final confirmation information to any reviewer through a second terminal, setting a review object passing review to be in a published state based on the final confirmation information, and warehousing the review object in an asset library, so that review opinions can be filled in through a unified path, review check items can be standardized in a unified mode, follow-up pre-review, record of review found problems and the like can be facilitated, the participation degree and the input degree of each reviewer can be controlled, the quality of requirements, design and use cases in the research and development process can be guaranteed, the found problems can be traced and tracked, and the software research and development quality can be improved.
Based on the same inventive concept, an embodiment of the present invention further provides an online review collaboration device, as shown in fig. 5, the online review collaboration device 20 may include:
the response unit 21 is configured to respond to a review starting request initiated by a responsible person through the first terminal, and start a review of a software development full life cycle;
a review unit 22 for:
informing any reviewer to enter the review through a second terminal of the reviewer;
after determining that any reviewer enters the review, displaying a review interface through a second terminal; the review interface provides a submission button, review buttons of various review work items and a review object supporting that any reviewer fills review opinions and investment time aiming at the review objects of the various review work items, and the review buttons provide details and check items for viewing the review objects of the various review work items;
receiving a personal review result submitted by any reviewer triggering a submission button; the personal evaluation result comprises evaluation opinions, evaluation findings and input time which are filled by any one of the evaluation persons aiming at the check items of the evaluation objects of all the evaluation work items;
after determining that personal evaluation results submitted by all the reviewers are received, notifying a responsible person through a first terminal to carry out final confirmation of the evaluation results;
receiving final confirmation information submitted by a responsible person through a first terminal, sending the final confirmation information to any reviewer through a second terminal, setting a review object passing review to be in a published state based on the final confirmation information, and warehousing the review object in an asset library; the final confirmation information comprises the review history of the review objects of various review work items and whether the review objects pass the review state.
In one possible design, the response unit 21 is further configured to:
responding to a review creation request initiated by a review initiator through a third terminal, acquiring preset review configuration information, and displaying the review configuration information through the third terminal; the review configuration information comprises relevant field information corresponding to various review work items, review workflow, review objects and review examination sheets related to the review objects;
receiving review creation information submitted by a review initiator through a third terminal; the review creation information comprises a responsible person, a plurality of reviewers, relevant review information, each target review object and the version of each target review object, and the review creation information is filled in by review initiation reference review configuration information;
and informing the responsible person to start the review through the first terminal based on the review creation information.
In one possible design, the review interface further comprises a save button, and the save button supports any reviewer to save the current review condition in the review process;
the review interface also supports any reviewer to modify the personal review result and to issue questions aiming at the review objects of various review work items.
In one possible design, the review unit 22 is further configured to:
acquiring the review condition of any reviewer in real time through the second terminal; the review condition comprises review progress, review details and the problem initiated by the review object aiming at various review work items;
and responding to a viewing request initiated by the responsible person through the first terminal, and displaying the review condition through the first terminal.
In one possible design, the review unit 22 is specifically configured to:
after determining that the personal evaluation results submitted by all the reviewers are received, determining whether the evaluation mode of the review is a countersigning mode or a non-countersigning mode;
if the review mode of the review is determined to be the countersigning mode, counting the final review condition of the review based on the personal review results submitted by all the reviewers, and sending the final review condition to the first terminal so as to inform the responsible person of final confirmation of the review result; alternatively, the first and second electrodes may be,
and if the review mode of the review is determined to be the non-countersigning mode, sending the personal review results submitted by all the reviewers to the first terminal so as to inform the responsible person of carrying out final confirmation on the review results.
In one possible design, the review unit 22 is specifically configured to:
and setting the evaluation object passing the evaluation as a released state through a built-in process engine based on the final confirmation information, and warehousing the evaluation object into an asset library.
In one possible design, the review unit 22 is further configured to:
modeling the personal evaluation result and the final confirmation information of any reviewer and extracting and cleaning the personal evaluation result and the final confirmation information into evaluation indexes of each dimension;
and carrying out measurement analysis on the evaluation indexes of all dimensions, determining the evaluation quality of evaluation, and providing evaluation optimization opinions of evaluation based on the evaluation quality.
The online review collaboration device 20 in the embodiment of the present invention and the online review collaboration method shown in fig. 1 and fig. 4 are inventions based on the same concept, and through the foregoing detailed description of the online review collaboration method, a person skilled in the art can clearly understand the implementation process of the online review collaboration device 20 in the embodiment, so for the sake of brevity of the description, no further description is provided here.
Based on the same inventive concept, an embodiment of the present invention further provides an online review collaboration device, as shown in fig. 6, the online review collaboration device 30 may include: at least one memory 301 and at least one processor 32. Wherein:
the at least one memory 31 is used to store one or more programs.
The one or more programs, when executed by the at least one processor 302, implement the online review collaboration method described above and illustrated in FIGS. 1 and 4.
The online review collaboration device 30 may also optionally include a communication interface for communicating with external devices and data interactive transmission.
It should be noted that the memory 31 may include a high-speed RAM memory, and may also include a nonvolatile memory (nonvolatile memory), such as at least one disk memory.
In a specific implementation process, if the memory 31, the processor 32 and the communication interface are integrated on a chip, the memory 31, the processor 32 and the communication interface may complete mutual communication through an internal interface. If the memory 31, the processor 32 and the communication interface are implemented independently, the memory 31, the processor 32 and the communication interface may be connected to each other through a bus and perform communication with each other.
Based on the same inventive concept, the present invention also provides a computer-readable storage medium, which can store at least one program, and when the at least one program is executed by a processor, the online review collaboration method shown in fig. 1 and 4 is implemented.
It should be understood that the computer-readable storage medium is any data storage device that can store data or programs which can thereafter be read by a computer system. Examples of computer-readable storage media include: read-only memory, random access memory, CD-ROM, HDD, DVD, magnetic tape, optical data storage devices, and the like.
The computer readable storage medium can also be distributed over network coupled computer systems so that the computer readable code is stored and executed in a distributed fashion.
Program code embodied on a computer readable storage medium may be transmitted using any appropriate medium, including but not limited to: wireless, wire, fiber optic cable, radio Frequency (RF), etc., or any suitable combination of the foregoing.
The above-mentioned embodiments only express several embodiments of the present invention, and the description thereof is more specific and detailed, but not construed as limiting the scope of the invention. It should be noted that, for a person skilled in the art, several variations and modifications can be made without departing from the inventive concept, which falls within the scope of the present invention.
Claims (10)
1. An online review collaboration method, comprising:
responding to a review starting request initiated by a responsible person through a first terminal, starting the review of the software development full life cycle, and informing any reviewer to enter the review through a second terminal of the reviewer;
after determining that any reviewer enters the evaluation, displaying a review interface through the second terminal; the review interface provides a submission button, review buttons of various review work items and a support for any reviewer to fill review opinions and input time aiming at the review objects of the various review work items, and the review buttons provide details and check items for checking the review objects of the various review work items;
receiving a personal review result submitted by any reviewer triggering the submission button; the personal review result comprises review opinions, review findings and invested time which are filled by any reviewer aiming at the check items of the review objects of the various review work items;
after determining that personal evaluation results submitted by all the reviewers are received, notifying the responsible person to carry out final confirmation of the evaluation results through the first terminal;
receiving final confirmation information submitted by the responsible person through the first terminal, sending the final confirmation information to any reviewer through the second terminal, setting a review object passing review to be in a published state based on the final confirmation information, and warehousing the review object in an asset library; the final confirmation information comprises the review history of the review objects of the various review work items and whether the review objects pass the review state or not.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein in response to a review initiation request initiated by a principal via a first terminal, initiating a software development full lifecycle review and notifying any reviewer via a second terminal of the reviewer prior to entry into the review, the method further comprising:
responding to a review creation request initiated by a review initiator through a third terminal, acquiring preset review configuration information, and displaying the review configuration information through the third terminal; the review configuration information comprises relevant field information corresponding to various review work items, review workflow, review objects and review examination sheets related to the review objects;
receiving review creation information submitted by the review initiator through the third terminal; the review creation information comprises a responsible person, a plurality of reviewers, relevant review information, each target review object and the version of each target review object, and the review creation information is filled in by the review initiator referring to the review configuration information;
and informing the responsible person to start the review through the first terminal based on the review creation information.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the review interface further comprises a save button that supports the saving of current review conditions by any of the reviewers during the review process;
the review interface also supports any reviewer to modify the personal review result and to issue questions aiming at the review objects of all the review work items.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein after determining that any of the reviewers enter the review and after displaying a review interface via the second terminal, the method further comprises:
acquiring the review condition of any reviewer in real time through the second terminal; the review condition comprises review progress, review details and problems initiated by the review objects aiming at the various review work items;
and responding to a viewing request initiated by the responsible person through the first terminal, and displaying the review condition through the first terminal.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein notifying the responsible party via the first terminal of a final confirmation of the review results after determining that all reviewers submit personal review results comprises:
after determining that all the reviewers submit personal review results, determining whether the review mode of the review is a countersigning mode or a non-countersigning mode;
if the review mode of the review is determined to be the countersigning mode, counting the final review condition of the review based on the personal review results submitted by all the reviewers, and sending the final review condition to the first terminal so as to inform the responsible person of final confirmation of the review result; alternatively, the first and second electrodes may be,
and if the review mode of the review is determined to be the non-countersigning mode, sending the personal review results submitted by all the reviewers to the first terminal so as to inform the responsible person of final confirmation of the review results.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein setting the reviewed object that passes the review to a published state based on the final confirmation information, warehousing the asset repository, comprises:
and setting the evaluation object passing the evaluation as a published state through a built-in process engine based on the final confirmation information, and warehousing the evaluation object into an asset library.
7. The method of any one of claims 1-6, further comprising:
modeling the personal evaluation result of any reviewer and the final confirmation information and extracting and cleaning the personal evaluation result and the final confirmation information into evaluation indexes of each dimension;
and carrying out measurement analysis on the evaluation indexes of all dimensions, determining the evaluation quality of the evaluation, and providing the evaluation optimization opinion of the evaluation based on the evaluation quality.
8. An online review collaboration apparatus, comprising:
the response unit is used for responding to a review starting request initiated by a responsible person through the first terminal and starting the review of the software development full life cycle;
a review unit to:
informing any reviewer to enter the review through a second terminal of the reviewer;
after determining that any reviewer enters the evaluation, displaying a review interface through the second terminal; the review interface provides a submission button, review buttons of various review work items and a support for any reviewer to fill review opinions and input time aiming at the review objects of the various review work items, and the review buttons provide details and check items for checking the review objects of the various review work items;
receiving a personal review result submitted by any reviewer triggering the submission button; the personal review result comprises review opinions, review findings and invested time which are filled by any reviewer aiming at the check items of the review objects of the various review work items;
after determining that personal evaluation results submitted by all the reviewers are received, notifying the responsible person to carry out final confirmation of the evaluation results through the first terminal;
receiving final confirmation information submitted by the responsible person through the first terminal, sending the final confirmation information to any reviewer through the second terminal, setting a review object passing review to be in a published state based on the final confirmation information, and warehousing the review object in an asset library; the final confirmation information comprises the review history of the review objects of the various review work items and whether the review objects pass the review state.
9. An online review collaboration apparatus, comprising: at least one memory and at least one processor;
the at least one memory is for storing one or more programs;
the one or more programs, when executed by the at least one processor, implement the method of any of claims 1-7.
10. A computer-readable storage medium characterized in that the computer-readable storage medium stores at least one program; the at least one program, when executed by a processor, implements the method of any of claims 1-7.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202211506296.5A CN115545680A (en) | 2022-11-29 | 2022-11-29 | Online review collaboration method and device and storage medium |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202211506296.5A CN115545680A (en) | 2022-11-29 | 2022-11-29 | Online review collaboration method and device and storage medium |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN115545680A true CN115545680A (en) | 2022-12-30 |
Family
ID=84722213
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202211506296.5A Pending CN115545680A (en) | 2022-11-29 | 2022-11-29 | Online review collaboration method and device and storage medium |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN115545680A (en) |
Citations (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN105447627A (en) * | 2015-11-13 | 2016-03-30 | 国网宁夏电力公司经济技术研究院 | Design review process management and control mode research method |
| CN108256814A (en) * | 2017-08-18 | 2018-07-06 | 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 | Item information processing method, device, server and storage medium |
| CN108345991A (en) * | 2018-01-31 | 2018-07-31 | 国网山东省电力公司经济技术研究院 | A kind of the feasibility study review system and reviewing method of fusion power grid multi-source information |
| CN109242438A (en) * | 2018-09-21 | 2019-01-18 | 中国航空无线电电子研究所 | Software peer review system |
| CN111127244A (en) * | 2018-11-01 | 2020-05-08 | 国网江苏电力设计咨询有限公司 | Three-dimensional intelligent auxiliary evaluation system and method for power transmission and transformation project |
-
2022
- 2022-11-29 CN CN202211506296.5A patent/CN115545680A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN105447627A (en) * | 2015-11-13 | 2016-03-30 | 国网宁夏电力公司经济技术研究院 | Design review process management and control mode research method |
| CN108256814A (en) * | 2017-08-18 | 2018-07-06 | 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 | Item information processing method, device, server and storage medium |
| CN108345991A (en) * | 2018-01-31 | 2018-07-31 | 国网山东省电力公司经济技术研究院 | A kind of the feasibility study review system and reviewing method of fusion power grid multi-source information |
| CN109242438A (en) * | 2018-09-21 | 2019-01-18 | 中国航空无线电电子研究所 | Software peer review system |
| CN111127244A (en) * | 2018-11-01 | 2020-05-08 | 国网江苏电力设计咨询有限公司 | Three-dimensional intelligent auxiliary evaluation system and method for power transmission and transformation project |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US20210176136A1 (en) | Continuous data sensing of functional states of networked computing devices to determine efficiency metrics for servicing electronic messages asynchronously | |
| AU2020253496A1 (en) | Systems and methods for improved meeting engagement | |
| US7353230B2 (en) | Dynamic distributed customer issue analysis | |
| CN112926941A (en) | Management method and device for financial auditing rules, storage medium and server | |
| CN112183910A (en) | Supplier selection method and related device | |
| CN113052650A (en) | Material production overall process information perception visualization system based on supply chain control tower | |
| CN112150164A (en) | Customer service communication management system | |
| CN115964272A (en) | Transaction data automatic testing method, device, equipment and readable storage medium | |
| CN115222077A (en) | Work order operation and maintenance statistical analysis system | |
| US20130132165A1 (en) | Computer system and method for ctq-based product testing, analysis, and scoring | |
| CN115545680A (en) | Online review collaboration method and device and storage medium | |
| CN114124743B (en) | Method and system for executing full-link inspection rule of data application | |
| CN115439080A (en) | Work order automatic processing method and electronic equipment | |
| CN111985900B (en) | Information processing method and device | |
| CN113469558A (en) | Material management method and system | |
| CN113177760B (en) | Method, device and system for material object storage processing | |
| CN112215560A (en) | Intelligent shift arrangement system and implementation method thereof | |
| CN112488652B (en) | Work order auditing method, system, terminal and storage medium | |
| JP2000348090A (en) | Action information management system | |
| CN115249192A (en) | Investment project management system, method and equipment | |
| CN117764423A (en) | Engineering efficiency measurement method, device, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
| JP2024029694A (en) | Information processing device and program | |
| CN118037268A (en) | Equipment point detection method, device, equipment and storage medium | |
| CN115330334A (en) | Automatic market terminal abnormity monitoring system, control method and storage medium | |
| CN116611801A (en) | Project research and development management system |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20221230 |
|
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |