CN114841682A - Transmission method and system of book checking information - Google Patents
Transmission method and system of book checking information Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN114841682A CN114841682A CN202210780461.XA CN202210780461A CN114841682A CN 114841682 A CN114841682 A CN 114841682A CN 202210780461 A CN202210780461 A CN 202210780461A CN 114841682 A CN114841682 A CN 114841682A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- annotation
- checking
- annotations
- unit
- preset
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/10—Office automation; Time management
- G06Q10/103—Workflow collaboration or project management
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
- G06Q10/06393—Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
- G06Q10/06398—Performance of employee with respect to a job function
Abstract
The invention relates to the field of book checking, in particular to a transmission method and a transmission system of book checking information, wherein the transmission method comprises the following steps that S1, a judgment unit determines core checking personnel according to acquired comprehensive checking parameters; step S2, the judging unit compares the obtained reliability with a preset reliability, and when the reliability of the current endorsement obtained by the judging unit meets a preset standard, the current endorsement of the core checking personnel is reserved to form checking information; step S3, the supplement unit obtains the annotations of the un-repeated checking information through the annotations of the checking personnel, supplements the checking information according to the same number of the annotations of the un-repeated checking information, and the correction unit corrects the positions of the annotations of the supplemented checking information so as to enable the checking information of the book to meet the preset standard; and step S4, the adjusting unit compares the acquired number with a preset number, and adjusts the comprehensive checking parameters of the core checking personnel so that the next time of book checking information meets the preset standard.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the field of book checking, in particular to a transmission method and system of book checking information.
Background
Book checking is indispensable in the book publishing process, in order to guarantee the checking quality, in the traditional checking, the previous checking personnel completes checking to form a check sample and transmits the check sample to the next checking personnel, the next checking personnel can start checking work, checking information needs to be transmitted for many times among all the checking personnel, comments in the check sample of all the checking personnel cannot be intensively compared, and all the comments are confirmed and supplemented according to the checking capability of all the checking personnel to form comprehensive and accurate checking information, so that the waiting time of the checking personnel and the transmission times of the checking information are reduced, and time and labor are saved.
Chinese patent ZL 201610580519.0 discloses a transmission method and a transmission system for book checking information, which is characterized in that each page is printed with the corresponding identification code, the image of the page with the endorsement information in the multiple pages is collected, the page information and the image with the association relationship are transmitted, the information of each checking person is still transmitted, the checking information is manually compared, the time is consumed, the checking information cannot be comprehensively compared, and the final checking information is formed.
Disclosure of Invention
Therefore, the invention provides a transmission method and a transmission system for book checking information, which can solve the technical problem that checking information cannot be confirmed and supplemented according to comprehensive checking parameters and the number of checking personnel to form a piece of checking information so as to reduce the transmission times of the checking information.
In order to achieve the above object, in one aspect, the present invention provides a method for transmitting book checking information, including:
step S1, the judgment unit acquires comprehensive calibration parameters of each calibrator, and determines core calibrators according to the acquired comprehensive calibration parameters, wherein the comprehensive calibration parameters are determined according to the calibration times, the annotation quantity and the working time of the calibrators;
step S2, the judging unit acquires the reliability of each annotation of the core checking personnel through the annotation repetition times and the comprehensive checking parameters, compares the acquired reliability with a preset reliability, and retains the current annotation of the core checking personnel to form checking information when the reliability of the current annotation acquired by the judging unit meets a preset standard;
step S3, the supplement unit obtains the annotations of the un-repeated checking information through the annotations of the checking personnel, supplements the checking information according to the same number of the annotations of the un-repeated checking information, and the correction unit corrects the positions of the annotations of the supplemented checking information so as to enable the checking information of the book to meet the preset standard;
and step S4, the adjusting unit acquires the number of the supplementary notes corrected by the correcting unit, compares the acquired number of the supplementary notes with a preset number, and adjusts the comprehensive checking parameters of the core checking personnel so as to enable the next time of book checking information to meet the preset standard.
Further, in the step S1, the determining unit obtains a comprehensive calibration parameter p of each calibration worker, and sets p = d × Z1/d0+ S × Z2/S + q × Z3/q0, where d is a number of times that the calibration worker participates in the calibration, Z1 is a calibration time compensation parameter, S is a number of comments reserved for the calibration worker, S is a number of comments made by the calibration worker, Z2 is a number compensation parameter of reserved comments, q is a work duration of the calibration worker participating in the calibration, d0 is a preset time criterion value of the determining unit, q0 is a preset work duration criterion value of the determining unit, Z3 is a work duration compensation parameter, and the determining unit determines the calibration worker with the highest comprehensive calibration parameter as a core calibration worker.
Further, in the step S2, the judging unit obtains the reliability ri of the ith annotation of the core reviewer, compares the obtained reliability with a preset reliability R, and judges once whether the ith annotation remains, wherein,
when ri is not more than R1, the judging unit judges that the core checking personnel checks the ith annotation again;
when R1 < ri < R2, the judging unit acquires the type of the ith annotation;
when ri is larger than or equal to R2, the judging unit judges that the ith annotation is reserved;
the judging unit is used for presetting a reliability R, and setting a first preset reliability R1 and a second preset reliability R2, I =1, 2, ·, I, I as the postil number of the core checking personnel.
Further, the reliability ri of the ith annotation is determined according to the repetition number of the ith annotation and the comprehensive examination and correction parameters of the examiners participating in the examination and correction, wherein ri = n × P/m, wherein n is the repetition number of the ith annotation, m is the number of the examiners participating in the examination and correction, and P is the sum of the comprehensive examination and correction parameters of the examiners who make the ith annotation.
Further, when the reliability of the ith annotation obtained by the judging unit is greater than a first preset reliability and less than a second preset reliability, the judging unit obtains the type j of the ith annotation and obtains the correctness E0 of the ith annotation, sets E0= E1j + E2j + · · ekj + · · egj, where ekj is the correctness of the type j of the k th reviewer who makes the ith annotation, k =1, 2, · g, and sets ekj = Ak/Ak, where Ak is the number of times the type j of the kth reviewer who makes the ith annotation remains, Ak is the total number of times the type j of the kth reviewer who makes the ith annotation remains, g is the number of times the reviewer who makes the ith annotation remains, and compares the obtained correctness E of the ith annotation with the preset correctness E to judge the second time of the remaining annotation, wherein the type j of the i remains,
when E0 is less than or equal to E, the judging unit judges that the ith annotation is not reserved;
when E0 > E, the judging unit judges that the ith annotation remains.
Further, in the step S3, the supplementing unit obtains the same number W of annotations in the annotations whose examination information is not repeated, compares the same number W with a preset number W, and determines whether to keep the annotations whose examination information is not repeated, wherein,
when W is less than or equal to W, the supplementary unit further judges whether to reserve the annotations of which the checking information is not repeated;
and when W is larger than W, the supplement unit judges that the remarks of which the checking information is not repeated are reserved, and supplements the checking information.
Further, when the number of the same annotations acquired by the supplementing unit is less than or equal to a preset number, the supplementing unit acquires the type j of the same annotation in the annotations with unrepeated checking information, acquires the authority f of each checking person on the type j, and sets f = p × ej, wherein ej is the accuracy of each checking person on the type j, and the supplementing unit judges whether the auditing person with the maximum authority on the type j confirms whether to reserve the annotations with unrepeated checking information.
Further, the correction unit takes the annotations of the core reviewers before supplementation as mark points, divides the to-be-reviewed picture into a plurality of areas, and obtains the annotations in each area, wherein when the correction unit judges that two or more annotations belonging to the type j exist in the current area, the correction unit judges that the review file is sent to the reviewer with the maximum annotation authority degree for the type j, and the reviewer with the maximum annotation authority degree for the type j judges the reservation of the annotations of the same type in the current area.
Further, in the step S4, the adjusting unit presets a quantity T, and the adjusting unit compares the obtained supplementary annotation quantity T with the preset quantity to adjust the comprehensive calibration parameters of the core calibration personnel, wherein,
when T is less than or equal to T1, the adjusting unit judges that the comprehensive examination parameters of the core examiners are increased from p1 to p11, and sets p11= p1 x (1 + | T1-T |/T1);
when T1 is more than T and less than T2, the adjusting unit judges that the comprehensive calibration parameters of the core calibration personnel are not adjusted;
when T is larger than or equal to T2, the adjusting unit judges that the comprehensive examination parameters of the core examiners are reduced from p1 to p12, and sets p12= p1 x (1- | T2-T |/T2);
the preset number T of the adjusting units is set as a first preset number T1 and a second preset number T2.
In another aspect, the present invention provides a transmission system for book checking information, comprising,
the judging unit is used for determining core checking personnel according to the comprehensive checking parameters of all the checking personnel and judging whether the comments of the core checking personnel are reserved or not to form checking information;
the supplement unit is connected with the judgment unit and used for supplementing the checking information according to the same number of the annotations in the annotations of which the checking information is not repeated;
the correcting unit is connected with the supplementing unit and is used for adjusting the annotation positions of the supplemented checking information;
the adjusting unit is connected with the judging unit and the correcting unit and is used for adjusting the comprehensive examination and calibration parameters of the core examination and calibration personnel according to the supplementary annotation quantity of the examination and calibration information so as to enable the examination and calibration information of the next book to meet the preset standard
Compared with the prior art, the invention has the advantages that the judging unit determines the core reviewer according to the comprehensive review parameters of each reviewer, acquires the reliability of each annotation of the core reviewer according to the iteration number of the annotation and the comprehensive review parameters, judges whether each annotation of the core reviewer is reserved according to the acquired reliability, forms the review information so that the reliability of the reserved annotation meets the preset standard, the supplementing unit acquires the annotation with no iteration of the review information, supplements the review information when the same annotation quantity meets the preset standard in the annotation with no iteration of the review information, corrects the position of each annotation of the supplemented review information by the correcting unit so that the comprehensiveness and standard of the finally formed review information meet the preset standard, and adjusts the comprehensive review parameters of the core reviewer according to the quantity of the supplemented annotation, so that the accuracy of the next book checking information meets the preset standard. According to the invention, by confirming and supplementing the annotations of the core checking personnel and correcting the supplemented annotations, centralized processing of multi-source checking information is realized, so that the transmission times of the checking information are reduced, the checking efficiency is improved, and the comprehensiveness and accuracy of the checking information meet the preset standards.
In particular, the judging unit acquires comprehensive review parameters of each reviewer and determines the core reviewer, the judging unit acquires the reliability of each comment of the core reviewer based on the comment of the core reviewer, compares the acquired reliability with a preset reliability and judges whether the comment of the core reviewer is reserved, wherein when the reliability acquired by the judging unit is less than or equal to a first preset reliability, the judging unit indicates that the number of the reviewers making the comment is small and the comprehensive review capability is low, the reliability of the comment is low, the core reviewer revises the comment again to determine whether the comment is reserved, when the reliability acquired by the judging unit is greater than the first preset reliability and less than a second preset reliability, the judging unit acquires the type of the comment, and further judging, when the reliability acquired by the judging unit is greater than or equal to a second preset reliability, the fact that the number of the checking personnel making the annotation is large and the comprehensive checking capability is strong is indicated, so that the judging unit judges that the annotation is reserved.
Specifically, when the reliability acquired by the judgment unit is greater than a first preset reliability and less than a second preset reliability, the judgment unit acquires the type of the annotation and acquires the correctness of the type of annotation by the reviewer who made the annotation, wherein when the correctness acquired by the judgment unit is less than or equal to the preset correctness, it indicates that the reviewer who made the annotation has poor ability to correct the type of error, and therefore the judgment unit judges that the annotation is not retained, and when the correctness acquired by the judgment unit is greater than the preset correctness, it indicates that the reviewer who made the annotation is adept at correcting the type of error, and therefore the judgment unit judges that the annotation is retained.
Particularly, after the judging unit judges each annotation made by the core reviewer to form the review information, the supplementing unit obtains the annotations with the unrepeated review information and obtains the number of the same annotations in the unrepeated annotations, when the number obtained by the supplementing unit is smaller than or equal to the preset number, the number of the reviewers making the annotations is less, the supplementing unit selects the reviewer with the highest authority of the annotations belonging to the type of the annotations, the retention of the annotations is judged, when the reviewers judge that the annotations are retained, the supplementing unit supplements the annotations to the review information, when the number obtained by the supplementing unit is larger than the preset number, the number of the reviewers making the annotations is more, the core reviewers omit the annotations, and the supplementing unit judges that the annotations are retained and supplements the review information.
Particularly, after the supplement unit supplements the checking information, the correction unit takes the annotations of the core checking personnel before supplementation as mark points, divides the to-be-checked drawing into a plurality of areas and obtains the annotations in each area, wherein when two or more annotations obtained by the correction unit in a certain area belong to the same type, the problem of repeated annotations is possibly caused, the correction unit selects the checking personnel with the maximum authority degree on the type of the annotations to analyze the annotations of the same type, judges whether the problem of repeated annotations exists, and if so, the accurate annotations at the annotation positions are reserved, so that the annotation positions are more accurate.
Particularly, the adjusting unit compares the acquired supplementary notes number with a preset number to adjust the comprehensive calibration parameters of the core calibrator, wherein when the supplementary notes number acquired by the adjusting unit is less than or equal to the first preset number, the supplementary notes number is less, the notes of the core calibrator are more comprehensive and accurate, so that the adjusting unit judges that the comprehensive calibration parameters of the core calibrator are improved, and when the supplementary notes number acquired by the adjusting unit is more than or equal to the second preset number, the supplementary notes number is more, the notes quality of the core calibrator is poorer, and therefore the adjusting unit judges that the comprehensive calibration parameters of the core calibrator are reduced.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a flow diagram of a transmission method of book checking information according to an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of a transmission system for book checking information according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Detailed Description
In order that the objects and advantages of the invention will be more clearly understood, the invention is further described below with reference to examples; it should be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are merely illustrative of the invention and are not intended to limit the invention.
Preferred embodiments of the present invention are described below with reference to the accompanying drawings. It should be understood by those skilled in the art that these embodiments are only for explaining the technical principle of the present invention, and do not limit the scope of the present invention.
It should be noted that in the description of the present invention, the terms of direction or positional relationship indicated by the terms "upper", "lower", "left", "right", "inner", "outer", etc. are based on the directions or positional relationships shown in the drawings, which are only for convenience of description, and do not indicate or imply that the device or element must have a specific orientation, be constructed in a specific orientation, and be operated, and thus, should not be construed as limiting the present invention.
Furthermore, it should be noted that, in the description of the present invention, unless otherwise explicitly specified or limited, the terms "mounted," "connected," and "connected" are to be construed broadly, and may be, for example, fixedly connected, detachably connected, or integrally connected; can be mechanically or electrically connected; they may be connected directly or indirectly through intervening media, or they may be interconnected between two elements. The specific meanings of the above terms in the present invention can be understood by those skilled in the art according to specific situations.
Referring to fig. 1, it is a flow chart of a transmission method of book checking information according to an embodiment of the present invention, including,
step S1, the judgment unit acquires comprehensive calibration parameters of each calibrator, and determines core calibrators according to the acquired comprehensive calibration parameters, wherein the comprehensive calibration parameters are determined according to the calibration times, the annotation quantity and the working time of the calibrators;
step S2, the judging unit acquires the reliability of each annotation of the core checking personnel through the annotation repetition times and the comprehensive checking parameters, compares the acquired reliability with a preset reliability, and retains the current annotation of the core checking personnel to form checking information when the reliability of the current annotation acquired by the judging unit meets a preset standard;
step S3, the supplement unit obtains the annotations of the un-repeated checking information through the annotations of the checking personnel, supplements the checking information according to the same number of the annotations of the un-repeated checking information, and the correction unit corrects the positions of the annotations of the supplemented checking information so as to enable the checking information of the book to meet the preset standard;
and step S4, the adjusting unit acquires the number of the supplementary notes corrected by the correcting unit, compares the acquired number of the supplementary notes with a preset number, and adjusts the comprehensive checking parameters of the core checking personnel so as to enable the next time of book checking information to meet the preset standard.
Specifically, the annotation with the unrepeated checking information is an annotation which is not made by the core checking personnel and is made by the checking personnel other than the core checking personnel.
In the step S1, the determining unit obtains a comprehensive calibration parameter p of each calibration worker, and sets p = d × Z1/d0+ S × Z2/S + q × Z3/q0, where d is the number of times that the calibration worker participates in the calibration, Z1 is a calibration time compensation parameter, S is the number of comments reserved for the calibration worker, S is the number of comments made by the calibration worker, Z2 is a reserved comment number compensation parameter, q is the work duration of the calibration worker participating in the calibration, d0 is a preset time standard value of the determining unit, q0 is a preset work duration standard value of the determining unit, Z3 is a work duration compensation parameter, and the determining unit determines the calibration worker with the highest comprehensive calibration parameter as a core calibration worker.
Specifically, the compensation parameters are not specifically limited, as long as the comprehensive calibration capability of the calibrator can be evaluated, and the embodiment of the present invention provides a preferred embodiment, wherein Z1=1.4-1.6, Z2=1.7-1.9, and Z3= 1.1-1.3.
In step S2, the determining unit obtains the reliability ri of the ith annotation of the core reviewer, compares the obtained reliability with a preset reliability R, and determines whether the ith annotation remains, wherein,
when ri is not more than R1, the judging unit judges that the core checking personnel checks the ith annotation again;
when R1 < ri < R2, the judging unit acquires the type of the ith annotation;
when ri is larger than or equal to R2, the judging unit judges that the ith annotation is reserved;
the judging unit is used for presetting a reliability R, and setting a first preset reliability R1 and a second preset reliability R2, I =1, 2, ·, I, I as the postil number of the core checking personnel.
And the reliability ri of the ith annotation is determined according to the ith annotation repetition frequency and the comprehensive examination and correction parameters of the examination and correction personnel participating in the examination and correction, wherein ri = nxp/m, wherein n is the ith annotation repetition frequency, m is the number of the personnel participating in the examination and correction, and P is the sum of the comprehensive examination and correction parameters of the examination and correction personnel making the ith annotation.
Specifically, the embodiment of the present invention exemplifies the calculation of the reliability of each annotation, for example, 10 people are involved in the verification, the ith annotation of the core verifier appears 6 times in total, and the reliability of the ith annotation is 6 × 5/10=3 when the comprehensive verification parameters of the 6 verifiers who make the ith annotation are added to 5.
Specifically, the judging unit acquires comprehensive review parameters of each reviewer and determines the core reviewer, the judging unit acquires the reliability of each comment of the core reviewer based on the comment of the core reviewer, compares the acquired reliability with a preset reliability and judges whether the comment of the core reviewer is reserved, wherein when the reliability acquired by the judging unit is less than or equal to a first preset reliability, the judging unit indicates that the number of the reviewers making the comment is small and the comprehensive review capability is low, the reliability of the comment is low, the core reviewer revises the comment again to determine whether the comment is reserved, when the reliability acquired by the judging unit is greater than the first preset reliability and less than a second preset reliability, the judging unit indicates that the dispute of the reviewer for the comment is large, and the judging unit acquires the type of the comment, and further judging, wherein when the reliability acquired by the judging unit is greater than or equal to a second preset reliability, the judging unit indicates that the number of the checking personnel making the annotation is large and the comprehensive checking capability is strong, so that the judging unit judges that the annotation is reserved.
When the reliability of the ith annotation obtained by the judging unit is larger than a first preset reliability and smaller than a second preset reliability, the judging unit obtains the type j of the ith annotation and obtains the accuracy E0 of the ith annotation, sets E0= E1j + E2j + · · ekj + · · egj, wherein ekj is the accuracy of the proofing personnel type j annotation of the kth annotation, k =1, 2, · g, and sets ekj = Ak/Ak, wherein Ak is the number of times the proofing personnel type j annotation of the kth annotation makes the ith annotation, Ak is the total number of times the proofing personnel type j annotation of the kth annotation makes the type j, g is the number of the proofing personnel making the ith annotation, the judging unit compares the obtained accuracy of the ith annotation with the preset accuracy E, and judges the retention time of the ith annotation, wherein i, and j is the number of the second annotation,
when E0 is less than or equal to E, the judging unit judges that the ith annotation is not reserved;
when E0 > E, the judgment unit judges that the ith annotation is retained.
Specifically, when the reliability obtained by the judgment unit is greater than a first preset reliability and less than a second preset reliability, the judgment unit obtains the type of the annotation and obtains the correctness of the type annotation by the reviewer who makes the annotation, wherein when the correctness obtained by the judgment unit is less than or equal to the preset correctness, the reviewer who makes the annotation is lower in the error correction capability of the type, so the judgment unit judges that the annotation is not reserved, and when the correctness obtained by the judgment unit is greater than the preset correctness, the reviewer who makes the annotation is adept in correcting the type error, so the judgment unit judges that the annotation is reserved.
Specifically, the classification mode and the classification number of the annotations are not limited, and the annotations can be classified according to the error types indicated by the annotations in the embodiment of the invention, such as the annotations are classified into the types of wrongly written or mispronounced words, ill sentences, unclear semantics and the like.
In step S3, the supplementing unit obtains the same number W of annotations in the annotations whose examination information is not repeated, compares the same number W of annotations with a preset number W, and determines whether to keep the annotations whose examination information is not repeated, wherein,
when W is less than or equal to W, the supplementary unit further judges whether to reserve the annotations of which the checking information is not repeated;
and when W is larger than W, the supplement unit judges that the remarks of which the checking information is not repeated are reserved, and supplements the checking information.
When the number of the same annotations acquired by the supplementing unit is less than or equal to the preset number, the supplementing unit acquires the type j of the same annotation in the annotations with unrepeated checking information, acquires the authority f of each checking person on the type j, and sets f = p × ej, wherein ej is the accuracy of each checking person on the type j, and the supplementing unit judges whether the auditing person with the maximum authority on the type j confirms whether to reserve the annotations with unrepeated checking information
Specifically, after the judging unit judges each annotation made by the core reviewer to form the review information, the supplementing unit obtains the annotations with the unrepeated review information and obtains the number of the same annotations in the unrepeated annotations, when the number obtained by the supplementing unit is smaller than or equal to the preset number, the number of the reviewers making the annotations is less, the supplementing unit selects the reviewer with the highest authority on the type of the annotations to which the annotations belong, the retention of the annotations is judged, when the reviewer judges that the annotations are retained, the supplementing unit supplements the annotations to the review information, when the number obtained by the supplementing unit is larger than the preset number, the number of the reviewers makes the annotations, the core reviewer misses the annotations, and the supplementing unit judges that the annotations are retained and supplements the review information.
The correction unit takes the annotations of the core reviewers before supplementation as mark points, divides the to-be-reviewed picture into a plurality of areas and obtains the annotations in each area, wherein when the correction unit judges that two or more annotations belonging to the type j exist in the current area, the correction unit judges that the review file is sent to the reviewer with the maximum annotation authority degree on the type j, and the reviewer with the maximum annotation authority degree on the type j judges the reservation of the annotations of the same type in the current area.
Specifically, after the supplementing unit supplements the checking information, the correcting unit takes the annotations of the core checking personnel before supplementation as mark points, divides the to-be-checked drawing into a plurality of areas, and acquires the annotations in each area, wherein when two or more annotations acquired by the correcting unit in a certain area belong to the same type, the problem of repeated annotations is possibly caused, the correcting unit selects the checking personnel with the highest authority degree on the type to analyze the annotations of the same type, judges whether the problem of repeated annotations exists, and if so, reserves the annotations with accurate annotation positions, so that the annotation positions are more accurate.
Specifically, the embodiment of the present invention exemplifies the repeated annotation questions, wherein if the core reviewer annotates a sentence at the end of a certain segment of text, and after the annotation is supplemented, the annotation at the end of the second sentence of the segment of text is the sentence, the correction unit determines whether the reviewer with the highest authority for annotating the sentence type of the disease determines to keep the annotation, so as to prevent the repeated annotation and accurately annotate the position.
In step S4, the adjusting unit presets a number T, and the adjusting unit compares the obtained supplementary annotation number T with the preset number to adjust the comprehensive examination and calibration parameters of the core examiner, wherein,
when T is less than or equal to T1, the adjusting unit judges that the comprehensive examination parameters of the core examiners are increased from p1 to p11, and sets p11= p1 x (1 + | T1-T |/T1);
when T1 is more than T and less than T2, the adjusting unit judges that the comprehensive calibration parameters of the core calibration personnel are not adjusted;
when T is larger than or equal to T2, the adjusting unit judges that the comprehensive examination parameters of the core examiners are reduced from p1 to p12, and sets p12= p1 x (1- | T2-T |/T2);
the preset number T of the adjusting units is set as a first preset number T1 and a second preset number T2.
Specifically, the adjusting unit compares the acquired supplementary notes number with a preset number and adjusts the comprehensive examination and correction parameters of the core examiners, wherein when the supplementary notes number acquired by the adjusting unit is smaller than or equal to the first preset number, the supplementary notes number is less, the notes of the core examiners are more comprehensive and accurate, so that the adjusting unit judges that the comprehensive examination and correction parameters of the core examiners are improved, and when the supplementary notes number acquired by the adjusting unit is larger than or equal to the second preset number, the supplementary notes number is more, the notes quality of the core examiners is poorer, and therefore the adjusting unit judges that the comprehensive examination and correction parameters of the core examiners are reduced.
Specifically, the present invention does not specifically limit the implementation manner of the transmission method of the book review information, and the embodiment of the present invention provides a preferred implementation scheme, where the judgment unit presets a review number compensation parameter of 1.5, reserves an endorsement number compensation parameter of 1.8, presets a number standard value of 60 times, has a working duration standard value of 160 hours and a working duration compensation parameter of 1.1, and obtains the comprehensive review parameters of each reviewer, where, for example, one reviewer participates in the review for 80 times, makes 1000 endorsements, reserves an endorsement number of 900, has a working duration of 200 hours, and has a comprehensive review parameter p =80 × 1.5/60+900 × 1.8/1000+200 × 1.1/160=4.99, the judgment unit determines the reviewer with the highest comprehensive parameter as the core reviewer and obtains the reliability of each endorsement of the core reviewer, wherein, if a certain annotation has 4 auditors, i.e. the number of times of repetition is 4, and the sum of the four auditors is 18, and there are 5 auditors participating in the current audit, the reliability of the annotation is 4 × 18/5=14.4, the determining unit sets the first preset reliability to 8 and the second preset reliability to 12, so that the determining unit determines to retain the annotation, and so on, the determining unit determines the reliability of each annotation of the core auditors, when the reliability of a certain annotation is greater than the first preset reliability and less than the second preset reliability, the determining unit obtains the correctness of the auditor making the annotation to the type of the annotation, if there are 3 auditors making the annotation, the determining unit obtains the correctness of the first auditor of the 3 auditors to the type of the annotation to 60/100=0.6, wherein the checking personnel makes the type annotation 100 times, the retention time is 60 times, and so on, and the accuracy of the other 2 checking personnel to the type annotation
0.7 and 0.8 respectively, the accuracy of the annotation is 2.1 and is greater than the preset accuracy 1.5, the judging unit judges that the annotation is reserved, and similarly, the judging unit confirms each annotation of the core reviewer to form the review information, the supplementing unit acquires the same annotation quantity in the annotation with no repetition of the review information, namely the quantity of the same annotation made by reviewers other than the core reviewer, such as one annotation made by 3 reviewers out of 4 reviewers except the core reviewer and is greater than the preset quantity 2, the supplementing unit judges that the annotation is reserved and is supplemented in the review information, if one annotation is made by 1 reviewer out of 4 reviewers except the core reviewer, the supplementing unit acquires the authority degree of each reviewer to the type of the annotation, and the reviewer with the highest authority degree confirms whether the annotation is supplemented in the review information, the correction unit corrects each supplemented examination and calibration information, avoids the problem of repeated annotation, and forms final examination and calibration information, the adjustment unit obtains that the number of the supplementary annotations of the final examination and calibration information is 6, the adjustment unit sets a first preset number of 3 and a second preset number of 5, so that the adjustment unit reduces the comprehensive examination and calibration parameters of the core examiners, and if the comprehensive examination and calibration parameters of the core examiners are 16, the adjusted comprehensive examination and calibration parameters are 16 x (1- |5-6 |/5) = 12.8.
Specifically, the preset values are not specifically limited, and the preset values can meet the requirements, and can be set by a person skilled in the art according to the specific conditions of the examiners.
Referring to fig. 2, it is a schematic diagram of a transmission system for book checking information according to an embodiment of the present invention, including,
the judging unit is used for determining core checking personnel according to the comprehensive checking parameters of all the checking personnel and judging whether the comments of the core checking personnel are reserved or not to form checking information;
the supplement unit is connected with the judgment unit and used for supplementing the checking information according to the same number of the annotations in the annotations of which the checking information is not repeated;
the correction unit is connected with the supplement unit and is used for adjusting the annotation positions of the supplemented checking information;
and the adjusting unit is connected with the judging unit and the correcting unit and is used for adjusting the comprehensive examination and calibration parameters of the core examination and calibration personnel according to the supplementary annotation quantity of the examination and calibration information so as to enable the examination and calibration information of the next book to meet the preset standard.
So far, the technical solutions of the present invention have been described in connection with the preferred embodiments shown in the drawings, but it is apparent to those skilled in the art that the scope of the present invention is not limited to these specific embodiments. Equivalent changes or substitutions of related technical features can be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the principle of the invention, and the technical scheme after the changes or substitutions can fall into the protection scope of the invention.
Claims (10)
1. A transmission method of book checking information is characterized by comprising the following steps:
step S1, the judgment unit acquires comprehensive calibration parameters of each calibrator, and determines core calibrators according to the acquired comprehensive calibration parameters, wherein the comprehensive calibration parameters are determined according to the calibration times, the annotation quantity and the working time of the calibrators;
step S2, the judging unit acquires the reliability of each annotation of the core checking personnel through the annotation repetition times and the comprehensive checking parameters, compares the acquired reliability with a preset reliability, and retains the current annotation of the core checking personnel to form checking information when the reliability of the current annotation acquired by the judging unit meets a preset standard;
step S3, the supplement unit obtains the annotations of the un-repeated checking information through the annotations of the checking personnel, supplements the checking information according to the same number of the annotations of the un-repeated checking information, and the correction unit corrects the positions of the annotations of the supplemented checking information so as to enable the checking information of the book to meet the preset standard;
and step S4, the adjusting unit acquires the number of the supplementary notes corrected by the correcting unit, compares the acquired number of the supplementary notes with a preset number, and adjusts the comprehensive checking parameters of the core checking personnel so as to enable the next time of book checking information to meet the preset standard.
2. The method for transmitting book review information of claim 1, wherein in step S1, the determining unit obtains the comprehensive review parameters p of each reviewer, and sets p = d × Z1/d0+ S × Z2/S + q × Z3/q0, where d is the number of times that the reviewer participates in the review, Z1 is a review number compensation parameter, S is the number of remarks reserved for the reviewer, S is the number of remarks made by the reviewer, Z2 is a reserved number compensation parameter, q is the review work duration participated by the reviewer, d0 is a criterion value of the number of times preset by the determining unit, q0 is a criterion value of the work duration preset by the determining unit, and Z3 is a work duration compensation parameter, and the determining unit determines the reviewer with the highest comprehensive review parameters as the core reviewer.
3. The method for transmitting book review information of claim 2, wherein in the step S2, the judging unit obtains the reliability ri of the ith annotation of the core reviewer, compares the obtained reliability with a preset reliability R, and makes a judgment as to whether the ith annotation remains, wherein,
when ri is not more than R1, the judgment unit judges that the core calibrator re-calibrates the ith annotation;
when R1 < ri < R2, the judging unit acquires the type of the ith annotation;
when ri is larger than or equal to R2, the judging unit judges that the ith annotation is reserved;
the judging unit is used for presetting a reliability R, and setting a first preset reliability R1 and a second preset reliability R2, I =1, 2, ·, I, I as the postil number of the core checking personnel.
4. The method for transmitting book review information as claimed in claim 3, wherein the reliability ri of the ith annotation is determined according to the repetition number of the ith annotation and the comprehensive review parameters of the reviewers participating in the review, wherein ri = nxp/m, wherein n is the repetition number of the ith annotation, m is the number of the reviewers participating in the review, and P is the sum of the comprehensive review parameters of the reviewers who made the ith annotation.
5. The method for transmitting book review information as set forth in claim 4, wherein the judging unit obtains the type j of the ith annotation and obtains the correctness E0 of the ith annotation when the reliability of the ith annotation obtained by the judging unit is greater than a first preset reliability and less than a second preset reliability, setting E0= E1j + E2j +. cndot. + ekj +. cndot. egj, wherein ekj is the correctness of the type j annotation of the kth corrector making the ith annotation, k =1, 2,. cndot.,. g, and setting ekj = Ak/Ak, wherein Ak is the number of times the type j of the verifier making the ith annotation, Ak is the total number of times the type j of the kth corrector making the annotation, g is the number of the reviewer making the ith annotation, and the judging unit compares the obtained correctness E of the ith annotation with the preset reliability E, making a secondary judgment on the retention of the ith annotation, wherein,
when E0 is less than or equal to E, the judging unit judges that the ith annotation is not reserved;
when E0 > E, the judgment unit judges that the ith annotation is retained.
6. The method for transmitting book review information according to claim 5, wherein in step S3, the supplementing unit obtains the same number of annotations W in the annotations whose review information is not repeated, compares the same number of annotations with a preset number W, and judges whether or not the annotations whose review information is not repeated remain, wherein,
when W is less than or equal to W, the supplementary unit further judges whether to reserve the annotations of which the checking information is not repeated;
and when W is larger than W, the supplement unit judges that the remarks of which the checking information is not repeated are reserved, and supplements the checking information.
7. The transmission method of book review information as claimed in claim 6, wherein when the number of the same annotations obtained by the supplementing unit is less than or equal to the preset number, the supplementing unit obtains the type j of the same annotation in the annotations with unrepeated review information, and obtains the authority f of each reviewer for the type j, setting f = p × ej, where ej is the accuracy of each reviewer for the type j annotation, and the supplementing unit determines whether to confirm whether to keep the annotation with unrepeated review information by the reviewer with the maximum authority for the type j annotation.
8. The transmission method of book review information according to claim 7, wherein the correction unit takes the annotations of the core reviewers before replenishment as a mark point, divides the book to be reviewed into a plurality of regions, and obtains the annotations in each region, wherein when the correction unit determines that two or more annotations belonging to type j exist in the current region, the correction unit determines to send the review file to the reviewer with the highest authority for the annotations of type j, and the reviewer with the highest authority for the annotations of type j determines to reserve the annotations of the same type in the current region.
9. The method for transmitting book review information of claim 8, wherein in the step S4, the adjusting unit presets a quantity T, the adjusting unit compares the obtained supplementary notes quantity T with the preset quantity to adjust the comprehensive review parameters of the core reviewers, wherein,
when T is less than or equal to T1, the adjusting unit judges that the comprehensive examination parameters of the core examiners are increased from p1 to p11, and sets p11= p1 x (1 + | T1-T |/T1);
when T1 is more than T and less than T2, the adjusting unit judges that the comprehensive calibration parameters of the core calibration personnel are not adjusted;
when T is larger than or equal to T2, the adjusting unit judges that the comprehensive examination parameters of the core examiners are reduced from p1 to p12, and sets p12= p1 x (1- | T2-T |/T2);
the preset number T of the adjusting units is set as a first preset number T1 and a second preset number T2.
10. A transmission system of book checking information, the transmission method of the transmission system of book checking information adopts the method of any one of claims 1 to 9, which is characterized by comprising,
the judging unit is used for determining core checking personnel according to the comprehensive checking parameters of all the checking personnel and judging whether the comments of the core checking personnel are reserved or not to form checking information;
the supplement unit is connected with the judgment unit and used for supplementing the checking information according to the same number of the annotations in the annotations of which the checking information is not repeated;
the correction unit is connected with the supplement unit and is used for adjusting the annotation positions of the supplemented checking information;
and the adjusting unit is connected with the judging unit and the correcting unit and is used for adjusting the comprehensive examination and calibration parameters of the core examination and calibration personnel according to the supplementary annotation quantity of the examination and calibration information so as to enable the examination and calibration information of the next book to meet the preset standard.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202210780461.XA CN114841682B (en) | 2022-07-05 | 2022-07-05 | Transmission method and system of book checking information |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202210780461.XA CN114841682B (en) | 2022-07-05 | 2022-07-05 | Transmission method and system of book checking information |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN114841682A true CN114841682A (en) | 2022-08-02 |
| CN114841682B CN114841682B (en) | 2022-09-13 |
Family
ID=82575159
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202210780461.XA Active CN114841682B (en) | 2022-07-05 | 2022-07-05 | Transmission method and system of book checking information |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN114841682B (en) |
Citations (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2010003218A (en) * | 2008-06-23 | 2010-01-07 | Ricoh Co Ltd | Document review support device and method, program and storage medium |
| CN105930315A (en) * | 2016-05-06 | 2016-09-07 | 长沙市麓智信息科技有限公司 | Patent application file annotation system and method |
| CN107644009A (en) * | 2016-07-21 | 2018-01-30 | 北大方正集团有限公司 | Books examine and revise the transmission method and Transmission system of information |
| CN110059850A (en) * | 2019-03-07 | 2019-07-26 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | Exam pool optimization method and device calculates equipment and computer readable storage medium |
| CN110400029A (en) * | 2018-04-24 | 2019-11-01 | 北京京东尚科信息技术有限公司 | A kind of method and system of mark management |
| CN111353626A (en) * | 2018-12-21 | 2020-06-30 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | Data auditing method, device and equipment |
-
2022
- 2022-07-05 CN CN202210780461.XA patent/CN114841682B/en active Active
Patent Citations (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2010003218A (en) * | 2008-06-23 | 2010-01-07 | Ricoh Co Ltd | Document review support device and method, program and storage medium |
| CN105930315A (en) * | 2016-05-06 | 2016-09-07 | 长沙市麓智信息科技有限公司 | Patent application file annotation system and method |
| CN107644009A (en) * | 2016-07-21 | 2018-01-30 | 北大方正集团有限公司 | Books examine and revise the transmission method and Transmission system of information |
| CN110400029A (en) * | 2018-04-24 | 2019-11-01 | 北京京东尚科信息技术有限公司 | A kind of method and system of mark management |
| CN111353626A (en) * | 2018-12-21 | 2020-06-30 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | Data auditing method, device and equipment |
| CN110059850A (en) * | 2019-03-07 | 2019-07-26 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | Exam pool optimization method and device calculates equipment and computer readable storage medium |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN114841682B (en) | 2022-09-13 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| DE602004011141T2 (en) | Method for power regulation with detection of DTX (Discontinuous Transmission) frames for communication channels | |
| US20060210197A1 (en) | OCR apparatus and OCR result verification method | |
| DE112008000436B4 (en) | Interference-proof high-frequency (HF) signals | |
| CN114841682B (en) | Transmission method and system of book checking information | |
| US20050182721A1 (en) | Remittance information processing system | |
| US20060247947A1 (en) | System and method for verifying the accurate processing of medical insurance claims | |
| US20060129896A1 (en) | Account data reconciliation | |
| DE202022101348U1 (en) | Full-featured detection system for winding defects in pole piece manufacture | |
| CN110909013B (en) | Service list generation method, device, equipment and computer readable storage medium | |
| EP3557816A1 (en) | Self-diagnosis method for communication protocol of security-level instrumentation and control system of nuclear power plant | |
| CN111711609A (en) | Protocol design method in serial port communication | |
| EP1906560A1 (en) | Turbo decoding system, transmission power control method, and cdma mobile communication terminal | |
| BRPI0913345B1 (en) | DIMENSIONAL MEASUREMENT SYSTEM AND INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE | |
| CN112860957B (en) | Method, medium and system for checking fixed value list | |
| CN105404269A (en) | Three-remote signal acceptance system of intelligent transformer station | |
| CN109660429A (en) | Information calibration method and information checking system | |
| CN115908871B (en) | Wearable equipment track equipment data detection method, device, equipment and medium | |
| DE102019207542A1 (en) | Subscriber station for a serial bus system and method for communication in a serial bus system | |
| CN114051182A (en) | Current data acquisition, analysis and transmission system and method based on can protocol | |
| CN117371958A (en) | Standard auditing system and method for enterprise data | |
| CN116596489B (en) | Distributed photovoltaic operation worksheet data acquisition and analysis method | |
| CN117041123B (en) | Dual-task concurrent broadcast monitoring method | |
| CN117036073B (en) | Invoice auditing and automatic reimbursement system based on Internet | |
| CN109254952A (en) | A kind of intelligent substation configuration file legitimacy verifies method | |
| CN113435854A (en) | Intelligent document signing method and equipment |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant |