CN114519568A - Order examination method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium - Google Patents

Abstract

The embodiment of the application discloses a document examination method and device, electronic equipment and a storage medium. Acquiring information to be audited in a document to be audited; determining a target auditing rule of the document to be audited; and determining the auditing result of the document to be audited according to the information to be audited and the constraint condition of each reference auditing information in the target auditing rule. The method has the advantage that the information to be audited in the document to be audited can be quickly and directly checked according to the constraint conditions in the target auditing rule. Meanwhile, each constraint condition can be independently checked, the defect that in the prior art, the checking needs to be circularly traversed is overcome, the technical effect of simultaneously checking different pieces of information to be checked in the same document to be checked is achieved, and the document checking efficiency is greatly improved.

Description

Document examination method, device, electronic device and storage medium

technical field

The embodiments of the present application relate to the technical field of artificial intelligence, and in particular, to a method, apparatus, electronic device, and storage medium for examining documents.

Background technique

With the progress of society, the tertiary industry such as commerce and service industry develops rapidly, followed by the emergence of a large number of transactions and transaction certificates. This poses a difficult problem for all walks of life to review transaction vouchers. How to conduct document review more quickly and efficiently has become one of the key points in all industries.

At present, the work of reviewing documents is mostly done manually. The relevant personnel are trained to review the documents, and the information on the documents is gradually checked according to the review standards, so as to determine whether there are any problems in the documents. Manual review of documents relies too much on manual experience. This method of reviewing documents requires high labor costs, and the efficiency of review is very low.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The embodiments of the present application provide a document review method, device, electronic device and storage medium, so as to realize automatic review of documents and improve document review efficiency.

In the first aspect, the embodiments of the present application provide a method for examining documents, including:

Get the pending information in the pending document;

Determine the target approval rules for documents to be reviewed;

Determine the audit result of the document to be audited according to the information to be audited and the existence constraints of each reference audit information in the target audit rule.

In the second aspect, the embodiment of the present application also provides a document checking device, including:

The module for obtaining the information to be reviewed, which is used to obtain the information to be reviewed in the document to be reviewed;

The target approval rule determination module is used to determine the target approval rule of the document to be reviewed;

The audit result determination module is used to determine the audit result of the document to be audited according to the information to be audited and the existence constraints of each reference audit information in the target audit rule.

In a third aspect, an embodiment of the present application also provides an electronic device, including:

one or more processors;

memory for storing one or more programs;

When the one or more programs are executed by the one or more processors, the one or more processors implement a document review method provided by any embodiment of the present application.

In a fourth aspect, an embodiment of the present application further provides a computer-readable storage medium on which a computer program is stored, and when the program is executed by a processor, implements a document checking method provided by any embodiment of the present application.

The technical solution of the embodiment of the present application is to obtain the information to be reviewed in the document to be reviewed; to determine the target review rule of the document to be reviewed; Audit results. The advantage of this is that the information to be reviewed in the documents to be reviewed can be checked quickly and directly according to the existing constraints in the target review rules. At the same time, each constraint condition can be reviewed separately, which solves the shortcoming of cyclic traversal review in the prior art, and achieves the technical effect of simultaneously reviewing different information to be reviewed in the same document to be reviewed, which greatly improves document review. s efficiency.

Description of drawings

Fig. 1 is a flow chart of a method for checking a document provided in Embodiment 1 of the present application;

Fig. 2 is the flow chart of a kind of document checking method provided by the second embodiment of the present application;

3 is a structural diagram of a document checking device provided in Embodiment 3 of the present application;

FIG. 4 is a structural diagram of an electronic device according to Embodiment 4 of the present application.

Detailed ways

The present application will be further described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings and embodiments. It should be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are only used to explain the present application, but not to limit the present application. In addition, it should be noted that, for the convenience of description, the drawings only show some but not all the structures related to the present application.

Example 1

FIG. 1 is a flowchart of a method provided in Embodiment 1 of the present application. The embodiments of the present application can be applied to the case of checking documents, and the method can be executed by a document checking device, and the device can be implemented by software and/or hardware, and is specifically configured in an electronic device.

Referring to the document review method shown in Figure 1, it specifically includes the following steps:

S110: Obtain the pending information in the document to be reviewed.

The document to be reviewed may be any document that needs to be reviewed, such as a bank's letter of credit document and a collection document. The information to be reviewed is the target information that needs to be checked in the documents to be reviewed. For example, it can be reviewed in the form of keywords (phrases). For example, when reviewing collection documents, the keywords to be reviewed can be the name of the importer, the name of the exporter, etc. .

It should be noted that the method of obtaining the pending information of the document to be reviewed may be to first obtain the original image of the document to be reviewed through image scanning or image shooting, and then use a preset image processing algorithm to denoise the original image. Using BM3D (Block Matching 3D, three-dimensional block matching) algorithm and so on. The denoised image is used to extract all the text information on the document to be reviewed through a preset text recognition algorithm. For example, the OCR (Optical Character Recognition, Optical Character Recognition) algorithm can be used to extract the text information. Then, through the preset keyword extraction algorithm, the keywords that need to be reviewed in the extracted text information are further extracted. For example, the spaCy database can be used for natural language recognition and extraction, and the keywords to be reviewed are filtered out. Keywords are reviewed as information to be reviewed.

S120. Determine the target approval rule of the document to be reviewed.

The target audit rule may be a basis or standard for auditing the information to be audited, and with reference to the basis or standard, it is determined whether the information to be audited can pass the audit.

In an optional implementation manner, the determining the target approval rule of the document to be reviewed may include: selecting a reference review rule matching the document category to which the document to be reviewed belongs from a preset review rule library as the target review rule.

The preset audit rule library may be a database that can store or call preset audit rules, and the database can store or call reference audit rules of various types of documents to be audited. The reference audit rules can be various audit rules in the preset audit rule library, and are the basis or standard for auditing various documents. Target audit rules. The document category to which the document to be reviewed belongs can be the type of the document to be reviewed or the classification of the document. For example, whether the document to be reviewed belongs to a collection document or a letter of credit document, according to the document type, select the document type that matches the document type in the preset review rule library. Corresponding reference audit rules. Exemplarily, a collection document needs to be reviewed currently, a reference review rule for reviewing a collection document is selected in the preset review rule base, and the reference review rule is used as a target review rule to review the collection document.

In the technical solution of the above embodiment, a reference audit rule that matches the document category to which the document to be reviewed belongs is selected from the preset audit rule library as the target audit rule, so that the audit basis of the category to which the document to be audit belongs can be accurately obtained, and the preset audit rule can be called. The reference audit rules in the audit rule base solve the shortcomings of relying on manual experience to audit documents in the past, and improve the audit efficiency.

In an optional implementation manner, the reference review rules may be determined in the following manner: extracting reference review information in reference review documents of different document types; Existence constraints under the category; combine the existence constraints of each reference audit information under the same document category to obtain the reference audit rules for the corresponding document category.

The reference approval document may be a historical document, that is, various documents that have been reviewed in the past. The reference audit information may refer to all the information recorded on the reference audit document, which may include but not limited to words, numbers and symbols. The existence of constraints can be understood as whether a certain word, number or symbol in the reference audit information must exist in the reference audit document, or is prohibited to exist in the reference audit document.

Specifically, various pieces of information in historical documents that have been reviewed can be processed, and statistics on the necessary or prohibited existence of different keywords in similar documents can be used as constraints on the existence of keywords. Combining the constraints of each item of the same type of document with the result of whether the review is passed or not, it is used as the reference review rule for each type of document itself.

It can be understood that the reference approval rules for various types of documents can be stored or invoked by the preset approval rule base. Wherein, any word processing algorithm in the prior art may be used for the statistics of the historical document information, which is not limited in this embodiment of the present application.

In the technical solutions of the above embodiments, the reference audit rules are obtained by combining various existence constraints corresponding to different document categories in the reference audit information. The advantage of this is that it provides an effective way to obtain the reference approval rules of each document category in the preset approval rule base, improves the accuracy of the reference approval rules, and helps to improve the accuracy of document approval.

In an optional implementation manner, the determining the existence constraints of each reference audit information in the corresponding document category according to the document category corresponding to the reference audit information may include: for any document category, corresponding the document category to the reference audit information The existence constraint under the document category is set to exist as necessary, and/or the existence constraint under the audit category corresponding to the reference audit information for other document categories other than the document category is set to prohibit existence.

Among them, the necessary existence can be that a certain information must appear in the document to be reviewed; the prohibited existence can be that a certain information cannot appear in the document to be reviewed.

Exemplarily, the collection document in the historical reference audit document must contain three keywords of "consignor, payer and collection bank", but it is impossible to appear such as "borrowing period" or "lender" that does not belong to Keywords in collection documents.

For example, in the historical documents of Type A documents, the keywords A, B and C are necessary to exist, and the keyword D is forbidden to exist. You can set the existence status indicator of the keyword ABCD to be reviewed for the Type A document, for example, you can Set the necessary identification value to 0 and the forbidden identification value to 1, then A corresponds to the identification value of 0, B corresponds to the identification value of 0, C corresponds to the identification value of 0, and D corresponds to the identification value of 1. The corresponding relationships between these keywords and their corresponding identification values are combined into a reference audit rule.

In the technical solution of the above embodiment, the existence of constraints is determined according to whether the review information should exist in the corresponding category of documents, and an effective method for determining the existence of constraints is provided, which provides information on whether the documents to be reviewed pass the review. Simple and direct judgment basis helps to improve the efficiency of document review.

S130: Determine the audit result of the document to be audited according to the information to be audited and the existence constraints of each reference audit information in the target audit rule.

Wherein, the audit result may include audit pass and audit fail.

Specifically, the to-be-approved information of the to-be-approved document is reviewed according to the existence constraints in the target review rules. If all the information to be reviewed meets all the constraints, the document to be reviewed can be determined to be approved; if all the information to be reviewed does not meet the constraints, the document to be reviewed can be determined to be rejected.

The technical solution of the embodiment of the present application is to obtain the information to be reviewed in the document to be reviewed; to determine the target review rule of the document to be reviewed; Audit results. The advantage of this is that the information to be reviewed in the documents to be reviewed can be checked quickly and directly according to the existing constraints in the target review rules. At the same time, each constraint condition can be reviewed separately, which solves the shortcoming of cyclic traversal review in the prior art, and achieves the technical effect of simultaneously reviewing different information to be reviewed in the same document to be reviewed, which greatly improves document review. s efficiency.

Embodiment 2

FIG. 2 is a flowchart of a method for checking documents provided in Embodiment 2 of the present application. Based on the technical solutions of the foregoing embodiments, the embodiment of the present application refines the operation for determining the review result, so as to improve the efficiency of the review.

Referring to the document review method shown in Figure 2, it specifically includes the following steps:

S210: Obtain the pending information in the document to be reviewed.

S220. Determine the target approval rule of the document to be reviewed.

S230: Determine the audit result of the to-be-approved document according to the consistency of the reference audit information with constraints of different document categories in the target audit rule and the to-be-approved information.

Wherein, the consistency can be understood as the consistency of the information to be reviewed and the existing constraints, that is, whether the information to be reviewed conforms to the existing constraints in the target review rules.

In an optional implementation manner, the determining the audit result of the document to be audited according to the consistency of the reference audit information with constraints in different categories and the information to be audited in the target audit rule may include: if the target audit rule contains If there is a constraint condition that the necessary reference approval information is the same as the information to be reviewed, and if there is a constraint condition that the reference approval information prohibited to exist does not overlap with the information to be reviewed, the review result of the document to be reviewed is determined to be approved.

Exemplarily, it is assumed that the target review rules corresponding to Type B documents are: keyword A must exist, keyword B must exist, keyword C is forbidden to exist, and keyword D must exist. If the information to be reviewed in the document to be reviewed at this time has: keyword A, keyword B, keyword D, and keyword E. At this time, A, B and D stipulated in the target review rules of Type B documents all exist in the documents to be reviewed; and C, which is prohibited in the target review rules of Type B documents, does not exist in the documents to be reviewed. It is understandable Yes, even if the keyword E exists in the document to be reviewed, it does not affect the fact that the reference review information for which the constraint condition is prohibited does not overlap with the information to be reviewed. That is, the keywords that must exist in the target review rules exist in the documents to be reviewed; the keywords that are prohibited from being in the target review rules do not exist in the documents to be reviewed. pass.

In another optional embodiment, determining the audit result of the document to be audited according to the consistency of the reference audit information with constraints in different categories in the target audit rule and the information to be audited may include: if the target audit rule If there is a constraint condition that the reference approval information must exist is different from the to-be-approved information, or if there is a constraint condition that the reference approval information that is prohibited to exist overlaps with the to-be-approved information, the approval result of the to-be-approved document is determined to be unapproved.

Similar to the foregoing optional embodiments, it is exemplarily assumed that the target review rules corresponding to the Type C documents are: keyword A must exist, keyword B must not exist, keyword C must not exist, and keyword D must exist.

If the information to be reviewed in document X to be reviewed has: keyword D, keyword E, keyword A that must exist in the target review rules of type C documents, and does not exist in document X to be reviewed, then it is to be reviewed Document X is not approved for the approval of Type C documents.

Another example is that the information to be reviewed in document Y to be reviewed has: keyword A, keyword B, and keyword D, and keyword B, which is prohibited in the target review rules of category C documents, exists in document Y to be reviewed. Then the document Y to be reviewed does not pass the review of the Type C document.

Another example is that the pending information in the pending document Z has: keyword A and keyword B, and the keyword D that must exist in the target review rules of the C document does not exist in the pending document Z; The keyword B, which is prohibited in the target approval rules of the class document, exists in the document Z to be reviewed, so the document Z to be reviewed does not pass the review of the class C document.

The implementation scheme of the embodiment of the present application determines the audit result of the document to be audited according to the consistency of the reference audit information with constraints of different document categories in the target audit rule and the information to be audited, and the information to be audited and the constraints are simply and quickly By comparing the existing conditions, you can judge the audit results of the documents to be audited, which greatly improves the efficiency of document auditing.

Embodiment 3

FIG. 3 is a structural diagram of a document checking device provided in Embodiment 3 of the present application. This embodiment of the present application can be applied to the case of document checking. The device can be implemented by software and/or hardware, and can be configured in electronic equipment. middle. As shown in FIG. 3 , the document review device 300 may include: a module 310 for obtaining information to be reviewed, a module 320 for determining target review rules, and a module 330 for determining review results, wherein,

an information acquisition module 310 to be reviewed, configured to acquire the information to be reviewed in the document to be reviewed;

A target audit rule determination module 320, configured to determine a target audit rule for a document to be audited;

The audit result determination module 330 is configured to determine the audit result of the document to be audited according to the information to be audited and the existence constraints of each reference audit information in the target audit rule.

The technical solution of the embodiment of the present application is to obtain the information to be reviewed in the document to be reviewed; to determine the target review rule of the document to be reviewed; Audit results. The advantage of this is that the information to be reviewed in the documents to be reviewed can be checked quickly and directly according to the existing constraints in the target review rules. At the same time, each constraint condition can be reviewed separately, which solves the shortcoming of cyclic traversal review in the prior art, and achieves the technical effect of simultaneously reviewing different information to be reviewed in the same document to be reviewed, which greatly improves document review. s efficiency.

In an optional implementation manner, the audit result determination module 330 may include:

The document review unit is used to determine the review result of the document to be reviewed according to the consistency between the reference review information and the information to be reviewed with the constraints of different document categories in the target review rules.

In an optional implementation manner, the document review unit may include:

The audit pass judgment subunit is used to determine if the reference audit information whose constraint condition is necessary exists in the target audit rule is the same as the information to be audited, and the reference audit information whose constraint condition is prohibited does not overlap with the information to be audited is determined. The approval result of the document to be approved is approved.

In an optional implementation manner, the document review unit may include:

The audit failure judgment sub-unit is used for if the reference audit information whose constraint condition is necessary exists in the target audit rule is different from the to-be-audited information, or, the reference audit information whose constraint condition is prohibited exists overlaps with the to-be-audited information, Then it is determined that the audit result of the document to be audited is not approved.

In an optional implementation manner, the target audit rule determination module 320 may include:

The target approval rule determination unit is used to select the reference approval rule matching the document category to which the document to be approved belongs from the preset approval rule base as the target approval rule.

In an optional implementation manner, the target audit rule unit may include:

The reference audit information extraction subunit is used to extract the reference audit information in the reference audit documents of different document categories;

The existence constraint determination subunit is used to determine the existence constraints of each reference audit information under the corresponding document category according to the document category corresponding to the reference audit information;

The reference approval rule determination subunit is used to combine the existence constraints of each reference approval information under the same document category to obtain the reference approval rules of the corresponding document category.

In an optional implementation manner, the existence constraint determination subunit may include:

The existence constraint setting slave unit is used to set the existence constraint condition of the document category corresponding to the reference audit information under the document category to necessary existence for any document category, and/or, other documents other than the document category The existence constraint condition of the category corresponding to the reference audit information under the audit category is set to prohibit existence.

The document checking device provided by the embodiment of the present application can execute a document checking method provided by any embodiment of the present application, and has functional modules and beneficial effects corresponding to executing each document checking method.

Embodiment 4

FIG. 4 is a structural diagram of an electronic device according to Embodiment 4 of the present application. FIG. 4 shows a block diagram of an exemplary electronic device 412 suitable for use in implementing embodiments of the present application. The electronic device 412 shown in FIG. 4 is only an example, and should not impose any limitations on the functions and scope of use of the embodiments of the present application.

As shown in FIG. 4, electronic device 412 takes the form of a general-purpose computing device. Components of electronic device 412 may include, but are not limited to, one or more processors or processing units 416, system memory 428, and a bus 418 connecting various system components including system memory 428 and processing unit 416.

Bus 418 represents one or more of several types of bus structures, including a memory bus or memory controller, a peripheral bus, a graphics acceleration port, a processor, or a local bus using any of a variety of bus structures. By way of example, these architectures include, but are not limited to, Industry Standard Architecture (ISA) bus, Micro Channel Architecture (MAC) bus, Enhanced ISA bus, Video Electronics Standards Association (VESA) local bus, and Peripheral Component Interconnect ( PCI) bus.

Electronic device 412 typically includes a variety of computer system readable media. These media can be any available media that can be accessed by electronic device 412, including both volatile and nonvolatile media, removable and non-removable media.

System memory 428 may include computer system readable media in the form of volatile memory, such as random access memory (RAM) 430 and/or cache memory 432 . Electronic device 412 may further include other removable/non-removable, volatile/non-volatile computer system storage media. For example only, storage system 434 may be used to read and write to non-removable, non-volatile magnetic media (not shown in FIG. 4, commonly referred to as a "hard drive"). Although not shown in FIG. 4, a disk drive may be provided for reading and writing to removable non-volatile magnetic disks (eg "floppy disks"), as well as removable non-volatile optical disks (eg CD-ROM, DVD-ROM) or other optical media) to read and write optical drives. In these cases, each drive may be connected to bus 418 through one or more data media interfaces. The memory 428 may include at least one program product having a set (eg, at least one) of program modules configured to perform the functions of various embodiments of the present application.

A program/utility 440 having a set (at least one) of program modules 442, which may be stored, for example, in memory 428, such program modules 442 including, but not limited to, an operating system, one or more application programs, other program modules, and program data , each or some combination of these examples may include an implementation of a network environment. Program modules 442 generally perform the functions and/or methods of the embodiments described herein.

Electronic device 412 may also communicate with one or more external devices 414 (eg, keyboards, pointing devices, display 424, etc.), may also communicate with one or more devices that enable a user to interact with the electronic device 412, and/or Communicate with any device (eg, network card, modem, etc.) that enables the electronic device 412 to communicate with one or more other computing devices. Such communication may take place through input/output (I/O) interface 422 . Also, the electronic device 412 may communicate with one or more networks (eg, a local area network (LAN), a wide area network (WAN), and/or a public network such as the Internet) through a network adapter 420 . As shown, network adapter 420 communicates with other modules of electronic device 412 via bus 418 . It should be appreciated that, although not shown, other hardware and/or software modules may be used in conjunction with electronic device 412, including but not limited to: microcode, device drivers, redundant processing units, external disk drive arrays, RAID systems, tape drives and data backup storage systems.

The processing unit 416 executes various functional applications and data processing by running at least one of the other programs among the multiple programs stored in the system memory 428, for example, to implement the document checking method provided by the embodiments of the present application.

Embodiment 5

Embodiment 5 of the present application further provides a computer-readable storage medium, on which a computer program (or referred to as a computer-executable instruction) is stored, and when the program is executed by a processor, is used to execute the one provided by the embodiment of the present application. Document review method: Obtain the pending information in the document to be reviewed; determine the target review rule of the document to be reviewed; determine the review result of the document to be reviewed based on the information to be reviewed and the constraints of the reference review information in the target review rule.

The computer storage medium of the embodiments of the present application may adopt any combination of one or more computer-readable media. The computer-readable medium may be a computer-readable signal medium or a computer-readable storage medium. The computer-readable storage medium may be, for example, but not limited to, an electrical, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system, apparatus or device, or a combination of any of the above. More specific examples (a non-exhaustive list) of computer readable storage media include: electrical connections having one or more wires, portable computer disks, hard disks, random access memory (RAM), read only memory (ROM), Erasable programmable read only memory (EPROM or flash memory), optical fiber, portable compact disk read only memory (CD-ROM), optical storage devices, magnetic storage devices, or any suitable combination of the above. In this document, a computer-readable storage medium can be any tangible medium that contains or stores a program that can be used by or in conjunction with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.

A computer-readable signal medium may include a propagated data signal in baseband or as part of a carrier wave, with computer-readable program code embodied thereon. Such propagated data signals may take a variety of forms, including but not limited to electromagnetic signals, optical signals, or any suitable combination of the foregoing. A computer-readable signal medium can also be any computer-readable medium other than a computer-readable storage medium that can transmit, propagate, or transport the program for use by or in connection with the instruction execution system, apparatus, or device .

Program code embodied on a computer readable medium may be transmitted using any suitable medium, including but not limited to wireless, wireline, optical fiber cable, RF, etc., or any suitable combination of the foregoing.

Computer program code for carrying out the operations of the embodiments of the present application may be written in one or more programming languages, or combinations thereof, including object-oriented programming languages—such as Java, Smalltalk, C++, and also Conventional procedural programming languages such as the "C" language or similar programming languages. The program code may execute entirely on the user's computer, partly on the user's computer, as a stand-alone software package, partly on the user's computer and partly on a remote computer, or entirely on the remote computer or server. Where a remote computer is involved, the remote computer may be connected to the user's computer through any kind of network including a local area network (LAN) or wide area network (WAN), or may be connected to an external computer (eg, using an Internet service provider to connect over the Internet) .

Note that the above are only preferred embodiments of the present application and applied technical principles. Those skilled in the art will understand that the present application is not limited to the specific embodiments described herein, and various obvious changes, readjustments and substitutions can be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the protection scope of the present application. Therefore, although the present application has been described in detail through the above embodiments, the present application is not limited to the above embodiments, and can also include more other equivalent embodiments without departing from the concept of the present application. The scope is determined by the scope of the appended claims.

Claims (10)

1. An order examination method, comprising:

acquiring to-be-audited information in a to-be-audited document;

determining a target auditing rule of the document to be audited;

and determining the auditing result of the document to be audited according to the information to be audited and the constraint condition of the reference auditing information in the target auditing rule.

2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the determining the audit result of the document to be audited according to the to-be-audited information and the constraint condition of the reference audit information in the target audit rule includes:

and determining the auditing result of the document to be audited according to the consistency condition of the reference auditing information with constraint conditions of different document types in the target auditing rule and the information to be audited.

3. The method according to claim 2, wherein the determining the audit result of the document to be audited according to the consistency between the reference audit information with constraint conditions in different categories in the target audit rule and the information to be audited includes:

and if the reference auditing information with the constraint condition as necessary in the target auditing rule is the same as the information to be audited, and the reference auditing information with the constraint condition as forbidden to exist is not overlapped with the information to be audited, determining that the auditing result of the document to be audited is approved.

4. The method according to claim 2, wherein the determining the audit result of the document to be audited according to the consistency between the reference audit information with constraint conditions in different categories in the target audit rule and the information to be audited includes:

and if the reference auditing information with the constraint condition of being necessary in the target auditing rule is different from the information to be audited, or the reference auditing information with the constraint condition of being forbidden to exist is overlapped with the information to be audited, determining that the auditing result of the document to be audited is that the auditing is not passed.

5. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the determining the target audit rule of the document to be audited comprises:

and selecting a reference auditing rule matched with the bill category of the bill to be audited from a preset auditing rule base to serve as the target auditing rule.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein the reference audit rule is determined by:

extracting reference audit information in reference audit documents of different document types;

determining the existence constraint condition of each reference auditing information under the corresponding bill category according to the bill category corresponding to the reference auditing information;

and combining the existing constraint conditions of the reference auditing information under the same bill category to obtain the reference auditing rule of the corresponding bill category.

7. The method according to claim 6, wherein the determining the existence constraint condition of each reference audit information in the corresponding document category according to the document category corresponding to the reference audit information comprises:

and aiming at any bill category, setting the existence constraint condition of the reference auditing information corresponding to the bill category in the bill category as necessary existence, and/or setting the existence constraint condition of the reference auditing information corresponding to other bill categories except the bill category in the auditing category as forbidden existence.

8. An apparatus for conducting an audit, comprising:

the system comprises a to-be-audited information acquisition module, a to-be-audited information acquisition module and a to-be-audited information acquisition module, wherein the to-be-audited information acquisition module is used for acquiring to-be-audited information in a to-be-audited document;

the target auditing rule determining module is used for determining the target auditing rule of the document to be audited;

and the auditing result determining module is used for determining the auditing result of the document to be audited according to the information to be audited and the constraint condition of each reference auditing information in the target auditing rule.

9. An electronic device, comprising:

one or more processors;

a memory for storing one or more programs;

when executed by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to implement a method of ticketing as claimed in any one of claims 1-7.

10. A computer-readable storage medium, on which a computer program is stored which, when being executed by a processor, carries out a method of ordering according to any one of claims 1-7.

Images