CN113553480A - Document auditing method, document auditing device and readable storage medium - Google Patents
Document auditing method, document auditing device and readable storage medium Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN113553480A CN113553480A CN202110860171.1A CN202110860171A CN113553480A CN 113553480 A CN113553480 A CN 113553480A CN 202110860171 A CN202110860171 A CN 202110860171A CN 113553480 A CN113553480 A CN 113553480A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- auditing
- target
- audit
- result
- rule model
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/90—Details of database functions independent of the retrieved data types
- G06F16/903—Querying
- G06F16/90335—Query processing
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/90—Details of database functions independent of the retrieved data types
- G06F16/903—Querying
- G06F16/90335—Query processing
- G06F16/90344—Query processing by using string matching techniques
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Computational Linguistics (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention provides a bill auditing method, a bill auditing device and a readable storage medium, wherein the method comprises the following steps: establishing an audit rule model; responding to an updating request of the audit rule model, and updating the audit rule model according to the updating request to obtain a target audit rule model; receiving document information; and auditing the bill information according to the target auditing rule model to obtain a target auditing result. The document auditing method provided by the invention solves the problem that the existing auditing method needs to modify the computer program every time the auditing rule is modified, and can not flexibly adapt to different scenes.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the field of document auditing, in particular to a document auditing method, a document auditing device and a readable storage medium.
Background
In the related art, for the automatic auditing of the document, the auditing rule needs to be written in a way of writing a computer program, so that the computer program needs to be modified every time the auditing rule is modified, and the document auditing method cannot be flexibly adapted to different scenes.
Disclosure of Invention
The present invention is directed to solving at least one of the problems of the prior art or the related art.
Therefore, the invention provides a document auditing method in a first aspect.
The invention provides a document auditing device in a second aspect.
A third aspect of the invention proposes a readable storage medium.
In view of this, according to a first aspect of the present invention, a document auditing method is provided, including: establishing an audit rule model; responding to an updating request of the audit rule model, and updating the audit rule model according to the updating request to obtain a target audit rule model; receiving document information; and auditing the bill information according to the target auditing rule model to obtain a target auditing result.
The document auditing method provided by the invention firstly establishes an auditing rule model, when a use scene and the like change, the specific rule of auditing the document also changes, at the moment, an updating request is received, and the auditing rule model is updated according to the received updating request to obtain a target auditing rule model. And finally, auditing the document information by using the target auditing rule model to obtain a target auditing result corresponding to the document information.
Specifically, after the audit rule model is established, the document information can be audited by using the established audit rule model. Further, if an updating request is received, the auditing rule model is correspondingly updated according to the updating request, and then the document information is audited by the updated auditing rule model, so that the obtained target auditing result accords with the latest auditing rule and has higher matching degree with the current use scene. When the use scene and the like change, the method and the device can directly update the audit rule model according to the update request, and then audit the document information through the updated audit rule model without modifying a computer program, thereby reducing the difficulty of modifying the audit rule and enabling the document audit to be flexibly suitable for various different scenes.
In addition, the document auditing method provided by the technical scheme of the invention can also have the following technical characteristics:
in one possible design, establishing an audit rule model specifically includes: receiving configuration information; analyzing the configuration information, and acquiring a field to be configured, a comparator and a comparison value in the configuration information; generating a comparison formula according to the field to be configured, the comparator and the comparison value; and generating an audit rule model according to the comparison formula.
In the design, when an audit rule model is established, configuration information is received first, and a field to be configured, a comparator and a comparison value are obtained through analysis in the received configuration information. And combining the field to be configured, the comparator and the comparison value to generate a comparison formula, and further generating a corresponding audit rule model according to the comparison formula.
For example, if the parsed field to be configured is the total maintenance amount, the comparator is a "<" symbol, and the comparison value is 10, the field to be configured, the comparator, and the comparison value may be combined to generate a comparison formula: total repair amount < 10. And finally, according to the generated comparison formula, generating a corresponding audit rule model by using the following audit rule: if the total maintenance amount is less than 10, the audit is passed; in the case where the total repair amount <10 is not satisfied, the audit is not passed. According to the invention, the corresponding audit rule model is generated according to the comparison formula of each field to be configured, and each comparison formula does not need to be written directly through codes, so that the audit rule model is more flexibly modified.
In one possible design, document information is reviewed according to a target review rule model to obtain a target review result, which specifically includes: determining at least one parameter to be audited according to the bill information; determining a field to be audited corresponding to the parameter to be audited according to the parameter to be audited; determining a target comparison formula corresponding to the field to be checked according to the field to be checked; obtaining an auditing result of the parameter to be audited according to the parameter to be audited and the auditing comparison value corresponding to the target comparison formula through the auditing rule model; and determining a target auditing result of the bill information according to the auditing result.
In the design, after at least one parameter to be audited is determined, an audit field corresponding to each parameter to be audited can be determined, and then a target comparison formula corresponding to each field to be audited is determined according to the corresponding field to be audited. And verifying whether each parameter to be verified meets the target comparison formula or not through the verification rule model, namely whether the field to be verified and the verification comparison value meet the comparison relation of the target comparison formula or not, so as to determine the verification result of each parameter to be verified. And finally, determining a target auditing result of the bill information according to the auditing result of each parameter to be audited. The invention sets the audit rule model and audits the document information by using the audit rule model, so that when the use scene changes, only the audit rule model needs to be updated, and the document information is audited through the updated audit rule model without modifying the computer program.
Further, the field to be audited includes a repair operation code, a total repair amount, a repair type, and the like. For example, when the field to be checked is the total maintenance amount, determining a target comparison formula corresponding to the field to be checked as follows: total repair amount < 10. After the target comparison formula is determined, it can be verified that the parameter to be audited, the total maintenance amount, and the audit comparison value 10 are in a comparison relation which can meet the target comparison formula, if the parameter to be audited is greater than 10, it can be determined that the value of the parameter to be audited does not meet the target comparison formula, and the audit result of the parameter to be audited does not pass. The invention comprises a plurality of different fields to be audited, and can be used for configuring different auditing rules in a targeted manner according to different requirements so as to limit the conditions of maintenance amount, maintenance type and the like meeting the auditing requirement.
In one possible design, updating the audit rule model according to the update request specifically includes: acquiring a target field, a target comparator and a target comparison value according to the updating request; generating an updating comparison formula according to the target field, the target comparator and the target comparison value; and updating the audit rule model according to the update comparison formula.
In this design, when updating the audit rule model according to an update request, the received update request is first parsed to obtain a target field, a target comparator, and a target comparison value. And combining the target field, the target comparator and the target comparison value to generate an update comparison formula, and updating the audit rule model according to the generated update comparison formula. Specifically, the updated comparative expression is added to the audit rule model, and the old comparative expression corresponding to the updated comparative expression is deleted from the audit rule model.
For example, if the parsed target field is the total amount of repairs, the target comparator is "<" symbol, and the target comparison value is 10, then the target field, the target comparator, and the target comparison value may be combined to generate an updated comparison equation: total repair amount < 10. And finally updating the audit rule model according to the generated comparison formula.
Further, the update request can be received through a terminal or can be obtained through direct input. In the case of receiving an update request through the terminal, the target field may be received first, and after receiving the target field, the set of target comparators corresponding to the target field may be sent to the terminal to receive the target field comparator selected by the terminal from the set of target comparators. For example, when the target field is the total repair amount, the target field comparator set may include: and, <, ═ and the like.
According to the design, the comparator set is set, the corresponding target comparator set is determined according to the target field, then the target comparator is determined in the target comparator set, the range of the required target comparator can be narrowed, the comparator which is not matched with the target field is eliminated, and the phenomenon that the updated audit rule model cannot play a due role due to the fact that the target comparator which is not matched with the target field is used in the updating process is avoided. Meanwhile, the target comparator is obtained from the target comparator set instead of all the comparators, so that the difficulty of selecting the target comparator is reduced, and the updating is simpler and more convenient.
In one possible design, generating a comparison formula according to the field to be configured, the comparator, and the comparison value specifically includes: determining a first target verification module corresponding to the type of a field to be configured in a plurality of preset verification modules; and combining the field to be configured, the comparator and the comparison value through the first target verification module to obtain a comparison formula.
In the design, when a comparison formula is generated according to a field to be configured, a comparator and a comparison value, a first target verification module corresponding to the type is determined in a plurality of preset verification modules according to the type of the field to be configured, wherein the first target verification module can verify the comparison relation of each corresponding type. And finally, combining the field to be configured, the comparator and the comparison value through the determined first target verification module to obtain a comparison formula.
Furthermore, the preset check modules comprise a data check module, a time check module, a character string check module, a file check module and the like.
Specifically, under the condition that the field to be configured is the total maintenance amount, it can be determined that the type of the field to be configured is the numerical value type, and therefore, the target verification module corresponding to the numerical value type is determined to be the data verification module, and the numerical value verification module can verify the comparison relationship corresponding to the numerical value type, such as >, < and ═ and the like. And finally, combining the field to be configured, the comparator and the comparison value through the determined data verification module to obtain a comparison formula.
The invention designs a plurality of checking modules, and different checking modules can check different types of comparison relations. After the field to be configured is determined, the required first target verification module can be determined according to the field to be configured, and then the comparison formula is obtained by combining according to the first target verification module. Each check module corresponds to a field to be configured of a specific type, so that corresponding comparison formulas can be combined, and the combination of the comparison formulas is more flexible and diversified.
In one possible design, obtaining an audit result of the parameter to be audited according to the parameter to be audited and the audit comparison value corresponding to the target comparison formula, specifically including: determining a second target verification module corresponding to the type of the field to be checked in a plurality of preset verification modules; analyzing the target comparison formula through a second target verification module to obtain an audit comparator and an audit comparison value; and comparing the parameter to be audited with the audit comparison value according to the audit comparator to obtain an audit result.
In the design, when an audit result of a parameter to be audited is determined, a second target verification module corresponding to the type is determined in a plurality of preset verification modules according to the type of the field to be audited, wherein the second target verification module can verify the comparison relation of each corresponding to the type. And then, analyzing the target comparison formula through a second target verification module to obtain an audit comparator and an audit comparison value contained in the target comparison formula. And finally, checking whether the comparison relationship between the parameter to be checked and the check comparison value meets the comparison relationship identified by the check comparator, and further obtaining a check result.
For example, under the condition that the field to be audited is determined to be the total maintenance amount, the type of the audit field can be determined to be the numerical value type, therefore, the second target verification module corresponding to the numerical value type is determined to be the data verification module, and then the second target verification module is used for analyzing the target comparison formula to obtain the sign of the audit comparator "<" and the audit comparison value 10. And finally, checking whether the comparison relation between the parameter to be checked and the checking comparison value 10 meets the comparison relation identified by the < "symbol, and obtaining a checking result according to the checking result.
The invention designs a plurality of checking modules, and different checking modules can check different types of comparison relations. After the field to be checked is determined, the required second target checking module can be determined according to the field to be checked, and then the target comparison formula is analyzed through the second target checking module, so that when the checking result of the parameter to be checked is obtained through checking, the second target checking module can correctly compare the relation between the parameter to be checked and the checking comparison value, further the result is obtained, and the reliability of the checking process is effectively guaranteed.
In one possible design, under the condition that a plurality of parameters to be audited are available, acquiring an audit relationship corresponding to the parameters to be audited and the priority of each audit result in a plurality of audit results; obtaining an analysis result according to the audit relationship, the audit result and the priority; taking the analysis result as a target auditing result; and under the condition that the parameter to be audited is one, determining the auditing result as the target auditing result.
In the design, if only one parameter to be audited is available, the auditing result of the parameter to be audited is the target auditing result of the whole document information. If the number of the parameters to be audited is multiple, the auditing result and the priority of each auditing parameter and the auditing relationship corresponding to the auditing parameters need to be comprehensively analyzed to obtain a comprehensive analyzing result, and the analyzing result is used as a target auditing result.
Specifically, under the condition that a plurality of parameters to be audited exist, an audit relationship among the plurality of parameters to be audited, an audit result of each parameter to be audited, and a priority of each audit result are comprehensively analyzed to obtain an analysis result. For example, if one parameter to be audited is a claim type, the audit result of the parameter to be audited is a pass, and the other parameter to be audited is a total maintenance amount, and the result of the parameter to be audited does not pass, the relationship between the audit rules corresponding to the two parameters to be audited needs to be comprehensively considered to determine the final target audit result.
The invention respectively considers the condition that one or more parameters to be audited exist, comprehensively considers the relationship among the parameters to be audited and the auditing result of the parameters to be audited under the condition that the parameters to be audited exist, for example, two parameters to be audited, namely the claim type and the total maintenance amount, can be simultaneously considered, so that the invention is not only limited to a single index, but also can simultaneously consider a plurality of meals to be audited and is suitable for the auditing situation of a plurality of indexes.
In a possible design, obtaining an analysis result according to the audit relationship, the audit result and the priority, specifically including: determining whether the analysis result passes or fails according to the audit relationship and the plurality of audit results; determining the non-passing type of each audit result according to the audit rule model under the condition that the analysis result is non-passing; and determining the non-passing type of the analysis result according to the non-passing type of each audit result and the priority of the audit result.
In this design, when there are a plurality of parameters to be audited, the audit relationship and the result of each audit parameter need to be analyzed to determine whether the analysis result passes or not. Specifically, the audit relationship may be a relationship or an or relationship, and the result of each audit parameter may be a pass or a fail, and the audit relationship between the audit parameters and the audit result of each audit parameter are comprehensively considered, so that an analysis result can be obtained, and a target audit result of the whole document information is obtained.
The invention comprehensively considers the audit rule relation and a plurality of audit results to obtain a final analysis result as a target analysis result. Especially, under the condition that one part of the plurality of auditing results is passed and the other part of the plurality of auditing results is not passed, the target auditing result of the whole document can be determined according to the auditing rule relation, and the final result cannot be obtained because the auditing results of different auditing parameters are contradictory.
Further, in the case that the audit result fails, the non-passing type of the audit result needs to be determined, so as to facilitate further processing according to the non-passing type. Specifically, the non-pass type set may include one or more of reject, and to-be-audited, and may also include other types. When the audit result is failed, a type can be determined in the failed type set according to the comparison formula corresponding to the audit result, and the type is used as the failed type of the audit result.
Further, when the analysis result is failed, at least one audit result is not passed. In this case, a non-passing type of each non-passing audit result is determined, and in particular, the set of non-passing types may include one or more of reject, and to-be-audited, and may also include other types. When the audit result is failed, a type can be determined in the failed type set according to the comparison formula corresponding to the audit result, and the type is used as the failed type of the audit result. And then according to the priority of each audit result, determining the audit result with the highest priority, and taking the non-passing type of the audit result as the non-passing type of the target audit result of the whole document information.
According to the method and the device, the priority is set for the non-passing type, and under the condition that a plurality of non-passing auditing results exist and the non-passing types of the plurality of auditing results are different, only the non-passing type with the highest priority in all the non-passing types is determined as the analysis result. Therefore, the invention effectively solves the problem of the non-passing type of how to comprehensively analyze to determine the result of the whole document information when a plurality of non-passing auditing results exist and the non-passing types are different.
According to a second aspect of the present invention, there is provided a document auditing apparatus for auditing a document by using the document auditing method according to any one of the first aspects, the document auditing apparatus comprising: the defining unit is used for establishing an audit rule model; the configuration unit is used for responding to the updating request of the audit rule model, updating the audit rule model according to the updating request and obtaining a target audit rule model; the receiving unit is used for receiving the bill information; and the processing unit is used for auditing the document information according to the target auditing rule model to obtain a target auditing result.
The document auditing device provided by the invention comprises a definition unit, a configuration unit, a receiving unit and a processing unit. The defining unit is used for establishing an audit rule model, when a use scene and the like change, the specific rule of the audit document changes, the receiving unit receives an update request, and then the configuration unit can update the audit rule model according to the received update request to obtain a target audit rule model. And finally, the processing unit utilizes the target auditing rule model to audit the document information to obtain a target auditing result corresponding to the document information.
Specifically, after the definition unit establishes the audit rule model, the processing unit may audit the document information by using the established audit rule model. Further, if the receiving unit receives the updating request, the configuration unit correspondingly updates the audit rule model according to the updating request, and then the processing unit audits the document information by using the updated audit rule model, so that the obtained target audit result accords with the latest audit rule and has higher matching degree with the current use scene. When the use scene and the like change, the configuration unit can directly update the audit rule model according to the update request, and then the processing unit audits the document information through the updated audit rule model without modifying a computer program, so that the difficulty of modifying the audit rule is reduced, and the document audit can flexibly adapt to various different scenes.
According to a third aspect of the present invention, there is provided a readable storage medium, on which a program or an instruction is stored, and the program or the instruction, when executed by a processor, implements the steps of the document auditing method according to any one of the first aspects, so that the method has all the advantages of the document auditing method, and details are not repeated herein.
Additional aspects and advantages of the invention will be set forth in part in the description which follows, and in part will be obvious from the description, or may be learned by practice of the invention.
Drawings
The above and/or additional aspects and advantages of the present invention will become apparent and readily appreciated from the following description of the embodiments, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings of which:
FIG. 1 is a flow diagram illustrating a document review method according to an embodiment of the first aspect of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a schematic flow chart diagram illustrating a document auditing method according to another embodiment of the first aspect of the present invention;
FIG. 3 is a schematic flow chart diagram illustrating a document auditing method according to another embodiment of the first aspect of the present invention;
FIG. 4 is a schematic flow chart diagram illustrating a document auditing method according to another embodiment of the first aspect of the present invention;
FIG. 5 is a flow chart of a document auditing method according to another embodiment of the first aspect of the present invention;
FIG. 6 is a flow chart of a document auditing method according to another embodiment of the first aspect of the present invention;
FIG. 7 is a schematic flow chart diagram illustrating a document review method according to another embodiment of the first aspect of the present invention;
FIG. 8 is a schematic flow chart diagram illustrating a document review method according to another embodiment of the first aspect of the present invention;
FIG. 9 is a schematic flow chart diagram illustrating a document review method according to another embodiment of the first aspect of the present invention;
FIG. 10 is a schematic flow chart diagram illustrating a document review method according to another embodiment of the first aspect of the present invention;
FIG. 11 shows a block diagram of a document auditing apparatus according to an embodiment of a second aspect of the present invention;
FIG. 12 shows a block diagram of a document auditing apparatus according to another embodiment of the second aspect of the present invention;
figure 13 shows a schematic diagram of information received by a document auditing apparatus of another embodiment of a second aspect of the present invention.
Wherein, the correspondence between the reference numbers and the part names in fig. 11 and 12 is:
100 document auditing device, 102 definition unit, 104 receiving unit, 106 configuration unit, 108 processing unit, 1082 verification unit and 1084 analysis unit.
Detailed Description
In order that the above objects, features and advantages of the present invention can be more clearly understood, a more particular description of the invention will be rendered by reference to the appended drawings. It should be noted that the embodiments of the present invention and features of the embodiments may be combined with each other without conflict.
In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention, however, the present invention may be practiced in other ways than those specifically described herein, and therefore the scope of the present invention is not limited by the specific embodiments disclosed below.
An embodiment of the first aspect of the present invention provides a document auditing method, as shown in fig. 1, where the method includes:
s102, establishing an audit rule model;
s104, responding to the updating request of the audit rule model, updating the audit rule model according to the updating request, and obtaining a target audit rule model;
s106, receiving bill information;
and S108, auditing the bill information according to the target auditing rule model to obtain a target auditing result.
In the embodiment, an audit rule model is firstly established, when a use scene and the like change, a specific rule of an audit document also changes, at this time, an update request is received, and the audit rule model is updated according to the received update request, so that a target audit rule model is obtained. And finally, auditing the document information by using the target auditing rule model to obtain a target auditing result corresponding to the document information.
Specifically, after the audit rule model is established, the document information can be audited by using the established audit rule model. Further, if an updating request is received, the auditing rule model is correspondingly updated according to the updating request, and then the document information is audited by the updated auditing rule model, so that the obtained target auditing result accords with the latest auditing rule and has higher matching degree with the current use scene. When the use scene and the like change, the method and the device can directly update the audit rule model according to the update request, and then audit the document information through the updated audit rule model without modifying a computer program, thereby reducing the difficulty of modifying the audit rule and enabling the document audit to be flexibly suitable for various different scenes.
In some embodiments, as shown in fig. 2, the establishing of the audit rule model specifically includes the following steps:
s202, receiving configuration information;
s204, analyzing the configuration information, and acquiring a field to be configured, a comparator and a comparison value from the configuration information;
s206, generating a comparison formula according to the field to be configured, the comparator and the comparison value;
and S208, generating an audit rule model according to the comparison formula.
In this embodiment, when the audit rule model is established, the configuration information is received first, and the received configuration information is analyzed to obtain the field to be configured, the comparator, and the comparison value. And combining the field to be configured, the comparator and the comparison value to generate a comparison formula, and further generating a corresponding audit rule model according to the comparison formula.
For example, if the parsed field to be configured is the total maintenance amount, the comparator is a "<" symbol, and the comparison value is 10, the field to be configured, the comparator, and the comparison value may be combined to generate a comparison formula: total repair amount < 10. And finally, according to the generated comparison formula, generating a corresponding audit rule model by using the following audit rule: if the total maintenance amount is less than 10, the audit is passed; in the case where the total repair amount <10 is not satisfied, the audit is not passed. According to the invention, the corresponding audit rule model is generated according to the comparison formula of each field to be configured, and each comparison formula does not need to be written directly through codes, so that the audit rule model is more flexibly modified.
In some embodiments, as shown in fig. 3, auditing document information according to the target audit rule model to obtain a target audit result includes the following steps:
s302, determining at least one parameter to be audited according to the bill information;
s304, determining a field to be audited corresponding to the parameter to be audited according to the parameter to be audited;
s306, determining a target comparison formula corresponding to the field to be checked according to the field to be checked;
s308, obtaining an auditing result of the parameter to be audited according to the parameter to be audited and the auditing comparison value corresponding to the target comparison formula through the auditing rule model;
and S310, determining a target auditing result of the bill information according to the auditing result.
In this embodiment, after at least one parameter to be audited is determined, an audit field corresponding to each parameter to be audited can be determined, and then a target comparison formula corresponding to each field to be audited is determined according to the corresponding field to be audited. And verifying whether each parameter to be verified meets the target comparison formula or not through the verification rule model, namely whether the field to be verified and the verification comparison value meet the comparison relation of the target comparison formula or not, so as to determine the verification result of each parameter to be verified. And finally, determining a target auditing result of the bill information according to the auditing result of each parameter to be audited. The invention sets the audit rule model and audits the document information by using the audit rule model, so that when the use scene changes, only the audit rule model needs to be updated, and the document information is audited through the updated audit rule model without modifying the computer program.
Further, the field to be audited includes a repair operation code, a total repair amount, a repair type, and the like. For example, when the field to be checked is the total maintenance amount, determining a target comparison formula corresponding to the field to be checked as follows: total repair amount < 10. After the target comparison formula is determined, it can be verified that the parameter to be audited, the total maintenance amount, and the audit comparison value 10 are in a comparison relation which can meet the target comparison formula, if the parameter to be audited is greater than 10, it can be determined that the value of the parameter to be audited does not meet the target comparison formula, and the audit result of the parameter to be audited does not pass. The invention comprises a plurality of different fields to be audited, and can be used for configuring different auditing rules in a targeted manner according to different requirements so as to limit the conditions of maintenance amount, maintenance type and the like meeting the auditing requirement.
In some embodiments, as shown in fig. 4, updating the audit rule model according to the update request specifically includes the following steps:
s402, acquiring a target field, a target comparator and a target comparison value according to the updating request;
s404, generating an updating comparison formula according to the target field, the target comparator and the target comparison value;
and S406, updating the audit rule model according to the update comparison formula.
In this embodiment, when updating the audit rule model according to an update request, the received update request is first parsed to obtain a target field, a target comparator, and a target comparison value. And combining the target field, the target comparator and the target comparison value to generate an update comparison formula, and updating the audit rule model according to the generated update comparison formula. Specifically, the updated comparative expression is added to the audit rule model, and the old comparative expression corresponding to the updated comparative expression is deleted from the audit rule model.
For example, if the parsed target field is the total amount of repairs, the target comparator is "<" symbol, and the target comparison value is 10, then the target field, the target comparator, and the target comparison value may be combined to generate an updated comparison equation: total repair amount < 10. And finally updating the audit rule model according to the generated comparison formula.
Further, the update request can be received through a terminal or can be obtained through direct input. In the case of receiving an update request through the terminal, the target field may be received first, and after receiving the target field, the set of target comparators corresponding to the target field may be sent to the terminal to receive the target field comparator selected by the terminal from the set of target comparators. For example, when the target field is the total repair amount, the target field comparator set may include: and, <, ═ and the like.
According to the design, the comparator set is set, the corresponding target comparator set is determined according to the target field, then the target comparator is determined in the target comparator set, the range of the required target comparator can be narrowed, the comparator which is not matched with the target field is eliminated, and the phenomenon that the updated audit rule model cannot play a due role due to the fact that the target comparator which is not matched with the target field is used in the updating process is avoided. Meanwhile, the target comparator is obtained from the target comparator set instead of all the comparators, so that the difficulty of selecting the target comparator is reduced, and the updating is simpler and more convenient.
In some embodiments, as shown in fig. 5, generating a comparison formula according to the field to be configured, the comparator, and the comparison value specifically includes the following steps:
s502, determining a first target verification module corresponding to the type of the field to be configured in a plurality of preset verification modules;
s504, combining the field to be configured, the comparator and the comparison value through the first target verification module to obtain a comparison formula.
In this embodiment, when generating the comparison formula according to the field to be configured, the comparator, and the comparison value, first, according to the type of the field to be configured, in a plurality of preset checking modules, a first target checking module corresponding to the type is determined, where the first target checking module is capable of checking a comparison relationship with each corresponding to the type. And finally, combining the field to be configured, the comparator and the comparison value through the determined first target verification module to obtain a comparison formula.
Furthermore, the preset check modules comprise a data check module, a time check module, a character string check module, a file check module and the like.
Specifically, under the condition that the field to be configured is the total maintenance amount, it can be determined that the type of the field to be configured is the numerical value type, and therefore, the target verification module corresponding to the numerical value type is determined to be the data verification module, and the numerical value verification module can verify the comparison relationship corresponding to the numerical value type, such as >, < and ═ and the like. And finally, combining the field to be configured, the comparator and the comparison value through the determined data verification module to obtain a comparison formula.
The invention designs a plurality of checking modules, and different checking modules can check different types of comparison relations. After the field to be configured is determined, the required first target verification module can be determined according to the field to be configured, and then the comparison formula is obtained by combining according to the first target verification module. Each check module corresponds to a field to be configured of a specific type, so that corresponding comparison formulas can be combined, and the combination of the comparison formulas is more flexible and diversified.
In some embodiments, as shown in fig. 6, obtaining an audit result of the parameter to be audited according to the audit comparison value corresponding to the parameter to be audited and the target comparison formula specifically includes the following steps:
s602, determining a second target verification module corresponding to the type of the field to be verified in a plurality of preset verification modules;
s604, analyzing the target comparison formula through a second target verification module to obtain an audit comparator and an audit comparison value;
and S606, comparing the parameter to be audited with the audit comparison value according to the audit comparator to obtain an audit result.
In this embodiment, when determining an audit result of a parameter to be audited, a second target verification module corresponding to the type is determined in a plurality of preset verification modules according to the type of the field to be audited, where the second target verification module is capable of verifying a comparison relationship with each corresponding to the type. And then, analyzing the target comparison formula through a second target verification module to obtain an audit comparator and an audit comparison value contained in the target comparison formula. And finally, checking whether the comparison relationship between the parameter to be checked and the check comparison value meets the comparison relationship identified by the check comparator, and further obtaining a check result.
For example, under the condition that the field to be audited is determined to be the total maintenance amount, the type of the audit field can be determined to be the numerical value type, therefore, the second target verification module corresponding to the numerical value type is determined to be the data verification module, and then the second target verification module is used for analyzing the target comparison formula to obtain the sign of the audit comparator "<" and the audit comparison value 10. And finally, checking whether the comparison relation between the parameter to be checked and the checking comparison value 10 meets the comparison relation identified by the < "symbol, and obtaining a checking result according to the checking result.
The invention designs a plurality of checking modules, and different checking modules can check different types of comparison relations. After the field to be checked is determined, the required second target checking module can be determined according to the field to be checked, and then the target comparison formula is analyzed through the second target checking module, so that when the checking result of the parameter to be checked is obtained through checking, the second target checking module can correctly compare the relation between the parameter to be checked and the checking comparison value, further the result is obtained, and the reliability of the checking process is effectively guaranteed.
In some embodiments, as shown in fig. 7, determining a target audit result of the document information according to the audit result specifically includes the following steps:
s702, acquiring an auditing relationship corresponding to the parameter to be audited and the priority of each auditing result in a plurality of auditing results under the condition that the parameter to be audited is multiple;
s704, obtaining an analysis result according to the audit relationship, the audit result and the priority; taking the analysis result as a target auditing result;
and S706, determining that the auditing result is the target auditing result under the condition that the parameter to be audited is one.
In this embodiment, if there is only one parameter to be audited, the auditing result of the parameter to be audited is the target auditing result of the whole document information. If the number of the parameters to be audited is multiple, the auditing result and the priority of each auditing parameter and the auditing relationship corresponding to the auditing parameters need to be comprehensively analyzed to obtain a comprehensive analyzing result, and the analyzing result is used as a target auditing result.
Specifically, under the condition that a plurality of parameters to be audited exist, an audit relationship among the plurality of parameters to be audited, an audit result of each parameter to be audited, and a priority of each audit result are comprehensively analyzed to obtain an analysis result. For example, if one parameter to be audited is a claim type, the audit result of the parameter to be audited is a pass, and the other parameter to be audited is a total maintenance amount, and the result of the parameter to be audited does not pass, the relationship between the audit rules corresponding to the two parameters to be audited needs to be comprehensively considered to determine the final target audit result.
The invention respectively considers the condition that one or more parameters to be audited exist, comprehensively considers the relationship among the parameters to be audited and the auditing result of the parameters to be audited under the condition that the parameters to be audited exist, for example, two parameters to be audited, namely the claim type and the total maintenance amount, can be simultaneously considered, so that the invention is not only limited to a single index, but also can simultaneously consider a plurality of meals to be audited and is suitable for the auditing situation of a plurality of indexes.
In some embodiments, as shown in fig. 8, obtaining the analysis result according to the audit relationship, the audit result, and the priority includes the following steps:
s802, determining whether the analysis result passes or fails according to the audit relationship and the plurality of audit results;
s804, determining the non-passing type of each audit result according to the audit rule model under the condition that the analysis result is non-passing;
and S806, determining the non-passing type of the analysis result according to the non-passing type of each audit result and the priority of the audit result.
In this embodiment, when there are multiple parameters to be audited, the audit relationship and the result of each audit parameter need to be analyzed to determine whether the analysis result passes or not. Specifically, the audit relationship may be a relationship or an or relationship, and the result of each audit parameter may be a pass or a fail, and the audit relationship between the audit parameters and the audit result of each audit parameter are comprehensively considered, so that an analysis result can be obtained, and a target audit result of the whole document information is obtained.
The invention comprehensively considers the audit rule relation and a plurality of audit results to obtain a final analysis result as a target analysis result. Especially, under the condition that one part of the plurality of auditing results is passed and the other part of the plurality of auditing results is not passed, the target auditing result of the whole document can be determined according to the auditing rule relation, and the final result cannot be obtained because the auditing results of different auditing parameters are contradictory.
Further, in the case that the audit result fails, the non-passing type of the audit result needs to be determined, so as to facilitate further processing according to the non-passing type. Specifically, the non-pass type set may include one or more of reject, and to-be-audited, and may also include other types. When the audit result is failed, a type can be determined in the failed type set according to the comparison formula corresponding to the audit result, and the type is used as the failed type of the audit result.
Further, when the analysis result is failed, at least one audit result is not passed. In this case, a non-passing type of each non-passing audit result is determined, and in particular, the set of non-passing types may include one or more of reject, and to-be-audited, and may also include other types. When the audit result is failed, a type can be determined in the failed type set according to the comparison formula corresponding to the audit result, and the type is used as the failed type of the audit result. And then according to the priority of each audit result, determining the audit result with the highest priority, and taking the non-passing type of the audit result as the non-passing type of the target audit result of the whole document information.
According to the method and the device, the priority is set for the non-passing type, and under the condition that a plurality of non-passing auditing results exist and the non-passing types of the plurality of auditing results are different, only the non-passing type with the highest priority in all the non-passing types is determined as the analysis result. Therefore, the invention effectively solves the problem of the non-passing type of how to comprehensively analyze to determine the result of the whole document information when a plurality of non-passing auditing results exist and the non-passing types are different.
Fig. 9 is a schematic flow chart of a document auditing method according to another embodiment of the first aspect of the present invention, and as shown in fig. 9, the method includes:
s902, determining an audit rule list of the claim document, and determining configuration information of each comparative formula according to the audit rule list;
s904, configure the configuration information into a comparative formula, and check whether the configuration is correct.
In the embodiment, an audit rule list of the claim document is determined, the list comprises audit rules required by document information audit, configuration information of each comparison formula is determined according to the list, and then the corresponding comparison formula is generated according to each configuration information. And finally checking whether the comparison formula is correct or not.
Fig. 10 is a schematic flow chart of a document auditing method according to another embodiment of the first aspect of the present invention, and as shown in fig. 10, the method includes:
s1002, receiving bill information;
s1004, the definition unit establishes an audit rule model;
s1006, the analysis unit calls a configuration unit;
s1008, the configuration unit inquires a comparison formula;
s1010, the checking unit checks the parameters to be checked;
s1012, the analysis unit obtains a target auditing result;
s1014, checking whether the operation is manual or not; if so, go to S1016; if not, ending;
and S1016, manual auditing is performed.
In this embodiment, after receiving the document information, the defining unit establishes an audit rule model, and then audits the document information through the audit rule model. Specifically, the analysis unit calls the configuration unit, and the configuration unit queries a comparison formula required for checking the document information through the checking rule model. And then the verification unit verifies each parameter to be verified determined according to the document information through the verification rule model to obtain the verification result of each parameter to be verified. And the analysis unit analyzes the audit result of each parameter to be audited to obtain a target audit result. And finally, determining whether manual auditing is needed or not according to the target auditing result, if so, displaying auditing information or sending the auditing information to a terminal, and if not, ending the document auditing process.
As shown in fig. 11, an embodiment of the second aspect of the present invention provides a document auditing apparatus 100, where the document auditing apparatus 100 audits a document by using a document auditing method according to any one of the above first aspects, and the document auditing apparatus 100 includes: a defining unit 102, configured to establish an audit rule model; the configuration unit 106 is configured to respond to an update request of the audit rule model, update the audit rule model according to the update request, and obtain a target audit rule model; a receiving unit 104 for receiving document information; and the processing unit 108 is configured to audit the document information according to the target audit rule model to obtain a target audit result.
The document auditing apparatus 100 according to this embodiment includes a defining unit 102, a configuring unit 106, a receiving unit 104, and a processing unit 108. The defining unit 102 is configured to establish an audit rule model, and when a usage scenario and the like change, a specific rule of an audit document also changes, at this time, the receiving unit 104 receives an update request, and then the configuring unit 106 can update the audit rule model according to the received update request, so as to obtain a target audit rule model. Finally, the processing unit 108 uses the target audit rule model to audit the document information, and obtains a target audit result corresponding to the document information.
Specifically, after the defining unit 102 establishes the audit rule model, the processing unit 108 may audit the document information by using the established audit rule model. Further, if the receiving unit 104 receives the update request, the configuration unit 106 updates the audit rule model accordingly according to the update request, and then the processing unit 108 audits the document information by using the updated audit rule model, so that the obtained target audit result conforms to the latest audit rule and has a higher matching degree with the current usage scenario. When the use scene and the like change, the configuration unit 106 can directly update the audit rule model according to the update request, and then the processing unit 108 audits the document information through the updated audit rule model without modifying a computer program, so that the difficulty of modifying the audit rule is reduced, and the document audit can flexibly adapt to various different scenes.
Fig. 12 shows a schematic structural diagram of a document auditing apparatus 100 according to another embodiment of the second aspect of the present invention, where the document auditing apparatus 100 includes a defining unit 102, a configuring unit 106, and a processing unit 108, where the processing unit 108 includes a verifying unit 1082 and a parsing unit 1084. Specifically, the definition unit 102 can define a document model, a vehicle model, a man-hour model, and a part model in the claim document, and establish an audit rule model according to these models. The verification unit 1082 can verify the parameters to be verified by using the verification module, so as to obtain a verification result of each parameter to be verified. The configuration unit 106 is configured to update the audit rule model, and further, the configuration unit 106 can set the non-passing type of each audit result, specifically including reject, and audit required. And the parsing unit 1084 may obtain a target audit result of the whole document information according to the audit result of each parameter to be audited.
Fig. 13 is a schematic diagram illustrating information received by a document auditing apparatus according to another embodiment of the second aspect of the present invention, and as shown in fig. 13, the configuration information or the update request information received by the document auditing apparatus is: the claim type is not a first maintenance or service activity, the total amount of maintenance is greater than or equal to 0, and the maintenance operation code is first letter E, but does not begin with EA1600, EA1601, or EE.
An embodiment of the third aspect of the present invention provides a readable storage medium, on which a program or an instruction is stored, where the program or the instruction, when executed by a processor, implements the steps of the document auditing method according to any one of the above first aspects, so that the method has all the advantages of the document auditing method, and details are not repeated herein.
A readable storage medium may include any medium that can store or transfer information. Examples of readable storage media include electronic circuits, semiconductor memory devices, ROM, flash memory, Erasable ROM (EROM), floppy disks, CD-ROMs, optical disks, hard disks, fiber optic media, Radio Frequency (RF) links, and so forth. The code segments may be downloaded via a network such as the internet, an intranet, etc.
It should be noted that, in this document, the terms "comprises," "comprising," or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, article, or computer apparatus that comprises a list of elements does not include only those elements but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or computer apparatus. Without further limitation, an element defined by the phrase "comprising an … …" does not exclude the presence of other like elements in a process, method, article, or computer device that comprises the element. Further, it should be noted that the scope of the methods and computer apparatus of the embodiments of the present application is not limited to performing the functions in the order illustrated or discussed, but may include performing the functions in a substantially simultaneous manner or in a reverse order depending on the functionality involved, e.g., the methods described may be performed in an order different than that described, and various steps may be added, omitted, or combined. In addition, features described with reference to certain examples may be combined in other examples.
While the present embodiments have been described with reference to the accompanying drawings, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to the precise embodiments described above, which are meant to be illustrative and not restrictive, and that various changes may be made therein by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
The above description is only a preferred embodiment of the present application and is not intended to limit the present application, and various modifications and changes may be made by those skilled in the art. Any modification, equivalent replacement, improvement and the like made within the spirit and principle of the present application shall be included in the protection scope of the present application.
Claims (10)
1. A bill auditing method is characterized by comprising the following steps:
establishing an audit rule model;
responding to an updating request of the audit rule model, and updating the audit rule model according to the updating request to obtain a target audit rule model;
receiving document information;
and auditing the bill information according to the target auditing rule model to obtain a target auditing result.
2. The document auditing method of claim 1, where establishing an audit rule model specifically includes:
receiving configuration information;
analyzing the configuration information, and acquiring a field to be configured, a comparator and a comparison value in the configuration information;
generating a comparison formula according to the field to be configured, the comparator and the comparison value;
and generating the auditing rule model according to the comparison formula.
3. The document auditing method according to claim 2, wherein the auditing the document information according to the target auditing rule model to obtain a target auditing result specifically comprises:
determining at least one parameter to be audited according to the bill information;
determining a field to be audited corresponding to the parameter to be audited according to the parameter to be audited;
determining a target comparison formula corresponding to the field to be checked according to the field to be checked;
obtaining an auditing result of the parameter to be audited according to the parameter to be audited and the auditing comparison value corresponding to the target comparison formula through the auditing rule model;
and determining a target auditing result of the bill information according to the auditing result.
4. The document auditing method of claim 2, wherein updating the audit rule model according to the update request specifically comprises:
acquiring a target field, a target comparator and a target comparison value according to the updating request;
generating an updating comparison formula according to the target field, the target comparator and the target comparison value;
and updating the audit rule model according to the update comparison formula.
5. The document auditing method according to claim 3, wherein generating a comparison formula according to the field to be configured, the comparator and the comparison value specifically comprises:
determining a first target verification module corresponding to the type of the field to be configured in a plurality of preset verification modules;
and combining the field to be configured, the comparator and the comparison value through the first target verification module to obtain the comparison formula.
6. The document auditing method according to claim 5, wherein obtaining the auditing result of the parameter to be audited according to the parameter to be audited and the auditing comparison value corresponding to the target comparison formula specifically includes:
determining a second target verification module corresponding to the type of the field to be verified in the preset multiple verification modules;
analyzing the target comparison formula through the second target verification module to obtain the audit comparator and the audit comparison value;
and comparing the parameter to be audited with the audit comparison value according to the audit comparator to obtain the audit result.
7. The document auditing method of claim 3, wherein the determining a target auditing result for the document information according to the auditing result specifically comprises:
acquiring an auditing relation corresponding to the parameter to be audited and the priority of each auditing result in a plurality of auditing results under the condition that the parameter to be audited is a plurality of parameters;
obtaining an analysis result according to the audit relationship, the audit result and the priority;
taking the analysis result as the target auditing result;
and determining that the auditing result is the target auditing result under the condition that the parameter to be audited is one.
8. The document auditing method of claim 7, wherein obtaining an analytic result according to the auditing relationship, the auditing result, and the priority level specifically includes:
determining whether the analysis result passes or fails according to the audit relationship and the plurality of audit results;
determining the non-passing type of each audit result according to the audit rule model under the condition that the analysis result is not passed;
and determining the non-passing type of the analysis result according to the non-passing type of each audit result and the priority of the audit result.
9. A document auditing apparatus, characterized in that the document auditing apparatus audits a document by using the document auditing method of any one of claims 1 to 8, the document auditing apparatus comprising:
the defining unit is used for establishing an audit rule model;
the configuration unit is used for responding to an updating request of the audit rule model, updating the audit rule model according to the updating request and obtaining a target audit rule model;
the receiving unit is used for receiving the bill information;
and the processing unit is used for auditing the bill information according to the target auditing rule model to obtain a target auditing result.
10. A readable storage medium having a program or instructions stored thereon, which when executed by a processor, carries out the steps of a document auditing method according to any one of claims 1 to 8.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202110860171.1A CN113553480A (en) | 2021-07-28 | 2021-07-28 | Document auditing method, document auditing device and readable storage medium |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202110860171.1A CN113553480A (en) | 2021-07-28 | 2021-07-28 | Document auditing method, document auditing device and readable storage medium |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN113553480A true CN113553480A (en) | 2021-10-26 |
Family
ID=78133152
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202110860171.1A Pending CN113553480A (en) | 2021-07-28 | 2021-07-28 | Document auditing method, document auditing device and readable storage medium |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN113553480A (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN117273667A (en) * | 2023-11-22 | 2023-12-22 | 浪潮通用软件有限公司 | Document auditing processing method and device |
Citations (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN108648810A (en) * | 2018-05-11 | 2018-10-12 | 平安医疗健康管理股份有限公司 | Data processing method, device and the computer readable storage medium of medicine audit |
| CN109616995A (en) * | 2018-11-26 | 2019-04-12 | 内蒙古电力(集团)有限责任公司电力调度控制分公司 | A kind of fixed value list automatic auditing method based on custom rule library |
| WO2020077061A1 (en) * | 2018-10-10 | 2020-04-16 | Safenet Inc. | Methods for securely managing a paper document |
| CN111598850A (en) * | 2020-04-29 | 2020-08-28 | 中国平安财产保险股份有限公司 | Data auditing method and system |
| CN112712429A (en) * | 2020-12-28 | 2021-04-27 | 中电金信软件有限公司 | Remittance service auditing method, remittance service auditing device, computer equipment and storage medium |
-
2021
- 2021-07-28 CN CN202110860171.1A patent/CN113553480A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN108648810A (en) * | 2018-05-11 | 2018-10-12 | 平安医疗健康管理股份有限公司 | Data processing method, device and the computer readable storage medium of medicine audit |
| WO2020077061A1 (en) * | 2018-10-10 | 2020-04-16 | Safenet Inc. | Methods for securely managing a paper document |
| CN109616995A (en) * | 2018-11-26 | 2019-04-12 | 内蒙古电力(集团)有限责任公司电力调度控制分公司 | A kind of fixed value list automatic auditing method based on custom rule library |
| CN111598850A (en) * | 2020-04-29 | 2020-08-28 | 中国平安财产保险股份有限公司 | Data auditing method and system |
| CN112712429A (en) * | 2020-12-28 | 2021-04-27 | 中电金信软件有限公司 | Remittance service auditing method, remittance service auditing device, computer equipment and storage medium |
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN117273667A (en) * | 2023-11-22 | 2023-12-22 | 浪潮通用软件有限公司 | Document auditing processing method and device |
| CN117273667B (en) * | 2023-11-22 | 2024-02-20 | 浪潮通用软件有限公司 | Document auditing processing method and device |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US8392884B2 (en) | Test case automatic generation method for testing proactive GSM application on SIM cards | |
| CN110276074B (en) | Distributed training method, device, equipment and storage medium for natural language processing | |
| CN114048701B (en) | Netlist ECO method, device, equipment and readable storage medium | |
| CN101167053A (en) | Implementing data-compatibility-based version scheme | |
| CN110287104A (en) | Method for generating test case, device, terminal and computer readable storage medium | |
| CN104363112A (en) | Parameter management method and parameter management device | |
| CN105225066A (en) | The verification method of workflow legitimacy and demo plant | |
| CN105791242A (en) | Object type identification method and system, server and client | |
| CN110297761A (en) | Acquisition methods, device, computer equipment and the storage medium of returned data | |
| CN113553480A (en) | Document auditing method, document auditing device and readable storage medium | |
| CN107066411A (en) | Data transmission method, device and computer-readable recording medium | |
| CN101026511A (en) | Measuring method, system and its configuration method and system | |
| CN106095511A (en) | A kind of server updating method and apparatus | |
| CN109101265B (en) | Method and system for gray scale publishing | |
| CN111651500A (en) | User identity recognition method, electronic device and storage medium | |
| CN109919573B (en) | Data processing method and device and computer equipment | |
| CN116415258A (en) | Vulnerability detection method, device, equipment, medium and program product | |
| CN115543816A (en) | Software regression test result verification method, device, equipment and storage medium | |
| CN114064068A (en) | Method and device for updating and managing different versions of distributed software | |
| KR100622129B1 (en) | Dynamically changing web page defacement validation system and method | |
| CN113568834A (en) | SDK code compatibility detection method, device, computer equipment and medium | |
| CN113515436A (en) | Interface testing method and device | |
| CN111062342A (en) | Debugging method and device of face recognition system | |
| CN116737141B (en) | Flow configuration type development method based on flow engine | |
| CN113516129B (en) | Business card recognition method and device, computer readable storage medium and control device |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination |