CN114493499A - Method for evaluating digital model product - Google Patents
Method for evaluating digital model product Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN114493499A CN114493499A CN202111642245.0A CN202111642245A CN114493499A CN 114493499 A CN114493499 A CN 114493499A CN 202111642245 A CN202111642245 A CN 202111642245A CN 114493499 A CN114493499 A CN 114493499A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- product
- review
- digital model
- design
- task
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 19
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 39
- 238000012552 review Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 26
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 7
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 claims description 14
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 claims description 14
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 claims description 13
- 230000000977 initiatory effect Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000000007 visual effect Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 abstract description 3
- 238000012854 evaluation process Methods 0.000 abstract description 2
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 abstract description 2
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 abstract 1
- 238000012356 Product development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/10—Office automation; Time management
- G06Q10/103—Workflow collaboration or project management
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
- G06F30/20—Design optimisation, verification or simulation
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/04—Manufacturing
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
- Y02P90/00—Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
- Y02P90/30—Computing systems specially adapted for manufacturing
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
- Geometry (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention provides a method for evaluating a digital model product. After the digital model product of the design engineer is finished, the product design task book and the digital model file are placed at the designated position, a review task is initiated, and the review task is notified to related personnel in an email mode. The personnel who receive the review task can freely arrange time, analyze the digital model product according to the own specialty, give an opinion in combination with the actual processing and production conditions, show the opinion in a software window in the form of pictures and texts, and share the information for other review personnel. And the design engineer processes the digital model according to the review opinions, and makes corresponding responses according to the image-text data and the question contents and by combining all the review opinions. And after all the problems are closed, all the related personnel are informed of finishing the review. And finally, all records in the evaluation process are exported, so that the later-stage tracing is facilitated.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the field of computer science, in particular to a method for evaluating a digital model product.
Background
In the product development stage, when all products are subjected to digital model completion, in order to ensure the product processability, the products can be produced and can be evaluated as model products, and the method mainly comprises the aspects of technology, purchase, process, development period, trial-manufacture cost and risk degree, input-output benefit analysis and the like.
However, in the current evaluation of digital model products, all professionals are used to discuss details in a conference room in a centralized way, which is long in time consumption and low in efficiency.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to solve the defects in the prior art and provides a method for evaluating a digital model product.
In order to achieve the purpose, the invention adopts the following technical scheme: a method for digitized model product review, comprising the steps of:
s1: finishing the primary design of the product;
the product preliminary design is that an engineer designs a digital model of a design drawing and a design file meeting requirements according to a product design task book, for example, a digital model of a smart phone and a computer;
the product preliminary design is also called product design specification, which is a task document for proposing specific tasks, indexes, principles and requirements for a certain product design project in advance;
s2: initiating a review;
the evaluation is to examine whether the preliminary design of the product meets the requirements of technical conditions or not, whether the design file is correct or not and completely express the principle, thought, characteristics and key points of the product design;
examining the technical standard and specification of the product design basis, whether the data is correct and reliable or not and whether the data meets the relevant national and industrial regulations or not, and if the internally-controlled enterprise standard is adopted, whether the enterprise standard is superior to the national and industrial standards or not is examined;
s3: analyzing the product and raising a problem;
the relevant personnel analyzes the digital model provided in the step S1 according to the technical standard and specification, describes the problem by words, displays the position, the visual angle and the content of the model by pictures, and records the time, the personnel and the corresponding solution for asking questions;
s4: engineer modifies and feeds back:
the modification and feedback refers to the modification of the digital model of the product by the engineer, the digital model is modified according to the requirement according to the description problem and the solution provided by the step S3, and the requirement of the review opinion is met, such as reasonable structure, picture number replacement and the like;
s5: finishing the evaluation task, and completing problem closed loop:
the engineer provides a description question according to step S3 to make a response, modify the model, modify the basis, etc., all questions should be responded to, complete all response questions, end the review task, complete the closed loop of the questions;
s6: generating a review record:
the review record refers to that all the problems in S5 that the loop is closed are quickly formed into a document format and stored as an electronic file to be used as a review conclusion.
Preferably, a database is further provided in step S3; the sub-modified content is stored in the database in real time.
Preferably, the content displayed in the database is restored upon saving.
Preferably, in step S5, the user who made the modification and used is notified when the problem closed loop is completed.
Preferably, in step S6, the document format is one of word, txt, and excel.
Compared with the prior art, the invention has the beneficial effects that: according to the evaluation method, all problems are shared in an evaluation task mode, the description of the problems is displayed in an image-text mode, opinions are made at any time, and the problems are recorded; because of the sharing problem, the design engineer can conveniently obtain feedback opinions and timely respond and modify, and according to the evaluation method disclosed by the invention, the evaluation method is not limited by time, place and personnel, so that the evaluation process is dispersed, the evaluation opinions are concentrated, the evaluation result is clearly recorded, and corresponding information is provided for subsequent production.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a schematic flow chart of the present invention.
Detailed Description
In order to further understand the objects, structures, features and functions of the present invention, the following embodiments are described in detail.
Referring to fig. 1, the present invention provides S1: finishing the primary design of the product;
the product preliminary design is that an engineer designs a digital model of a design drawing and a design file meeting requirements according to a product design task book, for example, a digital model of a smart phone and a computer;
the product preliminary design is also called product design specification, which is a task document for proposing specific tasks, indexes, principles and requirements for a certain product design project in advance;
s2: initiating a review;
the evaluation is to examine whether the preliminary design of the product meets the requirements of technical conditions or not, whether the design file is correct or not and completely express the principle, thought, characteristics and key points of the product design;
examining the technical standard and specification of the product design basis, whether the data is correct and reliable or not and whether the data meets the relevant national and industrial regulations or not, and if the internally-controlled enterprise standard is adopted, whether the enterprise standard is superior to the national and industrial standards or not is examined;
s3: analyzing the product and raising a problem;
the relevant personnel analyzes the digital model provided in the step S1 according to the technical standard and specification, describes the problem by words, displays the position, the visual angle and the content of the model by pictures, and records the time, the personnel and the corresponding solution for asking questions;
s4: engineer modifies and feeds back:
the modification and feedback refers to the modification of the digital model of the product by the engineer, the digital model is modified according to the requirement according to the description problem and the solution provided by the step S3, and the requirement of the review opinion is met, such as reasonable structure, picture number replacement and the like;
s5: finishing the evaluation task, and completing problem closed loop:
the engineer provides a description question according to step S3 to make a response, modify the model, modify the basis, etc., all questions should be responded to, complete all response questions, end the review task, complete the closed loop of the questions;
s6: generating a review record:
the review record refers to that all the problems in S5 that the loop is closed are quickly formed into a document format and stored as an electronic file to be used as a review conclusion.
Preferably, a database is further provided in step S3; the modified content is stored in the database in real time.
By storing the modified content in real time, the data loss caused by unexpected problems is avoided, and meanwhile, the modified data can be prevented from being deleted by mistake and modified by mistake, so that the model is changed, and a larger error is generated for subsequent modification.
Preferably, the content displayed in the database is restored upon saving.
Because the users of the model are different, different users have different use habits during modification, and the trouble of reopening to find problems is avoided during the next use by storing the real-time modification interface.
Preferably, in the step S5, the user who made the modification and used is notified when the problem closed loop is completed.
By notifying all the users of the modifications and usage, it is convenient for them to know the path taken by the program throughout the four u.
Preferably, in step S6, the document format is one of word, txt, and excel.
The present invention has been described in relation to the above embodiments, which are only exemplary of the implementation of the present invention. It should be noted that the disclosed embodiments do not limit the scope of the invention. Rather, it is intended that all such modifications and variations be included within the spirit and scope of this invention.
Claims (5)
1. A method for evaluating a digital model product is characterized by comprising the following steps: the method comprises the following steps:
s1: finishing the primary design of the product;
the product preliminary design is that an engineer designs a design drawing and a digital model of a design file according with requirements according to a product design task book;
s2: initiating a review;
the evaluation is to examine whether the preliminary design of the product meets the requirements of technical conditions or not, whether the design file is correct or not and completely express the principle, thought, characteristics and key points of the product design;
s3: analyzing the product and raising a problem;
the relevant personnel analyzes the digital model provided in the step S1 according to the technical standard and specification, describes the problem by words, displays the position, the visual angle and the content of the model by pictures, and records the time, the personnel and the corresponding solution for asking questions;
s4: engineer modifies and feeds back:
the modification and feedback refers to the modification of the digital model of the product by the engineer, the digital model is modified according to the requirement according to the description problem and the solution provided by the step S3, and the requirement of the review opinion is met, such as reasonable structure, picture number replacement and the like;
s5: finishing the evaluation task, and completing problem closed loop:
the engineer provides a description question according to step S3 to make a response, modify the model, modify the basis, etc., all questions should be responded to, complete all response questions, end the review task, complete the closed loop of the questions;
s6: generating a review record:
the review record is that all the problems in S5 which are closed loop are quickly formed into a document format and stored as an electronic file to be used as a review conclusion.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the method further comprises: a database is also arranged in the step S3; the sub-modified content is stored in the database in real time.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein the method further comprises: and recovering the content displayed in the database according to the storage time.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the method further comprises: in step S5, the user who made the modification and used is notified when the problem closed loop is completed.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein the method further comprises: in the step S6, the document format is formed as one of word, txt, and excel.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202111642245.0A CN114493499A (en) | 2021-12-30 | 2021-12-30 | Method for evaluating digital model product |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202111642245.0A CN114493499A (en) | 2021-12-30 | 2021-12-30 | Method for evaluating digital model product |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN114493499A true CN114493499A (en) | 2022-05-13 |
Family
ID=81508652
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202111642245.0A Pending CN114493499A (en) | 2021-12-30 | 2021-12-30 | Method for evaluating digital model product |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN114493499A (en) |
Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN109858751A (en) * | 2018-12-26 | 2019-06-07 | 中国大唐集团科学技术研究院有限公司 | Power engineering Evaluating Projects System |
| CN110189098A (en) * | 2019-05-13 | 2019-08-30 | 北京机电工程总体设计部 | A kind of online reviewing method |
| CN112598397A (en) * | 2020-12-30 | 2021-04-02 | 北京迪浩永辉技术有限公司 | Circuit design online evaluation method, system, medium, equipment, terminal and application |
-
2021
- 2021-12-30 CN CN202111642245.0A patent/CN114493499A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN109858751A (en) * | 2018-12-26 | 2019-06-07 | 中国大唐集团科学技术研究院有限公司 | Power engineering Evaluating Projects System |
| CN110189098A (en) * | 2019-05-13 | 2019-08-30 | 北京机电工程总体设计部 | A kind of online reviewing method |
| CN112598397A (en) * | 2020-12-30 | 2021-04-02 | 北京迪浩永辉技术有限公司 | Circuit design online evaluation method, system, medium, equipment, terminal and application |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US11327935B2 (en) | Intelligent data quality | |
| Burgess Yakemovic et al. | Report on a development project use of an issue-based information system | |
| Preece et al. | Designing and evaluating online communities: research speaks to emerging practice | |
| Moody et al. | Improving the quality of entity relationship models—experience in research and practice | |
| Chirumalla | Organizing lessons learned practice for product–service innovation | |
| CN108052542B (en) | Multidimensional data analysis method based on presto data | |
| Dobrotvorskiy et al. | Big challenges of small manufacturing enterprises in industry 4.0 | |
| Gephart Jr | Sensemaking and new media at work | |
| US20150339627A1 (en) | System for structured communication between parties | |
| Aqlan et al. | Applying product manufacturing techniques to teach data analytics in industrial engineering: a project based learning experience | |
| CN114153914A (en) | Power plant equipment defect visualization system, method, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| JP2020091793A (en) | Cooperation management device and cooperation management method | |
| CN114493499A (en) | Method for evaluating digital model product | |
| Borges et al. | Bringing context to CSCW | |
| Thom et al. | Workflow patterns for business process modeling | |
| CN115330420A (en) | Jade tracing method and system based on standard | |
| US20220253480A1 (en) | Method and device for providing function to review visual contents for visual contents production management | |
| Fisher | Improving the usability of information systems: the role of the technical communicator | |
| CN111583394B (en) | Knowledge technology inspection method and system based on feature recognition | |
| Meng et al. | Web-based communication platform for decision making in early design phases | |
| Peng et al. | A requirements maturity measurement approach based on sklsewiki | |
| Risku | Cooperation and quality assurance in technical translation projects | |
| Sharma et al. | A smart advisor for software delivery-a bot framework for awareness, alerts and advice | |
| Rikhardsson | Corporate environmental management and information technology | |
| Seer | Toward a threshold model of consumer autonomy for human-smart system interactions: A qualitative study |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination |