CN114154661A - Distribution network first-aid repair operation priority evaluation method, system, equipment and medium - Google Patents
Distribution network first-aid repair operation priority evaluation method, system, equipment and medium Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN114154661A CN114154661A CN202111484073.9A CN202111484073A CN114154661A CN 114154661 A CN114154661 A CN 114154661A CN 202111484073 A CN202111484073 A CN 202111484073A CN 114154661 A CN114154661 A CN 114154661A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- power failure
- user
- repair work
- loss
- emergency repair
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 81
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 31
- 238000012163 sequencing technique Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 11
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 17
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 claims description 12
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 claims description 10
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 abstract description 5
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000007726 management method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000007796 conventional method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000005611 electricity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013439 planning Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008092 positive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/20—Administration of product repair or maintenance
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
- G06Q10/06393—Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/06—Energy or water supply
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- Water Supply & Treatment (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Supply And Distribution Of Alternating Current (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention provides a priority evaluation method, a system, equipment and a medium for distribution network emergency repair work, which comprises the steps of obtaining a preset importance level corresponding to a power failure user in each emergency repair work order, sequencing the emergency repair work orders according to the importance levels of the users from high to low, and evaluating a priority result; when the importance levels of a plurality of users of the emergency repair work orders are the same in the priority evaluation result, acquiring the power failure user condition corresponding to the emergency repair work order and the power failure duration of the users in the emergency repair work order; calculating the power failure loss electric quantity of the power failure user; calculating the power failure loss of a power failure user and a power failure loss reference value; calculating the power failure comprehensive index of each first-aid repair work order; and sorting a plurality of emergency repair work orders with the same user importance level from large to small according to corresponding power failure comprehensive indexes, and outputting the priority evaluation result and the sorting result as a final priority evaluation result. The invention carries out comprehensive evaluation on the power failure loss of the user and provides decision reference for the priority of the development of distribution network emergency repair work.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of priority evaluation of distribution network emergency repair work, in particular to a priority evaluation method, a priority evaluation system, priority evaluation equipment and priority evaluation media for distribution network emergency repair work.
Background
In recent years, with the rapid development of national economy, urban power load is rapidly increased, and the position of power supply reliability in production management and customer service work is also increasingly important. The power supply reliability is one of the main indexes reflecting the power supply capacity and the power supply quality of the power system, and is the comprehensive reflection of the planning, design, production, operation and maintenance, power supply service and other aspects of the power system.
Currently, with the continuous development and reformation of electric power systems in China, the safe operation of a power distribution network will have a positive effect on the service quality of electric power companies. Meanwhile, the efficiency and the quality of the emergency repair of the power distribution network can also have positive and profound influence on the improvement of the operation quality of power supply enterprises. However, the existing first-aid repair sequence is usually evaluated according to the work experience and the sequence of faults, and the problems of unreasonable fault repair priority evaluation and low efficiency exist.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to provide a method, a system, equipment and a medium for evaluating the priority of distribution network emergency repair work, and solves the technical problems of unreasonable evaluation of the priority of distribution network maintenance and low efficiency in the conventional method.
On one hand, the priority evaluation method for distribution network emergency repair work is provided, and comprises the following steps:
acquiring preset importance levels corresponding to power failure users in each emergency repair work order, and taking the highest level in the corresponding preset importance levels as the user importance level of the emergency repair work order; the emergency repair work orders are sorted from high to low according to the user importance levels, and the priority evaluation results are obtained;
when the importance levels of a plurality of users of the emergency repair work orders are the same in the priority evaluation result, acquiring the power failure user condition corresponding to the emergency repair work order and the power failure duration of the users in the emergency repair work order; calculating the power failure loss electric quantity of the power failure user according to the power failure user condition and the power failure duration; wherein, the power failure user condition at least comprises a power failure load of a user;
calculating the power failure loss of the power failure user and a power failure loss reference value according to the power failure loss electric quantity of the power failure user; calculating the power failure comprehensive index of each first-aid repair work order according to the power failure loss and the power failure loss reference value;
sorting a plurality of first-aid repair work orders with the same user importance level from large to small according to corresponding power failure comprehensive indexes to obtain a sorting result; and outputting the priority evaluation result and the sequencing result as a final priority evaluation result.
Preferably, the calculating the power outage loss electric quantity of the power outage user according to the power outage user condition and the power outage duration specifically includes:
outputting the average load of the power failure user in a preset time period as the power failure load of the user;
and outputting the product of the user power failure load and the power failure duration as the power loss of the user.
Preferably, the power outage loss of the power outage user is calculated according to the power outage loss electric quantity of the power outage user, specifically according to the following formula:
LP(ti,k)＝639.35t-0.564
wherein f isECOST,iThe power failure loss of the ith emergency repair work order is solved; LP (t)i,k) The power failure loss function of the kth user in the ith emergency repair work order is obtained; t is the power failure duration of the user; qi,kThe power loss is the power failure loss of the kth user in the ith emergency repair work order.
Preferably, the power outage loss reference value of the power outage user is calculated according to the power outage loss amount of the power outage user, specifically according to the following formula:
wherein f isE,RefRepresenting a power failure loss reference value of a user; f. ofECosT,iThe power failure loss of the ith emergency repair work order is solved; n is the total number of the first-aid repair work orders; i is the sequence number of the first-aid repair work order.
Preferably, the power failure comprehensive index of each emergency repair work order is calculated according to the power failure loss and the power failure loss reference value, specifically according to the following formula:
therein, UIiThe power failure comprehensive index of the ith emergency repair work order is represented; k is the power failure loss coefficient; f. ofE,RefRepresenting a power failure loss reference value of a user; f. ofECOST,iThe power failure loss of the ith emergency repair work order.
On the other hand, the priority evaluation system for the distribution network emergency repair work is further provided, and the priority evaluation method for the distribution network emergency repair work is realized and comprises the following steps:
the first evaluation module is used for acquiring preset importance levels corresponding to power failure users in each emergency repair work order and taking the highest level in the corresponding preset importance levels as the user importance level of the emergency repair work order; the emergency repair work orders are sorted from high to low according to the user importance levels, and the priority evaluation results are obtained;
the second evaluation module is used for acquiring the power failure user condition corresponding to the first-aid repair work order and the power failure duration of the user in the first-aid repair work order when the importance levels of a plurality of users of the first-aid repair work order are the same in the priority evaluation result; calculating the power failure loss electric quantity of the power failure user according to the power failure user condition and the power failure duration; wherein, the power failure user condition at least comprises a power failure load of a user; the power failure loss and power failure loss reference value of the power failure user is calculated according to the power failure loss electric quantity of the power failure user; calculating the power failure comprehensive index of each first-aid repair work order according to the power failure loss and the power failure loss reference value; the emergency repair work orders are used for sorting the plurality of emergency repair work orders with the same user importance level according to the corresponding power failure comprehensive index from large to small to obtain a sorting result; and outputting the priority evaluation result and the sequencing result as a final priority evaluation result.
Preferably, the second evaluation module is further configured to output an average load of the power outage user in a preset time period as the power outage load of the user; outputting the product of the user power failure load and the power failure duration as the power loss of the user;
and calculating the power outage loss of the power outage user specifically according to the following formula:
LP(ti,k)＝639.35t-0.564
wherein f isECOST,iThe power failure loss of the ith emergency repair work order is solved; LP (t)i,k) The power failure loss function of the kth user in the ith emergency repair work order is obtained; t is the power failure duration of the user; qi,kThe power failure loss electric quantity of the kth user in the ith emergency repair work order is calculated;
the method is also used for calculating the power failure loss reference value of the power failure user according to the following formula:
wherein f isE,RefRepresenting a power failure loss reference value of a user; f. ofECOST,iThe power failure loss of the ith emergency repair work order is solved; n is the total number of the first-aid repair work orders; i is the sequence number of the first-aid repair work order.
Preferably, the second evaluation module is further configured to calculate a power outage combined index for each emergency repair work order according to the following formula:
therein, UIiThe power failure comprehensive index of the ith emergency repair work order is represented; k is the power failure loss coefficient; f. ofE,RefRepresenting a power failure loss reference value of a user; f. ofECOsT,iThe power failure loss of the ith emergency repair work order.
In another aspect, a computer device is also provided, which includes a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored on the memory and executable on the processor, and when the processor executes the computer program, the computer device implements the following steps of the method:
acquiring preset importance levels corresponding to power failure users in each emergency repair work order, and taking the highest level in the corresponding preset importance levels as the user importance level of the emergency repair work order; the emergency repair work orders are sorted from high to low according to the user importance levels, and the priority evaluation results are obtained;
when the importance levels of a plurality of users of the emergency repair work orders are the same in the priority evaluation result, acquiring the power failure user condition corresponding to the emergency repair work order and the power failure duration of the users in the emergency repair work order; calculating the power failure loss electric quantity of the power failure user according to the power failure user condition and the power failure duration; wherein, the power failure user condition at least comprises a power failure load of a user;
calculating the power failure loss of the power failure user and a power failure loss reference value according to the power failure loss electric quantity of the power failure user; calculating the power failure comprehensive index of each first-aid repair work order according to the power failure loss and the power failure loss reference value;
sorting a plurality of first-aid repair work orders with the same user importance level from large to small according to corresponding power failure comprehensive indexes to obtain a sorting result; and outputting the priority evaluation result and the sequencing result as a final priority evaluation result.
In another aspect, there is also provided a computer readable storage medium having stored thereon a computer program which, when executed by a processor, performs the steps of the method of:
acquiring preset importance levels corresponding to power failure users in each emergency repair work order, and taking the highest level in the corresponding preset importance levels as the user importance level of the emergency repair work order; the emergency repair work orders are sorted from high to low according to the user importance levels, and the priority evaluation results are obtained;
when the importance levels of a plurality of users of the emergency repair work orders are the same in the priority evaluation result, acquiring the power failure user condition corresponding to the emergency repair work order and the power failure duration of the users in the emergency repair work order; calculating the power failure loss electric quantity of the power failure user according to the power failure user condition and the power failure duration; wherein, the power failure user condition at least comprises a power failure load of a user;
calculating the power failure loss of the power failure user and a power failure loss reference value according to the power failure loss electric quantity of the power failure user; calculating the power failure comprehensive index of each first-aid repair work order according to the power failure loss and the power failure loss reference value;
sorting a plurality of first-aid repair work orders with the same user importance level from large to small according to corresponding power failure comprehensive indexes to obtain a sorting result; and outputting the priority evaluation result and the sequencing result as a final priority evaluation result.
In summary, the embodiment of the invention has the following beneficial effects:
according to the priority evaluation method, system, equipment and medium for distribution network emergency repair work, loss caused by fault power failure to a user is evaluated on the basis of building a user power failure loss model, a power failure loss evaluation rate is obtained, a power failure comprehensive index is obtained through weighted calculation, and distribution network emergency repair work priorities of various items are determined according to the important level conditions of the user. And comprehensively evaluating the power failure loss of the user by combining parameters such as the emergency repair power failure duration, the user importance level and the like, and providing decision reference for the priority of the development of the distribution network emergency repair operation.
Drawings
In order to more clearly illustrate the embodiments of the present invention or the technical solutions in the prior art, the drawings used in the description of the embodiments or the prior art will be briefly introduced below, and it is obvious that the drawings in the following description are only some embodiments of the present invention, and it is within the scope of the present invention for those skilled in the art to obtain other drawings based on the drawings without inventive exercise.
Fig. 1 is a main flow diagram of a priority evaluation method for distribution network emergency repair work in an embodiment of the present invention.
Fig. 2 is a schematic diagram of a priority evaluation system for distribution network emergency repair work in the embodiment of the present invention.
Detailed Description
In order to make the objects, technical solutions and advantages of the present invention more apparent, the present invention will be described in further detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.
Fig. 1 is a schematic diagram of an embodiment of a priority evaluation method for distribution network emergency repair work according to the present invention. In this embodiment, the method comprises the steps of:
acquiring preset importance levels corresponding to power failure users in each emergency repair work order, and taking the highest level in the corresponding preset importance levels as the user importance level of the emergency repair work order; the emergency repair work orders are sorted from high to low according to the user importance levels, and the priority evaluation results are obtained; that is, the importance level of the user involved in the power failure in each emergency repair work order is counted, and the highest level in the work orders is taken as the user importance level of the work orders. Determining the distribution network emergency repair operation priority of the emergency repair work order according to the following rules: and if the user importance level is high, the distribution network emergency repair operation priority of the work order is higher.
In a specific embodiment, the highest level in the work order is taken as the user importance level of the work order, that is: the importance level of the jth user of the ith emergency repair work order is as follows: UL (UL)i,jWherein, i is 1,2, …, and N is the total number of the first-aid repair worksheets;
ULi,jis the importance level, UL, of the jth user of the ith emergency repair work orderi,j0 denotes a super user, ULi,j1 denotes primary user, ULi,j2 denotes secondary user, ULi,jAnd 3 represents an ordinary user.
If the user importance level is high, the priority of the work order is also high, i.e. if UL is providedi<ULjThen the priority of work order i is higher than the priority of work order j.
Further, when the importance levels of a plurality of users of the emergency repair work orders are the same in the priority evaluation result, acquiring the power failure user condition corresponding to the emergency repair work order and the power failure duration of the users in the emergency repair work order; calculating the power failure loss electric quantity of the power failure user according to the power failure user condition and the power failure duration; wherein, the power failure user condition at least comprises a power failure load of a user; namely, according to the emergency repair work orders and the related power failure user conditions, the power failure duration of each user in each emergency repair work order is estimated, and then according to the power failure user conditions and the user load conditions in the load system, the loss load and the power failure loss electric quantity of each power failure user are estimated.
In the specific embodiment, the average load of the power failure user in a preset time period is output as the power failure load of the user; and outputting the product of the user power failure load and the power failure duration as the power loss of the user. That is, the power outage start time t according to the user's work orderi,k,0End time ti,k,1And calculating the power failure time of the users in each work order:
ti,k＝ti,k,1-ti,k,0
wherein, ti,kThe power failure duration of the kth user in the ith emergency repair work order is represented as a unit: h; i is 1,2, …, N, N is the total number of the first-aid repair work orders; k is 1,2, …, ni。
According to data in a load system, acquiring the total power consumption of each power failure user in the latest D days of the distribution transformer:
wherein Q isCT,i,kFor the total power consumption, unit of the k user in the ith rush-repair work order in the latest D days: kW.h; qi,k,hThe electricity consumption of the kth user in the ith emergency repair work order on the h dayThe unit: kW.h; i is 1,2, …, N, N is the total number of the first-aid repair work orders; k is 1,2, …, ni；
Estimating the power failure load of a user:
wherein, Pi,kThe average load of the kth user in the ith emergency repair work order on the latest D days is as follows: kW; i is 1,2, …, N, N is the total number of the first-aid repair work orders; k is 1,2, …, ni。
Calculating the power failure loss electric quantity of a user in the first-aid repair work order:
Qi,k＝Pi,k×ti,k
wherein Q isi,kFor the power failure loss electric quantity of the kth user in the ith rush-repair work order, unit: kW.h; i is 1,2, …, N, N is the total number of the first-aid repair work orders; k is 1,2, …, ni。
Further, calculating the power failure loss of the power failure user and a power failure loss reference value according to the power failure loss electric quantity of the power failure user; calculating the power failure comprehensive index of each first-aid repair work order according to the power failure loss and the power failure loss reference value; that is, the user power outage loss and the user power outage loss reference value of each work order are calculated according to a preset user power outage loss function. The power loss function for the user is: lp (t) 639.35t-0.564The unit: yuan/kWh; wherein t is the power failure duration of the user. And calculating the power failure comprehensive index of each first-aid repair work order according to the power failure of the user and the power failure loss of the user.
In a specific embodiment, the power outage loss of the power outage user is calculated according to the power outage loss electric quantity of the power outage user, specifically according to the following formula:
LP(ti,k)＝639.35t-0.564
wherein f isECOST,iPower loss for the ith repair orderThe unit: element; LP (t)i,k) The power failure loss function of the kth user in the ith emergency repair work order is obtained; t is the power failure duration of the user; qi,kThe power loss is the power failure loss of the kth user in the ith emergency repair work order. That is, the user's loss of power function is:
LP(t)＝639.35t-0.564
wherein, lp (t) is a function of the power failure loss and the power failure duration t of the mixed user, and the unit is: yuan/kWh.
Specifically, the power outage loss reference value of the power outage user is calculated according to the power outage loss electric quantity of the power outage user, specifically according to the following formula:
wherein f isE,RefRepresenting a power failure loss reference value of a user; f. ofECOsT,iThe power failure loss of the ith emergency repair work order is solved; n is the total number of the first-aid repair work orders; i is the sequence number of the first-aid repair work order.
More specifically, the power failure comprehensive index of each emergency repair work order is calculated according to the power failure loss and the power failure loss reference value, and specifically calculated according to the following formula:
therein, UIiThe power failure comprehensive index of the ith emergency repair work order is represented; k is the power failure loss coefficient; f. ofE,RefRepresenting a power failure loss reference value of a user; f. ofECOST,iThe power failure loss of the ith emergency repair work order.
The user importance level of the ith emergency repair work order is as follows:
wherein, ULiIndicating the user importance level, UL, of the ith repair orderiA premium user is denoted by 0,ULi1 denotes primary user, ULi2 denotes secondary user, ULiAnd 3 represents an ordinary user.
Further, sorting a plurality of emergency repair work orders with the same user importance level according to corresponding power failure comprehensive indexes from large to small to obtain a sorting result; and outputting the priority evaluation result and the sequencing result as a final priority evaluation result. That is, under the condition that the importance levels of users are the same, the larger the power failure comprehensive parameter is, the higher the distribution network emergency repair operation priority of the work order is. Under the condition that the user importance levels are the same, the larger the power failure comprehensive index is, the higher the priority of the work order is, namely when the UL isi＝ULjWhen, if UIi>UIjThen the priority of work order i is higher than the priority of work order j.
Fig. 2 is a schematic diagram of an embodiment of a priority evaluation system for distribution network emergency maintenance work according to the present invention. In this embodiment, the method includes:
the first evaluation module is used for acquiring preset importance levels corresponding to power failure users in each emergency repair work order and taking the highest level in the corresponding preset importance levels as the user importance level of the emergency repair work order; and the emergency repair work orders are sorted from high to low according to the user importance levels, and the priority evaluation results are obtained.
The second evaluation module is used for acquiring the power failure user condition corresponding to the first-aid repair work order and the power failure duration of the user in the first-aid repair work order when the importance levels of a plurality of users of the first-aid repair work order are the same in the priority evaluation result; calculating the power failure loss electric quantity of the power failure user according to the power failure user condition and the power failure duration; wherein, the power failure user condition at least comprises a power failure load of a user; the power failure loss and power failure loss reference value of the power failure user is calculated according to the power failure loss electric quantity of the power failure user; calculating the power failure comprehensive index of each first-aid repair work order according to the power failure loss and the power failure loss reference value; the emergency repair work orders are used for sorting the plurality of emergency repair work orders with the same user importance level according to the corresponding power failure comprehensive index from large to small to obtain a sorting result; and outputting the priority evaluation result and the sequencing result as a final priority evaluation result.
Specifically, the second evaluation module is further configured to output an average load of the power outage user in a preset time period as a power outage load of the user; outputting the product of the user power failure load and the power failure duration as the power loss of the user;
and calculating the power outage loss of the power outage user specifically according to the following formula:
LP(ti,k)＝639.35t-0.564
wherein f isECOST,iThe power failure loss of the ith emergency repair work order is solved; LP (t)i,k) The power failure loss function of the kth user in the ith emergency repair work order is obtained; t is the power failure duration of the user; qi,kThe power failure loss electric quantity of the kth user in the ith emergency repair work order is calculated;
the method is also used for calculating the power failure loss reference value of the power failure user according to the following formula:
wherein f isE,RefRepresenting a power failure loss reference value of a user; f. ofECOST,iThe power failure loss of the ith emergency repair work order is solved; n is the total number of the first-aid repair work orders; i is the sequence number of the first-aid repair work order.
The second evaluation module is also used for calculating the power failure comprehensive index of each emergency repair work order according to the following formula:
therein, UIiThe power failure comprehensive index of the ith emergency repair work order is represented; k is the power failure loss coefficient; f. ofE,RefRepresenting a power failure loss reference value of a user; f. ofECOST,iThe power failure loss of the ith emergency repair work order.
The above-described system embodiments are merely illustrative, and the units described as separate parts may or may not be physically separate, and parts displayed as units may or may not be physical units, may be located in one place, or may be distributed on a plurality of network units. Some or all of the modules may be selected according to actual needs to achieve the purpose of the solution of the present embodiment.
It should be noted that the system described in the foregoing embodiment corresponds to the method described in the foregoing embodiment, and therefore, portions of the system described in the foregoing embodiment that are not described in detail can be obtained by referring to the content of the method described in the foregoing embodiment, and details are not described here.
Accordingly, another aspect of the present invention also provides a computer device including a processor, a memory, and a network interface connected by a system bus. Wherein the processor of the computer device is configured to provide computing and control capabilities. The memory of the computer device comprises a nonvolatile storage medium and an internal memory. The non-volatile storage medium stores an operating system and a computer program. The internal memory provides an environment for the operation of an operating system and computer programs in the non-volatile storage medium. The network interface of the computer device is used for communicating with an external terminal through a network connection. The computer program is executed by a processor to realize a priority evaluation method for distribution network emergency repair work.
It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the above-described computer apparatus is merely part of the structure associated with the present application and does not constitute a limitation on the computer apparatus to which the present application is applied, and that a particular computer apparatus may comprise more or less components than those described above, or some components may be combined, or have a different arrangement of components.
In one embodiment, there is provided a computer device comprising a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored on the memory and executable on the processor, the processor implementing the following steps when executing the computer program:
acquiring preset importance levels corresponding to power failure users in each emergency repair work order, and taking the highest level in the corresponding preset importance levels as the user importance level of the emergency repair work order; the emergency repair work orders are sorted from high to low according to the user importance levels, and the priority evaluation results are obtained;
when the importance levels of a plurality of users of the emergency repair work orders are the same in the priority evaluation result, acquiring the power failure user condition corresponding to the emergency repair work order and the power failure duration of the users in the emergency repair work order; calculating the power failure loss electric quantity of the power failure user according to the power failure user condition and the power failure duration; wherein, the power failure user condition at least comprises a power failure load of a user;
calculating the power failure loss of the power failure user and a power failure loss reference value according to the power failure loss electric quantity of the power failure user; calculating the power failure comprehensive index of each first-aid repair work order according to the power failure loss and the power failure loss reference value;
sorting a plurality of first-aid repair work orders with the same user importance level from large to small according to corresponding power failure comprehensive indexes to obtain a sorting result; and outputting the priority evaluation result and the sequencing result as a final priority evaluation result.
Accordingly, a further aspect of the present invention also provides a computer-readable storage medium having stored thereon a computer program which, when executed by a processor, performs the steps of;
acquiring preset importance levels corresponding to power failure users in each emergency repair work order, and taking the highest level in the corresponding preset importance levels as the user importance level of the emergency repair work order; the emergency repair work orders are sorted from high to low according to the user importance levels, and the priority evaluation results are obtained;
when the importance levels of a plurality of users of the emergency repair work orders are the same in the priority evaluation result, acquiring the power failure user condition corresponding to the emergency repair work order and the power failure duration of the users in the emergency repair work order; calculating the power failure loss electric quantity of the power failure user according to the power failure user condition and the power failure duration; wherein, the power failure user condition at least comprises a power failure load of a user;
calculating the power failure loss of the power failure user and a power failure loss reference value according to the power failure loss electric quantity of the power failure user; calculating the power failure comprehensive index of each first-aid repair work order according to the power failure loss and the power failure loss reference value;
sorting a plurality of first-aid repair work orders with the same user importance level from large to small according to corresponding power failure comprehensive indexes to obtain a sorting result; and outputting the priority evaluation result and the sequencing result as a final priority evaluation result.
It is understood that, for more details of the above-mentioned computer device and the steps involved in the computer readable storage medium, reference may be made to the aforementioned definition of the priority evaluation method for the distribution network emergency maintenance work, and details are not described herein again.
Moreover, the management system accessed by the intelligent device according to the above embodiment may be stored in a computer-readable storage medium if it is implemented in the form of a software functional unit and sold or used as an independent product.
In summary, the embodiment of the invention has the following beneficial effects:
according to the priority evaluation method, system, equipment and medium for distribution network emergency repair work, loss caused by fault power failure to a user is evaluated on the basis of building a user power failure loss model, a power failure loss evaluation rate is obtained, a power failure comprehensive index is obtained through weighted calculation, and distribution network emergency repair work priorities of various items are determined according to the important level conditions of the user. And comprehensively evaluating the power failure loss of the user by combining parameters such as the emergency repair power failure duration, the user importance level and the like, and providing decision reference for the priority of the development of the distribution network emergency repair operation.
The above disclosure is only for the purpose of illustrating the preferred embodiments of the present invention, and it is therefore to be understood that the invention is not limited by the scope of the appended claims.
Claims (10)
1. A priority evaluation method for distribution network emergency repair work is characterized by comprising the following steps:
acquiring preset importance levels corresponding to power failure users in each emergency repair work order, and taking the highest level in the corresponding preset importance levels as the user importance level of the emergency repair work order; the emergency repair work orders are sorted from high to low according to the user importance levels, and the priority evaluation results are obtained;
when the importance levels of a plurality of users of the emergency repair work orders are the same in the priority evaluation result, acquiring the power failure user condition corresponding to the emergency repair work order and the power failure duration of the users in the emergency repair work order; calculating the power failure loss electric quantity of the power failure user according to the power failure user condition and the power failure duration; wherein, the power failure user condition at least comprises a power failure load of a user;
calculating the power failure loss of the power failure user and a power failure loss reference value according to the power failure loss electric quantity of the power failure user; calculating the power failure comprehensive index of each first-aid repair work order according to the power failure loss and the power failure loss reference value;
sorting a plurality of first-aid repair work orders with the same user importance level from large to small according to corresponding power failure comprehensive indexes to obtain a sorting result; and outputting the priority evaluation result and the sequencing result as a final priority evaluation result.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein said calculating the power loss amount of the blackout user according to the situation of the blackout user and the blackout duration specifically comprises:
outputting the average load of the power failure user in a preset time period as the power failure load of the user;
and outputting the product of the user power failure load and the power failure duration as the power loss of the user.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein said calculating the outage loss of the outage user based on the outage loss power of the outage user is based on the following equation:
LP(ti,k)＝639.35t-0.564
wherein f isECOST,iThe power failure loss of the ith emergency repair work order is solved; LP (t)i,k) The power failure loss function of the kth user in the ith emergency repair work order is obtained; t is the power failure duration of the user; qi,kThe power loss is the power failure loss of the kth user in the ith emergency repair work order.
4. The method of claim 3, wherein the power outage loss reference value of the power outage user is calculated according to the power outage loss amount of the power outage user, and is calculated according to the following formula:
wherein f isE,RefRepresenting a power failure loss reference value of a user; f. ofECOST,iThe power failure loss of the ith emergency repair work order is solved; n is the total number of the first-aid repair work orders; i is the sequence number of the first-aid repair work order.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein the power outage combined index of each emergency repair work order is calculated according to the power outage loss and the power outage loss reference value, and is specifically calculated according to the following formula:
therein, UIiThe power failure comprehensive index of the ith emergency repair work order is represented; k is the power failure loss coefficient; f. ofE,RefRepresenting a power failure loss reference value of a user; f. ofECOST,iThe power failure loss of the ith emergency repair work order.
6. A priority evaluation system for distribution network emergency repair work, which is used for realizing the method of any one of claims 1-5, and is characterized by comprising the following steps:
the first evaluation module is used for acquiring preset importance levels corresponding to power failure users in each emergency repair work order and taking the highest level in the corresponding preset importance levels as the user importance level of the emergency repair work order; the emergency repair work orders are sorted from high to low according to the user importance levels, and the priority evaluation results are obtained;
the second evaluation module is used for acquiring the power failure user condition corresponding to the first-aid repair work order and the power failure duration of the user in the first-aid repair work order when the importance levels of a plurality of users of the first-aid repair work order are the same in the priority evaluation result; calculating the power failure loss electric quantity of the power failure user according to the power failure user condition and the power failure duration; wherein, the power failure user condition at least comprises a power failure load of a user; the power failure loss and power failure loss reference value of the power failure user is calculated according to the power failure loss electric quantity of the power failure user; calculating the power failure comprehensive index of each first-aid repair work order according to the power failure loss and the power failure loss reference value; the emergency repair work orders are used for sorting the plurality of emergency repair work orders with the same user importance level according to the corresponding power failure comprehensive index from large to small to obtain a sorting result; and outputting the priority evaluation result and the sequencing result as a final priority evaluation result.
7. The system of claim 6, wherein the second evaluation module is further configured to output an average load of the blackout user over a preset time period as the user blackout load; outputting the product of the user power failure load and the power failure duration as the power loss of the user;
and calculating the power outage loss of the power outage user specifically according to the following formula:
LP(ti,k)＝639.35t-0.564
wherein f isECOST,iThe power failure loss of the ith emergency repair work order is solved; LP (t)i,k) The power failure loss function of the kth user in the ith emergency repair work order is obtained; t is the power failure duration of the user; qi,kFor the kth user in the ith emergency repair work orderPower loss in the power failure;
the method is also used for calculating the power failure loss reference value of the power failure user according to the following formula:
wherein f isE,RefRepresenting a power failure loss reference value of a user; f. ofECOST,iThe power failure loss of the ith emergency repair work order is solved; n is the total number of the first-aid repair work orders; i is the sequence number of the first-aid repair work order.
8. The system of claim 7, wherein the second evaluation module is further configured to calculate a power outage summary index for each repair order according to the following formula:
therein, UIiThe power failure comprehensive index of the ith emergency repair work order is represented; k is the power failure loss coefficient; f. ofE,RefRepresenting a power failure loss reference value of a user; f. ofECOST,iThe power failure loss of the ith emergency repair work order.
9. A computer device comprising a memory, a processor and a computer program stored on the memory and executable on the processor, characterized in that the steps of the method of any of claims 1 to 5 are implemented when the computer program is executed by the processor.
10. A computer-readable storage medium, on which a computer program is stored, which, when being executed by a processor, carries out the steps of the method of any one of claims 1 to 5.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202111484073.9A CN114154661A (en) | 2021-12-07 | 2021-12-07 | Distribution network first-aid repair operation priority evaluation method, system, equipment and medium |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202111484073.9A CN114154661A (en) | 2021-12-07 | 2021-12-07 | Distribution network first-aid repair operation priority evaluation method, system, equipment and medium |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN114154661A true CN114154661A (en) | 2022-03-08 |
Family
ID=80452980
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202111484073.9A Pending CN114154661A (en) | 2021-12-07 | 2021-12-07 | Distribution network first-aid repair operation priority evaluation method, system, equipment and medium |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN114154661A (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN117196333A (en) * | 2023-08-31 | 2023-12-08 | 北京国电通网络技术有限公司 | Natural disaster influence and loss information generation method and device based on power data |
Citations (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN106570653A (en) * | 2016-11-10 | 2017-04-19 | 国网山东省电力公司济南供电公司 | Support system for rush-repair work order distributing of distribution network and optimization method |
| CN107180297A (en) * | 2017-04-24 | 2017-09-19 | 广西电网有限责任公司南宁供电局 | A kind of decision-making technique for screening the user for participating in ordered electric |
| CN110289682A (en) * | 2019-06-11 | 2019-09-27 | 广西电网有限责任公司南宁供电局 | A kind of distribution repairing aid decision and intelligent managing and control system |
| CN112446615A (en) * | 2020-11-26 | 2021-03-05 | 深圳供电局有限公司 | Method for evaluating priority of uninterrupted operation |
| CN112446614A (en) * | 2020-11-26 | 2021-03-05 | 深圳供电局有限公司 | Uninterrupted power operation priority evaluation method based on user power failure loss |
| CN113077161A (en) * | 2021-04-14 | 2021-07-06 | 华北电力大学 | Emergency repair decision method for emergency robot in power distribution room |
-
2021
- 2021-12-07 CN CN202111484073.9A patent/CN114154661A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN106570653A (en) * | 2016-11-10 | 2017-04-19 | 国网山东省电力公司济南供电公司 | Support system for rush-repair work order distributing of distribution network and optimization method |
| CN107180297A (en) * | 2017-04-24 | 2017-09-19 | 广西电网有限责任公司南宁供电局 | A kind of decision-making technique for screening the user for participating in ordered electric |
| CN110289682A (en) * | 2019-06-11 | 2019-09-27 | 广西电网有限责任公司南宁供电局 | A kind of distribution repairing aid decision and intelligent managing and control system |
| CN112446615A (en) * | 2020-11-26 | 2021-03-05 | 深圳供电局有限公司 | Method for evaluating priority of uninterrupted operation |
| CN112446614A (en) * | 2020-11-26 | 2021-03-05 | 深圳供电局有限公司 | Uninterrupted power operation priority evaluation method based on user power failure loss |
| CN113077161A (en) * | 2021-04-14 | 2021-07-06 | 华北电力大学 | Emergency repair decision method for emergency robot in power distribution room |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
| Title |
|---|
| 周莉梅;范明天;: "城市电网用户停电损失估算及评价方法研究", 中国电力, no. 07, 20 July 2006 (2006-07-20) * |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN117196333A (en) * | 2023-08-31 | 2023-12-08 | 北京国电通网络技术有限公司 | Natural disaster influence and loss information generation method and device based on power data |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Setréus et al. | Identifying critical components for transmission system reliability | |
| CN109787243B (en) | Artificial emergency load reduction online optimization decision method, system and storage medium | |
| WO2020164322A1 (en) | Unigram model-based low-voltage user loop impedance estimation method | |
| CN111181201B (en) | Multi-energy park scheduling method and system based on double-layer reinforcement learning | |
| CN108649556B (en) | Random optimization scheduling method for power grid emergency scene | |
| CN110348674A (en) | A kind of power grid risk assessment method, system and computer readable storage medium | |
| CN113112136A (en) | Comprehensive evaluation method and system for reliability of power distribution network | |
| Nazari et al. | Uniform price-based framework for enhancing power quality and reliability of microgrids using Shapley-value incentive allocation method | |
| CN112766730A (en) | Distribution network planning scheme adaptability evaluation method for distributed resource access | |
| CN114154661A (en) | Distribution network first-aid repair operation priority evaluation method, system, equipment and medium | |
| CN106548284A (en) | A kind of adaptive mode massing power grid security Alarm Assessment method towards operation regulation and control | |
| CN112418700B (en) | Electric power capacity market demand curve design method, device and equipment | |
| Azami et al. | Impact of EDRP on composite reliability of restructured power systems | |
| Wang | Risk-based security-constrained optimal power flow: Mathematical fundamentals, computational strategies, validation, and use within electricity markets | |
| CN115587685A (en) | Tough power distribution network evaluation system containing high-permeability distributed power supply | |
| CN112446615A (en) | Method for evaluating priority of uninterrupted operation | |
| Sang et al. | Assessment of power system cascading failure under the background of direct power purchase by large consumers | |
| Zheng et al. | Data-Adaptive Robust Transmission Network Planning Incorporating Post-Contingency Demand Response | |
| Zheng et al. | Robust transmission expansion planning incorporating demand response and N-1 contingency | |
| CN112330125A (en) | Parameter determination method and device for distribution transformer utilization rate index and storage medium | |
| CN112446614A (en) | Uninterrupted power operation priority evaluation method based on user power failure loss | |
| CN111967896A (en) | Method and system for improving interruptible load participation demand response enthusiasm | |
| Lo et al. | Load modelling for Volt-VAR optimization control in limited network visibility-a case study in Malaysia | |
| CN111861098B (en) | Method, system, device and medium for clearing electric power spot market | |
| Lindsay et al. | Enhancing power system reliability using multiple FACTS devices |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination |